Podcast appearances and mentions of summer zervos

This is the Trump on Trial podcast and this is your update for 10-16-2023.Good morning, listeners. Here's the latest on the legal proceedings surrounding former and disgraced President Donald Trump from across the country:In Georgia, on October 12th, a Fulton County judge has ruled against Trump's bid to move his election interference case to a federal jurisdiction. The trial has been marked for March 6, 2024. The following day, Trump's legal team introduced a motion to dismiss, asserting that the grand jury was improperly formed. The court has yet to issue a decision on this motion. Meanwhile, the state's special prosecutor, Fani Willis, disclosed on October 14th her intentions to probe Trump on potential racketeering charges.Switching to New York, a judge, on the 12th, declared that Trump is required to give testimony in a civil lawsuit initiated by Summer Zervos, a past participant of 'The Apprentice'. Zervos alleges that Trump acted inappropriately towards her. Trump's counsel, on October 13th, moved to delay the Zervos case until the conclusion of his ongoing criminal trials. The decision on this request remains pending. In another update, on October 14th, Attorney General Letitia James unveiled a $250 million civil lawsuit against both Trump and the Trump Organization, accusing them of business misconduct.Finally, in Washington, D.C., the special counsel delving into the January 6th Capitol incident, Jack Smith, on October 12th, served Trump with a grand jury subpoena. Trump's lawyers quickly reacted the next day, suggesting that Trump, as a former president, should be exempt from such legal proceedings. The court's decision on this matter is still in the offing. Smith, on October 14th, declared an expansion in the breadth of his inquiry, now covering Trump's activities leading up to and during the January 6th event.Stay tuned for more updates as these stories develop.

Trump Legal Troubles Update: Top Stories and Major Headlines from the Past 7 DaysOctober 5, 2023Trump's Mar-a-Lago Classified Documents CaseTrump is facing criminal charges for allegedly mishandling classified documents after leaving office. He is accused of taking thousands of sensitive papers with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, where they were stored in a haphazard manner. Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and his trial is scheduled to begin in May 2024.In the past 7 days, there have been several notable developments in the case. On October 3, the Justice Department released a batch of documents related to its investigation, including a memo from Trump's former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, in which Meadows warned Trump that he could be charged with a crime if he did not return the classified documents. The documents also showed that Trump resisted efforts by his own aides to retrieve the documents, and that he continued to claim that he had declassified them, even though there is no evidence to support this claim.On October 4, Trump's lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the charges, arguing that the Justice Department is targeting Trump for political reasons. The motion is unlikely to succeed, but it could delay the trial.Trump's New York Civil Fraud TrialTrump is also facing a civil fraud lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General's Office. The lawsuit alleges that Trump and his company inflated the value of their assets in order to obtain loans and insurance policies on favorable terms. Trump has denied the allegations, and the trial is scheduled to begin in January 2024.In the past 7 days, there have been no major developments in the civil fraud case. However, it is worth noting that the case is being presided over by Judge Arthur Engoron, who has already issued several rulings against Trump. This suggests that the case could pose a serious threat to Trump and his business empire.Trump's Other Legal TroublesIn addition to the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case and the New York civil fraud trial, Trump is facing a number of other legal challenges. These include:A criminal investigation in Georgia into Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. A civil defamation lawsuit filed by Summer Zervos, who alleges that Trump sexually assaulted her. A civil defamation lawsuit filed by E. Jean Carroll, who alleges that Trump raped her in the 1990s.It is important to note that Trump has denied all of these allegations. However, the fact that he is facing so many legal challenges on multiple fronts is a sign that he is in serious legal trouble and will likely be found guilty of many serious crimes.Trump's legal troubles are mounting, and he is facing the possibility of serious consequences, both criminal and civil. they pose a significant threat to Trump's personal and political future.Thank you listenand please be sure to subscribe to never miss an update.

Josh and Ken talk about the indictment of Steve Bannon, the end of Summer Zervos' defamation lawsuit against former President Trump, and more.

Former President Trump has sued the National Archives and the chairman of the January 6 investigating committee, Congressman Bennie Thompson, to try to prevent the disclosure of White House papers, records and communications up to and during the riot. He's asserting executive privilege. What does that mean again? Where does the idea of executive privilege come from, and how are the interests weighed in a situation like this? And then...does a former president have a strong executive privilege claim? That's a not-very-well-explored question. Trump is also instructing former advisers, including Steve Bannon, not to comply with subpoenas from the committee. Bannon hasn't been complying and so the committee voted to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department for contempt of Congress. Does that mean the Sergeant at Arms has a job to do? (Not just yet.) Plus: President Trump is deposed for more than four hours, New York's new anti-SLAPP law and the Summer Zervos lawsuit, Lev Parnas's ongoing trial, and Congressman Fortenberry is indicted.

Rep. Matt Gaetz is allegedly under federal investigation for sex trafficking. He has denied the charges and said he’s the victim of an extortion plot. Former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos’ defamation case against former President Trump continues. The prosecution makes its case against former officer Derek Chauvin. And there’s breaking SCOTUS news! This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

Today: the trial of Derik Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd continues with powerful testimony for the prosecution; Matt Gaetz is being investigated for a possible sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl; new information on the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine - this time from the CDC; leaked audio from conservatives opposing The For The People Act show that they’re scared of more people voting; Ghislaine Maxwell is hit with superseding indictments; Biden names diverse nominees for the federal bench; Florida COVID numbers face new scrutiny; Summer Zervos’s lawsuit against the former guy can move forward; Matt Gaetz considers quitting Congress to work for Newsmax; plus Dana Goldberg (@DGComedy) and AG deliver the Hot Notes and your Good news. Our guest: Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) Host, Objections podcast; Senior Investigative Reporter & Editor, @LawCrimeNews Follow AG and Dana on Stereo: stereo.com/allisongill stereo.com/dgcomedy Have some good news, a confession, a correction, or a case for Beans Court? https://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Want to support the show and get it ad-free and early? https://dailybeans.supercast.tech/ Or https://patreon.com/thedailybeans Promo Codes To find your perfect sofa, check out allform.com/DAILYBEANS. Allform is offering 20% off all orders for our listeners! You can try Caliper CBD risk-free for 30 days. If you don’t love it they’ll give you a full refund! https://trycaliper.com/dailybeans/  Don’t forget promo code DAILYBEANS for 20% off your first order! Get $20 off your fertility test when you go to ModernFertility.com/dailybeans Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

According to a Wednesday report from Consortium News, "defense witness Prof. Paul Rogers, political scientist at Bradford University, established that Assange is motivated by a political viewpoint that places him as a political opponent of his accusers. On cross examination, the prosecutor, James Lewis QC, hammered Rogers to try to get him to admit he has no basis to testify that the prosecution of Julian Assange is politically motivated. Lewis tried to destroy the witness' credibility as an expert by saying he did not include a statement by the US prosecutor saying that the charges against Assange are motivated by criminal justice, and not politics." What is going on here?"Coronavirus deaths in the United States topped 190,000 Wednesday along with a spike in new cases in the US Midwest with states like Iowa and South Dakota emerging as the new hotspots in the past few weeks," Reuters reported Wednesday. What are the ramifications?"The writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Donald J. Trump of raping her in the 1990s and is suing him for defamation, asked on Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she had on at the time of the incident," the New York Times reported in January. In August, the Washington Post reported, "Verna L. Saunders, a New York Supreme Court Justice, wrote that the lawsuit filed by journalist E. Jean Carroll could move forward and need not wait for an appeals court decision in a similar suit brought by former 'Apprentice' contestant Summer Zervos, who also alleges Trump sexually assaulted her." Finally, the Post reported on Tuesday, "The Justice Department on Tuesday intervened in the defamation lawsuit" brought by Carroll, "moving the matter to federal court and signaling it wants to make the US government — rather than Trump himself — the defendant in the case." How does this happen? "Upon returning from summer recess on Tuesday, Senate Republicans introduced a 78-page piece of legislation that party leaders have called a 'skinny' coronavirus relief plan," Common Dreams reported Tuesday. Is it skinny or emaciated? "German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her economy minister on Tuesday played down the possibility of halting the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany as part of any sanctions imposed on Moscow due to the poisoning of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny," Reuters reported Tuesday. Are there some very fine lines being walked here? "Analysts with TankerTrackers.com have tentatively identified a new round of Iranian gasoline shipments to Venezuela," the Maritime Executive reported Monday. "According to the firm, the product tankers Forest, Faxon and Fortune appear to have taken on about 825,000 barrels of gasoline at Port Shahid Rajaee, then turned off their AIS transponders. None have broadcast an AIS position since the end of August, according to consultancy Dryad Global." Are Iran and Venezuela thumbing their noses at US sanctions?"Shares of Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC), China's biggest contract chipmaker, plunged over 23% on Monday, after the US government said it was considering putting export restrictions on the company," CNBC reported Monday."Over 100 organizations that work on issues related to Latin America and the Caribbean sent a letter calling for the next administration to adopt a new Good Neighbor Policy toward the region based on non-intervention, cooperation and mutual respect," MintPress News reported Tuesday. Will this letter have any influence?Guests:Steve Poikonen - National organizer for Action4AssangeDr. Jehan "Gigi" El-Bayoumi - Professor of medicine and founding director of the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences' Rodman InstituteJim Kavanagh - Writer at The Polemicist and CounterPunch and the author of the article "Over the Rainbow: Paths of Resistance After George Floyd" Dr. Colin Campbell - Washington, DC, senior news correspondentDaniel Lazare - Investigative journalist and author of "The Velvet Coup"Scott Ritter - Former UN weapons inspector in Iraq Caleb Maupin - Journalist and political analystMedea Benjamin - Co-founder of Code Pink

Lev Parnas, Rudy Giuliani’s thumb-headed henchman, who is under indictment for campaign finance violations, has been really trying to cooperate with Congress in their investigations of President Trump. A judge allowed him to share seized documents with Congress and well, they turned out to be pretty interesting. Ken and Josh talk through the dump of documents and what this new character Robert Hyde was/is up to. Then: it looks like the impeachment trial could start next week. Nancy Pelosi has named impeachment managers and the articles have been sent to the Senate. So, what’s next? Michael Flynn is officially withdrawing his guilty plea, and Michael Avenatti was taken into custody during disciplinary hearing, which has complicated his upcoming federal trial in New York. Plus: updates on the defamation cases against President Trump from Summer Zervos and E. Jean Carroll, Bill de Blasio says the Manhattan DA is looking into the Trump Organization, and Michael Cohen wants his prison sentence reduced.

Today on The Daily Beans: Sondland amends his testimony and admits to the quid pro quo, Roger Stone’s trial is already weird, Nunes and Russia, Summer Zervos has evidence and more. P.S.: Come and see our sister show Mueller She Wrote in Boston, MA tomorrow, November 7th at City Winery! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today on The Daily Beans: Sondland amends his testimony and admits to the quid pro quo, Roger Stone’s trial is already weird, Nunes and Russia, Summer Zervos has evidence and more. P.S.: Come and see our sister show Mueller She Wrote in Boston, MA tomorrow, November 7th at City Winery! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Managers at McDonalds are throwing blenders and a 600 Lb Pound (Life) wife is cheating. Jordon claims Curry isn’t “hall of fame” ready and Summer Zervos claims your president sexually assaulted her. Rob Owens (iamrobowens), social media influencer and non-profit founder, sits in the third seat as we explore a full day of politics, entertainment, and social media.

On this week's 100th episode of Versus Trump, Charlie, Easha, and Jason offer a few quick hits and then have a discussion about the effect of litigation against the President personally and against the Administration.Charlie begins with a quick hit on the Devin Nunes defamation lawsuit (which Charlie says "reads like it's written by a crazy person"), and Easha mentions a new case by a Russian oligarch who claims he shouldn't be sanctioned by the U.S. Jason then highlights recent developments in the case of Summer Zervos, who was allegedly sexually harassed by the President before he took office, and a case about the Emoluments Clauses. This leads to a big picture discussion of where've been and where we're going.Thanks to Take Care for hosting us for 100 episodes, to We Edit Podcasts for editing most of the 100, and, most of all, to our listeners for tuning each week. We look forward to many more—but not too, too many, to be honest. This is a podcast that we hope does not go on forever.You can find us at @VersusTrumpPod on twitter, or send us an email at versustrumppodcast@gmail.com. You can buy t-shirts and other goods with our super-cool logo here. NotesThe Nunes complaint is here.The Zervos decision is here. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Today's episode is inspired by the 56th anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright, one of the most famous and celebrated landmark Supreme Court cases that guarantees indigent defendants the right to a court-appointed lawyer.  Is it under attack from our right-wing Supreme Court?  (You bet it is.) We begin with a quick update on the recent district court opinion in California v. Ross and what that means for the 2020 Census. Then, it's time for an Andrew Was Right segment a update on the New York appellate court's ruling in the Summer Zervos lawsuit.  As it turns out, Donald Trump does have to respond to Summer Zervos's lawsuit -- just like Bill Clinton had to respond to Paula Jones's. Then it's time for a terrifying deep dive into Clarence Thomas's dissent in the Supreme Court's recent decision in Garza v. Idaho.  What's the case about, and why is Thomas using it as a vehicle to try and overturn one of the most basic and fundamental rights criminal defendants enjoy today?  Listen and (sadly) find out. After all that, it's time for a fun listener question about footballer Wayne Rooney and public obscenity laws. Then, it's time for the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #118.  Did Thomas get a dreaded real property question correct??  Listen and find out!  And, as always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! AppearancesNone!  If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links Click here to read the recent district court opinion in California v. Ross. Check out the New York appellate court's ruling in the Summer Zervos lawsuit. If you have the stomach for it, read Clarence Thomas's dissent in the Supreme Court's recent decision in Garza v. Idaho. In the question-and-answer section, we discussed this statute, Rooney's arrest record, and Cohen v. California. Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

Today's Rapid Response Friday revisits some cases we've previously discussed with recent positive developments:  the Summer Zervos lawsuit and the future of political gerrymandering in Pennsylvania. We begin with the Zervos lawsuit we first covered in Episode 176, in which a state trial court judge has ordered Donald Trump to respond to discovery served by Zervos's attorney.  What's next for the President and why does it have Yodel Mountain implications?  You'll have to listen and find out! After that, we revisit our discussion from Episodes 146 and 148 regarding the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's opinion redrawing congressional maps in that state.  The U.S. Supreme Court -- and yes, that's the Brett Kavanaugh-and-Neil-Gorsuch-laden Supreme Court! -- just declined to intervene to protect the Republicans.  Why is that, and how is that a map forward?  We tell all! Then, we return to the Gary Hart story we discussed last episode.  Was Hart really set up?  Listen and find out! Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #100 that is the dreaded real property question Thomas needs to get right in order to hit "60% at the half."  Can he do it?!??  You'll have to listen and find out!  And, of course, if you'd like to play along with us, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Appearances None!  If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links Click here to read the cert petition in Turzai v. Brandt and here to read the opposition. This is the James Savage response on Gary Hart. Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

Join us for an early Rapid Response Friday, in which we break down the Supreme Court's decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.  To tackle a topic this big, we needed a little extra help, so we brought back our favorite guest, Andrew Seidel, attorney with the Freedom From Religion Foundation.  But that's not all!  We recorded so much information that we decided to do a crossover episode with Serious Inquiries Only, so you can have over two hours of Andrew-on-Andrew (and Thomas!) action. We begin, however, on Yodel Mountain, with two pieces of news arising out of Paul Manafort's criminal trial.  Is Paulie M going to jail?  Did he engage in illegal witness tampering?  Did he back up his encrypted WhatsApp messages on an unencrypted iCloud?  Listen and find out!  We also delve into Manafort's response to the press's motion to unseal the Mueller investigation documents first discussed in Episode 168.  And, as long as we're yodeling, we might as well catch up on what's going on in the Summer Zervos lawsuit first discussed in Episode 176. After that, it's time to figure out exactly what's going on in Masterpiece Cakeshop.  Is this a narrow decision?  Is it a win for anti-LGBTQ forces?  Is it a nothing-burger?  Listen and find out! Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #79 about the real property conveyance to a church.  Yes, it's more 13th-Century Saxony law!  And if you'd like to play along , just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Recent Appearances Andrew and Andrew continued to talk Masterpiece Cakeshop on Serious Inquiries Only, and Andrew was a guest talking the same thing on Episode 177 of The Scathing Atheist. Show Notes & Links Here's the government's motion to revoke Paul Manafort's pretrial release.  Witness tampering is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1512. We first discussed the press's motion to unseal the Mueller investigation documents in Episode 168, and the Summer Zervos lawsuit back in Episode 176. We've uploaded Supreme Court's decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission so you can read it for yourself. If you love Andrew Seidel, you might want to go back to his  FIVE previous appearances on the show, Episode 82 (on Trinity Lutheran), Episode 85 (which was originally a Patreon-only exclusive),Episode 111, Episode 131, and most recently, Episode 171. Finally, please consider supporting the Freedom From Religion Foundation. Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

It's time for another Rapid Response Friday, which means we get to break down whether Donald Trump has to respond to the Summer Zervos defamation lawsuit.  (Hint:  yes) We begin, however,  with a potential Stormy Setback.  What's the deal with press reports of a $10 million judgment entered against Stormy Daniels' attorney, Michael Avenatti?  Could it jeopardize the pending litigation?  Listen and find out! After that, we break down the recent federal district court opinion in Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump, which we covered when the case was first filed way back in Episode 77.  Are Donald Trump's Tweets really a "protected forum" to which the First Amendment applies?  Listen and find out! Then, we break down exactly how duplicitious Donald Trump's personal lawyer has been regarding the Summer Zervos lawsuit.  It's exactly as much as you'd expect! Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #77 regarding the constitutional requirement to a trial by jury.  If you'd like to play along with our new Patreon perk, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Recent Appearances Andrew was just a guest on the Dumb All Over Podcast, episode 70.  Go check it out! Show Notes & Links We discussed Michael Avenatti's pro hac vice motion in Episode 174; you can also read the LA Times article about the bankruptcy judgment, as well as check out both the Avenatti involuntary bankruptcy petition and the Avenatti creditors list. We analyzed several cases, the most hilarious of which is Kohlmayer v. AMTRAK, 124 F.Supp.2d 877 (D.N.J. 2000). Trump's Tweets were first discussed in Episode 77, along with the Davison v. Loudon County decision. You should read the Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump decision. This is the Supreme Court's decision in Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), and if you want to read Marc Kasowitz's deliberately misleading statements yourself, you can do so here. Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

In this week's episode, Jason and Charlie revisit two lawsuits in which the Plaintiffs have recently successfully fought off motions to dismiss and been allowed to proceed. And in a new installment of "Sanctions Corner with Uncle Charlie," Charlie answers questions about the FBI raid on the office of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.Jason and Charlie start the discussion by discussing DC and Maryland v. Trump, an Emoluments Clause case. They discuss the district court's recent decision holding that the state plaintiffs there had standing to proceed, and they explain why parts of the decision make good sense, while other aspects are a bit harder to understand. They then move on to the New York state court case of Summer Zervos v. Trump, in which former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos has sued Trump for defamation. A trial court judge in New York recently denied Trump's request to kick the case out of court on the grounds that Zervos could not litigate in state court against a sitting President, and Jason and Charlie have good things to say about the court's concise and elegant opinion. Finally, Uncle Charlie—always on the lookout for lawyer misconduct—answers a few questions about the recent FBI raid on Michael Cohen's office, even though he has to rely on press reports because the search warrant has not yet been made public.You can find us at @VersusTrumpPod on twitter, or send us an email at versustrumppodcast@gmail.com. And you can buy t-shirts and other goods with our super-cool logo here. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Devon and Drexel discuss John Bolton's past of abusive behavior and why his appointment as National Security Advisor poses a risk to our national security. They also discuss Stormy Daniels, Summer Zervos, and Karen McDougal's stories about their past relationships with Trump and what the possible consequences those stories will produce. We also announced Drexel's NEW SHOW, Bleep What you Heard with Drexel Heard and Friends. We can't wait for y'all to hear it! Follow the show on Twitter for updates @TheBleepingPod http://www.twitter.com/TheBleepingPod Check out our Sponsor for this week: Winc - Winc matches you with NEW wines that you're sure to love. Bottles start at just $13 and shipping is always on the house. For $20 off your first shipment go to http://www.trywinc.com/hellbent - if you try them, let us know and we'll toast to Trump's demise together!

Jackie and Dunlap on Trump vs Biden, Cambridge Analytica, dumping Facebook, Congratulations Putin, Russians, Stormy Daniels, Karen McDougal, Summer Zervos, Bolton in, McMaster out, driverless Uber kills pedestrian, Zuckerberg, and the last Trump Chief of Staff. Sponsors: Victor Mileage and Dodge's Tater Log store. Thanks to everybody who patreoned us at http://patreon.com/redstateupdate

Sex, lies and videotapes: kom maar op met de roddels over Trump en zijn buitenechtelijke escapades! Het blijft overigens niet bij roddel en achterklap, er zitten inmiddels ook voor Trump best tricky juridische aspecten aan, nu een oud-deelneemster aan The Apprentice, Summer Zervos, een rechtszaak tegen hem aanspande.

A judge gave the green light this week for a woman to sue President Trump for defamation. Summer Zervos claims Donald Trump sexually assaulted her; he called her a liar. Vox’s Laura McGann explains why this might change the game for other Trump accusers, and Jessica Leeds recalls sitting next to Trump on a plane. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jesse and Brittany discuss the upcoming March for Our Lives on Saturday, listener emails and voicemails related to American Idol controversy and MRAs, the lawsuit extravaganza against Donald Trump featuring Stormy Daniels, Karen McDougal, and Summer Zervos, the Cambridge Analytica fiasco, and some recognition of the victims of the Austin bombings. Support the show with... The post #391 – “March for Our Lives, Stormy, Summer, & Karen vs. Trump, Cambridge Analytica, and Recognition of Austin Bombing Victims.” appeared first on I Doubt It Podcast.

Max starts off by giving his take on the recent Austin bombings and the effect on the city of Austin where he lives. Next Max gets into Donald’s recent telephone call with Russia’s Putin to congratulate him on his recent electoral win as after all, it was a free and fair election. Of course he was told in big bold letters “DO NOT CONGRATULATE” as otherwise Donald might have a hard time reading such big words. Needless to say, Donald ignored this advice, which let’s not forget leaked out immediately from Donald Trump’s own White House. Then Max gets into Trump’s choice of lawyers, they may not be lawyerly but they play one on TV. Sure seems to Max that Trump has found a class A legal team and is bound to have Mueller quaking in his boots. Plus now it seems like two more women are suing the Donster, one for defamation, which is the case that could really cause Donald a lot a problems. Here name is Summer Zervos, so now we have Summer & Stormy. No one could make this stuff up.    

Three prominent women are giving Donald Trump a BIG headache these days. Stormy Daniels, Summer Zervos and Karen MacDougal have all made allegations against Trump and their cases are finally being heard. Could this bring the President down?We talk about the Mueller investigation with The Hill's Jonathan Easley. Plus, Democratic Strategist Joel Payne and Rep Mark Pocan from Wisconsin discuss the news of the day!

Max starts off by giving his take on the recent Austin bombings and the effect on the city of Austin where he lives. Next Max gets into Donald's recent telephone call with Russia's Putin to congratulate him on his recent electoral win as after all, it was a free and fair election. Of course he was told in big bold letters “DO NOT CONGRATULATE” as otherwise Donald might have a hard time reading such big words. Needless to say, Donald ignored this advice, which let's not forget leaked out immediately from Donald Trump's own White House. Then Max gets into Trump's choice of lawyers, they may not be lawyerly but they play one on TV. Sure seems to Max that Trump has found a class A legal team and is bound to have Mueller quaking in his boots. Plus now it seems like two more women are suing the Donster, one for defamation, which is the case that could really cause Donald a lot a problems. Here name is Summer Zervos, so now we have Summer & Stormy. No one could make this stuff up.    

Attorney Gloria Allred was fighting for women long before anyone ever hashtagged Me Too or Time's Up, and she's the subject of a new Netflix documentary Seeing Allred.  She reveals how her own personal experience inspired to fight for victims assault, harassment, and discrimination.  She addresses critics who say she just does it all for the publicity, and explains that for many of her clients such as the Cosby accusers, a "trial" in the court of public opinion may be the only justice they can get.  She talks about how that's changing with a new California law that extends the statute of limitations for sexual assault, she discusses why she decided to represent the family of Nicole Brown Simpson during the O.J. trial, and she gives an update on her client Summer Zervos’s pending defamation suit against President Donald Trump.  Plus she talks about her surprisingly cordial relationship with defense attorney Alan Dershowitz, the battle of the Friar’s Club steam room, and why so many people call her "Senator." Watch Seeing Allred on Netflix now, and keep up with Gloria Allred at www.gloriaallred.com or on Twitter at @GloriaAllred.  Today's podcast was sponsored by App River, Grasshopper, Just for Men Hair Regrowth, ZQuiet, and Google Cloud Platform podcast.

The lawsuit “Summer Zervos v. Donald Trump” is among the high profile cases handled by attorney Gloria Allred. The Netflix film “Seeing Allred,” directed by Sophie Sartain and Roberta Grossman, explores the history of the 76-year-old lawyer, known for her work with women, LGBT and other minority clients. On February 6, Allred sat for a […] The post PN 66: Attorney Gloria Allred on “Seeing Allred” appeared first on Pure Nonfiction.

On this week’s episode of Versus Trump, Charlie, Jason, and Easha talk about a defamation lawsuit brought by Summer Zervos, a woman who alleges that she was sexually assaulted by President Trump in a hotel room in 2007. Charlie, Easha, and Jason begin by discussing the facts in the lawsuit and then [at 5:00] quickly move to the first reason that President Trump has asked the court in New York to dismiss the case: the sitting President cannot be sued in state court. That leads to some deep cuts about the relationship between federal and state power [at 13:00] and then a wonky discussion [at 26:30] of how California's so-called Anti-SLAPP statute works and why Zervos may have been trying to avoid it. They then turn [at 32:30] to the President's second argument, which is that the statements calling Zervos a liar were protected by the First Amendment because they were made in the context of a political campaign.No Trump Nuggets this week, but stay tuned for the big end-of-year recap, coming soon!Please share or provide feedback, and rate us in iTunes. You can find us at @VersusTrumpPod on twitter, or send us an email at versustrumppodcast@gmail.com. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Mark opens this week's episode of Reasonable Doubt talking about Summer Zervos' sexual harassment case against President Donald Trump. After that, Adam and Mark talk about the murder case of Kate Steile, who was shot and killed by an illegal immigrant who had been to prison 5 times prior. For the remainder of the show, Mark talks about the most recent developments in his case involving an Arizona Police officer shooting an innocent man multiple times while he was subdued on the ground.

Om tystnadskulturen runt sexuella övergrepp. Vad upprätthåller den och vad kan bryta den? Hör advokater i New York, "järnladyn" från Kongo och professionella "krokodiljägare" i Malmö. I Kongo sjunger Salima Katana Nono kvinnors berättelser om sexuella övergrepp och under hashtaggen #MeToo har miljontals kvinnor världen över delat med sig av sina erfarenheter av sexuella övergrepp och trakasserier på sociala medier. Konflikt tittar närmare på hur tystnadskulturer kring sexuella övergrepp upprätthålls och vad som bryter dem. Vi börjar på Sergels torg i Stockholm där hundratals människor tar hashtaggen #MeToo från internet och ut på gatorna. Konflikts Sara Olsson var där. I USA är sexuella övergrepp och trakasserier i strålkastarljuset efter anklagelserna mot filmproducenten Harvey Weinstein. Från Boston hör vi författaren och aktivisten Jaclyn Friedman om de amerikanska sekretessavtalen som köper kvinnors tystnad. På telefon från New York hör vi också Mariann Meier Wang, advokaten som företräder Summer Zervos - kvinnan som stämt självaste Donald Trump. Tillbaka i Sverige går vi på "krokodiljakt" i Malmö med Jeanette Paludan, VD och grundare av ett konsultbolag som hjälper företag och myndigheter att komma tillrätta med sexuella trakasserier på arbetsplatsen genom bland annat rollspel. I en studio på Münchenbryggeriet i Stockholm möts kvinnorättsaktivisterna Gégé Katana Bukuru från Kongo, Anu Kumar, Indien, och Shahira Amin från Egypten i ett samtal om sexuellt våld, tystnadskulturer och hur man kan bryta dem. Sist en krönika från en underklädesmarknad i Kairo om mäns syn på kvinnor, trakasserier och maskuliniteter av Cecilia Uddén. Programledare: Robin Olin robin.olin@sverigesradio.se Producent: Anja Sahlberg anja.sahlberg@sverigesradio.se