Podcasts about bad arguments

Icon Wars: Has the Church Been Bowing to Idols? How Rome and the East Smuggle Idolatry into Worship Through Sentiment and Bad Arguments “Stop kissing idols.” When God thundered from Sinai, He did not mumble. He did not leave room for clever loopholes. He said: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image… thou shalt not bow down thyself to them.” Yet for centuries, Rome and the East have tried to explain away what God made plain. In this episode of The Patriarchy Podcast, Pastor Joseph Spurgeon and Zach Krugler step into the Icon Wars. Are icons, statues, relics, and painted images harmless aids to worship… or baptized idolatry dressed up in tradition? The guys break down the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic arguments for icon veneration, including appeals to the incarnation, church history, temple imagery, and “honor passing through the image.” They examine why modern Protestants, exhausted by shallow evangelicalism, are being lured toward ancient aesthetics and mystical sentimentality. They also ask the practical questions many Christians wrestle with: Is every image of Jesus sinful? What about children’s Bibles and movies like The Chosen or The Passion of the Christ? What do we do with relics like the Shroud of Turin? Does church history actually support icon veneration? Can Christians distinguish between honor and worship? This is not a debate about art alone. It is a battle over worship, authority, and whether God gets to decide how He is approached. Faithful men do not improve God’s worship. They obey it. Timestamps 00:00 – Cold Open: “Stop Kissing Idols”02:01 – Introduction to the Icon Wars03:12 – Has God Authorized Religious Images?04:39 – Why Eastern Orthodoxy Is Gaining Ground08:36 – Does Calling Icons Idolatry Mean the Church Fell Away?10:02 – What the Second Commandment Actually Says13:17 – The Bronze Serpent and Corrupted Worship17:24 – Is There a Difference Between Images and Veneration?19:56 – “Jesus Is the Image of God” Argument Examined23:39 – Did Christ Change the Second Commandment?27:33 – The Incarnation and the Logic of Iconography31:36 – Honor vs. Worship: Are They the Same?35:45 – The Regulative Principle of Worship38:20 – Westminster Larger Catechism on Images43:18 – Mental Images of Christ and the Human Imagination47:12 – The Dangers of Modern Depictions of Jesus50:17 – Applying This Debate in Real Life Key Topics Discussed The Second Commandment and worship Eastern Orthodox icon veneration Roman Catholic statues and relics The regulative principle of worship The Westminster Larger Catechism The incarnation and images of Christ Church history and iconoclasm The Shroud of Turin The Chosen and visual depictions of Jesus Idolatry disguised as tradition The King’s Council Men need more than shallow answers and soft leadership. The King’s Council is a gathering for men who want biblical truth, real brotherhood, and strength under the lordship of Christ. Join us June 20 from 5:00–8:00 PM at Sovereign King Church in Jeffersonville, IN. Pastor Michael Clary of Christ the King Church in Fort Thomas, KY will speak on Piety Without Pietism. Food, discussion, and fellowship included. Take your seat at the King’s Council: https://sovereignkingscouncil.com About the Show The Patriarchy Podcast features in-depth conversations on faith, culture, theology, and leadership. Each episode equips Christians to live boldly and biblically in an age of compromise—exploring the challenges and opportunities of standing firm for truth in the modern world. Support the Mission We’re still raising funds to expand Sovereign King Academy and keep tuition affordable for families. Want to invest in the future of Christ’s Kingdom?Give here: https://sovereignkingacademy.com Connect with The Patriarchy Podcast YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ThePatriarchyPodcastSpotify: https://tinyurl.com/58tm5zjzApple Podcasts: https://tinyurl.com/f3ruzrsaWebsite & All Links: https://linktr.ee/thepatriarchypodcast Follow Joseph Spurgeon:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThePatriarchyPodcastX/Twitter: https://x.com/PatriarchyPodInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/thepatriarchypodcastGab: https://gab.com/thepatriarchypodcast Sponsored By Steadfast Cigars – For men who reject passivity and take dominionOrder: https://steadfastcigars.com/ Fit Father Project – Dr. Balduzzi built the Fit Father Project to help men stop drifting, reclaim discipline, and get strong for life. If you're ready to take ownership of your health, don’t wait. This is the first real step toward lasting strength—for your body, your family, and your legacy. Start: https://secure.fitfatherproject.com/a/transformation/4539 Books by Joseph Spurgeon:It’s Good to Be a Boy – https://a.co/d/7zpEh5DIt’s Good to Be a Girl – https://a.co/d/6VlBTzS Final Call to Action Subscribe for more conversations that sharpen men for battle.Turn on notifications so you never miss an episode.Like and share to support biblical masculinity. icons, icon veneration, Eastern Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, idolatry, second commandment, graven images, worship idols, Protestant theology, Reformed theology, Westminster Confession, icon worship, biblical worship, regulative principle, Joseph Spurgeon, Patriarchy Podcast, Christian nationalism, theology podcast, false worship, Exodus 20, images of Jesus, Shroud of Turin, The Chosen critique, church history, Protestant vs Orthodox, Christian apologetics, biblical masculinity

Join the Conversation at 303-477-5600 or text to 307-200-8222 Monday - Friday from 3 pm - 6 pm MT. HOUR 1 Hour 1 of https://RushToReason.com opens with urgency and doesn't let up. John Rush and Andy Peth dive into a Rhode Island shooting that John argues hasn't been fully scrutinized—and ask why certain details seem to vanish from the national conversation. From there, the discussion expands into mental health, accountability, and whether ideology is replacing honest diagnosis in moments of crisis. A key turning point comes with listener calls that raise uncomfortable but timely questions: What happens when courts, insurance companies, and malpractice risk start driving decisions faster than politics? Could lawsuits—and not legislation—be the real force that changes the system? And why do parents and students feel pressured into silence in schools when they disagree? The hour also pivots to real-world danger closer to home, as deadly wind-driven accidents on Colorado highways highlight how denial of weather, risk, or reality—can turn tragic fast. By the end of the hour, John challenges listeners on both sides of the aisle: are we willing to confront hard truths, or will we keep blaming tools instead of addressing the people and systems failing in plain sight? HOUR 2 Hour 2 of Rush To Reason zeroes in on power, accountability, and who really controls the system. John Rush and Andy Peth are joined by Mark Mix of the National Right to Work Committee (https://nrtwc.org/), who breaks down why Virginia's move to expand public-sector union power could have sweeping consequences nationwide. From rising taxpayer costs to unions acting as unelected power brokers, Mark explains why government unions are fundamentally different from private ones—and why voters often have no real leverage. The hour then pivots to election integrity as Priscilla Rahn joins the conversation to walk listeners through the SAVE Act. She tackles claims that voter ID laws suppress women and minorities, explains what the bill actually requires, and argues that restoring trust—not restricting access—is the real goal. The discussion widens to messaging failures, young voter confusion, and why fear-based narratives may be driving people away from the ballot box altogether. If confidence in elections is broken, can participation survive—and who benefits when voters stay home? Guest Timestamps * Mark Mix (National Right to Work Committee) — 1:10 * Priscilla Rahn (KLTT Radio Host) — 44:40 HOUR 3 Hour 3 of Rush To Reason opens with a sharp clash over gun rights, mental illness, and constitutional limits, as John Rush and Andy Peth respond to listener pushback and challenge what they see as selective logic on public safety and freedom. From there, the hour pivots into a bold defense of the two-party system, arguing that fragmentation and “purity politics” weaken conservatives while collectivists consolidate power. Drawing on examples from Europe, Israel, and Colorado, John explains why fewer choices can actually protect individual liberty. The conversation then shifts to Colorado legislation that could legalize prostitution statewide, sparking an unusually nuanced debate. John and Andy weigh personal liberty against cultural fallout, marriage stability, addiction, public health, and how law-enforcement resources are really being used. A call from Andrew in Greeley adds another layer—raising questions about taxpayer responsibility and unintended consequences. Are conservatives fighting this issue with the wrong arguments? And when one side controls every lever of power, does the debate even matter anymore?

If you don't know what the other side believes, you'll probably end up using some bad arguments.

A certain naïvete about the state has been creeping in on the right, so it's an opportune moment to do this episode, in which Keith Knight of the Libertarian Institute Interviews me about my book The Church and the Market, which observes its 20th anniversary this year. This is an episode not about religion per se, but about prosperity and human flourishing. Sponsors: Expat Money Summit: Mikkel Thorup, host of the Expat Money Show, is bringing together top experts from around the world for the Expat Money Online Summit -- and it's completely free to attend. You'll learn how to legally protect your wealth, secure second residencies and citizenships, reduce your tax burden, and own property abroad -- all to safeguard your freedom. Reserve your free ticket at ExpatMoneySummit.com Persist SEO Agorist Tax Advice: Pick up a free copy of the brilliant Matthew Sercely's Agorist Tax Toolkit at: AgoristTaxAdvice.com/woods Show notes for Ep. 2699

https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/san-diego/san-diego-horton-plaza-future/ https://www.kpbs.org/news/living/2025/08/20/after-6-years-san-diego-approves-380-unit-housing-project-next-to-blue-line-trolley https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2025/08/23/california-democrats-see-redistricting-push-as-way-to-build-momentum-for-party/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2pQt2cYtnY  

The arguments for tariffs lack the kind of useful perspective provided by a basic economics course. Cato's Colin Grabow picks them apart. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On the one-year anniversary of Hamas's atrocities on October 7th, which have been used as a pretext for unfathomably worse atrocities for the last year, Ben Burgis does an on-air version of his lecture "Debunking the Many Bad Arguments Made By Israel's Apologists in the West" which he gave as a teach-in at the encampment at Princeton last April, and before that as a presentation to Metro Detroit DSA & Wayne State University YDSA. (Sadly, we couldn't line up anyone to record either of those!) Before that, Ben and the crew talk about the VP debate, the successful strike that shut down ports across the East Coast last week (and the shameful failure of many liberals to support it), and a petition to posthumously exonerate Ethel Rosenberg. In the postgame for patrons, they watch Ta-Nehesi Coates being grilled on CBS.The launch event for Ben's pamphlet "Four Essays on Palestine" is going to be in October 22nd at 7:30 PM in Los Angeles (at Lawless Brewing Co. in North Hollywood) w/a panel in the beer garden with Ben, Jason Myles and Ana Kasparian. Tickets come with a copy of the book:https://www.eventbrite.com/e/four-essays-on-palestine-launch-wben-burgis-ana-kasparian-jason-myles-tickets-1039381567247Or order the pamphlet from Everyday Analysis:https://everyday-analysis.sellfy.store/p/four-essays-on-palestine-by-ben-burgis-print-and-digital-edition/Sing the Ethel Rosenberg petition:https://www.rfc.org/exonerate-ethel?utm_id=120213379584320359Read the MSNBC article about the strike on the docks:https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/dock-workers-strike-sent-powerful-message-bosses-workers-rcna173849Follow Ben on Twitter: @BenBurgisFollow GTAA on Twitter: @Gtaa_ShowBecome a GTAA Patron and receive numerous benefits ranging from patron-exclusive postgames every Monday night to our undying love and gratitude for helping us keep this thing going:patreon.com/benburgisRead the weekly philosophy Substack:benburgis.substack.comVisit benburgis.com

Send us a textHave you ever found yourself in the aftermath of a heated argument, wondering if your relationship can survive? We've all been there. But what truly determines the longevity of a partnership isn't the absence of conflict, but rather the ability to navigate those stormy seas and emerge stronger. In this podcast, we'll delve into the art of recovering from bad arguments. Discover effective strategies to calm the waters, rebuild trust, and foster deeper intimacy. Learn how to turn disagreements into opportunities for growth and strengthen your bond with your partner. Join us as we explore the secrets to lasting love and resilience in the face of adversity.❤️‍

We interview Leo Strine on the purpose of the corporation, differentiating between shareholder primacy and stakeholder theory. We discuss ESG and the power of stockholders and workers. Leo Strine applies his perspective on corporate purpose to corporate acquisitions and lays out his hopes for the future of corporations. Some critical articles to learn more about the shareholder primacy vs stakeholder theory debate:Origins of the argument: - Merrick Dodd, For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?, 45 HARV. L. REV. 1145 (1932) - Adolph A. Berle, Jr., For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note, 45 HARV.. L. REV. 1365, 1372 (1932)Shareholder primacy ownership argument: - Milton Friedman, A Friedman doctrine– The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, N.Y. Times, Sept. 13 1970.Critique on shareholder primacy: - Lynn A. Stout, Bad and Not-so-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy, 75 S. CAL. L. REV. 1189 (2002).Example of Application: - Lucian Bebchuk and Roberto Tallarita, The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance. 106 Corn. L. Rev. 91 (2020).Example of Court Case Application: - Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173, 177 (Del. 1986)A bit about Leo Strine:Leo E. Strine, Jr., is Of Counsel in the Corporate Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.  Prior to joining the firm, he was the Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court from early 2014 through late 2019.  Before becoming the Chief Justice, he served on the Delaware Court of Chancery as Chancellor since June 22, 2011, and as a Vice Chancellor since November 9, 1998.In his judicial positions, Mr. Strine wrote hundreds of opinions in the areas of corporate law, contract law, trusts and estates, criminal law, administrative law, and constitutional law.  Notably, he authored the lead decision in the Delaware Supreme Court case holding that Delaware's death penalty statute was unconstitutional because it did not require the key findings necessary to impose a death sentence to be made by a unanimous jury.For a generation, Mr. Strine taught various corporate law courses at the Harvard and University of Pennsylvania law schools, and now serves as the Michael L. Wachter Distinguished Fellow in Law and Policy at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and a Senior Fellow of the Harvard Program on Corporate Governance. From 2006 to 2019, Mr. Strine served as the special judicial consultant to the ABA's Committee on Corporate Laws. He also was the special judicial consultant to the ABA's Committee on Mergers & Acquisitions from 2014 to 2019. He is a member of the American Law Institute.Mr. Strine speaks and writes frequently on the subjects of corporate and public law, and particularly the impact of business on society, and his articles have been published in The University of Chicago Law Review, Columbia Law Review, Cornell Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Harvard Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and Stanford Law Review, among others.  On several occasions, his articles were selected as among the Best Corporate and Securities Articles of the year, based on the choices of law professors.Before becoming a judge in 1998,  Mr. Strine served as Counsel and Policy Director to Governor Thomas R. Carper, and had also worked as a corporate litigator at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom from 1990 to 1992.  He was law clerk to Judge Walter K. Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and Chief Judge John F. Gerry of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.  Mr. Strine graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law Sc

Daf Yummy épisode 1199. Bava Batra 41 : An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments. by Myriam Ackermann Sommer

In previous episodes, we have looked at some of the best arguments for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In this three-part series, we look at bad arguments for the resurrection and why you should not use them. Please have a listen, and we hope you will enjoy it! Find out more information at: https://truthinmydays.com/ Follow the Truth in My Days Apologetics Program on all social platforms: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/truthinmydays/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthInMyDays MeWe: https://mewe.com/p/truthinmydays Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4QnkYOIO91RWIGR6KPKoYc Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/truth-in-my-days-lets-defend-christianity/id1570747696 Google Podcast: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy81NzIyNTM4OC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw Anchor: https://anchor.fm/john-tors Breaker: https://www.breaker.audio/truth-in-my-days-lets-defend-christianity Pocket Cast: https://pca.st/licr8nad

In today's conversation, I want to share some of the bad arguments I have heard for not attending church. Specifically, the church isn't a building, and the NT church didn't meet in a building. I'd love to hear your thoughts. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thispoorpastor/support

This episode of the Performance Initiative Podcast features an in-depth conversation with Jake Julius from  @rattlesnaketv . This podcast delves into various aspects of Julius' life, including his personal journey, transformation, and career shifts. Key themes include the influence of boxing and a boxing coach in Julius' life, his ideological shifts, views on COVID-19's impact, and the role of alternative media. Julius discusses his approach to breaking down debates, the importance of understanding both sides, and the role of logical fallacies. The conversation also touches upon his spiritual journey and views on politics and religion. Additionally, the podcast explores the importance of charisma in debates, the role of non-verbal communication, and various tactics used in debates. Julius shares insights on finding objective information and his perspective on freedom in Western countries. The podcast provides a comprehensive look at Julius' life, opinions, and methodologies in understanding complex debates and political issues.Jake Julius is the founder of RattlesnakeTV, a dynamic and engaging platform that focuses on a wide range of contemporary and controversial topics. It delves into issues related to culture, current events, geopolitics, and masculinity, adopting a fearless and often humorous approach. The channel showcases content that is both thought-provoking and research-backed, offering insights into complex issues. RattlesnakeTV features various mediums of communication, including a YouTube channel and the locals platform for uncensored discussions. RattlesnakeTV is dedicated to offering its audience an opportunity to explore and discuss these crucial topics in an open and unfiltered manner.(00:00) Introduction and Podcast Goals(00:57) Guest Introduction: Jake Julius(01:42) Jake's Personal Journey and Transformation(02:53) Jake's Early Life and Challenges(03:22) Jake's Journey to Self-Improvement and Boxing(06:40) Jake's Career Shift and Podcasting Journey(07:58) Jake's Interest in Politics and Ideological Shift(09:42) Jake's Views on COVID-19 Impact and Australian Culture(14:46) Jake's Future Aspirations for Rattlesnake TV(16:01) Jake's Spiritual Journey and Influence on Politics(19:22) Jake's Views on Debating and Effective Debaters(23:03) The Role of Charisma and Body Language in Debates(33:53) Analyzing Malcolm Gladwell's Debate Tactics(36:42) Understanding Non-Verbal Techniques for Confidence and Assertiveness(36:56) The Power of the Predator Gaze(39:10) The Art of Staying Relaxed and In Control(41:29) The Importance of Being Large and In Charge(43:35) The Role of Debates in Shaping Public Opinion(49:37) The State of Freedom in Western Countries(54:07) The Challenge of Finding Objective Information(01:01:09) The Shift from Liberal to Conservative Views with Age(01:02:45) The Importance of Competence over Diversity in Building Societies(01:03:24) Closing Remarks https://rattlesnaketv.com/Performance Initiative Social & WebsiteWebsite: https://www.performanceinitiativepodcast.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/performanceinitiativeTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@performanceinitiative

Scott discusses the China/Taiwan issue, a little bit about Ukraine, his forthcoming book, and a specific thing we can all do for the cause. Libertarian Institute fundraising drive:  

In this episode Trent examines some of the arguments atheist Bible scholar Bart Ehrman makes against the Bible presented in recent interviews on various atheist podcasts.

In this episode, we explore the fascinating world of argumentation and the impact it has on our lives. From the way politicians and public figures communicate to the strategies health coaches use to motivate their clients, arguments are everywhere. But are we really listening and thinking critically about the arguments we encounter, or are we relying on emotional appeals and intellectual laziness? We discuss the benefits of seeking truth through argumentation, the importance of being skeptical and vigilant, and the role of education and propaganda in shaping our beliefs. We also explore specific examples of bad arguments, from the flat Earth theory to eugenics. Finally, we offer practical tips for improving your own argumentation skills, from challenging your own beliefs to active listening and seeking out diverse perspectives. Whether you're a student, professional, or just a curious person who wants to navigate the world of communication more effectively, this episode has something for everyone. So join us as we explore the power of argumentation and the importance of seeking truth in a world filled with noise and confusion.

Audio Article - Bad Arguments for Abortion. To read this article online, visit www.remnantresources.org. Remnant was founded in 2020 as a center for Biblical contribution and leadership resources. We seek to provide clarity and truth on theological and cultural topics/issues, all from a Biblical standpoint. We believe in the inerrant, inspired Word of God, and all content produced therein exists from a Christian worldview. The world is starving for truth; Remnant is just one voice among many providing solid reasons for what we believe and why we believe it.

Does an all-knowing God make free will an illusion? Since heaven is without sadness, does mean that we won't be ourselves? These two arguments were put forth in posts that students sent my way. Let's work through these bad arguments and learn to think well.

In this week's episode, we respond to an email we received about Prosperity Theology, specifically D&C 130:20-21. We also discuss current apostate movements that claim Brigham Young has led the Church astray and Joseph Smith never practiced polygamy. We talk about a meme sent by a listener that claims Brigham Young changed Joseph Smith's journal to justify polygamy. The links below take you to Joseph Smith's original journal entry and the Church History record that references Joseph Smith's journal. We also discuss that if the intention of the Church is to hide Joseph Smith's original journal they are doing a terrible job of it by posting it on a freely accessible website.  Joseph's journal entry https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/journal-december-1842-june-1844-book-3-15-july-1843-29-february-1844/123 History of Church version https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1838-1856-volume-e-1-1-july-1843-30-april-1844/118 Please visit our website at www.standardoftruth.com If you have any questions or possible topics of discussion for upcoming podcasts, please email us at: questions@standardoftruthpodcast.com

In this episode, Sean Ríos goes into detail about arguments and how to spot bad arguments. He argues that without proper preparation, each of us is capable of making a flawed argument. After listening to the entire podcast, you'll pick up the necessary tools for making a strong argument. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/royaltalk2020/support

This week, Michael and Nathan discuss terrible arguments that have been made against student loan forgiveness. Then they use the carried interest loophole as a case study of corruption in the US. Finally they discuss euthanasia in Canada.

Apologetics without evangelism leaves the task unfinished. Evangelism without apologetics risks a shallow approach to a very deep process. Andy Bannister helps us weave the two together. Recommended Resources: https://www.andybannister.net https://www.solas-cpc.org The Atheist Who Didn't Exist: Or the Dreadful Consequences of Bad Arguments by Andy Bannister

Abortion is no longer the topic and a Congressional hearing shows why Democrats have decided to jump into the racist ring again. And the tantrum the women's national soccer team has been throwing for the last five years has finally hit pay dirt.     Follow me on Twitter @RunninFewl Follow me on Rumble @DumbAssesTalkingPolitics Download or listen to my podcast on Apple Podcasts, Podbean, Podcast Addict, Stitcher and Rumble. Show notes and blog can be found on: http://www.dumbassestalkingpolitics.com   Please Subscribe, Like and Comment!

BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE, you have got to check out this link. I didn't spot it until after writing my script, and it's probably a good thing that I didn't, or this would have morphed into a seven-episode series: https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/proabortion-slogans-and-how-to-handle-them-9553 Ok, as promised in the episode, here's some of the cutting-room-floor text as well as some helpful links. CUTTING ROOM FLOOR: Another argument states that babies aren't actually living people with human rights because they're not “viable.” This one is weak. Babies aren't even “viable” long after they're born! Those with severe cerebral palsy or advanced muscular dystrophy aren't “viable” for their whole lives! On the topic, many state that since the baby isn't sentient until a certain amount of weeks, it's morally acceptable to dismember or otherwise terminate the baby's life until it is sentient and can tell what's going on and/or feel pain. Barring the notion that people in comas are also not sentient, it nonetheless remains morally unacceptable due to the fact that babies are indeed sentient even as early as 12 weeks and can feel pain as early as 8 weeks. Many (such as popular pro-abortion activist Katha Pollitt) say that although modern translations of Exodus 21:22–23 confer a financial penalty for an early delivery of a child due to abuse at the hands of an offender (see this link for more on that: https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-life/the-bible-say-about-abortion.html), Katha and many, many others like her hold that the earliest Rabbinical traditions state that there was a fine for miscarriage, not pre-term birth, thus indicating that since the death penalty wasn't carried out for the miscarriage, the unborn child was seen as less than human. Well, that would be all well and good, except for these pesky little things called historical documents. The famed historian Josephus, writing in the very first century (two thousand years ago), was fully aware that the Torah forbade abortions and stated clearly as much in his writings. Another early source which contradicts this is a first-century document called the Didache, which was a sort of church instruction manual written by Christians who knew their Torah inside and out. In it, it states “thou shalt not murder a child by abortion nor kill them when born.” Furthermore, the Letter of Barnabas, a second-century work, states “You shall not abort a child nor, again, commit infanticide.” Oh, and there's no word for “fetus” in the Bible because the Greek word “brephos” is used in the Bible to refer to both an unborn child and an infant. There's no distinction, and such a distinction is actually quite novel. So tell me again how opposition to abortion is some new idea, Miss Pollitt? In 2014, the same lady went on record as saying the following: “[Jewish tradition] does not have the concept of the personhood of the fetus (much less the embryo or fertilized egg). In Jewish law, you become a person when you draw your first breath.” So let's address that one, too. First, most arguments in this realm enter weird territory pretty quick, going so far as to include Ezekiel's vision in the valley of dry bones or Adam having received the breath of life as some sort of prescriptive argument for when life begins. It's wildly outlandish. But for what it's worth, it's really popular to make the claim that life doesn't begin until the first breath. But is this what the Bible teaches? No. Here's a link for more on this: https://www.str.org/w/does-bible-teach-life-begins-first-breath. Source on statistics of reasons for abortions: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html Lastly, here's a really, really cool page that very fairly shows arguments for and against abortion: https://abortion.procon.org/

BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE, you have got to check out this link. I didn't spot it until after writing my script, and it's probably a good thing that I didn't, or this would have morphed into a seven-episode series: https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/proabortion-slogans-and-how-to-handle-them-9553 Ok, as promised in the episode, here's some of the cutting-room-floor text as well as some helpful links. CUTTING ROOM FLOOR: Another argument states that babies aren't actually living people with human rights because they're not “viable.” This one is weak. Babies aren't even “viable” long after they're born! Those with severe cerebral palsy or advanced muscular dystrophy aren't “viable” for their whole lives! On the topic, many state that since the baby isn't sentient until a certain amount of weeks, it's morally acceptable to dismember or otherwise terminate the baby's life until it is sentient and can tell what's going on and/or feel pain. Barring the notion that people in comas are also not sentient, it nonetheless remains morally unacceptable due to the fact that babies are indeed sentient even as early as 12 weeks and can feel pain as early as 8 weeks. Many (such as popular pro-abortion activist Katha Pollitt) say that although modern translations of Exodus 21:22–23 confer a financial penalty for an early delivery of a child due to abuse at the hands of an offender (see this link for more on that: https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-life/the-bible-say-about-abortion.html), Katha and many, many others like her hold that the earliest Rabbinical traditions state that there was a fine for miscarriage, not pre-term birth, thus indicating that since the death penalty wasn't carried out for the miscarriage, the unborn child was seen as less than human. Well, that would be all well and good, except for these pesky little things called historical documents. The famed historian Josephus, writing in the very first century (two thousand years ago), was fully aware that the Torah forbade abortions and stated clearly as much in his writings. Another early source which contradicts this is a first-century document called the Didache, which was a sort of church instruction manual written by Christians who knew their Torah inside and out. In it, it states “thou shalt not murder a child by abortion nor kill them when born.” Furthermore, the Letter of Barnabas, a second-century work, states “You shall not abort a child nor, again, commit infanticide.” Oh, and there's no word for “fetus” in the Bible because the Greek word “brephos” is used in the Bible to refer to both an unborn child and an infant. There's no distinction, and such a distinction is actually quite novel. So tell me again how opposition to abortion is some new idea, Miss Pollitt? In 2014, the same lady went on record as saying the following: “[Jewish tradition] does not have the concept of the personhood of the fetus (much less the embryo or fertilized egg). In Jewish law, you become a person when you draw your first breath.” So let's address that one, too. First, most arguments in this realm enter weird territory pretty quick, going so far as to include Ezekiel's vision in the valley of dry bones or Adam having received the breath of life as some sort of prescriptive argument for when life begins. It's wildly outlandish. But for what it's worth, it's really popular to make the claim that life doesn't begin until the first breath. But is this what the Bible teaches? No. Here's a link for more on this: https://www.str.org/w/does-bible-teach-life-begins-first-breath. Source on statistics of reasons for abortions: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html Lastly, here's a really, really cool page that very fairly shows arguments for and against abortion: https://abortion.procon.org/

In today's episode, I identify a new group of people that I will call the new classical theists. They are like new atheists in that they have a lot of strong rhetoric, but very little by way of cogent arguments. First, I offer a brief discussion on models of God. Then I consider different claims from people like Edward Feser, Thomas Weinandy, Gerald Bray, and Matthew Barrett. I articulate their arguments against neoclassical theism. I explain why their arguments are not solid critiques of neoclassical theism. One of the major problems is that nothing they say remotely resembles neoclassical theism or any serious model of God. Credits Host: R.T. Mullins (PhD, University of St Andrews) is a senior fellow at the Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki. Scientific Adviser and Show Manager: Ema Sani (PhD, University of Glasgow) is a postdoctoral fellow in biology at the University of Edinburgh. Music by Rockandmetal_domination – Raising-questions. We Butter the Bread with Butter--Jump n' Run. Burn it Down--Kill Their Idols. rtmullins.com Support the Show: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=66431474 https://ko-fi.com/rtmullins

If our economy "cares only about profit," the results will be X, Y, and Z. We've heard this over and over again. I take on this and a bunch of related complaints today.

Hi Res Audio isn't all it's cracked up to be. That's what all the blind listening tests seem to indicate anyway. But when Justin Colletti says this, he gets pushback from some people. What are their arguments and what does he have to say about them? In this episode Justin talks about super high resolution audio, like 24/192k, 24/96, and consumer formats including 320kbps and 256kbps mp3, 16/44.1k WAV files and more, and the most common arguments for and against each. ►Get Mixing Breakthroughs here: https://mixingbreakthroughs.com ►Get Mastering Demystified here: https://MasteringDemystified.com ►Get the free mastering workshop: https://sonicscoop.com/Mastering101 ►Get the free mixing workshop: https://sonicscoop.com/MixHabits

In this episode Trent reveals three bad ways to answer mythicism, or the view that Jesus never existed.

It's important for Christians to arrive at the right conclusions and to be able to defend how they got there. A big part of that is not using logical fallacies, and recognizing them when they are used against us. This video identifies five very common logical fallacies that are probably familiar to most Christians, and gives some examples of how they are often used. This is meant to provide the average Christian with some basic tools to utilize in looking out for bad argumentation, whether it's being used by themselves, other Christians, or someone arguing against their beliefs. We want to call out logical fallacies when we see them and replace them with sound arguments for why we believe what we believe.

Since we discuss them so often on the show, it's really only logical that Matt should formally (and informally) talk about what constitutes a logical fallacy and why they're important. Levi teaches us the ins and outs of figs and the depressing life of some wasps, while Sam breaks the news that bone broth may not be all it's cracked up to. Logical Fallacies "Book of Bad Arguments" by Ali Almossawi (Also a book) https://bookofbadarguments.com/ "Logically Fallacious" by Bo Bennett (Also a book) https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/ Other Notes "Drinking Bone Broth - Is it Beneficial or Just a Fad?" by Conor Kerley https://nutritionstudies.org/drinking-bone-broth-is-it-beneficial-or-just-a-fad/  

We begin this episode of DXP by introducing our Summer 2021 Playlist, after which we hear from a listener who ironically faults us for repeating ourselves. We share an update about the Well & Table, and then we hear a bunch of jokes about cheese from someone who ought to know. “Dick Move, God” makes a comeback, and then we hear from a listener who ironically faults us for repeating ourselves. We break down some bad arguments about Christianity, and then share biebers involving ATM fees and auto-correct.

In previous episodes, we have looked at some of the best arguments for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In this three-part series, we look at bad arguments for the resurrection and why you should not use them. Please have a listen, and we hope you will enjoy it! Follow the Truth In My Days Apologetics Program on all social platforms: MeWe: https://mewe.com/p/truthinmydays Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_truthinmydays/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthInMyDays YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqAhZo9ktzvnWGYDZfixcdQ Find out more information at: https://truthinmydays.com/

In previous episodes, we have looked at some of the best arguments for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In this three-part series, we look at bad arguments for the resurrection and why you should not use them. Please have a listen, and we hope you will enjoy it! Follow the Truth In My Days Apologetics Program on all social platforms: MeWe: https://mewe.com/p/truthinmydays Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_truthinmydays/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthInMyDays YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqAhZo9ktzvnWGYDZfixcdQ Find out more information at: https://truthinmydays.com/

In previous episodes, we have looked at some of the best arguments for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In this 3-part series, we look at bad arguments for the resurrection and why you should not use them, in this podcast. Please have a listen, and we hope you will enjoy it! Follow The Truth In My Days Apologetics Program on all social platforms: MeWe: https://mewe.com/p/truthinmydays Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_truthinmydays/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TruthInMyDays YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqAhZo9ktzvnWGYDZfixcdQ Find out more information at: https://truthinmydays.com/

Let's be honest - who wants to have kids these days? Having kids means your life is OVER. Or is it? In this episode, the guys discuss why the arguments against having kids made in this article: https://www.businessinsider.com/why-people-should-not-have-children-2017-11 are poor at best. Facebook.com/dadsdiapersdrinks Email: dadsdiapersdrinks@gmail.com --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/dadsdiapersdrinks/support

This episode is also available as a blog post: http://donnyferguson.com/2017/04/13/5-bad-arguments-for-public-infrastructure-spending/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/donny-ferguson/message

Today we do some analysis of bad arguments from John Cusack to James Lindsay. We focus primarily on the arguments put forth by James Lindsay in a recent appearance he made on The Rubin Report. We also go into criticism and understanding that no matter what position you take, it is likely that you will take some flak.  Email me.  jackrabournrules@gmail.com 

We deconstruct Destiny's arguments against socialism, sort out the theoretical and empirical elements, and look at some contemporary issues that support a socialist analysis. -- Watch live at https://www.twitch.tv/moondoughcorp

This episode is also available as a blog post: http://donnyferguson.com/2021/05/17/how-anti%e2%80%90%e2%80%8bimmigrant-and-anti%e2%80%90%e2%80%8bgun-advocates-make-the-same-bad-arguments/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/donny-ferguson/message

Today we examine a tiktok video in which a woman poses the argument that you are Fatphobic. We go through it beat by beat and figure out why this lady is totally wrong, and we learn how we can help others by trying to connect with them by listening.  Email me.  jackrabournrules@gmail.com 

Broadcasted live on Twitch -- Watch live at https://www.twitch.tv/moondoughcorp

As western culture moves further into a "post-Christian" era, there will be various arguments made against our faith. Some arguments are better than others. In this episode Pastor Zac and Pastor Mark address some of the weaker arguments against the orthodox, historic Christian faith. Music Provided With Permission by Jonathan Ogden - https://amzn.to/2DTw5rj

"In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken," and then they actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that has happened in politics or religion."  -Karl Sagan A professor at Cypress College in California berated her student for a pro-police view.  She said some nonsense -- and I mean real nonsense since it was false but had it been true it wouldn't have meant anything. It got me thinking about dumb arguments I hear both for good and for bad things. For example, a BLM supporter once murdered five Dallas police officers.  But this is not a good argument that BLM is evil.  No organization is accurately defined by its worst element. “Mudslinging - In politics, anything bad the opponent says about our candidate; in contrast, when our candidate does this, it is called 'making a good point.”  –Richard Turner

Some of the most popular and “formidable” arguments against Christianity today are actually bad arguments. Listen as Greg Koukl addresses some of the most popular arguments against Christianity and explains their error and how to answer these challenges.

Some of the most popular and “formidable” arguments against Christianity today are actually bad arguments. Listen as Greg Koukl addresses some of the most popular arguments against Christianity and explains their error and how to answer these challenges.

People in rebellion against God often make bad arguments against Christianity. However, it takes skill and insight to identify and answer such challenges. Listen as Greg Koukl explains some of the most popular arguments against Christianity and how to answer them.

People in rebellion against God often make bad arguments against Christianity. However, it takes skill and insight to identify and answer such challenges. Listen as Greg Koukl explains some of the most popular arguments against Christianity and how to answer them.

Subscribe Here: https://www.youtube.com/c/thebeginningofwisdom Here in Part 2 reviewing Justin Best's arguments against Paul, we dispense with the stuff that is blatantly false or just made up, moving to the more serious arguments later. Support: https://www.subscribestar.com/beginningofwisdom Donate: paypal.me/schumachermedia Ministry Resources List: https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/1V2T852DNUWIO/ref=nav_wishlist_lists_2?_encoding=UTF8&type=wishlist Ministry website: https://www.beginningwisdom.org Sign up for Email updates for a free Ebook: The Biblical Trinity Subscribe to the Podcast! https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-beginning-of-wisdom/id1496899207 Social: Andrew Twitter: @beginningwisdom https://twitter.com/Beginningwisdom Facebook: @bwapologetics https://www.facebook.com/bwapologetics Minds: https://www.minds.com/beginningofwisdom Gab: https://gab.com/Beginningofwisdom Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/JTb2XFr9bN5j/ My gear: Microphone: Blue Snowball USB Microphone https://amzn.to/2H1psmH Cameras: iPhone 7 facetime camera https://amzn.to/2XHbbkq Logitech C920s https://amzn.to/2HTgcAC Computer: Mac Mini: https://amzn.to/2XDAJyy Editing headphones: https://amzn.to/2H42wDf Favorite Books The Forgotten Trinity by Dr. James White https://amzn.to/2H1psmH The Unseen Realm by Michael Heiser https://amzn.to/2WuEpkK Citations: Justin Best's video, 50 Reasons to Never Quote Paul Again Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BPFa9NXzy0 Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGP61qmnnsE --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/beginningofwisdom/message

Andy Bannister on how life's biggest questions are not just abstract, but deeply personal. --- "I think the gospel has something to say in every area of life. Christianity is a public truth. One of the mistakes Christians make is answering yesterday's truth. One way to address this is to do a lot more listening and a lot less talking." In the West, it's safe to say that there are many obstacles that come between people and taking faith seriously. There's the idea that science holds the answer to all things; that religion is the cause of all wars; that all religions are the same. "It's far more respectful to my Muslim friends to recognise that what they believe is different, and to take the effort to understand those differences, and not to assume they're just like me." Andy Bannister is the Director of Solas Centre for Public Christianity in the UK, and author of the book The Atheist Who Didn't Exist: Or, The Dreadful Consequences of Bad Arguments. He's dedicated the better part of his life to encouraging people to consider faith, to think carefully and seriously about it. In this conversation we talk about life's big questions; some of the key differences between Islam and Christianity; and what Christian faith has to offer our culture that might be worthwhile. "The reason I treated you with respect and dignity was because I believe you're a person made in the image of God and that your life bears incredible value and dignity. You, on the other hand, have told me three times during our lunch that you believe human beings are nothing more than atoms and particles - nothing more than biology. But you haven't treated me as a person made of atoms and particles, you've actually treated me as a person made in the image of God. You've treated me on the basis of my worldview, not yours. I'm very grateful for that." --- SUBSCRIBE to Life & Faith on Apple Podcasts: www.bit.ly/cpxpodcast