Podcasts about anonymously

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Mitch Harper breaks down anonymous comments from Big 12 coaches regarding this year's BYU football team.

Listen to this week's episode of the Dateline: True Crime Weekly podcast with Andrea Canning. In Placer County, California, a former MLB pitcher is on trial for gunning down his in-laws at their home. He says he didn't do it.  A new expert testifies at the Karen Read retrial about data pulled from Read's car. He says it nails down the prosecution's timeline of what happened. Updates on the Menendez brothers and Lori Vallow Daybell. Plus, an attorney talks about witnesses who testify anonymously. 

5-12 Andscape's Marc Spears praises Tyrese Haliburton's efforts in the 2025 playoffs after being voted "overrated" anonymously by his peersSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Placer County, California, a former MLB pitcher is on trial for allegedly gunning down his in-laws in their home. He says he didn't do it. A new expert testifies at the Karen Read retrial about data pulled from Read's car. He says it nails down the prosecution's timeline of what happened. The defense has a blistering response. Updates on the Menendez brothers and Lori Vallow Daybell. Plus, an attorney talks about witnesses who testify anonymously. Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com

5-12 Andscape's Marc Spears praises Tyrese Haliburton's efforts in the 2025 playoffs after being voted "overrated" anonymously by his peersSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike highlights National Police Week (May 11-17, 2025) and discusses the Ontario Court of Justice decision R. v. Vernaza-Vinces, 2025 ONCJ 257 where police chased a man on foot until he entered a vehicle and fled. Even though the police never pursued the man's vehicle in a police car, the court had to determine whether a charge of flight from police under s. 320.17 of the Criminal Code applied. Or was an essential element of the crime a requirement that the police themselves be pursuing in a motor vehicle?  Order of Merit of the Police Forces Ceremony.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Manitoba Provincial Court decision R. v. Wiebe, 2025 MBPC 35 where the police  installed a fixed pole camera in an alley accessible to the public to video record — for a month — the back lane and part of the concrete approach of a detached garage. Information noted by the police included the makes, models and licence plates of vehicles attending the garage; the time of day of the comings and goings; people who attended, who they were attending with, the type of clothing worn, and characteristics such as hair style, facial hair and tattoos. Did the warrantless use of the pole camera itself amount to a Charter search such that s. 8 was engaged?  Winnipeg Police Service Press Release.R. v. Desylva sentencing update (2025 ABKB 262).Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the BC Court of Appeal decision R. v. Jaramillo, 2025 BCCA 77 where police brought a K9 along to arrest a man on an outstanding aggravated assault warrant. The dog never bit or touched the man, but barked. The man — a convicted criminal — said he was scared during the arrest. The judge found the use of the K9 breached the man's s. 7 Charter right to “life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice” and reduced his sentence by 11 months to account for this Charter violation. When the Crown appealed the ruling, BC's top court weighed in on the matter. Did the dog display violate s. 7 or was the judge way off-base? Decision on Sentence (2024 BCPC 263)Decision on Sentence in a different matter (2021 BCPC 225)BC Provincial Policing Standard 1.4 Principles for Standards for Police Service DogsBC Provincial Policing Standard 1.4.1 Police Service Dogs — General RequirementsBC Provincial Policing Standard 1.4.1 Police Service Dogs — Threshold and Circumstances of Police Dog UseThanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

  I made that phone call. Another call for help to my birth mother. The need for help, assistance getting into a home because this property will need to be sold. I am still attempting to make a HUGE FEAT solo and it's getting to feel impossible. Even YOU listening... you couldn't get into another home or mortgage or take over, without him co-signing and helping YOU. It's the same thing, I am doing, asking for help, but from someone who should care enough to help me after 3 years of myself, getting nowhere but stressed. But you make me feel bad for asking my own parents? Sorry, I meant, birth mother. Yet, your parents helped raise all of your children. However, I am downgraded and insulted for asking for mere help, assistance. Yes, it's behavior that is nothing but like a double-edge sword. Calling the kettle black, even at this point. If it wasn't for a close friend and cousin guiding me, to understand. I deserve to be cared about, because I matter. If it was not for them. I would not had made that call, because the easy way to had helped me was 3 years ago. A mere signature on a grant form from next of kin, from an organization that helps those going solo as a first time home buyer. My pre-qual budget is not proving promising, in order to find me a home. I have been going in circles, without the help from blood or my birth parents for over 3 years and counting. In one hand, I have a pre-qual that honestly would need "per realtor," around another $50,000 to secure a good home. The reason, because the market where I need to be, where my providers are located is not cheap.  With the constant pain, getting to be OFF-THE-CHART and evolving to SHARP-PAIN down the same leg as the tumor. My time to move is narrow at best and so was the hopes of you actually starting to show any remote of care or concern about someone who is sick and deserved the best. Well... that again was left on deaf ears and once again, not even caring enough to listening to me talk. That is, when your not putting the phone down. You can hear when someone puts the phone down. The same move, and bizarre way to let me know after many years of doing the same thing to me... when it involved, serious matters... "YOU are not WORTHY of my time to even care to listen." That is what putting the phone down and not listening, says to me. It makes adult children choose unhealthy relations, when they lack simple care or concern from their own. Mind you, this came from a trauma therapist. It's a pattern that has taken me years to understand. I feel more so now, than ever before of one of my prior neighbors named, Brenda. The woman who myself and a prior relation befriended. When others considered her different and mean only because she was withdrawn from society. She got hurt. She was hurt from her own family. She unnecessarily struggled, suffered and felt like nothing, but a mere burden. All from her very own. All because she was sick and her health was declining. She was, a mere burden in their eyes. Yet, she soooooo deserved SO-MUCH-FAR-BETTER!!!!!!. I would never take my own life, because of my own family. Her doing so, still haunts me. What I learned from Brenda was wisdom and so much more... how to be sick with still demanding respect and dignity. Demanding so, from your family. Anyone, who keep stressing, that family should help family.... You can't make people care, when they do not. All you can do is keep reaching out to others and remember how you were treated. To not treat others, in turn, who are sick. The way you were treated. I refuse to be on hospice and help by a death dollula where I currently reside, because it is not even within their reach. Or even within reach of my own providers. Not even the same hospital network. Facts. Everyone deserves to feel comfortable. Everyone deserves to feel loved. Those needs are basic human needs, that should easily be given by the people, who should had loved you unconditionally the most. No if, ands, buts or rhyme or reason, about it. No one, who loves someone, let's their very own struggle. Especially when loved ones, make sure to protect that from happening... before they leave this earth. Today, I just realized, to you. I am not worthy of love by you or being cared for, by you or any concern from you... but only through your eyes. My lifetime of illness, was your let down and burden. I couldn't be the rich, success story, that you so-longed for me to be. I could not even bare the grandchildren, that for most... is easily attainable. I was not the baby boy, as once hoped. I was born instead... just me. All of me and my broken pieces of failing health that started young. As a baby. I am glad, you were able to find all the above and even more. From those who provided, what you needed. What I could never, ever be. Understanding patterns, behavior and not-so-smart decisions in my lifetime, isn't so hard to figure out now at an older age. When you finally understand, that sometimes you had no choice in the matter. Because the very people, who should been by your side to help lift you up... were never to be found. I have no clue or idea how to maneuver, through this current part of my journey. Your response of needing help, was to just ask another guy. Go ask Eric. Where you ask, is Eric? Scrambling to find any guy, because you aren't worthy of help, from the very people who should always be lifting you up... is a damning thing to figure out at an older age. By saying those words, every time someone needs help. Can lead to placing a vulnerable time in one's life... into the wrong hands. Women and young ladies, then find themselves in unhealthy relationships, abuse, violence, rape and abandonment. Time and time and time again. By grace and many decades of experience... trials and tribulations. I will, get there one way, shape or form. I may die feeling unwanted, unworthy and unloved by you and others. However, I will never allow myself another phone call, asking for help. I deserve better. I deserved, the best.

Today Rebecca is joined by Kristen Brancaccio to react to some anonymously submitted production horror stories - the good, the bad, and the downright hilarious. BREAKDOWN: 0:30 - Updates with Kristen! Full-time directing largely in vertical soap operas 3:55 - Anonymously submitted production horror stories!4:20 - UPM asked LAPD to ID homeless defecation, cop reverse unos and asks production to read screenplay 6:23 - Cops respond to film shooting but not gun shooting7:05 - Chandler Berg the PA putting out a Malibu fire with the production fire extinguisher 8:30 - Producers digging into an actual cemetery 10:06 - Director beat up PD on set, Kristen stands up for art department11:14 - 300 extras were told to actually fight each other, actor gets stabbed12:28 - Rap video with dog fights, stabbing, and computers stolen out of motor home 13:09 - Kristen is up to direct a music video, artist goes to jail before they can shoot 14:22 - Script supervisor stole the lined script for ransom 14:45 - “The Terminator” goes off on PA for chewing too loudly15:40 - Department head commits fraud, blames assistant 16:18 - Kristen declines to deposit production budget into department head's personal account17:30 - Woman shocked by amount of cash taken out by Hollywood productions18:17 - Person asked to only be paid in gold bars18:40 - Camera van without handbrake runs through video village on car commercial28:55 - Portable toilet driven for 45 minutes on bumpy road with person inadvertently inside 19:50 - Talent rage quit his own pilot 20:40 - mayor allowed filming in exchange for photos with celebrities 21:06 - Extra wardrobe malfunction 21:58 - Background actor backstories22:58 - Bribing the neighbor with Magic Castle tickets24:25 - Director freaks out that set design isn't bougie enough 25:22 - Client decided day of the shoot that pre-approved wooden paneling needed to be VFX'd out26:52 - Wet garbage falling30:27 - Unusable footage from holding camera on top of a moving camera29:50 - Petty cash disappeared x231:35 - Who can decode these acronyms? DM us @nosetpathshowKEEP UP WITH KRISTEN: IG: @kristensrealityKristen's first episode on No Set Path: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/02-pitching-matt-damon-producing-for-finneas-w-kristen/id1676370871?i=1000605417778KEEP UP WITH THE SHOW: All Platforms: @NoSetPathShowwww.NoSetPathShow.combio.site/nosetpath

Anonymously promoting an event

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the BC Provincial Court decision R. v. Bajwa, 2025 BCPC 43 where police monitored and recorded — by video surveillance — a man using the toilet in cells for less than a minute. Although no genitalia was observed, his buttocks and thighs were videoed but there was no blurring, pixilation or blacking out of his toilet use, nor was he offered a privacy gown or shield. Did this videoing amount to an intrusion into the man's privacy such that his right under s. 8 of the Charter — to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure — was breached? If yes, were the remedies of a stay of proceedings or exclusion of evidence in order?   Decision on remedy (2025 BCPC 44)BC Provincial Policing Standard 4.1.1 Video Surveillance Recording in Police BuildingsToronto Police Service Policy — Privacy ShieldsThanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike celebrates the Charter's 43rd birthday! On April 17, 1982 the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms came into force. Listen to learn about some of the early discussion on the remedy provisions, from s. 26 to s. 24 to s. 24(1) and (2).The 2025 International Use of Force Expert Conference April 29-May 1, 2025This conference is designed for professionals who have an interest in developing a deeper understanding of this subject matter area, or in building the foundational skills towards becoming a court-qualified use of force expert.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. In this episode, Mike discusses the Alberta Court of King's Bench decision R. v. Tierney, 2025 ABKB 223 where police delayed providing a man access to counsel for more than 16 hours after his arrest, claiming it was justified while seeking a search warrant for fear evidence might be destroyed. The police also failed to bring the man before a justice, waiting about 33 hours to do so. How did the judge feel about these delays after Crown conceded Charter breaches. Was evidence supporting serious charges excluded? This case provides a good summary of the case law and things a police officer needs to think about if delaying access to counsel.  The 2025 International Use of Force Expert Conference April 29-May 1, 2025This conference is designed for professionals who have an interest in developing a deeper understanding of this subject matter area, or in building the foundational skills towards becoming a court-qualified use of force expert.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message. TRIGGER WARNING: This episode contains graphic content, including suicide, which may shock, offend or upset.In this episode, Mike discusses the Supreme Court of Canada's 2024 Year in Review. How do last year's stats stack up against previous years? How long does it take the court to decide a matter? And how often is the court split on the outcome of a case?  The Supreme Court of Canada Marks 150 Years of Service to CanadiansRoyal Canadian Mint Supreme Court of Canada Commemorative Circulation CoinMike also updates two IIO cases.IIO 2023-248: Mackenzie RCMP — Public ReportIIO 2022-249: Abbotsford Police — Information BulletinThe 2025 International Use of Force Expert Conference April 29-May 1, 2025This conference is designed for professionals who have an interest in developing a deeper understanding of this subject matter area, or in building the foundational skills towards becoming a court-qualified use of force expert.Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Send us a textJeremy assigns Andy: Take Me Back to Eden by Sleep Token. Andy assigns Jeremy: Stampede by Orville Peck.AAJLTM Theme Music by Ryan Robinson.Follow him here: https://www.instagram.com/ryrobrawAAJLTM Original Images by Jade Armstrong.Follow her here: https://www.instagram.com/fxmint.art 

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Yasin and Kiran are back after a well-deserved hiatus! In this episode, they dive into the world of Desperate Housewives, unpacking the dynamic between Lynette and Tom and how it reflects the struggles of eldest daughters everywhere. From managing responsibilities to navigating relationships, they explore why eldest daughters often carry the emotional and mental load—both on screen and in real life.They also discuss the importance of taking a break and indulging in the things you love—whether it's binge-watching your favourite show or just reclaiming some guilt-free downtime. Because eldest daughters deserve rest too!Tune in for a fun, insightful conversation filled with pop culture, personal reflections, and a reminder that you're allowed to just enjoy.Book a RANT session⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Anonymously send your eldest daughter confessions ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Find us on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email us:  hello@homegirlsunite.com

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Sorry the video failed this week.Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Get up and get informed! Here's all the local news you need to start your day: A new Siena College poll finds strong public support for placing two NYPD officers on every overnight subway train for the next six months. Meanwhile, New York State will allow doctors to prescribe abortion medication anonymously, days after a Hudson Valley doctor was charged under Louisiana's criminal abortion law. Plus, Governor Kathy Hochul is launching a Super Bowl weekend DWI crackdown, with increased patrols and sobriety checkpoints through Sunday.

In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between.   However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit.   In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdf

In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between.   However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit.   In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdf

In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between.   However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit.   In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

The mayor is in the final stages of negotiating a future for the Park Hill Golf Course, according to CBS Colorado. But would a major land swap change much for the neighbors living around this 155 acres of dead grass? Then, City Council voted on some big changes to needle exchange sites in Denver last night, but the mayor still has final say. It's Tuesday, and Host Bree Davies and producer Paul Karolyi are digging into the biggest stories of the week -- plus, they answer one listener's question: What is with those quirky buildings around town that look like they've been swallowed by another structure?  Bree mentioned our coverage of the ongoing Park Hill Golf Course saga, which we summed up in this episode from January 2023.  Get your tickets to HEYDAY now! We're putting on an indoor fair with urban flair, like a classic county fair but with a very cool Denver twist. Join us on March 8 for classic carnival games, vintage arcade games, Denver-themed balloon art, and a full day of grandstand entertainment, featuring some of your favorite guests from the podcast. It's family friendly, too, if you wanna bring your kids. Get those tickets now at www.heydaydenver.com. What is your “toxic Colorado trait”? We want to hear from you! Anonymously or not, text or leave us a voicemail, and you might hear it on the show: 720-500-5418‬ For even more news from around the city, subscribe to our morning newsletter Hey Denver at denver.citycast.fm. Follow us on Instagram: @citycastdenver Chat with other listeners on reddit: r/CityCastDenver Support City Cast Denver by becoming a member: membership.citycast.fm Learn more about the sponsors of this January 14th episode: Denver Health Looking to advertise on City Cast Denver? Check out our options for podcast and newsletter ads at citycast.fm/advertise Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Sorry for the delay, holidays have been a suck fest for scheduling. Happy new year!Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us

Need advice? Trouble with girls? Strange questions about your addictions? Anonymously send questions for us to answer on the next episode by clicking this link! Support the showFollow our Instagram: @swallowdaddysSubscribe to Youtube: @swallowdaddysFollow RJ: rj_sainsFollow Drew: drewbockkindof (deleted instagram due to gross incompetence)Join Patreon for Early Access and Bonus Content: Help Us