Podcasts about Courthouse

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order effectively ending birthright citizenship for children born to mothers who are unlawfully present or temporary lawful residents in the United States and whose fathers are not lawful permanent residents at the time of the child’s birth. One day later, four states and three individuals challenged this order in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, which three days later granted a universal temporary restraining order enjoining the government from implementing this order. Two weeks later, this became a nationwide injunction. Other similar nationwide injunctions have since been issued from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The government appealed all of these, and the Supreme Court took the case in order to decide the issue of whether, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, federal courts have equitable authority to issue universal injunctions. On June 27, 2025, the Court ruled in favor of the government, holding that “universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts.” The Court granted the government’s applications for a partial stay of these injunctions, “but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.”Join this FedSoc Forum to discuss this case, its decision, and future implications.Featuring:Ed Wenger, Partner, Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLCModerator: Elbert Lin, Chair, Issues & Appeals, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP --To register, click the link above.

Greg Belfrage asks listeners if ICE should be able to arrest illegal immigrants at the courthouse.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Anti-bullying Dog Therapy Fido is now being used to stop bullying. Rachel McPherson is introducing canines to both the bully victim as well as the bully-er. The transformation is astonishing. Find out what the Good Dog Foundation has planned. Listen Now Allergy Season Animal Radio is getting more and more calls from pet guardians whose furry friends are suffering from Summer allergies. It's essential to identify the type of allergy, whether it's food-related, environmental, or caused by a pest. For some pets, it may be a Miliary Flea Dermatitis - an acute reaction to fleas, pollen in the air, or simply a food allergy. Your vet has the tools to decipher and treat. Listen Now Courthouse Dogs Former Prosecutor Ellen O'Neill-Stephens thinks dogs can be extremely helpful to those testifying in a courtroom. And, in fact, she may be right. Over 30 dogs are currently tucked away next to the defendant as they deliver their sworn statements. It's all part of a program of the Courthouse Dogs Foundation. And while most people think this is a fine idea, it does have its detractors. Listen Now Seeing-Eye Dogs Bring Blind Couple Together A pair of seeing-eye dogs is getting credit for leading their owners to love.  Claire Johnson and Mark Gaffey first met at a course for their guide dogs, Rodd and Venice, last year in Shrewsbury, England. Apparently, the guide dogs were inseparable and seemed to be falling in love. Their visually impaired owners soon followed suit. Listen Now It's A Zoo! Dr. Debbie is prepared to answer all of your questions about almost every kind of animal. That's why she's at the top of her game. Today, it's all about Chinchillas. And that's because more and more pet guardians are choosing this furry critter over a cat or dog. Listen Now Cow Spa Produces More Milk We found a dairy farmer who's pampering his cows in order to produce more milk. Farmer Smith is using waterbeds for his cows to lounge in while they watch a giant flat-screen TV. And believe it or not, the cows seem to be reacting by making more milk than those moo-cows without TV privileges. Listen Now Read more about this week's show.

In this episode, the kitchen is closed.  Anne and Karen detail their courthouse adventures during the Michael Colucci trial.  The bidding is opened on Karen's signed, original courtroom drawing.  You can email us at murder.sugarcoated@gmail.com to provide your bid.   #femalevoices #courtreport #murdertrial #colucci #truecrimepodcast #applepodcasts #spotify #goodpods #YouTube #courtroomartist #courtroomdrawing #upforauction

On July 2nd, Sean Combs was acquitted of the most serious charges he faced: racketeering and sex trafficking. He was found guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution — and he remains in prison awaiting sentencing in early October.Over the course of eight weeks, the trial became a spectacle, even by the high standards of celebrity courtroom dramas. One reason? All of the influencers. For our weekly Reporter's Notebook series we bring you the the view from inside the courthouse as the Diddy spectacle unfolded. For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Happy Friday! Here's a quick look at our top local stories for June 11. Find these stories and much more in today's print edition and online at https://www.iolaregister.com/.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has traditionally regulated interstate and international communications and, as part of that, maintained a universal service fund that requires telecommunications carriers to contribute quarterly based on their revenues. In order to calculate these contribution amounts, the FCC contracts the help of the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). The constitutionality of these delegations of power—to the FCC by Congress and to USAC by the FCC—were challenged in court by Consumers’ Research. On June 27, 2025, the Court ruled in favor of the FCC, rejecting the argument that the universal-service contribution scheme violates the nondelegation doctrine.Join this FedSoc Forum to discuss this case, its decision, and what this means for the nondelegation doctrine going forward.Featuring:Sean Lev, Partner, HWG LLPModerator: Devin Watkins, Attorney, Competitive Enterprise Institute --To register, click the link above.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton concerned Texas Law H.B. 1181, and what precedent should apply in considering its impact on free speech. Passed in 2023, the law requires commercial entities, including social media platforms, "that knowingly and intentionally publish or distribute material on an Internet website... more than one-third of which is sexual material harmful to minors" to age-gate their content, and to verify the age of their users, ensuring they are 18 years of age or older.Soon after the law passed, plaintiffs sued, claiming the law violated their right to free speech. Drawing on a line of cases including Ashcroft v. ACLU (2004), they argued that since the law impacted constitutionally protected speech, strict scrutiny should be applied and the TX law failed that test. The Fifth Circuit denied that argument, instead applying a rational basis test, drawing from the precedent of Ginsburg v. New York (1968).The Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer the question of whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech, and heard oral argument on January 15, 2025.On June 27, 2025, a 6-3 Court issued its decision, holding that the correct answer was to apply intermediate scrutiny, and that the Texas law survived intermediate scrutiny because it only incidentally burdened adults' protected speech.Join us for a Courthouse steps decision program where we will break down and analyze the decision, opinions, and what the potential impacts may be.Featuring:Darpana Sheth Nunziata, General Counsel, Center for Individual Rights

Today on the show: Confrontation at the courthouse in Downtown San Francisco, where heavily armed ice forces carry out violent arrests. Flashpoints contributor Francisco Herrera has been talking with those directly impacted by the raid. He'll join us along with an eyewitness to this morning's raid. Also We'll feature an in-depth update on the expanding US/Israeli Genocide in Gaza. And we will continue to report on the US Israeli use of food as a deadly weapon of war. The post ICE Invades Downtown San Francisco at SF Courthouse appeared first on KPFA.

In 2019, the Environmental Protection Agency withdrew California’s previously-granted waiver to implement its Advanced Clean Car Program. This program had been in effect since 2013 and required that car companies reduce carbon dioxide emissions and produce fleets that are at least 15% electric vehicles. The waiver was withdrawn due to a lack of “compelling and extraordinary conditions” and because California could not show a direct connection between greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution.In 2022, however, the EPA reinstated the waiver. This prompted legal challenges from fuel producers (among others) who argued that California did not meet the requirements to justify these state-specific standards. The D.C. Circuit dismissed the fuel producers' statutory claim based on a determination that they did not prove that their injuries would be redressed by a decision in their favor.This Supreme Court case presented the question whether a party may establish the redressability component of Article III standing by relying on the coercive and predictable effects of regulation on third parties. On June 20, the Court ruled 7-2 in favor of standing. Join this FedSoc Forum to hear more about the case and this decision, authored by Justice Kavanaugh.Featuring:Eli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLPModerator: Jeff Beelaert, Partner, Givens Pursley LLP--To register, click the link above.

In Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization, the Court considered whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) violates the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. The court heard oral argument on April 1, 2025 and on June 20, 2025 a 9-0 Court ruled the PSJVTA did not violate the Fifth amendment because the statute "reasonably ties the assertion of jurisdiction over the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority to conduct involving the United States and implicating sensitive foreign policy matters within the prerogative of the political branches."Chief Justice Roberts authored the opinion for the Court, and Justice Thomas wrote a concurrence in which Justice Gorsuch joined as to Part II.Join us for a Courthouse Steps decision program where we will break down and analyze this decision and discuss the potential effects of this case.Featuring:Erielle Davidson, Associate, Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC(Moderator) Shiza Francis, Associate, Shutts and Bowen LLP

An announcement is due this month on a new round of funding for projects all over Ireland under the revised National Development Plan. One such project, which has been on the table for a long time without any progress, is a new courthouse for Tralee. The town's court facilities have long been acknowledged as inadequate, and the Courts Service plans to build a new courthouse at the Island of Geese. However, there are still calls for the Courts Service to use whatever funding may be allocated to refurbish and expand the current courthouse. An Post is due to vacate a nearby site in the coming weeks, and a survey undertaken by Radio Kerry has now found the majority of Tralee Municipal District councillors would prefer the current building be refurbished. In the meantime, while funding and a new court building are awaited, people in Tralee and Kerry with mobility needs have to make do with the interim solution of a powered chair at the back of the courthouse, to access justice. Mark Lynch brings us this report.

Mahmoud v. Taylor concerns the question of whether parents have the right to be notified and opt their children out of classroom lessons on gender and sexuality that violate their religious beliefs.In 2022, the Montgomery County, Maryland, School Board introduced storybooks for pre-K through fifth-grade classrooms covering topics like gender transitions and pride parades. Maryland law and the Board’s own policies provide parents the right to receive notice and opt their kids out of books that violate their religious beliefs. However, when parents attempted to exercise this right, the School Board eliminated notice and opt-outs altogether. In response, a diverse coalition of religious parents, including Muslims, Christians, and Jews, sued the School Board in federal court. The parents argue that storybooks are age-inappropriate, spiritually and emotionally damaging for their kids, and inconsistent with their beliefs.Last year, the Fourth Circuit upheld the School Board’s policy, ruling that the removal of notice and opt-outs does not impose a legally cognizable burden on parents’ religious exercise. The parents appealed.On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that parents challenging the Board’s introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt-outs, are entitled to a preliminary injunction. Join us for a breakdown of this decision and its implications.Featuring:Eric Baxter, Vice President and Senior Counsel, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty(Moderator) Prof. Teresa Stanton Collett, Professor and Director, Prolife Center, University of St. Thomas School of Law

Send us a textMusic speaks volumes about who we are and how we feel. This episode dives headfirst into the emotional resonance of sharing songs with loved ones and what our playlists reveal about our true selves.The crew explores that unique vulnerability of sending someone a track that perfectly captures your feelings about them. From R&B slow jams to heartbreak anthems, we unpack how these musical messages can strengthen connections or signal the end of relationships. When was the last time you sent someone a song that said "this reminds me of us"? The answers might surprise you.Apple Music's 10-year anniversary "All-Time Faves" playlists become a window into our hosts' souls—and occasionally their parenting journeys. One host hilariously discovers Peppa Pig dominates his top tracks, while others reveal their affinity for Summer Walker, Drake, and P. Diddy classics. These musical fingerprints tell stories we sometimes don't even recognize about ourselves.Speaking of Diddy, we break down his trial verdict where he escaped RICO charges but faces transportation charges that could bring substantial prison time. From the bizarre baby oil demonstrations outside the courthouse to celebrity reactions online, this cultural moment reveals much about fame, justice, and public perception. The conspiracy theories around what might happen before his October sentencing will have you questioning everything.New music gets its moment too, with deep dives into Kehlani's relationship-ending anthem "Folded" (when those clothes are neatly stacked at the door, you know it's over), Cardi B's summer banger "Outside," and upcoming releases from Lizzo and Keke Palmer that have us excited.What's been your standout moment of 2024 so far? Hit us up on social media @mixedvibespodcast and let us know which topics from this episode resonated with you most. Your musical confessions are safe with us!FOLLOW. SUBSCRIBE. SHARE. Contactmixedvibeztv@gmail.com (720) 381-1092Facebook www.facebook.com/mixedvibezYouTube https://youtube.com/@mixedvibezmediaTikTokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@mixedvibezmedia?_t=8aEYresFfkw&_r=1Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/mixedvibezpodcast/

Infidelity, betrayal, and the dark side of suburbia. This episode of What's Happening at the Courthouse with Rameez Khan brings you to a local courthouse to uncover the real stories behind the cases. In this raw, unfiltered episode, host Rameez Khan hits the streets to speak with people outside a courthouse. This week, he's in Goodwood. He asks them a simple question: Why are you here today? Their responses reveal tales of love triangles, cheating spouses, and false accusations. From a woman supporting her boyfriend through a case she says is false to a woman fighting for child support from her cheating ex.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

INSANE: Diddy Supporters Lather Up in Baby Oil & Twerk Outside Courthouse After Verdict

Hello, media consumers! Bryan and Joel present both sides of an argument around Gavin Newsom's lawsuit against Fox News (1:29), reporters live tweeting Wednesday night's congressional session, Netflix's NFL announcer problem, and Paramount becoming the latest media company to settle a lawsuit with Donald Trump (21:53). Next, Joel is joined by Matthew Lee of the Inner City Press to discuss his coverage of the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial, stories from covering the Southern District of New York, how institutions treat new media, and more (40:54). Bryan and Joel then close the show with some weekend recommendations (1:15:35)! Hosts: Bryan Curtis and Joel AndersonGuest: Matthew LeeProducer: Kyle Crichton Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It's Kfm Morning's 8th birthday! Join Darren, Sherlin and Sibs as they celebrate with games, prizes, and plenty of laughs. This fun-filled episode celebrates Kfm Morning's 8th anniversary. Darren, Sherlin and Sibs look back on the last 8 years of the show and all the ups and downs they've experienced together. There's a special birthday Wheel of Joy with Pick n Pay vouchers up for grabs, as well as a Netflix Squid Game cash giveaway. Rameez heads out to the courthouse to get the latest gossip. Plus, Darren pulls off an epic prank phone call that will have you in stitches. Timestamps: 6:10 - Celebrating 8 years of Kfm Mornings 16:30 - Latest news on the Diddy trial26:37 - Courthouse with Rameez37:28 - Prank phone call from Darren49:15 - Birthday Wheel of Joy with Pick n Pay59:30 - Vinyl Classics game Key Takeaways: - KFM Morning's has been on air for 8 years, starting on July 3, 2017- The hosts have great camaraderie and have been through highs and lows - Prizes given away include Netflix Squid Game cash and Pick n Pay vouchers- Rameez shares juicy courthouse gossip from Goodwood - Darren's hilarious prank call impersonating an Eskom employee- The show has evolved over 8 years but has kept its fun and family-like tone It's clear this trio has formed close bonds over the last 8 years - listen in for plenty of laughs and insights as they walk down memory lane. Tune in and join the birthday fun!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

TRENDING - Diddy fans celebrate verdict in the most Diddy way possible, Nancy Mace roasted over pajama video, authorities set the record straight about Dad of little girl who fell off a Disney cruise ship.

All that baby oil has paid off as Diddy has slipped through the justice system by being found NOT GUILTY on most of the serious charges. He was found guilty on the lesser counts but the chances of him doing any serious time have faded. Diddy loyalists were even reportedly pouring baby oil on each other outside the courthouse.. Also on the show, a Bartlett father who has lived in Memphis for 23 years was taken by ICE and faces deportation which has sparked a lot of opinions in Memphis, and Jake gives a deserving rant about people using SNAP benefits to purchase Red Bulls. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Inside INdiana Business Radio for the morning of July 2, 2025. A new $46 million judicial building opens today in downtown Martinsville as part of a $72 million campus. Community Health Network CEO Brian Mills will retire after more than 40 years with the system. Also: Fort Wayne narrows developers for its North River project, 23andMe's new owner agrees to data protections, and Goshen Health opens its 27th facility. Get the latest business news from throughout the state at InsideINdianaBusiness.com.

in July of 2018, Governor Henry McMaster of South Carolina issued an executive order to end the inclusion of Planned Parenthood in the Medicaid program. The Department of Health and Human Services then informed Planned Parenthood that they were no longer qualified to provide services to Medicaid beneficiaries, which prompted lawsuits both from Planned Parenthood […]

Join the conversation with C4 & Bryan Nehman.  Latest on the big beautiful bill & the vote-o-rama.  ICE agents at city courthouse and the sheriff speaks out.  A research poll on the pride in being an American.  State senator Mary Beth Carozza joined the show discussing a lawsuit regarding wind farms off the coast of Ocean City among other topics.  Elon Musk wants to create a third party.  Listen to C4 & Bryan Nehman live weekdays from 5:30 to 10am on WBAL News Radio 1090, FM 101.5 & the WBAL Radio App.

The Courthouse Gallery in Ennistymon is preparing for its Summer Open Exhibition. The exhibition gets underway from Friday (4th July). The show, which will be curated by Gabhann Dunne, will feature an exciting mix of paintings, sculpture and multimedia works by selected artists. To find out more, Alan Morrissey was joined by Éanna Burt, Director and curator Courthouse Gallery & Studios. PHOTO CREDIT: The Courthouse Gallery & Studios, Ennistymon via Facebook

in July of 2018, Governor Henry McMaster of South Carolina issued an executive order to end the inclusion of Planned Parenthood in the Medicaid program. The Department of Health and Human Services then informed Planned Parenthood that they were no longer qualified to provide services to Medicaid beneficiaries, which prompted lawsuits both from Planned Parenthood and beneficiaries seeking to enforce their right to “free-choice-of-provider,” included in a 1967 Medicaid provision. This case asked whether this provision unambiguously confers a private right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider. On June 26, 2025, the Court ruled 6–3 in favor of South Carolina, affirming the state's right to exclude abortion providers from its Medicaid program. Tune in to this Courthouse Steps podcast as we break down the case and its recent decision. Featuring: John J. Bursch, Senior Counsel and VP, Appellate Advocacy, Alliance Defending Freedom Kyle Douglas Hawkins, Partner, Lehotsky Keller Moderator: Ryan L. Bangert, Senior Vice President, Strategic Initiatives & Special Counsel to the President, Alliance Defending Freedom

On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court released its decisions for two circuit splits arising under the Clean Air Act (CAA) provision regarding judicial venue: EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (23-1229), and Oklahoma v. EPA (23-1067). Decided 7-2 and 8-0, respectively, the outcome of these cases hinged on the Court's interpretation of the CAA's […]

On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court released its decisions for two circuit splits arising under the Clean Air Act (CAA) provision regarding judicial venue: EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (23-1229), and Oklahoma v. EPA (23-1067). Decided 7-2 and 8-0, respectively, the outcome of these cases hinged on the Court’s interpretation of the CAA’s unique venue provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1). The CAA states that challenges to “nationally applicable” actions may be filed only in the D.C. Circuit. 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1). Conversely, challenges to CAA actions that are “locally or regionally applicable” may generally be filed only in the appropriate circuit court for the region. Id. But there is an exception: actions that are “based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect” must be filed in the D.C. Circuit “if in taking such action the Administrator finds and publishes that such action is based on such a determination.” Id.In Calumet, the Court ruled 7-2 that the “EPA’s denials of small refinery exemption petitions are locally or regionally applicable actions that fall within the “nationwide scope or effect” exception, requiring venue in the D.C. Circuit.” Similarly, in Oklahoma, the Court ruled 8-0 that “EPA’s disapprovals of the Oklahoma and Utah state implementation plans are locally or regionally applicable actions reviewable in a regional court of appeals.” Tune in as Jimmy Conde and Garrett Kral offer a breakdown of these decisions.Featuring:James Conde, Partner, Boyden Gray PLLCModerator: Garrett Kral, Administrative and Environmental Law Attorney--To register, click the link above.

Chelan County officials have clarified courthouse security protocols following the arrest of a man by federal immigration authorities just outside the county courthouse three weeks ago. Read more: https://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/local/chelan-county-officials-clarify-courthouse-arrest-protocols-following-ice-encounter/article_9b093456-bb5e-474d-81ac-8bb03f6a269a.html Support the show: https://www.wenatcheeworld.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Our Legal Bestie Attorney Symone Redwine takes us inside the Diddy courtroom (it's like watching a Black movie at a Black theatre opening weekend), helps us understand Jane's scarcity-survival mode and why it's ok (legally) that Diddy is paying for her lawyer, and explains why the Defense is scheduled to rest after just two days.  Ooh, oh, also(!): the high stakes (production nightmare) of that Tyler Perry lawsuit and how Cassie's lawsuit against Diddy set the stage for it.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Hosted By Nell  Cousin Brittany  Lobo

Kickstart your morning with a dose of fun, laughter, and the best feel-good tunes! Darren, Sherlin, and Sibs are here to shake up your day with the freshest breakfast show in town. Brace yourself for the thrilling 20K Pop Quiz with Suzuki, a trip down memory lane with the Vinyl Classic, Darren’s legendary pranks, and the wildest stories from What’s Happening at the Courthouse with Rameez. Whether you’re in it for the laughs, the music, or the big wins, this is the only way to wake up right!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the last several years, numerous minors who identify as transgender have undergone surgery and other medical procedures to mirror common physical features of the opposite sex. In March 2023, Tennessee enacted Senate Bill 1, which prohibits medical procedures for the purpose of either (1) enabling a minor to identify with, or live as, a […]

(The Center Square) – A federal judge sentenced Michael Madigan Friday to seven-and-a-half years in prison and ordered him to pay a fine of $2.5 million for crimes committed during his tenure as the longest-serving speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives. Judge John Robert Blakey handed down the 90-month sentence Friday at the Everett McKinley Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in Chicago. He also imposed three years of supervised release after his prison time ends. Madigan will be required to report to prison on Oct. 13. The judge said it was difficult to reconcile the two recommendations, one from government attorneys and one from the defense. Prosecutors had asked for a 12.5-year prison sentence and a $1.5 million fine. Defense attorneys requested that Madigan be sentenced to a year of home confinement with probation and community service.

In the last several years, numerous minors who identify as transgender have undergone surgery and other medical procedures to mirror common physical features of the opposite sex.In March 2023, Tennessee enacted Senate Bill 1, which prohibits medical procedures for the purpose of either (1) enabling a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex, or (2) treating purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity. Individuals, joined by the United States, brought suit against Tennessee. They alleged that a ban on “gender affirming care” violates the Equal Protection Clause and that the Due Process Clause’s “substantive” component gives parents a right to demand medical interventions for their children, even if a state has found them to be unproven and risky.On June 18th, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that Tennessee’s law prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors is not subject to heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and satisfies rational basis review.Featuring:Erin M. Hawley, Senior Counsel, Vice President of Center for Life & Regulatory Practice, Alliance Defending Freedom(Moderator) Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow and Director of Constitutional Studies, Manhattan Institute

06-19-25 - It's Juneteenth And We Hope All Our Black Listeners Are Taking The Day Off - Singer Of Red Jumpsuit Apparatus Says Trump Voters Not Welcome At Shows - Watching Karen Reed Trial Confused By People Who Flew In To Stand At Courthouse In SupportSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A sinister Republican bond scheme could price you out of justice — forever...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

06-19-25 - It's Juneteenth And We Hope All Our Black Listeners Are Taking The Day Off - Singer Of Red Jumpsuit Apparatus Says Trump Voters Not Welcome At Shows - Watching Karen Reed Trial Confused By People Who Flew In To Stand At Courthouse In SupportSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Rameez Khan is on the steps of the courthouse and asking people the simple question: "What are you doing at the courthouse today?" Today, he speaks to a man who is supporting his friend and a woman whose boyfriend is in jail for attempted murder. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Headlines for June 18, 2025; Tehran Professor Reports from Iran State TV Building Bombed by Israel as Trump Threatens Khamenei; “A Moment of Immense Danger”: U.S. Inches Toward Direct Involvement in Israel’s War with Iran; Mosab Abu Toha: As Attention Shifts to Iran, Israel Ramps Up Killings, Starvation & Annexation in Gaza; “What Authoritarians Do”: NYC Comptroller Brad Lander Speaks Out After ICE Arrests Him in Courthouse

In Kousisis v. United States, the Supreme Court considered the question of whether a defendant who induces a victim to enter into a transaction under materially false pretenses may be convicted of federal fraud--even if the defendant did not seek to cause the victim economic loss. It heard oral argument on December 9, 2024, and on May 22, 2025, issued a unanimous decision authored by Justice Barrett affirming the lower court's holding that the defendant could be convicted of federal fraud.Although the Court was unanimous, there are an array of opinions. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion, Justice Gorsuch authored an opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment, and Justice Sotomayor wrote to concur in judgment.Join us for a Courthouse Steps program where we will discuss the decision and the potential ramifications of the case.Featuring:Brandon Moss, Partner, Wiley Rein

In Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Mexico brought suit against several U.S. gun manufacturers, including Smith & Wesson. It alleged, among other things, that they were in part liable for the killings perpetrated by Mexican cartels. Mexico argued that the gun manufacturers know the guns they sell are/may be illegally sold to the cartels and thus are the proximate causes of the resulting gun violence.The manufacturers argued that they were immune from such suits under the U.S. Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which protects U.S. gun manufacturers from certain types of liability, though not universally, as it contains a predicate exception for manufacturers who knowingly violate applicable federal (and potentially international) law.The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 4, 2025. On June 5, 2025, the Court issued a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Kagan, ruling that the PLCAA did prevent the suit from moving forward. Justices Thomas and Jackson both filed concurrences.Join us for a Courthouse Steps program where we will discuss the decision and the potential ramifications of the case.Featuring:Joel S. Nolette, Associate, Wiley Rein LLP

Wisconsin's unemployment insurance program provides financial assistance to those who have lost their job through no fault of their own. Under state law, certain nonprofit organizations can opt out of the program, including those operated primarily for religious purposes. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Superior—a religious ministry that serves people with disabilities, the elderly, […]

Klamath County was about to move into a courthouse just outside town -- but downtown businesses, fearful they'd lose their status as county seat, fought the plan with every weapon they had ... and won. (Klamath Falls, Klamath County; 1900s) (For text and pictures, see https://offbeatoregon.com/1812a.klamath-courthouse-battle.html)

Big Breakdown : Kentucky Sheriff Executes Judge in Courthouse—But Was It Vigilante Justice? In this episode of Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski, we take you deep inside one of the most shocking cases to hit the American justice system in decades—a sitting sheriff walks into a judge's chambers and pulls the trigger. But was it a breakdown, a hit, or the fallout from a system drowning in its own corruption? On September 19, 2024, Sheriff Sean “Mickey” Steins shot and killed Judge Kevin Mullins inside the Letcher County courthouse. The murder was caught on surveillance video. No one is questioning whether he did it. The question is: why? What unfolds next is a twisted tale of alleged courthouse sexual abuse, political backroom deals, federal lawsuits, and a defense strategy shifting between claims of insanity, extreme emotional disturbance, and the fallout of an explosive deposition just three days before the killing. Joined by defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, this breakdown dissects the legal tightrope ahead. We explore whether Steins' mental state qualifies as legally insane or just morally compromised. Was he cracking under guilt, paranoia, or blackmail? Was he protecting his family from threats—or himself from exposure? We also dig into the broader allegations: Was a courthouse being used for sexual coercion? Did Mullins turn a blind eye—or worse, enable it? And was Steins a whistleblower-turned-vigilante, or part of the very system he tried to destroy? This case isn't just about a murder—it's about how unchecked power, broken oversight, and small-town politics can spiral into violence. If you care about justice, corruption, and the cost of silence, you don't want to miss this episode. #JudgeMullins #SeanSteins #LetcherCounty #CourthouseMurder #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #CorruptionInKentucky #SexScandalCoverup #VigilanteJustice Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This case concerned the question of whether the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. When the Surface Transportation Board granted a petition from the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition to construct and operate an 80-mile Utah […]

CC417: Kail and Lindsie have some post-field day thoughts! Lindsie gives us a surprising update from New Orleans regarding the jail escape saga – Kail chooses a new prison bae! Also in today's episode, thoughts on the highly controversial game "Senior Assassin," the critical importance of pool and water safety, and one listener asks whether it's okay to skip your best friend's destination wedding. Plus, Lindsie and Kail share their opinions on technology-free dinners, a listener's AITA that we surprisingly don't agree with, and a Foul Play involving an untimely period.Thank you to our sponsors!Progressive: Visit Progressive.com to learn moreThrive Causemetics: New customers get the Liquid Lash Extensions Mascara and a mini-sized Brilliant Eye Brightener at a special set price with free shipping. Save more with 20% off your first order at https://thrivecausemetics.com/COFFEEWayfair: Visit Wayfair.com or get the Wayfair mobile app.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.