POPULARITY
3 episodes with judicial elections
2 episodes with judicial elections
2 episodes with judicial elections
Premier Doug Ford recently declared that he thought it was time for Ontario to start electing judges, ranting against "bleeding heart" jurists and suggesting that all appointments are political. Could tougher judges indeed help fix our system? What's the best way to ensure judicial independence, and who gets to define it? To discuss, we're joined by Donna Kellway President of the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association Boris Bytensky President of the Criminal Lawyers' Association of Ontario Peter Copeland Deputy director of domestic policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and former director of policy to the solicitor general of Ontario and Shakir Rahim Director of the criminal justice program at the Canadian Civil Liberties AssociationSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Trump administration plans to revoke the legal status of some 240,000 Ukrainians who fled to the U.S. during the war - and Washington hits pause on intelligence sharing with Kyiv. The White House threw the Big 3 automakers a lifeline, allowing them to dodge the tariffs for a month - the politics of pickup trucks may explain why. Cartels loom large over Mexico's new system of electing judges. And some U.S. retailers which have publicly scrapped DEI programs are keeping some of their efforts going behind the scenes. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Find the Recommended Read here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit megaphone.fm/adchoices to opt out of targeted advertising. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
North Carolina’s judges are chosen by voters in partisan elections, just like any other politician. But should judges have party labels next to their names on the ballot? WRAL State Government Reporter Will Doran explains why some state lawmakers say it’s time to take those labels off judicial races.
Montana lawmakers heard more than a dozen bills last week aimed at regulating the state's courts and judges. They included one of the top priorities for Republicans: to make judicial elections partisan.
Given the critical role that judges play in the criminal justice system which entraps poor people and people of color disproportionately, activists are calling for a need to democratize judicial selection.
Judicial votes/races are always among the top inquiries I receive around election cycles and this cycle is no different.
Judicial selection in the states is not uniform, but most states have some form of judicial elections. Some are contested elections–whether partisan or nonpartisan–and some involve uncontested retention elections. During an election, judicial candidates must abide by ethical rules that explicitly restrict their ability to speak freely. What are the implications, if any, for restrictions […]
Judicial selection in the states is not uniform, but most states have some form of judicial elections. Some are contested elections--whether partisan or nonpartisan--and some involve uncontested retention elections. During an election, judicial candidates must abide by ethical rules that explicitly restrict their ability to speak freely.What are the implications, if any, for restrictions on judicial speech arising from different systems of selecting and retaining judges? How do judicial campaign experiences inform free speech perspectives? Join us for a conversation about how judicial elections intersect with free speech rights.Featuring:Hon. Clint Bolick, Justice, Arizona Supreme CourtHon. J. Brett Busby, Justice, Texas Supreme CourtHon. Daniel Kelly, Former Justice, Wisconsin Supreme Court(Moderator) Hon. G. Barry Anderson, Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court (ret.) Related Reading(s):Op. Ed By Justice BolickOther Materials
Throughout most of U.S. history, state courts (and judicial elections) have seldom been the site of pitched political battles. While these courts regularly issued important rulings with significant impacts on public policy debates, the judges and justices who served on these courts were generally able to avoid being drawn into the bareknuckle politics that so […] The post Douglas Keith of the Brennan Center discusses the Politics of Judicial Elections appeared first on NC Newsline.
When you get to the part of the ballot that asks you to vote for a local judge, have you ever thought, “am I qualified to make this decision?” While federal court trial and appellate judges are appointed and enjoy lifetime tenures, state court judges often have to run for election or re-election, and most voters have scant information on the candidates. In California, you can run to be a judge if you have been a lawyer for ten years, no trial experience necessary. And while we expect judges to be neutral, can they be when they have to run for office and take campaign donations? In our next installment of our “Doing Democracy” series, we look at what it means when judges have to stand for election. Guests: Michael S Kang, professor, Northwestern School of Law. Kang is the co-author of "Free to Judge: The Power of Campaign Money in Judicial Elections." He served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States Judge LaDoris Hazzard Cordell, retired judge, Superior Court of California. She is the author of "Her Honor: My Life on the Bench...What Works, What's Broken and How to Change It" Teresa Johnson, incoming president, Bar Association of San Francisco. Johnson is a partner at the law firm Arnold & Porter
Some NYC voters will have to choose between candidates for judgeships on Tuesday. Rachel Holliday Smith, associate editor for THE CITY, talks about those races and how judges are picked in New York.
Raging Chicken's Friday Politics Roundup for November 3, 2023. We're here to break down the good, the bad, and the ugly in state and national politics. This week, we're focused on the critical election this coming Tuesday, Nov. 7 - at stake the future of school boards in Pennridge, Central Bucks, Council Rock, and others. Not only that, but protection for abortion and voting rights is on the ballot with control of the PA Supreme Court up for grabs. Also, the fight to keep a Democratic Party majority on the Bucks County Board of Commissioners is alive and well. Key links: Vote for these Pennridge School Board Candidates: https://www.pennridgecommunityalliance.com/ Vote for these Central Bucks School Board Candidates: https://www.cbsdneighborsunited.com/ Vote for these Council Rock School Board Candidates: https://www.togetherforcouncilrock.org/ Vote for these Bucks County Board of Commissioners & Judicial Candiates: https://bucksdemocrats.org/candidates/ You can support this show by becoming a patron for as little as $5/month at https://www.patreon.com/rcpress. Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/7XzfKUWCmh
As state judicial elections become more and more expensive, it's worth asking whether campaign funding impacts judicial decision making. On this episode, Jeanne Hruska speaks with Michael Kang and Joanna Shepherd about their new book, "Free to Judge: The Power of Campaign Money in Judicial Elections." According to Kang and Shepherd, “campaign money profoundly affects how judges do their jobs.” Join the Progressive Legal Movement Today: ACSLaw.org Today's Host: Jeanne Hruska, ACS Sr Advisor for Communications and Strategy Guest: Michael S. Kang, Class of 1940 Professor, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Guest: Joanna M. Shepherd, Thomas Simmons Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law Link: "Free to Judge: The Power of Campaign Money in Judicial Elections," by Michael Kang and Joanna Shepherd Visit the Podcast Website: Broken Law Podcast Email the Show: Podcast@ACSLaw.org Follow ACS on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube ----------------- Production House: Flint Stone Media Copyright of American Constitution Society 2023.
Featuring Carrie Severino; President Of JCN On Abolishing Judicial Elections? Not So Fast! by Kevin McCullough Radio
Ahead of a deadline for general policy bills to advance, Montana lawmakers have voted down four different proposals that would have made judicial elections partisan. But efforts to alter how judges reach the bench aren't over.
Montana lawmakers are continuing to urge change to how the state's judiciary operates. One bill to require judicial elections to become partisan has advanced.
Wisconsin Supreme Court elections have become expensive, hard-fought, frequently negative campaigns in recent years. The same could also be happening with races for seats on the state's Courts of Appeals—but not in one of the districts, where Dane County Judge and former state Rep. Chris Taylor is running unopposed. She and former state Treasurer Sarah […]Civic Media
Today: Culver City voting age; Voters braving heavy rain; Judicial elections, and more This program is made possible in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private corporation funded by the American people.Support the show: https://laist.com
The General Election ballot includes races for local judges. The governor's task force to reduce abortions releases its report. A new food program at UCO feeds students and helps the environment. You can find the KOSU Daily wherever you get your podcasts, you can also subscribe, rate us and leave a comment. You can keep up to date on all the latest news throughout the day at KOSU.org and make sure to follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram at KOSU Radio. This is The KOSU Daily, Oklahoma news, every weekday.
With millions of dollars flowing into Illinois judicial elections, Douglas Keith of the Brennan Center for Justice discusses the impact of money in judicial politics and other options for judicial selection.
This is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.Part I (00:13 - 12:25) We Have Been Warned: President Biden Brazenly Promises that Support for Abortion Will Be His First Priority if Voters Give Him a Democratic CongressRemarks by President Biden at a Political Event at the Howard Theatre by The White HousePart II (12:25 - 18:34) From ‘Abortion is Wrong from the Moment of Conception' to Abortion on Demand: The Evolution of Joe Biden on AbortionPart III (18:34 - 26:37) ‘The Fact That We Elect Judges is Idiotic and Utterly Perverse': The Left Argues We Should Leave the Choosing of Judges to Professionals — Wait, Where Have We Heard That Before?Judicial Elections are a Time Bomb That Could Blow Up Our Democracy by Washington Post (Paul Waldman)Sign up to receive The Briefing in your inbox every weekday morning.Follow Dr. Mohler:Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | YouTubeFor more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.
Voters will decide two state supreme court races this midterm, with the results potentially shifting partisan control of the bench. The fact that North Carolina even has partisan judicial elections is uncommon. On this episode of The Politics Podcast Michael Crowell discusses some of the pitfalls for how our state handles judicial elections, and why these races are so important.
This episode digs into several election-related topics ahead of the Nov. 8 election. First, Community Impact reporter Rachel Carlton stops by with details on how a possible shakeup among local judges could affect bail reform, with 14 out of 15 misdemeanor judge seats up for grabs. Then, reporter Wesley Gardner discusses how the legacy of Senate Bill 1 continues to impact mail-in voting. The Houston Breakdown is a production of Community Impact. This episode was produced by Olivia Aldridge with assistance from Holly Galvan Posey and editing by Marie Leonard. Weather and allergy reports are sourced from www.weather.com and AccuWeather. ***PATRON PROGRAM SIGN-UP: www.communityimpact.com/patron
Air Date 7/13/2022 Today, we take a look at how the Supreme Court stripped abortion rights for half the country, what life will look like for those seeking abortions and what we can do both personally and politically to fight back. Be part of the show! Leave us a message at 202-999-3991 or email Jay@BestOfTheLeft.com Transcript BestOfTheLeft.com/Support (Get AD FREE Shows and Bonus Content) Join our Discord community! Nominate us for the Podcast Awards by July 31st! SHOW NOTES Ch. 1: Aimee Arrambide of Avow Texas with Abortion Resources - Burn It All Down - Air Date 6-29-22 Jessica Luther talks with Aimee Arrambide who provides information and abortion resources related to the overturning of Roe V. Wade. Ch. 2: Looking for an abortion online? Listen to this first. - There Are No Girls on the Internet - Air Date 6-28-22 Computer scientist and social media expert Dr. Jen Golbeck has been running a popular TikTok series educating people on how to be more secure while navigating abortion online. Ch. 3: The Day 'Roe' Died - Boom! Lawyered - Air Date 6-24-22 For the first time in this country's history, an unelected majority of Supreme Court justices have taken away a fundamental constitutional right. Ch. 4: When Pregnancy becomes Crime - This Is Hell! - Air Date 7-5-22 Writer and philosophy scholar at Cornell University, Kate Manne talks about her Substack article "Criminalizing Pregnant People: A Brief Retrospective." Ch. 5: “A Devastating Ruling”: Law Prof. Michele Goodwin & SCOTUS Attorney Kitty Kolbert on Overturning Roe - Democracy Now! - Air Date 7-4-22 We speak with two leading legal scholars. Kathryn "Kitty" Kolbert is co-founder of the Center for Reproductive Rights Ch. 6: Just Doing The Job They Were Put On The Court To Do - Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick - Air Date 6-25-22 Roe v Wade has been swept away and Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis. Ch. 7: Rep. Ocasio-Cortez: Pres. Biden Should Forcefully Support Ending The Filibuster & Expanding SCOTUS - The Late Show with Stephen Colbert - Air Date 6-29-22 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez lays out the case for what Democrats need to do in response to the Dobbs decision MEMBERS-ONLY BONUS CLIP(S) Ch. 9: How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade - LegalEagle - Air Date 6-29-22 This is a sea change at the Supreme Court FINAL COMMENTS Ch. 12: Final comments on the importance of state judicial elections TAKE ACTION! Start Paying Attention to State Judicial Elections: Ballotpedia: ALL State Judicial Elections 2022 (scroll down for state links & maps) Quick Links: Texas (18 appellate | 6 supreme); Florida (28 appellate | 5 supreme); Ohio (28 appellate | 3 supreme); Lousiana (22 appellate | 1 supreme); Tennesee (24 appellate | 5 supreme) ...and more. Your State-by-State Guide to the 2022 Supreme Court Elections (via Bolts Magazine) Share BOTL's Twitter Thread on this Subject EDUCATE YOURSELF & SHARE State Judge Elections Are About to Become Decisive for Abortion Rights (via Slate - July 6, 2022) We Need to Reclaim State Courts From Big Money and Hateful Agendas (via TRUTHOUT - May 2019) The Politics of Judicial Elections, 2019–20 (via Brennan Center - Jan. 25, 2022) Gerrymandering or Creating New Courts (Dec 2021) Written by BOTL Communications Director Amanda Hoffman MUSIC (Blue Dot Sessions) SHOW IMAGE: Description: A black and white photo showing a large crowd of people protesting in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building on the day Roe v. Wade was overturned, amidst ominous dark clouds in the sky. Credit: "2022.06.24 Roe v Wade Overturned - SCOTUS, Washington, DC USA 175 143207" by Ted Eytan, Flickr | CC BY-SA 2.0 | Changes: Slightly cropped
Cook County Circuit Court Judge Debra Walker joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to discuss the judicial elections occurring on June 28th. Judge Walker explained the qualities that we should look for in a judicial candidate and the process of submitting an absentee ballot. Later, Walker elaborated on what she personally experiences as a judge for […]
A Voter Guide To Pennsylvania's 2021 Judicial Elections by WSKG News
Welcome to our first official episode of PA Youth Voices! In this episode, we will cover the basics of the judicial system and judicial election process in Pennsylvania. It can be very confusing so hopefully the way we have broken up the topics will help you understand everything better. This episode begins with an introduction to judges, an explanation of the Pennsylvania court system, details of the judges in running in each court level, and ends with some ballot issues and some ways to help. Hosts in this episode: Sajda, Gauri, Sehaj, Gayatri, Maryem, Samyah, Laqueenda, and Anika. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pa-youth-voices/message
Political Editor Craig Dellimore talks with Prosecutor Risa Lanier about the many candidates for judge and the judicial retention issues on the ballot this year. She explains how voters can get good information about them. She also discusses the issue of judicial independence, and how politics can conflict with it. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Much mystery has surrounded the election of judges in LA County for years. A candidate herself, professor and Fulbright Scholar in climate change law and policy, gives a behind-the-scenes look into the real workings of how judges are elected in California. The truth matters! Myanna will also give a pitch for her own run as the non-Establishment, non-prosecutorial candidate.
2020 Census, Reapportionment, and Redistricting, Destin Hall takes on Rules Committee, Judicial Elections, and more..... https://www.rightcourse-with-danbarry.com/
Kim I. Plyler talks with local political strategist Celeste Dee about her work and the importance of judicial elections.
Local News Chat: Dark Store & Make Up Days (0:00)Emily Hsaio Explains Storycorps Visit & Mission (11:45)Your Take on Objectivity in the Courtroom (19:55)Mitch Foster, Administrator, Village of Winneconne (40:39)Superintendents on Neenah & Kaukauna Referenda (59:04)The Takeaway: The Primal Desire to be Right Always (1:31:10)
How do judges affect mass incarceration, and what role do judicial elections play? Today we’re looking at a topic that doesn’t get a lot of attention - the relationship between judges, corporate money, big business interests, and mass incarceration. We talk to Alicia Bannon, Program Manager at the Brennan Center, about the role of Judicial Elections in mass incarceration, and how fear-mongering is used to incentivize harsh decision making. For links to resources visit theappeal.org
Mike, Pasquale, and Michel sit down for the last time in 2018 to talk about the best, worst, busiest, and most absurd moments of the year, go over one of the infinite reasons that no-bid 911 services contract was a bad idea, tell Mike who's actually running for office in Delco, and avoid giving the residents of Chester any more unwanted advice. Then, Amanda joins the crew for discussions about what we hope Millennials kill in 2019, where they hide the IT department in the state capitol, electric car racing, and the Philly Young Dems' slaying their Insta game. Music: "Generation to Generation" by Tinmouth, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 US
Ep. 420 | Originally Aired: November 24, 2018 The confirmation of Justice Bret Kavanaugh was a bruising episode for many Americans. Jed Shugerman views that confirmation process against the long history of America’s courts and essential debates over the constitutional limits on executive power. Shugerman is a Professor of Law at Fordham University. He attended Yale Law School and graduated in 2002, and went on to earned his PhD in History. Blending his two areas of study, Shugarman published, The People’s Courts: The Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Power in America. The book “traces the history of judicial elections and Americans’ quest for an independent judiciary―one that would ensure fairness for all before the law―from the colonial era to the present.” (Harvard University Press, 2012). His articles often appear in Law Journals such as Yale Law Journal, the Georgia Law Review and the Harvard Law Review.
Lots of folks say they’re confused about how to make an informed vote for judges. Farm Bureau policy counsel Leah Curtis says that’s not good, and tells us how to fix it.
On May 2, ACS held a call reviewing Voting Rights Act jurisprudence as it relates to judicial elections, in light of recent events. In recent weeks, the North Carolina General Assembly has proposed redrawing the map of the state's District and Superior courts. Analysis of one proposed new map found it to be a racial and partisan gerrymander, with significant population deviations. The changes would “double-bunk” incumbent judges, reducing the number of judges of color in the state. The call discusses the status of recent litigation challenging judicial districts under the VRA, such as Terrebonne Parish NAACP v. Jindal, and Alabama NAACP v. Alabama. Panelists underscore the importance of a diverse judiciary and independent state courts and how judicial redistricting can promote or undermine those aims. For supporting documentation, go here: https://bit.ly/2Kt9zDX Featuring: Leah Aden, Senior Counsel, NAACP-LDF Kareem Crayton, Executive Director, Southern Coalition for Social Justice Ezra Rosenberg, Co-Director, Voting Rights Project, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Join us in a discussion with our experts, Professor Chris Bonneau and Professor Scott Gaylord, as we review The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections, a new white paper from Professor Bonneau that argues partisan judicial elections are the best way to select state judges. This paper is the first in a series of papers commissioned by the Federalist Society on the leading methods of state judicial selection. Featuring:Prof. Chris W. Bonneau, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of PittsburghProf. Scott W. Gaylord, Professor of Law, Elon University School of LawPeter Bisbee, The Federalist Society (Moderator)Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
Join us in a discussion with our experts, Professor Chris Bonneau and Professor Scott Gaylord, as we review The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections, a new white paper from Professor Bonneau that argues partisan judicial elections are the best way to select state judges. This paper is the first in a series of papers commissioned by the Federalist Society on the leading methods of state judicial selection. Featuring:Prof. Chris W. Bonneau, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of PittsburghProf. Scott W. Gaylord, Professor of Law, Elon University School of LawPeter Bisbee, The Federalist Society (Moderator)Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
Think big business and big money are only influencing politics? Have you looked at judicial elections lately? A report issued by Justice at Stake found that special interest spending is skyrocketing in even obscure and small town judicial elections, and that is leading to some heavy influence at play for special interests. Not such good news for the "little people" who are looking to the courts to help settle issues in our lives. So how bad is the problem, and what can we do about it? Scott Greytak is the Policy Counsel and Research Analyst for Justice at Stake, where he designs and manages advocacy campaigns to protect courts from special interest influence and politicization by utilizing legislative, letigative, communications and organizing strategies. He is the lead author of "Bankrolling the Bench: The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2013 - 2014." He has been an Ohio public defender and sits on the boards of the American Civil Liberties Union of the Nation's Capital and the American Constitution Society D.C. Lawyer Chapter. Join us as we look at who is paying for judicial elections, what it means to fair and impartial courts, and who it impacts.
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com
Retired Associate Justice O’Connor speaks her mind. Jeffrey Rosen Interviews
The Supreme Court of California - Part 3 Legal experts discuss the impact of having to be elected by voters to serve on the court in this panel sponsored by the UC Berkeley School of Law, Boalt Hall
The Supreme Court of California - Part 3 Legal experts discuss the impact of having to be elected by voters to serve on the court in this panel sponsored by the UC Berkeley School of Law, Boalt Hall
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
