Podcast appearances and mentions of Paul McCartney

Kim Kaupe is the founder of Bright Ideas Only where she has worked with Oprah, Paul McCartney, and Jimmy Buffett. Her first company, The Superfan Company, allowed her to work with everyone from Katie Perry to the Boston Red Sox. She was recognized as a Forbes 30 under 30, and by Inc Magazine, 35 under 35. She also received one of the highest offers on Season 5 of Shark Tank. On this episode, we discussed how she went from being an accidental entrepreneur to running a thriving marketing business, her best productivity tips, and how she prepares for a meeting. Finally, she shares how she's dealt with imposter syndrome and how you can too.

Comedians Nick Whitmer, Cristian Duran, and Bret Raybould hang out every week and occasionally someone will say something so horrible that all the others can say is, "Oh Dear." Oh Dear is basically if your group chat was a podcasts. @Nick_Whitmer @Cristianduranduran @Bretraybould --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/ohdear/support

Katie Couric gets asked about Matt Lauer in Today Show interview - Somehow another Bachelorette season kicks off tonight - Rust, Sid, Geno injury updates for the Pens - The Weeknd moves arena tour to stadiums - Paul McCartney and Taylor Swift will be part of the Rock N Roll HOF induction ceremony - Should we be worried about this wild hypersonic missile that China has or nah? - Florida man wants to do meth so he can see his imaginary girlfriend in a Walmart parking lot - Remember when our listeners came up with NEW Mike Lange goal calls? - Teacher gets fired for putting Stoney Patch Kids edibles in prize bowl for kids at school - We both mailed in our ballots for this upcoming local election on November already so, do your research and know who your'e voting for

The Watch List is full of surprises today. News about Disney, DWTS, Mel Gibson, Paul McCartney and a few suggestions of what to watch tonight.

Episode Three is a deep exploration of John's inner conflicts—his lasting trauma over the Beatles breakup, his susceptibility to Yoko's continuing mind games, and potentially lingering aftereffects of his nightmarish therapy at the hands of Arthur Janov.  Primal Scream Therapy is a topic which usually slides under the radar of Beatles discourse—until now.  AKOM believes it was catastrophic to John's psyche and the Lennon/McCartney relationship.  Ultimately, John chooses not to revive his partnership with Paul McCartney in New Orleans. How does this alter the course of their renewed relationship?  And how does John's eventual descent into paranoia and superstition alter both his feelings for and perception of Paul? TW: Psychological abuse, homophobia --- SOURCES Loving John, MAY PANG (1983) John Lennon interview w/ Alan Freeman (January, 1975) May Pang, The Beatles' Biggest Secrets BBC doc (2004) Linda McCartney: A Portrait DANNY FIELDS (2001) “Arthur Janov, 93, Dies; Psychologist Caught World's Attention With ‘Primal Scream'” by Margalit Fox, NEW YORK TIMES (Oct 2, 2017) “On Homosexuality as a Normal Variant of Human Sexuality” (Sunday, January 8, 2012) “On Becoming Homosexual. Is it Becoming?” (Saturday, May 23, 2009) John & Yoko interview, w/ McCabe and Schonfeld (Sept 9, 1971)  John & Yoko Interview w/ Howard Smith, (January 23, 1972) Robert Christgau, Village Voice: Living without The Beatles. (September, 1971) Art Garfunkel, Beatles Stories doc (2011) Francis Schoenberger, SPIN MAGAZINE (1975) Letter 204 to Rick Sklar dated July 1975, The John Lennon Letters (2012) Home cassette, recorded for Vin Scelsa at WNEW-FM (Autumn, 1975) Interview w/ Elliot Mintz (January 1, 1976)  Klaus Voormann, c/o Memories of John Lennon. (2005) The Beatles (afterword) by Hunter Davies (re-issued version from 1985) John Lennon: The Life by Philip Norman (2008) Man on the Run TOM DOYLE (2013) John Lennon w/ Bob Harris for The Old Grey Whistle Test BBC, (April 18, 1975) Paul McCartney w/ Jay Cocks for Time: McCartney comes back. (May 31st, 1976) Lennon Remembers, Rolling Stone (1970) The Primal Center for Treatment, Training and Research “About John Lennon” (2008) Last Days of John Lennon, FRED SEAMAN (1990) John Lennon interview w/ Barbara Graustark, NEWSWEEK (September 1980) Dakota Days, JOHN GREEN (1983) Paul McCartney, The Adam Buxton Podcast, episode 144 (2020) The Love You Make, Peter Brown (1983) The Beatles Roundup Interview, Theatre Royal, Glasgow, (April 30, 1964)  Paul McCartney Reddit chat (December 2020) Jack Douglas to Ben Yakas, Gothamist (July 19, 2016) John Lennon, Interview for Playboy (1980) Jimmy Carter on The Late Show w/ Stephen Colbert (March 31, 2018) PLAYLIST Helen Wheels WINGS Tennessee (demo) JOHN LENNON Letting Go WINGS Bridge on the River Suite WINGS San Ferry Ann WINGS Let Em In WINGS Love JOHN LENNON Beware My Love WINGS Call Me Back Again (live) WINGS

Borde David Druid ställa upp i Lets Dance? Finns det något band i världen som inte är lite lite töntigt? Och vad fan gör the artist formerly known as Kanye West på donken i Trollhättan? SD-riksdagsledamoten som menar att vaccinet är en giftspruta! Trippelmördaren som startat podd! Paul McCartney hävdar att Bob Dylan ligger bakom The Beatles gräsrökande! Dessutom pratar vi med Alexanda Pascalidou om kritiken mot hennes rapportering kring en försvunnen flicka, hennes nya pjäs Mammorna och vad som format henne. Programledare: Kodjo Akolor, David Druid och Vendela Lundberg

Good looking people in the news, Drew Crime, RIP Colin Powell, Travis Barker engaged to a Kardashian, The Guilty on Netflix, Jackson Mahomes dance & apology, and Drew's buying new season tickets.Mr. Methane is selling farts in a jar online and you should buy one. Drew wants to purchase THIS specific fart.The Beatles are on TikTok, so sign Drew up to dance.Drew Crime: Eric Pearson is not a good guy. Mother God drank a little too much Jim Bakker silver. Ex-principal, Joe Bryan, is looking to clear his name so he can hang up his Chippendales calendar.Who Are These Podcasts? is cranking up the comedy charts after their episode on Dave & Chuck.We remember when Mike Clark's description of Evan Longoria's weiner got the show in legal/FCC trouble (NSFW link).Chad Dukes got a raw deal in radio and no one knows exactly what he said to get in trouble.SNL's ratings are terrible. Check out this week's top skit.Travis Barker and Kourtney Kardashian are engaged. Thankfully they caught it all on film for their new Hulu show. Both of their ex's need to be check on and they are losing it.Kelly Osbourne is off the wagon and back in rehab, thus answering the question of "What ever happened to Kelly Osbourne?".TikTok is causing tics in teen girls.The Five-Eighths beer we were talking about has NOTHING to do with us. #sad.Paul McCartney is going to induct the Foo Fighters into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.Jennifer Love Hewitt announced on social media that she needs to take a social media break to get her body back in order.Drew watched Jake Gyllenhaal's new movie and he hates it.Mandate Issues: Chicago Police are in a vaccine battle with Lori Lightfoot. Drew is upset that nobody knows Brandon Goodwin's story. Allison Williams leaves ESPN to have a baby. Johnson & Johnson folks need their booster.Local Accidents: A semi-truck driver bailed after crashing into EVERYTHING! Two women were killed in a hit and run in Detroit.Henry Ford Hospital "spoofing" is all the rage. RIP Colin Powell.Robert Durst is going to die ASAP.Daniel Craig goes to gay bars to stay out of fights. It's definitely NOT because he's gay.Britney Spears is planning a huge Freedom Bash.Not one member of Motley Crue reached out to see if Vince Neil and his broken ribs are ok.Rolling Stone Magazine is evolving into 'Rock and Roll Tattle-Tale Magazine'.A Netflix employee was fired for leaking company info in an attempt to hurt Dave Chappelle."America's Got Talent: Extreme" is a thing. They halted production after a stunt gone wrong. Some people are saying the trick wasn't that great, but it's still better than anything by Nic Wallendas.Flavor Flav's Fried Chicken didn't work out so well, but at least he's now roosting in Michigan.Jackson Mahomes danced on Sean Taylor's memorial. He's really sorry,  as there's a drive into deep left field by Castellanos and that'll be a home run.REAL SPORTS: The WNBA Championship was a MASSIVE success according to Robin Roberts, Chance the Rapper and 6 other people. It's a great day to be Dawn Staley, but still not a college athlete. The Lady Gamecock's such a draw that Drew's looking into getting season tickets. Stephen Belichick is a product of nepotism. DUUUUH!Cancel every single Pittsburgh Steeler fan for doing the wave at the wrong time.Benton Harbor is the new Flint.Superman has abandoned the 'American Way' to sell out to the rest of the world.Lori Loughlin is coming back and making some coin proving that her crime was the best thing for her entire family.Enjoy some classic Flavor Flav conversations with the show.Social media is dumb but we're on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew and Mike Show, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels and BranDon).

In this episode, I am joined by Broadcaster & Journalist - John Wilson It's amazing to hear so many passionate stories of his love of The Jam (thanks Aunt Liz!) - it's an out-pouring of emotions, memories and envy inducing tales from a master story-teller! As one of the regular presenters of Front Row - the Radio 4 arts programme, John specialised in music-related interviews for the programme with the likes of Ray Davies, David Bowie, Paul McCartney, Elton John and Kate Bush - whilst also interviewing Paul Weller on many occasions on the show. In 2007, he worked with Paul to create the book Suburban 100 - which saw Paul share his reflections on his lyrics, offering candid insights to his writing process and the inspiration behind some of pop music's best loved songs.  In 2012 - Paul Weller guested on his Radio 4 Music Programme Mastertapes - discussing a career-defining album in front of a live audience (Paul selected The Gift) which also featured a previous podcast guest (Teenage Waitress - Daniel J Ash) In recent years, Paul has been a guest on John's 'These Three Songs' Podcast and John has returned the favour by interviewing him for the Making of True Meanings Documentary. LINKS This Cultural Life - Radio 4 - with John Wilson https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0010fl4 Paul Weller - Radio 4 - MasterTapes with John Wilson https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01ntfw1 https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nxh35 These Three Songs Podcast - Paul Weller https://shows.acast.com/thesethree/episodes/paulweller John Wilson with Paul Weller - The Jam Exhibition  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02vmtkr True Meanings - In Conversation with John Wilson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wY06Ic-xZTE   Thanks for listening - make sure that you subscribe / follow and leave a review - and if you want to support the podcast financially, you can buy me a virtual coffee via the link below (£3) Buy me a coffee on ko-fi https://ko-fi.com/paulwellerfanpodcast

We are in Mixtape Monday and Kanye West is back with us as he has legally changed his name to Ye! We also get into the feud between Mick Jagger and Paul McCartney.

Rocco went to a great concert! The Rolling Stones respond to Paul McCartney's shade last week; Rami Malek did a fairly good job hosting SNL this weekend with a surprise appearance by Daniel Craig; The College of Pop Culture Knowledge; Some tipsy calendar tips; Donna has thoughts about the Morning Show (She's all caught up)

This week, Tony and Fingers review Stellum Bourbon and the Ferio Tego Generoso cigar. Tony Katz and Fingers Malloy (http://eatdrinksmokeshow.com) host Eat! Drink! Smoke! (http://facebook.com/eatdrinksmoke) recorded live at Blend Bar Cigar (http://blendbarcigar.com) in Indianapolis, IN. The fellas did a bonus review on this episode when they tried Burger King's new Ghost Pepper Chicken Nuggets. Just how hot were they? Were they any good? A new four part series on The Beatles is coming out soon, and Tony is ticked off at Paul McCartney. What did Sir Paul say that got Tony hot under the collar? Is Paul in the wrong? George Takei is not happy with William Shatner and his trip into space, and he let everyone know about it. Is George right to criticize Shatner's journey into space, or does he just come across as jealous? All that and much more on episode 155 of Eat! Drink! Smoke! Follow Eat! Drink! Smoke! Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoEatDrinkSmoke | @GoEatDrinkSmoke Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/eatdrinksmoke | @eatdrinksmoke IG: https://www.instagram.com/eatdrinksmokepodcast | @EatDrinkSmokePodcast The Podcast is Free! Click Below! On Apple Podcasts (http://bit.ly/eatdrinksmoke) On Amazon Music (https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/09697f78-947d-4008-92f6-18f6b241774a/Eat-Drink-Smoke) On Stitcher (https://www.stitcher.com/show/eat-drink-smoke) On Spotify (https://open.spotify.com/show/6Qf6qSmnpb5ctSMEtaB6lp)

durée : 00:05:00 - Tanguy Pastureau maltraite l'info - par : Tanguy Pastureau - McCartney a taclé les Stones, et Mick Jagger, le monsieur à grosses lèvres, a répondu. Tanguy nous raconte…

Hey Ken Krueger!!! HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!! Chunga has a new update! He went to a buffet ... a fancy one! How did it go?! Not well ... REALLY not well. The buffet was great but ... Chunga had an "incident." IT WAS BAD! Gregg is MAD! He's really angry!!! He's looked high and low for Halloween Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins! Have you noticed, they're nowhere to be found?!! Paul McCartney has done it all ... and he's really old! Yet, he's still tough enough to pick a fight with the Rolling Stones!!! Why? Why Paul!!?? Chunga has not seen the new James Bond movie. Have you? What did you think?!? Josh was late to the show because a deer tried to get him, Gregg has another Halloween movie recommendation ... AND it's time for another round of Headline D&D! LISTEN NOW!!!

Hey Ken Krueger!!! HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!! Chunga has a new update! He went to a buffet ... a fancy one! How did it go?! Not well ... REALLY not well. The buffet was great but ... Chunga had an "incident." IT WAS BAD!Gregg is MAD! He's really angry!!! He's looked high and low for Halloween Reese's Peanut Butter Pumpkins! Have you noticed, they're nowhere to be found?!! Paul McCartney has done it all ... and he's really old! Yet, he's still tough enough to pick a fight with the Rolling Stones!!! Why? Why Paul!!??Chunga has not seen the new James Bond movie. Have you? What did you think?!? Josh was late to the show because a deer tried to get him, Gregg has another Halloween movie recommendation ... AND it's time for another round of Headline D&D! LISTEN NOW!!!

In this episode Chris is joined by Tim Burgess, the frontman for The Charlatans, a man who's now a household name for his Twitter Listening Party, which has featured everyone from Art Of Noise to The Zutons and most famously, Paul McCartney. In this chat with Chris Tim talks not only about bringing the nation together under lockdown, but also recalls his record collection as a teenager, the excitement of being in a recording studio for the first time and how DJ-ing and writing have replaced drink and drugs.

Elizabeth Barrett Browning - Sonnets Of The Portuguese - Plus A Great Love Story!   Hi, I'm Christy Shriver, and we're here to discuss books that have changed the world and have changed us.    And I'm Garry Shriver, and this is the How to Love Lit Podcast.  This is our second week in a two part series discussing one of English Language literature's most romantic couples- the poets Robert and Elizabeth Barrett Browning.  Last week, we introduced Robert Browning and his notable dramatic monologue My Last Duchess which gives voice to a twisted psychopath.  We talked a little bit about Robert Browning's life, but not too much.  This week we'll return to his story as well as introduce his remarkable wife and her poetry, Elizabeth Barrett Browning.  Christy, am I correct when I say that during their lifetimes, she was famous and he was the Mr. Elizabeth Barrett Browning, so to speak?  Also, am I also correct that the man who wrote about the most twisted love relationship in British poetry also arguably had one of the most famous personal love stories!      You are correct on both accounts- although, in his defense, in regard to the second fiddle Robert played to Elizabeth during her life, history has elevated him over the years.      And been less kind to her, am I right about that?      For a while-you're right- the world turned on  Elizabeth, or EBB, as she signed her things.      Wait= stop there- EBB for Elizabeth Barrett Browning?  She went by that?      Well, she had a family nickname BA, but in her professional life-Yes- she signed everything EBB but there is a story.  When she was single she was Elizabeth Barrett Barrett- so, she started that before she got married.  When she got married, she kept up the EBB- it avoided all the normal name confusion women deal with when they marry later in life and have the hassle of changing identities.  In her case, sticking with thethe initials  just made it easy.    That worked out.      I agree- Anyway- back to your point that history was RUDE to her.  There was a period of about 100 years where people really criticized put her down.  Virginia Wolfe, specifically, wrote what to me is a cruel essay about EBB's most accomplished piece of poetry, a long epic novel in poem form called Aurora Leigh.  Wolfe is very condescending for many reasons, but from my perspective, Wolfe just didn't like poetry very much, and Aurora leigh is an epic poem.   So, EBB, for about a 100 years drifted along on the coat tails of her husband, ironically, whose reputation gained ground over that same period of time.  It was this giant reversal after death.      Huh- I guess it's a good thing they were both gone- that could have brought some marital complications!      So true, but maybe they would have laughed.  When they were alive, Robert Browning once said that the only way he could get a publisher to look at his work was if he promised he'd get Elizabeth to print something with them.   Today, though, over two hundred years later, we can all be relieved to know, history has decided to let them rest together in peace. They are both viewed in high regard in their own rights.  The Wolfe crowd has settled down, and we can see EBB with a more balanced perspective, especially her work Aurora Leigh- something notable but more than we can really handle in one episode-  I did want to mention because it was EBB's masterpiece- and something that is quite original- if you like her stuff or if you like epic poetry, you should check it out.  No one has really done an epic poem about a female hero like her either before or since, at least that I know anything about. When it came out It was extremely popular, as well as quite scandalous. It's a plot driven story, and Marian Erle, a heroine in the stories, gets raped, has a child, refuses to hide the fact that it was a product of rape and does not take a proposal in marriage that would redeem her reputation as a fallen woman, so to speak.  It has been said that women read it secretly under their sheets so as not to be discovered, and EBB loved that.      Let me just tell you, that might scandalize readers even todayOh my, I'd say that's a very different hero than Odysseus or Gilgamesh, and I can see why Aurora Leigh was so popular so quickly not just in Britain but in America- in fact,. I read it hadsomewhere that they printed over 20 editions before the end of the 19th century.  But, let's back up and get a little of the back story on this scandalous Victorian celebrity.      Okay- boring stuff first.  EBB was born on March 6, 1806, the eldest of TWELVE children to very prominent people.  Her father's family, the Barrett's owned thousands of acres of sugar plantation in Jamaica plus all the slaves that went with that.  The Barrett's had gobs of money.  Her early years were happy, and for a while she lived in a fairy land.  Her father built this incredibly lavish estate, and she had free reign to roam at will, and that's exactly what she did.  In one sense, her family was progressive.  They encouraged and even supported her studying, and she did and loved it.  She had an excellent private tutor and she worked hard- even though at the time for a woman there wasn't much point in it.  She received a very good classical education becoming proficient in both Greek and Latin.  She read all of the time and anything she could get her hands on- which was a lot.  She also got into poetry writing pretty early on. She wrote for everyone and all the time.  Her father called her the Poet Laureate of Hope End (that was the name of their estate).  He even sponsored the publication of her first epic poem she was only 13.      Can you imagine a proud father publishing his teenage daughter's epic poem- that's definitely a rich kid thing to do.    Well, it certainly was and an indication that her life was all just dreamy…until it wasn't.  First, The Barrett's, as in the extended family, had some sort of squabble about the sugar plantation money and somehow, I'm not sure how, Elizabeth's dad, lost a big chunk of it.  They lost the big fancy estate and had to move into some sort of temporary housing.     Then, and this is even worse although, it seems what I'm about to describe happened to a lot of women during this time period, at age 15, she started getting really sick with no commensurate explanation.  To this day, her illness is undiagnosed, but she had all kinds of symptoms that left her weak to the point of literally being physically disabled.      What did they say it was at the time?  And as historians have looked back through the record is there an idea today about what made her sick?    Two good questions.  Well, of course, her family tried everything, including moving to live by the seaside- which we've seen in a lot of British literature- that came up even in Emma.  But in her case her health never really improved. By the time she was 25, her family was living in London,but that place wasn't really known at the time for its fresh air- think the chimney sweeper or Dick Van Dyke in Mary Poppins.  What happened to poor Elizabeth is that she ended up spending all of her time confined in a bedroom in that famous address associated with her today- 50 Wimpole Street.       Well, I'm not sure about 50 Wimpole street, but isn't 57 Wimpole street the famous home of Paul McCartney- the place where he and John Lennon wrote “I want to Hold your Hand” and then later “Yesterday”.      Yes- that's a little bit after EBB's time there, though.  HA.  But actually, they did make a fairly famous movie called The Barretts at Wimpole Street about Elizabeth Barrett Browning.  So, there's that too.    Anyway, back to EBB's health-  Victorian London, in general,  was dirty and smoggy, and so Elizabeth ended up basically being locked up in her room theoretically for her own good.  There is a school of thought that suggests that Some of her problems were connected to an issue with her spine from an injury she got from falling off a horse.  We also know for a fact she  had a lot of trouble with her lungs.  I think the most trustworthy sources say she probably had spinal tuberculosis. Honestly, I really don't really know what was wrong with her except to say that by the time she was twenty-five, it seems she was pretty much disabled.  And, if that wasn't enough, she has another issue- again fairly common for the time period.   Her doctors- proscribed to her meds- and you can probably guess where I'm going with this- that were addictive- and like so many back then as well as today- she became an opium addict, of course, all under her doctor's care.  This seems a little horrifying to me, partly because we just finished watching the Netflix series The Pharmacist which was an expose on the opium problem in the United States connected to Oxycotin and the ensuing 400,000 overdoses directedly related to that drug.  But Garry, clearly, opium addiction is not a 21st century phenomenon, we talked about it a little bit with Frankenstein because it surfaced a little in that book, and even though this is a little tangential, it's interesting to me, so tell us about what opium addiction looked like in the 19th century and why would a little doted on homeschool girl wind up addicted to it?     Sure, wellFirst let's establish what it was she was taking.  It was a common drug called laudanum is what Elizabeth Barrett Browning was addicted to..  She wasn't popping pills or shooting up. anything.   Laudanum was an alcoholic herbal preparation thatand was 10% opium.  It was prescribed pretty much for everything: it was used as a pain reliever, a cough suppressant, it was used to control depression, heart palpitations.  It was given as a sleeping pill, menstrual cramps were treated with laudanum.  Just likeEven worse than oxycotin in the early days of the opioid epidemic today, itlaudanum was an entirely uncontrolled substance. Almost no one took the side effects of the drug seriously- and there were a lot of them- But another point to understand, and again this is just like opioids today- there was that associated euphoria people experienced from taking the drug that encouraged it's people to use it.  Why not, right?  It's not hurting anything, and it makes me feel good.       .  However, as we all know, thatdrug euphoria comes at a cost and the cost was depression, the slurred speech, the restlessness, poor concentration, and of course, theif you ever wanted to get off, terrible withdrawal symptoms.  Here's one crazy fun fact that might blow your mind- Itlaudanum was even spoon fed to infants, if you can believe that.      No way!    But before we judge too quickly with the arrogance of the present, we have to remember, that it wasn't until 1899 that aspirin was invented.  These were days when there were no antibiotics,  no mild tranquiliers;  not much of anything and people needed help- not just pain relief, but with all kinds of things, and this is what they had.      Do you think Barrett's prolonged disabilities could be connected with her drug use?    I'm sure it's possible, but I really don't know.  Laudanum has no curative properties. After they got married, Robert Browning did help her reduce her drug use significantly,  and in fact, she reduced her dosage to where she was finally able to get pregnant after two miscarriages related to laudanum.  After marrying him, her entire health condition improved actually.  She even got to where she could walk again, but I'm not sure what all the factors were that contributed to her general improved health.  She was definitely in a better climate and presumably happy.   I do want to be clear, there was no stigma at that time in using laudanum, so we don't need to see her as dark or even unconventional because she was a laudanum user.  Lots and lots of people used it for all kinds of things and lots were addicted- including names we recognize like Charles Dickens.      Okay-moving on to the love story- so Elizabeth was pretty much locked up in her room, disabled but otherwise living a fairly engaging intellectual life.  She was writing poetry, writing letters and basically building a literary career out of that bedroom, even in her disabled state.  In 1838, she published a book of poetry called The Seraphim and Other Poems and that one was met with a lot of critical success- oh and let me note- Elizabeth Barrett Browning published her work under her own name!!!  That wasn't what a lot of women writers were doing.  But, because her work was well received and NOT anonymous, this led to her corresponding via the mail and making friends with important literary figures of her day- some we've even heard of today- famous people like William Wordsworth and Edgar Allan Poe.  In 1844, she published another book of poetry, and it met even more success- and it was the publication of this book that changed her personal life completely.  In one of the poems in this collection,  the poem's name, btw, was  “Lady Geraldine's Courtship”, If you're interested, but in this poem she references the poetry of another  fairly obscure British poet,  a man by the name of Robert Browning.  Well, this obscure poet, Robert, was highly flattered to be noticed by someone who was now quite famous, and wrote her a letter thanking her for the shout out.  However, this was not your run of the mill thank you note.  In his thank you letter he very forwardly and now famously said this, “I love your verses with all my heart, Miss Barrett”…”, I do, as I say, love these books with all my heart- and I love you too.”      Ha!  That is forward.  Robert Browning was very much a very bold suitor- no doubt.  He pursued Elizabeth and all throughvia the mail. I was amazed to read there are over 573 letters between these two, and these letters pretty much document the story of two people falling in love.  Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan's email drama has nothing on these two!!  They wrote each other every day and seemingly pretty much about everything  in the world.  These were not check in texts.  These were not Joey Tribiani lines like “what's up!”- they were full on epistles.     So true, and these letters have been popular reading material ever since- for those of us who want to take stalking to the next level and stalk the love lives of the dead.  You really get an intimate look at two people falling in love.  Elizabeth said they were “talking upon paper”.   When you read the letters, you literally feel like you are injecting yourself into their private world.      Mostly because you are.      I guess that's true, but it is sweet.  Here's a clip for you to see what I mean.  “You've come to me as a dream comes, as the best of dreams comes.”  That's Elizabeth to Robert. And Robert Browning responds in the same sorts of ways, “I have loved you all my Life unawares- that is the idea of you.”         It's a very special back and forth that has been preserved, and they were clearly falling in love now before the eyes of the world and posterity- but we also see that Elizabeth was not totally sure marriage was the path for her.       No, she had a couple of serious hesitations.  Not the least of these was her father.  He absolutely did not believe in allowing his children to get married- especially Elizabeth, and by that I mean not ever.  They were a close family, and that put her in a terrible position.  To marry Robert would be to cut off her father.  Her relationship with her father otherwise was good- if you take out the tyrannical controlling thing- I know that kind of fails the say out loud test.       And of course we see in the letters that Robert, obviously was totally against this kind control over her.        That was one big problem, but she was also concerned about her disability and her age.  She was six years older.  Would this really work? By the time, they got married she was 40- today 40 is the new 20, but she didn't feel that way.   She felt past her prime.  These are some of the insecurities, we will see her write about in her love sonnets.  But, at the end of the day, Robert did love her.  He wanted the relationship to work.  And despite her father's objections, he visited her home 91 times unrelenting in wanting a relationship with Elizabeth.  Garry, do you have a theory as to what Mr. Barrett had against Robert or marriage in general?    Well, for one thing, he thought Robert might be trying to use Elizabeth's fame for his own career- and that would be understandable, I guess, although for a 40 year old, today that seems her problem not his.  But the bigger problem was sex in general.  From everything I've read he was a good father and loved his daughter.  Elizabeth, who they calledhis Ba- in many ways she his pride and joy.  He struggled with his daughter having her own sexual identity- he had idealized her.  It seems that as he got older, the sex piece was just more than he could handle.  This sort of thing happens even today.    Well, the locking the daughter up in the room plan failed.      I will say those plans usually do.    Robert and Elizabeth were in love, and on September 12 1846, with the help of her maid, Elizabeth sneaks out of the house and marries Robert.  One oddity is that after they get married, she had to sneak back into her father's house and live there secretly married for another week before they could work out their train tickets to Italy.  But they did ran away together and eventually settled in Florence and where they lived for the rest of Elizabeth's life.     One unfortunate fall out is that her father never got over the elopement.  He disowned her; cut her off financially and never spoke to her again.  He would die never to see his daughter again.  That's sad.     I suspect she knew that was a possibility, and the reason for her hesitation.  I'm also sure that really hurt, but she didn't seem to regret her decision.  Italy was her choice.  She'd loved it from her classical studies.  The doctors insisted it would significantly improve her health- which it did.   She also wanted Robert and a life with Robert, so Italy was the plan.  After three miscarriages, they had a son, she began walking again; she got involved with European politics, supported the the Unification of Italy, took stands on women's rights issues.  She was fully engaged in a life there.  In 1850, she would publish another collection of poetry- this one contained what she is most famous for- her “Sonnets from the Portuguese”.  Selections from this work is what we're going to read.  These were poems she had written to Robert during those days when she was living locked up in that room on Wimpole street.  She wrote 44 love sonnets to Robert,  but she didn't give them to Robert until after they were married.      What's the connection with the Portuguese?      Well, when they were dating, Elizabeth wrote a poem about a Portuguese girl named Catarina who was beloved.  Robert loved it and always connected Elizabeth to this fictional girl Catarina from the poem.  When Elizabeth published these love sonnets it was kind of an inside joke- the speaker is the Portuguese (her) and the poems are all love poems to her husband.  Sonnets from the Portuguese.    Also, you may remember from Robert's life- he had kind of a bad experience with writing personal confessional poems, so when it came to publishing truly personal poems, he wanted her to create some distance between the speaker of the poem.  So, they basically pretended she translated the sonnets. I like the idea- although, I will say, it's not super-well disguised.      So, why are these love sonnets so popular?    For one, there's just the idea that they are so so sweet.  And since their love life is so well documented with their letters, the personal story makes the sentiments in the sonnets charming.   Elizabeth was 39 years old.  She considers herself past her prime when they met.  She was disabled.  She expresses what to me seems like a disbelief someone she found to be as amazing as this man she admired really truly loved her.  On his part, it's kind of a female fantasy- it's sweet- against a lot of big obstacles,he made her believe he loved her because he did.  He really did.  He was equally enamoured with her.  He admired her.  He wondered how could a woman as brilliant as this woman love me?     And there we have something special- a mutual admiration- it is this mutual admiration that led to a real intellectual exchange.  In these letters we watch this intellectual exchange develop into a reciprocity of respect and from this respect we see trust and then intimacy. All of this, of course, is exactly the kind of thing Ibsen advocates for in A Doll's House.  The Browning's relationship is the exact opposite of the Helmer marriage.  The BrownsingsThe Brownings started  as intellectual equals but then emotionally connect.  After many months of back and forth, after many doubts, we finally land on those famous lines most of us recognize from grocery store valentine cards that young boys glue boxes of chocolates or put in the arms of teddy bears. “How do I love thee, let me count the ways?”      I really like Elizabeth; but I also like Robert.  He loved her for who she was.  He was bold; he took risks.  This is something young men aren't often encouraged to do. For whatever reason, Robert demonstrated leadership, and Elizabeth absolutely reciprocated this strength back to him.  Sonnets from the Portuguese take us on her journey. And because we know the true story of their real-life romance- the sonnets just seem sweet, romantic and precious.    You seem smitten, Christy, should I be concerned?  Or should I write sonnets?    Oh, you should definitely write sonnets, But let me say, there is more to appreciate about these love sonnets than just the love confession.  EBB was a rhetorician- and you know I love rhetoric- persuasion.  These poems don't just express emotion.  They are making an articulate argument- she's making a statement one I find interesting and relevant. Because Elizabeth was a product of the Victorian era, she had a very specific understanding of the view of the ideal woman of her day.  However, she was an intellectual, her father had done her the disservice of introducing her to Greek and Latin philosophy.  She was enamored with the female poet Sapphos- so as she sat in the confining room on Wimpole street, receiving letters from Robert- she found herself thinking- what does something like romantic love mean for someone like me?  I don't need a man for money?  I don't need a man for a career?  I don't even need a man for love- my father loves me.  What is romance?  What is love?  What is a relationship between a man and a roman?  She sat around her room a thought about those sort of things and she draws conclusions.     For one thing, she  defines female love in a different way- it doesn't have to be the same thing as masculine love- but it also doesn't have to be this frail Victorian helpless type she found typical of the age- she defines feminine love in a stronger way.  For EBB love comes from confidence and fills the lover with confidence. In the beginning we see a woman who was confident in her intelligence; confident in her work, confidenr in her family,  but not necessarily confident in any romantic sense.  And how many of us can relate to that?  This was exactly me as a high school and college student- if I'm being honest.       One thing that stands out to me is this idea the frail female.  This WAS the ideal female for a lot of men at this time period.  Of course, most men, even today, want to be strong for a significant lover or the love of women in general,  but this dramatic idea of the sickly and frail woman is very typical of the Victorian period.   I can see that a woman expressing powerful confidence was not something people expected from a female in a romantic relationship and certainly not in a female romantic figure.      Exactly, and EBB, who ironically was sickly, didn't want that to be the reason someone loved her.  She ran from that.  In fact, she even ran from being appreciated for being a woman in general.  When Wordsworth died, England needed a new poet Laureate, Elizabeth's name was recommended to succeed him.  The argument was that there should be a woman poet Laureate for the nation because there was a woman monarch.  Barrett took issue with this- she made the statement that she was not a poetess but a poet and she thought poetry should be judged by its merits not by the sex of its writers.    HA!!  19th century cross-sectional politics.    I know, right, but here's why I bring it up.  When it came to her poetry, she didn't want to be looked at as a woman-as in a hyphenated sub-group.  She saw this kind of thing as patronizing like how I heard boys talk about girl athletes when I was a kid- phrases like, “she's pretty fast- for a girl.” That was not Elizabeth's thing.  It's why didn't use a pseudonym like George Eliot or Emily Bronte who went by Ellis Bell.  Hiding your gender professionally  was totally acceptable.  But it seems to me that for EBB she wanted to say- I am a woman- know that-, I have the feelings and desires define me as a woman.   I will write about women and what women care about.  I will show how I as a woman see the world and I will stand confidently this.  This is an important thing to do.   Don't patronize me by qualifying me by gender; I define my femininity for myself.    But all of that only applies to outside relationships. n    So, how does it apply to personal relationships?     It seems crazy, and unljikely but somehow, she and Robert were on the same page in their understanding of how men and women should relate.  He was not intimated by her professional success at all, and he really should have been.  She was very well known; he was not.  Their personal relationship was all theirs.  She was a woman who wanted to be desired, to be cherished, to be loved and adored- and he wanted very much to do all those things for her.  That is a very traditional relationship, and maybe Victorian in nature- but I have to be honest, I love all those very same things.     As we read these poems, I see a powerful writer but also a dreamy love-struck woman.   “As the prisoners think of liberty, as the dying think of heaven so I think of you.”  That is another quote from one of her letters to Robert- but in this line we see a brave but smitten female voice.      So, you're saying, she's not writing as someone trying to be coy or silently waiting to be seduced.       Exactly, she does want to be seduced; she's just dropping the silent part.  Sonnets from the Portuguese are in sequence; they take us through her evolution of thinking and her emotions on this experience of falling in love.  In sonnets 1-2 we see the woman speaker as object of man- she is not the creator of her own poetic voice yet.  And this of course is what we think of when we think of traditional love poetry- man loves woman- man speaks- woman stays silent- just think about the convention of the sonnets in particular- especially Petrarchan sonnets.  That's what they were all about.    Now, we don't need to rehash our entire episode on Petrarch- although he's worth listening to if you haven't listened to that podcast- or at least not in a while- but, by way of reminder, Petrarch wrote sonnets to a woman named Laura who did not return his affection- the entire genre of the Petrarchan sonnet is about objectifying women.    In fact, I'm pretty sure Petrarch never really even refers to Laura as a whole human being- it's always her hair, or her breasts, her voice, her smile- even the name Laura- some people think just stands in for the word Laurel.      You're right.  Laura is distant- impersonal- an ideal.  The sonnets are mostly about Petrarch- the man- not the woman at all. Elizabeth is to not just going to reverse this- she's going to redefine the sonnet genre entirely.  She's going to say, I'm the object- yes- I want to be the object, but I'm also the speaker- I am not silent.  I am a recipient of a love that empowers, but I am also the giver of a love that emboldens.  The poetic relationship in these sonnets is reciprocal- His love calls for her poems- SHE writes them.  In a sense, he is a magic prince who kisses and restores her- she sees him like this- but she is not weak, she is not powerless- even in her physical fraility- even in her age- and she did see herself as kind of past her prime maybe physically but definitely not creatively or professionally.    SHE is the creator of the art here- she is creating this new idea that I can be a the muse for love and the creator of its art.      I also want to point out that their relationship, although it is intellectual,  it is not platonic.  It's very romantic and there is a lot that is physical here… and some of this is erotic to be honest… He was bold towards her, but now she reciprocates with boldness of her own….    Well, that could get interesting.      I think so, but we'll let you read those on your own, though.     Okay- so, we're going to read three of her sonnets?     Yes, I want to.   I think it's nice to try to see a little bit of the progression we've been talking about- how they kind of show her evolving into her own understanding of her relationship.  We won't overdo the analysis thing because there are three of them- and we'll just try to enjoy them more holistically.  We'll start with 14, move to 22 and then finish with the famous 43- the one most people know.        Sonnet 14    If thou must love me, let it be for nought  Except for love's sake only. Do not say,  "I love her for her smile—her look—her way  Of speaking gently,—for a trick of thought  That falls in well with mine, and certes brought  A sense of pleasant ease on such a day"—  For these things in themselves, Belovèd, may  Be changed, or change for thee—and love, so wrought,  May be unwrought so. Neither love me for  Thine own dear pity's wiping my cheeks dry:  A creature might forget to weep, who bore  Thy comfort long, and lose thy love thereby!  But love me for love's sake, that evermore  Thou mayst love on, through love's eternity.      It seems very straightforward and easy to understand for me.      It really is.  Just to give a little introduction to the form, notice that it is in iambic pentamenter, that means there are five strong beats in every line- just like in most every other sonnet in the world. Also, just like Petrarch, there is a rhyme scheme abba abba cdcdcd. But, that's as far as she will follow Petrarch's model.  In fact, she's almost responding to Petrarch- don't love me like Petrarch loved Laura.   He loved her for stuff- for her smile, her look, her way… all that garbage… don't even love me for any cute thing I say, or even what you do for me and how it makes you feel to do stuff for me, like wipe tears from my cheeks- nonsense like that…I'm just not interested.  If we're going to do this love thing, we need to get past all that and figure out something much deeper …the smile and tears stuff isn't enough.    “Love me for love's sake, that evermore though mayst love, on, through love's eternity.”      Well, it's a very ornate style- and it's understandable in light of what we know about her own personal underconfidences that she would talk like this, but like I said before, I really enjoy seeing a mature woman experience a deep and intimate love- she's allowing herself to enjoy all the emotions of love like most people associate with you, but it's not immature love, it establishs reciprocal terms.       Another point I want to make before we read the next one, and this may be one of the reasons her poetry was so ill-received in the 20th century, EBB has no trouble exploring her doubts and underconfidences in her romantic relationship.  And we see that a little here, although the earlier ones had more of it.  She seems slightly concerned that if the love relies too much on the physical, it might be a bust.  Feminist critics of the 20th century didn't like that.  They said things like, she's lowering herself in the relationship when she should be promoting herself.  And there is a real sense that that is true- she clearly submits to Robert in these sonnets- on purpose- but here is the difference that I think has since redeemed her- it's a reciprocated submission- it's not something that Robert himself was not doing.  Today, as we read her poems, we aren't really offended by her vulnerability.  In fact, the honesty has been reinterpreted as confidence.  It takes quite a bit of sincerity and confidence to be openly underconfident and dependent- as paradoxical as it sounds.      Well, of course, I agree with that.  And I have to think, from a psychological point of view, that being in love and writing about how it makes you feel at age 39 as opposed to 19 is probably why she can be vulnerable about her self-doubts without coming across as weak and pitiful.  She's already been through the adolescent stuff as a totally separate issue, so as she tries to understand what about love is overwhelming her and making her feel so differently- she can separate what is unique about this particular love relationship from regular developmental issues of underconfidence or even the loving relationships she's already experienced from her family- which we have to remember- she'd been adored her entire life.      Let's read 22- we can see the tone has shifted.  There's been a progression from love me for love's sake to now WHEN we stand erect…the posture is very different.  Let's read it.        When our two souls stand up erect and strong,    Face to face, silent, drawing nigh and nigher,    Until the lengthening wings break into fire    At either curvèd point,—what bitter wrong    Can the earth do to us, that we should not long   Be here contented? Think. In mounting higher,    The angels would press on us and aspire    To drop some golden orb of perfect song    Into our deep, dear silence. Let us stay    Rather on earth, Belovèd,—where the unfit   Contrarious moods of men recoil away    And isolate pure spirits, and permit    A place to stand and love in for a day,    With darkness and the death-hour rounding it.    Again, we have the same iambic pentameter- five strong beats in every line.  We have the rhyme scheme Abba Abba cdcdcd.  But what we notice more than the rhyme change is the tone change.  Traditionally in the Petrarchean sonnet the first eight lines set up a question and then the second six lines answer it.  There's a turn.  In this one, the first eight lines or the octave are going to define the status of their love as it is now.  The last six will argue- quite untraditionally that they need to stop time and just stay in the present moment.      HA!!  Wouldn't that be nice to be able to do.      Yeah- but I guess it's a nice sentiment even if a bit unrealistic.  I guess that's why she can enjoy it.  I want to point out how much religious imagery she throws in here.  It's not two bodies- it's two souls- they are not constrained by physical restraints anymore- something she was all too familiar with.   I also want to point at how equal the two people in this poem are.  They are two souls- erect and strong- face to face- with wings breaking into fire- that's pretty cool imagery.- kind of like some mythical phoenix full of power and energy.    And yet, as cool as they would be, I would prefer to just stay here in this moment with you.  It's sweet.  Okay, ready for the last one…the famous sonnet 43, the second to last poem in the series- in many ways the concluding one.  In this one, she is going to summarize some of the arguments she's made throughout the other sonnets.  She is going to catalogue the eight ways of loving that she's been making for the last 42.  Let's read it and then we'll see how this famous love story ends.      How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.  I love thee to the depth and breadth and height  My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight  For the ends of being and ideal grace.  I love thee to the level of every day's  Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light.  I love thee freely, as men strive for right.  I love thee purely, as they turn from praise.  I love thee with the passion put to use  In my old griefs, and with my childhood's faith.  I love thee with a love I seemed to lose  With my lost saints. I love thee with the breath,  Smiles, tears, of all my life; and, if God choose,  I shall but love thee better after death.    By the end of EBB's sonnet sequence she has reshaped her understanding of love.  She has allowed herself to express her initial insecurities, walked us through her doubts and developed before us a full and complete discovery of what her romantic relationship means.   Again, she is using the same iambic pentameter- and the same abba abba cdcdcd.  It's simple.  It's obvious.  It's confident. Where in the first one we read, there was a lot of insecurity, the second a very confident equality, here she is asserting her own leadership.  I think she's ready to elope!!!    HA!!  I guess she is.  Again there is a lot of religious and Christian imagery- it even alludes to the Bible.  The languages borrows from St. Paul in his letter to the Ephesians where he describes Christ's love for humanity.      Exactly, she's expressing a completeness here- in every line she's showing us this cycle.  There's spiritual love, every day love, free and society love, virtuous love, passionate love, permanent love and finally eternal love- after death.    Well, how does their story end.      It's nice.  First of all, I forgot to tell you, they nicknamed their son, Pen.  That's cute.  After the elopement and the move to Italy, they had 15 years before Elizabeth's health finally gave out.  The story goes that on the day Elizabeth died, Robert lifted her up towards him and she kissed him repeatedly, even kissing the air after he put her back on her bed.  Robert was heard saying, “Beautiful, beautiful.”  After she breathed her last breath, he looked at her and said, “How she looks now, how perfectly beautiful.”  This was on June 29, 1861.  That autumn, Robert and Pen left Florence never to return.  He prepared and published her last works that he titled, “Last Poems”.  He was unselfishly pleased that even after her death, sales of her work exceeded his.      Browning stayed in England, gradually establishing a place in London society.  He did propose again to a woman named Louisa, Lady Ashburton, a rich and attractive widow in 1869.  However, he blew the proposal so badly that she turned him down.     You know bad proposals are some of the things America's Funniest Home Videos really taught us all to enjoy.  But how was his so bad.  I mean, he was a poet.  You'd think he could turn a line.       Oh, he turned a line for sure, but this stands out- even in a long list of bad proposals.   He literally told her that his heart lay buried with his wife in Florence and he really just wanted to marry her for the advantages it would give Pen.      Well, at least he was honest.      Yes, he was that- just honest and single.  He continued to write and to publish all the way until his death.  And he died in the same country as his wife.  He and his sister were vacationing in Venice, Italy.  He had bought a house there for Pen.  While in Venice, he caught a cold and died on December 12, 1878 there.  Today, EBB is buried in Florence, but ironically they did not ship Robert Brownings down to Florence to be buried with her.  He actually got a very prestigious placement.  Today Robert Browning's body rests in Westminster Abbey.    Wow, that's impressive and an interesting ending to this very famous romance.    Unless  it doesn't end the romance…according to Elizabeth, she was going to love him better after death.    Ha!!!  Well, there you go, perhaps she's set those wings on fire!!    Oh my, we've read way too many sonnets this week.  Next week, we are changing gears entirely.  If you're listening to this in real time, it's October 2021, Halloween season and we are starting The Haunting of Hill House by the American Shirley Jackson.  It's not my favorite sub-genre, but here we go…into the scary stuff!!!    Thanks for listening, please know we appreciate you spending time with us each week.  We hope you are enjoying exploring the classics with us.  If so, please help us by tweeting an episode, posting a link on Facebook or LinkedIn or simply texting an episode to a friend.  And if you're a teacher, Visit our website for teaching support.    Peace Out.     

Peter chose to take a "throw summer."  He spent time alone and "finding himself" and living in Upstate NY.  He called up a buddy and said "I need a job."  "When can you start?" is the question he heard on the other end of the line.  Peter became the manager of a coffee shop.  He had early mornings hearing this song as the day began. "Band on the Run" is on his workout playlist.  He is pumped up by this song or he can be transported to that coffee shop and sometimes even smell the beans roasting!   Peter Pessetto is another author of the book "Active Choices."  Peter knows all about active choices then and active choices now.  The first chapter has become so impactful to his readers he has started a program titled Choose You!  Peter is a busy man, making active choices, and a fan of "Band on the Run." Full Show Notes

Taylor Swift fans sent us their confessions, spicy hot takes, embarrassing moments, and hills they'd die on–and we share them in this very special second edition of Swiftie Confessions. We hear an important defense of ME!, a reminder of Taylor Swift and Paul McCartney's power, a surprising Peter Pan reference, and much more. There's laughter, tears… yeah, mostly just laughter and tears. Join the Discord to fill out your own Taylor Swift song bracket! Thank you to everyone who sent us a Swiftie Confession, as well as wished Ali and Kressie a happy birthday! See ya next year. Same place, same time? Join the Good for a Weekend discussion! Discord TikTok Twitter Instagram Facebook Reddit GFAW Hotline: (205) 693-9160

Paul McCartney calls the Rolling Stones them a 'blues cover band', Flash Poll: the Beatles vs the Rolling Stones?, the Rolling Stones remove 'Brown Sugar' from tour set list over lyrics depicting slavery and the Pat Walsh Show 8 Year Anniversary and Halloween are almost here!

It's episode 35 and we kick it into high gear by discussing that famous Beatles-Canada collab, the second best second place victory of all time, Pauly and Rocky's robot, how many Beatles podcasts there are, our absurd stupidity as a compliment, the introduction of our friend Tim Clark, Scotty's use of primal scream therapy as a sleep aide, the Beatles Village Green Submarine, the difference between a luthier and a Lutheran, our extra special guests in Mr. Big, what we offer in terms of craft service to our guests, and the feedback-introduced "It's All Too Much."As always, you can find Team Blotto Beatles on Instagram (@blottobeatles) and Twitter (@blottobeatles), by emailing us (blottobeatles@gmail.com), or on the web (blottobeatles.com).  We want to hear from you!Please also take the time to rate and review us on Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.We have a shop!  Grab some merch.  You can also drunk dial us (tel:+18572339793)  or leave us a tip in our new tip jar (don't forget to include a message telling us what drinks we should drink with the money).See the canonical, argument-ending list of Beatles songs we are assembling here: https://www.blottobeatles.com/list; listen to it on Spotify here.Please remember to enjoy Blotto Beatles responsibly.Peace and Love.Hosts: Becker and TommyExecutive Producer: Scotty C.Guest: Tim Clark (@nodisassemble)Additional Musical Supervision: RB (@ryanobrooks)#PeteBestGetThatCheck

Today we investigate the great hinkle theft of Alpharetta as we welcome back rocking chair season. One thing is for certain, Donna never forgets.  William Schatner went to space. But was it the real space? Scientists have yet to agree. Then we have a grim update on the case of Gabby Petito as we discuss the new autopsy report released just this week. We check in with teen habits according to a recent study before discussing a fresh new country artist that has made PT very upset. And finally, Tim McGraw and Paul McCartney are starting fights. Want to get in touch with Caddy? Call or Text 7704646024.

Jason Palmer, long-time host, voice actor, Ironman athlete, and international tour guide joins Paul Carganilla and Kevin Gregg as they talk about his experiences in television, theatre, video games, and beyond.In addition to traveling the world, Jason has hosted countless events, toasted with Paul Mccartney at the Golden Globes, and voices a major character on one of the most legendary video games around. Jason just wrote his Master's thesis on the benefits of improv in leadership and loves any chance to practice that form of play. He's a big advocate for creativity, being childlike (not childish), and pursuing the things that help us care for our hearts and others. Jason is currently co-writing a play, pitching a TV show to the biggest entertainment companies out there, and will be touring this winter as Boss Elf in Rudolph the Musical. And when he's not doing all that, he's either surfing, doing a triathlon, or talking to people in various dialects.Your Creative Journey explores the challenges creators can face as they forge their own paths. Whether you want to act, write, dance, draw, make music or make a movie, the Your Creative Journey Podcast is here for you! Twice a month, Paul and Kevin discuss their experiences as working creatives and offer any insight to help you get one step closer to making your creative dream a reality.Past shows of Your Creative Journey athttp://yourcreativejourneypodcast.comFor shows on The Vaudacity Networkhttp://vaudacitynetwork.com/Follow Kevin onhttps://kevingregg.locals.com/https://t.me/kevingreggshow#creativedesign #artcreative #creativityatitsbest #createveryday #creativeworld #creativeprocess #creativeminds #creativemind #creativityfound #creativeartist

Alex Murdaugh's alleged shooter joins us, Shatner survives space, the Great Resignation, Millennials wreck the mafia, Britney Spears' Uncle v. her fans, The Beatles: Get Back doc, and Urban Meyer's girl Cayman Nebraska has been spotted.Karl and Eric Zane will be taking a look at Dave & Chuck the Freak on this week's upcoming Who Are these Podcasts? with special guest: Drew.Britney Watch 2021: Uncle Willie enters the chaos and tells off her fans. Britney vs Jaime Lynn's book. Jason Alexander is going to take a mental health break... after using too many hashtags.We scoop Mandy Matney and the Murdaugh Murder podcast and chat with Curtis Smith... who allegedly shot Alex Murdaugh in an insurance fraud scheme.Gone Gruden Fallout: The NFL has all the answers. Adam Schefter is apparently in trouble now, if you think he's a journalist. Carl Nassib needed to take a mental health day. John Gruden has been kicked out of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Ring of Honor. Jeff Fisher had to come out and make his own statement.Katie Couric edited some of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Colin Kaepernick comments to "protect" her. Here's the original article from Yahoo.Urban Meyer's bar girlfriend is seen for the first time since the fluttering 'incident'.MGK and Megan Fox are so hot. Just ask them.Curb Your Enthusiasm is finally BACK October 24th on HBOMax.Drew doesn't care for Seth Rogen that much these days or his best friend, #MeToo's own James Franco.Kim Kardashian loves murderers. Here is another example.The world's most expensive carnival ride sent William Shatner in 'space'. Marc wants to send Darth Vader/James Earl Jones up there next.Econ 101: It's the Great Resignation. The supply chain is messed up as well. Inflation is insane. It is, however, a lucrative time to be a nurse.Millennials are killing the mafia. They are also buying homes together.Music News: The Rolling Stones cave to wokeness and cancel Brown Sugar. The Beatles: Get Back trailer is out. Paul McCartney "hates" the Rolling Stones.American Crime Story: Impeachment dropped another episode. Ann Coulter is a Deadhead.Brett Favre needs to pay $828,000 back for ripping off the Mississippi welfare funds.Mia Zapata and The Gits were almost huge. Tim Taylor and Brainiac were almost huge. They died.Dave Grohl and a couple other people will be inducted onto the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. An exhibit is open if you need to see Dave Grohl in the meantime.The Ferndale Project dropped a beer called Five Eighths. TFLTTP!Social media is dumb but we're on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew and Mike Show, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels and BranDon).

-Jayron Kearse reportedly punched Evan Engram in the face -Evan thinks Craig's wedding ring is "fake" -Did Craig get a tat yesterday? -Paul McCartney's shot at the Rolling Stones -Pete Rose speaks out on all the times Joey Gallo struck out this season -Our SNY poll sparked a major debate about Yankee and Mets fan -The story behind one of the most popular spams over the last year See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

info@podcastone.com

Scoot reminds us all about the Paul McCartney death rumors from the late 1960s. He goes over the clues that so many tuned in to hear explaining the Paul is dead.  Just a reminder, Paul McCartney is not dead. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 4 of A&G features Chinese/American/Taiwanese relations. Amazon's real estate value to the Washington area. Whose the better band? Rolling Stones or The Beatles? Paul McCartney weighs in. Michelangelo celebrates a special anniversary.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 4 of A&G features Chinese/American/Taiwanese relations. Amazon's real estate value to the Washington area. Whose the better band? Rolling Stones or The Beatles? Paul McCartney weighs in. Michelangelo celebrates a special anniversary.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Wednesday's A&G gets started with an agricultural mailbag. There's a dire need for truckers. Paul McCartney has started saying some crazy things in Interviews. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Wednesday's A&G gets started with an agricultural mailbag. There's a dire need for truckers. Paul McCartney has started saying some crazy things in Interviews. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Thankful is AI customer service software that transforms daily customer problems into lifetime value by combining machine-like speed with human-like expertise. They combine Deep Learning from millions of pieces of data to understand customers just as well as best human agents. Ted Mico is the Founder & CEO of Thankful. In his past endeavors, he's worked in the music business with many high-profile musicians such as Paul McCartney, David Bowie, Mick Jagger, and the rest of the Stones. He's not your typical entrepreneur, which makes this interview refreshing and without boundaries.

Thankful is AI customer service software that transforms daily customer problems into lifetime value by combining machine-like speed with human-like expertise. They combine Deep Learning from millions of pieces of data to understand customers just as well as best human agents. Ted Mico is the Founder & CEO of Thankful. In his past endeavors, he's worked in the music business with many high-profile musicians such as Paul McCartney, David Bowie, Mick Jagger, and the rest of the Stones. He's not your typical entrepreneur, which makes this interview refreshing and without boundaries.

Hour 4 of A&G features Chinese/American/Taiwanese relations. Amazon's real estate value to the Washington area. Whose the better band? Rolling Stones or The Beatles? Paul McCartney weighs in. Michelangelo celebrates a special anniversary. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Commenting on the recent news that Paul McCartney explained that it was not he but John Lennon who broke up the Beatles, Patrick discusses Lennon‘s tragic killing on December 8, 1980. The “God door” here, he explains, is how Lennon‘s murder brought home to him for the very first time the reality of the gospel […] All show notes at The Impact of John Lennon’s Death on Patrick Madrid - This podcast produced by Relevant Radio

We are mesmerized by Shatner's trip to Space, Paul McCartney throws shade at The Rolling Stones, Bradley came in the studio to successfully scare Steve, COPCK and a Great Robin Williams impressionist

Wednesday's A&G gets started with an agricultural mailbag. There's a dire need for truckers. Paul McCartney has started saying some crazy things in Interviews... Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

The Watch List is what you need for a quick look and listen at some of the day's biggest entertainment news stories. Marvel, Netflix, AMC are hot today, Paul McCartney is not pulling punches and big country night on tv tonight.

Kim & Kanye's divorce takes a twist. Nicole Brown Simpson's family fires back at Kim over her disrespectful O.J. joke on "SNL." Paul McCartney & Mick Jagger have a war of words. Demi Lovato thinks it's offensive to call extraterrestrials "aliens." Adele has severe "rich people problems."

Rock & Roll Hall of Famer, Nancy Wilson of Heart fame, is playing with the Seattle Symphony Orchestra on October 30th (tickets at www.seattlesymphony.org). They're doing a mix of songs from her first-ever solo album, “You And Me,” and the Heart catalogue! Nancy's talking about this killer live event, why she chose to cover songs by The Beatles, Pearl Jam, and Bruce Springsteen on her new solo album, and what it was like recording at the height of the pandemic lockdown. She's got some great rock & roll stories about Heart's early days on the road, opening for Rod Stewart, what happened when John Mellencamp opened for Heart, meeting Paul McCartney, performing Led Zeppelin songs in front of Robert Plant and Jimmy Page, her cameo appearance in “Fast Times At Ridgemont High,” and the time that Eddie Van Halen called her in the middle of the night to play his new song for her.

Strap in for this one!  Richard Balducci guides us through the world of conspiracy with master dot-connecting impossible to dismiss.  Richard, an expert in astrology and the occult, began his journey as publisher of the satirical magazine Snicker.   His research would eventually unveil secrets "hidden in plain sight", which still go without notice to the entrained thinking of the masses. On this Alfacast we go very deep into the incredible level of occultism permeating every aspect of our lives.  Have you ever speculated the veracity of claims that the present Beatle, Paul McCartney, is not the real deal?  Is there a similar storyline surrounding the death of John Lennon?  Are World Wars actual conflicts, or ritualistic theater for those who fancy themselves "elite"?    Richard decodes the pervasive symbology conflated with our present microbial obsession, and much more. This episode will both entertain & inform, but focus on how we might ground this awareness into the positive change that is now more accessible than ever.  Just for grins we ended the show by giving you the formula to calculate the mass of your Soul. Show links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDaIQkhoick&t=5567s https://www.bitchute.com/video/bOmLZXQqkSkb/ Have you checked out Re:Union Summit?  https://alfavedic.com/reunion Also please look into donating to our current GoFundMe!  https://alfavedic.com/fundraiser​​​​

Between you and Nikki, applying painful meds alone sucks but reading books on your phone doesn't. After taking a personality test on 16personalities.com, Nikki and Andrew sort of understand each other better. Brenna teaches them about an act of love as they miss her so much baby. You Heard It Here First, it's suing season, penises come in all shapes and sizes and Nikki does care about the possibility of finding love even after giving up hope. In her Reddit Dump, Nikki found an acid laced Paul McCartney interview about honesty, a sports moment with Taylor Swift, Andrew shows off his math skills and Final Thoughts on Chappelle's new special that has been partially watched. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Dave Mason is a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductee with his band Traffic, but there's so much more to his story! As well as a successful solo career in America, Dave also played and recorded with legends like The Rolling Stones, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Eric Clapton, Michael Jackson, Fleetwood Mac and his good friend, Jimi Hendrix! It's an incredible career for a man born in rural Worcestershire who's lived in Hawaii since the 70s. Hear some of his stories in this star studded interview. Plus find out what my favourite 5 Traffic songs are. Part of Pantheon Podcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Nous sommes le 10 avril 1970 . Alors qu'est sorti "Abbey Road" 7 mois plus tôt, le 11ème album des Beatles en 10 ans, Paul McCartney annonce la séparation du groupe et son premier album solo. "PAUL IS QUITING THE BEATLES", "PAUL QUITTE LES BEATLES", peut-on lire sur toute la moitié de la Une du quotidien britannique Daily Mirror, avant que le New-York Times lui emboite le pas le lendemain. Ce que le public ignore alors, c'est que les Beatles sont déjà séparés mais qu'ils ont fait un pacte : ne pas médiatiser la fin du groupe car il reste encore un album à produire. Ecoutez Jour J avec Flavie Flament du 12 octobre 2021

Luke and Andrew are surprised to learn that a sixth iteration of Home Alone is coming to theaters, and that it features some of their favorite comedians. Plus, Paul McCartney continues to make headlines, this time by negging the Rolling Stones.

Wagyu Beef//Paul McCartney blames John//William Shatner – Blue Origin//Foul odor in Carson//

It's time for another potentially excellent episode of the Greatest Pod in The South starring Neal McCready of RebelGrove.com and Jay G. Tate of AuburnSports.com. Topics covered: • Jay's HS reunion is just a few weeks away now. Neal offers some tips and best practices. • Reviewing Week Six in the world of SEC football, which included a HUGE upset in College Station. • LSU lost, their star wideout is out for the season and Ed Orgeron's job security is slipping by the hour. Yikes. • Is LSU still a good job? Is Will Wade ever going to get penalized for coordinating player payments on an FBI wiretap? • Kentucky WON and now is up to 6-0 after summarily dispatching the Fightin' Ed Os. We know they're for real, but how much damage can the Cats actually levy this season? •  Paul McCartney now says John Lennon actually broke up The Beatles, which doesn't surprise Neal because he didn't know why they broke up in the first place. • Octagenarian broadcaster Jim Kaat used an oddly specific term to refer to a Dominican player the other day and it was super cringy. • Dave Chappelle pissed some people off. Why is anyone surprised? That's his brand. • Brach's is hoping to augment holiday sales with a terrible decision to market Thanksgiving-themed candy corn. • Looking ahead to an interesting Week Seven in the world of SEC football. CHECK OUT ... * CATHEAD DISTILLERY, makers of fine vodka, gin, liqueur and bourbon! www.catheaddistillery.com * PINNACLE: www.pinntrust.com * JOHN EDWARDS of REGENCY TRAVEL: 901-494-3387 or jedwards@regencytravel.net or www.regencytravel.net

Luke stumbled on one of the weirdest, most fascinating stories about a rock band that he's ever heard. It involves “Fake Zombies.” Plus, Paul McCartney says he didn't break up The Beatles. 

El cantante agregó que si John no hubiera dejado a la agrupación su viaje musical pudo ser mucho más largo