Podcasts about Procedural

The latest in business, financial, and market news and how it impacts your money, reported by CNBC's Peter Schacknow

This lecture provides an overview of crucial constitutional rights within the realm of criminal procedure, extending from the moment an individual faces charges through potential post-conviction challenges. It details Sixth Amendment trial guarantees, including the rights to a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, confrontation of witnesses, and compulsory process. The lecture then addresses the Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy, explaining when it attaches and relevant doctrines like the same-elements test and dual sovereignty. Furthermore, it covers the Fourteenth Amendment's due process and equal protection considerations, particularly as they relate to sentencing and prosecution, before discussing the right to counsel at trial and on appeal. Finally, the lecture explores the avenues and limitations of post-conviction remedies, such as habeas corpus.SummaryThis lecture series on Criminal Procedure delves into the essential rights and protections afforded to defendants under the U.S. Constitution. It covers the Sixth Amendment's trial rights, the Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy protections, and the Fourteenth Amendment's due process and equal protection guarantees. The discussion also highlights the importance of the right to counsel, post-conviction remedies, and emerging issues in criminal law, providing a comprehensive overview of the principles that govern the criminal justice system.TakeawaysThe Sixth Amendment guarantees a fair trial through various rights.Double jeopardy prevents multiple prosecutions for the same offense.Due process includes both procedural and substantive protections.The right to counsel is fundamental for a fair trial.Post-conviction remedies allow for challenging convictions.Emerging technologies pose new challenges to criminal procedure.The Equal Protection Clause ensures non-discriminatory enforcement of laws.The right to an impartial jury is crucial for justice.Procedural default can block federal review of claims.New evidence can lead to claims of actual innocence in court.Sound Bites"The accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial.""Due process ensures fair procedures in adjudication.""Access to counsel is essential for a fair trial."Criminal Procedure, Trial Rights, Double Jeopardy, Due Process, Equal Protection, Right to Counsel, Post-Conviction Remedies, Legal Standards, Criminal Justice Reform

Editor's Summary by Preeti Malani, MD, MSJ, Deputy Editor of JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, and Anne R. Cappola, MD, ScM, Senior Editor at JAMA, for articles published from May 3-9, 2025.

Legal Challenge to VAT Hike: DA and EFF Unite Over Procedural Concerns by Radio Islam

In this case, the court considered this issue: Can a plaintiff state a claim under ERISA's provision prohibiting a plan fiduciary from knowingly engaging in transactions with barred parties, solely by alleging that such a transaction took place?The case was decided on April 17, 2025.The Supreme Court held that To state a claim under Section 1106(a)(1)(C) of ERISA, a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements listed in that provision itself: that a plan fiduciary knowingly caused the plan to engage in a transaction involving goods, services, or facilities with a party in interest. The plaintiff is not required to plead that the transaction does not qualify for an exemption under Section 1108. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.Section 1106(a)(1)(C) establishes a clear, categorical prohibition on certain transactions between a pension plan and a party in interest. ERISA's structure places relevant exemptions, including those for reasonable and necessary services under Section 1108(b)(2)(A), in a separate statutory provision. Because those exemptions are laid out apart from the prohibitions and refer back to conduct already defined as unlawful, they function as affirmative defenses. As a result, plan fiduciaries who wish to invoke an exemption bear the burden of pleading and proving it. Plaintiffs, on the other hand, are not obliged to anticipate and refute every possible statutory or regulatory exemption.Reading exemptions as affirmative defenses also aligns with longstanding legal principles and avoids unworkable results. Requiring plaintiffs to negate all exemptions—especially when ERISA includes 21 statutory and hundreds of regulatory exemptions—would be impractical and unfair, particularly because the relevant facts are often in the defendant's possession. Procedural safeguards such as pleading requirements, discovery limits, and Rule 11 sanctions enable federal courts to deter and manage meritless litigation without shifting the pleading burden to plaintiffs. Consequently, only the elements in Section 1106(a)(1)(C) must be pleaded to survive a motion to dismiss.Justice Samuel Alito joined the majority opinion in full and authored a concurrence, in which Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh joined.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you. 

N Engl J Med 2024;391:1673-1684Background: Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is the most common acute coronary syndrome subtype in adults over 75 years old. However, these patients were underrepresented in landmark NSTEMI trials. Older adults with multiple comorbidities face an increased risk of mortality. While NSTEMI contributes to this risk, they also have competing risks such as advanced age, frailty, and chronic kidney disease. The presence of competing risks means that aggressively managing one condition may have a smaller impact on overall mortality compared to a younger, otherwise healthy adult with myocardial infarction, whose primary risk of death stems from the myocardial infarction itself. Additionally, comorbid conditions like advanced kidney disease and diffuse atherosclerosis can increase the risks associated with revascularization.Cardiology Trial's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.A patient-level meta-analysis of smaller trials, including 1,479 patients, found that in elderly patients with NSTEMI, an invasive strategy reduced myocardial infarction and urgent revascularization but not mortality.The Older Patients with Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Randomized Interventional Treatment (SENRIOR-RITA) trial sought to assess invasive vs conservative management of elderly patients with NSTEMI, in a more pragmatic design.Patients: Eligible patients had to have type I NSTEMI and be 75 years or older.Patients were excluded if they had cardiogenic shock or life expectancy less than 1 year.Baseline characteristics: The trial randomized 1,518 patients from hospitals across England and Scotland – 753 randomized to invasive strategy and 765 to conservative strategy.The average age of patients was 82 years and 55% were men. Approximately 65% had hypertension, 31% had diabetes, 31% had hyperlipidemia, 31% had prior myocardial infarction, 15% had prior stroke or TIA, 21% had kidney disease, 15% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 5% were current smokers.The average Charlson comorbidity index was 5.Procedures: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo invasive or conservative strategy.In the invasive strategy, patients underwent coronary angiogram, and revascularization was performed as appropriate. In the conservative arm, patients were treated (unless contraindicated) with aspirin, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, statin, beta-blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. Patients in the conservative arm were allowed to have a coronary angiogram if they had worsening clinical status.Endpoints: The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, subsequent coronary revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke and bleeding.Analysis was performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. The trial aimed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.78, assuming a 20% risk of the primary outcome in the conservative arm. A sample size of 1,668 patients with at least 688 primary outcome events would provide 90% power at 5% alpha, while 520 events would provide 80% power.Results: Among the patient randomized to the invasive arm, 90% underwent coronary angiography and 50% underwent revascularization. The medium number of days from admission to coronary angiography was 5. Among patients randomized to the conservative arm, 5.6% underwent coronary angiography within 7 days. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years.The primary outcome was not significantly different between both groups (25.6% with invasive vs 26.3% with conservative, HR: 0.94, 95%: 0.77 - 1.14; p= 0.53).There was also no difference in all-cause death (36.1% vs 32.3%), cardiovascular death (15.8% vs 14.2%), stroke (4.2% vs 5.2%), hospitalization for heart failure (10.9% vs 10.7%), or major bleeding (8.2% vs 6.4%) “incidence for invasive mentioned first”. Future coronary revascularization was more frequent in the conservative arm (13.7% vs 3.9%). Non-fatal myocardial infarction was significantly lower with an invasive strategy (11.7% vs 15.0%).Procedural related complications occurred in less than 1% of the patients.There were no significant subgroup interactions for the primary outcome.Conclusion: In older patients with NSTEMI, an invasive strategy compared to conservative strategy, did not reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, over a median of 4.1 years.The trial enrolled fewer patients than planned, and the lower-than-expected event rate reduced its statistical power. Additionally, the median 5-day delay before coronary angiography may have biased the results toward the conservative strategy.Despite its limitations, this trial demonstrates that a conservative approach is a reasonable option for selected older patients with NSTEMI. It also highlights that, although enrolling older patients with comorbidities in trials is challenging, it is feasible, and greater effort is needed to include more of this population in future trials.Finally, in this trial of patients with myocardial infarction, about one-third died over a median of 4.1 years, with less than half of these deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease. Even if an invasive strategy had reduced cardiovascular mortality, its impact on all-cause mortality would have been less significant. This concept extends beyond this trial; when interventions are applied to older patients with multiple competing risks, their overall benefit diminishes.Cardiology Trial's Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Cardiology Trial's Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe

Andy McCarthy joins us for a legal jam, and Jim Carafano gives us the future of Iran-U.S. negotiations.

Black Forum SA challenges IDT board appointments over procedural irregularities by Radio Islam

In this episode, we're talking about the writing and worldbuilding in the science fiction TV show Fringe.Proprietor's Pick: Recursion by Blake Crouch (Disclosure: we are a Bookshop.org affiliate, so if you purchase through these links, we will earn a small commission AND you will support an indie bookstore!)Intro and outro music: "The Tavern" by Michael GhelfiVisit the Tavern: Website⁠ | ⁠Discord⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TikTokListen to our Worldbuilding Workshop bonus episodes by joining our PatreonSupport Haneen's family in Gaza

https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2025/01/29/pope-francis-common-date-easter-east-west-249804  @christianbaxter_yt  Metagelical TLC as Christianity in Transition https://www.youtube.com/live/EEZYsWzamaA?si=oTiMr5NzycuNW1bf https://philosophyportal.substack.com/p/christianity-in-transition-pt-2-28a The Freddie and Paul Show: See you by the Murls Every 3 Months https://youtu.be/JkNJG-0E47w?si=kWyVZt-7A4Nx9in4 https://www.crcna.org/news-and-events/news/response-letters-concerning-us-govt-administration https://www.crcna.org/sites/default/files/To%20CRCNA%20leadership%2C%20March%2010%2C%202025%20%281%29.pdf https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/letters/2025/documents/20250210-lettera-vescovi-usa.html  @theeconplayground1193  What is Orthodox Social Thought? - An Interview with Dylan Pahman https://youtu.be/W02z_kCyLPY?si=5X64rWmRdpzflY_3 https://www.adcrucem.news/p/the-eastern-orthodox-hall-of-mirrors  Paul Vander Klay clips channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX0jIcadtoxELSwehCh5QTg Midwestuary Conference August 22-24 in Chicago https://www.midwestuary.com/ https://www.meetup.com/sacramento-estuary/ My Substack https://paulvanderklay.substack.com/ Estuary Hub Link https://www.estuaryhub.com/ If you want to schedule a one-on-one conversation check here. https://calendly.com/paulvanderklay/one2one There is a video version of this podcast on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/paulvanderklay To listen to this on ITunes https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/paul-vanderklays-podcast/id1394314333  If you need the RSS feed for your podcast player https://paulvanderklay.podbean.com/feed/  All Amazon links here are part of the Amazon Affiliate Program. Amazon pays me a small commission at no additional cost to you if you buy through one of the product links here. This is is one (free to you) way to support my videos.  https://paypal.me/paulvanderklay Blockchain backup on Lbry https://odysee.com/@paulvanderklay https://www.patreon.com/paulvanderklay Paul's Church Content at Living Stones Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh7bdktIALZ9Nq41oVCvW-A To support Paul's work by supporting his church give here. https://tithe.ly/give?c=2160640 https://www.livingstonescrc.com/give  

Senate passes a federal government funding extension to prevent a shutdown tonight; President Trump gives a speech at the Justice Department on 'law and order'; Secretary of State Rubio gives updates on negotiations to end the war in Ukraine and Hamas saying it is willing to release an American hostage; Dr. Mehmet Oz, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator nominee, testifies before the Senate Finance Committee; former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-WY) dies at age 93. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you're a fan of crime dramas with a twist, you're in for a treat. In this episode, Eddie Z and Rolando dive into the intriguing world of High Potential, the latest American remake of the French hit, HPI. It's all about a sharp-witted woman with a genius-level IQ solving crimes, but with some fun quirks and a lot of heart. Join us as we chat about the charm of Kaitlin Olson's portrayal as Morgan, a single mom navigating life's chaos while consulting for the LAPD. We've got some laughs, some heartfelt moments, and lots to say about wardrobe choices! Plus, we discuss how the show cleverly balances standalone crime-solving episodes with a captivating overarching mystery. So grab your snacks, and let's explore this delightful detective show and see why it's making waves on ABC and Hulu. Can't wait to hear what you think!

Episode 217: This week on Thinking Deeply about Primary Education, John Jackson and Emma Lindley-Thompson from Ambition Institute return to explore the next extract from their expert edit—this time, focusing on concreteness fading and its role in mathematics teaching.We discuss: The relationship between procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding and how this influences mathematics instruction. The challenge of premature reliance on abstract symbols and how teachers can strike the right balance between concrete and abstract representations. The debate over concrete representations—do they make abstract ideas clearer, or do they hinder transfer to new contexts? Key implications for teacher professional development and how educators can implement concreteness fading effectively in the classroom.Whether you're a maths specialist, a primary educator, or a leader supporting professional development, this episode provides valuable research-backed insights to enhance mathematical understanding in your teaching.If you enjoy this episode, please support us by subscribing to our YouTube channel, leaving a review on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, or making a donation via www.ko-fi.com/tdape. Join the conversation on our Discord server!Click here for tickets to TDaPE Manchester. 30 wonderful sessions about everything primary education.

The Goldman Case (Le Procès Goldman) (2023), is a French courtroom drama based on the real-life 1976 trial of Pierre Goldman, a far-left Jewish militant who was accused of multiple armed robberies and four murders during a holdup of a pharmacy in Paris. The film, which was directed by Cedric Kahn from screenplay by Kahn and Nathalie Hertzberg, stars Arieh Worthalter as Goldman and Arthur Harari as his lead lawyer, Georges Kiejiman. The film is not only a gripping account of this celebrated trial, but also explores larger themes around individual and collective responsibility, the way courtrooms can become the battleground for contested narratives about the past, and the swirling forces of race, class, and religion in 1970s France. Joining me to talk about The Goldman Case is Fred Davis, an internationally acclaimed trial attorney, expert on French criminal law and procedure, and Lecturer at Columbia Law School, where he teaches about how to examine comparative criminal procedure through film. Timestamps:0:00     Introduction2:34      Background for the Pierre Goldman case5:15       Goldman's lawyers, Georges Kiejiman and Francis Chouraqui7:48      Breaking down a French courtroom9:21       The lawyer for the victims10:20    Procedural differences between French and American trials14:47     A window into 1970s France17:33     The backdrop of the treatment of Jews in Vichy France 23:05    How the Left rallied to Goldman's side27:10     Tensions around race and policing in France29:58    The role of the investigating magistrate in France   32:22    The verdict and aftermath 38:55    French courtroom dramas40:42    Evolving discussion about France's history during World War II43:40   Studying comparative criminal justice through filmFurther reading:Goldman, Pierre, Dim Memories of a Polish Jew Born in France (1977) Oltermann, Philip, “Tried for double murder and adored by the French left: the violent life and crimes of Pierre Goldman,” The Guardian (Sept. 16, 2024)Paxton, Robert O., Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order, 1940-1944 (1972)Marrus, Michael, R. & Paxton, Robert O., Vichy France and the Jews (1981)Reid, Donald, “From Souvenirs obscurs to Lieu de mémorie,” French Politics,Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 2 (Summer 2008)Vincendeau, Ginette, “The Goldman Case: arresting courtroom drama holds its own outside a French context,” Sight and Sound (Sept. 20, 2024) Law on Film is created and produced by Jonathan Hafetz. Jonathan is a professor at Seton Hall Law School. He has written many books and articles about the law. He has litigated important cases to protect civil liberties and human rights while working at the ACLU and other organizations. Jonathan is a huge film buff and has been watching, studying, and talking about movies for as long as he can remember. For more information about Jonathan, here's a link to his bio: https://law.shu.edu/profiles/hafetzjo.htmlYou can contact him at jonathanhafetz@gmail.comYou can follow him on X (Twitter) @jonathanhafetz You can follow the podcast on X (Twitter) @LawOnFilmYou can follow the podcast on Instagram @lawonfilmpodcast

Listen every weekday for a local newscast featuring town, county, state and regional headlines. It's the daily dose of news you need on Wyoming, Idaho and the Mountain West — all in four minutes or less. 

As voted on by our patrons, a new (hopefully) long-running mini-series turning research directly into updated practice: Tutorial! This month, we're looking at research to up your procedural integrity process. Just what should go into your PI checklists? How do you turn your observations into meaningful fidelity data instead of a series of “yeses” and “nos”? And just what good are training manuals, anyway? So, listen in! Your supervisees and clients will thank you. This episode is available for 1.0 LEARNING CEU. Remember, Patrons get access to the video version of this episode AND a free CEU for this episode. Not a patron? Join today! Articles discussed this episode: Bergmann, S., Harman, M.J., Brand, D., & Vladescu, J.C. (2024). A survey of procedural-fidelity data collection in behavior-analytic practice. Behavior Analysis in Practice. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00995-1 Morris, C., Jones, S.H., & Oliveira, J.P. (2024). A practitioner's guide to measuring procedural fidelity. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17, 643-655. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00910-8 Al-Nasser, T., Williams, W.L., & Feeney, B. (2019). A brief evaluation of a pictorially enhanced self-instruction packet on participant fidelity across multiple ABA procedures. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 387-395. doi: 10.1007/s40617/018-00282-w If you're interested in ordering CEs for listening to this episode, click here to go to the store page. You'll need to enter your name, BCBA #, and the two episode secret code words to complete the purchase. Email us at abainsidetrack@gmail.com for further assistance.

We're cracking the case on why procedural TV shows have kept audiences hooked for decades. From the exciting debut of Watson to the legal drama of Suits LA, we break down what makes this storytelling format so addictive.We uncover the history of procedural television, including the fascinating discovery of the very first procedural TV show, and explore how the format has evolved over time. What makes these shows so binge-worthy? And what are the risks and rewards of telling self-contained stories in a serialized world?Whether it's solving crimes, winning court cases, or unraveling mysteries, procedural TV shows continue to dominate our screens and we're here to explain why.For exclusive bonus podcasts like our Justice League or Teen Titans Review show, GHL Extra & Livestreams with the hosts, join the Geek History Lesson Patreon ► https://www.patreon.com/JawiinGHL RECOMMENDED READING from this episode► https://www.geekhistorylesson.com/recommendedreadingFOLLOW GHL►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/geekhistorylessonThreads: https://www.threads.net/@geekhistorylessonTik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@geekhistorylessonFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/geekhistorylessonGet Your GHL Pin: https://geekhistorylesson.etsy.comYou can follow Ashley at https://www.threads.net/@ashleyvrobinson or https://www.ashleyvictoriarobinson.com/Follow Jason at https://www.threads.net/@jawiin or https://bsky.app/profile/jasoninman.bsky.socialThanks for showing up to class today. Class is dismissed!

We're cracking the case on why procedural TV shows have kept audiences hooked for decades. From the exciting debut of Watson to the legal drama of Suits LA, we break down what makes this storytelling format so addictive.We uncover the history of procedural television, including the fascinating discovery of the very first procedural TV show, and explore how the format has evolved over time. What makes these shows so binge-worthy? And what are the risks and rewards of telling self-contained stories in a serialized world?Whether it's solving crimes, winning court cases, or unraveling mysteries, procedural TV shows continue to dominate our screens and we're here to explain why.For exclusive bonus podcasts like our Justice League or Teen Titans Review show, GHL Extra & Livestreams with the hosts, join the Geek History Lesson Patreon ► https://www.patreon.com/JawiinGHL RECOMMENDED READING from this episode► https://www.geekhistorylesson.com/recommendedreadingFOLLOW GHL►Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/geekhistorylessonThreads: https://www.threads.net/@geekhistorylessonTik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@geekhistorylessonFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/geekhistorylessonGet Your GHL Pin: https://geekhistorylesson.etsy.comYou can follow Ashley at https://www.threads.net/@ashleyvrobinson or https://www.ashleyvictoriarobinson.com/Follow Jason at https://www.threads.net/@jawiin or https://bsky.app/profile/jasoninman.bsky.socialThanks for showing up to class today. Class is dismissed!

Christina Tabacco examines the tradeoffs between increased EB5 regulatory burden and revised processing approaches under the reformed programView the full article here.Subscribe to the IMI Daily newsletter here.

Kim went on vacation, Jenn got a haircut and we're back together discussing Babygirl, The Pitt, Noah Wyle, curiosity in midlife, the gym, good decisions, healthy breakfasts and changing up our routines, plus: listener questions and a whole lot more!You can find us on Patreon: patreon.com/everythingisfineYou can find Kim on her Substack: kimfrance.substack.comYou can find Jenn on her Substack: jennromolini.substack.comConcerns? Critiques? Suggestions? Just want to say "hi"? You can email us: everythingisfinethepodcast@gmail.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Our guest today is the Parliamentarian to the Assembly Speaker, Brian Ebbert. Ebbert has spent over three decades in the Assembly starting as an Assistant Clerk in 1991. He served as Assembly Floor Director from 2017 to 2014; he announced his retirement last year (and even got the cake) but agreed at the end of 2024 to stay on one more year as Assembly ParliamentarianWhat does the Assembly Parliamentarian do? In this role, Ebbert is the senior procedural and parliamentary advisor to the Assembly Speaker and his leadership team. He is responsible for daily coordination of the Floor business, strategic motions, and procedures of the House, and provides expert procedural analysis and advice to Majority Party leadership team. He also develops logistics, rules, and procedures for Floor sessions, and - one of his favorite duties - identifies, drafts, and implements House rule changes for each two-year legislative session.  Ebbert joins Hosts Rich Ehisen and Tim Foster to talk about the Parliamentarian's role, how the legislature has changed in the time he has been there, and about his brief but fascinating time in the Canadian Parliament.  Plus - Who Had the Worst Week in California Politics?1:53 The role of Parliamentarian4:56 "You can read a book about football... but that doesn't make you a football player"7:15 From Speaker's Floor Director to Parliamentarian10:33 Questions from members12:30 The flow of information15:17 Touchy topics19:44 Impact of Social Media23:49 How has the institution changed?26:16 Length of Floor sessions28:36 Procedural rule changes30:29 Two weeks in the Canadian Parliament42:24 #WWCAWant to support the Capitol Weekly Podcast? Make your tax deductible donation here: capitolweekly.net/donations/ Capitol Weekly Podcast theme is "Pickin' My Way" by Eddie Lang "#WorstWeekCA" Beat provided by freebeats.io

Funez-Ortiz v. McHenry, No. 23-2290 (4th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025)CAT protection; BIA overturning IJ; under color of law; gangs wearing military uniform; acquiescence; presumption of regularity Matter of De Jesus-Platon, 29 I&N Dec. 7 (BIA 2025)Cal. Pen Code § 1473.7 vacated conviction; post-conviction relief; Cal. Pen. Code § 18.5; Matter of Velasquez-Rios; CIMT; Cal. Pen Code § 422; motion to remand; procedural or substantive defect; noncitizen's burdenBecerril-Sanchez v. Bondi, No. 23-3349 (8th Cir. Feb. 6, 2025)fear of cartels and police in Mexico; harm in utero as past persecution; insufficient threats and beating for past persecution; motion to reopen and women in Mexico United States v. Greenberg, No. 23-7168 (2d Cir. Feb. 3, 2025)criminal prosecution of immigration attorneys; 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) ¶ 1; conspiracy to obtain documents through fraudSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!The Pen & Sword College (formerly The Clinic at Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law) Use Promo Code: ImmReview2025Link to firm: https://sharma-crawford.com/ Link to Nonprofit: https://thepen-and-swordkc.org/ Link to books: https://www.rekhasharmacrawford.com/ Immigration Lawyer's Toolboxhttps://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/immigration-reviewWant to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerAll praise to the pod's wonderful editors!Luana Lima SerraYasmin LimaDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Diane chats wtih documentary director/filmmaker RACHEL MASON about the Max docuseries AN UPDATE ON OUR FAMILY about family vloggers & the toxic effects fandom can have. Then, Diane talks to TIM WALSH, a Co-Creator/EP of Prime Video's gritty poice show ON CALL, and why it's more than average police procedural.

This discussion emphasizes the importance of risk mitigation strategies and practical tips for implementing oral immunotherapy (OIT) in clinical practice. Key points include ensuring adult supervision during dosing, adhering to safe dosing rules to minimize allergic reactions, and maintaining close communication with healthcare providers for adjustments or emergencies. The conversation highlights the challenges of adherence, the need for proper patient and caregiver training, and the critical role of informed consent in supporting successful and safe long-term OIT management.

Alexa Ray Corriea chats with Anne, Douglas, and Nate Austin from Worldwalker Games, developers of Wildermyth. Together they discuss how they started creating games together; the inspirations behind the story and gameplay of Wildermyth; how to create iconic and memorable characters in procedural experiences; the differences between writing for procedural generation compared to a traditional campaign; and how to handle early access as a narrative focused game. This episode is supported by Xsolla Episode Host: Alexa Ray Corriea Producers: Claudio Tapia and Josh Chu, The Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences If you enjoyed this episode, please consider subscribing and leaving us a rating and review. Follow us: linktr.ee/AIAS Please consider supporting game dev students with: AIAS Foundation

In this discussion, Dr. Anagnostou and Dr. Greenhot review key elements for informed consent in oral immunotherapy (OIT), emphasizing the benefits, risks, and outcomes of the treatment. They highlight OIT's ability to increase allergen tolerance thresholds, while acknowledging potential risks like dose-related reactions and rare conditions such as eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. Alternatives to OIT, including food avoidance, emerging biologics, and clinical trial participation, are also discussed, with a focus on empowering clinicians to guide families in making informed decisions.

Aikaterini Anagnostou, MD (Hons), MSc, PhD and Matthew Greenhawt, MD, MBA, MSc discuss the process of preparing patients for oral immunotherapy (OIT). This first part of a 3-part video highlights the development and findings of the first International Delphi Consensus Panel on preparing patients for oral immunotherapy (OIT). Experts created a standardized checklist and consent framework to guide clinicians in counseling families about OIT, emphasizing its long-term, stepwise desensitization process and associated risks. Key considerations include controlling patient comorbidities like asthma, ensuring family commitment and agreement, and tailoring counseling to logistical and cultural factors to optimize adherence and success.

Hosts: Adam Gardiner and Rusty Cannon  Many Democrats in the US Senate have joined their Republican colleagues, voting to advance a bill dealing with immigration called the Laken Riley Act. Even prominent Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin voted for cloture on the bill. Some Democrats are hoping to make amendments to the bill, however. Rusty and Adam describe what’s in the bill and why some Democrats support it. 

Co-chairs of Herrick's Sports Law Group, Irwin Kishner and Dan Etna, along with the chair of Herrick's Land Use and Zoning Group, Mitch Korbey, discuss the financial, environmental, procedural and community considerations in the building and development of stadium and mixed-use projects.Engaging in these projects entails many steps from identifying the land, to obtaining support and consensus of the community, accounting for the availability of public transportation to assessing the environmental impact. Mitch discusses many of the procedural steps involved in the often-multijurisdictional approval process for stadium projects from permits to the public review process to environmental impact reviews. Dan and Irwin touch on the financing implications for these projects including conventional financings, tax exempt opportunities, as well as concession revenues and media rights. Listen to how these veterans of stadium development discuss how it can be economically and socially transformative for a community.Music by Michelangelo Sosnowitz

Julie Ward, senior executive officer of public policy for The Arc, feels a strong sense of urgency to help protect the Medicaid program and its home- and community-based services (HCBS) from impending cuts. For people with disabilities, she noted, HCBS is a lifeline. If HCBS is cut, it will force people into institutions and cause hardships for families. The HCBS program is currently grappling with challenges including a waiting list of over 711,000 and a workforce shortage. Procedural challenges that ensued with the Medicaid unwinding — the process of refining Medicaid enrollment following the COVID-19 pandemic — may serve as a cautionary tale if the Trump administration enacts work requirements, she said. The need to act to defend Medicaid feels stronger than it ever has been, she noted, as there will not be a divided Congress to serve as a backstop.Follow us on social media:X (formerly Twitter): @McKHomeCareFacebook: McKnight's Home CareLinkedIn: McKnight's Home CareInstagram: mcknights_homecareFollow The Arc on social media:X: @TheArcUSFacebook: The Arc of the United StatesLinkedIn: The Arc of the United StatesInstagram: thearc_usShow contributors:McKnight's Home Care Editor Liza Berger and Julie Ward, senior executive officer of public policy, The Arc

Join us on December 6th, 2024 @ 10:30am EST / 3:30 pm GMT. Cost $17 USD but NEED A FREE TICKET? We offer a pay-what-you-can honor system pricing. If you have the means to support our work, please do. All profit goes toward The Farmer Fund to help support farmers in the midst of post-disaster recovery. Discount codes: WORKSHOP50 for 50% off | WORKSHOP75 for 75% off | WORKSHOPFREE for free  Purchase here: https://destinywinters1.podia.com/checkout/cart _______________________________________________ In this episode, I sit down with Grace Quantock, an award-winning psychotherapeutic counselor and author of "Living Well with Chronic Illness: Write Your Own Roadmap to Healing in Tough Times." Grace shares her insights on navigating chronic illness while challenging toxic wellness culture and persistent cure mentality. Key Topics Discussed: The pressure of "bootstrap wellness narratives" and compulsive miracle cure culture The concept of the "accordion routine" - creating flexible healing practices that expand and contract with your needs Challenging societal expectations around disability and accommodation The importance of questioning "normal" standards and finding what works for you How to navigate medical appointments and healthcare systems The problem with forced positivity and toxic wellness culture Resources Mentioned: Grace's book: "Living Well with Chronic Illness: Write Your Own Roadmap to Healing in Tough Times" Free resources with book purchase: Waiting room meditations Procedural peace audios for medical appointments Post-appointment support sessions Pre-appointment pep talks Newsletter access Connect with Grace: Website: www.gracequantock.com This episode offers a trauma-informed perspective on chronic illness management, challenging traditional wellness narratives while providing practical tools for creating personalized healing routines that honor your unique needs and circumstances. _______________________________________________ Join us on December 6th, 2024 @ 10:30am EST / 3:30 pm GMT. Cost $17 USD but NEED A FREE TICKET? We offer a pay-what-you-can honor system pricing. If you have the means to support our work, please do. All profit goes toward The Farmer Fund to help support farmers in the midst of post-disaster recovery. Discount codes: WORKSHOP50 for 50% off | WORKSHOP75 for 75% off | WORKSHOPFREE for free  Purchase here: https://destinywinters1.podia.com/checkout/cart

Join us on December 6th, 2024 @ 10:30am EST / 3:30 pm GMT. Cost $17 USD but NEED A FREE TICKET? We offer a pay-what-you-can honor system pricing. If you have the means to support our work, please do. All profit goes toward The Farmer Fund to help support farmers in the midst of post-disaster recovery. Discount codes: WORKSHOP50 for 50% off | WORKSHOP75 for 75% off | WORKSHOPFREE for free  Purchase here: https://destinywinters1.podia.com/checkout/cart _______________________________________________ In this episode, I sit down with Grace Quantock, an award-winning psychotherapeutic counselor and author of "Living Well with Chronic Illness: Write Your Own Roadmap to Healing in Tough Times." Grace shares her insights on navigating chronic illness while challenging toxic wellness culture and persistent cure mentality. Key Topics Discussed: The pressure of "bootstrap wellness narratives" and compulsive miracle cure culture The concept of the "accordion routine" - creating flexible healing practices that expand and contract with your needs Challenging societal expectations around disability and accommodation The importance of questioning "normal" standards and finding what works for you How to navigate medical appointments and healthcare systems The problem with forced positivity and toxic wellness culture Resources Mentioned: Grace's book: "Living Well with Chronic Illness: Write Your Own Roadmap to Healing in Tough Times" Free resources with book purchase: Waiting room meditations Procedural peace audios for medical appointments Post-appointment support sessions Pre-appointment pep talks Newsletter access Connect with Grace: Website: www.gracequantock.com This episode offers a trauma-informed perspective on chronic illness management, challenging traditional wellness narratives while providing practical tools for creating personalized healing routines that honor your unique needs and circumstances. _______________________________________________ Join us on December 6th, 2024 @ 10:30am EST / 3:30 pm GMT. Cost $17 USD but NEED A FREE TICKET? We offer a pay-what-you-can honor system pricing. If you have the means to support our work, please do. All profit goes toward The Farmer Fund to help support farmers in the midst of post-disaster recovery. Discount codes: WORKSHOP50 for 50% off | WORKSHOP75 for 75% off | WORKSHOPFREE for free  Purchase here: https://destinywinters1.podia.com/checkout/cart

Procedurals have a formula that they follow, but that doesn't mean that they can't be enjoyable - or have a twist! High Potential has Morgan - a bright woman with keen insight coupled with some overt and hidden challenges. We dive into all of it!Email us: KillerFunPodcast@gmail.comFollow us on Facebook: fb.me/KillerFunPodcastAll the Tweets, er, POSTS: https://x.com/KillerFunPodInstagram: killerfunpodcast

The dudes are hopping into a round of their popular game show, "Procedural or Nocedural", this week with a lil FDWTS and Puss in Boots discussion thrown in there. Rate Us ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ on Apple Podcasts! Connect With The Show:  Follow Us On Instagram  Follow Us On Twitter  Follow Us On TikTok  Visit Us On The Web    

Bestselling authors William and Lara Bernhardt discuss the latest news from the book world, offer writing tips, and interview Robert Dugoni, the New York Times-bestselling author with a new novel, Beyond Reasonable Doubt, the second in his new legal thriller series featuring Keera Duggan.Chapter 1: Opening ThoughtsWelcome to Season 4! We have great plans to make this the best writer podcast EVER!Chapter 2: News1) Book Bars Are Growing in Popularity2) Anti-Billionaire Books are Surging Chapter 3: Craft CornerDon't Confuse "Stuff Happening" with Conflictby Lara BernhardtChapter 4: Interview with Robert DugoniIn this interview, you will learn:1) how a difficult childhood led to writing;2) why he's returning to legal thrillers;3) where his literary novels come from;4) why he's writing a female protagonist; and5) what he's learned over the course of more than a dozen bestsellers.Chapter 5: Parting WordsWriterCon has its own newsletter and you don't want to miss the next issue, which has wonderful articles for writerss and news on breaking issues. Learn more.If you haven't joined the WriterCon Facebook Group yet, do it now! Join this wonderful community of writers. Learn more.Until next time, keep writing, and remember: You cannot fail, if you refuse to quit.William Bernhardtwww.williambernhardt.comwww.writercon.com

Are three shows too much for one episode? Not when two are long awaited comic book shows and the third has a tie to one of them! This week Chris and Steve take a look at The Penguin a spin off series from 2022's The Batman film The sequel to 2021's Wanda Vision: Agatha All Along And a new Procedural that caught our eye, High Potential starring Kaitlin Olson from The Mick and It's Always Sunny! It's a long episode, so buckle in and let's go!      

Selling your company is one of the most challenging aspects of owning a business. Longtime colleague and Distribution Team Senior Advisor, Marshall Jones knows the mental, emotional, and procedural challenges well. Those experiences put him in a unique position to assist other sellers through the process.  Jason and Marshall review a client case study highlighting critical aspects of securing a successful (and profitable!) sale and tips for avoiding deal-breaking pitfalls.  CONNECT WITH JASON LinkedIn CONNECT WITH MARSHALL LInkedIn *** For full show notes and services visit: https://www.distributionteam.com Distribution Talk is produced by The Distribution Team, a consulting services firm dedicated to helping wholesale distribution clients remove barriers to profitability, generate wealth and achieve personal goals.    This episode was edited & mixed by The Creative Impostor Studios.  Special thanks to our sponsor for this episode: INxSQL Distribution Software, an integrated distribution ERP software designed for the wholesale and distribution industry.   

State Rep. Jamie Thompson. Rep. Thompson underscores state's procedural shortcomings involving child welfare

Whether one calls it Procedural Fidelity, Treatment Integrity, or any combination of those, and/or many other related terms, this is an important and often overlooked issue when it comes to implementing behavior analytic interventions. Think about it for a minute: as practitioners, we spend all this time obsessing about what assessment strategy to use and what interventions we think are the best fit for the individuals we serve. As you'll come to find out, we spend comparatively less time on ensuring that the programs we write are being implemented correctly. So it is with this in mind that I'm grateful that Dr. Claire St. Peter returned to the podcast to discuss her research in this area of procedural Fidelity. In this episode, we talk about why she prefers the term "Procedural Fidelity," the types of behavior plans that are difficult for teachers to implement, the different types of procedural errors one can make, the impact these different errors have, what types of intervention plans are more vs. less resistant to reductions in procedural fidelity, why this is a topic that practitioners should care about, whether to measure procedural fidelity via rate or percent correct, and regardless of method, how behavior analysts can start tracking procedural fidelity right away. We also talk about Claire's research in this area, going back to the work she did as part of her dissertation. We also talk about the state of reporting procedural fidelity in the behavior-analytic research literature. Lastly, I think it's important to point out that this topic is replete with ethical implications, which is why I titled this episode the way I did. When I listened to the show, I kept track of the various code elements that were indirectly outlined or addressed. For the mentors in the audience, this might be a fun exercise to do with your supervisees. Here are the resources discussed in this episode: Session 269/193: Claire's episode on Constructional Approaches to behavioral intervention. A link to Claire's multiple BOP appearances. Claire's lab website. On Claire's site, a section where you can download examples of Procedural Fidelity checklists and related resources. Bergmann et al., (2023). A detailed examination of reporting procedural fidelity in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Han et al., (2022). Trends in Reporting Procedural Integrity: A Comparison. Jones et al., (2023). Effects of Commission and Omission Errors on the Efficacy of Noncontingent Reinforcement. Jones and St. Peter (2022). Nominally acceptable integrity failures negatively affect interventions involving intermittent reinforcement. St. Peter et al. (2023). On a persisting curious double standard in behavior analysis: Behavioral scholars' perspectives on procedural fidelity. Kranak and Falligant (2023). Treatment Integrity, Commission Errors, and Reinstatement: A Primer. Campbell and Skinner (2008). Combining Explicit Timing with an Interdependent Group Contingency Program to Decrease Transition Times. This episode was brought to you with support from: The 2024 Stone Soup Conference! Behavior Analysis' premier online event is taking place on October 25th. Come hear from pod faves including Drs. John Austin, Lina Slim, Jim Moore, and many others! 8.5 Learning CEUs are available, and when you use the promo code PODCAST24, that comes out to less than 8 bucks per credit. Learn more here! How to ABA…The Bx Resource Membership saves you time, lends you support, and helps you keep up with your CEUs. It's a growing library of resources, materials, programs, datasheets, assessments, and how-to videos to help you tackle any ABA program with ease. It also includes live CEUs each month, live mentorship sessions, a full library of CEUs (60+, enough for recertification), and a community of fellow behavior professionals where you can ask questions when you need support. Join us at howtoaba.com/join. The New England Center for Children! In previous podcasts, you've heard me talk about NECC's career opportunities, but later in this episode, you'll hear about their Autism Curriculum Encyclopedia, or ACE for short. It's an evidence-based teaching technology for educators and BCBAs who teach learners with autism and related disabilities. If you must know more right now however, you can go to acenecc.org. HRIC Recruiting. Barb Voss has been placing BCBAs in permanent positions throughout the US for just about a decade, and has been in the business more generally for 30 years. When you work with HRIC, you work directly with Barb, thereby accessing highly personalized service. So if you're about to graduate, you're looking for a change of pace, or you just want to know if the grass really is greener on the other side, head over to HRIColorado.com to schedule a confidential chat right away. ACE Approved CEUs from .... Behavioral Observations. That's right, get your CEUs while driving (maybe even this episode!), walking your dog, doing the dishes, or whatever else you might have going on, all while learning from your favorite podcast guests!

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the ongoing case against Richard Allen, accused of the Delphi murders. Coffindaffer delves into the complexities surrounding Allen's numerous confessions during his 22 months in custody, questioning their validity due to his deteriorating mental state and extreme confinement conditions. She highlights the procedural mishandling of Allen's case, such as restricted access to his attorneys and potential Sixth Amendment violations. Despite Allen's confessions potentially containing unique knowledge of the case, Coffindaffer points out the overall weak evidence, including the problematic probable cause affidavit and geofencing data. She emphasizes that even if Allen is guilty, the mishandling of the case might lead to serious appellate issues. The conversation also touches on the controversial Odinism aspect linked to some guards, adding another layer of complexity to the case. Coffindaffer concludes that the case's numerous issues might ultimately undermine the prosecution's efforts. **Main Points:** - Richard Allen's confessions during custody are questioned due to his poor mental state and extreme confinement. - Procedural mishandling, including restricted attorney access and potential Sixth Amendment violations, complicates the case. - Confessions potentially containing unique knowledge of the case, but overall evidence remains weak. - Issues with the probable cause affidavit and geofencing data undermine the prosecution. - Even if guilty, mishandling may lead to significant appellate issues. - Controversial Odinism aspect linked to some guards adds complexity. - Case's numerous procedural errors may ultimately undermine prosecution efforts. **Hashtags:** #RichardAllen #JenniferCoffindaffer #DelphiMurders #ProceduralErrors #LegalChallenges #ConfessionValidity #HiddenKillers Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the ongoing case against Richard Allen, accused of the Delphi murders. Coffindaffer delves into the complexities surrounding Allen's numerous confessions during his 22 months in custody, questioning their validity due to his deteriorating mental state and extreme confinement conditions. She highlights the procedural mishandling of Allen's case, such as restricted access to his attorneys and potential Sixth Amendment violations. Despite Allen's confessions potentially containing unique knowledge of the case, Coffindaffer points out the overall weak evidence, including the problematic probable cause affidavit and geofencing data. She emphasizes that even if Allen is guilty, the mishandling of the case might lead to serious appellate issues. The conversation also touches on the controversial Odinism aspect linked to some guards, adding another layer of complexity to the case. Coffindaffer concludes that the case's numerous issues might ultimately undermine the prosecution's efforts. **Main Points:** - Richard Allen's confessions during custody are questioned due to his poor mental state and extreme confinement. - Procedural mishandling, including restricted attorney access and potential Sixth Amendment violations, complicates the case. - Confessions potentially containing unique knowledge of the case, but overall evidence remains weak. - Issues with the probable cause affidavit and geofencing data undermine the prosecution. - Even if guilty, mishandling may lead to significant appellate issues. - Controversial Odinism aspect linked to some guards adds complexity. - Case's numerous procedural errors may ultimately undermine prosecution efforts. **Hashtags:** #RichardAllen #JenniferCoffindaffer #DelphiMurders #ProceduralErrors #LegalChallenges #ConfessionValidity #HiddenKillers Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the ongoing case against Richard Allen, the alleged Delphi murderer. Coffindaffer addresses the complexities surrounding Allen's numerous confessions during his 22 months in custody, questioning their validity given his deteriorating mental state. Allen was held in extreme conditions, including solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, which Coffindaffer argues could drive anyone to madness. She emphasizes the procedural mishandling of Allen's case, which includes restricted access to his attorneys and questionable probable cause for his arrest. Despite the confessions potentially being credible, the mishandling might allow Allen to challenge his prosecution successfully. Coffindaffer also points out deficiencies in the probable cause affidavit, questioning the foundation of the investigation. She raises concerns that the entire case might be compromised due to these procedural errors, potentially leading to Allen's release despite his possible guilt. **Main Points:** - Richard Allen's numerous confessions during custody are questioned due to his poor mental state. - Allen's extreme confinement conditions could have contributed to his unstable behavior. - Procedural mishandling of Allen's case, including restricted access to attorneys, raises significant concerns. - Despite credible confessions, mishandling might allow Allen to challenge his prosecution. - Deficiencies in the probable cause affidavit question the foundation of the investigation. - Procedural errors could compromise the entire case, potentially leading to Allen's release. - The focus is on whether Allen's initial confession sparked the investigation. **Hashtags:** #RichardAllen #JenniferCoffindaffer #DelphiMurders #ProceduralErrors #LegalChallenges #ConfessionValidity #HiddenKillers Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the ongoing case against Richard Allen, the alleged Delphi murderer. Coffindaffer addresses the complexities surrounding Allen's numerous confessions during his 22 months in custody, questioning their validity given his deteriorating mental state. Allen was held in extreme conditions, including solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, which Coffindaffer argues could drive anyone to madness. She emphasizes the procedural mishandling of Allen's case, which includes restricted access to his attorneys and questionable probable cause for his arrest. Despite the confessions potentially being credible, the mishandling might allow Allen to challenge his prosecution successfully. Coffindaffer also points out deficiencies in the probable cause affidavit, questioning the foundation of the investigation. She raises concerns that the entire case might be compromised due to these procedural errors, potentially leading to Allen's release despite his possible guilt. **Main Points:** - Richard Allen's numerous confessions during custody are questioned due to his poor mental state. - Allen's extreme confinement conditions could have contributed to his unstable behavior. - Procedural mishandling of Allen's case, including restricted access to attorneys, raises significant concerns. - Despite credible confessions, mishandling might allow Allen to challenge his prosecution. - Deficiencies in the probable cause affidavit question the foundation of the investigation. - Procedural errors could compromise the entire case, potentially leading to Allen's release. - The focus is on whether Allen's initial confession sparked the investigation. **Hashtags:** #RichardAllen #JenniferCoffindaffer #DelphiMurders #ProceduralErrors #LegalChallenges #ConfessionValidity #HiddenKillers Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the Karen Read trial and the implications of a mistrial declared by the judge. Coffindaffer clarifies that the mistrial does not constitute double jeopardy since no official verdict was rendered. Jurors had reportedly found Karen Read innocent on counts one and three but were deadlocked on count two (manslaughter). Coffindaffer explains that without an official jury verdict, the case remains open for retrial. She mentions the procedural issues, including the lack of polling the jury and the anonymity requested by jurors due to harassment concerns. The conversation also compares this case to the Alex Murdaugh case, emphasizing that without a signed verdict, the proceedings must continue from a clean slate. Coffindaffer concludes that the defense team is unlikely to reverse the mistrial decision. **Main Points:** - Karen Read's mistrial does not trigger double jeopardy as no official verdict was rendered. - Jurors reportedly found Read innocent on counts one and three, deadlocked on count two. - Procedural issues include lack of jury polling and jurors' request for anonymity due to harassment. - Comparison with Alex Murdaugh case highlights the need for an official signed verdict. - Defense team benefits from the mistrial as they start with a clean slate. - The judge's efforts to obtain a verdict were unsuccessful, leading to the mistrial. - Coffindaffer believes the mistrial decision is unlikely to be reversed. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #DoubleJeopardy #Mistrial #JuryVerdict #LegalProcedure Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the podcast "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the Karen Read trial and the implications of a mistrial declared by the judge. Coffindaffer clarifies that the mistrial does not constitute double jeopardy since no official verdict was rendered. Jurors had reportedly found Karen Read innocent on counts one and three but were deadlocked on count two (manslaughter). Coffindaffer explains that without an official jury verdict, the case remains open for retrial. She mentions the procedural issues, including the lack of polling the jury and the anonymity requested by jurors due to harassment concerns. The conversation also compares this case to the Alex Murdaugh case, emphasizing that without a signed verdict, the proceedings must continue from a clean slate. Coffindaffer concludes that the defense team is unlikely to reverse the mistrial decision. **Main Points:** - Karen Read's mistrial does not trigger double jeopardy as no official verdict was rendered. - Jurors reportedly found Read innocent on counts one and three, deadlocked on count two. - Procedural issues include lack of jury polling and jurors' request for anonymity due to harassment. - Comparison with Alex Murdaugh case highlights the need for an official signed verdict. - Defense team benefits from the mistrial as they start with a clean slate. - The judge's efforts to obtain a verdict were unsuccessful, leading to the mistrial. - Coffindaffer believes the mistrial decision is unlikely to be reversed. **Hashtags:** #KarenRead #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #DoubleJeopardy #Mistrial #JuryVerdict #LegalProcedure Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Send us a Text Message.Procedural closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a clinical practice guideline.Mitra S, Bischoff AR, Sathanandam S, Lakshminrusimha S, McNamara PJ.J Perinatol. 2024 Jul 12. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02052-9. Online ahead of print.PMID: 38997403 Review.As always, feel free to send us questions, comments, or suggestions to our email: nicupodcast@gmail.com. You can also contact the show through Instagram or Twitter, @nicupodcast. Or contact Ben and Daphna directly via their Twitter profiles: @drnicu and @doctordaphnamd. The papers discussed in today's episode are listed and timestamped on the webpage linked below. Enjoy!

In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast episode, Defense Attorney Bob Motta discussed the defense arguments for Karen Read's case. The defense claims that the jury was unanimous on some charges being not guilty, based on affidavits from Alan Jackson and others. Motta emphasized the importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about whether the jury was deadlocked on all counts. He explained the concept of double jeopardy and how it could impact Read's case if the mistrial was improperly declared. The discussion also covered the procedural nuances and ethical considerations, including the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury about their verdicts. Motta highlighted the potential complexities of retrying the case and the significance of preserving objections for appeal. The conversation provided insights into the legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial, underscoring the importance of proper legal procedures and the challenges faced by both the defense and prosecution. ### Main Points - Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read. - Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock. - Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case. - Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury. - Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case. - Significance of preserving objections for appeal. - Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast episode, Defense Attorney Bob Motta discussed the defense arguments for Karen Read's case. The defense claims that the jury was unanimous on some charges being not guilty, based on affidavits from Alan Jackson and others. Motta emphasized the importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about whether the jury was deadlocked on all counts. He explained the concept of double jeopardy and how it could impact Read's case if the mistrial was improperly declared. The discussion also covered the procedural nuances and ethical considerations, including the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury about their verdicts. Motta highlighted the potential complexities of retrying the case and the significance of preserving objections for appeal. The conversation provided insights into the legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial, underscoring the importance of proper legal procedures and the challenges faced by both the defense and prosecution. ### Main Points - Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read. - Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock. - Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case. - Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury. - Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case. - Significance of preserving objections for appeal. - Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Pat Mayo & Davis Mattek get together for their quarterly chat and hit on the Best Procedural TV Shows, Back Injuries, Sail GP, Pick'em or Drafts, Lost, and a lot More. Plus, the guys try to answer the question of "If you weren't doing this, what would you be doing?" Use code “MAYO” at underdog for a deposit bonus up to $250: https://play.underdogfantasy.com/p-pat-mayo Subscribe, Rate and Review Apple: http://bit.ly/PMEiTunes Spotify: https://goo.gl/VboemH FOLLOW MAYO MEDIA NETWORK Newsletter: https://mayomedia.substack.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mayomedianetwork/ TIK TOK: https://www.tiktok.com/discover/mayo-media-network YOUTUBE: https://bit.ly/YTMMN __________________________ Get 20% off https://www.fantasynational.com/mayo with code “MAYO” RUN THE SIMS F1 & Spring Football PACKAGE (Code “MAYO” for 10% OFF): https://www.runthesims.com/mayo Code “MAYO” 10% OFF at Ship It Nation: https://shipitnation.com/?aff=Thepme BETTERHELP — Visit BetterHelp.com/PATMAYO today to get 10% off your first month. PXG - To to https://www.pxg.com/Mayo to learn more and get free shipping on all equipment OMAHA STEAKS — Go to OmahaSteaks.com, promo code “MAYO” at checkout to save on exclusive packages starting at just $89. MODERN MAMMALS — Go to modernmammals.com and use code MAYO for 10% off. Apple: http://bit.ly/PMEiTunes Spotify: https://goo.gl/VboemH Pat Mayo Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThePME Pat Mayo Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThePME Pat Mayo Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thepme/ Message and data rates apply. Must be 18+ (21+MA & AZ, 19+ AL, NE) and present in a state where Underdog Fantasy operates. Terms apply. Concerned with your play? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit www.ncpgambling.org; AZ: 1-800-NEXT-STEP (1-800-639-8783) or text NEXT-STEP to 53342; NY: Call the 24/7 HOPEline at 1-877-8-HOPENY or Text HOPENY (467369) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices