Podcasts about ai act

Europa maakt eindelijk meer werk van technologische onafhankelijkheid. De afgelopen week zijn er drie baanbrekende ontwikkelingen die bewijzen dat de EU niet langer alleen maar wil reguleren, maar ook wil innoveren en concurreren. Het is niet de Europese Commissie maar de industrie zelf die zich roert en met duidelijke plannen komt.

Broadcasting from Florence and Los Angeles, I Had One of Those Conversations...You know the kind—where you start discussing one thing and suddenly realize you're mapping the entire landscape of how different societies approach technology. That's exactly what happened when Rob Black and I connected across the Atlantic for the pilot episode of ITSPmagazine Europe: The Transatlantic Broadcast.Rob was calling from what he optimistically described as "sunny" West Sussex (complete with biblical downpours and Four Seasons weather in one afternoon), while I enjoyed actual California sunshine. But this geographic distance perfectly captured what we were launching: a genuine exploration of how European perspectives on cybersecurity, technology, and society differ from—and complement—American approaches.The conversation emerged from something we'd discovered at InfoSecurity Europe earlier this year. After recording several episodes together with Sean Martin, we realized we'd stumbled onto something crucial: most global technology discourse happens through an American lens, even when discussing fundamentally European challenges. Digital sovereignty isn't just a policy buzzword in Brussels—it represents a completely different philosophy about how democratic societies should interact with technology.Rob Black: Bridging Defense Research and Digital RealityRob brings credentials that perfectly embody the European approach to cybersecurity—one that integrates geopolitics, human sciences, and operational reality in ways that purely technical perspectives miss. As UK Cyber Citizen of the Year 2024, he's recognized for contributions that span UK Ministry of Defense research on human elements in cyber operations, international relations theory, and hands-on work with university students developing next-generation cybersecurity leadership skills.But what struck me during our pilot wasn't his impressive background—it was his ability to connect macro-level geopolitical cyber operations with the daily impossible decisions that Chief Information Security Officers across Europe face. These leaders don't see themselves as combatants in a digital war, but they're absolutely operating on front lines where nation-state actors, criminal enterprises, and hybrid threats converge.Rob's international relations expertise adds crucial context that American cybersecurity discourse often overlooks. We're witnessing cyber operations as extensions of statecraft—the ongoing conflict in Ukraine demonstrates how narrative battles and digital infrastructure attacks interweave with kinetic warfare. European nations are developing their own approaches to cyber deterrence, often fundamentally different from American strategies.European Values Embedded in Technology ChoicesWhat emerged from our conversation was something I've observed but rarely heard articulated so clearly: Europe approaches technology governance through distinctly different cultural and philosophical frameworks than America. This isn't just about regulation—though the EU's leadership from GDPR through the AI Act certainly shapes global standards. It's about fundamental values embedded in technological choices.Rob highlighted algorithmic bias as a perfect example. When AI systems are developed primarily in Silicon Valley, they embed specific cultural assumptions and training data that may not reflect European experiences, values, or diverse linguistic traditions. The implications cascade across everything from hiring algorithms to content moderation to criminal justice applications.We discussed how this connects to broader patterns of technological adoption. I'd recently written about how the transistor radio revolution of the 1960s paralleled today's smartphone-driven transformation—both technologies were designed for specific purposes but adopted by users in ways inventors never anticipated. The transistor radio became a tool of cultural rebellion; smartphones became instruments of both connection and surveillance.But here's what's different now: the stakes are global, the pace is accelerated, and the platforms are controlled by a handful of American and Chinese companies. European voices in these conversations aren't just valuable—they're essential for understanding how different democratic societies can maintain their values while embracing technological transformation.The Sociological Dimensions Technology Discourse MissesMy background in political science and sociology of communication keeps pulling me toward questions that pure technologists might skip: How do different European cultures interpret privacy rights differently? Why do Nordic countries approach digital government services so differently than Mediterranean nations? What happens when AI training data reflects primarily Anglo-American cultural assumptions but gets deployed across 27 EU member states with distinct languages and traditions?Rob's perspective adds the geopolitical layer that's often missing from cybersecurity conversations. We're not just discussing technical vulnerabilities—we're examining how different societies organize themselves digitally, how they balance individual privacy against collective security, and how they maintain democratic values while defending against authoritarian digital influence operations.Perhaps most importantly, we're both convinced that the next generation of European cybersecurity leaders needs fundamentally different skills than previous generations. Technical expertise remains crucial, but they also need to communicate complex risks to non-technical decision-makers, operate comfortably with uncertainty rather than seeking perfect solutions, and understand that cybersecurity decisions are ultimately political decisions about what kind of society we want to maintain.Why European Perspectives Matter GloballyEurope represents 27 different nations with distinct histories, languages, and approaches to technology governance, yet they're increasingly coordinating digital policies through EU frameworks. This complexity is fascinating and the implications are global. When Europe implements new AI regulations or data protection standards, Silicon Valley adjusts its practices worldwide.But European perspectives are too often filtered through American media or reduced to regulatory footnotes in technology publications. We wanted to create space for European voices to explain their approaches in their own terms—not as responses to American innovation, but as distinct philosophical and practical approaches to technology's role in democratic society.Rob pointed out something crucial during our conversation: we're living through a moment where "every concept that we've thought about in terms of how humans react to each other and how they react to the world around them now needs to be reconsidered in light of how humans react through a computer mediated existence." This isn't abstract philosophizing—it's the practical challenge facing policymakers, educators, and security professionals across Europe.Building Transatlantic Understanding, Not DivisionThe "Transatlantic Broadcast" name reflects our core mission: connecting perspectives across borders rather than reinforcing them. Technology challenges—from cybersecurity threats to AI governance to digital rights—don't respect national boundaries. Solutions require understanding how different democratic societies approach these challenges while maintaining their distinct values and traditions.Rob and I come from different backgrounds—his focused on defense research and international relations, mine on communication theory and sociological analysis—but we share curiosity about how technology shapes society and how society shapes technology in return. Sean Martin brings the American cybersecurity industry perspective that completes our analytical triangle.Cross-Border Collaboration for European Digital FutureThis pilot episode represents just the beginning of what we hope becomes a sustained conversation. We're planning discussions with European academics developing new frameworks for digital rights, policymakers implementing AI governance across member states, industry leaders building privacy-first alternatives to Silicon Valley platforms, and civil society advocates working to ensure technology serves democratic values.We want to understand how digital transformation looks different across European cultures, how regulatory approaches evolve through multi-stakeholder processes, and how European innovation develops characteristics that reflect distinctly European values and approaches to technological development.The Invitation to Continue This ConversationBroadcasting from our respective sides of the Atlantic, we're extending an invitation to join this ongoing dialogue. Whether you're developing cybersecurity policy in Brussels, building startups in Berlin, teaching digital literacy in Barcelona, or researching AI ethics in Amsterdam, your perspective contributes to understanding how democratic societies can thrive in an increasingly digital world.European voices aren't afterthoughts in global technology discourse—they're fundamental contributors to understanding how diverse democratic societies can maintain their values while embracing technological change. This conversation needs academic researchers, policy practitioners, industry innovators, and engaged citizens from across Europe and beyond.If this resonates with your own observations about technology's role in society, subscribe to follow our journey as we explore these themes with guests from across Europe and the transatlantic technology community.And if you want to dig deeper into these questions or share your own perspective on European approaches to cybersecurity and technology governance, I'd love to continue the conversation directly. Get in touch with us on Linkedin! Marco CiappelliBroadcasting from Los Angeles (USA) & Florence (IT)On Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marco-ciappelliRob BlackBroadcasting from London (UK)On Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/rob-black-30440819Sean MartinBroadcasting from New York City (USA)On Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/imsmartinThe transatlantic conversation about technology, society, and democratic values starts now.

Kann Europa im globalen KI-Wettrennen mithalten – oder verliert es den Anschluss?In dieser Episode des The Agenda Podcasts spricht Elisabeth L'Orange, Partner bei Deloitte und gehört zu dem Manager Magazin zu den 15 führenden Frauen im Bereich Künstlicher Intelligenz. mit Sherpany Podcast-Host Ingo Notthoff, über die Herausforderungen und Chancen der Künstlichen Intelligenz in Europa. Elisabeth L'Orange beleuchtet den aktuellen AI-Act und seine Auswirkungen, spricht über die Innovationskraft europäischer Unternehmen und teilt ihre Erfahrungen aus der Praxis. Zudem gibt sie wertvolle Empfehlungen für Unternehmen, die KI erfolgreich implementieren möchten.Diese Impulse erhalten Sie in dieser Episode:Die USA und China sind führend bei KI-InnovationenWarum Europa bei KI-Innovationen hinterherhinkt – und wo es seine Stärken hatDie Akzeptanz von KI in Unternehmen ist oft geringUnternehmen müssen KI strategisch implementierenDie Auswirkungen des AI-Act auf die Innovation von UnternehmenAufsichtsräte sollten aktiv in die KI-Transformation eingreifenWie sich der Einsatz von KI per KPIs messen lässtAus medizinischen KI-Anwendungen lernenAufsichtsräte und Vorstände müssen selbst KI nutzenThank you for listening! Visit us at Sherpany.com or follow us on LinkedIn for board, board committee, and executive meetings solutions.

Thỏa thuận thuế quan và thương mại Liên Hiệp Châu Âu đạt được với Hoa Kỳ về mức thuế 15 % còn chưa ráo mực, Washington mở thêm một mặt trận mới đòi Bruxelles xóa bỏ mọi rào cản để cho các tập đoàn công nghệ kỹ thuật số của Hoa Kỳ tự do tung hoành trên thị trường châu Âu. Một lần nữa Donald Trump lại sử dụng đòn thuế quan để hù dọa.  Châu Âu, « con gà đẻ trứng vàng » của các GAFAM Vì sao chính quyền Trump muốn « phạt » Bruxelles trong lúc Liên Âu là thị trường màu mỡ nhất - ngoài lãnh thổ Hoa Kỳ, của các tập đoàn Mỹ ? Trong số những vị khách mời có chọn lọc để được trực tiếp dự lễ nhậm chức của tổng thống Hoa Kỳ thứ 47 hôm 20/01/2025, chủ nhân Meta đã mau mắn hơn cả nhờ ông Trump giúp đỡ, nới lỏng các chuẩn mực của châu Âu điều tiết các hoạt động trong lĩnh vực digital. Hơn nửa năm sau, phải chăng Mark Zuckerberg sắp được toại nguyện ? Ngày 24/08/2025 tổng thống Donald Trump trên mạng xã hội cá nhân đã « ra lệnh » cho tất cả những quốc gia trên thế giới dẹp bỏ mọi hình thức thuế quan và luật lệ gò bó hạn chế hoạt động của các tập đoàn Mỹ trong lĩnh vực « digital ». Trong mắt ông, đó là những biện pháp mang tính « phân biệt đối xử ». Kèm theo là lời đe dọa những ai không thỏa mãn đòi hỏi này. Chủ nhân Nhà Trắng không nêu đích danh các mục tiêu Hoa Kỳ nhắm tới nhưng Liên Âu, thị trường số 1 của các ông khổng lồ trong ngành công nghệ High Tech Hoa Kỳ, đã gây dựng nhiều cơ sở pháp lý « tự vệ » mà Donald Trump gọi là những « biện pháp bảo hộ ». Ba cái gai trong mắt Donald Trump Từ tháng 2/2025 chỉ vài tuần sau khi tổng thống Trump trở lại cầm quyền, ông và phó tổng thống J.D Vance -người rất gần gũi với các đại gia trong lĩnh vực digital của Mỹ đã liên tục đòi châu Âu dẹp bỏ những đạo luật và quy tắc « che khuất những thành công rực rỡ  » của nhóm GAFAM (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple và Microsoft), của những tên tuổi lớn trong lĩnh vực trí tuệ nhân tạo, những nhà cung cấp các dịch vụ trên mạng … của Hoa Kỳ. Liên Hiệp Châu Âu hiện có ít nhất 3 đạo luật đang khiến Washington tức giận : Đạo luật Thị trường Kỹ thuật số (DMA), nhằm kiểm soát các hành vi gây trở ngại cho việc cạnh tranh giữa các nhà cung cấp dịch vụ digital. Kế tới là DSA, tức là Đạo luật Dịch vụ Kỹ thuật số nhằm tăng cường tính minh bạch của các thuật toán (algorithm), kiểm soát hoạt động kiểm duyệt nội dung và gần đây nhất là AI Act : đây là bộ luật đầu tiên trên thế giới « quản lý » các khâu phát triển, sử dụng trí tuệ  nhân tạo. Theo phân tích của Andrea Renda giám đốc Trung Tâm Nghiên Cứu Chính Sách Châu Âu -CEPS, trụ sở tại Bruxelles, đạo luật DSA chẳng hạn do muốn « cân bằng giữa các mục đích bảo vệ người sử dụng và các quyền tự do ngôn luận » nên là « hiện thân của quỷ dữ » như chính Trump đã nói. Vẫn theo chuyên gia này, trong suốt quá trình đàm phán với châu Âu về thuế quan và thương mại, lĩnh vực digital luôn luôn là nỗi ám ảnh của phía Hoa Kỳ. Một khi đạt được thỏa thuận về mức thuế 15 % với Bruxelles (tháng 7/2025) và giành được nhiều nhượng bộ từ phía châu Âu, Washington lập tức « quay lại tiếp tục gây sức ép, đe dọa Liên Hiệp Châu Âu », đòi khối này phải trả giá đắt nếu gây trở ngại cho đà phát triển của các « ông lớn » trong lĩnh vực công nghệ kỹ thuật số của Mỹ. Hơn nữa chính vì các đạo luận DMA và DSA nói trên mà Apple và Meta đã bị châu Âu phạt hàng trăm triệu đô la. Nói cách khác, cuộc chiến sắp tới Washington đang chuẩn bị nhắm vào châu Âu không hề xuất phát từ nhu cầu thu hẹp nhập siêu của Mỹ với 27 thành viên Liên Âu. Trên đài truyền hình Arte, chuyên gia kinh tế và địa chính trị, thuộc Viện nghiên cứu châu Âu Jacques Delors, bà Elvire Fabry cho rằng, các đòn tấn công liên tiếp của Donald Trump trong lĩnh vực thương mại hay sắp tới đây là công nghệ kỹ thuật số nhắm vào châu Âu trước hết không liên quan đến việc Mỹ bị nhập siêu với châu Âu « Phía sau cuộc chiến thương mại này còn có nhiều ý đồ chính trị. Donald Trump tìm cách xé nát Liên Âu ra thành từng mảnh nhỏ nhưng lại vừa muốn tiếp cận thị trường châu Âu giúp cho các hãng của Mỹ. Cùng lúc, Hoa Kỳ mượn tay các đảng phái chính trị cựu hữu ở châu Âu, để khuynh đảo Liên Âu từ ở bên trong. Chính vì thế mà Mỹ hiện đang ủng hộ các đảng cánh cực hữu tại nhiều nước châu Âu ». Về phần Jean Luc Demarty nguyên giám đốc đặc trách về thương mại của Ủy Ban Châu Âu (2011-2019), ông giải thích, ngay cả việc áp dụng « thuế đối ứng » cũng không có cơ sở. « Đành rằng khoản thặng dư mậu dịch của châu Âu đối với Mỹ là rất lớn, và mức xuất siêu đó lại càng tăng thêm trong năm 2024 vừa qua, bởi vì đồng đô la tăng giá. Nhưng đấy chỉ là xét riêng về các khoản xuất và nhập hàng hóa. Nếu cộng cả vế dịch vụ với hàng hóa thì cán cân thượng mại giữa Hoa Kỳ và Liên Hiệp Châu Âu khá cân đối, chênh lệnh chỉ khoảng 50 tỷ đô la chứ không phải là 200 hay 300 tỷ đô la như ông Donald Trump khẳng định ». Liên Âu luôn « run tay » khi cần tự vệ Trong mọi trường hợp, kinh tế gia Shahin Vallée thuộc cơ quan tư vấn về chính sách đối ngoại DGAP trụ sở tại Berlin đánh giá, châu Âu quá nhu nhược trong cuộc đọ sức với Hoa Kỳ. Mỹ đã nắm bắt rõ điều đó ngay từ khi mới chỉ vừa bắt đầu dọa nạt.    « Thực ra chiến lược đàm phán của Liên Hiệp Châu Âu chưa bao giờ khiến ông Trump phải lo lắng. Bruxelles đã có nhiều cơ hội để đặt những điều kiện cứng rắn hơn với Hoa Kỳ lên bàn thương thuyết, nhưng đấy chỉ là những lời đe dọa suông. Thậm chí ngay cả khi đề cập đến các biện pháp trả đũa để khỏi bị Washington o ép, châu Âu cũng không thể đồng ý và có một tiếng nói chung. Bruxelles đã ‘run tay' và ở phía bên kia, Washington thấy rõ điều ấy và đã tận dụng thời cơ ». Một nhược điểm khác của Liên Hiệp Châu Âu mà Hoa Kỳ đã chóng nhận thấy là tính thiếu đoàn kết của khối này. Cuộc chiến Digital còn chưa khai mào mà nhiều nhà phân tích đã báo động « coi chừng Đức sẽ bán rẻ tham vọng độc lập của châu Âu về kỹ thuật số cho Hoa Kỳ » để được Washington nương tay khi đánh vào công nghiệp xe hơi Đức. Mỹ cũng biết sử dụng chiến thuật « chia để trị ». Liên Hiệp Châu Âu đối tác nặng ký nhất của Mỹ Vài con số về trao đổi mậu dịch hai chiều : tổng kim ngạch xuất nhập khẩu hàng hóa và dịch vụ giữa Liên Hiệp Châu Âu và Mỹ năm 2024 vượt hơn 1.600 tỷ đô la (867 tỷ euro cho hàng hóa và 817 tỷ euro cho dịch vụ). Để so sánh, theo các thống kê chính thức của Mỹ (US Bureau of Economic Analysis) cùng thời kỳ, trao đổi hàng hóa và dịch vụ giữa hai nền kinh tế lớn nhất thế giới, tức Mỹ và Trung Quốc, là 660 tỷ đô la. Nghịch lý ở đây là Liên Hiệp Châu Âu tuy là khách hàng lớn nhất của Mỹ mà vẫn bị chèn ép. Hôm 27/07/2025 chủ tịch Ủy Ban Châu Âu, Ursula von der Leyen và tổng thống Mỹ Donald Trump đã đạt được một thỏa thuận quan trọng nhằm « tăng cường quan hệ thương mại và đầu tư » song phương và cũng vì thỏa thuận này bà đã bị nhiều thành viên trong khối chỉ trích gay gắt. Để hàng của châu Âu xuất khẩu sang Hoa Kỳ bị đánh thuế 15 % , thay vì 30 % như Donald Trump từng đe dọa, Liên Âu đã vội vã hứa mua thêm hơn 700 tỷ đô la dầu hỏa và khí đốt của Hoa Kỳ trong ba năm sắp tới và đầu tư thêm 600 tỷ đô la vào Mỹ từ nay đến năm 2029. Hàng rào phi quan thuế Nhưng bên cạnh đó, văn bản được ký kết còn kèm theo một điều khoản buộc các bên giảm thiểu các hàng rào phi quan thuế để thúc đẩy mâu dịch hai chiều. Chính trên điểm này Washington chuẩn bị một đợt tấn công sắp tới nhắm vào Liên Âu. Liên Hiệp Châu Âu là thị trường chiếm 27 % doanh thu của Google, 23 % thu nhập của Meta. Nhờ có 450 triệu dân châu Âu mà mỗi năm Marck Zuckerberg thu về 38 tỷ đô la … còn với ông Sundar Pichai, trong cương vị chủ tịch tổng giám đốc Alphabet Inc, công ty mẹ của Google thì năm ngoái Liên Hiệp Châu Âu cho phép thu về 90 kiếm được 96 tỷ đô la nhờ Liên Hiệp Châu Âu. Trong cuộc chiến về công nghệ kỹ thuật số đang manh nha giữa hai bờ Đại Tây Dương, chủ đích của tổng thống Trump là « diệt trừ hiểm họa » châu Âu cũng sẽ có những nhà vô địch trong thế giới digital.

Dit is aflevering 134 van Licht op Legal. In deze aflevering gaat Godart van Ekeren, Advocaat Information Technology en Privacy bij Van Benthem & Keulen, in op de AI-verordening (AI Act).De AI-verordening (AI Act) is aangenomen en dat heeft onder meer gevolgen voor zorginstellingen. Zorginstellingen hebben namelijk de verplichting om AI transparant en verantwoord in te zetten. Wat zijn de gevolgen voor de praktijk? In deze aflevering legt Godart uit wat de gevolgen zijn voor bijvoorbeeld het gebruik van spraakherkenningsapps voor verslaglegging en AI-systemen die medische diagnoses ondersteunen. Ook gaat Godart in op de aandachtspunten bij de inkoop van AI-systemen en hij sluit af met praktische adviezen voor de praktijk. Wilt u meer weten over dit onderwerp? Neem dan contact op met Godart van Ekeren.Heeft u suggesties voor een onderwerp of wilt u dat onze experts hun licht laten schijnen op uw juridische vraagstuk? Stuur dan een mail naar lichtoplegal@vbk.nl. Licht op Legal kunt u via onze website, Spotify, Apple Podcasts of uw eigen favoriete podcastapp beluisteren.Dit is een podcast van Van Benthem & Keulen. U vindt ons op:vbk.nlLinkedInTwitterFacebookInstagram Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Čo dokážu pokročilé AI nástroje už dnes? Zistite, prečo je agent revolúciou nad rámec klasických jazykových modelov — inteligentne skombinuje prehľadávanie webu, generovanie textu, obrázkov, audia, ale dokonca za vás vybaví online nákupy, zostaví prezentáciu či automatizuje bežné digitálne úlohy. Čakajú vás praktické tipy na výber správnych AI služieb, dôležité rady o ochrane súkromia aj pohľad do zákulisia európskej regulácie (AI Act), ktorá mení pravidlá hry.

K ist der 11.Buchstabe im Alphabet und dort ist der Paragraph 34 inzwischen angekommen. Oder besser gesagt, kommt er am 1.1.2026 an. Was hat es damit auf sich und worum müssen sich Vermittelnde kümmern? Und was ist überhaupt mit dem AI-Act der Europäischen Union? Und dann wäre da noch die BaFin und ihre Stellungnahme zur Beratung von Nettopolicen. Jede Menge los. Es gibt viel zu bereden mit der Netfonds Syndikusanwältin Sarah Lemke.

AI is rapidly becoming part of the healthcare system, powering everything from diagnostic tools and medical devices to patient monitoring and hospital operations. But while the potential is extraordinary, the risks are equally stark. Many hospitals are adopting AI without the safeguards needed to protect patient safety, leaving critical systems exposed to threats that most in the sector have never faced before. In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I speak with Ty Greenhalgh, Healthcare Industry Principal at Claroty, about why healthcare's AI rush could come at a dangerous cost if security does not keep pace. Ty explains how novel threats like adversarial prompts, model poisoning, and decision manipulation could compromise clinical systems in ways that are very different from traditional cyberattacks. These are not just theoretical scenarios. AI-driven misinformation or manipulated diagnostics could directly impact patient care. We explore why the first step for hospitals is building a clear AI asset inventory. Too many organizations are rolling out AI models without knowing where they are deployed, how they interact with other systems, or what risks they introduce. Ty draws parallels with the hasty adoption of electronic health records, which created unforeseen security gaps that still haunt the industry today. With regulatory frameworks like the UK's AI Act and the EU's AI regulation approaching, Ty stresses that hospitals cannot afford to wait for legislation. Immediate action is needed to implement risk frameworks, strengthen vendor accountability, and integrate real-time monitoring of AI alongside legacy devices. Only then can healthcare organizations gain the trust and resilience needed to safely embrace the benefits of AI. This is a timely conversation for leaders across healthcare and cybersecurity. The sector is on the edge of an AI revolution, but the choices made now will determine whether that revolution strengthens patient care or undermines it. You can learn more about Claroty's approach to securing healthcare technology at claroty.com.

In this episode of The AI Report, An AI Showdown: Musk Accuses Apple & OpenAI of Rigging the Future, and he's suing. Artie Intel and Micheline Learning report on all things Artificial Intelligence. Today, the duo explores breakthrough research in neuro-symbolic systems, the rollout of the EU’s AI Act, and how innovation, regulation, and everyday life are colliding in real time. Topics this episode covers include:

Marc spricht mit Dr. Constantin Rehaag, Partner bei Dentons, über seinen vielfältigen Weg vom Reserveoffizier zum IP-Litigator mit strafrechtlichem Schwerpunkt. Es geht um die Bekämpfung von Marken- und Produktpiraterie, die internationale Zollpraxis, lebensgefährliche Medikamentenfälschungen und den Einsatz von KI in Großkanzleien, inklusive Einblicken in interne AI-Guidelines, Legal-Tech-Investitionen und veränderte Ausbildungsmodelle für junge Juristen. Wie erkennt man Fälschungen schon an der Paketflut? Welche Chancen eröffnet der europäische AI-Act für Anwälte? Weshalb bevorzugt Constantin Bewerber, deren zweites Examen stärker ausfällt? Warum sollten Partner in Kanzleien länger arbeiten? Antworten auf diese und viele weitere Fragen erhaltet Ihr in dieser Folge von IMR. Viel Spaß!

Tekoälysäädös on tekoälyjärjestelmien CE-merkki ja minimoi tekoälyjärjestelmistä aiheutuvia riskejä ihmisten terveydelle, turvallisuudelle ja perusoikeuksien toteutumiselle. Turun yliopiston Yksityisoikeuden professori Mika Viljanen avaa tekoälysäädöksen eli AI Act:in sisältöä. Aihetta käsitellään yliopistossa tehtävän työn ja etenkin opetuksen näkökulmasta. Podcastin aikana käydään läpi tekoälysäädökseen liittyvät keskeiset käsitteet kuten tekoälyjärjestelmä ja suuririskinen tekoälyjärjestelmä. Opettajia kiinnostava kysymys on miten tekoälyä voi käyttää osana oppimisen arviointia vai voiko sitä käyttää? Entä milloin opettajasta tulee laajoja kielimalleja hyödyntäessään tekoälyjärjestelmän tarjoaja ja mitä siitä taas seuraa? Suositeltava podcast myös koulutuksen hallinnon puolella työskenteleville sekä tekoälyjärjestelmien kehittäjille. Tekoälysäädöksestä lisätietoja tarvitsevalle vielä lukuvinkkinä 2025 julkaistu Tekoälyn sääntely -kirja (Lindroos-Hovinheimo, Koivisto, Koulu, Sankari). Podcastin tekstivastine: https://www.utu.fi/fi/ajankohtaista/podcast/latua-asiaa-yliopistopedagogiikasta-ja-oppimismuotoilusta Podcastin kansikuva: Totti Tuhkanen CC-BY 4.0

Telekom-Chef gegen EU AI Act – Tim Höttges im Metacheles-Faktencheck Ein LinkedIn-Post von Telekom-CEO Tim Höttges sorgt für Diskussion: „Europa reguliert“ – mehr Bürokratie, weniger Innovation? Sascha Pallenberg widerspricht. Warum die Offenlegung von Trainingsdaten im EU AI Act entscheidend ist, wie Big Tech (Meta, OpenAI & Co.) Regeln umgeht und weshalb Europa mit Transparenz statt Silicon-Valley-„Faktenschaffen“ punkten muss.In diesem Podcast erfahrt ihr: ✅ Was Tim Höttges am EU AI Act kritisiert ✅ Warum Transparenz bei Trainingsdaten so wichtig ist ✅ Wie Meta & OpenAI mit Scraping & illegalen Daten arbeiten ✅ Wieso Social Media als warnendes Beispiel gilt ✅ Warum EU-Regeln Innovation sichern statt verhindern ✅ Wie Telekom selbst mit AI-Standards vorbildlich war

I detta avsnitt diskuterar vi skillnaderna mellan USA:s AI Action Plan, EU:s AI Act och Kinas syn på AI-utveckling. Vi utforskar hur dessa olika perspektiv påverkar innovation och reglering inom AI, samt de utmaningar som företag står inför i en snabbt förändrad teknologisk miljö.

Czy w erze sztucznej inteligencji możemy jeszcze mieć pewność, że „ja w Internecie” to naprawdę ja? W najnowszym odcinku Rozmów Sebastiana Stodolaka w Świetlicy Wolności wiceprezes WEI rozmawia z Janem Szajdą – inżynierem informatyki i współwłaścicielem firmy IDENTT – o cyfrowej tożsamości, biometrii, oszustwach „na PESEL” i wyścigu technologicznym z cyberprzestępcami. Dowiesz się, dlaczego stuprocentowe bezpieczeństwo w sieci to mit, jak AI jednocześnie zwiększa nasze możliwości i ryzyka, dlaczego Europa może przegrać technologiczny wyścig oraz czy naprawdę powinniśmy zlikwidować anonimowość w Internecie. To rozmowa o granicach prywatności, przyszłości weryfikacji online i tym, co czeka rynek nowych technologii w świecie coraz bardziej cyfrowym – i coraz mniej anonimowymNajważniejsze tematy rozmowy:

Tentokrát o tom, že strana Motoristé má nového autoklempíře, že předsedu Stačilo Vidláka podle všeho platí slovenský miliardář s kontakty na Rusko a Babiše, rychle si proletíme novinky z Reichu, kde se mimo jiné schyluje k zatýkání demokratických zákonodárců v Texasu. Připomeneme si, že v EU začíná platit AI Act a že je to dobře a na závěr dojde na srovnání amerických a čínských akčních plánů AI.Celé epizody na https://www.herohero.co/kanarcivsiti . A nebo si kupte naše trička na https://www.neverenough.shop/kanarci . Podcast pro Vás připravují @alexalvarova a @holyj . Hudba a sound engineering: PsyekTwitter Spaces moderuje @jiribulan .Najdete nás na www.kanarci.online

Vandaag spreken we met Karen Boers, CEO van FARI, over AI voor het common good in België en Europa.We starten bij een introductie van FARI als onderzoeksinstituut van VUB en ULB, met focus op AI, data en robotica voor maatschappelijk nut. Van daaruit duiken we in toepassingen zoals smart cities, gezondheidszorg met exoskeleton, en uitdagingen rond data bias en governance. We bespreken de AI Act als risicokader, de balans tussen regulering en innovatie, en hoe Europa tech-soevereiniteit nastreeft tegenover grootmachten als de VS en China. Maar wat met high-risk toepassingen in onderwijs, huisvesting of surveillance, en de nood aan human oversight?We eindigen met te spreken over haar bioboerderij als contrast. Enjoy!PS. Koop ons boek, de dialoog-paradox; https://www.standaardboekhandel.be/p/de-dialoog-paradox-9789464750935 DISCOURS vzw https://www.discours.be PODCASTApple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/be/podcast/discours-met-de-boys/id1552090974 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1hC2t2YYCE3l7BOB12yjIrYoutube: https://www.youtube.com/@discoursSOCIALSTwitter: https://x.com/DiscoursDialoog Instagram: http://instagram.com/discoursdialoog Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DiscoursDialoog TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@discoursdialoog

In this thought-provoking episode, Cresset Group's CSO, Mark Mackey, and VP of AI, Mutlu Dogruel, dissect the emerging geopolitical battle for AI supremacy, revealing how China's DeepSeek model fundamentally disrupted the AI landscape by achieving GPT-4 level performance for just $6 million versus OpenAI's reported $100+ million investment. The discussion exposes a critical divide in global AI governance: Europe's "regulatory fortress" approach with the AI Act creates strict but vague rules that leave companies navigating a complex maze, while the US employs a "Wild West" philosophy of sector-specific oversight and red-teaming strategies. In the race for global AI dominance, China is leaping ahead of the US and the EU.This episode is presented in partnership with Cresset.Host⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Lori Ellis⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, Head of Insights, BioSpaceGuestsMutlu Dogruel, VP of AI, CressetMark Mackey, CSO, CressetDisclaimer: The views expressed in this discussion by guests are their own and do not represent those of their organizations.

In this episode, Ricardo discusses the impact of the AI Act, the European regulation on artificial intelligence (General-Purpose AI models). The law, passed in 2024 and fully in force in 2026, began imposing strict rules on general-purpose AI models such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini on August 2, 2025. Projects using these AIs, even for simple integration, must also follow ethical, privacy, and transparency requirements. This changes the role of the project manager, who now needs to ensure legal compliance. Despite criticism that the law limits innovation, Ricardo emphasizes that it signals technological maturity. For him, adapting is essential to avoid risks and add value to projects. Listen to the podcast to learn more! https://rvarg.as/euactslide https://rvarg.as/euact

Neste episódio, Ricardo comenta o impacto da AI Act, regulamentação europeia da inteligência artificial (General‑Purpose AI models). A lei, aprovada em 2024 e em vigor plena em 2026, começou a impor, desde 2/08/25, regras rígidas aos modelos de IA de uso geral, como GPT, Claude e Gemini. Os projetos que usam essas IAs, mesmo como integração simples, também devem seguir exigências sobre ética, privacidade e transparência. Isso muda o papel do gerente de projetos, que agora precisa garantir conformidade legal. Apesar das críticas de que a lei limita a inovação, Ricardo destaca que ela sinaliza maturidade tecnológica. Para ele, adaptar-se é essencial para evitar riscos e agregar valor aos projetos. Escute o podcast para saber mais! https://rvarg.as/euactslide https://rvarg.as/euact

New rules came into force requiring makers of artificial intelligence models to ensure their systems are safe and transparent. While EU's AI Act means the Government must police the companies providing AI tools, the US vows to cut red tape for the sector. RTÉ Work and Technology Correspondent Brian O'Donovan reported on the latest in tech.

In this episode of Top in Tech, Adriana Capparelli, Practice Director, and Anna Lisa Schäfer-Gehrau, Associate, discuss the latest developments in digital policy from Brussels, focusing on the Digital Fairness Act (DFA) and its implications for child protection and fairness in digital environments. They explore the intersection of the DFA with existing regulations like the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the AI Act, the scope of the DFA, and the ongoing consultation process. The conversation also highlights international regulatory trends and the importance of stakeholder engagement as the EU moves towards significant legislative changes in the coming months. Top in Tech will take a short break for August and return in September. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

 In today's Cloud Wars Minute, I spotlight a powerful joint message from two of Europe's top tech CEOs, Siemens CEO Roland Busch and SAP CEO Christian Klein, who are urging the European Union to reconsider its AI legislation.Highlights00:03 — The CEOs of Siemens and SAP have urged the EU to reconsider its AI legislation, expressing concerns that the current law hinders innovation. SAP CEO Christian Klein and Siemens CEO Roland Busch are advocating for a new regulatory framework that supports AI innovation rather than stifling it. Busch cited the EU's AI Act as the reason that Europe is falling behind.00:46 — Klein echoed these concerns. Both CEOs believe the first step should be reevaluating the existing legislation affecting AI innovators in Europe. While the AI Act is designed to ensure the safe development and deployment of AI technologies, it also risks stifling innovation.01:17 — This can lead to monopolization and hold back key innovators in the EU who are working collectively with their global partners to create what will become the cornerstones of the AI era. And there's a strong case for collaboration here. Both tech companies and legislators need to align in establishing the foundations for a thriving yet safe AI operations landscape. Visit Cloud Wars for more.

Today's episode is brought to you in partnership with The Observer and Tortoise, who just released a brand new investigative podcast series, called “The Lab Detective”. “The Lab Detective" deals with the story of Kathleen Folbigg, who experienced unimaginable loss. All four of her infant children died suddenly, over a 10-year period. Their deaths were unexplained. Until a police detective turned up at her door, and arrested Kathleen on suspicion of murder.Kathleen was labelled ‘Australia's worst female serial killer', convicted, and was destined to spend most of the rest of her life in jail.Until a different type of detective entered her life. A scientist working in a lab who uncovered the truth behind the deaths.This is the story of a shocking miscarriage of justice, but as journalist Rachel Sylvester starts to investigate how this happened, she learns that Kathleen is not alone – other mothers have endured the same fate, and may also be in prison.The Lab Detective is a story about the power of science, and the determination of those searching for the truth.Follow the link to listen to the full series: https://lnk.to/thelabdetectiveFD!europod.About today's episode on Long Story Short:Google has confirmed, today, it will sign the European Union's Code of Practice for General Purpose AI. The Code is a voluntary rulebook designed to help companies comply with the EU's AI Act, a landmark law that regulates artificial intelligence based on the risks it poses to society. But critics ask: is Europe protecting its citizens or putting itself at a disadvantage in the global AI race?Join us on our journey through the events that shape the European continent and the European Union.Production: By Europod, in co production with Sphera Network.Follow us on:LinkedInInstagram Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Alors que le règlement européen "AI Act" entre progressivement en vigueur, réécoutez ce point de vue sans langue de bois de Luc Julia, expert de l'intelligence artificielle, co-inventeur de Siri et directeur scientifique de Renault. Un entretien percutant sur les enjeux de souveraineté, de régulation… et sur l'avenir des IA agentiques.Rediffusion du 06/03/2025Dans cet épisode, Luc Julia revient sur :Le sommet de l'IA à Paris : entre annonces budgétaires ambitieuses et réalités incertaines sur le terrain.La régulation de l'intelligence artificielle : pourquoi vouloir encadrer trop tôt pourrait freiner l'innovation ?Le retard européen en matière de puces électroniques et de data centers.L'importance de soutenir les start-up françaises pour franchir le cap du scale-up.Le potentiel des IA open source, plus transparentes, plus frugales, et mieux adaptées à une IA « à domicile ».L'émergence des IA agentiques : vers des systèmes plus spécialisés, orchestrés, et capables d'agir sur le monde, notamment en robotique.-----------

Een zege voor Europese regelgeving op het gebied van AI, want Google heeft na eerder verzet nu tóch ingestemd met nieuwe richtlijnen. Joe van Burik vertelt erover in deze Tech Update. Verder in deze Tech Update: In Italië moet AI helpen in de strijd tegen klimaatverandering met het voorspellen van aardverschuivingen en modderstromen Een schandaal in de categorie slimme seksspeeltjes bij maker Lovense See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Steve speaks with Dragos Tudorache, one of the members of the European Parliament who is responsible for writing the EU's AI Act. Dragos explains the thought process that went into developing the new law and tells Steve what organisations can expect and how they can prepare for its implementation. Mentioned in and related to this episode: ISF Podcast: Ellie Pavlick - Balancing the Risk and Reward of AI ISF Podcast: The Ethical Dilemma of AI & Innovation ISF Podcast: Beyond Buzzwords: AI, ML, and the Future of Cyber ISF Podcast: Mo Gawdat: Rethinking the Paradigm of Artificial and Human Intelligence ISF Analyst Insight Podcast Read the transcript of this episode Subscribe to the ISF Podcast wherever you listen to podcasts Connect with us on LinkedIn and Twitter From the Information Security Forum, the leading authority on cyber, information security, and risk management.

En esta edición veraniega, hablamos de los movimientos tectónicos en el mundo de la programación con IA: desde la batalla entre OpenAI y Google por Winsurf, hasta el auge de los IDEs agénticos y la revolución en cómo los desarrolladores escriben (o ya no escriben) código.Además, analizamos el nuevo plan de Estados Unidos para liderar la carrera global de la inteligencia artificial —Winning the Race— con apuestas tan ambiciosas como polémicas. Y cerramos con el nuevo Código de Buenas Prácticas publicado por la UE para prepararse ante la regulación de la AI Act, una iniciativa que podría cambiar las reglas del juego para startups y grandes empresas en Europa.0:00 - Introducción veraniega y situación pre-agosto3:00 - ¿Todos los programadores usan ya IA? Tres niveles de adopción7:00 - IDEs agénticos: Winsurf, Cursor, GitHub Copilot y compañía10:00 - El culebrón Winsurf: ¿qué pasó entre OpenAI, Google y Cognition AI?13:45 - Números de Winsurf: ¿era una startup moribunda? Todo lo contrario17:00 - ¿Basta con decirle a la IA el “qué”? El “cómo” marca la diferencia20:00 - Reflexión: ¿cualquiera podrá programar en el futuro?22:00 - Las grandes rondas: Cursor, Lovable y la fiebre por la programación IA25:00 - Gabe Newell y el valor de saber usar Cloud Code hoy28:00 - IA en el Business Model Canvas: ¿es tu propuesta de valor o un recurso clave?31:00 - El peligro de creerte una empresa de IA sin serlo34:00 - El plan de EE.UU.: Winning the Race, IA con valores americanos39:00 - Código abierto, supercomputadores y desregulación ambiental43:00 - ¿Una nueva Guerra Fría? EE.UU. vs China en la carrera por la IA47:00 - AI Act de la UE: llega la regulación (y la burocracia)51:00 - El nuevo Código de Buenas Prácticas de la UE: ¿voluntario u obligatorio?55:00 - Meta y el rechazo europeo: modelos frontera y choques regulatorios59:00 - ¿Dónde emprender con IA: Europa o fuera?1:03:00 - Cierre: entre el entusiasmo y la incertidumbre global⁠Hosted on Mumbler.io

Alors que je suis toujours à Beyrouth, ce nouvel épisode du Debrief Transat avec Bruno Guglielminetti est l'occasion d'explorer comment l'intelligence artificielle s'installe… même là où on ne l'attend pas. Au Liban, malgré un contexte politique et économique tendu, des initiatives locales voient le jour pour démocratiser l'IA, sensibiliser les jeunes pousses, et tenter de freiner la fuite des cerveaux. Une conférence baptisée AI and Lebanon témoigne de cette effervescence.On revient aussi sur l'explosion des usages de ChatGPT et des agents IA personnalisés. Je partage mes tests très concrets avec le nouvel AI Agent de ChatGPT, capable de passer des commandes sur Uber Eats ou d'analyser mon emploi du temps. Un aperçu du futur de l'assistance numérique.Nous parlons aussi de Grok, l'IA d'Elon Musk, qui se décline désormais en avatars destinés aux enfants — une initiative controversée qui pose des questions éthiques. Enfin, focus sur le AI Act européen qui entre en vigueur en août : une nouvelle phase de régulation qui pourrait marquer un tournant dans l'innovation en Europe.Enfin, nous évoquons les sommaires de nos podcasts hebdo respectifs.-----------

Depuis Beyrouth, Jérôme Colombain raconte sa découverte d'une conférence sur l'IA au Liban, avec notamment un bus itinérant de sensibilisation aux technologies et une volonté d'éviter la fuite des cerveaux. Il partage aussi son test du nouvel agent GPT, capable de passer une commande sur Uber Eats ou d'analyser un agenda Google en détail. Discussion ensuite sur les avatars virtuels de Grok, dont un projet controversé destiné aux enfants, et sur les inquiétudes liées au laxisme américain face à l'IA, comparé au futur AI Act européen.

Entre un Donald Trump qui promet un avenir sans contraintes pour l'IA et une Europe qui entre dans l'ère de la régulation avec l'AI Act, le fossé transatlantique s'élargit. ChatGPT 5 se profile, les attaques informatiques se multiplient, et le sport entre dans une nouvelle ère avec des commentaires générés par l'IA.

Dans cet épisode, Gil Katz nous montre comment Intelsia utilise l'intelligence artificielle pour transformer des données publiques éparpillées en levier stratégique pour les entreprises. Matching d'appels d'offres, RAG sur-mesure, agents intelligents… un vrai retour aux fondamentaux : créer de la valeur, pas de la hype.

Welche ethischen Herausforderungen ergeben sich durch den Einsatz von KI? Reicht es aus, die gesetzlichen Anforderungen zu erfüllen? Und welche Verantwortung tragen Vorstände und Aufsichtsräte? In dieser Episode des The Agenda Podcasts präsentiert von Sherpany spricht Prof. Dr. Christoph Lütge, Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik und Direktor des Instituts für Ethik in der KI an der Technischen Universität München, mit Podcast-Host Ingo Notthoff, über den etischen Umgang mit Künstlicher Intelligenz. Zudem erläutert er, welche Auswirkungen der AI-Act der europäischen Union auf den vertrauenswürdigen und verantwortungsvollen Umgang mit KI hat und wie der Aufsichtsrat und Vorstand die Einhaltung der Bestimmungen überprüfen kann.Die Episode im Überblick:Ethische Fragen sind entscheidend für das Vertrauen in KIDie fünf Prinzipien der KI-EthikUnternehmen müssen sich aktiv mit den Risiken von KI auseinandersetzenCompliance ist wichtig, reicht aber nicht ausEthische Risiken können zu betriebswirtschaftlichen Risiken werdenAufsichtsräte und Vorstände müssen KI-Ethische Prinzipien aktiv umsetzenDer EU-AI-Act schafft Unsicherheit für UnternehmenMenschliches Monitoring ist ein wichtiger Aspekt der KI-EthikUnternehmen sollten KI-Ethik als Wettbewerbsvorteil sehenEthische KI-Nutzung kann das Vertrauen der Nutzer stärkenThank you for listening! Visit us at Sherpany.com or follow us on LinkedIn for board, board committee, and executive meetings solutions.

Meta has said it won't sign the EU's AI code of practice agreement. Meta snubs the EU's voluntary AI guidelines 'Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI.' The code published by the EU on July 10th is a voluntary set of guidelines to help companies follow the AI Act's rules around general-purpose AI before they come into effect in a few weeks. Jess Kelly explains all.

Das ist das KI-Update vom 21.07.2025 unter anderem mit diesen Themen: Altman warnt vor der Nutzung des eigenen ChatGPT Agent Meta stellt sich gegen die KI-Pläne der EU OpenAI überzeugt in Mathe-Olympiade und Apple-KI-Framework MLX soll Nvidias CUDA unterstützen Links zu allen Themen der heutigen Folge findet Ihr hier: https://heise.de/-10494349 https://www.heise.de/thema/KI-Update https://pro.heise.de/ki/ https://www.heise.de/newsletter/anmeldung.html?id=ki-update https://www.heise.de/thema/Kuenstliche-Intelligenz https://the-decoder.de/ https://www.heiseplus.de/podcast https://www.ct.de/ki Eine neue Folge gibt es montags, mittwochs und freitags ab 15 Uhr.

La inteligencia artificial sigue avanzando… pero no siempre como esperábamos. En este episodio de La Tertul-IA, Lu, Frankie y Corti charlan sobre el choque entre las expectativas infladas y la realidad operativa de la IA. Exploramos los desafíos que viven las empresas al integrar agentes autónomos en producción, la creciente presión regulatoria del AI Act europeo y sentencias clave en EE. UU. que podrían cambiar las reglas del juego. 

Last week, following months of negotiation and just weeks before the first legal deadlines under the EU AI Act take effect, the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on General-Purpose AI. The Code is voluntary and intended to help companies demonstrate compliance with the AI Act. It sets out detailed expectations around transparency, copyright, and measures to mitigate systemic risks. Signatories will need to publish summaries of training data, avoid unauthorized use of copyrighted content, and establish internal frameworks to monitor risks. Companies that sign on will see a “reduced administrative burden” and greater legal clarity, the Commission said. At the same time, both European and American tech companies have raised concerns about the AI Act's implementation timeline, with some calling to “stop the clock” on the AI Act's rollout.To learn more, Tech Policy Press associate editor Ramsha Jahangir spoke to Luca Bertuzzi, senior AI correspondent at MLex, to unpack the final Code of Practice on GPAI, why it matters, and how it fits into the broader rollout of the AI Act.

Will EU cybersecurity laws result in new global standards? Should companies handle NIS2 compliance in concert with GDPR, AI Act, or Data Act requirements? Does it make sense to take data localization to its ultimate consequences? Nathalie Barrera serves as the Director for Privacy for the EMEA region at Palo Alto Networks, which is a leading provider of cybersecurity solutions. Her expertise involves the company's compliance with NIS2, the AI Act, the GDPR, and DORA. She also assists customers in navigating their own complex regulatory requirements. She has previously spent seven years at Cisco Systems working as commercial counsel and Privacy and Security Counsel.  She studied law and completed her LLM at the University of Navarra.  References: Nathalie Barrera on LinkedIn EU Network and Information Services Directive II EU Data Act EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)  

Über 100 Unternehmen fordern eine zweijährige Aussetzung der KI-Verordnung. Ist die EU-Gesetzgebung wirtschaftsfeindlich oder Grundrechtsschutz? Außerdem: Chinas Perspektive auf das US-TikTok-Gesetz. Und: Was blieb vom Metaversum-Hype? Vera Linß, Hagen Terschüren, Katharin Tai, Dennis Kogel, Marcus Richter www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Breitband

Eindelijk is bekendgemaakt hoe bedrijven zich aan de AI Act binnen de EU kunnen houden. Dat gaat om een gedragscode die vanaf 2 augustus al gevolgd dient te worden, al volgen er pas boetes over op z'n vroegst een jaar. Joe van Burik vertelt erover in deze Tech Update. Dat gaat om allerlei zaken, zoals het verplicht kunnen geven van inzage bij het ontwikkelen van eigen AI-modellen, zowel naar autoriteiten toe als andere partijen die zulke technologie willen afnemen en gebruiken. Maar dit gaat ook om de inachtneming van auteursrecht als je AI-systemen gebruik, zoals ChatGPT of Gemini": AI mag niet getraind worden op illegaal verkregen data en andere materialen, dus het mag NIET als schrijvers of andere makers aangeven dat ze dat niet willen. In de gedragscode staat ook hoe bedrijven dat soort situaties moeten aanpakken als het misgaat. Daarbij wordt ook onderscheid gemaakt tussen algemeen gebruik van AI en hoog risico, bijvoorbeeld als het gaat om meten van sentiment bij mensen met AI. Verder in deze Tech Update: De Belastingdienst krijgt een forse tik op de vingers van de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens wegens privacyschending met meerdere systemen, die zo gauw mogelijk moeten worden vervangen of aangepast See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

i'm wall-e, welcoming you to today's tech briefing for monday, july 7th. here's what's happening in the tech world: microsoft's strategic shift: microsoft is winding down its pakistan operations after 25 years, maintaining customer agreements through resellers and neighboring offices, impacting five employees. rivian's major investment: rivian receives a significant $1 billion investment from volkswagen, while techcrunch mobility plans a move to the beehiiv platform, enhancing reader engagement. uber's potential deal: speculation arises around uber's travis kalanick exploring a deal with the u.s. arm of pony ai, indicating fluid movements in the mobility sector. eu's ai act progresses: the eu is advancing its ai act, planning a risk-based regulatory framework by 2026, addressing "unacceptable risk" and transparency for "high-risk" ai applications. gallant's advancement in pet healthcare: gallant secures $18 million for ready-to-use stem cell therapies targeting pet conditions, marking a breakthrough in biotech solutions for veterinary medicine. that's all for today. we'll see you back here tomorrow.

From February 16, 2024: The EU has finally agreed to its AI Act. Despite the political agreement reached in December 2023, some nations maintained some reservations about the text, making it uncertain whether there was a final agreement or not. They recently reached an agreement on the technical text, moving the process closer to a successful conclusion. The challenge now will be effective implementation.To discuss the act and its implications, Lawfare Fellow in Technology Policy and Law Eugenia Lostri sat down with Itsiq Benizri, counsel at the law firm WilmerHale Brussels. They discussed how domestic politics shaped the final text, how governments and businesses can best prepare for new requirements, and whether the European act will set the international roadmap for AI regulation.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Key Trend 1: Hyper-Accelerated Scaling and New Venture Capital DynamicsSignificance:AI innovation is driving hypergrowth that shatters traditional timelines. Companies now catapult from zero to hundreds of millions in ARR in months, not years. Venture capital must adapt to this new reality with massively larger and risk-tolerant funding rounds focused on parallel scaling — raising as much capital as revenue grows to capture market share rapidly.Why it matters:The "burn rate is a feature, not a bug" mentality defines funding strategies today, making capital intensity a necessity in winner-take-all AI markets. Companies ignoring this shift risk falling behind or being outspent by competitors who build moats with talent, infrastructure, and data first.Key Trend 2: Talent and Data as Critical Moats in the AI Arms RaceSignificance:Talent wars are escalating, with massive compensation packages used to acquire top AI researchers and engineers, reflecting a strategy to build defensible moats beyond pure technology. Additionally, proprietary data pipelines and reinforcement learning processes are becoming crucial competitive advantages, often trumping model architectures alone.Why it matters:As AI models become commoditized and easier to replicate, the real differentiation lies in costly-to-copy human capital and exclusive data ecosystems. Companies investing in these defensive layers will sustain leadership and fend off rapidly emerging competitors.Key Trend 3: Redefining Content Economics in the AI EraSignificance:AI's reliance on vast amounts of web content to train models, often without compensation or permission, is triggering a fundamental rethink of content ownership, access, and monetization. Cloudflare's new policies signal a shift toward pay-for-access models that require AI companies to compensate content creators, disrupting the previous “free crawl” economic bargain.Why it matters:This reshapes incentives for publishers, creators, and AI businesses alike. Content providers gain leverage to set terms and generate revenues from AI models, while AI companies must adapt business models to accommodate these new costs, potentially accelerating AI ad monetization.Key Trend 4: The Great Differentiation — Building Hard-to-Copy Moats in an AI WorldSignificance:As AI makes imitation easy and replicable, companies must differentiate through costly signals, authentic experiences, and unique assets that competitors cannot copy cheaply. This includes physical infrastructure, branding, cultural elements, and deep human expertise — all forming sustainable moats in a landscape of digital abundance.Why it matters:In a world where digital replication is trivial, the economic value shifts toward rarity and authenticity. Companies adopting this mindset can build lasting competitive advantages that resist commoditization.Key Trend 5: The Geopolitical and Regulatory Landscape of AISignificance:AI development is not just a technology race but a geopolitical contest, with varied national approaches balancing innovation speed and regulation. Europe's AI Act exemplifies efforts to govern AI but faces pushback for potentially stifling competitiveness compared to the US and China's growth-first posture.Why it matters:The regulatory environment shapes where and how AI innovation flourishes. Diverging standards and delayed coordination may influence global market leadership, investment flows, and the speed of AI adoption.Discussion QuestionsHow does the new model of “parallel scaling” of funding and revenue fundamentally change startup growth strategies in AI compared to traditional SaaS? What risks and benefits does this introduce?With talent and data becoming primary moats, is the AI market at risk of consolidating power among a small set of firms? How can startups compete in such an environment?Cloudflare's “Pay Per Crawl” aims to rebalance value between content creators and AI companies. Will this model incentivize innovation or hamper the open data flows AI depends on?In a world where AI makes copying easy, what are the most viable forms of costly signals for differentiation? Can digital firms realistically replicate physical or cultural moats?Given the divergent regulatory approaches between the US, Europe, and China, how might geopolitical competition affect the speed and ethics of AI adoption globally?How do the controversies around tokenization and digital asset legitimacy, like OpenAI's rejection of Robinhood tokens, reflect broader regulatory challenges for blockchain-based financial innovation?Is the venture capital industry prepared to adapt investment models to AI's capital intensiveness and growth patterns? How might smaller VCs or new investors respond to the concentration of “ultra-unicorns”? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thatwastheweek.com/subscribe

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is delaying construction of a second plant in Japan, Ilya Sutskever announced he will take on the CEO role at his AI startup, Safe Superintelligence, and the EU is proceeding with its AI Act despite tech companies’ efforts to delay it. MP3 Please SUBSCRIBE HERE for free or get DTNS Live ad-free.Continue reading "The EU Is Proceeding With Its AI Act Despite Tech Companies’ Efforts To Delay It – DTH"

Ce jeudi 3 juillet, François Sorel a reçu Lucas Perraudin, fondateur de AI Partners et ancien directeur de Meta Reality Labs, Jérôme Marin, fondateur de Cafetech.fr, et Didier Sanz, journaliste spécialisé en informatique. Ils se sont penchés sur Perplexity qui lance un abonnement IA à 200 dollars par mois, la grande offensive des entreprises pour reporter la régulation sur l'IA en Europe, la compétition entre Starlink et Eutelsat pour équiper les TGV de WI-FI, ainsi que le partenariat entre France TV et Amazon Prime Vidéo, dans l'émission Tech & Co, la quotidienne, sur BFM Business. Retrouvez l'émission du lundi au jeudi et réécoutez-la en podcast.

Die Talent-Abwerbeschlacht um KI-Forscher geht weiter. Apple verhandelt mit OpenAI und Anthropic, um Siri über fremde LLMs aufzurüsten, plant zugleich ein günstiges A18-MacBook Air und mehrere leichte AR-Brillen. Shein stolpert vor dem Börsengang: London scheitert, jetzt vertrauliches Hongkong-Filing bei sinkendem Wachstum. Berlins Datenschutzaufsicht will DeepSeek aus deutschen App-Stores verbannen. Yupp AI startet als Meta-Suchmaschine für LLMs: ein Prompt, zwei Antworten, User küren das bessere Modell. OpenAI schwenkt für Inferenz auf Google-TPUs – billiger, schneller, unabhängiger. Roger Federer knackt dank seiner On-Beteiligung die Milliarde. WhatsApp Business rechnet künftig pro Nachricht ab und verdient an KI-Bots. Tesla verliert seinen Produktionschef, X holt Produkt-Tüftler Nikita Bier. Trumps Team plant 47 ATF-Deregulierungen, das TikTok-Verbot wird erneut vertagt. Amazon beschäftigt jetzt über eine Million Roboter, Start-ups fordern ein Moratorium für den EU AI Act, Microsofts Diagnose-KI schlägt Ärzte bei seltenen Fällen. Unterstütze unseren Podcast und entdecke die Angebote unserer Werbepartner auf ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠doppelgaenger.io/werbung⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Vielen Dank!  Philipp Glöckler und Philipp Klöckner sprechen heute über: (00:00:00) Meta wirbt OpenAI-Forscher ab (00:07:55) Apple sucht LLM-Partner (00:14:00) Shein-IPO wankt (00:23:45) Berliner Datenschutz will DeepSeek aus App-Stores werfen (00:25:33) Yupp AI Side-by-Side-Vergleich von LLM-Antworten (00:31:20) OpenAI nutzt Google-TPUs für Inferenz (00:43:20) Roger Federer wird Milliardär dank On-Beteiligung (00:48:00) WhatsApp Business: Wechsel zu Pay-per-Message-Modell (00:49:30) Tesla verliert Produktionschef; Nikita Bier neuer X-Produktchef (00:55:00) Trump (00:56:00) TikTok-Verbot erneut verschoben (00:58:00) Amazon meldet 1 Mio Roboter (01:00:05) Gute News Des Tages Shownotes OpenAI-Führung reagiert auf Meta-Angebote – wired.com Zuckerberg kündigt Meta-‘Superintelligenz'-Projekt an – bloomberg.com Apple erwägt Anthropic oder OpenAI für Siri – bloomberg.com Apple arbeitet an 7 Kopf-Displays – 9to5mac.com Apple bringt günstigeres MacBook mit iPhone-Prozessor heraus – 9to5mac.com Shein plant geheime Hongkong-Börsennotierung – reuters.com US-Käufer meiden Shein und Temu nach Schließung der Steuerschlupflücke durch Trump – ft.com DeepSeek droht Verbot in deutschen App-Stores von Apple und Google – reuters.com Google überzeugt OpenAI zur Nutzung von TPU-Chips – theinformation.com Roger Federers langfristige Deals machen ihn zum Tennis-Milliardär – bloomberg.com 500+ KI-Modelle im Vergleich – x.com WhatsApp Business Plattform Preise | WhatsApp API Preise – business.whatsapp.com Elon Musk Vertrauter Omead Afshar verlässt Tesla –  bloomberg.com Musk's X stellt Unternehmer Nikita Bier als Produktchef ein – bloomberg.com DOGE tritt ATF bei, um Waffenregulierungen zu reduzieren – washingtonpost.com TikTok in den USA: Trump findet Käufer – zeit.de Amazon kurz davor, mehr Roboter als Menschen in Lagern einzusetzen – wsj.com Europäische Startups und VCs fordern EU auf, AI Act zu pausieren – sifted.eu Microsoft: Neues KI-System diagnostiziert genauer als Ärzte – wired.com

John Pavolotsky is a partner at Stoel Rives in San Francisco. He is co-chair of the firm's AI, Privacy & Cybersecurity group and focuses his practice on data privacy, information security, and complex technology transactions. He has also been chair of the Intellectual Property Section of the California Lawyers Association.  John has taught Technology Transactions Law at the UC Davis School of Law and Comparative Privacy Law at the Santa Clara University School of Law. John has also guest lectured on technology and privacy law topics at the University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business; the University of San Francisco School of Management; and Stanford University. References: John Pavolotsky on LinkedIn John Pavolotksy at Stoel Rives Timeline of discussions (House, Senate) leading to a final decision on a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI laws (final deadline: July 4, 2025), Techcrunch Texas Legislature Passes House Bill 149 to Regulate AI Use (Nelson Mullins) Colorado AI Act California Privacy Protection Agency: Draft Automated Decision-making Technology Regulations California Gov. Newsom vetoes AI safety bill that divided Silicon Valley (September 2024), NPR Poland puts pausing enforcement of the AI Act on EU ministers' table (June 2025, MLex - paywalled) A Brief Overview of the Federal Trade Commission's Investigative, Law Enforcement, and Rulemaking Authority (FTC)

Kevin Werbach interviews Kay Firth-Butterfield about how responsible AI has evolved from a niche concern to a global movement. As the world's first Chief AI Ethics Officer and former Head of AI at the World Economic Forum, Firth-Butterfield brings deep experience aligning AI with human values. She reflects on the early days of responsible AI—when the field was dominated by philosophical debates—to today, when regulation such as the European Union's AI Act is defining the rules of the road.. Firth-Butterfield highlights the growing trust gap in AI, warning that rapid deployment without safeguards is eroding public confidence. Drawing on her work with Fortune 500 firms and her own cancer journey, she argues for human-centered AI, especially in high-stakes areas like healthcare and law. She also underscores the equity issues tied to biased training data and lack of access in the Global South, noting that AI is now generating data based on historical biases. Despite these challenges, she remains optimistic and calls for greater focus on sustainability, access, and AI literacy across sectors. Kay Firth-Butterfield is the founder and CEO of Good Tech Advisory LLC. She was the world's first C-suite appointee in AI ethics and was the inaugural Head of AI and Machine Learning at the World Economic Forum from 2017 to 2023. A former judge and barrister, she advises governments and Fortune 500 companies on AI governance and remains affiliated with Doughty Street Chambers in the UK.  Transcript Kay Firth-Butterfield Is Shaping Responsible AI Governance (Time100 Impact Awards) Our Future with AI Hinges on Global Cooperation Building an Organizational Approach to Responsible AI Co-Existing with AI - Firth-Butterfield's Forthcoming Book

L'Union européenne envisage de repousser certaines obligations du futur AI Act. Les règles sur la gouvernance et les modèles génériques pourraient n'entrer en vigueur qu'en 2026.Traduction: The European Union is considering delaying parts of the upcoming AI Act. Governance rules and requirements for general-purpose models might not take effect until 2026. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In Europe, the digital regulatory landscape is in flux. Over the past few years, the EU has positioned itself as a global leader in tech regulation, rolling out landmark laws like the AI Act. But now, as the much-anticipated AI Act approaches implementation, the path forward is looking anything but smooth. Reports suggest the European Commission is considering a delay to the AI Act's rollout due to mounting pressure from industry, difficulties in finalizing technical standards, and geopolitical tensions—including pushback from the US government. At the same time, a broader movement for Europe to reduce its dependence on Amercian tech is gaining momentum: What does this push for digital sovereignty actually mean? To help us unpack all of this, Tech Policy Press associate editor Ramsha Jahangir spoke to Kai Zenner, Head of Office and Digital Policy Advisor to German MEP Axel Voss, and one of the more influential voices shaping the future of EU digital policy.

In a world racing into the AI era, security, privacy, and trust are under pressure like never before. Chief Security Officers are facing a whole new battlefield, with laws rapidly taking shape — especially in the U.S. and California. Big changes are on the horizon, like California's new SB 468 bill, pushing for stronger protections around high-risk AI systems, while the EU's AI Act moves in a similar direction. So, what does this mean for CISOs today — and how should they prepare? Join us with Nick Shevelyov and Punit Bhatia, a seasoned cybersecurity leader, former Chief Security Officer at Silicon Valley Bank, and the author of Cyber War and Peace. With years of experience defending innovation and building digital trust, Nick shares real stories, powerful lessons from history, and sharp insights into where the future is heading.  This is your sneak peek into the conversation — stay tuned for the full episode.