Podcasts about Bland

Here's what we know. SLED reopened Stephen Smith's case in 2021 because of information found during the Murdaugh murder investigation. In 2023, SLED officially reclassified Stephen's death as a homicide. His body was exhumed. A second autopsy was performed. Those results are sealed. Kenny Kinsey — the prosecution's star forensic witness from the Murdaugh murder trial — is now independently investigating Stephen's death because he believes critical opportunities were missed in 2015. And still — no arrest. No suspect named. No charges.Eric Bland represents Sandy Smith and has a direct line into this investigation. On True Crime Today, he addresses whether SLED is deliberately holding back until the Murdaugh retrial plays out. He explains whether anyone from the prosecution's side has ever spoken to him about the overlap between these cases. And he gives Sandy's perspective on what another year of silence means for a mother who has been fighting since before anyone cared about the Murdaugh name.Bland also addresses the Buster Murdaugh defamation settlement — and whether that legal resolution makes it harder or easier for Sandy to get answers about her son.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#StephenSmith #AlexMurdaugh #SandySmith #EricBland #TrueCrimeToday #SLED #KennyKinsey #ColdCase #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

SLED reopened Stephen Smith's case in 2021 because of something they found while investigating the Murdaugh murders. They've never said what it was. Eric Bland represents Sandy Smith and has been pushing for that answer since he took the case. He's also the attorney who represented the Satterfield sons and helped dismantle Murdaugh's financial empire. He sits at the intersection of both investigations — and he's watching the Murdaugh retrial create new discovery opportunities that could theoretically touch Stephen's case.In this interview, Bland addresses the sealed second autopsy results, Kenny Kinsey's independent investigation into Stephen's death, and the Murdaugh name appearing more than forty times in the original 2015 investigation. He explains what SLED would need to move from "active and ongoing" to an actual arrest. And he answers the hardest question in this case — whether someone with power in the Lowcountry is keeping the truth from surfacing, or whether the evidence genuinely isn't there yet.Eleven years. A homicide ruling. A fifty-thousand-dollar reward. And a mother who has been fighting alone for most of that time. This is her attorney telling you where things actually stand.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#StephenSmith #AlexMurdaugh #SandySmith #EricBland #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #ColdCase #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #SouthCarolina

The Murdaugh name appeared more than forty times in the original investigation of Stephen Smith's death in 2015. Stephen was a former classmate of Buster Murdaugh. He was found dead on a road miles from the Murdaugh family's hunting property. When SLED reopened the case six years later, they said it was because of evidence found during the Murdaugh murder investigation. They never revealed what that evidence was.Eric Bland has said publicly that he has no evidence the Murdaugh family was directly involved in Stephen's death — but that they may have known something. That's a specific claim from the attorney who represents Sandy Smith, who helped expose Murdaugh's financial crimes, and who has relationships with investigators on both cases.In this interview, Bland addresses what that claim is based on. He talks about where the "powerful older individual" thread leads and why it hasn't produced an arrest. He explains what the sealed autopsy results mean and whether Sandy's legal team has seen them. And he tackles the Buster Murdaugh defamation settlement — a legal outcome that resolved one set of claims while the underlying questions about Stephen's death remain completely unanswered.With the Murdaugh retrial potentially generating new discovery, this is the moment where Stephen Smith's case either moves forward or stays frozen. Bland tells us which one he expects.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#StephenSmith #AlexMurdaugh #BusterMurdaugh #SandySmith #EricBland #SLED #MurdaughFamily #ColdCase #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Eric Bland has represented Sandy Smith since 2023 and has been publicly careful about what he shares regarding her son's unsolved death. But he's also dropped specific claims that suggest he knows more than he's saying. He told this show that the Murdaugh family may have known something about Stephen's death. He's hinted at relationships Stephen may have had with someone powerful. And he's been pressing SLED for information about what triggered the reopening of the case during the Murdaugh murder investigation.On Hidden Killers Live, Bland goes further than he has anywhere else. He addresses the sealed autopsy, the Buster Murdaugh defamation settlement with Warner Bros., and whether SLED is waiting for the retrial to play out before making a move on Stephen's case. He also answers the question Sandy Smith has been living with for more than a decade — whether any mechanism exists for her to access new evidence or testimony that the retrial process might produce.This isn't a recap of what's publicly known about Stephen Smith. This is the family's attorney assessing whether the Murdaugh retrial opens a door that's been closed for eleven years — and whether anyone on the other side is willing to walk through it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#StephenSmith #EricBland #SandySmith #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillersLive #SLED #ColdCase #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #MurdaughRetrial

The prosecution won the first trial in under three hours of jury deliberation. The second trial might not go the same way. The Supreme Court limited the financial crimes evidence. The defense has new evidence and subpoena power. The jury pool has spent three years watching documentaries and forming opinions. And the AG just complicated everything by putting the death penalty on the table.Eric Bland predicted a high likelihood of reconviction when the ruling came down. He also said something most legal commentators skipped — that there's a real possibility of a hung jury. One or two jurors who decide circumstantial evidence isn't enough. One or two who watched three years of Murdaugh content and came in with doubt baked in. That's all it takes.On True Crime Today, Bland explains what the prosecution should prioritize, whether the kennel video still hits the same after years of public dissection, and what Harpootlian might actually have when he says the defense has uncovered additional evidence. He also gives the most honest assessment you'll hear on whether Alex Murdaugh should take the stand again — from someone who watched him do it the first time and knows exactly what it cost him.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricBland #TrueCrimeToday #HungJury #DeathPenalty #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers #MurdaughCase

Strip away the twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony that dominated the first trial. Take out the emotional victim impact that the Supreme Court just called prejudicial. What's left is a circumstantial murder case built on a cell phone video and a lie about being at the kennels. Eric Bland says that might be enough. He also says it might not.Bland built the financial crimes case the prosecution leaned on. He knows which pieces were essential to motive and which were emotional padding. In this interview, he does something nobody's asked him to do on any other show — he walks through what he'd tell Creighton Waters to keep and what to cut if the prosecutor called him for advice.He also tackles the defense's escalating strategy. Harpootlian says they have new evidence. Griffin is pointing to unknown DNA under Maggie's fingernails. The AG has put the death penalty on the table and handed Harpootlian a vindictive prosecution argument on a platter. And Alex Murdaugh may or may not take the stand again.Bland has spent years in discovery on the financial side of this case. He knows what's in those records. The question nobody's asking is whether the defense can reframe anything Bland has seen. He answers it here.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricBland #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers #NewEvidence #DNA #CircumstantialEvidence #MurdaughCase

Jim Griffin went on national television after the Supreme Court ruling and said the defense has evidence nobody's seen — including an unknown male DNA profile found under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails. He said it wasn't properly investigated. He said it changes the case. And now the defense walks into retrial with subpoena power and the ability to build a full third-party culprit strategy around it.Eric Bland has seen more of this case's financial discovery than almost anyone outside the AG's office. He's been watching the defense signal its strategy for weeks — the DNA claim, Harpootlian's argument that SLED had tunnel vision from night one, the push for a venue change and attorney-led jury selection. He knows what the prosecution has to work with now that the Supreme Court has limited the financial crimes presentation. And he's making a prediction that splits the difference: reconviction is likely, but a hung jury is possible.In this interview, Bland explains what makes the hung jury scenario real, whether the unknown DNA has the forensic weight to support an alternative suspect theory, and why Creighton Waters may be walking into a fundamentally harder case than the one he won. He also answers a question nobody else has put to him — whether anything in the financial records he's reviewed could be reframed by the defense in their favor.The lawyer who built the state's motive case gives his blueprint for trial two.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricBland #DNA #MaggieMurdaugh #Harpootlian #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers #ThirdPartyCulprit

During the appeal, Murdaugh's defense had limited tools. They could argue the record. They could point to Becky Hill. But they couldn't compel new documents or force new testimony. That's over. At retrial, Harpootlian and Griffin walk in with full subpoena power — and they've already signaled they intend to use it.Eric Bland has been in discovery on the financial side of this case for years. He's seen records the public hasn't. He knows what the prosecution relied on and what it left on the table. Now the defense gets access to that same landscape — and the ability to reframe it.In this interview, Bland assesses whether the prosecution can still win with a narrower financial crimes presentation, what the defense's unknown DNA evidence actually means in a courtroom, and whether Wilson's death penalty consideration helps or hurts the state's position. He gives his honest read on whether Alex Murdaugh should testify again — and explains why the hung jury scenario is more real than most commentators want to admit.This isn't a legal panel rehashing what we already know. This is the attorney who built the motive case telling you whether the prosecution can survive without it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricBland #Harpootlian #SubpoenaPower #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillersLive #NewEvidence #MurdaughTrial

Attorney Eric Bland has a problem nobody else in the Alex Murdaugh case has. He built the financial crimes case that prosecutors turned into their motive theory — the argument that Murdaugh killed Maggie and Paul to generate sympathy and buy time as his financial empire collapsed. The jury bought it. The Supreme Court said the prosecution overdid it. And now Bland's clients — the Satterfield family, the financial crime victims who testified — are being told their time on the stand may have done more harm than good.The Supreme Court's twenty-nine-page ruling focused primarily on Becky Hill's jury interference. But tucked inside that opinion was guidance that could reshape the entire retrial. The justices said twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony was too much. They called out specific witnesses by name. They said some of that testimony had "obviously high potential for unfair prejudice."The questions he has to sit with are the ones nobody else in this case faces. Did Becky Hill actually change the outcome? Was the financial crimes evidence improper, or did the prosecution just present too much of it? Does Harpootlian's victory lap change the fact that Alex Murdaugh stole from vulnerable people and is still serving decades for it? And what does this ruling mean for the people Bland represents — the ones who already lived through the first trial?On True Crime Today, Bland gives his first long-form reaction to the ruling, the defense's civil rights lawsuit, and what happens next for the families caught in the middle.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #EricBland #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #Satterfield #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JuryTampering

Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions are gone — and the lawyer who built the financial crimes case the prosecution used as motive says the system just failed the people it was supposed to protect. Eric Bland represented the Satterfield sons. He helped expose the web of financial schemes that became the backbone of the state's argument for why Murdaugh killed his wife and son. The Supreme Court agreed that evidence was relevant to motive. Then the justices said prosecutors spent twelve and a half hours burying the jury in it — and that some of the most emotionally powerful testimony had no legal value at all.Bland sits in a position nobody else in this case occupies. He's not the prosecutor. He's not the defense. He's the attorney who handed the state its motive theory and then watched the court say the state got greedy with it. In this interview, he responds to the ruling with the kind of specificity only someone inside the case can provide. He takes on the Toal decision, the Becky Hill question, Harpootlian's "lone wolf" theory, and the defense's civil rights lawsuit that claims to benefit the very victims Bland represents.If you want to understand what this ruling actually cost — not in legal terms, but in human terms — this is the conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #EricBland #MurdaughRetrial #Satterfield #BeckyHill #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers #FinancialCrimes #MurdaughTrial

Becky Hill wanted to sell books. Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions are gone. And the financial crime victims who sat on that witness stand are now being told by the state's highest court that some of their testimony had "zero probative value." Eric Bland represented those victims. He's the attorney who exposed the financial schemes that prosecutors used as their entire theory of motive. And he's furious.The Supreme Court's ruling turned on Hill's conduct — the improper comments to jurors, the pressure to convict, the book deal that allegedly motivated her interference. Hill has since pleaded guilty to obstruction and perjury. She received probation. And now Murdaugh's defense team is suing her for six hundred thousand dollars under a federal civil rights statute, claiming any money recovered goes to the financial crime victims Bland represents.Bland wasn't consulted. He has questions about that promise. He also has questions about Harpootlian's "lone wolf" theory — the suggestion that Hill may not have acted alone in influencing the jury. That's not an idle question. If the defense can establish that someone else was involved, the entire first trial becomes even more radioactive — and the prosecution's job at retrial gets exponentially harder.This interview is with the lawyer who knows where the financial bodies are buried, who has watched this case from inside the machinery since the beginning, and who is now watching the court system tell his clients their suffering didn't count enough. That's a conversation worth hearing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #EricBland #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #Satterfield #FinancialCrimes #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughCase

The South Carolina Supreme Court overturned Alex Murdaugh's double murder convictions in a unanimous ruling — then told prosecutors their use of financial crimes evidence went too far. Attorney Eric Bland built that financial crimes case. His clients were the ones on the witness stand. And the court just told them some of their testimony was legally worthless.Bland represented the Satterfield sons — the family of the Murdaugh housekeeper who died under suspicious circumstances and whose insurance payout Murdaugh stole. He helped unravel the financial empire that prosecutors argued drove Murdaugh to kill. Now the court has drawn a line around how much of that evidence can come back in at retrial, and Bland has to reckon with what that means for the families who already endured the first one.The questions are sharp. Did Becky Hill's comments actually move the needle with jurors? Is Harpootlian's civil rights lawsuit against Hill about accountability or about building a defense? Was this a legal correction or a gift to a convicted killer delivered on a technicality? Bland is the one person who can answer all of that from inside the case, not the sidelines.This is Eric Bland with no filter, on Hidden Killers Live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #EricBland #MurdaughRetrial #SouthCarolina #BeckyHill #Satterfield #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersLive #JuryTampering #MurdaughCase

Evan Bland from the Omaha World-Herald joins us here at the Omaha Baseball Village to talk some CWS and of course, Husker football.

Slap A Nevertheless On It - Pastor Mitchell Bland

Agnes Cohn på P3 Nyheter förklarar morgonens stora nyheter, alltid tillsammans med programledarna för Morgonpasset i P3: David Druid och Michelle Hallström. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Flera svenska bibliotek har utsatts för ett cyberangrepp, där hackare lyckats ta sig in på tusentals lånekonton. Syftet verkar bara ha varit att låna mängder med e-böcker – men det kan också handla om att visa att inloggningssystemet är svagt. Kan man då säga att hackaren är någon typ av hjälte?Sedan pratar vi om Kim Kardashian, som var på plats under helgens Monaco Grand Prix för att stötta pojkvännen och F1-föraren Lewis Hamilton. Enligt flera F1-fans gjorde hon flera tabbar och anklagas nu för att inte känns till ”F1-etikett”.

That's a wrap on Season 6. While the middle of the season felt a bit uneventful, we did witness some memorable moments. We saw some of the younger Duggars come into their own in talking heads, watched Lego try and speak Spanish to the Japanese and Chinese people alike, and saw what Michelle could look like with some semi-modern hair. Enjoy our season Superlatives and our look back at some of our favorite Digs. We also get some discussion in on Bingo Boards going into next season. Thank you to everyone who contributed questions to our Q&A!We have Merp, I mean Merch! over at https://digging-up-the-duggars.dashery.comTake a peek at our episode visuals and Mildred related contact at instagram.com/digginguptheduggarspod

Refocus - Pt. 2 - Pastor Mitchell Bland

Ring P1 från Stadsbiblioteket i Göteborg om demokrati och yttrandefrihet. Bland annat om ungdomar, medborgarförslag och partisamarbeten. Programledare: Emmy Rasper, ansvarig utgivare: Sabina Schatzl Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app.

Säsongens sista program. Späckat och svängigt med en maasa härlig musik och sång. Hans Lennart, en form av hovmästare leder det hela med bravur och det handlar om tillsammanshet, ett nyord som folkhälsomyndigheten har skapat för att motverka ofrivillig ensamhet. Yosuf från Stadsmissionens mötesplats Mariatorget gästar och berättar om allt tillsammansarbete som pågår där. Bland annat en stilla stund för fred som de anordnar varje fredag 15:30 och som helt enkelt innebär att man sitter tillsammans i ring och tänker på fred. Fountain Houses egen kör sjunger flera gånger genom programmet och vi pratar med Folkhälsomyndigheten om vad en sådan här tillsammanshet egentligen innebär och vad de hoppas att det ska leda till. Lyssna och njut helt enkelt och ha en glad sommar så hörs vi igen i slutet av augusti!

Hur lever man ett autentiskt liv? Sociologen Emma Engdahl om egenintresset som moralisk princip. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. Först sänd: 2017-11-22.Vem är jag? Var kommer jag ifrån? Vad kan ett bättre liv innebära? Vad bör jag önska och begära? Dessa frågor är nödvändiga att besvara för att vara autentisk, det vill säga sann mot sig själv och sina värderingar. Enligt filosofen Charles Taylor, har vi alla ett unikt sätt att vara människa på. Det är så vi ska leva; inte som en blek kopia av någon annan. Annars går vi miste om innebörden av att vara människa för just oss själva; meningen med vårt liv. Ytterst handlar det om vår förmåga att påverka vår egen, andras och samhällets utveckling från vår personliga förståelsehorisont och sociala position.Mitt svar på vem jag är överensstämmer på ett kusligt sätt med sociologen Luc Boltanski och ekonomen Eve Chiapellos beskrivning av den ”den stora människan” i deras bok ”Den nya kapitalistiska andan”. Jag är aktiv, kreativ och oberoende. Jag är med andra ord en person med egenskaper som är önskvärda i dagens kapitalistiska samhälle, eftersom de går att tjäna pengar på. Som ett barn av min tid har jag också utvecklat vad sociologen Zygmunt Bauman kallar en konsumtionsestetik. Jag har hellre tretton par högklackade skor än 100 000 kronor på banken. Man skulle också kunna säga att jag har övergett värden som förnuft, arbete och framsteg, till fördel för fantasi, skapande och närvaro, vilket sociologen Michel Maffesoli menar är tidstypiskt. När jag läser den skotske upplysningsfilosofen Adam Smiths bok ”Nationernas välstånd”, som fortfarande går att betrakta som det kapitalistiska samhällets bibel, får jag emellertid klart för mig att jag är förhindrad från att förverkliga mig själv. Jag handlar inte egennyttigt på marknaden, det vill säga på ett sätt som ökar min egen och samhällets rikedom. Smith talar i detta sammanhang om något så märkligt som egenintresset som moralisk princip. Denna idé lär vara anledningen till att Margret Thatcher ständigt bar med sig ”Nationernas välstånd” i sin handväska. För Smith var egenintresse inte detsamma som egoism. Han ansåg inte heller att det var det enda motivet bakom människans handlingar. I motsats till vad många tycks tro stod Smith på de utsatta och fattigas sida när han förespråkade en fri ekonomisk marknad, styrd av ensklida individers egenintresse som likt en osynlig hand skulle skapa samhällelig balans. Bland annat noterade han att en euroepisk bonde hade det betydligt bättre ställt än en afrikansk prins, vilket förklarades med hänvisning till den förändrade politiska ekonomin snarare än ett slags immanent europeisk överlägsenhet. Smith menade alltså inte att det ligger i människans natur att handla egennyttigt. Tvärtom motiveras vi spontant av subjektiva intressen och inte av objektiva intressen som privat rikedom och nationellt välstånd. Egentligen är det bara entreprenören som på ett subjektivt plan motiveras till att lägga pengar på hög eller rättare sagt investera dem i företag. Min skofetischism hade alltså fått ge fått ge vika för mina pengars förökning om jag varit mer av en entreprenör och mindre av en estetiskt lagd statligt anställd. Även jag förstår emellertid det problematiska med den ommedelbara lusttillfredställelsen som iögonfallande konsumtion leder till. Jag menar att Smiths tankar om egenintresset som moralisk princip bör ligga till grund för en ny förståelse av demokrati. I praktiken skulle egenintresset kunna lösa de problem vi idag har med att realisera ett samhälle där alla inte enbart är lika inför lagen, utan också har lika goda förmågor att utveckla och förverkliga sig själva. Jag hittar stöd för min tanke i Smiths bok En teori om moraliska känslor som gavs ut 1759, det vill säga sjutton år före utgivningen av Nationernas välstånd. Hans banbrytande idé är att intresset för det egna inte är en individuell, utan en social process. Det är detta som förklarar att egenintresset är ett moraliskt fenomen som med nödvändighet inkluderar andra och samhället. Människan har ingen aning om hon är vacker, god eller rättfärdig i ensamhet. Det finns ingen spegel som talar om vem hon är eller vem hon borde vara. Placeras hon däremot i samhället förses hon genast med den spegel som behövs; andra människors bemötande och uppfatting om henne. De är alltså våra medmänniskor som ursprungligen formar vår självbild. Egentligen uppstår vårt intresse för våra egenheter först när vi inser att andra påverkar oss, precis som vi påverkar dem. Till en början kan detta intresse vara så intensivt att vi fastnar i oss själva eller i föreställningen om hur andra uppfattar oss, med påföljande känslor av stolthet eller skam. Risken är stor att vi förvandlas till slavar under andra människors önskningar och begär. Det är en farlig väg att vandra, inte minst för den moraliska utvecklingen. Ur ett moraliskt perspektiv finns det knappast något beundransvärt i att hoppa för att någon applåderar om man gör det. Moral handlar istället om att sätta sig över människans nyckfulla impulser. Man måste lära sig konsten att bedöma de egna handlingarna utifrån en opartisk åskådares ståndpunkt, det vill säga att dra slutsatser om sig själv och vem man vill vara från en abstrakt samhällelig position eller rättare sagt från ett slags helhetsperspektiv på en själv som människa. Det är också detta som krävs för att handla egennyttigt. Från detta perspektiv är det kapitalistiska samhället behäftat med vissa problem, vilket Smith var väl medveten om trots att han menade att det inte fanns något bättre alternativ för att realisera ett demokratiskt samhälle. Till exempel menade han att den ökande arbetsdelningen som är nödvändig för social och ekonomisk utveckling resulterat i att större delen av vår tid ägnas åt att förfina en försvinnande liten del av våra mänskliga förmågor. Vi mister därmed en möjlighet att se vår fulla potential som människor. Såväl den personliga försåelsehorisonten som medvetenheten om den egna sociala positionen krymper. I ett kapitalistiskt organiserat samhälle måste därför staten träda in som garant för allmänhetens bildning. Endast så kan glappet mellan den enskilda individen som en människa med själ och den enskilda individen som en specialist utan ande överbryggas, menar Smith. Men vi har ett problem till: Idag har arbetsetiken förvandlats till konsumtionsestetik. Vi speglar inte längre varandra i relation till vår profession, utan i relation till våra konsumtionsvanor. En del av oss riskerar att reduceras till de val av varor vi gör på marknaden och det är främst i denna egenskap som samhället engagerar oss. Vi är vad köper. Eller rättare sagt; valet av varor på en aldrig sinande marknad är den enda friheten vi utövar. Vad skulle hända om vi istället vänder oss mot oss själva med hjälp av andra för att skapa en genensam förståelse för vad som är rätt, riktigt och gott? Det är detta Smith föreslår att vi bör göra genom att motiveras av ett intresse för det egna som är förståleseorienterat, snarare än rent ekonomiskt eller instrumentellt. I Smiths mening innebär egenintresset att låta de moraliska känslorna som uppstår i mötet med andra styra våra handlingar på marknaden. Det är så vi kan skapa en bättre och mer demokratisk värld, utan att överge kapitalismen.Emma Engdahl, sociolog Litteratur:Bauman, Zygmunt (2012) Arbete, konsumtion och den nya fattigdomen. Göteborg: DaidalosBoltanski, L., Chiapello E ( 2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism, London-New York, VersoMaffesoli, M (1996) The Time of the Tribes:The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: SageSmith, Adam (17 59/2010))The Theory of Moral Sentiments Penguin ClassicsSmith, Adam (1776/1976) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Chicago: Chicago University PressTaylor, C. (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University PressMer info om Adam Smith finns t ex på Ne.se:

Vallningar, hjärndimma och att inte riktigt känna igen sig själv. Lyssnarna delar med sig av sina erfarenheter av att själv vara i, eller nära någon som är i klimakteriet. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Klimakteriet är sällan något som bara händer en person – det påverkar ofta hela livet runt omkring. I dagens program handlar det om din relation till klimakteriet, både om du själv är i det och om du står bredvid: som partner, vän, kollega, vuxet barn eller nära anhörig.Ibland märks det mest i det lilla: trötthet som aldrig släpper, kortare tålamod, en kropp som känns annorlunda, en natt med stökig sömn. Och för den som är nära kan det väcka frågor, eller kanske en vilja att förstå men inte riktigt veta hur man ska göra. Sex av tio kvinnor i Sverige i åldrarna 40–60 år rapporterade klimakteriesymtom under det senaste året. Bland de kvinnor som sökt vård upplevde mindre än hälften av kvinnor i åldrarna 40–44 år att de fått adekvat hjälp, berättar Folkhälsomyndigheten i en ny undersökning.Hur har klimakteriet ditt liv? Dela med dig av din historia i Karlavagnen.Klimakterieterfarenheter i Karlavagnen med Sarit MonastyrskiRing oss, mejla på karlavagnen@sverigesradio.se eller skriv till oss på Facebook och Instagram. Slussen öppnar kl 21:00 och programmet börjar 21.40

Evan Bland of the Omaha World-Herald joins the show to give his insight on the Sorsby situation and talks some college baseball.

Is It True - Pastor Mitchell Bland

Adam får finbesök av Marcus Krüger, som berättar om framtidstankarna, erfarenheterna från Chicago-tiden, chocken i Carolina och smsen som ramlade in från Anton Frondell efter att han flyttat till Nordamerika. Bland annat. Mycket mer utlovas när Krüger hoppar in och surrar hockey i 40 minuter.

Refocus - Pt. 1 - Pastor Mitchell Bland

Ekots dagliga, längre sändningar med nyheter och fördjupning. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app.

The Left Hook features Mark Bland and Jason Kull in a sharp, fast-moving political conversation centered on Donald Trump, corruption, and the chaos of the current news cycle. The episode opens with discussion of Trump's escalating behavior, fears about authoritarian overreach, the proposed $250 bill with Trump's face, and the federal law that would make that illegal. Bland and Kull also talk about Trump's public image-building, comparing it to dictator-style propaganda and warning that the country is slipping deeper into a culture of spectacle and intimidation. A big part of the show focuses on what they call a slush-fund-style maneuver, which they argue is designed to help Trump and January 6 defendants while sidestepping normal legal limits. From there, the episode expands into a rundown of major corruption stories, including a DOJ investigation involving a woman Trump allegedly raped, a White House contract tied to Don Jr.'s firm, a Pentagon contract linked to Trump stock purchases, and foreign money moving through an account connected to Trump's "Board of Peace". The hosts also discuss the No Kings protests, immigration, right-wing media attacks on James Talarico, and the broader collapse of political norms in America

In this episode of The Kirk Miller Podcast, Kirk sits down with Luke Bland to explore one of the most inspiring transformation stories ever shared on the show. Luke's journey didn't begin with Ironmans, 100-mile races or marathon finish lines. It began with self-doubt, unhealthy habits, and a life that was heading in the wrong direction. Through a complete shift in mindset, environment, and personal standards, Luke transformed not only his body, but his entire identity. Together, Kirk and Luke unpack the decisions, challenges, and lessons that helped him go from struggling with direction and confidence to becoming an endurance athlete capable of extraordinary physical and mental feats. Luke shares how joining the Built To Last community became a turning point in his life, giving him the accountability, support, and belief he needed to start operating at a higher level. He opens up about the role sobriety played in his transformation, why discipline became his superpower, and how changing the story he told himself unlocked a completely different future. Throughout the conversation, Luke reflects on the experiences that shaped him, including completing his first marathon, crossing the finish line of an Ironman, and running 100 miles in under 24 hours. But more importantly, he explains why those achievements were simply the result of becoming a different person. This episode is packed with powerful lessons on resilience, personal growth, identity change, and the importance of surrounding yourself with people who challenge you to become better. In This Episode: Luke's journey from scaffolder to endurance athlete How joining Built To Last changed his trajectory The mindset shifts that transformed his life Why sobriety became a catalyst for growth Lessons learned from marathon running, Ironman and ultra-endurance events The importance of community, accountability and environment How changing your identity changes your results Why discipline matters more than motivation The role family plays in creating lasting success What Luke's biggest challenges taught him about resilience If you've ever felt stuck, doubted your potential, or wondered whether lasting change is possible, this conversation will show you exactly what's possible when you commit to becoming a better version of yourself. To learn more about Built To Last or apply to work with Kirk and his team, visit: https://www.builttolast.co/apply  

Bellmanvitsar är en av Sveriges tio nya immateriella kulturarv. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Hela veckans Morgonpasset i P3 – Gästen hör du i Sveriges Radios app.Sverige har fått tio nya immateriella kulturarv. Bland annat bada bastu, halmslöjd, Bellmanvitsar, tegelhantverk och diwali. Vad klassas som ett immateriellt kulturarv och hur blev Sveriges lista så här konstig? Nordiska museets etnolog Jonas Engman hjälper oss förstå alltihop.Programledare: David Druid och Linnea Wikblad.

I Will - Pastor Mitchell Bland

Thomas Stenström och Brandsta City Släckers lämnar med sina VM-låtar, blir det öppet mål nu för Magnus Uggla som bubblar med låten VM-Guld? Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Förra veckan var både Thomas Stenström och Brandsta City Släckers aktuella på listan med sina Fotbolls-VM låtar. Nu får de lämna, men kanske kan det bli mer VM-musik på Svensktoppen nu när Magnus Uggla är bubblare med ”VM-Guld”? Bland övriga bubblare märks Europe med nya ”One On One” och Petra Marklund med ”Mitt Hjärta En Rebell”. FELICIA är fortsatt etta med ”My System”.

Matt poses a food question to Evan Bland before getting to a preview of this weekend's Lincoln Regional.

I veckans avsnitt pratar vi rymdbolag som nu fått luft under vingarna inför SpaceX jättenotering. Utöver det avhandlar vi försvarssektorn och vilka bolag som visar tecken på en vändning. Bland annat pratar vi om en teknisk formation i Rheinmetall som är extra intressant. Elias presenterar Hemnet som veckans case och ser en förändring i betalningsmodellen som kan vända utvecklingen. Utöver det ser Patrick toppformation i Sivers...

I år firar rekordmånga diamantbröllop för 1966 så gifte sig nämligen ovanligt många par i ovanligt ung ålder. Att hålla ihop ett äktenskap så länge är imponerande och idag pratar vi om hur man lyckas. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Om man söker på orden ”livslång kärlek” på nätet så dyker en mängd artiklar fulla av tips och råd upp om hur man klarar det. För nog är det bra många som verkligen önskar att de får leva tillsammans hela livet och inte ”bara” i 11.7 år, vilket enligt SCB är genomsnittslängden för ett äktenskap (2022 års siffror).Bland råden räknas allt från att visa varandra respekt och skratta mycket tillsammans till att vara öppen för den andres känslor och önskningar, att alltid fråga hur man mår, att ha gemensamma intressen men samtidigt kunna leva sitt eget liv osv.Firar du diamantbröllop i år eller kanske rubinbröllop (40 år), pärlbröllop (30 år) eller bara ett ojämnt antal många år, 27 till exempel? Vilka tips har du för att få kärleken att hålla länge, hur har ni firat era olika jubileum och vad är det roligaste, konstigaste, finaste, knäppaste som hänt under alla era år som gifta?Ring oss på 020-22 10 30 och berätta om livslång kärlek. Telefonslussen öppnar 21.00 och programmet börjar 21.40. Du kan även skriva till oss på våra sociala medier eller mejla till karlavagnen@sverigesradio.se. Programledare Li Skarin sänder direkt från Piteå.Producent: Helene Almqvist

Evan is sitting in a weather delay at The Chuck, and he predicts whether or not Nebraska will play today, how the Huskers shape up, and who might come to Lincoln for a potential regional.

Stay Ahead of the Comms Curve! As discussed in this week's news review, modern public relations requires a bold, adaptive approach to narrative building and corporate communication. To ensure your skills remain razor-sharp in an evolving digital landscape, don't miss PRmoment's AI in PR Masterclass. Learn how to ethically and effectively leverage cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools to supercharge your campaigns, streamline insights, and manage modern brand reputations.

The NRL’s return to Las Vegas was supposed to build on last year's historic success, but the newly announced team slate has completely missed the mark by splitting up natural rivalries like the Tigers and Eels.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Welcome to the 'Gina Gardiner & Friends Show' - this episode features my guest, Mimi Bland whose theme was 'Mastering your mind and your emotions'.

Tone Schunnesson är författare till en ny roman som heter Ultravåld. När hon kommer till studion är romanen precis på väg ut i världen till läsarna, hon har just fått ett första exemplar av den tryckta boken i handen. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Tone Schunnesson är född 1988 och debuterade 2016 med romanen Tripprapporter. Andra romanen kom 2020, den heter Dagarna dagarna dagarna och nominerades bland annat till Sveriges Radios Romanpris. Bland mycket annat gör hon ihop med Aftonbladets kulturchef Karin Pettersson en filmad podd som heter Café Bambino.Den nya romanen har hämtat sin titel ur Anthony Burgess klassiker A Clockwork Orange från 1962, där han introducerade ordet ultraviolence för läsarna. Ett ord som översatts till ultravåld och är synonymt med brutalt, meningslöst våld.Ultravåld är Tone Schunnessons mest omfattande roman hittills och spänner över ca 450 sidor.Skriv till oss! bokradio@sverigesradio.seProgramledare: Marie Lundström

Evan Bland joins Happer and Schaefer to break down keys for Nebraska baseball in the upcoming Big Ten tournament.

I made it this far into my life and decided NOW is a good time to start dunking my pizza in bleu cheese. Guess how my Hinge date went last weekend? It's. not just a new job; it's a lifestyle change! Yay! (That's always fun, at almost 50 years old) Don't ask famous cinematographers' sons about their….DYAD. It's looking more like the BLAND-alorian movie, isn't it? (Shit, I should've saved that pun for when I actually review it…) Converge played a free show in the parking lot at Epitaph, and Bokes & I went. The worst bagel experience I've ever had. (A monumental life event) I went to see Bruce play drums two nights in a row, then cooled my heels at the Comedy Store. It was a booze and junk food fueled weekend, mostly by accident. (But it was still fun)

What score would you get if you took the IELTS tomorrow? Get your ⁠⁠estimated IELTS Band Score now⁠⁠ with our free 2-minute quiz. Want to get a guaranteed score increase on your next IELTS Exam? Check out our ⁠⁠3 Keys IELTS Online course.⁠⁠ Check out our other podcasts: ⁠⁠All Ears English Podcast⁠⁠: We focus on Connection NOT Perfection when it comes to learning English. This podcast is perfect for listeners at the intermediate or advanced level. This is an award-winning podcast with more than 4 million monthly downloads. ⁠⁠Business English Podcast⁠⁠: Improve your Business English with 3 episodes per week, featuring Lindsay, Michelle, and Aubrey Visit our website⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠ or https://lnk.to/website-sn Send your English question or episode topic idea to support@allearsenglish.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On the next episode of Redefining Medicine, we are honored to feature Dr. Jeffrey Bland, internationally recognized scientist, entrepreneur, and co-founder of the Institute for Functional Medicine and Metagenics. Widely regarded as the "father of functional medicine," Dr. Bland has spent decades reshaping the future of healthcare through a more personalized, root-cause approach to chronic illness.   In this episode, Dr. Bland reflects on the early questions that sparked his lifelong pursuit to better understand why people become chronically ill. At a time when little research existed around the biology of chronic disease, he became determined to uncover answers that could transform medicine into a more proactive, health-focused model of care.   Dr. Bland also shares how these ideas ultimately led to the formation of the Institute for Functional Medicine in the early 1990s, built on the belief that chronic illness could be addressed through lifestyle, nutrition, and environmental interventions - not just pharmaceuticals. His work helped pioneer a teachable framework that continues to influence the evolution of integrative and longevity medicine today.   Don't miss this inspiring conversation as Dr. Bland explores the origins of functional medicine, the future of personalized healthcare, and why shifting from disease-focused medicine to health-focused care may be one of the most important transformations in modern medicine.

Evan joins The Grum to talk a little Nebraska baseball!

Hej Somna. Är du en sån som lyssnar på hela avsnitten, eller en sån som somnar? Jag gillar att det finns båda. Jag har suttit och bölat så som ett litet barn bakom ratten på min svarta Peugeot. Jag är i den perioden i mitt liv just nu när jag sitter i bilen, skruvar upp någon låt på hög volym, sjunger med och grinar. Det har varit mycket sånt på sistone.Det finns en aria som inleder Händels Xerxes och som jag har lyssnat sönder de senaste dagarna. Det är en persisk kung som börjar hela operan med att sjunga till ett träd, en platan, och om hur fin och skön skuggan var under det. Vet du vad en kastratsångare är? Vi pratar om den fruktansvärda och fascinerande traditionen kring kastraterna. Det är någonting med att den där ljusa rösten var den yttersta maskuliniteten i en annan tid. En kastratsångare var det manligaste av det manliga, och så sjunger han om ett träd, så ömsint. Det är lite sorgligt att flera stycken är skrivna för en rösttyp som är borta. Som ett sorgset eko från denna tragiska passage i kulturhistorien.Jag funderar över att min förmåga att känna djupt har återvänt, sakta, sedan jag slutade med antidepressiva. Förstå mig rätt, tycker att antidepressiva är en bra lösning, men det tar även udden av känslorna. Oavsett tragiken i att jag sitter och gråter högt, så är det en väldigt helande grej att göra.Jag har börja köpa instrument. Det började när jag flyttade in i lägenheten. Bland annat en fiol som hänger på väggen där hemma. Jag tar ned den ibland och försöker spela låtarna jag lärde mig som barn. Jag vill fylla mitt liv med klang. Godnatt Somna.Mer från Somna med Henrik: https://somnamedhenrik.se/Mer om Henrik: https://www.henrikstahl.se/Lyssna utan reklam, få extraavsnitt, spellistor med mera på: https://somnamedhenrik.supercast.com/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Emily and Han discuss the experience of finding abundance and deliciousness threatening. The key takeaway points are….Bland and non-highly palatable foods often feels more familiar, safe and consistent Delicious tasty food is often more energy denseRecovery = going towards perceived threatAllow yourself to burst out of the survival stateCelebrate wider life abundance + pleasure + comfort Ensure portion abundance of the delicious foodIf you would like to sign up for the newsletter, please let us know here: https://recover-ed.wixforms.com/f/7458167267222619353

View This Week's Show NotesStart Your 7-Day Trial to Mobility CoachJoin Our Free Weekly Newsletter: The AmbushWhat if the biggest thing holding your health back isn't what you're doing, but how you're thinking about it? Most of us have been trained to see the body in silos: diagnose the problem, treat the symptom, move on. But what if that model is missing the bigger picture?In this episode of The Ready State Podcast, Dr. Jeffrey Bland – widely recognized as the father of functional medicine – joins Juliet and Kelly Starrett to unpack a more complete, systems-based approach to health. From a simple (and surprisingly accessible) blood test that can reveal your inflammatory status, to the real role of inflammation as both a healing response and a hidden driver of chronic disease, this conversation challenges everything you thought you knew about “being healthy.”Dr. Bland also shares the deeply personal story that reshaped his entire career and led him to question conventional medicine's focus on downstream symptoms instead of root causes.You'll walk away understanding why everyday choices – like sugar intake, sleep, stress, and even your sense of self-agency – play a far bigger role in longevity than most people realize. Because at the end of the day, health is something you actively create.What You'll Learn in This EpisodeWhy chronic inflammation is both a healing response and a hidden driver of diseaseHow a standard blood test (CBC) can reveal your body's inflammatory stateThe difference between treating symptoms vs. addressing root causes (upstream vs. downstream health)Why your body is a system – and not a set of isolated problems to fixHow everyday habits like sugar intake, stress, and sleep quietly accelerate agingKey Highlights: (0:00) Intro & Teaser Clips(0:35) Introducing Dr. Jeffrey Bland, Father of Functional Medicine(3:11) Dr. Bland Joins the Show / Earth Day Connection(3:50) How Dr. Bland's Career Began in 1970(7:33) What's Most Urgent for People to Understand About Health Today(9:13) Systems Thinking vs. Siloed Medicine(12:43) A Seismic Life Event That Changed Everything(15:19) Finding Purpose After Tragedy — The Birth of a Mission(17:35) Origins of the Term "Functional Medicine"(19:03) Functional Medicine in The Lancet — 1874(31:15) Understanding Good vs. Chronic Inflammation(38:30) The Ibuprofen Epidemic in Youth Athletes(39:59) The Functional Medicine Model: Antecedents, Triggers & Mediators(42:47) Big Bold Health & Testing for Inflammaging(43:33) The CBC with Differential — A $6 Test Everyone Already Has(45:08) The SIRI Index — Calculating Your Inflammatory Status(46:25) Immune Cells Renew Every 90–120 Days(56:03) The 850-Person Clinical Trial on Food & Immune Health(56:56) Tartary Buckwheat — A 3,500-Year-Old Immune Superfood(1:02:57) The Healthcare System Isn't Working — A Seismic Change Is Coming(1:08:13) Rapid Fire: Blue Zones & Eating a Rainbow of Polyphenols(1:09:47) The #1 Lever for Aging Well — Starting With How You See Yourself(1:10:56) Where to Find Dr. Jeff Bland & Closing ThoughtsHuge thanks to our sponsors, Kreatures of Habit, LMNT, and Momentous.

Join Doc and Paul as they review the creature feature film KILLER WHALE (2026) from director Jo-Anne Brechin and writer Katharine McPhee. Synopsis: Killer Whale is a gripping survival thriller centred around best friends, Trish (Virginia Gardner, FALL) and Maddie (Mel Jarson, MORTAL COMBAT), who find themselves locked into a deadly face-off against the ocean's apex predator: the orca. With a dark cloud of the past hanging over them, will they make it out alive or become a part of the food chain? Cast: Virginia Gardner (Fall), Melanie Jarnson (Mortal Combat) & Mitchell Hope

You're Just Like Your Mama - Janelle Bland

This episode of The Rizzuto Show starts with a simple moral question and somehow ends with the entire room debating whether permanent Cheeto dust is worse than having taste buds in your butt. So yeah… business as usual for your favorite funny podcast.The chaos begins when King Scott asks the gang a hypothetical that immediately exposes everybody's true character: would you rather win $25,000 for yourself or secretly let your best friend win $100,000? Sounds wholesome at first… until everyone starts trying to loophole the situation, negotiate “finder's fees,” and openly admit they'd probably take the money and just buy dinner afterward. Friendship has never looked weaker.Then things take a sharp turn directly into nightmare fuel when another “Would You Rather?” gets dropped on the table: permanent Cheeto dust fingers you can NEVER clean… or taste buds in your butt. Suddenly the studio becomes a think tank for the dumbest scientific discussion ever recorded. Moon explains why finger residue makes him physically uncomfortable. Rafe starts calculating how to avoid tasting his own farts. Rubber gloves become a survival strategy. Nobody comes out looking good here.As if that wasn't enough, the episode also includes:Moon's horror at people licking sauce off their fingersA massage therapist wearing rubber glovesThe realization that gloves technically solve the Cheeto problemRafe inventing a “berry-only diet” to improve hypothetical fart flavorAn alarming amount of discussion about digestive consequencesThen the Riz Quiz kicks off and things somehow become even more embarrassing. Contestants crumble under elementary-level trivia questions while the gang loses their minds over people forgetting how leap years work. Adults fail questions about rainbows, geography, oceans, and basic science while Tony absolutely steamrolls the competition like a trivia machine sent from the future.This funny podcast somehow combines friendship betrayal, snack-food body horror, caller meltdowns, and public humiliation into one perfectly chaotic daily comedy experience. If you enjoy sarcastic humor, weird debates, pop culture nonsense, and the sound of grown adults emotionally unraveling before 10am, welcome home.The Rizzuto Show continues to be the premier destination for bad decisions, ridiculous hypotheticals, and the kind of conversations that absolutely should not happen on live radio… yet somehow do every single day.And yes, we're still thinking about the butt taste buds.Follow The Rizzuto Show → https://linktr.ee/rizzshow for more from your favorite daily comedy show.Connect with The Rizzuto Show Comedy Podcast online → https://1057thepoint.com/RizzShowHear The Rizz Show daily on the radio at 105.7 The Point | Hubbard Radio in St. Louis, MO.Texas ‘Karen' Kicks a C8 Z06 at a Gas Station Over the Sound of His Exhaust'I donated my mum's body to Alzheimer's research but found out they blew her up in the experiment'Two women accused of stealing cash, machine, attempting ATM break-in at Bland bar'NO TIP' fury in Fulton as Domino's driver accused of hitting customer‘Unfortunate:' Classes canceled at NW suburban school after resource officer misplaces weaponWoman accused of giving tattoo to toddlerHow the Explosive 'Pop Rocks and Coke' Legend Destroyed an Iconic Candy Brand“It Is Extremely Unattractive”: Woman Said Men Who Play Video Games Are a Turnoff and the Internet DisagreedCNN founder Ted Turner, a pioneer of cable TV news, dies at 87Celebrities Who've Struggled with Lewy Body DementiaRobert Downey Jr. Says ‘It's Absolute Horses—‘ to Declare That Social Media Influencers Are the ‘Stars of the Future'Delta ending food and beverage service on shorter flightsSecret Service Officer Arrested, Allegedly Masturbated in Hotel Hallway After Trump AssignmentYour 2027 Car Will Decide If You Can DriveSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.