Podcasts about moral argument

Points of Interest0:00 – 0:32 – Show Introduction & Guest Introduction: Marcel introduces Tim Thompson, Owner and Chief Revolution Thinker at RevThink. He shares how they met at the MYOB conference, where they bonded over deep discussions on agency profitability and creative business management.0:33 – 2:25 – Tim's Background & The Journey to RevThink: Tim shares his career transition from Hollywood production, where he worked with legends like Ridley Scott and Steven Spielberg, to consulting creative studios. His firm, RevThink, now supports 750+ creative agency owners worldwide in building financially stable businesses.2:26 – 5:00 – The Challenge of Balancing Creativity & Profitability: Tim explains how many creative entrepreneurs struggle to balance financial discipline with artistic freedom. The industry often pushes efficiency metrics like utilization rates, but creative businesses need a different approach to pricing, budgeting, and decision-making.5:01 – 7:32 – The Shift from Cost-Plus Pricing to Value-Based Models: Marcel and Tim discuss the shift from hourly billing and cost-plus pricing to value-based models. Agencies that fail to adapt often undercharge and overdeliver, leading to profitability struggles.7:33 – 10:55 – How Agencies Can Ensure They're Charging Enough: Tim introduces The Splits Method, a framework that separates costs into direct (project-related) and indirect (overhead). This helps agencies better understand where their money is going and ensures that profit is baked into pricing from the start.10:56 – 14:25 – The Power of Profit as an Expense: Tim challenges agencies to treat profit as an expense, meaning it should be allocated first before deciding how much to spend on project costs. This ensures business sustainability and long-term financial stability.14:26 – 17:00 – The Seven Ingredients for a Thriving Agency: Tim introduces RevThink's Seven Ingredients framework—Creative, Production, Sales, Marketing, Operations, Finance, and Entrepreneurship—which helps agency owners optimize their business holistically as they scale.17:01 – 19:50 – Overcoming the Fear of Raising Prices: Many agencies negotiate against themselves, fearing clients won't pay more. Tim explains how agencies can increase their rates or adjust project scope to maintain profitability without sacrificing client relationships.19:51 – 23:30 – The Production Roll-Up: A Simple Meeting to Keep Projects on Track: Tim shares his method for a weekly production roll-up meeting, where agency teams quickly review: Creative quality, Client relationships, and Profitability.23:31 – 26:55 – The Importance of Profitability for Business & Personal Freedom: Marcel and Tim discuss why profitability isn't just about numbers—it's about freedom, growth, and legacy. Many agency owners unknowingly sacrifice their financial future because they aren't pricing or managing projects correctly.26:56 – 29:30 – Why Business Owners Must Stop Negotiating Against Themselves: Many agency owners undercharge out of fear that clients won't pay more. Tim encourages owners to ask for what their work is truly worth and, if needed, target better clients who understand the value they provide.29:31 – 32:10 – The Role of Entrepreneurship in Agency Growth: Tim discusses the entrepreneurial mindset required to scale a creative agency while managing financial risks. He explains how business growth, personal wealth, and legacy planning must be aligned.32:11 – 35:50 – How Agencies Can Adapt to Industry Changes & Maintain Profitability: Marcel and Tim analyze industry shifts, including advances in technology, changing client expectations, and pricing pressures. They discuss how agencies can innovate and stay competitive in a rapidly evolving market.35:51 – 38:20 – The Moral Argument for Running a Profitable Business: Marcel and Tim discuss why being profitable is a responsibility, not just a goal. A profitable agency provides stability for employees, fosters innovation, and allows owners to reinvest in their vision.Show NotesRevthink.comRevthinking podcast:Community1-1 consultingAccelerators

Go to https://ground.news/ivm for a better way to stay informed. Subscribe for 40% off unlimited access to worldwide coverage through our link.Does God exist? In this video, we explore three compelling arguments for God's existence: the Creation Argument, the Design Argument, and the Moral Argument. These logical and philosophical perspectives provide strong reasons to believe in a higher power. Whether you're a believer or a skeptic, this discussion encourages thoughtful conversation.

The moral argument for God's existence has become less popular in some circles. Here Gavin Ortlund shares two reasons why Christians should hesitate before abandoning this argument, and three strategies for how to rehabilitate this argument. Truth Unites exists to promote gospel assurance through theological depth. Gavin Ortlund (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) is President of Truth Unites and Theologian-in-Residence at Immanuel Nashville. SUPPORT: Tax Deductible Support: https://truthunites.org/donate/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/truthunites FOLLOW: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/truth.unites/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/gavinortlund Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthUnitesPage/ Website: https://truthunites.org/

In this podcast, J. Warner follows up on the previous podcast and examines objections to the axiological argument for the existence of God. Can naturalists account for transcendent moral truths without grounding them in a transcendent source? Are these alternative explanations reasonable?

In this podcast, J. Warner examines the axiological argument for the existence of God. Do objective moral truths exist, and if so, how can these truths be grounded? Does God's existence best account for objective moral truth claims?

Pastor Tony walks us through the moral argument for God's existence this week.

Subscribe to Bad Faith on Patreon to instantly unlock this episode and our entire premium episode library: http://patreon.com/badfaithpodcast Professor of Journalism at Northwestern University Dr. Steven Thrasher returns to discuss how the fourth estate is failing Gaza, the suppression of students and future journalists for speaking out against the genocide, and how he's been personally targeted by his university for standing with students in their advocacy for Palestinian lives. Subscribe to Bad Faith on YouTube for video of this episode. Find Bad Faith on Twitter (@badfaithpod) and Instagram (@badfaithpod). Produced by Armand Aviram. Theme by Nick Thorburn (@nickfromislands).

We're glad to share this crossover episode of THE CHARGE with Dennis Metzler. In this episode, Dennis and Doug sit down and discuss the moral argument for the existence of God, a key aspect of natural theology, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of this philosophical topic. Join Dennis and Dr. Grothuis for an insightful discussion on the intersection of morality and belief in God. The moral argument for God is a philosophical position that asserts the existence of objective moral values, which are best explained by the presence of a personal, transcendent God. This argument stands in contrast to moral relativism and atheistic frameworks, which struggle to provide a satisfactory foundation for morality. Objective Moral Values At the heart of the moral argument is the assertion that objective moral truths exist. Dr. Groothuis emphasizes that statements such as "it is always wrong to torture the innocent for pleasure" are not merely subjective opinions but are necessarily true. This leads to the first stage of the argument, which critiques moral relativism. Moral relativism posits that moral values are determined by cultural consensus or individual preferences, suggesting that what is deemed right or wrong can vary from one culture or person to another. Critique of Moral Relativism Dr. Groothuis identifies several significant problems with moral relativism. One major issue is that cultures can and do make moral mistakes. For instance, the historical justification of slavery by certain cultures demonstrates that cultural consensus is not a reliable measure of moral truth. If a culture endorses a practice that is fundamentally wrong, such as slavery, it cannot be justified merely because it is accepted by that culture. This leads to the conclusion that there must be some objective standard by which to judge moral actions, which moral relativism fails to provide. Furthermore, Dr. Groothuis argues that if morality is entirely relative to individual or cultural perspectives, it ultimately leads to nihilism—the belief that nothing has any ultimate value. This progression from cultural relativism to individual relativism and then to nihilism illustrates the inadequacy of a relativistic framework for grounding moral values. The Role of a Personal God In contrast to moral relativism, the moral argument posits that a personal, transcendent God is the best explanation for the existence of objective moral values. Grothuis articulates this in a deductive format: If a personal God does not exist, then objective moral values do not exist. Objective moral values do exist. Therefore, a personal God exists. This structure highlights that the existence of objective moral values necessitates a moral lawgiver—God—who provides a foundation for these values. Dr. Groothuis argues that without God, moral truths cannot be adequately explained. Atheistic frameworks, such as those that attempt to derive morality from evolutionary processes, fail to establish a basis for moral obligation or meaning. Simply put, survival does not equate to moral goodness, and one cannot derive an "ought" from an "is." Atheistic Moral Realism Some atheists may argue for a form of moral realism, claiming that objective moral truths exist independently of God. However, Dr. Groothuis critiques this position by stating that it presents a bizarre ontology. If moral truths exist in a godless universe, they are abstract and disconnected from any purpose or meaning. This raises the question of how humans, who are not designed to know these truths, can access them. The lack of a personal relationship with a moral authority undermines the concept of moral obligation, which is essential for a coherent moral framework. Conclusion In summary, the moral argument for God asserts that objective moral values exist and are best explained by the existence of a personal, transcendent God. This argument effectively counters moral relativism and atheistic frameworks, which struggle to provide a solid foundation for morality. By positing that God is the source of moral truth, the moral argument offers a compelling explanation for why certain actions are universally recognized as right or wrong, thus affirming the necessity of a divine moral lawgiver in understanding the nature of morality. For more from Dr. Groothuis, visit DouglasGroothuis.com. Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.

Apologetics can be helpful in reassuring oneself about faith and helping one be certain that God exists. In this video, I discuss important topics like the Kalam Cosmological Argument, Design Argument, Fine-Tuning Argument, the Resurrection Argument, and the Moral Argument. I hope you enjoy this more philosophical line of thinking and find it interesting. Support the Show.--------------------------If you would want to support the channel and what I am doing, please follow me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/christianityforall Where else to find Josh Yen: Philosophy YT: https://bit.ly/philforallEducation: https://bit.ly/joshyenBuisness: https://bit.ly/logoseduMy Website: https://joshuajwyen.com/

Here we go again.

Two Christian apologists reviewed my series on the moral argument for God on their channel, Democracy of the Dead. I recorded my own counter-response shortly thereafter, but thought it was too profanity-laden and impolite to release. Generally speaking, it's good to remain dispassionate in these online spaces, but I let my frustration get the better … Continue reading The Moral Argument for God – Have I Been Debunked? →

This video is from our 2022 Fall lecture series. Watch the video here: https://youtu.be/zsqHrL0nBnc DISCLAIMER Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and […]

This video is from our 2022 Fall lecture series. Watch the video here: https://youtu.be/zsqHrL0nBnc DISCLAIMER Think Theism lectures are supported by Ratio Christi @ Texas A&M, but the opinions represented herein do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or values of Ratio Christi, Inc. nor Texas A&M University. This content is presented to encourage discussion and […]

“We Give Thanks”; Music and words by Jon Althoff and Marc Willerton © 2022 Sovereign Grace Worship/ASCAP (administrated by Integrity Music). Sovereign Grace Music, a division of Sovereign Grace Churches. All rights reserved.

“We Give Thanks”; Music and words by Jon Althoff and Marc Willerton © 2022 Sovereign Grace Worship/ASCAP (administrated by Integrity Music). Sovereign Grace Music, a division of Sovereign Grace Churches. All rights reserved.

What does our notions of right and wrong tell us about the existence of God?In this episode Dr. Justin Gash of Franklin College joins us to tackle this fascinating question. We discuss the moral argument for God's existence, describe how it is usually countered, and then analyze those counter-arguments. In the end we each give our take on how effective this argument is in achieving various goals.

Children are not something to be purchased. Host Joseph Backholm is joined by Katy Faust, founder of Them Before Us for a moral discussion on the topic of surrogacy. Unlike adoption, there are few regulations in the world of surrogacy. Katy explains the dynamic and effects that all three types of mothers have on the child, surrogacy tourism, and the Uniformed Parentage Act. Public policy is being shaped to the interest of adults and to the detriment of children. There is no surrogacy situation where the child comes out ahead. Listen now to learn the moral argument against surrogacy.

Children are not something to be purchased. Host Joseph Backholm is joined by Katy Faust, founder of Them Before Us for a moral discussion on the topic of surrogacy. Unlike adoption, there are few regulations in the world of surrogacy. Katy explains the dynamic and effects that all three types of mothers have on the child, surrogacy tourism, and the Uniformed Parentage Act. Public policy is being shaped to the interest of adults and to the detriment of children. There is no surrogacy situation where the child comes out ahead. Listen now to learn the moral argument against surrogacy. Read ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Washington Stand⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, featuring news and commentary from a biblical worldview. Published by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Family Research Council⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

Children are not something to be purchased. Host Joseph Backholm is joined by Katy Faust, founder of Them Before Us for a moral discussion on the topic of surrogacy. Unlike adoption, there are few regulations in the world of surrogacy. Katy explains the dynamic and effects that all three types of mothers have on the child, surrogacy tourism, and the Uniformed Parentage Act. Public policy is being shaped to the interest of adults and to the detriment of children. There is no surrogacy situation where the child comes out ahead. Listen now to learn the moral argument against surrogacy.

Welcome to the Salty Pastor Podcast, where we dive into the core of what it means to believe. In this episode, Dr. Douglas Peake and Jesse explore the critical question: Is believing in God rational?We're challenging the misconception that faith and logic are adversaries. Delving into how the belief in God forms the foundation of our worldview, we dissect the implications of atheism versus theism on our understanding of life's meaning, morality, and purpose.Dr. Peake tackles the Moral Argument, illustrating why the existence of objective moral values points to a divine origin. We confront the modern intellectual crisis, where emotion often trumps logic, and unveil the path to a reasoned and fulfilling belief in God.This discussion isn't just academic; it's about finding the rational roots of faith that empower us to live with purpose and joy. Join us as we unravel the logic of faith and demonstrate that belief in God is not just a matter of the heart but of the mind too.Tune in to the Salty Pastor Podcast for a thought-provoking journey into the rationality of faith and discover why embracing belief in God is a logical cornerstone of a meaningful life.

When it comes to defending our faith or religion, what should focus on? Creation, the Gospels, or the resurrection? On this episode of Everyday Theology, Brandon answers the question, "What is the greatest argument for Christianity?" and shares with us how we can share and defend our faith with others!   Resources: Check out our Everyday Theology Blogs - http://tinyurl.com/2u7mfcb8 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode 7 Michael and Zach discuss Romans 1:18-23. Find the original sermon here: https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=31124155218121 Find our videocast here: https://youtu.be/26NziO8zPq4 Video on the Cosmological Argument: https://youtu.be/KOZIWVNvBXs Video on the Teleological Argument: https://youtu.be/zurhmVzqQDM Video on both Cosmological and Teleological Arguments: https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=115231826401985 Video on the Moral Argument: https://youtu.be/msU0LWWyS8I Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): ⁠https://uppbeat.io/t/reakt-music/deep-stone⁠ License code: 2QZOZ2YHZ5UTE7C8 Find more Take 2 Theology content at https://take2pod.wordpress.com/

Benjamin Ayanian is a contributor for Young Voices, a PR firm and talent agency for young, pro-liberty commentators. His writing has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, Newsweek, and more. Follow him on Twitter @BenjaminAyanian.  Another Overstated AI Concern https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2024/02/29/another_overstated_ai_concern_1015276.html A moral argument for California progressives to drop wealth tax proposals for good https://www.ocregister.com/2024/01/26/a-moral-argument-for-california-progressives-to-drop-wealth-tax-proposals-for-good/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Zach interviews Dr. David Baggett, professor of philosophy and Director of the Center for Moral Apologetics at Houston Christian University. Video: https://youtu.be/YWrif8pvWXc “The Morals of the Story” https://www.ivpress.com/the-morals-of-the-story With his co-author, Jerry Walls, Dr. Baggett authored Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. The book won Christianity Today's 2012 apologetics book of the year of […]

I examine eight more objections to the moral argument and provide a response. Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

I offer five tactics for presenting the moral argument. Then, I respond to three objections against the moral argument:(1)    One doesn't have to believe in God to be moral(2)    If you would still be good if God didn't exist, then God is irrelevant to morality(3)    Is something good because God wills it, or does God will it because it is good (Euthyphro Dilemma)?Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

Questions about how one can use the moral argument and also say we can't impose a moral standard from one period of time on another and responding to someone who says she would never follow a God who killed his own son. If you say we can't impose a moral standard from one period of time on another, then how does the moral argument fit into this way of thinking? How would you respond to someone who says she would never follow a God who killed his own son?

I provide six aspects of our moral experience that are best explained by a theistic God. This is the heart of the moral argument for God's existence. Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

Our sense of duty to do good can only have meaning if it comes from God. Is this enough to prove that God exists? Today, R.C. Sproul responds to the influential and problematic views of Immanuel Kant. Get R.C. Sproul's 'The Consequences of Ideas' 35-Part DVD Series and the Digital Study Guide for Your Gift of Any Amount: https://gift.renewingyourmind.org/3189/the-consequences-of-ideas Don't forget to make RenewingYourMind.org your home for daily in-depth Bible study and Christian resources. A donor-supported outreach of Ligonier Ministries. Explore all of our podcasts: https://www.ligonier.org/podcasts

I round out my critique of non-theistic explanations for morality, including the view that morality is a brute fact, the view that logic can ground morality, the view that science can explain morality, and the best of all non-theistic explanations: moral Platonism.Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

Spent the entire episode offering 11 critiques against the most popular non-theistic account of morality: Evolutionary Ethics.Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

Accounting for the existence of real morality (the grounding problem) is the biggest challenge facing any moral theory. I talk about this problem in some detail before beginning my critique of non-theistic explanations for morality, starting with the social constructionism and social contract theory.Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

The moral argument argues from the reality of morality to the morality of God, so it's important that we establish the objectivity of morality. I provide a number of reasons to reject moral subjectivism in favor of moral objectivism/realism. Then, I describe the nature of our moral experience. This will provide the basis for future episodes where I explore competing hypotheses that purport to explain our moral experience. Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

We wrap up our series on the moral argument for theism, summarize several problems with the argument famously associated with William Lane Craig, and discuss two other moral arguments for God that are not abysmal failures like the standard moral argument. Linktree

In episode 1 of my mini-series on the moral argument, I discuss the concept of moral arguments, provide the objective of the argument, and key concepts to understanding the argument. Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. And morality. The standard moral argument popularized by William Lane Craig and others goes as follows: (1) If God does not exist, objective moral values do not exist.  (2) Objective moral values do exist.  (3) Therefore, God exists.  Today, we cast some doubt on the … Continue reading CA125 The Moral Argument for God (pt.1) →

I begin my fifth argument for God's existence: the moral argument. In this 1-N-Done episode, I explain why God is the only adequate explanation for our moral experience. I explore our moral experience, then compare theistic and non-theistic explanations and conclude that only Theism can explain our moral experience. I conclude with the two most common objections against the moral argument. Web: ThinkingtoBelieve.comEmail: ThinkingToBelieve@gmail.comFacebook: facebook.com/thinkingtobelieveTwitter & Gettr: @thinking2believParler & Truth: @ThinkingToBelieve

In this episode we examine one of the most powerful and helpful arguments for the existence of God, the Moral Argument. This argument is both intellectually powerful and immensely practical in your day to day faith. I'm getting over a cold so thank you in advance for being patient with my stuffy sounding self. Blessings!

Jimmy Walker on raising funds by making a better case for free-market ideas

I John 5: 1-5, 11-13  “When someone becomes a Christian he becomes a brand new person inside. He is not the same any more. A new life has begun.”II Corinthians 5:17“I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.”I John 5:13 I. The natural order 1. Cosmological argument 2. Evidential Evidence.   3. Moral Argument.II. The Word of God III. The Work of JesusIV. The Witness of the Spirit

14 But even if you should suffer for righteousness' sake, you will be blessed. Have no fear of them, nor be troubled, 15 but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, 16 having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame.1 PETER 3:14-16The question is not whether or not you're going to be a theologian, but what kind of theologian you're going to be.”Michael LawrenceTHE DOCTRINE OF GODWHAT IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE LIKE?19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[g] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things…28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.Romans 1:19-23,28I will worship toward Your holy temple,And praise Your nameFor Your lovingkindness and Your truth;For You have magnified Your word above all Your name.PSALM 138:2HOW DO WE KNOW GOD EXISTS? Inner Knowing (inward evidence)21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.Romans 1:21For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Hebrews 8:10"This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,"Hebrews 10:1614 For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them Romans 2:14-15 Moral Argument: argues that there are objectively valid moral values, and therefore, there must be an absolute from which they are derived.If everything wasn't created ON PURPOSE, then nothing that is created HAS PURPOSE. Ontological Argument: argues that the very concept of God demands that there is an actual existent God.Presuppositional Argument: argues that the basic beliefs of theists and non-theists require God as a necessary pre-condition.HUMANS WERE MADE FOR WORSHIPTo worship is to live for something.“The human heart is a perpetual idol factory.”John Calvin22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things…28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.Romans 1:22-23,28 Nature and Scripture (outward evidence)19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[g] in the things that have been made.Romans 1:19-20“We tend by a secret law of the soul to move toward our mental image of God… Were we able to extract from any man a complete answer to the question, ‘What comes to mind when you think about God?' Weight predict with certainty the spiritual future of that man.”A.W. TozerInstead of glorifying God we transformed our idea of Him into forms and images more comfortable to our corrupt and darkened hearts.David Guzik“Here's how you know you've created God in your own image: he agrees with you on everything…”John Mark Cromer16 Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him as he saw that the city was full of idols.Acts 17:16-21 As Paul sailed to Athens from the sea near Berea, he came to a city he had probably never been to before, and like any tourist, he was ready to be impressed by this famous and historic city – which, hundreds of years before, was one of the most glorious and important cities in the world. But when Paul toured Athens, he was only depressed by the magnitude of the idolatry he saw all around.David Guzik22 So Paul, standing in the midst of the Areopagus, said: “Men of Athens, I perceive that in every way you are very religious. 23 For as I passed along and observed the objects of your worship, I found also an altar with this inscription: ‘To the unknown god.' What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you.Acts 17:22-23WHAT IS GOD LIKE? 24 The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man,[c] 25 nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything.Acts 17:24-25GOD IS… INDEPENDENTIndependent: God does not need us or the rest of creation for anything, yet we and the rest of creation bring Him glory and bring Him joy. Someone might wonder, if God does not need us for anything, then are we important at all? Is there any significance to our existence or to the existence of the rest of creation? In response it must be said that we are in fact very meaningful because God has created us and he has determined that we would be meaningful to him… to be significant to God is to be significant in the most ultimate sense. No greater personal significance can be imagined.Wayne GrudemThe starting place of knowing God is knowing His love.26 And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place, 27 that they should seek God, and perhaps feel their way toward him and find him. Yet he is actually not far from each one of us, 28 for“‘In him we live and move and have our being';[d]as even some of your own poets have said,“‘For we are indeed his offspring.'[e]Acts 17:26-28GOD IS… INFINITE AND PERSONALEvery day I will bless you    and praise your name forever and ever.Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised,    and his greatness is unsearchable.Psalm 145:2-3Apart from the true religion found in the Bible, no system of religion has a god who is both infinite and personal. For example, the gods of ancient Greek and Roman mythology were personal, but not infinite: they had weaknesses and frequent moral failures, even petty rivalries. On the other hand, deism portrays a god who is infinite but far too removed from the world to be personally involved in it… We can pray to [God] him, worship Him, obey Him, and love Him; and He can speak to us, rejoice in us, and love us.Wayne Grudem29 Being then God's offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man. 30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.”Acts 17:29-31 GOD IS… JEALOUS

Exploring the impulse to withhold gains in order to selfishly instantaneously gratify desires over providing voluntary repair of human suffering of various kinds.patreon.com/solomonstemple will you help this man spread his wisdom.. king solomon isnt rich, what a weird idea.

In this video I respond to Brian Holdsworth on "A Question Protestants Can't Answer." At the core of the gospel is the glorious truth that Jesus' death on the cross is a substitutionary atonement that enables God to be both just and forgiving. See Brian's video: https://youtu.be/0I05643Pbxo See Sean Luke's response: https://youtu.be/9Ks-2HwuHwQ My video on purgatory: https://youtu.be/YPnNldd9K8c Matthew Barrett's book, The Reformation as Renewal: https://zondervanacademic.com/products/the-reformation-as-renewal Truth Unites exists to promote gospel assurance through theological depth. Gavin Ortlund (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) serves as senior pastor of First Baptist Church of Ojai. SUPPORT: Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/truthunites One time donation: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/truthunites FOLLOW: Twitter: https://twitter.com/gavinortlund Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthUnitesPage/ Website: https://gavinortlund.com/

What is the moral argument for God's existence? How does it lead to belief in God? How does it apply to moral situations today? Today's show will focus on answering questions related to the moral argument for God's existence.

Greg responds to objections to the moral argument in this interview from the Reasoned Hope podcast with Parks Edwards. They discuss cultural relativism and its inability to explain moral progress, the Euthyphro dilemma, moral Platonism, the evolutionary explanation for morality, and more.   Topics: Commentary: Objections to the moral argument for the existence of God (00:00) Download the mp3...   Mentioned on the Show:  Reasoned Hope podcast with Parks Edwards Street Smarts: Using Questions to Answer Christianity's Toughest Challenges by Greg Koukl Related Links: Euthyphro's Dilemma by Greg Koukl

In this episode from the archives we're revisiting a debate between two Christian philosophers on the arguments for God.   AC Grayling is one of the UK's most well known atheist thinkers. His book The God Argument claims to refute the key arguments for God and show why humanism is the best way forward. Christian Philosopher Peter S Williams interacted with Grayling who he believes badly misunderstood the arguments for God in his book.   In a busy show they debated The Argument from Fine Tuning, The Cosmological Argument and The Moral Argument. First broadcast in 2013   Support our End Of Year Appeal: https://gtly.to/aAxRk0kQs   • Subscribe to the Unbelievable? podcast: https://pod.link/267142101 • More shows, free eBook & newsletter: https://premierunbelievable.com • For live events: http://www.unbelievable.live • For online learning: https://www.premierunbelievable.com/training • Support us in the USA: http://www.premierinsight.org/unbelievableshow • Support us in the rest of the world: https://www.premierunbelievable.com/donate