Podcasts about psychology department

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdf

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdf

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdf

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Our guest today is Kentucky State Legislator Lisa Willner. Lisa Willner has a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology, and she is a licensed psychologist. She is the past Executive Director of the KY Psychological Association, and she taught in Bellarmine University's Psychology Department for 20 years. She is a former member of the Jefferson County Board of Education where she also served as vice-chair. Currently she is serving in her fourth term in the Kentucky House of Representatives, where she represents Kentucky House District 35.

This is the Weight and Healthcare newsletter! If you like what you are reading, please consider subscribing and/or sharing!Diabetes Prevention Programs are a group of programs that are created to prevent the onset of Type 2 Diabetes, often in people who have been identified as at-risk. Most include behavior changes, social support, and include weight loss as a metric and/or the primary outcome. The assumption is typically that any health changes and/or reductions in the development of T2D are because of any weight loss. In discussing these programs previously I've expressed the concern that any differences in health/T2D development were more likely due to behavior changes/support than any weight loss and that, because of their insistence on a weight-loss focus, the programs likely included much more restriction than is necessary to create any health changes, which could create harms including weight cycling (which can actually drive T2D,) weight stigma (which can actually drive T2D,) and disengagement from behaviors that might actually support health and make T2D less likely (with the clear and critical understanding that whether or not someone develops T2D involves myriad factors, many of which are completely outside of their control, including genetics.)Enter the new systematic review “Potential mechanisms for change in diabetes prevention programs” which sought “to investigate potential mechanisms for change in diabetes prevention programs (DPPs), and assess the strength of associations.” Their hypothesis was that “ Weight loss would be less strongly associated with improved health than other mechanisms.” SummaryA group of researchers, several of whom work in weight inclusive Type 2 Diabetes preventions and management, sought to fill a gap in research around Diabetes Prevention Programs (DPPs). These program seek to delay/prevent onset of Type 2 Diabetes and typically include multiple interventions but often target an end goal of weight loss. There is a significant lack of research that even attempts to determine which aspects of DPPs might actually be responsible for any benefits and which might be unhelpful or cause harm. These researchers undertook a systematic review to attempt to determine just that. The AuthorsWe'll begin, as we always do, with the authors. Spoiler alert, this is going to be much shorter than these typically are. The study received no funding and the authors disclosed no conflicts of interest. I'll do my usual deeper dive into their work and, as a reminder, working in the space in which you are researching is not considered a conflict of interest that requires disclosure but is something that always makes me give extra scrutiny to methodology. As usual, if you want to skip this part you can scroll down to where it says “The Study.”Margit I. Berman is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Professional Psychology at the University of St. Thomas. Dr. Berman is the author of a “A Clinician's Guide to Acceptance-Based Approaches for Weight Concerns: The Accept Yourself! Framework” This is not a DPP program but does have a section on Health at Every Size™ approaches to Diabetes and Cardiovascular Health. [Note: that Health at Every Size is the trademarked brand of the Association for Size Diversity and Health) Martha Burla - per LinkedIn currently works at the Feinberg School of Medicine in the Department of Medical Social Sciences where she supports research on patient reported outcomes and shared decision making. She is also pursuing a PhD in Health Sciences from Rush University with the hope of continuing to research patient decision making and autonomy.Hannah Martin - per her Linkedin she is a PhD candidate at the University of Otago, Dunedin New Zealand. Her research focuses on Intuitive EatingMegrette Fletcher - is the owner of Inclusive Diabetes Care, LLC which offers free and paid resources for weight-inclusive diabetes care. Full disclosure, Megrette and I have worked together including speaking on the same panel and on a writing project.Elizabeth A. Michaels - per LinkedIn, works at Christopher Rural Health Planning Corporation Primary Care including Coordination of Diabetes Program in accordance with AADE Standards , Individualized Nutrition Consultation and Diet Instruction, Nutrition Therapy for Emotional Eating, Personalized Meal Plans and Recipe Development, Provision and Marketing of Community Health Classes, Development of Educational Resources and Materials, Diabetes Medication and Insulin Management, Continuous Quality Improvement Tracking, Patient Goal Setting and Ongoing Support, Auditor AADE Programs, and Development and initiation of CDCs Diabetes Prevention ProgramLauren Brittany Beach- Per LinkedIn they are an Assistant Professor at Northwestern University's Department of Medicine Social Sciences and Department of Preventive Medicine in the Feinberg School of Medicine and “a leader with a strong track record of scientific research and business development across a wide variety of therapeutic areas, including infectious disease, oncology, cardiology, endocrinology, nephrology, rare disease, and more. In my roles as Assistant Professor, ADVOCATE Center Director, and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Executive Team member at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, I am recognized for innovative and high impact contributions in research, mentorship, education, and service. I have 20 years of experience translating results from cutting-edge science into narratives that resonate with funding agencies, regulators, clinicians, and the public. I have experience directing interdisciplinary teams in the United States and globally of up to 60 people to solve complex research and operational challenges on time and on budget. Trained in genetics, law, and epidemiology, I am a skilled data scientist and technical writer with experience in research and regulatory communication in both the discovery and clinical research domains.”Michelle L. May - per LinkedIn May is an Associate Professor in the Psychology Department at Arizona State University and the creator of the Am I Hungry? Mindful eating program offering “experiential mindful eating workshops, retreats, and corporate wellness programs. We have trained over 800 health and wellness professionals in over 40+ countries to offer mindful eating programs, coaching, and therapy in their communities, practices, and workplaces.“Pamela J. Bagley - per LinkedIn Bagley is Coordinator of Biomedical Research Support at Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries.Heather B. Blunt - is a Research and Education Librarian, Public Health Lead in Medical and Health Sciences at the Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries with subspecialties in Medical and Health SciencesThe StudyThe authors begin by explaining diabetes prevention programs (DPPs), including that they can vary but often have multiple components including medical and/or psychosocial interventions. They point to the DPP-ILI (Intensive Lifestyle Intervention) as a typical intervention that focuses on creating 7% weight loss using multiple components. They also point out that in one study the DPP-ILI reduced diabetes incidence by 58% compared to a placebo, but that participants don't necessarily find the program either “helpful or tolerable” and the programs often having drop out rates from 40-80%. They also note that the DPP-ILI contains multiple elements - change in weight, physical activity, food, social support, psychological change, education, and self-monitoring and self-awareness that may impact onset of diabetes. Finally, the authors point out that “despite their efficacy, it is possible that DPPs may include harmful elements such as exposure to weight stigma or healthism.” I'll also add, based on about 100 years of research, exposure to the harms of weight cycling since the vast majority of people who lose weight will gain it back.Here the researchers hit on an issue I would suggest is not just with DPPs but with all health interventions that are based on weight loss. As these authors put it, “it is striking how little is known about which components of these interventions cause a delay in diabetes onset, and which components may cause harm.” As is, again, the case with almost all, if not all , research that tries to claim that weight loss create health benefits, more than twenty years in, the research into the DPP-ILI “was not designed to test the relative contributions of dietary changes, increased physical activity, and weight loss to the reduction in the risk of diabetes.” Given our culture's obsession with weight loss (driven by, and with tremendous profit to, the weight loss industry,) the assumption with the DPP (and in general) is always that weight loss (and, typically, very small amounts of weight loss) causes health benefits, literally ignoring all of the behavior changes and other components that precede both the (small, typically temporary) weight loss and the health changes/benefits. The researchers note that “clinicians have focused on the importance of weight loss…recommending weight loss, however, may be a particularly likely candidate to cause harmful or null effects in DPPs.”Considering weight loss, the researchers note that long-term weight loss is “not achievable for most people” and, further, that weight loss programs can induce or exacerbate weight stigma and expose participants to discrimination. They point out that despite the “transient” nature of weight loss in DPPS, “the delayed onset of diabetes can be largely retained, suggesting that mechanisms other than weight loss may contribute to the benefits.”In part 2 we'll look at the study methodology and what they found.If you think my work is valuable, and you want to support my ability to do it, you can become a free or paid subscriber. Both support the work I do here! Liked the piece? Share the piece!More researchThe Research PostMore resourcesThe Resource Post*Note on language: I use “fat” as a neutral descriptor as used by the fat activist community, I use “ob*se” and “overw*ight” to acknowledge that these are terms that were created to medicalize and pathologize fat bodies, with roots in racism and specifically anti-Blackness. Please read Sabrina Strings' Fearing the Black Body – the Racial Origins of Fat Phobia and Da'Shaun Harrison's Belly of the Beast: The Politics of Anti-Fatness as Anti-Blackness for more on this. Get full access to Weight and Healthcare at weightandhealthcare.substack.com/subscribe

Rational choice theory has become so familiar that it can feel like common sense. We talk about trade-offs, optimization, ROI, and risk as if they capture what it means to think clearly. But many of the decisions that matter most do not work that way. They are shaped by context, values, relationships, and the larger story of a life. In this episode, Barry Schwartz returns to discuss how rational choice theory became the default way we think, how it shapes work and decision-making, and what a more human approach to being rational might look like.Barry Schwartz is a psychologist and professor emeritus at Swarthmore College. He studies decision-making, motivation, and the role of meaning in work and life.In this episode, Dart and Barry discuss:- Why we treat decisions like math- What gets lost when everything becomes a number- Why some choices cannot be compared- The difference between risk and uncertainty- How framing shapes every decision- Why metrics can crowd out judgment- The danger of maximizing everything- Why good enough can be wiser- How choices fit into a larger life story- Why counting is not the same as thinking- And other topics…Barry Schwartz is the Dorwin P. Cartwright Professor Emeritus of Social Theory and Social Action in the Psychology Department at Swarthmore College, and Visiting Professor of Management at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley. His work focuses on decision-making, motivation, moral judgment, and meaning in work and life. He is the author of The Battle for Human Nature, The Costs of Living, The Paradox of Choice, and Why We Work. He is also the co-author of Practical Wisdom (with Kenneth Sharpe) and Choose Wisely (with Richard Schuldenfrei).Resources Mentioned:Barry's Book, Choose Wisely: Rationality, Ethics, and the Art of Decision-Making: https://www.amazon.com/Choose-Wisely-Rationality-Ethics-Decision-Making/dp/0300283997 Barry's Book, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less: https://www.amazon.com/Paradox-Choice-Why-More-Less/dp/0060005688 Barry's Book, Why We Work: https://www.amazon.com/Why-We-Work-TED-Books/dp/1476784868 Work with Dart:Dart is the CEO and co-founder of the work design firm 11fold. Build work that makes employees feel alive, connected to their work, and focused on what's most important to the business. Book a call at 11fold.com.

On March 22, WAMC On the Road presented a special conversation at historic Caffè Lena in Saratoga Springs, New York. A panel of experts attempted to answer the question “Does music matter?” (spoiler: Yes, it does.) by exploring topics surrounding music as a path to healing, empathy and health.Lead by WAMC's Southern Adirondack Bureau Chief Aaron Shellow-Lavine, the participants were Caffè Lena Executive Director Sarah Craig, Associate Professor in the Psychology Department and Neuroscience Program at Skidmore College Dr. Dominique Vuvan, and folk-musician and educator Dan Berggren.

Episode Summary: In this powerful episode, Dr. Lino Martinez sits down with world-renowned mental health and addiction expert Dr. Adi Jaffe, Ph.D., to explore the hidden force behind shame.Dr. Jaffe, author of Unhooked and founder of IGNTD Recovery, shares a revolutionary perspective on recovery that challenges traditional models and focuses on personalization, mental health, and self-understanding rather than stigma and labels.Together, they unpack how shame silently drives destructive behaviors, impacts relationships, and prevents people from seeking help—and more importantly, how to break free from it.This conversation offers a compassionate, science-backed, and empowering approach to healing that integrates psychology, personal responsibility, and self-compassion.In This Episode, You'll Learn: How shame contributes to addiction and mental health struggles  Practical ways to begin healing and reclaim control of your life  Dr. Jaffe's “Unhooked” approach to personalized recovery About Dr. Adi Jaffe: Dr. Adi Jaffe, Ph.D., is a world-renowned expert on mental health, addiction, relationships, and shame. He is the author of Unhooked and the founder of IGNTD Recovery, a Smart Personalized Adaptive Recovery System. Dr. Jaffe previously served as a lecturer in the Psychology Department at UCLA and was the Executive Director and Co-Founder of one of the most progressive addiction treatment facilities in the country. His mission is to reduce the stigma surrounding mental health and transform how we understand recovery.Connect with Dr. Adi Jaffe: Dr. Adi JaffeInstagram #MentalHealthMatters #AddictionRecovery #HealingJourney #SelfCompassion #BreakTheStigma #EmotionalHealing #InnerWork #PersonalGrowth #MindsetShift #Resilience #shame #alittlelessfearpodcastThis is Dr. Lino Martinez the host for A Little Less Fear Podcast. For more information, please use the information below. Thanks so much for your support!Author | A Little Less FearA Little LESS FEAR Podcast (@alittlelessfearpodcast) • Instagram photos and videosLino Marinez (@alittlelessfear) TikTok | Watch Lino Marinez's Newest TikTok Videos(4) A Little Less Fear Podcast - YouTube

This week we discuss the controversial Stanford Prison Experiment where a professor created a simulated prison in the basement of the Psychology Department in Stanford University. The experiment was abruptly ended due to the questionable ethics during the experiment,In the news this week:JD Vance gives opinion on alien life.Human Euthenasia.Quadruple Amputee commits murder.Man kidnapped by dolphins. Except he isn't.Join the Patreon:www.Patreon.com/Wednesdaystalk  Join the Facebook Group:https://www.facebook.com/share/g/17r9NPkasi/ Email Us:OnWednesdaysWeTalkWeird@gmail.com  Follow Ashley Hilt:Linktr.ee/itsasherz  Follow Cassie Marozsan:Linktr.ee/Cassiesland  Produced By: Prisoner #6969 NateBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/on-wednesdays-we-talk-weird--5989318/support.

In today's conversation, we connect with Dr. Adi Jaffe, a #1 best-selling author and nationally recognized expert on transformation and communication – especially in times of deep crisis. As the author of groundbreaking works like The Abstinence Myth and Unhooked: Free Yourself from Addiction Forever, Dr. Jaffe's mission is both simple and radical: to help people overcome addiction and life challenges without shame, judgment, or rigid rules… Dr. Jaffe's work spans mental health, addiction, relationships, and professional identity, supporting individuals navigating personal, career, and emotional crises. He spent nearly a decade as a lecturer in UCLA's Psychology Department and served as Executive Director and Co-Founder of one of the country's most progressive mental health treatment centers before founding IGNTD. Through IGNTD, Dr. Jaffe is reshaping how we understand and address mental health by helping people move beyond shame, reconnect with purpose and joy, and build lives rooted in fulfillment — for themselves and those around them. This discussion outlines: How anxiety and mental health challenges have evolved in recent years. The psychological impact of technology on modern life. How to navigate conflict in healthier, more constructive ways, and how substances can interfere with that process. The importance of reframing the conventional ideals of addiction. Want to follow along with Dr. Jaffe and his work? Click here now!

In a world where confidence is rewarded and humility can feel like a liability, Stanford Law professor Robert MacCoun argues for something radical: fewer unwavering opinions, more critical reflection, and a better way to disagree. On Stanford Legal, MacCoun joins co-hosts Pamela Karlan and Diego Zambrano for a conversation about how “habits of mind” borrowed from science can help citizens, lawyers, and policymakers think more clearly and function more effectively in a pluralistic society.MacCoun is the James and Patricia Kowal Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, a professor by courtesy in Stanford's Psychology Department, and the university's senior associate vice provost for research. Trained as a social psychologist, his work sits at the intersection of law, science, and public policy, with decades of research on decision-making, bias, and the social dynamics that shape how evidence is interpreted. In the episode, he draws on his most recent book, Third Millennium Thinking: Creating Sense in a World of Nonsense, co-authored with Nobel Prize–winning physicist Saul Perlmutter and philosopher John Campbell, to explain why probabilistic thinking, intellectual humility, and what he calls an “opinion diet” are essential tools for modern civic life. Links:Robert MacCoun >>> Stanford Law pageThird Millennium Thinking >>> Stanford Law pageConnect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>>  Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageDiego Zambrano >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X (00:00:00) Introduction and Noise vs. Bias(00:04:42) The Power of Probabilistic Thinking(00:12:20) Juries, Community Judgment, and Reasonable Doubt(00:13:23) Habits of Community(00:25:08) Motivation, Tools, and Decision Processes(00:26:14) When Evidence Won't Settle It Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this episode of The Lectern, host Ethan Hsieh sits down with philosopher and cognitive scientist Mark Miller to explore the science of predictive processing and its implications for happiness, meaning, and wellbeing. They unpack how the brain is not a passive receiver of reality, but an active prediction engine—constantly generating its best guesses about the world and updating them through experience. From belief formation and perception to resilience, virtue, play, and mindfulness, the conversation bridges cutting-edge cognitive science with ancient contemplative wisdom. Together, Ethan and Mark discuss how understanding the predictive nature of the mind can transform how we relate to uncertainty, cultivate agency, and develop a deeper, more participatory sense of happiness—both individually and collectively. This episode also introduces Mark Miller's upcoming course, Generations of Joy, which explores these ideas through neuroscience, philosophy, and contemplative practice. Sign up for the course: https://lectern.johnvervaeke.com/courses/generations-of-joy   00:00 Welcome back to The Lectern 02:30 Mark Miller's background and research focus 06:00 Predictive processing and cognitive science 09:00 Belief, perception, and meaning-making 10:18 "You're not seeing the world—you're seeing your best guess about the world." 13:00 Course overview and key themes 27:00 Honesty, virtue, and transformation 39:30 Practical applications and course dynamics 41:30 Real-world implications of science 43:00 Emptiness, neuroscience, and insight 43:30 The frame problem in cognitive science 45:30 Optimism vs. pessimism: locking onto the world 46:30 Training the mind to discern 47:30 The interpretive nature of reality 52:00 The role of play in cognitive development 56:00 Managing uncertainty through play 01:12:30 Mindfulness and emerging evidence 01:22:00 The Transformational Neuroscience course   Mark Miller is a philosopher and cognitive scientist whose work bridges philosophy, neuroscience, and contemplative science. His research explores how the predictive brain shapes happiness, wellbeing, and meaning in a technologically saturated world. He is a Senior Research Fellow at Monash University's Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies (Australia), cross-affiliated with the Psychology Department at the University of Toronto (Canada), and a visiting researcher at Hokkaido University's Centre for Human Nature, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience (Japan). Website: https://www.markdmiller.live/   Ethan Hsieh is a facilitator, educator, and philosophical practitioner working at the intersection of performance, cognition, and transformative pedagogy. He is the creator of TIAMAT, a three-tier developmental framework integrating cognitive science, dialogical philosophy, and embodied practice. Through immersive learning environments and collaborative inquiry, Ethan helps individuals cultivate virtuosity as a way of life—emphasizing participatory sense-making, metacognitive mapping, and shared agency. His work with the 5toMidnight collective focuses on building deliberately developmental communities grounded in relational ontology and lived philosophical transformation.

We all feel emotions every day, but how often do we stop to understand what they really are and how they work? Joining Michael for this episode is Ethan Kross, a renowned authority on emotion regulation and author of Shift: Managing Your Emotions—So They Don't Manage You, for a conversation about the science behind how our internal dialogue affects health, performance, and relationships. Ethan explains what emotions are, how they function, and the importance of teaching emotional regulation skills from a young age. He also covers various tools and strategies that can help you manage your emotions more effectively, shares examples from his books, and highlights significant studies.Listen and Learn: Why we have emotions and how they quietly shape our thoughts, bodies, and actions in ways most of us don't fully noticeWhy meaningful moments almost always come with emotional friction, and what that reveals about living a purposeful lifeThe 50-year study that shows how early emotion skills shape health, money, and relationshipsWhat happens when logic is pushed too far, and emotions are removed, and how science suggests a more balanced approach that quietly shapes better outcomes in work, relationships, and lifeWhy managing emotions isn't about suppressing them, but learning how you can use the right tools at the right time to keep them working for you instead of against youSimple mental shifts that help you move through discomfort and emotional blocks fasterResources: Shift: Managing Your Emotions--So They Don't Manage You https://bookshop.org/a/30734/9780593444412 Ethan's Website: https://www.ethankross.com/Emotion & Self Control Laboratory: http://selfcontrol.psych.lsa.umich.edu/Connect with Ethan on Social Media: https://www.instagram.com/ethankross/https://www.linkedin.com/in/ekross/About Ethan KrossEthan Kross is one of the world's leading experts on emotion regulation. An award-winning professor and bestselling author in the University of Michigan's top- ranked Psychology Department and its Ross School of Business, he studies how the conversations people have with themselves impact their health, performance, decisions, and relationships.Ethan was born and raised in Brooklyn, New York. He attended the University of Pennsylvania, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and graduated magna cum laude. After earning his PhD in Psychology from Columbia University, Ethan completed a post-doctoral fellowship in social-affective neuroscience to learn about the neural systems that support self-control. He moved to the University of Michigan in 2008, where he founded the Emotion & Self Control Laboratory.Ethan's research has been published in Science, The New England Journal of Medicine, and The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, among other peer-reviewed journals. He has participated in policy discussion at the White House and has been interviewed on CBS Evening News, Good Morning America, Anderson Cooper Full Circle, and NPR's Morning Edition. His pioneering research has been featured in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, Harvard Business Review, USA Today, The Economist, The Atlantic, Forbes, and Time.Ethan is the two-time National Bestselling author of SHIFT: Managing Your Emotions—So They Don't Manage You and CHATTER: The Voice in Our Head, Why it Matters and How to Harness It. His books are routinely featured in the worlds' top media (e.g., New York Times, Wall Street Journal, BBC, The New Yorker), have garnered multiple accolades and been translated into over 40 languages. Related Episodes:309. The Language of Emotions with Karla McLaren265. The Power of Emotions at Work with Karla McLaren183. Permission to Feel: Emotional Intelligence with Marc BrackettSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Teamwork skills are highly valued by employers but most faculty have not been trained to create effective team projects. In this episode, Tim Franz and Lauren Vicker join us to discuss a resource they developed to help faculty create more effective team assignments and projects. Tim is a Professor in the Psychology Department at St. John Fisher University and Lauren is a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Media and Communication, also at St. John Fisher University. They are the authors of Making Team Projects Work: A College Instructor's Guide to Successful Student Groupwork which has been recently released by Routledge. A transcript of this episode and show notes may be found at http://teaforteaching.com.

How we experience an event may change how we remember it. Christopher Baldassano, associate professor of psychology at Columbia University, looks into our past experiences for clues. Christopher Baldassano is an Associate Professor in the Psychology Department at Columbia University. He was an undergraduate in Electrical Engineering at Princeton University, received his PhD in Computer […]

Today's episode is a rebroadcast from February 4, 2022.  This was a unique episode, as Ms. Jaynes and Mr. Bradley interviewed special guest Dr. Ethan Kross.  He is an award-winning professor in the University of Michigan's top ranked Psychology Department and its Ross School of Business, he is the director of the Emotion & Self Control Laboratory. He is also the author of Chatter: The Voice in Our Head, Why It Matters, and How to Harness It (https://www.ethankross.com/chatter/).

Send us a textIn this episode of Behind the Stigma, I sit down with Dr. Prince Kouassi, Assistant Professor and Chair of the Psychology Department at the American University of Dubai, to explore the landscape of mental health in the UAE. We discuss whether we are over-diagnosing mental health, the educational psychology market and careers in the UAE, using AI in the classroom and his thoughts on digital mental health apps. Timestamps added!About Dr. Prince KouassiDr. Kouassi is an Assistant Professor of Psychology and the Chair of the Department of Psychology at the American University of Dubai. He completed his Ph.D. at City, University of London (UK) in computational psychology, and after completing his PhD accepted a Teaching Fellowship in Psychology at Coventry University (UK). Dr. Kouassi has a wide range of active research interests in psychology which include but not limited to cognitive modeling, quantum probability applications, research participation, psychology education, and the practical application of psychological principles in the workplace.Find him on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-prince-kouassi-phd-0616a71aa/Subscribe to the Behind the Stigma podcast on YouTube, Apple Podcast or Spotify. Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/behindthestigmapodcast/ 

This is part three of our conversation with Dr Claire St Peter from the University of West Virginia where she is currently the Chair of the Department of Psychology, and Dr Carol Pilgrim, a Professor Emerit in the Psychology Department at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. Dr Pilgrim has received many honors throughout her career including the North Carolina Board of Governors Teaching Excellence Award, the Faculty Scholarship Award, the Chancellor's Teaching Excellence Award, the ABAI Student Committee Outstanding Mentor Award in 2006, and the ABAI Distinguished Service to Behavior Analysis award in 2017. Her research contributions include both basic and applied behavior analysis, with an emphasis in human operant behavior and relational stimulus control. Our subject is for this podcast is stimulus control. In Part 1 Dr. Pilgrim started us out with definitions and an introduction to the subject. She shared the story of Clever Hans, a horse who was said to be able to do complicated math problems. What he really could do was read the very subtle cues his handler and others were giving that told him when he had reached the right answer. In part two we took a deeper into the subject of stimulus control, including a discussion of relational stimulus control. That brought us to the use of models. Dr Pilgrim described the use of models to teach women to do their own breast cancer exams to detect any abnormalities in the very earliest stages. In Part Three we continue with the discussion of simulators as it relates to training riders. I share a story about a riding simulator I got to experience during a visit to the UK. We also talk about why science matters as we describe the use of A/B reversals to develop riding and handling skills.

Dr. Deborah Heiser discusses how and why to find mentors from all directions.— YOU'LL LEARN — 1) The fundamental human need that mentorship fulfills2) Why most struggle to find mentors—and the simple fix3) The unlikely places where you can find more mentorsSubscribe or visit AwesomeAtYourJob.com/ep1109 for clickable versions of the links below. — ABOUT DEBORAH — Dr. Deborah Heiser (Ph.D.) is an applied developmental psychologist, the CEO/Founder of The Mentor Project, and author of The Mentorship Edge: Creating Maximum Impact Through Lateral and Hierarchical Mentoring. She is a TEDx speaker, member of Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, expert contributor to Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.• Book: The Mentorship Edge: Creating Maximum Impact through Lateral and Hierarchical Mentoring• LinkedIn: Deborah Heiser• Substack: The Right Side of 40• Website: DeborahHeiser.com— RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THE SHOW — • Book: Madame Curie: A Biography by Eve Curie and Vincent Sheean— THANK YOU SPONSORS! — • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO• Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome• Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This is part two of our conversation with Dr Claire St Peter from the University of West Virginia where she is currently the Chair of the Department of Psychology, and Dr Carol Pilgrim, a Professor Emerit in the Psychology Department at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. Dr Pilgrim has received many honors throughout her career including the North Carolina Board of Governors Teaching Excellence Award, the Faculty Scholarship Award, the Chancellor's Teaching Excellence Award, the ABAI Student Committee Outstanding Mentor Award in 2006, and the ABAI Distinguished Service to Behavior Analysis award in 2017. Her research contributions include both basic and applied behavior analysis, with an emphasis in human operant behavior and relational stimulus control. Our subject is for this podcast is stimulus control. In Part 1 Dr. Pilgrim started us out with definitions and an introduction to the subject. She shared the story of Clever Hans, a horse who was said to be able to do complicated math problems. What he really could do was read the very subtle cues his handler and others were giving that told him when he had reached the right answer. In part two we take a deeper into the subject of stimulus control, including a discussion of relational stimulus control.

We've covered a lot of topics with behavior analysts. This week we're talking with Dr. Carol Pilgrim and Dr. Claire St Peter about stimulus control. Dr Claire St Peter is from the University of West Virginia, where she is currently the Chair of the Department of Psychology. Claire has been on this podcast many times. Claire is not only a behavior analyst she is also a horse person. When I say that everything is connected to everything else, Claire has been helping us to see the connection between behavior analysis and horse training. We wrote an article together on loopy training which was published in 2022 in the Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior. The title was: Connecting animal trainers and behavior analysts through loopy training. Claire has gone on connecting animal trainers and behaviors analysts via this podcast. This past spring I received a SABA award for all the equiosity episodes Dominique and I have done on topics directly related to behavior analysis. When Claire and I met up after the award ceremony, we were chatting about topics that would be interesting to cover. Claire suggested we reach out to Dr Carol Pilgrim for a deep dive into stimulus control. Dr Carol Pilgrim is a Professor Emerit in the Psychology Department at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. Dr Pilgrim has received many honors throughout her career including the North Carolina Board of Governors Teaching Excellence Award, the Faculty Scholarship Award, the Chancellor's Teaching Excellence Award, the ABAI Student Committee Outstanding Mentor Award in 2006, and the ABAI Distinguished Service to Behavior Analysis award in 2017. Her research contributions include both basic and applied behavior analysis, with an emphasis in human operant behavior and relational stimulus control. In Part 1 of this podcast we begin the conversation with basic definitions and concepts related to stimulus control.

Colorado State University's Psychology Department was awarded the Gary A. Darling Award alongside a $50,000 grant, Two people were killed in a head-on collision between Fort Collins and Wyoming Friday night on U.S. 287, Israel and Hamas's new ceasefire deal faces its first major test over the weekend.

For years, Dr. Deborah Heiser studied the pathology of aging, immersed in the nitty gritty of everything that can go wrong with your body as you get older. Until one day someone challenged her to find out what on earth we have to look forward to. And what she found surprised her. ”Honestly, there was a huge amount of research that was out there showing what we have to look forward to, but nobody was talking about it.” That's when she shifted her research about aging and what it actually offers.Today, Deborah tells us about the deeply satisfying stages that are ahead and how an aging population benefits everyone.In a culture that tells us that as we age, we matter less. Deborah wants everyone to know that as we mature, we matter more than ever before.About DeborahDr. Debbie Heiser is an Applied Developmental Psychologist with a specialty in midlife and beyond and is redefining what life after 40 looks and feels like. She has been featured at TEDx, Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.Linkshttps://mentorproject.org/https://www.linkedin.com/in/deborah-heiser-phdAbout The BreakoutThe Breakout is the hit podcast hosted by human resources and change experts Dr. Keri Ohlrich and Kelly Guenther. The founders of Abbracci Group, a results-driven coaching, HR Management and consulting firm, Keri and Kelly are laser-focused on getting the best out of people. They launched The Breakout in early 2023 to find the best stories and advice on busting boundaries and making change, and since then the show has charted #1 in self-improvement, #1 in education, and #7 in all podcasts. From huge transformations to quiet shifts, The Breakout highlights why every change matters. At Abbracci Group, Keri and Kelly offer a four-step coaching process to help you increase your self-awareness, break out of expectations, and live life on your terms.Keri and Kelly Links:Whatever the Hell You WantThe Way of the HR WarriorInstagram - @thebreakoutpodThe Breakout on FacebookYouTube Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Spooky season is back! In the latest episode of The Science of Personality, Ryne and I are joined by Chris French, PhD, professor emeritus and former Head of the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit in the Psychology Department at Goldsmiths, University of London, to talk about the psychology of demonology, possession, and exorcism. With his primary area of research being the psychology of paranormal beliefs and anomalous experiences, Chris is a frequent radio and television guest who casts a skeptical eye over paranormal claims, and is also the author of multiple books on the paranormal, including his most recent one from earlier this year, titled The Science of Weird Shit. For our loyal listeners, you are well aware by now that Ryne and I dedicate our episodes in October to topics like this to celebrate Halloween and the spooky season. Because demonology, possession, and exorcism are at the core of some of history's best horror films and literary works, we thought it would be a fun topic to cover, and Chris is the perfect guest to join us for this special episode.

‘Change is possible' - that's the message of Doctor and Neuroscientist Brian Pennie, who is about to deliver his first talk at Maynooth University since his studies there.The university is celebrating 25 years of its Psychology Department, and is hosting a number of free events to mark the occasion, which are open to the public.The event is taking place on October 8th, and coincides with the day Dr. Brian Pennie recovered from his heroin addiction.12 years on, he has obtained a PhD and uses his platform to help people who are looking to turn their life around…He also hosts the ‘Change is Possible' podcast, which encourages everyone to pursue the very best version of themselves.Dr. Brian Pennie joins Seán to discuss.Image: @mu_psychology_ on Instagram

Send Jay comments via textWhen your focus shifts from raising children to looking at your own next chapter, it's easy to see this as an ending. But in reality, it's the beginning of one of life's most emotionally enriching phases. In this inspiring episode, Dr. Deborah Heiser—host of The After 40 Podcast and founder of The Mentor Project—reframes aging and empty nesting as opportunities for growth, connection, and fulfillment.While society often emphasizes physical decline with age this period of "generativity versus stagnation" is a prime time to give back—through mentoring, creating, exploring, or sharing our wisdom. Dr. Heiser discusses the five essential components of true mentorship—generativity, receptivity, intrinsic motivation, meaningful connection, and trust—and emphasizes that everyone has something valuable to offer, regardless of age or background. From passing down family recipes to guiding new community members, mentorship enriches both mentor and mentee, creating a ripple of connection and purpose.Highlights & Key Takeaways:Our physical decline doesn't define our emotional or spiritual growth; it continues upward throughout life.The empty nest phase opens up mental and emotional bandwidth for purpose-driven living.Midlife is an ideal time to give back—whether through mentoring, sharing knowledge, or exploring new interests.Mentoring creates purpose and satisfaction for both mentor and mentee, fostering connection that money can't buy.Deborah Heiser BioDeborah Heiser, Ph.D., is an Applied Developmental Psychologist, a TEDx speaker, consultant, author, and Founder of The Mentor Project, and an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.She has been quoted in The New York Times, Seattle Times, Dallas Times and contributes to Psychology Today. Her research covers a wide range of topics related to aging, including depression identification, dementia, and frailty with grants awarded from NIA/NIH and Pfizer. She received an international award for her research on depression identification, as well as serving for 9 years on the Board of the State Society on Aging of New York.Find Deborah Online: LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, WebsiteSupport the showFREE WORKBOOK3 Steps to Loving Your Empty Nest Life ENJOY THE SHOW?Don't miss an episode, subscribe via Apple Podcasts or follow on Spotify and many more. LOVE THE SHOW?Get your THIS EMPTY NEST LIFE swagReview us on Love the Podcast, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify -- reviews and ratings help others find us and we'd appreciate your support greatly.CONNECT WITH JAYEmail, LinkedIn, Instagram, or TikTok

On July 8th, in what can only be described as an act of reckless clarity, we published a white paper (grab it here—>) Unified Behavioral Model™ — Read more… listen now.Disclaimer: The following is a bit tongue-in-cheek. Just a bit.I have the utmost respect for the behavioral science community and its vast contributions—including the many scientists whose work has directly shaped my own.That said, the more I learn about the history of attempts to unify behavioral science (and, by association, psychology)—and then set those challenges alongside the Unified Behavior Model (UBM) as it now exists—formally published (elemental and falsifiable), 500+ downloads later—the more peculiar the entire situation becomes.To be clear: it's only in hindsight that these “obvious” errors and omissions—both in behavioral science (BS) and in its unification efforts—come into focus.Subscribe nowTip #1: Make Sure Only True Insiders Get to PlayWhatever you do, don't approach this unification challenge from the outside. That's where troublemakers and fresh ideas tend to arise—reportedly.

Episode Title: Social Connectedness & Health, with Dr. Cassidy Leibold, PhD!!! Cassidy's Bio: Is a graduate of the University of Dayton (2020) and University of Kentucky, with an MS and PhD in Experimental Psychology. Specifically, she studies Behavioral Neuroscience and Pharmacology. Her research focuses on the excitotoxic effects of alcohol on the hippocampus, and how prolonged alcohol exposure impairs neurogenesis and overall cell survival in this brain structure. She is now a lecturer in the Psychology department at the University of Kentucky, and loves getting to work with aspiring researchers and clinicians. Description: In this episode, Rob welcomes back Dr. Cassidy Leibold, PhD, a lecturer in the Psychology Department at the University of Kentucky. Cassidy shares the exciting developments since her last visit, including her new role teaching aspiring researchers and clinicians. She also reflects on her journey through her PhD, where she studied the effects of chronic binge alcohol use on neurogenesis in the hippocampus—a key brain region involved in memory formation. Cassidy discusses the importance of social connectedness and how our relationships play a significant role in our health. She explores the evolutionary significance of group membership, the brain's response to social pain, and how social media can both connect and amplify relationships. She also explains the delicate balance between the number and quality of social connections, highlighting why quality tends to matter more as we age. Cassidy wraps up the conversation with her personal insights on how she's grown since her PhD, including changes in how she views success, the impact of joining groups that support her, and the importance of personal well-being. Topics Covered: Cassidy's Journey and New Role at the University of Kentucky Cassidy shares her experiences during and after her PhD, discussing the challenges of conducting empirical research and the lessons she's learned along the way. What We Know About Social Connectedness Explore how social connectedness has shaped human survival and how it continues to impact our health today. Cassidy dives into the evolutionary psychology behind group membership and why being part of a group is so deeply ingrained in our brains. Quality vs. Quantity in Social Relationships Cassidy talks about the importance of both the number and quality of connections, explaining why the quality of relationships becomes more important with age and how our closest relationships influence our behaviors and beliefs. The Elevate Yourself Podcast is brought to you in partnership with Athletic Brewing. Use code ELEVATE30 for 30% OFF your first online order at checkout!

Creativity through the lens of CEO and Founder of The Mentor Project"Creativity is taking something and repackaging it building on something we already have."Dr. Deborah Heiser is the CEO/Founder of The Mentor Project, author of The Mentorship Edge, and an Applied Developmental Psychologist. She has been featured at TEDx, Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/deborah-heiser-phd/Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@DebbieHeiserwww.deborahheiser.comwww.mentorproject.orgThinkers50Radar List 2022100 CoachesBook a time to meet!TEDx: Rethinking Aging: Mentoring the New Generationhttps://youtu.be/uSubiZf8JQoSend us a text

In this episode of Dr. Alison Jane Martingano welcomes Dr. Regan Gurung and Dr. Georjeanna Wilson-Doenges to explore the emerging science of eco-spirituality, which examines how experiences in nature can become a gateway to a deeper well-being and connection in the world. Dr. Gurung, a professor at Oregon State University, has authored over 100 peer-reviewed articles and 15 books, and had previously served as Chair of the Psychology Department at UW-Green Bay. Dr. Wilson-Doenges, is a current UWGB psychology professor with expertise in environmental psychology and previous host of this podcast. The conversation dives into the psychology of awe, sacred spaces, and spiritual experiences which can shape how we connect. This episode also explores different activities that can be brought into the classroom to explore eco-spirituality. Virtual reality technology for environmental contact, and ways to navigate feeling out of control in an uncontrollable world are additional topics explored in this episode.

Our guest today is Kentucky State Legislator Lisa Willner. Lisa Willner has a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology, and she is a licensed psychologist. She is the past Executive Director of the KY Psychological Association, and she taught in Bellarmine's Psychology Department for 20 years. She is a former member of the Jefferson County Board of Education where she also served as vice-chair. Currently she is serving in her fourth term in the Kentucky House of Representatives, where she represents Kentucky House District 35.

Dr. Deborah Heiser is the CEO/Founder of The Mentor Project, author of The Mentorship Edge, and an Applied Developmental Psychologist. She has been featured at TEDx, Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.Join host Dori DeCarlo on The Mompreneur Model and connect with Dr. Heiser at DeborahHeiser.com and on LinkedIn. Find out more and become a mentor at MentorProject.org.Please support UnsilencedVoices.org a global 501(c)3 nonprofit that empowers survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking.  We thank Smith Sisters and the Sunday Drivers for our theme song, "She is You".Be sure to connect with us on BlueSky, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and come tell us your story!WordofMomRadio.com - sharing the wisdom of women, in business and in life.Become a supporter of this podcast!

What does it mean to belong to a tribe? How does cultural psychology offer insight into politics, organizational behavior, and leadership? How does tribalism distinguish humans from other animals?Michael Morris is the Chavkin-Chang Professor of Leadership at Columbia Business School and also serves as Professor in the Psychology Department of Columbia University. Michael is also the author of the new book Tribal: How the Cultural Instincts That Divide Us Can Help Bring Us Together.Greg and Michael discuss the concept of tribalism, its historical and modern connotations, and how our evolved group psychology can both contribute to and resolve contemporary social conflicts. Michael emphasizes the importance of understanding cultural instincts like the peer instinct, hero instinct, and ancestor instinct, and how leaders can harness these to steer cultural evolution in organizations and societies. The conversation also explores real-world examples of cultural change, the pitfalls of top-down and bottom-up change strategies, and the critical role of managing cultural identities in fostering cooperation and successful adaptation.*unSILOed Podcast is produced by University FM.*Episode Quotes:What makes us human is our tribal nature14:22: We are the tribal animal. If we want to understand what distinguishes us, our brains are not that much bigger than chimpanzees'. Our brains are not bigger than Neanderthals'; they're smaller than Neanderthal brains. But what distinguishes us is that we have these adaptations for sharing culture that enable tribal living, and this wonderful force of tribal inheritance, of wisdom accumulating like a snowball across the generations. And it can be the generations of a nation, but it can also be the generations of a corporation or the generations of a motorcycle club. Generations don't have to be referring to the human lifespan. And so, that's our killer app. That's what makes us who we are. That's what made us the top of the food chain and the dominant species of the planet and solar system. So, we should not renounce our tribal nature. We shouldn't pretend that what makes us human is rationality, or ethics, or poetry, or something like that.Why tradition is actually a change maker's secret weapon19:02: Tradition can seem like an obstacle to change. And the traditionalism in our mind can seem like an obstacle to cultural change, but it's a change-maker's secret weapon.How we learn from our community through peer, hero, and ancestor instincts16:39 There are social learning heuristics, and I kind of label them in a way to try to make them more concrete and more accessible. I label them the peer instinct, the hero instinct, and the ancestor instinct. But I'm aggregating decades of research from evolutionary anthropologists and from a cultural psychologist about the fact that we tend to learn the culture that nurtures us, in part by paying attention to what's widespread. And that's peer instinct learning, by paying attention to what carries prestige. That's hero instinct learning. And by paying attention to what seems like it's always been the distinctive mark of our community, traditions, and that's ancestor instinct learning. And so we're sort of wired to form maps of our community in those three ways.Show Links:Recommended Resources:TribalismE. O. WilsonCesar ChavezPhilip E. TetlockMulticulturalismPolyculturalismSyncretismGuest Profile:Faculty Profile at Columbia Business SchoolMichaelMorris.comWikipedia ProfileSocial Profile on XHis Work:Tribal: How the Cultural Instincts That Divide Us Can Help Bring Us TogetherGoogle Scholar Page

In this episode, Seerat interviews Dr. Jay McClelland, a professor in the Psychology Department and director of the Center for Mind, Brain, Computation, and Technology at Stanford. Their research includes a variety of topics from cognitive science and neuroscience to learning, memory, reading, mathematical cognition, and much more.

Ethan Kross shares simple, science-backed tools for managing your emotions. — YOU'LL LEARN — 1) When avoidance is actually helpful 2) Effortless strategies for quickly shifting your mood 3) The emotional regulation framework used by the Navy SEALs Subscribe or visit AwesomeAtYourJob.com/ep1050 for clickable versions of the links below. — ABOUT ETHAN — Ethan Kross, PhD, author of the national bestseller Chatter, is one of the world's leading experts on emotion regulation. An award-winning professor in the University of Michigan's top ranked Psychology Department and its Ross School of Business, he is the Director of the Emotion and Self-Control Laboratory. Ethan has participated in policy discussion at the White House and has been interviewed about his research on CBS Evening News, Good Morning America, Anderson Cooper Full Circle, and NPR's Morning Edition. His research has been featured in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, The New England Journal of Medicine, and Science. He completed his BA at the University of Pennsylvania and his PhD at Columbia University.• Book: Shift: Managing Your Emotions--So They Don't Manage You • Book: Chatter: The Voice in Our Head, Why It Matters, and How to Harness It • Study: “Remotely administered non-deceptive placebos reduce COVID-related stress, anxiety, and depression” with Darwin A. Guevarra, Christopher T. Webster, Jade N. Moros, and Jason S. Moser • Website: EthanKross.com — RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THE SHOW — • Book: The Lincoln Letter: A Peter Fallon Novel (Peter Fallon and Evangeline Carrington) by William Martin • Book: Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change, and Thrive in Work and Life by Susan David • Book: Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl • Book: The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay: A Novel by Michael Chabon • Past episode: 023: The Power of Workplace Humor with Michael KerrSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Student use of generative AI tools as a substitute for learning has led to increased concerns about academic dishonesty. In this episode, Tricia Bertram Gallant and David A. Rettinger join us to discuss why students might use these tools and strategies instructors can use to encourage academic integrity. Tricia is the Director of the Academic Integrity Office at UC San Diego and Board Emeritus for the International Center for Academic Integrity. David is an Applied Professor and Undergraduate Program Director in the Psychology Department at the University of Tulsa. He is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Mary Washington, where he directed Academic Integrity Programs and the Center for Honor, Leadership, and Service. David is also President Emeritus of the International Center for Academic Integrity. Tricia and David are the authors or co-authors of numerous articles, books, and book chapters on academic integrity. Their most recent book, The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI, was recently released as the 4th volume in the Teaching, Engaging, and Thriving in Higher Ed series at the University of Oklahoma Press, edited by James Lang and Michelle Miller. A transcript of this episode and show notes may be found at http://teaforteaching.com.

Ethan Kross is a Professor in the University of Michigan's Psychology Department and Ross School of Business. He is the director of the Emotion & Self-Control Lab. His research examines how people can control their thoughts, feelings and behaviors to improve their lives. Today on the show we discuss: how to effectively manage negative self talk and emotions, how to harness and control your inner voice, the science of better decision making how to help others regulate their emotions, whether or not negativity is genetic, how to build mental resilience and much more. Today's sponsor: Silver Biotics Try their amazing Recover Muscle Cream now at silverbiotics.com Use the code DOUG for 30% off your first order. Plus, Silver Biotics throws in some extra samples when you order directly from their site! ⚠ WELLNESS DISCLAIMER ⚠ Please be advised; the topics related to health and mental health in my content are for informational, discussion, and entertainment purposes only. The content is not financial advice. Always seek the advice of your health or mental health professional or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding your current condition. Never disregard professional advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have heard from your favorite creator, on social media, or shared within content you've consumed. If you are in crisis or you think you may have an emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. If you do not have a health professional who is able to assist you, use these resources to find help: Emergency Medical Services—911 If the situation is potentially life-threatening, get immediate emergency assistance by calling 911, available 24 hours a day. National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, 1-800-273-TALK (8255) or https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org.  SAMHSA addiction and mental health treatment Referral Helpline, 1-877-SAMHSA7 (1-877-726-4727) and https://www.samhsa.gov Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

You probably think you have a pretty good idea of what mentorship is and isn't.I did, too, until I had the opportunity sit down with Dr. Deborah Heiser, CEO and founder of The Mentorship Project.I learned how true mentorship is distinct from coaching or advisory roles and its five key components: generativity, a willing recipient, intrinsic motivation, meaningful connection, and a clear goal.Dr. Heiser shares insightful real-world examples, including stories from astronauts and tech pioneers, to illustrate how mentorship can be both informal and impactful.Whether you're a seasoned professional or just starting out, this episode will inspire you to engage in mentorship in everyday life. Tune in to redefine what mentorship means and how it can enrich your personal and professional journey.Dr. Deborah Heiser is the CEO/Founder of The Mentor Project, author of The Mentorship Edge, and an Applied Developmental Psychologist. She has been featured at TEDx, Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.Buy The Mentorship Edge - https://a.co/d/hDeTHeTCheck out The Mentor Project - https://mentorproject.org/Tune in each week for practical, relatable advice that helps you feel your best and unlock your full potential. If you're ready to prioritize your health and level up every area of your life, you'll find the tools, insights, and inspiration right here. Buy Esther's Book: To Your Health - https://a.co/d/iDG68qUFollow Esther on TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@estheravantFollow Esther on IG - https://www.instagram.com/esther.avantLearn more about booking Esther to speak: https://www.estheravant.comLearn more about working with Esther: https://www.madebymecoaching.com/services

Ethan Kross: Shift Ethan Kross is the author of the national bestseller Chatter and one of the world's leading experts on emotion regulation. An award-winning professor in the University of Michigan's top-ranked Psychology Department and its Ross School of Business, he is the Director of the Emotion and Self-Control Laboratory. He's the author of the new book, Shift: Managing Your Emotions--So They Don't Manage You*. Being a leader means that our emotions get triggered, often many times a day. While none of us can avoid those triggers, how we respond to them can make all the difference. In this conversation, Ethan and I explore his research on how to better manage our emotions. Key Points We often assume that approaching emotions is universally good and avoiding emotions is universally bad. Reality is much more nuanced. We can strategically use our senses to modulate our feelings. Music is a simple and powerful way to manage emotions proactively. Use playlists that align with the mood you wish to create. Using distancing language when talking to yourself (i.e. saying “you” instead of “I”) can help you regulate. Time shifting may help regulate your emotions. Ask yourself, how will I feel about this in a week? A month? A year? Different tools work for different people at different times. Experiment to help you determine what works best for you. Resources Mentioned Shift: Managing Your Emotions--So They Don't Manage You by Ethan Kross Interview Notes Download my interview notes in PDF format (free membership required). Related Episodes How to Find Helpful Advisors, with Ethan Kross (episode 516) How to Grow From Your Errors, with Amy Edmondson (episode 663) How to Handle High-Pressure Situations, with Dan Dworkis (episode 701) Discover More Activate your free membership for full access to the entire library of interviews since 2011, searchable by topic. To accelerate your learning, uncover more inside Coaching for Leaders Plus.

Practical strategies for managing our emotional lives.Dr. Ethan Kross, author of the international bestseller Chatter, is one of the world's leading experts on emotion regulation. An award-winning professor in the University of Michigan's top ranked Psychology Department and its Ross School of Business, he is the Director of the Emotion and Self-Control Laboratory.In this episode we talk about:What an emotion actually is The myth that we should only experience positive emotions Why sometimes avoidance is a smart strategyThe six emotional "shifters"  we can use to regulate our emotionsThe role of our sensesHow to use mental time travel to shift perspectiveAnd the role of our surroundings, relationships, and culture Related Episodes:#365 The Voice in Your Head | Ethan KrossThe Neuroscience Of: Emotional Regulation, Relationships, Body Image, And Intuition | Emma SeppäläSign up for Dan's newsletter hereFollow Dan on social: Instagram, TikTokTen Percent Happier online bookstoreSubscribe to our YouTube ChannelOur favorite playlists on: Anxiety, Sleep, Relationships, Most Popular EpisodesFull Shownotes: https://meditatehappier.com/podcast/tph/ethan-kross-902See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

I am an Associate Professor in the Psychology Department of Arizona State University where I teach graduate and undergraduate courses in child development, and conduct original research. I received a Ph.D. from University of Michigan, in Developmental Psychology. I have published approximately 75 articles in peer reviewed scientific psychology journals and books, including research on the effects of divorce on children's health. I have received research grants from the National Institutes of Health, including a 10-year longitudinal study of the role of fathers in adolescent and young adult development. I have testified as an expert witness in approximately two dozen child custody and relocation cases in approximately 15 states. I have been invited to present research findings on parenting time and parent conflict to policy-makers in Japan, Canada, Great Britain, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. I chaired the committee at the Arizona Legislature that produced a comprehensive reform of the state's child custody statutes to “maximize the child's time with both parents,” which became law in 2013.Support the show

More of Ellen: Dr. Ellen Langer, Ph.D., is a pioneering social psychologist renowned as the “mother of mindfulness” and the first woman to earn tenure in Harvard University's Psychology Department. Over her 45-year career, she has authored twelve books, including the bestsellers Mindfulness, The Power of Mindful Learning, Counterclockwise: Mindful Health and the Power of Possibility, and her latest, The Mindful Body: Thinking Our Way to Chronic Health (2023), hailed as a game changer in health and well-being. Dr. Langer's groundbreaking research on mindfulness, the illusion of control, aging, stress, and decision-making has earned her over 200 published articles and numerous prestigious accolades, such as a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Staats Award for Unifying Psychology, and multiple Distinguished Scientist Awards. A celebrated thinker and a painter, she resides in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where her work continues to inspire transformative perspectives on health, creativity, and the human experience. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ellenjlanger/ Mentions: Mindfulness by Ellen Langer Counterclockwise: Mindful Health and the Power of Possibility by Ellen Langer The Mindful Body: Thinking Our Way to Chronic Health by Ellen Langer

The upside of the often misunderstood "tribalism".Michael Morris is the Chavkin-Chang Professor of Leadership at Columbia Business School as well as a Professor in its Psychology Department. Outside of academia, Professor Morris has consulted with and conducted executive training workshops for hundreds of clients across the globe, including Fortune 100 firms, governments, and the Obama and Clinton campaigns. He lives in New York City. His latest book is called Tribal: How The Cultural Instincts That Divide Us Can Help Bring Us Together.Related Episodes:How Turning Habits Into Rituals Can Help You At Home, At Work, And When You're Anxious | Michael NortonSign up for Dan's newsletter hereFollow Dan on social: Instagram, TikTokTen Percent Happier online bookstoreSubscribe to our YouTube ChannelOur favorite playlists on: Anxiety, Sleep, Relationships, Most Popular EpisodesFull Shownotes: https://happierapp.com/podcast/tph/michael-morris-876See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

-- On the Show: -- Doctor Harry Segal, clinical psychologist and Senior Lecturer in the Psychology Department at Cornell University as well as the Department of Psychiatry at Cornell Weill Medical School, joins David for a final discussion of the cognitive stakes of the Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris election -- The Supreme Court decides to allow a voter purge in Virginia in the latest disastrous election news -- Nicky Jam rescinds his endorsement of Donald Trump after Trump's Tony Hinchcliffe Puerto Rico fiasco -- Tucker Carlson says that Tim Walz is "obviously gay" -- Donald Trump almost falls on the floor while trying to step into a garbage truck during a campaign stunt -- Donald Trump delivers a terrifying speech in Green Bay, Wisconsin, where he tells women what he will do, even if they don't want it -- Kamala Harris goes after Trump as "unstable" and "obsessed" during the closing days of the 2024 campaign -- Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger endorses Kamala Harris for president over Donald Trump -- Matt Schlapp and other right wingers are delusionally pretending that Kamala Harris might try to steal the election, the way Trump did in 2020 -- On the Bonus Show: Trump's garbage gaffe stunt goes very wrong, new polls have Harris way ahead in multiple swing states, Americans bet $100 million on Trump vs Harris but at what cost?