The Niall Boylan Podcast

In today's thought-provoking episode, Niall opens the phone lines and asks a big question: Are zoos still relevant in the 21st century — or is it time we phased them out?As the debate heats up, callers from across the country weigh in with passionate and diverse opinions.

In this episode of the show, Niall dives into one of Ireland's most controversial legislative proposals — the Occupied Territories Bill. The bill would ban trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, a move hailed by some as a powerful stand for human rights — and criticised by others as a dangerous gamble with Ireland's economy and international trade.Is this a bold act of moral leadership? Or could it cost us key trade relationships with the EU and the United States?As always, Niall opens the lines and takes calls from listeners across the country with strong — and very different — opinions.

In this thought-provoking episode, Niall sits down with barrister Dominic Wilkinson to unpack the current status of hate speech laws in Ireland and the growing pressure from the European Union to implement legislation that many see as controversial and deeply unpopular.Ireland has taken a step back from enacting full hate speech laws, opting instead to split the legislation from hate crime provisions. Yet, EU scrutiny is mounting — with the threat of legal action looming — as the Government struggles to balance international obligations with public resistance.Dominic offers legal insights into the EU's push, what hate speech laws might look like if introduced, and the potential consequences for free expression.Niall then opens the phone lines to callers and sparks a lively debate: Should social media platforms be compelled to increase their efforts in censoring divisive and hateful content?The responses are diverse:One caller supports stricter moderation, arguing that “there's a difference between free speech and targeted abuse, and platforms have a responsibility to act.”Another strongly disagrees, saying “once you give tech companies more power to decide what's acceptable, you risk silencing legitimate views just because they're unpopular.”A third caller offers a middle ground, suggesting “AI filters and human oversight should work together, but only for content that clearly incites violence — not just because it offends someone.”This episode dives deep into the tension between freedom of expression, public safety, and political pressure — both at home and from Brussels. A must-listen for anyone interested in Ireland's future direction on civil liberties and digital censorship.

On today's show, Niall opens the phone lines to discuss a heated dilemma from a listener that's got families divided.After a tough year and tight finances, a husband surprises his wife with a fully paid two-week holiday to Alicante. Sounds perfect… until she realizes it's just for the two of them — no kids.Now she's furious, calling it selfish and saying she'd never leave her children behind for a sunny getaway. Her husband says it's their chance to reconnect. Her sister says she's overreacting. Her mother says she's right to be upset.What do you think? Is this a thoughtful gesture from a husband trying to save their relationship — or a tone-deaf move that ignores what it means to be a family?

In this thought-provoking episode, Niall sits down with outspoken journalist Ian O'Doherty to unpack the controversial crackdown on so-called "dodgy boxes" — devices that allow illegal streaming of sports, movies, and premium TV content.With the Data Protection Commission now engaging with Sky over the company's use of personal data to pursue illegal streamers, questions are swirling. Is this a legitimate fight against copyright theft — or a dangerous overreach into personal privacy?Ian brings his trademark sharp insight and strong opinions to the table, and listeners don't hold back either. Callers from across the country weigh in — some defending digital freedom and affordability, others demanding stronger protection for content creators.Is Sky protecting its rights — or snooping where it shouldn't? You decide.

In this episode, Niall sits down with Chris O'Reilly from the Liberty Soup Run, a grassroots group that has been serving Dublin's homeless community for the past 7 years. With 30 volunteers and two vans operating five nights a week, Liberty Soup Run provides not only food but a vital lifeline to people living rough on the streets.Chris shares powerful insights into the day-to-day work of the team, the challenges they face, and the deep human connections that come with helping those in need.Later, Niall opens the phone lines to ask a tough but important question:

In this powerful and emotional episode of The Open Line with Niall, we ask the question: Are age gaps in relationships a real concern—or just social bias?Niall reads a gripping email from a distressed mother whose 19-year-old son—fresh into college—has fallen head over heels for a woman twice his age. Julie, 39 (or so she claims), is divorced with two children and has asked him to move in. The mother suspects manipulation, while her husband believes it'll “blow over.”Listeners call in live with a wide range of opinions:

In this explosive episode of The Open Line with Niall, we dive deep into the reaction to Niall's viral tweet from the day before:"I've reached the point where I'm done worrying about young people leaving this country. In fact, I'd urge them to get out while they still can because if they stay, they'll end up homeless, broke, and stuck in a system that offers them nothing. No hope, no future, just empty promises from the same useless governments now and in the years ahead."The tweet struck a chord—and a nerve.Tonight, callers from all over Ireland join the conversation live with passionate, divided opinions:

In this fiery episode, Niall opens the phone lines to callers across the country to weigh in on the government's decision not to raise the Jobseeker's Allowance in Budget 2026. While pensioners look set for an increase, the unemployed have been left out – and people have a lot to say about it.With contributions from concerned citizens, former jobseekers, employers, and advocacy groups, we explore the controversial question: Is the government right to hold back increases for the unemployed – or are they punishing those already struggling?We also dig into a key recommendation from the Department of Finance's expert group: that welfare thresholds should reflect the national minimum wage. Are current disincentives to part-time work keeping people trapped on the dole? Or is the state simply trying to incentivize a return to employment?Join Niall and his callers as they debate fairness, compassion, economics, and the future of Ireland's welfare state.

In this emotionally charged episode, Niall dives into one of the most talked-about travel debates: Should plus-size passengers be required to book an extra seat on flights? Inspired by viral content from plus-size travel influencer Kirsty Leanne, who unapologetically refuses to pay for more space—even when it upsets fellow passengers—Niall opens the lines and gives listeners the mic.With passionate views on both sides, callers share raw and honest opinions on whether airlines should be more size-inclusive, or if shared space means shared responsibility. From personal experiences to broader ethical concerns, this episode asks the uncomfortable questions we can't afford to ignore in today's world of packed planes and evolving norms.Caller Opinions: “Kirsty's right — booking two seats every time is financially and emotionally draining. The onus should be on airlines to design better, more inclusive seating.” “Nobody asks tall people to pay extra for legroom — why single out plus-size passengers? It's about dignity and fair treatment.”“If you're taking up more than one seat, it's only fair to pay for it. Everyone's paying for their space — it's not about shame, it's about practicality.”“I once had a flight where I was half-squashed because the person next to me overflowed into my seat. It was uncomfortable and unfair.”Tune in for a compelling, respectful conversation about body size, fairness, and the future of air travel — only on Talk It Out with Niall

In this heated and thought-provoking episode, Niall opens the phone lines to tackle one of the most controversial questions facing parents, educators, and lawmakers today: Should young children between the ages of 8 and 16 receive sex and relationship education in school?As society changes and kids are exposed to more information — and misinformation — at younger ages, the debate intensifies: Should the state take responsibility for teaching children about sex and relationships, or should this remain firmly in the hands of parents?Listeners call in with passionate views from both sides:

In this thought-provoking episode, Niall asks a powerful and controversial question: Should we still listen to the music of artists accused or convicted of serious crimes — especially against children?From R. Kelly to Gary Glitter, Michael Jackson to others, their work has left an undeniable mark on pop culture — but should their songs still be played on the radio? And what about movie stars accused of similar crimes — should they be blacklisted from future roles and wiped from the screen?Can we — or should we — separate the art from the artist?Or does continuing to enjoy their work make us complicit in ignoring their actions?Listeners call in to weigh both sides:

On todays episode with Niall, we're diving into one of Ireland's most contentious and emotionally charged questions: Has the Catholic Church, despite its well-documented failures, actually done more good than bad?Niall is joined in studio by journalist Jason Osborne to unpack a provocative column written by Laura Perrins, published in Gript. In her piece, Perrins argues that it has become too easy — and often historically inaccurate — to lay every societal ill at the feet of the Catholic Church. She points to the ongoing Tuam Mother and Baby Home story and claims the media often misrepresents or oversimplifies the Church's role, while ignoring the responsibilities of state bodies like Galway County Council.Quoting Perrins:"The thing about defaming Catholic nuns is that they are a soft target as they are too dead to defend themselves."She adds that the narrative of “evil nuns and priests” is convenient, but not always rooted in fact.With this backdrop, Niall opens the phone lines to you — the listeners — to weigh in:

In this emotionally charged episode of Late Lines with Niall, we hear from a heartbroken single mother who discovered drugs in her teenage son's bedroom. After confronting him, he admitted to selling them at school — not to use them — but to make money and ease the financial pressure on their struggling household. The twist? The drugs didn't belong to him… and now, the dealer wants them back — or €2,000 in cash.Faced with the terrifying threat of violence, the mother is torn: should she take out a credit union loan to bail her son out, or report everything to the Gardaí and risk things getting worse?Listeners call in with their takes:

In this gripping episode, Niall reads out a real email from a listener caught between loyalty and legality. The listener's brother—already sitting on 9 penalty points—was caught speeding again and is now begging him to take the fall by accepting the penalty points on his own licence.“He says he was only doing 135 km/h on the M1 and can't afford to lose his licence with work being so far away,” the listener writes. “My wife says I'd be mad to take the points—he's always speeding and has no respect for the limits.”Niall opens the lines to callers, and the country weighs in.Some say family comes first:“It's only three points, and he said he'd cover the insurance cost—of course I'd help my brother,” says Kevin from Louth.Others warn against crossing the line:“It's illegal, plain and simple,” argues Lisa in Cork. “You could both get into serious trouble, and for what? So he can keep speeding?”Callers debate the pros and cons:✅ Pros:Helping a loved one avoid losing their jobMaintaining family harmonyBrother promises to cover financial impact❌ Cons:It's illegal and could result in criminal chargesHigher insurance premiums and personal riskEnabling reckless behaviourNiall guides the conversation with humour, insight, and fairness as the nation reflects on just how far they'd go for family—and where the line should be drawn.Would you take the points?Let me know if you'd like this shortened for Spotify or made more dramatic for promotional use!

In this episode, Niall dives into one of the most heated discussions in Ireland today: Should the Constitution be changed to guarantee every citizen the right to housing?Broadcasting live, Niall opens the lines to callers from across the country—and the opinions couldn't be more divided.Some callers strongly support the idea:“Housing should be a basic right, not a privilege,” says Mary from Galway. “People are living in tents while buildings lie empty. It's time the government was held accountable.”Others warn of unintended consequences:“If you write this into the Constitution, you're opening the floodgates,” argues Declan in Dublin. “It'll lead to endless legal battles and strain public finances even more.”And some are torn:“I believe everyone deserves a home, but I'm not sure a constitutional change is the best way to fix a broken system,” admits Aoife from Cork.Through respectful debate, passionate views, and tough questions, Niall guides listeners through the legal, moral, and practical sides of a constitutional right to housing.Whether you're firmly for it, completely against it, or just trying to make sense of it all—this episode is a must-listen.

In this powerful and emotional episode, Niall shares an email from a listener named Tina, a mother of two young children whose husband has recently been sent to prison for several years. With the details of the case kept private, Tina asks for public input on a deeply personal question:Should she bring the children to visit their father in jail?Tina describes the difficult reality she's facing — a partner behind bars, children who miss their dad, and the guilt of having told them he's working abroad to shield them from the truth. She worries that exposing them to the prison environment — with its grim surroundings, tense atmosphere, and strict security procedures — could do more harm than good.Niall opens the phone lines, and callers weigh in with heartfelt, conflicting views.Some argue in favour of prison visits:“Kids deserve to know the truth and have a relationship with both parents, even if one made a mistake.”“Shielding them now might cause more confusion and pain down the line when they find out the truth.”Others strongly disagree:“A prison is no place for a child — the trauma could be lasting.”“She's doing the right thing by protecting them from a harsh and confusing environment.”As Niall moderates this emotionally charged discussion, listeners explore themes of honesty, loyalty, parenting under pressure, and the long-term impact on children when a parent is incarcerated.A must-listen episode for anyone navigating complicated family dynamics — or anyone who believes in the power of community to help guide difficult decisions

In this episode, Niall dives into the heated debate over children's access to social media following the rollout of a new age verification system under Ireland's Online Safety Code.He's joined by Eric Nelligan, school teacher and spokesperson for the political party Aontú, to explore what this new code means in practice, how effective age checks might really be, and whether social media platforms can ever truly be safe for children.Later, Niall opens the phone lines and hears from the public, sparking a lively and divided conversation.Some callers argue that social media is toxic for kids, exposing them to harmful content like cyberbullying, eating disorders, and dangerous challenges. One caller says, “There's no real benefit for kids being on these apps — it's just a breeding ground for anxiety and peer pressure.”Others see it differently, highlighting that social media can help teens stay connected, learn new skills, and express themselves creatively. As one parent puts it, “My daughter learned photography and video editing through TikTok — she's more confident because of it.”Tune in as Niall unpacks both sides of this complex issue — and asks: Do the risks outweigh the rewards when it comes to kids and social media?

In this lively and heartfelt episode of The Niall Boylan Show, Niall dives into a fiery question that struck a chord with listeners across the country: "Has chivalry died?"The debate was sparked by a listener's powerful email, where he shared a shocking first date experience. After chatting for weeks with a woman he met on Tinder, they finally went out for a nice dinner—only for the night to end with a glass of wine thrown in his face when he asked to split the €200 bill.Was he in the wrong for suggesting it? Or has the meaning of chivalry changed in today's dating world?To make sense of it all, Niall is joined by Sharon Kenny from TheMatchmaker.ie, who gives her expert insight into modern dating dynamics, the expectations men and women bring to the table, and whether the old rules still apply in 2025.Then, the phone lines light up as callers share their honest, passionate, and sometimes hilarious views:“He dodged a bullet—anyone who reacts like that over a bill is not relationship material.”“Chivalry isn't dead, but it's about respect—not footing every bill.”“If you ask a woman out, you should expect to pay. That's how I was raised.”“Women want equality, and that means splitting the bill sometimes. Fair is fair.”“Throwing a drink? That's insane. He should count himself lucky she showed her true colours early.”Whether you're old school or strictly modern, this episode is packed with real talk about dating, money, and manners.Listen now for expert advice, wild stories, and one of the most divisive debates we've had in a long time!

In this explosive episode of The Niall Boylan Show, Niall tackles one of the most pressing issues facing Irish households today—a staggering 65% inflation rate over the last decade.Joining Niall to break it all down is financial expert Karl Deeter, who explains the forces behind rising prices—from housing to food to fuel—and why so many people feel like they're falling behind.Then it's over to you, the listeners, as Niall opens the phone lines to hear who you think is to blame. Is it:The government, for overspending and poor economic planning?The providers, for continuously raising prices?Or employers, for failing to raise wages in line with the cost of living?As always, the opinions are sharp and unfiltered:“The government are the ones who let this happen. They're completely out of touch with working people.”“Businesses are getting greedy—prices go up, but the service stays the same. It's a joke.”“I've had the same salary for eight years. Employers are squeezing the life out of us.”No spin, no sugar-coating—just real talk from real people.Tune in now for a lively, honest debate on who's really footing the bill for Ireland's cost-of-living crisis.

In this powerful and deeply personal episode of Ireland Talks, Niall opens up the lines to discuss a question that's stirring emotions in homes across the country:Can a woman — or anyone — feel truly emotionally safe when their partner regularly watches porn?Prompted by a listener's heartbreaking message, the show explores the emotional fallout that can occur when one partner discovers the other's porn habits.“I caught him at 2 a.m. watching porn in his office. I felt sick, betrayed… he says it's just harmless fun, but I'm lying in bed while he's watching other women. It feels like a form of cheating.”As platforms like X (formerly Twitter) expand access to explicit content — including AI-generated pornography — and Ireland's media regulator moves to introduce age verification, the conversation around porn's influence on relationships, intimacy, and trust is more urgent than ever.Callers weigh in with raw honesty:“It's not cheating — it's fantasy.”“I tried to be okay with it, but it slowly eroded our connection.”“If you can't talk about it openly, maybe that's the red flag.”Niall navigates the emotional minefield of pornography, trust, and modern love, asking:Is porn harmless escapism, or does it quietly sabotage intimacy in committed relationships?A must-listen for anyone grappling with love, loyalty, and the impact of the digital age on the bedroom.

In this powerful episode of Ireland Talks, host Niall takes on one of the most provocative developments in modern medicine — the birth of eight babies in the UK using DNA from three people to prevent fatal genetic conditions. Is this the beginning of a new era in healthcare, or are we crossing a dangerous ethical line?We hear from callers with mixed views:"If this had existed when my niece was born, she might still be alive.""This isn't curing disease — it's editing the human blueprint. That's dangerous.""It's just 0.1% of DNA — we're not making designer babies."The debate dives deep into questions about genetic inheritance, the future of reproduction, and whether we're tampering too much with nature.Later in the episode, Eilís Mulroy from the Pro Life Campaign joins Niall to discuss the rise in abortions in Ireland since the repeal of the Eighth Amendment. With over 10,000 pregnancies ending in termination annually, she raises serious concerns about how far we've come — and what might have been lost.Thought-provoking, emotional, and unafraid to ask the big questions — this is a must-listen for anyone thinking about the future of life, science, and society.

In this episode, host Niall takes calls from concerned residents of Saggart and Citywest as they react to the government's controversial €140 million purchase of the local hotel, which has been used for several years to house asylum seekers.While many callers express that they initially had no objection to the hotel being used as temporary accommodation, they now fear it will never return to its original purpose as a community and leisure space. With few local amenities already, the move has sparked frustration and concern.“We were told this was temporary. Now they've bought the place outright – how is that temporary?” – Patricia from Citywest“I've lived here all my life. That hotel was for weddings, family events, even job fairs. Now it's gone – just like that.” – Mark in Saggart“I'm not against helping people in need. But the area can't cope. Services are stretched, and some of the behaviour we're seeing is worrying.” – Louise, mother of two“It's not racist to want to feel safe. Some of the lads hanging around the park at night are intimidating. That's just the truth.” – Anonymous callerThe episode dives into the tension between compassion and community strain, with Niall giving space for residents to voice their lived experiences. A raw and revealing conversation about policy, planning, and the future of a fast-growing Dublin suburb.

Ireland plans to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030—five years earlier than the EU's 2035 deadline—as part of its sweeping Climate Action Plan. But is this ambitious move realistic? In this episode, Niall dives deep into the heated debate with guest Nadia Forde from Ashford Motors.Niall explores both sides of the conversation:"We can't ignore climate change any longer. EVs are the future, whether we like it or not," says one caller, supporting the shift."I live in rural Clare—there's barely a charging point within 20 miles!" argues another, questioning the practicality of going electric for everyone.Meanwhile, Naill highlights the financial strain on smaller manufacturers and how big brands like Mercedes-Benz, Jaguar, and VW are already transitioning ahead of schedule due to tightening emissions standards—not just regulation deadlines.From concerns over affordability and charging infrastructure to hopes for a cleaner, greener future, Niall asks:Are you ready to give up petrol and diesel? Or is this just policy running ahead of reality?Tune in now, and decide for yourself.

Should your social media determine whether you can enter a country, get a job, or earn a promotion?In this episode, Niall tackles the controversy surrounding the US Embassy's new "enhanced social media vetting" for J1 visa applicants, which requires students to make their social media accounts public and open to scrutiny. The policy has sparked outrage and confusion, especially among Irish students, some of whom feel they're being silenced for speaking out on global issues.

In this deeply emotional and raw episode, Niall reads a heartbreaking email from a mother pushed to her limits. She's 38, raising a 16-year-old daughter with special needs on her own, and confesses a truth that many parents may feel but are too afraid to say aloud: "Although I love her, I also hate her so much for ruining my life."The mother describes the breakdown of her marriage, the loss of her job, constant verbal and physical abuse from her daughter, and a deep sense of isolation. She's tried support groups, family help, and even dating, but nothing seems to offer lasting relief. Now, she's considering putting her daughter into care—just to survive.Listeners call in with powerful stories and opinions, some standing in empathy and support, others expressing shock and concern.One caller shares: “I've been there, Niall. My son is 12 and has severe behavioural issues. I've screamed into my pillow more nights than I can count. This mother is brave for admitting what many of us are afraid to say.”Another says: “I was raised by a single mum with a disability and if she'd spoken about me like this, I'd be devastated. That girl needs love, not resentment.”Others offer practical thoughts:“I don't think she hates her child, Niall. I think she hates the life she's been forced into without proper support.”“Putting her daughter in care isn't giving up—it might be the only safe choice for both of them.”Niall navigates the emotional weight of the conversation with compassion, asking the big question: Is this mother truly wrong to feel the way she does—or is society failing families like hers by not giving them real, long-term support?

In this thought-provoking episode, Niall asks a tough question: Should we be paying more for our food if it means protecting the environment? As the cost of groceries continues to rise, listeners from across the country call in to share their views—some passionately in favour, others strongly opposed.

In this open and honest episode, host Niall asks a timeless question: Do you believe in God? And if so, why? The phone lines light up as callers from all walks of life share their personal beliefs, doubts, and experiences.Some callers passionately defend their faith:"I've felt God's presence in my life during my darkest moments. I can't explain it scientifically, but I know it's real.""Look at the beauty and complexity of the world—there has to be a creator behind it."Others are more skeptical, challenging the idea of a higher power:"If there was a God, why would there be so much suffering in the world?""I used to believe, but the more I learned about science and history, the less sense religion made to me."And some callers are still searching:"I'm not sure what I believe anymore, but I'd like to think there's something bigger than us."It's a lively, thought-provoking discussion filled with honesty, debate, and moments of reflection—inviting listeners to question their own beliefs, wherever they stand.

In this powerful and thought-provoking episode, host Niall opens the phone lines to the public on a highly emotional and divisive issue: Should people who suffered physical abuse at the hands of teachers before corporal punishment was outlawed in 1982 be entitled to compensation?As the calls come in, listeners hear a wide range of passionate opinions. Some callers argue that society cannot keep paying for the wrongs of the past, especially when they were legal at the time. Others insist that the damage done to victims is lifelong and that justice demands recognition—and reparation—no matter how much time has passed.This is a raw, honest, and often uncomfortable conversation about accountability, trauma, and how we reckon with the darker chapters of our shared history.

On today's show, Niall hears from a heartbroken wife struggling with a heartbreaking dilemma. After years of trying for a baby, her husband was diagnosed as infertile. She wants to pursue sperm donation and experience pregnancy, but he insists on adoption — saying he couldn't love a child that wasn't biologically his.Callers join the conversation to share their own experiences, opinions, and advice. Should she follow her dream of pregnancy or respect her husband's wishes to adopt? Can their marriage survive this divide, or is this a choice that could break them apart?A powerful and emotional discussion on love, parenthood, and what really makes a family.

In this episode, host Niall sits down with outspoken restaurateur and media personality Paul Treyvaud to take a hard look at the state of Irish tourism. Paul pulls no punches as he shares his views on why Ireland's tourism industry is struggling, pointing the finger at government policies, rising costs, and what he sees as a lack of vision for the future. Expect frank opinions, insider perspectives from the hospitality frontline, and a passionate call for change. Whether you agree with Paul or not, this is a conversation you won't want to miss.

Today on the show, we read a heart-wrenching email from a woman whose world has been turned upside down. After 10 years of what she thought was a happy marriage, her husband returned from a golf trip and confessed to a drunken one-night stand with a hotel employee. Now she's torn between her love for him, his tearful remorse, and her own heartbreak.Listeners weighed in — and wow, did opinions differ. Some callers said forgiveness is possible when someone is truly sorry, especially for the sake of their family. Others insisted that betrayal is betrayal, and once that trust is broken, there's no going back.Would you forgive a cheating partner who confessed out of guilt? Or is that a line that can't be uncrossed?Tune in for an emotional, raw, and thought-provoking discussion on love, trust, and second chances.

In this episode, we tackle a question that affects almost every homeowner in Ireland: Is property tax giving us value for money?Dublin City Councillors are preparing to scrap a long-standing 15% discount on Local Property Tax for 2026—the first time this has happened in over a decade. Combined with government-led revaluations reflecting Ireland's soaring house prices, some homeowners could see their annual bills rise by hundreds of euros.For example, owners of a €450,000 home will now pay around €428 a year, while those with properties worth €1.2 million face an annual charge of €1,094. Yet, by European standards, Labour's Darragh Moriarty argues that Ireland's property taxes are still relatively modest—and crucially, they help fund local services like waste collection, libraries, street maintenance, and parks.But is this extra cost justified? That's what we asked our listeners—and the responses were mixed:

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland limit how many terms a politician can serve?Twelve states in the United States are calling for limits on how long members of Congress can stay in office. Some believe Ireland should do the same to stop politics becoming a lifelong career for the same faces decade after decade. Would term limits shake up Irish politics or just swap out one set of problems for another?Some callers said term limits are badly needed. They argued that too many politicians get comfortable, lose touch, and do little to earn their place once elected. They felt limits would clear out the old guard and bring in new people with fresh ideas and real-life experience.Others disagreed, saying it is up to voters to decide who stays or goes. They argued that if someone does a good job and people want them back, that is democracy in action. Some pointed out that experience matters and that not all long-serving politicians are out of touch.A few callers felt term limits would change little if deeper issues in the system were not fixed. They said Ireland needs more accountability and genuine change, not just new faces following the same old party line.As Niall points out, this debate is about more than years in office. It is about trust in politics, the quality of leadership, and whether new rules would really bring new ideas.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should couples who live together have the same legal rights as married couples?More couples than ever are choosing to live together without getting married. But when it comes to things like inheritance, pensions and property rights, cohabiting partners often have far fewer protections under the law. Should that change, or does marriage deserve to stay different?Some callers argued that marriage is about serious commitment — legally and financially. They felt if you want the rights and security that come with marriage, you should be willing to make that commitment. For them, it is about protecting what marriage means.Others said times have changed. They pointed out that many couples build full lives together, raise children and buy homes but still have no legal safety net if things go wrong. They argued that love and loyalty matter more than paperwork, and the law should reflect that.A few callers said living together is often stronger than some marriages, and that modern families should not be penalised for avoiding a ceremony.As Niall points out, this is not just about weddings and rings. It is about how the law treats families, fairness in modern relationships, and whether tradition should still decide who is protected.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should you put a dog down for biting?A distressed listener wrote in about a painful family dilemma. Her five-year-old dog bit their three-year-old son on the leg badly enough to need stitches. Her husband now insists the dog must be put to sleep to protect their child. She believes it was a one-off incident that could be managed with training or rehoming. Who is right?Some callers sided with the husband, saying once a dog bites a child so seriously, you can never fully trust it again. They argued the safety of a child must always come first, even if it means making a heartbreaking decision.Others said putting the dog down is too extreme. They pointed out that dogs often bite when provoked or scared and that proper training or rehoming could prevent it from happening again. Some argued families have to take responsibility too, and killing the dog is not the only answer.As Niall points out, this is not just about a dog. It is about balancing love for a family pet with the responsibility to protect a child, and deciding whether one bite should mean the end.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should there be limits on free speech?The EU is pressuring the Irish Government to bring in stricter hate speech laws that would make it illegal to say or share certain things that are seen as inciting hatred or violence. Some say this is badly needed to protect vulnerable groups. Others believe it is a dangerous step towards censorship and losing the right to speak freely.Some callers supported tighter rules, saying free speech should not mean giving people a free pass to spread hate, threats, or messages that fuel real-world violence. They argued that with so much online abuse and polarisation, clear limits help keep communities safe.Others argued the opposite. They said once you start restricting speech, it becomes easy for governments to control what people can say about anything, including politics. They warned that fear of saying the wrong thing could silence ordinary people and damage honest debate.As Niall points out, this debate is about finding a balance — how to protect people from harm without losing the freedom to speak your mind.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland scrap student loans for graduates who stay and work here for ten years?The government recently confirmed there will be no cut to college fees, leaving many students and families struggling with the high cost of third-level education. One idea suggested before is to let students borrow the full amount for fees — but if they stay and work in Ireland for a decade, the loan is wiped.Some callers supported the idea, saying it would keep skilled graduates like nurses, engineers, and teachers in the country. They argued it rewards young people who commit to giving back and helps families who can barely cover rising fees.Others disagreed, saying the plan is unfair on taxpayers who would foot the bill. They felt a free degree for staying puts students ahead of other workers who also pay their way but get no such benefit. Some said the real problem is not fees, but the high cost of living that drives people abroad anyway.As Niall points out, this is not just about student debt — it is about how to keep Irish talent at home and whether the State should give graduates a reason to stay.

In this episode, Niall asks: Would you stand by a loved one if they committed a serious crime?It is one of the hardest questions any family could face. If your son, daughter or close relative was found guilty of something terrible like rape or murder, would you stand by them or cut all ties? Some say family loyalty comes first no matter what. Others believe there are crimes so serious that the bond is broken forever.Some callers said they could never turn their back on their child, no matter the crime. They argued you can hate the act but still love the person who did it, because family means standing beside them in the darkest times, not just when things are good.Others could not accept that idea. They said some crimes cross a line that cannot be forgiven, and that standing by a guilty loved one only adds to the pain of the victim and their family. For them, loyalty has limits.As Niall points out, this is not a question most people ever want to face — but it reveals where we draw the line between unconditional love and what we cannot excuse.

In this episode, Niall asks: Do you feel safe walking Ireland's streets?Official figures suggest that overall crime rates in Ireland have gone down in recent years. Yet many people say they feel less safe than ever, especially with videos of random assaults and antisocial behaviour spreading quickly on social media. Are we really more at risk — or are we just seeing more of it online?Some callers said they no longer feel safe, blaming groups of teenagers hanging around, filming attacks for views, and knowing there are few real consequences. Others pointed to immigration and claimed certain areas feel more intimidating than they did before.Some still believe Ireland is safe compared to other places, arguing that fear is often amplified by viral clips that do not reflect most people's daily reality. They said using common sense still keeps you safe.Others said the real problem is trust in the system. They argued that soft sentences and a lack of Garda presence make people feel abandoned and fearful, no matter what the statistics say.As Niall points out, this is not just about numbers. It is about whether ordinary people trust that they and their families are safe in the streets where they live.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should you contest an unfair will, even if it risks tearing the family apart?A listener got in touch after learning she was left a much smaller share than her siblings in her father's will. Now she wants to know if she should fight for what she feels is fair or stay silent to keep the peace.Some callers said she should absolutely contest it if there is no good reason for the unequal share. They argued that standing up for yourself is not about greed but about protecting your rights and not letting resentment fester for years.Others warned that challenging a will can ruin relationships forever. They said money is not worth losing family over and that fighting it could create bitterness that never heals.Some callers felt that right or wrong, a will should be respected as the person's final decision. They said family is more important than any inheritance and sometimes it is better to let it go.As Niall points out, this is not just about money. It is about family ties, respect for a loved one's last wishes, and deciding when to let things lie or when to stand your ground.

In this episode, Niall asks: Does Ireland really need a president?With new presidential hopefuls putting their names forward, some are questioning whether the office still serves any real purpose. Is the president an important neutral figure for the country, or just an expensive tradition Ireland can no longer justify?Some callers said the role is a waste of taxpayer money. They argued the Taoiseach runs the country and the president is mostly there for ceremonies and photo opportunities. In their view, the funds could be better spent on services like housing or healthcare.Others said the presidency is more than just symbolic. They pointed out that the president plays a vital role as guardian of the Constitution, with powers to refer laws and act as a final check on government overreach. Some callers said having a unifying figure above party politics helps keep the country together, especially in difficult times.As Niall points out, this debate goes beyond cost. It is about identity, trust, and whether Ireland still values a head of state who stands above the political fray.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland lower the age of consent to 16?There have already been suggestions about reducing the voting age, with arguments that young people today are mature enough to decide at 16. On the same basis, some believe the age of consent should match the EU average and be lowered from 17 to 16. Would this protect teenagers better or put them at greater risk?Some callers supported lowering it, saying teenagers are already sexually active and that the current law just ignores reality. They argued that aligning with the rest of Europe would remove unnecessary stigma and better protect young people in normal relationships.Others were firmly against it. They said sixteen-year-olds are still too young and vulnerable and lowering the age makes it easier for adults to take advantage of them. Some warned that instead of protecting teenagers, it would lower safeguards and open the door to exploitation.As Niall points out, this debate is not just about numbers on paper. It is about trust, maturity, and what it really means to protect young people in today's world.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Irish citizens living abroad or in Northern Ireland have the right to vote in Irish elections?Sinn Féin has put forward a motion to extend voting rights in presidential elections to Irish citizens overseas and in the North. Supporters say it would honour the global Irish community and reflect modern realities. Opponents argue that voting should be reserved for those who live, work, and pay tax in Ireland.Some callers said voting must be tied to residency. They felt people living abroad are too disconnected from daily life in Ireland to influence decisions that don't affect them directly. Others raised concerns about security, fraud, and voters basing choices on outdated views.But others passionately supported the motion, saying Irishness doesn't end at the border. They pointed to the importance of the diaspora in shaping Ireland's story and said presidential elections are largely symbolic. One caller argued that excluding Irish citizens in Northern Ireland is especially unjust.As Niall points out, the debate raises deep questions about identity, participation, and what it really means to belong to a nation — even from afar.

In this episode, Niall asks: If your landlord gave you 30 days to get rid of your dog or face eviction, what would you do?We received an emotional email from a woman whose landlord found out she had a dog in breach of her lease. Now she's been given a choice — rehome the dog or lose her home. Her husband says the dog has to go, but she refuses. The story has sparked debate about responsibility, rules, and the bond people have with their pets.Some callers said the answer is clear. As much as they love animals, no one should risk losing their home over a pet. Others argued that when you sign a lease, you agree to the terms, and breaking those terms has consequences.But many callers took the woman's side. They said pets are more than animals — they are family. Some argued that landlords should show compassion, especially when renters have limited options. Others called for legal changes to protect tenants with pets.As Niall points out, this is about more than just a lease or a dog. It's about housing, dignity, and the limits of what people are expected to give up just to keep a roof over their head.

In this episode, Niall asks: Do you oppose all immigration, or just illegal entry?The media often labels protestors as anti-immigrant, but many say they are only against illegal immigration. So where do you draw the line? Is it fair to oppose immigration entirely, or is the real issue how it is managed?Some callers said they have no problem with legal immigration. They support people who come to Ireland through the proper channels, contribute to society, and follow the rules. What they oppose is abuse of the system, such as fake claims, destroyed documents, or overstayed visas.Others said even legal immigration has gone too far. They pointed to overcrowded hospitals, a housing crisis, and overwhelmed schools. For them, the issue is not about how people arrive but how many are arriving. They believe Ireland simply cannot absorb more people, regardless of their status.As Niall points out, this conversation is no longer just about border control. It is about public trust, national capacity, and the fear that raising these concerns comes with a label.

In this hard-hitting episode, Niall sits down with Dr. Gerry Quinn and Dr. Ronan Connolly to unpack one of the most controversial scientific papers published since the pandemic began. Titled What Lessons Can Be Learned from the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic, their work challenges the mainstream response to Covid-19 from multiple angles—lockdowns, vaccines, data manipulation, and the silencing of dissent.Niall reflects on his own experience during the pandemic, revealing he was nearly fired not for voicing an opinion, but for letting guests question the official narrative. "I was threatened, not by my employers, but by outside forces who didn't want these conversations aired," he says. The episode sets out to revisit the core claims made during the pandemic and interrogate which of them have stood up to scrutiny.Dr. Gerry Quinn admits he initially believed the official warnings. But when early policy proposals made no immunological sense, alarm bells rang. "They were proposing things that just didn't add up," he recalls. "Infection control standards I had used in HIV labs were being completely ignored in public health measures."Dr. Ronan Connolly breaks down how pandemic modelling became detached from reality. He explains that many of the early models were based on outdated mathematical frameworks with almost no grounding in biology or human behavior. “The same models could be run with any new virus and they'd spit out the same terrifying results,” he says. He also points out that excess mortality was lower than predicted in many regions, suggesting the scale of the threat had been overstated.The episode pulls no punches on vaccine policy either. Both doctors raise serious concerns about how traditional treatments like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were shut down, while experimental mRNA technology was fast-tracked without the usual safety thresholds. “I personally don't think it should have been released,” says Dr. Quinn. “Too many unknowns. Any other drug with that level of uncertainty would never have been approved.”They also expose the uniformity of lockdown measures across countries as evidence of top-down coordination. “These policies were almost identical worldwide. That doesn't happen by accident,” says Dr. Quinn. He suggests international bodies may have shaped national strategies more than people realize.The paper at the heart of the conversation is backed by 37 scientists and academics, including Dr. Robert Malone, one of the inventors of mRNA technology. The group argues that fear was prioritized over facts, debate was suppressed, and honest scientists were punished for speaking out.“Science only works when people disagree,” says Dr. Connolly. “The biggest failure wasn't the lockdowns or the masks or the modeling. It was the refusal to let anyone question the answers we were being given.”This episode is a must-listen for anyone who wants to understand what went wrong, why so many were silenced, and how to ensure the same mistakes are not repeated.The full scientific paper is linked in the episode notes.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland bring in welfare payment cards?We received an email from a listener who suggested that welfare payments should be issued on a card that can only be used for essentials like food and clothing. The card would block spending on alcohol, cigarettes, or gambling. Supporters say it ensures taxpayer money is spent responsibly. Critics say it is insulting and strips people of basic dignity.Some callers agreed with the idea. They said State support should be used for essentials and argued that a card system would help protect families, especially where addiction is involved. They felt the measure was about accountability, not punishment.Others disagreed, saying the proposal treats welfare recipients like children and unfairly assumes the worst of them. Some warned that it could lead to even tighter restrictions and punish people who already use their payments responsibly.As Niall points out, this debate is not just about how people spend money. It is about how much control the State should have over private lives and whether help should come with conditions.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Gardaí be allowed to tell potential partners if someone has a history of domestic violence?There have been calls for a new law that would let Gardaí share information about individuals who've been accused — or convicted — of domestic abuse. Supporters say it could save lives. Critics argue it's an invasion of privacy and undermines the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”Some callers said it's a no-brainer: If someone has a pattern of abuse, especially if convicted, new partners deserve to know. Others were more cautious, warning that unfounded accusations could ruin reputations and be misused during bitter breakups. One caller insisted even allegations should be taken seriously, pointing to the difficulty of securing convictions in such cases.As Niall points out, it's a complex issue that pits personal safety against personal rights — and asks how far the state should go to protect people from potential harm.

In this episode, Niall asks a provocative question: Is shouting at your children a form of child abuse?The debate was sparked by a top psychologist who claimed that shouting at children — or even arguing loudly in front of them — can be just as damaging as physically slapping them. The expert warned that such behaviour can have long-lasting emotional and psychological effects, and even suggested it should be legally recognised as harmful.Is this an overreaction? Or are we only beginning to understand the impact of verbal and emotional discipline?Some callers strongly agreed, arguing that constant shouting creates fear, anxiety, and insecurity in children. They believe emotional abuse is often overlooked simply because it doesn't leave bruises, and that parenting should focus on calm, respectful communication.Others said the idea goes too far. Parenting is chaotic, stressful, and imperfect — and sometimes raising your voice is the only way to get a message across. One caller asked: “If we ban shouting, are we also banning being human?”Others took a middle ground, saying occasional shouting doesn't equal abuse, but that consistent yelling, insults, or aggressive behaviour can cross the line into real harm.As Niall points out, this is about more than parenting styles — it's about defining where discipline ends and damage begins.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should children repay their parents for college fees?A mother wrote to the show after a heated disagreement with her husband. Their 26-year-old daughter, now working in a well-paid legal job, had her college fees fully covered by her parents. The mother believes it's only fair that she repays them now, but the father insists that supporting your child through education is part of parenting — not a loan with strings attached.The conversation opened the lines to passionate callers. Some argued that repayment shows respect and gratitude, especially if parents made financial sacrifices. Others said it's wrong to treat family support like a business transaction, and that the cost of education is something parents take on willingly.Some took a middle-ground view — suggesting repayment depends on family circumstances. If the parents are struggling, a payback plan might be reasonable. But if the family is financially stable, perhaps the support should be seen as a gift.As Niall points out, this debate isn't just about money — it touches on values, responsibility, and the evolving expectations between parents and adult children.