Podcasts about Reasonable doubt

Award-winning actress, model, director, and producer Meagan Good joins Tavis in studio to discuss her latest role as District Attorney Regina Harris in the upcoming fourth season of Hulu's hit legal drama Reasonable Doubt and her noteworthy career.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tavis-smiley--6286410/support.

In this episode, I discuss whether the evidence supports reasonable doubt about Lindsay Clancy's mental state at the time of the murders. I also examine the diagnoses involved, questioning whether they can legitimately establish what medical professionals should have known beforehand. While certainty may be impossible, the case raises a crucial question: when does skepticism become reasonable? Join my community: The Captains' Quarters. Attend bimonthly group consultations where I answer members' questions and work through their problems in real time. Participate in AMAs with notable guests, access nearly 100 hours of unpublished content, receive discounts on individual consultations, gain a community of supportive, like-minded individuals, and much more. Use this link to learn more: https://orion-taraban.com Access me 24/7 with Orion AI: Trained on my entire body of work, Orion AI allows me to weigh in on your situation in real time. Bridge the gap between theory and execution with actionable, personalized advice. Text or talk in over 70 languages. Available on Telegram. Start your free trial today: https://oriontaraban.ai Buy my book, "The Value of Others" Ebook: https://amzn.to/460uGrA Audiobook: https://amzn.to/3YfFwbx Paperback: https://amzn.to/3xQuIFK Buy my book, "Starry Night" Ebook: https://amzn.to/4qJrh9U Audiobook: https://amzn.to/3LuUJRS Paperback: https://amzn.to/4sGcqOY Book a paid consultation: https://oriontarabanpsyd.com/consultations Subscribe to my newsletter: https://oriontarabanpsyd.com Social Media TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@oriontaraban Facebook: https://facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090053889622 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/orion-taraban-070b45168/ Instagram: https://instagram.com/psyc.hacks Twitter: https://twitter.com/oriontaraban Website: https://oriontarabanpsyd.com Orion's Theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrXBzQ2HDEQ Thinking of going to grad school? Check out STELLAR, my top-rated GRE self-study program based on the world's only empirically-validated test prep system. Use the code "PSYCH" for 10% off all membership plans: https://stellargre.com. Become a Stellar affiliate and earn a 10% commission for every membership purchased by a new student you conduct into the program: https://stellargre.tapfiliate.com. GRE Bites: https://www.youtube.com/@grebites4993 Become a Psychonaut and join PsycHack's member community: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSduXBjCHkLoo_y9ss2xzXw/join Sound mixing/editing by: valntinomusic.com Presented by Orion Taraban, Psy.D. PsycHacks provides viewers with a brief, thought-provoking video several days a week on a variety of psychological topics, inspired by his clinical practice. The intention is for the core idea contained within each video to inspire viewers to see something about themselves or their world in a slightly different light. The ultimate mission of the channel is to reduce the amount of unnecessary suffering in the world. #psychology #justice #mentalhealth

Defense attorney Mark Geragos and Los Angeles Magazine's Lauren Conlin break down the Caleb Flynn murder trial: from the former American Idol contestant's secret affair and staggering number of messages with his mistress to the missing 9mm, alleged staged break-in and forensic evidence. What actually matters to a jury, and where could prosecutors and the defense face their biggest challenges? Flynn has pleaded not guilty. Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Quake discusses Lil Durk juror breaking down what led to acquittal, Durk also getting trial delayed and securing bond hearing in November, Trey Songz alleged sexual assault victim seeking settlement money, Jay-Z's rape accuser fully recanting allegations, Drake scoring appeal date as UMG seeks to dismiss lawsuit, Jay-Z saying he didn't like being an artist despite ‘Reasonable Doubt' success, 50 Cent performing at Tyrese Haliburton's wedding for free, Druski explaining how Drake completely changed his life, Kendrick Lamar breaking another touring record with ‘Grand National' tour and much more.(00:00) - Intro(12:52) - Lil Durk Juror Breaks Down What Led To Acquittal(16:36) - Lil Durk Gets Trial Delayed And Secures Bond Hearing In November(18:19) - Trey Songz Alleged Sexual Assault Victim Seeks Settlement Money(21:24) - Jay-Z's Rape Accuser Fully Recants Allegations(25:02) - Drake Scores Appeal Date As UMG Seeks To Dismiss Lawsuit(26:35) - Jay-Z Says He Didn't Like Being An Artist Despite ‘Reasonable Doubt' Success(34:44) - 50 Cent Performed At Tyrese Haliburton's Wedding For Free(36:36) - Druski Explains How Drake Completely Changed His Life(40:23) - Kendrick Lamar Breaks Another Touring Record With ‘Grand National' Tour(43:26) - New Music(43:54) - Album Sales(45:04) - Billboard Hot 100

Jay-Z has been everywhere lately. It's been 30 years since his acclaimed debut Reasonable Doubt, and he celebrated with a series of concerts at Yankee Stadium. And now there's the HBO docuseries, JAŸ-Z In 8, in which Jay-Z dissects his catalog with producer Rick Rubin. The series hopes to further cement his legacy as one of the most revered lyricists of our time. But Jay-Z (or JAŸ-Z, as he's styled it lately.) has always been a polarizing figure, both in his personal life and as a business mogul. So what does this series accomplish?Looking for more episodes about music? Check out these:Ariana Grande stares down the public eye in 'Petal'It's time to talk about how y'all act at music festivalsMost overused songs in moviesConnect with Pop Culture Happy Hour:Letterboxd / FacebookOur weekly newsletterSupport public media with NPR+ and enjoy perks for over 25 podcasts like this one. This show's perks include bonus episodes and sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Mark Geragos and Los Angeles Magazine's Lauren Conlin discuss Patrick Clancy's first upcoming televised interview on 60 Minutes, the holdout juror's emergence and the motions that could determine whether Lindsa Clancy faces another trial. Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On Constitution Day, Todd reflects on the Constitution's role in limiting government, protecting liberty, and placing authority with the people. He discusses reports that the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial has spoken about deliberations, while noting that the reported account is not established with absolute certainty. Todd explains his view of reasonable doubt, criminal responsibility, and the pressure on jurors to change their votes. He also addresses hostile social media comments, the importance of persuasion, and the Constitution Day membership offer for Inner Circle Plus.

The penultimate Samuel L. Jackson themed movie collection focuses on some of the obscure, underrated and truly divisive Crime Thrillers & Revenge Dramas on his resume:   *Which of these reasonable thrill rides were commonly on cable TV and streaming but still flew under the radar?   *Which ones have some sadly lackluster and anticlimatic plot twists?   *Which one was actually based on a manga?   *And which ones could've been bigger had they not gone the VOD route?     FILMS REVIEWED: Fresh, Kiss of Death, The Cavemen's Valentine, No Good Deed (2002), Cleaner (2007), Meeting Evil, The Samaritan, Kite, Reasonable Doubt (2014) & Damaged (2024).   MOVIE QUOTES: Pulp Fiction   INTRO CLIP: Actors on Actors by Variety: SLJ and Michael Keaton Episode

On Constitution Day, Todd reflects on the Constitution's role in limiting government, protecting liberty, and placing authority with the people. He discusses reports that the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial has spoken about deliberations, while noting that the reported account is not established with absolute certainty. Todd explains his view of reasonable doubt, criminal responsibility, and the pressure on jurors to change their votes. He also addresses hostile social media comments, the importance of persuasion, and the Constitution Day membership offer for Inner Circle Plus.

The twelve-member jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial deliberated for over 38 hours across seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The panel was split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Foreperson Roni Carlson told NBC10 Boston that the lone holdout admitted to having reasonable doubt but stated he would not vote not guilty by reason of insanity.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the procedural and legal framework surrounding the holdout juror's conduct. Kevin Reddington moved to have the juror removed, arguing the man was not following the court's instructions on reasonable doubt. Judge Sullivan declined the request. Reddington then filed an emergency appeal with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, contending the holdout's reasoning reflected bias against individuals with mental illness rather than a good-faith evaluation of the evidence. The SJC denied the appeal.Since the mistrial, juror Nick Dargie told ABC News the holdout could not identify any evidence or witness testimony supporting his position, reportedly would not engage with fellow jurors during deliberations, and spent time on his phone. Dargie also reported the holdout handled a piece of physical evidence from the case during deliberations.Motta analyzes the voir dire challenge both prosecution and defense face if the case proceeds to a second trial. Massachusetts law places the burden on the prosecution to disprove insanity beyond a reasonable doubt. Screening prospective jurors for bias against psychiatric defenses in a case where the sole contested issue is postpartum psychosis presents a procedural challenge with limited existing legal remedies.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #JurySystem #TrueCrime

Attorney Mark Geragos and LA Magazine reporter Lauren Conlin break down the fallout surrounding the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, including the controversy over the holdout juror, the reported 11-1 divide, questions over reasonable doubt and what could come next as the case moves forward.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week on the KPL Podcast, we have middle-grade author, Emily Galvin Almanza.  Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt is about the daughter of public defenders as she locates why a classmate was suspended from school.Author ReadsThe Mismeasurement of America: How Outdated Government Statistics Mask The Economic Struggle Of Everyday Americans by Gene LudwigEverything is Tuberculois: The History and Persistence of Our Deadliest Infection by John GreenThe Mysterious Benedict Society by Trenton Lee StewartThe Hounds of the Morrigan by Pat O'Shea

Twenty-five years after September 11, America still remembers the lives lost—but has it learned the right lessons from everything that followed?Rick Robinson reflects on the attacks, the people whose names must not be forgotten, and the transformation of American life through the Patriot Act, Homeland Security, airport security, surveillance, and two decades of war. He examines the human and financial cost of Afghanistan and Iraq, the chaotic withdrawal from Kabul, and the uncomfortable question that must precede every military commitment: What does winning actually look like?That question becomes urgent again as conflict with Iran escalates. Rick considers attacks on shipping, the Strait of Hormuz, energy prices, proxy forces, regional alliances, nuclear ambitions, and the danger of entering another open-ended conflict without a clearly defined objective or exit.The program concludes with the mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, jurors' accounts of the deliberations, reasonable doubt, criminal responsibility, and the difficult distance between moral judgment and the legal standard required for conviction.Memory matters. Justice matters. But neither can substitute for clear objectives, honest accountability, and the courage to recognize when a mission has lost its way.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/america-off-the-rails--986237/support.

Another Lindsay Clancy juror is speaking out, revealing just how much doubt remained inside the jury room. What did jurors really think during deliberations, and what concerns could shape the future of the Lindsay Clancy trial? STS breaks down the juror's perspective, the disagreements that prevented a verdict, and what could happen next.Key Points:What another Lindsay Clancy juror revealedWhy there was “so much doubt” during deliberationsWhat divided the juryQuestions surrounding Lindsay Clancy's mental stateWhat the mistrial could mean for a future trialConcerns prosecutors and defense attorneys may face nextThe Lindsay Clancy juror revelations offer a rare look inside the deliberations and the challenges surrounding this case. The Lindsay Clancy juror perspective also raises new questions about evidence, reasonable doubt, and what a future trial could look like. Join the sts podcast for true crime news, survivor stories, cold cases, and real crime stories as STS examines the latest developments and what they could mean going forward.Another juror from the Lindsay Clancy murder trial is speaking out, revealing new details about the jury's deliberations, the holdout juror and the questions that ultimately led to a mistrial. The juror describes “so much doubt” as jurors wrestled with whether Lindsay Clancy was legally insane or criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children, Cora, Dawson and Callan.Surviving The Survivor (STS) breaks down the juror's new revelations, what they tell us about the divided jury, and what could happen next in the Lindsay Clancy case. Join Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and the #BestGuests for expert analysis of the Lindsay Clancy trial, jury deliberations, mistrial and the legal battle ahead.ubscribe, Like & Set Alerts to "ALL" for show times & breaking news. https://www.youtube.com/@SurvivingThe...Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yr...Support the show & be a part of #STSNation:Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorEmail: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.comSurviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions.Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories.From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases.Known for having the best guest in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

durée : 00:03:58 - La grande matinale - par : Aline Afanoukoé - 30 ans après Reasonable Doubt, comment Jay-Z est-il passé du statut de jeune rappeur de Brooklyn à celui d'icône mondiale et d'entrepreneur ? Retour sur la trajectoire hors norme de Shawn Carter dans Musicaline. - équipe : Stéphanie Texier Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

In episode 2122, Jack and guest co-host Pallavi Gunalan are joined by poet, former public defender, co-founder & Executive Director of Partners for Justice, and author of Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt, Emily Galvin Almanza, to discuss… Mamdani Releases Damning 9/11 Air Quality Documents, Legally-Dubious Trump-Branded Coin Sells Out, Silicon Valley Grifters = The Biggest Movie Stars Of 2026? And more! Rudy Giuliani: It offends me that Bartiromo fired, Mamdani coming to 9/11 Rudy Giuliani calls for Mamdani to skip 9/11 memorial ceremonies: ‘It offends me’ Records Show City Health Officials Misled New Yorkers on Air Quality After 9/11 Attacks NYC Mayor Mamdani releases 9/11 records showing officials misled New Yorkers about air quality around Ground Zero New Yorkers were 'lied' to about toxic air after 9/11 attacks, says Mamdani New York issuing 'recovery notes' to help city rebuild Trump $1 coin makes him first living president on US currency in a century The $1 Trump coin: legal tender, depending on what you mean by legal Trump $1 coins out of stock hours after going on sale You Can See Everything | Official Teaser HD | A24 Nathan Fielder’s Elizabeth Holmes Doc Hits Theaters in October From A24 — Watch the Trailer Now Nathan Fielder Drops Weird Trailer for Secret Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’ Nathan Fielder’s Elizabeth Holmes Doc Met With Shock and Awe at Secret Screening Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s Elizabeth Holmes Doc ‘You Can See Everything’: First Reactions Nathan Fielder’s Secret Elizabeth Holmes Documentary Is Sheer Craziness Musk - Official Teaser Trailer (2026) Elon Musk documentary trailer drops ahead of Venice premiere: 'Man who's lost his mind' ‘Musk’ Review: World’s Richest Man, And His Digital Avatar, Thrashed In Damning Alex Gibney Doc – Venice Film Festival Luca Guadagnino’s ‘Artificial’ to World Premiere at New York Film Festival Artificial - Official Teaser Trailer - In Theaters Christmas Day ‘The Social Reckoning’ New Trailer: Aaron Sorkin Returns To The World Of Facebook & “That Guy” Big tech goes to Hollywood: is Silicon Valley ready for a silver-screen reckoning? Pallavi's Piece of Media LISTEN: Drive by FousheéSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Todd returns to the Lindsay Clancy mistrial after three jurors publicly criticized the lone holdout who refused to find her not criminally responsible for killing her children. Drawing on his own experience serving on a jury, he defends the role of independent judgment, reasonable doubt, and unanimous verdicts while questioning the foreperson's apparent rush to complete acquittal forms. Todd argues that professional expertise inside the jury room is not itself evidence, challenges the claim that medication or expert opinion must settle the question of personal responsibility, and warns against surrendering critical thought to doctors, nurses, technocrats, or any other authority.

Todd returns to the Lindsay Clancy mistrial after three jurors publicly criticized the lone holdout who refused to find her not criminally responsible for killing her children. Drawing on his own experience serving on a jury, he defends the role of independent judgment, reasonable doubt, and unanimous verdicts while questioning the foreperson's apparent rush to complete acquittal forms. Todd argues that professional expertise inside the jury room is not itself evidence, challenges the claim that medication or expert opinion must settle the question of personal responsibility, and warns against surrendering critical thought to doctors, nurses, technocrats, or any other authority.

Send us Fan MailWas the Lindsay Clancy trial doomed from the start, or did one single detail hijack the entire justice system?In this episode of Surviving-ish, we are diving deep into the massive legal shockwave out of Massachusetts: seven straight days of deliberations, over 36 hours locked in a jury room, 85 witnesses—and an absolute MISTRIAL.According to court filings and statement notes, 11 jurors saw the evidence one way, while ONE single male juror stood completely isolated. The foreperson even sent a note to the judge stating this holdout juror explicitly acknowledged out loud that REASONABLE DOUBT existed… yet still refused to vote Not Guilty.Is this a juror doing his civic duty, or holding the entire court hostage to a personal agenda?We are breaking down the public court records, the 11-to-1 jury breakdown, and the unanswered forensic anomalies surrounding January 24th.DISCLAIMER: This podcast is based on public court records, news reporting, and official transcripts. All commentary, opinions, and visual breakdowns represent personal views and analysis for educational and commentary purposes. All individuals discussed are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancyCase #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #Survivingish #PostpartumPsychosis #KevinReddington #Mistrial #HungJury #ReasonableDoubt #LegalAnalysis #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrimeCommunity #DuxburyMA #MassVsClancy #LegalTokSupport the show

In this episode of Read the Damn Book, host Michelle Glogovac interviews Emily Galvin Almanza, a former public defender and author of the children's mystery novel Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt. Emily shares her journey from practicing law as a public defender to becoming a published author and discusses how her legal career inspired her writing.The conversation explores justice, legal rights, the criminal justice system, and the importance of teaching children about the law. Emily explains how Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt empowers young readers to understand their rights, ask questions, and think critically about the legal system while enjoying an engaging mystery story. This episode offers a fascinating look at children's literature, legal education, social justice, and the power of storytelling to educate and empower young readers.What We're Talking About...Emily Galvin Almanza's journey from public defender to children's book authorThe inspiration behind Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable DoubtTeaching children about legal rights, justice, and the legal systemRepresentation of Bolivian culture and identity in children's literatureThe role of public defenders in community empowerment and social justiceAddressing systemic issues within the juvenile justice systemThe importance and impact of early legal education for childrenRaising awareness about juvenile detention and youth justiceWhat's next for the Andromeda Diaz book seriesChapters00:00 Introduction to Emily Galvin Almanza and her work01:20 Emily's background as a public defender03:10 Synopsis of Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt05:11 Legal issues faced by children and systemic challenges08:21 Teaching children their legal rights and powers14:43 Real-life cases and holistic defense approach18:51 Origin of the character Andromeda and cultural influences28:03 Next book in the series and raising the stakes30:45 Representation of juvenile detention and systemic change31:13 Where to find Emily and her booksLinks MentionedEmily Galvin Almanza's website: https://www.emilygalvinalmanza.comOrder your copy of Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/816163/andromeda-diaz-and-the-reasonable-doubt-by-emily-galvin-almanza/Emily Galvin Almanza's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/galvinalmanza/

In this episode, Hunter speaks once again with Emily Galvin Almanza about a new book she is publishing. While her last book sought to teach adults about the failings of our criminal legal system, Emily's newest book, Andromeda Diaz and the Reasonable Doubt, is aimed at teaching kids about legal principles through a public defender's lens. In doing so, Emily hopes to instill a different type of civic education in schools around the country.   Guest: Emily Galvin Almanza, Co-Founder and Executive Director, Partners for Justice   Resource: Pick up a Copy of the Book Here https://www.amazon.com/Andromeda-Reasonable-Doubt-Galvin-Almanza/dp/B0G5WVXFSQ   Follow Emily's Work https://www.emilygalvinalmanza.com/ https://www.instagram.com/galvinalmanza/?hl=en   Learn More About Partners for Justice https://partnersforjustice.org/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=15231703396&gbraid=0AAAAAoL1I_LuXR_6d_5khg4qkdAQN6d77&gclid=Cj0KCQjwteTUBhD4ARIsAEYjs3otlUtZa1n7oPjFoT0NWL_Lg3CFUNJVuvKxK0xJQZKRHXg2j1D9zvkaAlSbEALw_wcB      Contact Hunter Parnell:  Publicdefenseless@gmail.com  Instagram: @PublicDefenselessPodcast  YouTube: @publicdefenselesspodcast  Facebook: Public Defenseless Podcast  Bluesky: @pdefenselesspod.bsky.social  Twitter: @PDefenselessPod  Website: www.publicdefenseless.com  Subscribe to the Patreon: www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast  Donate on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ Donate on Stripe: https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN Trying to find a specific part of an episode? Use this link to search transcripts of every episode of the show! https://app.reduct.video/o/eca54fbf9f/p/d543070e6a/share/c34e85194394723d4131/home **** ALL OPINONS SHARED BY HOST HUNTER PARNELL DO NOT REFLECT THE THOUGHTS OR OPINIONS OF THE AURORA MUNICIPAL PUBLIC DEFENDER****  

Todd examines the mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case and the lone juror who reportedly refused to join the other eleven in supporting an acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility. He challenges the defense attorney's public criticism of that holdout, explains the role of reasonable doubt and personal accountability, and warns about a reported Illinois case involving a mother who had followed the Clancy trial. Todd then contrasts the treatment of Clancy with a Virginia mother placed on a child-abuse registry after allowing her five-year-old to walk alone through their gated community, arguing that society has inverted its moral standards by excusing grave wrongdoing while punishing ordinary parenting decisions.

Todd examines the mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case and the lone juror who reportedly refused to join the other eleven in supporting an acquittal based on lack of criminal responsibility. He challenges the defense attorney's public criticism of that holdout, explains the role of reasonable doubt and personal accountability, and warns about a reported Illinois case involving a mother who had followed the Clancy trial. Todd then contrasts the treatment of Clancy with a Virginia mother placed on a child-abuse registry after allowing her five-year-old to walk alone through their gated community, arguing that society has inverted its moral standards by excusing grave wrongdoing while punishing ordinary parenting decisions.

Mark Geragos is joined by his daughter, criminal defense attorney Teny Geragos, to break down the Lindsay Clancy mistrial and the reported 11-1 jury split favoring acquittal. They explain why Kevin Reddington fought to keep deliberations going, what happened with the lone holdout juror, and whether Clancy could face another trial or a potential double jeopardy challenge.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Federal Defense Attorney Michael Leonard of Leonard Trial Lawyers joins Let’s Get Legal to break down the Lindsay Clancy Case. The Judge declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case after a jury deadlock. Lindsay was being charged with first-degree murder of her three young children, and her lawyer said she was suffering from postpartum […]

Hour 1 stays on the Lindsey Clancy trial. One juror is holding out over “reasonable doubt.” Defense is spinning it 11-1 not guilty. Shaun walks through why it could just as easily be 11-1 the other way, why nobody in that room is telling the court which direction the split is actually going, and why a compromise manslaughter verdict is the most likely “net” the jury throws themselves. Clay drops the Chad Doerman comparison nobody wanted: father executes his three sons, no parade, no GoFundMe hero narrative. Same number of dead kids. Different sex. Different reaction. They also hit the death penalty (deterrence vs. cost vs. the innocent people Mississippi has already put on the row), the CSI effect versus real homicide cases, and how defendants still convict themselves the old-fashioned way—books, podcasts, rap songs, and talking to DJ Vlad.

**FAFO Friday with attorney Shaun Yurtkuran and retired Clinton PD officer Creston Birch.** Jury holdouts, reasonable doubt, copycats, and why a white mom who strangled her three kids is getting a different conversation than the dad who lined his sons up and shot them. Then the SEC vs. LSU eligibility fight, Lane Kiffin pushing every envelope, and a surprise call from Mississippi State legend John Bond. Hour 1 stays on the Lindsey Clancy trial. One juror is holding out over “reasonable doubt.” Defense is spinning it 11-1 not guilty. Shaun walks through why it could just as easily be 11-1 the other way, why nobody in that room is telling the court which direction the split is actually going, and why a compromise manslaughter verdict is the most likely “net” the jury throws themselves. Clay drops the Chad Doerman comparison nobody wanted: father executes his three sons, no parade, no GoFundMe hero narrative. Same number of dead kids. Different sex. Different reaction. They also hit the death penalty (deterrence vs. cost vs. the innocent people Mississippi has already put on the row), the CSI effect versus real homicide cases, and how defendants still convict themselves the old-fashioned way—books, podcasts, rap songs, and talking to DJ Vlad. Hour 2 pivots to the LSU/SEC lawsuit. Two former Ole Miss players who already went pro want another year after the eligibility rules changed. A Louisiana state judge let them play this weekend. The SEC filed in federal court in Alabama and is running a First Amendment freedom-of-association argument. Shaun breaks down why that's clever lawyering that probably still loses to the antitrust problem, why the federal judge is likely to stay his own case and let the Louisiana track play out first, and why kicking LSU out of the conference is the dumbest idea smart people keep floating. John Bond calls in mid-hour. He says NIL just advertised the old bootlegging routes every school already ran. Collectives turned it into payroll instead of a kid walking into a car lot or restaurant and selling his face. Transfer portal needs a hard cap (two times max, coach leaving counts as one). These two players didn't get the full buffet of choices when they left—give them the extra year. Congress needs to stay out of it. NCAA has always picked on the schools it wanted to pick on.

Bradley Jay Fills In On NightSide with Dan Rea: The Lindsay Clancy jury remains deadlocked after six days of deliberations, with the case now hanging on the question of whether prosecutors proved criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge William Sullivan has urged jurors to keep deliberating, while the defense has raised concerns about one juror’s understanding of the court’s instructions on reasonable doubt. Mike Coyne, Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law in Andover, joined Bradley for legal analysis of the day's proceedings and what we might expect next.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Some crazy Lindsay Clancy case news as it turns out one single juror is holding out against 11. The defense moved to dismiss that juror, which means likely that he or she was the sole vote for conviction. That implicates, I believe, Massachussetts unique insanity defense law, and that in turn implicates pretty much the entire destruction of Western Civilization. The thumb in the dam. The key comparison is between post partum/pharma meds and drunkenness, which cannot be used in insanity defense. I explain it all in this short solo episode! Also a few more thoughts on Flock.A couple written posts on this here: This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thecarousel.substack.com/subscribe

Catie's Case: The Lindsay Clancy Trial Catie takes a deep dive into one of the most complicated and emotionally charged criminal trials in the country. Lindsay Clancy is charged in the January 2023 deaths of her three children—Cora, Dawson and Callan—at the family's home in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Clancy has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. The facts of what happened are largely undisputed. The trial instead centers on Clancy's mental state and whether she was legally responsible for her actions. Her defense argues that Clancy was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis, had undergone extensive psychiatric treatment and medication changes, and had lost touch with reality when she killed the children. Defense expert Dr. Phillip Resnick testified that she was psychotic at the time. Prosecutors argue that although Clancy suffered from significant mental-health problems, she still understood right from wrong. They point to evidence they say demonstrates organization and planning, including sending her husband Patrick out of the house on errands before the killings. Patrick Clancy's testimony became one of the trial's most emotional moments. He described Lindsay as a loving mother before her mental-health decline and said she had never previously expressed a desire to harm the children. The trial ultimately became a battle between competing psychiatric interpretations: was this a deliberate murder committed by someone suffering from depression and other mental-health problems, or the catastrophic result of postpartum psychosis severe enough to eliminate criminal responsibility? After testimony from more than 80 witnesses over roughly five weeks, jurors began deliberating on August 27. And they still haven't reached a verdict. As of August 31, the jury has deliberated for approximately 17 hours across three days. Jurors have requested to review physical evidence including prescription bottles and the knife Clancy used during her suicide attempt. The available verdicts are not simply “guilty” or “not guilty.” Depending on how jurors interpret Clancy's intent and mental state, they may consider first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter or a finding that she was not criminally responsible because of mental illness. If the jury ultimately finds her not guilty by reason of insanity, that would not necessarily mean Clancy simply goes free. She could instead be committed to a psychiatric hospital, potentially for an extended period. The case has also forced a much broader conversation about postpartum psychosis, how seriously severe postpartum psychiatric symptoms are treated, and whether the medical system failed to recognize just how sick Clancy had become. Also in this episode: The U.S.–Iran war heats up again as Trump declares Iran “dead,” threatens additional strikes and shares AI-generated footage depicting an attack that apparently never occurred. The Supreme Court, USPS and the Trump administration collide over mail voting while election officials warn that thousands of otherwise valid ballots are arriving too late to be counted. Texas Republicans begin asking uncomfortable questions about changes to the state's $3 billion-plus broadband program that benefited Elon Musk's Starlink. Meta reportedly discovers a flaw in its plan to replace huge portions of its workforce with artificial intelligence: humans still have to fix everything the AI screws up. Plus another food-recall roundup, the Pentagon gets government versions of ChatGPT and Grok, Howard Stern heads to HBO Max, AMC becomes a movie distributor, and plenty more from another completely normal week in America. LINKShttps://instagram.com/itsnewstoushttps://tiktok.com/@itsnewstous Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Catie's Case: The Lindsay Clancy Trial Catie takes a deep dive into one of the most complicated and emotionally charged criminal trials in the country. Lindsay Clancy is charged in the January 2023 deaths of her three children—Cora, Dawson and Callan—at the family's home in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Clancy has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. The facts of what happened are largely undisputed. The trial instead centers on Clancy's mental state and whether she was legally responsible for her actions. Her defense argues that Clancy was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis, had undergone extensive psychiatric treatment and medication changes, and had lost touch with reality when she killed the children. Defense expert Dr. Phillip Resnick testified that she was psychotic at the time. Prosecutors argue that although Clancy suffered from significant mental-health problems, she still understood right from wrong. They point to evidence they say demonstrates organization and planning, including sending her husband Patrick out of the house on errands before the killings. Patrick Clancy's testimony became one of the trial's most emotional moments. He described Lindsay as a loving mother before her mental-health decline and said she had never previously expressed a desire to harm the children. The trial ultimately became a battle between competing psychiatric interpretations: was this a deliberate murder committed by someone suffering from depression and other mental-health problems, or the catastrophic result of postpartum psychosis severe enough to eliminate criminal responsibility? After testimony from more than 80 witnesses over roughly five weeks, jurors began deliberating on August 27. And they still haven't reached a verdict. As of August 31, the jury has deliberated for approximately 17 hours across three days. Jurors have requested to review physical evidence including prescription bottles and the knife Clancy used during her suicide attempt. The available verdicts are not simply “guilty” or “not guilty.” Depending on how jurors interpret Clancy's intent and mental state, they may consider first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter or a finding that she was not criminally responsible because of mental illness. If the jury ultimately finds her not guilty by reason of insanity, that would not necessarily mean Clancy simply goes free. She could instead be committed to a psychiatric hospital, potentially for an extended period. The case has also forced a much broader conversation about postpartum psychosis, how seriously severe postpartum psychiatric symptoms are treated, and whether the medical system failed to recognize just how sick Clancy had become. Also in this episode: The U.S.–Iran war heats up again as Trump declares Iran “dead,” threatens additional strikes and shares AI-generated footage depicting an attack that apparently never occurred. The Supreme Court, USPS and the Trump administration collide over mail voting while election officials warn that thousands of otherwise valid ballots are arriving too late to be counted. Texas Republicans begin asking uncomfortable questions about changes to the state's $3 billion-plus broadband program that benefited Elon Musk's Starlink. Meta reportedly discovers a flaw in its plan to replace huge portions of its workforce with artificial intelligence: humans still have to fix everything the AI screws up. Plus another food-recall roundup, the Pentagon gets government versions of ChatGPT and Grok, Howard Stern heads to HBO Max, AMC becomes a movie distributor, and plenty more from another completely normal week in America. LINKShttps://instagram.com/itsnewstoushttps://tiktok.com/@itsnewstous Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Attorney Mark Geragos and Los Angeles Magazine reporters Lauren Conlin and Taylor Parise discuss the cases they've been covering from inside the courtroom: the Lindsay Clancy triple-murder trial in Massachusetts and Lil Durk's federal murder-for-hire trial in Los Angeles. Conlin has been reporting from the Clancy trial for L.A. Mag, while Parise has been covering the Durk proceedings for L.A. MagWatch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Comedian Maria Bamford riffs on money troubles... and why Instacart might be to blame; comic and crop artist Brandi Brown unpacks her childhood encounter with Prince and her favorite spots at the famed Minnesota State Fair; and The Reasonable Doubts prove that a cover band made up entirely of Minnesota state judges knows how to rock without robes.

Mark Geragos and guest host Lauren Conlin unpack a tense day in the Lindsay Clancy trial, from Kevin Reddington's heated questioning of the Commonwealth's psychiatric expert to the dueling opinions over Clancy's mental state...plus the controversy surrounding those publicly supporting her.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Are Lindsay Clancy's defense witnesses creating enough reasonable doubt? In this episode, STS examines the testimony and expert opinions presented by the defense in the Lindsay Clancy case and what they could mean for the trial. As the defense builds its argument, could the witnesses raise enough questions about Lindsay Clancy's state of mind and actions to create reasonable doubt?   Key Points:   Lindsay Clancy's defense witnesses and testimony Expert opinions presented by the defense Arguments surrounding Lindsay's mental state How the testimony could affect reasonable doubt The prosecution's case and potential challenges Key questions raised during the trial What the jury may consider when weighing the evidence The latest developments in the Lindsay Clancy case What could happen next in court   The Lindsay Clancy case has raised difficult questions about mental health, intent, evidence, and accountability. STS breaks down the defense witnesses, expert testimony, and competing arguments while separating confirmed courtroom evidence from interpretation and speculation. Follow the STS Podcast for survivor stories, true crime news, cold cases, and real crime stories, bringing clear analysis and context to the cases behind the headlines. They can't harm you, if they can't find you! Use code SURVIVING at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/surviving The Lindsay Clancy murder trial reaches a critical moment as the defense brings in witnesses...but is there is enough reasonable doubt surrounding the deaths of her three children, Cora, Dawson and Callan? We break down the latest evidence, testimony and defense claims involving Lindsay Clancy, postpartum psychosis and her mental state at the time of the January 2023 Duxbury, Massachusetts murders.  Could reasonable doubt lead to an acquittal, or will prosecutors prove Lindsay Clancy is criminally responsible? Watch Surviving the Survivor to get the latest Lindsay Clancy trial news, courtroom updates, evidence and legal analysis. Subscribe, Like & Set Alerts to "ALL" for show times & breaking news. https://www.youtube.com/@SurvivingThe... Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yr... Support the show & be a part of #STSNation: Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ... VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast Check out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/ Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor Email: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.com Surviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions. Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories. From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases. Known for having the best guest in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

DISCLAIMER: Discussion of violence and murder involving small childrenWho is Lindsay Clancy and what is she being accused of doing? What has happened so far in court? What evidence has been presented to show that she snapped and harmed her children while her husband was out on an errand? Were any other possibilities investigated?These are the questions this pod aims to address. We begin with background of who Lindsay Clancy is, her work as a labor and delivery nurse, her marriage, the births of her children, her post partum struggles, and her life as a mom in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Then, we focus on learning about the night of January 24, 2023. Including what Lindsay's husband, Patrick, stated happened and his perspective on the months prior, as shared at trial and via interviews and published articles. From there, we look at what has been presented thus far regarding the crime scene, cyber analysis, cell data, Lindsay's injuries, her diary and notes, her doctors and prescriptions, and most importantly, the timeline of events. Lingering questions and observations, along with possible alternative events, are discussed at the end.This is an ongoing trial, currently in progress, that has sparked an important discussion about post partum care and mental health, please see resources listed below for support: The National Maternal Mental Health Hotline is free, confidential, and here to help, 24/7. Call: 1-833-TLC-MAMACall 988 in the U.S. anytime, 24/7, for the free and confidential Mental Health Crisis HotlineAll opinions are personal and not representative of any outside company, person, or agenda. Information shared is for entertainment purposes only and is sourced via published articles, legal documents, press releases, government websites, public websites, books, public videos, news reports, and/or direct quotes and statements, and all may be paraphrased for brevity, and presented satirically and in layman's terms.Wanna support this independent pod? Links below:Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/cw/BBDBBuyMeACoffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/BBDBVenmo @TYBBDB Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on A Pod Named Kickback, we're getting into everything from the WNBA and transgender athletes to the age-old question: when is cutting somebody off protecting your peace, and when does it become toxic or manipulative? We're talking boundaries, relationships, knowing when enough is enough, and whether everybody deserves another chance.Then we get into the wildest stories of the week, including the disturbing reports of Black people found hanging from trees, Funky Dineva catching the Don't Be Dumb Award, and the latest in sports and entertainment—from Russell Westbrook's retirement and Claressa Shields' dominant Atlanta victory to Hip-Hop celebrating 53 years. We'll also talk new Nipsey Hussle music, House of the Dragon, The Chi, Reasonable Doubt, and finish it all off with Eargasm/Netflix & Chill. No filters, no brakes—just another night in the Kickback. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Some of America’s most notorious criminal cases are taking dramatic new turns. Tudor Dixon is joined by criminal defense attorney David Gelman to break down the latest legal developments involving Luigi Mangione, Bryan Kohberger, Alex Murdaugh, and Lindsay Clancy. They examine the intense public fascination surrounding Mangione, his potential legal strategy and sentencing, and what Gelman describes as the “Netflix effect” that can turn accused and convicted killers into cultural figures. They also discuss Kohberger’s effort to withdraw his guilty plea and why Gelman believes his chances of succeeding are extraordinarily slim. Then, Tudor and David examine why Alex Murdaugh is getting another trial, including allegations of improper conduct involving the court clerk and the jury. Finally, they tackle the disturbing Lindsay Clancy case and the complicated questions surrounding postpartum mental health, medication, criminal intent, reasonable doubt, and whether doctors and pharmaceutical companies should face greater scrutiny when medications are alleged to contribute to violent behavior. It’s a wide-ranging look inside the criminal justice system—and the legal battles behind some of the cases captivating America.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark and Gary break down Luigi Mangione's surprise guilty plea in federal court and the legal strategy behind the immediate double jeopardy challenge in New York state court. They examine why there was no formal plea agreement, what prosecutors are likely to argue next, how a 3D-printed firearm could shape the case, and what Mangione's sentencing could look like. They also explore the political intrigue surrounding the federal and state prosecutions, the legal precedent that could influence the outcome, and why this case is far from over.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Lindsay Clancy Trial raises a critical question: are state witnesses strengthening the prosecution's case, or is the defense creating reasonable doubt? In this episode, we break down the latest Lindsay Clancy Trial testimony, the key evidence presented by the state, and the arguments the defense is using to challenge the case. As the Lindsay Clancy Trial continues, which side is making the stronger argument? Key Points: Key testimony from state witnesses Evidence presented by the prosecution The defense's reasonable-doubt strategy Important testimony and contradictions Legal questions surrounding intent and responsibility How witnesses could impact the jury What the latest developments could mean for the case The Lindsay Clancy Trial continues to generate intense true crime news coverage as both sides present their cases. We break down the testimony, evidence, and legal arguments while separating confirmed courtroom facts from speculation and opinion. Follow the STS Podcast for survivor stories, cold cases, and real crime stories, with legal analysis and in-depth coverage of major cases. Data breaches happen every day. Take control of your digital safety with OmniWatch: Run a free dark web scan here: https://tracking.omniwatch.com/?a=172... Get 24/7 identity theft monitoring and fraud alerts. Use promo code STS for 50% off your first month of full digital protection. Subscribe, Like & Set Alerts to "ALL" for show times & breaking news. https://www.youtube.com/@SurvivingThe... Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yr... Support the show & be a part of #STSNation: Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ... VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast Check out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/ Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLx Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor Email: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.com Surviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions. Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories. From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases. Known for having the best guest in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

With Mark Geragos and Gary Smith away, defense attorneys Teny Geragos and Setara Qassim take over Reasonable Doubt to analyze the latest developments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. They discuss the prosecution's strategy, the defense's handling of the insanity case, key witness testimony, and why public opinion has shifted so dramatically. Drawing on their own courtroom experience, the pair also explores what makes an effective trial lawyer, how cases evolve in real time, and why jurors may be seeing the evidence differently than prosecutors expect.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On today's page, ⁠Chullin 97, the rabbis explore what happens when permitted and forbidden foods become accidentally mixed together. Recorded around a barbecue table in upstate New York, this special summer episode with Rabbi Dovid Bashevkin and producer Josh Kross reflects on how Jewish law was designed not for a world of certainty, but for one filled with ambiguity and doubt. How do we make faithful decisions when we can't know everything? Listen and find out. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Mark Geragos and Lauren Conlin discuss the mysterious death of 18-year-old Nolan Wells, who disappeared during a Fourth of July trip to Mississippi's Horn Island. They break down the state and private autopsies, the disputed timeline, the boat distress call, potential civil litigation and what could happen when the case reaches a grand jury.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this special episode, presented by Boost Mobile, we celebrate the 30th Anniversary of Reasonable Doubt with the legendary Memphis Bleek. Bleek drops by to share some wild stories about running around with Jay-Z and the Roc-a-Fella crew, the process of recording with Hov, and much more. He also presses Mal over picking sides, and speaks on his recent back and forth with Tony Yayo and Uncle Murda. The guys discuss the significance of Jay’s Yankee Stadium shows, what the album means to the culture, and some of the stories behind your favorite songs. We also take a couple calls from our Patreon members, asking Bleek’s opinions on producers, Hov songs, and advice for someone with baby mama drama. Memphis Bleek’s podcast, ROC Solid, is available everywhere you listen/watch podcasts! Visit your nearest Boost Mobile store or https://www.boostmobile.com/promo/25-forever All lines provided by Hard Rock BetSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Purple Pants Podcast | Casual Tea: Conspiracies, Comebacks & Chaos The tea is flowing this week as Brice is joined by investigative journalist Justin Carter for another episode of Casual Tea. The duo dives into Jay-Z's Reasonable Doubt 30th anniversary celebration, reflecting on his recent New York performances and upcoming international shows while unpacking the latest theories surrounding Beyoncé's long-awaited Act III era, a rumored Lady Gaga collaboration, and whispers of a Destiny's Child reunion. They also break down the newest developments in the Nolan Wells case before turning to the conversation surrounding Taco Bell, the recent diarrhea outbreak, and the public back-and-forth involving the FDA and CDC. Finally, they react to the internet buzzing over LeBron James “officially joining” the Philadelphia 76ers. From conspiracy theories to breaking headlines and plenty of laughs along the way, it's another unfiltered episode of Casual Tea you won't want to miss. You can also watch along on Brice Izyah’s YouTube channel to watch us break it all down https://youtube.com/channel/UCFlglGPPamVHaNAb0tL_s7g LISTEN: Subscribe to the Purple Pants podcast feed  WATCH: Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT: Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks! Previously on the Purple Pants Podcast Feed: Purple Pants Podcast Archives

Purple Pants Podcast | Casual Tea: Conspiracies, Comebacks & Chaos The tea is flowing this week as Brice is joined by investigative journalist Justin Carter for another episode of Casual Tea. The duo dives into Jay-Z's Reasonable Doubt 30th anniversary celebration, reflecting on his recent New York performances and upcoming international shows while unpacking the latest theories surrounding Beyoncé's long-awaited Act III era, a rumored Lady Gaga collaboration, and whispers of a Destiny's Child reunion. They also break down the newest developments in the Nolan Wells case before turning to the conversation surrounding Taco Bell, the recent diarrhea outbreak, and the public back-and-forth involving the FDA and CDC. Finally, they react to the internet buzzing over LeBron James “officially joining” the Philadelphia 76ers. From conspiracy theories to breaking headlines and plenty of laughs along the way, it's another unfiltered episode of Casual Tea you won't want to miss. You can also watch along on Brice Izyah's YouTube channel to watch us break it all down https://youtube.com/channel/UCFlglGPPamVHaNAb0tL_s7g Previously on the Purple Pants Podcast Feed:Purple Pants Podcast Archives LISTEN: Subscribe to the Purple Pants podcast feed WATCH: Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTubeSUPPORT: Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

LA Mag's Lauren Conlin and famed defense attorney Mark Geragos break down the biggest developments from the first week of D4vd's preliminary hearing. From graphic medical examiner testimony and digital evidence to DNA findings, text messages and the prosecution's theory of the case, they analyze what stood out most, what surprised them and what to watch as the hearing heads toward its conclusion.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Jay-Z recently celebrated the 30th anniversary of his debut Reasonable Doubt with a three-night residency at Yankee Stadium featuring superstar guests like Pharrell, Nas, Alicia Keys and, of course, Beyoncé. The marathon event was a tribute to one of rap's most influential and successful icons—but it was also a reminder that many of Jay-Z's biggest hits were collaborations that showcased the talents of other—often women—artists.Join Chris Molanphy as he traces the decades-long history of Hova's hitmaking, and how he deftly sought the assistance of female collaborators to push his biggest songs to No. 1.Podcast production by Kevin Bendis.Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The latest episode from the JBP breaks down all three nights from JAY-Z's shows at Yankee Stadium including Reasonable Doubt (24:25), The Blueprint (37:32), the delay prior to Sunday's show (55:50), followed by the setlist and guests for 'Extra Innings' on night three (1:14:58). 38 Spesh discusses Hip-Hop & business along with his issues with some rappers today on a recent podcast (1:50:30), Boosie was allegedly scammed for $600,000 as he seeks a pardon (2:29:00), DJ Akademiks & Charlamagne tha God finally sit down together (2:41:53), Bam Adebayo and Tyler Herro get into a fight in Vegas (3:11:12), and much more!  Become a Patron of The Joe Budden Podcast for additional bonus episodes and visual content for all things JBP! Join our Patreon here: http://www.patreon.com/joebudden 

February 14, 2023Mark and Drew continue their week together and they open the show discussing the legal ramifications surrounding covid and the “misinformation” term that was wieldy so wildly during the pandemic. Later they pivot to a story that Mark has been covering closely on ‘Reasonable Doubt' and ‘Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' – the Alex Murdaugh murder case out of South Carolina.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.