Podcasts about tldr it

Olly runs through some of Barnier's choicest cabinet picks TLDR: It's a cabinet choc full of reactionary catholics, the policy in New Caledonia is likely to remain repressive, Macronism's left wing wakes up with a hangover and the NFP pursues censure. Send us questions and suggestions for our Friday interviews at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠flep24pod@gmail.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Cover our newspaper expenses. How about you buy us one today? ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/flep24⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Want your book, magazine, or website advertised at the beginning or end of the show? Get in touch! Fighting Fund: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://buymeacoffee.com/flep24⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Flep24's Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠@flep24pod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Marlon's Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠@MarlonEttinger⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Olly's Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠@reality_manager

Tldr:It takes really long and in the current scenario its forever and you better be ready with another source of income! Did I tell you I am amongst the top 25 Indian Doctor's Blog on Feedspot ?It's always great to reach the people I want to help and Feedspot is a big help. Read the blog post --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/healthwealthbridge/message

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Ideological Bayesians, published by Kevin Dorst on February 26, 2024 on LessWrong. TLDR: It's often said that Bayesian updating is unbiased and converges to the truth - and, therefore, that biases must emerge from non-Bayesian sources. That's not quite right. The convergence results require updating on your total evidence - but for agents at all like us, that's impossible - instead, we must selectively attend to certain questions, ignoring others. Yet correlations between what we see and what questions we ask - "ideological" Bayesian updating - can lead to predictable biases and polarization. Professor Polder is a polarizing figure. His fans praise him for his insight; his critics denounce him for his aggression. Ask his fans, and they'll supply you with a bunch of instances when he made an insightful comment during discussions. They'll admit that he's sometimes aggressive, but they can't remember too many cases - he certainly doesn't seem any more aggressive than the average professor. Ask his critics, and they'll supply you with a bunch of instances when he made an aggressive comment during discussions. They'll admit that he's sometimes insightful, but they can't remember too many cases - he certainly doesn't seem any more insightful than the average professor. This sort of polarization is, I assume, familiar. But let me tell you a secret: Professor Polder is, in fact, perfectly average - he has an unremarkably average number of both insightful and aggressive comments. So what's going on? His fans are better at noticing his insights, while his critics are better at noticing his aggression. As a result, their estimates are off: his fans think he's more insightful than he is, and his critics think he's more aggressive than he is. Each are correct about individual bits of the picture - when they notice aggression or insight, he is being aggressive or insightful. But none are correct about the overall picture. This source of polarization is also, I assume, familiar. It's widely appreciated that background beliefs and ideology - habits of mind, patterns of salience, and default forms of explanation - can lead to bias, disagreement, and polarization. In this broad sense of "ideology", we're familiar with the observation that real people - especially fans and critics - are often ideological.[1] But let me tell you another secret: Polder's fans and critics are all Bayesians. More carefully: they all maintain precise probability distributions over the relevant possibilities, and they always update their opinions by conditioning their priors on the (unambiguous) true answer to a partitional question. How is that possible? Don't Bayesians, in such contexts, update in unbiased[2] ways, always converge to the truth, and therefore avoid persistent disagreement? Not necessarily. The trick is that which question they update on is correlated with what they see - they have different patterns of salience. For example, when Polder makes a comment that is both insightful and aggressive, his fans are more likely to notice (just) the insight, while his critics are more likely to notice (just) the aggression. This can lead to predictable polarization. I'm going to give a model of how such correlations - between what you see, and what questions you ask about it - can lead otherwise rational Bayesians to diverge from both each other and the truth. Though simplified, I think it sheds light on how ideology might work. Limited-Attention Bayesians Standard Bayesian epistemology says you must update on your total evidence. That's nuts. To see just how infeasible that is, take a look at the following video. Consider the question: what happens to the exercise ball? I assume you noticed that the exercise ball disappeared. Did you also notice that the Christmas tree gained lights, the bowl changed c...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Ideological Bayesians, published by Kevin Dorst on February 26, 2024 on LessWrong. TLDR: It's often said that Bayesian updating is unbiased and converges to the truth - and, therefore, that biases must emerge from non-Bayesian sources. That's not quite right. The convergence results require updating on your total evidence - but for agents at all like us, that's impossible - instead, we must selectively attend to certain questions, ignoring others. Yet correlations between what we see and what questions we ask - "ideological" Bayesian updating - can lead to predictable biases and polarization. Professor Polder is a polarizing figure. His fans praise him for his insight; his critics denounce him for his aggression. Ask his fans, and they'll supply you with a bunch of instances when he made an insightful comment during discussions. They'll admit that he's sometimes aggressive, but they can't remember too many cases - he certainly doesn't seem any more aggressive than the average professor. Ask his critics, and they'll supply you with a bunch of instances when he made an aggressive comment during discussions. They'll admit that he's sometimes insightful, but they can't remember too many cases - he certainly doesn't seem any more insightful than the average professor. This sort of polarization is, I assume, familiar. But let me tell you a secret: Professor Polder is, in fact, perfectly average - he has an unremarkably average number of both insightful and aggressive comments. So what's going on? His fans are better at noticing his insights, while his critics are better at noticing his aggression. As a result, their estimates are off: his fans think he's more insightful than he is, and his critics think he's more aggressive than he is. Each are correct about individual bits of the picture - when they notice aggression or insight, he is being aggressive or insightful. But none are correct about the overall picture. This source of polarization is also, I assume, familiar. It's widely appreciated that background beliefs and ideology - habits of mind, patterns of salience, and default forms of explanation - can lead to bias, disagreement, and polarization. In this broad sense of "ideology", we're familiar with the observation that real people - especially fans and critics - are often ideological.[1] But let me tell you another secret: Polder's fans and critics are all Bayesians. More carefully: they all maintain precise probability distributions over the relevant possibilities, and they always update their opinions by conditioning their priors on the (unambiguous) true answer to a partitional question. How is that possible? Don't Bayesians, in such contexts, update in unbiased[2] ways, always converge to the truth, and therefore avoid persistent disagreement? Not necessarily. The trick is that which question they update on is correlated with what they see - they have different patterns of salience. For example, when Polder makes a comment that is both insightful and aggressive, his fans are more likely to notice (just) the insight, while his critics are more likely to notice (just) the aggression. This can lead to predictable polarization. I'm going to give a model of how such correlations - between what you see, and what questions you ask about it - can lead otherwise rational Bayesians to diverge from both each other and the truth. Though simplified, I think it sheds light on how ideology might work. Limited-Attention Bayesians Standard Bayesian epistemology says you must update on your total evidence. That's nuts. To see just how infeasible that is, take a look at the following video. Consider the question: what happens to the exercise ball? I assume you noticed that the exercise ball disappeared. Did you also notice that the Christmas tree gained lights, the bowl changed c...

The quest to find the perfect search engine continues with Swisscows.com. TLDR: It sucks. Club goes over moves/roster, Nordecke elections, and gets to talk to Ravi head of Partnerships. Get stuck in! Bird: https://twitter.com/President_Birb https://ahernandezart.com/ Check links below: Supporter Supply  https://www.supportersupply.co/  Code for free delivery:  upper90boyz (that's boys with a Z) https://nordecke.com/ Podcasts are available on Spotify, Apple Podcast, and all podcast apps. Now on YouTube, with video, and the faces!  Not seeing us somewhere? Email us Check us out on our Social Media Platforms and feel free to email us! We're totally literate and will 100% read anything you send, promise. Songs by Nick Tolford and Company https://ntac.bandcamp.com/track/boys-night-out SIGN UP TO BE PART OF THE NORDECKE!  Here - https://nordecke.com/ Become part of the Discord family:  https://discord.gg/crew96 Subscribe to our channel for more soccer content: -Email us:  podcast@upper90club.com -Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Upper90ClubPod -Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/upper90clubpod -Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/upper90clubpod/ -Apple Music: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/upper-90-club/id1647214221 -Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1xnYAtnQ8tThdn5JWX6c24 -Linktree: https://linktr.ee/upper90clubpod #VamosColumbus | #Crew96 | #Upper90Club https://sirkbook.com/ https://www.amazon.com/stores/Steve-Sirk/author/B0821YJYT8?ref=ap_rdr&store_ref=ap_rdr&isDramIntegrated=true&shoppingPortalEnabled=true

Today we offer you some first impressions of OVHcloud and how we're seriously considering moving our Light Pentest LITE training class to it! TLDR: It runs on vCenter, my first and only virtualization love! Unlimited VM "powered on" time and unlimited bandwidth Intergration with PowerShell so you can run a single script to "heal" your environment to a gold image Easy integration with pfSense to be able to manage the firewall and internal/external IPs Price comparable to what we're paying now in Azure land

This episode contains: Ben joins Steven in person, and Devon phones it in this week. Your heart has ventricles and… dorsicles? No Ben; It's atriums. Steven reminds us that he knows the beginning of a Barenaked Ladies song. Devon chats about his first cruise! TLDR: It was… about as he expected. Was Devon on a cruise long enough to get scurvy? Are drink packages on cruise ships worth it? Everything's still wrong with Ben this week. Looks like one of Ben's bedroom walls will need to be replaced. FEMA declared the recent rainstorms in California an Avengers-level event. Ben is getting his septic tank pumped this week. Goodbye wooden deck. Ben found a lot of surprising things when crawling under his house. You wouldn't illegally download a house, would you? Steven needs a break from his vacations. Listen to Steven guest host the Plastic Plesiosaur podcast this month! Brain Matters: Orienteering may help fight cognitive decline. Orienteering is a new sport, kinda like extreme hiking. Devon is our resident sports advocate and expert. De-stress and unplug with Orienteering, and improve your cognitive fitness. The recent study about Orienteering is self-reported, so we're kinda skeptical. Ben loves exploring new routes in his town. Steven & Devon say "no thanks." Steven thought Ben was going to murder him when driving him the wrong way home. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230120154924.htm Charge it! Could gravity batteries really store excess renewable energy? Gravity batteries could theoretically be located in abandoned mines. Gravity batteries are one of the few ways to generate energy without steam!  Gravity batteries are not feasible: maintenance costs outweigh the benefits. We chat about hydroenergy between two lakes. Why do all our tech advances go back to the Romans? Thanks, middle ages! Steven's kids just watched Ratatouille for the first time... is it for kids? Steven has a quick Rant-atouille.  Ben invites Steven to come over and watch Everything, Everywhere, All at Once. https://www.techspot.com/news/97306-gravity-batteries-abandoned-mines-could-power-whole-planet.html Mid-pod Patreon only: Renee reminded Steven he's talking about Bridgerton. Devon recommends the second Downton Abbey film. Doesn't recommend the first. Devon lawyersplains Downton Abbey to Ben. He could go on for a half hour, easy. Ben guesses the footmen in Downton Abbey are the ninjas working for Shredder. Science Fiction / Big Question: We gush about The Last of Us, video game and show. Cordyceps is a real fungal thing that set up the premise of The Last of Us. We compare The Last of Us to a couple other zombie media. The Walking Dead refers to the people still left... just like The Last of Us. Starting The Last of Us with scientists in a 1968-era show is a good choice. Anna Torv is FANTASTIC in The Last of Us, AND Fringe. Watch Fringe. Wanna see more Pedro Pascal? We recommend Prospect. Did anybody see the FBI marriage subplot in Sonic 2 coming? Devon did.  Big question this week: we are old men grumbling about streaming services. HBO Max has been doing Ben dirty, y'all. Babylon 5 going away and a price hike? The Remastered version of Babylon 5 has been incredible.  Could HBO Max have waited a little after The Last of Us premier to raise price? Is it time to begin rotating streaming services?  Should we go back to physical media? When we bought shows that weren't revoked? Who would be hurt most from rotating streaming services?  Is it just time for us to grow up? Devon grew up 30 years ago. Git gud n00bs. Devon recommends Kevin Can F**k Himself on AMC. After-pod Patreon only: Devon tries to tell a joke. He gets there eventually. Joke Orienteering is our new sport: here's a map, let's find the punch line! We like Wednesday despite it being a Tim Burton show. Why did Tim Burton spend 25 years making movies that didn't speak to Ben?  Wednesday gives Ben some Pushing Daisies vibes. Tim Burton was an Imagineer! That explains a lot, in a good way. Steven and Devon gush about The Last Kingdom. Very fast paced show. Slow book. Steven LOVES having maps in books, especially The Last Kingdom.  The same characters are in both The Last Kingdom and Assassins Creed: Valhalla. Ben would love to take a nap every day.  We say good night to Devon, and then Steven and Ben WE KEEP ON RECORDING! Steven tries to get Ben to name the people he hates.

The team turns their sights on Pixar's newest flick, "Turning Red". TLDR: It's not good.  For more movie recommendations and commentary, go to our website, www.FoxfireFarmhouse.com. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions for future episode topics, reach out to us on Facebook or Instagram or email us at podcast@foxfirefarmhouse.com. Cheers!

With the cost of living crisis becoming ever more apparent, The Bevan Foundation have just published a new report focussing on the problems people on low incomes face finding a home to rent. TLDR: It's not good but to expand on that we are joined by two of the report's authors: Hugh Kocan: https://twitter.com/HughKocan Steff Evans: https://twitter.com/SteffHEvans You can read the report here: https://www.bevanfoundation.org/current-projects/preventing-homelessness-through-improving-the-local-housing-allowance/ and follow The Bevan Foundation here: https://twitter.com/BevanFoundation If you're enjoying the pod, please leave us a rating and review in your podcast app of choice and follow us for all the latest pods, videos, and live events: https://twitter.com/HiraethPod

In this episode of The SXS Guys Offroad Podcast, I'm joined via Zoom by Brent Gilliam from 212 Gloves to watch the spring launch of the Can-Am Offroad 2022 lineup expansion. TLDR: It was pretty short and without a lot of news... so we make up for it with some King of the Hammers talk, Polaris Pro R experiences, and more!

A longie but goodie just in time for the fall of US imperialist projects in Afghanistan...and autumn. TLDR: It's giving very much hating on the not rich who did not understand the assignment of shutting the fuck up and running politicians their propers for re-election. A tax on vibes. If "Taliban" means "student" in Pashto--the US is the teacher. Have you ever asked yourself why tax reform is such a contentious issue and has been for decades? Have you ever stopped to think that politicking, grandstanding and "fashion diplomacy" is part of moderate, centrist Democrats' pandering to a more leftist, "progressive" voter base but without alienating their prioritized white voter base too much (think Nancy Pelosi kneeling in the kente cloth sash in 2020)? There's a slavery era explanation for that: The tobacco rice and indigo that our ancestors grew and produced were considered in Alexander Hamilton's own words “which must be capital objects in treaties of commerce w foreign nations” and precipitated the events that led to this country's independence in 1776 following the Revolutionary War. His more famous quote, though, "no taxation without representation" portends a more glaring contradiction: imagine being mad you have to pay taxes to enrich the British whose royal companies, militaries, fleets and slavers sold and transported the Indigenous Africans you enslaved and calling TAXATION slavery while actually enslaving people? Tax the rich is again policy sloganeering and is a liberal democratic/partisan rallying cry that can't happen in good faith in an oligarchy that siphons all its resources to an already massive defense budget. Just earmark our reparations, will ya? Maybe the majority of folks who at least have some semblance of a revolutionary or radical politic aren't hating on rich people or Met Gala attendees or AOC herself, but instead recognizing that she and other politicians across the spectrum are sworn to serve a country that used the international slave trade between Britain and Spain to generate revenue to build a domestic manufacturing infrastructure to keep taxes lowered for their most invaluable taxable import--Black people and whose Central Intelligence Agency created the Taliban to wrest power from the USSR's puppet pro-soviet government during the Soviet Afghan War in 1979-1989 as part of plan to distort the public's view of the barbaric, warmongering, misogynist primitive backward United States to continue competing for oil and other natural resources in Central Asia, including the global heroin trade to finance the invasion of other countries, arm the genocide of their number one ally in the region (the Israeli Government. See Kamala Harris's comments on Israel)while pretending to care about "women's right's" and immigration while whipping Haitian immigrants at the border. That said, shirking accountability for their complicities in systems of oppression to remain elected isn't above any of their paygrades--even the politicians you like! Eyes On Haiti Oligarchy: https://haitiantimes.com/2021/07/16/haitians-can-no-longer-hide-behind-the-caste-system-killing-our-country/ US mass deportations of Haitian Immigrants: https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/elviadiaz/2021/09/20/border-patrol-using-whips-del-rio-round-up-haitian-immigrants/5789596001/ Recommended Reading: https://blackallianceforpeace.com/newsletter/afghanistannograveyard?fbclid=IwAR20EeWyNUk4MpwUubcXZ53usiqemg3Rl6u4ZkeSioLAO14DiY5A2E4KrRA https://blackallianceforpeace.com/afghanistan Tariq Ali: https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/debacle-in-afghanistan http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/readings.nsf/ArtWeb/4AF487C90CA14FB985256E000057B5EB?OpenDocument Global Heroin Trade Links to US presence in Afghanistan: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jan/09/how-the-heroin-trade-explains-the-us-uk-failure-in-afghanistan https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/84028515/FULL_TEXT.PDF AOC: https://www.dsausa.org/democratic-left/aoc/

This week's episode is a spoilercast discussion of Chainsaw Man creator Tatsuki Fujimoto's newest one-shot, Look Back. It's a manga about manga (don't worry, it's not cringeworthy), validation, grief, and just generally being alive. TLDR: It's pretty great.    Content warning: We're a fairly NSFW podcast that makes frequent use of reclaimed homophobic slurs. This episode also includes discussions of both real and fictionalized acts of violence and mass murder. 

Heyyyyy Heifer! Quarantine seems to be slowly ending and it’s been weirder than I thought it would be. Like, I knew I’d be socially rusty and would have to remember how to order food, etc. But I wasn’t expecting to have weird depression, or that my brain would short circuit and make it feel like things had always stayed open and that the last 1.5 years didn’t happen. So I figured I’d talk about that whiplash today! Enjoy this episode and get vaccinated! Moo, Elaine TIMESTAMPS 00:00 No masks, no problems? LOL. 01:23 The transition from 1.5 years of quarantine to pre-COVID routines is so weird to me. It feels like quarantine has gone by in the wink of an eye, like I want to forget all this ever happened. 06:10 For so long we’ve had external stressors affecting us that we may have never acknowledged or processed.  08:09 With things opening again, and us getting to return to our old habits/routines/haunts, there’s this fear that it will get taken away again. 12:01 Some people are going to adjust faster than others (or that’s how it may seem!).  13:15 I’ve had another wave of depression and I think part of it is the overwhelming idea of getting to “come back” to life even though I’ve continued to live life? Like, quarantine wasn’t a pause. We kept going. How do I merge the two? 17:36 TLDR: It’s really okay if your feelings about quarantine ending are: scared, happy, worried, depressed, anxious, elated, overwhelmed, etc. 19:11 My weird outro where today’s scenario is that you get a kickass MEET CUTE OMG HEART EYES. *** If you enjoy this podcast, please consider giving it a review! It also is incredibly helpful for me to hear what is resonating with you, so feel free to DM me! You can find the show notes for this episode at www.anguseyetea.com.  Follow me on Insta and Twitter @AngusEyeTea. Email: anguseyetea@gmail.com Want additional content including a secret blog? Check out my Patreon at www.patreon.com/anguseyetea!  I am not a health professional. I am simply someone who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Please talk to your friends, family, teachers, doctor, trusted human, etc. if you need help. I also have a resources page on my website that can direct you to different hotlines, therapy websites, and more at https://anguseyetea.com/resources/

Rob and Chris learn about Viking magic and shamanism. TLDR: It's time to strut.

What do you know about cybersecurity in healthcare? You've probably heard news reports about the surge in cybersecurity incidents across the healthcare industry throughout 2020. The reality is that developing and maintaining a robust cybersecurity and risk management program is a challenge for any organization. For healthcare companies in particular, it's difficult to stay up to date with a rapidly evolving cybersecurity compliance landscape. Our guest on the pod today saw these problems firsthand when he was CISO at the health IT company Voxiva and he decided to do something about it. Grant Elliott is CEO and Founder of Ostendio. Grant tells the story of how he realized there was a market opportunity in healthcare security and compliance, and how he made the leap from the steady ride of the corporate C-suite to the extremely uncertain world of tech entrepreneurship. Grant gives his advice for founders (“Just don't do it”) and shares his secret for successfully scaling a technology company (TLDR: It's the title to this episode.) Grant teaches courses on business and entrepreneurship at the Pratt Institute, he is the Founder and Former President of the Healthcare Cloud Coalition, and in his spare time he mentors and advises entrepreneurs. You can check out all the healthcare compliance and risk management tools Grant and his team are building at Ostendio.com and you can follow them on Twitter @Ostendio.

Rob and Chris are still learning about philosophy. TLDR: It's a mechy situation.

We helped create a fun episode about a drink that has helped the Master of Some Team (Daren Lake and Phil Cross) compete faster and better. TLDR - It doesn’t have EPO in it, it tastes great and it’s 100% legal!Watch the full episode HEREREAD/Download the whole episode PDF Here---On this episode, we break down the components of the ultimate performance enhancing drink, WAR JUICE! We were so excited to share this with you because we think it has great beneficial impacts on endurance performance. There are only three ingredients to War juice. Each ingredient has its own health benefits that we dive into but combined together, these foods create a Godly drink that gets your body ready for a solid race! Pretty please with a tart cherry on top, hit the subscribe or like button on whatever app you use to listen to us so that you are alerted and updated on our latest episodes. You can find us on Acast, Apple podcast, Spotify and Stitcher. There is so mushroom for doper stuff we can create for you, but we need your support so please rate us, leave us a comment, and share this out to all your fave people! Let us know what we can do better!If you like the beets and music you hear in this episode, it was created mostly by Daren and you can check it out here. LINKSSuggested episode to listen to next: Race Week NutritionAll the amazing puns above will link you to further information about these ingredients.Happy listening and learning! PODCAST PRODUCTION BY POD PASTE See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this episode Chris Thoreau joins me to explore the idea - Can you actually make a living growing microgreens?  Is it actually possible or just an unrealistic dream? If it is possible what does that look like? How big does the business need to be?  How much do you need to be selling?  Would you need employees? TLDR: It is possible, with the right combination of luck, skills and hard work. Some people will find it’s a fit for them and their lifestyle, but they’ll need to be committed. Learn how to start a Profitable Microgreens Business https://microgreens.teachable.com/ Increase farm efficiency with the Paperpot Transplanter and Other Small Farm Equipment at https://www.paperpot.co/ Follow Diego on IG https://instagram.com/diegofooter Follow PaperpotCo on IG https://instagram.com/paperpot Podcasts by Diego Footer: Microgreens: https://apple.co/2m1QXmW Vegetable Farming: https://apple.co/2lCuv3m Livestock Farming: https://apple.co/2m75EVG Large Scale Farming: https://apple.co/2kxj39i Small Farm Tools https://www.paperpot.co/  

In this episode Chris Thoreau joins me to explore the idea - Can you actually make a living growing microgreens?  Is it actually possible or just an unrealistic dream? If it is possible what does that look like? How big does the business need to be?  How much do you need to be selling?  Would you need employees? TLDR: It is possible, with the right combination of luck, skills and hard work. Some people will find it’s a fit for them and their lifestyle, but they’ll need to be committed. Learn how to start a Profitable Microgreens Business https://microgreens.teachable.com/ Increase farm efficiency with the Paperpot Transplanter and Other Small Farm Equipment at https://www.paperpot.co/ Follow Diego on IG https://instagram.com/diegofooter Follow PaperpotCo on IG https://instagram.com/paperpot Podcasts by Diego Footer: Microgreens: https://apple.co/2m1QXmW Vegetable Farming: https://apple.co/2lCuv3m Livestock Farming: https://apple.co/2m75EVG Large Scale Farming: https://apple.co/2kxj39i Small Farm Tools https://www.paperpot.co/  

In this episode Chris Thoreau joins me to explore the idea - Can you actually make a living growing microgreens?  Is it actually possible or just an unrealistic dream? If it is possible what does that look like? How big does the business need to be?  How much do you need to be selling?  Would you need employees? TLDR: It is possible, with the right combination of luck, skills and hard work. Some people will find it’s a fit for them and their lifestyle, but they’ll need to be committed. Chris's online course Growing Your Profitable Microgreens Business https://microgreens.teachable.com/courses Follow Diego on IG https://instagram.com/diegofooter Small Farm Tools and Microgreens Supplies https://www.paperpot.co/ Support my content while you shop at Amazon: https://amzn.to/32FYCqW

Rob and Chris wrap up their discussion of Plato, the Republic, and god. TLDR: It's lonely up here.

Brett Kavanaugh's hearing was on track.... then off..... then on.... and now maybe off track again? We break down what's happening between Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused him of sexual assault in the 80s. TLDR: It's a mess for everybody. Then, in our second segment we talk about the midterm races shaping up to be real nail biters. Will Texas go blue for Beto? Charlie's all "nah." Can Steve change his mind?

Hurray. The guys are back...in ancient China...again. As always they're in a constant state of battle to stay happy. But then this rich kid's tutors die and he seeks revenge, but then becomes just another shitty king. Also the guys discuss the logistics of the 4 horse-pull-apart death and more about Confucius bull shit. TLDR: It's the same goddamn time every WEEK!

Rob and Chris are back in Egypt learning about what it's like to live in a desert with no rain. They also talk about dental dams and how to have a proper crab fight. TLDR: It's sooooo dry.

This week the guys learn about some new cities they can't pronounce and the crazy war freaks that ruled them. The guys decide to write a children's book. The guy's ice swords break in battle and they sell their kids for a new 4K TV! TLDR: It gets political?

In this “bonus” episode, Rob and Chris take a break from learning and instead get distracted by their favorite topic of discussion: food. Learn everything you didn't want to know about wraps, fried chicken, burritos, chicken fingers and more on this very special episode of The Dunce Caps. TLDR: It's all hot dogs!

Synopsis: In this bonus episode, Alex, Aleen, and Tempest discuss the abysmal Jem and the Holograms live action movie. TLDR: It stinks. Duration: 50:08:00 Present: Alex, Aleen, Tempest. Episode Links […]

Rob and Chris learn about what early colonial life was like and what lead to the French and Indian War. A moving sermon of Fireball and New England clam chowder leaves us quite full and sleepy. A young surveyor by the name of George Washington gets punk'd by the French, but will he have the last laugh? TLDR: It's a Colonial Life.