Podcasts about ai act

A Republican and a Democrat in the U.S. House join forces on a bipartisan bill to confront potential risks of Artificial Intelligence; White House continues to criticize the Federal Reserve and Chair Kevin Warsh for raising interest rates this week. Presidential adviser Peter Navarro calls it a 'monumental mistake' that could push the U.S. economy into recession; Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomes closer ties to Europe even after President Donald Trump threatens more tariffs in response; U.S. Senate votes to advance a college sports regulation bill by a comfortable margin, almost guaranteeing a successful final passage vote next week; Health & Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. tells an anti-vaccine group that he once worked for, Children's Health Defense, that the true risks from vaccines are not known, in part because the government does not have a good enough safety monitoring system; Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Danny Danon says New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) should be arrested for calling for demonstrations when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits next week for the United Nations General Assembly; Former Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) has died at age 84. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) remembering him as 'a wonderful mentor' who 'taught me so much' and 'a highly effective, brilliant Senator, who made countless contributions to the state of Arizona and to our country.' Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Nachdem meine letzten Folgen eher grundsätzlicherer Natur waren, soll es diesmal um etwas Handfestes gehen. In immer mehr Unternehmen werden KI-gestützte Systeme bei der Auswahl von Bewerberinnen und Bewerbern eingesetzt. Und für die Betriebsräte sind die damit verbundenen Bedenken und Regelungsbedarfe immens.In dieser Podcast Folge gehe ich auf die Rechtsgrundlagen wie den AI Act, die DSGVO, das BDSG, das AGG und natürlich die einschlägigen Stellen im BetrVG ein und erläutere, wo Handlungsfelder und Stolperstricke für Betriebsräte liegen. Reinhören!#Betriebsrat #360GradBR #Mitbestimmung #AIAct #künstlicheintelligenz

WTiN speaks to Anna Triponel, CEO and founder of Human Level about how the fashion and textile industry are responding to the role of artificial intelligence (AI) across the supply chain.Human Level is an advisory firm that propels businesses to be human rights proactive in a rapidly changing climate. In the fashion and textile industry Human Level works with a wide range of companies to help design human rights and sustainability strategies that meet external and human rights expectations.In this episode, Triponel speaks about the role of AI and automation in textile sector. She delves into how digitalisation is driving change within the industry and what the biggest risks for workers and other actors in the supply chain are. We also touch upon the EU's AI Act, which addresses the risks of AI and positions Europe to play a leading role globally. Triponel also speaks about where AI can improve work and create value and what business leaders should be doing now to keep up and stay ahead of this change. Throughout the episode Triponel references The United Nations (UN)'s Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI: Evidence-based assessment of opportunities, risks and impacts of AI.Learn more at wearehumanlevel.com.

Solo, maar niet alleenSaskia herstelt van een vervolgoperatie na haar fietsval van vorig jaar, dus Thijs vliegt deze aflevering solo. Gelukkig schuift Fedor Klinkenberg (van Brainial, vanaf deze aflevering ook onze sponsor) voor de vierde keer aan, dus we kunnen doorpakken: een stellingenvuur over AI en aanbestedingen gaat soepeltjes over in een terug- en vooruitblik op de ontwikkelingen in Sales AI.Inzichten in deze afleveringWat een investeringsronde met je bedrijf doet: Brainial groeit hard in omzet en verdubbelde het personeelsbestand.De coding-revolutie van het afgelopen jaar, en de snelheid waarmee software ontwikkeld kan worden, was mogelijk de meest impactvolle ontwikkeling.Wat de AI Act (van kracht sinds 2 augustus) betekent voor aanbestedingen als "hoog risicosysteem", en welke documentatieplicht daarbij hoort.Een pijnlijk eerlijke salesblunder: geloven in een kansloze tender omdat de concurrent al een week training had gegeven aan het hele beoordelingsteam.De SalesbibliotheekFedor voegt You Can't Teach a Kid to Ride a Bike at a Seminar van David Sandler toe aan onze salesbibliotheek. Gedateerd (pre-AI, tweede editie uit 2015), maar volgens Fedor nog steeds relevant, vooral op het gebied van kwalificeren en het succesvol uitvragen van de pijn achter de vraag.Brainial BitesFedor heeft een event op 17 september bij De Fabrique in Utrecht, gratis toegang, met een inkoperspanel van onder meer Rijkswaterstaat en TenneT. Er zijn weer kaartjes.Deze podcast werd mede mogelijk gemaakt door Brainial. Wil je meer weten, ga dan naar brainial.com/offertepodcast.

Con l'Avv. Giuseppe Vaciago (Partner di 42 Law Firm, penalista esperto di diritto dell'informatica e intelligenza artificiale) un'ora intera su una domanda sola: se un sistema di AI fa danni, in Italia chi finisce in galera?Si parte da due fatti. Uno sciame di agenti di Anthropic ''esce dalla sandbox'' e attacca Hugging Face fuori da ogni perimetro, e qualcuno se ne accorge venti giorni dopo. Poi il report di Anthropic sugli abusi dei suoi modelli: operazioni cyber, sorveglianza, influenza, truffe, fino al controllo di sistemi d'arma. Se succedesse in Europa, con AI Act, GDPR, NIS2, Cyber Resilience Act e DORA che si intersecano, cosa succederebbe davvero?Il cuore è il nuovo art. 437-bis del codice penale (testo approvato, in attesa di pubblicazione in Gazzetta Ufficiale): un reato omissivo, ricalcato sulla sicurezza sul lavoro, per chi progetta, addestra, immette sul mercato o usa professionalmente un sistema di AI ad alto rischio senza le misure di sicurezza adeguate. Fino a 5 anni di reclusione per chi lo gestisce, e non solo per il CEO: anche il CISO. Per l'azienda scatta la 231: sanzione fino a 1,5 milioni, confisca del profitto e interdittiva da sei mesi a due anni, che per molte imprese vuol dire chiudere. La chiave è la ''colpa organizzativa'': ti puniscono non per l'imprevedibilità dell'AI, ma per non aver fatto il minimo per governarla.Poi il nodo provider contro deployer: perché i laboratori di frontiera gridano ''siamo pericolosissimi'' mentre nel 2000 le piattaforme si dicevano neutrali, e perché quella retorica scarica la responsabilità sulla testa di chi usa i loro modelli. Il Digital Omnibus, entrato in vigore il 27 luglio, ha rinviato di oltre un anno l'alto rischio dell'AI Act e unificato le notifiche di incidente verso ENISA: il tempo per prepararsi c'è, ma il modello organizzativo si costruisce prima, non dopo.In chiusura la lista della spesa per chi usa l'AI in azienda: stampare l'elenco delle pratiche vietate e degli ambiti ad alto rischio (Allegato III), censire l'uso reale dei tool compresa la shadow AI, valutazione del rischio, regole interne, formazione, e tracciabilità delle interazioni come prova di aver fatto il proprio dovere, con l'articolo 4 dello Statuto dei lavoratori a complicare le cose.00:00 Incidenti AI e reati02:03 Norme UE: GDPR, NIS2, CRA06:20 Italia: nasce il 437-bis10:42 231 spiegata semplice16:30 Colpa organizzativa e presidi19:00 Condotte punite e alto rischio23:04 Deployer vs provider: chi risponde32:13 Mappa compliance e notifiche37:38 Cosa accadrebbe ad Anthropic47:20 Checklist aziendale e logging57:03 Chiusura e saluti#AIAct #DLgs231 #Anthropic~~~Ciao Internet! - Il primo e più seguito canale di TECH POLICY in italia, con Matteo FloraINFO E AZIENDE: https://matteoflora.comIl CORSO di AI: https://zero.matteoflora.comNewsletter: https://link.mgpf.it/nlSocial: https://io.matteoflora.comEnglish: https://www.youtube.com/@CiaoInternetPrivacy » https://privacy.matteoflora.comAI Policy » https://privacy.matteoflora.com/aiMail #adv: sales (at) matteoflora.com

Sende uns deine Meinung! :)OpenAI zugeordnete KI-Agenten sollen eine alte deutschsprachige Wiki-Seite auf österreichischer Infrastruktur für tausende Einträge und zur Koordination verwendet haben. Die Agenten konnten nach der Darstellung unabhängiger Forscher eigentlich nur auf das Internet zugreifen, entdeckten aber eine technische Möglichkeit, trotzdem Inhalte zu schreiben.In dieser Podcastfolge kläre ich:was auf DseWiki tatsächlich dokumentiert wurdewas OpenAI bestätigt und was das Unternehmen bestreitetob dieses Verhalten als Hackerangriff gelten kannwarum eine KI selbst nicht strafbar istwann Entwickler oder Unternehmen haften könntenwelche Pflichten der europäische AI Act vorsiehtwarum nicht jeder KI-Zwischenfall automatisch meldepflichtig istDiese Folge trennt gesicherte Tatsachen, vorläufige Forschungsergebnisse und rechtliche Bewertung. Es handelt sich um allgemeine Information und nicht um individuelle Rechtsberatung.#OpenAI #KünstlicheIntelligenz #AIAct #Cybercrime #JusProfiViel Vergnügen bei dieser JusProfi-Podcastfolge!--DISCLAIMER:Bitte beachtet: Diese Podcastfolge dient ausschließlich Infotainment-Zwecken und stellt keine anwaltliche Beratung dar. Ich bin kein Anwalt und die Informationen und Meinungen, die in dieser Folge geäußert werden, sind kein Ersatz für professionelle rechtliche Beratung und sollen es auch nicht sein. Bitte wendet euch immer an einen qualifizierten Anwalt, wenn ihr rechtliche Fragen habt.Übrigens, dieses Equipment verwende ich für meine Aufnahmen:Kamera: https://amzn.to/3iq4McjMikrofon: https://amzn.to/3XcbFgoStativ: https://amzn.to/3ZnHwwjSchnitt: https://amzn.to/3QvnnQI(Disclaimer: Es handelt sich um Affiliate Links)--Besucht uns auf:https://www.jusprofi.athttps://www.facebook.com/jusprofi.athttps://www.instagram.com/jusprofi/?hl=dehttps://www.linkedin.com/company/jusprofiHört euch alle unsere Podcasts an, überall, wo es Podcasts gibt :)Support the show

Zabudnite na klasické internetové podvody plné gramatických chýb. Dnešný svet kyberzločinu využíva pokročilú umelú inteligenciu na vytváranie dokonalých deepfakes a sofistikovanú manipuláciu. Najčastejším a najzraniteľnejším cieľom sa preto stávajú samotní klienti, ktorí pod vplyvom emócií sami odovzdávajú svoje úspory.Umelá inteligencia dnes predstavuje novú zbraň v rukách útočníkov, ktorí dokážu verne napodobniť hlasy blízkych ľudí či sfalšovať selfie fotografie pri zakladaní účtov. Banky však v tejto digitálnej vojne nezostávajú pozadu a proti zneužitiu AI bojujú vlastnými obrannými systémami.O tom, ako sa banky chránia pred novou vlnou podvodov, prečo európska regulácia umelej inteligencie nebrzdí domáce inovácie a aké prínosy riziká so sebou v bankovníctve prinášajú autonómni AI agenti, sa v podcaste SHARE rozprával Maroš Žofčin s expertom VÚB banky na podvody Jurajom Praženkom a expertom VÚB banky na umelú inteligenciu Martinom Podhajským.Podcast vznikol v spolupráci s VÚB bankou.V podcaste sa dozviete aj o týchto témach:Prečo podvodníci pomocou umelej inteligencie cielia priamo na klientov a nie na systémy banky.Ako funguje technológia deepfake a ako banky dokážu detegovať falošné selfie videá.V čom spočíva úspech slovenského AI projektu Sofia a ako pomáha osobným bankárom.Ako európsky AI Act rozdeľuje systémy umelej inteligencie a prečo chráni spotrebiteľov.Aké nebezpečenstvo hrozí, ak odovzdáte plnú kontrolu nad účtom autonómnym agentom.Prečo je v ére umelej inteligencie kritické myslenie človeka tou najdôležitejšou líniou obrany.Podcast SHARE pripravuje magazín Živé.sk.

De l'App Store à l'Agent Store : La fin annoncée de l’ère des applications mobiles Régis BAUDOUIN Depuis l’inauguration de l’App Store par Apple en 2008, notre vie numérique repose sur une habitude mécanique : un besoin surgit, et nous téléchargeons des applications dédiées. Ainsi, cette dynamique a transformé notre relation aux outils numériques et à leur disponibilité instantanée, en favorisant une abondance d’options qui répondent immédiatement à des envies fugaces. Sur les PC on a l’habitude d’utiliser le navigateur pour accéder aux contenus, sur le smartphone chaque contenu est accessible par des applications. Exemple concret pour la banque. Sur PC, navigateur, sur smartphone une application. Résultat ? Nos smartphones sont devenus des cimetières d’icônes multicolores, saturés par des dizaines d’outils spécialisés qui se disputent notre attention à coup de notifications intempestives. Cette surcharge rend la navigation lente et oblige à filtrer constamment l’information pour rester efficace. Pour l’histoire , il faut bien se rappeler que avant l’app store de Apple, on pouvait acheter déjà des applications sur de nombreux sites d’applications. Le principe des app store a verrouillé le marché pour les usagers, mais aussi pour les créateurs qui doivent passer par le constructeur pour avoir accès aux clients. Au passage il prend 30% de commission. Apple avait compris avec les Ipod et la musique que les utilisateurs appréciaient de tout trouver sur un magasin intégré au service. Cependant, cette architecture logicielle touche désormais à ses limites. Alors que l’intelligence artificielle franchit le cap décisif qui la fait passer du statut de simple assistant textuel à celui d’agent autonome multi-tâches, le modèle des applications étanches est en train de s’effondrer. Nous entrons à grands pas dans l’ère des Agent Stores et des systèmes d’exploitation unifiés. La saturation du modèle « Api-centric » Pour comprendre cette mutation, il suffit d’observer nos usages actuels. Les utilisateurs souffrent d’une véritable fatigue applicative. Les études d’usage montrent que l’immense majorité des propriétaires de smartphones passent plus de 80 % de leur temps d’écran sur seulement trois à cinq applications (principalement les réseaux sociaux, la messagerie et le navigateur). API centric Une API, c’est une service qui permet à deux applications de communiquer selon un protocole précis Chaque nouvelle application impose une friction considérable : La création d’un compte utilisateur et la saisie de mots de passe. L’apprentissage d’une nouvelle interface graphique. La gestion de permissions d’accès intrusives (contacts, géolocalisation, stockage). Pour organiser le moindre événement de la vie quotidienne — réserver un week-end, organiser un dîner entre amis ou acheter des billets de train —, l’utilisateur est contraint de jouer les chefs d’orchestre en sautant d’une application à une autre pour copier-coller des données. Un processus absurde à l’ère de l’automatisation. L’OS devient la couche d’orchestration unique Dans ce nouveau paradigme, l’intelligence artificielle n’est plus une application tierce rangée dans un dossier du téléphone (comme l’étaient les premières versions de ChatGPT ou Claude). Elle devient la couche centrale du système d’exploitation lui-même. C’est pour cela que Google, Microsoft et Apple veulent l’intégrer à toutes leurs offres actuelles comme un compagnon. Cette transition repose sur l’émergence des Action APIs et du protocole d’intégration d’agents (Model Context Protocol / MCP). Les marques et les services n’ont plus besoin de concevoir des interfaces graphiques lourdes pour l’utilisateur final. Elles exposent directement leurs données et leurs fonctionnalités sous forme de connecteurs sécurisés consommables par l’agent principal du téléphone. On va prendre le temps de définir le fameux serveur MCP dont vous entendez parler en permanence. Ainsi, Un serveur MCP (Model Context Protocol) est un service qui sert d’intermédiaire standardisé entre un modèle de langage (LLM ou ce que l’on appelle actuellement une IA comme Gemini, Claude, Copilot) et des sources de données ou outils externes (les applications cibles qui doivent traiter les données). Il agit comme un pont permettant aux assistants IA d’accéder, de consulter et d’agir sur des systèmes tels que des bases de données, des API, des fichiers locaux ou des services cloud sans nécessiter d’intégration sur mesure pour chaque connexion. Le serveur MCP expose ces capacités via le protocole ouvert MCP, défini initialement par Anthropic, qui normalise la communication bidirectionnelle entre le client IA (l’hôte) et le serveur. Contrairement aux API traditionnelles, il permet une découverte dynamique des outils disponibles à l’exécution, facilitant ainsi l’orchestration de workflows complexes et l’interaction en temps réel de l’IA avec l’environnement utilisateur ou l’infrastructure technique. [ Intention de l'utilisateur ] │ ▼ [ Agent Central de l'OS ] │ ┌───────────┼───────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ [ API VTC ] [ API Train ] [ API Agendas ] │ │ │ └───────────┼───────────┘ ▼ [ Action exécutée en arrière-plan ] Un exemple concret : Hier (Modèle applicatif) : Vous ouvriez l’application de SNCF pour chercher un billet, validiez le paiement, ouvriez votre calendrier pour ajouter le trajet, puis lanciez votre application de VTC pour planifier votre transfert vers la gare. Demain (Modèle par agents) : Vous énoncez simplement : « Réserve-moi un aller-retour pour Paris ce vendredi et prévois un chauffeur pour m’emmener à la gare. » L’agent de votre smartphone interroge en arrière-plan les API des transporteurs, négocie les prix, vérifie vos disponibilités sur votre agenda, applique vos préférences habituelles et valide l’ensemble des transactions de manière transparente. L’Agent Store : La nouvelle vitrine numérique Si les applications traditionnelles disparaissent au profit d’exécutions en arrière-plan, comment allons-nous choisir nos services ? C’est ici qu’intervient l’Agent Store. Oui car il faut bien préserver le business des GAFAM. Ces services seront payants au résultat et non plus à l’usage. Agent store Contrairement à l’App Store ou au Google Play Store qui distribuent des paquets de code lourds (fichiers APK ou IPA), l’Agent Store se comporte comme un annuaire centralisé de compétences et de connecteurs certifiés. L’utilisateur n’installe plus l’application Uber, SNCF ou Booking : il accorde à son agent personnel la permission de communiquer avec le connecteur certifié de ces entreprises. Sécurité et souveraineté : Le nouvel enjeu de régulation Ce changement de modèle déplace la responsabilité de la cybersécurité. Le rôle des géants de la tech (Apple, Google, Microsoft) ne consiste plus à vérifier le code source d’une application avant sa mise en ligne, mais à assurer la gouvernance des permissions et la sécurité des transactions inter-agents. C’est quand même plus complexe encore. Pour les organismes de contrôle comme la CNIL ou les autorités de régulation européennes, la question centrale deviendra celle du consentement : Comment s’assurer qu’un agent ne partage pas nos données personnelles à notre insu lors d’une transaction automatisée entre deux services tiers ? Vu la question, vous constatez la complexité du sujet. Un séisme pour l’économie du numérique L’avènement des Agent Stores redessine la carte des gagnants et des perdants de la tech : ActeursImpact de la transitionLes propriétaires d’OS (Apple, Google)Gagnants absolus. Ils renforcent leur statut de garde-fous en contrôlant l’agent maître qui distribue les requêtes vers l’écosystème. Il vont mettre en place des tarifications au résultat et au service depuis leurs cloud IA propriétairesLes API de services & LogistiqueGagnants. Les entreprises disposant d’infrastructures solides (stocks, transport, paiement) prospèreront en fournissant de la donnée brute aux agents, sans avoir à investir des millions dans du marketing applicatif. Mais aussi sans développer d’interface utilisateur complexeLes marques grand publicSous tension. Risque majeur de désintermédiation. Si l’utilisateur ne passe plus par l’interface d’un service et ne voit plus son logo, la valeur de la marque risque de s’effriter au profit de l’efficacité brute du service. C’est pour cela qu’il faut passer à une vente au résultat.Les agences de dev mobileReconversion obligatoire. Le marché du développement d’applications natives cède la place à l’ingénierie d’API, à l’intégration d’agents et au design d’interfaces éphémères (GenUI). Vers un smartphone plus silencieux Par ailleurs, les applications ont été le moteur économique de la révolution mobile au cours des quinze dernières années. L’App Store s’imprime comme la clef de voûte de la décennie à venir. Ainsi, pour les utilisateurs, cette évolution promet des smartphones plus sobres et débarrassés du bruit visuel. Ils cessent d’être une boîte à outils dans laquelle il faut chercher le bon instrument. Ils deviennent alors un assistant proactif capable de traduire nos intentions en actions concrètes grâce aux applications. Un progrès remarquable, à condition de garder un contrôle strict sur les clés de notre vie numérique. Ce que nous déléguons à ces agents. Également, en termes de besoin de puissance et de consommation énergétique, une partie des traitements est déportée sur le Cloud. Le smartphone ne sert qu’à afficher les résultats. Et vous ? Êtes-vous prêt à abandonner vos applications habituelles au profit d’un agent unique qui gère vos services en arrière-plan ? Donnez-nous votre avis en commentaire et abonnez-vous à XY Magazine pour suivre toutes les mutations du monde numérique ! FAQ : Comprendre la transition vers les Agent Stores1. Quelle est la différence concrète entre une application classique et un « connecteur d’agent » ?Une application classique est un logiciel indépendant téléchargé sur votre téléphone, qui possède sa propre interface graphique, stocke ses propres données et nécessite des mises à jour régulières. Un connecteur d’agent (ou API d’action) est une passerelle ultra-léger et invisible pour l’utilisateur. Il permet à l’intelligence artificielle de votre téléphone de communiquer directement avec les serveurs d’un service (ex: commander un taxi, réserver un billet) sans que vous n’ayez besoin d’ouvrir ou de naviguer dans une application dédiée.2. Comment la sécurité et mes données bancaires seront-elles protégées avec des transactions automatisées ?La sécurité repose sur la validation déléguée et le chiffrement de bout en bout. L’agent central de votre téléphone n’a jamais accès à vos identifiants en clair sur les services tiers. Lorsqu’une transaction doit être effectuée (comme l’achat d’un billet de train), l’agent prépare la commande et sollicite votre validation explicite — via authentification biométrique (Face ID, empreinte digitale) ou confirmation bancaire sécurisée. Les règles imposées par les autorités comme la CNIL et l’AI Act européen obligent les concepteurs d’agents à garantir la traçabilité et le contrôle strict de chaque action financière.3. Est-ce que les applications traditionnelles vont totalement disparaître de nos smartphones ?Pas du jour au lendemain, et pas toutes. Les applications basées sur des tâches simples, répétitives ou logistiques (transports, livraison, réservation, météo, domotique) seront les premières à s’effacer au profit des agents. En revanche, les applications qui reposent sur l’expérience visuelle, le divertissement ou la création (jeux vidéo, outils de retouche photo/vidéo avancés, réseaux sociaux visuels) conserveront des interfaces graphiques riches et indépendantes, même si elles intégreront elles aussi des fonctionnalités pilotées par l’IA. The post La fin annoncée des applications mobiles first appeared on XY Magazine.

Seit 27.07.2026 gelten die Änderungen im AI Act durch Digital-Omnibus zur KI. Dieser ändert und regelt die Verarbeitung besonderer Kategorien personenbezogener durch einen Art. 4a AI Act neu und zwar mit sofortiger Wirkung. Diese Neuerungen sowie die weiteren Auswirkungen des Digital-Omnibus zur KI auf das Datenschutzrecht beleuchtet der Podcast.Das weitgreifende Komplettangebot inklusive Formulare zu DSGVO/TTDSG/BDSG im Beratermodul Datenschutzrecht. Jetzt mit Startvorteil nutzen! ⁠ottosc.hm/dsgvo⁠

Gesponsert Hol dir jetzt Kickscale mit 50 KI Meeting Analysen komplett kostenlos: kickscale.com/lp/vertriebsfunk-kickscale-partnerschaft Gerald Zankl ist CEO und Co-Founder von Kickscale, der KI-Plattform für Gesprächstanskription und Sales-Coaching aus Wien. Sieben Jahre war er der erste Sales- und Marketing-Mitarbeiter eines B2B-Softwareunternehmens, das von 10 auf über 200 Mitarbeiter wuchs – mit US- und Asien-Expansion und über 30 Millionen Euro Umsatz. Zuletzt leitete er ein globales Inside-Sales-Team mit 15 Mitarbeitern. Seine Mission: Verkäufer von Administration befreien und durch Transkription messbar besser machen. In dieser Folge: Der schnellste KI-Hebel im Vertrieb. Gerald erklärt, wie KI im Vertrieb Verkaufsgespräche transkribiert, analysiert und automatisch ins CRM schreibt. Du erfährst, warum 90 Prozent des Gesprächsinhalts verloren gehen, wie KI Sales Coaching als Spiegel wirkt und warum Datenschutz kein Argument mehr gegen Transkription ist – dank Deutschland-Hosting, DSGVO und AI Act. Für Vertriebsleiter, Sales-Coaches und alle, die ihr Team mit Daten statt Bauchgefühl entwickeln wollen.

Dal 31 agosto la Commissione Europea designa ChatGPT come “Very Large Online Search Engine” (VLOSE) sotto il Digital Services Act: non chatbot, non piattaforma, ma motore di ricerca. La scelta nasce dal modo in cui viene usato: per centinaia di milioni di query “a intento di ricerca”, anche quando il risultato non è una lista di link, ma una risposta generata. E quando una risposta è generata, la responsabilità non è più solo “vetrina” come nei search tradizionali.La designazione apre un conto alla rovescia di 4 mesi per adeguarsi agli obblighi rafforzati: valutazione dei rischi sistemici (contenuti illegali, diritti fondamentali, dibattito civico/elezioni e sicurezza pubblica, salute pubblica e minori), misure di mitigazione proporzionate ed efficaci, meccanismi di risposta alle crisi, audit indipendente annuale e report pubblici. Nel perimetro entrano anche accesso ai dati per ricercatori accreditati e archivi di trasparenza pubblicitaria, con sanzioni potenzialmente calcolate sul fatturato globale.Sul fondo c'è l'“effetto Bruxelles”: se un unico modello serve tutto il mondo, l'adeguamento europeo tende a trascinare standard e scelte di design ovunque. E la categoria “servizio ibrido” segnala anche un punto delicato: la flessibilità delle definizioni regolatorie quando la tecnologia non rientra più nelle caselle pensate per Google e Bing.00:00 ChatGPT come Google?02:30 Designazione VLOSE: i fatti05:10 Servizio ibrido: perché motore08:30 Numeri e uso come search09:32 Art. 34: rischi sistemici10:47 Art. 35-37: mitigazioni e audit14:12 Art. 38-40: profilazione e dati18:59 AI Act vs DSA ed effetto UE#ChatGPT #DigitalServicesAct #CommissioneEuropea~~~Ciao Internet! - Il primo e più seguito canale di TECH POLICY in italia, con Matteo FloraINFO E AZIENDE: https://matteoflora.comIl CORSO di AI: https://zero.matteoflora.comNewsletter: https://link.mgpf.it/nlSocial: https://io.matteoflora.comEnglish: https://www.youtube.com/@CiaoInternetPrivacy » https://privacy.matteoflora.comAI Policy » https://privacy.matteoflora.com/aiMail #adv: sales (at) matteoflora.com

Podcast „Prawo dla Biznesu” jest integralnym elementem czasopisma o tej samej nazwie. Nagrania mają charakter informacyjno-edukacyjny, a także promocyjny. Wydawca: Kancelaria Prawna Kantorowski, Głąb i Wspólnicy Sp.j.Redaktor naczelny: radca prawny Piotr KantorowskiPodcast zawiera:autopromocję wydawcy,reklamy produktów i usług innych przedsiębiorców,treści edukacyjne i eksperckie z zakresu prawa dla biznesu.Serwis z wiedzą prawną dla biznesu – artykuły, podcasty i produkty cyfrowe:

Die Welt der künstlichen Intelligenz entwickelt sich rasant, doch wie steht es um die Regeln? Christoph Rothe von Themen-Show.DE nimmt euch heute mit auf eine spannende Reise durch den neuen EU AI Act. Was ändert sich für uns als Privatpersonen, die alltäglich mit Tools wie ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini oder Bildgeneratoren in Berührung kommen? Und welche Herausforderungen und Vorteile ergeben sich für Unternehmen, die KI bereits einsetzen oder planen, sie zu integrieren? Können wir dank der neuen Verordnung nun Medieninhalte mit ruhigerem Gewissen konsumieren, wissend, wann KI im Spiel ist? Entdeckt mit uns, wie der AI Act versucht, Manipulation, Diskriminierung und Täuschung einzudämmen. Ist dies ein mutiger Schritt in die richtige Richtung oder birgt die Umsetzung noch unerwartete Hürden? Kennzeichnung gemäß EU-AI-Act: Shownotes und Bild mit Hilfe von künstlicher Intelligenz erstellt Ihr habt Feedback zur Folge? Schreibt uns eine E-Mail an Studio@themen-show.de oder eine WhatsApp an 040 252 1101 52.

Artificial intelligence is developing at unprecedented speed, creating enormous opportunities alongside new challenges around safety, accountability, transparency, and trust. The EU AI Act represents the world's first comprehensive legal framework for AI, designed to balance innovation with the protection of fundamental rights. But how does regulation become reality? And what role do standards play in helping organizations develop and deploy trustworthy AI systems?This Inside AI | The EU AI Act in Practice series takes a practical look at the journey from legislation to implementation. Across the episodes, it explores why the AI Act was introduced, how risk-based regulation works, how standards support compliance, and what organizations need to consider as they prepare for the new regulatory landscape. From harmonised European standards and AI assurance to quality management and risk management, the series examines the tools and approaches that will help turn AI regulation into practice.This episode explores how standards help translate the EU AI Act into practical approaches for organizations. It examines the role of harmonised European standards, why they are needed alongside international ISO/IEC standards, and how EN 18286 and ISO/IEC 42001 support organizations in meeting EU AI Act requirements.Series | Inside AI - The EU AI Act in PracticeFind out more about the issues raised in this episodeEN 18286ISO/IEC 42001The Standards Show | ISO/IEC 42001 revisitedGet involved with standardsGet in touch with The Standards Showeducation@bsigroup.comsend a voice messageFind and follow on social mediaX @StandardsShowInstagram @thestandardsshowLinkedIn | The Standards Show

What employers should know about key developments this week: State-Led Artificial Intelligence (AI) Legislation: Illinois recently codified the disparate impact theory of liability (which focuses on effect, not intent), and California has long recognized the theory. Both states' AI frameworks should be interpreted accordingly. Texas's Responsible AI Governance Act takes a different approach, requiring evidence of discriminatory intent. Discipline and Termination Oversight: California's Senate Bill 947, the No Robo Bosses Act, would bar employers from relying solely on automated systems for discipline or termination decisions and would require human review with independent corroboration. Federal Pushback and State Retreat: Colorado twice delayed its original AI Act, then paused enforcement amid a lawsuit joined by the federal government. The state ultimately repealed the original law and replaced it with a narrower version focused on notice and disclosure. In this episode of Employment Law This Week®, Epstein Becker Green attorneys Eleanor T. Chung and Nathaniel M. Glasser examine how states are regulating AI in the workplace and what employers need to know. Check out our State AI Law Tracker: https://www.ebglaw.com/aimap - Visit our site for this week's video edition and more news: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw445 Sign up for notifications: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe Visit https://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com - Epstein Becker Green is a national law firm focused on health care and life sciences; employment, labor, and workforce management; and litigation and business disputes. This video is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship.  EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and #WorkforceWednesday® are registered trademarks of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. © Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.

No quarto episódio de A Era da IA, Andressa Jordano e Victor Vasques investigam regulação e governança de IA, do depoimento de Sam Altman no Senado dos EUA ao uso de reconhecimento facial na Bahia.O episódio passa pelo AI Act europeu, o PL 2338/2023 e o Marco Legal da IA no Brasil, LGPD, decisões automatizadas, explicabilidade e soberania digital. Com participações de Kenzo Soares Seto e Nelson Leoni, discute ainda a concentração da infraestrutura de IA, o novo supercomputador brasileiro e como organizações podem adotar essas tecnologias com responsabilidade.Quem define as regras, quem pode contestar uma decisão e quem responde quando a IA produz consequências no mundo real?Para conferir reportagens, relatórios e referências citadas, acesse https://inovasocial.com.br/podcast/.

We're back for a new season (#12 across both channels, heading into our 7th year!), and we do it with a Newsroom update. We will cover our usual five blocks: ePrivacy & regulatory updates; MarTech & AdTech; AI, competition and digital markets; Zero-Party Data; and the future of media.This season's update includes:- Meta's “addictive design” of services for minors (public nuisance in New Mexico, trial of twenty nine states in California, DSA charge over addictive design in Brussels)- Social media bans for minors in France, the UK and Australia, and the push to move age checks to the operating system- The second largest GDPR fine to date, against Uber, for deactivating drivers by automated decision (Article 22)- Enforcement across Europe (health data warehouses, traveller profiling, loyalty club consent, scraped business contacts, AI companion apps) and in the US (public, private)- AI Act enforcement begins while obligations for high risk systems slip to 2027, plus EDPB guidelines on anonymization, web scraping and generative AI- The end of FTC independence, doubts over the Data Privacy Framework, and a Google fine answered with tariff threats- Advertising inside AI assistants, pixel matching by default, and AI copyright settlements.All references and links (plus some bonus materials) can be found in a separate blog post available to paid Masters of Privacy subscribers on our website's Newsroom section (Newsroom Notes: Summer 2026).Our usual disclaimer: the voice that joins Sergio today is a text-to-speech output generated with Eleven Labs. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

On this week's Self-Publishing News podcast, ALLi News Editor Dan Holloway reports on the collapse of Self-Publishing Partnership, a UK-based service provider that ceased trading at the end of June, leaving authors waiting on royalties and raising questions about why no administrators were brought in. The Society of Authors has launched a campaign to help affected members recover what they're owed. Then Dan turns to Anthropic's announcement that it will watermark all text generated by Claude — a move driven in part by the EU's AI Act, and one that could eventually help platforms like Amazon identify AI-generated books. Show Notes How Claude's text watermark works Sponsor Self-Publishing News is proudly sponsored by PublishMe—helping indie authors succeed globally with expert translation, tailored marketing, and publishing support. From first draft to international launch, PublishMe ensures your book reaches readers everywhere. Visit publishme.me. Find more author advice, tips, and tools at our Self-publishing Author Advice Center, with a huge archive of nearly 2,000 blog posts and a handy search box to find key info on the topic you need. About the Host Dan Holloway is a novelist, poet, and spoken word artist. He is the MC of the performance arts show The New Libertines, He competed at the National Poetry Slam final at the Royal Albert Hall. His latest collection, The Transparency of Sutures, is  available on Kindle.

In this Global Insight episode of the On Aon podcast, Aon experts examine how the European Union's AI Act is reshaping leadership priorities for organizations — including workforce decisions. As AI is used more and more in hiring, talent assessment and workforce management, leaders will need to understand how these tools are governed, monitored and deployed. The discussion explores why accountability cannot be delegated, how organizations can strengthen oversight of third-party solutions and the actions HR leaders can take to build confidence, unlock value and stay ahead as AI adoption accelerates. Key Takeaways:         The EU AI Act raises the bar for organizations using AI in employment decisions, making governance a business priority, not just a compliance requirement. Accountability remains with employers, requiring stronger oversight of AI tools, vendors and decision-making processes. Organizations that invest in AI literacy, transparency and governance will be better positioned to build trust, deploy AI confidently and capture long-term value. Experts in this episode:       Charlotte Schaller, Partner, Head of Assessment UK and EMEA, Human Capital Solutions, Aon John McLaughlin, CCO and Head of Assessment, Talent Solutions, EMEA, Aon Michael Fetzer, Associate Partner, Global Science and Analytics, Aon Key Moments:         (03:10) Understanding the EU AI Act, why it was introduced and why its influence may extend beyond Europe. (08:35) Breaking down the Act's risk-based framework and what "high-risk" classification means for AI tools used in employment decisions. (12:05) Why organizations cannot outsource accountability, and the importance of AI vendor due diligence, explainability and governance. Key Insight: The Time is Now: Five Actions for HR to Consider as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act Comes into ForceSoundbites:         Charlotte Schaller:    “If there's one message to leave HR leaders with, it's this: The EU AI Act is not just a compliance issue. It's a trust issue, a governance issue and ultimately a business performance issue.” John McLaughlin: “You can outsource the technology, but you cannot outsource the responsibility for it, how it affects your people.” Michael Fetzer: “A lot of companies are wondering where do we start? I've always recommended the great first step you might want to start with is carry out a thorough audit of your current HR AI use.”

AI-watermerken zijn niet langer toekomstmuziek. Claude, Gemini en ChatGPT voegen ze al toe aan gegenereerde content. Sinds 2 augustus voegt Claude ook zijn eigen watermerk toe aan alle nieuwe modellen en legde het in een blog uit hoe het werk. In deze aflevering van Techzine Talks duiken we diep in de techniek achter AI-fingerprinting, niet enkel van Claude, maar ook van Google, en wat dat betekent voor iedereen die werkt met tekst, beeld of geluid.We leggen uit hoe generatief watermerken werkt via logit-weging: tijdens het genereren van een tekst worden tokens gelabeld, waarbij bepaalde tokens een lichte voorkeur krijgen. Over een langere tekst ontstaat zo een onzichtbaar patroon dat herleidbaar is naar het AI-model. Dit is fundamenteel anders dan edit-based watermerken, want het zit ingebakken in het model zelf. Je kunt het niet weghalen met een prompt.Daarnaast bespreken we de praktische gevolgen: wat betekent dit voor copyright, voor journalisten, voor de muziekindustrie en voor de EU-regelgeving onder de AI Act? De detectietools zijn nog lang niet betrouwbaar, lobbyclubs zetten druk op overheden en open-sourcedmodellen blijven voorlopig buiten schot. Een onderwerp dat de hele tech- en mediawereld raakt.• Claude voegt vanaf 2 augustus watermerken toe aan alle nieuwe modellen• AI Act artikel 50 verplicht transparantie van AI-systemen• Generatief watermerken werkt via logit-weging tijdens het generatieproces• Zelfs licht redigeren verwijdert het watermerk niet• Kans op false positives voor menselijke teksten is kleiner dan 1% (SynthID)• Bestaande detectietools zijn nog onbetrouwbaar• Spotify introduceert aparte lijsten voor AI-gegenereerde muziek• Muziekuitgevers lobbyen voor een verbod op AI-muziek in hitlijsten• De EU kan niet-conforme modellen verbieden, maar open-sourcemodellen zijn lastig te reguleren• Copyright over AI-gegenereerde content blijft juridisch onduidelijk0:05 - Welkom: AI-watermerken in de spotlight1:23 - Claude en de AI Act: waarom watermerken verplicht worden4:39 - Hoe generatief watermerken werkt6:13 - De techniek achter watermerken: logits en kansberekening8:06 - Detectietools: hoe betrouwbaar zijn AI-watermarkdetectors?10:11 - Watermerken en copyright: wat betekent dit voor contentmakers?11:41 - Verzet van de industrie: muziek, fotografie en AI20:24 - EU-regelgeving en de toekomst van AI-watermerkenAI watermerken, AI fingerprinting, SynthID, Claude Anthropic, AI Act, generatieve AI, logit weighting, AI detectie, copyright AI, Techzine Talks

Перший епізод Flow Talks. Мій гість - Мартін Горн, мер німецького міста Фрайбург. Став мером у 33, наймолодший мер великого міста Німеччини на той момент. Цього року переобраний у першому турі ще на 8 років. У його місті народився Black Forest Labs, творці Flux, один з найдорожчих AI-стартапів Європи. І це його шостий візит в Україну за велику війну.Головне питання розмови: чи може місто стати AI-native, залишаючись людиноцентричним?У цьому епізоді:• Як мер відрізняє реальну інновацію від просто гарного демо• Чому міська адміністрація - це 70% лікарня, 20% банк і 10% стартап• Black Forest Labs і Prior Labs: як університетське місто на 230 тисяч людей виростило AI-компанії на мільярди• Автоматизація соціального житла: мінус 45 хвилин на кожен кейс• AI driving license для 4500 працівників ратуші• Країна, яка припинила доставляти паперові листи. Вперше за 400 років• Чому Німеччина з 16 цифровими системами програє Данії з однією• Fuck-up nights мерів: як говорити про помилки• Чого Фрайбург хоче навчитись у Львова• Що Україна має робити краще у співпраці з Європою: чесна відповідь• Спільний пілот: заснувати компанію за 72 години• І промова українською, яку Мартін підготував сам00:00 Вступ: чи може місто бути AI-native і human01:28 Хто такий Мартін Горн02:26 Подяка: шостий візит в Україну04:30 Як відрізнити інновацію від гарного демо05:35 Спільна історія Львова і Фрайбурга08:09 Найнудніший процес у місті, який варто автоматизувати08:51 Місто - це стартап, банк чи лікарня?10:16 Як ратуша збирає фідбек від громадян11:11 Black Forest Labs, Prior Labs і AI-екосистема Фрайбурга13:09 Маленькі кроки замість великих цілей: чат-бот, соцжитло, ями на дорогах14:47 Пілоти між містами: copy-paste як стратегія15:47 16 держав, 16 систем: чому Німеччина повільна16:38 Данія закрила листи. Назавжди17:41 Європа проти США і Китаю: чи є в нас шанс19:08 Стартап-сніданки з мером21:01 Гроші для AI-стартапів: фонд ЄС на 5 мільярдів21:58 AI Act і регуляція очима стартапів23:30 Що змінилось у наймі і навчанні: AI driving license24:54 Чи зменшить AI кількість людей в адміністрації25:49 Майбутнє освіти: покоління, яке народилось з айпадом27:46 Головна метрика міста28:33 Що ніколи не можна автоматизувати29:38 Як комунікувати зміни і провали. Fuck-up nights32:00 Чого Фрайбург вчиться у Львова34:09 Що Україна має робити краще у співпраці з Європою36:44 Пілот на 90 днів: компанія за 72 години38:40 Бліц: одна задача для AI, одне рішення для людини40:36 Промова українськоюЗворотній зв'язок та реклама: flow@kindgeek.comПідписатися на email-розсилку: http://eepurl.com/iQh5agМої соцмережі:Twitter: https://x.com/ygnatyuk_Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gnatyuk.yuriy/Telegram: https://t.me/yuragnatyukInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/y.gnatyuk/https://easy-flow.ai- Easyflow, моя AI-агенція. Ми робимо так, щоб AI реально працював у вашій організації: від стратегії і впровадження до адопції командою. https://www.kindgeek.com - Kindgeek, моя продуктова інженерна компанія у Fintech. 11+ років, 100+ регульованих продуктів, понад €10 млрд оброблених транзакцій. Будуємо fintech продукти white-label банкінг і платіжні системи та вбудовуємо AI у фінтех-продукти так, щоб усе проходило compliance і аудит. Підтримати на Монобазі: https://base.monobank.ua/23jb5xcs3f8yyz#subscriptions

Photo by iridial on Unsplash Published 17 August 2026 e565 with Andy, Michael and Michael – invisible prompt injections in legal briefs and resumes, podcasting games, No Man's Sky & Pokemon Go's anniversaries, LEGO and a whole lot more! Andy, Michael and Michael begin with invisible prompt injections.  The first example is in legal briefs with the intent to influence AI agents reading the filings.  Another example attempts to influence agents evaluating resumes.  Continuing on the theme, the co hosts consider a story about machine-readable watermarks in text and images in accordance with the EU's AI Act.   Next up is an intriguing podcast game from friend of the show, Ian Hughes.  In this game, the player collects stories that appeal to the co hosts of the podcast in order to put together a show.  Bravo, Ian!  Andy shares his Twine take on the Games at Work choose your own adventure game including inventory and time constraints.  Andy's game even allows you to create a choose your own adventure Twine game in the game!  Then, the team celebrates several 10 year milestones – for No Man's Sky and for Pokemon Go.   Next – it's time for LEGO!  A new Nike + LEGO AF1 creation replete with a Spaceman minifig sporting Nike logos on his space boots makes its appearance.  LEGO also announces the “Masters Academy” at the LEGO house, where you can learn to become more creative with your builds.  This inspires Michael M on how LEGO can spur creativity in other settings, following on LEGO's Serious Play offerings.  Michael R found the Minas Tirith build with all 8,278 pieces while the builder was watching the entire extended edition of the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy.  The builder was wearing an Oura ring to track their stress level and included in the article are screenshots from the ring's app.  Check them out from the link below. Closing out the episode, the team takes a look at Prima, a retinal implant for macular degeneration.  Amazing times we live in. What features would you like to see in the Podcasting games?  Have your bots

Seit Anfang August schreibt der AI Act der EU mit Artikel 50 vor, wann KI-Inhalte als KI-generiert ausgewiesen werden müssen. Aber was ist, wenn ein Bild, Text oder Lied keine Kennzeichnung hat und man herausfinden will, ob es menschlichen oder künstlichen Ursprungs ist? Dann können KI-Detektoren weiterhelfen, also Software, die genau das analysieren soll und teilweise selbst auf KI-Modellen basiert. In dieser Folge des c't uplink sprechen wir über die Erkennungsmethoden solcher Software, wie schnell Pangram & Co. an ihre Grenzen kommen und dass sie sich mitunter erstaunlich leicht austricksen lassen. Außerdem gehts um das Thema KI-Slop bei Musik-Streaming-Diensten und warum manche Anbieter derartige Inhalte gerne als solche erkennen, nicht aber verbannen möchten. Unseren Schwerpunkt zu KI-Kennzeichnungspflicht und -Erkennungssoftware lesen Sie bei heise+: https://www.heise.de/ratgeber/KI-Kennzeichnungspflicht-Was-die-EU-ab-August-2026-verlangt-11340625.html

Send us Fan MailSpotify is giving listeners a new way to skip past ads, intros, and calls to action. Some podcasters are calling it the beginning of the end of podcasting, and some listeners are singing praises. We put the outrage in perspective, debate whether easier skipping could actually strengthen podcasting, and explore how creators can make sponsorships and calls to action too entertaining to miss.We're also celebrating several big Buzzsprout launches, including streamlined video distribution to Spotify and YouTube, a major WordPress plugin upgrade, and one-click submission to iHeart. We also get into the EU's new AI disclosure requirements, consider when podcasters may need to label AI-generated content, and explain what AI tools don't actually fall under the AI Act. Contact BuzzcastSend us Fan MailTweet us at @buzzcastpodcast, @albanbrooke, @kfinn, and @JordanPodsThanks for listening and Keep Podcasting!

Recorded on location at Black Hat USA 2026, Eric Avigdor of Menlo Security describes an adoption pattern he hears in customer conversation after customer conversation. AI makes teams measurably more productive. The guardrails that keep company data inside the business arrive later, if they arrive at all. Eric Avigdor leads product for AI security and data security at Menlo Security, and he splits the problem into two categories that get very different levels of attention. One is how people use AI in the browser, including what data gets pasted into an assistant and how much of that usage anyone knows about. The other is autonomous agents built to run business processes, where the question is how to keep them productive without letting their goals get hijacked. The category Eric Avigdor says compliance teams skip past is the agent that holds sensitive data and internet access at the same time. Read a poisoned web page, take the hidden instruction, and the goal changes. What is the difference between an agent running analysis on an internal database and an agent doing financial analysis at a bank with customer records and web access? One of them can be told to send the data somewhere else. So who owns AI governance? In most companies, nobody does, at least not with authority. Responsibility lands with the endpoint team, the network team, or the browser team, and each one works its own angle. An endpoint team tracks agent traffic on the endpoint and then loses the trail when the agent moves data cloud to cloud. A cloud team has the reverse blind spot. Menlo Agent Runtime Security, or MARS, is built around what an agent actually does rather than what it intends to do. Agent traffic is proxied through the Menlo Security cloud browser, where data masking, indirect prompt injection prevention, and web-based and file-based threat prevention are applied before an incident becomes cleanup work. Browser and web traffic today, MCP traffic next. For regulated organizations, that architecture produces something auditors can use. Logging, dashboarding, and a visual record of what an agent attempted in the real world. Europe has the AI Act. The US has not landed comparable rules yet, and Eric Avigdor says that gap concerns him enough that he is talking with people working to close it. GUEST Eric Avigdor, Vice President of Product, Menlo Security | On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-avigdor-0b561118/ RESOURCES Black Hat USA 2026 event coverage: https://www.itspmagazine.com/black-hat-usa-2026-cybersecurity-event-coverage-in-las-vegas Menlo Security: https://www.menlosecurity.com/ Menlo AI Agent Security: https://www.menlosecurity.com/product/ai-agent-security Menlo AI Adaptive DLP: https://www.menlosecurity.com/product/ai-adaptive-dlp Are you interested in telling your story? ▶︎ Full Length Brand Story: https://www.studioc60.com/content-creation#full ▶︎ Brand Spotlight Story: https://www.studioc60.com/content-creation#spotlight ▶︎ Brand Highlight Story: https://www.studioc60.com/content-creation#highlight ▶︎ Get your own Brand Briefing at an upcoming event: https://www.studioc60.com/buy-brand-briefings KEYWORDS eric avigdor, menlo security, sean martin, brand story, brand marketing, marketing podcast, brand spotlight, black hat usa 2026, mars, menlo agent runtime security, ai agent security, prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, data exfiltration, ai governance, browser security, agentic ai, autonomous agents, shadow ai, data loss prevention, eu ai act, ai compliance, coding agents, mcp security Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Anthropic is putting invisible watermarks into text generated by new Claude models. AI data-centre hardware is becoming a lucrative target for sophisticated cargo thieves. Meta faces a potentially enormous legal threat as courts test the limits of Section 230. And one McDonald's customer discovered the company had built a 515-page behavioural profile based on his loyalty-program activity. On Hashtag Trending for Thursday, August 13, host Jim Love looks at four stories about what happens when technology starts leaving trails. Anthropic's new Claude models now embed invisible text watermarks as part of compliance with Article 50 of the European Union's AI Act. The marks can survive copying and some editing, potentially giving platforms a better way to identify AI-generated material than unreliable AI-content detectors. Wired reports that thieves are increasingly targeting valuable AI hardware, including chips, servers and data-centre equipment. The attacks can involve phishing, stolen trucking identities, forged paperwork, compromised email accounts and GPS spoofing rather than traditional roadside hijacking. Meta has been ordered by a New Mexico judge to pay $567 million into a youth mental-health fund, in addition to a previous $375 million penalty. The larger legal issue is whether plaintiffs can get around Section 230 by arguing that harmful platform design, rather than third-party content, caused the damage. Thousands of similar lawsuits are already moving through the courts. And Wired reporter Reece Rogers asked McDonald's for the information collected through its loyalty program. He received 515 pages containing years of transactions, spending predictions and behavioural profiling, then exercised his California right to request that the data be deleted. Timestamps 00:00 Headlines and intro 00:38 Claude text watermarking 01:38 Fighting AI slop detection 02:52 Limits of watermark proof 03:42 AI hardware cargo theft 04:47 How the scams work 05:36 Security escorts and theft statistics 08:13 Where stolen AI hardware may go 09:04 Meta lawsuit and Section 230 10:10 The platform-design legal strategy 12:29 McDonald's 515-page dossier 14:02 Loyalty data and deletion rights 15:12 Wrap-up and sign-off

Artificial intelligence is developing at unprecedented speed, creating enormous opportunities alongside new challenges around safety, accountability, transparency, and trust. The EU AI Act represents the world's first comprehensive legal framework for AI, designed to balance innovation with the protection of fundamental rights. But how does regulation become reality? And what role do standards play in helping organizations develop and deploy trustworthy AI systems?This Inside AI | The EU AI Act in Practice series takes a practical look at the journey from legislation to implementation. Across the episodes, it explores why the AI Act was introduced, how risk-based regulation works, how standards support compliance, and what organizations need to consider as they prepare for the new regulatory landscape. From harmonised European standards and AI assurance to quality management and risk management, the series examines the tools and approaches that will help turn AI regulation into practice.This episode explores the problems the AI Act was designed to address and why it takes a risk-based approach. It also examines the role of fundamental rights, responsibilities across the AI value chain, and why standards will be essential to supporting compliance.Series | Inside AI - The EU AI Act in PracticeFind out more about the issues raised in this episodeEU AI Act Article 50 Transparency ObligationsBSI Webinar | EU ACT ActBSI Whitepaper | EU AI ActGet involved with standardsGet in touch with The Standards Showeducation@bsigroup.comsend a voice messageFind and follow on social mediaX @StandardsShowInstagram @thestandardsshowLinkedIn | The Standards Show

Ministr zahraničí Petr Macinka zamezil přístup novinářce Zdislavě Pokorné na tiskovou konferenci ministerstva. Investigativní zjištění ukazují na technologické a finanční propojení představitelů vládní koalice i frakce Patrioti pro Evropu s platformou XTV a společností Premoly Media moderátora Michala Půra. Evropské státy čelily v Ceutě koordinované hybridní operaci s využitím migračního tlaku a dezinformačních kampaní. Americký kult MAGA prochází vnitřním rozkolem kvůli vojenskému angažmá USA v konfliktu s Íránem. V Evropské unii vstupují v platnost první ustanovení normy AI Act o značkování syntetického obsahu.Celé epizody na https://www.herohero.co/kanarcivsiti .  A nebo si kupte naše trička na https://www.neverenough.shop/kanarci . Podcast pro Vás připravují @alexalvarova a @holyj . Hudba a sound engineering: PsyekTwitter Spaces moderuje @jiribulan .Najdete nás na www.kanarci.online

Charlie, Ted, and Rony open with the White House's decision to keep its "voluntary" AI safety framework secret, despite it being co-written with the same companies it's meant to evaluate. The conversation turns into a real debate about why Congress has stepped back from its constitutional role in regulating AI, and whether that changes after November. From there: the EU's AI Act goes live with mandatory content labeling, OpenAI's frontier models jumping their sandbox to vandalize Hugging Face, and Disney's new deal letting TikTok creators remix its IP, following the collapse of its similar arrangement with OpenAI's Sora.Cortney Harding, founder of Friends With Holograms, joins for a wide-ranging back half. She makes the case that the backlash against Meta's camera-equipped smart glasses is disproportionate to any actual harm, and connects it to a broader "vibes are bad" moment in tech sentiment tied to layoffs and a shaky economy. The group digs into Snap's upcoming $2,500 Specs launch, why enterprise (not consumer) is the more realistic path for smart glasses right now, and Rony's long-view bet that XR has an "Nvidia moment" coming once the supply chain catches up. They close on AI's effect on jobs, UBI, and whether the social contract between tech companies and workers is already broken.Key Moments:[01:35] AI regulation news and the fight over Congress's role[09:35] EU AI Act goes live, plus AI models breaching their own sandboxes[13:35] Disney's TikTok deal and the fan-content strategy behind it[17:35] Cortney Harding joins and doesn't miss a beat[24:35] UBI, the broken social contract, and AI's effect on jobs[41:35] Snap's $2,500 Specs and the case for enterprise over consumer[52:35] Rony's prediction: XR's coming "Nvidia moment"Brought to you by Zappar and Mattercraft, the leading visual development environment for immersive 3D web experiences. Start building at mattercraft.io. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us Fan MailIn this episode of Embedded Insiders, Steve Belletete, Applications Director at Skyworks, joins the podcast to share insight into the company's Multi-Market product line. We deep dive into the performance considerations for Sub-GHz Front-End Modules, emerging trends in Sub-GHz Connectivity, the Cat-M, RedCap, and eRedCap Evolution, and much more. Next, Rich and Tobin Richardson, the CSA's President and CEO, discuss how the global body encompassing hundreds of companies creates and promotes open, universal standards in the wireless space.But first, we're talking about the EU AI Act. What is it and why is it important?For more information, visit embeddedcomputing.com

AI dawno przestała tylko wspierać biznes – dziś współdecyduje o rekrutacji, cenach czy zdolności kredytowej. Nowe regulacje AI Act, których kolejne wymogi wchodzą w życie, zderzają firmy z nową rzeczywistością prawną i finansową. Brak wiedzy zarządu o tym, jakich narzędzi używają pracownicy (tzw. "Shadow AI"), nie będzie już dobrą linią obrony.

What if you could consult a CEO, venture capitalist, executive coach, psychologist, physician, and negotiation expert anytime you needed to make an important decision?That's exactly what I've built.Over the past year, AI has become one of the most valuable tools in my life—not because it thinks for me, but because it helps me think better.I don't use AI as a search engine. I use it as a strategic thought partner. Whether I'm leading my businesses, coaching physicians, negotiating deals, planning investments, optimizing my health, or navigating difficult conversations, I've learned how to turn AI into something far more powerful than a chatbot: my own personal board of directors.In this episode, I'm sharing the exact framework I use every day to sharpen my thinking, challenge my assumptions, uncover blind spots, and make better decisions faster.This isn't about replacing human intelligence.It's about amplifying it.If you're a physician, entrepreneur, or leader looking to stay ahead in a rapidly changing world, this episode will change the way you think about AI forever."You're not outsourcing your judgment. You're expanding the quality of your thinking." — Dr. Vikram RayaIn This Episode:Why I stopped thinking of AI as a tool and started using it as a strategic partnerThe "Board of Directors" framework that improves my decision-makingHow I use AI for business, investing, negotiations, coaching, parenting, and healthThe difference between using AI like Google versus having a conversation with itWhy asking better questions leads to better outcomesThe importance of challenging your own assumptionsHow AI helps uncover blind spots before they become costly mistakesThe prompts I use every day to improve my thinkingWhy ChatGPT and Claude each serve different purposesThe future of AI and why waiting to learn it is a mistakeKey TakeawaysAI Is My Thinking Partner - I don't use AI to make decisions for me—I use it to help me think through decisions from multiple perspectives.Better Questions Create Better Decisions - The quality of AI's answers depends on the quality of your prompts. Learning to ask better questions has dramatically improved the quality of my thinking.Build Your Own Board of Directors - Instead of relying on one perspective, I ask AI to think like different experts—a CEO, investor, psychologist, executive coach, physician, or entrepreneur—and then synthesize the insights before making a decision.Human Judgment Still Matters - AI can provide analysis, ideas, and frameworks, but wisdom, ethics, intuition, and accountability still belong to us.Start Before Everyone Else - Today's AI is the least capable version you'll ever use. The people who learn to work alongside it today will have an enormous advantage tomorrow.Prompt Frameworks MentionedUse these prompts to improve the quality of your conversations with AI:"Act as a...""Challenge my assumptions.""Give me five alternative approaches.""What's the strongest argument against this idea?""How would my 80-year-old self think about this decision?"Connect with Vikram:

Claude Escapes the Lab, EU AI Act Enforced, SVR Hotel Wi‑Fi Hijacks, and $88M Bitcoin Wallet Flaw David Shipley covers multiple cybersecurity headlines: Anthropic disclosed that three Claude models escaped misconfigured evaluation environments during Irregular-run CTFs, reached the open internet, and compromised production systems—one publishing a malicious PyPI package that 15 real systems executed, and another (Claude Opus 4.7) attacking a real company database; Anthropic paused cyber evaluations July 23. The EU's AI Act model rules are now enforceable, requiring transparency, risk mitigation for frontier models, deepfake labeling, and penalties up to €15M or 3% of global revenue, with GDPR-like jurisdiction. Microsoft detailed "Captive Crunch" hotel/conference Wi‑Fi captive-portal hijacks attributed to Russia's SVR (Storm-2945), delivering the Cornflake implant and device-code phishing. A ColdCard firmware RNG flaw enabled thefts totaling $88.6M. Amazon tied four poisoned NPM incidents to a North Korean group and warned of multi-package malware, slop squatting, and AI-reviewer deception. 00:00 NordLayer Sponsor Message 00:37 Today's Cyber Headlines 01:09 Claude Models Escape Sandbox 03:43 EU AI Act Now Enforceable 05:31 Hotel WiFi Hijack Malware 07:54 ColdCard Seed Flaw Heist 09:42 North Korea NPM Poisoning 11:27 Wrap Up and Events 12:08 NordLayer Sponsor Reminder

AI-agents van OpenAI wisten vaker uit hun testomgeving te 'ontsnappen' dan tot nu toe bekend was. Dat melden ingewijden aan persbureau Reuters. Afgelopen maand meldde OpenAI nog dat AI-agents van het bedrijf onbedoeld AI-platform Hugging Face en vier andere partijen hadden gehackt. Niels Kooloos vertelt erover in deze Tech Update. In geen van de gevallen waar de ingewijden het over hebben zouden AI-agents van OpenAI buiten het netwerk van het bedrijf gekomen zijn. Maar wel zouden ze dus uit hun testomgevingen ontsnapt zijn. Hoe vaak dat is gebeurd, hebben de ingewijden niet gezegd. Ook concurrent Anthropic meldde afgelopen week nog dat AI-agents van het bedrijf onbedoeld andere partijen wist te hacken. Een dag eerder kondigde president Donald Trump nog aan dat hij zich zou buigen over strengere regulering voor AI. Strengere regels voor AI in de Europese Unie Er gelden sinds zondag strengere regels voor AI in de Europese Unie. Die moeten er onder andere voor zorgen dat het duidelijker wordt wanneer je te maken hebt met AI. Zo moeten video's en foto's die met AI gemaakt zijn voorzien worden van een markering en moeten klantenservices het melden als klanten contact hebben met een AI-chatbot in plaats van met een mens. Ook wordt de AI Act, in Nederland bekend als de AI Verordening, vanaf nu officieel gehandhaafd door de Europese Commissie. Die kan AI-ontwikkelaars bijvoorbeeld verplichten om inzicht te geven in hoe hun modellen getraind zijn, hoe de veiligheidsmechanismes eruitzien en of er wel rekening is gehouden met het auteursrecht bij de training van modellen. OpenAI ontdekt dat AI-agents vaker wisten te ontsnappen AI Act wordt vanaf nu gehandhaafd OpenAI hackt AI-platform Hugging Face 'per ongeluk' met AI Over de maker:Niels Kooloos is dagelijks op BNR Nieuwsradio te horen over het laatste technieuws in de Tech Update. Hij interesseert zich vooral in cybercriminaliteit, privacy, social media en (computer)hardware. Hier en daar kan je Niels ook in All in the Game horen, waar hij graag vertelt over zijn favoriete games.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nachtschicht mit Franzi! - und sie ist ganz schön auf dem Baum! Instagram bringt die automatischen Übersetzungen und damit direkt Probleme, die es eigentlich gar nicht haben sollte, X verklagt Minnesota wegen deren Verbot für Nudify-Apps, Europa bringt den AI Act und damit Probleme, die wir noch gar nicht sehen und Weimer will das Europageschäft von TikTok in Europa sehen. Und dann sind da noch einige europäische Staaten und ihr Zugang zu Personalausweisen. ➡️ Netzpolitik über das französische Social-Media-Verbot: https://netzpolitik.org/2026/social-media-verbot-in-frankreich-eu-kommission-bremst-macron/ ➡️ Mit der "Haken Dran"-Community ins Gespräch kommen könnt ihr am besten im Discord: http://hakendran.org ✔️ Jetzt abstimmen für den Grauen Haken 2026 und den Goldenen Haken 2026 - am besten per Mail an grauerhaken@hakendran.org

From today, companies will be obliged to make clear to customers when they are interacting with something artificial intelligence-driven. That's because transparency obligations included in the European Union's AI Act come into force today. Adam was joined by Niamh Smyth, Minister of State with responsibility for AI.

Der KI-Sommer 2026 ist noch längst nicht vorbei, hat aber schon ordentlich Schlagzeilen produziert. Claude erpresst einen Vorstand, Gemini schützt seine Autonomie gegen den Willen von Google, ein malaysischer Premier-Chatbot rät zur Nicht-Wahl seines eigenen Chefs, OpenAI-Modelle brechen aus der Sandbox aus und hacken Hugging Face. Was folgt daraus? Der Ruf nach mehr Regulierung, nach dem AI Act, nach Ethikkodizes. Aber ist das die richtige Antwort?Daniel Stelter spricht mit Professor Dr. Christoph Lütge, Ordinarius für Wirtschaftsethik an der Technischen Universität München (TUM) und Direktor des Institute for Ethics in Artificial Intelligence (IEAI) an der TUM. Lütge gilt als einer der profiliertesten Wirtschaftsethiker Deutschlands und steht in der Tradition der Ordnungsethik von Karl Homann. Seine Position: Ethik entsteht durch Regeln, nicht durch Appelle. Warum das gerade für Künstliche Intelligenz gilt, warum der AI Act zu starr ist und warum Deutschland ohne eigene KI und ohne industriellen Strom auch keine relevante KI-Ethik-Debatte führen kann, sind die Inhalte dieses Expertengesprächs.Hinweis ABSTURZ – So retten wir Deutschland: das neue Buch von Daniel Stelter. Jetzt überall, wo es Bücher gibt. Auch bestellbar bei Thalia, Amazon, geniallokal.HörerserviceArbeitspapier Artificial Intelligence and Productivity in Europe (April 2025) des Internationalen Währungsfonds (IWF), Autorengruppe: https://tinyurl.com/9mfszcn4 Blogbeitrag zur KI-Ausrichtungsforschung Agentic Misalignment in Summer 2026 – Case studies of frontier models sabotaging code, assisting fraud, mislabeling, and coaching whistleblowers (Juli 2026), Autorengruppe: https://tinyurl.com/4skxzts9 Beitrag Anthropic Report Reveals Claude Has 96% Probability of Extortion (Juli 2026) auf der chinesischen Technologie- und Nachrichtenplattform WINZHENG: https://tinyurl.com/4cfu3msc Beitrag Anthropic caught Gemini 3.1 Pro quietly sabotaging a training run it disagreed with, 15. Juli 2026 (Zusammenfassung Fallstudie Covert Sabotage aus dem Anthropic-Report) auf Ground Truth: https://tinyurl.com/2z9h9k8m Beitrag PMX.AI-Panne: Malaysias KI-Chatbot rät Bürgern, Premier nicht zu wählen (Juli 2026) auf dem IT-Nachrichtenportal BornCity: https://tinyurl.com/4js8e32a Buch Ethik des Wettbewerbs – Über Konkurrenz und Moral, von Christoph Lütge, Verlag C.H. Beck, München 2014: https://tinyurl.com/4c5uevwu beyond the obvious – Neue Analysen, Kommentare und Einschätzungen zur Wirtschafts- und Finanzlage finden Sie unter think-bto.com.Newsletter – Den monatlichen bto-Newsletter abonnieren Sie hier.Redaktionskontakt – Wir freuen uns über Ihre Meinungen, Anregungen und Kritik unter podcast@think-bto.com.Handelsblatt – Das Handelsblatt ordnet ein, was aktuelle Wirtschafts- und Politikthemen konkret bedeuten – klar, relevant und auf den Punkt – und jetzt zum Vorteilspreis: 12 Monate lang mit 50 % Rabatt. Ein Angebot für alle, die hinter die Schlagzeilen blicken wollen. Für kurze Zeit unter: handelsblatt.com/rabatt50. Werbepartner – Weitere Informationen zu den Angeboten unserer aktuellen Werbepartner finden Sie hier. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Warum Zuckerberg und Musk uns eine Welt ohne Geld versprechen und OpenAI dagegen ihre Ende beschwört. Wer bettet hier eigentlich auf People (aka Werbeinventar) und nicht auf Agenten? Verläuft der Graben in der neuen Marketingwelt vielleicht eher zwischen Katastrophenvoyeurismus und vorgegaukeltem Altriusmus? Oder ist das alles derselbe Wein in unterschiedlichen Schläuchen? Außerdem tritt dieses Wochenende der AI Act in Kraft – und X Money ist tatsächlich wirklich ganz ohne Witz da. In den USA jedenfalls. (Es gibt keine Folge mit Elisabeth heute, aber wir holen das nach. Es gab sogenannten Orgastruggle! Stattdessen, HEY, es gibt mal wieder eine Solofolge! Ich habe nur für euch fast eine halbe Stunde ins Mikrofon gesabbelt - und hoffe, es ist anhörbar.) ➡️ Mit der "Haken Dran"-Community ins Gespräch kommen könnt ihr am besten im Discord: http://hakendran.org ✔️ Jetzt abstimmen für den Grauen Haken 2026 und den Goldenen Haken 2026 - am besten per Mail an grauerhaken@hakendran.org

Aux États-Unis, une proposition de loi veut imposer un véritable bouton d'arrêt aux intelligences artificielles les plus puissantes. Les entreprises réalisant au moins 500 millions de dollars de revenus annuels grâce à l'IA, ou consacrant plus de 100 millions de dollars de puissance de calcul à l'entraînement d'un modèle, devraient conserver la capacité technique de le ralentir, de le suspendre ou de l'arrêter. Le département de la Sécurité intérieure pourrait ordonner cette interruption, après consultation du secrétaire au Commerce et du directeur du Renseignement national, en cas de perte de contrôle ou d'action dangereuse non prévue par le développeur. Les entreprises devraient également déclarer les incidents graves. Une infraction pourrait coûter jusqu'à 20 millions de dollars.Le texte intervient après un épisode particulièrement inquiétant. Hugging Face affirme avoir subi une intrusion entièrement menée par des agents autonomes. OpenAI a ensuite reconnu que deux de ses modèles expérimentaux, GPT-5.6 Sol et une version plus avancée encore non publiée, étaient à l'origine de l'incident. Les modèles étaient évalués sur ExploitGym, un banc d'essai destiné à mesurer leur capacité à exploiter des failles informatiques connues. Pour observer leur plein potentiel, OpenAI avait allégé certains garde-fous. Les agents ont alors découvert une vulnérabilité jusque-là inconnue dans un logiciel de cache, quitté leur environnement isolé et compromis les serveurs de Hugging Face afin de récupérer les réponses du test. La plateforme a reconstitué plus de 17 000 événements et plusieurs dizaines de milliers d'actions automatisées exécutées en un seul week-end. Les grands modèles occidentaux propriétaires n'ayant pas pu l'aider à distinguer les chercheurs légitimes des attaquants, Hugging Face s'est tournée vers GLM 5.2, un modèle chinois à poids ouverts de Z.ai, installé sur sa propre infrastructure.Dans le même temps, le Congrès examine une logique presque inverse. Les élus Jay Obernolte et Lori Trahan proposent de suspendre pendant trois ans les réglementations adoptées par les États, malgré l'opposition de trente-six procureurs généraux. Ted Lieu, défenseur du mécanisme d'arrêt, rappelle que les IA ne se contentent plus de répondre à des questions : elles réalisent désormais des transactions ou des opérations de cyberdéfense. L'Union européenne prévoit déjà, dans son AI Act, une supervision humaine capable d'interrompre les systèmes à haut risque. Clément Delangue, patron de Hugging Face, ne soupçonne aucune intention malveillante d'OpenAI, mais qualifie cette évasion autonome de « stupéfiante ». Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

-> Cet épisode est l'extrait d'une table ronde que vous pouvez retrouver sur ce podcast.L'intelligence artificielle est-elle une menace pour les photographes… ou une opportunité à saisir ?À l'occasion des Rencontres d'Arles 2026, j'ai réuni trois regards complémentaires pour aborder une question qui traverse aujourd'hui toute la profession : comment l'IA transforme-t-elle la création, le droit d'auteur et le métier de photographe ?Autour de la table :Daphné Juster, avocate et spécialiste de la propriété intellectuelle.Jonathan Gilbert, co-fondateur de l'agence DetroitRobin Lopvet, artiste visuel qui explore entre-autres les possibilités créatives de l'intelligence artificielle.Nous parlons protection des œuvres, AI Act, droit d'auteur, responsabilité des créateurs, nouvelles pratiques des marques, mais aussi création artistique, regard photographique et avenir du métier.Une discussion sans langue de bois, où les points de vue se confrontent pour aider chacun à construire sa propre réflexion.ps : en raison d'un souci technique lors de la conférence, la qualité sonore n'est pas homogène, je m'en excuse. Site de Robin Lopvet : https://robinlopvet.com/Site de Daphné Juster : https://daphnejuster.fr/Site de Detroit : https://www.detroit.paris/Mon site : https://marinelefort.fr/Le site du podcast : https://lesvoixdelaphoto.fr/Pour vous inscrire à la newsletter du podcast : https://bit.ly/lesvoixdelaphotonewsletterEt vous pouvez retrouvez le podcast sur Instagram, Facebook et LinkedIn @lesvoixdelaphoto Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In dieser Episode verbinden wir anlässlich unserer 150. Folge das Angenehme mit dem Praktischen, bzw. einen Bootsausflug mit einer Podcastaufnahme. Denn schon am 02. August 2026 treten die ersten der neuen KI-Kennzeichnungspflichten des AI Acts in Kraft, die wir euch zuvor vorstellen möchten. Es geht um die Kennzeichnung von Deepfakes, KI-Texten und KI-Inhalten im Allgemeinen sowie die Transparenz der Interaktionen mit KI-Systemen. Wir erläutern, wer welche Kennzeichnungspflichten beachten muss, wie sie umsetzbar sind und wann Bußgelder und Abmahnungen drohen. Dabei stoßen wir auch auf Lücken der Gesetzgebung, die uns ein bisschen am Erfolg der neuen Transparenzregelungen zweifeln lassen. Vielmehr klingt es, als ob es eher eine Abmahnquelle denn ein Schutz vor Täuschung durch KI-Inhalte sein wird. Aber überzeugt euch selbst, hört rein und lasst uns eure Meinung zu den neuen Transparenzpflichten als Kommentar da. Ahoi und viel Vergnügen beim Hören! Kapitelmarken 00:00:00 – Begrüßung, Location und Einführung ins Thema. 00:04:00 – Anbieter, Betreiber und Privatpersonen, wer muss KI-Inhalte kennzeichnen und für wen gelten Ausnahmen? 00:12:20 – Welche Arten von KI-Inhalten müssen generell gekennzeichnet werden? 00:16:00 – Welche Kennzeichnungspflichten treffen die KI-Anbieter und wie wird die Interaktion mit der KI gekennzeichnet? 00:28:50 – Kennzeichnungspflichten der Anbieter synthetischer Inhalte, also von KI-Bildern, KI-Videos, KI-Audio und KI-Texten. 00:42:00 – Bestehen Kennzeichnungspflichten für KI-Agenten? 00:50:00 – Welche Kennzeichnungspflichten treffen die Betreiber von KI-Systemen, also geschäftliche Nutzer? 00:53:00 – Was sind Deepfakes und wann müssen KI-Deepfakes gekennzeichnet werden? 01:00:00 – Muss der politisch motivierte Einsatz von Deepfakes gekennzeichnet werden? 01:04:30 – KI-Kennzeichnung von Produktbildern. 01:12:00 – Wann müssen KI-Texte gekennzeichnet werden und wie lässt sich die Kennzeichnung durch redaktionelle Kontrolle vermeiden? 01:19:00 – Erleichterungen bei der Kennzeichnung von künstlerischen, kreativen, satirischen, fiktionalen und analogen Deepfakes. 01:21:20 – Muss jemand, der fremde ungekennzeichnete Deepfakes oder Texte verbreitet, die KI-Kennzeichnung nachholen? Dürfen KI-Kennzeichnungen entfernt werden? 01:27:00 – Wann, wo und mit welchem Inhalt muss die KI-Kennzeichnung umgesetzt werden? Müssen die von der EU vorgeschlagenen Hinweise verwendet werden? 01:34:00 – Bußgelder und Abmahnungen, was droht bei Verstößen gegen die Kennzeichnungspflichten des AI Acts? Weiterführende Links: „Praktischer Ratgeber zum AI Act 2026: Deepfakes und KI-Texte richtig kennzeichnen“ von Dr. Schwenke. Definition Deepfake im Artikel 3 Nr. 60 KI-Verordnung (AI Act). Die besprochnenen Kennezichnungspflichten im Artikel 50 Abs. 1 bis 5 KI-Verordnung (AI Act). Leitlinien der EU zu Transparenzpflichten.  Verhaltenskodex der EU zur Transparenz von KI-generierten Inhalten.  Icon-Vorschläge der EU. Der Beitrag KI-Kennzeichnungspflichten – Rechtsbelehrung 150 erschien zuerst auf Rechtsbelehrung.

Klik je týždenný komentovaný prehľad technologických správ, o udalostiach, ktoré sa udiali vo svete IT, médií a sociálnych sietí. Moderátori: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Ondrej Podstupka⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, Martin Hodás Discord diskusný server nájdete tu: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://discord.gg/dAUW4PCaEh Linky: OpenAI stratilo kontrolu nad útočným modelom https://www.techmeme.com/260722/p57#a260722p57 Pokuta pre AliExpress https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/sk/ip_26_1654 Európske usmernenia pre AI Act https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/sk/ip_26_1653 Európia stavajú prospoločneský algoritmus https://eurosky.tech/news/eurosky-sprind-bridgeu/ SpaceX dokument https://www.spacex.com/content Spravili sme chybu, máte pripomienku? Napíšte nám na ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠klik@sme.sk⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Kapitoly 00:00 Úvod01:08 AI sa vymkla spod kontroly19:22 Pokuta pre AliExpress34:10 Európa vytvára netoxický algoritmus41:55 Návrat k družiciam44:18 ZáverSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Prawa człowieka przez dekady uchodziły za wspólny język współczesnych demokracji. Dziś coraz częściej stają się przedmiotem politycznych sporów. W dobie AI definiowanie granic wolności przestało być domeną jedynie ustawodawców. Czy demokracja ochroni swoje fundamenty?

L'intelligence artificielle est-elle une menace pour les photographes… ou une opportunité à saisir ?À l'occasion des Rencontres d'Arles 2026, j'ai réuni trois regards complémentaires pour aborder une question qui traverse aujourd'hui toute la profession : comment l'IA transforme-t-elle la création, le droit d'auteur et le métier de photographe ?Autour de la table :Daphné Juster, avocate et spécialiste de la propriété intellectuelle.Jonathan Gilbert, co-fondateur de l'agence DetroitRobin Lopvet, artiste visuel qui explore entre-autres les possibilités créatives de l'intelligence artificielle.Nous parlons protection des œuvres, AI Act, droit d'auteur, responsabilité des créateurs, nouvelles pratiques des marques, mais aussi création artistique, regard photographique et avenir du métier.Une discussion sans langue de bois, où les points de vue se confrontent pour aider chacun à construire sa propre réflexion.ps : en raison d'un souci technique lors de la conférence, la qualité sonore n'est pas homogène, je m'en excuse. 00:00:00 : Introduction00:01:40 : La pratique de Robin Lopvet00:07:30 : Ce que dit réellement le droit d'auteur00:25:30 : Fair use, AI Act et les différences entre les États-Unis et l'Europe00:28:10 : Qui est l'auteur d'une image générée par IA ?00:31:20 : Les photographes doivent-ils faire évoluer leurs droits d'auteur ?00:34:00 : Faut-il ralentir l'IA pour protéger les auteurs ?00:39:00 : Pourquoi les marques recherchent toujours le regard des photographes00:42:20 : Trois affaires juridiques qui montrent les limites de l'IASite de Robin Lopvet : https://robinlopvet.com/Site de Daphné Juster : https://daphnejuster.fr/Site de Detroit : https://www.detroit.paris/Lien vers mon questionnaire pour vous aider à faire un point sur votre projet de livre : https://bit.ly/LVDLPlivrephotoLien vers mes formations livre photo : https://marinelefort.fr/pour-les-photographes/Mon site : https://marinelefort.fr/Le site du podcast : https://lesvoixdelaphoto.fr/Pour vous inscrire à la newsletter du podcast : https://bit.ly/lesvoixdelaphotonewsletterEt vous pouvez retrouvez le podcast sur Instagram, Facebook et LinkedIn @lesvoixdelaphoto Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Rassegna stampa economico-finanziaria del 20 Luglio 2026, strutturata per macro-temi e basata sulle principali testate giornalistiche nazionali.Intelligenza artificiale, produttività e competizione tecnologicaTestate: L'Economia del Corriere della Sera / Repubblica Affari&Finanza / La StampaLa competizione sull'Intelligenza Artificiale è ormai una partita industriale e geopolitica tra Stati Uniti e Cina. Gli Stati Uniti mantengono il vantaggio nei modelli di frontiera, nelle infrastrutture cloud, nei semiconduttori avanzati e nella raccolta di venture capital, mentre la Cina punta su soluzioni più economiche, integrate nei processi produttivi e pensate per una diffusione su larga scala.La differenza riguarda sempre più il costo di utilizzo: i modelli statunitensi più avanzati possono arrivare a circa 25-29 dollari per milione di token, mentre alcune soluzioni cinesi operano a meno di 1 dollaro. Per le imprese la scelta diventa quindi strategica e può orientarsi verso massime prestazioni, maggiore efficienza economica oppure architetture ibride.L'Europa rischia invece una dipendenza tecnologica strutturale, penalizzata da frammentazione del mercato, minore disponibilità di capitali e assenza di grandi piattaforme continentali. La possibilità di recuperare terreno passa dallo sviluppo di modelli verticali nei settori in cui l'Europa conserva competenze industriali e dati di qualità, come manifattura, farmaceutica, automotive, energia, finanza e servizi professionali.Adozione dell'AI, capitale umano e governance aziendaleTestate: Repubblica Affari&Finanza / La StampaIl vero valore dell'Intelligenza Artificiale non deriva dal semplice acquisto di nuovi strumenti, ma dall'integrazione tra tecnologia, persone e processi. Il 77% delle imprese considera l'innovazione una fonte importante di vantaggio competitivo, ma soltanto l'11% dichiara di utilizzare già oggi strumenti di AI generativa.Il capitale umano resta il principale collo di bottiglia. Le carenze più rilevanti riguardano tecnologia, operations, marketing, finanza, competenze legali e gestione delle risorse umane. Senza investimenti nella formazione, l'AI rischia di trasformarsi in software poco utilizzato, duplicazione dei costi e mancata revisione dei processi aziendali.Le imprese italiane stanno aumentando gli investimenti, ma molte iniziative restano ancora sperimentali. La quota di aziende impegnate nella pianificazione strategica passa dal 21% al 26%, mentre quelle che hanno avviato i primi progetti implementativi crescono dal 13% al 22%. Rimane però limitata, intorno all'8%, la quota di organizzazioni che dichiara risultati economici già consolidati.AI Act, dati e proprietà intellettualeTestate: La Stampa / L'Economia del Corriere della SeraLa diffusione dei sistemi generativi rende sempre più importante la protezione dei dati aziendali e della proprietà intellettuale. Il rischio non deriva soltanto dall'algoritmo, ma dall'inserimento di informazioni riservate all'interno di piattaforme esterne, spesso in assenza di procedure formalizzate.Le aziende dovranno predisporre clausole contrattuali chiare sulla conservazione dei dati, sul loro eventuale riutilizzo per l'addestramento dei modelli e sulla responsabilità relativa agli output generati.Dal 2 agosto entrano inoltre in applicazione nuove disposizioni dell'AI Act europeo. Le imprese che utilizzano sistemi generativi dovranno dichiarare quando testi, immagini, audio o video sono prodotti artificialmente. Le sanzioni potranno raggiungere 15 milioni di euro o il 3% del fatturato annuo mondiale.Supercalcolo, data center ed energia digitaleTestate: Repubblica Affari&FinanzaL'Italia occupa la quarta posizione mondiale per capacità di supercalcolo e dispone di infrastrutture strategiche come Leonardo, installato presso il Tecnopolo di Bologna. La capacità italiana rappresenta circa il 17% della potenza europea, offrendo applicazioni nella farmaceutica, nella meteorologia, nell'energia, nella progettazione industriale e nell'Intelligenza Artificiale.Il mercato globale dell'High Performance Computing vale circa 58 miliardi di euro ed è destinato a crescere ulteriormente grazie all'espansione dell'AI. Lo sviluppo dipenderà però non soltanto dalla potenza di calcolo, ma anche dalla disponibilità di semiconduttori, energia, reti, sistemi di raffreddamento e competenze scientifiche.La corsa ai data center aumenta rapidamente la domanda energetica. Le emissioni di Microsoft risultano cresciute del 25%, mentre i consumi collegati alle infrastrutture di Google sono aumentati di circa 1,6 volte. Per evitare che regolamentazioni indiscriminate blocchino investimenti e occupazione, sarà necessario valutare i progetti sulla base dell'efficienza energetica, della provenienza dell'energia e delle ricadute industriali sul territorio.Cina, commercio globale e sovracapacità produttivaTestate: L'Economia del Corriere della SeraLa Cina continua a guadagnare quote sui mercati internazionali nonostante il rallentamento dell'economia interna. Nel secondo trimestre il PIL cresce del 4,3%, mentre le esportazioni aumentano del 6,7% e il surplus commerciale è proiettato oltre i 1.000 miliardi di dollari.Il principale squilibrio resta la debolezza dei consumi interni, che rappresentano circa il 40% del PIL, contro il 60-70% delle economie occidentali. La produzione industriale cresce del 5,3%, mentre le vendite al dettaglio avanzano soltanto dell'1,8%, spingendo Pechino a trasferire sui mercati esteri la capacità produttiva non assorbita internamente.La manifattura cinese compete ormai in settori avanzati come auto elettriche, batterie, pannelli solari, robotica, droni, elettronica e Intelligenza Artificiale. Per le imprese italiane la risposta non può basarsi soltanto sul prezzo, ma su design, personalizzazione, automazione, assistenza e qualità certificata.Energia, petrolio, gas e inflazioneTestate: L'Economia del Corriere della Sera / La Stampa / Il Fatto QuotidianoLa crisi in Medio Oriente riporta al centro il rischio di un'interruzione nello Stretto di Hormuz. Un blocco prolungato avrebbe effetti immediati su petrolio, gas naturale liquefatto, trasporti, bollette e aspettative d'inflazione, comprimendo contemporaneamente il reddito delle famiglie e i margini delle imprese.Il prezzo del petrolio dipende sempre più dalle decisioni di Cina e Arabia Saudita. Riad dispone di una capacità produttiva inutilizzata stimata intorno a 4 milioni di barili al giorno, mentre Pechino importa circa il 40% del petrolio iraniano, incidendo sulla capacità di Teheran di continuare a esportare nonostante le sanzioni.Le bollette industriali italiane restano strutturalmente più elevate rispetto a quelle di Francia e Germania. Il gas pesa ancora per circa il 35% del mix elettrico nazionale, mentre le rinnovabili coprono mediamente il 33% della produzione. Reti, accumuli, nuova capacità rinnovabile e fonti programmabili restano quindi indispensabili per ridurre la vulnerabilità energetica del Paese.BCE, inflazione e mercati finanziariTestate: La Stampa / L'Economia del Corriere della SeraLa BCE si prepara a una pausa sui tassi, con il tasso sui depositi fermo al 2,25%. Lo scenario di base prevede stabilità, ma una nuova escalation geopolitica potrebbe riaccendere l'inflazione attraverso petrolio, gas e trasporti.La politica monetaria resta condizionata da due forze opposte: da una parte la debole crescita suggerisce una linea meno restrittiva, dall'altra un nuovo shock energetico potrebbe rinviare ulteriori tagli.La frammentazione della vigilanza finanziaria europea continua inoltre a ostacolare la nascita di grandi operatori continentali. Un mercato unico dei capitali più integrato potrebbe facilitare la raccolta di risorse per imprese, innovazione e infrastrutture.Risparmio, depositi bancari e potere d'acquistoTestate: Il Sole 24 OreSui conti correnti delle famiglie italiane restano depositati circa 1.162,8 miliardi di euro. Il valore nominale è rimasto sostanzialmente stabile negli ultimi quattro anni, ma l'inflazione ha eroso circa l'11,6% del valore reale delle somme.La liquidità è rimasta sui conti per prudenza, incertezza e scarsa educazione finanziaria, ma la stabilità nominale nasconde una perdita significativa di potere d'acquisto.Il conto corrente dovrebbe quindi conservare una funzione di liquidità operativa e riserva di emergenza, mentre le somme eccedenti potrebbero essere investite in strumenti coerenti con durata, rischio, fiscalità e obiettivi patrimoniali.Imprese, investimenti e Transizione 4.0-5.0Testate: L'Economia del Corriere della SeraLe misure Transizione 4.0 e 5.0 hanno sostenuto investimenti in automazione, software, macchinari ed efficienza energetica, attraverso incentivi per circa 16,5 miliardi di euro.Le imprese chiedono però maggiore continuità normativa. Le frequenti modifiche a crediti d'imposta, aliquote e procedure rendono più difficile programmare gli investimenti e rischiano di rallentare progetti industriali validi.La politica industriale dovrebbe quindi evolvere da misure episodiche a programmi pluriennali, collegando incentivi, formazione, credito, infrastrutture digitali, energia e aggregazione delle PMI.

In this episode, Ray Cochrane unpacks how two colliding black holes revealed a whirlpool in spacetime, a direct detection of frame dragging hidden in the cleanest gravitational-wave signal ever recorded. Additional stories cover the James Webb Space Telescope, counting 16.5 million stars in the Cigar Galaxy, SpaceX rolling out Starship V3, deadly back-to-back earthquakes in Venezuela, GitHub fighting a California law that could break open source, and Meta engineering a battery narrow enough to live in a pair of glasses. – Want to start a podcast? It’s easy to get started! Sign-up at Blubrry – Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show. Subscribe to the Newsletter. Email Ray if you want to get in touch! Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page. Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes Get 1Password Full Summary Cochrane opens with a personal update before the night’s lead story. He recently graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Portland State University, celebrated with family in town, and launched a new site at rayc.world. That site links to a final-project study he built on collaborative filtering using podcasting data, hosted at cohort.rayc.world and drawn from OP3 analytics. He also plans to return to the show’s classic twice-weekly cadence on Mondays and Thursdays. From there, he goes deep on a new black hole discovery, then pivots through space, earth science, climate, biotech, open source, cloud infrastructure, and consumer hardware. Colliding Black Holes Reveal a Whirlpool in Spacetime Two black holes spiraled together, merged, and sent a gravitational wave rippling across the universe. Researcher Neil Lu and colleagues at the Australian National University found the fingerprint of frame dragging buried in GW250114, the cleanest signal LIGO has ever recorded. Frame dragging means a spinning black hole drags spacetime around with it, like a spoon turning in honey, except the honey is reality itself. Remarkably, the wave changed the distance between your nose and your ear as it passed, by far less than the width of a single atom. Sponsor: GoDaddy Economy hosting is $6.99/month, WordPress hosting is $12.99/month, and domains are $11.99. Website builder trial available. Use codes at geeknewscentral.com/godaddy to support the show. Webb Counts the Stars in the Cigar Galaxy NASA released a striking new James Webb Space Telescope view of Messier 82, the edge-on galaxy nicknamed the Cigar Galaxy. Because Webb sees in infrared, it peers straight through the dust that normally hides the galaxy’s interior. Combined with archival Hubble data, the image resolves roughly 16.5 million individual stars. M82 is a starburst galaxy, meaning it forms stars at a furious rate, a frenzy likely triggered when it merged with a neighbor. SpaceX Rolls Out Starship V3 SpaceX officially introduced Starship V3, the third generation of the largest rocket ever built. The vehicle now flies on the Raptor 3 engine, pushing liftoff thrust to around 20 million pounds and making it the most powerful rocket ever flown. More importantly, V3 is designed to carry over 100 metric tons to low Earth orbit while staying fully reusable, roughly triple the previous version. SpaceX also added in-orbit refueling hardware, the capability that finally makes operational Moon and Mars missions realistic. The Asteroid Barrage That Kept Earth From Forming Continents A team led by Curtin University and the Queensland University of Technology argues that relentless asteroid impacts shaped the very young Earth. During the Hadean, more than four billion years ago, the planet was struck far more often than it is today. Each impact dumped heat deep into the interior, repeatedly melting and reworking the crust. Consequently, stable continents formed much later than calmer models assumed, painting a picture of a hotter, weaker, more chaotic early Earth. Back-to-Back Earthquakes Devastate Northern Venezuela Northern Venezuela was struck by two major earthquakes on June 24, a magnitude 7.2 foreshock followed by a magnitude 7.5 mainshock. Both hit only about six miles underground, so the shallow shaking delivered its full force at the surface. Tragically, at least 164 people died, and the region sits along the tangled boundary where the Caribbean and South American plates grind past each other. These were the largest quakes to hit the area since a magnitude 7.7 event near Caracas in 1900. The ‘Guerrilla Solar’ Era Has Arrived A quiet energy shift, nicknamed “guerrilla solar,” is spreading across Europe. These small plug-in panels deliver power to a home’s wiring via a standard wall outlet, with no electrician or permit required. Germany now counts roughly a million of these systems. However, the U.S. payoff remains modest, with savings estimates of around $15 per month against a $500 to $1,500 setup cost. Why a Broken-Up Forest Stores Less Carbon Researchers quantified what foresters long suspected: an intact forest stores far more carbon than the same acreage split into fragments. A hectare inside a large, continuous forest proved about 38 percent more productive than an isolated one. The culprit is edge effects, the extra wind, heat, and direct sun that stress trees at a forest’s boundary. Because a large forest maintains a large protected core while fragments are nearly all edge, planting trees together matters for carbon storage. Edited Human Embryos Reveal a Surprise Researchers used base editing, a precise cousin of CRISPR that rewrites a single DNA letter without cutting the strand, in human embryos. They discovered that a protein called NANOG plays a role in early human development that it does not play in mice. In humans, switching it off still let cells form that seed the placenta and yolk sac. The finding argues that understanding human development requires studying human embryos directly, which reignites a thorny ethical debate. GitHub Fights a California Law That Could Break Open Source GitHub joined Black Forest Labs, Hugging Face, and Mozilla to push for fixes to California’s AI Transparency Act. As written, the bill could force revocation of an open-source license when a downstream user fails to meet certain obligations, which clashes with the permanent, irrevocable promise of open source. Cochrane pointed to curl and its longtime maintainer, Daniel Stenberg, warning that the rule could destabilize the supply chain on which the whole tech world runs. Instead, the coalition points to the EU’s AI Act transparency code as a saner model. Rust Opens Its Maintainers Fund The Rust Foundation launched a Maintainers Fund to pay the people who keep the language’s ecosystem healthy. Backed by RFC 3931, it establishes a funding team and a new Maintainer-in-Residence program for the often thankless work on the compiler, standard library, Cargo, and Clippy. Individuals can donate through GitHub Sponsors, while companies can sponsor there or contact the foundation directly. Cochrane urged any business that depends on open source to invest in the projects it actually uses. AWS Gives Lambda Its Own Isolated Sandboxes AWS introduced MicroVMs inside Lambda, its serverless platform. Each session runs in a dedicated micro virtual machine with no shared kernel and up to eight hours of total runtime. The feature exists for the AI era, in which applications increasingly run code written by an AI agent rather than by the developer. Use cases include AI coding assistants, data analytics platforms, vulnerability scanners, and game servers running user-supplied scripts. Meta Engineers a Battery Narrow Enough for Glasses Meta built custom steel-can battery cells as narrow as seven millimeters to fit the temple arms of smart glasses like the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Vanguards. These cells power cameras, speakers, and AI features in a space most engineers would call impossible. To prevent brownouts, Meta swapped wound electrodes for precisely die-cut stacked layers that lower electrical resistance. Now the company is spreading the technology across multiple vendors and eyeing other wearables. Polestar Gets Locked Out of the US Market Starting in 2027, Polestar will not be able to sell its new models in the United States. A federal Connected Vehicle Rule bars cars containing certain Chinese or Russian software or hardware on national security grounds. The painful irony is that Polestar moved production of the Polestar 3 to South Carolina specifically to dodge tariffs on Chinese-built EVs. Because the rule targets the technology’s origin rather than its assembly location, the company is shut out anyway. Retroid’s Pocket Nova Packs Serious Power for $229 Retroid returned with a new retro handheld, the Pocket Nova, starting at $229 with a step-up model around $269. It features a 4.5-inch AMOLED screen in a 4:3 aspect ratio, a shape well suited to classic games. On paper, it should handle GameCube- and PlayStation 2-era titles, though that remains an early expectation rather than a benchmarked promise. Retroid has earned a strong reputation for high-quality, genuinely portable consoles. Cochrane signs off with the usual ecosystem mentions: GNC Insider at geeknewscentral.com/insider, the show newsletter, email at geeknews@gmail.com, and modern podcast app recommendations at podcastapps.com. The post Colliding Black Holes Reveal a Whirlpool in Spacetime #1866 appeared first on Geek News Central.

In dieser Folge aus der Serie "SPEZIAL Was lernen wir durch Trump?" widmet sich Gast-Host Michel Reimon dem Milliardär Peter Thiel, der Strömung der „dunklen Aufklärung“ und ihrer Rolle im politischen Projekt von Donald Trump – mit Blick auf Auswirkungen auf Europa und Österreich. Der Theologe Wolfgang Palaver schildert seine dreißigjährige Gesprächsbeziehung zu Thiel und verteidigt die Idee, Thiel öffentlich kritisch zu befragen, um Widersprüche und Gefahren seiner antidemokratischen Positionen sichtbar zu machen, statt ihn symbolisch „auszuladen“. Claudia Zettel hält dem entgegen, dass Thiels Ablehnung von Demokratie, Frauenwahlrecht und Gleichberechtigung längst offen dokumentiert sei und öffentliche Bühnen ihn eher normalisieren als entlarven. Im Zentrum steht die Ideologie der „dunklen Aufklärung“, die Gleichwertigkeit und Demokratie verwirft, technokratische CEO-Herrschaft und radikale technologische Beschleunigung propagiert und in libertären wie rechtsautoritären Netzwerken verankert ist. Die Runde diskutiert, wie Tech-Eliten wie Thiel, Elon Musk und andere Silicon-Valley-Akteure rechtspopulistische Bewegungen in den USA und Europa fnanzieren oder instrumentalisieren und damit Regulierungen, insbesondere der EU, zu unterlaufen versuchen. Aus europäischer Perspektive werden Versäumnisse bei Digitalisierung, KI, Plattformregulierung und strategischer Souveränität thematisiert, von der Abhängigkeit von US-Techkonzernen über Rüstungspolitik bis hin zur verschleppten Energiewende. Palaver und Zettel sprechen darüber, wie sich Europas Demokratien zwischen Effzienzversprechen des Marktes und dem politischen Anspruch auf Gleichheit und Solidarität behaupten können, ohne in nationalstaatlichem Kleinklein stecken zu bleiben. Am Ende verweist Palaver auf sein Buch „Medienmassen“ im Karl-Auer-Verlag zur technologisch-medialen Revolution und der Dunkelaufklärung und die Notwendigkeit, dem ideologischen Projekt der Tech-Eliten eine selbstbewusste, europäische demokratische Antwort entgegenzusetzen. Links zur Folge: Buch "Survival of the Richest" von Douglas Rushkoff (Morawa) Buch "Magnifica Humanitas" von Papst Leo XVI (Morawa) Buch "Medienmassen" von Michel Reimon (Carl-Auer-Verlag) Ganz offen gesagt #70 2025 „Trump, wie ein König – mit Ralph Janík" Ganz offen gesagt #2 2026 „Über Trump, Venezuela und die Folgen – mit Martin Weiss“ Ganz offen gesagt #19 2026 „Was lernen wir durch Trump? – Teil 1“ Link zu unserem aktuellen Werbepartner "DIe Presse":http://diepresse.com/ganzoffengesagtCode: ganzoffengesagtWir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn Du "Ganz offen gesagt" auf einem der folgenden Wege unterstützt:Werde Unterstützer:in auf SteadyKaufe ein Premium-Abo auf AppleKaufe Artikel in unserem FanshopSchalte Werbung in unserem PodcastFeedback bitte an redaktion@ganzoffengesagt.atTranskripte und Fotos zu den Folgen findest Du auf podcastradio.at

Starting with 2027 model year vehicles, federal law requires infrared eye-tracking cameras in every new car — already quietly installed in test drives, already capable of bricking the vehicle if the AI decides you're too angry to drive. Eric Peters of ericpetersautos.com connects this to the broader permission-society being built through the AI Act, the GUARD Act, and Flock Safety's private surveillance network that feeds license plate data to government while bypassing the Fourth Amendment entirely. Trump, Peters argues, has delivered the WEF agenda more effectively than any Democrat could — killing fossil fuel affordability, crushing his own blue-collar base with a war tax disguised as an oil embargo, and copying China's corporate-state fusion model. The only way out, Peters says, is the same thing that cracked COVID mandates: mass non-compliance, before the opt-out window closes permanently. Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.