Podcasts about Succession

“Where is apostolic succession in the Bible?” This question opens a discussion on the biblical foundations of church leadership, alongside inquiries about the celibacy of bishops and priests, the distinctions between ordination and consecration, and the roles of different levels of clergy. Each topic sheds light on the structure and traditions of the Catholic Church. Join the Catholic Answers Live Club Newsletter Invite our apologists to speak at your parish! Visit Catholicanswersspeakers.com Questions Covered: 03:09 – Where is apostolic Succession in the bible? 17:39 – Why did the Catholic Church decide to have bishops and priests be celibate, especially when that wasn't the case with the first pope? 28:45 – What is the difference between ordination and consecration? I hear about priests being ordained and bishops being consecrated. Is there a difference? 36:30 – The Levels of clergy and what each of them do 43:25 – If any Catholic male can be a pope, but they first must be made a bishop, does that mean they skip being a priest?

(0:00) About the Boardroom Governance Summit (Aug 26-27, 2026)  (1:17) Intro (2:45) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel. (3:31) Start of interview.  (4:39) AI and Governance Today (5:34) Data Center Politics (reference to moratorium by New York State) (6:48) About the 3rd Rome Conference on AI, Ethics and Governance (9:06) AI Hype and Job Fears (14:45) Birth and focus of The Chairs Circle and Limerick Lane Cellars. (22:53) CEO Succession Lessons (30:58) Founders versus Boards (37:04) EVs and China's Rise (44:58) Semiconductors, Chips and Geopolitics (49:03) Boards in a Fractured World "[W]e now need to have engaged board members, board members who are curious, who read, who stay up to speed on things, who keep asking more questions. You cannot have directors who are just calling it in anymore." (53:31) Government as Shareholder Karen Francis DeGolia is a board member at Vontier, CelLink, and NAUTO. Penny Herscher is a board member at Lumentum, Penguin Solutions, Forvia SA, and Modern Health. You can follow Evan on social media at:X: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__To support this podcast you can join as a subscriber of the Boardroom Governance Newsletter at https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Most leaders know they need to have it. Almost none of them do. The succession conversation: that honest, direct discussion about who leads what, when transitions occur, who is being developed for which roles, and what the organization's future actually looks like. sits on the to-do list of senior leaders and founders indefinitely.Acknowledged as important. Consistently deferred.Not because leaders don't understand why it matters. Because the conversation feels dangerous.

Spain wins the World Cup, 2 US soldiers are killed in Jordan, Japan revises its imperial succession law,  Andy Burnham delivers his first speech as Labour leader, an atmosphere on an "Earth-Like" planet is detected for the first time, Nicaragua severs diplomatic ties with Italy over a 1978 murder case, a White House teleprompter operator is suspended over betting allegations, Taco Bell's lettuce supplier is linked to the Cyclosporiasis outbreak, President Xi says that no single country should dominate AI, and Canada's wildfires force the displacement of First Nations communities in Ontario. Sources: Verity.News

Dans ce premier épisode de la série d'été « Histoire de successions », Laurent Capdetrey, professeur d'histoire ancienne à l'université Bordeaux-Montaigne, évoque la dynastie fondée par Séleucos, compagnon d'Alexandre le Grand, en 305 avant notre ère.Une série de Paroles d'histoire, podcast créé et produit par André Loez, distribué par Binge audio. Contact pub : project@binge.audioGénérique: extraits des Rois maudits, House of the Dragon et La Reine Margot ; musique de Nicholas Brittell pour la série Succession.Référence : Laurent Capdetrey, Le pouvoir séleucide. Territoire, administration, finances d'un royaume hellénistique (312-129 av. J.-C.), Rennes, PUR, 2007.Un podcast créé, animé et produit par André Loez et distribué par Binge Audio. Contact pub : project@binge.audioHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Succession planning often begins with a legal document, but that document is only one piece of a much larger process. In the first episode of this five-part Nebraska FARMcast series on building a farm succession plan, Anastasia Meyer, Extension agricultural economist with the Center for Agricultural Profitability at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, explains why a good plan is really a transition plan, one that unfolds over three to five years or more. She covers the conversations families need to have, the fears both generations bring to the table, and the team of professionals, from an ag-focused attorney to a tax adviser and lender, that a farm or ranch family should assemble before making decisions.Produced and hosted by Lexi Bodlak, Nebraska Land Link Program Intern.Find resources for farm and ranch transition and estate planning on the Center for Agricultural Profitability's website, https://cap.unl.edu/succession.

If You're a FAN leave me a message :-) But more importantly, let us know what you think, suggestions, topics, constructive criticism... ALL WELCOME!!In this episode of The Executive Five, I challenge the confidence behind most succession plans. A name in a box marked “ready now” is not proof of future leadership capacity, especially when that judgment is built on reputation, current performance, or one executive's opinion. This five-minute executive brief shows senior leaders how to test readiness against future-role demands, build harder evidence into succession decisions, and protect critical roles from promotion based on hope.Key TakeawaysStrong performance today does not automatically predict success at the next level.Succession planning should begin with the future demands of the role, not a familiar candidate's name.High-potential leaders need real assignments that test judgment, influence, ambiguity, and enterprise thinking.One senior sponsor's confidence is not enough evidence for a critical appointment.Future leadership readiness should be proven across different situations, stakeholders, and levels of pressure.#TheExecutiveFive#SuccessionPlanning#ExecutiveLeadership#LeadershipPipeline#TalentStrategy#LeadershipDevelopment#ExecutiveCoaching#FutureLeaders#HighPotentialTalent#BoardLeadership#StrategicLeadership#TalentManagement#LeadershipReadiness#CSuiteLeadership#SouthAfricanLeadershipSupport the showContact me:Daniel@the-success-blueprint.co.zawww.mindworx.bizdaniel@mindsworx.comInstagram: @Mindworx_Coaching

The Mincing Rascals this week are John Williams of WGN Radio, Eric Zorn, publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, Austin Berg (on his birthday), Executive Director of the Chicago Policy Center and author of the The Last Ward on Substack and Chicago journalist Cate Plys, publisher of Roseland, Chicago: 1972. The Rascals begin the podcast by talking about government transparency regarding the health and welfare […]

The Mincing Rascals this week are John Williams of WGN Radio, Eric Zorn, publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, Austin Berg (on his birthday), Executive Director of the Chicago Policy Center and author of the The Last Ward on Substack and Chicago journalist Cate Plys, publisher of Roseland, Chicago: 1972. The Rascals begin the podcast by talking about government transparency regarding the health and welfare […]

The Mincing Rascals this week are John Williams of WGN Radio, Eric Zorn, publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, Austin Berg (on his birthday), Executive Director of the Chicago Policy Center and author of the The Last Ward on Substack and Chicago journalist Cate Plys, publisher of Roseland, Chicago: 1972. The Rascals begin the podcast by talking about government transparency regarding the health and welfare […]

The Mincing Rascals this week are John Williams of WGN Radio, Eric Zorn, publisher of The Picayune Sentinel, Austin Berg (on his birthday), Executive Director of the Chicago Policy Center and author of the The Last Ward on Substack and Chicago journalist Cate Plys, publisher of Roseland, Chicago: 1972. The Rascals begin the podcast by talking about government transparency regarding the health and welfare […]

Welcome back to the Rural Round-up. On today's episode George Chalmers and Tiffany Stephenson discuss opportunities for those looking to enter Agriculture, though apprenticeship and pre-apprenticeship schemes, The Scottish Land Matching Service, and funded mentoring services, whilst also talking about Succession for those who may be ready to think about passing on the reigns, identifying specialist advice funding and resources to support people on their journey wherever they may be. They bring you all of this alongside the latest industry updates. FAS Resources Agri Culture - Lawrence Martin: Opportunities Through Apprenticeships | FAS New Entrants resources for farmers from Farm Advisory Service Mentoring for new farmers and crofters | Helping farmers in Scotland Specialist Advice | Helping farmers in Scotland (Succession Planning) FAS Connect | Helping farmers in Scotland Land-Based Pre-Apprenticeship Scheme | Helping farmers in Scotland Other Resources Scottish Land Matching Service | Opportunities in Scottish Farming Future Farming Investment Scheme Agri-Environment Climate Scheme Study at SRUC | Apprenticeships For more information, visit www.FAS.scot Twitter: @FASScot Facebook: @FASScot National Advice Hub Phone: 0300 323 0161 Email: advice@fas.scot

Franck Ferrand nous plonge dans les dernières années tourmentées du règne de Louis VII, le vieux roi capétien. En 1179, alors que son fils Philippe, âgé de 14 ans, doit être sacré à Reims, une dramatique mésaventure va bouleverser les plans de la cour.

If you've owned a business for any length of time, you've probably told yourself some version of this: I'll deal with succession as soon as I solve whatever crisis my business is confronting right now. The problem, of course, is that there's always another crisis to solve or opportunity to pursue, and time has a way of passing.Jay Goltz has spent decades building a collection of successful businesses in Chicago. He knows he needs a succession plan. He knows that if something happened to him tomorrow, there'd be chaos. And he'd very much like to leave the business in the hands of the employees who helped build it. Over the years, he's considered the usual options—selling to a bigger company, to a few key employees, to an ESOP, even to an Employee Ownership Trust. But every option comes with compromises. And so, year after year, it's been easier to focus on challenges that seem more urgent—until this past April, when Jay turned 70. "I realized," he says, "I can't kick this down the road much further."This week, Jay sits down with David C. Barnett and Mel Gravely for an unusually candid conversation about what makes succession planning so difficult—even when you understand how important it is. Jay explains why he has no interest in selling, why money isn't really the issue, and why he still loves going to work every day. Mel, meanwhile, offers some tough love, suggesting that if protecting Jay's family and employees really are his priorities, then something else must be holding him back.Mel also shares an unexpected twist in his own succession journey. After stepping away from the CEO role two and a half years ago to become executive chairman, Mel found himself pulled back into operations this spring—a reminder that even well-designed succession plans don't always unfold as expected. And along the way, David offers a blunt explanation for why many aging business owners overestimate what their companies are actually worth. The episode is brought to you by Grasshopper Bank.

Too many advisory firms treat succession as an event triggered by retirement, but Ray Sclafani reveals why succession must be an everyday leadership discipline. In this episode, Ray shares a practical four-part framework for building bench strength, designing intentional transfer experiences, and creating a written succession plan that reduces avoidable risk. For advisory firm owners and leaders, succession readiness directly impacts enterprise value, client retention, and your ability to scale beyond your own capacity.The data is clear: 105,000 advisors plan to retire over the next decade, representing 37.4% of industry headcount and 41.4% of total assets. Yet many firms haven't developed the next generation needed to carry client relationships and leadership. Real succession is a series of transfers of trust built over five to seven years, not a transaction completed in months. When you implement systematic succession planning, your firm reduces avoidable risk, protects client continuity, and creates visible opportunities for emerging leaders.What you'll take away: a simple, immediately applicable framework you can stress test against your own firm's situation this week. Whether you're early in succession planning or well prepared, this episode gives you the discipline to move forward with clarity and intention.WHAT YOU'LL LEARN IN THIS EPISODEWhy succession must be treated as a daily leadership discipline, not an event triggered by retirementThe four-part framework for building a succession plan that protects client relationships and firm cultureHow to identify the roles in your firm that carry the most client trust and who depends on themHow to design "second chair" transfer experiences that let next generation advisors build capability before they inherit client relationshipsWhy reviewing bench strength every 90 days reduces avoidable risk and protects against unexpected departuresTHE FOUR-PART SUCCESSION FRAMEWORKIdentify the Roles in Your Firm That Carry the Most Client Trust - Start with trust, not titles. Who holds important relationships? Who makes decisions clients rely on? In many firms, this is concentrated with a few people, creating risk and limiting growth.Name the Successor for Each Trust Bearing Role - For each key role, identify the likely successor, backup successor, and the specific readiness gap (technical skill, executive presence, business judgment, or communication maturity).Build Transfer Experiences Before They're Needed - Use "second chair" meetings, client events, and leadership responsibilities to let next generation advisors build capability. They can lead planning discussions, present plans, and engage clients while the founder remains present and supportive.Review Bench Strength Every 90 Days - A succession plan sitting in a file is not a plan. Quarterly leadership reviews should address successors, readiness gaps, client exposure, and development priorities for unexpected departures, illness, burnout, acquisitions, and growth.REFLECTION QUESTIONS FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP TEAMWho inside your firm is learning how to carry client trust before they're asked to inherit it?Which client relationships remain too dependent on one or a couple of people in your firm?What experiences must your next generation leaders have over the next 12 months?Where does your succession plan exist in writing, and where does it still live only in someone's head?Building the Billion Dollar Business is hosted by Ray Sclafani, founder and CEO of ClientWise, the financial services industry's leading executive coaching and team development firm for elite advisors and wealth management teams.Find Ray and the ClientWise Team on the ClientWise website or LinkedIn | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | YouTubeBuilding The Billion Dollar Business

(0:00) About the Boardroom Governance Summit (Aug 26-27, 2026)  (0:55) Intro (2:37) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel. (3:24) Start of interview.  (4:23) Origin story Mayree Clark (6:08) Origin story Linda Riefler (8:23) About their Leading-Edge Stewardship framework and personal road-map. (11:38) Teamwork and Long-Term Value Creation (16:03) On board diversity and pace of change (19:02) Boards in distress: Mayree joining Ally Financial in financial crisis (2009) (21:39) MSCI Culture and CEO Relations (26:02) Tough calls on CEO transitions (example of CSX CEO transition) (32:39) Private Equity Board Lessons (flexibility on decision-making and talent pools) (36:22) Handling under-performing directors (43:11) German Governance Across Borders (Mayree's experience serving on Deutsche Bank's board) (48:06) Purpose, Adversity, and Stewardship (50:42) What are the 1-3 books that have greatly influenced your life:  Mayree: Self Renewal : The Individual and the Innovative Society, by John Gardner (1963) Linda: A Brief History of Everything, by Ken Wilber (2017) How the Word is Passed, by Clint Smith (2021) The Spark Within, by Michael Neal (coach) (53:36) Who were their mentors, and what they learned from them. (56:37) An unusual habit or an absurd thing that they love. (1:00:16) The living person they most admire. Mayree Clark is a longtime corporate director, founder and Managing Partner of Eachwin Capital, and former senior executive at Morgan Stanley. She currently serves on the boards of Ally Financial and Deutsche Bank AG.  Linda Riefler is an experienced corporate director and former senior executive at Morgan Stanley. She currently serves on the boards of CSX Corporation, MSCI Inc., and North American Partners in Anesthesia, and is chair of Pencils of Promise. You can follow Evan on social media at:X: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__To support this podcast you can join as a subscriber of the Boardroom Governance Newsletter at https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Check out Cam's latest novel / audio drama here! Evil Dead Burn is one of the best directed horror movies of the year. It's gnarly, it's fast, and it feels like it has something to prove. In this episode, we're exploring every aspect of the gloriously mean-spirited hunger at the heart of this movie, as well as some problems with runtime, fear factor, and creature design. We also work through some unorthodox comparisons, ranging all the way from Krampus to Succession, before forming some theories about "half deadites" and then zooming out to consider the past and future of this beloved franchise. LINKS: Patreon, YouTube, Spotify, Instagram Feedback & Theories: secondbreakfastpod@gmail.com 00:00 Intro / Outline 02:03 First Impressions 10:07 Horror Sequels 13:25 Fear Factor 13:57 Runtime Problems 20:53 Krampus 22:15 Final Destination Bloodlines 22:53 Ready Or Not 23:41 Succession 25:42 Passenger 26:51 Inside 28:33 Genre Fusion 30:38 Franchise Innovations 33:10 Creature Design Woes 36:26 Will's Final Form 37:55 Theory: The Half Deadite 42:43 Theory: Victim Blaming 47:07 Post Credits Scene 50:05 The Future of the Franchise 52:44 Is This Movie Funny? 54:14 Punctum 58:36 Closing Thoughts

Send us Fan MailIn Episode 132 of the Waypoint Podcast, Dyke and Rebecca sit down with Waypoint's Mark Magee and Adam Woods to talk about a leadership transition done with wisdom, humility, and joy. As Mark passed the role of Lead Pastor to Adam, they experienced the Lord's faithfulness every step of the way. Together they discuss the importance of having a plan, trusting God's timing, and the lessons they learned throughout the process. Whether your church is facing a transition now or preparing for one someday, this conversation offers practical insight and a hopeful reminder that healthy succession is possible when Christ remains at the center. We pray this episode equips and inspires you for the season you're in.Follow up with Mark or Adam:mmagee@waypointchurchpartners.comadam@thecrossingde.comRemember you can always find us atwaypointchurchpartners.comFollow us atfacebook.com/WaypointChurchPartnersinstagram @waypointchurchpartnersThe Waypoint Podcast is hosted  and produced by Dyke McCordhosted, produced, and edited by Rebecca HottIf you want to find out more about supporting Waypoint Church Plants head toiplantchurches.comRegister for future Waypoint Events or reach out to any of our Staff! 

Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina died over the weekend at the age of 71. He served more than three decades on the Hill, was the president's Senate whisperer, and played a key role on the world stage. So, what happens next with his vacant seat in South Carolina – and how are insiders in Washington responding to this moment? Plus, everything else you need to jump-start your day – from renewed strikes on Iran to Congress' first day back in session.   For more news and analysis, subscribe to the Playbook newsletter: politico.com/playbook 

In a special Q recording, Tom Power interviewed Jesse Armstrong at the Banff World Media Festival in front of a live audience. Jesse talks about his award-winning writing, directing, and showrunning on hits like Succession, Peep Show, The Thick of It, and Mountainhead. Plus, Jesse opens up about why he left his career in politics for TV, why he is so drawn to writing about power, and why satire isn't the potent weapon some may think.

LESTAT'S ROCKSTAR JOURNEY JUST KEEPS GETTING WILDER! Greg Alba & Roxy Striar react to The Vampire Lestat Season 3 Episode 6 for the first time, diving deeper into AMC's adaptation of Anne Rice's legendary vampire saga. From unforgettable Lestat and Louis moments to shocking revelations, haunting performances, and another major ending, this Interview with the Vampire Season 3 Episode 6 reaction explores one of the series' most emotional and unpredictable chapters. Taking care of your health just got easier – start here with Zocdoc: https://zocdoc.com/REJECTS #sponsored The Vampire Lestat 3x06 Reaction (Full Length Watch Along):   / thereelrejects   In this Interview with the Vampire Season 3 Episode 6 reaction, The Vampire Lestat 3x06 reaction, and review, Greg & Roxy continue following Sam Reid as Lestat de Lioncourt (The Newsreader, Belle), Jacob Anderson as Louis de Pointe du Lac (Game of Thrones, Doctor Who), Eric Bogosian as Daniel Molloy (Talk Radio, Succession), Assad Zaman as Armand (Hotel Portofino, Apple Tree Yard), Delainey Hayles as Claudia (Something in the Water, Holby City), and the ever-expanding cast of AMC's Immortal Universe as Lestat's rockstar era continues to reshape the Vampire Chronicles. Featuring powerful performances from Sam Reid, emotional character moments, Lestat and Louis developments, Daniel Molloy's continuing investigation, music from The Beautiful Unwell and The Failures, expanding Anne Rice lore, and another ending packed with discussion and theories, The Vampire Lestat continues to push the Immortal Universe in exciting new directions. Greg & Roxy break down every major reveal, performance, relationship, and twist from Episode 6 while discussing what it all could mean for the rest of the season. Follow Roxy Striar YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@TheWhirlGirls Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/roxystriar/?hl=en Twitter:  https://twitter.com/roxystriar Intense Suspense by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... Support The Channel By Getting Some REEL REJECTS Apparel! https://www.rejectnationshop.com/ Follow Us On Socials:  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reelrejects/  Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@reelrejects?lang=en Twitter: https://x.com/reelrejects Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheReelRejects/ Music Used In Ad:  Hat the Jazz by Twin Musicom is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Happy Alley by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... POWERED BY @GFUEL Visit https://gfuel.ly/3wD5Ygo and use code REJECTNATION for 20% off select tubs!! Head Editor: https://www.instagram.com/praperhq/?hl=en Co-Editor: Greg Alba Co-Editor: John Humphrey Music In Video: Airport Lounge - Disco Ultralounge by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ask Us A QUESTION On CAMEO: https://www.cameo.com/thereelrejects Follow TheReelRejects On FACEBOOK, TWITTER, & INSTAGRAM:  FB:  https://www.facebook.com/TheReelRejects/ INSTAGRAM:  https://www.instagram.com/reelrejects/ TWITTER:  https://twitter.com/thereelrejects Follow GREG ON INSTAGRAM & TWITTER: INSTAGRAM:  https://www.instagram.com/thegregalba/ TWITTER:  https://twitter.com/thegregalba Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this week's young stock podcast, Sophie Tyner chats with Hannah Furlong about growing up on a mixed beef, sheep and tillage farm in County Wicklow and the decision for herself and her parents to go into partnership together two years ago.She also talks about balancing working full-time as a regional sales manager for Grassland Agro along with part-time farming and a bit of CrossFit on the side. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Octobre 1716. Le jeune tsarévitch Alexis, héritier du trône de Russie, prend la fuite dans un carrosse avec sa maîtresse Afrosinia. Leur destination : non pas le Danemark où son père, le puissant tsar Pierre le Grand, l'attend, mais l'Allemagne, où il espère trouver refuge. Qu'a donc fait Alexis pour se résoudre à une telle trahison ? Que se passe-t-il lorsque le tsar découvre la disparition de son fils ? Franck Ferrand vous plonge dans les coulisses d'un drame familial qui va déchirer la Russie. Entre ambitions réformatrices de Pierre le Grand et conservatisme d'Alexis, c'est un affrontement sans merci qui s'engage, mêlant intrigues politiques, manipulations et cruelles représailles.Tortures, emprisonnements, condamnations à mort... Le destin tragique du tsarévitch Alexis vous tiendra en haleine jusqu'au dénouement final. Véritable récit d'une chute annoncée, cet épisode vous fera découvrir les dessous sanglants de la succession au trône de Russie sous le règne de Pierre le Grand.

The Pitt and Succession, Paramount's 65 Primetime Emmy Award nominations, today's holidays and celebrity birthdays, Uber ratings, Bluetooth speakers, bears — plus the latest news and sports. 

A battle is underway in Maine to replace the Democratic party's nominee for the U.S. Senate. AP correspondent Donna Warder reports.

Higher education is facing a moment where moving slowly is no longer an option. In this episode of Start the Week with Wisdom, Bridget Burns and Sarah Custer sit down with Karen Stout, outgoing president and CEO of Achieving the Dream, to reflect on decades of leadership in community college student success, institutional transformation, data-driven decision-making, and what it really takes to leave an organization stronger than you found it.Karen shares lessons from leading Montgomery County Community College, transforming Achieving the Dream into a national student success network, and helping hundreds of community colleges rethink completion, transfer, mobility, workforce alignment, and community impact. This conversation is for higher ed leaders, community college presidents, faculty leaders, student success professionals, nonprofit executives, and anyone trying to drive meaningful change in education. You'll hear why colleges must stop fighting their data, why innovation needs intention, why faculty must be centered in reform, and why the future of student success depends on moving faster from knowing to doing.Highlights:→ You'll learn why community colleges have a unique power to shape the future of their local communities and why Karen Stout calls “leveraging your localness” their secret sauce. → You'll hear how Achieving the Dream used a transformative unrestricted gift from MacKenzie Scott to build capacity, strengthen reserves, and reinvest in under-resourced colleges. → Karen explains why higher ed leaders must own their data, especially around completion, transfer, bachelor's degree attainment, mobility, and workforce outcomes. → She also shares why institutions need to stop chasing shiny objects and instead pursue innovation with intention, clear priorities, and a deeper focus on teaching, learning, faculty engagement, and shared governance.Learn more about the UIA by visiting:WebsiteLinkedInTwitterYouTubeFacebookThis week's episode is sponsored by Mainstay, a student retention and engagement tool where you can increase student and staff engagement with the only platform consistently proven to boost engagement, retention, and wellbeing. To learn more about Mainstay, click here.Chapters00:00 Intro00:14 Welcome to Start the Week with Wisdom01:13 Karen Stout's Achieving the Dream legacy02:00 Leadership transition and stewardship03:26 What Karen is proudest of04:05 Leveraging the local power of community colleges05:45 Succession, transition, and leaving stronger06:00 The impact of MacKenzie Scott's investment07:58 How ATD invested in long-term capacity10:44 Why colleges must move faster on reform12:00 Compressing the time between knowing and doing13:08 Bringing faculty into the center of transformation15:42 Advice for higher ed leaders today15:54 Why colleges must stop fighting their data16:45 Innovation with intention, not invention18:00 What it means to own your data20:06 The best career advice Karen received20:33 Closing reflections

DR1THINGS WE MISSEDThe meritocracy is still a lie: ‘Don't look at the résumé': Elon Musk admits he's ‘fallen prey' to flashy credentials and says conversation matters most when hiring“Generally, what I tell people—I tell myself, I guess, aspirationally—is, don't look at the résumé,” he said. “Just believe your interaction. The résumé may seem very impressive…but if the conversation after 20 minutes is not ‘Wow,' you should believe the conversation, not the paper.”“I think goodness of heart is important.”Four Black women. Nine degrees. Not one steady paycheck.The president promised to save “Black jobs,” but his policies have resulted in fresh pain for the Black middle class as the employment gap widens.Study: Women are more likely to get hired after taking GLP-1sZuck still sucks: Mark Zuckerberg Sure Sounds Eager to Get Young People Hooked on Online GamblingThe Meta CEO is developing a social network betting market app—and wants help from Polymarket and Kalshi.Starbucks “Actively Reassessing” 2030 Climate GoalStarbucks initially unveiled its climate goal in 2020, targeting a 50% reduction in Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 2030, on a 2019 basis.While the company's impact report indicates that it has succeeded in cutting operational emissions, with Scope 1 and 2 falling 17% since 2019, wider value chain emissions have continued to climb, with Scope 3 rising by 8% since 2019. With Scope 3 accounting for over 90% of overall emissions, Starbucks has seen its GHG footprint grow by 7% overall since 2019.The reassessment of the goal comes as the company takes “a fresh, comprehensive look at our sustainability goals,” according to a blog post by Starbucks' Chief Sustainability and Social Impact Officer Kelly Goodejohn, as part of the company's ‘Back to Starbucks' strategy initiated by CEO Brain Niccol. From the Impact Report:Overall Grants from the Starbucks FoundationFY25 $13.6M ($31M)FY24 $21.4M ($96M)Delaware Court of Chancery Interprets New Section 144 and Applies Heightened Presumption of Director IndependenceThe Opinion arose in a common context in Delaware stockholder litigation: claims over director and management compensation. In the decision, Vice Chancellor Lori W. Will applied, for the first time, the statute's heightened presumption of independence for directors of public companies determined by the board to be independent under the relevant NYSE or Nasdaq listing standards to dismiss derivative claims on demand futility grounds.In conducting the demand futility analysis, which looks to whether a majority of the board can independently consider a stockholder demand to bring derivative litigation, the Court reasoned that the new statutory language requiring a plaintiff to plead “substantial and particularized facts” to rebut the “heightened” presumption of independence sets a higher bar than under pre-existing law. Specifically, the Court held that the addition of “substantial” to the existing standard that already required particularized facts meant that “a plaintiff must plead specific, non-conclusory facts of sufficient qualitative significance to support a reasonable inference of a material interest or relationship that would impair the director's objective judgment.” The Court was clear that it is not a matter of quantity but rather quality, observing that “a collection of trivial facts” will not rise to the level of materiality required to satisfy this “heightened” standard. Applying that standard to the facts in the case, the Court concluded that the plaintiff's allegations of various overlapping board positions, overlapping investments, and other “business ties” with the company's founder and non-executive chairman were not sufficiently material.DR2The Boardroom Buy-InThe Taser CEO Who Says AI Is the Future of PolicingTaser and body-cam king Rick Smith is betting Axon's dominance—and his own pay package—on his tech-driven vision66% influenceRick Smith: Every 30 seconds one of his Tasers is fired by somebody in the U.S., usually a police officer.The pay package he and his board put together catapulted him to the top of last year's list of the highest-paid CEOs, with a compensation package valued at $164.4 million.33% no 2025; 10% no 2026Smith has already hit three of seven goals. At the end of 2025, Axon estimated the shares underlying the full award could be worth nearly $386 million.IN: Not a dictatorshipOne share one voteBlackRock 9.3%The Vanguard Group 11.6%Patrick Smith 3.5 %OUT: Patrick Smith 66% influence MMWith Chair Michael Garnreiter (2006-); sits on Audit, Compensation Committee, and Nominating committeesCompensation Committee chair Hadi Partovi (2010-): Smith (‘91) and Partovi (‘94) both members of the Theta Eta chapter of Sigma Chi at HarvardOUT: Patrick Smith ignores his board: In the wake of the tragic 2022 school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, Smith announced that Axon would begin developing Taser-equipped drones that could fly into classrooms to incapacitate active shooters.This decision was made unilaterally, bypassing Axon's own independent AI Ethics Board.The board issued a rare, public rebuke of Smith, accusing him of "trading on the tragedy" of school shootings to push a dangerous idea.Consequently, 9 of the 12 ethics board members resigned in protest, citing a total loss of faith in Axon's ability to act responsibly.Smith was forced to publicly back down and pause the project. IN: The CEO Performance award was specifically voted on in 2024 and passed, barely, but it passed: 50.1% yesNintendo Boss to Give Sweeping 10% Salary Raise to Retain EmployeesWhile most of the players in the gaming industry continue to hemorrhage jobs, Nintendo is opting to take a different path. The Kyoto-based gaming giant has recently announced a 10% increase to base salaries for its employees, a move that highlights its commitment to talent retention while everyone else is laying off employees.Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa made the announcement during a recent shareholder meeting, emphasising that maintaining competitive compensation is central to the company's strategy. The raise applies to the company's workforce, which has grown to over 8,200 employees, the highest headcount in Nintendo's history.IN: CEO Shuntaro Furukawa's (18%) annual executive compensation at Nintendo generally totals around $2.5MOUT: 63% of shares held by institutional investors. What the hell do these suits know about video games? IN: Of six outside directors, 3 are women (20% average in Japan)IN: Because they literally have questions like this at their annual meeting, in fact it was the first one: “With the release of Splatoon Raiders approaching, how does Nintendo evaluate the previous title, Splatoon 3? Some players experienced communication errors and discrepancies in hit detection in that title. I feel that Nintendo's response to these issues may not have been consistent with “sincerity,” one of the values in the Nintendo DNA.”Copart CEO Jeff Liaw to step down, Jay Adair to returnCEO Jeff Liaw will step down from his position and leave the board of directors effective July 31, 2026.Executive Chairman Jay Adair to resume the CEO role on the same date. Adair previously served as Copart's CEO. Liaw will assist with the transition as Special Advisor to Adair.Liaw has been with the online vehicle auction company for approximately a decade, serving first as CFO, then as President, before becoming the company's third CEO.OUT: Leadership messiness, highlighted by a boomerang CEO and so much more:The board has a Chair (founder Willis Johnson 40%) AND an Executive Chair: Willis' son-in-law and co-founder and boomerang CEO Jay Adair 38%The board also included resigning CEO/former CFO Jeff Liaw and former COO Jim Meeks and former Copart executive Steve CohanIN: a boomerang marks a return to the glory days?former CEO Liaw is actually leaving the boardStock price down 50% over past few yearsOUT: A dumb board for an online car auction company:12 directors5 are former or current executivesOne independent director with an car experience: sort of.Matt Blunt is the president of the American Automobile Policy Council, which represents the public policy interests of Stellantis N.V., Ford Motor Company, and General Motors CompanyServed as the governor of the State of Missouri from 2005 to 2009.Only 2 women.3 directors involved as a private inverter or venture capitalIN: CEO Pay Ratio is 46:1Liaw $2.1MAdair $432k for certain benefits MM1Things We MissedDOL's Replacement ESG Rule Reaches White HouseThe rule isn't interesting in and of itself - it reverts to Trump's prior rule in his first term that basically said ESG (E+S really) is dumb, and that everything must be "pecuniary focused”But the interesting part this time around:Trump also signed an executive order in December 2025 directing the DOL to tighten fiduciary rules governing proxy voting and to increase transparency about plan sponsors' use of proxy advisers. The department issued a technical release in April warning that proxy advisory firms may be subject to ERISA fiduciary standards and that proxy voting is a fiduciary act under the law that must be carried out “for the exclusive purpose of maximizing risk-adjusted return.”From the technical release in April: The Department has long recognized that voting rights and other shareholder rights attributable to shares held by ERISA-governed employee benefit plans are plan assets in their own right. Accordingly, management of those rights is subject to ERISA's fiduciary duties, including the duties of prudence and loyalty. The Department first issued guidance on this topic in the 1980s. For example, a 1988 letter (Avon Letter) noted that “it is the Department's position that the decision as to how proxies should be voted . . . are fiduciary acts of plan asset management.”(2)Proxy advisory firms may also be functional fiduciaries under ERISA section 3(21)(A)(ii) by providing investment advice for a fee to plans with respect to property of that plan.Here's why it's interesting:Defining fiduciaries as those who provide advice for a fee means everyone selling research is a fiduciary if the research is used in an investment decisionThe DOL is squarely defining proxy voting as a fiduciary act - which means that there can be no rational apathy as Mike Levin likes to talk about - if voting your proxies is definitionally your fiduciary duty, you can't defer it or ignore itIf you vote 99% in favor of management, you definitionally are ignoring your fiduciary duty - half of companies will underperform some peer set, meaning they produced fewer returns than peers, in any given year. So you either set the time frame longer (thus forcing the inclusion of long term data like climate and social factors) and say that in any one year it makes sense to vote with management to allow them time to execute strategy, OR you should be voting against nearly half of management proposals for underperformers each year because they are not producing pecuniary returnsGovernance chairs remain under pressure as investor scrutiny rises despite rising support for directors, research showsISS found that the MEDIAN support for directors has hit 98%They found that governance/nom chairs (those are specifically governance/nom committee chairs) had median support of 94.1%Pay chairs had 96.9% supportMM2The Boardroom Buy-InJPMorgan built a pipeline of female CEO candidates that was the envy of Wall Street. How did it fall apart? Are you IN or OUT on this board to find a successor to Dimon?IN or OUT: Nom chair: Gini Rometty (2020)Massively connected - highest betweenness, 82% connected to other directors (highest on board)Ex IBM CEO (retired 2020), IBM lifer (since 1981), Council on Foreign Relations, Business RoundtableCEOs replaced: herself? With Arvind Krishna, who was at IBM for more than 30 yearsIN or OUT: Michele Buck (2025)Newly appointed, ex CEO of Hershey, Hershey for 20 years and Kraft/Nabisco for 17 years prior (two companies, all food), board of NY LifeCEOs replaced: zero (dictatorship at Hershey)IN or OUT: Stephen Burke (2004)Lead Director! 16% influence, 22 year tenureComcast since 1998, Disney/ABC 1986, director at Berkshire HathawayCEOs replaced: zero (dictatorship at NBC/Comcast)IN or OUT: Alex Gorsky (2022)Ex CEO of J&J, Boards of Apple, IBM (!), ex Business RoundtableCEOs replaced: Tim Cook, himself, Gini Rometty (!)Jensen Huang's iconic leather jacket is going up for auction. Are you IN or OUT on “iconic” founder clothes?IN or OUT: Steve Jobs' turtleneck INEnabled by Arthur LevinsonIN or OUT: Zuck hoodie INEnabled by Peter Thiel, Marc AndreessenIN or OUT: Bill Gates' glasses OUTIN or OUT: Elizabeth Holmes' turtleneck OUTIN or OUT: Jack Dorsey's “love” hat OUTIN or OUT: Musk's chainsaw INSub question: if a board member has been on the board as long as the founder, are they iconic?Tench Coxe - 32 years on Nvidia board, only board he's on, buddies with JensenHarvey Jones - 32 years on Nvidia board, only board he's on, buddies with JensenBrooke Seawell (28 years) and Mark Stevens (17 years) - both were with Jensen when Nvidia just made dopey video cards for better video games

Most leaders think succession is just naming the next person for the chair. It is not. Real leadership succession is about protecting everything you spent years building.Dr. Mira Brancu sits down with Dr. Mark L. Vincent, author of The Maestro Effect, to close out the season on rediscovering human needs at work. They get into why handing off a company is so much harder than picking a name, and why the value you built can quietly leak away if you treat the transition like a finish line.Mark breaks down the two traps most leaders fall into. There is the one where you check out early and reach for the golden parachute, and the one where you cannot let go and slowly choke the life out of the team. He walks through his Maestro theory, the three turns of a leader's life, and the four key elements that actually make or break a succession plan. Near the end the conversation turns personal, and that is the part that stays with you. If you lead anything now, or you will one day, this one is worth your time.Subscribe for weekly conversations on leadership, mental health, and the human side of work.IF YOU ENJOYED THIS EPISODE, CAN I ASK A FAVOR?We do not receive any funding or sponsorship for this podcast. If you learned something and feel others could also benefit, please leave a positive review. Every review helps amplify our work and visibility. This is especially helpful for small women-owned boot-strapped businesses. Simply go to the bottom of the Apple Podcast page to enter a review. Thank you!Connect with our guest:https://www.youtube.com/@MARKLVINCENTwww.marklvincent.com www.maestrolevelleaders.com Connect wth me:Subscribe to my free newsletter at: mailchi.mp/2079c04f4d44/subscribeWork with me one-on-one: calendly.com/mira-brancu/30-minute-initial-consultationConnect with me on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/MiraBrancuLearn more about my services: www.gotowerscope.comGet practical workplace politics tips from my books: gotowerscope.com/booksAdd this podcast to your feed: www.listennotes.com/podcasts/the-hard-skills-dr-mira-brancu-m0QzwsFiBGE/

In the season finale of “Gathering Ground,” host Mary Morten sits down with Teresa C. Younger, outgoing president and CEO of the Ms. Foundation for Women, for a candid reflection on 13 years of leading a legacy institution through fundamental transformation. Teresa talks about what it took to center women and girls of color at a second-wave feminist foundation, the listening tour that covered 50,000 miles in her first year, and why she believes succession planning is one of the most overlooked acts of leadership. She also shares what comes next: Project Stargazing, an intentional pause to redesign the constellations.Episode Highlights- Teresa Younger on arriving at the Ms. Foundation as its second Black woman CEO and leading a 50,000-mile listening tour that reshaped the foundation's language, priorities, and grantmaking strategy- On centering women and girls of color as a point of inclusion, not exclusion — and the board conversations, donor fears, and courageous clarity it took to make that shift explicit- Trust-based philanthropy before it had a name: how the Ms. Foundation moved to general operating support, de-siloed its grant pillars, and started treating grantees as partners instead of recipients- Succession planning as a leadership responsibility: why Teresa started the conversation with her board in year eight, why transitions cost money, and what she would tell any long-tenured leader about exit strategyIf you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe to Gathering Ground and leave us a review! Follow Morten Group, LLC on Instagram @mortengroup for more updates.

This Day in Legal History: The Execution of Sir Thomas MoreOn July 6, 1535, Sir Thomas More was beheaded at Tower Hill in London, convicted of high treason against King Henry VIII. More had been one of the most powerful men in England—a lawyer, a scholar, a former Lord Chancellor, the King's own friend—and he went to the scaffold because he would not say the words the King demanded.The dispute was, at its heart, about supremacy. Henry VIII had broken with Rome and declared himself Supreme Head of the Church of England, and Parliament had passed the Act of Supremacy and an Act of Succession requiring subjects to swear an oath acknowledging the King's new status and the legitimacy of his marriage to Anne Boleyn. More refused to take the oath. Crucially, he did not denounce the King. He said nothing at all. He believed that by staying silent he stayed within the law—that under the old maxim, silence gives consent, and no court could convict a man for what he had not said.The Crown answered that theory with new law. The Treason Act of 1534, which took effect in early 1535, made it treason to “maliciously” deprive the King or Queen of their “dignity, title, or name”—and the government argued that More's conspicuous silence about the King's supremacy was itself a denial of it. More was tried on July 1, 1535, before a panel that included Anne Boleyn's father, brother, and uncle. The decisive testimony came from Richard Rich, the solicitor general, who claimed More had privately rejected the King's title in conversation in the Tower. More insisted the testimony was perjured. The jury deliberated for about fifteen minutes and found him guilty. He was sentenced to be hanged, drawn, and quartered; the King, in what passed for mercy, commuted the sentence to beheading.More's case endures in the legal imagination because it sits at the fault line between law as an instrument of power and law as a limit on power. More was a formidable lawyer who tried to use the law's own rules—the presumption that silence is not a crime, the requirement of proof—to protect his conscience, and the state simply rewrote the rules and manufactured the proof. His famous last words, that he died “the King's good servant, but God's first,” draw the line between obedience to the state and obedience to something the state cannot command. Four centuries later, we still cite More when we argue about compelled speech, about the right to remain silent, about loyalty oaths, and about what a person owes a government that has turned the machinery of law against him. He is a patron saint of lawyers precisely because he lost—because his trial shows how thin the protection of law can be when those in power decide they would rather have a conviction than a fair one.A federal appeals court has ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement cannot detain migrants for more than ninety days without giving them a chance to seek release at a bond hearing. In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals—one of the most conservative in the country—sided against the administration, a ruling that could affect thousands of people held in detention in states like Texas and Louisiana.When the government seeks to deport someone, that process can take months or even years, and in the meantime the government often detains the person. The legal question is whether the government can simply hold someone indefinitely while the case grinds on, or whether at some point that person is entitled to a hearing where a neutral decision-maker asks whether they actually need to be locked up—whether they're a flight risk or a danger, or whether they can safely be released on bond while they wait. The administration argued that certain migrants are subject to “mandatory detention” with no such hearing at all. The Fifth Circuit said that after ninety days, that position runs into constitutional trouble.Imagine being held in a jail cell for months, not because a judge decided you were dangerous, but because a statute was read to mean nobody ever has to ask the question. The core idea the court is protecting is an old one: the government generally cannot deprive a person of physical liberty without some individualized process, some moment where a human being reviews your particular case. A bond hearing is that moment. It doesn't guarantee release—it guarantees that someone with authority has to look at you and decide.The Department of Homeland Security said it disagreed with the ruling and remained confident in its legal position on mandatory detention, which signals a likely appeal, possibly to the Supreme Court. But for now, the decision draws a line: prolonged civil detention without any bond hearing is constitutionally suspect, and the length of confinement matters. The ruling is significant not only for the thousands of detainees it directly affects, but because it comes from a court that rarely rules against this administration—a reminder that even sympathetic judges have limits when the question is indefinite detention without a hearing.Appeals court bars mandatory detention for migrants past 90 days without bond hearing | Fox NewsCourt Blocks Immigration Detention Without HearingsThe Supreme Court has refused to hear Donald Trump's appeal seeking to overturn the jury verdict finding him liable for abusing and defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. With the Court declining to take the case, the 2023 verdict and the roughly five-million-dollar judgment against him stand.In 2023, a civil jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store in the mid-1990s and later defamed her by branding her account a lie. He was ordered to pay her about five million dollars. Trump appealed and lost in the lower courts, then asked the Supreme Court to step in. Last week the Court denied that request. When the Supreme Court denies review—what lawyers call denying “certiorari”—it isn't endorsing the verdict or ruling on the merits. It's simply declining to hear the case, which leaves the lower court's decision in force. But the practical effect is the same as a loss: the judgment is final, and there are no more appeals to pursue.It helps to separate two things people often blur together. This is a civil case, not a criminal one. Carroll didn't send anyone to prison; she sued for money and for the harm to her reputation, and a jury of ordinary citizens weighed the evidence and believed her. The Supreme Court's role at this stage isn't to re-try the facts—juries find facts, and appellate courts generally don't second-guess them. The question the Court was asked was narrower and more legal, and the Court decided it wasn't worth their time to review.The significance here is partly about accountability and partly about the ordinariness of the outcome. A private citizen brought a claim, a jury sided with her, the appellate courts affirmed, and the highest court in the country let that stand—the system working exactly as it's supposed to, regardless of the defendant's power. It's also a marker of the limits of that power: the office does not come with a trapdoor out of a civil judgment. The verdict is now as final as verdicts get.Supreme Court rejects Trump effort to overturn E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse and defamation verdict | NBC NewsThe Supreme Court's next term, beginning in October, is already set to feature major cases involving gun rights, voting rules, LGBT rights, immigration detention, and corporate disputes. One of the highest-profile cases concerns whether states and local governments may ban assault-style rifles such as AR-15s, with challenges coming from Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois. Gun rights advocates argue that these weapons are commonly owned and protected by the Second Amendment, while government officials describe them as military-style firearms that pose serious public safety risks.The Court will also hear a voting rights dispute over Arizona rules that would impose stricter proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and allow removal of suspected noncitizens from voter rolls. A lower court blocked parts of that law after finding that they conflicted with federal voter registration protections. Another case involves whether certain immigrants with criminal convictions can be held for long periods during deportation proceedings without receiving bond hearings. The Trump administration is asking the Court to uphold that detention policy, while a lower court found that prolonged detention without a hearing can violate due process. The Court will also consider a religious rights case from Colorado involving Catholic groups that want an exemption from nondiscrimination rules tied to a state preschool funding program. That case adds to the Court's ongoing disputes over how to balance religious liberty claims against LGBT anti-discrimination protections. The term will also include business-related cases involving ExxonMobil and Suncor, Apple and Epic Games, and PepsiCo.US Supreme Court to hear gun, LGBT, voting rights cases in next term | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

LESTAT'S PAST AND FUTURE COLLIDE! As The Vampire Lestat Season 3 continues to expand Anne Rice's Immortal Universe, Greg Alba & Roxy Striar react to The Vampire Lestat Episode 5, where shocking revelations, haunting visions, and powerful new immortals push Lestat further than ever before. From Lestat meeting Akasha and the long-awaited Marius de Romanus reveal to Louis, Armand, Daniel Molloy, and Nicolas continuing to shape his journey, this The Vampire Lestat 3x05 reaction dives into one of the season's biggest episodes. The Vampire Lestat Season 3 Episode 5 Reaction (Full Length Watch Along):   / thereelrejects   In this The Vampire Lestat Season 3 Episode 5 reaction, Interview with the Vampire Season 3 reaction, and review, Greg & Roxy continue following Lestat de Lioncourt, played by Sam Reid (The Newsreader, Lambs of God), as his rockstar tour takes another dramatic turn while confronting the ghosts of his past and the mysteries surrounding the oldest vampires. The episode also features Jacob Anderson (Game of Thrones, Broadchurch) as Louis de Pointe du Lac, Assad Zaman (Hotel Portofino, Apple Tree Yard) as Armand, Eric Bogosian (Talk Radio, Succession) as Daniel Molloy, Damian Atkins (Slasher, Designated Survivor) as Marius de Romanus, and introduces the legendary Akasha, Queen of the Damned, whose arrival reshapes Lestat's destiny. Featuring Lestat's electrifying rock performances, haunting visions of Nicolas de Lenfent, the long-awaited introduction of Marius, the mysterious presence of Akasha, major developments involving Louis, Armand, and Daniel Molloy, and another episode packed with Anne Rice lore, The Vampire Lestat continues to deepen the mythology of the Immortal Universe. As the season builds toward its biggest confrontations yet, Greg & Roxy break down every shocking reveal, emotional character moment, and vampire mystery from Episode 5. Follow Greg Alba:  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thegregalba/ Twitter:  https://x.com/thegregalba Follow Roxy Striar YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@TheWhirlGirls Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/roxystriar/?hl=en Twitter:  https://twitter.com/roxystriar Intense Suspense by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... Support The Channel By Getting Some REEL REJECTS Apparel! https://www.rejectnationshop.com/ Follow Us On Socials:  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reelrejects/  Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@reelrejects?lang=en Twitter: https://x.com/reelrejects Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheReelRejects/ Music Used In Ad:  Hat the Jazz by Twin Musicom is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Happy Alley by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... POWERED BY @GFUEL Visit https://gfuel.ly/3wD5Ygo and use code REJECTNATION for 20% off select tubs!! Head Editor: https://www.instagram.com/praperhq/?hl=en Co-Editor: Greg Alba Co-Editor: John Humphrey Music In Video: Airport Lounge - Disco Ultralounge by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ask Us A QUESTION On CAMEO: https://www.cameo.com/thereelrejects Follow TheReelRejects On FACEBOOK, TWITTER, & INSTAGRAM:  FB:  https://www.facebook.com/TheReelRejects/ INSTAGRAM:  https://www.instagram.com/reelrejects/ TWITTER:  https://twitter.com/thereelrejects Follow GREG ON INSTAGRAM & TWITTER: INSTAGRAM:  https://www.instagram.com/thegregalba/ TWITTER:  https://twitter.com/thegregalba Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

White Lotus, Succession, Real Housewives... Depuis plusieurs années, les ultra-riches ont envahi nos écrans. Alors que les inégalités se creusent, des personnages réels ou fictionnels étalent leurs privilèges pour notre divertissement. Alors pourquoi on regarde ?Ameziane :Son compte Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/hahamez/?hl=frLe Summer Tour de la Random Family : https://www.billetweb.fr/random-summer-tourSon spectacle Seum & Spleen à La Nouvelle Seine : https://www.billetreduc.com/spectacle/ameziane-dans-seum-spleen-393302Sources : Emma Garland, "Why Do We Love Watching Rich Arseholes on TV?", Vice (2021)Sophie Gilbert, "Money Is Ruining Television", The Atlantic (2025)Emily J. Smith, "When Did TV Stop Worrying About Money?", Substack (2025)Amelia Eqbal, "After years of 'eat the rich' television, are we finally full?", CBC (2025)Mia Sato, "Streaming services really want you to buy stuff while you watch TV", The Verge (2024)Erica Sweeney, "Wealth on TV Could Change Attitudes Toward Low-Income People, Study Finds", Teen Vogue (2018)"Rich People on TV: Satire or Good PR?", Wisecrack (2022)Kaleigh Werner, "Are TikTok Influencers Mainstreaming the Birkin?", WWD (2026)Rob Grams, Bourgeois Gaze, La domination de classe au cinéma, Editions Les liens qui libèrent (2026)Abonnez-vous à la newsletter sur Substack : chaque mois, je publie un article sur un sujet de la pop culture !Suivez Star System sur les réseaux :Instagram : @starsystempodcastTikTok : @starsystempodcastIllustration : Ines Basille. Musique : Naaha. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Dismantling the "Heroic Lawyering" Trap: Architectural Systems and Financial Scaling with Brooke LivelyIn a recent episode of The Thoughtful Entrepreneur Podcast, host Josh Elledge sat down with Brooke Lively, the founder of Scaling Law, to unpack the structural vulnerabilities that routinely stall the valuation and equity growth of independent legal practices. Brooke, an elite financial strategist, operational consultant, and corporate author, details how traditional legal founders succumb to "heroic lawyering"—a destructive operational loop where the firm's owner acts as the centralized bottleneck for every legal document, administrative choice, and frontline client interaction. This conversation serves as an essential strategic manual for law firm owners and mid-market professional services executives who want to leverage the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) to eradicate micromanagement, build automated workflow pipelines, and transition their firms into self-sustaining corporate assets.The Operational Architecture: Standardizing Legal Governance and Scaling Non-Founder Dependent FirmsThe primary constraint holding back a boutique or mid-market law practice from scaling past its current revenue ceiling is almost always an educational and cultural mismatch: attorneys launch firms because they possess premium legal acumen, yet they rarely inherit the systems-engineering background required to run an efficient enterprise. Running a professional service firm without explicit structural guardrails naturally breeds a culture of learned helplessness across the labor infrastructure, as staff members routinely abandon individual initiative when they assume the owner will manually review or redo their work. This centralized workflow reliance introduces massive administrative debt and severe executive burnout, which ultimately caps client capacity and compromises long-term enterprise valuation. True operational scale is achieved only when an organization implements a clear corporate playbook that transitions the business from a stressful, solo-led environment into a highly structured, data-driven system.Implementing the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) within a law practice effectively decentralizes authority by establishing an ironclad Accountability Chart that separates functional roles from subjective job titles. Rather than allowing trivial micro-tasks to consume executive cognitive capacity, leadership must establish a weekly scorecard to track leading performance indicators—such as new client acquisition velocity, active billable hour production, and ongoing collection rates. Replacing intuitive, gut-level management choices with visual data dashboards allows cross-functional legal teams to solve internal operational bottlenecks independently during structured Level 10 Meetings. When an organization standardizes its core legal workflows into repeatable checklists and digital templates, it removes personal bias from daily client delivery, ensuring the firm maintains its premium brand consistency even when the founder is completely absent from the boardroom.Sustaining a premium, high-valuation legal practice over multiple decades demands that firm owners actively look past revenue milestones to focus fiercely on baseline profitability, succession frameworks, and peer accountability. Building an intentional legal community designed specifically for firms self-implementing or optimizing their structural governance enables visionary owners to exchange localized operational templates and insulate their bottom lines against marketplace shifts. Shifting the executive mindset toward building a sellable, transferable corporate asset increases the firm's open-market equity while actively reducing the extreme systemic stress often associated with the legal sector. When data-driven financial leadership, automated workflow pipelines, and supportive peer networks are synthesized into a single architecture, a firm safely expands its market share and functions as a predictable, high-performance wealth vehicle.About Brooke LivelyBrooke Lively is the Founder of Scaling Law, a premier corporate financial consultant, an international speaker, and an expert system implementer specializing in law firm optimization. Drawing from a deep analytical background in corporate valuation, fractional executive leadership, and organizational design, Brooke focuses on helping attorneys transition from stressed-out practitioners into visionary business CEOs. She is the author of Scaling Law: How Visionary Law Firm Owners Use EOS to Build Value and Plan Their Exit, providing legal executives with clear, actionable strategies to eliminate administrative debt and scale profitability.About Scaling LawScaling Law is an elite professional services consultancy and leadership advisory firm engineered to guide law firm owners through rapid organizational and financial transitions. The company specializes in delivering comprehensive business posture assessments, custom EOS implementation frameworks, litigation workflow engineering, and strategic succession planning resources. Through specialized multi-unit data analysis, peer mastermind ecosystems, and structural accountability blueprints, Scaling Law enables small-to-mid-sized legal enterprises to remove operational scaling debt and predictably command premium market authority.Links Mentioned in This EpisodeScaling Law Official Website: scalinglaw.comBrooke Lively on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/brookelivelyKey Episode HighlightsThe Heroic Lawyering Trap: Identifying the hidden operational friction points and administrative bottlenecks that emerge when a founder handles all daily business decisions.The Data-Driven Legal Scorecard: Transitioning away from subjective gut-level management to track weekly metrics covering billable hours, customer acquisition, and cash collections.Eradicating Learned Helplessness: Building an EOS Accountability Chart to foster absolute psychological ownership and clear team responsibility across all management tiers.The Structure-First Success Mandate: Standardizing and documenting recurring case workflows into clean, repeatable digital checklists to insulate business margins.The Succession and Exit Playbook: Designing an autonomous professional services infrastructure to maximize enterprise value for future investors, buyers, or partners.ConclusionThe conversation with Brooke Lively reinforces that scaling a law firm sustainably requires an intentional balance of operational standardization, precise financial metrics, and a total shift in executive philosophy. By standardizing internal corporate governance, shifting daily decision-making rights to specialized management tiers, and ruthlessly protecting automated system infrastructure, legal leaders can successfully transform a volatile practice into a highly structured, self-sustaining corporate asset.More from The Thoughtful Entrepreneur

Après la série "un meurtre, une société" diffusée à l'été 2025, rendez-vous à partir du 20 juillet 2026 pour "Histoires de succession", six épisodes consacrés aux enjeux et conflits de transmission du pouvoir.Générique: extraits des Rois maudits, House of the Dragon et La Reine Margot ; musique de Nicholas Brittell pour la série Succession. Illustration: photogramme du film Ran (Akira Kurosawa).Une série proposée par André Loez / parolesdhistoire@gmail.comUn podcast créé, animé et produit par André Loez et distribué par Binge Audio. Contact pub : project@binge.audioHébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

【一起来读书吧 Bookclub】 7月24日，我们想和大家一起线上共读Patrick McGee 的热销作品 Apple in China。 这本书细致讲述了苹果如何在中国建立起现代史上最复杂、最高效的制造与供应链体系之一，也讲述了中国如何成为世界上最有价值公司的关键支柱。 作者 Patrick McGee 将在活动最后 30 分钟加入我们，回答大家的问题；问答部分使用英文。 读书会链接：https://luma.com/buwyzrkk On July 24th, we'll be reading Patrick McGee's bestselling book Apple in China together online. The book offers a detailed account of how Apple built one of the most complex and efficient manufacturing and supply chain systems in modern history in China. It also tells the story of how China became a crucial pillar of the world's most valuable company. Author Patrick McGee will join us for the final 30 minutes of the event to answer questions. The Q&A session will be conducted in English. Book club link: https://luma.com/buwyzrkk 【聊了什么The What】 本期节目，我们和老朋友Nancy一起深度剖析HBO高口碑偶像群像剧《The Pitt》（匹兹堡医院前线）。作为一部医疗剧，这部剧像继承之战一样，成了了解当下美国最重要的文本之一。从为了获得保险而选择失能的糖尿病父亲，到潜伏在急诊室门外的移民局（ICE）探员，我们聊聊那个被称为"坑底"的急诊室如何成为社会最后的防线。 当黑客攻击让全院电子病历停摆，医疗系统回归最原始的纸笔沟通，这究竟是技术的倒退还是人性的回归？我们借此深入探讨美国医疗系统的底层逻辑：为什么效率提升了，医生却更累了？为何这一季变得更“不好看”了？当意义感在日复一日的文书工作中磨损，我们该如何自我救赎？ In this episode, we're joined by our old friend Nancy for an in-depth discussion of HBO's critically acclaimed ensemble drama The Pitt. As a medical drama, the show has become, much like Succession, one of the most important texts for understanding contemporary America. From a diabetic father who chooses disability in order to obtain insurance, to ICE agents lurking outside the emergency room, we discuss how the ER becomes society's last line of defense. When a cyberattack shuts down the hospital's electronic medical records system and forces the medical system back to the most primitive form of communication — pen and paper — is this a technological regression, or a return to humanity? From there, we dig into the underlying logic of the American healthcare system: Why are doctors more exhausted even as efficiency improves? Why has this season become “less entertaining”? And when a sense of meaning is worn down by the daily grind of paperwork, how can we save ourselves? 【时间轴 The When】 00:00 - 背景：诺亚·怀尔与《ER》后的跨时代野心 10:28 - 群像之光：从自闭症医生到按时下班的争议实习生 34:26 - 从糖尿病父亲的悲剧聊聊美国医疗系统是为什么这么差 43:21 - 主演在国会山推动保护医护人员法案 51:31 - 意义感的磨损：第二季为何由爽剧转向压抑？ 59:43 - 场外争议：少数族裔角色离场与好莱坞系统性偏见的互文 70:26 - 昂贵的电子病历：奥巴马时期的法案如何塑造了今日的冗余官僚 76:46 - AI Can Never：人类的缺陷与温情不可取代 84:23 - 夏威夷古老祷文：I love you, thank you, I forgive you, please forgive me 00:00 - Background: Noah Wyle's cross-generational ambition after ER 10:28 - The brilliance of the ensemble: From an autistic doctor to the controversial intern who “leaves on time” 34:26 - From the tragedy of a diabetic father to why the American healthcare system is so broken 43:21 - The lead actor's advocacy on Capitol Hill for legislation protecting healthcare workers 51:31 - The erosion of meaning: Why Season 2 shifts from a “satisfying drama” to something darker and more oppressive 59:43 - Off-screen controversy: The departure of minority characters and its connection to systemic bias in Hollywood 70:26 - Expensive electronic medical records: How Obama-era legislation shaped today's redundant bureaucracy 76:46 - AI Can Never: Human flaws and warmth are irreplaceable 84:23 - An ancient Hawaiian prayer: I love you, thank you, I forgive you, please forgive me 【拓展链接 The Links】 On ‘The Pitt,' E.R. Doctors Try to Fix This Broken World 主演Noah Wyle和Bernie Sanders的对谈 Noah Wyle tells Congress: Healthcare workers shouldn't have to ‘beg for basic support' 【疲惫红书 CyberRed】 除了播客以外，疲惫娇娃的几个女的在小红书上开了官方账号，我们会不定期发布【疲惫在读】、【疲惫在看】、【疲惫旅行】、【疲惫Vlog】等等更加轻盈、好玩、实验性质的内容。如果你想知道除了播客以外我们在关注什么，快来小红书评论区和我们互动。 Apart from the podcast, we have set up an official account on Xiaohongshu. We will periodically post content such as “CyberPink Reading,” “CyberPink Watching,” “CyberPink Traveling,” “CyberPink Vlog,” and more. Those are lighter, more fun and more experimental stuff about our lives. Leave us some comments on Xiaohongshu! 【买咖啡 Please Support Us】 如果喜欢这期节目并愿意想要给我们买杯咖啡： 海外用户：https://www.patreon.com/cyberpinkfm 海内用户：https://afdian.com/a/cyberpinkfm 商务合作邮箱：cyberpinkfm@gmail.com 商务合作微信：CyberPink2022 If you like our show and want to support us, please consider the following: Those Abroad: https://www.patreon.com/cyberpinkfm Those in China: https://afdian.com/a/cyberpinkfm Business Inquiries Email: cyberpinkfm@gmail.com Business Inquiries WeChat: CyberPink2022

What happens when the leadership of one of the pet care industry's most influential organizations changes hands? In this episode, Collin sits down with Adam and Rachel Foster, the new owners of Pet Sitters International, to discuss their backgrounds in technology, entrepreneurship, and pet care. They explore how technology is reshaping the industry, why relationships remain at the heart of professional pet sitting, and the challenges of competing in an increasingly app-driven marketplace. The conversation also dives into succession planning, the future of independent pet care businesses, and the importance of preserving industry standards. Adam and Rachel share their vision for honoring PSI's legacy while helping it evolve for the next generation of pet care professionals. Main topics: Technology and pet care Independent business advantages PSI leadership transition Industry growth and maturity Succession planning strategies Main takeaway: "I think the independent business owners are the ones who are going to win." That's a bold statement in an industry filled with apps, automation, and growing competition. But Adam and Rachel Foster, the new owners of PSI, believe that what separates independent pet care businesses isn't technology—it's trust, relationships, and genuine expertise. While apps can make booking convenient, they can't replace the peace of mind that comes from knowing a professional is caring for your pet. As the pet care industry continues to mature, the businesses that invest in professionalism, education, and exceptional client relationships will be well positioned for the future. About our guests: Adam and Rachel Foster are the new owners of Pet Sitters International (PSI), the world's largest educational association for professional pet sitters. Adam brings extensive experience in customer success, business operations, and entrepreneurship through acquisition, while Rachel has a background in software development, project management, and pet technology. Together, they combine expertise in technology, leadership, and small business growth with a shared passion for pets and professional pet care. Their goal is to honor PSI's legacy while helping prepare the organization and its members for the future. Links: Check out our Starter Packs See all of our discounts!

Let's get brutally honest, fam: the US government's debt is so wild right now, you'd think it's a plotline ripped out of Succession. This episode goes deep into the $39 trillion debt crisis and why there's literally zero intention—or plan—to pay it back the traditional way. We're breaking down what the Fed, big banks, politicians, and those headline AI investments are really up to. It's not what you think (and the way your future is tied to all this will blow your mind).Whether you're a finance junkie or suspicious about why your dollars don't stretch like they used to, we're peeking behind the curtain at the real mechanics behind national debt, inflation, and those “solutions” no one in power wants to talk about. Grab a notebook—you're about to spot red flags before everyone else and save yourself from ending up on the wrong side of a financial cliff.00:00 - Intro02:17 - Part 1: Only Two Ways Out09:36 - Part 2: Control What You Show Them To Control What They See17:51 - Part 3: The Invisible Money Printer Go BrrrrWhat's up, everybody? It's Tom Bilyeu here:If you want my help...STARTING a business: join me here at ZERO TO FOUNDER: https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20showSCALING a business: see if you qualify here.: https://tombilyeu.com/callGet my battle-tested strategies and insights delivered weekly to your inbox: sign up here.:https://tombilyeu.com/**********************************************************************If you're serious about leveling up your life, I urge you to check out my new podcast, Tom Bilyeu's Mindset Playbook —a goldmine of my most impactful episodes on mindset, business, and health. Trust me, your future self will thank you.**********************************************************************FOLLOW TOM:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tombilyeu?lang=enTwitter: https://twitter.com/tombilyeuYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeuTruemed: Check your eligibility and start saving at https://truemed.com/impactEthos: Get a free quote at https://ethos.com/impactIncogni: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code IMPACT at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/impact Ketone IQ: Visit https://ketone.com/IMPACT for 30% OFF your subscription orderShopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial period at https://shopify.com/impactATT Business: Switch to AT&T Business at business.att.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Screenwriter Will Tracy (BUGONIA, THE MENU, SUCCESSION) returns to walk Josh and Joe through movies that themselves have been cancelled or have been made with a cancelled person. Show Notes: Movies Referenced In This Episode The Menu (2022) Bugonia (2025) Heathers (1988) Song of the South (1946) Jezebel (1938) The Little Foxes (1941) The Princess and the Frog (2009) Treasure Island (1950) The Devil and Max Devlin (1981) The Usual Suspects (1995) Get Him to the Greek (2010) Casablanca (1942) Clownhouse (1989) Powder (1995) Jeepers Creepers (2001) Boys Town (1938) Stand by Me (1985) Lord of the Flies (1960) Bound (1996) An Officer and a Spy (2019) Crimes and Misdemeanors  (1989) Match Point (2005) Manhattan (1979) The Two Jakes (1990) Chinatown (1974) The Godfather Part III (1990) Knife in the Water (1962) Rosemary's Baby (1968) Repulsion (1965) Predator (1987) Die Hard (1988) The Hunt for Red October (1990) The Thomas Crown Affair (1999) Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995) Rollerball (1975) Rollerball (2002) The Royal Hunt of the Sun (1969) The 13th Warrior (1999) I Love You, Daddy (2017) Blue Jasmine (2013) One Battle After Another (2025) Life is Beautiful (1997) Crash (2005) Green Book (2018) Driving Miss Daisy (1989) Other Notable Items Our revamped Patreon!  The Hollywood Food Coalition Succession TV series (2018-23) The Onion The Academy Awards Stavros Halkias Wikipedia Daniel Waters William Hurt Our Thomas Jane podcast episode Disney Dalton S. Reymond Maurice Rapf Morton Grant The Hays Code Splash Mountain at Disneyland in Anaheim, CA James Baskett  M*A*S*H* TV series (1972-83) Br'er Rabbit  Elliott Gould Bill Cosby “The Devil and Daniel Webster” short story by Stephen Vincent Benét (1936) Kevin Spacey Bryan Singer Russell Brand Diddy Jonah Hill Christopher McQuarrie Humphrey Bogart Richard Wagner  Woody Allen Roman Polanski Victor Salva  Francis Ford Coppola American Zoetrope The Wachowski sisters Colombo TV series (1971-78, 1989-2003) Johnny Cash Donald Pleasence Ruth Gordon The Sopranos TV series (1999-2007) Breaking Bad TV series (2007-13) Robert Towne Jack Nicholson The Dreyfus affair  Sofia Coppola Winona Ryder The Big Goodbye: Chinatown and the Last Years of Hollywood book by Sam Wasson (2020) Peter Bogdanovich Polly Platt Andrew Hickey's The History of Rock in 500 Songs podcast “Waterloo Sunset” song by The Kinks (1967) Ray Davies The Beatles John Lennon Yoko Ono “I'm Not Angry” song by Elvis Costello (1977) John McTiernan Anthony Pellicano Chris Klein LL Cool J Sean Connery Sam Neill Stellan Skarsgard Alec Baldwin Antonio Banderas Louis C.K. Louie TV series (2010-15) The Late Show with Stephen Colbert TV series (2014-26) John Malkovich Apropos of Nothing memoir by Woody Allen (2020) Dane Cook Roberto Benigni Steven Spielberg Jerry Lewis Nick Vallelonga Al Franken Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Commodore 64 built a phone. Say yes to the interNOT, they market. And we are fans. What a way to open the doom hole, with a Santa-bell worthy story!Ed Zitron guest on Better Offline writes a opinion piece for the New York Times about 'doom trolling' which he defines as AI executives warning us the sky is falling due to their products.Our interview with Miss Molly Knows (who is dynamite, by the way!) ends with her advice about ways to heal fast after dipping a toe in the mainstream news and other exposure to current events.Our own confessions about getting drawn in by the news and its negative effects on us. Are there really two sides to American politics? Leading researchers and professors beg to disagree on that. There's a third substantial group that feels neither party represents them. Pew Research has a great in-depth article about this.There is a happy place on the internet that Jesse found and shared, Low Tech Web Ring. It's a place that does not spy on you or sell your data and is a landing page for RSS feeds. He shares the site and explains they no longer accept new RSS feeds, as of 2025, but Jenn and Jesse are certain someone out there is doing the same thing in the same spirit. This was definitely a Santa-bell moment.Then we looked at the chart shared by Luiza Jarovsky on socials about who is suing who in the world of AI behemoths.The original author of the chart is credited as David McCandless. If you're interested in learning more about Luiza Jarovsky's AI Tech and Privacy Academy click here.Offhand conversation about Whitley Strieber while Jesse looks up something on the google. Watching the alien show made Jenn feel itchy!Then Jesse finds the story and images! Snapchat's CEO has helped develop the most ridiculous AR glasses and the world is responding with gold-medal memes! Then Jesse loops in Succession, to add to Jenn's watchlist.And to close out the show, Jesse's thoughts drift to the time that our AI chatbot, Nova, called him a genius. Here's that show in case you missed it!Send us Fan MailIf you are searching for a fresh, binge-able podcast, this might be the one for you!Support the showSupport Curious Cat, an independent, human-made podcast!***Curious Cat Podcast on Substack!***Buy Curious Cat Podcast a Coffee!

Au sommaire :Le gouvernement français réclame 800 millions d'euros d'économies sur les arrêts maladie, en durcissant les conditions d'indemnisation et en limitant la durée des arrêts.La canicule attendue en France la semaine prochaine pousse les Français à modifier leurs projets de vacances d'été, avec une forte hausse des recherches pour des destinations plus fraîches comme la Normandie.Au Royaume-Uni, Andy Burnham, qui devrait devenir le prochain Premier ministre, présente sa feuille de route économique axée sur la décentralisation, la réindustrialisation et une "bonne croissance" bénéficiant à tous.Au Venezuela, le séisme meurtrier qui a frappé le pays aggrave une situation économique déjà très dégradée et complique les efforts de restructuration de la dette.Le groupe français Suez remporte un contrat de 2 milliards d'euros pour la gestion de l'eau à Mascate, la capitale d'Oman, un retour à l'international pour l'entreprise.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

A Note of Gratitude:

LESTAT'S ROCKSTAR ERA IS GETTING MORE DANGEROUS!

"These are long-term decisions that have far-reaching impacts — not just for us, but for future generations." Host Laurie Barkman sits down with Jennifer Wilson, founder of Oak Bay Coaching and Consulting and former CEO of the Canada Homestay Network — a family business her mother started in 1995 from a bed and breakfast in Toronto that has since placed over 100,000 international students across Canada.  Jennifer joined the company as an accidental second-generation leader, grew into the CEO role after completing her MBA, and spent 17 years building the organization before transitioning to chair in 2022.  She built a co-CEO structure, created a board of directors from scratch, and navigated a partial management buyout — all while keeping the family intact. Here's how she did it.   Key Insights The CEO handoff is as much symbolic as it is structural. Jennifer's mother passed her a vintage recipe box — the company's original "analog database" — in front of the entire team at a company retreat. That moment publicly transferred authority and gave the whole organization clarity about who was leading. Succession isn't just paperwork — it's a signal. A co-CEO structure can work — but only under two conditions. Different skill sets and clearly separated accountabilities are non-negotiable. Jennifer hired an HR consultant who specializes in co-CEO models, created distinct strategic plan line items for each CEO, and built separate performance reviews. When both conditions are met, both leaders say they wouldn't want to do it alone. Leadership succession and ownership transition are not the same thing — and confusing them is costly. Jennifer separated the two processes deliberately. She transitioned leadership years before she transitioned ownership, and treating them as distinct conversations gave the family time to think clearly about equity, estate planning, and sibling fairness without the pressure of an operational handover happening simultaneously. Give your successors enough time. Jennifer gave her two internal candidates 18 months of lead time before officially stepping back. That window allowed for trust-building, task delegation, and honest conversations about whether each person actually wanted the role. One of them said no — and that was crucial information to have before the transition, not after. Family-to-management buyouts require a mind shift, not just a legal agreement. The reframe that unlocked Jennifer's MBO: instead of "they're paying for the business with our revenue," think "we sold it on day one and they're paying us back." That shift changes the emotional dynamic — and the 80/20 split they landed on was driven in part by Canadian tax thresholds that required each buyer to hold over 10% equity.   Chapters: 00:04 Introduction of Jennifer Wilson 02:08 Origin Story: How Canada Homestay Network Began 04:30 Jennifer's Unexpected Path Into the Family Business 07:12 Flash Forward: When Succession Conversations Started 08:40 The Recipe Box Ceremony: A Symbolic Handoff 09:36 The Trio: Running the Business as a Family Team 12:00 Deciding to Think About Her Own Succession 13:12 Building a Self-Managed Organization 16:05 Identifying and Developing Internal Successor Candidates 18:24 The Big Reveal: A Co-CEO Structure 18:53 How the Co-CEO Model Works in Practice 21:15 Governance: Building a Board and Separating Strategic vs. Operational Plans 24:28 Pitfalls and What Went Wrong: When One Candidate Said No 25:21 COVID: Laying Off 100 People in Six Months 29:01 Ownership Transition vs. Leadership Succession 29:37 Equity, Estate Planning, and Sibling Fairness 38:17 The Management Buyout: How the 80/20 Split Was Determined 40:23 Top Takeaways for Founders and Next-Gen Leaders   Is your business truly ready—and are you? Take the Succession Readiness Assessment to get a clear snapshot of where you stand and what to focus on next. https://btsherpa.com/succession P.S. Most owners don't realize where they stand until they're already in a transition. Take a few minutes now to understand your readiness—and give yourself more options later.  

James 5:16-18 16 Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective. 17 Elijah was a human being, even as we are. He prayed earnestly that it would not rain, and it did not rain on the land for three and a half years. 18 Again he prayed, and the heavens gave rain, and the earth produced its crops. SERMON NOTES I. The Burden of Legacy The Coca-Cola Lesson: In 1985, "New Coke" failed because customers felt betrayed by the loss of something familiar and trustworthy, even though the new flavor was "better". Defining the Mantle: To "take up the mantle" means to assume the role and responsibility of a predecessor and say, "I will carry on what they began". Succession is Hard: It is almost impossible to follow a "GOAT" (Greatest of All Time) because you are constantly compared to their legacy. II. The Pitfall of Talent: Churchill vs. Eden Winston Churchill: A legendary leader who rallied Britain against "monstrous tyranny" with bold determination and grit. Anthony Eden: A "polished diplomat" and Churchill's right-hand man who seemed perfect on paper but failed his first test (the Suez Canal crisis) and resigned in disgrace. Insight: It isn't easy to take up the mantle. III. The Source of Power: Elijah vs. Elisha Dark Days: King Ahab and Jezebel led Israel into extreme evil, murdering God's prophets and worshipping idols. Elijah's Fire: Elijah single-handedly confronted 450 prophets of Baal, and God answered with fire from heaven to prove He was the true God. The Big Truth: Elisha was called to follow this legend, but James 5:17 reminds us Elijah was "a man just like us". The power came from God's presence, not Elijah's ability. IV. Taking Up the Mantle Today The Current Call: In modern days of darkness and challenge, we are called to be the church. The First Passing: Successful legacy requires mentorship. Elijah didn't just leave; he invited Elisha to walk with him and learn from his presence for years. The Ultimate Strength: We take up the mantle by trusting the Spirit of Jesus, who conquered death and lives in us.   Discussion Questions The "Familiarity" Factor: Why do you think people react so strongly to change (like the "New Coke" example)? In your own life, when has it been difficult to let go of the "familiar" to embrace something new? The Pressure of Success: What makes it so hard to live up to a previous legacy? The "Just Like Us" Reality: James 5:17 says Elijah was "a man just like us." How does it change your view of your own faith to know that Elijah's miracles were about God's power rather than Elijah's special abilities? Practical Mentorship: The sermon mentioned a "first passing" of the mantle where Elijah gave Elisha his presence. What does it look like practically for different generations in our church to spend time together and share their walks with the Lord? Looking at the "Faith Hall of Fame" (Hebrews 11), many faced extreme hardships. Which "dark days" in our world today feel most overwhelming to you, and how does the promise that "He who lives in you is greater" give you courage?

Welcome to RealAg on the Weekend with your host Shaun Haney! On this week’s edition of the show, Haney is joined by Kristjan Hebert of Fairlight, Sask., and Kresten Jorgenson of New Brigden, Alta., to take a look at this year’s growing season, plus Justine Hendricks of Farm Credit Canada is on to discuss the... Read More

PODCAST/WEBSITE HEAD: Jamie Dimon succession race narrowsSTANDFIRST: Marianne Lake leaves bank as Doug Petno and Troy Rohrbaugh handed two of its largest divisionsDescription: The race to succeed JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon just got tighter, and the investment chief at insurance group Allianz is warning that the SpaceX bond sale signals markets are in ‘bubble territory'. Plus, the US Supreme Court shielded German pharmaceuticals group Bayer from thousands of lawsuits over its Roundup weedkiller.Mentioned in this podcast:Jamie Dimon promotes two potential successors at JPMorganSpaceX bond sale signals markets are in ‘bubble territory', warns Allianz CIOBayer wins crucial US Supreme Court ruling over Roundup weedkillerTell us your thoughts to enter a prize draw for a chance to win a pair of Bose QuietComfort Headphones worth £229. Take our survey: https://www.feedback.ft.com/c/a/6f9bJBvxsxaEBSIB5esBISOver 18s only. Find full T&Cs here Prize Draw winners' surnames and regions may be made available upon request, as required by the Advertising Standards Authority. If you do not want your information to be made available, please email Privacy.Officer@ft.com upon entry. For more information on your rights and how we use your data, please read our Privacy Policy.Want to get in touch? Email us at podcasts@ft.comNote: The FT does not use generative AI to voice its podcasts The FT News Briefing is produced by Victoria Craig, Sonja Hutson, Saffeya Ahmed, Katya Kumkova, and Fiona Symon. Our editor is Marc Filippino. Our show is mixed by Kelly Garry and Alex Higgins. Additional help from Gavin Kallmann, Michael Lello, Peter Barber and David da Silva. Our intern is Cole van Miltenburg. Our executive producer is Topher Forhecz. Flo Phillips is the FT's global head of audio. The show's theme music is by Metaphor Music.Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A leadership baton is being passed, and Katherine Coble is stepping into the CEO role at Borshoff with gratitude, clarity, and a deep commitment to people-first leadership. Nikki sits down with Katherine to celebrate the legacy of Karen Alter, the evolution of Borshoff, and what it means to steward a company with more than 40 years of history.

Full Text of Readings Tuesday of the Twelfth Week in Ordinary Time Lectionary: 372 The Saint of the day is Saint John Fisher Saint John Fisher's Story John Fisher is usually associated with Erasmus, Thomas More, and other Renaissance humanists. His life therefore, did not have the external simplicity found in the lives of some saints. Rather, he was a man of learning, associated with the intellectuals and political leaders of his day. He was interested in the contemporary culture and eventually became chancellor at Cambridge. John Fisher had been made a bishop at 35, and one of his interests was raising the standard of preaching in England. Fisher himself was an accomplished preacher and writer. His sermons on the penitential psalms were reprinted seven times before his death. With the coming of Lutheranism, he was drawn into controversy. His eight books against heresy gave him a leading position among European theologians. In 1521, Fisher was asked to study the question of King Henry VIII's marriage to Catherine of Aragon, his brother's widow. He incurred Henry's anger by defending the validity of the king's marriage with Catherine, and later by rejecting Henry's claim to be the supreme head of the Church of England. In an attempt to be rid of him, Henry first had John Fisher accused of not reporting all the “revelations” of the nun of Kent, Elizabeth Barton. In feeble health, Fisher was summoned to take the oath to the new Act of Succession. He and Thomas More refused to do so because the Act presumed the legality of Henry's divorce and his claim to be head of the English Church. They were sent to the Tower of London, where Fisher remained 14 months without trial. Finally both men were sentenced to life imprisonment and loss of goods. When the two were called to further interrogations, they remained silent. On the supposition that he was speaking privately as a priest, Fisher was tricked into declaring again that the king was not supreme head of the church in England. The king, further angered that the pope had made John Fisher a cardinal, had him brought to trial on the charge of high treason. He was condemned and executed, his body left to lie all day on the scaffold and his head hung on London Bridge. More was executed two weeks later. John Fisher's liturgical feast is celebrated on June 22. Reflection Today many questions are raised about Christians' and priests' active involvement in social issues. John Fisher remained faithful to his calling as a priest and bishop. He strongly upheld the teachings of the Church; the very cause of his martyrdom was his loyalty to Rome. He was involved in the cultural enrichment circles as well as in the political struggles of his time. This involvement caused him to question the moral conduct of the leadership of his country. “The Church has the right, indeed the duty, to proclaim justice on the social, national and international level, and to denounce instances of injustice, when the fundamental rights of man and his very salvation demand it” (Justice in the World, 1971 Synod of Bishops).Saint of the Day, Copyright Franciscan Media