Podcasts about transcendental argument

Eli responds to a critic of the Transcendental Argument for God.

March 4, 2025 Eli Ayala,Presuppositionalist apologist &founder of RevealedApologetics.comwho will address: “The TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENTfor the EXISTENCE of GOD (TAG)” & announcing the fall conference inFranklin, TN featuring Eli Ayala,Dr. James R. White & Dr. Jason Lisle!!! Subscribe: Listen:

Matt, an agnostic, initiates a respectful dialogue about transcendental arguments, circular reasoning, and the validation of the Christian worldview. The discussion compares the foundations of the Christian worldview with those of atheism and Buddhism, concluding that the Christian worldview offers a coherent and self-authenticating basis for knowledge and morality. Men, get real accountability and knowledge to help you become the worldview leader your family and church need. Try out the Hammer & Anvil Society FREE for 90 days. Learn more ➡️ https://hammerandanvil.circle.so/c/join/join-the-hammer-anvil-society ---- Check out our FREE CLASS on 3 Steps for Unleashing the POWER of Presuppositional Apologetics

Atheist Armin Navabi tackles Matt Slick's version of the transcendental argument for God (TAG) in chapter 14 of his book, "Why There Is No God." TAG is an attempt to demonstrate the existence of God using the Laws of Logic. These laws would include the Law of Identity, the Law of Non-Contradiction, and the Law of Excluded Middle. Armin believes that while the argument is structurally sound, it commits the fallacy of equivocation. He states, "The phenomena these laws refer to would continue to exist regardless of whether a deity or anyone else thought about them... Minds are necessary only to describe that phenomenon, not to make it true." Is TAG a good argument, or should it be discarded as a failed attempt to demonstrate that God exists? This will be the topic of today's show! As always, come join the show and bring your questions! Callers welcome at the end.

You're about to see the Transcendental Argument for God in action when atheism and Christianity collide. In this compelling episode of the Worldview Legacy podcast, Joel Settecase steps into the hot seat on the "Real Atheology, a Philosophy of Religion Podcast," hosted by Benjamin Blake Speed Watkins. The conversation centers around one of the most profound questions in moral philosophy: Does Objective Morality Require God? Join Joel and Ben as they engage in a rigorous and respectful dialogue, exploring their contrasting views on the nature of morality and meta-ethics. Ben presents his case for ethical non-naturalism, arguing that objective moral values can exist independently of God. Joel counters by grounding moral truths in the very nature of God, asserting that without a divine being, objective morality lacks a coherent foundation. Key Topics Covered: The distinction between moral values and moral obligations. Ethical non-naturalism vs. theistic moral realism. The relationship between general and special revelation in understanding morality. The coherence (or incoherence) of abstract moral propositions without a divine mind. Joel's challenge to atheism and the implications of God's necessary existence for morality and knowledge. The episode concludes with a thought-provoking challenge from Joel, inviting listeners to consider the Christian worldview and its robust answers to the moral questions that shape our lives.

FDA joins me to cover his new paper on TAG and what it means to make meta-level arguments and how TAG is not another rationalist argument relying on absolute logic, etc. FDA is here: https://www.youtube.com/@esorem Send Superchats at any time here: https://streamlabs.com/jaydyer/tip The New Philosophy Course is here: https://marketplace.autonomyagora.com/philosophy101 Use JAY50 promo code here https://choq.com for huge discounts - 50% off! Set up recurring Choq subscription with the discount code JAY53LIFE for 53% off now https://choq.com Lore coffee is here: https://www.patristicfaith.com/coffee/ Orders for the Red Book are here: https://jaysanalysis.com/product/the-red-book-essays-on-theology-philosophy-new-jay-dyer-book/ Subscribe to my site here: https://jaysanalysis.com/membership-account/membership-levels/ Follow me on R0kfin here: https://rokfin.com/jaydyerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/jay-sanalysis--1423846/support.

FDA joins me to cover his new paper on TAG and what it means to make meta-level arguments and how TAG is not another rationalist argument relying on absolute logic, etc.Send Superchats at any time here: https://streamlabs.com/jaydyer/tip The New Philosophy Course is here: https://marketplace.autonomyagora.com/philosophy101 Use JAY50 promo code here https://choq.com for huge discounts - 50% off! Set up recurring Choq subscription with the discount code JAY53LIFE for 53% off now https://choq.com Lore coffee is here: https://www.patristicfaith.com/coffee/ Orders for the Red Book are here: https://jaysanalysis.com/product/the-red-book-essays-on-theology-philosophy-new-jay-dyer-book/ Subscribe to my site here: https://jaysanalysis.com/membership-account/membership-levels/ Follow me on R0kfin here: https://rokfin.com/jaydyerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/jay-sanalysis--1423846/support.

In this re-posted podcast, J. Warner begins to examine the case for God's existence from the Laws of Logic (the Transcendental Argument). Jim also responds to email concerning objections to the Anthropic Principle and talks about the sometimes 'hidden' nature of God as he interacts with his children today.

Show NotesThis month we return to that different form of Apologetics - Presuppositional Apologetics. Please see Part 1 - Episode 70 - where we gave a more social and historical background to it. Here we look at the basic argument made: the Transcendental Argument for God, “TAG”. We set it out and discuss implications and objections to it. Links:The Debunking Christianity material on Presup:https://www.debunking-christianity.com/2022/08/the-failure-of-van-tillian.html The short clip of someone doing a ‘reverse Presup' on Presuppositional Apologists, invoking a “non-conscious power”:https://youtu.be/BPF8lcYWQ1Y?si=_B8mO9jUKdA6z8Q7 Blog expanding on our point that our desire for there to be reliable rationality does not show there ishttps://useofreason.wordpress.com/2019/05/10/the-limitations-of-transcendental-arguments/ Julian Baggini's book “How the World Thinks”https://www.amazon.co.uk/How-World-Thinks-History-Philosophy/dp/1783782285 The Dan Linford paper given to us by Josh on skeptical theism and how it destroys TAGhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/4iojx3honcv4mv4/On_Knowledge_Without_God_Van_Tillian_Pre.docx?fbclid=IwAR34-aQh0Kny9J6pTCQbSKyiiuZauzza1j4ddu4WeCTE3XsXCGqdJFq4sa4 Doubts Aloud Links:Please give feedback and ask questions using: doubtsaloud@gmail.com Join the Facebook Group discussions:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1023280847835278/ Meet us all in person again at the monthly “Unbelievable Christian and Skeptic Discussion Group” in central London, see:https://www.meetup.com/Unbelievable-Christian-and-Skeptic-Discussion-Group-London

In this episode, Eli gives a presentation and breakdown of the Transcendental Argument for God's Existence in an easy to follow and digestible way. Please consider supporting Revealed Apologetics: https://www.revealedapologetics.com/donate. Also, consider signing up for PresupU (Premium). It is a 5 week course complete with PowerPoint slides, notes, outlines, and 5 private zoom meetings with Eli to go deeper into the content. Sign-up here: https://www.revealedapologetics.com/event-details/course-1-introduction-to-biblical-apologetics-7

Apologetics is the term used to describe "making a defense" of the hope we have as Christians (1 Peter 3:15-16).  During this series, we will be discussing different objections to the Christian faith and hope to equip our church with ways to think about God's world.In today's episode,  Vinnie welcomes in special guest Lindsay Brooks (from Apologetics.com) to discuss the role of thinking philosophically, especially when considering the idea of the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God. Join us each Friday through the fall as we dive into a different apologetic topic.You can find us online at:  www.goldenhills.orgFor more information email Vinnie:  vinnieangelo@goldenhills.orgExample of the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God:The Great Debate (Greg Bahnsen & Gordon Stein)Book referenced:Greg Koukl, "Tactics"Closing Song:"If I Ever Lose My Faith In You" (Sting)

In this conversation with Chris Bolt, we discuss his work on presuppositionalism in the academy and the church. We explore various figures in the debate and take a look at the merits of natural theology. We also discuss his absence and reappearance on Twitter/X. Support the show!! - https://www.patreon.com/chasedavis“The World in His Hands: A Christian Account of Scientific Law and its Antithetical Competitors” - https://amzn.to/3ZToTRLGreg Bahnsen and R.C. Sproul - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbHkZ7SXm7kChris Bolt Dissertation - https://repository.sbts.edu/bitstream/handle/10392/5171/Bolt_sbts_0207D_10325.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yCraig Carter and Chris Bolt - https://www.podbean.com/ew/pb-7guy5-1229a90Chris Bolt Twitter - https://twitter.com/clboltVillage Church RVA - https://villagechurchrva.com/https://youtu.be/e02aF_4F9VoSupport the showSign up for the Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/chasedavisFollow Full Proof Theology on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/fullprooftheology/Follow Full Proof Theology on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/fullprooftheology/

Ben Edwards talks with Dr. Michael Riley about the transcendental argument for God's existence.

What Is the Transcendental Argument for God?The Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) was first developed by Cornelius Van Til, the godfather of Presuppositional Apologetics. Since Van Til first articulated it, it has been picked up and worked on by subsequent theologians and apologists.  Today you're going to hear from Joel Settecase, Kevin Blessum, Brian Kurkjian and Rob Barker. Joel is the President of The Think Institute (TTI) and host of the Worldview Legacy Podcast. Kevin is a TTI board member. Brian is developing a really cool resource for TTI, and Rob Barker helps run the ThinkSquad community. Each of them is a dad. Each of them is seeking to disciple his family in the Christian faith. And these are exactly the four guys you want to hear from, if you want to know more about TAG and how to use it to respond to the toughest challenges to Christianity today. Specifically, you're going to learn: • Why logic presupposes God—AND why “not logic” also presupposes God!  • Why logic cannot merely be something humans evolved with. • What the Transcendental Argument is and how to use it to defend your faith.  ---- Related Resources: • Article: What Is TAG, the Transcendental Argument for God? (Advanced Guide)https://thethink.institute/tag  • 6 Reasons Why Logic Is Not Just A Human Convention (Article, Podcast and Video) https://thethink.institute/articles/no-logic-is-not-just-a-human-convention  ---- Please support this work! Give to the Think Institute at https://thethink.institute/partner .  Join the Every Question Answered Campaign now: https://thethink.institute/eqa  ---- Subscribe to the Think Institute YouTube Channel! This channel will deliver even more knowledge on how to answer questions and objections to the Christian worldview! If you subscribe now, you'll get to hear the next video in this series... ---- Want to bring Joel to speak at your church or event? Go here.   ---- Music Credits: Synthwave Intro 10 by TaigaSoundProd  Link: https://filmmusic.io/song/8736-synthwave-intro-10  License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/worldviewlegacy/message

Transmisja czwarta wystartowała!

Ben Edwards talks with Mark Snoeberger about believing the Bible. Join us for a free seminar and lunch on June 20, 2023. Dr. Michael Riley will present on the Use and Misuse of the Transcendental Argument in Apologetics. Sign up here.

In this final episode of a three part series on John McDowell's Mind and World, I take a look at McDowell's Transcendental Argument. I feel his transcendental argument comes up a bit short in making McDowell's case and neither does it seem to hold the same gravitas as other transcendental arguments like Kant's. Basically, the conclusions sound a lot like the premises. But, McDowell makes another interesting claim namely that there is nothing unnatural about our role as conceptualizers and judgement-makers in carving out the epistemic content of our worldviews. Our normative nature is, well, natural. Natural to us anyway. And, if we acknowledge this, then we see that there is not some divorce or separation of us from the world when we apply concepts to our perception of the world. Our way of seeing is no less natural than a cat's way of seeing. It's just unique to us. And, to fill out how we might understand how the rational and social can be fully natural, we need to look at Aristotle's ethical theory. Which we will. In the episode.

John Frame's TAG Argument Frame finishes up his critique of VanTil's TAG argument and one that focuses on a big point of contention of TAG users – the apologetic use of probability and certainty. Then presented is John Frame's TAG argument in which he offers not to eradicate TAG but offers a 6-point reevaluation of [...] The post John Frame's TAG Argument – Ep.217 – Apologetics By John Frame – Transcendental Argument – Part 4 appeared first on Cave To The Cross Apologetics.

TAG, Trinity, & Negative Arguments Within Frame's critique of VanTil's version of the transcendental argument, he's not throwing it all away and Frame's fair judgment of where TAG emphasizes the rights points are brought out. Here, TAG, Trinity, & negative arguments are discussed to show that TAG is best used, especially from a worldview level, [...] The post TAG, Trinity, & Negative Arguments – Ep.216 – Apologetics By John Frame – Transcendental Argument – Part 3 appeared first on Cave To The Cross Apologetics.

Questioning TAG Now that John Frame has presented TAG in an overview, he is going to be questioning TAG as what he might consider some deficiencies – or at least in a way that VanTil presents TAG as being the one argument to rule them all and in the light, bind them. This is exactly [...] The post Questioning TAG – Ep.215 – Apologetics By John Frame – Transcendental Argument – Part 2 appeared first on Cave To The Cross Apologetics.

The Best Argument For God “The Transcendental Argument (TAG) is the best argument for God!” You may have heard this claim along keywords like “preconditions of intelligibility” and “by what standard”. However, what makes TAG so powerful is something that is beneficial for not just the apologist or the philosophically minded to know and understand [...] The post The Best Argument For God – Ep.214 – Apologetics By John Frame – Transcendental Argument – Part 1 appeared first on Cave To The Cross Apologetics.

In this episode, Eli talks with Jon Kaus as he walks us through the logical structure of the Transcendental Argument. Watching the video on YouTube may prove helpful as Jon uses slides to accompany his presentation. https://youtu.be/a9wL0v3IXIQ

In this episode, Eli has Joshua Pillows on to discuss the Presuppositional response to the infamous “Fristianity” objection to the Transcendental Argument for God's Existence.

Today we will have open forum . Today we will have open forum discussion and debate from Twitter spaces. Topics will cover atheism, materialism, the laws of logic and justification. Open forum will allow for Trinity debates, deity of Christ, philosophical issues, the Transcendental Argument for God, and more!

Today we will have open forum discussion and debate from Twitter spaces. Topics will cover atheism, materialism, the laws of logic and justification, Quine's Two Dogmas, more on my last stream covering Peterson Vs Harris on is/ought. Open forum will allow for Trinity debates, deity of Christ, philosophical issues, the Transcendental Argument for God, and more!

Today we will have open forum debate and Q n A, as I will discuss some philosophical and theological topics relating to apologetics, debate, atheism, the Divine Mind, the Dr. Russ Manion TAG essay, revelation and the texts and much more, depending on what topics the audience brings up!

This is Part 2 of Lecture 4 in a 4 Lecture Introduction to Apologetics given at Transformation Church in Pensacola, FL. The Introduction Song is from Brian Sauve, I highly recommend his music for your church and your family. You can find more here: https://www.briansauve.com/songs-worth-singing?fbclid=IwAR1z8kphXKhl9AL1W6cIIkonZwqSa-7hxp99Sjxuf0kh839K6tfprs6hiqY

This is Part 2 of Lecture 4 in a 4 Lecture Introduction to Apologetics given at Transformation Church in Pensacola, FL. The Introduction Song is from Brian Sauve, I highly recommend his music for your church and your family. You can find more here: https://www.briansauve.com/songs-worth-singing?fbclid=IwAR1z8kphXKhl9AL1W6cIIkonZwqSa-7hxp99Sjxuf0kh839K6tfprs6hiqY

This is Part 1 of Lecture 4 in a 4 Lecture Introduction to Apologetics given at Transformation Church in Pensacola, FL. The Introduction Song is from Brian Sauve, I highly recommend his music for your church and your family. You can find more here: https://www.briansauve.com/songs-worth-singing?fbclid=IwAR1z8kphXKhl9AL1W6cIIkonZwqSa-7hxp99Sjxuf0kh839K6tfprs6hiqY

This is Part 1 of Lecture 4 in a 4 Lecture Introduction to Apologetics given at Transformation Church in Pensacola, FL. The Introduction Song is from Brian Sauve, I highly recommend his music for your church and your family. You can find more here: https://www.briansauve.com/songs-worth-singing?fbclid=IwAR1z8kphXKhl9AL1W6cIIkonZwqSa-7hxp99Sjxuf0kh839K6tfprs6hiqY

In this blast from the past, Jim and Jimmy discuss common objections to the Transcendental Argument for the existence of God.

In this blast from the past, Jim introduces the Transcendental Argument for the existence of God, responds to email concerning objections to the Anthropic Principle and talks about the sometimes 'hidden' nature of God as he interacts with his children today.

Transcend- Whatsit?! Transcendental Argument. Starting March 29, we’ll be starting this book – https://amzn.to/2PzTp2U This book simply lays out the arguments backing up the beliefs of Christianity and explores what Christianity really claims, and shows the underlying reason and consistency behind these claims. If you’ve looked into getting into presuppositionalism or try to understand the [...] The post ANNOUCEMENT – Book 6 Reveal appeared first on Cave To The Cross Apologetics.

Tyler Vela runs the FreedThinker Podcast. In this interview, I talk with him about the argument from abstract objects to God. Follow Tyler: https://twitter.com/FreedPodcastWe are 83% funded! Please consider supporting: https://www.patreon.com/AdherentApologetics

Join us as we take a deeper look into Apologetics and in particular the Transcendental Argument and Presuppositionalism. The Veritas Forum Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwE_D9GUC0s&ab_channel=TheVeritasForum --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/ghewsten/support

I had the privilege of being asked to teach a series on Presuppositional Apologetics to our brothers and sisters in India via Zoom. This is the third of 4 sessions that was done live on 4 separate Fridays. This series was setup and hosted by B.O.A.T a Christian ministry in India. In this session I go over TAG

We often hear the same objections to TAG based on similar mistakes. A year ago I did a specific stream presenting TAG and why it holds up against TANG found here: https://youtu.be/tx3ssbjb3XsI covered the supposed transcendental argument for the non-existence of God, but we saw this was based on a fallacious understanding of theological voluntarism. Today we will cover more common and simpler objections to TAG which are usually based on misunderstandings, fallacies and basic blunders.

The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG) is the argument that attempts to prove the existence of God by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a supreme being and that God must therefore be the source of logic and morals. A version was formulated by Immanuel Kant in his 1763 work The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, and most contemporary formulations of the transcendental argument have been developed within the framework of Christian presuppositional apologetics. Jay Dyer Jay Dyer is known for one of the premier film and philosophy sites on the net, Jaysanalysis.com. Jay's graduate work focused on the interplay of film, geopolitics, espionage and psychological warfare. Jay is a public speaker, lecturer, comedian and author of the popular title Esoteric Hollywood: Sex, Cults and Symbols in Film, which made it to Amazon's No. 1 spot in its first month of release in the Film and Hollywood Category. Known for his in-depth commentary and satire, he has appeared on numerous nationally syndicated radio and television shows. Jay is also the co-host and co-creator with Jay Weidner of the TV show Hollywood Decoded on Gaia TV. https://www.youtube.com/user/jaydyer https://jaysanalysis.com/ Dr. Alex Malpass Alex Malpass. runs a podcast, called Thoughtology, in which he interviews professional philosophers about the things that they are working on and the ideas that they are excited about. He want to bring their knowledge and expertise to a wider audience, because he believes that philosophy shouldn't just be for those who are privileged enough to be able to go to university to study it. Malpass was fortunate in this regard, and has a BA, MA and PhD in philosophy, and he wants to be able to share the joys of #philosophy to as many people as possible. It also means that he knows a bit about the field and knows who to talk to about different topics. Dr. Malpass is mainly interested in logic, metaphysics, philosophy of science, philosophy of #religion, philosophy of language and epistemology, although he will also be engaging with philosophers who do moral philosophy, feminist philosophy, continental philosophy and much more besides. https://useofreason.wordpress.com/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/nonseqshow/message

Introduction: Today we want to move on from traditional arguments for God, the ontological, the cosmological and the teleological to some new arguments advanced for the existence of God. Today we want to look at what is known as the transcendental argument for God. This is an argument implemented by Cornelius Van Til, perfected by Greg Bahnsen and is now widely used by Presuppositionalists, this is a particular brand of Reformed apologists. The transcendental argument as a type of argument was first used and named by Immanuel Kant. He proposed the transcendental argument to demonstrate contrary to the scepticism of David Hume that things are known by sense alone, and contrary to Liebniz that things are known by reason alone, that things are known by a combination of sense and categories the mind brings to anything we are encountering. In other words, when we know anything we know it by what our senses experience, but also by previous innate categories the mind brings that helps us make sense of the data, like space and causality. These presuppositions in combination with what our sense experience enable us to know things. This transcendental way of knowing became a staple of Van Til’s apologetic method. Cornelius Van Til, 1895-1987 was a Reformed Theologian who taught at Princeton and then at Westminster in America. And because of His Reformed theology was critical of traditional arguments for God. You see most traditional arguments for God can be put in the rational or empirical category. In other words, they rest on man’s ability to reason from what man is able to identify as foundational truth; or its rests on man’s ability to scrutinise the universe and reason his way to God. Both rationalism and empiricism as epistemological starting points for Apologetics contradict what the Bible teaches... Read More Source

Classical Apologetics: With Dr. Ken SamplesIn this theology podcast Kenneth R. Samples (a scholar from Reasons to Believe) joins Josh Lewis on The Remnant Radio to discuss the classical Apologetic arguments. We discuss the Cosmological Argument, the Teleological argument, the Ontological argument, the Moral Argument, the Transcendental Argument, and Presuppositional Arguments.Cosmological argument – Argues that the existence of the universe demonstrates that God exists. Various primary arguments from cosmology and the nature of causation are often offered to support the cosmological argument.Teleological argument – Argues that there is a purposeful design in the world around us, and a design requires a designer.Ontological argument – Argues that the very concept of God demands that there is an actual existent God.Moral Argument – Argues that there are objectively valid moral values, and therefore, there must be an absolute from which they are derived.Transcendental Argument – Argues that all our abilities to think and reason require the existence of God.Presuppositional Arguments – Argues that the basic beliefs of theists and non-theists require God as a necessary precondition.As a Reasons to Believe scholar Ken has a great passion to help people understand and see the truth and relevance of Christianity's truth-claims. His writings and lectures at Reasons to Believe focus on showing how the great doctrinal truths of the faith (the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Atonement, creation ex nihilo, salvation by grace, etc.) are uniquely compatible with reason. This approach reflects the historic Christian apologetic statement - "faith seeking understanding." To listen to more from Ken, visit his website at reasons.orgTo support Remnant Radio please visit us at our website at TheRemnantRadio.com

Apologetics Live 11/08/2018 Women in ministry was the opening topic:  Some very helpful references to learn more about Women in Ministry is on the CARM website: http://carm.org/women-in-ministry The chat moved toward “TAG”:  Study the "The Transcendental Argument for the existence of God” at https://carm.org/transcendental-argument As it relates to the “TAG” issue, see: "The Christian Worldview, the Atheist Worldview, and Logic” https://carm.org/christian-worldview-atheist-worldview-and-logic Brief mention was made of: THE INFLUENCE:   A novel of fiction by Matt Slick detailing the spiritual battle of a man who is helped by an angel.  But in order to learn the answers and prevail, he must face his greatest test. Truth is sometimes challenging. Get your copy of “THE INFLUENCE “at: Amazon and B&N “Red Pill Christians” were mentioned and seems to be a questionable group at first glance.  However further examination will be necessary to determine an accurate evaluation. A review of the frequent topic of Free Will was discussed. Great information on this topic in these two articles: “What is free will?” https://carm.org/what-is-free-will  and: “What is compatibilist free will?” https://carm.org/questions-compatibilist-free-will Free Will connected in relationship to Inspiration was examined:  Dictionary of Theology › Inspiration https://carm.org/dictionary-inspiration What is meant by the inspiration of the Scriptures? https://carm.org/what-is-meant-by-ins... The issue of the “Harvest” in apocalyptic literature (Specifically in The Book of Revelation) For an expanded look at this topic please see:  "Are the good or the wicked taken first when Jesus returns?" https://carm.org/are-the-good-or-the-wicked-taken-first-when-jesus-returns  There was a great deal of chat in regards to Monotheism and verses of Scripture which may need to be examined carefully. How many Gods are there, one or many? https://carm.org/how-many-gods-are-th... Psalm 82 is what's called an imprecatory Psalm.  In other words, it is a Psalm of condemnation and judgment against the unrighteous. Psalm 82:6 is given a better look at: https://carm.org/psalm826-mormon-jehovahs-witness See more about this in the article: "Why should I only believe in one God? By Luke Wayne" https://carm.org/why-should-i-only-believe-in-one-god The conversation naturally progressed to understanding of the claim of Deity as made by Jesus and the rejection to the claim by some at the time. Study this further at "John 10:30-33, What made the Jews want to kill Jesus? "  https://carm.org/john-1030-33-what-made-jews-want-kill-jesus John 8:58 and John 10:30 are examined at that link: https://carm.org/john-1030-33-what-made-jews-want-kill-jesus To review exactly "What are the imprecatory Psalms?” you may examine this topic further at: https://carm.org/what-are-the-imprecatory-psalms A chat participant who would not come on the microphone and who identified themselves as “Most Holy Family Monastery” failed to take up the various and repeated invitations to participate in audio. The brothers Peter and Michael Dimond are most popularly identified in connection to the Most Holy Family Monastery and are not “Roman Catholic” in the conventional sense. They are sedevacantist. It is the position held by a small portion of traditional Catholics who claim that the Papal Seat, the Holy See, has been vacant since around 1960. Modern Roman Catholics sometimes view Sedevacantism as an altered style of a “Protestant” denomination. See more at: “What is sedevacantism?  https://carm.org/questions-sedevacantism Moving on from the shallow venture into Roman Catholicism, some Marriage issues were discussed in generalities. The chat was then guided back to the topic of Roman Catholicism as a chat participant (Another “text only” with no audio participation) attempted to promote and defend some of the more common Roman Catholic teachings and doctrines.

Today we discussed the "Transcendental Argument for God" (TAG), common objections to it and gave practical insight to how to use it, in many different versions, in presuppositional apologetics.

Today we discussed the "Transcendental Argument for God" (TAG), common objections to it and gave practical insight to how to use it, in many different versions, in presuppositional apologetics.

Brian Knapp joins Allan and Ben to talk about the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God and Presuppositional Apologetic.

In this episode Jason goes over the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) from within the Presuppositional Apologetic. TAG is a specific argument to address atheism. We go over multiple formulations

In this reposted podcast, J. Warner examines the case for God’s existence from the Laws of Logic (the Transcendental Argument) and offers responses to many objections offered by skeptics. Jim was joined by his son (19 years old at the time) and together they discussed the value (and limits) of the Transcendental Argument for God’s existence.

In this reposted podcast, J. Warner begins to examine the case for God’s existence from the Laws of Logic (the Transcendental Argument). Jim also responds to email concerning objections to the Anthropic Principle and talks about the sometimes 'hidden' nature of God as he interacts with his children today.

TAG:  The Transcendental Argument for God.  The biggest bunch of bull ever comprised. This episode will discuss the ways of TAG.  If Chet from New York calls in, it will be filled with awesomeness. Can anyone reason without god?  Can people find logic without a creator?  Is TAG anymore than a "I know you are but what am I" game with god? Your call makes it awesome.

What is the transcendental argument for the existence of God? Logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose the Christian worldview and God's transcendent character is the source of logic and morals.

This episode gives the basics of how a Christian should think. It defends the accusation that Christians are using "circular reasoning" when establishing the Bible as their ultimate source of truth. I also give the basics of the Transcendental Argument for God proposed by Cornelius Van Til and furthered by Greg Bahnsen.ResourcesChristian Apologetics by Cornelius Van TilPresuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended by Greg BahnsenThe Ultimate Proof of Creation by Jason LisleCornelius Van Til: An Analysis of His Thought by John FrameThere are many YouTube videos and Podcasts on Presuppositional Apologetics. Here are a few popular Presuppositional Apologists: Cornelius Van Til, Greg Bahnsen, John Frame, Jason LisleMy Friend's Podcast“Andrew's Daily Five” - Music countdowns. A great way to discover music, both new and old!MusicMusic by MichaelKobrin from Pixabay (Intro/Outro)Music by JuliusH from Pixabay (Sponsor/Commercial)EmailBearChristianity@gmail.comInstagram@the_real_bear_martinTwitter@bear4Christos