Podcast appearances and mentions of sarah weiler

In this week's episode, we're celebrating the milestone of reaching 300 episodes on the podcasts by reflecting on the inspiring stories of reimagining success from a selection of our guests: Chloe Temple, Elodie Ferchaud, Chris Ducker, Verity Baldry, and Sarah Weiler, each of whom brings a unique perspective to redefining success and finding balance. Join us as... Chloe Temple opens up about her struggle with depression and anxiety, realising that true success lies in fulfilment and living in line with one's purpose. Elodie Ferchaud shares her transformative sabbatical leading to the launch of her company, re beauty, and finding her ikigai through remote work and travel. Chris Ducker shares his evolution from a money-focused view of success to prioritising personal freedom and work-life balance highlights the importance of hustling in seasons. Verity Baldry discusses her journey of self-discovery, from feeling unsustainable in her startup role to balancing her creative passions with her career. Sarah Weiler introduces the concept of the carousel, a flexible approach to prioritising various interests. We thank you, our dedicated listeners, whose support has been invaluable. Tune in for a celebration of success reimagined, and let's look forward to an inspiring journey together in the next 300 episodes!   READY FOR MORE? Join the free Facebook community https://www.facebook.com/groups/onestepoutside/ Follow Anna on Instagram https://instagram.com/annaselundberg GET STARTED WITH THESE FREE RESOURCES: Explore a broader definition of success https://onestepoutside.com/success  Find a way to quit your job and start your own business https://onestepoutside.com/roadmap  Get a free assessment of your business https://onestepoutside.com/scorecard DISCOVER THE BOOKS Outside of the 9 to 5 https://outsideofthe9to5.com Leaving the Corporate 9 to 5 https://leavingthecorporate9to5.com/ 

How do you navigate the uncertainty of deciding when it's time to make a change in your life, or even quit something altogether? How do you weigh all the options and make decisions when you just feel exhausted and empty? Sarah Weiler, a thought leader, coach, and creative entrepreneur, believes that quitting doesn't equal failure—in fact, it can be life-giving. In this fun and insightful clip, she guides us through the art of quitting and explains how it can boost your happiness, mental health, and even physical well-being. Sponsors and discounts: BetterHelp — use code PGISH for 10% off your first month Pique Teas — use code PGISH for 5% off and free shipping Join my Weary To Revived Course Show links: Watch the full clip Learn more at sarahweiler.com  Read the TIME article   As always, I'd love to hear from you! Subscribe, leave a review, or follow PG-ish on IG @pgishparenting, or you can always find me at www.pgishparenting.com.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: There are no massive differences in impact between individuals, published by Sarah Weiler on March 14, 2024 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Or: Why aiming for the tail-end in an imaginary social impact distribution is not the most effective way to do good in the world "It is very easy to overestimate the importance of our own achievements in comparison with what we owe others." attributed to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, quoted in Tomasik 2014(2017) Summary In this essay, I argue that it is not useful to think about social impact from an individualist standpoint. I claim that there are no massive differences in impact between individual interventions, individual organisations, and individual people, because impact is dispersed across all the actors that contribute to the outcomes before any individual action is taken, all the actors that contribute to the outcomes after any individual action is taken, and all the actors that shape the taking of any individual action in the first place. I raise some concerns around adverse effects of thinking about impact as an attribute that follows a power law distribution and that can be apportioned to individual agents: Such a narrative discourages actions and strategies that I consider highly important, including efforts to maintain and strengthen healthy communities; Such a narrative may encourage disregard for common-sense virtues and moral rules; Such a narrative may negatively affect attitudes and behaviours among elites (who aim for extremely high impact) as well as common people (who see no path to having any meaningful impact); and Such a narrative may disrupt basic notions of moral equality and encourage a differential valuation of human lives in accordance with the impact potential an individual supposedly holds. I then reflect on the sensibility and usefulness of apportioning impact to individual people and interventions in the first place, and I offer a few alternative perspectives to guide our efforts to do good effectively. In the beginning, I give some background on the origin of this essay, and in the end, I list a number of caveats, disclaimers, and uncertainties to paint a fuller picture of my own thinking on the topic. I highly welcome any feedback in response to the essay, and would also be happy to have a longer conversation about any or all of the ideas presented - please do not hesitate to reach out in case you would like to engage in greater depth than a mere Forum comment :)! Context I have developed and refined the ideas in the following paragraphs at least since May 2022 - my first notes specifically on the topic were taken after I listened to Will MacAskill talk about "high-impact opportunities" at the opening session of my first EA Global, London 2022. My thoughts on the topic were mainly sparked by interactions with the effective altruism community (EA), either in direct conversations or through things that I read and listened to over the last few years. However, I have encountered these arguments outside EA as well, among activists, political strategists, and "regular folks" (colleagues, friends, family). My journal contains many scattered notes, attesting to my discomfort and frustration with the - in my view, misguided - belief that a few individuals can (and should) have massive amounts of influence and impact by acting strategically. This text is an attempt to pull these notes together, giving a clear structure to the opposition I feel and turning it into a coherent argument that can be shared with and critiqued by others. Impact follows a power law distribution: The argument as I understand it "[T]he cost-effectiveness distributions of the most effective interventions and policies in education, health and climate change, are close to power-laws [...] the top intervention is 2 or almost 3 orders of magni...

This episode was recorded live at the Brighton Fringe in May 2022, with piano accompaniment from Sarah Weiler.  Episode 39: Live Episode - Liz Peters/Kill Billy Elliott IMDp is an improvised interview podcast. Every week Martina Minnow interviews a director about their upcoming film, except the film doesn't exist and they create it together through their conversation. Also joining Martina each week are our resident improvisers who create cutaway scenes and clips from the films discussed. However... until she introduces them, only Martina knows the guests name and the name of their movie. The  guest and team are kept in the dark until we press record.  Today's Special Guest:  Liz Peters (Casey Thread)  The IMDp Team: @improvmoviepod Sabrina Luisi (Martina Minnow) is in Hoopla House team Michelle, acapella improvised musical group Acaprov, improvised musical narrative group Multiverse and long form team Buffet. Sabrina is also an actor and writer in immersive online murder mystery group, Play Dead London. She loves Eastenders, refrigerated Curly Wurlys, and has three accents she uses on rotation in improv shows.  Twitter: @sabrinaluisi                      Instagram: @sabrina.luisi Rory Vieyra (Resident Improviser) is an improviser and Actor who regularly performs with Music Box Improv, Acaprov and The Inflatables in London and abroad. He also teaches improv with Hoopla Impro and performs in immersive Murder Mystery group Play Dead London. He loves Cinnanmon Buns, Dolly Parton and Ancient Greece. He know his impressions are bad but refuses to stop. Instagram & Facebook: @roryvieyra Monica Gaga (Resident Improvisor) is a British-born black African queer improviser, facilitator, host and scripted actor and performer. She trained in Community Theatre at East 15 Acting School, and her boundless love for improv stems from time spent at Second City in Chicago. When she is not performing, hosting or teaching, Monica is championing diversity, inclusion and equity in improv and trying to get as many people, particularly POC, involved as possible. Monica is based in London, UK.                               www.monicagaga.com Ryan J Murphy (Resident Improvisor) is an improviser from London who has been performing since 2012. He's performed shortform, longform and musical improv up and down the UK, including at the last 7 Edinburgh Festival Fringes, and internationally. Ryan performs in the Enid Blyton inspired show Bumper Blyton and improvised acapella musical Acaprov.  Find him eagerly shouting out answers at a quiz or whipping up a pavlova.  Twitter: @RyanJMurphy Sarah Weiler (Piano Accompaniment) is a Pianist, Composer and Creative Coach. She runs a breakfast radio show on Boogaloo Radio and corporate songwriting workshops with Power of Uke. She was also a founding member of Acaprov.  Steve Tanner (Producer/Editor) is Director of 4Foot1Films. He is a theatre director with Southside Players, and he creates and edits video content, regularly collaborating with Hoopla Impro. He runs filmmaking workshop Make A Movie Club for kids and is also an actor and writer with immersive online murder mystery group, Play Dead London. @4foot1films   Theme Music by Matt Brown & Jonny Griffiths Episode Artwork by Marty Sears 

This is part two of my conversation with Sarah Weiler. In this episode I share a personal coaching session I had with Sarah on her podcast, Knowing When To Quit. We dive deep into my limiting beliefs, internal conflicts, and outright frustrations that have been keeping me stuck and unsure of whether I want to or need to quit my medical career.I hope you enjoy this very raw and real episode! Excerpt from Sarah's Podcast:This is part 2 of a double episode with Dr. Jude Galea on her decision to quit the medical field profession after 20 years.This is a live coaching session where we explore this decision. At the end, you'll hear a voice note from a few weeks after the recording, with a final update.Thanks again, Jude for allowing us into your process.Dr. Jude Galea is an A+E doctor of 20 years, the founder of the WIitchy Women platform, and host of the podcast Dr. Body Mind Soul, both of which help people inform themselves about alternative therapies away from Western medicine.Jude's Instagram: @dr.bodymindsoulJude's website: drbodymindsoul.comKnowing When To Quit- Instagram: @knowingwhentoquitPodcast homepage: www.sarahweiler.com/podcast/Sarah's newsletter: https://sarahweiler.subtrack.com/

I'm here to introduce you to a different sort of episode this week - which has a part one - which is what you will hear today - and a part two - released to you next week. Because I want to start sharing with you a little bit more personal and let you know what is going on behind the scenes. I have found myself at a bit of a crossroads wondering whether or not I need to leave the medical profession, and luckily enough I have a friend - Sarah Weiler - who hosts a podcast called ‘Knowing When To Quit' - because quitting or ending anything - brings up A LOT of emotions. And may or may not be what is required at any given moment. It is tricky terrain to navigate - and Sarah is here to help us do just that.I really hope you enjoy the insight from these episodes and get a better understanding of where I am coming from and how I want to support you all moving forward.Excerpt from Sarah's Podcast:I'm so excited about today's episode, which is part 1 of a 2-part series with Dr. Jude Galea- she's an A+E doctor of 20 years, the founder of the Witchy Women platform- and host of the podcast Dr. Body Mind Soul, both of which help people inform themselves about alternative therapies away from western medicine. Jude is changing the conversation about medicine and is in the process of going through a big personal transformation with her identity as a doctor.The episode you're going to hear today was recorded exactly a year ago in May 2022 when Jude was taking a break from being an A+E doctor and living in Mexico, setting up her business.At this point a year ago, she's very much still weighing up whether she should leave the medical profession and can see the pros and cons of both leaving and staying.In next week's episode, we will see where she has got to one year on in terms of the decision to leave.The process of putting these two episodes together side by side really highlights to me just how hard the decision to quit can be. It's rarely an overnight decision, it's complex and it can take a lot of processing.Thank you, Jude, for sharing your story and allowing us to accompany you in your exploration of what it means for you to quit or remain in the medical field.In this episode, we discuss:· Jude's relationship with being ‘a doctor' and why she decided to be a doctor.· When she first wanted to quit medicine· What medicine HAS given her over the years and why she's stayed· Jude's exploration of alternative therapies and what she's doing to change the narrative· What we mean by ‘healing' and how the body works naturally· Jude's experience with plant medicine and how it informed her decision to leaveJude's website: drbodymindsoul.com

This episode was recorded semi-live with piano accompaniment from Sarah Weiler. The team were in the same room together preparing for their 2022 run at the Brighton Fringe. Episode 36: Live Episode - Rory Vieyra/Star Shrek IMDp is an improvised interview podcast. Every week Martina Minnow interviews a director about their upcoming film, except the film doesn't exist and they create it together through their conversation. Also joining Martina each week are our resident improvisers who create cutaway scenes and clips from the films discussed. However... until she introduces them, only Martina knows the guests name and the name of their movie. The  guest and team are kept in the dark until we press record.    IMDp will be recording two live episodes at the Brighton Fringe on Saturday 20 & Sunday 21 May 2023. Where we will be joined by Guest Directors: Mike Kunze & Izzy Glynn (Sat 20 May) / Jenny Wynter & Adam Balakjian (Sun 21 May). Tickets Here   Today's Special Guest:  Rory Vieyra (Eunice Sneak) is an improviser and Actor who regularly performs with Music Box Improv, Acaprov and The Inflatables in London and abroad. He also teaches improv with Hoopla Impro and performs in immersive Murder Mystery group Play Dead London. He loves Cinnanmon Buns, Dolly Parton and Ancient Greece. He know his impressions are bad but refuses to stop. Instagram & Facebook: @roryvieyra   The IMDp Team: @improvmoviepod Sabrina Luisi (Martina Minnow) is in Hoopla House team Michelle, acapella improvised musical group Acaprov, improvised musical narrative group Multiverse and long form team Buffet. Sabrina is also an actor and writer in immersive online murder mystery group, Play Dead London. She loves Eastenders, refrigerated Curly Wurlys, and has three accents she uses on rotation in improv shows.  Twitter: @sabrinaluisi                      Instagram: @sabrina.luisi Monica Gaga (Resident Improvisor) is a British-born black African queer improviser, facilitator, host and scripted actor and performer. She trained in Community Theatre at East 15 Acting School, and her boundless love for improv stems from time spent at Second City in Chicago. When she is not performing, hosting or teaching, Monica is championing diversity, inclusion and equity in improv and trying to get as many people, particularly POC, involved as possible. Monica is based in London, UK.                               www.monicagaga.com Ryan J Murphy (Resident Improvisor) is an improviser from London who has been performing since 2012. He's performed shortform, longform and musical improv up and down the UK, including at the last 7 Edinburgh Festival Fringes, and internationally. Ryan performs in the Enid Blyton inspired show Bumper Blyton and improvised acapella musical Acaprov.  Find him eagerly shouting out answers at a quiz or whipping up a pavlova.  Twitter: @RyanJMurphy Steve Tanner (Producer/Editor) is Director of 4Foot1Films. He is a theatre director with Southside Players, and he creates and edits video content, regularly collaborating with Hoopla Impro. He runs filmmaking workshop Make A Movie Club for kids and is also an actor and writer with immersive online murder mystery group, Play Dead London. @4foot1films   Sarah Weiler (Piano Accompaniment) is a Pianist, Composer and Creative Coach. She runs a breakfast radio show on Boogaloo Radio and corporate songwriting workshops with Power of Uke. She was also a founding member of Acaprov.    Theme Music by Matt Brown & Jonny Griffiths Episode Artwork by Marty Sears 

Sarah is a thought leader, coach and creative entrepreneur. But as a true ‘Carouseller' (someone who thrives on living a varied life) she is also a pricing coach, pianist, learning designer, songwriter, composer, writer, qualified secondary school languages teacher and podcaster. If you enjoy listening to the show, please subscribe and leave a review! The Outsiders Business Academy - A self-paced course for you to work through in your own time, to learn – and implement – the foundations of building a profitable business that lets you escape the 9 to 5. www.onestepoutside.com/course Sarah's "quitting quadrant": https://mailchi.mp/37b57f29026e/the-quitting-quadrant Join the free Facebook community: https://www.facebook.com/groups/onestepoutside/ Follow Anna on Instagram: https://instagram.com/annaselundberg  Get started with these free resources: Explore a broader definition of success https://onestepoutside.com/success  Find a way to quit your job and start your own business https://onestepoutside.com/roadmap  Get a free assessment of your business https://onestepoutside.com/scorecard Discover the book, Outside the Corporate 9 to 5: www.leavingthecorporate9to5.com

This episode was recorded semi-live with piano accompaniment from Sarah Weiler. The team were in the same room together preparing for their 2022 run at the Brighton Fringe. At the time of record our guest director was only 10 years old.  Episode 35: Live Episode - Maisie Tanner/Lilo & Hitch IMDp is an improvised interview podcast. Every week Martina Minnow interviews a director about their upcoming film, except the film doesn't exist and they create it together through their conversation. Also joining Martina each week are our resident improvisers who create cutaway scenes and clips from the films discussed. However... until she introduces them, only Martina knows the guests name and the name of their movie. The  guest and team are kept in the dark until we press record.    IMDp will be recording two live episodes at the Brighton Fringe on Saturday 20 & Sunday 21 May 2023. Where we will be joined by Guest Directors: Mike Kunze & Izzy Glynn (Sat 20 May) / Jenny Wynter & Adam Balakjian (Sun 21 May). Tickets Here   Today's Special Guest: Maisie Tanner (Clara Bell) loves all things Musical Theatre, taking part in at least five different dance and drama groups each week. She has written and performed for Southside Players' annual new-writing night Short & Sweet, and has taken online improv classes (for Under 10s) with The Nursery/The Maydays. This episode was recorded shortly before her 11th birthday. The IMDp Team: @improvmoviepod Sabrina Luisi (Martina Minnow) is in Hoopla House team Michelle, acapella improvised musical group Acaprov, improvised musical narrative group Multiverse and long form team Buffet. Sabrina is also an actor and writer in immersive online murder mystery group, Play Dead London. She loves Eastenders, refrigerated Curly Wurlys, and has three accents she uses on rotation in improv shows.  Twitter: @sabrinaluisi                      Instagram: @sabrina.luisi Ryan J Murphy (Resident Improvisor) is an improviser from London who has been performing since 2012. He's performed shortform, longform and musical improv up and down the UK, including at the last 7 Edinburgh Festival Fringes, and internationally. Ryan performs in the Enid Blyton inspired show Bumper Blyton and improvised acapella musical Acaprov.  Find him eagerly shouting out answers at a quiz or whipping up a pavlova.  Twitter: @RyanJMurphy Rory Vieyra (Resident Improviser) is an improviser and Actor who regularly performs with Music Box Improv, Acaprov and The Inflatables in London and abroad. He also teaches improv with Hoopla Impro and performs in immersive Murder Mystery group Play Dead London. He loves Cinnanmon Buns, Dolly Parton and Ancient Greece. He know his impressions are bad but refuses to stop. Instagram & Facebook: @roryvieyra Sarah Weiler (Piano Accompaniment) is a Pianist, Composer and Creative Coach. She runs a breakfast radio show on Boogaloo Radio and corporate songwriting workshops with Power of Uke. She was also a founding member of Acaprov.  Steve Tanner (Producer/Editor) is Director of 4Foot1Films. He is a theatre director with Southside Players, creates and edits video content, and regularly collaborates with Hoopla Impro. He runs filmmaking workshop Make A Movie Club for kids and is also an actor and writer with immersive online murder mystery group, Play Dead London. @4foot1films   Theme Music by Matt Brown & Jonny Griffiths Episode Artwork by Marty Sears   

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Call me, maybe? Hotlines and Global Catastrophic Risk [Founders Pledge], published by christian.r on January 24, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This post summarizes a Founders Pledge shallow investigation on direct communications links (DCLs or "hotlines") between states as global catastrophic risks interventions. As a shallow investigation, it is a rough attempt at understanding an issue, and is in some respects a work in progress. Summary Crisis-communication links or “hotlines” between states are a subset of crisis management tools intended to help leaders defuse the worst possible crises and to limit or terminate war (especially nuclear war) when it does break out. Despite a clear theory of change, however, there is high uncertainty about their effectiveness and little empirical evidence. The most important dyadic adversarial relationships (e.g., U.S.-China, U.S.-Russia, Pakistan-India, India-China) already have existing hotlines between them, and forming new hotlines is an unlikely candidate for effective philanthropy. Along with high uncertainty about hotline effectiveness in crisis management, the highest stakes application of hotlines (i.e., WMD conflict limitation and termination) remains untested, and dedicated crisis-communications channels may have an important fail-safe role in the event of conflict. War limitation- and termination-enabling hotlines have high expected value even with very low probability of success, because of the distribution of fatalities in WMD-related conflicts. Importantly, it appears that existing hotlines — cobbled together from legacy Cold-War systems and modern technology — are not resilient to the very conflicts they are supposed to control, and may fail in the event of nuclear war, electro-magnetic pulse, cyber operations and some natural catastrophic risks, like solar flares. Additionally, there are political and institutional obstacles to hotline use, including China's repeated failure to answer in crisis situations. Philanthropists interested in crisis management tools like hotlines could pursue a number of interventions, including: Funding work and dialogues to establish new hotlines; Funding work and dialogues on hotline resilience (including technical work on hotlines in communications-denied environments); Funding more rigorous studies of hotline effectiveness; Funding track II dialogues between the U.S. and China (and potentially other powerful states) focused on hotlines to understand different conceptions of crisis communication. We believe that the marginal value of establishing new hotlines is likely to be low. The other interventions likely need to be sequenced — before investing in hotline resilience, we ought to better understand whether hotlines work, and what political and institutional issues affect their function. Crucially for avoiding great power conflict, we recommend investing in understanding why China does not “pick up” crisis communications channels in times of crisis. Acknowledgments: I would like to thank Tom Barnes, Linton Brooks, Matt Lerner, Peter Rautenbach, David Santoro, Shaan Shaikh, and Sarah Weiler for helpful input on this project. Background Thomas Schelling first suggested the idea of a direct communications link between the United States and the Soviet Union in 1958, and the idea was popularized in outlets like Parade magazine. Although early attempts were made at implementing such a link (e.g. in early 1962), the need for such a dedicated communications channel between the United States and Soviet Union became pressingly clear during the Cuban Missile crisis, when Kennedy and Krushchev communicated through “clumsy” and slow traditional communications channels. Officials at the Soviet embassy in Washington later recalled that even their own communications with Moscow used slow an...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Cruxes for nuclear risk reduction efforts - A proposal, published by Sarah Weiler on November 16, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This is my attempt to give an overview of debates and arguments relevant to the question of how to mitigate nuclear risks effectively. I list a number of crucial questions that I think need to be answered by anyone (individual or group) seeking to find their role as a contributor to nuclear risk mitigation efforts. I give a high-level overview of the cruxes in Figure 1: These questions are based on my moderately extensive engagement with the nuclear risk field; they are likely not exhaustive and might well be phrased in a less-than-optimal way — I thus welcome any feedback for how to improve the list found below. I hope that this list can help people (and groups) reflect on the cause of nuclear risk reduction by highlighting relevant considerations and structuring the large amount of thinking that has gone into the topic already. I do not provide definitive answers to the questions listed, but try to outline competing responses to each question and flesh out my own current position on some of them in separate posts/write-ups (linked to below). The post consists of the following sections: Setting the stage: some background on my CERI research project Outline of my work on nuclear issues prior to the summer fellowship Summary of work by others with some similarity to mine A defense of the value of my project and the output presented here Main body: list of cruxes in the nuclear risk debate Substantive cruxes: questions to determine which nuclear risks to work on and how to do so Sub-cruxes: questions to help tackle the cruxes above Meta-level cruxes: methodological and epistemological questions Links and references Setting the stage For a couple of months, I have been engaged in an effort to disentangle the nuclear risk cause area, i.e., to figure out which specific risks it encompasses and to get a sense for what can and should be done about these risks. I took several stabs at the problem, and this is my latest attempt to make progress on this disentanglement goal. My previous attempts to disentangle nuclear risk While I had some exposure to nuclear affairs during my studies of global politics at uni (i.e., at least since 2018) and have been reading about the topic throughout the last few years, I've been engaging with the topic more seriously only since the beginning of this year (2022), when I did a part-time research fellowship in which I decided to focus on nuclear risks. For that fellowship, I started by brainstorming my thoughts and uncertainties about nuclear risk as a problem area that I might want to work on (resulting in a list of questions and my preliminary thoughts on them), did a limited survey of the academic literature on different intellectual approaches to the topic of nuclear weapons, and conducted a small-scale empirical investigation into how three different non-profits in the nuclear risk field (the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, and the RAND Corporation) conceptualize and justify their work on nuclear risk (resulting in a sketch of the theory of change. of each organization, constructed based on the information they provide on their websites). During ten weeks over this summer (Jul-Sep 2022), my participation in the Cambridge Existential Risk Initiative — a full-time, paid and mentored research fellowship — has allowed me to dedicate more time to this project and to test out a few more approaches to understanding the nuclear risk field. I spent around three weeks with the goal of compiling a list of organizations working on nuclear risk issues, collecting information on their self-described theory of change, and categorizing the organizations in a broad typolog...

When women's tennis world number one Ash Barty suddenly announced in March 2022 that she was retiring from tennis, it was huge shock. Barty, a three time grand slam champion, was only 25. At the time she said she was leaving professional tennis to pursue other life goals. Quitting is often seen as a negative thing to do, but in this episode we explore the positive side. PwC's Global Workforce Hopes and Fears survey of more than 52,000 people in 44 countries showed that one in five workers planned to quit their jobs in 2022. Marie Keyworth speaks to Moya Dodd, former vice-captain of Australia's women's football team - The Matildas. She now works as a lawyer in Sydney and says Barty's decision to 'quit at the top' could be a lesson to us all. Career coach Sarah Weiler has quit several roles herself, and has now made it her job to help others – how do you know when it's time to move on? And Dina Denham Smith is an executive coach based in the San Francisco Bay area. She helps what she calls ‘high performing, high achieving' people make decisions. She tells Marie how you can improve your situation if quitting isn't an option. Presented and produced by Marie Keyworth. (Image: Ash Barty. Credit: Getty)

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: A Critique of The Precipice: Chapter 6 - The Risk Landscape [Red Team Challenge], published by Sarah Weiler on June 26, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This post was written as part of the Red Team Challenge by Training For Good. We spent seven weeks writing a critique of Chapter 6 of The Precipice because it is a key text in the Effective Altruism community and we believe that it is important to ensure that our ways of comparing and prioritizing existential risks (henceforth referred to as x-risks) rest on a solid foundation. Key takeaways The author provides several useful frameworks for how to think about, compare, and prioritize existential risks - (1) Importance x Tractability x Neglectedness (ITN) (2) Anatomy of extinction risks, (3) Correlation between different x-risks, (4) Existential risk and security factors, and (5) Soon, sudden, sharp. While the Importance x Tractability x Neglectedness (ITN) framework is provided as a key way to prioritize, the author mainly focuses on the Importance aspect, in particular disregarding the Tractability parameter, which we believe could make a significant impact on the final prioritization. There are some plausible reasons for not trying to estimate Tractability, but we would prefer the author to explicitly mention his reasoning. The author does not provide a way to combine all of the different frameworks into a single prioritization, leaving this difficult to apply consistently. Priorities research - the question of how to allocate effort between mitigating x-risks directly vs. investigating the risk landscape to improve future resource allocation - seems important to the chapter, yet is missing from the book entirely. The methods of x-risk probability calculation are highly uncertain, and the author's use of these uncertain estimates as a basis for prioritizing between different x-risks and for allocating large amounts of resources to specific targeted interventions is not fully justified. In light of the large uncertainty of existential risk prioritization, we explore the idea of how broad resilience interventions might side-step some of the issues with estimating the impact of targeted risk reduction, and suggest that these warrant more attention. With the goal of preventing existential catastrophe, focusing on maximizing core resiliency of our species could be a promising alternative. The scope of our critique The Precipice focuses on minimizing existential risks (x-risks) to humanity, defined as “permanent destruction of humanity's potential” (p. 6). These risks include extinction, but also other ways humanity's long-term potential could be permanently destroyed, e.g. permanent collapse of civilization. While there are arguments that a pure focus on x-risks at the cost of everything else may be misguided, we accept the premise of the book for the purposes of our critique. Instead, we focus on critiquing whether Chapter 6, The Risk Landscape, has achieved its stated goal to “contemplate the entire landscape of existential risk, seeing how the risks compare, how they combine, what they have in common, and which risks should be our highest priorities” (p. 165). While we focus this critique on points we believe could be even stronger, we also investigated several claims that hold up very well. In particular, we believe that the author (1) provides useful models for thinking about existential risk, (2) presents a very solid mathematical treatment of how multiple risks combine into an overall risk, clearly highlighting some counterintuitive results, (3) highlights not only direct risks, but also existential risk and security factors, which either increase or lower the chance of existential catastrophe without being a direct existential threat themselves, and (4) differentiates well between targeted vs. broad risk in...

EPISODE 1 IS HERE! 'The News is Alive with the Sound of Quitting... aaaaah!' In 2017 I put a call out for people to share their quitting stories with me. People were shocked that I was bringing this 'brave' and 'out-there' topic into the world. They DM'd me on the sly with their confessions about times they wanted to quit, or shared their relief of when they did. Quitting was still a guilty secret. Fast forward to 2022 and Quitting is all the rage! The great resignation is upon us and Quitting is showing up in every newspaper, magazine and podcast interview. The world is ready for this podcast! In this first episode I'm interviewed by my wonderful coach Kate Taylor, who is helping me bring the themes of this podcast and my own Quitting journey to life. Listen to the whole thing over a cuppa, or skip to the bits you want like the true short-attention-span millennial you are. (And yes, I'm forever a teacher - still differentiating for all listening types!) 4:24 - How and why I've created frameworks to support myself and others as multi-passionates 8:55 - What I do now and the journey I've been on 12:20 - My hopes for this podcast and how it came about 15:56 - How we are constantly quitting and re-committing - and the idea of a ''mini-quit'' 20:03 - What the desire to quit is really showing us 23:08 - The importance of celebrating endings the grace and harvesting the experience 27:36 - My own early experiences of quitting and how it shaped me 38:45 - Framework time! The Quitting Quadrant® 44:00 - The Carousel Model (+ how it intersects with the Quitting work) 47:19 - Whether I've ever regretted quitting something... 50:09 - What to expect with the podcast interviews coming up... 52:50 - The best piece of advice about quitting I can give people... I hope you enjoy it! And if you get half way through and it's not your vibe, you have full permission to quit listening... Also, yes don't worry, I will make sure every episode has a musical theatre link in its title. IMPORTANT THINGS COVERED. Interview by Kate Taylor // Edited by Jonny Hall // Podcast Art by Tom Pauling // Intro music by Sarah Weiler More on the podcast: https://sarahweiler.com/podcast/ (https://sarahweiler.com/podcast/) The Quitting Quadrant®: www.quittingquadrant.com Carousel Model: https://sarah-weiler.medium.com/the-carousel-check-in-tool-d82b3ebf83b8 RECORDED AUGUST 2021

SARAH WEILER IS an L&D Designer & Disruptor, TEDx Speake, CEO & FaSILLYtator - Power of Uke™, Creator - Quitting Quadrant® + Carousel™. In this interview we talk about how playing the ukulele can helps us with empathy, creativity, and dealing with uncertainty. And why a "tech free Thursday" could be a good idea. For more stories, visit https://www.collaborationsuperpowers.com

content: Nov 10, 2016 · podcast: Nov 2, 2020 Audio (MP3): 20161110 - Only on Mondays and Wednesdays Video (MP4): 20161110 - Only on Mondays and Wednesdays What I wrote about Trump and the people who voted for him the day after the 2016 election, I’ve been thinking about that more. Thinking about it more because I was more than annoyed when I wrote it and because I have life long friends who voted for him. And, most importantly, I’ve been thinking about it because I try to self-correct as needed. It was pretty harsh to say that people should be ashamed of themselves for voting for Trump. I know that I should be ashamed of myself for voting for Hillary, too. A friend sent me a link last night reminding me that Hillary and her minions stole the nomination from Bernie. I knew this and voted for her anyway. It’s the two-party political world we live in. But still. It’s easier to point fingers than look at my own actions. Whatever, I can admit that. I’m not morally superior but I often act like it. Trump is publicly horrible and Hillary is privately villainous. Which behavior is worse? I tend to go with the obvious, the undeniable. But...shady backroom deals just might be worse in the cosmic scheme of things than someone who’s undeniably sexist. I’m a horrible person in private and I try to be a good person in public. I would wager that a lot of us are based on how we want to appear in front of our peers. Trump has little humility in public, uses the word rapist to describe an entire race. I’m even more outraged when people defend Trump for being horrible, saying "he’s not so bad" or "he didn’t mean it." He’s an asshole and saying that he’s not is ridiculous to me. If someone said to me that Hillary is an asshole, I’d agree. If someone told me I was an asshole, I’d say “ya, but only on Mondays and Wednesdays.” So anyways I'll put my superior political morals down for awhile. 😉 I don't have a bow to wrap this up in. You might expect me to say, everybody get together and try to love on another right now. But I won’t. People are entitled to their emotions and opinions. Casting them aside too soon is bad for the soul. Update: so Trump didn’t say that all Mexicans are rapists, just the ones that Mexico sends to the US. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people. Okay, so this is only slightly less bad. But still pretty bad. The bigger thought to me is why do illegal immigrants come to the US in the first place? Because US corporations hire them. #politics #election2016 #trump #diariespodcast #diariesvideo tam.the.terrible · Nov 10, 2016 at 11:14 am Thanks for voicing my sentiments. I privately mourn the outcome of this election. I also believe that unity is extremely important, and I believe that anyone who can take small steps to help heal, whether one voted for Trump or Hillary, I ask they please do so. It’s unreasonable to expect those who feel absolute horror over a Trump presidency to suck it up and move on in the days after the election. Rage, grieve, cry, do whatever it takes. We will have to get to work and quickly. There is apparently an amendment to the DEFENSE contract, HR 4909 put forth by Rep. Russell from Oklahoma, that will allow contractors to the government to discriminate against the LGBTQ community. Not being a reader of legalese, I can’t immediately see how this will work, but anyone who wants to can read it here. Having a Republican majority in the house, senate, etc. will unfortunately mean we will have to fight tooth and nail to keep the advancements we have made in the past 8 years. I hope people who support love, equality, equity, harmony, peace, and education will be willing to work hard to keep our gains. http://docs.house.gov/meetings/AS/AS00/20160427/104832/BILLS-114-HR4909-R000604-Amdt-232r2.pdf $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; Momma J · Nov 10, 2016 at 11:15 am First of all, you’re not a horrible person in private. Second of all, you do not act morally Superior. Third of all you are humble enough to self-correct! Love you $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; Sarah Weiler · Nov 10, 2016 at 11:21 am So good $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; fivewayrack · Nov 10, 2016 at 12:06 pm You are and have always been one of you favorite people on this planet. The thought that you might dislike me due to a difference in politics really bummed me out. I know I have to reconsider things I post when I am annoyed often. Like when I call someone morally superior. 😑 $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; tcr! · Nov 11, 2016 at 8:19 am I didn’t mean to come across as not liking people based on their poliitical vote. I have many great friends (you included) and relatives who voted Republican this year. I was just throwing a fit because I wasn’t ready for Trump to be president the morning after. I’m also happy that you called me out publicly. I need that sometimes. 😉 $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; fivewayrack · Nov 10, 2016 at 12:17 pm Now if I could just get my thoughts onto the screen as well as you! I rewrote the above paragraph several times. Still not right. $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; sveagrabarek · Nov 10, 2016 at 12:32 pm meme storyboard should capture the meaning and spirit. $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; Kelly K · Nov 10, 2016 at 1:54 pm Good stuff $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; jimi hindrance experience · Nov 11, 2016 at 12:31 am Thanks everybody. I don’t think it’s 100% accurate to say Hillary “stole” the nomination from Bernie. It’s a complicated process, some would call “rigged”. I can be wrong too. For example, I wasn’t the least bit prepared for this to happen. I’m getting over it. Oh yeah, I should add that Bernie was my first pick. And that I am proud to have voted for Hillary, who’s made mistakes, just like me. $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; jimi hindrance experience · Nov 11, 2016 at 12:47 am I re-read the comments, with special attention to those of TLC. Where would any of us be without the transcending power of forgiveness? I’m going to assume that the public figures we’ve discussed are just as worthy as me and you, et al. Peace and popsicles for everyone. Purple for me. $m.wand.ajax_click=true;$m.wand.lightswitch=true; Add a comment! Got 30 seconds? Take the super duper, quick and easy podcast survey! Please. 😊 Love the show? Make a donation! Because you're the best. 💖 tcrbang.com · Instagram · Facebook · YouTube View original

If you've ever had a crazy creative idea for a business or project, and then you've talked yourself out of it because you couldn't see where it will go and what the point was, and how you could ever make some money out of it. Well, this is gonna be a great podcast for you. Sarah Weiler, runs a business called Power of Uke, teaching ukulele to giant corporations such as Google. Sarah also runs a London comedy club that has been running for six years ever since she launched it during a programme I used to run, called the 30 Day Challenge. On top of this, she has collaborated with Airbnb, and she's given a TEDx talk. Sarah has so many creative projects she wants to pursue, but she developed some really interesting ideas about how to manage them all and how to decide which ones to continue and which ones to quit. Best Wishes, John   For full links and notes please visit:  https://theideaslab.org/sarahweiler-powerofuke ______________________________________________________________ Music provided by Argofox: TheDiabolicalWaffle – My Wish https://youtu.be/sRWEMjYR6e4

  Our 9th podcast episode, in the Legendary Leaders series, sees us back chatting with Sarah Weiler, owner of Power of Uke, TedX Speaker, Comedian and DJ. Sarah kicks things off sharing an insight she's experienced where there's a tendency to make work harder for ourselves because we feel the need to be ‘too busy' and almost overwhelmed to prove that we are working hard. Sarah explains that when things happen that feel a bit easy, we question what we did, and almost talk ourselves into believing we didn't work hard enough. She alludes to surrendering in order to allow ourselves to find something easy and enjoyable and accept it as just that.      Sarah continues the theme of pressure by talking about how people often don't quit something until they end up in crisis, and as such quitting is seen as a negative, something associated with burn out and drama. She reframes quitting and describes it as deciding something no longer serves you or you've reached as far as something's going to take you.     During the podcast we are introduced to the ‘Quitting Quadrant' tool which involves understanding the level of interest and level of discomfort you have with a project or challenge. Sarah explains the four quadrants and how they can be used to understand where we are and what we need to do next, as well as being a useful tool to trigger conversations about what we're doing and whether it's right. The key benefit, Sarah shares with us, is that the Quitting Quadrant helps you to learn quickly if something is working for you or not, and if not, you can move on without shame.      Sarah finishes the podcast with some top tips, including the importance of having time not working, a restoring phase, as well as being kinder by allowing ourselves to not be on edge the whole time.      She also suggests at the end of each day focusing not on what you have done but ask yourself how have you been.     If you enjoyed this episode, check out the video show notes and more here and follow me on Social Media:      Facebook Instagram LinkedIn     In this episode you will learn:    How you can use the Quitting Quadrant to understand what is working for you and where something isn't, quitting without shame.     How to be kinder to yourself from acknowledging success and achievement even in those times when things feel easy, to asking yourself how have you been, rather than what have you done today.   The importance of taking time out from work to restore and recharge and the positive impact that will have on your work     About Cathleen:     As a trained Leadership & Mindset Coach, Facilitator and Keynote Speaker Cathleen supports high achieving but worn-out Women in Corporates create a more content & balanced life without sacrificing their hard-earned success.      Cathleen focuses on women who lost their sense of purpose, who feel they are running in a hamster wheel, trying to please everyone but themselves. She helps people turn their careers around so that they start feeling fulfilled and excited again about the Mondays to come.      Her proven 6-step "Legend Framework" helps Leaders go from feeling lost, lacking confidence and clarity about their career to owning their next career step, feeling at ease with themselves and others, excited about their future and able to tackle any obstacle that may get in their way. At the end of the process, Cathleen's clients will feel healthier, happier, energised and clear about their future.      She works with action takers who really want to make an impact on the world around them - people who are driven by purpose. If you are a female high-achiever and you are ready to take your career to the next level whilst fully enjoying your personal life, then get in touch!      With over 15 years of leadership experience in Retail, Media & Broadcasting, Engineering and Property Investment, Cathleen has not only experienced the challenges and opportunities of a leader herself, she has also been leading and supporting various leadership development projects within large, complex, multinational matrix organisations. These are exactly the experiences that made her choose to help leaders across the world step out of the “daily hamster wheel” and into a life of purpose, inspiration and courage to live a life on their own terms.      Cathleen's Links:  Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Pinterest Website     About Sarah Weiler:     Sarah has spent the last 12 years teaching, facilitating and coaching all over the world and working hard to build a life full of activities that make her feel alive. These include: Power of Uke (using the ukulele to access Growth Mindset and Creativity in corporate organisations like Google and PWC), Rye Laughs Comedy night, DJing, stand-up comedy, career and life coaching, teaching money mindset, becoming a TEDx speaker around the topic of Quitting and most recently creating The Carousel. Her claim to fame is her GDPR comedy song, which went viral.     Having so many things on the go at the same time can lead to overwhelm if we're trying to do them all at the same time, and feeling as though we not giving all the attention to all things at all times. Enter then the concept of the Carousel, devised by Sarah Weiler, who honours that having variety in life and career doesn't have to mean doing all the things at the same time, and that variety can also mean focus. Not one or the other.     WHERE TO FIND SARAH ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Instagram Facebook Facebook Facebook     WHERE TO FIND OUT WHAT'S ON SARAH'S CAROUSEL: Sarah's Power of Uke Website Reconnect with Your Creativity Event - Nov 12 2019 Rye Laughs Comedy Night - Nov 13 2019 Sign up to The Carousel Tiny Newsletter Day of Musical Joy - December 8: Email Sarah The Quitting Quadrant New and Full Moon Ceremonies and Character act Saray Moany (hilarious) Sarah's comedy songwriting Sarah's famed GDPR song

  In this the 8th podcast episode in the Legendary Leaders series, we meet Sarah Weiler, owner of Power of Uke, TedX Speaker, Comedian and DJ (having played Glastonbury in 2019).     Sarah shares some great insights into life and interests. She refers to the analogy of a carousel when it comes to having a varied lifestyle and not wanting to focus on just one ‘thing' in life.     Putting your life and interests on the carousel acknowledges them all without the worry of forgetting one area when your focus is elsewhere. Sarah also redefines focus, explaining that it doesn't mean having to pick one thing and only do that, but rather ensuring that at any one point in time you focus completely and fully on that one area to give it your all.     Sarah shares with us the unique workshops she has run with numerous corporates where she takes people through a process to learn the ukulele, write a song and perform it, and the immediate reactions she receives compared to the feedback from those involved at the end.   She explains the sense of self-belief that the workshops help to create, and the role they play enabling participants to have a bit of fun, loosen up and get into a good mental and interpersonal state for doing their work. Sarah challenges the recent trend of ‘niching' when it comes to our work, which can cause unnecessary stress and potentially overlook the variety of skills and areas of life we enjoy.     If you enjoyed this episode, check out the video show notes and more here and follow me on Social Media:      Facebook Instagram LinkedIn     In this episode you will learn:    A great tool to use to view your life and interests without feeling overwhelmed by everything you have on your plate. How Sarah's workshops have challenged participants and built their self-belief. How Sarah keeps creating a life that's full of variety, fun and growth, consciously deciding not to choose only one direction.   About Cathleen:     As a trained Leadership & Mindset Coach, Facilitator and Keynote Speaker Cathleen supports high achieving but worn-out Women in Corporates create a more content & balanced life without sacrificing their hard-earned success.      Cathleen focuses on women who lost their sense of purpose, who feel they are running in a hamster wheel, trying to please everyone but themselves. She helps people turn their careers around so that they start feeling fulfilled and excited again about the Mondays to come.      Her proven 6-step "Legend Framework" helps Leaders go from feeling lost, lacking confidence and clarity about their career to owning their next career step, feeling at ease with themselves and others, excited about their future and able to tackle any obstacle that may get in their way. At the end of the process, Cathleen's clients will feel healthier, happier, energised and clear about their future.      She works with action takers who really want to make an impact on the world around them - people who are driven by purpose. If you are a female high-achiever and you are ready to take your career to the next level whilst fully enjoying your personal life, then get in touch!      With over 15 years of leadership experience in Retail, Media & Broadcasting, Engineering and Property Investment, Cathleen has not only experienced the challenges and opportunities of a leader herself, she has also been leading and supporting various leadership development projects within large, complex, multinational matrix organisations. These are exactly the experiences that made her choose to help leaders across the world step out of the “daily hamster wheel” and into a life of purpose, inspiration and courage to live a life on their own terms.      Cathleen's Links:  Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Pinterest Website     About Sarah Weiler:     Sarah has spent the last 12 years teaching, facilitating and coaching all over the world and working hard to build a life full of activities that make her feel alive. These include: Power of Uke (using the ukulele to access Growth Mindset and Creativity in corporate organisations like Google and PWC), Rye Laughs Comedy night, DJing, stand-up comedy, career and life coaching, teaching money mindset, becoming a TEDx speaker around the topic of Quitting and most recently creating The Carousel. Her claim to fame is her GDPR comedy song, which went viral.     Having so many things on the go at the same time can lead to overwhelm if we're trying to do them all at the same time, and feeling as though we not giving all the attention to all things at all times. Enter then the concept of the Carousel, devised by Sarah Weiler, who honours that having variety in life and career doesn't have to mean doing all the things at the same time, and that variety can also mean focus. Not one or the other.     WHERE TO FIND SARAH ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Instagram Facebook Facebook Facebook     WHERE TO FIND OUT WHAT'S ON SARAH'S CAROUSEL: Sarah's Power of Uke Website Reconnect with Your Creativity Event - Nov 12 2019 Rye Laughs Comedy Night - Nov 13 2019 Sign up to The Carousel Tiny Newsletter Day of Musical Joy - December 8: Email Sarah The Quitting Quadrant New and Full Moon Ceremonies and Character act Saray Moany (hilarious) Sarah's comedy songwriting Sarah's famed GDPR song

Would you describe yourself as a multi-hyphenate, multipotentialite, or in my case the proverbial 'slashie', meaning that I have so many strings to my bow, and things that I love to do in my work, that I find it difficult to encapsulate it all into one job title. Being a multipotentialite or multi-hyphenate doesn't always have to relate to our work, it can relate to all of the things that we do in work, in careers, at home, in our interests; in live overall. Having so many things on the go at the same time can lead to overwhelm if we're trying to do them all at the same time, and feeling as though we not giving all the attention to all things at all times. Enter then the concept of the Carousel, devised by my lovely client - and multipotentialite - Sarah Weiler, who honours that having variety in life and career doesn't have to mean doing all the things at the same time, and that variety can also mean focus. Not one or the other.  Sarah has spent the last 12 years teaching, facilitating and coaching all over the world and working hard to build a life full of activities that make her feel alive. These include: Power of Uke (using the ukulele to access Growth Mindset and Creativity in corporate organisations like Google and PWC), Rye Laughs Comedy night, DJing, stand-up comedy, career and life coaching, teaching money mindset, becoming a TEDx speaker around the topic of Quitting and most recently creating The Carousel. Her claim to fame is her GDPR comedy song, which went viral. So listen in to this fascinating conversation, as we celebrate our lives of having lots of different creative ideas and projects on the go. On the show we chat: Just what the Carousel is, and how we can adopt it into our lives. Why there has been a societal bias towards focus over variety, when actually the Carousel means you can have both. Why doing less and taking time to be 'off' to 'do nothing' feeds the energy and flow of your creative projects, work and life in general. Embracing the cyclical / seasonal nature of life and our work. How bringing in Sarah's principles of quitting can actually benefit the rest of your life and work, rather than fearing it. How to bring the carousel into your life as a way of living. Just what's on Sarah's carousel right now, and what's at the back of her carousel.   Where to find Sarah on social media: Instagram  https://www.facebook.com/ryelaughs/ https://www.facebook.com/powerofuke https://www.facebook.com/DjSarahToninUK/   Where to find out what's on Sarah's Carousel: Sarah's Power of Uke website Reconnect with Your Creativity Event - Nov 12 2019 Rye Laughs Comedy Night - Nov 13 2019 Sign up to The Carousel Tiny Newsletter Day of Musical Joy - December 8 - Email Sarah The Quitting Quadrant New and Full Moon Ceremonies and Character act Sarah Moany (hilarious) Sarah's comedy songwriting Sarah's famed GDPR song    

Molly Benjamin and Lisa Conway-Hughes are joined by Sarah Weiler who is a stand-up comedian, TedEx speaker, uke performer, DJ, corporate specialist and creator of Quitting Quadrant™! Sarah shares advice on how to set your best price as a freelancer, different pricing strategies and how often you should re-evaluate your offerings! Sarah introduces the quitting quadrant - which helps you to evaluate key emotions which help you make the best decisions about when's best to quit, and shares her love for the uke - http://powerofuke.com/ 

Jenni chats to Power of Uke founder Sarah Weiler about those niggling doubts that plague even the most successful freelancers, and how to turn them to our advantage. After all, it's impossible for us ALL to be imposters... isn't it?  Reference: "Playing Big" by Tara Mohr http://powerofuke.com/ Music: Sarah Weiler Twitter: @properfreelance  

A conversation with Sarah Weiler, founder of Power of Uke and Rye Laughs Comedy Nights, where we talk (and sing!) about the way music can help us break through communication problems.For more of Sarah's work, please check out www.powerofuke.com and www.facebook.com/ryelaughs.Being Human is a FirstHuman production. For more on FirstHuman's coaching and leadership programmes, head to http://www.firsthuman.com.

A conversation with Sarah Weiler, founder of Power of Uke and Rye Laughs Comedy Nights, where we talk (and sing!) about the way music can help us break through communication problems.For more of Sarah's work, please check out www.powerofuke.com and www.facebook.com/ryelaughs.Being Human is a FirstHuman production. For more on FirstHuman's coaching and leadership programmes, head to http://www.firsthuman.com.

A conversation with Sarah Weiler, founder of Power of Uke and Rye Laughs Comedy Nights, where we talk (and sing!) about the way music can help us break through communication problems.For more of Sarah's work, please check out www.powerofuke.com and www.facebook.com/ryelaughs.Being Human is a FirstHuman production. For more on FirstHuman's coaching and leadership programmes, head to http://www.firsthuman.com.

“Development involves giving up a smaller story in order to wake up to a larger story.” - Jean Houston When is the moment at which you become an entrepreneur? Is there a definitive moment or action that makes it official? Sarah Weiler followed her passion to bring creativity and playfulness into the workplace by founding The Power of Uke. Like many entrepreneurs, Sarah is still working a day job to pay her bills as she builds her business. The Power of Uke is growing,­­ gaining clients and billings, but Sarah is reluctant to identify as an entrepreneur. In this conversation Jerry and Sarah discuss what’s holding her back from identifying as an entrepreneur and why it’s so hard to shift from living to satisfy what you think is expected of you to what you want and love to do. Links Sarah on Twitter ­ - https://twitter.com/weilersarah Power of Uke on Twitter - https://twitter.com/powerofuke ­ Power of Uke - http://powerofuke.com/