Podcast appearances and mentions of dean buonomano

Support the show to get full episodes, full archive, and join the Discord community. The Transmitter is an online publication that aims to deliver useful information, insights and tools to build bridges across neuroscience and advance research. Visit thetransmitter.org to explore the latest neuroscience news and perspectives, written by journalists and scientists. Read more about our partnership. Sign up for Brain Inspired email alerts to be notified every time a new Brain Inspired episode is released. To explore more neuroscience news and perspectives, visit thetransmitter.org. Rony Hirschhorn, Alex Lepauvre, and Oscar Ferrante are three of many many scientists that comprise the COGITATE group. COGITATE is an adversarial collaboration project to test theories of consciousness in humans, in this case testing the integrated information theory of consciousness and the global neuronal workspace theory of consciousness. I said it's an adversarial collaboration, so what does that mean. It's adversarial in that two theories of consciousness are being pitted against each other. It's a collaboration in that the proponents of the two theories had to agree on what experiments could be performed that could possibly falsify the claims of either theory. The group has just published the results of the first round of experiments in a paper titled Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness, and this is what Rony, Alex, and Oscar discuss with me today. The short summary is that they used a simple task and measured brain activity with three different methods: EEG, MEG, and fMRI, and made predictions about where in the brain correlates of consciousness should be, how that activity should be maintained over time, and what kind of functional connectivity patterns should be present between brain regions. The take home is a mixed bag, with neither theory being fully falsified, but with a ton of data and results for the world to ponder and build on, to hopefully continue to refine and develop theoretical accounts of how brains and consciousness are related. So we discuss the project itself, many of the challenges they faced, their experiences and reflections working on it and on coming together as a team, the nature of working on an adversarial collaboration, when so much is at stake for the proponents of each theory, and, as you heard last episode with Dean Buonomano, when one of the theories, IIT, is surrounded by a bit of controversy itself regarding whether it should even be considered a scientific theory. COGITATE. Oscar Ferrante. @ferrante_oscar Rony Hirschhorn. @RonyHirsch Alex Lepauvre. @LepauvreAlex Paper: Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness. BI 210 Dean Buonomano: Consciousness, Time, and Organotypic Dynamics 0:00 - Intro 4:00 - COGITATE 17:42 - How the experiments were developed 32:37 - How data was collected and analyzed 41:24 - Prediction 1: Where is consciousness? 47:51 - The experimental task 1:00:14 - Prediction 2: Duration of consciousness-related activity 1:18:37 - Prediction 3: Inter-areal communication 1:28:28 - Big picture of the results 1:44:25 - Moving forward

Dean Buonomano runs the Buonomano lab at UCLA. Dean was a guest on Brain Inspired way back on episode 18, where we talked about his book Your Brain is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time, which details much of his thought and research about how centrally important time is for virtually everything we do, different conceptions of time in philosophy, and how how brains might tell time. That was almost 7 years ago, and his work on time and dynamics in computational neuroscience continues. One thing we discuss today, later in the episode, is his recent work using organotypic brain slices to test the idea that cortical circuits implement timing as a computational primitive it's something they do by they're very nature. Organotypic brain slices are between what I think of as traditional brain slices and full on organoids. Brain slices are extracted from an organism, and maintained in a brain-like fluid while you perform experiments on them. Organoids start with a small amount of cells that you the culture, and let them divide and grow and specialize, until you have a mass of cells that have grown into an organ of some sort, to then perform experiments on. Organotypic brain slices are extracted from an organism, like brain slices, but then also cultured for some time to let them settle back into some sort of near-homeostatic point - to them as close as you can to what they're like in the intact brain... then perform experiments on them. Dean and his colleagues use optigenetics to train their brain slices to predict the timing of the stimuli, and they find the populations of neurons do indeed learn to predict the timing of the stimuli, and that they exhibit replaying of those sequences similar to the replay seen in brain areas like the hippocampus. But, we begin our conversation talking about Dean's recent piece in The Transmitter, that I'll point to in the show notes, called The brain holds no exclusive rights on how to create intelligence. There he argues that modern AI is likely to continue its recent successes despite the ongoing divergence between AI and neuroscience. This is in contrast to what folks in NeuroAI believe. We then talk about his recent chapter with physicist Carlo Rovelli, titled Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time, in which Dean and Carlo examine where neuroscience and physics disagree and where they agree about the nature of time. Finally, we discuss Dean's thoughts on the integrated information theory of consciousness, or IIT. IIT has see a little controversy lately. Over 100 scientists, a large part of that group calling themselves IIT-Concerned, have expressed concern that IIT is actually unscientific. This has cause backlash and anti-backlash, and all sorts of fun expression from many interested people. Dean explains his own views about why he thinks IIT is not in the purview of science - namely that it doesn't play well with the existing ontology of what physics says about science. What I just said doesn't do justice to his arguments, which he articulates much better. Buonomano lab. Related papers The brain holds no exclusive rights on how to create intelligence. What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific? Ex vivo cortical circuits learn to predict and spontaneously replay temporal patterns. Bridging the neuroscience and physics of time. 0:00 - Intro 8:49 - AI doesn't need biology 17:52 - Time in physics and in neuroscience 34:04 - Integrated information theory 1:01:34 - Global neuronal workspace theory 1:07:46 - Organotypic slices and predictive processing 1:26:07 - Do brains actually measure time? David Robbe

------------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Dean Buonomano is Professor of Neurobiology and Psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles. His research goal is to understand how neurons develop selective responses to temporal features such as duration, interval and order. He is the author of Brain Bugs, and Your Brain is a Time Machine. In this episode, we talk about the neuroscience of timing. We start by discussing how to understand time from the perspective of neuroscience, and how the brain processes time. We talk about factors that influence our perception of time, when it comes to duration, interval, and order. We discuss the relationship between neural time and subjective time, how the brain encodes neural time in patterns of neural activity, and if there are brain regions specialized in time processing. We talk about the interaction between timing and the sensory systems, and timing as an intrinsic property of neural networks. We discuss the relationship between neural time and the physical nature of time. Finally, we talk about what a mental clock is. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, JONATHAN VISSER, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, SIMON COLUMBUS, PHIL KAVANAGH, MIKKEL STORMYR, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, ALEXANDER DANNBAUER, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, NICK GOLDEN, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, MORTEN EIKELAND, DR BYRD, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, ROOFTOWEL, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, PEDRO BONILLA, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, STARRY, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, TOM ROTH, THERPMD, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, RICHARD BOWEN, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, CHRIS STORY, AND MANUEL OLIVEIRA! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, VEGA GIDEY, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, ROBERT LEWIS, AND AL NICK ORTIZ! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, AND BOGDAN KANIVETS!

Episode 507 also includes an E.W. Essay titled "On Cobble Stone Streets." We share an excerpt from the book "Your Brain Is a Time Machine. " by Dean Buonomano. We have an E.W. Poem called "With Coffee." Our music this go round is provided by these wonderful artists: Thelonious Monk, Josephine Baker, Babes in Toyland, Clicquot Club Eskimos, Helen Kane (aka Betty Boop), Isham Jones, Branford Marsalis and Terence Blanchard. Commercial Free, Small Batch Radio Crafted in the West Mountains of Northeastern Pennsylvania... Heard All Over The World. Tell Your Friends and Neighbors.

It's not an exaggeration to say that “clock time” runs our lives. From the moment our alarms go off in the morning, the clock reigns supreme: our meetings, our appointments, even our social plans are often timed down to the minute. We even measure the quality of our lives with reference to time, often lamenting that time seems to “fly by” when we're having fun and “drags on” when we're bored or stagnant. We rarely stop to think about time, but that's precisely because there are few forces more omnipresent in our lives.“You are the best time machine that has ever been built,” Dean Buonomano writes in his book “Your Brain Is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time.” Buonomano is a professor of neurobiology and psychology at U.C.L.A. who studies the relationship between time and the human brain. His book tackles the most profound questions about time that affect all of our lives: Why do we feel it so differently at different points in our lives? What do we miss if we live so rigidly bound to the demands of our clocks and appointments? Why during strange periods like pandemic lockdowns do we feel “lost in time”? And what if — as some physicists believe — the future may already exist, with grave implications for our ability to act meaningfully in the present?We discuss what time would be in an empty universe without humans, why humans have not evolved to understand time the way we understand space, how our ability to predict the future differs from animals', why time during the Covid lockdowns felt so bizarre, why scientists think time “flies” when we're having fun but slows down when people experience near-death accidents, what humans lost when we invented very precise clocks, why some physicists believe the future is already determined for us and what that would mean for our ethical behavior, why we're so bad at saving money, what steps we could take to feel as if we're living longer in time, why it's so hard — but ultimately possible — to live in the present moment and more.Mentioned:Don't Sleep, There Are Snakes by Daniel L. EverettBook Recommendations:Noise by Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass R. SunsteinWhen We Cease to Understand the World by Benjamin LabatutThe Age of A.I. by Henry A. Kissinger, Eric Schmidt and Daniel HuttenlocherThoughts? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com. (And if you're reaching out to recommend a guest, please write  “Guest Suggestion” in the subject line.)You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast, and you can find Ezra on Twitter @ezraklein. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.“The Ezra Klein Show” is produced by Emefa Agawu, Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld, Rogé Karma and Kristin Lin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris and Kate Sinclair. Original music by Isaac Jones. Mixing by Jeff Geld and Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta.

Dean Buonomano is a professor of psychology and neurobiology at UCLA, and the author of Brain Bugs: How the Brain's Flaws Shape Our Lives, as well as the newer, Your Brain is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time. He says it's impossible to overstate how important associations are for cognition, behavior learning and decisions.We'll learn in this episode about memory capacity, creating and breaking those important associations, reward learning, and why we think about the brain as a computer.Episode Quotes:Breaking associations:It's not forgetting. I think maybe, maybe a hundred years ago, it was thought that extinction was a type of forgetting, but it's best seen as a different type of learning and suppressing a previously existing learned response.Comparing human memory with harddrive data:When we retrieve information from our computer hard drive, it doesn't alter that. Nor does it store that information that it was retrieved. But in the case of the human brain, every time we retrieve information, we're also sort of rewriting it or reconsolidating it. And again, this makes sense in the sense that every time you see your nephew every six months or every year, you're not only recalling your niece or nephew - his or her face. But you're rewriting it as well. So you're continuously updating it. So the process of writing information down and recalling it is not independent, but interacting in the case of the brain, which is very different in the case of the computer.Memory and Capacity:I do take the position that one of the reasons we forget, and one of the reasons that our memories are not perfect is because there is a capacity issue. Now it's extremely hard to quantify. you said some people have a better memory, some people don't and it seems, like, well, how can you reconcile that?Show Links:Guest Profile:Faculty Profile at University of California, Los AngelesDean Buonomano on TwitterDean Buonomano on Talks at GoogleDean Buonomano on TEDXViennaHis work:Buonomano LabsDean Buonomano on Google ScholarYour Brain Is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of TimeBrain Bugs: How the Brain's Flaws Shape Our Lives

If you enjoy this podcast, consider buying me a coffee: https://adamstoner.com/support His body blue, no blood pressure to speak of, and no pulse to find, artist Andy Warhol was declared dead on arrival at Columbus Hospital in New York City – 4:51pm on June 3rd 1968 – having just been shot by a former colleague at his workshop, The Factory. Bleeding on the gurney, a senior doctor took a fleeting look at the corpse, peeling back an eyelid and watched as its pupil contracted in the bright emergency room lights. Andy Warhol wasn't dead. More culturally relevant to modern day, materialistic Christmases than Jesus himself, disciples of the king of consumerism gathered outside the hospital that night, Andy's resurrection happening within. A cardiac arrest on the operating table and 12 pints of blood later, Warhol's scarified body walked from the hospital alive. I tell you this because I've just finished reading The Andy Warhol Diaries and am about to finish Year of Wonder: Classical Music for Every Day by ex-BBC Radio 3 presenter Clemency Burton-Hill. Clemency's got a sequel out this December, Another Year of Wonder, which I've pre-ordered. On the subject of music, Paul McCartney's new double-volume coffee-table book – The Lyrics – is an intimate self-portrait in 154 songs, a fascinating trawl through the handwritten notes of the UK's greatest songwriter. I got that at the start of the month when I saw his Q&A at the Southbank Centre in London. Spread over pages 48 and 49 of the most recent edition of Science and Nature magazine, I write about something that world leaders overwhelmingly failed to grasp at COP26: the fragility of planet Earth. Despite their failure, it was lovely to see my writing published and now exist in the hands and homes of people across the country. That edition is still on newsstands if you've not been able to pick up your copy yet. On Audible I've been listening to Conscious: A Brief Guide to the Fundamental Mystery of the Mind by Annaka Harris, Your Brain Is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time by Dean Buonomano, and Transcend by Scott Barry Kaufman. I've also been listening to the tonnes of great music that's come out this month. HalfNoise's new album, Motif, is a blend of classical and jazz and a perfect easy evening listen. ABBA's new album shot straight to number one and it's no surprise why. Adele's new album is undoubtedly fantastic too. I was gifted a gorgeous Voyager Golden Record three-LP box-set from Ozma Records and also received a signed copy of Christopher Tin's Calling All Dawns on vinyl this month. For me, albums are a snapshot of the time in which they were recorded, something the Voyager record captures so poignantly and Adele clearly feels too; why else would you title each album your age? That's why I feel strongly about Taylor Swift's re-recording of her albums. Red (Taylor's Version) came out earlier in the month and although I sympathise with the reasons behind its re-release, there's something wholly inauthentic about a soon-to-be 32 year old re-releasing songs written by a 22 year old Swift. As she catches up with her present day work, I daresay I'll feel differently. That said, the album is just as fantastic as the first time around and like Paul McCartney's book, I love gems from the archive. I've had such a lovely month getting out-and-about too. Working on a big project I'll be able to tell you more about in the new year, I was at the Royal Observatory Greenwich in mid-November. I also visited We The Curious in Bristol yesterday for more of the same. Either my taste in films is terrible or critics are stuffy people whose self-importance impedes their judgement. The reviews for House of Gucci are terrible; I saw it in the cinema on Friday and thoroughly enjoyed it. I reckon it's the second of those two things. I was invited to hear the Cotswold Male Voice Choir perform in Cheltenham on Saturday and even took a walk around Westonbirt Arboretum a few days ago on a press preview of their Enchanted Christmas trail. I was also invited to the Tewkesbury Festival of Lights at the start of the month, a beautiful sound and light show telling the story of Tewkesbury through the lens of its 900 year old Abbey. That's sort of what I'm trying to do with these updates; place my story – what I've been doing, reading, watching, and listening to – within the much wider context in which we all live our otherwise individual lives. I think that's also what makes religion so fascinating, I'm not a religious person (though I did have tea with the Bishop of Tewkesbury in the Reverend's home) but I do love the theatrics of it; cathedrals and churches and choirs and the feeling of belonging to something bigger than yourself, a grander story. Today's the first day of December and the countdown to Christmas and the New Year is on. Assisting me are advent calendars from Yankee Candles and T2 Tea. It won't be long before we pop up our tree also; we've decorated ours in basically the same style for as long as I can remember, only ever replacing and adding ornaments here-and-there. I've also got a smaller tree from Bloom & Wild. It comes through your letterbox, is taking pride of place atop a locker I got from Mustard, and with its roots still intact, you can even plant it on afterwards! I did so last in 2019; it's still growing strong. In 1964, a few years prior to Andy's shooting, he had his photo taken in front of a bare Christmas tree, a blue spruce, stripped of all decoration. The image is anathema to everything we know about Warhol his colourful pop art so I emailed the The Andy Warhol Museum on a quest to find out more about it. Matt Gray, manager of the archives, replied. The photo is a design submission for an exhibit at the headquarters of Hallmark Cards. His decision to submit an empty tree wasn't a publicity stunt or a critical read on culture but was a very subversive and deliberate artistic decision. […] He was very aware that the other participants in the show were stuffy and traditional and this was a chance to emphasize his new and rebellious image. […] The fact that he was given the largest tree and a prominent location [in the show] confirms he was on to something. Warhol's tree was left out of the cheery full-colour spread that filled Ladies' Home Journal that year and became known as his ‘anti-Christmas tree', but neither Matt or I think that was his intention… Warhol's tree captures precisely what makes Christmas so special because whether you're a fan of the theatrics of religion or of commercialism, this time is a blank canvas to decorate as you see fit. There is no right or wrong way to celebrate the holidays. Whether you spend this time surrounded by family, binge-eating food or in quiet contemplation of the year just gone, I hope you enjoy it. Here's how Warhol spent his final Christmas in 1986: I went to the church of Heavenly Rest to pass out Interviews [his magazine] and feed the poor. Got a lot of calls to go to Christmas parties but I just decided to stay in and I loved it. Merry Christmas. You'll next hear from me on December 31st 2021.

The biology of time across different scales, Population clocks: motor timing with neural dynamics, Temporal Perceptual Learning, and The Neural Basis of Timing: Distributed Mechanisms for Diverse Functions. Scientific Sense ® by Gill Eapen: Prof. Dean Buonomano, Professor, Behavioral Neuroscience and Neurobiology at UCLA. The primary goal of his laboratory is to understand the neural basis of temporal information processing. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/scientificsense/message

Algo que en el budismo se enseña es que las emociones no se pueden suprimir, las emociones existen y son parte del órgano mental y es inútil bloquearlas o suprimirlas.Como podemos transformarnos siguiendo la máxima de aceptar que hay cosas que podemos cambiar y cosas que no podemos cambiar?Síguenos en Instagram: @podcast.asReferencias:*Libros: The radical acceptance. - Tara BrachYour brain is a time machine. - Dean Buonomano

I veckans avsnitt av Antiloop Podcast diskuterar Anna Svahn och Mikael Syding Presentism, idén att det enda som existerar är nuet, och Eternalism, som i rak motsats till Presentism hävdar att all existens, historisk som futuristisk, är lika verklig. Vi får också en replik från Martin Sandquist som kommenterar några av påståendena från förra avsnittet om inneboende värden. Du kan hitta intervjun med Dean Buonomano som nämns i avsnittet här. Glöm inte att prenumerera i din podcast-app och lämna gärna en recension så hjälper du oss nå ut till fler lyssnare. Mer information om Antiloop hittar du på antiloophedge.com och på antiloophedge.com/memos får du även tillgång till Antiloops alla memos. Ingenting du hör i Antiloop Podcast är någon form av rekommendation och alla investeringar är förknippade med risken att förlora hela eller delar av ditt kapital. Antiloop Podcast produceras i samarbete med Vexaton Media. 00:00 - Intro 00:58 - Uppföljning från Martin Sandquist ang. inneboende värden 01:37 - Andelen av gulds värde som består av use case:t 03:48 - Objektivt vs subjektivt inneboende värde 06:50 - Martin om Cathie Woods syn på inflation 09:06 - Det enda som existerar är nuet - Dean Buonomano om presentism 12:04 - Illusionen av hur vi uppfattar våra kroppsdelar 13:55 - Illusionen av hur vi uppfattar tid 15:22 - Presentism vs Eternalism 20:18 - Att allt får konsekvenser talar för eternalism 22:11 - Ingen har ännu förstått vad verkligheten och tid faktiskt är 24:24 - Var Anna står i fri vilja-frågan

I veckans avsnitt av Antiloop Podcast diskuterar Anna Svahn och Mikael Syding Presentism, idén att det enda som existerar är nuet, och Eternalism, som i rak motsats till Presentism hävdar att all existens, historisk som futuristisk, är lika verklig. Vi får också en replik från Martin Sandquist som kommenterar några av påståendena från förra avsnittet om inneboende värden. Du kan hitta intervjun med Dean Buonomano som nämns i avsnittet här. Glöm inte att prenumerera i din podcast-app och lämna gärna en recension så hjälper du oss nå ut till fler lyssnare. Mer information om Antiloop hittar du på antiloophedge.com och på antiloophedge.com/memos får du även tillgång till Antiloops alla memos. Ingenting du hör i Antiloop Podcast är någon form av rekommendation och alla investeringar är förknippade med risken att förlora hela eller delar av ditt kapital. Antiloop Podcast produceras i samarbete med Vexaton Media. 00:00 - Intro 00:58 - Uppföljning från Martin Sandquist ang. inneboende värden 01:37 - Andelen av gulds värde som består av use case:t 03:48 - Objektivt vs subjektivt inneboende värde 06:50 - Martin om Cathie Woods syn på inflation 09:06 - Det enda som existerar är nuet - Dean Buonomano om presentism 12:04 - Illusionen av hur vi uppfattar våra kroppsdelar 13:55 - Illusionen av hur vi uppfattar tid 15:22 - Presentism vs Eternalism 20:18 - Att allt får konsekvenser talar för eternalism 22:11 - Ingen har ännu förstått vad verkligheten och tid faktiskt är 24:24 - Var Anna står i fri vilja-frågan

“Time” and “the brain” are two of those things that are somewhat mysterious, but it would be hard for us to live without. So just imagine how much fun it is to bring them together. Dean Buonomano is one of the leading neuroscientists studying how our brains perceive time, which is part of the bigger issue of how we construct models of the physical world around us. We talk about how the brain tells time very differently than the clocks that we’re used to, using different neuronal mechanisms for different timescales. This brings us to a very interesting conversation about the nature of time itself — Dean is a presentist, who believes that only the current moment qualifies as “real,” but we don’t hold that against him.Support Mindscape on Patreon.Dean Buonomano received his Ph.D. from the Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Texas Medical School, Houston. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Neurobiology at UCLA. His lab studies how the brain perceives time and constructs models of the external physical world. He is the author of Brain Bugs: How the Brain’s Flaws Shape our Lives and Your Brain is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time.Lab web siteUCLA web pageGoogle Scholar publicationsAmazon.com author pageWikipediaTwitter

It flows and runs, drags and flies and there's never enough – how does our brain keep track of time? We talked to Dean Buonomano, UCLA neuroscientist and author of ‘Your Brain is a Time Machine.’

Topics Discussed : Your Brain Is A Time Machine Progress in neuroscience Presentism vs Eternalism Fear of Death and Religion Prospective Timing vs Retrospective Timing Drugs Meditation & Hypnosis Consciousness Free will Buy Dean's Book From: UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Your-Brain-Time-Machine-Neuroscience/dp/0393247945 US: https://www.amazon.com/Your-Brain-Time-Machine-Neuroscience-ebook/dp/B01HDSU0GK Make sure to Like, Share and Subscribe if you enjoyed the video! Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/LittleBrainsBigTopics You can find us on: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkXYM0v5AtEiS1FV-7nkakQ/ https://www.facebook.com/Little-Brains-Big-Topics-100713241600938/?modal=admin_todo_tour https://www.instagram.com/littlebrainsbigtopics/ https://twitter.com/big_topics https://open.spotify.com/show/7fgsElbVdoSJyzMKmr83Dk https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/little-brains-big-topics/id1506431166

Analysons le scénario du film Inception (2010) : comment joue-t-il de la temporalité ? SOURCES MENTIONNÉES DANS CE NUMÉRO : ➡ On Film-making (Alexander Mackendrick) : https://amzn.to/2z7TEK0 ➡ Your Brain is a time machine (Dean Buonomano) : https://amzn.to/30Fz5QU ➡ Dramatic Construction (Edward Mabley) : https://amzn.to/2RpizQ1 ➡ Story (Robert McKee) : http://amzn.to/2snymA3 ➡ Construire un récit (Yves Lavandier) : https://amzn.to/2zuYzpb ➡ Analyse de Mission Impossible (Lessons from the Screenplay) : https://youtu.be/3jzw7AOi_sM ➡ Étude de lecteurs américains : https://goo.gl/o1fVzE VERSION RETRANSCRITE DE CE NUMÉRO : ➡ https://bit.ly/3hsabKP LE FILM INCEPTION : ➡ DVD : https://amzn.to/3cYIB4q ➡ BLURAY : https://amzn.to/30DYg6t ➡ BLURAY 4K : https://amzn.to/37rfaGU S’ABONNER AU PODCAST : ➡ Apple Podcasts : https://itunes.apple.com/fr/podcast/comment-cest-racont%C3%A9/id1289058024?l=fr ➡ Spotify : https://open.spotify.com/show/5xwhFW5X3MatC15rvNoibd ➡ YouTube : https://goo.gl/vWg5VP ➡ RSS : http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:325404655/sounds.rss SUIVRE LE PODCAST : ➡ Site web : http://ccrpodcast.fr ➡ Instagram : https://instagram.com/commentcestraconte/ ➡ Facebook : https://facebook.com/commentcestraconte/ ➡ Twitter : https://twitter.com/Baptiste_Rmbd ➡ SensCritique : https://senscritique.com/serie/Comment_c_est_raconte/27787059 ➡ Medium : https://medium.com/comment-cest-racont%C3%A9 Habillage musical par RÉMI LESUEUR : ➡ https://soundcloud.com/remilesueur AVIS : MES LIVRES PRÉFÉRÉS SUR L’ÉCRITURE DE SCÉNARIOS : ➡ https://goo.gl/mouqJQ

The pandemic has upended every aspect of our lives, including the disorienting way many of us have been perceiving time. It might feel like a day drags on, while a week (or month!) just flies by. We talk with Dean Buonomano, a professor of neurobiology and psychology at UCLA, about his research into how the brain tells time. We'll also ask him what's behind this pandemic time warp.

In this replay of a past Delayed Recall, Dr. Ted Burns talks with Dr. Dean Buonomano, author of Brain Bugs, on how the brain makes and forgets memories.

TU CEREBRO ES LO ÚNICO QUE ERES Y LO QUE SERÁS, POR ESO, DEBES APRENDER SUS FORTALEZAS Y VULNERABILIDADES. QUIEN NO LO HAGA TOMARÁ MALAS DECISIONES Y SERÁ FÁCIL DE MANIPULAR Esta idea sobre Efectividad Extraordinaria fue extraída de "Brain Bugs" por Dean Buonomano. Este título recopila una amplia lista de vulnerabilidades y errores de la mente y aporta estrategias para superarlos para tomar mejores decisiones. Algo útil para dialogar ¿Cuáles de tus problemas o retos crees que podrían ser producto de una vulnerabilidad o error en tu mente? ¿Te sirvió esta idea? Propágala para que más personas descubran de dónde vienen las buenas ideas. Suscríbete en ideasinfalibles.com o visita ideasinfalibles.com/premium para conseguir resúmenes completos.

Dean and I talk about how time and duration is encoded in the brain, how he implemented timing and sequences using short-term synaptic plasticity, in neuronal cultures, and in recurrent neural networks. We also discuss the subjective nature of time, consciousness, and how time might be implemented in future general AI.

Thursday, September 21, 2017 Dean Buonomano (UCLA) talks about strategies that neural networks might use to store information about time in the states of neural networks. Duration: 38 minutes Discussants:(in alphabetical order) Salma Quraishi (Res Asst Prof, UTSA) Todd Troyer (Assoc Prof, UTSA) Charles Wilson (Ewing Halsell Chair, UTSA) acknowledgement: JM Tepper for original music.

Dean Buonomano (UCLA) talks about strategies that neural networks might use to store information about time in the states of neural networks. Duration: 38 minutesDiscussants:(in alphabetical order)Salma Quraishi (Res Asst Prof, UTSA)Todd Troyer (Assoc Prof, UTSA) Charles Wilson (Ewing Halsell Chair, UTSA)acknowledgement: JM Tepper for original music.

We talk to neuroscientist Dean Buonomano about his new book “Your Brain Is a Time Machine: The Neuroscience and Physics of Time.”

Since 2008, Big Think has been sharing big ideas from creative and curious minds. Since 2015, the Think Again podcast has been taking us out of our comfort zone, surprising our guests and Jason Gots, your host, with unexpected conversation starters from Big Think’s interview archives. 100 episodes in, like the universe itself, the show continues to expand and accelerate at speeds that boggle the imagination. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an astrophysicist and the director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City and the spiritual heir to Carl Sagan in getting us all worked up about the Cosmos. He’s been appointed to special NASA commissions, hosted multiple TV specials and podcasts, and written many excellent books, the latest of which is Astrophysics for People in A Hurry – a succinct, wryly funny book that’s surprisingly informative for its size - it has the informational density of a black hole. In This, Our 100th Episode: Can Neil tell the entire history of the universe in 30 seconds? When is it possible to move faster than the speed of light? Why is "dark matter" a terrible name for dark matter? And what does Neil's esteemed colleague Lawrence Krauss have in common with a pit bull? Surprise conversation starter interview clips: Lawrence Krauss on Optimism, Dean Buonomano on "Presentism" and "Eternalism" Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode we continue our exploration of how musicians tell time and how anyone embodies pulse. We talk to Dean Buonomano, a neuroscientist who studies time at UCLA and we hear from previous guests: music cognition researcher Jessica Grahn, percussionist Jack van Geem, and film director Jonathan Lynn.

Since 2008, Big Think has been sharing big ideas from creative and curious minds. The Think Again podcast takes us out of our comfort zone, surprising our guests and Jason Gots, your host, with unexpected conversation starters from Big Think’s interview archives. Dean Buonomano is a professor of neurobiology and psychology at UCLA and a leading theorist on (and researcher into) the neuroscience of time. His latest book, Your Brain is a Time Machine, the Neuroscience and Physics of Time convinced Jason that time is far weirder than he knew it to be (and he already knew it was mind-bogglingly weird). In this episode: Does time exist at all, or is it an illusion of consciousness? If the latter, what's the evolutionary advantage of seeing time as linear and one-directional? Which is right: the Einsteinian view that the universe is a four dimensional box in which all time is already present, or the "common-sense" view that time is uni-directional? How does comic timing work? What's the evolutionary advantage of comedy? And oh so much more.  Surprise conversation starter interview clips: Scott Aukerman on comedy as a survival skill, Kevin Kelly on optimism as an engine of progress Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1) Progesterone versus placebo therapy for women with epilepsy and 2) Topic of the month: Memory. This podcast for the Neurology Journal begins and closes with Dr. Robert Gross, Editor-in-Chief, briefly discussing highlighted articles from the print issue of Neurology. In the second segment Dr. Chenjie Xia interviews Dr. Andy Herzog about his paper on progesterone versus placebo therapy for women with epilepsy. Dr. Stacey Clardy is reading our e-Pearl of the week about myotonia congenita. In the next part of the podcast Dr. Ted Burns interviews Dr. Dean Buonomano about bedside testing of memory. The participants had nothing to disclose except Drs. Herzog, Clardy, Burns and Buonomano.Dr. Herzog serves as an editorial board member of Epilepsy & Behavior.Dr. Clardy serves on the editorial team for the Neurology® Resident and Fellow Section. Dr. Burns serves as Podcast Editor for Neurology®; performs EMG studies in his neuromuscular practice (30% effort); and has received research support from the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America and Knopp Neurosciences Inc..Dr. Buonomano receives royalties from the publication of the book Brain Bugs: How the brain's flaws shape our lives.

1) Measures of health-related quality of life and 2) Topic of the month: Memory. This podcast for the Neurology Journal begins and closes with Dr. Robert Gross, Editor-in-Chief, briefly discussing highlighted articles from the print issue of Neurology. In the second segment Dr. Ted Burns interviews Dr. David Cella about his paper on measures of health-related quality of life. Dr. Stacey Clardy is reading our e-Pearl of the week about frontotemporal dementia. In the next part of the podcast Dr. Ted Burns interviews Dr. Dean Buonomano about major categories of memory. Next week they will discuss bedside testing of memory. All participants have disclosures.Dr. Burns serves as Podcast Editor for Neurology®; performs EMG studies in his neuromuscular practice (30% effort); and has received research support from the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America and Knopp Neurosciences Inc..Dr. Cella serves on the scientific advisory boards of the Moffitt Cancer Center, NCI Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life (SxQOL) Steering Committee, serves as Associate Editor of The Journal of Supportive Oncology; is a consultant for Pfizer Inc, Genetech, Inc., Novartis, Bayer Schering Pharma, and GlaxoSmithKline; receives royalties from Up-to-Date annual review of Quality of life measures; receives research support from Pfizer Inc, Genetech, Inc., Novartis, Bayer Schering Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline and AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and is funded by the NIH.Dr. Clardy serves on the editorial team for the Neurology® Resident and Fellow Section. Dr. Buonomano receives royalties from the publication of the book Brain Bugs: How the brain's flaws shape our lives.