Legally, Dirty, Blonde.

We've got a lot to catch up on with weeks two and three of testimony in the prosecution's case. We hear a lot about guns, ammunition and cell phone data. We hear from a lot of the people Alex Murdaugh screwed over financially and so does the jury. We have some key witness testimony from two prosecution witnesses who worked for and knew the Murdaugh's intimately. If you don't have time to watch 8 hours a day of testimony you've come to the right place because I did it for you.Don't forget to like, share, subscribe and leave a review or rating if you're feeling generous.I'll be on joining Rekieta Law on Tuesday February 14th for some of the live stream and you can check that out at the link below. If you aren't already subscribed to his YouTube channel what are you doing? https://youtube.com/@RekietaLawTwitter: @LDBlondePodIG: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

This week we are back to talk about the Alex Murdaugh double homicide trial. We get into the openings statements and first witnesses for the prosecution's case. It has been a while and I am really happy to be back with everyone. Please like, subscribe and share, and most importantly dont forget to check out The Legal Mindset and Rekieta Law on YouTube this week for the streams I'll be a guest for and just always because they're awesome channels and awesome lawyers. https://youtube.com/@LegalMindsethttps://youtube.com/@RekietaLawContact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

WELCOME BACK I'm sorry its been so long but we are back with a very important episode.  Today we are getting into the controversial owner of bot sentinel - Chris Bouzy and how he has somehow decided it is a good idea to go after the lawtubers. Specifically Nate the Lawyer.  We're talking about bankruptcy fraud (allegedly) and the defamation case Nate the Lawyer is bringing against Mr. Bouzy.  Here's hoping Mr. Bouzy doesn't come after me and try to ban me from twitter like he did some other people today. nate the lawyer re: explaining clipped video: https://youtu.be/_IPC0a2YKz8Good Lawgic Video re: text thread about landlord: https://youtu.be/hRE8eosnGsALegal Mindset Video re: Nate v Bouzy: https://youtu.be/moNQcEnSyl4Runkle' s Video re: Bouzy misquotes TUG: https://youtu.be/XmPqFBBow24Nate The Lawyer's Site with Bouzy Documents: https://natethelawyer.locals.com/post/2794293/bouzy-bankruptcy-complaint-bot-sentinelRolling Stone: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/youtube-hate-speech-targeted-harassment-study-bot-sentinel-1234590813/amp/Washington Post article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/18/you-tube-mysogyny-women-hate/Bot Sentinel report: https://botsentinel.com/reports/documents/youtube/report-09-13-22.pdfCash App: https://cash.app/$LegallyDirtyBlondeTwitter: LDBlondepodIG: LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

As promised, we have Unsealed Episode 2.  This is the tea…this is the spice. The one you've all been waiting for.  We get into the motions in limine that were made right before the trial began & discuss all the evidence the parties wanted excluded at trial and why. We'll talk about what we think the judge decided since we don't have that order. We also talk about how the MSM specifically the Daily Beast article is totally out of context uninformed biased nonsense. There is a whole of of information to point to that shows just how shady Amber's lawyers were and all the shady evidence she wanted to exclude too. We also talk about how the AH supporters apparently don't understand what feminism is & how they better leave Britney Spears alone.Again linking below to the unsealed documents thanks to Andrea, the website with the Judge's Orders from Fairfax county website, and to the cash app (basically another type of Venmo link for creators) where you can show support for the show.  New links are the houseinhabit article about the Silicon Valley sex parties and AHs connection to them.  Links:Andrea's Social Media: @aburkhartlaw (Andrea's Twitter) Andreas YouTube : https://m.youtube.com/c/aburkhartlawAll of The Unsealed Documents Thanks. To Andreahttps://andreaburkhart.com/documentsLink to Fairfax Court Website for Judge's Ordershttps://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-casesHouseinhabit Article about Heard's connection to Silicon Valley sex parties & black mail on Elon Musk https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/eyes-wide-shut-creepfest-houseinhabit-substack-alleged-amber-heard-parties-goes-viralCash App Link to Show Some Love & Help Support LDB (its like a Venmo)https://cash.app/$LegallyDirtyBlondePlease don't hesitate to reach out to me on social or via email and let me know what you think about the show & with any other trials you would be interested in hearing about.  I love to hear from my listeners.Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

LDB is back for the Unsealed Episodes.  This is part one and today we're talking about the beginning of the recently unsealed court documents.  Those include the Psych IME motions, the multiple motions to compel that were made during the pre trial period, and the motion for sanctions the sassy Ben Chew made because Elaine violated the protective order.  The lawyers were not pleased with each other during pretrial (or trial for that matter).Links below for Andrea's unsealed documents website where you can read them all yourself, the Fairfax county website with the judge's orders and the cash app (its the same as Venmo) if you're feeling generous and want to support the show.  You guys have been amazing & so incredibly supportive I want to thank everyone for making LDB happen because I truly couldn't have done it without you. Links:Andrea's Social Media: @aburkhartlaw (Andrea's Twitter) Andreas YouTube : https://m.youtube.com/c/aburkhartlawAll of The Unsealed Documents Thanks. To Andreahttps://andreaburkhart.com/documentsLink to Fairfax Court Website for Judge's Ordershttps://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-casesCash App Link to Show Some Love https://cash.app/$LegallyDirtyBlondeReach out to the show on social media and let me know what you think and what other trials you would want to hear about!Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

It's safe to say I wasn't a fan of this interview.  I'm bothered and ranting and you're going to learn about free speech and why using the phrase “you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre” doesnt make the point you think it does and also why it pisses me off beyond belief. Come join me as we dismantle the crap Amber Heard spewed during her dateline special with Savannah Guthrie.  We also discuss how her appeals process will work & how  she has no shot at winning her appeal. At the end we get into some research from a fellow podcaster and from a book by a lawyer and social worker, Bill Eddy called: Splitting: Protecting Yourself While Divorcing Someone with Borderline Or Narcissistic Personality Disorder.  A link to buy the book is below. If you want to show LDP some love you can contribute through the cash app link here:https://cash.app/$LegallyDirtyBlondeLinks for episode  Splitting by Bill Eddy https://www.amazon.com/Splitting-Protecting-Borderline-Narcissistic-Personality/dp/1608820254/ref=nodl_?dplnkId=421fc360-4d4f-4956-85e4-a450d2748e6cGreat legal article on “fire in a crowded theatre” also @popehat on twitter https://www.popehat.com/2012/09/19/three-generations-of-a-hackneyed-apologia-for-censorship-are-enough/All of The Audios - specifically in this episode I referenced the morning after the incident in Australia - give it a listen. https://youtube.com/channel/UCg0C-N_MPYYOXyF4T3jMxNQThis is the Wiki for the SCOTUS case re: fire in a theaterhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_StatesI forgot to mention this in the show and I hope you see this because this Reddit is great.  It points out all the lies she told on the stand. https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeForJohnnyDepp/comments/vfe1s7/in_your_opinion_what_is_the_most_ridiculous_lie/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmfSupport the show

Since the verdict things have been pretty crazy.  The main stream media is telling us not to believe our own eyes.  It's one of the most bizarre things I have ever seen. Today we are talking about the MSM & how survivors are reacting to being gaslit, were debunking the arguments about the verdict being “wrong”  & “bad for women & survivors”  Then things get more fun we get into Elaine's press tour of lies.  Then we get really spicy because didnt you hear? Jason Momoa testified for AH according to the LA Times. WaPo calls independent outlets covering the trial “misinformation” and LawTube fights back.  Dr. Spiegel makes a return & did you guys know that Captain Jack Sparrow is a racist?! Yup.  According to a Professor at Stanford.Thanks to you guys I was asked to take part of the monetization beta trial! You are amazing. The cash app is linked if you want to keep supporting LDB with a small donation. https://cash.app/$LegallyDirtyBlondeContact:Twitter:LDBlondePodIG: LegallydirtyblondepodGmail: legallydirtyblondepodToday show :https://youtu.be/G5UBoIdoZpACBS Morning Show https://youtu.be/2PNh4L6gHGgArticles:Article 1: LA times article (this is with the edit - check out my IG highlight depp v heard 3 to see the uncorrected page of the article referencing Momoa)   https://web.archive.org/web/20220604032157/https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2022-06-01/bad-and-dangerous-what-johnny-depps-victory-meansArticle 2: Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/02/johnny-depp-trial-creators-influencers/LEGALBYTES YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/LegalBytesMediaIG/Twitter: @legalbytesmediaHOEGLAWYouTube:https://youtube.com/c/HoegLawTwitter: @HoegLawArticle 3: By Joyce Maynard https://www.oprahdaily.com/entertainment/books/a40167619/depp-heard-trial-maynard/Article 4: An independent outlet  http://www.eviemagazine.com/post/the-only-one-setting-back-abuse-survivors-is-amber-heard-media-propped-her-upArticle 5: Spiegel https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386?amp=1Support the show

I don't need to say much because you guys know what's up - the jury verdict is in and Johnny has clearly been declared the winner. Today we're gonna talk about the verdict, compensatory and punitive damages and what to expect going forward with this legal case and specifically with appeals After that I answer some of your legal questions about the verdict and basically about what all this legal & law mumbo jumbo really means. Don't worry it won't be our last Johnny episode together because I still have a lot more to say so stay tuned and if you have a minute please leave the show a rating and review if you're enjoying it!I appreciate all you guys you're seriously the best and you rock. Let's keep LDB going with another trial! Let me know any ideas you have & don't be a stranger Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

I genuinely cannot believe we've almost reached the end of our legal journey through the defamation trial of Depp v Heard.  Today Johnny's finishes his rebuttal, then Amber finishes her sur rebuttal and we get to the close of evidence & testimony. Just like we saw Johnny retake the stand yesterday today we saw Amber do the same.  Let's just say that Queen Camille is back and she is not playing around.  And I am here for it.If you're enjoying the show please give a rating a little love note in the review section.  I love hearing from you guys and would love to hear any other legal cases you would want covered, even if they aren't being televised.You guys rock thank you for helping LDB reach over 12,000 downloads this month.  It's been an amazing ride and I am so grateful for all the support. Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

Wow guys I really can't believe we've been together for almost a full 6 weeks now - this trial has been a doozy and I am so happy to have you all along for the legal law analysis ride.Amber Heard rested her case on Tuesday morning in Court and from then on it was Johnny's Rebuttal case.  So the last two days have been all Johnny rebutting her testimony with his own and with her witnesses.  On Tuesday we heard from Walter Hamada, the head of DC productions at Warner Bros.  After Mr. Hamada we heard from Dr. Kulber who was Johnny's hand surgeon for his finger.  Then we heard from three of Johnny's experts we had already heard from - Mr. Hollywood aka Richard Marks, Mr. Spindler and Mr. Bania - they were there to say hey everything that lady said yesterday was a joke.  After them we had a true rebuttal witness Mr. Night who was the owner of the Hicksville Trailer Palace - and guys when i say this place looks dope I truly mean it and you should check it out at the link below.  After him we heard from a real ethical psychiatrist Dr. Richard Shaw who rebutted all that crazy doctor Spiegel said yesterday.  And lastly we had the pre-recorded deposition of Jennifer Howell which was somewhat anticlimactic.  Oh and we heard about how Amber didn't actually donate 3.5 million to the Los Angeles Children's Hospital - shocking i know., On Day 22, or Wednesday we heard from 6 more witnesses including Johnny himself.  First we got to hear from the infamous super model Ms. Kate Moss herself and Ms. Moss you look amazing.  What it is your trick is please keep it up.  Then we brought back Dr. Curry to rebut Dr. Hughes testimony.  After Dr. Curry Johnny retook the stand and Rottenborn was the one to cross examine.For the second half of the day we heard from a prior employee of TMZ who had some super hot tea about who told them about the TRO and to be there for pictures and who leaked them that video of JD in the kitchen assaulting cabinets.  Our last two witnesses of the day were Mr. Neumeister who spoke to the metadata issues with Amber's photos.  Last but certainly not least we heard from an employee at the Washington Airport who witnessed Amber Heard assault her former partner and even tried to interject.  A very concise together and well strategized rebuttal so far.  We will see what more we get tomorrow and then we'll be at closing arguments on Friday so stay tuned.Also to all the lovely listeners if you have any other upcoming cases you think are worth covering even if they arent being televised please let me know! Thats what I am doing here and I would love to cover what interests people.If you're enjoying the show please give a rating and a review if you have a minute it means the world to me!Link to Hicksville Trailer Palace:https://www.hicksvillepalace.com/Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

Today we get into what is likely the full final day of Amber Heard's case in this defamation trial we've just entered out 6th week of in Fairfax, Virginia.  We do some legal analysis of her experts and criticize some of their lack of knowledge of the evidence. First we hear from expert orthopedic surgeon Dr. Moore who testified about the causation of how Johnny lost the tip of his finger.  Next we hear from a very angry psychiatrist who also never treated Johnny but he has some really strong opinions on him.  Last we hear from Amber's expert in the Hollywood Biz and her huge damages and Johnny's non-existent damages.This trial is getting closer and closer to its end and Johnny Depp should be starting his rebuttal case and witnesses tomorrow.  If you want to learn a little about the law and how defamation  trials work with celebs then come take a listen.  It's certainly entertaining. If you have a minute and are enjoying the show please consider giving a rating and writing me a little love note in the review section.  You guys seriously rock and it has been awesome getting to know everyone through this trial.Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

Wow we have a lot of trial testimony to get to today guys so I had to condense as much as possible. So on Thursday we heard from 12 witnesses.  Yes you heard that right - 12 - 11 of them were via pre-recorded deposition so you're welcome that I sat through this nap-fest for you. As a lawyer I can promise you this was super boring for even myself. Before we get into this lets heard a huge happy birthday to our favorite and most entertaining trial witness - Isaac Barouch - Have a wonderful born day my guy!So first we heard from Bruce Witkin a former friend and band mate of Johnny's, then we heard from Johnny's former talent agent & his former business manager.  After them we hear from Johnny's lawyer, Adam Waldman (who you may recall is the reason AH is countersuing JD for defamation).  After Mr. Waldman we hear from the LAPD Domestic Violence Coordinator. Amber had an expert on social media and hashtags and fortunately I was hear to listen to the phrase “Amber Turd” get read into a court record #amberturd guys.  To wrap up the dozen witnesses we hear from AH's Pre/Post-nup lawyer, an executive from Disney, the second famous celeb at this trial, Ellen Barkin, Johnny's psychiatrist, the lawyer who reviewed AH's Washington post Op-ed and AH's talent agent.It's even a lot for me to type.  A number of these witnesses were there to try and break down Johnny's damages claims, and others were there to bolster Amber's damages claims.  It was a lot to say the least. But come listen and get yourself caught up for Monday.  Honestly guys this next week should be a real doozy with recalling JD and all the rebuttal we know is going to happen.If you're enjoying the show please give it a rating and review if you have a minute.  It means so much to me to hear from you guys so please keep reaching out with yout questions and awesome comments.  It's really awesome.  I have my contact info below and also dont forget to checkout the links for That Umbrella Guy and Incredibly Average and The Real Laura B which are below too! Links:That Umbrella Guy YouTube Channel https://youtu.be/oiBWeNYCeO0Incredibly Average Brian YouTube Channelhttps://youtu.be/HwKB80xZdusThe Real Laura B - Twitterhttps://twitter.com/laurabockov/status/1527646517946945536?s=21&t=XRGpQ0H8ceU0XesJUkm68wContact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

Sorry in advance for basically screaming today guys. I'm a little cranky - you're girl needs a nap before tomorrows episode.  This trial testimony is so inconsistent that I am actually annoyed today,  I promise - no yelling tomorrow.  Geez I sound like AH. So we hear from a bunch of ambers witnesses Snd we start with IO Tillet Wright. He says he's not friends with AH anymore but we've got questions. He's the one who called the cops on 5/21/16. It's the ex best friend parade. Next we hear from her former BFF Rocky Pennington. She's saying they don't talk anymore too. Why? Because AH punched her in the face. Yet still Rock's testimony helps Amber. Up next is Josh Drew. His depo is from 2019 which is before the LAPD bodycam footage came out. No wonder he wouldn't come back to testify. Yikes. After Josh we get Whitney Heard/Henriquez - Amber's younger sister. She attempts to tell us about the staircase incident and somehow most of us missed it bc the sorry was so different. Also - on cross they set her up for the perfect rebuttal witness that will completely discredit some of her testimony. Melanie Inglesses a friend of AH's but also the makeup artist who did her makeup before the James Cordon show when she claimed she had two black eyes & a broken nose from the night before. Hmm. Last up we have Ms Sexton. This is Ambers acting coach. She tells us how bad Ah struggles with acting crying and we're all like yes we know we saw her trying. These witnesses had a lot of inconsistencies in their statements and in their testimony about the very crucial incidents of abuse that AH is claiming. Contradictions all day. Also And honestly this was the best trial day for Amber and her lawyers. Love hearing from you guys please keep reaching out with any questions or comments or just to say hi. Contact: Twitter @LDBlondePodInstagram @LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: LegallyDirtyBlondePod@gmail.com If you have a minute I would so much appreciate if you could rate the show and if you're feeling really generous leave me a little love note in the review section. Support the show

I am sick and tired people - Sick and tired of listening to Amber Heard be completley unable to tell the truth on the stand. Not gonna lie this episode is a little sloppy because I am super cranky and tired, but wanted to get this out to you guys ASAP.SO today we are finishing up the cross examination of Amber Heard by Johnny's attorney'/Lawyer Camille Vasquez. There is a lot to talk about today and a lot to impeach Miss Heard on so please come take a listen if you want to get caught up before we move onto other witnesses. Cross examination didnt go to well for Heard at this trial.   Amber admits to never seeking medial treatment for her injuries.  She also tells us or lies to us about her drug use.  We get big legal news about the OpEd that is cetnrak to this case.  Also if you want to see that videos of Amber at her divorce decomposition and make a slip about TMZ check out the IG page - I am also putting up the video of her leaving before the judge an d jury today.  Thats a big no no guys.  Either on the story, story highlight or a post. Elaine's re-direct - what a disaster.  Elaine is Amber's lawyer and at this part of the trial it is abundantly clear Elaine and Amber are not besties.  We have some steaming hot tea about this attorney  client  relationship so I think you guys should stay tuned for this one. Oh yeah how could I forget - Elaine does her best Johnny Depp impression and Idont think you'l want to miss that one so come on in,..Contact: Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodGmail: legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

NOTE: I MISSPOKE @ 30 MINS; It should be 5/21/16 incident (I accidentally said 12/15/15. Sorry guys I didn't listen until after I uploaded it & I just want to make sure I'm giving the right info.After a long 10 days we are back at the Depp v Heard defamation trial & Amber Heard is finishing her last day of direct testimony before Elaine turns it over to Camille Vasquez for cross-examination. If you ask me, it seems like Elaine is trying to do some damage control after seeing all the posts the last 10 days pointing out all the weird inconsistencies in Amber's testimony the first two days.  We learn that Amber is now saying she forgot the first abuse incident was actually a year before what she testified to.  Weird.  And this is only one of these blatant contradictions and changes.  Also, it certainly seems like Elaine and Amber chatted over these 10 days.  This is a big no no for her lawyer Elaine. And she knows better. Come listen to find out why. After backtracking some of her prior testimony Amber goes on and details a few remaining incidents including Thanksgiving 2015, her 30th birthday and the infamous bed turd, and then the 5/21/16 incident that finally led to the divorce.We hear Amber's nonsense about why she needed to get this TRO and of course nothing that is bad is ever her fault right? From a legal standpoint I had a lot of problems with her testimony today.  She makes some straight up inaccurate assertions and also keeps proving she has no corroborating evidence til back up her claims.  Honestly she has set herself up to be destroyed on cross examination and i cannot wait.  That episode will be up in just a few minutes too.I LOVE hearing from you guys.  It has truly been an amazing couple weeks hearing from people and I just want you to know how much i really appreciate the support.  Please keep reaching out and if you haven't yet I'll be escorting you after this episode!Contact:Twitter:LDBLondePodInstagram: LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod Support the show

We have arrived at arguably the most important and definitely the most anticipated testimony of the trial - Amber Heard's cross examination.Before I say anymore, can I get a round of applause for Johnny's attorney, Camille Vasquez.  This woman is not only an incredibly intelligent badass lawyer but she also happens to be absolutely beautiful.  She  annihilates Amber on the stand and shows the blatant lies she has told.We only got about 1.5 hours of cross today and if it is any indication of the rest of cross we are in for quite the show.  We get a lot of photos of Amber from times when she should have had very severe injuries and well lets just say things dont go super awesome for Miss Heard today.We also get into those charitable donations she says she made to the ACLU and the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles.  You'll hear a clip played at trial from a 2018 TV appearance where Amber unequivocally tells everyone she has donated the full $7 million from her divorce settlement to charity as promised.  You'll want to hear about this one.I'll be posting many of the exhibits from her direct and her cross on my instagram so definitley check those out so you can see the evidence for yourself.Also guys I have to say, all the feedback and support I've been getting from all of you makes me so  happy.  You guys truly rock and I appreciate all of you.  Please reach out to me with any questions or comments or if you just wanna talk about this case or life in general! I may be a lawyer but I promise I'm not an asshole :)Contact:Twitter: LDBlondePodInstagram: legallydirtyblondepod Gmail: legallydirtyblondepod Support the show

Today we are getting our legal fix while the trial is on hold for the week & if you want to get caught up for cross examination on Monday come hangout.  I'm also answering a lot of questions I got from listeners this week on this episode. So on this episode we talk about a lot of things including the status of the trial going forward including Amber's case presentation & Johnny's rebuttal and what witnesses they're both likely to call.  So if you want to hear the game plan & what to expect going forward you're in the right place. We also talk about some really important audio recordings. Specifically we talk about a long recording that the lawyers on either side have not played for jury.  That is linked here (from incredibly average YouTube) and it is worth the listen - I promise. One more time for the folks in the back - why the UK ruling is not relevant to the US trial - important opinion letter from the VA judge is linked and gives a great explanation.We also discuss the VA laws about IMEs and how that applies to Dr. Curry.  We also get into some legal analysis of possible verdicts in this trial . We talk about inconsistencies in AH testimony and what I think she'll be attacked with on cross examination. Also we love Kate Moss and I'll tell you why.  We get into the statements made my spokespersons from team Depp & team Heard. We're talking about the opinions & thoughts of real abuse survivors on AHs testimony. & I'll say it again - survivors are the real experts and their opinions hold a ton of weight for me and they should for anyone listening. So come hangout and get yourself up to date before the defamation trial of Depp v Heard resumes on Monday May 16 2022 with the cross examination of Amber Heard. If you're enjoying the show & can spare a minute I would love to hear your reviews & if you have any questions don't you dare hesitate to reach out to me - I am so happy to explain these complicated issues.Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondepodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Important LinksIncredibly Average Brian's video of uncensored Australia audio after the finger incident we can hear that AH says she “didnt mean to” hurt JD's finger & we hear Dr. Kipper and Nurse Debbie discussing the incident and its very clear AH did not the sustain the injuries she alleged https://youtu.be/VDP9NVQmiXwJudge Azcarate's Opinion Letter denying AH's pretrial motion to dismiss - this is well written and explains the legal reasons for denying her motion based on the UK ruling in more detail than I went into.  Worth the read! https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/depp-heard-trial-decison-.pdfThis is a link to the Virginia Statute regarding IMEs (independent medical examinations) https://casetext.com/rule/virginia-court-rules/virginia-rules-of-supreme-court/part-four-pretrial-procedures-dispositions-and-production-at-trial/rule-410-physical-and-mental-examination-of-personsThis is a link if you would like to read the judgment from the Judge in the UK trial https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2020/2911.htmlSupport the show

*SKIP THE FIRST 18 MINS IF YOU WANT TO GET RIGHT INTO THE TESTIMONY &  YOU'RE NOT INTERESTED IN CAMILLE'S EPIC DAY OF HEARSAY OBJECTIONS **TRIGGER WARNING: Sexual abuse, domestic violence and physical absue are discussed in graphic detail so if that's not something you want to hear about (and believe me it made me feel physically ill to listen to her say it myself) then maybe skip this one and join us again next time. I told everyone on Twitter i would be stanning Camille Vasquez this week and I am a woman of my word.  The first 18  minutes of the episode are devoted to Camille Vasquez,  Johnny's bad ass attorney who will be doing the cross examination of Amber Heard. We listen to her insanely effective objections & we thoroughly enjoy how much they pissed off Amber Heard.  Cross examination is going to be lit with Camille at the wheel & we can't wait.  I'll explain to you some of the objections and what their legal reasoning for using them  is.  If you don't want to hear Camille's objection compilation & learn about the different objections skip to 18  minutes. We're talking about Amber Heard's heinous and graphically detailed description of sexual abuse allegations during her second day of direct examination. There is so much to unpack and dissect here guys I actually ran out of time to get you my full analysis & I have a lot more to say which I'll get to in our next episode. Don't worry we have a week before the next trial day. We get through the horrific sexual abuse allegations & I try not to scream about the absurdity of it all. There's a lot of suspect things said today that need to be discussed at length….. We get more into things next episode and break down some of the problems with her allegations and her story. Things just aren't adding up for Amber. As an update, Court is not in session this week because Judge Penney had a prior engagement.  Proceedings resume a week from the day of this episode (5/16) and by then we will be all up to date and done with our legal analysis of the case up until this point - and then we get the cross-examination which will be epic and you wont want to miss,  We will definitely have a couple of episodes during this week off from trial to discuss some of my insight as a lawyer, how the trial will be different  going forward, and I'm going to answer some of the questions I've gotten from listeners so please stay tuned for that! Most people don't understand what it's like to be a survivor of abuse. If you are most people please consider checking out the podcast “Narcissist Apocalypse” & you'll hear first hand the stories of abuse survivors. This week they have a male survivor speaking his truth on the show. That is an issue that is very central to the discussion around this case so I think if you're listening to my show you would and should appreciate the importance of hearing the stories of all abuse survivors including men.  The link to that show is below. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/narcissist-apocalypse/id1452117002Contact: Twitter: @LDBlondePoDInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

There's a difference between being prepared and fully scripted for direct examination.  I'd love to hear what you all think was the case here. Amber Heard takes the stand to defend the claims of sexual & physical abuse made in her 2018 Washington Post OpEd against Johnny Depp. We've got some things to say about this. Amber Heard's claim go back to 2012 which is the very beginning of their relationship. We hear about the first incident at his home where she has a lot of things to say about a dirty carpet. Another story involves a backhand that  seemingly had the velocity of an elite boxers power punch because there was blood spattered on the wall afterwards. Then she starts to go into these brand new sexual abuse allegations she has claimed for the first time after being sued by Johnny. She tells the jury that Johnny conducted a cavity search on her looking for cocaine.On a plane to Russia she took MDMA with Johnny & a flight attendant. Things didn't go too well this time either according to Amber. Her last story today involved his children and I just have to say I think this is absolutely disgusting of her to do. There was no need for his kids to be brought up whatsoever. You can decide if you agree with me & if you don't let me know why! Please reach out with any questions, criticisms, or further information you think is worth sharing - I'm happy to hear all of it. I love to hear from people so don't hesitate to reach out - I promise I'm a nice lawyer! Haha Contact: Twitter: @LDBlondepodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

We finish up the testimony of Amber's expert forensic & clinical psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes. In my opinion the only experts that any of us need to hear from here are actual survivors of IPV and DV.  Stayed tuned for next episode where we start to dissect all that we've heard from Amber herself so far on direct.If you're into this podcast please consider giving the show a rating!Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

Today we are talking about the close of Johnny's case in chief & the testimony of his final handful of witnesses. We start of with Travis McGivern, the final bodyguard of Johnnys to testify for her. He has some very interesting personal experience with Amber's violence towards Johnny. Up next is Johnny's agent, Jack Whigham. He tells us all about the monetary damages Johnny has suffered as a result of the OpEd. We are talking Pirates 6 and 20 million bucks. Then we hear from an expert on damages for Johnny - Richard Marks - I'll call him Mr. Hollywood. He named dropped about 50 celebs in first 10 mins and I'd love to have a drink with this dude & hear more Hollywood stories because it sounds like he's got a whole lot after 50 years in the biz.  Another expert on damages for Johnny - Doug Bania - he's an intellectual property valuation, licensing & damages expert. Well at least he was because I'm not sure he will be after his performance on the stand. Then we have the testimony of Amber Heard's former private nurse - Erin Faleti. She had a lot of fucking tea and you'll want to hear about that. Johnnys last witness to testify in his case in chief was another expert on damages - Michael Spindler - this guy is a forensic accountant. He talked about how much Johnny lost as a result of the OpEd and was a good witness for JD. Lots of math going on here guys. Not my forte so please check the IG page for the slides he used to explain it to the jury. We are done with Johnnys case in chief guys. It's been a wild ride and we're only halfway done so hold onto your butts for Amber's case presentation which starts tomorrow. Shoutout to all the wonderful people who have sent me questions about the case and to all those who have supported the show. You guys rock. If you have anything to add or ask please check out the show on social media and if you're enjoying the show please rate it and if you a minute write a little love note for me in the review section. See you all tomorrow for Amber's case day 1. Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

Amber Heard started to present her case today. Her first witness was her expert forensic psychologist, Dr. Dawn Hughes. She's got a lot of opinions and they are a lot different than the ones offered by Johnnys expert. You'll want to hear this one guys because there is a whole lotta stuff we learn from here. Trigger warning we've got some detailed descriptions of sexual & domestic abuse so if you're not into that - I get it come back tomorrow when we're done with this expert.Just a heads up for anyone who who doesn't know and wants to tune in - Amber Heard takes the hot seat tomorrow and well, to say the least it should be incredibly interesting. If you're enjoying the show please consider giving it a handful of stars & writing me a little love note in the review section. And please if you have any questions or think I'm missing something or just want to say hi don't you dare hesitate to reach out to me! Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: Legallydirtyblondepod Email: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

We're recapping all the witness testimony from part 1 of week 3 of Depp v Heard. We've got A LOT to cover. We start with the British house manager/butler who is a former employee of Buckingham Palace, Attorney Rottenbirn has a Jim Carey liar liar moment during an objection, and then we get to what you've been waiting for….Through JDs expert witness, clinical & forensic psychologist, Dr. Shannon Curry.  We learn about her analysis and diagnoses of AH (how all of our uneducated opinions on AH's mental health problems are basically confirmed). It's not a great day for AH. Next up we have the testimony of 3 LAPD officers. And let me tell ya, the testimony AH gave at the UK trial about abuse & destruction on 5/21/16 seems arguably deserving of perjury charges.** WARNING: SEVERE HOST VOCABULARY FAILURE. So I realized I use the word “important” about 15 times in 5 minutes at some point on this episode - so apologies for that momentary lapse in  vocabulary. Stay updated on Depo v Heard and get some legal insight into what's going on. Thanks everyone so much for all the incredible a support. You guys rock. Please keep sharing and if you are enjoying give me a rating & leave me a little love note in the reviews.Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.conSupport the show

This was not an ideal week for Amber Heard.We get testimony from the COO of the ACLU who tells us the truth about those alleged donations from the divorce settlement. After this testimony we're all wondering  AH even wrote her own OpEd. Up first we have testimony from Lady GaGa's ex fiancée, Christian Carino. Oh and he was both JD & AH former agent. Elon Musk has entered the testimony. Next we hear from Johnny's divorce attorney who is a bad ass bitch. She has some pretty interesting things to tell the jury about their divorce. Ken White who is Johnnys financial guy & handled all that complicated numbers stuff tells us all the tea about that divorce settlement & I think you'll want to hear about it. Last we hear from two of Johnnys long time employees who have their own experiences with AH to share with the jury. We're 3 weeks in and half way through this trial.  We start Part 2 of this trial tomorrow so if you listened to this you're already all caught up. Thanks for listening & if you can please leave me a rating & maybe a little note in the review section if you have the time. Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.conSupport the show

Today we talk about Johnny's cross examination by Mr. Rottenborn, and how well Johnny handled being in the hot seat.  We also dive into some legal chess maneuvers on re-direct that I was very impressed with.  It's stuff like this that makes me proud to be a lawyer as well as a huge dork.  We've also got some GREAT audio clips today that I think are well worth listening to if you want to understand this trial.  Anyway come listen and hangout - please leave a review, give a rating and follow the show on social media.  Reach out with your questions, criticisms and any other nonsense you'd want to chat about. I love to hear from people!Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Support the show

In person coverage from your favorite new crime reporter here (drips with sarcasm).  I was lucky enough to be one of the people able to fully envelope myself in this experience and tell you guys what it was like from a person in the courtroom in Fairfax County, Virginia. Today we dive into Johnny Depp's direct testimony. We go from his childhood and recount abuse from his mother, his relationship with his father, his drug use and abuse, his past relationships and his relationship and deterioration of his relationship with Ms. Heard.Next episode we will get into the cross examination (when it is hopefully over tomorrow, Monday) For now stay tuned and I'll update you as often as I can.Please reach out with any comments or questions or topics to cover - I love to hear from people. Twitter: @LDBlondePodIntstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

Today we are going through the witnesses from Days 3 & 4 of the trial.  You'll hear the relevant testimony from their marriage counselor, Heard's former personal assistant, Dr. Kipper (Johnny's personal MD), Nurse Lloyd, Johnny's head of security, and from an Audio Tech who has worked with Johnny for many years.We'll talk about how they came across to the jury and how their direct and cross examinations went for both sides.Stayed tuned for the next episode because your girl went down to Fairfax to get some personal insight into how this trial is going and got to hear JD testify in person.Support the show

Just a quick little update to let you guys know where I am (I'm in the Great State of Virginia y'all) and what's going on with the Depp v Heard trial.  

Today we meet one of Johnny's closest friends for the last 40 years - Isaac Baruch - the LA transplant from Brooklyn who has not lost his accent or NY attitude  and we are here for it.  Isaac was an incredible witness for a bunch of reasons including his destruction of AH's attorneys on their cross of him.  This man had the entire room laughing - even AH herself. Genuinely don't think shes cracked a smile aside from when he was referring to a joke he had told her once during this testimony. But anyway enough of my pre-thoughts. I emphatically suggest you go listen to his testimony because if you want to know what a good witness looks like this is ithttps://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/johnny-depp/johnny-depps-friend-testifies-that-he-didnt-see-amber-heard-with-bruises-swelling-or-make-up-around-time-of-abuse-allegations/Contact:Twitter; @LDBlondePodInstagram: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSupport the show

Day 1 of the Depp v Herd defamation trial guys.  Today we heard opening statements from both sides and we're going to talk about their different strategies and what theories they are putting out there to the jury.  Then Johnny calls his first witness - his older sister.  We'll get into how effective big sis's testimony was for Johnny and how her cross-examination was going before they broke for the day.PS can you believe this is predicted to last SIX weeks?! I mean we have quite the legal journey ahead of us guys so stay tuned!Contact:Twitter: @LDBlondePodInstagram: @legallydirtyblondepodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com(This was originally going to be a whole week 1 recap but it was getting way too long so I cut it and if it sounds like shit sometimes well - at least i warned you right?)Support the show

This is a spicy opinion episode (let me say its an opinion based on facts) about why I do not think Amber Heard is even close to as credible as Pinocchio.  Today we're talking about all of Amber's factual discrepancies especially in light of the new evidence we're seeing at this Virginia trial.  If you want to stay unbiased I suggest skipping this one.  But hey, theres a reason why we call her Amber Terd and you're about to find out why.Check the links below for all the evidence discussed during this episode and if your mind hasn't already changed on this saga - I think this will be a game changer. #JusticeForJohnnyDepp If you like what you hear please leave a review and dont forget to rate the show! And more importantly if you have any input please reach out any way you can:Twitter: @LDBlondePodIG: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.com Links and Cites:James Corden Show (12/16/15) the day after she alleges she had two black eyes, broken nose, rib injuries, etc https://youtu.be/HqPUxBi29pY LAPD BodyCam Second Set of Officers on 5/21/16 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2398992/Police-arrive-Depp-Heard-penthouse-night-2016-altercation.htmlLAPD First Officer Testimony - starts at page 22 of the transcript  (5/21/16) https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-plaintiffs-memo-supp-mot-use-prior-depositions-11-22-2019.pdf Full Audio of JD & AH - AH being abusive and admitting to hitting - https://youtu.be/k9pbrBmHI58Australian Perjury Investigation: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10145523/Amber-Heard-investigation-perjury-2015-dog-smuggling-scandal.htmlHer prior arrest for DV/Assault of ex-partner (alleging homophonic cop - who was a lesbian): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3633240/Police-officer-accused-homophobia-Amber-Heard-s-ex-girlfriend-2009-domestic-violence-arrest-identified-gay.htmlThe Finale Link of the Poo in the Bed: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/johnny-depp-feces-bed-was-last-straw-marriage-amber-heard-1302737/

Welcome to Season 3 (trial 2) of Legally Dirty Blonde! I say this from the get in this episode but I'll admit my bias on this case one more time.  I wasn't going to cover this because of my lifelong love for Johnny Depp  but honestly the amount of nonsense that has gone on  and has been shared about this needs and deserves some explanation.  There is so much to cover in this case it is nearly impossible for anyone to get it all in (even the lawyers litigating it in court).  So hang in there with me and I promise we will get to all of the evidence and I will explain it as we go.  But for now we are just talking background and what went on before the trial.So today we talk about a few things: 1) The background of Johnny and Amber's relationship & how we ended up on CourtTV in a defamation suit 2) Johnny's defamation claims & suit seeking $50 mill and Amber Heard's counterclaims for defamation seeking $100mill 3) AH's  pretrial motions seeking dismissal and  the Judge's opinion schooling AH's legal team for their arguably frivolous motion based on the UK defamation case JD brought against The Sun4) A SUPER important pretrial motion by Johnny's team about AH's failure to comply with the Judge's order directing her to turn over all her devices (phones etc) and photos showing her alleged injuries and damages to the apartment and his team asking for sanctions for being prejudiced by not having these extremely relevant items of discovery before the trial began (SUSPECT) 5) What will both sides have to prove to prove Defamation in Virginia (& the additional hurdle for public figures - actual malice)So like I said - trying to keep it unbiased but next, I will be doing an episode  that is full of some of my bias (and mainly the facts) about why AH is in no way credible.  I will mark that one as bias if you want to skip it and keep a more juror like perspective. Please dont forget to give the show a rating and if you have the time write me a nice love letter in those review.  Also don't forget to follow the show on social media:Twitter: @LDBlondePodIG: @LegallyDirtyBlondePodEmail: LegallyDirtyBlondePod@gmail.com Support the show

Today we answer a question that confuses a lot of people: Does twitter violate your first amendment right to free speech if they censor your tweet, suspend you or ban you because of your tweet? If you want to know the answer, you'll have to listen to this quickie episode. Anyone who knows me knows that I am a fierce defender of free speech and the first amendment and I will argue with just about anyone who wants to engage with me on the topic. So this episode is a brief explanation of free speech and how it applies specifically in the context of social media apps like twitter. This week, Elon Musk purchased a 9.2% stake in twitter and it sent people on twitter from both sides of the party line into a tizzy.  As you may know, Elon holds himself out to be a proponent of free speech and has often expressed his concerns that Twitter censors and regulates too much of the user's content.  His purchase was celebrated by the right, and condemned by the left, and as you can imagine there were a whole lot of arguments about this. I  saw a lot of opinions on free speech this week that were just straight up wrong and when I polled my own followers I realized that the first amendment and the protections it gives us are confused by a lot of people.  So thats why we're here- hopefully this super quickie episode can clear that up for anyone who isn't exactly sure if they know how it works.  And listen, if this is confusing to you - don't you worry because its not all common sense and by the end of this episode I promise you'll get it.Next episode we're doing a much deeper dive into the First Amendment protections of free speech and specifically we're going to discuss the overused and (more often than not) misused phrase of “YOU CANT JUST YELL FIRE IN A CROWDED THEATRE”.  So if you're interested in learning if you can or cannot yell fire in crowded theatre, come back for the next episode too!If anyone is still confused or has more questions or just wants to argue with me about the first amendment, I am here for that so feel free to reach out! Twitter: LDBlondePodInstagram:LegallyDirtyBlondePodGmail: Legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comLinks:The First Amendment of the US Constitution https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendmentSection 230 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

It has been a minute friends but I'm happy we're back and ready to discuss the chaos that was the Oscars this year.  Today we are getting into some of the terrible legal takes I saw on twitter this week about Will Smith slapping the shit out of Chris Rock.  We start with the issue of why legally this wasn't an assault in the way you think it was, move onto “victimless crimes” and close out with my favorite topic of free speech and the first amendment.  So come hang and listen to some pop culture legal analysis.Hey guys please don't forget to rate the show and leave your girl a review on whatever platform you use for your podcast listening pleasure.  I really love hearing from everyone and have already gotten some great ideas for future episodes from some of you so keep em' coming! Contact: legallydirtyblondepod@gmail.comSocial:@LDBlondePod - twitter @LegallyDirtyBlondePod - Instagram Citations for California Penal LawsAssault  https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-240.htmlBattery https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-242.html#:~:text=A%20battery%20is%20any%20willful,upon%20the%20person%20of%20another.

Don't worry that's not like an ominous text from your partner i promise about needing to talk - we've got to talk about the show and what we got going on coming up next on Legally Dirty Blonde.  So take a few minutes and listen to  what we have in store so far for 2022 .A podcast that solved a cold case,The trial of a well known celebrity & his co-defendant, The Church of Scientology ,  Will it be the death penalty or life in prison for the Parkland Shooter?E-mail me with your ideas , thoughts, recommendations, legal questions and whatever the fuck else you think is just an  interesting topic worth looking into.  I really appreciate all feedback so don't get scared - send the email - we'll have fun. ContactLegallyDirtyBlondePod@gmail.comInstagram@LegallyDirtyBlondePodTwitter@LDBlondePod

So here it is - the episode you've all been waiting for (sarcasm friends), my opinion episode on abortion.  You'll hear my thoughts on this incredibly important issue and this time its not necessarily from a legal standpoint but I promise you it is certainly from a logical one.  So if you're looking for some good debate points or just want to get an idea about how these conversations are going to go down this summer then give a listen.And when I say that I want to hear your opinion, whether you agree or vehemently disagree, I truly mean that.  So if you want to try and change my mind or just want to chat some more - lets talk! I'm here for it. Don't forge to like and subscribe and leave your girl a review!Follow the show on social media @legallydirtyblondepod on instagram and @LDBlondepod on twitterSupport the show

So we've finally arrived at Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Org - the case currently pending before SCOTUS that will ultimately decide the right to abortion in our country and may change how many of us have known those rights to exist since we were born.  So this episode we're analyzing the case from a strictly legal perspectives but stay tuned for next episode where I get a little more personal with you guys and a whole lot more opinionated (and honestly probably a whole lot more entertaining for you guys). Link below is to the audio for the oral arguments https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2021/19-1392https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2021/19-1392_4425.pdfSupport the show

Did that episode title get your attention? GOOD because this is important people - on the anniversary of Roe v Wade we're here to discuss another extremely important SCOTUS decision on abortion that in some ways supported Roe's holding but overturned it in other ways - and thats Planned Parenthood v Casey.  So put your thinking caps on because I am about to drop some knowledge on you guyshttps://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/505/833https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_casey.htmlhttps://www.penncapital-star.com/commentary/how-planned-parenthood-v-casey-started-the-attack-on-abortion-rights-opinion/https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/91-744https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey

Okay people if you were looking for a really speedy and basic legal understanding of the SCOTUS holding in Roe v Wade - look no further because you have just hit the jackpot.  On this episode we discuss the legal reasoning behind the SCOTUS' decision in this landmark abortion rights case and I certainly try my best not to confuse anyone any further.  That being said - if I confused you, please reach out and lets talk because this is a really important issue and I think we all deserve to understand it from a legal perspective regardless of  personal or political beliefs.  Below I've linked the Court's entire opinion, the fourteenth amendment and some articles on due process if you feel like you want to be a con law nerd with me.https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxivhttps://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/amendment-xiv/clauses/701https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment5/annotation08.html

Well we're back with a quickie episode during our interim episode section between trials.  Today we talk about that chatty juror in Maxwell trial and if a mistrial is in her future, we talk about the Michigan school shooters plea, and about how Prince Andrew is a sweaty mess.Support the show

Today we talk about a little known American serial killer. This episode is a challenge to all my fellow true crime junkies to test their knowledge and see if they have heard of this man who some have called the country's most prolific serial killer.  So buckle up because this is a rough one folks. Trigger warning for those of you who may not do well with cases involving children and/or horrific details. Although this case is not about it - this episode will bring us into our discussion about Roe v Wade, Casey and the current abortion case before the SCOTUS. Don't forget to check out the show on social @LDBlondePod on twitter & @legallydirtyblondepod on instagram for some more info and photos about this house of horrors case. Check out the the below for more info:Book: Gosnell: America's Most Prolific Serial Killer Documentary: 3801 Lancaster: American tragedyMovie: Gosnell: Americas Biggest SKhttps://www.delcotimes.com/2011/01/20/philly-abortion-murder-case-fuels-national-debate/amp/https://www.phillytrib.com/news/state-and-region/prosecution-gosnell-case-about-murder-not-abortion/article_7a2c0cb6-7a30-556c-89bf-decdbb91d636.htmlhttps://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/274944/https://pafamily.org/2018/10/12/gosnellontrial/https://www.phillymag.com/news/2013/04/12/news-trial-philadelphia-abortion-doctor-kermit-gosnell/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/04/14-theories-for-why-kermit-gosnells-case-didnt-get-more-media-attention/274966/https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/us/kermit-gosnell-abortion-doctor-found-guilty-of-murder.amp.html?referringSource=articleSharehttps://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/24/us/judge-throws-out-some-charges-against-dr-kermit-gosnell.amp.html?referringSource=articleSharehttps://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/19/us/philadelphia-abortion-doctors-murder-trial-opens.html?referringSource=articleSharehttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/58-horrific-details-from-the-kermit-gosnell-trial-that-you-do-not-want-to-read?_amp=trueSupport the show

Episode 18 - Maxwell Trial - Guilty Verdict, Sentencing & Appeal Our final installment for Season 1 of LDB guys. Today we talk about the guilty convictions, sentencing, what's up next for Maxwell and what are the potential arguments she'll make on appeal. Don't forget to follow the show on Instagram @legallydirtyblondepod and on twitter @LDBlondePod and reach out with anything! I'd love to hear from you guys https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/day-after-ghislaine-maxwells-convictions-prosecutors-formally-ditch-case-against-jeffrey-epsteins-jail-guards/https://www.thecut.com/2021/12/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-key-moments-from-witness-testimony.htmlhttps://wamu.org/story/21/12/30/analysis-of-the-ghislaine-maxwell-guilty-verdict/https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/dec/29/ghislaine-maxwell-sex-trafficking-trial-live-blog-latesthttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-happens-after-ghislaine-maxwells-guilty-verdict-2021-12-29/https://www.insider.com/ghislaine-maxwell-could-cooperate-or-appeal-after-guilty-verdict-2021-12?amhttps://www.the-sun.com/news/4365546/five-ways-ghislaine-maxwell-appeal-conviction/amp/

Quickie Episode 17 - Maxwell Trial - Jury Deliberations Day 4So today we talk about some confusing legal arguments by the defense and keep wondering what the hell is going on in that jury room. Link for the Defense Letterhttps://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.566.0.pdfArticleshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-coverage-update-verdict-epstein-b1983134.htmlhttps://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/ghislaine-maxwell/jurors-weighing-fate-of-ghislaine-maxwell-scrutinize-reams-of-evidence-as-deliberations-stretch-into-second-week/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/28/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial.amp.html?referringSource=articleShare

Quickie Episode 16 - Maxwell Trial - Day 3 Jury DeliberationsToday we're talking about more love notes from the jury and why the lion king date is actually more relevant than I thought. Inner City Press Coverage https://t.co/NPCD2n37eQJury Instructions (page 21 and 28 discussed today) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165198-finaljurychargeicpVariety Article and Reddit Post Lion King https://variety.com/1994/legit/news/lion-set-to-roar-at-radio-city-120480/https://www.reddit.com/r/GhislaineMaxwell/comments/r7abvz/janes_testimony_about_1994_lion_king_is_true/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmfSupport the show

Quickie Episode 15 - Maxwell Trial - Ghislaine Maxwell will not be spending her Christmas birthday at home this year people but apparently the jury is.  Take ten minutes to get updated on the trial before the holiday break,

Quickie Episode 14 - Maxwell Trial - Jury Deliberations & UpdatesToday we talk about the first full day of jury deliberations and go over the questions the jury had for the judge and what evidence they wanted to see more of.  Check out the links below thanks to the awesome reporting by The Inner City Press.Partially redacted slides from government's closing presentation https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165753-usvmaxredactedicpPartially redacted slides from defense closing presentation (initially withheld) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165807-usvmaxdefredactedicphttp://www.innercitypress.com/

For some reason this episode got deleted so sorry if its a repeat for you guys but just skip it if so. I'm not sure what happened here and lord knows I'm no tech genius so I'm just reposting it for you fine people.  Day 12 - The Defense Rests - Today we talk about Maxwell's two supporters, a former Miss Sweden, Maxwell doesn't take the stand and my thoughts before closings https://jeffreyepsteinpodcast.com/2020/10/14/epsteins-zorro-ranch-sisters-michelle-healy-shannon/https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/17/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/takeaways-from-day-12-of-the-ghislaine-maxwell-trialhttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/17/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/ghislaine-maxwell-tells-judge-she-will-not-testifyhttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/17/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/defense-rests-in-ghislaine-maxwells-sex-trafficking-trialhttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/17/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/defense-calls-second-witness-to-counter-group-sex-allegation-against-maxwellhttps://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/17/nyregion/eva-dubin-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/19/ghislaine-maxwells-lawyers-likablehttps://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article256675947.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/18/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-jury-instructions-attorneys-judgehttps://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/in-maxwell-trial-charging-conferencehttps://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/courtroom-confidential-at-maxwell

Maxwell Trial - Day 13 - Closing Arguments Today we talk about my home girl Mariah Carey, closing arguments by the government & defense, some foot fetish stories for you guys and what do we think about this verdict.Jury charge https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21165198-finaljurychargeicpArticles https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/20/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/in-a-blistering-closing-argument-ghislaine-maxwells-defense-lays-blame-on-epsteinhttps://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/ghislaine-maxwell/ghislaine-maxwells-defense-team-picks-apart-lapses-of-memory-as-prosecutors-ridicule-the-argument-accusers-are-all-liars/https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/in-us-v-ghislaine-maxwell-closingshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-charges-trial-epstein-b1979615.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/20/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/jury-in-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-begins-deliberations

Today we look into the backgrounds and  accusations made against these 4 co-conspirators and why they aren't involved in this trial.  Episode 11 - Articleshttps://nypost.com/2020/08/10/emmy-tayler-maxwells-ex-personal-assistant-flees-uk-report/amp/https://filmdaily.co/obsessions/true-crime/maxwells-former-pa/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7295159/amp/Jeffrey-Epstein-purchased-assistant-Nadia-Marcinkova-child-family-teen-victim-told-cop.htmlhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadia_Marcinkohttps://www.pressreader.com/usa/national-enquirer/20210621/281784222020136https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-co-conspirators-gloria-allred/amphttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/10/an-actual-conspiracy-kept-jeffrey-epsteins-accomplices-out-of-prison/https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/the-prosecution-is-fumbling-its-case-against-ghislaine-maxwell/ampSupport the show

HAPPY 10 EP ANNIVERSARY PARTY PEOPLE Today we talk about an Epstein and Maxwell fan girl taking the stand, rich people ship sand to islands, Jeffrey Epstein loves bread, false memories mean nothing you know is real, defense minded experts get paid a pretty penny and we're already almost at closings guys Day 11The Little Black Book https://epsteinsblackbook.comDefense expert's Twitter pic with Clinton https://twitter.com/eloftus1/status/661563536561172480?s=21Judges Ruling on defense anonymous witnesses https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.548.0.pdfArticles https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/16/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/ghislaine-maxwells-defense-opens-with-a-former-employee-who-highly-respected-herhttps://www.thedailybeast.com/ghislaine-maxwells-ex-assistant-creepily-gushes-about-generous-jeffrey-epsteinhttps://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/12/16/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-trial/a-defense-expert-testified-about-how-false-memories-can-be-formedhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-defence-updates-epstein-b1977065.html?amphttps://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-defense-day-one-1272648/amp/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ghislaine-maxwells-defense-sex-abuse-trial-begin-its-case-2021-12-16/https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/ghislaine-maxwell/false-memory-expert-involved-in-robert-durst-o-j-simpson-and-harvey-weinstein-cases-testifies-for-ghislaine-maxwell/https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/ghislaine-maxwell/this-is-a-trial-not-an-inquest-legal-experts-debunk-popular-misconceptions-about-ghislaine-maxwells-criminal-proceedings/

The defense files some new and very strange requests over the weekend, and a discussion into potential defense strategies, will Ghislaine take the stand?  https://www.insider.com/meet-alison-nathan-judge-presiding-over-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-2021-12https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/13/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-witness.html?referringSource=articleSharehttps://www.fox8live.com/2021/12/13/twitter-suspends-account-tracking-ghislaine-maxwell-trial/https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-12-13/defendants-trafficking-cases-victims?_amp=truehttps://fortune.com/2021/12/10/ghislaine-maxwell-lawyers-jeffrey-epstein-sex-abuse-defense-attack-accusers-motives-memories/amp/