Podcasts about Digital Single Market

W 2024 roku do Polski weszła dyrektywa o prawie autorskim na jednolitym rynku cyfrowym. Zadaniem DSM – czyli Digital Single Market – była zmiana sposobu wynagradzania muzyków za udostępnienie ich utworów w serwisach streamingowych. - Jest to niewątpliwie sukces naszych środowisk - mówił w Dwójce Miłosz Bembinow, prezes Stowarzyszenia Autorów ZAiKS.

El sector Telco en EU está a punto de cambiar radicalmente. Los signos son muchos y hasta una industria tan conservadora como esta, una que sobrevivió a la desaparición de la #Voz sin grandes en su estructura, debe cambiar. En un sector tan regulado y con tanto impacto en la sociedad ese cambio tiene que venir de la mano de un cambio de la regulación y las políticas públicas. Así que, de la mano de Thierry Breton, la industria ha iniciado una nueva #epopeya con orígenes brumosos y destino incierto, como todos los relatos míticos. A finales de la semana pasada se "filtraba" a la prensa un borrador del WhitePaper que servirá de base para la redacción, tal vez, de una Digital Networks Act o DNA. Demos un vistazo al documento filtrado, frustrémonos con el nivel de nuestro "comisionés" y comprobemos responde bien preguntas que no nos hemos hecho (criptografía cuántica, gobierno de cables submarinos, I+D y 6G) y tiene bastante más dificultades en contestar las que si nos hacemos (consolidación, FairShare). El documento también incluye la descripción de algún nuevo animal mitológico: "Pan European Core Network Operator" que reinarán en un país que el propio documento reconoce que no existe: el "Digital Single Market”

Though many privacy pros are still grappling with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the EU is now busy leading a new generation of data regulations. As part of its Digital Single Market strategy, the EU is looking to not only protect data but also to create frameworks that allow for data flows, while aiming to mitigate hate speech and misinformation. Through an ambitious line of of proposed laws – including the Data Act, Data Governance Act, Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act and the AI Act – the EU is poised to place a slew of new requirements for companies doing business in the region. Though not all privacy-related, privacy pros should be paying attention to this space. To catch up on this flurry of activity, IAPP Editorial Director recently chatted with journalist Luca Bertuzzi.  

Data protection and competition enforcement have been on a collision course in recent years. The Big Tech platforms have amassed powerful market share with vast amounts of user data. This inevitable convergence is shaping up on both sides of the Atlantic. U.S. President Joe Biden has appointed notable antitrust proponents to powerful government positions in recent months. And in Brussels, the European Commission has released a slew of draft legislation to help bolster its Digital Single Market efforts, curtail Big Tech hegemony, and promote competition. Journalist Samuel Stolton has been following these developments with an ear to the ground in Brussels. Host Jedidiah Bracy recently caught up with Stolton right as news emerged that Amazon faces a record $888 million fine related to GDPR violations.

The European Commission fined Valve and the game publishers Focus Home, ZeniMax, Koch Media, Capcom, and Bandai Namco a combined 7.8 million Euros for geo-blocking roughly 100 PC games, preventing them from being played outside certain EU countries and breaking EU’s Digital Single Market rules.Starring Tom Merritt, Sarah Lane, Scott Johnson, Roger Chang, Joe.Link to the Show Notes.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The European Commission fined Valve and the game publishers Focus Home, ZeniMax, Koch Media, Capcom, and Bandai Namco a combined 7.8 million Euros for geo-blocking roughly 100 PC games, preventing them from being played outside certain EU countries and breaking EU’s Digital Single Market rules. Starring Tom Merritt, Sarah Lane, Scott Johnson, Roger Chang, Joe MP3 Download Using a Screen Reader? Click here Multiple versions (ogg, video etc.) from Archive.org Please SUBSCRIBE HERE. Subscribe through Apple Podcasts. A special thanks to all our supporters–without you, none of this would be possible. If you are willing to support the show or to give as little as 10 cents a day on Patreon, Thank you! Become a Patron! Big thanks to Dan Lueders for the headlines music and Martin Bell for the opening theme! Big thanks to Mustafa A. from thepolarcat.com for the logo! Thanks to Anthony Lemos of Ritual Misery for the expanded show notes! Thanks to our mods, Kylde, Jack_Shid, KAPT_Kipper, and scottierowland on the subreddit Send to email to feedback@dailytechnewsshow.com Show Notes To read the show notes in a separate page click here!

In their toolkit against a pandemic that knows no borders, several EU countries have bet on new technology from our era of globalisation: digital contact tracing COVID-19 apps. But the way they've been rolled out illustrate troublesome limits to the EU digital single market.

Breaking Banks Europe brings to you the very voice of the European Commission. This special #BBE episode discusses current initiatives to create an efficient digital infrastructure across the EU. Paolo Sironi and Matteo Rizzi are pleased to host Joan Rodrigues Frade - lead ITC architect of the 7 Billion EUR “Connecting Europe Facility” (CEF) - and Kelly Liljemo - organizer of the “Digital Initiative Challenge” (DIC) -. To build a Digital Single Market, the CEF funds a set of generic and reusable digital infrastructure elements, known as Building Blocks, which offer basic capabilities that can be reused in any EU project to facilitate the delivery of digital public services across borders and sectors. The DIC tasked EU's SMEs and startups to come up with innovative ideas using these solutions, boosting their businesses and helping the EU Commission understand how to build solutions SMEs and startups can use. Episode Materials: The Challenge: https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/smeCEF Solutions: https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/ISA Solutions: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/Email EU: EC-SMES-CONNECTING-EUROPE@ec.europa.eu

While the world is standstill, the EU is taking things seriously and transitioning action digitally via their broad Digital Single Market plan. In this episode, Alia discusses the structure and background of the foreign plan that's cited in the approx. 60-page report released by the higher commission. We take a deeper look into the plan, by analyzing the fundamentals in the executive summary. Website: bit.ly/2X5Tugt, Twitter: @_libertastribune, Instagram: @_thelibertastribune

At a time where digital trade is the fastest growing component of all trade flows, barriers to digital trade are also rising. Fredrik Erixon talks to Erik van der Marel, Senior Economist at ECIPE and Lecturer at the Solvay Brussels...

Con la Comunicazione COM(2020)66 su Data Strategy dello scorso 19 febbraio, la Commissione Europea inaugura un nuovo decennio per l’innovazione data-driven, fa il punto di quello che è stato, e su ciò che diventerà il Digital Single Market alla luce di questi dati come bene comune.---Leggi l'articolo completo - https://www.forumpa.it/open-government/dati-la-strategia-europea-ce-ora-tocca-alla-governance/

Martin Jackson   https://www.linkedin.com/in/martin-jackson-ab4147b/ is a GRC , Compliance Manager, Subject Matter Expert, Data Protection Officer Governance, Martin Jackson, Talks about PET, Privacy Enhancing Technology and the Digital Single Market which is a policy belonging to the European Single Market that covers digital marketing.Martin has massive experience in Risk & Compliance consultancy & training operation, including GRC, ISO27001/2, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, Cyber Essentials, ISO 31000, ISO 19011 and discusses how it all fits together.

Arrate Hernandezek zuzentzen duen Bipareta saioak bi horma ditu, eta bakoitzari gai batekin joko diogu. Lehen gaia ZuZeuko erredakzioak aukeratuko du eta bigarrena kanpoko erredakzio batetik ekarriko digute. Lehen pareta: Europak 'Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market' izeneko direktiba onartu berri du. Honek datozen urteetan Europar Batasuneko kide diren herrialdeen sareko egile eskubideen gaineko legediak baldintzatuko ditu. Eta ez da broma datorkiguna edo etor litekeena. Zehazki, pare bat artikuluk sortu dute polemika. ZuZeuko erredakzioko Oier Aranzabal eta Beñat Hach Embarek kazetariekin berba egingo dugu gaiaz. Bigarren pareta: EiTBko albiste zerbitzuetako kazetari Ainhoa Lendinezek Euskal Herria zeharkatu du Korrikari segiz. Aste hontan bertan egin da aurtengo edizioaren balorazio ofiziala, baina, guk balorazio pertsonala egingo dugu. Lendinezek barren barrenetik nola bizi duen azalduko digu. Eta Anartz Bilbao ZuZeuko erredakzioko kideak ere botako du bere aburua. Erreferentziak: Jaime Altozano Youtuberrak legeaz esan duena: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilEsBgbm7Fo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilEsBgbm7Fo) Epicenter.works katearen azalpena:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyUh9wOp_Rw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyUh9wOp_Rw) Maialen Lujanbiok Korrikaren amaieran botatako diskurtsoa:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3cR11EmztM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3cR11EmztM) Harpidetu zure audio plataforman. 

Bruegel senior fellow J. Scott Marcus joins Sean Gibson for this episode of Deep Focus on the 'The Sound of Economics', elaborating on a Bruegel study for the European Parliament into the progress made with the Commission's Digital Single Market Strategy since 2015. In a study for the European Parliament, Bruegel senior fellow J. Scott Marcus (together with co-authors Georgios Petropoulos and Timothy Yeung) has reviewed the gains delivered so far by these new measures, insofar as they can yet be determined. The authors also look at what the next legislative term might deliver, what realistic progress can be expected and what business remains unfinished regarding measures implemented by the current Commission. Speaking to Bruegel press officer Sean Gibson in this episode of the Deep Focus podcast series, Scott Marcus specifies some of the real achievements that the DSM can - and, indeed, has begun to - deliver for both consumers and producers. More broadly, the DSM is put in the context of efforts to digitise European society, specifically how well policies towards the former are keeping pace with the latter.  We invite you to review [the research paper in question](http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/631044/IPOL_STU(2019)631044_EN.pdf) in this episode, but also recommend consulting [Scott Marcus' testimony before the European Parliament Committee](http://bruegel.org/2018/07/economic-benefits-of-the-digital-single-market/) on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO).

In this episode we discuss the European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, and how it's passing could heavily affect, if not halt the forward motion of the cannabis industry (Content intended for audiences 21+)

We now have a website that you can find here! Feel free to send us an email at PreviouslyInEurope@gmail.com or follow us on Twitter @PrevInEurope If you can please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and if you can't do that tell a friend, this stuff really helps us out Also have you considered Matteo Renzi? Show Notes: Voting History Rejected narrowly in June after 2 years of negotiations and drafts (https://www.politico.eu/article/european-parliament-votes-to-block-copyright-reform/) After some edits and a whole lot of lobbying it passed parliament (https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved, https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/9kv5pa/eu-copyright-directive-vote-internet, https://www.politico.eu/article/european-parliament-axel-voss-backs-copyright-reform-against-tech-giants-google-facebook/) Some of this is fine: Article 3 proposes an exemption for text and data mining for scientific research - this would be sweet as generating data-sets is a massive pain as it is! This would potentially create a case to open up more scientific research to being used in research (see the open access movement if you're not familiar with why is this such a problem) Article 4 potentially adds exemptions for using copyrighted works in educational material including digitally (So "on the interweb"?) Article 14 adds some transparency obligations for rights holders to the original performers, requiring them to provide updated on the use and any payment owed Article 15 would allow for renegoiation for authors who have found their royalties from rights holders to be disproportionately low. Some of it is not fine in its current form Article 13 takes aim at "online content sharing service providers", aimed at getting rid in part of the "Mere conduit" exception from the original 2001 directive. The original being written in a time before YouTube or proper social media as we now know it didn't imagine YouTube not being liable for copyright just because they're only the "conduit". It seems pretty specifically targeted "...store and give the public access to a large amount of works or other subject-matter uploaded by its users which [they] organise and promote for profit-making purposes" Article 11, or so called "link tax", does something which appears very straightforward: "Member States shall provide publishers of press publications with the rights provided for in Article 2 and Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC for the digital use of their press publications" So those two are detailed in the original 2001 directive here (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029&from=EN). Cool so that's fine right... but way so publishing excerpts in the way Facebook and Google do won't be cool anymore. That might be a problem, people love their Google news and sweet Facebook links. Mega Corporations react to... complex regulations YouTube have launched a pretty full on attack against the directive, specifically targeting "article 13". Their CEO wrote an op-ed for the FT and republished it on their blog (I guess to be paywall free.. https://youtube-creators.googleblog.com/2018/11/i-support-goals-of-article-13-i-also.html). Their argument is effectively that if you hold them directly accountable for copyright infringement on their platform they will probably just have to block things from outside the EU to EU countries. What about creators in the EU? Their content will probably have to just be deleted. Content ID, YouTube's often controversial and much hated system for automatically flagging copyrighted material, already exists. They instead "welcome the chance to work with policymakers and the industry to develop a solution within article 13 that protects rights holders while also allowing the creative economy to thrive", which sounds like "let's make a more aggressive version of Content ID". The existing system already has problems with cases of record labels trying to claim copyright on music they clearly don't own and any version of fair use being ignored (Nintendo's aggressive removal of game play clips being a good example). It's already very in favor of the rights holder... Unsurprisingly YouTube's suggestion makes it good for YouTube because at the cost of some more development money they get to remain the only platform with the existing tech to have a 'compliant' user generated platform. Their core point makes a lot of sense - the EU has written the regulation in terms that don't really make sense on the scale of YouTube. Regulators are in a sense asking for a system where only things which have been vetted will get posted... This is basically impossible for the volume YouTube adds daily. For music this would probably mean a return to mid 00s style music piracy to some extent in Europe where nobody got paid at all. How would something like Mastodon be approached since they're technically not the "platform", people running instances would be responsible. They've created a whole page of videos where hip YouTubers from Europe explain why this is bad https://www.youtube.com/saveyourinternet/ . It also includes a Youtube guy talking in his best YouTube voice explaining they'd simply have to block EU YouTubers. It's well polished but really their search for compromise is probably not in the interest of the little guy. Extend the existing directive This is effectively an attempt to expand the Copyright Directive (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Directive) to cover social media, expand the use of automated controls and generally make the directive more modern. The extensions proposed and approved by the parliament are pretty extensive (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Copyright_in_the_Digital_Single_Market) Full text - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0593&from=EN Criticism So there's two great examples which lay out some good objections to the way this is described: EFF (https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/10/effs-letter-eus-copyright-directive-negotiators) Two main problems described: Copyright complains are currently wildly overused because there's no repercussion for incorrectly claiming copyright as it is... so making the claims stronger is a terrible idea. "Online service providers should be able to pre-emptively strike off a rightsholder who has been found to be abusive of Article 13 by another provider." Article 11 is way too broad in its current language. What is a link? How big a quotation requires permission? I'd say a lot of online publications don't want it to be any length.. but if the EU wants to direct this they need to have specifics! Julia Reda MEP, Pirate Party (https://juliareda.eu/2018/11/youtube-article-13/) On the more idealistic end - They're both wrong. YouTube's compromise will just end with hyped up Content Id and the existing text is only there for the music and paywall news industry to get some version of their old business model back in a world that's moved on from it. A sadder part from a parliament member is that there's worry the good parts will be quietly removed in renegotiation in order to get to a compromise... so the actual artists get nothing new but the companies that benefit from and those who collect their lenience fees get a bunch.

This episode features a recording of the Industry Talk: SVoD Platforms: Repositioning the European Digital Single Market. Our documentary industry is going through major changes that we, the documentary community, need to discuss. Between new EU regulations and the influential demand of streaming giants, are we facing a great new opportunity or losing one? Industry Talk co-hosted with Creative Europe Desk for the Netherlands and Flanders. Guests: Marijn Duijvestein (European Commission), Axel Arno (European Broadcasting Union, SVT), Justine Nagan (POV), James Bridges (iwonder), Paul Pauwels (European Documentary Network).  The session is moderated by Simon Kilmurry (International Documentary Association) and was recorded on November 20, 2018.

In this episode, I reflect on STEAL THIS SHOW episode S04E03, (http://stealthisshow.com/s04e03/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss)  with Cory Doctorow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Doctorow?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) . One of the big themes to come up in the conversation was the European Copyright Directive (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Copyright_in_the_Digital_Single_Market?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) — which, if passed early next year, will threaten the future of the Web as we know it. But does this threat to the future of the the traditional Web mean the moment of decentralized services like IPFS (https://ipfs.io/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) and Blockstack (https://blockstack.org/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) has finally come? Presented by TorrentFreak  (http://torrentfreak.com?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) | Season Sponsor Private Internet Access (http://privateinternetaccess.com?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) Showrunner & Host Jamie King (mailto:jamie@stealthisshow.com) | Editing & Post Lucas Marston (mailto:lucas@hollagully.com) Original Music David Triana | Web Production Eric Barch Executive Producers: Mark Zapalac (http://twitter.com/mark_zapalac?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) , Eric Barch (https://twitter.com/ericbarch?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) , Nelson Larios, George Alvarez, Adam Burns, Daniel, Grof, Sean Lynch. (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&t=%E2%80%98Enter%20The%20Periphery%E2%80%99%3A%20Regulation%20%26%20Decentralization&s=100&p[url]=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&p[images][0]=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F10%2Fjamie.jpg&p[title]=%E2%80%98Enter%20The%20Periphery%E2%80%99%3A%20Regulation%20%26%20Decentralization&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&text=Hey%20check%20this%20out&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) (https://plus.google.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) (http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&title=%E2%80%98Enter%20The%20Periphery%E2%80%99%3A%20Regulation%20%26%20Decentralization&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) (http://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&media=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F10%2Fjamie.jpg&description=%E2%80%98Enter%20The%20Periphery%E2%80%99%3A%20Regulation%20%26%20Decentralization&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) (http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F&title=%E2%80%98Enter%20The%20Periphery%E2%80%99%3A%20Regulation%20%26%20Decentralization&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss) (mailto:?subject=%E2%80%98Enter%20The%20Periphery%E2%80%99%3A%20Regulation%20%26%20Decentralization&body=Hey%20check%20this%20out:%20https%3A%2F%2Fstealthisshow.com%2Fs04e06%2F)

At this event, we looked into the progress made towards achieving the main priorities for strengthening the digital single market, the opportunities and the challenges at EU level.

At this event, we looked into the progress made towards achieving the main priorities for strengthening the digital single market, the opportunities and the challenges at EU level.

At this event, we looked into the progress made towards achieving the main priorities for strengthening the digital single market, the opportunities and the challenges at EU level.

In the first session, the panellists discussed how to establish a fair and competitive Digital Single Market, in particular a fair and competitive platform economy. Since the crucial factors for success for digital platforms are trust and big data, the trade-off between both determine the efficiency of the entire industry. This trade-off is embodied in privacy, and unfortunately empirically there is no clear-cut answer to how much privacy is needed for people’s welfare. The panellists also discussed the role of competition policy and regulation as complementary tools, one as a credible deterrent and the other as a specific way to tailor policy to social objectives. For competition policy, several features of the platform economy were highlighted that make the situation particular, notably the winner-take-all markets, the first-mover advantage, the network effect, the cross-markets leverage that scale brings and other bundling. Due to the fragmentation of the EU market, there are cases where national players effectively compete with global ones. All these aspects make the response all the more difficult and while dominant position leads to increased vigilance it is not always beneficial to break dominant players. The panel also highlighted how self-regulation and purely top-down regulations were both ill-suited for such a fast-moving topic, and instead recommended the use of co-regulation, whereby regulators and stakeholder find pragmatic solutions through continued consultations. Regarding DSM legislative process, some criticized how politicized it had become, shifting away from long-term added-value and evidence-based policies, while others praised the legislators’ openness to input from stakeholders.

Pohner Ádám, a Kistücsök étterem séfhelyettese nyerte a Bocuse d’Or hazai döntőjét, ő képviselheti hazánkat júniusban, Torinóban. A verseny kiélezett volt, Pohner Ádám gasztro rovatunkban elmondta, hogy a sok munkát most majd újra sok munka és felkészülés követi. Kiss Móni, az Equilor vezető elemzője számolt be a BÉT nyitása utáni helyzetről, külön kiemelve a Richterrel kapcsolatos információkat. Geoblokkolás, területi tartalomkorlátozás, Digital Single Market – a témákat Habók Lilla, a hwsw.hu munkatársa járta körül IT-rovatunkban.

In an environment where we now receive much of our news and media content via mobile and social media platforms, information lawyers and regulators are having to work hard to keep up. Libel trials and privacy superinjunctions are giving way to data privacy and fake news as the big legal issues of the day and English law increasingly needs to be considered alongside international law to be of practical relevance to commercial decision making, particularly for global tech players like Facebook and Google. This talk by Ashley Hurst, a media and tech litigation partner at the international firm Osborne Clarke, is a chance to gain an insight into how new digital trends are shaping our laws and regulations and how the world's leading tech companies and start ups are adapting to these changes. It will cover issues such as the GDPR and growth of data privacy, complex issues of intermediary liability, fake news, the Digital Single Market, and the general clash between innovation and freedom of expression on the one hand and reputation and privacy on the other. Ashley will also be happy to answer your questions about digital media law and becoming a digital media lawyer in today's legal market. The Cambridge University Law Society (CULS) is one of the oldest and largest student run societies in the University, the country and indeed the world. With a membership base of over a 1000, its aims are manifold and its enterprises diverse. Each year, the Law Society invites eminent speakers to address its members. The events are an exciting chance to hear from leaders in their respective fields about issues crucial to the modern legal world. In the past CULS have had the pleasure of hearing from such distinguished speakers as Justice of the Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony; Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury and former President of the International Court of Justice, Dame Rosalyn Higgins. This event was kindly supported by Osborne Clarke. For more information see the CULS Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/camlawsoc/

In an environment where we now receive much of our news and media content via mobile and social media platforms, information lawyers and regulators are having to work hard to keep up. Libel trials and privacy superinjunctions are giving way to data privacy and fake news as the big legal issues of the day and English law increasingly needs to be considered alongside international law to be of practical relevance to commercial decision making, particularly for global tech players like Facebook and Google. This talk by Ashley Hurst, a media and tech litigation partner at the international firm Osborne Clarke, is a chance to gain an insight into how new digital trends are shaping our laws and regulations and how the world's leading tech companies and start ups are adapting to these changes. It will cover issues such as the GDPR and growth of data privacy, complex issues of intermediary liability, fake news, the Digital Single Market, and the general clash between innovation and freedom of expression on the one hand and reputation and privacy on the other. Ashley will also be happy to answer your questions about digital media law and becoming a digital media lawyer in today's legal market. The Cambridge University Law Society (CULS) is one of the oldest and largest student run societies in the University, the country and indeed the world. With a membership base of over a 1000, its aims are manifold and its enterprises diverse. Each year, the Law Society invites eminent speakers to address its members. The events are an exciting chance to hear from leaders in their respective fields about issues crucial to the modern legal world. In the past CULS have had the pleasure of hearing from such distinguished speakers as Justice of the Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony; Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury and former President of the International Court of Justice, Dame Rosalyn Higgins. This event was kindly supported by Osborne Clarke. For more information see the CULS Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/camlawsoc/

In an environment where we now receive much of our news and media content via mobile and social media platforms, information lawyers and regulators are having to work hard to keep up. Libel trials and privacy superinjunctions are giving way to data privacy and fake news as the big legal issues of the day and English law increasingly needs to be considered alongside international law to be of practical relevance to commercial decision making, particularly for global tech players like Facebook and Google. This talk by Ashley Hurst, a media and tech litigation partner at the international firm Osborne Clarke, is a chance to gain an insight into how new digital trends are shaping our laws and regulations and how the world's leading tech companies and start ups are adapting to these changes. It will cover issues such as the GDPR and growth of data privacy, complex issues of intermediary liability, fake news, the Digital Single Market, and the general clash between innovation and freedom of expression on the one hand and reputation and privacy on the other. Ashley will also be happy to answer your questions about digital media law and becoming a digital media lawyer in today's legal market. The Cambridge University Law Society (CULS) is one of the oldest and largest student run societies in the University, the country and indeed the world. With a membership base of over a 1000, its aims are manifold and its enterprises diverse. Each year, the Law Society invites eminent speakers to address its members. The events are an exciting chance to hear from leaders in their respective fields about issues crucial to the modern legal world. In the past CULS have had the pleasure of hearing from such distinguished speakers as Justice of the Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony; Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury and former President of the International Court of Justice, Dame Rosalyn Higgins. This event was kindly supported by Osborne Clarke. For more information see the CULS Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/camlawsoc/

Follow-up The Tommy Edison Experience, How A Blind Person Uses A Computer. Pablo Escobar, el Patron del mal Screentime Onderwerpen De NES Classic verkoopt erg goed, nog steeds te goed. De EU gaat achter Valve aan, want geo-blocking.. dat mag niet. In lijn met een Digital Single Market. Door FBI gebruikte iOS-hacktools verschijnen online na hack. Zo geweldig blijkt de Amazon Echo toch niet te zijn. Tips Maarten: The Daily Stefaan : NASA API portal Steven: Anthony van der Meer maakt een kortfilm over zijn gestolen smartphone

What will be the impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution? Through a series of events, articles and working group meetings, Friends of Europe is bringing together stakeholders from both sides of the Atlantic. Their aim is to debate and propose a set of policy measures, incentives and approaches that would help Europe to be better prepared and ready to maximise the potential of the 4th Industrial Revolution – as well as provide the stimulus for greater transatlantic cooperation. Can Europe embrace the changes wrought by the 4th Industrial Revolution? How can transatlantic cooperation help Europe compete and contribute effectively in a rapidly changing global digital landscape? To launch this initiative, we held a conversation with the European Commission Vice-President for the Digital Single Market, Andrus Ansip on 28 November 2016 in Brussels. We discussed the opportunities and the obstacles Europe is encountering as the 4th Industrial Revolution takes hold, with a focus on current issues such as data-sharing and privacy, in light of the Commission’s forthcoming proposal on free-flow of data. Moderator: Dharmendra Kanani, Director of Strategy at Friends of Europe

Bruegel was pleased to welcome Andrus Ansip, Vice-President of the European Commission and European Commissioner for the Digital Single Market. He discussed the place of parcel delivery in the DSM, and commented on research by Bruegel scholars suggesting there are useful parallels with telecommunications interconnection and roaming. You can find more information on this event here: http://bruegel.org/events/promoting-e-commerce-in-europe-lessons-for-parcel-delivery-from-electronic-communications-policy/

The European Union (EU) is an interesting case for tech policy. While individual member states get direction from Brussels, where the EU is headquartered, they also create policies within their own borders. Should technology regulations be harmonized across the EU to create a “Digital Single Market?” Or should EU nations compete over crafting the best policies and attracting the most startups and investment? What can the US learn from this dynamic? Evan is joined by Dominique Lazanski, Public Policy Director at GSMA, an international trade association representing mobile operators. They discuss the latest tech headlines from the EU, their connection to the United States, and what it all means for Internet governance.

Recent estimates by the European Parliament suggest that moving from 28 national markets to a single one could contribute €415 billion per year to our economy and create millions of new jobs. The EU's single market is one of the greatest successes of European integration. But switch from the physical to the online, and you'll see the picture is not quite the same. Find out about the progress and challenges facing the EU digital single market in this EPRS policy podcast.Source : © European Union - EP

Recent estimates by the European Parliament suggest that moving from 28 national markets to a single one could contribute €415 billion per year to our economy and create millions of new jobs. The EU's single market is one of the greatest successes of European integration. But switch from the physical to the online, and you'll see the picture is not quite the same. Find out about the progress and challenges facing the EU digital single market in this EPRS policy podcast.Source : © European Union - EP

When it comes to tech startups and innovation, the European Union has largely lagged behind the United States and China. In an effort to reverse this trend, the European Commission is working to create a Digital Single Market (DSM) to harmonize technology regulations across its member states. It's a nice idea, in theory, but it poses serious concerns for competition and differentiation among EU nations. Evan and Berin are joined by Massimiliano Trovato, a research fellow at the Istituto Bruno Leoni, a libertarian think tank based in Milan. Will the DSM, bolster Europe's tech landscape? What can the US learn from the EU's approach to regulation? Is espresso really better in Italy?

Brian O’Connor, Chair ECHAlliance Catherine Chronaki, Secretary General at HL7 International Foundation The Digital Single Market strategy has raised questions about its impact on U.S.-EU trade and investment, especially with respect to cross-border data flows, data protection, standards development, and competition. These questions arise as both the United States and the EU strive to negotiate the new Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Considering the EU has limited powers regarding the organisation of member states’ health systems and can only recommend actions; what immediate actions should willing states and/or companies take in order to be competitive?

George Crooks, Medical Director for NHS24 Karima Bourquard, Director of Interoperability at IHE-Europe, France Marcello Melgara Responsible for International eHealth Projects, Italy The Digital Single Market strategy has raised questions about its impact on U.S.-EU trade and investment, especially with respect to cross-border data flows, data protection, standards development, and competition. These questions arise as both the United States and the EU strive to negotiate the new Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Considering the EU has limited powers regarding the organisation of member states’ health systems and can only recommend actions; what immediate actions should willing states and/or companies take in order to be competitive?

Henrique Martins, President of the Board of SPMS - Shared Services of the Ministry of Health, Portugal Alexander Berler, HL7 Hellas Chair, Greece Dimitra Liveri, Network and Information Security Expert at ENISA, eHealth projects The Digital Single Market strategy has raised questions about its impact on U.S.-EU trade and investment, especially with respect to cross-border data flows, data protection, standards development, and competition. These questions arise as both the United States and the EU strive to negotiate the new Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Considering the EU has limited powers regarding the organisation of member states’ health systems and can only recommend actions; what immediate actions should willing states and/or companies take in order to be competitive?

John Higgins, Director General of Digital Europe, talks to Paul Adamson about the European Commission's digital single market strategy.

John Higgins, Director General of Digital Europe, talks to Paul Adamson about the European Commission's digital single market strategy.

Host Brian Wesolowski first chats with Harley Geiger about his vision of a pizza delivery drone (and other potential positive uses of drones), their unique perspective and thus privacy implications, potential rules and regulations and where they should come from, and more. Then Jens-Henrik Jeppesen joins from the other side of the pond to talk about "what the heck is going on in Europe?" – the Digital Single Market strategy, the RTBF ("right to be forgotten"), online hosting liability, and more. Attribution: sounds used from Psykophobia, Taira Komori,BenKoning, Zabuhailo, bloomypetal, guitarguy1985, bmusic92, and offthesky of freesound.org.