POPULARITY
8 episodes with judge sullivan
6 episodes with judge sullivan
20 episodes with judge sullivan
5 episodes with judge sullivan
3 episodes with judge sullivan
5 episodes with judge sullivan
6 episodes with judge sullivan
8 episodes with judge sullivan
5 episodes with judge sullivan
In breaking news, Judge Sullivan has thrown the book at AG Todd Blanche and the DOJ in the Katie Phang litigation over the missing Epstein documents, and has ordered that the DOJ immediately turn over for the Judge's personal review the dozens of pages of handwritten FBI interview notes of the 4 separate interviews of the alleged victim of Trump's sex abuse who claims she was abused at the age of 13; has ordered that the DOJ review and produce all foreign language documents in the files; ordered that the DOJ file its answer to the suit by next week without delay; and that it prepare and file the Administrative Record comprised of all the documents about its decisions to produce and not produce documents, redact and not redact the files etc. Popok reports. Select Quote: Get the right life insurance for you for less at https://SelectQuote.com/legalaf today! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af Sidebar with Katie Phang: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sidebar-with-katie-phang/id1886801652 The Parnas Perspective: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-parnas-perspective/id1869165949 The Intersection with Michael Popok: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-intersection-with-michael-popok/id1818863274 MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get Current! Sign up at https://pnl.link/MFy08s5 and use my link to get $75 and unlock tools like a paycheck advance, credit building, and more. Terms apply. See https://current.com/legal_disclaimers for details. Current is a financial technology company, not an FDIC-insured bank. Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group and/or Cross River Bank, Members FDIC. I may earn a commission from sign-ups. Current is associated only with this promotion and does not endorse or represent the other content, language, opinions, or commentary in this video.The Lindsay Clancy case continues to unfold after the mistrial, with Judge William Sullivan revealing that at least one juror has been threatened and warning of a “real and present” danger to jurors and the administration of justice. The judge has now indefinitely sealed juror identities as questions and controversy continue to surround the lone holdout juror who prevented an 11–1 verdict. Meanwhile, Patrick Clancy is preparing to speak publicly on 60 Minutes, adding another major development to a case that continues to captivate national attention.STS and our #BestGuests break down the latest Lindsay Clancy news, the holdout juror controversy, Judge Sullivan's new orders and what happens next. Subscribe, Like & Set Alerts to "ALL" for show times & breaking news. https://www.youtube.com/@SurvivingThe...Become a Member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yr...Support the show & be a part of #STSNation:Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorEmail: SurvivingTheSurvivor@gmail.comSurviving The Survivor is a leading destination for true crime analysis, breaking crime news, murder trial coverage, criminal investigations, courtroom breakdowns, and live case discussions.Hosted by Emmy Award-winning journalist Joel Waldman and his mother Karm, a child Holocaust survivor, STS brings together top FBI profilers, homicide detectives, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, forensic experts, journalists, victims' advocates, and survivors to analyze the biggest true crime stories.From high-profile murder cases and missing persons investigations to serial killers, criminal psychology, police procedures, and major court trials, STS delivers fact-based reporting and expert insight from those who have worked some of the nation's most notorious cases.Known for having the best guests in true crime, STS gives viewers direct access to the experts behind the headlines. Join #STSNation for live shows, breaking updates, audience Q&As, and in-depth case analysis. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
The Lindsay Clancy murder trial ended in a mistrial on September 4, 2026, after the twelve-member jury spent over 38 hours across seven days of deliberation without reaching unanimity. The panel was split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Multiple jurors have since spoken publicly, stating the lone holdout acknowledged reasonable doubt but refused to deliver the corresponding verdict.Defense attorney Bob Motta provides a comprehensive legal analysis across three areas. The jury room: the legal constraints preventing Judge Sullivan from removing the holdout, the defense's emergency SJC appeal, and the voir dire challenges both sides face in screening for bias against psychiatric defenses if the case proceeds to a second trial.The post-mistrial legal maneuvering: Reddington's Rule 25(b)(2) motion filed September 10 seeking acquittal, the double jeopardy argument underlying it, the September 29 hearing, and the negotiation dynamics when Reddington publicly refuses incarceration and the Plymouth County DA's office has a documented history of rarely entering plea agreements.The human and systemic costs: the toll of a second trial on Patrick Clancy and the family, the practical implications of prosecuting a defendant who is reportedly paralyzed and confined on suicide watch at a state psychiatric facility, the limitations of the first-degree murder framework for cases of documented maternal psychiatric crisis, and the broader implications for how the criminal justice system processes severe postpartum psychosis. Eleven of twelve jurors reportedly accepted Dr. Resnick's testimony that Clancy's actions originated in a psychotic state rather than criminal intent.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyMistrial #TrueCrimeToday #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #TimCruz #Retrial #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrime
The twelve-member jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial deliberated for over 38 hours across seven days before Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. The panel was split 11 to 1 in favor of acquittal by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Foreperson Roni Carlson told NBC10 Boston that the lone holdout admitted to having reasonable doubt but stated he would not vote not guilty by reason of insanity.Defense attorney Bob Motta examines the procedural and legal framework surrounding the holdout juror's conduct. Kevin Reddington moved to have the juror removed, arguing the man was not following the court's instructions on reasonable doubt. Judge Sullivan declined the request. Reddington then filed an emergency appeal with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, contending the holdout's reasoning reflected bias against individuals with mental illness rather than a good-faith evaluation of the evidence. The SJC denied the appeal.Since the mistrial, juror Nick Dargie told ABC News the holdout could not identify any evidence or witness testimony supporting his position, reportedly would not engage with fellow jurors during deliberations, and spent time on his phone. Dargie also reported the holdout handled a piece of physical evidence from the case during deliberations.Motta analyzes the voir dire challenge both prosecution and defense face if the case proceeds to a second trial. Massachusetts law places the burden on the prosecution to disprove insanity beyond a reasonable doubt. Screening prospective jurors for bias against psychiatric defenses in a case where the sole contested issue is postpartum psychosis presents a procedural challenge with limited existing legal remedies.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #Mistrial #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #KevinReddington #JurySystem #TrueCrime
Judge Sullivan has ordered ALL jurors who reported for jury duty between July 20-24th (not just Lindsay Clancy jurors) remain private indefinitely due to safety concernsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)
The holdout in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial told the room he didn't know whether the prosecution or the defense had proved their case. Under the instructions Judge Sullivan read that jury, the defense had no burden to prove anything.Nick Dargie, a 25-year-old military veteran and the most recent juror to speak publicly, said the holdout couldn't point to any evidence supporting his position and scrolled his phone while other jurors deliberated. He described the holdout pulling an exercise band from the evidence bag, tying it around a water bottle, and pulling it tight — an apparent reenactment Dargie called disgusting.The foreperson signed three verdict forms after the holdout admitted reasonable doubt. He reversed himself in the same breath. The jury split 11-1 after about 38 hours of deliberation.Reddington has filed a motion asking the court to enter an acquittal. Cruz has not announced whether he'll retry. A hearing is set for September 29.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HoldoutJuror #Mistrial #ReasonableDoubt #JuryInstructions #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
The Lindsay Clancy trial went to a jury that deliberated for thirty-eight hours across seven days and couldn't agree. Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial September 4 after the jury reported being hopelessly deadlocked at eleven to one.Outside the courtroom, the conspiracy was already running. TikTok and Instagram creators built an alternate case against Patrick Clancy — the man who testified as the prosecution's first witness and whose ex-wife admitted through her defense that she killed their three children. Some used astrology. Others used trial footage. The theories grew through the trial and intensified after the mistrial.A man posted a TikTok saying he ended a $200,000 wedding because his fiancée expressed sympathy for Lindsay. He called her a monster. Four million people watched.On September 8, Patrick's attorney Howard Cooper called it a defamation campaign, confirmed law enforcement has been notified, and warned that consequences are coming. Lindsay's own attorney Kevin Reddington praised the conspiracy theorists' investigative ability after the mistrial.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the full picture with Tony Brueski — the relationships cracking, the father accused, and why the country can't sit with uncertainty when three children are dead.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #Nightbird #TrueCrimePodcast
The jury split eleven to one. The trial ended in a mistrial. And instead of closure, the Lindsay Clancy case broke into three simultaneous legal fights.The first: DA Timothy Cruz deciding whether to retry a case where eleven jurors reportedly sided with the defense. Judge Sullivan scheduled a September 29 status conference and indicated he wants to retry in the fall.The second: Two civil lawsuits — one from Patrick Clancy, one from Lindsay — against the same medical providers. The complaints allege nine psychiatric medications, eight in a three-week window, telehealth-only care from a psychiatrist who never met her patient, and no coordinated treatment plan. With the criminal case stalled, the civil track is the only active proceeding examining the medical timeline.The third: The legal maneuvering for a potential second trial. Reddington wants the next jury sequestered. A 56-year-old woman was arrested for filming jurors during deliberations. The prosecution characterized Clancy's injuries as insincere and may have lost eleven jurors doing it.Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication. Prosecutors alleged deliberate action.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines all three battles in one extended conversation — what the deadlock signals, what the lawsuits allege, and whether the prosecution can survive a second trial after an eleven-to-one rejection.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #MedicalMalpractice #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday
Patrick Clancy buried three children. He testified in the trial that followed their deaths. He divorced Lindsay, remarried, and tried to build a new life in New York. Lindsay admitted through her defense that she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The jury deadlocked eleven to one and Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4.The conspiracy theories started during the trial. TikTok and Instagram creators accused Patrick of being the real killer. Some used astrology and birth charts. Others analyzed trial livestream footage frame by frame. Creators compared him to Chris Watts. Tabloids ran paparazzi photos of Patrick and his new wife under headlines designed to make grief look suspicious.On September 8, Patrick's attorney Howard Cooper released a statement through publicist Diana Pisciotta calling the accusations a defamation campaign and confirming law enforcement has been notified. Cooper said the conspiracy has produced threats to Patrick's reputation, livelihood, and life.Lindsay's own defense attorney Kevin Reddington, asked about the theories after the mistrial, praised the internet investigators' ability to "ferret out facts."Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines how a father became a suspect in the court of TikTok, what makes a conspiracy feel more real than a courtroom admission, and what Patrick's forced response reveals about where true crime fandom has landed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #ConspiracyTheories #TrueCrime #Mistrial #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #Nightbird #Defamation #TrueCrimePodcast
The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial made a strategic choice: argue that her fall from a second-story window was not a genuine attempt on her life and that her injuries were superficial. Clancy sat in a wheelchair, paralyzed from the waist down, while the jury heard it.Eleven of twelve jurors reportedly sided with the defense. The trial ended in a mistrial after seven days of deliberation at Plymouth Superior Court. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington blamed the prosecution's tactics and said the jury had been “robbed” by the lone holdout.Reddington's legal maneuvers in the trial's final hours were aggressive. He asked Judge Sullivan to dismiss the holdout juror. Sullivan refused. He asked for a lesser-charge poll. Sullivan refused. He filed an emergency petition with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The court denied it.Separately, a 56-year-old woman named Dawn Light was arrested during deliberations for allegedly filming jurors in a courthouse parking lot. She was charged with aggravated intimidation. Reddington has said he will demand the next jury be sequestered.DA Timothy Cruz defended his prosecution and said he would decide on a retrial shortly. The case relied on the McHoul standard, which asks jurors to assess whether a defendant had substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines whether the prosecution's framing of Clancy's injuries alienated the jury, what the emergency petition reveals about the defense's confidence, and whether the insanity standard itself is the problem.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #DATimothyCruz #Retrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday
Judge Sullivan has declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy trial. All signs point to a single juror refusing to apply the law as instructed with respect to reasonable doubt. We discuss the final dramatic days of deliberations and what happens next.Click on link below to check out the extra content on our Patreon, including four bonus episodes every month covering pop culture hot topics and true crime stories plus a look into our personal lives plus all regular episodes ad free.PatreonIf you enjoy our content please SUBSCRIBE to the podcast and give us a 5-star rating on Apple Podcasts.We are on Instagram and TikTok @psychlegalpopEmail: psychlegalpoppodcast@gmail.com#lindsayclancy #lindsayclancytrial #lindsayclancymurdertrial #lindsayclancymistrial #lindsayclancydefense #lindsayclanceyjury #jurytrial #murdertrial #kevinreddington #patrickclancy #truecrime #truecrimetrial #trial #criminaltrial #psychology #attorney #therapist #law #lawyer #popculture #popularculture Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Somebody treated the Lindsay Clancy murder trial like a celebrity sighting — and it happened at the worst possible moment, while the jury was already telling the judge they couldn't agree. A 56-year-old woman was arrested outside Plymouth Superior Court, accused of secretly filming jurors as they left the building during deliberations. She claimed she'd come to see Lindsay. Police found deleted video of the panel on her phone regardless. Judge Sullivan had to pull every juror aside individually to make sure deliberations could keep going — all while the panel was already deep in a deadlock nobody expected to break easily. This jury heard eighty witnesses across five weeks and worked through more than three hundred exhibits. Prosecution psychiatrists testified Lindsay Clancy wasn't psychotic when her three children died. Defense psychiatrists said she was. The defense isn't contesting the physical evidence — the exercise bands, the DNA, none of it — only whether she was criminally responsible, a question Massachusetts law puts squarely on the prosecution to disprove. When the jury said they were stuck, Sullivan gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction, effectively telling them this is as good as the evidence gets. They went back anyway. They're still stuck. If it ends in a hung jury, nothing is settled. Lindsay Clancy remains charged with three counts of first-degree murder, still held at Tewksbury State Hospital, still paralyzed from the waist down, while Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz decides whether to do this whole trial again. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony to break down the deadlock, the courthouse spectator who may have handed both sides a mistrial argument, and what happens to a case this fractured next. Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #HungJury #JuryTampering #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Eighty witnesses. Five weeks. Three hundred exhibits. And Lindsay Clancy's jury still can't agree on the one question that decides everything — was she psychotic when her three children died, or wasn't she. Judge Sullivan gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction, the blunt version of there is no better jury coming after you, go finish the job. They went back into the room. They're still deadlocked. And while they were stuck, a 56-year-old woman was arrested outside Plymouth Superior Court for allegedly filming jurors as they left the building. She told police she'd come to see Lindsay. Investigators found deleted video of the jury on her phone anyway. Sullivan had to question every single juror, one at a time, before deliberations could resume — all while the panel was already telling the court they might not reach a verdict at all. The defense conceded the physical facts a long time ago. Kevin Reddington told the court outright that his client killed her children; the exercise bands and the DNA aren't in dispute. What's in dispute is criminal responsibility, and in Massachusetts, once the defense raises insanity, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove she was sane. That's the needle twelve strangers have been trying to thread for days. If they can't get there, nothing is resolved. Lindsay Clancy stays charged with three counts of first-degree murder, still held at Tewksbury State Hospital, still paralyzed from the waist down, while Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz decides whether to try this case all over again. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony to unpack the deadlock, the parking-lot arrest that nearly derailed it further, and what either outcome means for a case this fractured. Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #HungJury #JuryTampering #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
A jury that's already split on whether a mother is criminally responsible for killing her three children just found out someone was filming them on their way out of the courthouse. That's where the Lindsay Clancy trial stands right now. The panel spent five weeks hearing eighty witnesses and reviewing more than three hundred exhibits, all circling one unresolved question — was Lindsay Clancy psychotic on January 24, 2023, or wasn't she. The defense doesn't dispute what happened; Kevin Reddington has already told the court his client killed her kids with the exercise bands, and the DNA backs that up. The entire case now rests on criminal responsibility, and Massachusetts puts the burden of proving sanity on the prosecution once the defense raises it. When the jury told Judge Sullivan they couldn't reach a verdict, he read them the Tuey-Rodriguez charge — essentially telling them no future jury will have better evidence, so go back and keep trying. They did. They're still stuck. And somewhere in the middle of that impasse, a woman was arrested outside the courthouse accused of secretly filming jurors, with deleted footage of the panel recovered from her phone. Sullivan had to individually question every juror before letting deliberations continue. If this jury ultimately hangs, nothing about Lindsay Clancy's status changes. No acquittal, no conviction. She stays charged with three counts of murder, held at Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed from the waist down, while Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz weighs what comes next. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down how close this case is to a mistrial, what the secret filming does to either side's appeal options, and why a jury this deadlocked was always going to be a coin flip. Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Three developments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court are converging into a single question: what happens next?The jury has been deliberating for days and has sent notes indicating they cannot agree. Judge Sullivan read the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction and sent them back. The impasse continued. The deadlock centers on a psychiatric dispute that twelve lay jurors appear unable to resolve.Outside the courthouse, a woman was arrested for filming the jurors. Police found deleted videos on her phone. The judge questioned each juror individually. The arrest created documented interference during active deliberation—evidence that could affect any appeal or future proceeding.If the jury hangs, the defense enters the next phase with options that did not exist before. A bench trial would put the case before a judge instead of a new jury. A renewed bifurcation motion could split a retrial into two phases, focusing only on criminal responsibility. Massachusetts precedent suggests the DA will retry—Karen Read was retried after a hung jury, as was Emanuel Lopes.But the depth of the deadlock, the outside interference, and the defense's strategic options make this a more complicated decision than a simple retry.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis covers all three developments and what they mean for Lindsay Clancy, for the DA's office, and for the mothers watching who needed this trial to deliver an answer.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #HungJury #JuryFilming #BenchTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
For complete Medicare guidance, dial (617) 644-0093 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter Medicare Advisors.Judge William Sullivan has scheduled an open-court hearing for 9 AM ET in which he is demanding that the one hold-out juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial appear before him and explain their apparent intransigence. Lindsay Clancy is the Massachusetts woman who strangled her three children—five years old, three years old, and 8 months old—to death after sending their father out of the house on errands. Clancy then dropped herself out of a second-story window in a purported attempt to kill herself, but survived the fall with a broken spine and paralysis below the waist.Clancy is charged with first-degree murder, which carries a mandatory life sentence without possibility of early release. Her defense is not guilty by reason of insanity, based on a claim of having committed these killings while under psychosis or as a result of irresistible impulse, a condition driven by her own existing mental illness and a cornucopia of psychiatric drugs she had been prescribed. Clancy's defense counsel, Kevin Reddington, has already demanded that the intransigent juror be replaced by one of the six alternate jurors still being held available, which Judge Sullivan declined to do yesterday afternoon, instead scheduling today's 9 AM ET open-court examination of that juror.Join me LIVE at 8 AM ET as we talk the Lindsay Clancy case and observe the open-court hearing in real time!Make sure you're ready to win the LEGAL FIGHT that follows the PHYSICAL FIGHT if you're ever compelled to defend yourself or your family from criminal predation. Learn why I am PERSONALLY a member of CCW SAFE, and why YOU SHOULD CONSIDER JOINING, TOO: https://lawofselfdefense.com/ccwsafeClarence Thomas x 9: Perfect SCOTUS Mugs! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2kFor complete Medicare guidance, dial (617) 644-0093 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter.All @TheBrancaShow mugs & MORE! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2kJOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month! YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/hn32rfz9 Locals: https://tinyurl.com/yck4w9kfFOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIAL: Founding Fathers SPEED DIAL: https://tinyurl.com/3f7pc8nzEpisode #1435.Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan's contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don't directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov, 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options.
Bradley Jay Fills In On NightSide with Dan Rea:The Lindsay Clancy murder trial came to an end today after Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial, leaving the case unresolved. The decision follows weeks of testimony and intense debate over Clancy’s mental state and what happened the night her three children died. The jury’s inability to reach a unanimous verdict means the legal battle may be far from over. What happens next, and will prosecutors seek a new trial? Mike Coyne, Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law in Andover, joined Bradley for legal analysis of the case and what lies ahead.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A one hour delay, turned into a three hour ordeal, that ultimately ended in a mistrial. After a judge from the Massachusetts Supreme Court denied the defense’s last-ditch effort for an emergency stay, Judge Sullivan officially declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial. There was no emotion on the faces of Lindsay Clancy, her family, or any of the jurors after the announcement was made, following 40 hours of deliberations and a grueling 5 week trial. There is already a status hearing on the books to prepare for a possible retrial, which the DA has not committed to as of yet, set for the end of the month. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The jury came back after nearly 38 hours of deliberations with a note that said “with a heavy heart” we are unable to come to a unanimous decision. After protest from the defense, Judge Sullivan said he had no choice but to declare a mistrial. But that didn’t stop Kevin Reddington who asked to appeal to a Supreme Court Justice to issue an emergency stay on the ruling, and shockingly, Judge Sullivan gave him one hour. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The jury came back after nearly 38 hours of deliberations with a note that said “with a heavy heart” we are unable to come to a unanimous decision. After protest from the defense, Judge Sullivan said he had no choice but to declare a mistrial. But that didn’t stop Kevin Reddington who asked to appeal to a Supreme Court Justice to issue an emergency stay on the ruling, and shockingly, Judge Sullivan gave him one hour. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A one hour delay, turned into a three hour ordeal, that ultimately ended in a mistrial. After a judge from the Massachusetts Supreme Court denied the defense’s last-ditch effort for an emergency stay, Judge Sullivan officially declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial. There was no emotion on the faces of Lindsay Clancy, her family, or any of the jurors after the announcement was made, following 40 hours of deliberations and a grueling 5 week trial. There is already a status hearing on the books to prepare for a possible retrial, which the DA has not committed to as of yet, set for the end of the month. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A one hour delay, turned into a three hour ordeal, that ultimately ended in a mistrial. After a judge from the Massachusetts Supreme Court denied the defense’s last-ditch effort for an emergency stay, Judge Sullivan officially declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial. There was no emotion on the faces of Lindsay Clancy, her family, or any of the jurors after the announcement was made, following 40 hours of deliberations and a grueling 5 week trial. There is already a status hearing on the books to prepare for a possible retrial, which the DA has not committed to as of yet, set for the end of the month. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The jury came back after nearly 38 hours of deliberations with a note that said “with a heavy heart” we are unable to come to a unanimous decision. After protest from the defense, Judge Sullivan said he had no choice but to declare a mistrial. But that didn’t stop Kevin Reddington who asked to appeal to a Supreme Court Justice to issue an emergency stay on the ruling, and shockingly, Judge Sullivan gave him one hour. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A judge in Plymouth, Massachusetts spent Thursday afternoon reading twelve adults the definition of a word.Not the evidence. Not the eighty-odd witnesses. A definition. Reasonable doubt. Because a note came out of that jury room saying one person in there will not take it.Disagreeing with eleven people is allowed. That's the job. Refusing the standard itself is something else, and it's about to blow up five weeks of trial. Six days of deliberation. Thirty-six and a half hours. Split eleven to one. Judge Sullivan has already spent the dynamite charge, and under Massachusetts law he can't use it again without the jury's permission. Kevin Reddington stood up in open court and asked him to throw the holdout off the panel. Sullivan said no. They're back Friday morning. This episode: what actually happened in that courtroom Thursday, why courts almost never remove a holdout juror and why you should be glad they don't, and what a mistrial would actually mean for this case.Plus the number nobody in the discourse wants to look at. For three weeks the argument was that a jury of nine women and three men would split along sex. That prediction needed nine to three. It got eleven to one, and there is no way to reach eleven from a pool of nine women without bringing men along. And there is one thing I'm not telling you in this episode, about the identity of the holdout, and the reason why is the most important part of the whole hour.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/we-saw-the-devil-a-true-crime-podcast--4433638/support.Website: http://www.wesawthedevil.comPatreon: http://www.patreon.com/wesawthedevilRobin's Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/robin_wstdTwitter: http://www.twitter.com/WeSawtheDevilInstagram: http://www.instagram.com/wesawthedevilpodcastTikTok: tiktok.com/@wesawthedeviltruecrime
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Lindsay Clancy jury at Plymouth Superior Court has heard more testimony and reviewed more evidence than most juries see in a career of service. Eighty-plus witnesses. Three hundred exhibits. Five weeks of testimony covering every detail of January 24, 2023—from the snowman Lindsay built with her children that afternoon to the 911 call Patrick made that night.The jury indicated it could not reach a verdict. Judge Sullivan read the Tuey-Rodriguez charge—the instruction that tells jurors they are in the best position to decide and no future jury will have better evidence. They returned to deliberations and remained deadlocked.At the center of the impasse are dueling psychiatric experts. The prosecution's team said Clancy was not psychotic. The defense's team said she was. Both examined the same woman, reviewed the same medical records, and testified under oath to opposite conclusions. The jury—regular people, no medical training—was left to choose.Lindsay Clancy was on thirteen psychiatric medications at the time of the incident. She had been discharged from a psychiatric hospital three weeks earlier. Her defense conceded every physical fact and put the entire case on one question: was she criminally responsible?Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines what is blocking this jury, what a deadlock would mean for Clancy's future, and what happens when the people the system depends on to deliver verdicts cannot deliver one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #HungJury #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
For complete Medicare guidance, dial (617) 644-0093 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter Medicare Advisors.Judge Sullivan just dismissed the Lindsay Clancy trial with NEITHER a verdict NOR a mistrial, and they will return to deliberate again TOMORROW!This after an exciting afternoon in which the jury sent a question to the judge, the judge had each juror brought up to the bench individually to be questioned, and Defense Counsel Kevin Reddington through a FIT in the courtroom!Join me live NOW as I break it all down!Make sure you're ready to win the LEGAL FIGHT that follows the PHYSICAL FIGHT if you're ever compelled to defend yourself or your family from criminal predation. Learn why I am PERSONALLY a member of CCW SAFE, and why YOU SHOULD CONSIDER JOINING, TOO: https://lawofselfdefense.com/ccwsafeClarence Thomas x 9: Perfect SCOTUS Mugs! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2kFor complete Medicare guidance, dial (617) 644-0093 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter.All @TheBrancaShow mugs & MORE! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2kJOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month! YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/hn32rfz9 Locals: https://tinyurl.com/yck4w9kfFOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIAL: Founding Fathers SPEED DIAL: https://tinyurl.com/3f7pc8nzEpisode #1433.Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan's contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don't directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov, 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options.
The Lindsay Clancy jury has been deliberating for days at Plymouth Superior Court after hearing more than eighty witnesses across five weeks. They sent notes to Judge Sullivan indicating they could not reach a unanimous decision. Sullivan read them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction—a charge that tells jurors to keep working and that no future jury will hear better evidence. They went back in and remained stuck.The impasse centers on criminal responsibility. The prosecution's psychiatric experts said Clancy was not psychotic on January 24, 2023. The defense's experts said she was. Both used the same records. Both had comparable credentials. Both testified under oath. The jury is asked to resolve a medical dispute without medical training.Kevin Reddington conceded the physical evidence. Clancy killed her children. The defense has never contested that. The trial was always about one question—whether she was criminally responsible—and in Massachusetts, the prosecution carries the burden of proving sanity beyond a reasonable doubt.If the jury cannot agree and a mistrial is declared, Clancy is neither acquitted nor convicted. She remains charged with three counts of first-degree murder. She remains at Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed from the waist down. The DA's office decides whether to try her again.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down what a hung jury means for Clancy, whether a retrial is likely, and what mothers watching this case should understand about what happens when the system fails to deliver a verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #HungJury #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
The Lindsay Clancy jury was already signaling deep divisions when a new problem arrived from outside the courtroom. A 56-year-old woman was arrested at Plymouth Superior Court for allegedly filming jurors as they left the building. She told reporters she wanted to see Lindsay. Police recovered deleted videos of the jury from her phone.Judge Sullivan questioned each juror individually before allowing deliberations to continue. The jury had already spent days in the deliberation room and had sent multiple deadlock notes. The arrest added a layer of disruption to a panel that was already under extraordinary strain.The legal implications depend on the outcome. A guilty verdict gives the defense grounds to argue that the jury was compromised. A mistrial leaves the incident in the record for any future proceedings. Either way, the arrest forces the court to address whether the jury's deliberations were affected by the knowledge that someone outside was recording them.The incident also raises a broader question about the true-crime spectator culture and its impact on the legal process. Jurors in high-profile cases are increasingly exposed to public attention they never signed up for. A woman with no connection to the case showed up at a courthouse where three children's deaths are being litigated and treated the jurors like subjects in a documentary.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the fallout, the appeal risk, and what courts must do to keep jurors safe from a public that cannot tell the difference between following a case and interfering with one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #JuryTampering #TrueCrimeTourist #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
The assumption after a hung jury in the Lindsay Clancy case is a retrial. Massachusetts has a history of retrying its cases, and Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz has shown no interest in reducing the first-degree murder charges. But the defense has moves that could change the trajectory entirely.The first: a bench trial. Massachusetts allows defendants to waive the right to a jury and be tried by a judge. If the problem with this trial is that twelve lay people cannot sort through competing psychiatric testimony, a bench trial puts the question before someone trained to evaluate exactly that kind of evidence.The second: a renewed bifurcation motion. Reddington asked Judge Sullivan to split the trial into a guilt phase and a responsibility phase before this trial began. Sullivan denied it. After a hung jury, that motion carries different weight. If granted, a retrial could bypass the physical evidence Clancy has already conceded and go directly to the psychiatric question.The retrial timeline is another factor. A second trial means months of preparation, the same eighty-plus witnesses returning, and Clancy—paralyzed, held at Tewksbury—sitting through it all again. Her lawyer was asked if she could handle another trial and gave a one-word answer.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the bench trial option, the bifurcation strategy, the retrial math, and what mothers watching this case should think about if they ever find themselves on a jury summons for the next round.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #Retrial #BenchTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MassachusettsLaw #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast
Before jurors began deliberating again this morning, things got heated once again between Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan. Reddington wanted the holdout juror to be questioned in open court, but the judge ultimately denied his request, saying there was no indication the juror has refused to deliberate or follow the law. Reddington then accused the judge of softly, glossing over his instructions to the jury, and that’s when Sullivan fired back, defending himself. The judge ultimately gave new, slightly more forceful instructions to jurors before sending them back to deliberations.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The jury came back after nearly 38 hours of deliberations with a note that said “with a heavy heart” we are unable to come to a unanimous decision. After protest from the defense, Judge Sullivan said he had no choice but to declare a mistrial. But that didn’t stop Kevin Reddington who asked to appeal to a Supreme Court Justice to issue an emergency stay on the ruling, and shockingly, Judge Sullivan gave him one hour. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A one hour delay, turned into a three hour ordeal, that ultimately ended in a mistrial. After a judge from the Massachusetts Supreme Court denied the defense’s last-ditch effort for an emergency stay, Judge Sullivan officially declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial. There was no emotion on the faces of Lindsay Clancy, her family, or any of the jurors after the announcement was made, following 40 hours of deliberations and a grueling 5 week trial. There is already a status hearing on the books to prepare for a possible retrial, which the DA has not committed to as of yet, set for the end of the month. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Autistic child Saylor Hayes was found in a lake. Her parents, John Herb Hayes III and Geordyn Nichole Hayes, have been arrested.https://www.wjhl.com/news/crime/live-saylor-hayes-parents-appear-in-court-for-extradition-hearing/ https://wpde.com/news/local/timeline-saylor-hayes-case-from-disappearance-to-parents-arrestshttps://wcyb.com/news/local/documents-show-mother-of-saylor-hayes-was-charged-with-child-abuse-earlier-this-year-geordyn-john-south-carolina-carter-county-washington-virginia-tennesseeLindsay Clancy: Defense Tries to Remove Juror Day 6 of deliberations brought major courtroom drama as Lindsay Clancy's defense sought to remove a juror amid concerns over reasonable doubt. Judge Sullivan declined and sent the jury back to deliberate as the deadlock continued. Join our squad! Kristi and Katie share true crime stories and give you actionable things you can do to help, all with a wicked sense of humor.Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/q8d35JBvCFollow our True Crime Trials Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadTrialsFollow our True Crime Shorts Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@truecrimesquadshorts-t6iWant to Support our work and get perks like extra content and The Watch Party?www.truecrimesquad.com*Social Media Links*Facebook: www.facebook.com/truecrimesquadFacebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/215774426330767Website: https://www.truecrimesquad.comTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@truecrimesquadBlueSky- https://bsky.app/profile/truecrimesquad.bsky.social True Crime Squad on Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5gIPqBHJLftbXdRgs1Bqm1
In breaking news, Katie Phang's team have just told Judge Sullivan that Attorney General Todd Blanche and his legal team continue to mislead the Court and hide FBI handwritten file notes about Trump and his alleged sex abuse victim from the public, and they demand immediate justice! Popok breaks it down in real time. Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJgZJZZbnLFPr5GJdCuIwpA/join Become a member of the Legal AF Substack: https://michaelpopok.substack.com/20off Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595 Subscribe to the Intersection with Michael Popok podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-intersection-with-michael-popok/id1818863274 Subscribe to Unprecedented with Michael Popok and Dina Doll podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/unprecedented-by-legal-af/id1867023089 Subscribe to Court of History with Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-court-of-history/id1867022920 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Lindsay Clancy: Conspiracy and Confusion is the full three-segment run, fifteen comments from this channel checked against the trial record, with the carotid artery search her own lawyer showed the jury as the opening.What's at stake in the verdict comes first. First-degree murder in Massachusetts means mandatory life without parole. Not criminally responsible means commitment to a state hospital with periodic reviews, and Lindsay has already been at Tewksbury since May 2023. The burden is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she could appreciate the wrongfulness of what she did or control it. Judge Sullivan read that two-part test to the jury.Then the comments. Whether she did it: a rope with no exhibit behind it, and window blood the State Police analyst classified as contact stains. A handedness theory with zero testimony, a mistress absent from every filing, and a Europe trip that came after her 911-call admission. Patrick, meanwhile, is on a pharmacy camera while his wife is dialing him from home.Whether she was in her right mind: a Yates search missing from the extraction next to a Yates conversation a coworker swore to. A psychosis-doesn't-switch-off argument answered by a Commonwealth witness. A lawyer question asked through a breathing tube. And the diagnoses that exist, bipolar from both sides, major depression from the prosecution, psychosis from the defense.Patrick: the May 2023 relocation, the five-word answer on bipolar, a profiler with no Bureau history, thirteen medications listed in his own complaint, and his December 2022 phone calls with dates attached.She admits she killed her children. Her lawyer isn't blaming Patrick. Everything else, comment by comment, gets the record.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #AndreaYates #Duxbury #TrueCrimePodcast #ClancyTrial
The Justice Department moved to appeal Judge Emmet Sullivan's rulings in Katie Phang's lawsuit over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, escalating a fight that had already produced unusually sharp criticism of the government's handling of the records. Sullivan had granted Phang a preliminary injunction in June 2026 after concluding that the government had failed to meaningfully answer key portions of her argument and had effectively conceded important points concerning compliance with the law. His orders required the DOJ to address disputed redactions, review and produce certain foreign-language material, provide information concerning underlying FBI interview records, and publish the redaction log required by the statute. Sullivan later ordered the government to provide unredacted records for his own private review so he could determine whether the DOJ's stated reasons for withholding names and information were legitimate.On August 24, 2026, the DOJ filed a protective notice of appeal, signaling that it intended to challenge Sullivan's order rather than simply accept the court's interpretation of what the Epstein transparency law required. The department maintained that at least some of the disputed redactions were necessary to protect victims, private individuals and other sensitive information, while Phang's case argued that the government had withheld or obscured information beyond what Congress permitted when it ordered the Epstein records released. The appeal therefore set up a larger fight over how much discretion the Justice Department actually retained after Congress enacted a law specifically designed to force broad disclosure of its Epstein material. Instead of resolving the transparency dispute, the government's decision to appeal ensured that the battle would move higher into the federal courts, with the central question becoming whether Sullivan had gone too far in compelling disclosure or whether the DOJ itself had failed to carry out the disclosure mandate Congress imposed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Justice Department moved to appeal Judge Emmet Sullivan's rulings in Katie Phang's lawsuit over compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, escalating a fight that had already produced unusually sharp criticism of the government's handling of the records. Sullivan had granted Phang a preliminary injunction in June 2026 after concluding that the government had failed to meaningfully answer key portions of her argument and had effectively conceded important points concerning compliance with the law. His orders required the DOJ to address disputed redactions, review and produce certain foreign-language material, provide information concerning underlying FBI interview records, and publish the redaction log required by the statute. Sullivan later ordered the government to provide unredacted records for his own private review so he could determine whether the DOJ's stated reasons for withholding names and information were legitimate.On August 24, 2026, the DOJ filed a protective notice of appeal, signaling that it intended to challenge Sullivan's order rather than simply accept the court's interpretation of what the Epstein transparency law required. The department maintained that at least some of the disputed redactions were necessary to protect victims, private individuals and other sensitive information, while Phang's case argued that the government had withheld or obscured information beyond what Congress permitted when it ordered the Epstein records released. The appeal therefore set up a larger fight over how much discretion the Justice Department actually retained after Congress enacted a law specifically designed to force broad disclosure of its Epstein material. Instead of resolving the transparency dispute, the government's decision to appeal ensured that the battle would move higher into the federal courts, with the central question becoming whether Sullivan had gone too far in compelling disclosure or whether the DOJ itself had failed to carry out the disclosure mandate Congress imposed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Day 21 marked the end of testimony in the Lindsay Clancy trial after five weeks of evidence. The Commonwealth's final rebuttal witness, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff, told jurors that Lindsay was suffering from a mental disease or defect—he believed Bipolar II disorder was the best diagnosis—but nevertheless concluded that she understood right from wrong, remained in control of her behavior and was criminally responsible when she killed Cora, Dawson and Callan.Saathoff argued that Lindsay's behavior on January 24 showed significant organization and control. He pointed to her activities throughout the day, sending Patrick out for medication and takeout, the absence of witnesses during the killings, and her ability to carry out the strangulations without the alleged voice telling her specifically how, where or with what to kill the children. He also remained skeptical of Lindsay's account that a male voice suddenly appeared, commanded the killings and then disappeared afterward.But Kevin Reddington's cross-examination produced several important concessions. Saathoff acknowledged that he didn't interview Lindsay until more than three years after the killings, that there can be benefits to evaluating someone closer to the event, and that he had personally treated only two women with postpartum psychosis—both decades ago. He also agreed that being turned away while suicidal could have a serious effect on a patient and acknowledged Lindsay experienced significant medication side effects.Perhaps the most striking moment came at the very end. Reddington read Saathoff part of the Commonwealth's own opening statement, which portrayed Lindsay as deciding she no longer wanted the life she had and making a calculated choice to kill her children and herself. Saathoff responded that the prosecution's description “really minimizes what she was going through.”After Saathoff finished, the Commonwealth officially rested its rebuttal case, ending the evidentiary phase after 21 days of testimony. The jury was sent home while Judge William Sullivan and the attorneys worked through the final jury instructions and verdict forms. Sullivan denied Reddington's request for a special instruction allowing jurors to consider alleged deficiencies in the police investigation, although the defense may still argue those deficiencies during closing.Closing arguments are set for Thursday morning, followed by Judge Sullivan's instructions. The jury could begin deliberating Thursday afternoon.
Two prosecution rebuttal experts took the stand in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial and agreed on one thing: she wasn't psychotic. They disagreed on nearly everything else, including her diagnosis.Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun scored Clancy's account of hearing a commanding male voice against clinical benchmarks and found three indicators pointing toward fabrication. No accompanying delusions. No attempt to stop it. And an auditory experience that appeared for eighteen minutes during the killings and was never reported before or after. Approximately 88 percent of genuine command hallucinations come with delusions. Clancy reported none.Heilbrun's theory for why she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan landed harder than any clinical finding. He called it "suicide combined with altruistic filicide" — a mother who planned to end her own life and took her children with her because she was convinced they would suffer without her. When Patrick asked what happened, she didn't mention a voice. She said she tried to kill herself.The day ended early after the prosecution's own witness raised Clancy's Catholic upbringing and asked her about mortal sin — the second time in eight days faith entered the trial through the prosecution's side. Judge Sullivan denied a defense mistrial motion but sent the jury home. Closing arguments are expected Wednesday.END_LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #InsanityDefense #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrimeToday
In breaking news, Judge Sullivan has ordered that Todd Blanche and his DOJ tell him by next week, whether they are engaged in a massive coverup about handwritten FBI interview notes of a victim who claims Trump abused her at the age of 13. Popok reports on the new filing by Katie Phang's lawyers in the Epstein files case, which alerts the Court that Blanche's lawyer did not tell the truth about the missing handwritten notes and that they have produced handwritten notes about EPSTEIN (but not Trump) in the past! Subscribe: @LegalAFMTN Pre-order the new book from MeidasTouch, WTF America?!: The Way Out of This Hell and Back to Democracy, today: https://bit.ly/wtfamericayoutube Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Day 17 was the shortest day of the Lindsay Clancy trial and possibly the day that decides it.One witness. Sheila Cavanaugh, a board-certified chaplain at Brigham and Women's Hospital who has visited Lindsay Clancy roughly 200 times since her three children were killed. She was there the day after. She was there when they pulled the breathing tube out on January 31, 2023, and Clancy's first words were that she was glad her children were safe. And she was there when Clancy described a persistent male voice that told her if she did not follow the command, neither she nor her children would be safe.That date matters. The Commonwealth's timeline says the first report of voices came on February 6. The chaplain just moved it up six days, and the defense now has two sources placing the voice earlier than the prosecution's story allows.Then Jennifer Sprague got up and ran the sharpest cross of the week: you wrote down everything else, so why is the voice not in your notes?Outside, about 300 women in pink stood silent on the courthouse lawn in a demonstration called Stand in Peace, organized by a woman who drove down from Maine. Shirts that said "She Needed Help." Applause for a defense attorney.And after the jury went home before lunch, the lawyers stayed and had the most consequential argument of the entire trial: what instructions the jury gets. Involuntary intoxication, in or out. Involuntary manslaughter as a lesser charge, in or out. First degree, second degree, or both. Those three answers determine the shape of every possible verdict in this case, and not one juror was in the room to hear it.Plus: why Judge Sullivan pulled every juror aside individually for the first time in 17 days, what Dr. Phillip Resnick's filicide research has to do with Friday's testimony, why the Commonwealth stacking three rebuttal experts tells you something, and a Reality Check on what happens when a murder trial becomes a movement.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/we-saw-the-devil-unfiltered-political-analysis--4433638/support.Website: http://www.wesawthedevil.comPatreon: http://www.patreon.com/wesawthedevilRobin's Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/robin_wstdTwitter: http://www.twitter.com/WeSawtheDevilInstagram: http://www.instagram.com/wesawthedevilpodcast.TikTok: tiktok.com/@wesawthedevilpolitics
Popok is joined by Katie Phang's attorney and the head of the Public Integrity Project, Brendan Ballou for some exclusive updates in her case against AG Todd Blanche and the DOJ for the full release of millions of Epstein documents still withheld by the DOJ, and what Judge Sullivan will do about it next. Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJgZJZZbnLFPr5GJdCuIwpA/join Become a member of the Legal AF Substack: https://michaelpopok.substack.com/20off Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595 Subscribe to the Intersection with Michael Popok podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-intersection-with-michael-popok/id1818863274 Subscribe to Unprecedented with Michael Popok and Dina Doll podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/unprecedented-by-legal-af/id1867023089 Subscribe to Court of History with Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-court-of-history/id1867022920 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Susan Clancy, Patrick Clancy's mother, took the stand today in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She has pleaded not guilty and is mounting an insanity defense, with attorney Kevin Reddington arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication at the time of the killings.Susan Clancy testified that her daughter-in-law came to her struggling with anxiety, depression, and sleeplessness, and asked for help finding a doctor — not the picture of a woman hiding what was happening to her. She described Lindsay as a mother who loved and adored her kids. Under cross-examination, prosecutors pressed on an ER visit for anxiety and insomnia, and on medications Susan Clancy admitted even she found confusing to manage. Then came a question that never should have made it out of the prosecutor's mouth — asking whether Susan Clancy knew murder is considered a mortal sin under Catholic doctrine. Judge William Sullivan called an immediate sidebar and struck it from the record. On redirect, jurors heard that Lindsay had been turned away from a treatment program for being overmedicated, and that she'd called a suicide hotline twice before January 24.Prosecutors are expected to argue Clancy understood the nature of her actions despite the defense's mental-health claims. She allegedly attempted suicide afterward by jumping from a second-story window, leaving her paralyzed from the waist down. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #Breaking
Allison and Katie take you behind the scenes of the Epstein Files hearing last Thursday that resulted in Judge Sullivan ordering the DOJ to hand over handwritten FBI interview notes for review in chambers. Reminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:https://apple.co/3XNx7ckWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?https://patreon.com/thedailybeanshttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/https://apple.co/3UKzKt0 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Judge Emmet Sullivan held a hearing in the case in which independent journalist Katie Phang sued Attorney General Todd Blanche for violating the Epstein files transparency act, thereby violating her First Amendment freedom of the press rights. Glenn attended the court hearing in DC and did a live report from outside DC federal district court. He was joined by Adam Klasfeld of All Rise News for a discussion of what happened during the court hearing. The top line from the hearing: Judge Sullivan lectured the DOJ attorneys for a full 20 minutes about how he will hold them in contempt of court if need be, saying repeatedly, "That's not a threat, it's a promise." Find Adam Klasfeld at www.allrisenews.comFind Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
We have entered the accountability phase as Federal Courts and the Supreme Court have figured out a way to reign in Trump's abuse of power as we head for the midterms in less than 90 days. The Legal AF Podcast, helmed by Popok and Special Guest Anchor Adam Klasfeld of All Rise News (in for KFA), break down Blanche's terrible first week as AG starting with his deer in a headlights presser; this week's Epstein hearing in Katie Phang's suit, as Judge Sullivan prepares to lower the boom on Blanche, the new suit to stop Trump from selling our public government information to the highest bidder; 2 federal judges poised to declare Trump's latest attacks on Birthright Citizenship unconstitutional; new motions filed by Trump's fierce critics to support future motions to dismiss for vindictive prosecution, and so much more at the intersection of law and politics. Subscribe: @allrisenews Subscribe to All Rise News to support Adam Klasfeld's work: www.allrisenews.com Support ACLU and Take an Action Today: https://aclu.org/action Support Our Sponsors: IQ BAR : Get 20% off all IQBAR products. Text LEGALAF to 64000. (Message and data rates may apply) DELETE ME: Get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to join https://joindeleteme.com/LEGALAF and use promo code LEGALAF at checkout. HONEY LOVE: Save 20% Off Honeylove by going to https://honeylove.com/LEGALAF! #honeylovepod SUNDAYS FOR DOGS: Get 50% OFF your first order of Sundays. Go to https://sundaysfordogs.com/LEGALAF50 or use code: LEGALAF50 at checkout. Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJgZJZZbnLFPr5GJdCuIwpA/join Learn more about the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com Subscribe to Legal AF Substack: https://michaelpopok.substack.com/subscribe?coupon=c0fc8f5c Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Judge Emmett Sullivan is calling Attorney General Todd Blanche to the carpet. More specifically, he's hauling him into court on August 13th because Todd has to explain why he failed to comply with Judge Sullivan's July 25th order to provide the court some documents including some of the unreacted Epstein files.Glenn does a detailed review of Judge Sullivan's new court order in Katie Phang's lawsuit against Todd Blanche for violating federal law - the Epstein Files Transparency Act.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
