Podcasts about juries

Legislation to abolish juries in defamation trials will be back before the Oireachtas next week. The Dail has already voted in favour of the bill, but it is before the Seanad next week. Retired High Court Judge Bernard Barton and media lawyer Michael Kealy debate the proposed change.

Civil Disobedience by Defend Our Juries and Youth Demand https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/27-people-arrested-palestine-action-demonstration-londons-parliament-square #peoplearerevolting Peoplearerevolting.com movingtrainradio.com

Defend Our Juries Supports Palestine Action https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/05/palestine-action-supporters-arrested-defying-terror-ban-protest-23587773/ https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/5/supporters-of-banned-palestine-action-group-arrested-at-london-protest #peoplearerevolting Peoplearerevolting.com movingtrainradio.com

As jurors round day 3 of deliberations and we all wait on the final Diddy verdicts, Amy and T.J. go back and look at some of the most famous trials of our times. You might be surprised and which jury only took 4 hours and which one took 25 days to decide.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As jurors round day 3 of deliberations and we all wait on the final Diddy verdicts, Amy and T.J. go back and look at some of the most famous trials of our times. You might be surprised and which jury only took 4 hours and which one took 25 days to decide.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As jurors round day 3 of deliberations and we all wait on the final Diddy verdicts, Amy and T.J. go back and look at some of the most famous trials of our times. You might be surprised and which jury only took 4 hours and which one took 25 days to decide.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As jurors round day 3 of deliberations and we all wait on the final Diddy verdicts, Amy and T.J. go back and look at some of the most famous trials of our times. You might be surprised and which jury only took 4 hours and which one took 25 days to decide.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Chief Victims Advisor says scrapping juries from sexual violence trials could result in more fact-based verdicts. Ruth Money believes it would be better for survivors - in part because judges must give reasoning for their verdict. The idea's received some pushback, with one legal expert arguing jury trials are a foundation of the justice system. Money says jurors enter a court with bias, and mightn't understand nuances of sexual assault. "I've had survivors say to me - look, I was slammed around that courtroom like a tennis ball, I was rape-mythed, I was shamed, I was blamed." LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What happens when a justice system is asked to do more with less and at what cost to fairness, freedom, and the rule of law?   Crime and justice commentator Danny Shaw appears on the show to examine the political and legal fallout from the UK government's spending review. With stretched police forces, an underfunded probation service, and mounting pressure on the courts and the prisons, how can Labour's Manifesto commitment to “Take Back Our Streets” be fulfilled ?   Ken and Tim then turn to the bulging Double Jeopardy postbag and tackle listeners' questions and comments on the proposed reforms anticipated in the Leveson Review such as judge-only trials, as well as the implications of potential changes to abortion law in England Wales. What do these shifts mean for prosecutors, defendants, and the future of jury trials in Britain? And when are jurors entitled to follow their consciences rather than the evidence?    From prisons and sentencing to digital forensics and judicial independence, this episode offers expert legal commentary on the most pressing political issues in Britain today set against the broader backdrop of UK politics. Expect sharp, accessible legal system insights for anyone trying to make sense of current events and current political events. You can find the link to the Judgment in the Trudy Warner case here and the Report of the Westminster Commission on Miscarriages of Justice on Forensic Science here. --- Covering the critical intersections of law and politics in the UK with expert commentary on high-profile legal cases, political controversies, prisons and sentencing, human rights law, current political events and the shifting landscape of justice and democracy. With in-depth discussions and influential guests, Double Jeopardy is the podcast that uncovers the forces shaping Britain's legal and political future.   What happens when law and politics collide? How do politics shape the law - and when does the law push back? What happens when judicial independence is tested, human rights come under attack, or freedom of expression is challenged? And who really holds power in Britain's legal and political system?   Get answers to questions like these weekly on Wednesdays.   Double Jeopardy is presented by Ken Macdonald KC, former Director of Public Prosecutions, and Tim Owen KC, as they break down the legal and political issues in Britain. From high-profile legal cases to the evolving state of British democracy, Double Jeopardy offers expert legal commentary on the most pressing topics in UK law, politics, and human rights.   Ken Macdonald KC served as Director of Public Prosecutions from 2003-2008, shaping modern prosecutorial policy and advocating for the rule of law. He is a former Warden of Wadham College, Oxford, a crossbench member of the House of Lords, and a leading writer, commentator and broadcaster on politics and the rule of law.   Tim Owen KC has been involved in many of the most significant public, criminal and human rights law cases over the past four decades.    Both bring unparalleled experience from the frontline of Britain's legal and political landscape.   If you like The Rest Is Politics, Talking Politics, Law Pod UK and Today in Focus, you'll love Double Jeopardy.

Karen Read Trial: FBI Agent Explains Why Defense Strategy Is Backfiring With Juries Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke delivers a comprehensive breakdown of why Karen Read's defense strategy is fundamentally flawed from a jury psychology perspective. This exclusive analysis reveals how every major defense tactical choice appears designed to alienate rather than persuade the 12 people who will decide Read's fate. Dreeke explains how the defense's core conspiracy theory violates basic principles of human psychology that juries intuitively understand. The theory requires believing that multiple law enforcement officers spontaneously coordinated a perfect murder, evidence planting operation, and sustained cover-up involving precise timing and absolute secrecy from numerous participants. The FBI expert details why such complex theories typically fail with juries who prefer straightforward explanations supported by evidence. The analysis examines specific backfiring tactics including the apparent witness intimidation allegations, the presentation of experts who admit they conducted no testing, and the avoidance of discussing physical evidence like taillight fragments found in John O'Keefe's clothing. Dreeke reveals how these choices signal desperation rather than confidence to jury members trained to evaluate credibility and authenticity. Drawing from his extensive experience in high-stakes situations, Dreeke contrasts the defense's scattered approach with the prosecution's methodical presentation of integrated evidence. He explains how Special Prosecutor Brennan's patient cross-examination style demonstrates confidence that resonates with juries, while the defense's aggressive tactics often backfire by making them appear untrustworthy. The interview provides unique insights into jury decision-making psychology, explaining why the defense's social media success hasn't translated to courtroom effectiveness and how their apparent internal recognition of case weakness is becoming visible to the people who matter most. #KarenRead #JuryPsychology #DefenseBackfire #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #TrialStrategy #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtroomTactics #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #TrueCrime #TrialUpdate #Massachusetts #WitnessCredibility Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial: FBI Agent Explains Why Defense Strategy Is Backfiring With Juries Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke delivers a comprehensive breakdown of why Karen Read's defense strategy is fundamentally flawed from a jury psychology perspective. This exclusive analysis reveals how every major defense tactical choice appears designed to alienate rather than persuade the 12 people who will decide Read's fate. Dreeke explains how the defense's core conspiracy theory violates basic principles of human psychology that juries intuitively understand. The theory requires believing that multiple law enforcement officers spontaneously coordinated a perfect murder, evidence planting operation, and sustained cover-up involving precise timing and absolute secrecy from numerous participants. The FBI expert details why such complex theories typically fail with juries who prefer straightforward explanations supported by evidence. The analysis examines specific backfiring tactics including the apparent witness intimidation allegations, the presentation of experts who admit they conducted no testing, and the avoidance of discussing physical evidence like taillight fragments found in John O'Keefe's clothing. Dreeke reveals how these choices signal desperation rather than confidence to jury members trained to evaluate credibility and authenticity. Drawing from his extensive experience in high-stakes situations, Dreeke contrasts the defense's scattered approach with the prosecution's methodical presentation of integrated evidence. He explains how Special Prosecutor Brennan's patient cross-examination style demonstrates confidence that resonates with juries, while the defense's aggressive tactics often backfire by making them appear untrustworthy. The interview provides unique insights into jury decision-making psychology, explaining why the defense's social media success hasn't translated to courtroom effectiveness and how their apparent internal recognition of case weakness is becoming visible to the people who matter most. #KarenRead #JuryPsychology #DefenseBackfire #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #TrialStrategy #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtroomTactics #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #TrueCrime #TrialUpdate #Massachusetts #WitnessCredibility Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial: FBI Agent Explains Why Defense Strategy Is Backfiring With Juries Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke delivers a comprehensive breakdown of why Karen Read's defense strategy is fundamentally flawed from a jury psychology perspective. This exclusive analysis reveals how every major defense tactical choice appears designed to alienate rather than persuade the 12 people who will decide Read's fate. Dreeke explains how the defense's core conspiracy theory violates basic principles of human psychology that juries intuitively understand. The theory requires believing that multiple law enforcement officers spontaneously coordinated a perfect murder, evidence planting operation, and sustained cover-up involving precise timing and absolute secrecy from numerous participants. The FBI expert details why such complex theories typically fail with juries who prefer straightforward explanations supported by evidence. The analysis examines specific backfiring tactics including the apparent witness intimidation allegations, the presentation of experts who admit they conducted no testing, and the avoidance of discussing physical evidence like taillight fragments found in John O'Keefe's clothing. Dreeke reveals how these choices signal desperation rather than confidence to jury members trained to evaluate credibility and authenticity. Drawing from his extensive experience in high-stakes situations, Dreeke contrasts the defense's scattered approach with the prosecution's methodical presentation of integrated evidence. He explains how Special Prosecutor Brennan's patient cross-examination style demonstrates confidence that resonates with juries, while the defense's aggressive tactics often backfire by making them appear untrustworthy. The interview provides unique insights into jury decision-making psychology, explaining why the defense's social media success hasn't translated to courtroom effectiveness and how their apparent internal recognition of case weakness is becoming visible to the people who matter most. #KarenRead #JuryPsychology #DefenseBackfire #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #TrialStrategy #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtroomTactics #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #TrueCrime #TrialUpdate #Massachusetts #WitnessCredibility Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial: FBI Agent Explains Why Defense Strategy Is Backfiring With Juries Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke delivers a comprehensive breakdown of why Karen Read's defense strategy is fundamentally flawed from a jury psychology perspective. This exclusive analysis reveals how every major defense tactical choice appears designed to alienate rather than persuade the 12 people who will decide Read's fate. Dreeke explains how the defense's core conspiracy theory violates basic principles of human psychology that juries intuitively understand. The theory requires believing that multiple law enforcement officers spontaneously coordinated a perfect murder, evidence planting operation, and sustained cover-up involving precise timing and absolute secrecy from numerous participants. The FBI expert details why such complex theories typically fail with juries who prefer straightforward explanations supported by evidence. The analysis examines specific backfiring tactics including the apparent witness intimidation allegations, the presentation of experts who admit they conducted no testing, and the avoidance of discussing physical evidence like taillight fragments found in John O'Keefe's clothing. Dreeke reveals how these choices signal desperation rather than confidence to jury members trained to evaluate credibility and authenticity. Drawing from his extensive experience in high-stakes situations, Dreeke contrasts the defense's scattered approach with the prosecution's methodical presentation of integrated evidence. He explains how Special Prosecutor Brennan's patient cross-examination style demonstrates confidence that resonates with juries, while the defense's aggressive tactics often backfire by making them appear untrustworthy. The interview provides unique insights into jury decision-making psychology, explaining why the defense's social media success hasn't translated to courtroom effectiveness and how their apparent internal recognition of case weakness is becoming visible to the people who matter most. #KarenRead #JuryPsychology #DefenseBackfire #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #TrialStrategy #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtroomTactics #LegalAnalysis #CriminalDefense #TrueCrime #TrialUpdate #Massachusetts #WitnessCredibility Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Stuart Gilhooley, Solicitor and Senior Council and Michael Kealey, media lawyer from NewsBrands

People are making and evaluating various applications this week! Juries are out! Applications are in! How can we begin to make sense of it?!The music in this episode is by DJ DariaGet those apps into the woodchipper!Fleishhacker FoundationReal Time and SpaceBemis Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Today on the show - 0.00 - Where's Bryce Going? 15.48 - Fin-juries 20.04 - Valerie The Sausage Dog 22.47 - Fire Trouble 36.43 - Leslie Graham - Worlds Oldest Motorbike Rider 42.14 - Mullsys On The Phones 46.59 - Mastermind Monday 52.08 - Louisa Fell 50m From Rope Swing 63.32 - Cool Story Bryce 67.07 - Remixing Blindspott

Kingdom of God - seek it and righteousness; Common themes of Old and New testament; Jacob vs Israel?; Loins out of joint?; Making Israel stink; Praying with supplication; Gen 10:16; Amorites; Bondage of Egypt; "Corvee"; Bible about government; Sloth leads to tribute; Consent; Socialism vs capitalism; Morality?; Repentance; Removing delusion; Learning to be Israel; Denominational Jews?; Hiding and fleeing from God; Identity; What are you missing?; Understanding "leaven"; Gen 50:1; Relationship of Family; Roman revolution; Republic; Volunteerism; Governments of Cain, Nimrod, Sumer, Egypt…; Strengthening by persecution; Importance of Family; "biet-kuf-hey" (Wept); Sphinx?; Joseph's request of Pharoah; Wrestling with God; "Elders"; Corporation of God; Mourning Jacob; "Threshing floor"; Getting the basics; Gen 13:2; Classes of citizens; Corruption; Saul: first king in Israel; Recognizing congregationalism vs kingdom; Vengeance; Freewill offerings; Jacob's command to Joseph; Forgiveness; Knowing yourself; Coming together as families; Christ's alternative system; Loving our enemy; Juries; Early Rome mimicking Israel; Excusing immorality; Death of Joseph; Land of Israel; Property tax?; Abraham's altars; "licking" blood; Modern vs Early Church; Religion; Doctrines; Covetousness; "One purse"; Social safety net?; What do you really own?; Moral bondage?; Electing new Sauls; Legal charity; Coming to the aid of your neighbor; Early Church ministers; "Not of this world"; Christ's system = charity alone; World system = force; Following Christ's way; Your daily bread; Lacking knowledge; Living altars; 1 Sam 8; Social Security; Christ's commands; Charity = Love, The truth shall set you free.

Exploring the high-profile Lucy Letby case, and the dangers of relying too heavily on identification evidence, this episode of Double Jeopardy raises critical concerns about the ban on jury research and how it hampers efforts to improve the criminal justice system through controlled academic study. As expert legal commentators, Tim Owen KC and Ken Macdonald KC unpack the importance of pre-sentence reports in sentencing decisions - highlighting how vital they are in a time of crisis within UK prisons. They also consider how public scrutiny and media pressure impact legal representation in high-stakes cases. Through sharp insights into UK law and politics, the hosts focus on broader themes like the Rule of Law, judicial independence, and freedom of expression. This episode offers a timely and thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between crime and punishment, human rights law, and the UK's adversarial legal system.-----Covering the critical intersections of law and politics in the UK with expert commentary on high-profile legal cases, political controversies, prisons and sentencing, human rights law, current political events and the shifting landscape of justice and democracy. With in-depth discussions and influential guests, Double Jeopardy is the podcast that uncovers the forces shaping Britain's legal and political future. What happens when law and politics collide? How do politics shape the law - and when does the law push back? What happens when judicial independence is tested, human rights come under attack, or freedom of expression is challenged? And who really holds power in Britain's legal and political system? Get answers to questions like these weekly on Wednesdays at 6am GMT. Double Jeopardy is presented by Ken Macdonald KC, former Director of Public Prosecutions, and Tim Owen KC, as they break down the legal and political issues in Britain. From high-profile legal cases to the evolving state of British democracy, Double Jeopardy offers expert legal commentary on the most pressing topics in UK law, politics, and human rights. Ken Macdonald KC served as Director of Public Prosecutions from 2003-2008, shaping modern prosecutorial policy and advocating for the rule of law. He is a former Warden of Wadham College, Oxford, a crossbench member of the House of Lords, and a leading writer, commentator and broadcaster on politics and the rule of law. Tim Owen KC has been involved in many of the most significant public, criminal and human rights law cases over the past four decades. Both bring unparalleled experience from the frontline of Britain's legal and political landscape.If you like The Rest Is Politics, Talking Politics, Law Pod UK and Today in Focus, you'll love Double Jeopardy.

In this third and final episode of our mini-series on juries, we speak with a criminal lawyer about the ultimate question we've been leading to - Does the jury system make sense? While the idea of having one's peers decide their fate in the justice system sounds idealistic, does it actually work in practice? Should laypeople be called for jury duty to assess cases that are often very complex? Are personal biases too tough to overcome for the average juror? Is the potential group think of jurors a detriment to fair legal outcomes? Essentially, do we have the jury system right? Renowned criminal lawyer Brian Greenspan joins the podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Xanthe and Tim examine the jury secrecy principle with barrister and academic Jason Donnelly. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this first of three episodes on the jury system, we examine how biased jurors tend to be. What unexpected variables factor into jury decision making? Are jurors able to check their biases at the door, or do they tend to make their minds up before all the evidence has even be presented? Are there certain cases to which juries are particularly partial in delivering a verdict of guilty or not guilty? Lee Curley, an expert in jury biases, joins the podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The selection of Juries … GUEST Bruce Antkowiak … Senior Counsel to the College & Archabbey, Past Chair of the Criminology Dept and Professor of Law at Saint Vincent College. Jesus slain before the foundation of the world … GUEST Kathy Keller ... formerly served as assistant director of communications for Redeemer Presbyterian Church in NYC ... She is the author of "Jesus, Justice, & Gender Roles: A Case for Gender Roles in Ministry" and co-author with her husband, Tim, of "The Meaning of Marriage: Facing the Complexities of Commitment with the Wisdom of God," "God's Wisdom for Navigating Life: A Year of Daily Devotions in the Book of Proverbs," "The Songs of Jesus: A Year of Daily Devotions in the Psalms".See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Criminal law expert and Stanford Law Professor David Sklansky joins Pam Karlan to discuss his book Criminal Justice in Divided America: Police, Punishment, and the Future of Our Democracy, published in January. In this episode, they explore what he sees as the failures of America's criminal justice system—from overly harsh sentences and prosecutorial abuses to the under-utilization of the jury system—that don't just harm individuals, but erode the very foundations of democratic governance. They also examine the rise and fall of community policing, the role of mental health in police encounters, and the impact of jury service on civic engagement, offering insights into how criminal justice shapes political and social landscapes while proposing steps toward reform.Sklansky, a former federal prosecutor, teaches and writes about policing, prosecution, criminal law and the law of evidence at Stanford Law, where he is also the faculty co-director of the Stanford Criminal Justice Center.Connect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>>  Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/XLinks:David Sklansky >>> Stanford Law pageCriminal Justice in Divided America, Police, Punishment, and the Future of Our Democracy >>> Stanford Lawyer magazine online feature(00:00:00) Chapter 1: Criminal Justice and the Erosion of DemocracyPam Karlan welcomes professor David Sklansky and explains the link between the crises of criminal justice and democracy, discussing how failures in criminal law and policy have undermined democratic values. The conversation touches on racial disparities, equal protection, and how the criminal justice system has contributed to public distrust in government institutions.(00:05:15) Chapter 2: Policing and PolarizationKarlan and Sklansky delve into the historical role of policing in fueling political polarization, particularly during the rise of crime as a central political issue in the late 20th century. Sklansky highlights the impact of police abuse on public confidence, the Republican Party's pivot toward tough-on-crime policies, and how bipartisan approaches to policing briefly improved public trust.(00:09:12) Chapter 3: The Rise and Fall of Community PolicingThe discussion focuses on community policing as a promising reform effort that ultimately fell short. Sklansky critiques its limited engagement with younger residents and those affected by police violence. He explains how the movement's failure to address systemic issues, like excessive police violence, eroded its credibility and relevance in modern reform conversations.(00:14:15) Chapter 4: Guns, Policing, and Mental Health CrisesThe discussion explores the connection between America's lax gun laws and police killings, highlighting the role of training and the unique challenges posed by mental health crises. Sklansky addresses the need for better collaboration between police and other services while emphasizing the importance of proper training in de-escalation.(00:19:00) Chapter 5: Small Police Departments and Training ChallengesKarlan and Sklansky examine the implications of having too many decentralized police departments in the U.S. They discuss issues like poor training, rehiring problematic officers, and the proliferation of SWAT teams. Sklansky offers insights on potential reforms and the influence of state and federal coordination in improving policing.(00:21:32) Chapter 6: The Role of Juries in DemocracyKarlan and Sklansky delve into the jury system as a cornerstone of democracy, discussing its impact on civic engagement, cross-sectional representation, and public trust. They highlight the need for systemic changes to improve accessibility, fair cross-section representation, and community participation in jury duty.

Justin Shubow, President of the National Civic Art Society, presents his case for becoming the next Chair of the National Endowment for the Arts—an agency that could fundamentally reshape American culture. - - -  Today's Sponsor: Helix Sleep - Go to https://helixsleep.com/klavan to get an exclusive offer!

This is the third episode of six in the special “Symposium Edition Podcast” of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our symposium on “Judging Science,” which explores how the judiciary assesses and incorporates scientific and expert testimony in the US legal system.    Today, we are listening to Professor Valrie Hans from Cornell Law School present on “Juries Judging Science.” Her work will be published in the upcoming Vol. 26 No. 2, “Symposium Edition,” of the Columbia Science and Technology Law Review in the spring.  

In this highlight, Judge Mike Jacobs offers hope: "If you're losing faith in our system of government, just come and watch our jury system at work."

People get really weird when a murder suspect is hot, huh? Luigi Mangione needs to be extradited to New York, and he's resisting that — we discuss why it can make sense for a defendant to delay the inevitable. Also in New York, Daniel Penny has been acquitted of criminally negligent homicide in the killing of Jordan Neely. Juries can get weird. Plus: InfoWars may not be sold to The Onion after all, an expert witness in AI used AI to write his testimony and it hallucinated some fake cases (oops!), we have learned that John Doe is Jay-Z, and some Trump associates are now facing charges in Wisconsin related to defrauding the fake electors.Visit serioustrouble.show to sign up for our newsletter, and find a transcript of this episode. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.serioustrouble.show/subscribe

Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson was taken into court and he was struggling with officers, yelling at members of the media already trying to make his case. Luigi comes from an affluent family and has this persona of being a ‘hero' by some circles on the internet. We ask Dr. Ken about juries, which he says are now deciding verdicts they want – rather than what's according to the law.

The jury in the Daniel Penny trial reported that it is “unable to come to a unanimous vote” on whether Penny committed second-degree manslaughter. Trump puts out a carefully worded statement about Pete Hegseth. Dana reflects on the legacy of Mitt Romney in his final days in government and explains why she's glad to see him go. Canada's Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc announces an immediate ban on 324 additional firearms in Canada to confiscate for Ukrainian soldiers. The Daniel Penny case has become a clown show as the judge issues Allen Charges to the jury. Biden looks like Scrooge at the annual White House Christmas Tree Lighting. The Village People's Singer praises Trump for boosting 'YMCA,' and rejects the song's ‘Gay Anthem'. Biden donors are holding back from donating to his Presidential library. The assassin of the United Healthcare CEO exposed his face in order to flirt with an employee at his hostel. Do you think this was a hit job??Please visit our great sponsors:All Family Pharmacyhttps://allfamilypharma.com/danaAre you emergency ready?  Stock up today at allfamilypharmacy.com/dana and use code DANA10 for 10% off your entire order.  Black Rifle Coffeehttps://blackriflecoffee.com/danaUse code DANA to save 20% on your next order.  Byrnahttps://byrna.com/danaVisit today for 10% off and get the protection you need.  Hillsdalehttps://danaforhillsdale.comTake some time to learn more about what makes Hillsdale College unique.KelTechttps://KelTecWeapons.comInnovation. Performance. KelTec. Learn more at KelTecWeapons.com today.Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/danaGet a free smart phone with promo code FRIDAY.  Limited-time offer, or while supplies last.  PreBornhttps://preborn.com/danaHelp a woman meet her baby for the first time by donating to PreBorn!  To donate securely dial #250 and say keyword BABY or visit Preborn.com/DANA. ReadyWisehttps://readywise.comUse promo code Dana20 to save 20% on your entire purchase.Relief Factorhttps://relieffactor.comDon't mask pain, fight it naturally with Relief Factor.  Visit online or call 1-800-4-RELIEF today!

A jury in Nevada has delivered a $5.2 billion award in the latest large-sum lawsuit against a former Las Vegas-based bottled water company that was found responsible for causing liver damage in customers before it was recalled from store shelves in 2021. A 12-day trial ended with the verdict in the negligence and product liability case against Affinitylifestyles.com Inc. and its Real Water brand, according to Clark County District Court records. The jury awarded about $230 million in compensatory damages and $5 billion in punitive damages to Hunter Brown and several other plaintiffs. Attorney Will Kemp, representing plaintiffs, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal he expects Real Water's insurance company to fight paying damages because the company has filed for bankruptcy. Affinitylifestyles.com was headed by Brent Jones, who served as a Republican Nevada state Assembly member from 2016 to 2018. Jones and attorneys for the company did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment. Juries have previously delivered separate verdicts against the company, awarding plaintiffs almost $3.1 billion in June, $130 million in February and $228 million in October 2023. Juries have been told that tests found Real Water contained hydrazine, a chemical used in rocket fuel that may have been introduced during treatment before bottling. Defense attorneys have cast the company as unintentionally negligent, not reckless, because it didn't know hydrazine was in the water and didn't know to test for it. Kemp represents additional plaintiffs in several more civil lawsuits still pending against the company. Real Water was sold in distinctive boxy blue bottles as premium treated “alkalized” drinking water with healthy detoxifying properties. It was distributed to stores throughout the Southwest including Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico and the Los Angeles area, and also was delivered to homes in large bottles before being pulled off shelves in March 2021. This article was provided by The Associated Press.

The work of court personnel and recently empaneled jurors.

Defence lawyers say there are better ways of clearing clogged courts than the government's plan to have fewer jury trials

There are few things more stressful as a trial attorney than the jury selection process. Even if you're confident in your case, your arguments have been tested and refined, and every piece of evidence is on your side, picking jurors is a stark reminder that so much is out of your control. And because the ways in which all of us receive and retain information is changing, it's up to attorneys to adapt the ways in which they approach jurors.From the effects of polarization,the expectations around evidence, and generally shorter attention spans, there is so much to unpack about the way juries continue to evolve. Thankfully, I'm joined by Jury Consultant and Strategic Advisor, Dr. Christina Marinakis to help me do just that. With over 20 years of experience, Dr. Marinakis is the CEO and Founder of Immersion Legal which specialize in jury research, jury study, and applied practice in law and psychology.  Dr. Marinakis has assisted trial counsel with jury selection and daily trial monitoring across the country on some of the most substantial cases of our time, including her assistance to the prosecution with jury selection in State of Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd.This is definitely a conversation for the trial attorneys out there, but anyone with a passing curiosity in jury-trials will enjoy this peek behind the curtain. Enjoy the show. 

Researchers with @colorofchange have made a shocking discovery: for decades, prosecutors in Alameda County, California, worked to systematically exclude Black and Jewish individuals from jury participation in order to produce juries that were more likely to support capital punishment. Michael Collins, Senior Director of Government Affairs at Color Of Change, joins Rattling the Bars for a revealing discussion on prosecutor misconduct, and what these findings tell us about the state of the criminal injustice system.Studio / Post-Production: Cameron GranadinoHelp us continue producing Rattling the Bars by following us and becoming a monthly sustainer.Sign up for our newsletterLike us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterDonate to support this podcast

When Sean Claggett says that it's rare for a lawyer armed with data to lose at trial, he has the data to back it up.The evidence can be found in the pages of JuryBall: The Big Data Revolution is Here, the groundbreaking book that Sean wrote with Alicia Campbell and John Campbell. As Sean explains to host Dan Ambrose, their research made it clear that lawyers should reject the notion that jury trials are risky because “you never know what a jury is going to do… I think juried behavior is very predictable.” In this wide-ranging conversation, Sean recounts the genesis of JuryBall, his recent $24.6 million verdict in a med-mal case, and the tracks he'll teach at TLU VEGAS.Train and Connect with the Titans☑️ Sean Claggett | LinkedIn | Email ☑️ Claggett & Sykes on LinkedIn | X | Facebook | Instagram ☑️ Sean's book with Alicia Campbell and John Campbell: JuryBall: The Big Data Revolution is Here☑️ TLU VEGAS☑️ Trial Lawyers University☑️ TLU On Demand Instant access to live lectures, case analysis, and skills training videos☑️ TLU on X | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotBackground of Sean's med-mal case that ended in a $24.6 million verdictDays in the life: How Sean and his team prepped for the trialAre you a five-figure lawyer? Six-figure? Here's why every lawyer needs to answer that question honestlySean's career path, including his interactions with legal legends at a young age and eventually starting his own firmThe miracle settlement that saved...

In a late night verdict, former dancer Ashley Benefield is convicted of manslaughter days after she testified about the night she shot her estranged husband to death. In San Diego, prosecutors ask if a delayed police response allowed a murder to happen. And after a third high-profile hung jury in two months, we ask a jury expert what's going on.

Join Ben for this conversation with John and Johnny Simon and Tim Cronin of the Simon Law Firm.  This episode covers discussion of two fascinating recent cases in which the Simon firm obtained more than $ 1 billion in combined verdicts on behalf of a client killed by a driver high on nitrous oxide and a rape victim in a psychiatric hospital.  Learn about John, Johnny and Tim expertly built these cases around themes of corporate malfeasance, greed, neglect, and punitive damages.  Both verdicts are huge landmark accomplishments that will create positive change for society. The Simon Law Firm, P.C. | Over $1 Billion Won (simonlawpc.com) About John SimonJohn G. Simon's work as Managing Partner at the firm has resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars for past clients. Well-respected in his field, John's career includes several published works, frequent community involvement, and the role of adjunct professor at Saint Louis University School of LawFor 30 years, John Simon has devoted himself to fighting for the victims of negligence in St. Louis and across the nation. Because of his unparalleled skill and belief in the power of the law, John has secured over 150 verdicts and settlements in excess of $1 million or more for his clients.John's practice is among the most accomplished in the nation:He has secured over 150 verdicts and settlements in excess of $1 million each.He has obtained more than 15 verdicts/settlements over $10 million.He has secured more than 25 verdicts/settlements over $5 million.Fighting for Plaintiffs Across the United States John's conviction and passion for the law form the cornerstone of our practice. His belief in the power of hard work, persistence, and dedication allows him and his fellow attorneys to achieve incredible results. Above all, he knows that a group of committed individuals working together can accomplish great things—that's the heart of his firm. About Johnny SimonBy joining The Simon Law Firm, P.C. in 2015, Johnny continues a proud tradition of excellence in the art of advocacy on behalf of people and businesses in need. A tradition that was established by his father—a tradition he intends to uphold.Ask Johnny Simon, a native of St. Louis, Missouri, what he does for a living, and he will tell you very simply: a trial lawyer. Trying cases to juries, to verdict, is what he does. Practicing law, he will tell you, is not job, but a vocation—a privilege that he takes very seriously. Johnny focuses his practice on a diverse array of personal injury cases, including litigating cases involving defective products and product liability issues, medical malpractice claims, 1983 excessive force cases, and trucking/auto accidents, business litigation, and consumer fraud. Johnny graduated from Marquette University obtaining a degree in business, finance, and economics. He obtained a law degree from Boston College law school.Johnny has litigated against some of the largest companies and hospital systems in the country. He is proud to represent clients from in need of top-notch legal representation and knows that he has the resources and experience to even the odds. He has tried cases in state, federal, and appellate courts across the country. With every case, Johnny brings the same tenacity and drive in order to achieve the best results for his clients. He is always eager to tell the story of his clients to a jury, members of the community, and expose improper and unlawful conduct which caused devastating and life altering injuries.Outside of the Courtroom, Johnny is a husband, father, son, brother, and nephew. His hobby: thinking of ways to make a client's case better. About Timothy CroninTim Cronin is a skilled and experienced personal injury trial attorney, including product liability, medical malpractice, premises liability, and trucking litigation, serving clients nationwide from our St. Louis office. He has recovered over 750 million dollars for injury victims, received numerous legal accolades, and offers compassionate counsel to his clients.Timothy M. Cronin is a skilled trial attorney that focuses his practice on personal injury, product liability, medical malpractice, premises liability and trucking litigation involving catastrophic injuries or death.Tim devotes himself to uncovering wrongdoing and seeking justice for his clients. His goal in every case is to help repair the lives of his clients that have been devastated by the reckless conduct of others, to do everything possible to ensure it never happens again to anyone else, and to make the litigation process as easy and stress-free for his clients as possible. He has tried many cases, and prepared countless others that settled on the courthouse steps. Tim has obtained verdicts exceeding ten million dollars on four separate occasions, along with a recent $535 million verdict that is the largest in Illinois state history for a single plaintiff. He has also obtained settlements or verdicts exceeding a million dollars for his clients on nearly fifty separate occasions, recovering in excess of four million dollars or more on over half of those cases. 

No matter the case, no matter the client, you need a compelling story to convince the jury to award damages. “You want that million dollars?” asks jury trial consultant Jesse Wilson. “Tell me the ‘try' story. Tell me how somebody is trying to overcome their pain.” In this conversation with host Dan Ambrose, Jesse describes how this approach yields results. In one case he consulted on, a plaintiff who had been injured in a car wreck – and even gone back to work – got a $2.5 million settlement, after initially only being offered $80,000. Jesse calls his tactic the “victim-to-victor” approach, and he'll teach it at the upcoming TLU Vegas. Those who sign up should be prepared for an interactive experience – Jesse's a Juilliard-trained actor who borrows from his theater background so that participants will “understand and not intellectualize the process.” Train and Connect with the Titans☑️ Jesse Wilson | Tell The Winning Story | Email | X | Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube | Instagram | TikTok☑️ Jesse's Book: Witness Preparation: How to Tell the Winning Story ☑️ TLU VEGAS☑️ Trial Lawyers University Website☑️ TLU On Demand Instant access to live lectures, case analysis, and skills training videos☑️ TLU on X | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode SnapshotJesse Wilson's path from Juilliard to Colorado prisons to courtroomsWhy his “victim-to-victor” approach can maximize damagesHow he breaks a direct examination into three actsWhat four-letter word you and your client can...

Sean Lyons, one of Texas's top trial attorneys, joins Steve to share his remarkable path into law, shaped by his father's legacy as a civil rights activist. On this episode of Great Practice, Great Life, Sean opens up about his crusade against bullies and large corporations, highlighting the emotional and financial balancing act of running a legal practice. His insights into case selection and professional discipline offer lessons for avoiding burnout and staying true to one's passion for justice. Steve and Sean's conversation takes a deeper dive into the specialized nature of Sean's practice. They discuss the “expert's expert” model that focuses on referrals from other attorneys and the selective intake of high-stakes cases. Sean explains the intricate steps of case preparation and the importance of maintaining a sterling reputation in the legal field. He also underscores the rigorous demands of facing formidable defense teams and the criticality of thorough case evaluation. Finally, Sean illuminates the crucial balance between work, family, and self-care in a high-pressure career. He shares personal strategies for emotional resilience, scheduling family time, and making data-driven decisions. From effective time management techniques to building a values-driven law practice, Sean's advice guides aspiring and seasoned lawyers striving to excel while maintaining a fulfilling personal life. Join us for this conversation with a legal luminary dedicated to professional excellence and personal authenticity. In this episode, you will hear: Sean Lyons' journey into law that was influenced by his civil rights activist father Balancing emotional drive and financial realities in a legal practice Strategies for maintaining professional discipline and avoiding burnout The “expert's expert” model and selective case intake The importance of thorough case evaluation and preparation Techniques for balancing work, family, and self-care Lessons on strategic self-care, performance optimization, and effective business management in a legal career Follow and Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast. If there's a topic you would like us to cover on an upcoming episode, please email us at steve.riley@atticusadvantage.com. Supporting Resources: Dominate Your Market®: atticusadvantage.com/what-we-do/dominate-your-market The Path to a Great Practice & Great Life: atticusadvantage.mykajabi.com/the-path-to-a-great-practice-and-great-life-workshop-landing Get $500 off your registration to The Path to a Great Practice & Great Life workshop! Use promo code: Podcast500 The Daily Focuser: atticusinc.box.com/s/mgjgsb7c0w1vlu5f8h67mzd975faupqw Weekly Cash-Flow Focuser: atticusadvantage.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Weekly-Cash-Flow-Focuser-PDF.pdf The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the Right Things Done by Peter F. Drucker: a.co/d/0cLgO9nd Hire Slow. Fire Fast: A Lawyer's Guide to Building a High Performance Team by Mark Powers & Shawn McNalis: atticusadvantage.com/product/hire-slow-fire-fast Lyons & Lyons: lyonsandlyons.com Sean Lyons Bio: lyonsandlyons.com/our-practice/our-attorneys/sean-michael-lyons Episode Credits If you like this podcast and are thinking of creating your own, consider talking to my producer, Emerald City Productions. They helped me grow and produce the podcast you are listening to right now. Find out more at https://emeraldcitypro.com Let them know we sent you.

The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, letting the practice stand in the states that allow it. https://www.lehtoslaw.com

You know you've done your job in trial when you can see a tear or two come from the jury. On today's episode, Bob sits down with Simon Law Group's Robbie Munoz to discuss his approach to rebuttal arguments in trial, sharing stories and walking us through his thought processes during a case. 

It took almost a week to select the jurors and alternates for the Manhattan trial of former President Donald Trump. This hour is all about juries. We'll talk about jury selection, how to root out potential bias, and the process of choosing an impartial jury in this day and age. Plus, we'll look at depictions of juries in popular culture. And, some of the jury selection questions have to do with what media a person consumes, so we'll look at what the media we consume can say about us, and discuss media bias. GUESTS:  Renato Mariotti: Trial attorney and partner at the law firm Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP. He is a former federal prosecutor, and host of the “It's Complicated” podcast Nancy Marder: Professor of Law, Director of the Justice John Paul Stevens Jury Center and Co-Director of the Institute for Law and the Humanities at the Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech. She is author of The Power of the Jury: Transforming Citizens Into Jurors Vanessa Otero: Creator of the Media Bias Chart and the Founder and CEO of Ad Fontes Media Join the conversation on Facebook and Twitter. Subscribe to The Noseletter, an email compendium of merriment, secrets, and ancient wisdom brought to you by The Colin McEnroe Show. The Colin McEnroe Show is available as a podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, TuneIn, Listen Notes, or wherever you get your podcasts. Subscribe and never miss an episode.  Colin McEnroe and Dylan Reyes contributed to this show.Support the show: http://www.wnpr.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Frank talks about a new trend in Shanghai of people inviting strangers to their homes. Norm Pattis, a veteran trial attorney, legal analyst and author, whose books include, Juries and Justice: Saving a System Under Fire, joins the program to talk about the criminal justice system and the importance of juries. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Frank starts the show like he always does on Fridays: With Ask Frank Anything.  Frank talks about a new trend in Shanghai of people inviting strangers to their homes. Norm Pattis, a veteran trial attorney, legal analyst and author, whose books include, Juries and Justice: Saving a System Under Fire, joins the program to talk about the criminal justice system and the importance of juries. Frank starts the third hour with denunciations for the week. He follows that up with a conversation with Adam Scott Wandt, a practicing attorney, cyber expert and Professor at John Jay College to discuss the sentencing of Sam Bankman-Fried. Frank wraps up the show talking about the degradation of some Michaelangelo art, AI Frank Sinatra and more. Frank is joined by Noam Laden for News You Can Use. He is later joined by Pastor Joe Basile, a History channel host, Evangelical Pastor and author. They discuss the DNA of Jesus and the Shroud of Turin. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

True Sunlight Podcast co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and everyone's favorite attorney Eric Bland — check another item off their interview bucket list this week with one of the star witnesses from the Alex Murdaugh murder trial. Crime scene expert Dr. Kenny Kinsey sat down with Liz and Eric to talk about connecting with juries, how crimes scenes tell him the story of what happened to the victim and where law enforcement gets it wrong when investigating crime. Dr. Kinsey also shares stories from his stint in the Murdaugh spotlight — from the strange and wonderful gifts he's gotten from his supporters to getting yelled at in restaurants by people who think Alex's jury got it wrong. Perhaps most importantly, Dr. Kinsey gives a critical update in his investigation of Stephen Smith's murder. Premium Members get a few exclusive discussions with Dr. Kinsey on his impressions from the Murdaugh spotlight and some lighter anecdotes on strange and wonderful gifts he's received from his supporters. Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. And we also offer access to exclusive video content through our new YouTube Premiere subscription. Check out EB's new merch with a mission at theericbland.com or the Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP *** NEW: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send you fun merch if you find something that needs to be adjusted! *** Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ YouTube *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Many people are asking the question: "Can prosecutors really impanel fair and impartial juries to decide the many criminal cases against Donald Trump?" Glenn discusses the selection of the juries that have just ruled against him. Over the course of three trials; 3 juries (totaling 30 jurors) have unanimously found against Donald Trump and his namesake, the Trump Organization. These results provide some important foreshadowing regarding how future juries are likely to resolve the four criminal cases pending against Trump.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this hodgepodge of an episode, we traipse through a variety of subjects including the Michigan shooter's mom, Wendy Williams' Adderall, Zoomer's tips, and AOC's cockamamie theories about Bronx thugs.

Get involved now MAGA at http://www.TacticalCivics.com 

It's totally bonkers that in the US and other countries, the job of determining the guilt or innocence of an accused criminal – whose life may be at stake – is left not to experts in law but to a group of random citizens. Even crazier, it generally works!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.