Podcasts about Hughes

Pastor Barry preaches on Romans 5.Support the show

 This is the 191st episode of my podcast, 'Soccernostalgia Talk Podcast' For this episode, I interview Welsh Football fan, Mr. Gareth Hughes as we discuss the Wales National Team during the 1984 UEFA Euros qualifiers.  For any questions/comments, you may contact us: You may also contact me on this blog, on twitter @sp1873 and on facebook under Soccernostalgia. https://linktr.ee/sp1873  Mr. Paul Whittle, @1888letter on twitter and https://the1888letter.com/contact/ https://linktr.ee/BeforeThePremierLeague  You may also follow the podcast on spotify and Apple podcasts all under ‘Soccernostalgia Talk Podcast' Please leave a review, rate and subscribe if you like the podcast. Mr. Hughes' contact info: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/gareth.hughes.37604 Twitter: @pontblyddyn     Listen on Spotify / Apple:  https://open.spotify.com/episode/1CAVVqhQ9LfXmz3Ytrz1oG?si=SYtKjpkYRkWPgjePZZI4Uw&nd=1&dlsi=66b69f74c5a148cdhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/soccernostalgia-talk-podcast-episode-191-interview/id1601074369?i=1000712992165 Youtube Link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt6lbqYhRpE  Blog Link:  https://soccernostalgia.blogspot.com/2025/06/soccernostalgia-talk-podcast-episode_15.htmlSupport the show

Have you ever felt intimidated by theological conversations? Today, we talked to Dr. Amy Brown Hughes about the role of dialogue in generating theology in the early church. Famous theologians like Methodius, Gregory of Nyssa and Augustine published conversations with others, including prominent women in their lives, such as Thecla, Macrina and Monica. Amy argues that theology was not an elite genre or closed discussion then – nor should it be so today! She thoughtfully engages with many issues surrounding our engagement with God and invites us to enter into theology as a hospitable conversation. We'd encourage you to listen and discover aspects of the patristic period that may surprise and challenge your preconceptions – and then come join the dialogue in the classroom from July 14-18 at Regent.BioDr. Amy Brown Hughes is an Associate Professor of Theology at Gordon College in Wenham, Massachusetts. She earned her Ph.D. in historical theology with an emphasis in early Christianity from Wheaton College in 2013. Dr. Hughes specializes in early Christianity, focusing on Trinitarian and Christological thought, theological anthropology, and the role of women in early Christian history. She co-authored the book Christian Women in the Patristic World with Lynn H. Cohick. We're excited that Amy will be joining us at Regent from July 14-18 to teach a class on Theology as Dialogue in Early Christianity. Summer Listener SurveyPlease fill out our Listener Survey before the end of July for the opportunity to win a $100 Regent College Bookstore Gift Card.Regent College Podcast Thanks for listening. Please like, rate and review us on your podcast platform of choice and share this episode with a friend. Follow Us on Social Media Facebook Instagram Youtube Keep in Touch Regent College Summer Programs Regent College Newsletter

In this letter to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, the defense opposes the government's request to recall expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes for a second appearance during its case-in-chief. The defense argues that it relied on the Court's original framework—reinforced in both the opening jury instructions and pretrial rulings—that each witness would testify only once. They further contend that recalling Dr. Hughes after her cross-examination would be unfair and prejudicial, as the defense structured its questioning with the understanding that it would be their sole opportunity to challenge her testimony during the government's presentation of its case.The letter also raises concern about the signal it would send to the jury, suggesting that the Court is endorsing the government's effort to rehabilitate a witness whose methodology and credibility were already subjected to extensive scrutiny. The defense emphasizes that it cannot repeat its prior cross-examination, nor should it be expected to. They argue that such a move is highly irregular and risks altering the fairness of the proceedings. The letter urges the Court to deny the government's request and preserve the integrity of its prior rulings regarding the scope and structure of Dr. Hughes's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.393.0.pdf

In this letter to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, the defense opposes the government's request to recall expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes for a second appearance during its case-in-chief. The defense argues that it relied on the Court's original framework—reinforced in both the opening jury instructions and pretrial rulings—that each witness would testify only once. They further contend that recalling Dr. Hughes after her cross-examination would be unfair and prejudicial, as the defense structured its questioning with the understanding that it would be their sole opportunity to challenge her testimony during the government's presentation of its case.The letter also raises concern about the signal it would send to the jury, suggesting that the Court is endorsing the government's effort to rehabilitate a witness whose methodology and credibility were already subjected to extensive scrutiny. The defense emphasizes that it cannot repeat its prior cross-examination, nor should it be expected to. They argue that such a move is highly irregular and risks altering the fairness of the proceedings. The letter urges the Court to deny the government's request and preserve the integrity of its prior rulings regarding the scope and structure of Dr. Hughes's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.393.0.pdf

Sat down with Empire Academy's Garret Hughes before his K-4 fight.

In this Ortho Marketing episode, Dean Steinman is joined by Brad Hughes, Founder and CEO of Vision Dental Partners. They explore how to grow and accelerate dental practices—from strategic acquisitions to marketing tactics that drive real results. Learn how to scale faster, streamline operations, and boost patient growth post-acquisition.Ready to elevate your practice? Contact us!https://orthomarketing.com/contact-us/About Brad HughesDr. Hughes is a third-generation dentist, proudly following in his father and grandfather's footsteps, and has been providing excellent dentistry for over 17 years. He is a graduate of Indiana University School of Dentistry. With a passion for growing teams and helping others thrive both personally and professionally, Dr. Hughes has dedicated his career to fostering leadership and development in his practices and throughout the dental industry. His entrepreneurial spirit and commitment to growth continue to shape the future of his expanding dental group and the dental space as a whole.

From her roots on a New South Wales farm to leading education for Cotton Australia, Jenny Hughes is cultivating the future of food and fibre education. Learn classroom ready ideas for teaching about cotton in your classroom, whether you're from the city or the country. Hosted by Ben Newsome from Fizzics Education About Jenny Hughes Jenny Hughes brings a wealth of experience and passion to her role as Education Manager at Cotton Australia, where she leverages her background in teaching, event organisation, communications, and hospitality. Originally from a sheep and wheat property in central New South Wales, Jenny’s deep-rooted connection to agriculture fuels her commitment to food and fibre education. In her current role, she is a strategic thought leader and influencer, known for her advanced relationship skills and extensive network. Her responsibilities include managing the Cotton Classroom resource library, creating curriculum-linked educational materials, and supporting teachers and undergraduates through scholarships to attend relevant events. She also oversees the Teach the Teacher Field Trips program, delivers workshops at education and career events, and manages Cotton Australia's interactive displays at major agricultural shows like The Sydney Royal and EKKA.About Cotton Australia Cotton Australia is the peak body for Australia’s cotton growers, representing up to 1,500 cotton farming families, predominantly in New South Wales and Queensland with a committed and increasing number of growers in the emerging markets of the Northern Territory and Western Australia. Learn more For Cotton Classroom to access free curriculum-linked resources and request a Cotton Sample Kit posted to your school, click here. YouTube Channel Seed to Sock Video   Water Allocations Explained   Sustainability in Cotton   Google Arts & Culture page   Facebook Hosted by Ben Newsome from Fizzics Education With interviews with leading science educators and STEM thought leaders, this science education podcast is about highlighting different ways of teaching kids within and beyond the classroom. It's not just about educational practice & pedagogy, it's about inspiring new ideas & challenging conventions of how students can learn about their world! https://www.fizzicseducation.com.au/ Know an educator who'd love this STEM podcast episode?  Share it!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, the defense opposes the government's request to recall expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes for a second appearance during its case-in-chief. The defense argues that it relied on the Court's original framework—reinforced in both the opening jury instructions and pretrial rulings—that each witness would testify only once. They further contend that recalling Dr. Hughes after her cross-examination would be unfair and prejudicial, as the defense structured its questioning with the understanding that it would be their sole opportunity to challenge her testimony during the government's presentation of its case.The letter also raises concern about the signal it would send to the jury, suggesting that the Court is endorsing the government's effort to rehabilitate a witness whose methodology and credibility were already subjected to extensive scrutiny. The defense emphasizes that it cannot repeat its prior cross-examination, nor should it be expected to. They argue that such a move is highly irregular and risks altering the fairness of the proceedings. The letter urges the Court to deny the government's request and preserve the integrity of its prior rulings regarding the scope and structure of Dr. Hughes's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.393.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Full episode here! https://www.spreaker.com/episode/day-190-june-8-2025--66473429Get access to every episode of Day Zerohttps://spreaker.page.link/SxbwuK8SNGwp2y2h6Forbidden Knowledge Network https://forbiddenknowledge.newsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/forbidden-knowledge-news--3589233/support.

Hughes Norton joined Baskin and Phelps to preview the US Open. He talked about the future of golf as it pertains to the PGA and LIV Tours as competitors, whether or not he thinks LIV golfers will ever return to the PGA, and shared his predictions for the upcoming major.

Hour 2 of Baskin and Phelps

"Jesus Is The Miracle Multiplier" Pastor Kody Hughes 6.8.25

Welcome back to the studio.  This is My Day of Play, where you're taken into the real events and actions of how it happens long before the process of editing or cleaning up.  The original purpose of these episodes was to give my broadcasting students something to edit, to practice with and to call their own.  Then I realized that you are just as important.  Share the reality of how it really went.  We begin things with Ken Curtis and Jillian Hughes the creators of Geeking Out Heroes and Olympians.  But they've got something new to bring to families.  Then we'll step into the realms of reality with true crime podcaster Sloane Glass. And we'll wrap things up with an amazing actress and activator.  The unforgettable Stephanie Powers.  This is My Day of Play.  Completely unedited in the way of meeting the wizard behind the curtain.  Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-unplugged-totally-uncut--994165/support.

Economic growth increased by 9.7% in the first quarter of the year, with the CSO saying the significant growth was driven by an increase in exports of goods, which rose by nearly 15%. For more on these stories, Bobby is joined by economist Austin Hughes to discuss.

Podcast sponsors:1) Trinergy Health offers a 6-month program for mind-body recovery and wellness. Based on the foundational framework of Diet/trauma/toxins. To schedule an intake appointment, go to https://psychiatry2.com/schedule/ or call 262-955-6601. Use code Rav10 to get 10% discount for holistic psychiatry program.2) Alcami Elements - a natural, adaptogenic herbal supplement to kickstart your day! https://www.alcamielements.com/ Receive 10% OFF first order or 30% OFF subscription order using code: ILLUSIONIn this episode, Rav is joined by journalist and author Mia Hughes (The WPATH Files) for a wide-ranging conversation on the rise of gender dysphoria, particularly among adolescent girls. They explore the psychological and cultural forces driving this trend, including trauma, social contagion, and the influence of online communities. Mia shares her personal journey and offers a critical perspective on gender-affirming care, the phenomenon of autogynephilia, and the concept of diagnostic overshadowing—where gender identity becomes the sole focus of treatment at the expense of underlying mental health conditions. Together, they reflect on the ethical dilemmas within the trans rights movement, the medicalization of nonconforming identity, and the growing cultural shift toward victimhood over resilience.Chapters:00:00 Introduction to Gender Affirming Care02:02 Mia Hughes' Journey and Background05:20 The WPATH Files and Medical Scandal07:49 Statistics and Social Contagion in Gender Dysphoria12:55 Counterarguments: Transgender Identification vs. Homosexuality15:45 The Nature of Gender Dysphoria21:16 Understanding Autogynephilia27:26 The Impact of Trans Rights Movement33:01 Comparing Autogynephilia and Homosexuality40:23 Understanding Autogynephilia and Its Implications44:04 The Debate on Gender-Affirming Care50:29 Demographics of Gender Dysphoria58:49 The Role of Trauma in Gender Dysphoria01:12:32 Causation vs Correlation in Gender Identity01:14:58 Understanding Mental Health: Symptoms vs. Explanations01:18:47 The Role of Trauma in Mental Health01:21:35 The DSM and the Nature of Psychiatric Diagnoses01:24:29 The Impact of Labels on Mental Health01:27:48 Mindfulness and Mental Health01:32:23 The Utility of Diagnoses in Self-Discovery01:36:34 Navigating ADHD and Attention Issues01:42:11 The Paradox of Modern Life and Mental Health01:45:53 Victimhood Culture and Mental Health Perspectives This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.illusionconsensus.com/subscribe

In the past, Snow makes a wish that grants the entire Enchanted Forest the ability to use the gift of song as a strength, which also spreads to Oz as well. When Regina becomes affected by the wish, she finds a way to end it before the first curse takes place, but the Blue Fairy, […]

Kencan Dengan Tuhan - Sabtu, 7 Juni 2025Bacaan: "Sebab itu terimalah satu akan yang lain, sama seperti Kristus juga telah menerima kita, untuk kemuliaan Allah." (Roma 15:7)Renungan: Howard Hughes adalah seorang milioner pada zamannya, karena harta yang dimilikinya begitu melimpah. Hughes menikah dengan Jean Peters, wanita yang diakui sebagai wanita tercantik pada masa itu. Walaupun kaya dan memiliki istri yang sangat cantik, tetapi Hughes tidak pernah merasakan kebahagiaan dan kedamaian. Hughes menganggap istrinya hanya sebagai benda penghias hidupnya, sehingga pada tahun 1970 ia menceraikan Jean Peters. Hidup Hughes yang bergelimang harta membuatnya dapat pergi ke mana saja ia mau, yaitu untuk mencari kebahagiaan yang sangat diinginkannya. Hughes berkeliling dunia dengan memilih hotel-hotel bintang lima di Las Vegas, Nikaragua, Acapulco, dll, sebagai tempat tinggalnya. Sekalipun Hughes berkelana dari satu negara ke negara lain untuk mencari kebahagiaan, namun ia tidak menemukannya. Hidupnya penuh dengan kemuraman belaka. Di kemudian hari, kemuraman yang menyelimuti jiwanya membuat Hughes membiarkan rambutnya tumbuh panjang terurai hingga pinggang, kuku tangan serta kakinya tidak lagi dipotong sampai akhirnya orang menganggapnya sakit jiwa. Mengapa Hughes menjadi orang yang aneh? Karena ia tidak mampu membangun hubungan yang baik dengan orang lain, ia tidak memiliki kecerdasan emosional. Hughes menganggap orang lain hanya sebagai objek yang dapat dimanfaatkan, sebaliknya orang yang berteman dengannya hanyalah orang yang bermotivasi untuk meraup keuntungan semata. Tentu saja hubungan yang dilandasi atas dasar yang demikian tidak akan mendatangkan kebaikan. Jika menginginkan orang lain menghargai dan menerima kita apa adanya, maka kitalah yang pertama harus menghargai dan berkeputusan untuk menerima orang lain apa adanya. Buanglah sikap yang menggurui dan "bossy" atau sok menjadi raja atas orang lain. Jauhi sikap menekan mereka yang ada di bawah kita, meskipun orang itu tidak memiliki pendidikan yang memadai. Kebahagiaan akan menyelimuti hari-hari kita jika kita bisa membangun hubungan yang baik dengan semua orang. Terimalah orang lain sebagai saudara dengan segala kekurangan dan kelebihannya, sebagaimana Kristus menerima kita dengan segala kekurangan dan kelebihan kita, bahkan pada waktu kita masih berdosa! Tuhan Yesus memberkati. Doa:Tuhan Yesus, terima kasih atas teladan dan penerimaan-Mu yang luar biasa terhadapku. Bantulah aku agar aku pun dapat menerima dan membangun persahabatan dengan sesamaku. Amin. (Dod).

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf

Lou Hughes, President and CEO of IMI, brings us inside the evolving world of global electronics manufacturing where uncertainty has become the only certainty. From his perspective leading a major EMS provider through turbulent times, Hughes shares candid insights about how companies are adapting to constant disruption.The conversation opens with a frank assessment of tariff uncertainties and their paralyzing effect on customer decision-making. "I think our customers are totally frustrated by the whole situation and everybody is just frozen in place," Hughes explains, highlighting how geopolitics directly impacts manufacturing strategies. This uncertainty creates a challenging business environment where planning becomes increasingly difficult.What emerges as particularly fascinating is Hughes' articulation of a fundamental industry paradox: customers demand manufacturing flexibility across regions to mitigate geopolitical risks, but resist paying the premium required to maintain that capability. "To say you're fast and flexible is one thing, but to truly be able to deliver that to a customer at a competitive price they expect is completely different," Hughes notes. This tension between flexibility and cost efficiency represents perhaps the central challenge facing global manufacturers today.Hughes then reveals IMI's strategic response - consolidation around "super sites" rather than maintaining numerous smaller facilities. He explains how the company recently sold its Czech facility while expanding operations in Serbia, believing that "fewer bigger sites" improve competitiveness by controlling overhead costs. Similarly, IMI's Mexico operations have become its busiest location for new product introductions, particularly attractive to customers seeking tariff advantages under current trade rules. This practical approach to balancing global presence with operational efficiency offers valuable lessons for navigating manufacturing in an increasingly unpredictable world.Ready to dive deeper into the realities of global manufacturing strategy? Listen now to understand how leading manufacturing companies are redesigning their operations to thrive amid constant change.EMS@C-Level is sponsored by global inspection leaders Koh Young (https://www.kohyoung.com) and Creative Electron (https://creativeelectron.com) You can see video versions of all of the EMS@C-Level pods on our YouTube playlist.

This week on the Troika we meander through the topic of Howard Hughes, intelligent nepo baby, dater of stars, bedder of bombshells, madman with OCD in isolation and lacking help while surrounded by the obsequious worship of his massive wealth by a cadre of sycophants. We also discuss, comfortable cigarettes. Enjoy?!

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Charge F Gabbie Hughes on dealing with the unknown involving PWHL expansion, overwhelmed to be staying in Ottawa, seeing the league grow and the energy fans bring to Ottawa Charge games.

Charge F Gabbie Hughes on staying in Ottawa and PWHL expansion and the Redblacks are still trying to plug the same holes.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Moritz, Rainer www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Studio 9

Moritz, Rainer www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, Studio 9

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the  testimony of government expert Dr. Dawn Hughes, the defense team representing Sean Combs expressed concern that Hughes may exceed the boundaries established by the Court in its prior rulings. Drawing from 3500 material documenting her meetings with prosecutors after the April 18 and April 25, 2025, pre-trial conferences, the defense flagged several areas they believe could lead to prejudicial or impermissible testimony. They specifically cautioned that Dr. Hughes might offer opinions on subjects the Court previously deemed inadmissible, potentially violating the evidentiary scope outlined in earlier orders.The defense also noted that during a recent meet-and-confer with the government, prosecutors agreed to avoid certain topics during Dr. Hughes's direct examination. Despite this, the defense submitted the letter as a preemptive measure to ensure these boundaries are upheld during her testimony. Their objective is to secure the Court's oversight and intervention if necessary, to prevent Hughes from introducing testimony that could unfairly prejudice the jury or infringe on Combs' right to a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsoruce:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.362.0.pdf

Dawn Prince-Hughes spent years misunderstood—ostracized, unhoused, and struggling to find her place in the world. Everything changed the day she met a 500-pound silverback gorilla. In this powerful episode of Uncomfy, Dr. Prince-Hughes shares her extraordinary story of being identified as autistic at age 36—and how her connection with gorillas helped her understand human connection, truth, and herself. She explores what it means to belong, to embrace differences, and to connect on a primal, honest level. Dr. Dawn Prince-Hughes is an anthropologist, primatologist, author, and co-chair of the Cultural Autism Studies Program at Yale. Read Dawn's memoir: Songs of the Gorilla Nation: My Journey Through Autism – https://a.co/d/hwE3EBJ Learn more about the Cultural Autism Studies Program at Yale (CASY) – https://culturalautismstudiesatyale.space/ Share your Uncomfy story with us – uncomfy@byu.edu Subscribe/follow so you never miss an Uncomfy conversation! Episode transcript - https://uncomfypodcastbyu.blogspot.com/2025/06/how-gorillas-helped-me-understand.html CHAPTERS 00:00 Introduction 00:41 Understanding Autism: Statistics and Awareness 01:08 Meet Dawn Prince-Hughes: Anthropologist and Primatologist 01:46 Dawn's Journey: From Homelessness to Working with Gorillas 03:38 Lessons from Gorillas: Social Interactions and Humor 08:32 Identifying Autism: Dawn's Personal Experience 12:49 The Power of Cultural Belonging 15:40 Societal Changes for Autistic Individuals 17:23 Conclusion

Building a business involves making wise choices, focusing on what matters most, and driving long-term value.Joel Hughes, CEO of Rightworks, has guided his company from a niche QuickBooks hosting service to a comprehensive platform for accounting professionals. With a background in engineering and years of startup experience, Joel shifted to the accounting space, bringing a fresh perspective on technology adoption and customer-centric solutions.In this episode, Joel shares the story of Rightworks' evolution and the importance of staying focused on a single vertical. He explains how building a strong team and creating a shared vision are crucial for success. Joel also touches on the impact of industry-specific expertise and how growing a community within your space can help drive real, sustainable change.In this episode, you'll learn:The critical role of building a company around a focused, specialized vision.How slow, thoughtful change can create sustainable growth without overwhelming your team.Why creating community within your industry can drive innovation and adoption.Jump into the conversation: (00:00) Meet Joel Hughes(01:55) Moving from doing the work to managing teams(07:08) From product creation to company building(10:25) Sharing passion to inspire your team(12:53) Focusing on the accounting and tax vertical(15:04) Overcoming slow decision-making in firms(18:31) The power of referrals in firm growth(21:00) Expanding from QuickBooks hosting to a full platform(24:15) Introducing Spark AI and its industry impact(27:00) Building community for innovation in the profession(30:14) Scaling impact through peer interaction(33:40) Managing change and aligning teams(36:44) Creating a shared long-term vision(39:05) The importance of culture in team success(41:23) Building teams aligned with future growth

Join Chelsea and Roger and they recap Season One of the hit CW Dramady and Musical, “Crazy Ex Girlfriend”. So grab a cup of tea and join us as we explore the musical world of West Corvina and beyond with Chelsea and Roger. Any questions or comments? call (309) 761-4433 Check out the site for […]

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the  testimony of government expert Dr. Dawn Hughes, the defense team representing Sean Combs expressed concern that Hughes may exceed the boundaries established by the Court in its prior rulings. Drawing from 3500 material documenting her meetings with prosecutors after the April 18 and April 25, 2025, pre-trial conferences, the defense flagged several areas they believe could lead to prejudicial or impermissible testimony. They specifically cautioned that Dr. Hughes might offer opinions on subjects the Court previously deemed inadmissible, potentially violating the evidentiary scope outlined in earlier orders.The defense also noted that during a recent meet-and-confer with the government, prosecutors agreed to avoid certain topics during Dr. Hughes's direct examination. Despite this, the defense submitted the letter as a preemptive measure to ensure these boundaries are upheld during her testimony. Their objective is to secure the Court's oversight and intervention if necessary, to prevent Hughes from introducing testimony that could unfairly prejudice the jury or infringe on Combs' right to a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsoruce:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.362.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

PGA Tour Golfer Mackenzie Hughes joined OverDrive to discuss the mindset entering the RBC Canadian Open, the experience playing TPC Toronto and the advantages of the course, the preparation for the U.S. Open, the skill set of his putting game and around the green and more.

If you've ever felt like you're just throwing money at Facebook or Instagram ads and hoping something sticks — this episode is for YOU. I sat down with the founder of Hughes Media, the ad strategist behind countless successful photography campaigns (including mine!), to talk about what actually works when it comes to paid ads for photographers.**use referral code: RACHEL and get one month free!**We're digging into the difference between boosted posts and a real ad strategy, why your ads might not be converting, and how to make sure you're not wasting your budget — especially if you're trying to book high-end clients or grow your bookings fast.Whether you've never touched ads before or you've been frustrated by poor results, this episode breaks it down in a way that's easy to understand and ready to implement.In This Episode, We Cover:The difference between a boosted post vs. a true ad campaignWhat types of ads actually work for photographersWhy so many creatives waste money on ads that don't convertThe #1 mistake photographers make when running their own adsWhat it really takes for ads to work (hint: it's more than just a pretty photo)How to make sure your backend funnel supports your ad spendWhat results you can realistically expect from a good ad strategyWhy working with a niche ad team matters (and how Hughes Media is different)Want help with your ads? Work with Hughes Media: use referral code: RACHEL and get one month free!Join my coaching program for photographers: https://racheltraxler.com/passiontoprofit⁠⁠⁠⁠DM me “ADS” on Instagram @racheltraxler and use referral code: RACHEL and get one month free!Follow Hughes Media on IG: https://www.instagram.com/the_hughesmedia/

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the  testimony of government expert Dr. Dawn Hughes, the defense team representing Sean Combs expressed concern that Hughes may exceed the boundaries established by the Court in its prior rulings. Drawing from 3500 material documenting her meetings with prosecutors after the April 18 and April 25, 2025, pre-trial conferences, the defense flagged several areas they believe could lead to prejudicial or impermissible testimony. They specifically cautioned that Dr. Hughes might offer opinions on subjects the Court previously deemed inadmissible, potentially violating the evidentiary scope outlined in earlier orders.The defense also noted that during a recent meet-and-confer with the government, prosecutors agreed to avoid certain topics during Dr. Hughes's direct examination. Despite this, the defense submitted the letter as a preemptive measure to ensure these boundaries are upheld during her testimony. Their objective is to secure the Court's oversight and intervention if necessary, to prevent Hughes from introducing testimony that could unfairly prejudice the jury or infringe on Combs' right to a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsoruce:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.362.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 1977, the small town of Dansville, Michigan, was shattered by a fire that killed a man in his sleep. But this wasn't just another tragic house fire. What unfolded was a story of fear, survival, and justice in a system that offered none. And at the centre of it all was a woman named Francine Hughes.SHOW NOTES - https://morbidology.com/morbidology-podcast/PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/morbidologyYOUTUBE: https://youtube.com/morbidologyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/morbidology--3527306/support.

In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs's motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense's request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include.The government further asserts that Combs's arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes's expert contributions. They describe the defense's motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes's testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court's prior validation of its admissibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdf

In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs's motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense's request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include.The government further asserts that Combs's arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes's expert contributions. They describe the defense's motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes's testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court's prior validation of its admissibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdf

Christian welcomes back to the show Adam "Hughezy" / "The H Man" Hughes and Trucker Andy of the All Apologies podcast and Who Are These Podcasts to discuss the final film in the "Mission: Impossible" series, "Final Reckoning", and whether it was a fitting finale to this epic film franchise that spanned nearly 30 years.

Melvin Dummar: Howard Hughes WillMelvin Earl Dummar (August 28, 1944 – December 9, 2018) was a Utah man who earned attention when he claimed to have saved reclusive business tycoon Howard Hughes in the Nevada desert in 1967, and to have been awarded part of Hughes' vast estate. Dummar's claims resulted in a series of court battles that all ended in rulings against Dummar.[3] A Las Vegas jury determined in 1978 that the will, leaving Dummar $156 million, was a forgery.[4] Dummar's story was later adapted into Jonathan Demme's film Melvin and Howard in 1980. A 2005 reinvestigation of the circumstances surrounding the so-called Dummar Will yielded new evidence not previously known. Dummar's purported meeting with HughesWhile working at a service station in Willard, Utah, Dummar claimed to have discovered a disheveled and lost man lying on the side of a stretch of U.S. Route 95 about 150 miles (240 km) north of Las Vegas, Nevada, near Lida Junction. The man asked Dummar to take him to the Sands Hotel in Las Vegas. Dummar claimed that only in the final minutes of their encounter did the man reveal his identity as Hughes.The "Mormon Will"After Hughes' death in April 1976, a handwritten will was discovered in the Salt Lake City, Utah headquarters of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Though purportedly written by Hughes in 1968, the will had many strange discrepancies. It named Noah Dietrich as an executor, despite the fact that Dietrich had left Hughes' employ on bad terms in the late 1950s. The will left approximately $156,000,000 to the LDS Church and although Hughes had employed many LDS workers, he had never been a member of that church. The will left money to his two ex-wives, Ella Rice and Jean Peters, even though both women had alimony settlements that barred claims on Hughes' estate. The will was rife with misspellings, including misspelling the name of Hughes' cousin. It called Hughes' famous flying boat, the Hughes H-4 Hercules, the "spruce goose" — a derisive nickname that Hughes had always despised.[5] Most oddly, the will left one "Melvin DuMar" of Gabbs, Nevada one-sixteenth of Hughes' estate.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs's motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense's request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include.The government further asserts that Combs's arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes's expert contributions. They describe the defense's motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes's testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court's prior validation of its admissibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs's motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense's request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include.The government further asserts that Combs's arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes's expert contributions. They describe the defense's motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes's testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court's prior validation of its admissibility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This document is a motion in limine filed by Sean Combs' legal team in his federal criminal case (Case No. 24-cr-542) in the Southern District of New York, seeking to exclude the testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a psychological expert the prosecution intends to call. Dr. Hughes is expected to testify about general behavioral patterns of victims and perpetrators of sexual and domestic abuse, which the defense argues would unfairly bolster the credibility of the government's witnesses — including alleged victims — without having evaluated any facts specific to this case. The defense asserts that Dr. Hughes's testimony is not based on a reliable scientific application to the actual circumstances surrounding Combs and instead consists of broad generalizations that risk misleading the jury by presenting “typical” abuse behavior as evidence of guilt.Combs' attorneys argue that Hughes's proposed testimony violates the standards set by Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 403, which regulate expert witness admissibility. They claim her statements offer no specialized knowledge beyond what jurors already understand — such as abusers exploiting power or victims remaining in abusive relationships — and that she conflates clinical definitions of coercion with legal ones, potentially confusing the jury. The motion asserts that Hughes's testimony is “advocacy masquerading as expertise” and warns it would improperly bolster the credibility of government witnesses under the guise of psychology. The defense urges the court to block her from testifying, citing that her opinions are methodologically unsound and prejudicial rather than probative.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.206.0.pdf

This document is a motion in limine filed by Sean Combs' legal team in his federal criminal case (Case No. 24-cr-542) in the Southern District of New York, seeking to exclude the testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a psychological expert the prosecution intends to call. Dr. Hughes is expected to testify about general behavioral patterns of victims and perpetrators of sexual and domestic abuse, which the defense argues would unfairly bolster the credibility of the government's witnesses — including alleged victims — without having evaluated any facts specific to this case. The defense asserts that Dr. Hughes's testimony is not based on a reliable scientific application to the actual circumstances surrounding Combs and instead consists of broad generalizations that risk misleading the jury by presenting “typical” abuse behavior as evidence of guilt.Combs' attorneys argue that Hughes's proposed testimony violates the standards set by Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 403, which regulate expert witness admissibility. They claim her statements offer no specialized knowledge beyond what jurors already understand — such as abusers exploiting power or victims remaining in abusive relationships — and that she conflates clinical definitions of coercion with legal ones, potentially confusing the jury. The motion asserts that Hughes's testimony is “advocacy masquerading as expertise” and warns it would improperly bolster the credibility of government witnesses under the guise of psychology. The defense urges the court to block her from testifying, citing that her opinions are methodologically unsound and prejudicial rather than probative.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.206.0.pdf

This is a clip from Day Zero! Get access to the full episode and all thier content on all podcast platforms or click the link belowFull episode here! https://www.spreaker.com/episode/day-188-may-25-2025--66295719Get access to every episode of Day Zerohttps://spreaker.page.link/SxbwuK8SNGwp2y2h6Forbidden Knowledge Network https://forbiddenknowledge.newsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/forbidden-knowledge-news--3589233/support.

Enjoy these back to back throwback episodes! Doors of Perception is available now on Amazon Prime!https://watch.amazon.com/detail?gti=amzn1.dv.gti.8a60e6c7-678d-4502-b335-adfbb30697b8&ref_=atv_lp_share_mv&r=webMake a Donation to Forbidden Knowledge News https://www.paypal.me/forbiddenknowledgenehttps://buymeacoffee.com/forbiddenThe Forbidden Documentary: Doors of Perception official trailerhttps://youtu.be/F-VJ01kMSII?si=Ee6xwtUONA18HNLZMerchhttps://fknstore.net/Start your microdosing journey with BrainsupremeGet 15% off your order here!!https://brainsupreme.co/discount/FKN15Book a free consultation with Jennifer Halcame Emailjenniferhalcame@gmail.comFacebook pagehttps://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561665957079&mibextid=ZbWKwLWatch The Forbidden Documentary: Occult Louisiana on Tubi: https://link.tubi.tv/pGXW6chxCJbC60 PurplePowerhttps://go.shopc60.com/FORBIDDEN10/or use coupon code knowledge10FKN Link Treehttps://linktr.ee/FKNlinksForbidden Knowledge Network https://forbiddenknowledge.news/ Johnny Larson's artworkhttps://www.patreon.com/JohnnyLarsonSign up on Rokfin!https://rokfin.com/fknplusPodcastshttps://www.spreaker.com/show/forbiddenAvailable on all platforms Support FKN on Spreaker https://spreaker.page.link/KoPgfbEq8kcsR5oj9FKN ON Rumblehttps://rumble.com/c/FKNpGet Cory Hughes Book!Audio bookhttps://buymeacoffee.com/jfkbook/e/392579https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jfkbookhttps://www.amazon.com/Warning-History-Cory-Hughes/dp/B0CL14VQY6/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=72HEFZQA7TAP&keywords=a+warning+from+history+cory+hughes&qid=1698861279&sprefix=a+warning+fro%2Caps%2C121&sr=8-1https://coryhughes.org/YouTube https://youtube.com/@fknclipspBecome Self-Sufficient With A Food Forest!!https://foodforestabundance.com/get-started/?ref=CHRISTOPHERMATHUse coupon code: FORBIDDEN for discountsOur Facebook pageshttps://www.facebook.com/forbiddenknowledgenewsconspiracy/https://www.facebook.com/FKNNetwork/Instagram @forbiddenknowledgenews1@forbiddenknowledgenetworkXhttps://x.com/ForbiddenKnow10?t=uO5AqEtDuHdF9fXYtCUtfw&s=09Email meforbiddenknowledgenews@gmail.comsome music thanks to:https://www.bensound.com/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/forbidden-knowledge-news--3589233/support.

In episode 487 I chat with Justin Hughes, Valerie Andrews, Dr Alan Noble, and Chelsea Risko. We discuss  how OCD can latch on to faith, scrupulosity, finding the line between compulsive prayer and valued prayer, exposure and response prevention therapy (ERP), inference-based cognitive behavioural therapy (I-CBT), how faith was a support for them, worrying about therapy and faith, working with a non faith based counsellor, words of hope, and much more.  Show notes: https://theocdstories.com/episode/faith-487 The podcast is made possible by NOCD. NOCD offers effective, convenient therapy available in the US and outside the US. To find out more about NOCD, their therapy plans and if they currently take your insurance head over to https://learn.nocd.com/theocdstories Join many other listeners getting our weekly emails. Never miss a podcast episode or update: https://theocdstories.com/newsletter  Thanks to all our patrons for supporting our work. To sign up to our Patreon and to check out the benefits you'll receive as a Patron, visit: https://www.patreon.com/theocdstoriespodcast