Podcasts about lawmakers

Global markets are showing signs of serious stress as energy prices surge and financial tensions escalate worldwide. Oil is exploding in what some analysts are calling the worst energy shock since the 1970s, while major equity markets in Asia have suffered sharp declines. At the same time, a massive regulatory battle is unfolding in Washington over the future of crypto. Lawmakers are pushing forward with the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a bill that could determine whether the SEC or CFTC ultimately oversees the industry and potentially unlock the next phase of institutional adoption.

March 8, 2026; 8am: On this International Women's Day, Oscar winner Lupita Nyong'o joins “The Weekend” along with Senator Angela Alsobrooks, to discuss a critical health issue affecting millions of women worldwide. For more, follow us on social media: Bluesky: @theweekendmsnow.bsky.social Instagram: @theweekendmsnow TikTok: @theweekendmsnow To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

March 7, 2026; 8am: It's been more than 10 years since the Obama Presidential Center was announced in Chicago, and we've got an EXCLUSIVE announcement on its progress. Valerie Jarrett, CEO of the Obama Foundation, joins “The Weekend” to discuss. For more, follow us on social media: Bluesky: @theweekendmsnow.bsky.social Instagram: @theweekendmsnow TikTok: @theweekendmsnow To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ryan Nobles is the Chief Capitol Hill Correspondent for NBC News, and he join us to talk: -The president authorized the strike on Iran without a vote from Congress. Are lawmakers pushing back or largely supporting the move -Bill and Hillary's testimony and what we learned   To subscribe to The Pete McMurray Show Podcast just click here

KSL's Top Story: The clock is ticking on the 2026 legislative session  Lawmakers have until midnight tonight to get all their bills passed... or let them die. And the Utah State Capitol is filled with people watching it all go down. KSL NewsRadio's Becky Bruce is live on the scene with a vibe check.

For a lot of farmers in Colorado, and across the country, insecticides known as neonicotinoids, or neonics, have been a game changer. But what's been a breakthrough for some has been a nightmare for others. Neonics are being blamed for die-offs in domestic bees and native pollinators, and there's growing concern over their potential impacts on human health as well. This year, some Democratic lawmakers proposed a bold step to reduce the chemicals' use in Colorado; they wanted farmers to get something like a prescription to be allowed to use neonic-treated seeds.CPR's Bente Birkeland and Rae Solomon discuss what those lawmakers tried to do, and why they faced such fierce opposition from the get go.Read our coverage: Farmers bristle as state lawmakers weigh the future of a ubiquitous pesticide Democrats' bill to control pesticides that threaten pollinators dies at statehouse Purplish is produced by CPR News and the Capitol News Alliance, a collaboration between KUNC News, Colorado Public Radio, Rocky Mountain PBS, and The Colorado Sun, and shared with Rocky Mountain Community Radio and other news organizations across the state. Funding for the Alliance is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.Purplish's producer is Stephanie Wolf. Sound design and engineering by Shane Rumsey. The theme music is by Brad Turner. Megan Verlee is the executive producer.

The House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify about the Justice Department's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that reflected growing frustration in Congress over what lawmakers say has been a deeply flawed and opaque disclosure process. The subpoena passed in a 24–19 vote, with several Republicans joining Democrats in demanding that Bondi appear before the committee to explain why the department missed legal deadlines and failed to release large portions of the Epstein records despite the requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Lawmakers say that while the Justice Department released millions of pages of documents, investigators believe tens of thousands of files remain withheld or offline, raising serious concerns that the public has not been given the full picture. The vote to compel Bondi's testimony amounted to a rare bipartisan rebuke of the nation's top law-enforcement official and signaled mounting anger in Congress over what many members believe has been a pattern of evasion and incomplete disclosure.Critics have argued that Bondi's handling of the Epstein files has been marked by delays, contradictions, and combative responses to oversight rather than transparency. Lawmakers and investigators have accused the Justice Department under her leadership of missing mandated release deadlines, redacting or withholding key documents, and failing to provide clear explanations for why large portions of the records remain unavailable. During earlier congressional questioning, Bondi reportedly deflected direct questions about Epstein's accomplices and the status of ongoing investigations, which only deepened suspicions that the department may be shielding powerful figures connected to the case. The subpoena now forces Bondi to answer under oath about decisions that critics say have undermined confidence in the Justice Department's commitment to fully exposing Epstein's network. For many in Congress, the issue is no longer simply about document management—it is about whether the nation's top prosecutor has obstructed transparency in one of the most explosive criminal investigations in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House panel votes to subpoena Pam Bondi for Epstein files testimony

A report highlighted controversy surrounding tens of thousands of Jeffrey Epstein–related files that were temporarily taken offline or withheld from public release, fueling accusations that key documents were missing. The Justice Department acknowledged that roughly 47,000 to 50,000 Epstein files had been removed from the public archive for additional review, with officials saying the materials required further redaction or processing before they could be released. The documents are part of the broader disclosure effort mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires federal authorities to release records connected to Epstein's trafficking operation while protecting victim identities and privileged information.The controversy intensified after claims emerged that some of the withheld files contained FBI interview summaries and other records referencing unverified allegations involving Donald Trump, which he has repeatedly denied. Lawmakers and critics argued the missing files raised questions about whether the Justice Department had been fully transparent in its document releases, while officials insisted the documents were removed only for technical or legal review and would be released once properly redacted. The dispute over the missing files has become part of the broader political battle surrounding the Epstein records, as Congress continues investigating the handling of the documents and pushing for the full disclosure of all remaining materials.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:US to release nearly 50,000 more Jeffrey Epstein files that may contain 'missing' Trump claims | Daily Mail Online

Read more from VPM News:  Virginia lawmakers are on the cusp of changing medical malpractice law  General Assembly kills bills for certifying high-power facilities  Charlottesville considers $279M spending plan  Richmond School Board approves $550M budget for fiscal 2027  Heads up, Richmond: 2026 River City Half and 5K road closures, ‘no parking' zones    Other links:  Virginia joins multistate lawsuit challenging Trump administration over new global tariffs (Virginia Mercury) Hopewell city manager hopefuls include two recently fired administrators (The Progress-Index)* FOIA Files: 2025 Loudoun Crime Stats Release Would Cost $600, LCSO Says (Loudoun Now) Richmond councilwoman threatens to subpoena Mayor Avula (The Richmond Times-Dispatch)*    *This outlet uses a paywall  Our award-winning work is made possible with your donations. Visit vpm.org/donate to support local journalism. 

Illinois lawmakers are pushing for more federal support to fight Lyme disease. The House public health committee has adopted a resolution sponsored by State Representative Dan Swanson, which calls for increased funding to find a cure. Swanson highlighted a rise in Lyme cases across the state, noting that available data may underestimate the problem, as major employers' insurance plans aren't included in official counts. The measure also urges the State Board of Education to launch tick-bite prevention lessons for schoolchildren, who are at particular risk. May 2026 would be designated as Lyme Disease Awareness Month under the resolution, now headed to the full House.

A report highlighted controversy surrounding tens of thousands of Jeffrey Epstein–related files that were temporarily taken offline or withheld from public release, fueling accusations that key documents were missing. The Justice Department acknowledged that roughly 47,000 to 50,000 Epstein files had been removed from the public archive for additional review, with officials saying the materials required further redaction or processing before they could be released. The documents are part of the broader disclosure effort mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires federal authorities to release records connected to Epstein's trafficking operation while protecting victim identities and privileged information.The controversy intensified after claims emerged that some of the withheld files contained FBI interview summaries and other records referencing unverified allegations involving Donald Trump, which he has repeatedly denied. Lawmakers and critics argued the missing files raised questions about whether the Justice Department had been fully transparent in its document releases, while officials insisted the documents were removed only for technical or legal review and would be released once properly redacted. The dispute over the missing files has become part of the broader political battle surrounding the Epstein records, as Congress continues investigating the handling of the documents and pushing for the full disclosure of all remaining materials.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:US to release nearly 50,000 more Jeffrey Epstein files that may contain 'missing' Trump claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify about the Justice Department's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that reflected growing frustration in Congress over what lawmakers say has been a deeply flawed and opaque disclosure process. The subpoena passed in a 24–19 vote, with several Republicans joining Democrats in demanding that Bondi appear before the committee to explain why the department missed legal deadlines and failed to release large portions of the Epstein records despite the requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Lawmakers say that while the Justice Department released millions of pages of documents, investigators believe tens of thousands of files remain withheld or offline, raising serious concerns that the public has not been given the full picture. The vote to compel Bondi's testimony amounted to a rare bipartisan rebuke of the nation's top law-enforcement official and signaled mounting anger in Congress over what many members believe has been a pattern of evasion and incomplete disclosure.Critics have argued that Bondi's handling of the Epstein files has been marked by delays, contradictions, and combative responses to oversight rather than transparency. Lawmakers and investigators have accused the Justice Department under her leadership of missing mandated release deadlines, redacting or withholding key documents, and failing to provide clear explanations for why large portions of the records remain unavailable. During earlier congressional questioning, Bondi reportedly deflected direct questions about Epstein's accomplices and the status of ongoing investigations, which only deepened suspicions that the department may be shielding powerful figures connected to the case. The subpoena now forces Bondi to answer under oath about decisions that critics say have undermined confidence in the Justice Department's commitment to fully exposing Epstein's network. For many in Congress, the issue is no longer simply about document management—it is about whether the nation's top prosecutor has obstructed transparency in one of the most explosive criminal investigations in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House panel votes to subpoena Pam Bondi for Epstein files testimonyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

As work continues in Congress to piece together Farm Bill 2.0, there is also talk that lawmakers will soon resume work on farm labor reform.

Lawmakers grill Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison over what prosecutors say could be $9 billion in fraud across Minnesota's welfare programs, with many of the cases tied to schemes involving members of the state's Somali community. The U.S.–Israel military campaign against Iran intensifies, with American forces striking more than 2,000 targets in the first hundred hours and officials claiming Iran's navy and air force have been largely destroyed. Texas Democrats coalesce around State Representative James Talarico after Jasmine Crockett concedes the primary, while Republicans brace for a bruising Cornyn–Paxton runoff and a looming Trump endorsement. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem returns to Capitol Hill for a second day of testimony as lawmakers clash over immigration enforcement, DHS spending, and the administration's tactics in Minnesota.   Birch Gold: Text MK to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold    Lean: Discover why LEAN is becoming the choice for real weight‑loss results—shop now at https://TAKELEAN.com use code MK. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

*Buy an EZ "DEFECTOR" hoodieNote: EZ had some livestreaming difficulties today so it made making this show a bit of a challenge. Sorry if any of it sounds weird.Note: "Act 1" was a separate published audio podcast.*Check out EZ's morning radio show "The InZane Asylum Q100 Michigan with Eric Zane" Click here*Get a FREE 7 day trial to Patreon to "try it out."*Watch the show live, daily at 8AM EST on Twitch! Please click here to follow the page.Email the show on the Shoreliners Striping inbox: eric@ericzaneshow.comTopics:*EZ putting the finishing touches on Dad's eulogy.*A bat invaded EZ's Griffin's game*Some fat fuck wiped out on the ice at the Griffin's game.*Lawmakers in Michigan want to do away with needing a conceal carry pistol permit*Sicko former hot MILF mayor convicted of porking 16 YO best friend of her son.*Wild ladies basketball punch sees ref eating phantom punch.*Sexy Sheriff Swanson is starting to win EZ over.*Sinkhole in Nebraska eats cars at stop light.*Sinkhole eats Corvettes.*Video of John Mellencamp getting in shape for the big tour!*John Mellencamp and Bill Maher hilarity.*Tim Walz grilled on Capital HillSponsorsMerchant Automotive, SkyDive Grand Haven, Impact Power Sports, Kuiper Tree Care, Frank Fuss / My Policy Shop Insurance, Kings Room Barbershop, Shoreliners Striping,Interested in advertising? Email eric@ericzaneshow.com and let me design a marketing plan for you.Contact: Shoreliners Striping inbox eric@ericzaneshow.comDiscord LinkEZSP TikTokSubscribe to my YouTube channelHire me on Cameo!Tshirts available herePlease subscribe, rate & write a review on Apple Podcastspatreon.com/ericzaneInstagram: ericzaneshowTwitterSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-eric-zane-show-podcast/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

*Buy a EZ "DEFECTOR" hoodieNote: EZ had some livestreaming difficulties today so it made making this show a bit of a challenge. Sorry if any of it sounds weird.Note: "Act 2" is a separate published audio podcast.*Check out EZ's morning radio show "The InZane Asylum Q100 Michigan with Eric Zane" Click here*Get a FREE 7 day trial to Patreon to "try it out."*Watch the show live, daily at 8AM EST on Twitch! Please click here to follow the page.Email the show on the Shoreliners Striping inbox: eric@ericzaneshow.comTopics:*EZ putting the finishing touches on Dad's eulogy.*A bat invaded EZ's Griffin's game*Some fat fuck wiped out on the ice at the Griffin's game.*Lawmakers in Michigan want to do away with needing a conceal carry pistol permit*Sicko former hot MILF mayor convicted of porking 16 YO best friend of her son.*Wild ladies basketball punch sees ref eating phantom punch.*Sexy Sheriff Swanson is starting to win EZ over.*Sinkhole in Nebraska eats cars at stop light.*Sinkhole eats Corvettes.*Video of John Mellencamp getting in shape for the big tour!*John Mellencamp and Bill Maher hilarity.*Tim Walz grilled on Capital HillSponsorsMerchant Automotive, SkyDive Grand Haven, Impact Power Sports, Kuiper Tree Care, Frank Fuss / My Policy Shop Insurance, Kings Room Barbershop, Shoreliners Striping,Interested in advertising? Email eric@ericzaneshow.com and let me design a marketing plan for you.Contact: Shoreliners Striping inbox eric@ericzaneshow.comDiscord LinkEZSP TikTokSubscribe to my YouTube channelHire me on Cameo!Tshirts available herePlease subscribe, rate & write a review on Apple Podcastspatreon.com/ericzaneInstagram: ericzaneshowTwitterSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-eric-zane-show-podcast/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

The U.S. House Oversight Committee requested testimony from several high-profile figures — including Bill Gates, Kathryn Ruemmler, and Leon Black — as part of its expanding investigation into connections surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Committee Chairman James Comer sent letters asking seven individuals to appear before the panel, stating that the committee believes they may possess information relevant to its probe. Lawmakers are examining how Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell built influence among powerful figures, as well as whether federal authorities mishandled aspects of the investigation into the pair's alleged sex-trafficking operation. The requests came as Congress continues reviewing large batches of documents released by the Justice Department following legislation requiring disclosure of Epstein-related files.The documents and testimony requests highlight various previously reported interactions between Epstein and prominent figures. Gates has acknowledged meeting Epstein multiple times between 2011 and 2014 and said he is willing to testify, while maintaining he never witnessed or participated in any illegal activity. Ruemmler, who served as White House counsel under Barack Obama, appeared in emails within the released files and has also indicated she will cooperate with the committee's inquiry. Black, who previously paid Epstein large sums for tax and estate planning advice, is likewise expected to answer questions about his relationship with the financier. None of the individuals asked to testify have been charged with crimes related to Epstein, but lawmakers say their testimony could help clarify how Epstein cultivated relationships with influential people and how those connections may have intersected with the broader investigationto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Gates among 7 asked to testify before House committee on possible Epstein ties - CBS News

Read more from VPM News:  Supreme Court of Virginia greenlights April 21 referendum again  Del. Josh Thomas wants to put Virginia's boys and men on a better path  Lawmakers advance bills to set up child care cost-sharing pilot  Charlottesville considers $279M spending plan    Other links: GW sold Virginia campus for $427 million to Amazon for data center development (The GW Hatchet)  Why a 6-year-old with diabetes is pushing for change in Virginia (WTOP)  Wintergreen emergency exit bill passes U.S. House (CBS 19) Our award-winning work is made possible with your donations. Visit vpm.org/donate to support local journalism. 

A report highlighted controversy surrounding tens of thousands of Jeffrey Epstein–related files that were temporarily taken offline or withheld from public release, fueling accusations that key documents were missing. The Justice Department acknowledged that roughly 47,000 to 50,000 Epstein files had been removed from the public archive for additional review, with officials saying the materials required further redaction or processing before they could be released. The documents are part of the broader disclosure effort mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires federal authorities to release records connected to Epstein's trafficking operation while protecting victim identities and privileged information.The controversy intensified after claims emerged that some of the withheld files contained FBI interview summaries and other records referencing unverified allegations involving Donald Trump, which he has repeatedly denied. Lawmakers and critics argued the missing files raised questions about whether the Justice Department had been fully transparent in its document releases, while officials insisted the documents were removed only for technical or legal review and would be released once properly redacted. The dispute over the missing files has become part of the broader political battle surrounding the Epstein records, as Congress continues investigating the handling of the documents and pushing for the full disclosure of all remaining materials.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:US to release nearly 50,000 more Jeffrey Epstein files that may contain 'missing' Trump claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify about the Justice Department's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that reflected growing frustration in Congress over what lawmakers say has been a deeply flawed and opaque disclosure process. The subpoena passed in a 24–19 vote, with several Republicans joining Democrats in demanding that Bondi appear before the committee to explain why the department missed legal deadlines and failed to release large portions of the Epstein records despite the requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Lawmakers say that while the Justice Department released millions of pages of documents, investigators believe tens of thousands of files remain withheld or offline, raising serious concerns that the public has not been given the full picture. The vote to compel Bondi's testimony amounted to a rare bipartisan rebuke of the nation's top law-enforcement official and signaled mounting anger in Congress over what many members believe has been a pattern of evasion and incomplete disclosure.Critics have argued that Bondi's handling of the Epstein files has been marked by delays, contradictions, and combative responses to oversight rather than transparency. Lawmakers and investigators have accused the Justice Department under her leadership of missing mandated release deadlines, redacting or withholding key documents, and failing to provide clear explanations for why large portions of the records remain unavailable. During earlier congressional questioning, Bondi reportedly deflected direct questions about Epstein's accomplices and the status of ongoing investigations, which only deepened suspicions that the department may be shielding powerful figures connected to the case. The subpoena now forces Bondi to answer under oath about decisions that critics say have undermined confidence in the Justice Department's commitment to fully exposing Epstein's network. For many in Congress, the issue is no longer simply about document management—it is about whether the nation's top prosecutor has obstructed transparency in one of the most explosive criminal investigations in modern history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House panel votes to subpoena Pam Bondi for Epstein files testimonyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. House Oversight Committee requested testimony from several high-profile figures — including Bill Gates, Kathryn Ruemmler, and Leon Black — as part of its expanding investigation into connections surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Committee Chairman James Comer sent letters asking seven individuals to appear before the panel, stating that the committee believes they may possess information relevant to its probe. Lawmakers are examining how Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell built influence among powerful figures, as well as whether federal authorities mishandled aspects of the investigation into the pair's alleged sex-trafficking operation. The requests came as Congress continues reviewing large batches of documents released by the Justice Department following legislation requiring disclosure of Epstein-related files.The documents and testimony requests highlight various previously reported interactions between Epstein and prominent figures. Gates has acknowledged meeting Epstein multiple times between 2011 and 2014 and said he is willing to testify, while maintaining he never witnessed or participated in any illegal activity. Ruemmler, who served as White House counsel under Barack Obama, appeared in emails within the released files and has also indicated she will cooperate with the committee's inquiry. Black, who previously paid Epstein large sums for tax and estate planning advice, is likewise expected to answer questions about his relationship with the financier. None of the individuals asked to testify have been charged with crimes related to Epstein, but lawmakers say their testimony could help clarify how Epstein cultivated relationships with influential people and how those connections may have intersected with the broader investigationto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Gates among 7 asked to testify before House committee on possible Epstein ties - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE on:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/watchdog-on-wall-street-with-chris-markowski/id570687608 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2PtgPvJvqc2gkpGIkNMR5i WATCH and SUBSCRIBE on:https://www.youtube.com/@WatchdogOnWallstreet/featured  A heated hearing put DHS Secretary Kristi Noem under fire over a $143 million contract awarded to a company formed just days earlier with no website, headquarters, or federal history. Lawmakers also questioned hundreds of millions spent on DHS ads, sparking outrage over government waste and possible political favoritism. With tax season here, critics say taxpayers deserve answers.

Lawmakers may require universities to address Kentucky's physician workforce shortage, five universities could get $150 million in state funds to bolster their research, a committee advances measures to rollback some requirements for teachers, some pushback on a bill that would overhaul the Public Service Commission, and new information about the U.S. soldiers killed in Kuwait.

The U.S. House Oversight Committee requested testimony from several high-profile figures — including Bill Gates, Kathryn Ruemmler, and Leon Black — as part of its expanding investigation into connections surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Committee Chairman James Comer sent letters asking seven individuals to appear before the panel, stating that the committee believes they may possess information relevant to its probe. Lawmakers are examining how Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell built influence among powerful figures, as well as whether federal authorities mishandled aspects of the investigation into the pair's alleged sex-trafficking operation. The requests came as Congress continues reviewing large batches of documents released by the Justice Department following legislation requiring disclosure of Epstein-related files.The documents and testimony requests highlight various previously reported interactions between Epstein and prominent figures. Gates has acknowledged meeting Epstein multiple times between 2011 and 2014 and said he is willing to testify, while maintaining he never witnessed or participated in any illegal activity. Ruemmler, who served as White House counsel under Barack Obama, appeared in emails within the released files and has also indicated she will cooperate with the committee's inquiry. Black, who previously paid Epstein large sums for tax and estate planning advice, is likewise expected to answer questions about his relationship with the financier. None of the individuals asked to testify have been charged with crimes related to Epstein, but lawmakers say their testimony could help clarify how Epstein cultivated relationships with influential people and how those connections may have intersected with the broader investigationto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Gates among 7 asked to testify before House committee on possible Epstein ties - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Lawmakers are considering an increase to education funding for the first time since 2013.  More than 300 people signed up to speak in front of the Education Committee on Wednesday.  Some of those advocating for the increase included mayors, superintendents, educators and students. We got local perspective about the backlash local leaders face because there's a lack of action in Hartford. Here's our chat with Monroe First Selectman Terry Rooney.Image Credit: Melissa Sheketoff

Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov dig into the growing cracks inside Trump's MAGA coalition as U.S. strikes on Iran spark backlash from the right. JD Vance once sold Trump as the president who “started no wars” — now, with American casualties rising and only a quarter of Americans backing the strikes, that promise is under pressure. From Capitol Hill to conservative media, the movement is split: is this still “America First,” or something else entirely? Scott and Jess break down the White House's defiant message to Republicans, and what this fight could mean for the midterms — and for Vance's credibility with the anti-war right. Then, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem faces Congress for the first time since the killing of Alex Pretti in Minnesota. Lawmakers press her on DHS enforcement tactics, detention policies, and whether national security is being compromised amid escalating tensions with Iran. What kind of oversight should Congress demand right now? Follow Jessica Tarlov, @JessicaTarlov Follow Prof G, @profgalloway Follow Raging Moderates, @RagingModeratesPod Subscribe to our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@RagingModerates Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Rush Hour — Morning Episode Sponsored by Wayfair. Get organized, refreshed, and back on track this new year for WAY less. Shop all things home at Wayfair.com Go to rushhourwithdave.com for tickets to my upcoming Asheville NC, Stamford CT and Boston shows! Full breakdown of the latest updates in the war in Iran — new strikes, retaliation, and rising global tension Lawmakers reportedly shaken by classified briefings suggesting there may be no clear strategy or endgame Growing concern inside Washington that this conflict is reactive, rushed, and dangerously undefined Turning Point USA accused of pushing pro-war messaging as critics call it propaganda Candace Owens publicly calls out TPUSA and fractures the conservative narrative Behind-the-scenes political panic as officials question how the U.S. got pulled into what some are calling a senseless war Is there a real plan — or are Americans being sold one? Fast analysis, sharp commentary, and everything you need to know before lunch.

As recent court decisions make more people vulnerable to ICE detention, the Trump administration is purchasing massive warehouses that could detain upward of 5,000 people per site. Lawmakers and detainees describe existing ICE detention centers as grossly inadequate, with accounts of denied medical care, cruelty from guards and limited access to sunlight. Most immigrants detained by ICE have not committed a crime yet can be held for months or years. Now, resistance to these detention centers is growing nationwide – including in deeply red counties – and California activists and lawmakers are trying to prohibit ICE's expansion here. We hear about the legal landscape and answer your questions. Guests: Ahilan Arulanantham, law professor and faculty co-director, Center for Immigration Law & Policy at UCLA School of Law; former legal director, ACLU of Southern California Matt Haney, District 17 representative, California State Assembly Wendy Fry, reporter covering poverty and inequality for the California Divide team, CalMatters Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this edition of Essential, we look at two major issues facing pharmacy compounding. First is a state-by-state effort by pharma companies to pass laws restricting compounding, and second is a cryptic statement from the FDA about  possible limitations on compounding with GLP-1 ingredients. They're both Very Big Deals for pharmacists across the country. Links FDA statement on GLP-1 drugs: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-intends-take-action-against-non-fda-approved-glp-1-drugs … and APC's response: https://a4pc.org/news/apc-responds-to-fdas-glp-1-statement  Stay up to date on our state Compounding Defense Initiative: compounding.com  Join APC today: https://a4pc.org/membership  Find us on social: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a4pcrx/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/a4pcrx/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/a4pcrx/

Howard Lutnick and Kathryn Ruemmler are scheduled to appear before the congressional committee overseeing the Jeffrey Epstein investigation as lawmakers expand their effort to question individuals tied to institutions, financial networks, and legal structures that intersected with Epstein's operations. Lutnick, a prominent Wall Street executive, is expected to face questions about the extent of his contacts with Epstein, the circumstances surrounding reported appearances at gatherings where Epstein was present, and what knowledge—if any—he or his associates had about Epstein's activities at the time. Committee members are also expected to probe discrepancies between past public statements and emerging records connected to the broader Epstein document releases. The hearing is being framed by lawmakers as an opportunity to place key figures under oath and test their accounts directly in a public forum.Kathryn Ruemmler, a former senior Justice Department official and high-profile attorney who has represented major financial institutions connected to Epstein-related litigation, is also slated to testify about legal strategies, internal reviews, and institutional responses to Epstein's activities. Lawmakers are expected to question her about the handling of documents, legal advice given to institutions facing Epstein-related scrutiny, and how decisions were made regarding cooperation with investigators and disclosure of records. Her testimony is likely to focus heavily on the intersection between legal defense strategies and transparency, as the committee attempts to clarify how powerful organizations navigated the fallout from Epstein's crimes and the subsequent wave of investigations and lawsuits.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to testify on Jeffrey EpsteinGoldman Sachs lawyer Kathy Ruemmler set to face Congress over Jeffrey Epstein ties

The congressional committee overseeing aspects of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation has too often projected disorganization rather than discipline. Hearings have at times devolved into partisan sparring, with members appearing more focused on cable-news soundbites than methodical fact-finding. Lawmakers have publicly contradicted one another about timelines, subpoena strategies, and the scope of requested records, creating confusion about what the committee is actually pursuing. Promised document dumps have been delayed or incomplete, fueling public skepticism about competence and seriousness. Grandstanding exchanges with witnesses have sometimes overshadowed substantive lines of inquiry, leaving key evidentiary gaps unexplored in open session. When members use hearings to relitigate broader political grievances instead of drilling down into financial trails, prosecutorial decisions, or institutional failures, it weakens the perception of rigor. The result, to many observers, is an oversight effort that appears reactive and fragmented rather than strategic and coordinated.That perception is amplified when internal leaks, public infighting, and inconsistent messaging dominate headlines more than concrete findings. Announcements of “bombshell” revelations have occasionally yielded little new information, undermining credibility. Meanwhile, disputes over jurisdiction, document redactions, and executive-branch compliance have played out in public without a clear, unified enforcement plan. For a case that implicates powerful institutions and demands precision, the optics of confusion and theatrics can make the process look unserious. Oversight works best when it is disciplined, bipartisan where possible, and relentlessly evidence-driven. When it instead resembles political theater it risks eroding public trust in Congress's ability to deliver accountability in one of the most scrutinized scandals in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Serious investigation or ‘clown show'? Clintons' closed testimonies on Epstein leave room for disagreement - POLITICO

Tonight, Don breaks down the latest developments in the rapidly escalating crisis in the Middle East. The conflict has already closed embassies, triggered missile and drone attacks across the region, and drawn global concern about how far this could go and what it means for Americans at home and abroad. Then, we pivot to today's embarrassing testimony from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Lawmakers from both parties repeatedly challenged her leadership amid bipartisan criticism of her immigration policies, her defense of controversial comments labeling two U.S. citizens as “domestic terrorists,” and her refusal to take responsibility for clear missteps, prompting senators to call out incompetence and a lack of accountability. Will Noem ever face real consequences? This episode is brought to you by Shopify. See less carts go abandoned and more sales go with Shopify and their Shop Pay button.Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at https://SHOPIFY.COM/lemon This episode is brought to you by Incogni. Go to https://incogni.com/donlemon and use code donlemon for 60% off. Incogni HELPS wipe yourself from the Internet — they can't harm you if they can't find you. Click the link below to claim your 60% off and get your personal data off the market! Erase yourself from the internet. This episode is sponsored by Bioptimizers. Go to bioptimizers.com/donlemon and use my exclusive code DON15 to get 15% off any order. Make 2026 the year you finally start sleeping great again. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. BetterHelp makes it easy to get matched online with a qualified therapist. Sign up and get 10% off at https://BetterHelp.com/donlemon NMLS 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.196% for well qualified borrowers. Call 888-675-4090, for details about credit costs and terms. Or AmericanFinancing.net/Lemon Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gov. Tony Evers is calling on lawmakers to pass a ban on political gerrymandering in state legislative races. Lawmakers already passed a law banning cell phone use during instructional time. Now they're looking to expand it. And leaders in Milwaukee are passing new rules to prepare for any future visits from federal immigration officials

President Donald Trump on Tuesday stated that most of Iran's military installations have been “knocked out.” He also revealed that Israel struck the building where Iran was reportedly choosing a successor to Ayatollah Khamenei, as U.S. forces hit more than 1,700 military targets and U.S. embassies brace for imminent attacks.Lawmakers today received classified briefings behind closed doors on the escalating conflict with Iran. Meanwhile, a sharp partisan clash unfolded over presidential war powers inside a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Iran.North Carolina and Texas are holding the first major primary races of this election season today. Meanwhile, California Democrats are being urged to assess, and possibly drop out of, the governor's race.

Read more VPM News: Richmond School Board approves $550M budget for fiscal 2027 Henrico School Board OKs funding 100+ new positions in FY27 budget Chief Justice Cleo Powell formally sworn into Supreme Court of Virginia  Other links: Military families brace for long deployments during operation against Iran (WHRO News) William & Mary on Pentagon's list of ‘toxic indoctrination' colleges, losing its support (The Virginian-Pilot)* Va. transportation board overturns decision to transfer rail and trail project (Virginia Mercury) Early voting will begin everywhere Friday except in Tazewell County. Is that legal? (Cardinal News) *This outlet uses a paywall. Our award-winning work is made possible with your donations. Visit vpm.org/donate to support local journalism.

Howard Lutnick and Kathryn Ruemmler are scheduled to appear before the congressional committee overseeing the Jeffrey Epstein investigation as lawmakers expand their effort to question individuals tied to institutions, financial networks, and legal structures that intersected with Epstein's operations. Lutnick, a prominent Wall Street executive, is expected to face questions about the extent of his contacts with Epstein, the circumstances surrounding reported appearances at gatherings where Epstein was present, and what knowledge—if any—he or his associates had about Epstein's activities at the time. Committee members are also expected to probe discrepancies between past public statements and emerging records connected to the broader Epstein document releases. The hearing is being framed by lawmakers as an opportunity to place key figures under oath and test their accounts directly in a public forum.Kathryn Ruemmler, a former senior Justice Department official and high-profile attorney who has represented major financial institutions connected to Epstein-related litigation, is also slated to testify about legal strategies, internal reviews, and institutional responses to Epstein's activities. Lawmakers are expected to question her about the handling of documents, legal advice given to institutions facing Epstein-related scrutiny, and how decisions were made regarding cooperation with investigators and disclosure of records. Her testimony is likely to focus heavily on the intersection between legal defense strategies and transparency, as the committee attempts to clarify how powerful organizations navigated the fallout from Epstein's crimes and the subsequent wave of investigations and lawsuits.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to testify on Jeffrey EpsteinGoldman Sachs lawyer Kathy Ruemmler set to face Congress over Jeffrey Epstein tiesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Montana lawmakers have asked the Montana Department of Military Affairs to investigate allegations of sexual harassment and financial mismanagement at the Fort Harrison VA Medical Center.

Carmen talks about how the Iranian Christians are processing what's in front of them today and how to respond when an argument being made makes no sense for the well being of children. Clay Jones, co-author of "How Does God Use Suffering for Our Good?: Living with Hope While Making Sense of Life," shares about the importance of clinging to the Truth in the midst of suffering and why many Christians have a twisted view of eternity.   The Reconnect with Carmen and all Faith Radio podcasts are made possible by your support. Give now: Click here

Lawmakers in Tennessee go on record with their opposition to a planned tunnel by a company owned by Elon Musk. AP correspondent Mike Hempen reports.

AP correspondent Charles de Ledesma reports on UK arrests in a China spying investigation.

Lawmakers want the Attorney General to answer more questions about the Epstein files. AP correspondent Jennifer King reports.

This Day in Legal History: Lincoln's Second InauguralOn March 4, 1865, Abraham Lincoln delivered his Second Inaugural Address as he began his second term as President of the United States. The speech came during the final weeks of the Civil War, when Union victory was increasingly likely but the country remained deeply divided. Instead of celebrating the nearing end of the war, Lincoln used the moment to reflect on the deeper causes of the conflict. He identified slavery as the central issue that had brought the nation into war, describing it as both a legal institution and a moral injustice embedded in American law for generations. Lincoln noted that both the North and South had participated in a system that allowed slavery to endure within the nation's constitutional framework.In one of the address's most striking passages, Lincoln suggested that the war itself might be understood as divine judgment for the nation's long tolerance of slavery. He observed that slavery had existed in the Americas for centuries and reflected on the possibility that the immense suffering of the war was a form of punishment for that history. Lincoln famously stated that if divine providence willed that the war continue “until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword,” then such judgment might still be just. This reflection framed the war not simply as a political conflict but as a reckoning with a deeply rooted legal and moral wrong.Lincoln's remarks also pointed toward the constitutional transformation already underway through the pending Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Congress had passed the amendment earlier in 1865, and it awaited ratification by the states. If adopted, it would permanently abolish slavery across the United States and fundamentally alter the constitutional order. Lincoln's speech emphasized that the war's conclusion would also mark a legal turning point, ending a constitutional system that had protected slavery. At the same time, he called for reconciliation in rebuilding the nation, urging the country to move forward “with malice toward none.” Only months later, the Civil War ended and the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in December 1865, permanently outlawing slavery in the United States.The House Oversight Committee has asked several high-profile figures to testify about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein as part of a broader investigation into how the federal government handled the case. Those requested to appear include departing Goldman Sachs Chief Legal Officer Kathryn Ruemmler, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and Apollo Global Management co-founder Leon Black.The request to Ruemmler comes shortly after she announced plans to step down from Goldman Sachs and after Justice Department records brought renewed attention to her past communications with Epstein. Emails show that she sought career advice from him while exploring a move from Latham & Watkins to Facebook in 2018 and referred to him in messages as “Uncle Jeffrey.” The correspondence also mentioned gifts she received from him. Reports previously revealed that the two had numerous meetings during the 2010s, years after Epstein had served a prison sentence related to prostitution offenses involving minors.The committee's inquiry focuses on whether Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell used relationships with influential individuals to gain protection or influence while operating their sex-trafficking scheme. Lawmakers are also examining the federal government's handling of the investigation and the circumstances surrounding Epstein's death in a Manhattan federal jail in 2019.Along with Ruemmler, Gates and Black received similar requests for testimony. Gates has indicated he is willing to cooperate and answer questions from the committee. Black, meanwhile, is also facing a proposed class action accusing Apollo and its leadership of misleading investors about their connections to Epstein, allegations the firm has publicly denied.Other individuals asked to appear include Epstein's former assistants, political adviser Doug Band, and Gateway co-founder Ted Waitt. The committee has already interviewed several prominent figures, including former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as it continues reviewing the scope of Epstein's network and the government's response to his crimes.Goldman's Departing CLO, Gates Asked To Testify On Epstein - Law360 UKThe Justice Department quickly reversed course in an ongoing legal fight over executive orders issued by President Donald Trump targeting several prominent law firms. Late Monday, government lawyers told a federal appeals court they planned to drop their appeal after multiple federal judges ruled the orders unconstitutional. But the next day the department asked the court for permission to withdraw that dismissal request and continue defending the orders.The executive orders targeted firms including Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Susman Godfrey, and Jenner & Block. The measures sought to restrict the firms' security clearances, government contracts, and access to federal buildings, citing concerns about their clients and hiring practices. The firms challenged the orders in court, arguing they were unconstitutional retaliation against legal advocates.Federal judges consistently sided with the firms, with one ruling describing the order against Perkins Coie as an unprecedented attack on the legal system. After those rulings, the Justice Department initially appeared ready to abandon the appeal. Its sudden reversal, however, would allow the administration to continue fighting the cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.The law firms criticized the shift, saying the government offered no explanation for changing its position so quickly. They reiterated their commitment to challenging what they view as an unconstitutional attempt to punish law firms for representing disfavored clients. Civil liberties advocates echoed that criticism, arguing the orders represent a misuse of presidential power.The litigation highlights a broader dispute over the limits of executive authority and the independence of the legal profession. As the appeals process continues, the courts will ultimately decide whether the executive orders can survive constitutional scrutiny.BREAKING: DOJ Nixes Plan To Drop Law Firm EO Appeals In About-Face - Law360In quick reversal, DOJ seeks to continue Trump's battle with law firmsA trial beginning in Chicago will examine claims that baby formula made by Abbott Laboratories caused premature infants to develop a serious and potentially deadly intestinal condition known as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The case consolidates lawsuits from four families whose premature children were born in Chicago-area hospitals between 2012 and 2019 and later developed the disease. Although the infants survived, the lawsuits say several required surgery and continue to face long-term health complications.The case is part of a much larger wave of litigation against Abbott and Mead Johnson, the manufacturer of Enfamil. Nearly 1,000 lawsuits have been filed across the country alleging that the companies failed to warn doctors that cow's milk-based formulas used in hospitals may increase the risk of NEC in premature infants. Many of those cases are consolidated in federal court in Illinois, while others are pending in state courts.Abbott denies that its formulas cause the disease and maintains that the products are medically necessary when mothers cannot produce enough breast milk. The company and other researchers point to evidence suggesting that the higher risk of NEC is linked to the absence of breast milk rather than exposure to formula itself.Previous trials involving similar claims have produced mixed results. Some juries have awarded large verdicts to families, including multimillion-dollar judgments against both Abbott and Mead Johnson, though those decisions are currently under appeal. Other cases have resulted in defense wins or retrials, and several potential bellwether cases in federal court have been dismissed.The Chicago trial, which begins with jury selection, is expected to last several weeks and could influence how the remaining lawsuits move forward. With hundreds of similar claims still pending, the outcome may play an important role in shaping the broader litigation over infant formula and NEC.Abbott set to face trial over claims premature infant formula caused deadly disease | ReutersIn this week's column, I look at a new California proposal that attempts to sidestep the federal cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions by reclassifying vehicle sales taxes as licensing fees. The idea is simple: if the charge is treated as a property-style fee instead of a sales tax, it could fall into a category that allows taxpayers to make greater use of their federal SALT deduction. Supporters frame the proposal as middle-class tax relief and a way to reduce the amount of federal revenue flowing out of California. But while the policy is clever, its practical benefits would be limited and uneven.The proposal follows a familiar strategy used since the 2017 tax law capped SALT deductions: when one type of tax becomes less deductible, lawmakers try to redesign the tax structure so the revenue flows through a category that remains deductible. California's approach focuses on vehicle purchases, where sales taxes are currently difficult to deduct for many residents. By redefining those charges as licensing fees, lawmakers hope taxpayers could claim them alongside property taxes under the federal deduction cap.In practice, though, most lower-income taxpayers wouldn't benefit at all. Many households take the standard deduction rather than itemizing, especially after recent tax reforms increased its size. For those taxpayers, changing the label on a vehicle tax doesn't meaningfully change their federal tax bill. Even for many itemizers, the savings would likely be small.The proposal mainly helps a narrow band of higher-earning taxpayers—people with substantial state and property taxes who are still just below the federal SALT cap. For them, a vehicle purchase could generate a deductible amount that meaningfully lowers their federal tax liability. But that advantage grows with the price of the car and the taxpayer's marginal tax rate, which means the largest benefits flow to relatively affluent households.If the goal is truly middle-class relief, a more direct approach would likely work better. For example, a refundable state tax credit tied to vehicle purchases could help working families without depending on federal deduction rules or itemization. Another long-term option would be shifting some of California's tax burden from individuals to businesses, since certain business-level taxes remain deductible federally.California's proposal shows the creativity that the SALT deduction cap has sparked among state policymakers. The real question, however, is whether clever tax reclassification is the right tool—or whether more straightforward policies aimed directly at middle-income taxpayers would produce fairer and more predictable results.California SALT Deduction Proposal Is More Clever Than Helpful This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

A bill that would ban Minnesota municipalities from signing immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government got a hearing Tuesday by a state House committee. If passed, the legislation would prohibit and terminate any agreements with the federal government that gives authority to state, county and local agencies to enforce civil immigration law. A new national ACLU report shows that since the start of President Donald Trump's second term, the number of local municipalities with these so-called 287(g) agreements has grown tenfold. In Minnesota, nine counties have signed agreements.The bill's lead author, State Representative Athena Hollins, DFL-St. Paul, and Julio Murphy Zelaya from the ACLU of Minnesota joined Minnesota Now to talk more about the legislation and the report.

Read more from VPM News:  Early voting on Virginia redistricting amendment set to begin Friday  Scenes from the Virginia State Capitol 2026: a dispatch    Other links:  Lawmakers divided over Iran strikes, launched without approval from Congress (NPR)  Naval Station Norfolk updates visitor policy, suspends Trusted Traveler Program (WAVY)  Poopy Potomac no more? D.C. lifts advisory for river after sewage spill (The 51st)  Harrisonburg music scene hit by ABC violation, fire marshal closures (WMRA)  Researchers probe unmarked graves at Virginia site where slaves once toiled (The Washington Post)*    *This outlet uses a paywall.  Our award-winning work is made possible with your donations. Visit vpm.org/donate to support local journalism. 

The congressional committee overseeing aspects of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation has too often projected disorganization rather than discipline. Hearings have at times devolved into partisan sparring, with members appearing more focused on cable-news soundbites than methodical fact-finding. Lawmakers have publicly contradicted one another about timelines, subpoena strategies, and the scope of requested records, creating confusion about what the committee is actually pursuing. Promised document dumps have been delayed or incomplete, fueling public skepticism about competence and seriousness. Grandstanding exchanges with witnesses have sometimes overshadowed substantive lines of inquiry, leaving key evidentiary gaps unexplored in open session. When members use hearings to relitigate broader political grievances instead of drilling down into financial trails, prosecutorial decisions, or institutional failures, it weakens the perception of rigor. The result, to many observers, is an oversight effort that appears reactive and fragmented rather than strategic and coordinated.That perception is amplified when internal leaks, public infighting, and inconsistent messaging dominate headlines more than concrete findings. Announcements of “bombshell” revelations have occasionally yielded little new information, undermining credibility. Meanwhile, disputes over jurisdiction, document redactions, and executive-branch compliance have played out in public without a clear, unified enforcement plan. For a case that implicates powerful institutions and demands precision, the optics of confusion and theatrics can make the process look unserious. Oversight works best when it is disciplined, bipartisan where possible, and relentlessly evidence-driven. When it instead resembles political theater it risks eroding public trust in Congress's ability to deliver accountability in one of the most scrutinized scandals in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Serious investigation or ‘clown show'? Clintons' closed testimonies on Epstein leave room for disagreement - POLITICOBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The All Local for Tuesday, March 3rd

Active bills at the Iowa Statehouse involving public libraries and public assistance programs are the focus of this Legislative Monday episode. First, Sam Helmick, shares their perspective on proposals that would impact public libraries as president of the American Library Association. Then, Rep. Heather Matson, D-Ankeny and Rep. Helena Hayes, R-New Sharon, share their differing perspectives on library bills. Then, Rep. Ross Wilburn, D-Ames, and Rep. Austin Harris, R-Moulton, discuss proposed changes to SNAP and WIC. We also hear from Paige Chickering, vice chair of the Iowa Hunger Coalition.

Rubio insists Congress is in the loop on Iran; Trump's BLM bonding rollback could cost taxpayers over $750 billion; Lawmakers reverse course, give New Mexico teachers 1% pay raise; Supreme Court leans toward a marijuana user's challenge to gun restriction.

The United States and Israel launch Operation Epic Fury, a massive coordinated strike targeting Iran's leadership and military infrastructure, killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and striking hundreds of regime and weapons sites across the country. Lawmakers and voters react sharply to the Iran strikes as retaliation begins, and U.S. casualties mount. Federal authorities investigate possible terrorism ties after a gunman killed two people and injured more than a dozen in a downtown Austin shooting hours after Iran's Supreme Leader was killed. Texas voters head to the polls in high-stakes Senate primaries featuring a volatile Democratic clash between Jasmine Crockett and James Talarico and a bitter Republican fight among John Cornyn, Ken Paxton, and Wesley Hunt.   Riverbend Ranch: Visit https://riverbendranch.com/ | Use promo code MEGYN for $20 off your first order.    Relief Factor: Break up with pain—Relief Factor targets inflammation so you can move better and feel better; try the 3-Week QuickStart for just $19.95 at https://ReliefFactor.com or call 800-4-RELIEF. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The U.S. and Israel carried out a massive military campaign over the weekend against Iran. The Wall Street Journal’s Jared Malsin breaks down the operation. Lawmakers were briefed on the Iran attacks but the strikes were carried out without congressional approval. NPR reports on how that has put new urgency into an effort to reign in President Trump’s military powers. Los Angeles is the home to the largest population of Iranians outside of Iran. Corinne Purtill of the Los Angeles Times joins to discuss how they are reacting. Plus, a mass shooting in Austin left three dead including the gunman, OpenAI is stepping into a bigger role at the Pentagon, and how one Planned Parenthood location is offering spa-like treatments to generate revenue. Today’s episode was hosted by Cecilia Lei.