Podcast appearances and mentions of John Antonakis

Episode Six: On The Measurement of Leadership, featuring Dr Matt Barney, Founder and award-winning Organisational Psychologist & Professor John Antonakis, Organisational Behaviour in the Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Lausanne, Switzerland.  In this episode of the Leadership Navigating Complexity podcast, host Dr. Aiden Thornton speaks with Dr Matt Barney & professor John Antonakis about the challenges of accurately measuring leadership behaviour, differentiating it from mere perceptions, which are often influenced by biases. Dr. Barney discusses advances in AI that enable the capture of precise behavioural data, a "game changer" in leadership evaluation, while Professor Antonakis highlights issues around traditional behavioural assessments and the importance of understanding nuanced perceptions. Dr Aiden M. A. Thornton from The Australian National University (ANU); Dr Matt Barney from TruMind.ai; Professor John Antonakis from HEC Lausanne - The Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Lausanne.  Additional Resources:  Dr Matt Barney   3 Transdisciplinary measurement through AI: hybrid metrology and psychometrics powered by large language models   Professor John Antonakis: Learning Charisma, by John Antonakis, Marika Fenley and Sue Liechti  John Antonakis, Google Scholar  John Antonakis, ResearchGate 

Where do charismatic personalities come from? Are they people born with special or even divine gifts? Or have they simply mastered a few effective techniques for cordial social interaction that anyone can learn? As business, entertainment and politics increasingly turn into popularity contests conducted through social media and TV, charisma seems to matter more and more: hence the proliferation of companies offering to teach aspiring leaders how to acquire it. But the influence that magnetic personalities can have on an audience long predates modern screen media: in 1896, a speech brimming with charisma earned one little-known young orator a not just a 20-minute standing ovation but also a US presidential nomination.Iszi Lawrence explores the role of charisma in politics and business with Julia Sonnevend, Associate Professor of Sociology and Communications at The New School for Social Research in New York and author of Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics; John Antonakis, Professor of Organizational Behaviour in the Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Lausanne, and co-author of a political charismometer that predicts US presidential elections among other things; Jeremy C. Young, historian of political culture and social movements, author of The Age of Charisma: Leaders, Followers, and Emotions in American Society; as well as World Service listeners.(Photo: Smiling businessman in discussion. Credit: Thomas Barwick/Getty Images)

Jamais 2 sans 3 ! Nous recevons notre ami John Antonakis, professeur de sciences comportementales à HEC Lausanne, qui a continué d'affiner son modèle de prédiction de résultats d'élections basé - entre autres - sur le charisme. Modèle, qui avant le résultat de la dernière élection américaine, donnait Trump vainqueur avec 70% de chance, malgré les sondages qui prédisaient une victoire de Kamala Harris. Malheureusement pour nous, le modèle avait raison. Comment ça marche ? Pourquoi ça marche ? Quelles révisions ont été apportées au modèle pour améliorer son efficacité ? Bref, nous parlons de probabilités, d'hypothèses, de feedback, de corrections et de validation, bref, de science en train de se faire. Et on va sans doute parler un peu politique aussi ; on en a gros !Notes d'émission : https://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2024/12/07/podcast-science-520-il-avait-prevu-la-victoire-de-trump/Retrouvez-nous sur PodcastScience.fm, Bluesky, Twitter, Facebook et Instagram.Soutenez-nous sur Tipeee Soutenez nous sur Patreon Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Jeder kennt Menschen, die das gewisse Etwas zu haben scheinen. Menschen mit Charisma haben eine magnetische Anziehungskraft auf andere. Sie erhellen einen Raum, wenn sie ihn betreten, und inspirieren alle um sie herum. Aber was genau macht Charisma aus, und kann man es trainieren? Wir klären, was hinter Charisma steckt, welche Eigenschaften charismatische Menschen haben – und ob man lernen kann, charismatisch zu sein.   Shownotes: Studie zu Charisma als Signal dafür, dass sich jemand als Führungskraft eignet Sind Charismatiker gute Führungskräfte? Ja, zeigt diese Studie. Das "Social Skill Inventory" von Psychologie-Professor Ronald Riggio findet ihr in der Originalversion hier. Charismatische Menschen verfügen über eine sehr hohe soziale und emotionale Intelligenz. Charisma wird Führungsfiguren in unsicheren Zeiten eher zugeschrieben. Studie von John Antonakis dazu, ob sich Charisma trainieren lässt. Anekdote zu Prince, der sein Charisma trainiert hat. Never Mind – Psychologie in 15 Minuten ist ein Podcast von Business Insider. Wir freuen uns über eure Ideen und Fragen an podcast@businessinsider.de sowie https://www.instagram.com/fannyjimenezofficial/. Oder ihr schickt uns eine Sprachnachricht an die Nummer 0170-3753084. Redaktion/Moderation: Fanny Jimenez/Derman Deniz, Produktion: Wake Word GmbH Impressum: https://www.businessinsider.de/informationen/impressum/ Datenschutz: https://www.businessinsider.de/informationen/datenschutz/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Robin De Hass rencontre John Antonakis, professeur de comportement organisationnel à la Faculté des sciences économiques et commerciales de l'Université de Lausanne et actuel rédacteur en chef de The Leadership Quarterly

Robin de Haas est lʹinvité principal du Grand Soir, accompagné de John Antonakis, professeur de comportement organisationnel à la Faculté des sciences économiques et commerciales de l'Université de Lausanne et actuel rédacteur en chef de The Leadership Quarterly, en deuxième heure de lʹémission. Autres invité.es: Charles Pasi - Bernard Schmitt - co-auteur du livre "Johnny, private access, à ses côtés en coulisse" Editions Seghers

Changing hearts is an important part of changing minds. Research shows that appealing to human emotion can help you make your case and build your authority as a leader. This book highlights that research and shows you how to act on it, presenting both comprehensive frameworks for developing influence and small, simple tactics you can use to convince others every day. This volume includes the work of: Nick Morgan Robert Cialdini Linda A. Hill Nancy Duarte This collection of articles includes "Understand the Four Components of Influence," by Nick Morgan; "Harnessing the Science of Persuasion," by Robert Cialdini; "Three Things Managers Should Be Doing Every Day," by Linda A. Hill and Kent Lineback; "Learning Charisma," by John Antonakis, Marika Fenley, and Sue Liechti; "To Win People Over, Speak to Their Wants and Needs," by Nancy Duarte; "Storytelling That Moves People," an interview with Robert McKee by Bronwyn Fryer; "The Surprising Persuasiveness of a Sticky Note," by Kevin Hogan; and "When to Sell with Facts and Figures, and When to Appeal to Emotions," by Michael D. Harris. How to be human at work. The HBR Emotional Intelligence Series features smart, essential reading on the human side of professional life from the pages of Harvard Business Review. Each book in the series offers proven research showing how our emotions impact our work lives, practical advice for managing difficult people and situations, and inspiring essays on what it means to tend to our emotional well-being at work. Uplifting and practical, these books describe the social skills that are critical for ambitious professionals to master.

We've all met someone in our lives, that is so charming, the way the person talks, laughs, or tells stories. We are almost supernaturally drawn to them — only a few of us can quantify, in an instant, what makes charismatic people so magnetic. John Antonakis, notes that in every interaction with others, we're making constant micro-decisions about whether the person demanding our attention is deserving of it, and charisma, is merely information signaling. Today, we will dig deep into building charisma, and the possible ways to hone it as if it's a skill that we can learn and build.

Joyce Newman - “Everyone can be charismatic. We are not born charismatic - we cultivate it in many ways. One way is by observing and learning from people who you think are charismatic. You don't need to copy them, but learn their secrets, try them on and fine-tune them until they fit you. It's a trial and error process. Bad news is that once you have your charismatic status, you can lose it. Just look at Mel Gibson and Lindsay Lohan. But here's the good news – if you lose it, with self awareness and effort, you can regain your charismatic ranking” Some links: - https://www.forbes.com/sites/deniserestauri/2012/05/03/5-qualities-of-charismatic-people-how-many-do-you-have/?sh=101fd1b42ea9 - https://blog.hubspot.com/sales/habits-of-likable-people - https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/smarter-living/what-makes-people-charismatic-and-how-you-can-be-too.html - https://darwinianbusiness.com/2016/09/25/charismatic-leadership-through-the-lens-of-evolution/ Contact us at info@cloudstreaks.com

Débat entre François Hourmant, professeur en sciences politiques à l'Université d'Angers, auteur de "Pouvoir et beauté: le tabout du physique en politique" (Presse universitaires de France), Georg Lutz, professeur en sciences politiques à l'Université de Lausanne et directeur de FORS, le Centre suisse d'expertise en sciences sociales, et John Antonakis, professeur de comportement organisationnel et spécialiste du charisme à l'Université de Lausanne.

John Antonakis believes that the key to moving forward is getting back to basics: "We need to go back to basics, do some clean experiments, use clean behavioral measures, and then we can build the scaffolding on firm concrete and not on Jell-O that we have right now." We had a great conversation about this and other areas of our field. I hope you enjoy it.About Dr. John AntonakisJohn Antonakis is a Full Professor of Organizational Behavior at HEC Lausanne, University of Lausanne. His research focuses on predictors and outcomes of leadership, leadership development, psychometrics, and research methods.He has published articles in many top journals such as Science, Psychological Science, Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management, Journal of Operations Management, and Harvard Business Review. He has also published three books and 20 book chapters and has presented his research at dozens of conferences. He has received about 2.38 million Swiss Francs in funding for his research.John is Editor in Chief of The Leadership Quarterly, and is on the editorial boards of many other top journals in management and applied psychology. He is a fellow of the Association for Psychological Science (APS) and the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), as well as an elected member of the Society of Organizational Behaviour (SOB).Learn More About John's Work:John at Google ScholarJohn's Textbook - The Nature of LeadershipJohn's TED TalkQuotes From This Episode:On Charismatic Leadership Theory - "All the literature was written in a very abstract way... there are a lot of theoretical accounts of charismatic leaders, but it wasn’t properly defined. It was defined as if it was undefinable.""We said that charisma is basically symbolic, emotional, and value-laden...so values meaning that you speak about your morals, your values, what you’re defending. Symbolic means that you can speak in pictures, and emotion is that you can signal your emotions - your confidence, your emotional state, with your body, what you say, and on your face... These things are easy to observe, they’re easy to code objectively and easy to manipulate.""The process of becoming a doctor requires that one studies medicine and then gets certified to practice and uses interventions that have been tested. This doesn’t happen in leadership. People become leaders for all sorts of reasons.""We need to focus more on making the world of leaders selection more professional."Resources Mentioned in This EpisodeStoner by John WilliamsAlphaGo DocumentaryAbout The International Leadership Association (ILA)The ILA was created in 1999 to bring together professionals with a keen interest in the study, practice, and teaching of leadership. Today, ILA is the largest worldwide community committed to leadership scholarship, development, and practice. Connect with Your Host, Scott AllenScott's other Podcast - The Captovation PodcastLinkedInWebsite

Soutenez nous sur Patreon.com/PodcastScience // et fr.tipeee.com/podcast-science // Retrouvez nous sur PodcastScience.fm // Twitter: Twitter.com/PodcastScience // Facebook: Facebook.com/PodcastScience // Notes d'émission : https://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2020/10/28/podcast-science-425-le-retour-du-charismatique-john-antonakis/ À quelques jours des élections présidentielles américaines, les sondages annoncent toujours Biden gagnant. Mais que dit la science ? John Antonakis, professeur de comportement organisationnel à HEC Lausanne et expert en charisme en politique avait prédit la victoire de Trump sur cette antenne il y a 5 ans (c’était les épisodes 230 et 231, sur l’étude scientifique du charisme), et John avait promis de revenir nous en parler. Je ne suis pas sûr qu’il vienne avec des bonnes nouvelles. Mais je suis certain que nous allons passer un bon moment en sa compagnie. Nous sommes le mercredi 21 octobre 2021, c’est l’épisode 425. Bienvenue sur Podcast Science !

Donald Trump assure être guéri et immunisé contre le coronavirus. L'est-il également contre une défaite à la prochaine présidentielle américaine ? C'est ce qu'affirment un certain nombre d'observateurs et de prévisionnistes. Ils prennent appui sur les sondages, les précédents scrutins ou encore des modèles mathématiques. Celui de John Antonakis, professeur de comportement organisationnel à HEC Lausanne et Philippe Jacquart, de l'EM Lyon Business School, prédit une réélection de l'actuel président américain, grâce notamment à son charisme. Explications de John Antonakis dans le Point J. Caroline Stevan Réalisation : David Chapuis Nous écrire : pointj@rts.ch

Jonas Schneiter est entouré pour cette émission de Marie Fourquet, Micheline Calmy-Rey, Gabriel Bender et de l'humoriste Nathanaël Rochat. L'équipe parle des tenues vestimentaires à lʹécole, des "complotistes" et du oui à 50,1% pour lʹachat de nouveaux avions de chasse. En deuxième partie d'émission, les beaux parleurs accueillent John Antonakis, professeur de comportement organisationnel à HEC Lausanne pour aborder le sujet des élections américaines. Carlos Henriquez nous le présente avec humour.

John Antonakis est professeur de comportement organisationnel à HEC Lausanne. Ses études prédisent la victoire de Donald Trump à la présidentielle américaine. Il a également étudié de près, tout au long de sa carrière, lʹimportance du charisme en politique. Son portrait est brossé avec humour par Carlos Henriquez.

John Antonakis, Professor of Organisational Behaviour, Université de Lausanne, on the key predictive factors in political leadership elections. PRODUCTION | ChromeRadio in partnership with The Monthly Barometer and Anadeo, Chamonix | Producer - Catriona Oliphant | Post-production - Chris Sharp.

Soutenez nous sur Patreon.com/PodcastScience // Retrouvez nous sur PodcastScience.fm // Twitter: Twitter.com/PodcastScience // Facebook: Facebook.com/PodcastScience // Vous vous êtes sans doute déjà demandé ce qui fait qu’on est ou non, un bon orateur ou un bon leader… Ce qu’est le charisme, en somme… Et comme vous êtes sur Podcast Science, vous vous demandez sans doute s’il y a quelque chose à en dire d’un point de vue scientifique. Et bien, vous n’allez pas être déçus, chers poditeurs. Ce soir nous recevons l’un des spécialistes mondial de la question, en la personne de John Antonakis, qui a fait de l’étude scientifique du charisme son objet d’étude. Vous êtes bien sur Podcast Science, c’est l’épisode 231, bonsoir et bienvenue ! Images et notes de la soirée : http://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2015/10/03/podcast-science-231-le-charisme-avec-john-antonakis-p2

Soutenez nous sur Patreon.com/PodcastScience // Retrouvez nous sur PodcastScience.fm // Twitter: Twitter.com/PodcastScience // Facebook: Facebook.com/PodcastScience // Vous vous êtes sans doute déjà demandé ce qui fait qu’on est ou non, un bon orateur ou un bon leader… Ce qu’est le charisme, en somme… Et comme vous êtes sur Podcast Science, vous vous demandez sans doute s’il y a quelque chose à en dire d’un point de vue scientifique. Et bien, vous n’allez pas être déçus, chers poditeurs. Ce soir nous recevons l’un des spécialistes mondial de la question, en la personne de John Antonakis, qui a fait de l’étude scientifique du charisme son objet d’étude. Vous êtes bien sur Podcast Science, c’est l’épisode 230, bonsoir et bienvenue ! >> Images et notes de la soirée : http://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2015/10/03/podcast-science-230-charisme/

John ANTONAKIS, professeur de leadership à HEC Lausanne

John ANTONAKIS, professeur de leadership à HEC Lausanne

John ANTONAKIS, professeur de leadership à HEC Lausanne

John ANTONAKIS, professeur de leadership à HEC Lausanne

John ANTONAKIS, professeur de leadership à HEC Lausanne

John ANTONAKIS, professeur de leadership à HEC Lausanne

It is well known that endogeneity leads to inconsistent estimates. Unfortunately, many researchers working outside of economics are not aware of the problem of endogeneity and how to deal with it. Prof. John Antonakis shows how the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator recovers causal estimates in the presence of endogeneity (which includes the problem of common-method variance). He also shows that endogeneity can even be prevalent in experimental designs, when researchers estimate mediation models; that is, where the causal effect of an exogenous variable on a dependent variable is mediated by an endogenous variable (or a manipulation check).

A key assumption of regression analysis (or structural equation modeling) is that the modeled independent variables are not endogenous. Yet, the problems of endogeneity are not well known to researchers working in many social sciences disciplines (e.g., management, applied psychology, sociology, etc.). When the independent variable has not been exogenously manipulated, there is a strong possibility that its relationship to a dependent variable will not be correctly estimated, leading to spurious findings. This podcast gives a brief and vivid overview to endogeneity and why it is engendered. Prof. John Antonakis discusses the problems of endogeneity using non-technical language and intuitive explanations; he shows that when the independent variable is endogenous--which is also possible in experimental designs (when the mediator is endogenous)--the observed relationship that is estimated can be very misleading. Prof. Antonakis demonstrates how the problem of endogeneity can be solved using procedures borrowed from econometrics (i.e., two-stage least square regression estimator).

A key assumption of regression analysis (or structural equation modeling) is that the modeled independent variables are not endogenous. Yet, the problems of endogeneity are not well known to researchers working in many social sciences disciplines (e.g., management, applied psychology, sociology, etc.). When the independent variable has not been exogenously manipulated, there is a strong possibility that its relationship to a dependent variable will not be correctly estimated, leading to spurious findings. This podcast gives a brief and vivid overview to endogeneity and why it is engendered. Prof. John Antonakis discusses the problems of endogeneity using non-technical language and intuitive explanations; he shows that the observed relationship that is estimated can be very misleading when the independent variable is endogenous.

Prof. John ANTONAKIS, HEC Lausanne

Prof. John ANTONAKIS, HEC Lausanne

Associate Editor, Gail Fairhurst, leads this insightful discussion on context of leadership with guest editors, John Antonakis and Bob Liden.

Ulrich Hoffrage questionne John Antonakis sur la recherche qu'il a conduite avec Olaf Dalgas et qui donne lieu à une publication dans la revue Science de février 2009.

Ulrich Hoffrage questionne John Antonakis sur la recherche qu'il a conduite avec Olaf Dalgas et qui donne lieu à une publication dans la revue Science de février 2009.

John ANTONAKIS, Professeur en comportement organisationnel à HEC Lausanne

John ANTONAKIS, Professeur en comportement organisationnel à HEC Lausanne