POPULARITY
39 episodes with judge kaplan
26 episodes with judge kaplan
6 episodes with judge kaplan
4 episodes with judge kaplan
6 episodes with judge kaplan
4 episodes with judge kaplan
3 episodes with judge kaplan
3 episodes with judge kaplan
5 episodes with judge kaplan
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan denied Sean Combs' motion to dismiss the civil lawsuit filed by Anthony Tate, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Combs sexually assaulted Tate in the 1990s when Tate was a minor. Combs' legal team had argued for dismissal on several grounds, including statute of limitations and insufficiency of the claims under relevant law. However, Judge Kaplan concluded that the complaint plausibly alleged conduct falling within the scope of the New York Adult Survivors Act, which temporarily revives claims of sexual misconduct that would otherwise be time-barred. The judge emphasized that the law's purpose was to give survivors of sexual abuse a chance to seek justice regardless of when the alleged abuse occurred.Additionally, Judge Kaplan found that Tate's allegations were specific enough to survive a motion to dismiss. He rejected arguments that the claims were too vague or lacked the necessary legal basis, ruling that the complaint provided sufficient detail to warrant further proceedings. The court did not make any determinations about the truth of the allegations but affirmed that Tate's claims met the legal threshold to move forward. As a result, the case against Combs will proceed into the discovery phase, where both sides will gather evidence before any potential trial or settlement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.48.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan denied Sean Combs' motion to dismiss the civil lawsuit filed by Anthony Tate, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Combs sexually assaulted Tate in the 1990s when Tate was a minor. Combs' legal team had argued for dismissal on several grounds, including statute of limitations and insufficiency of the claims under relevant law. However, Judge Kaplan concluded that the complaint plausibly alleged conduct falling within the scope of the New York Adult Survivors Act, which temporarily revives claims of sexual misconduct that would otherwise be time-barred. The judge emphasized that the law's purpose was to give survivors of sexual abuse a chance to seek justice regardless of when the alleged abuse occurred.Additionally, Judge Kaplan found that Tate's allegations were specific enough to survive a motion to dismiss. He rejected arguments that the claims were too vague or lacked the necessary legal basis, ruling that the complaint provided sufficient detail to warrant further proceedings. The court did not make any determinations about the truth of the allegations but affirmed that Tate's claims met the legal threshold to move forward. As a result, the case against Combs will proceed into the discovery phase, where both sides will gather evidence before any potential trial or settlement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.48.0.pdf
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan denied Sean Combs' motion to dismiss the civil lawsuit filed by Anthony Tate, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Combs sexually assaulted Tate in the 1990s when Tate was a minor. Combs' legal team had argued for dismissal on several grounds, including statute of limitations and insufficiency of the claims under relevant law. However, Judge Kaplan concluded that the complaint plausibly alleged conduct falling within the scope of the New York Adult Survivors Act, which temporarily revives claims of sexual misconduct that would otherwise be time-barred. The judge emphasized that the law's purpose was to give survivors of sexual abuse a chance to seek justice regardless of when the alleged abuse occurred.Additionally, Judge Kaplan found that Tate's allegations were specific enough to survive a motion to dismiss. He rejected arguments that the claims were too vague or lacked the necessary legal basis, ruling that the complaint provided sufficient detail to warrant further proceedings. The court did not make any determinations about the truth of the allegations but affirmed that Tate's claims met the legal threshold to move forward. As a result, the case against Combs will proceed into the discovery phase, where both sides will gather evidence before any potential trial or settlement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.48.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Disgraced Prince Andrew's legal team was appeared before Judge Kaplan today as they argued their case to get the lawsuit tossed out of court. Unfortunately for the, Judge Kaplan threw ice water on their plans.Let's take a look!(Commercial at 12:16)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/prince-andrews-lawyers-claim-sex-abuse-allegations-vague-judge-disagre-rcna10937
Disgraced Prince Andrew's legal team was appeared before Judge Kaplan today as they argued their case to get the lawsuit tossed out of court. Unfortunately for the, Judge Kaplan threw ice water on their plans.Let's take a look!(Commercial at 12:16)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/prince-andrews-lawyers-claim-sex-abuse-allegations-vague-judge-disagre-rcna10937Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Sovereign District Minute: Eric Adams indictment should be dismissed WITH prejudice, amicus Clement recommends to SDNY Judge Ho - fwiw Judge Kaplan appointed a special prosecutor on Donziger; former judges recommend that too. City of Maybe: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DPCKZYSW
In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between. However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit. In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdf
In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between. However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit. In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdf
In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between. However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit. In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
**Former FTX Executives' Sentencing: A Tale of Leniency and Justice**In a recent development in the FTX saga, Nishad Singh, a former top executive at the cryptocurrency exchange, has been spared jail time despite his involvement in significant financial fraud. Singh, 29, was sentenced to three years of supervised release and ordered to forfeit $11 billion. This lenient outcome has sparked widespread debate about the fairness of the justice system, particularly when it comes to high-profile cases involving financial crimes.One of the most notable figures in this saga is Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of FTX. Bankman-Fried, 32, is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence imposed by Judge Kaplan. His case was highly publicized due to the scale of the financial fraud and the impact it had on investors and the broader cryptocurrency market.The contrast between Singh's sentence and Bankman-Fried's is striking. While Singh received a relatively light sentence for his cooperation, Bankman-Fried was given a much harsher penalty for his role in the scandal. This disparity has raised questions about the consistency of justice in such high-stakes cases.The sentencing of these former FTX executives serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges in prosecuting financial crimes. It also highlights the importance of cooperation in determining the severity of sentences, as seen in Singh's case. As the legal proceedings continue to unfold, it is clear that the FTX saga will remain a significant chapter in the history of cryptocurrency regulation and the pursuit of justice in financial crimes.In summary, while Nishad Singh's lenient sentence has sparked controversy, it underscores the nuanced approach to justice in high-profile cases like those involving Sam Bankman-Fried and the broader FTX scandal. The ongoing legal battles will continue to shape our understanding of accountability in the financial sector.
After Prince Andrew paid a Kings fortune to Virginia to avoid going to trial, Judge Kaplan has suspended the proceedings after the payment was finalized. With the settlement going through, Prince Andrew avoids having to be deposed and exposed for the world to see, but even still he is now a pariah on the world stage.(commercial at 8:42)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/03/08/prince-andrew-case-lawyers-ask-judge-dismiss-sex-abuse-lawsuit/9425187002/
After Prince Andrew paid a Kings fortune to Virginia to avoid going to trial, Judge Kaplan has suspended the proceedings after the payment was finalized. With the settlement going through, Prince Andrew avoids having to be deposed and exposed for the world to see, but even still he is now a pariah on the world stage.(commercial at 8:42)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/03/08/prince-andrew-case-lawyers-ask-judge-dismiss-sex-abuse-lawsuit/9425187002/
FTX endgame: Ryan Salame was just grilled by SDNY Judge Kaplan for 40 minutes and said his guilty plea allocution was not true, his previous lawyers told him prosecutors assured they wouldn't indict Bond. Judge says he's "taking under advisement" - story coming
As the tetstimony of Caroline Ellison continued in the courtroom of Judge Kaplan, it was very obvious that it was not going well for Sam Bankman Fried. After two days of laying waste to SBF, Caroline Ellison finished her testimony off with even more damning commentary.In this episode, we dive right back into the SBF trial and get caught on the testimony of Caroline Ellison and where the trial stands overall. (commercial at 6:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sam Bankman-Fried's Defense Gave Snooze-Worthy Cross of Caroline Ellison (businessinsider.com)
After Prince Andrew paid a Kings fortune to Virginia to avoid going to trial, Judge Kaplan has suspended the proceedings after the payment was finalized. With the settlement going through, Prince Andrew avoids having to be deposed and exposed for the world to see, but even still he is now a pariah on the world stage.(commercial at 8:42)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/03/08/prince-andrew-case-lawyers-ask-judge-dismiss-sex-abuse-lawsuit/9425187002/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
After Prince Andrew paid a Kings fortune to Virginia to avoid going to trial, Judge Kaplan has suspended the proceedings after the payment was finalized. With the settlement going through, Prince Andrew avoids having to be deposed and exposed for the world to see, but even still he is now a pariah on the world stage.(commercial at 9:31)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/03/08/prince-andrew-case-lawyers-ask-judge-dismiss-sex-abuse-lawsuit/9425187002/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ben Meiselas and Michael Popok are back with a new episode of the weekend edition of the top-rated Legal AF podcast. On this episode, they debate/discuss: whether the jury is ready to convict after just the first 2 weeks of the Trump NY criminal trial; the powerful impact of Judge Kaplan's denial of Trump's motion for new trial and to reduce the punitive damages in the E Jean Carroll sex assault, defamation and punitive damages trial; whether the Supreme Court can ever recover from a future decision that a criminal, coup plotting, rival assassination planning president can get away with it and enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution; whether Trump will be indicted eventually in Arizona for election interference, and who may be cooperating with the Arizona AG to make that happen, and so much more at the intersection of law and politics. Join the Legal AF Patreon: https://Patreon.com/LegalAF Thanks to our sponsors: Mack Weldon: Go to http://mackweldon.com/?utm_source=streaming&utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=podcastlaunch&utm_content=LEGALAFutm_term=LEGALAF and get 20% off your first order with promo code LEGALAF Liquid IV: Get 20% off when you go to https://Liquid-IV.com and use code LEGALAF at checkout! Miracle Made: Upgrade your sleep with Miracle Made! Go to https://TryMiracle.com/LEGALAF and use the code LEGALAF to claim your FREE 3 PIECE TOWEL SET and SAVE over 40% OFF. 3 Day Blinds: For their buy 1 get 1 50% off deal, head to https://3DayBlinds.com/LEGALAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coalition-of-the-sane/id1741663279 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Donald Trump LOST AGAIN in his efforts to have E Jean Carroll's sexual $83.5 million abuse/punitive damages federal judgment tossed. Michael Popok explains Judge Kaplan's new order which also makes some new observations about Trump's “REPREHENSIBLE CONDUCT” even during the trial itself that influenced the jury to rule against him, which is a precursor to what is playing out in his criminal trial right now. Lomi: Visit https://Lomi.com/LEGALAF and use code LEGALAF and checkout to save $50! Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Join us on Patreon: https://patreon.com/legalaf Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will typically provide an opinion detailing the legal principles, facts, and arguments that led to their decision. These opinions serve several important purposes:Legal Reasoning: A judge's opinion explains the legal reasoning behind a court's decision. It outlines the relevant laws, precedents (prior court decisions), and legal doctrines that were considered in reaching the judgment. This helps to clarify how the law was interpreted and applied to the specific facts of the case.Stare Decisis: Opinions contribute to the principle of stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This principle holds that courts should adhere to precedent and decisions made in prior cases, especially decisions made by higher courts within the same jurisdiction. Opinions provide a record of legal interpretations and principles that can guide future decisions and maintain consistency in the legal system.Public Accountability and Transparency: Opinions are typically published and made available to the public. This promotes transparency in the legal system by allowing people to understand the reasoning behind court decisions and evaluate the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process.Legal Education: Opinions are valuable educational resources for law students, legal professionals, and the general public. They illustrate how legal principles are applied in practice, demonstrate different approaches to interpreting the law, and provide insights into the evolution of legal doctrine over time.Dissenting Opinions: In some cases, judges who disagree with the majority opinion may write a separate opinion known as a dissenting opinion. Dissents offer an alternative perspective on the case and can influence future legal developments by highlighting issues or arguments that the majority opinion may have overlooked.We begin a dive into the opinion of the Judge (Judge Kaplan) who was in charge of the lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew. The lawsuit saw Prince Andrew pay out millions to his accuser, even though he still denies all of the allegations against him.So, what do the court documents say?(commercial at 8:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:21CV6702 JAN 11 2022 0900.pdf (uscourts.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will typically provide an opinion detailing the legal principles, facts, and arguments that led to their decision. These opinions serve several important purposes:Legal Reasoning: A judge's opinion explains the legal reasoning behind a court's decision. It outlines the relevant laws, precedents (prior court decisions), and legal doctrines that were considered in reaching the judgment. This helps to clarify how the law was interpreted and applied to the specific facts of the case.Stare Decisis: Opinions contribute to the principle of stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This principle holds that courts should adhere to precedent and decisions made in prior cases, especially decisions made by higher courts within the same jurisdiction. Opinions provide a record of legal interpretations and principles that can guide future decisions and maintain consistency in the legal system.Public Accountability and Transparency: Opinions are typically published and made available to the public. This promotes transparency in the legal system by allowing people to understand the reasoning behind court decisions and evaluate the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process.Legal Education: Opinions are valuable educational resources for law students, legal professionals, and the general public. They illustrate how legal principles are applied in practice, demonstrate different approaches to interpreting the law, and provide insights into the evolution of legal doctrine over time.Dissenting Opinions: In some cases, judges who disagree with the majority opinion may write a separate opinion known as a dissenting opinion. Dissents offer an alternative perspective on the case and can influence future legal developments by highlighting issues or arguments that the majority opinion may have overlooked.We begin a dive into the opinion of the Judge (Judge Kaplan) who was in charge of the lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew. The lawsuit saw Prince Andrew pay out millions to his accuser, even though he still denies all of the allegations against him.So, what do the court documents say?(commercial at 8:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:21CV6702 JAN 11 2022 0900.pdf (uscourts.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will typically provide an opinion detailing the legal principles, facts, and arguments that led to their decision. These opinions serve several important purposes:Legal Reasoning: A judge's opinion explains the legal reasoning behind a court's decision. It outlines the relevant laws, precedents (prior court decisions), and legal doctrines that were considered in reaching the judgment. This helps to clarify how the law was interpreted and applied to the specific facts of the case.Stare Decisis: Opinions contribute to the principle of stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This principle holds that courts should adhere to precedent and decisions made in prior cases, especially decisions made by higher courts within the same jurisdiction. Opinions provide a record of legal interpretations and principles that can guide future decisions and maintain consistency in the legal system.Public Accountability and Transparency: Opinions are typically published and made available to the public. This promotes transparency in the legal system by allowing people to understand the reasoning behind court decisions and evaluate the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process.Legal Education: Opinions are valuable educational resources for law students, legal professionals, and the general public. They illustrate how legal principles are applied in practice, demonstrate different approaches to interpreting the law, and provide insights into the evolution of legal doctrine over time.Dissenting Opinions: In some cases, judges who disagree with the majority opinion may write a separate opinion known as a dissenting opinion. Dissents offer an alternative perspective on the case and can influence future legal developments by highlighting issues or arguments that the majority opinion may have overlooked.We begin a dive into the opinion of the Judge (Judge Kaplan) who was in charge of the lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew. The lawsuit saw Prince Andrew pay out millions to his accuser, even though he still denies all of the allegations against him.So, what do the court documents say?(commercial at 8:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:21CV6702 JAN 11 2022 0900.pdf (uscourts.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will typically provide an opinion detailing the legal principles, facts, and arguments that led to their decision. These opinions serve several important purposes:Legal Reasoning: A judge's opinion explains the legal reasoning behind a court's decision. It outlines the relevant laws, precedents (prior court decisions), and legal doctrines that were considered in reaching the judgment. This helps to clarify how the law was interpreted and applied to the specific facts of the case.Stare Decisis: Opinions contribute to the principle of stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This principle holds that courts should adhere to precedent and decisions made in prior cases, especially decisions made by higher courts within the same jurisdiction. Opinions provide a record of legal interpretations and principles that can guide future decisions and maintain consistency in the legal system.Public Accountability and Transparency: Opinions are typically published and made available to the public. This promotes transparency in the legal system by allowing people to understand the reasoning behind court decisions and evaluate the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process.Legal Education: Opinions are valuable educational resources for law students, legal professionals, and the general public. They illustrate how legal principles are applied in practice, demonstrate different approaches to interpreting the law, and provide insights into the evolution of legal doctrine over time.Dissenting Opinions: In some cases, judges who disagree with the majority opinion may write a separate opinion known as a dissenting opinion. Dissents offer an alternative perspective on the case and can influence future legal developments by highlighting issues or arguments that the majority opinion may have overlooked.We begin a dive into the opinion of the Judge (Judge Kaplan) who was in charge of the lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Prince Andrew. The lawsuit saw Prince Andrew pay out millions to his accuser, even though he still denies all of the allegations against him.So, what do the court documents say?(commercial at 9:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:21CV6702 JAN 11 2022 0900.pdf (uscourts.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
After Prince Andrew paid a Kings fortune to Virginia to avoid going to trial, Judge Kaplan has suspended the proceedings after the payment was finalized. With the settlement going through, Prince Andrew avoids having to be deposed and exposed for the world to see, but even still he is now a pariah on the world stage.(commercial at 8:33)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2022/03/08/prince-andrew-case-lawyers-ask-judge-dismiss-sex-abuse-Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Last Thursday, Judge Lewis Kaplan sentenced Sam Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison. Some think that's an appropriate result. Some think it should have been more. But this sentence far more than necessary to meet the goals of sentencing. The bigger problem is, there were likely missed opportunities to convince the Judge that justice demanded a lower sentence for Sam. Therefore, here is the straight scoop on SBF's sentencing (we have the full transcript) and the larger problems it reveals about federal sentencing and beyond. IN THIS EPISODE: Judge Kaplan's “tip of the cap” to the insurrectionists; The missed opportunity to present powerful sentencing statistics, including average federal sentences for murder, kidnaping, sexual abuse, and child pornography; Judge Kaplan's explicit comments regarding broken guidelines; Autism Spectrum Disorder – the (largely ignored) elephant in the room; SBF's sentence compared to (spoiler alert, his sentence is HIGHER than all of ‘em); The missed opportunity of highlighting a LIFE EXPECTANCY analysis at sentencing; The missed opportunity to tell the story of BOP classification issues; LINKS: Ep. 73: Sam Bankman-Fried: Is Autism the Missing Piece of Mitigation? https://youtu.be/jkh6eEkvBRg?si=qXJxNu4SBKCqTWEq
In a shocking turn of events, Sam Bankman-Fried, one-time billionaire and the brain behind the FTX platform, received a 25-year federal prison sentence this past Thursday. Found guilty back in November on a string of seven charges, including conspiracy to perpetrate wire fraud and wire fraud, his unlawful actions led to a significant loss for customers and lenders alike. His legal missteps reportedly translated into billions in losses. Despite the prosecution suggesting a 40-50 year sentence, the presiding judge, Lewis Kaplan, imposed a 25-year one. In the aftermath of Bankman-Fried's digital currency venture toppling over, those who invested, lent, and utilized its services are said to have incurred losses surpassing $10 billion. This estimation was affirmed by Judge Kaplan during the sentencing. There's an understanding that a domino effect from the crash of the crypto tycoon's venture significantly impacted the financial stability of multiple players involved. The judge did not shy away from illuminating further conduct violations that occurred during the trial period, accusing SBF, as he is commonly known, of tampering with witnesses and committing perjury. SBF reportedly maintained contact with the previous FTX general counsel while in custody and falsely affirmed under oath that he was unaware of Alameda Research, an associated hedge fund of FTX, mishandling his clients' deposits prior to 2022's downfall. Making a case in defense, lawyers for SBF suggested a maximum punishment duration of six and a half years. They made the claim that their client's intentions were wrongly construed and mistaken. The defense team seemed to advocate for a softer sentence by underpinning their argument on potential misperceptions of SBF's motives. Taking the opportunity to express himself to the court during sentencing, Bankman-Fried extended his apologies. He acknowledged the disappointment felt by those who suffered losses due to his actions, expressing regret for what occurred during his orchestration of the venture. He stated, 'There is a deep sense of disappointment by many and they are justified in their feeling. For the disappointment and for the actions leading to this point, I apologize.' 'My effective life is perhaps at an end. In fact, it's been halted for some time now,' added the deposed tycoon. It has been reported that he is contemplating an appeal against both the conviction and the imposed sentence. In addition to his notable presence within the crypto circuit, Bankman-Fried acted as a significant political promoter. Through generous donations, he managed to influence political events and players. His contribution favored mostly democratic candidates, accomplishing significant sway in nomination race outcomes. Reports reveal that SBF committed nearly $40 million to supporting primarily Democrat candidates and interest groups leading up to the 2022 midterm elections. SBF's political influence didn't end there. His efforts resulted in being second only to the biggest donor for the 2020 Biden Presidential campaign. This afforded him necessary access, with four visits to the White House to meet with top-tier advisers before his businesses declared bankruptcy. Bankman-Fried's influence also extended into the sphere of health care. He invested millions into pandemic prevention efforts, funding research to find new treatments, even directing funds towards COVID-19. His contributions were aimed at both battling the pandemic and promoting advancements in healthcare. Prior to its downfall, FTX had amassed quite the celebrity endorsement portfolio. Notable figures such as Tom Brady and his former wife Gisele Bündchen, Stephen Curry, Kevin O'Leary, and Larry David were among the celebrities and athletes who endorsed the platform. These celebrity associations added to the allure of the enterprise while it was operating. With previous allegations already casting a shadow, last March brought forth newly unsealed charges against the entrepreneur. The Justice Department accused Bankman-Fried of approving and initiating a bribe amounting to no less than $40 million in favor of one or more Chinese government officials. This allegation seemed to initially spell the beginning of his descent into legal hardship. Public perception was further tarnished by these allegations. SBF, once recognized for his success and influence in the tech and political spheres, faced not only rolling clouds of legal repercussions but also damage to his reputation. The saga of SBF's collapse serves as a sobering reminder of the risks associated with high-stakes digital currency exchanges and the influence of money in politics. It also underscores the necessity of legal and ethical business operations in all sectors, including the crypto industry. The entire episode prompts a broader discussion about the implications of high-risk, high-reward ventures and the responsibilities and challenges that come with significant influence and wealth. In the end, this could be a valuable lesson not just for the sector but for all stakeholders in the broader business ecosystem. Real News Now Website Connect with Real News Now on Social Media Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RealNewsNowApp/ X Twitter: https://twitter.com/realnewsapp Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/realnews/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@realnewsnowapp Threads: https://www.threads.net/@realnews/ Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/realnewsnow Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@RealNews YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@realnewsnowapp End Wokeness: https://endthewokeness.com #realnewsnow See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Friday, March 8th, 2024Today, Judge Kaplan denies Trump's last minute bid to stay his payment to E. Jean Carroll; the Navy stripped Ronny Jackson of his rank before he left the military; Jack Smith has filed his opposition to Trump's motion to dismiss the espionage and obstruction charges against him; Dean Phillips and Nikki Haley have dropped out of the presidential race; Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after a failed lawsuit against Christopher Steele; Jared Kushner has been subpoenaed by an ex-Trump staffer in a lawsuit. Plus, Allison delivers your good news.Dana is out and about. Promo Code:Go to drinkAG1.com/dailybeans to try AG1 and get a FREE 1-year supply of Vitamin D3 AND K2 AND 5 FREE AG1 Travel Packs with your first purchase.Our GuestJohn Fugelsanghttps://www.johnfugelsang.com/tmehttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-john-fugelsang-podcast/id1464094232Sexy Liberal Live Tourhttps://sexyliberal.com/tour Judge won't let Trump delay E. Jean Carroll penalties, leaving him with days to cover $83M judgmenthttps://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-trump-delay-jean-carroll-penalties-leaving-days/story?id=107885701Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over the Steele dossierhttps://apnews.com/article/trump-steele-dossier-uk-lawsuit-russia-55427915a83f33a8ead484109b8a89f6Jared Kushner subpoenaed by ex-Trump staffer in pregnancy discrimination casehttps://www.rawstory.com/jason-miller-jared-kushner-aj-delgadoKentucky senate passes bill granting right to collect child support for fetuseshttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/06/kentucky-senate-child-support-unborn-childrenEx-Twitter executives sue Elon Musk for $128m in unpaid severancehttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/04/former-twitter-execs-sue-elon-musk-severance Subscribe to Lawyers, Guns, And MoneyAd-free premium feed: https://lawyersgunsandmoney.supercast.comSubscribe for free everywhere else:https://lawyersgunsandmoney.simplecast.com/episodes/1-miami-1985Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrote?utm_source=TwitterAG&utm_medium=creator_organic&utm_campaign=muellershewrote&utm_content=FollowMehttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good NewsMichigan Reconnecthttps://www.michigan.gov/reconnectDemocrats Abroadhttps://www.democratsabroad.orgBLUEPRINT FOR GOING GREEN by Gerald P. McCarthyhttps://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/5852The Literacy Alliancehttps://literacyalliance.orgPublic Service Loan Forgivenesshttps://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-serviceUpcoming Live Show Dates (Look for the presale ticket link this week)Sunday, June 2nd – Chicago IL – Schubas TavernFriday June 14th – Philadelphia PA – City WinerySaturday June 15th – New York NY – City WinerySunday June 16th – Boston MA – City WineryWednesday July 10th – Portland OR – Polaris HallThursday July 11th – Seattle WA – The Triple Door Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
Donald Trump is sending his lawyers from one New York courtroom to another, making them repeatedly ask judges to reduce the amount he must put up to appeal his massive losses in both the E. Jean Carroll case and his NY fraud case. Judge Kaplan and Judge Engoron have both told Trump's lawyers they won't reduce the amount. This is unsurprising, given that Trump recently boasted that he is worth $14 billion. So putting up $83 million in one case and a half-billion in the other should be a financial walk in the park for Trump. Of course, if he really was worth that much, he would not have to keep making the embarrassing ask of the judges to reduce the amount he must put up to appeal his cases.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Donald Trump is sending his lawyers from one New York courtroom to another, making them repeatedly ask judges to reduce the amount he must put up to appeal his massive losses in both the E. Jean Carroll case and his NY fraud case. Judge Kaplan and Judge Engoron have both told Trump's lawyers they won't reduce the amount. This is unsurprising, given that Trump recently boasted that he is worth $14 billion. So putting up $83 million in one case and a half-billion in the other should be a financial walk in the park for Trump. Of course, if he really was worth that much, he would not have to keep making the embarrassing ask of the judges to reduce the amount he must put up to appeal his cases.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
The nation continues to watch for a decision from the Supreme Court on both the Colorado ballot issue and Trump's presidential immunity claim. In the meantime, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord detail the flurry of motions filed by Trump's lawyers in the Florida classified documents case in an effort to have the case thrown out. This, as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg filed his own motions, including asking for a partial gag to keep the former president from talking about witnesses, potential jurors and court staff. Plus: Andrew and Mary catch up on dual decisions from Judge Engoron and Judge Kaplan denying Trump a stay of judgement in his civil trials, meaning he's got 30 days to pay, or the plaintiffs can start seizing assets.
Monday, February 26th, 2024Today, there's a hearing scheduled in the Central District of California on the pretrial detention of the GOP Russian spy impeachment witness Alexander Smirnov (more on this including Nadler on next cleanup); A New Orleans magician says a Democratic operative paid him to make the fake Biden robocall; a jury finds Wayne LaPierre misspent NRA money and owes more than $4M; an Illinois judge who reversed a rape conviction has been removed from the bench; Nazis mingle openly at CPAC; Judge Kaplan denies Trump's motion to stay the E. Jean Carroll payment. Plus, Allison and Dana deliver your good news.Gofundme for Nex Benedict https://www.gofundme.com/f/dagny-benedictThe Daily Beans is Live Friday, Mar 29th, 2024Natalie's - Music Hall Stage, Columbus, OHhttps://www.ticketweb.com/event/the-daily-beans-podcast-live-natalies-grandview-tickets/13498833?pl=celebrityPromo Code:For 20% off all mattress orders AND two free pillows for our listeners! Go to https://www.helxsleep.com/dailybeans and use code HELIXPARTNER20.A New Orleans magician says a Democratic operative paid him to make the fake Biden robocallhttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/biden-robocall-new-hampshire-strategist-rcna139760Former NRA chief Wayne LaPierre misspent gun rights group's money and owes more than $4M, jury findshttps://apnews.com/article/nra-wayne-lapierre-trial-ruling-d4d9b950ee2cbd63380826eb2bf210e6Illinois judge who reversed rape conviction removed from bench after panel finds he circumvented lawhttps://apnews.com/article/illinois-judge-removed-bench-reversed-rape-conviction-c821beec0cf87aebb64a36239e45fec6Nazis mingle openly at CPAC, spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories and finding allieshttps://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nazis-mingle-openly-cpac-spreading-antisemitic-conspiracy-theories-fin-rcna140335Subscribe to Lawyers, Guns, And MoneyAd-free premium feed: https://lawyersgunsandmoney.supercast.comSubscribe for free everywhere else:https://lawyersgunsandmoney.simplecast.com/episodes/1-miami-1985Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrote?utm_source=TwitterAG&utm_medium=creator_organic&utm_campaign=muellershewrote&utm_content=FollowMehttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good News“Molly Learns Responsibility” by Kathleen S. Perohttps://www.amazon.com/Miss-Molly-Learns-Responsibility-Kathleen/dp/1612448631 Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
In this new podcast, Jeff describes two court appearances from this past week, one before Trump's judge from his defamation case and the other the detention hearing for his assisted suicide-charged client; a loss would guarantee his elderly client dying in jail before he even gets to trial.Otherwise, Jeff points out the Democrats' dual election strategies, present and future: altering foreign policy to appease Muslim terror supporters in swing states and keeping the borders open to ensure more future Democrat voters, regardless of the havoc each strategy will cause America.Finally, the second installment of the musical interlude is here and Jeff practically begs to get sued.
Disgraced Prince Andrew's legal team was appeared before Judge Kaplan today as they argued their case to get the lawsuit tossed out of court. Unfortunately for the, Judge Kaplan threw ice water on their plans.Let's take a look!(Commercial at 12:16)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/prince-andrews-lawyers-claim-sex-abuse-allegations-vague-judge-disagre-rcna10937
Before dismissing the jury at the conclusion of the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial and just after they awarded Ms. Carroll $83.3 million for Trump's incessant defamation - Judge Lewis Kaplan told the jurors that he recommends they tell NO ONE that they served on the Trump jury. Although Judge Kaplan's motivation was undoubtedly to protect the jurors against the danger posed by Trump and his supporters, it's institutional insanity to make everyone else alter their lives and their behavior rather than address the source of the danger - Donald Trump.Trump endangers everyone who is involved in holding him accountable for his crimes and his civil wrongs. This includes witnesses; judges and their staff; prosecutors and their family members; and jurors. Trump is on pretrial release in four felony cases, both state and federal. The law provides that if someone is on release in a felony case, and there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant poses a danger to even one person in the community, that person should be detained pending trial. Yet instead of doing what the law provides, the institutions of government have decided that every single person involved in the endeavor of holding Trump accountable should alter their lives rather than neutralize the threat by detaining Trump pending trial. Glenn says let's hope the institutions of government - change course rather than continue to allow Trump to endanger jurors, witnesses, judges, and prosecutors.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Feel Focused, Energetic and Rested Today, click the link belowhttps://www.c60evo.com/redpill78/Use coupon code REDPILL78 to get an extra 10% offIt gets worse as more details come out about the pre-existing relationship between Judge Kaplan and E. Jean Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan.Save $200 off a 3 month supply of food: http://www.PrepareWithRedPill78.comBe Prepared - Click hereGet your chlorine dioxide kitshttps://onenessdrops.comUse code rp78 for 15% discountSupport My Pillow & RedPill78: https://www.mypillow.comUse Promo code - RP78 , or call 800-890-4893PROTECT YOURSELF! https://zstacklife.com/?ref=azbl62h8hdGet Dr. Z's Z Stack today and support this showULTRA MAGA Collection from Rise Attire: https://riseattireusa.com/ultramaga/PLEASE CONSIDER SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL: http://www.redpill78news.com/donatehttps://libertylinks.io/RedPill78 Audio Podcast: https://app.studeo.fm/channels/130http://www.redpill78news.com/podcast Telegram: https://t.me/OfficialRedPillNews NEW MAILING ADDRESS: Zak Paine - RedPill78250 Palm Coast Pkwy NESuite 607-180Palm Coast, FL32137-8225 MAKE DONATIONS PAYABLE TO CASH OR REDPILL78Cash: $ZakPaineSubscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/redpill78Donate: http://www.redpill78news.com/donateKo-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/redpill78Crypto Donations:Bitcoin Donations - 33zU6nAmpz9xCNHuVAUugTAvV5cAeM4PJbBitcoin Cash - qqwzw2s5z9ru434p5zhzfjaegllcvk5nq5atsetvm2Ethereum Donations - 0xa418De68a42a02Ab395013f6CBe516721acAd706LiteCoin Donations - MRMyqJPi7ar6z76dkKhbuRvZ6i3XDD2cg9LBRY Coin: bJTUi5NSYPMsSxnLDFidR9AKmFkrbtrnH5
Trump's defense team slammed a new report from Judge Engoron's Financial Monitor, claiming the "monitor" is not conducting an unbiased inquiry into the Trump Org., but is instead grifting millions of dollars in fees through the legal process.E. Jean Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan previously worked with the same Judge who presided over the Trump trial that resulted in the $83 million verdict. Judge Kaplan and Roberta Kaplan worked at the same firm in the 90s, according to Roberta's representative and the NYPost.Fani Willis' prosecutors admitted they were contacted twice by Biden's White House Counsel via letters to Fulton County, but only to discuss "logistics" and "procedural" issues, and nothing else worthy of being disclosed to the defense. Judge McAfee in Georgia will decide.
Today was not a particularly good day for justice. Although Peter Navarro was sentenced to four months in prison for contempt of Congress, the judge DID NOT order him to be taken into custody. This is reminiscent of Steve Bannon, who was also sentenced - back in October 2022 - to four months in prison for contempt of Congress, but has yet to to serve a single day of his sentence. Perhaps worst of all, Donald Trump took the stand today in his defamation trial in New York and, after Judge Kaplan told Trump he was prohibited from calling E. Jean Carroll a liar, Trump IMMEDIATELY called E. Jean Carroll a liar. Yet there was no sanction, no accountability, and no contempt finding.Today wasn't a good day for justice or for the equal application of our laws. But tomorrow is another day...If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Trump submitted his Colorado Ballot removal brief to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing there will be "bedlam" and "chaos" if the Court allows individual states to decide to keep Trump off the ballot in 2024.Alina Habba filed a letter motion with Judge Kaplan renewing her request for a mistrial based upon E. Jean Carroll's testimony admitting to deleting key evidence.Fani Willis sent a panicky emergency motion to quash Wade's divorce subpoena and Wade's ex-wife Jocelyn Wade responded.
Judge Lewis Kaplan, the judge presiding over the second defamation case that E. Jean Carroll brought against Donald Trump, said something during jury selection that provides important facts and context about who and what Trump really is. Judge Kaplan's words should become a campaign mantra, reminding the American voters exactly who Trump is and why he is entirely unqualified to return to presidential power. Glenn discusses the jury selection process (called voir dire), and reviews the single most important and revealing instruction Judge Kaplan gave to the folks who were assembled in a New York court room for jury selection in Ms. Carroll's defamation case.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
'The only rules are there are no rules' apparently doesn't fly in Judge Kaplan's courtroom. ____________________________________ We don't even talk about Alina Habba's weird swimsuit thing on the show because it broke after we wrapped recording (next week, I guess!), but we have more than enough material discussing Trump's lawyer bumble through basic courtroom procedure and lodge motions for bad court thingies in the proud tradition of the Simpsons' greatest character. We also discuss a racial discrimination lawsuit against Troutman Pepper and whether "the partner is always a jerk" is a defense. And it looks like the federal courts have opened an investigation into Clarence Thomas... which will probably go nowhere.
Time for a Legal AF viewers guide to what BY FEDERAL COURT ORDER UNDER PENALTY OF CONTEMPT Trump CAN AND CANNOT SAY UNDER OATH as a witness in the E Jean Carroll punitive damages case this week during trial. Michael Popok explains all of Judge Kaplan's orders limiting Trump's testimony, and whether the judge will DEFAULT Trump if he violates any of them. Thanks to our sponsor HumanN! Get a free 30-day supply of SuperBeets heart chews and a FREE Full - Sized Bag of Tumeric Chews valued at $25 by going to http://legalafbeets.com Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
As the tetstimony of Caroline Ellison continued in the courtroom of Judge Kaplan, it was very obvious that it was not going well for Sam Bankman Fried. After two days of laying waste to SBF, Caroline Ellison finished her testimony off with even more damning commentary.In this episode, we dive right back into the SBF trial and get caught on the testimony of Caroline Ellison and where the trial stands overall.(commercial at 6:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sam Bankman-Fried's Defense Gave Snooze-Worthy Cross of Caroline Ellison (businessinsider.com)
Donald Trump has repeatedly disrupted the court proceedings in his second trial for defaming E. Jean Carroll. Judge Kaplan warned Trump to stop making noise and talking out loud during the trial and he threatened to have him removed from the courtroom. When he did, Trump responded "I would love it!" In this podcast, Glenn discusses the broad authority trial court judges have to control the proceedings in their courtroom, and what may happen next time Trump is loud-mouthed in court.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
SERIES 2 EPISODE 108: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: ONE of these days ONE of these judges will have to take the bullshit by the horns and jail Trump overnight for contempt of court. He made a mockery of all the laws of the nation again yesterday in New York and must be punished. Clearly somebody or something has punished him for something. Three or four red marks have suddenly sprouted on his right hand. James Carville thinks they're evidence of the secondary stage of syphilis. I think they're more consistent with an old man slipping on ice and grabbing something to try to stop himself from face-planting. But I'm sure Trump will claim they're stigmata. America's constipated political pundits have finally figured out that the interior numbers from Iowa confirm he didn't crush ANYTHING there; in fact only 8% of Iowa's Republicans voted for him! Oh and Nikki Haley is up to 38% in New Hampshire. Trump might not be the only one disqualified under the 14th Amendment. Representative Dan Goldman has moved to censure Representative Elise "Hostages" Stefanik B-Block (21:15) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: The fascists are going to get another win out of the Supreme Court. Marjorie Taylor Greene sets herself up for another dick-pic joke. (25:23) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Argentina's New President - the guy in the Wolverine costume - blames the world's ills on feminism. The Babylon Bee's best bit of satire is its belief that it's funny. Ben Carson says why not concentration camps? The migrants have to have a place to stay! C-Block (30:35) EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY: Beaten puppy Sweet Cheeks needs our help in North Carolina. (32:05) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: Trump's rage against MSNBC for not worshiping him enough is actually not something new. The Republicans think they can get away with bullying MSNBC because they succeeded at it as long ago as 2008 - with me - and with the help of Tom Brokaw.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The second defamation case that plaintiff E. Jean Carroll has brought against Donald Trump has kicked off in federal court in New York with jury selection. What is perhaps most remarkable is the extreme security measures Judge Kaplan ordered to protect the jury from Trump and his supporters.Glenn discusses other trials in which judges have ordered comparable jury security measures, and what the comparison tells us about Donald Trump.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts and mission, you can becoming a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at glennkirschner.comFollow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Judge Kaplan scolded Trump and E. Jean Carroll took the stand in Day 2 of the second defamation and damages trial against Trump in the Southern District of New York. We review the trial X-Script provided courtesy of @innercitypress.The Fani-Wade Affair continues to get worse after a new report reveals Nathan Wade had a history of shoddy lawyering prior to being appointed Special Counsel. Congressman Cory Mills from Florida sent a letter to the local Georgia bar seeking information about their investigation.Jack Smith gets blasted by the dissenters in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for colluding with the lower court to get unprecedented access to Trump's Twitter DM's.
Trump will not be allowed to “sow chaos” and make a mockery in front of a jury of next week's E Jean Carroll MULTIMILLION DOLLAR CIVIL FRAUD CASE if the federal judge orders him to behave or ban him from the trial, as her lawyers have asked the judge to do in a late night court filing. Michael Popok of Legal AF reports on the likelihood that Judge Kaplan will order Trump to behave at the jury trial or risk contempt and being tried in abstentia. Go to https://neurohacker.com/legal for up to $100 off Qualia Mind and use code LEGAL at checkout for an additional 15% off any purchase! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode; Letitia James wants additional penalties for Trump, his two adult sons, Weisselberg, and McConney over their fraud; the Second Circuit Court of Appeals denies Trump's motion to stay his E. Jean Carroll trial pending immunity appeal; Judge Kaplan bars Donald Trump from arguing he didn't rape E. Jean Carroll; Mark Meadows wants the federal appeals court to rehear decision rejecting Georgia move; Trump is trying his immunity argument in Georgia; and more! Allison Gillhttps://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotePete Strzokhttps://twitter.com/petestrzokThe Podcasthttps://twitter.com/aisle45podWant to support this podcast and get it ad-free and early?Go to: https://www.patreon.com/aisle45podTell us about yourself and what you like about the show - http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short
Against the Rules with Michael Lewis: The Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried
Michael Lewis finishes his book tour and joins Lidia Jean Kott in court. His timing, as usual, is impeccable. The government rests its case. And then, everyone thinks Sam Bankman-Fried will take the stand. Instead, in a surprise twist, Judge Kaplan sends the jury home. LJ and Michael meet up on the courthouse steps to talk through the day's events. This conversation was recorded on October 26. Questions for Michael? Submit them by clicking the link in our show notes or visiting atrpodcast.com To access bonus episodes, and to listen to all of our coverage ad-free, sign up for Pushkin plus on the Against The Rules show page in Apple Podcasts or at Pushkin.fm/plus.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The courtroom was abuzz on Wednesday as financial and technical experts took the stand in the ongoing criminal trial against Sam Bankman-Fried. Accounting professor Peter Easton, a standout witness, presented a detailed analysis showing that Alameda had spent customer funds on VC investments, real estate, and political and charitable donations. Easton, who had previously worked on high-profile cases like Enron and Worldcom, said that by the end, the gap between what FTX owed to customers and what it had on hand was $8.8 billion. The defense, led by attorney David Lisner, attempted to challenge Easton's methods. Lisner questioned the accounting of the fiat@ftx internal account, which tracks customer deposits. Easton admitted to lumping amounts owed to customers from FTX's bank accounts with what was owed to customers from Alameda's bank accounts, giving the defense an opportunity to question his accuracy. The day also saw other witnesses, including a former FTX lobbyist and a Google employee, both of whose relevance was questioned by Judge Kaplan. The judge criticized the prosecution for wasting time with witnesses who seemed to offer little to the case. Catch up on Unchained's previous coverage: SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF's Family SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ Says Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied' While Defense Claims His Actions Were ‘Reasonable' SBF Trial, Day 3: Why a True Believer in FTX Flipped Once He Learned One Fact SBF Trial, Day 4: SBF's Lawyers Annoy Judge Kaplan, While Wang Reveals Alameda's Special Privileges SBF Trial, Day 5: SBF's Defense Finally Found Its Legs, But Can It Counter Caroline Ellison? SBF Trial, Day 6: Caroline Ellison Recalls 'The Worst Week of My Life' SBF Trial, Day 7: In SBF Trial, Did the Defense Lose Its Opportunity With the Star Witness? SBF Trial, Day 8: Former BlockFi CEO Adds Credibility to Fraud Charges SBF Trial, Day 9: Nishad Singh Describes Former FTX CEO as a Bully and Big Spender SBF Trial, Day 10: Defense Struggles to Discredit Nishad Singh's Testimony Did Sam Bankman-Fried Have Intent to Defraud FTX Investors? Why These Lawyers Say It's Over for SBF-But His Only Hail Mary Is to Testify Here's How Sam Bankman-Fried's High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried's Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Laura reports on the testimony of Gary Wang on Thursday, who described Alameda's special privileges that were programmed into FTX's code as early as July 2019, a few months after the exchange launched. These privileges included Alameda's ability to have a negative balance on its FTX account. This meant that Alameda was able to transfer and withdraw more funds than it had, essentially “borrowing from the exchange.” Those funds, Wang said, belonged to FTX customers, and at the time that FTX declared bankruptcy, Alameda had borrowed $8 billion from the exchange. Wang said Alameda had a $65 billion line of credit — far higher than any other customer on the exchange. He also revealed details about FTT, the cryptocurrency that FTX had created, and the concerns that were raised about how the tokens were allegedly used to boost Alameda's balance on the site. If you need to catch up, don't miss our recent coverage on the trial: SBF Trial, Day 3: Long-Time Friend Says, ‘FTX Defrauded All of Its Customers' SBF Trial, Day 2: DOJ: Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Lied' His Way to ‘Wealth, Power, and Influence' SBF Trial, Day 1: Possible Witnesses Include FTX Insiders, Big Names in Crypto, and SBF's Family Here's How Sam Bankman-Fried's High-Stakes Trial Could Play Out SBF Trial: How Sam Bankman-Fried's Lawyers Might Try and Win His Case The High-Stakes Trial of Sam Bankman-Fried Begins: What to Expect In the SBF Case, Elite Corruption Is What's Really on Trial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
