Podcast appearances and mentions of pamela karlan

Pamela Karlan, experienced advocate and co-director of Stanford's Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, joins Kate and Leah to break down just how exceptional Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar is at her job. Then, all three hosts speak with Madiba K. Dennie about her book, The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take It Back. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Threads, and Bluesky

The U.S. Supreme Court continues to issue major decisions that have profound impacts on the lives of Americans and the political future of the country. During the term that just ended, the court ruled on affirmative action, voting rights, gay rights and student loan forgiveness, among other issues with broad reach. But the justices are not a monolith, of course, and there is much to be learned from closely reading the full opinions and dissents, and placing the decisions in legal context. Georgetown Law professor Neal Katyal, Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan and Clark Neily from the Cato Institute join law professor and journalist Jeffrey Rosen for an in-depth discussion at the 2023 Aspen Ideas Festival about the justices' arguments and what we expect to see from the court in the future.

It has become commonplace that democracy in the United States faces an existential threat. This belief has gained popular currency in the wake of Donald Trump's presidency, nourished by his conduct in office, the attempt to overturn the 2020 election, and continuing efforts to subvert the electoral process. Whether this is true only time will tell. But a common narrative among scholars of American government holds that representative democracy is failing more systematically than the Trump phenomenon suggests. In this program, Charles Beitz, professor of politics at Princeton University, along with commentary by Martin Gilens, Pamela S. Karlan and Jane Mansbridge, talk about the current state of democratic dysfunction and what the future might hold. Series: "Tanner Lectures on Human Values" [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 38274]

It has become commonplace that democracy in the United States faces an existential threat. This belief has gained popular currency in the wake of Donald Trump's presidency, nourished by his conduct in office, the attempt to overturn the 2020 election, and continuing efforts to subvert the electoral process. Whether this is true only time will tell. But a common narrative among scholars of American government holds that representative democracy is failing more systematically than the Trump phenomenon suggests. In this program, Charles Beitz, professor of politics at Princeton University, along with commentary by Martin Gilens, Pamela S. Karlan and Jane Mansbridge, talk about the current state of democratic dysfunction and what the future might hold. Series: "Tanner Lectures on Human Values" [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 38274]

Join Cherise Trump as she brings back Hans von Spakovsky from the Heritage Foundation to discuss his recent article exposing a corrupt political actor, Pamela Karlan. Pamela has been able to manipulate the judicial system while collecting millions of dollars from Stanford University and its donors. Cherise and Hans break down the ways universities insulate themselves from financial and legal challenges while avoiding calls for transparency. It is high time the public holds them accountable and demands corrupt politicians like Pamela are no longer able to fly under the radar.

Pam Karlan, one of the nation's leading experts on law and voting and the political process, discusses the new conservative-majority Supreme Court—and the potential consequences of its blockbuster term, including the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Rich Valdes fills in for Jim Bohannon. He speaks with: Blaine Holt, Brigadier General (ret.), On to discuss President Biden's trip to the Middle East. Sam Paredes, Gun Owners of California Executive Director, On to discuss Gun Owners of America's lawsuit against the state of New York, current gun safety legislation, and the Second Amendment. Tom Jones, Founder of the American Accountability Foundation, On to discuss former DOJ attorney Pamela Karlan and President Biden's nominee to head ATF. Darius Mayfield, Candidate for the US Congress from New Jersey, On to discuss his campaign. And ... Your thoughts on the news in open phones across America See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Raheem Kassam hosts author Joe Allen and Natalie Winters for a discussion on the corporate media's sudden obsession with aliens, as well as breaking news stories about Hunter Biden's pandemic investments, and Pamela Karlan (the Peter Daszak of election integrity) and how she MUST be made to recuse herself. Links you must click:  1. Hunter Biden's Pandemic Firm Investments; 2. Pamela Karlan Must Recuse Herself; 3. Support The National Pulse.  

Jim Hoft, The Gateway Pundit, says that the person who wrote the letter from Biden's Department of Justice saying they might interfere with the Arizona election audit is the same Stanford University professor, Dr. Pamela Karlan, who made a "nasty joke about Barron Trump" during the first impeachment trial.

The civil rights movement has affected all Americans, whether they realize it or not. The opportunity for everyone to vote represents a major shift, but changes in education, housing and even sports reflect the strategic leadership of activists throughout American history. Civil rights experts and Stanford University professors Pamela Karlan and James Steyer discuss the history of civil rights movements in this country including racial equality, women's and LGBTQ rights and how those efforts inform the work that still needs to be done today.

This is the sixth episode of The Legal Academy, a show about law professors hosted by Professor Orin Kerr of UC Berkeley Law School. The guest this week is Pamela Karlan, the Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law at Stanford Law School. Music: www.bensound.com

What is the definition of a fact, and how can you convey those facts with authority? Several law professors spar on the alleged high crimes of President Trump, on which they have fundamental disagreement, in our look at the House Judiciary Committee's impeachment inquiry hearings. Listen to this episode to find out: How Democrats set the foundation, and how Republicans erode that foundation one bit at a time. Is this "Just the facts" examination a political circus, or something more – a close look at tactics of how we come to know truth? Why Rep. Collins (R-Ga) gives one witness free reign to comment on anything that he wanted to say The founders' interpretations of the powers of Kings. Could Baron Trump actually become "a Baron" in nobility? "The Clock and the Calendar" and how simple household concepts can build familiarity with an argument that might not hold muster The magic ratio that one witness speaks of, between an impeachment's foundation and it's weight And more! Remember to visit our website (http://www.subliminallycorrect.com) and support us through Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/subliminallycorrect)! You can also follow us on Twitter (https://twitter.com/SubliminalPod) and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/SubliminallyCorrect/)! (Theme Music: "Night Owl" by Broke For Free from Free Music Archive, CC BY 3.0)

Rod Arquette Show Daily Rundown - Monday, December 9, 20194:20 pm: Gina Cornia, Executive Director of Utahns Against Hunger, joins the show to give us her thoughts about the effects of the Trump Administration’s new food stamp rules6:05 pm: Joshua Sharf, Senior Fellow in Fiscal Policy for the Independence Institute joins the show to discuss why he says Major League Baseball owners will kill America’s pastime if they decide to eliminate rookie league minor league franchises6:20 pm: Rabbi Dov Fischer joins the show to discuss his piece in American Spectator regarding Pamela Karlan’s history of anti-Trump prejudices6:35 pm: Angie Keeton of the Save Legacy Parkway Committee and Roger Borgenicht of Utahns for Better Transportation join the show to discuss their call for more study about the effects of large trucks and higher speeds on the Legacy Parkway in Davis County

Leftist Highlight of the Day: Noah Feldman or Pamela Karlan? Call it a tie for lowest See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Steffan with sound from Democrat legal scholar Pamela Karlan and her untoward remarks about Barron Trump. More sound from a US Citizenship ceremony held today. Sen. Cory Gardner’s press releases continue to avoid talking about impeachment—we notice and provide some commentary on the silence.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Intellectual elites give their testimony in the impeachment inquiry yesterday. Stanford Law Professor, Pamela Karlan, was a witness who decided that invoking Barron Trump's name to illicit a laugh was appropriate. She also says she couldn't be on the same side of the street as the Trump Hotel....but, she's an objective expert & witness.

Nancy Pelosi CAN’T STOP quoting the Founders on impeachment! She finally requested articles of impeachment, but who thinks this is fair? At yesterday’s hearing, Rep. Matt Gaetz RIPPED leftist witness Pamela Karlan. Pat Gray joins with some crazy stories: Trans activists hated that police guarded their event, Pete Buttigieg was called homophobic for ringing the Salvation Army bell, and Hillary Clinton confirmed she’s straight. Glenn asks for your prayers, because next summer’s “Restoring the Covenant” event needs a miracle. Congressional candidate Anna Paulina Luna, the “AOC of the Right,” recounts why she’s running for office. BlazeTV writer Kevin Ryan discusses seeing Kamala Harris 15 times and Kanye’s service with Joel Osteen.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In hour two, Ericka and Val get into some more impeachment discussion and delve into audio of Pamela Karlan talking about having to talk on the opposite side of the street due to her being too close to Trump Towers. Then, Ericka brings up a story about a Star Wars ride in Disneyland that broke down minutes after it had opened. Finally, to end the show, they still wonder what Ava's joke was. #talk995 #realtalk

Intellectual elites give their testimony in the impeachment inquiry yesterday. Stanford Law Professor, Pamela Karlan, was a witness who decided that invoking Barron Trump's name to illicit a laugh was appropriate. She also says she couldn't be on the same side of the street as the Trump Hotel....but, she's an objective expert & witness.

Intellectual elites give their testimony in the impeachment inquiry yesterday. Stanford Law Professor, Pamela Karlan, was a witness who decided that invoking Barron Trump's name to illicit a laugh was appropriate. She also says she couldn't be on the same side of the street as the Trump Hotel....but, she's an objective expert & witness.

A Democratic witness at the House Judiciary Committee's impeachment hearing is apologising for bringing up the name of President Donald Trump's 13-year-old son, Barron.Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan said Wednesday that ‘’it was wrong of me to do that,'' adding, ‘’I do regret it.''Karlan's apology came after she faced a firestorm of criticism from Republicans, including first lady Melania Trump, who tweeted that "a minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics."Karlan had joked earlier Wednesday that the president can “name his son Barron, he can't make him a baron." Karlan was trying to make a point that Donald Trump is a president, not a king.Melania Trump said Karlan "should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it."'

Dan discusses the insufferable snobbery of liberal elite law professors at Wednesday's House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing. Ryan says Noah Feldman is what would happen if actor Benedict Cumberbatch and Bill Nye "The Science Guy" were brothers - and had a third brother - as it's revealed that the Harvard Law professor participated in "Slate's Trumpcast" on building the case for impeachment... back in April 2017, just three months into President Trump's time in office. Meanwhile, Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan makes a lame attempt at humor, invoking President Trump's son, Barron. Predictably, it went over like a lead balloon.

Why you are entitled to object to or try to quash a subpoena. And Donald Trump is entitled to the same right. What is procedural due process and why is it important in the impeachment process - and important to you, too. And law professor Pamela Karlan is an ass.

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by all-star SCOTUS experts to walk us through this week’s biggest legal and constitutional developments. First, Laurence Tribe answers the questions Amicus listeners have been asking about the next steps in the impeachment process. Next, Pamela Karlan takes us inside the chamber for Tuesday’s oral arguments in a trio of Title VII cases at the high court.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by all-star SCOTUS experts to walk us through this week’s biggest legal and constitutional developments. First, Laurence Tribe answers the questions Amicus listeners have been asking about the next steps in the impeachment process. Next, Pamela Karlan takes us inside the chamber for Tuesday’s oral arguments in a trio of Title VII cases at the high court.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Stanford Legal with Pam Karlan & Joe Bankman: "Supreme Court: A Crucial Year for Democracy with guest Brian Fletcher" Prof. Pamela Karlan and Brian Fletcher discuss gerrymandering, the 2020 census, and two of the most important decisions from the Supreme Court’s recent term. Originally aired on SiriusXM on July 20, 2019. Recorded at Stanford Video.

On Tuesday, Dec. 13, two of the nation’s top constitutional law scholars released an open letter to Donald Trump signed by over 40 leading constitutional law scholars. The letter outlines seven areas of “great concern” that several constitutional scholars have with the next president. Neil Siegel, David W. Ichel Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, co-director of the Program in Public Law, director of the DC Summer Institute on Law and Policy at Duke University School of Law and ACS Board of Academic Advisors member explained the need for the letter. Pamela Karlan, Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law, co-director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic at Stanford Law School and ACS Board Member discussed the substance of the letter and explained what constitutional scholars expect out of the next administration.

The Supreme Court’s 2016 term may not have contained the usual number of blockbuster cases, but it did have its fair share of drama. Between the stonewalling of Merrick Garland, the filibustered confirmation of Neil Gorsuch, rumors about Anthony Kennedy’s possible retirement, and in the background, the White House offensive against the federal judiciary, court-watchers had no shortage of things to keep them up at night. And so this week on Amicus, we pour a couple of our favorite court-watchers a big cup of coffee and plop some microphones down at Slate’s annual “Breakfast Table.” Mark Joseph Stern and Pamela Karlan join us to discuss what we learned about the justices this term and what we can expect from them in the fall.    Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members, several days after each episode posts. For a limited time, get 90 days of free access to Slate Plus in the new Slate iOS app. Download it today at slate.com/app. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Podcast production by Tony Field.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Supreme Court’s 2016 term may not have contained the usual number of blockbuster cases, but it did have its fair share of drama. Between the stonewalling of Merrick Garland, the filibustered confirmation of Neil Gorsuch, rumors about Anthony Kennedy’s possible retirement, and in the background, the White House offensive against the federal judiciary, court-watchers had no shortage of things to keep them up at night. And so this week on Amicus, we pour a couple of our favorite court-watchers a big cup of coffee and plop some microphones down at Slate’s annual “Breakfast Table.” Mark Joseph Stern and Pamela Karlan join us to discuss what we learned about the justices this term and what we can expect from them in the fall.    Transcripts of Amicus are available to Slate Plus members, several days after each episode posts. For a limited time, get 90 days of free access to Slate Plus in the new Slate iOS app. Download it today at slate.com/app. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Podcast production by Tony Field.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pamela Karlan will discuss what President Obama's election means for the blockbuster statutes passed during the Second Reconstruction and for civil rights law. (November 14, 2009)