Situation in which a person is non-identifiable, unreachable, or untrackable
POPULARITY
79 episodes with anonymously
80 episodes with anonymously
37 episodes with anonymously
41 episodes with anonymously
19 episodes with anonymously
9 episodes with anonymously
10 episodes with anonymously
8 episodes with anonymously
11 episodes with anonymously
7 episodes with anonymously
5 episodes with anonymously
11 episodes with anonymously
2 episodes with anonymously
6 episodes with anonymously
5 episodes with anonymously
2 episodes with anonymously
6 episodes with anonymously
2 episodes with anonymously
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Ontario Court of Appeal decision R. v. Jackson, 2025 ONCA 717 where police — after witnessing a suspected drug deal — stopped a vehicle, claiming a passenger was not wearing his seat belt. During the interaction, police saw cannabis shake (green specs and flakes) on the dashboard, smelled fresh marihuana and noticed an air freshener in the vehicle. When the man was about to be searched under Ontario's Cannabis Control Act, he fled, only to be chased down and arrested. A search incident to arrest turned up two ounces of fentanyl in his possession and other drugs in the vehicle. When this went to court the man alleged the police used the seatbelt infraction as a false pretext to arbitrarily detain him and search for drugs, and he wanted the evidence excluded. Was the traffic stop lawful? Or did the police use their Highway Traffic Act authority as a ruse — a false flag — to pull the vehicle over and search it? What you might learn may help you with future stops where you are suspicious of a vehicle's occupants while at the same time witness a traffic related infraction. Sentencing reasons (R. v. Jackson, 2024 ONSC 2402).Ontario's Highway Traffic Act (HTA)s. 216(1) HTA:A police officer, in the lawful execution of his or her duties and responsibilities, may require the driver of a vehicle, other than a bicycle, to stop and the driver of a vehicle, when signalled or requested to stop by a police officer who is readily identifiable as such, shall immediately come to a safe stop.s. 106(3) HTA:Every person who is at least 16 years old and is a passenger in a motor vehicle on a highway shall, (a) occupy a seating position for which a seat belt assembly has been provided; and (b) wear the complete seat belt assembly as required by subsection (5). Ontario's Cannabis Control Act (CCA)s. 12(1) CCA:No person shall drive or have the care or control of a vehicle or boat, whether or not it is in motion, while any cannabis is contained in the vehicle or boat.s. 12(2) CCA:Subsection (1) does not apply with respect to cannabis that, (a) is in its original packaging and has not been opened; or (b) is packed in baggage that is fastened closed or is not otherwise readily available to any person in the vehicle or boat. s. 12(3) CCA:A police officer who has reasonable grounds to believe that cannabis is being contained in a vehicle or boat in contravention of subsection (1) may at any time, without a warrant, enter and search the vehicle or boat and search any person found in it.Other reference:R. v. Kaddoura, 2009 BCCA 113.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Ontario Court of Appeal decision R. v. Samuels, 2025 ONCA 736 where police arrested a man for drug trafficking and searched him at the scene incident to arrest by lifting his shirt and removing a bag of drugs sticking out from his underwear waistband. The man's sweatpants were then lowered to his knees, exposing a pair of jeans underneath, so officer's could search his pockets. Police found a trove or drugs and drug-related evidence. Did these searches amount to a "strip search" such that special rules applied? Or were they more akin to a pat-down or frisk search, requiring no additional justification? Listen to learn on which side of this issue Ontario's top court fell? References:Lower court ruling (R. v. Samuels, 2023 ONCJ 596).Sentencing decision (R. v. Samuels, 2023 ONCJ 597).R. v. Choi, 2021 BCCA 410.R. v. Golden, 2001 SCC 83.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Supreme Court of Canada decision R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 where police arrested people present at a drug overdose after someone called 9-1-1 for emergency medical assistance. A search incident to arrest revealed modified handguns, firearm parts and ammunition inside a nearby vehicle. Was the arrest lawful? Or did the amendments made to the CDSA under the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act exempt a person present at the overdose not only from a charge or conviction for simple possession — as the text expressly provides — but also from arrest? If the arrest was unlawful, what should happen to the evidence? Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (2023 SKCA 106)Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act videoS.O.S.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision R. v. Brabant, 2025 SKCA 101 where police arrested a man without reasonable grounds to do so. When the man was searched, police found meth in his pocket and a sawed-off rifle under his sweater. Although the trial judge found Charter breaches — arbitrary detention and unreasonable search — the evidence was nevertheless admitted because the police could have detained the man and patted him down for safety and discovered the evidence anyway. Did the trial judge properly consider discoverability of the evidence in his s. 24(2) analysis? Or should the evidence have been excluded? Listen and find out how Saskatchewan's Court of Appeal felt about the trial judge's ruling.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Ontario Court of Appeal decision R. v. Ngo, 2025 ONCA 685 where police conducted a no-knock entry when executing a search warrant? Was departing from the knock-and-announce rule justified in the circumstances? Or did police action render the manner of search unreasonable?Lower court decision (R. v. Ngo, 2022 ONSC 3700)Sentencing decision (R. v. Ngo, 2023 ONSC 282)Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike looks back to the basics of search and seizure law by using the acronym CLEW — Consent | Lawful Exception | Warrant — that you can use to think about this important investigative tool. Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the BC Supreme Court decision R. v. Bateman, 2025 BCSC 1780 where police responded to an abandoned 911 call. Suspecting a possible domestic, an officer patted-down a man who answered the door at the residence. After feeling something “hard” and “firm” in the man's hoodie pocket, the officer reached in and removed the object, subsequently discovering it to be cocaine wrapped in a Ziplock baggie. Was the initial pat down lawful and, if so, was reaching into the pocket and removing the object for its inspection justified? Did either — or both — of these police actions exceed what was permitted in the circumstances? Listen and find out how a judge ruled on the matter. Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Welcome to Chat GPT, the only podcast where artificial intelligence takes the mic to explore the fascinating, fast-changing world of AI itself. From ethical dilemmas to mind-bending thought experiments, every episode is written and narrated by AI to help you decode the technology shaping our future. Whether you're a curious beginner or a seasoned techie, this is your front-row seat to the rise of intelligent machines—told from their perspective. Tune in for smart stories, surprising insights, and a glimpse into the future of thinking itself. Listen Ad Free https://www.solgoodmedia.com - Listen to hundreds of audiobooks, thousands of short stories, and ambient sounds all ad free!
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
5pm: Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app // Breaking: A massive data breach exposed the information of every Tea user // Know It All Quiz // Letters
July 24th, 2025 Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and X Listen to past episodes on The Ticket’s Website And follow The Ticket Top 10 on Apple, Spotify or Amazon MusicSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tea is a "dating advice app" where women can stalk and bash men anonymously, and now it's the #1 app in the U.S. You know they won't make a male equivalent. Watch this podcast episode on YouTube and all major podcast hosts including Spotify. CLOWNFISH TV is an independent, opinionated news and commentary podcast that covers Entertainment and Tech from a consumer's point of view. We talk about Gaming, Comics, Anime, TV, Movies, Animation and more. Hosted by Kneon and Geeky Sparkles. D/REZZED News covers Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We're an independent, opinionated entertainment news blog covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. As part of Clownfish TV, we strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Get more news, views and reviews on Clownfish TV News - https://news.clownfishtv.com/ On YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/ClownfishTV On Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4Tu83D1NcCmh7K1zHIedvg On Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/clownfish-tv-audio-edition/id1726838629
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Tea is a "dating advice app" where women can stalk and bash men anonymously, and now it's the #1 app in the U.S. You know they won't make a male equivalent. A new dating app that allows women to anonymously report or rate men raises concerns about stalking, privacy invasion, and potential misuse, highlighting the need for caution and safeguards to protect users.00:00 The new dating app Tea, allowing anonymous flagging of men, raises concerns about stalking and privacy, and potential misuse by women to target well-intentioned men.02:52 A dating app called "Tea" lets women anonymously share info about men, sparking concerns about user verification and potential misuse.06:56 A dating app called "Tea" allows anonymous users to rate and stalk men, raising concerns about data privacy, exploitation, and misuse.11:17 A dating app allowing anonymous reports on men raises concerns about "man bashing", user identity verification, and potential gender discrimination.13:37 Anonymous dating apps that allow rating and tracking of men can lead to stalking, revenge, and false accusations, raising serious concerns about safety, privacy, and potential lawsuits.18:14 A new dating app allows women to anonymously track and discuss problematic men, sparking concerns about stalking, false accusations, and invasion of privacy.23:04 Anonymous "man bashing" dating apps raise concerns about privacy invasion, potential stalking, and malicious use, prompting calls for opt-out features to protect users.25:21 The dating app trend of anonymously "bashing" men is unfair and ridiculous, as it doesn't acknowledge that men are simply not interested in dating right now.Watch this podcast episode on YouTube and all major podcast hosts including Spotify.CLOWNFISH TV is an independent, opinionated news and commentary podcast that covers Entertainment and Tech from a consumer's point of view. We talk about Gaming, Comics, Anime, TV, Movies, Animation and more. Hosted by Kneon and Geeky Sparkles.D/REZZED News covers Pixels, Pop Culture, and the Paranormal! We're an independent, opinionated entertainment news blog covering Video Games, Tech, Comics, Movies, Anime, High Strangeness, and more. As part of Clownfish TV, we strive to be balanced, based, and apolitical. Get more news, views and reviews on Clownfish TV News - https://news.clownfishtv.com/On YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/ClownfishTVOn Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4Tu83D1NcCmh7K1zHIedvgOn Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/clownfish-tv-audio-edition/id1726838629
How to Buy a House Anonymously
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
The unhinged agony aunts are IN. Kee and Kel are answering your anonymous questions - from newborn hell and toddler tantrums to sharing finances and European adventures with small humans. There’s some big feels, questionable advice, and surprisingly useful tips buried in the chaos. You know the drill. LINKS TO EVERYTHING MENTIONEDGen Muir On Catching Your Toddler On The Emotional ClimbHow To Cope With Unhinged Toddlers"Little People, Big Feelings" - Gen MuirPakembl Large Travel BackpackShop Vestirsi Bella XL HOSTS & PRODUCERSKelly McCarren @kelly_mccarrenKee Reece Searles @keereece AUDIO PRODUCTIONMadeline Joannou - Mylk Media See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York TimesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
An act of kindness you do anonymously? "I donate platelets and plasma; I'm 25 years old and I'm at 20 gallons." "I like to Venmo or Apple Pay Cash to people who could use a pick me up! Like coffee or a treat." "I send a few elementary teachers a year a $100 gift card at beginning of year."See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! On the Road!Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
To subscribe to "The Women of Ward Radio" Youtube Channel, please visit: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbu-wpRztV-8TYXClhUZhhwTo Order Jonah's Book, "The Key to the Keystone" visit the following link and use coupon Code: WARDRADIO https://tinyurl.com/Key-to-the-KeystoneFor 10% off Plain and Precious Publishing Books, visit plainandpreciouspublishing.com and use Coupon Code: WARDRADIOFor a 5% discount on Go and Do Travel, visit goanddotravel.com and use the promo code WARDRADIO5For a copy of Brad Witbeck's Novel, "Dragon Thief" Book, visit: https://a.co/d/7QzqsZN⚡For free trial of Scripture Notes please visit the following link!: https://scripturenotes.com/?via=wardradioJoin this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnmsAFGrFuGe0obW6tkEY6w/joinVisit us for this and more at: WardRadio.com#christian #mormon #exmormon #latter-daysaints #latterdaysaints #latterdays #bible #bookofmormon #archaeology #BYU #midnightmormons #jesus #jesuschrist #scriptures #sundayschool #biblestudy #christiancomedy #cardonellis #kwakuel #bradwitbeckTo support the channel:Venmo @WardRadio or visit: https://account.venmo.com/u/MidnightMormonsPaypal: paypal.me/@midnightmedia Amazon Wish List: https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/1AQLMTSMBM4DC?ref_=wl_shareCashApp: $WardRadioFollow us at:Instagram: @cardonellis @kwakuel @braderico @boho.birdyFacebook: @WardRadioWorldwideTwitter: WardRadioShowTikTok: WardRadioWorldwide
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York Times
Allowing an accuser to proceed anonymously in civil lawsuits or criminal proceedings offers several advantages. It protects the individual's privacy, especially in cases involving sensitive matters like sexual assault, thereby reducing potential public scrutiny and emotional distress. Anonymity can also shield the accuser from possible retaliation or harassment, encouraging victims to come forward without fear of personal repercussions. This protection is particularly vital when the accused holds significant power or influence, as it helps balance the scales of justice.However, anonymity in legal proceedings presents notable challenges. It may hinder the defendant's ability to fully investigate the accuser's background and credibility, potentially impacting the fairness of the trial. The public's right to open judicial proceedings is also compromised, as transparency is a cornerstone of the legal system. Moreover, anonymity could inadvertently suggest that the allegations are more severe, potentially biasing jurors or the public against the defendant. Courts must carefully weigh these factors, often requiring compelling reasons to grant anonymity to ensure that justice is served equitably for all parties involved.The debate over anonymity for Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers centers on balancing the accusers' privacy and safety with the defendant's right to a fair trial and the public's interest in transparent legal proceedings. Some accusers have sought to proceed under pseudonyms to protect themselves from potential harassment and public scrutiny. However, courts have ruled that allegations alone do not justify anonymity, emphasizing the importance of openness in judicial processes and the defendant's ability to investigate the accusers' credibility. This tension highlights the complexities of handling sensitive allegations against high-profile individuals.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Most of Sean ‘Diddy' Combs's Accusers Are Unnamed. Can They Stay That Way? - The New York Times
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Mitch Harper breaks down anonymous comments from Big 12 coaches regarding this year's BYU football team.
Listen to this week's episode of the Dateline: True Crime Weekly podcast with Andrea Canning. In Placer County, California, a former MLB pitcher is on trial for gunning down his in-laws at their home. He says he didn't do it. A new expert testifies at the Karen Read retrial about data pulled from Read's car. He says it nails down the prosecution's timeline of what happened. Updates on the Menendez brothers and Lori Vallow Daybell. Plus, an attorney talks about witnesses who testify anonymously.
5-12 Andscape's Marc Spears praises Tyrese Haliburton's efforts in the 2025 playoffs after being voted "overrated" anonymously by his peersSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In Placer County, California, a former MLB pitcher is on trial for allegedly gunning down his in-laws in their home. He says he didn't do it. A new expert testifies at the Karen Read retrial about data pulled from Read's car. He says it nails down the prosecution's timeline of what happened. The defense has a blistering response. Updates on the Menendez brothers and Lori Vallow Daybell. Plus, an attorney talks about witnesses who testify anonymously. Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com
5-12 Andscape's Marc Spears praises Tyrese Haliburton's efforts in the 2025 playoffs after being voted "overrated" anonymously by his peersSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
