POPULARITY
Air Date: 6/27/2026 Today we trace how one man went from receiving a $278 million government grant to becoming the world's first trillionaire who spent .025% of his wealth to get Trump elected, then used his position to slash programs that help people while stoking race riots overseas. Full Show Notes Transcript Be part of the show! Leave a voice message, message us on Signal at the handle bestoftheleft.01, or email Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com BestOfTheLeft.com/Support (Members Get Bonus Shows + No Ads!) Use our links to shop Bookshop.org and Libro.fm for a non-evil book and audiobook purchasing experience! Join our Discord community! TOP TAKES KP 1: 'Billionaire CRISIS': How the Country's Wealthiest Are 'bankrolling' U.S. Politics - MS NOW - Air Date 5-27-26 KP 2: We Uncovered a Hidden Wealth Transfer in the SpaceX IPO. You're Holding the Bag. - More Perfect Union - Air Date 5-27-26 KP 3: Trump DOGE Cuts Caused 600,000 Deaths This Year, Fmr. USAID Official Says - The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell - Air Date 11-24-25 KP 4: Everything Is Falling Apart and Americans Aren't Happy About It - Takes™ by Jamelle Bouie - Air Date 6-16-26 KP 5: Elon Musk Celebrates Trillionaire Status by Stoking Racist Terrorism in Belfast! - I Doubt It Podcast - Air Date 6-14-26 KP 6: Why The Economist Hates Wealth Taxes - Garys Economics - Air Date 6-14-26 (00:57:37) NOTE FROM THE EDITOR The System That Made Musk a Trillionaire Is the Real Villain My commentaries on YouTube - Share them! DEEPER DIVES (01:15:26) SECTION A: THE TRILLIONAIRE AND WHAT HE REVEALS A1: 'Massive Loser': World Roasts First Trillionaire Elon Musk - The Rational National - Air Date 6-14-26 A2: A Trillion Dollars - Jonathan Pie - Air Date 6-14-26 A3: Trillionaire Welfare Queen - The John Fugelsang Podcast - Air Date 6-15-26 A4: "Land Grab": Trillionaire Elon Musk Sued in South Texas to Block SpaceX Takeover of Wildlife Refuge - Democracy Now! - Air Date 6-16-26 (01:49:20) SECTION B: THE HUMAN COST OF CONCENTRATED POWER B1: 9.4M Lives at Risk: The Human Cost of Elon Musk's DOGE Cuts - Holy Post Media - Air Date 6-15-26 B2: Justin Wolfers on Musk, Inequality, and the Price of American Democracy - Platypus Economics with Justin Wolfers - Air Date 6-13-26 B3: 'If You Can Keep It': What The Wealth Gap Means For Democracy Part 1 - 1A - Air Date 4-27-26 (02:12:31) SECTION C: THE SPACEX IPO HEIST C1: SpaceX IPO: What They're Not Telling Retail Investors - UNFTR Media - Air Date 6-9-26 C2: The First Trillionaire! - PissedMagistus - Air Date 6-14-26 (02:28:50) SECTION D: BELFAST HOW MUSK FUELS RACIAL VIOLENCE ABROAD D1: Belfast Riots: Why UK Mobs See Racial Violence as 'national Defence' | Amina Shareef | MEE Opinion - Middle East Eye - Air Date 6-18-26 D2: The Truth About the Belfast Riots | Claire Hanna Interview - PoliticsJOE Podcast - Air Date 6-10-26 D3: Major Antiracist Rally Held in Belfast to Condemn Anti-Immigrant Riots - Democracy Now! - Air Date 6-15-26 D4: Elon Musk Moves Against German Broadcaster ZDF After Riot Report - DW News - Air Date 6-16-26 (03:00:30) SECTION E: THE RECKONING BILLIONAIRE RHETORIC AND THE CASE FOR TAXING WEALTH E1: Why Jeff Bezos Wants to Cut Your Taxes - Garys Economics - Air Date 5-31-26 E2: Elon Musk & America's Tech Oligarchy - The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart - Air Date 6-10-26 E3: 'If You Can Keep It': What The Wealth Gap Means For Democracy Part 2 - 1A - Air Date 4-27-26 E4: We Need a Wealth Tax on Billionaires. Here's Why | Aaron Bastani Meets Gabriel Zucman - Novara Media - Air Date 5-24-26 E5: The Hidden Danger of America's Wealth Gap - Robert Reich and Inequality Media - Air Date 6-9-26 Produced by Jay! Tomlinson Visit us at BestOfTheLeft.com Listen Anywhere! BestOfTheLeft.com/Listen Listen Anywhere! Follow BotL: Bluesky | Mastodon | Threads | X Like at Facebook.com/BestOfTheLeft Contact me directly at Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com
Lisa Graves exposes billionaire capture of the Roberts Court, Ro Khanna blasts Newsom's wealth tax failure, and Delia Ramirez warns Democrats to defend voting rights. Subscribe to our Newsletter:https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletterPurchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make AmericaUtopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And BeFit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of anAfro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE
Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! * Lisa Graves Exposes The Billionaire Capture Of The Roberts Supreme Court: Lisa Graves exposes how billionaires, dark money, and the Roberts Court threaten voting rights, democracy, and accountability for Trump. [More]* Failing ‘Moral Test,' Newsom Rejects Compromise 2% Wealth Tax … To hear more, visit egberto.substack.com
One major theme has emerged for this year’s election... money. Two parties at the weekend launched ideas to get the country’s finances in order and future-proof our economy for generations to come. National held its annual party conference in high spirits, despite a polling support slide since the last election. They announced policy that would make KiwiSaver compulsory, raise minimum contributions, and require employers pay for staff over 65. On the other hand, the Greens are focusing on taxing the rich, imposing a levy on the four big banks, and taxing offshore profits earned by tech giants. NZ Herald chief political reporter Jamie Ensor is with us to break it all down.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
FIRST WITH YESTERDAY'S NEWS (highlights from Monday on Newstalk ZB) And Spare Us the Details/Don't Worry About Policies That Will Never Happen/Arguments For and Against Pitch InvasionsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Doubts New Zealand could avoid the problems other countries faced with wealth taxes. The Greens are proposing a 2.5% tax on net assets above 10 million dollars, excluding the family home. The package also includes income tax cuts for those earning under $160,000. Dentons tax partner Bruce Bernacchi says several European countries abandoned similar taxes, after wealth and investment flowed offshore. He says it would be a giant leap backwards for our economy, which is doing well at the moment. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
FIRST WITH YESTERDAY'S NEWS (highlights from the weekend on Newstalk ZB) Chloe's Coming for You/World Cups Are Pretty Fun/That Rugby Thing Wasn't Though/Revolving PMs/Is Suzy Undead?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
There's no point talking about the latest loony bin tax plan grab from the Greens because it's not going to become anything more than a word doc on their website. It's not going to happen. An inheritance tax is about the cruellest thing a state can impose on a grieving family. 33% when mum or dad dies. You've got to then take out a loan from the bank, congratulations bank and pay the government. Or sell the shares or property or whatever. Then pay the state. Congratulations state. The idea is that somehow, this act of forced goodwill, taxing assets your family's worked hard to acquire, using money that's already been taxed, earning income that is already taxed, will somewhere, somehow materially change the livers of others is absolute BS. I've just been in France where they have exactly this system. They have high personal income tax rates. And they're swinging far right. And this plan includes a wealth tax on everything from shares to companies, which only a handful of countries around the world bother doing because you may have asset, but it doesn't mean you've got cash to pay a tax on it. Just a reminder. This is not how a country gets rich. This is not how you create more jobs and industry. It's not how you grow an economy. And if you're not doing that. You're standing still or going backwards. We've been doing that in this country for too long. Ideas like this, may be appealing on paper, in reality almost never deliver the things the politicians espousing them promise on the hustings. You don't hear this said often but thank god for Labour completely ruling this thing out.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A tax expert says the Greens' proposed approach to tackling corporate greed - is likely to be unpopular. If elected, the party's promising to add new super rich, gifts and inheritance taxes, a major banks levy and a big tech tax. It also wants to lift the corporate tax rate to 33 percent - for large companies like supermarkets, gentailers and banks. PWC tax partner Sandy Lau shares her thoughts with Ryan. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This week's bombshell news in Sacramento: California Gov. Gavin Newsom announcing that he and First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom are under federal investigation reportedly for tax and financial improprieties – Newsom claiming he's the victim of a political vendetta as a critic of President Trump, but the story also a window into the unseemly practice of “behested payments” that special interests use to curry favor with elected officials, especially sitting governors. As the June primary results are closer to being finalized, why did former reality-tv “villain” Spencer Pratt, billionaire Tom Steyer, AOC-clone Saikat Chakrabarti, and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan all fail to advance to the general election? Finally, as legislators race to finish a new state budget before its July 1 deadline, will Gov. Newsom, his political allies, and a powerful California labor union cut a deal to keep a billionaire wealth tax off the November ballot? Recorded on June 18, 2026.
Steve Forbes eviscerates a proposed wealth tax that will be voted on in California referendum, and is currently leading in the polls, and warns that its passage will advance a global effort to impose massive taxes and economic controls on a worldwide basis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Veronique de Rugy argues that the U.S. already has the most progressive tax system among OECD countries, with the wealthy paying a disproportionate share of revenue. She critiques Thomas Piketty's proposal for a global wealth tax and mandated "degrowth," characterizing it as an effort to limit national growth under the guise of climate and social justice. (13)1904 PERSIA
Preview for Later Today: Veronique de Rugy examines Thomas Piketty's "degrowth" plan, which uses a global wealth tax to cap income. The proposal seeks to shrink manufacturing and leisure sectors to address global inequality and climate change.1807 TILSIT
In this episode of the Sunlight Tax Podcast, I break down some of the biggest misconceptions about wealth taxes, estate taxes, and tax fairness in the United States. We'll explore how the tax system works for the wealthiest Americans, why so many myths persist around taxing wealth, and what these policies mean for everyday people, small business owners, and future generations.I also share the story behind my grassroots campaign to raise awareness about tax justice through art, advocacy, and community action. My goal is to make complex tax issues easier to understand and help more people engage in conversations about economic fairness and social change.Also mentioned in today's episode:00:10 My Art Campaign00:29 The State of Wealth Inequality in the US00:57 Tax Fairness and the Wealthy01:50 Problems with Wealth Tax and Historical Context02:45 Inheritances and the Income Tax System03:41 Hannah's Grassroots Campaign and Art Fundraiser04:41 Understanding the Sunlight Tax Website05:09 Funding the IRS and Tax Enforcement06:34 Myths and Misinformation about Tax Laws07:32 Upcoming Expert Interview with Professor Madoff09:00 Misconceptions about Inheritance and Gift Taxes12:17 The Truth About Estate Taxes and Public Perception16:35 Tax Benefits for Primary Residence SalesIf you enjoyed this episode, please rate, review and share it! Every review makes a difference by telling Apple or Spotify to show the Sunlight Tax podcast to new audiences.Episode Links:Support me in rebuilding my studioRay Madoff, author of The Second Estate: How the Tax Code Made an American Aristocracy.Get my Tax Help on Substack.Get your FREE visual guide to tax deductionsOrder my book: Taxes for Humans: Simplify Your Taxes and Change the World When You're Self-Employed Get full access to Taxes For Humans at sunlighttax.substack.com/subscribe
A March 2025 memo from Assistant Attorney General Andrew Krawczyk warns there is a "realistic possibility" a Washington State wealth tax would be struck down under the constitution's uniformity clause. The $50 million threshold exemption and out-of-state tax credits pose the greatest legal risk, the memo states. Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon says the House has no plans to advance a wealth tax in 2027. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/ago-memo-says-realistic-possibility-a-wealth-tax-would-be-overturned/ #WealthTax #WashingtonState #StatePolitics #AGOMemo #TaxPolicy #WaLeg #UniformityClause #ThecenterSquare
This Day in Legal History: Congress Passes the Nineteenth AmendmentOn this day in 1919, the U.S. Senate voted 56 to 25 to approve the Nineteenth Amendment, sending to the states a one-sentence constitutional rule that “the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” The House had already passed it two weeks earlier, by a comfortable margin, and the question now moved to the states, where ratification would take fourteen months of careful organizing and a now-legendary single vote by a Tennessee legislator named Harry Burn — cast on his mother's instruction — to clinch the 36-state threshold in August 1920. The Nineteenth Amendment did not by itself enfranchise all American women: Black women in the South, women of color across the country, and Native women living on tribal land would face decades more of state-level disenfranchisement that did not begin to ease until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and would not be fully addressed even after that. But June 4, 1919 was the day that women's suffrage stopped being a state-by-state campaign and became, at the federal level, a constitutional commitment. The structural lesson is one worth holding onto: in the United States, voting rights live not just in the Constitution but in the day-to-day administration of elections by the states — which is why the fight over them is never quite over.Senators John Kennedy of Louisiana and Ron Wyden of Oregon — a Republican and a Democrat who do not often appear in the same headline — jointly introduced the Open Courts Act on Tuesday, a bill that would do something the federal judiciary has talked about for two decades and never quite accomplished: replace PACER, the public court records system, with a modern interface, eliminate the per-page fees, and harden the cybersecurity around the federal judiciary's electronic filing system. PACER stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, and right now it charges users ten cents a page to read federal court filings, which adds up alarmingly quickly when you're trying to follow a case of any size. The bill would also require the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to build a new system funded outside the regular appropriations cycle, which the sponsors argue would save taxpayers about $60 million a year in operating costs and avoid the budget-fight ritual that has stalled past reforms. The cybersecurity piece is not incidental: the federal courts have suffered two significant intrusions in recent years, one reportedly tied to Russian actors in 2025 and a similar one in 2020, and Wyden has been pushing for an independent security review since last year. The legal stakes here are unusual because PACER is a public-access tool that has historically been priced like a paywalled subscription product, which is a kind of legal-transparency contradiction the U.S. has tolerated longer than almost any peer democracy. Kennedy's framing — “Americans should not have to sell plasma or wrestle with clunky government websites just to read public court records” — is the kind of soundbite the bill needs to actually move. Whether it actually moves is another question; previous versions of this bill have died quietly. Watch the Judiciary Committee in the next month.Bipartisan Bill Would Modernize Court Records Systems | Law360The Department of Justice has opened an investigation into former U.S. Representative George Santos for possible insider trading on Kalshi, the federally-regulated prediction-market exchange, after Kalshi itself reportedly flagged a pattern of suspicious wagers to prosecutors. The story, broken by Reuters on Wednesday, is one of the first big public test cases for how insider trading principles map onto event-based contracts — which are not stocks, are not commodities in the traditional sense, and have spent the better part of the last two years in regulatory limbo while Kalshi and the CFTC fought in federal court over whether the platform could list its contracts at all. The legal challenge is real: insider trading liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 historically requires a “security,” and Kalshi contracts are not securities — they sit under the CFTC's authority as “event contracts.” That leaves DOJ working with commodities-fraud theories, wire-fraud statutes, and potentially Santos's own conditions of release from his prior unrelated criminal sentencing, all of which apply differently and less neatly than they would in an old-fashioned stock-trading case. If you are wondering how an ex-Congressman ends up with material nonpublic information worth betting on Kalshi, you are asking the right question, and it is also the question prosecutors will have to answer if they want any of this to stick. Expect this to become a defining test case for how event-contract markets get policed.DOJ investigating ex-US lawmaker Santos for insider trading on Kalshi, source says | ReutersIn my column for Bloomberg this week, I write about a pattern emerging across California, Minnesota, Oregon, Illinois, Washington, Maine, and other states: lawmakers are reaching for the politically powerful phrase “wealth tax” to describe what are, on inspection, just new top brackets or surtaxes on high-income earners. I argue that the slippage is not just sloppy branding, it is a strategic mistake. A wealth tax and an income surtax are not the same thing — wealth is a stock and income is a flow, and a higher rate on income realized this year will never reach the accumulated balance-sheet fortunes that the wealth-tax conversation was actually designed to capture. The “buy, borrow, die” critique that motivates much of the wealth-tax movement is precisely about taxpayers who never realize income because they never need to: they hold appreciating assets, borrow against them for liquidity, and defer or escape income-tax recognition entirely. Adding a few points to the top marginal income-tax rate, I write, is just a slightly higher toll at the same toll booth — it does not reach the wealth that bypassed the toll entirely. The political-capital point is what worries me most. Wealth taxes pick a specific kind of fight — about asset valuation, billionaire flight, capital mobility, constitutional limits, and the like — and to spend that capital fighting that fight on behalf of what is in fact a different and more familiar policy is a strange trade. I think a more honest framing would serve both sides better: if states want a real wealth tax, they need to design one — with valuation rules, third-party reporting, anti-avoidance, residency standards, and liquidity protections — and if they want a high-income surtax, they should call it that and defend it on its own merits. The middle ground gets you the burden of a tax hike without the benefits of either. Half measures that cost full price in political capital, I conclude, are not helping anyone.States Should Avoid Using ‘Wealth Tax' Rhetoric for Income Taxes | Bloomberg Tax (Technically Speaking) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe
As socialists gain power in American cities and states, they look to destroy the creation of wealth and to tax the wealth-creators into oblivion. We know how these scenarios end.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/crazy-wealth-tax-proposals-california-and-new-york-city
As socialists gain power in American cities and states, they look to destroy the creation of wealth and to tax the wealth-creators into oblivion. We know how these scenarios end.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/crazy-wealth-tax-proposals-california-and-new-york-city
Pushback Talks Season 9 is here with "Word Food"!This season, Fredrik & Leilani return with their signature bite-sized episodes: sharp, surprising, 15-minute explorations of the words that shape our world. Each week, they pick a single word (or two) and unpack how its simple surface hides deeper social, political, and economic realities.Think of it as thought-provoking “intellectual snacking” – quick enough for your commute, rich enough to shift how you see power, privilege, and the systems around us.This week's episode:Wealth Tax: The conversation gets enthusiastic as Fredrik and Leilani go head-to-head on the benefits and ethics of a wealth tax in today's political landscape. Waterfalls: Waterfalls are a special place for both Fredrik and Leilani, who bond over the beauty and exploitation of this natural resource. New episodes drop every week.Make this your ritual for keeping your curiosity – and your resistance – alive!Support the show
Live May 18, 2026 | Yaron Brook Show(Season 12, Episode 87)Musk vs OpenAI; Trump Fund; Trump Rules; China/Taiwan; Iran; Economy; Wealth Tax | Yaron Brook ShowMusk vs OpenAI, Trump vs Reality, and the Threat from ChinaThe battle over AI is becoming a battle over civilization itself.On this episode of Yaron Brook's show, Yaron dives into the escalating conflict between Elon Musk and OpenAI, the growing authoritarian impulses surrounding Trump-era politics, China's ambitions toward Taiwan, Iran's ongoing threat, and the economic consequences of wealth taxes and government corruption.Is America drifting toward cronyism and political tribalism instead of capitalism and freedom? Why are so many business leaders suddenly turning against innovation and risk-taking? And what happens when voters begin to normalize corruption as “just politics”?Yaron connects the dots between AI fearmongering, economic stagnation, political power grabs, and the moral collapse behind today's headlines.Watch now and join the debate.Watch the full episode here: https://youtube.com/live/nBpMo6VVGh8⏱️ Main Topics01:20 — Musk vs OpenAI17:50 — Trump Fund33:30 — Trump Rules48:40 — China/Taiwan1:00:30 — Iran1:07:45 — Economy1:13:15 — Wealth Tax
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
"Pre-construction has become less efficient than construction itself."That is the claim Dustin Devan made on this week's Bricks, Bucks & Bytes after returning from Advancing Pre-Con. Martin, Patric Hellermann and Dustin also dug into the proposed California wealth tax, Bentley's Q1 earnings, and why VCs keep funding the 51st AI takeoff company.Tune in to find out about:✅ Why 80% of project cost is locked in before design is even 30% done✅ How the California wealth tax proposal would actually value private companies✅ Patric's case for indexing into "directionally right" early-stage bets✅ Why takeoff is a feature, not a companyListen now on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and YouTube.#aec #construction #constructiontech #bricksandbytes #bricksbucksandbytes #ai #vcOur Sponsors:BreadCrumb- 50,000+ projects globally. All running safer, faster, with Breadcrumb. - breadcrumb.coAphex is the multiplayer planning platform where construction teams plan together, stay aligned, and deliver projects faster – check out aphex.coArchdesk - “The #1 Construction Management Software for Growing Companies - Manage your projects from Tender to Handover” check archdesk.comChapters00:00 Intro00:35 Introduction and Overview of Topics02:15 US Construction Spending Trends09:52 California Wealth Tax Proposal26:29 Advancing Pre-Construction Insights34:38 Building Cost Infrastructure and Pricing Engines40:30 The Role of Design in Construction Projects45:39 The Importance of Feasibility in Design50:46 The Impact of AI on Construction Estimation53:25 Navigating the Takeoff Tool Landscape57:02 Innovations in Construction Robotics
The Latest on Wealth Taxes Episode 383 – The concept of a wealth tax—applying a tax to the value of someone's assets—has become popular in some state legislatures in the last few years. Are they likely to catch on anytime soon? More SML Planning Minute Podcast Episodes Transcript of Podcast Episode 383 Hello, this is Bill Rainaldi, with another edition of Security Mutual's SML Planning Minute. In today's episode: the latest on wealth taxes. Public budget concerns seem to be everywhere, and state governments are no exception. The problem has gotten worse in the past few years because, in some cases, states would like to continue programs that were started with federal COVID spending that has since run out.[1] So, what's left for a state to do? Some are taking a look at so-called “wealth taxes” as a way to raise revenue. The appeal of wealth taxes is that, in theory, a state government can raise significant sums of money while affecting only a small slice of its population. A wealth tax takes a completely different approach from a sales, income or estate tax. It's a tax imposed on someone's net worth, that is, the total market value of their assets minus liabilities.[2] Here's an example. Let's say there's a two percent wealth tax on individuals with a net worth above $100 million in a particular state. If you're lucky enough to have a net worth of $1 billion, you would pay on the difference of $900 million, resulting in a tax bill of $18 million. Some proposed wealth taxes are written to occur annually while others are written as a one-time levy. One of the arguments in favor of wealth taxes is that they could raise a significant amount of revenue for the individual states. Another is that they would make the tax system more progressive and thus lessen the effects of income inequality. Some studies have indicated that income inequality has risen in the United States in recent years.[3] But there are also some notable arguments against the use of wealth taxes, particularly at the state level. For one thing, individual mobility would likely work against them. In other words, a high-income individual facing a wealth tax can simply move to another state to avoid it. There is evidence to suggest that a high tax burden can prompt some people to relocate. For example, after decades of growth, California, the state with the highest maximum income tax rate at 13.3 percent, has led the nation in net out-migration for six consecutive years, according to a 2026 report.[4] Critics suggest that more recent developments in California could make matters worse. The state is now considering a referendum that, if approved, would impose a one-time five percent wealth tax on state residents with a net worth of $1 billion or more. Advocates are currently gathering signatures in an effort to get the proposed tax on the ballot in 2026.[5] There is anecdotal evidence that some California billionaires have left the state out of fear that the proposal will become law, among them Larry Page, Sergey Brin and Mark Zuckerberg.[6] Other states, such as Illinois, Maryland and Washington have all introduced wealth tax legislation, although the final outcome remains uncertain in each state.[7] There are still unanswered questions about how a wealth tax would work. Conceptually, a wealth tax is based on the value of your assets, rather than the income you receive from them. This is different from, for example, capital gains taxes, which only become payable when you sell the asset. What happens if you pay a wealth tax one year—without selling the assets—and then the value of those assets goes down the next year? Would you get a refund? The answer seems to be no. At the federal level, the question of whether a wealth tax is permitted under the U.S. Constitution is a matter of intense legal debate. The federal income tax began in 1913 after the 17th Amendment was passed to specifically authorize it.[8] Many experts believe that a federal wealth tax would not currently pass a constitutional challenge, and it would likely take another amendment before it is allowed.[9] At the state level, each one of them has its own constitution, and they're all different. There are potential legislative, constitutional and practical obstacles that could end up being too big to handle. Only time will tell whether the states will be able to collect the bonanza they're hoping for. [1] Finseca. “Finseca Policy 02/24/26: State Wealth Tax Blitz & US Deficit Updates.” Finseca.org. https://www.finseca.org/finseca-policy-02-24-26-state-wealth-tax-blitz-us-deficit-updates/ (accessed April 13, 2026). [2] Peter G. Peterson Foundation. “What Is a Wealth Tax, and Should the United States Have One?” Pgpf.org. https://www.pgpf.org/article/what-is-a-wealth-tax-and-should-the-united-states-have-one/ (accessed April 13, 2026). [3] Cunningham, Mary. “Wealth inequality in America just hit its widest gap in more than 3 decades.” CBSNews.com. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-wealth-gap-widest-in-three-decades-federal-reserve/ (accessed April 13, 2026). [4] Christopher, Nilesh. “California's exodus isn't just billionaires — it's regular people renting U-Hauls, too.” The Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-01-08/californias-exodus-isnt-just-billionaires-its-regular-people-renting-u-hauls-too (accessed April 13, 2026). [5] BDO USA, P.C. “California's Billionaire Tax Proposal Would Allow Sweeping, One-Time Taxation Based on Net Worth.” BDO.com. https://www.bdo.com/insights/tax/californias-billionaire-tax-proposal-would-allow-sweeping-one-time-taxation-based-on-net-worth (accessed April 13, 2026). [6] Perman, Stacy. “Inside the exodus of California tech billionaires to Florida.” The Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2026-03-11/inside-exodus-of-california-tech-billionaires-to-florida (accessed April 13, 2026). [7] Finseca. “Finseca Policy 02/24/26: State Wealth Tax Blitz & US Deficit Updates.” Finseca.org. https://www.finseca.org/finseca-policy-02-24-26-state-wealth-tax-blitz-us-deficit-updates/ (accessed April 13, 2026). [8] Bishop-Henchman, Joe. “Is a Wealth Tax Constitutional?” Ntu.org. https://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail/is-a-wealth-tax-constitutional (accessed April 13, 2026). [9] Id. More SML Planning Minute Podcast Episodes This podcast is brought to you by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, The Company That Cares®. The content provided is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Information is provided in good faith. However, the Company makes no representation or warranty of any kind regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information. The information presented is designed to provide general information regarding the subject matter covered. It is not to serve as legal, tax or other financial advice related to individual situations, because each individual's legal, tax and financial situation is different. Specific advice needs to be tailored to your situation. Therefore, please consult with your own attorney, tax professional and/or other advisors regarding your specific situation. To help reach your goals, you need a skilled professional by your side. Contact your local Security Mutual life insurance advisor today. As part of the planning process, he or she will coordinate with your other advisors as needed to help you achieve your financial goals and objectives. For more information, visit us at SMLNY.com/SMLPodcast. If you've enjoyed this podcast, tell your friends about it. And be sure to give us a five-star review. And check us out on LinkedIn, YouTube and Twitter. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk to you next time. Tax laws are complex and subject to change. The information presented is based on current interpretation of the laws. Neither Security Mutual nor its agents are permitted to provide tax or legal advice. The applicability of any strategy discussed is dependent upon the particular facts and circumstances. Results may vary, and products and services discussed may not be appropriate for all situations. Each person's needs, objectives and financial circumstances are different, and must be reviewed and analyzed independently. We encourage individuals to seek personalized advice from a qualified Security Mutual life insurance advisor regarding their personal needs, objectives, and financial circumstances. Insurance products are issued by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Binghamton, New York. Product availability and features may vary by state. SubscribeApple PodcastsSpotifyAndroidPandoraby EmailTuneInDeezerRSSMore Subscribe Options
Welcome to The Politicana Podcast — a decade-long political conversation delivering clarity, comedy, and sharp analysis on politics, culture, and the news. Follow For Weekly Episodes.In this episode, we break down:00:00 - California's Wealth Tax 27:45 - A New Maine Socialist, Graham Platner43:15 - Tennessee to lose only Democrat district 58:15 - The Worst Polls of Any President Ever 1:13:45 - Spirit Airlines Goes Bankrupt
(The Center Square) – New tax proposals being considered in Springfield could bring nearly $7 billion in revenue to the state, according to advocates. Critics say the proposals – which would change corporate tax rules, among other impactful tax changes – could drive capital and jobs out of the state. The Illinois Revenue Alliance and Democrat lawmakers on Wednesday discussed initiatives they want passed to increase revenue, which they say would address gaps in the state budget created in-part by federal funding cuts. Backers said new revenue could be raised without increasing taxes for everyday Illinoisans. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Read Dan Pilla's Nation Review article here >>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2026/04/minnesotas-wealth-tax-temptation/Daniel Pilla - #1 Tax Agent in the NationPillaTaxAcademy.comTaxHelpOnline.comFollow Dan on X @DanielJPillaIf you appreciate the work we do and wish to support us, you can donate here >> https://www.nemosnewsnetwork.com/donateOn Sale Now - CarbonShield60 Oil Infusions 15% OFFGo to >> https://www.redpillliving.com/NEMOSCoupon Code: NEMOS-(Coupon code good for one time use)
California's 5% billionaire wealth tax has cleared the ballot threshold and could raise $100 billion if voters approve it in November. In this video, IMI covers the law applying retroactively to any residents worth over $1 billion on January 1, the billionaire exodus already in motion, the $80 million counter-offensive funded by Google's founders, and the three strategies wealthy Americans are running to prepare for a potential federal version.Read the full story here.
Patrick Bet-David and the panel react to a Seattle AI founder fleeing Washington's new millionaire and proposed wealth tax, warning that “tax the rich” really means tax everyone, predicting blue‑state exit taxes, and breaking down why today's intangible assets make capital flight unstoppable.
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
Trump IRA, Iran war costs, Comey's 86-47 indictment, Mark Levin on de-platforming, and socialist economics all collide in one Dumb Bleep of the Week. Nate and Chuck break down why MAGA is defending a retirement savings program tied to Biden-era law, why "bombing Iran's ambition" is not a serious foreign policy, and why free speech standards suddenly get slippery when the target changes. This Good Morning Liberty episode covers Trump IRA, Pete Hegseth's Iran hearing, War Powers Act questions, James Comey and 86-47, Mark Levin's de-platforming comments, Ro Khanna's $25 minimum wage argument, California's wealth tax debate, socialist mayors, and the week's worst economic takes. Chapters: 00:00 Good Morning Liberty intro 02:45 Dumb Bleep of the Week begins 03:00 Democrats clap for King Charles 06:15 Trump IRA or Biden IRA? 11:45 Hegseth, Iran, and the 60-day war clock 16:45 Iran war costs hit Americans 20:30 "Quagmire" means you hate the troops? 25:15 James Comey, 86-47, and free speech 34:30 Mark Levin and de-platforming 41:30 Ro Khanna and the $25 minimum wage 48:15 California wealth tax and billionaires leaving 57:00 Socialist mayors say bye to millionaires 01:00:45 Socialist economics wins the week Links: Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club @ joingml.com All links @ gml.bio.link Subscribe, like, comment, and share. Follow the podcast and leave a rating and review.
Trump IRA, Iran war costs, Comey's 86-47 indictment, Mark Levin on de-platforming, and socialist economics all collide in one Dumb Bleep of the Week. Nate and Chuck break down why MAGA is defending a retirement savings program tied to Biden-era law, why "bombing Iran's ambition" is not a serious foreign policy, and why free speech standards suddenly get slippery when the target changes. This Good Morning Liberty episode covers Trump IRA, Pete Hegseth's Iran hearing, War Powers Act questions, James Comey and 86-47, Mark Levin's de-platforming comments, Ro Khanna's $25 minimum wage argument, California's wealth tax debate, socialist mayors, and the week's worst economic takes. Chapters:00:00 Good Morning Liberty intro02:45 Dumb Bleep of the Week begins03:00 Democrats clap for King Charles06:15 Trump IRA or Biden IRA?11:45 Hegseth, Iran, and the 60-day war clock16:45 Iran war costs hit Americans20:30 "Quagmire" means you hate the troops?25:15 James Comey, 86-47, and free speech34:30 Mark Levin and de-platforming41:30 Ro Khanna and the $25 minimum wage48:15 California wealth tax and billionaires leaving57:00 Socialist mayors say bye to millionaires01:00:45 Socialist economics wins the week Links:Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhAWatch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2Join the Fed Haters Club @ joingml.comAll links @ gml.bio.link Subscribe, like, comment, and share. Follow the podcast and leave a rating and review.
California's new “billionaire tax” ballot measure slaps a one‑time 5% levy on residents worth $1B+, prompting Sergey Brin and other moguls to head for the exits as economists warn it will kill jobs, lose future tax revenue, and turn billionaires into political villains
Billionaire Google co-founder and ex-California resident Sergey Brin has said he's adamantly opposed to a proposed one-time, 5% tax on the wealth of California residents (and has spent $57 million to fight it) because he fears it will lead the state down a similar socialist path as that of the former Soviet Union, which his family fled when he was 6 years old. Brin, who has moved from a backer of liberal causes to a supporter of Republican President Donald Trump, told the New York Times in a rare statement: “I fled socialism with my family in 1979 and know the devastating, oppressive society it created in the Soviet Union. I don't want California to end up in the same place.” The proposed tax would apply to California residents with assets worth at least $1.1 billion and has pushed a number of bold-faced billionaires, including Brin, to leave the state. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE on:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/watchdog-on-wall-street-with-chris-markowski/id570687608 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2PtgPvJvqc2gkpGIkNMR5i WATCH and SUBSCRIBE on:https://www.youtube.com/@WatchdogOnWallstreet/featured California's proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires is headed for the ballot, igniting controversy over its potential economic impact. Supporters call it a fairness measure, while critics warn it could trigger capital flight, reduce state revenue, and accelerate an ongoing exodus of high earners and businesses from the state.
Organizers of California's Billionaires Tax say they have collected more than 1.5 million signatures, far above the threshold needed to qualify for the November ballot. Meanwhile, a rival ballot initiative would significantly limit or undermine the tax if both pass. The initiative is primarily funded by Google co‑founder Sergey Brin, through a group called Building a Better California. Brin has contributed at least $57 million toward the effort so far. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Broeske & Musson' on all platforms: --- The ‘Broeske & Musson Podcast’ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever else you listen to podcasts. --- ‘Broeske & Musson' Weekdays 9-11 AM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Facebook | Podcast| X | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | InstagramSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
New figures have revealed that the number of super-rich people in Ireland has doubled in five years. With these new figures, should we introduce a wealth tax? And if we did introduce it, what would it look like? Susanne Rogers, Research and Policy Analyst at Social Justice Ireland, joined Anton Savage on the show to discuss.
The US economy looks great on paper: high GDP, low unemployment, and booming markets. So why does it feel like the system is broken for so many people? To unpack the disconnect between macroeconomic data and everyday financial anxiety, we're joined by Chicago Booth professor Steve Kaplan. A staunch defender of the free market, Kaplan argues that despite our collective pessimism, American capitalism is actually delivering unprecedented prosperity. Are we just looking at the data wrong, or is the market failing us? From the staggering costs of the US healthcare system to the lasting scars of the China labor shock, we debate the deepest fractures in our modern economic framework. Recorded alongside the Stigler Center's economic conference "Can Capitalism Be Popular?" the conversation covers how to actually measure an economic system, the U.S. vs. Europe debate, the opioid crisis, health care lock-in, teachers' unions, UBI, and the core tension of the whole show: if capitalism is working, why doesn't it feel that way? Connect with us:
Reaction from the CEO of the Minnesota Business Partnership, Kurt Zellers. He joined Vineeta on the Morning News to discuss the legacy of Barry who led one of Minnesota's most recognizable brands during Covid and other crisis filled times. Also, what are business leaders saying about Minnesota Paid Leave and a proposed Wealth Tax?
Donate (no account necessary) | Subscribe (account required) Join Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA Operations Officer, as he dives into today's top stories shaping America and the world. In this Listener Q&A episode of The Wright Report, Bryan answers your questions on a wide range of domestic and global issues, from a controversial Republican immigration bill to rising efforts by the Trump administration to crack down on illegal immigration, banking access, and birth tourism in the United States. He also shares candid reflections on media credibility and the growing divide within conservative voices, offering personal insight into why he chose to speak out on misinformation and the challenges of covering complex issues like the war with Iran. Bryan emphasizes the importance of facts, sourcing, and critical thinking as listeners navigate an increasingly noisy and polarized information landscape. Plus, Bryan provides key updates on global developments, including new peace talks between Israel and Lebanon, China's quiet but important role in pressuring Iran, and why the Iranian regime remains difficult to overthrow despite widespread public opposition. He breaks down the internal power structure of Iran, explaining how a small but well-funded minority maintains control through military force and economic dominance. "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32 Keywords: Dignity Act immigration bill analysis 2026, US immigration policy crackdown banking citizenship verification, birth tourism ICE enforcement anchor babies debate, conservative media divide misinformation Tucker Carlson analysis, Israel Lebanon peace talks 2026 Middle East strategy, China role Iran negotiations oil leverage, Iran regime IRGC control population analysis, global geopolitics US China Middle East conflict, Bryan Dean Wright podcast, The Wright Report
What's up, everybody? It's Tom Bilyeu here: If you want my help... STARTING a business: join me here at ZERO TO FOUNDER: https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20show SCALING a business: see if you qualify here.: https://tombilyeu.com/call Get my battle-tested strategies and insights delivered weekly to your inbox: sign up here.: https://tombilyeu.com/ ********************************************************************** If you're serious about leveling up your life, I urge you to check out my new podcast, Tom Bilyeu's Mindset Playbook —a goldmine of my most impactful episodes on mindset, business, and health. Trust me, your future self will thank you. ********************************************************************** FOLLOW TOM: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/ Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tombilyeu?lang=en Twitter: https://twitter.com/tombilyeu YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeu Ketone IQ: Visit https://ketone.com/IMPACT for 30% OFF your subscription orderSumm: code TOMVIP20 for 20% off your first year at https://summ.com?via=tombilyeu&coupon=TOMVIP20Monetary Metals: Future-proof your wealth at https://monetarymetals.com/impactAquaTru: 20% off your purifier with code IMPACT https://aquatru.comDuck.Ai: Protect your privacy at https://duck.ai/impactBlinkist: Start your free trial at https://blinkist.com/impactQuince: Free shipping and 365-day returns at https://quince.com/impactpodAT&T Business: Switch to AT&T Business at business.att.comIncogni: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code IMPACT at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/impactShopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial period at https://shopify.com/impact Tom breaks down exactly why this wealth tax isn't just a policy disagreement — it's a fundamental threat to how prosperity works in America. We're talking about a 2% annual tax on net worth above $50 million, an additional 1% surtax on billionaires, and a staggering 40% exit tax on anyone worth over $50 million who renounces their citizenship. And critically, this is a tax on what you own — not what you earn. Tom and Drew dig into the Iran conflict head-on: Did Trump bite off more than he could chew? Was this a strategic masterstroke or a $50 billion mistake that destabilized our alliances and solved nothing? They unpack the real motivations behind the conflict — from nuclear proliferation fears to economic ambition — and ask the question most pundits are too afraid to answer: what did we actually get for it? Tom breaks down why the war timeline was wrong from day one, what it means that we're already in week five of a "3 to 4 week endeavor," and why that single data point tells you almost everything you need to know about how well Washington actually understands this conflict. The big question on the table: boots on the ground. Tom argues that while there's theoretically a path where a ground presence works, the odds are vanishingly low — and the political fallout could be catastrophic. We're already watching historically Republican seats flip in special elections. A full ground invasion of Iran wouldn't just be a military gamble. It could be the end of the Republican Party as we know it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
What's up, everybody? It's Tom Bilyeu here: If you want my help... STARTING a business: join me here at ZERO TO FOUNDER: https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20show SCALING a business: see if you qualify here.: https://tombilyeu.com/call Get my battle-tested strategies and insights delivered weekly to your inbox: sign up here.: https://tombilyeu.com/ ********************************************************************** If you're serious about leveling up your life, I urge you to check out my new podcast, Tom Bilyeu's Mindset Playbook —a goldmine of my most impactful episodes on mindset, business, and health. Trust me, your future self will thank you. ********************************************************************** FOLLOW TOM: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/ Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tombilyeu?lang=en Twitter: https://twitter.com/tombilyeu YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeu Ketone IQ: Visit https://ketone.com/IMPACT for 30% OFF your subscription orderSumm: code TOMVIP20 for 20% off your first year at https://summ.com?via=tombilyeu&coupon=TOMVIP20Monetary Metals: Future-proof your wealth at https://monetarymetals.com/impactAquaTru: 20% off your purifier with code IMPACT https://aquatru.comDuck.Ai: Protect your privacy at https://duck.ai/impactBlinkist: Start your free trial at https://blinkist.com/impactQuince: Free shipping and 365-day returns at https://quince.com/impactpodAT&T Business: Switch to AT&T Business at business.att.comIncogni: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code IMPACT at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/impactShopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial period at https://shopify.com/impact Tom breaks down exactly why this wealth tax isn't just a policy disagreement — it's a fundamental threat to how prosperity works in America. We're talking about a 2% annual tax on net worth above $50 million, an additional 1% surtax on billionaires, and a staggering 40% exit tax on anyone worth over $50 million who renounces their citizenship. And critically, this is a tax on what you own — not what you earn. Tom and Drew dig into the Iran conflict head-on: Did Trump bite off more than he could chew? Was this a strategic masterstroke or a $50 billion mistake that destabilized our alliances and solved nothing? They unpack the real motivations behind the conflict — from nuclear proliferation fears to economic ambition — and ask the question most pundits are too afraid to answer: what did we actually get for it? Tom breaks down why the war timeline was wrong from day one, what it means that we're already in week five of a "3 to 4 week endeavor," and why that single data point tells you almost everything you need to know about how well Washington actually understands this conflict. The big question on the table: boots on the ground. Tom argues that while there's theoretically a path where a ground presence works, the odds are vanishingly low — and the political fallout could be catastrophic. We're already watching historically Republican seats flip in special elections. A full ground invasion of Iran wouldn't just be a military gamble. It could be the end of the Republican Party as we know it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
For the Good of the Public brings you news and weekly conversations at the intersection of faith and civic life. Monday through Thursday, The Morning Five starts your day off with scripture and prayer, as we also catch up on the news together. Throughout the year, we air limited series on Fridays to dive deeper into conversations with civic leaders, thinkers, and public servants reimagining public life for the good of the public. Today's host was Michael Wear, Founder, President and CEO of the Center for Christianity and Public Life. Thanks for listening to The Morning Five! Please subscribe to and rate The Morning Five on your favorite podcast platform. Learn more about the work of the Center for Christianity and Public Life at www.ccpubliclife.org. Today's scripture: Psalm 74:12-22, Matthew 21:23-46; 22:1-22 (NIV) News sources: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/28/trump-iran-ground-troops-marines/ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/iranian-attack-on-saudi-base-injures-u-s-troops-as-more-american-forces-arrive-in-the-middle-east https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/30/world/middleeast/trump-regime-change-iran.html https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/washington-state-adopts-new-tax-on-incomes-over-1-million-177baace?mod=hp_lead_post Join the conversation and follow us at: Instagram: @michaelwear, @ccpubliclife Twitter: @MichaelRWear, @ccpubliclife and check out @tsfnetwork Music by: King Sis #politics #faith #prayer #scripture #news #Easter #HolyWeek #Iran #Washington #taxes Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On this Friday episode of Good Morning Liberty, Nate and Charles run "Dumb Bleep of the Week," reacting to what they see as shifting, unreliable claims around the Iran conflict—especially Trump's moving strike timelines, talk of "great negotiations," and the story of Iran gifting "eight boats" (then "ten boats") of oil, which they note Bloomberg tanker data didn't substantiate. They question reports that Iran struck Diego Garcia based only on unnamed officials and criticize what they call war propaganda from figures like Alan Dershowitz, Rubio, JD Vance (including a "nuclear suicide vest" scenario), Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, and Lindsey Graham's talk of taking an island and invoking Iwo Jima. The audience votes Trump's admission about avoiding the word "war" because it would require approval as the week's dumbest moment, and the hosts plug their "Fed Haters Club" membership. 00:00 Show Intro Banter 01:38 Dumb Week Setup 02:58 Trump Iran Boats 10:13 Timeline Extensions 12:14 Off Ramp Debate 14:22 Diego Garcia Truther 19:56 Propaganda Hitler Claims 23:17 Rubio DVance Nukes 30:13 Ground Troops Talk 31:50 Ben Shapiro Tease 32:01 Shapiro Sells the War 33:59 Oil Strait Justification 35:44 Lindsey Graham Iwo Jima Talk 39:30 Trump Avoids Saying War 44:48 Israel Hypocrisy Debate 47:05 America First Award Satire 49:40 Mask Discourse Returns 52:11 Wealth Tax and Corporate Rates 58:31 Voting Results and Wrap Up
This is a recording of a reactions segment featuring Chunky, Jocelyne, Jade and Corey. This live stream dives deep into a topics including current news, politics, culture, personal finance, real estate, investing, the stock market, spirituality and history.If you enjoy lively conversation and want your questions answered in real time, click on this link to watch upcoming live streams and be part of the conversation: https://www.youtube.com/@CoachCoreyWayne/streams Join this channel to get access to exclusive members only videos, full viewer questions podcasts & The 3% Man & Mastering Yourself Study Group Podcasts with the girls where we discuss the content of both books in depth:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQTAVxA4dNBCoPdHhX9nnoQ/join
You may have seen news reports that California is facing something called “outmigration,” in which residents – including some of that state's most wealthy – are picking up and moving to greener pastures in states not dedicated to taxing them to death. California's billionaires are most recently eyeing a ballot measure to be voted on […]
In part two of Red Eye Radio with Gary McNamara and Eric Harley, more on Senator Bernie Sander's wealth tax proposal, a headline from The Gateway Pundit reads; "James Talarico Wins The Coveted Endorsement Of Beto O'Rourke, the Senate blocks a resolution that would have limited Trump and the Iran War. For more talk on the issues that matter to you, listen on radio stations across America Monday-Friday 12am-5am CT (1am-6am ET and 10pm-3am PT), download the RED EYE RADIO SHOW app, asking your smart speaker, or listening at RedEyeRadioShow.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The communist knows you will run from their policies. They will simply make you live under it by any means necessary. Gavin Newsom’s latest pandering line to black people. Wearing a wifebeater out. Medal of Honor: Gordon Douglas YentemaFollow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
California's wealth tax debate is fueling a migration wave as LA and Silicon Valley homeowners flood the Las Vegas housing market. With median prices nearly half of California's and zero state income tax, the panel breaks down why builders, tech founders, and everyday families are heading to Nevada.
Liz Peek critiques California Governor Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, citing California'sstruggles with homelessness, illegal immigration, and a wealth tax driving residents away, characterizing him as a catastrophe whose record undermines his viability.1900 BRUSSELS, PRINCE OF WALES ATTACKED
For more coverage on the issues that matter to you, download the WMAL app, visit WMAL.com or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 from 9:00am-12:00pm Monday-Friday To join the conversation, check us out on Twitter @WMAL and @ChrisPlanteShow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices