Podcasts about sybren

In deze aflevering van de De Donkere Kamer-podcast ga ik in gesprek met Sybren Vanoverberghe, een fotograaf-kunstenaar die in zijn werk de vluchtige schoonheid van veranderende landschappen en hun overblijfselen vastlegt. Geboren in Kortrijk in 1996 en inmiddels een gevestigde naam in de kunstwereld, onderzoekt Sybren hoe plaats en tijd onlosmakelijk met elkaar verbonden zijn.Hij nodigt ons uit om na te denken over zowel historische ruïnes als alledaagse plekken, en onthult hoe sommige van zijn beelden een tijdperk tonen dat eigenlijk nooit heeft bestaan. We duiken zeker ook in zijn creatieve proces. En Sybren bespreekt hoe geschiedenis, natuur en erfgoed samenkomen in zijn kunst, en wat hij als inspiratiebron ziet in de herhaling van bepaalde plekken.Ontdek in dit gesprek waarom Sybren fotograaf werd, waar hij van droomt, naar wie hij opkijkt en wat zijn toekomstplannen zijn. Laat je meenemen op een reis door tijd en herinnering, en ontdek hoe de kunst van het fotograferen ons kan laten reflecteren op het verleden én de toekomst.website van De Donkere Kamer: www.donkerekamer.cominstagram: @dedonkerekamer_belive shows: donkerekamer.com/showsCONNECT: donkerekamer.com/connectwebsite Sybren Vanoverberghe: https://www.sybrenvanoverberghe.cominstagram Sybren: @vanoverberghesybrenwebsite Keteleer Gallery: www.keteleer.com

Opw 797 Sela: mijn toevlucht Themalied: Kom aan boord Belijdenismoment Amanda, Adriaan en Sybren NLB 345: 1-3 Zingen: Heer wijs mij Uw weg Lezen: Psalm 122 Preek: Moet je naar de kerk? Zingen: In Christ Alone Hebreeën 10:19-25 luisterlied: Skillet – Anchor GK 170: 1, 2, 4

Blender is a free and open-source 3D graphics tool that was initially released in 1994 and just hit version 4.0. It's one of the triumphs of open-source software development and is used for creating animated films, art, 3D games, and more. Sybren Stüvel is a Senior Software Developer at Blender. He joins the show today The post Blender with Sybren Stüvel appeared first on Software Engineering Daily.

Blender is a free and open-source 3D graphics tool that was initially released in 1994 and just hit version 4.0. It’s one of the triumphs of open-source software development and is used for creating animated films, art, 3D games, and more. Sybren Stüvel is a Senior Software Developer at Blender. He joins the show today The post Blender with Sybren Stüvel appeared first on Software Engineering Daily.

Ouderen zijn een gewilde prooi voor sluwe oplichters. Steeds vaker ontvangen ze een belletje van een nep-bankmedewerker, die niet alleen op zoek is naar geld, maar ook naar sieraden. Presentator Maaike Timmerman gaat in gesprek met landelijk coördinator Senioren & Veiligheid bij de politie Sybren van der Velden, oud-inbreker Ron Konings die tegenwoordig trainingen geeft en met Raymond. Zijn moeder is voor ruim drie ton opgelicht. Onderzoeksjournalist Rick Pietersz duikt in de cijfers en achtergronden. 

Elke maand stellen we hier bij ALLsportsradio een nieuw Talentboek Talent van de Maand aan je voor. Voor september zijn dit de 16-jarige tweelingbroers Sybren en Tjebbe Berkhout. De jonge broers zijn in zowel het skeeleren als schaatsen de wereldtop aan het veroveren. We spraken met hen over hun sport, carrière en wat hun spaardoel is. Meer weten over Sybren en Tjebbe en hun spaardoelen? Kijk dan hier: https://yvgtf.nl/nieuws/laatste-nieuws/broers-tjebbe-en-sybren-berkhout-dromen-van-de-winterspelen-2030 Presentatie: Robert Denneman

In deze aflevering hebben Daniël en Rocher het over de aanstaande gemeenteraadsverkiezingen samen met digitale campagnestrateeg Sybren Kooistra. Want waarom zijn deze verkiezingen zo belangrijk? Hoeveel verkiezingen kent Nederland überhaupt? En wat zijn typische onderwerpen waar de gemeenteraad allemaal over beslist? Ook hebben we het over de zichtbaarheid van de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen, waarom het een ondergeschoven paardje lijkt te zijn en hoe we het meer sexy kunnen maken. Want elke verkiezing is belangrijk. Sowieso i Verder kijken we naar hoe mannelijkheid en vrouwelijkheid zich uiten in de (lokale) politiek. Want overal waar mensen zich bevinden, zijn er wel (traditionele) uitingen van mannelijkheid en vrouwelijkheid te vinden. Al met al een informatieve doch entertainende aflevering. En het meest belangrijke van allemaal: VERGEET NIET TE STEMMEN! In de aflevering werd gesproken over een VersBeton-artikel betreffende de Rotterdamwet, dit artikel vind je hier: https://www.versbeton.nl/2021/03/de-rekening-van-de-rotterdamwet/ En het artikel van De Groene Amsterdammer over online vrouwenhaat vind je hier: https://www.groene.nl/artikel/misogynie-als-politiek-wapen

This month, we discuss tone policing — what it is, how it shows up in church, the discriminatory ways it's deployed, the things it suppresses that are beneficial to Christian community, and a lot more. Also… Suzie's back!!! Shake the Dust is a podcast of KTF Press. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Find transcripts of this show at KTFPress.com. Hosts  Jonathan Walton – follow him on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.  Suzie Lahoud – follow her on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.  Sy Hoekstra – follow him on Twitter.  Our theme song is “Citizens” by Jon Guerra – listen to the whole song on Spotify. Our podcast art is by Jacqueline Tam – follow her and see her other work on Instagram.  Production and editing by Sy Hoekstra. Transcript by Joyce Ambale and Sy Hoekstra. Questions about anything you heard on the show? Write to shakethedust@ktfpress.com and we may answer your question on a future episode. TranscriptSuzie Lahoud: Your problem is not my anger. Your problem is that it triggers guilt in you. Why? Because of your — I'll put it in Christian terms — because of your lack of repentance. It has to be repentance rooted in action, because ultimately she's saying I'm not even interested in your feelings, your guilt doesn't do me any good. I'm interested in change. I want this thing that is hurting me, that's hurting my kids, is hurting the people that I love, I want it to change, and that is why I'm angry. [The song “Citizens” by Jon Guerra fades in. Lyrics: “I need to know there is justice/That it will roll in abundance/ And that you're building a city/ Where we arrive as immigrants/ And you call us citizens/ And you welcome us as children home.” The song fades out.] Sy Hoekstra: Welcome to Shake the Dust: Leaving colonized faith for the Kingdom of God. A podcast of KTF Press. My name is Sy Hoekstra. I'm here with Jonathan Walton AND! Say hi, Suzie.  Suzie Lahoud: Hello everyone.  Sy Hoekstra: Suzie's back!  Jonathan Walton: Yes! Sy Hoekstra: And Jonathan sounds like Grover, for some reason. [laughter] We are so excited to have Suzie back. This is the first one since she left to take care of a tiny little baby for a few months. We are very happy that we get to have her back on the mic before we start season two, for all of you lovely subscribers. Thank you so much for subscribing, this is a subscriber only bonus episode. So I'm not going to go through the whole, what our subscription is to KTFPress.com and all that. But please do remember to follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, at KTF Press if you don't. Leave a rating and review this show in your podcast player of choice, and just thank you for doing all that. It's very helpful, if you have a couple of minutes, we really, really appreciate it.  Now we're going to get started with our topic today, which is Tone Policing. We're going to talk about several different aspects of how tone policing fits into a church in a broader social context. But first let's just begin with the simplest thing, the definition. For people who do not know, what is tone policing? Jonathan Walton: The definition of tone policing, it's when dominant culture responds to the critiques of marginalized folks by addressing the matter in a way that critiques the delivery, as opposed to the actual argument. So it's dismissed, it's ignored. It'd be me stating that I am frustrated, angry, upset about the verdicts today in the shooting of Daunte Wright. And because I say it in an angry way, someone will say, “Ugh, that would be received so much better if you weren't such an angry Black person.” And they address me, as opposed to addressing the actual substance, which is, people should get sentenced for things in the United States in the same way that other people are. So the ad hominem argument, as I just learned, is when someone addresses me, minimize, dismiss, attack the person, as opposed to dealing fairly with the thing that's actually brought up, the issue at hand.  Suzie Lahoud: Yeah. So essentially, your argument, the point that you're making, is viewed as illegitimate and irrelevant, just because of the way that you delivered the argument. Because you showed emotion, people no longer have to listen to you and address what you're actually saying.  Sy Hoekstra: Right. And I think, so tone policing is a form of an ad hominem argument, meaning, an ad hominem argument is like any attack on a person instead of the substance, and tone policing is specifically when you're arguing against the way that something was spoken, or the way that you were addressed when the person made the argument. So what does that actually look like, both in a broader social context and in church specifically, how do we see tone policing happening? Jonathan Walton: Yeah. So the way I think the classical senses we hear these arguments made, is around like infidelity and abuse in church. So someone, usually a woman, will bring up like, “Oh, someone was sexually assaulted or there was a violation of some kind.” And they'll be like, “Oh, why is she so upset? Why does she have to say it in front of everybody? Why this, why this, why that.” Has nothing to do with the actual reality that there's a person who's been victimized, and we are not going to deal with the person who victimized her or the situation or help. We're just going to attack the way that she brought it up, because it disturbs some dominant cultural reality that we want to keep as the status quo. So I think inside and outside the church, I think this is an exceptionally unhelpful tactic and technique for… yeah. Well, the result of it is exceptionally unhelpful, because inside and outside the church, we just end up with entire groups of people, usually victims of sexual violence or some sort of abuse, being wholly dismissed, online or in real time. Sy Hoekstra: Can I emphasize one of those things that you said, which was, why do you bring this up in front of everyone? The specific Bible passage that gets thrown around a lot there is Matthew 18. People saying, you should have come to the individual person first, and addressed them and expected them to repent, which does not… or ask them to repent. Then you follow this step-by-step thing, where you bring in a couple other people, and then maybe you bring in the church leadership and then you bring it in front of the public, which does not make any sense in the context of abuse, because the whole relationship has been so distorted at that point. And the power dynamics are so clear, and the abuser is not, like, has probably repeatedly justified what they're doing to you already.  Like the whole, it indicates an incredible lack of understanding of what happens in abusive relationships. But that's in one specific context, the context of abuse. It could be criticism at anything. It could be criticism about how your institution runs. It could be criticism about just someone's leadership style. And a constant thing that you hear is about grace, and whether or not the person who is doing the criticizing is showing the proper amount of grace, is not being too accusatory, and isn't being too emotional about what they're saying.  So the reason that that is hypocrisy, is because the person who's being criticized is almost never required to show any grace when you're tone policing. You're not required to sit there and say, okay, even if this person is too angry, even if this person is not showing me the grace they deserve, you can get to the substance of what they're saying, even if they don't say it in the way that you think is correct. You should be able to show that grace to them, as somebody who is probably in pain or mourning somehow. But that level of grace is not expected of the person being criticized, it's only being expected of the person who is doing the criticizing. That's usually because of power dynamics.  This usually comes up when somebody in power is being criticized. And I just think we often lose sight of that. This happened recently, there was a whole spat because this Anglican priest wrote in the New York Times about how we need to get rid of online worship services, because people need to get back to church, which is, aside from just being dangerous because the pandemic's not over, is ridiculous for, as we've talked about before, like people with disabilities who can come to church, who suddenly during the pandemic had so much access to ministry and you're just going to cut that all off because she was afraid, being Anglican and being very concerned with embodied, embodied worship, embodied communion taking, that people were just going to stay home if you gave them the option to stay home. So people got really mad at her online, and then a lot of people wrote back like, “Gosh, this is just such vitriolic, ungracious...” So many people responded that way to her, and it just really bothered me that nobody was thinking like, why doesn't she have to show grace to people that she has angered, for quite legitimate reasons? Then think about the critiques and actually deal with those arguments and why the grace never goes the other way, is just frustrating to me.  Jonathan Walton: Yeah. Also, another example would be, like Brett Kavanaugh when he was doing the confirmation hearings, and the way that he and Lindsey Graham were allowed to yell, to spit, to seethe in contempt and disgust for the reality that they were even being questioned about something. Sy Hoekstra: To shout, “I like beer,” at the top of his lungs [laughs]. Jonathan Walton: Right. To push back against the questioner and be like, “Are you addicted to alcohol?” The way that he spoke, if that was a woman, if that was any minority, it would have… I re-watched it recently and was just shocked at the level of indignation and freedom that is totally fine because of the position he holds in society as a wealthy, white, educated male. It's yeah. There is no tone police for that. Suzie Lahoud: Yeah, and that actually sort of transitions to some of my thoughts on this, which are… well, first of all, I'll say in the context of the church, I feel like the Christianese that gets thrown around this a lot, is “the fruit of the spirit is self-control,” but then it ends up being a very gendered critique. So the first piece of it is, Dr. Willie Jennings in his book, After Whiteness, talks about this concept of the self-sufficient white male, and that that's the mold that everyone else is expected to adhere to. Particularly in professional settings, which I would include the church as an institution when you're sitting in a church meeting. Even when you're sitting in a Bible study this comes out, that the appropriate way to express yourself is almost as if you were a white man.  And to be honest, I feel like women feel this particularly. That if you show undue emotion, if you get too weepy, if, you know, your voice starts to quaver a little too much in the wrong way, not in the, “I'm filled with the Holy Spirit” kind of way [laughter], people are going to just write off what you're saying. Certainly in academic settings I've seen this happen, that you just lose the audience as soon as you step out of the armor of this ideal of a WASP-y way of expressing yourself. So that's the first piece of it. But the second piece of it that you were getting at Jonathan, is that it's really a double standard. Because white men do show emotion, and they show anger, but somehow it's not labeled as anger when they express it. It's labeled as strength. It's labeled as a show of authority.  Sy Hoekstra: Passion. Suzie Lahoud: Yes, it's showed as passion. It's showed as leadership, strong leadership. Because let's face it, white male rage provides the guard rails that patriarchy in a white supremacist society operates on. That's what keeps us in line, is the anger of white men, and we don't call it that. There's actually a great quote that's kind of been making its way around Twitter by this novelist and playwright and it's kind of tongue in cheek. But it's Claire Willett. She writes, “Honestly, the best marketing scheme in history is men…” and I would qualify this as white men, “successfully getting away with calling women, the ‘more emotional' gender for like, EONS, because they've successfully rebranded anger as,” all caps, “Not An Emotion.”  So again, when these men do it, as you were saying, Jonathan, when you look at that confirmation hearing, we don't say, “Oh my gosh, they got so angry. That disqualifies them.” No, it's appropriate somehow. We don't even see it. It's become invisible to us because that's the norm. That has been expressed as acceptable, that we've been socialized to accept as acceptable. But if a woman did that, if a minority did that, it would be a completely different response. They would be disqualified from holding a position of leadership and authority because of their expression of emotion. So again, it's this double standard, and it doesn't help men either. It makes me think of that great quote by CS Lewis, where he says, “I sat with my anger long enough until she told me her name was grief.”  So we don't provide proper outlets for grief for men, for expressing that they feel overwhelmed. It can only be expressed as anger in those cases for these white men. So that's also a problem. It doesn't… I guess what I'm trying to get at, is this double standard doesn't help anybody out. It's not healthy for anyone. It's not building a healthy society. It's not creating healthy homes and healthy institutions. That's part of why it needs to be called out.  But I'll return to the point of this often being a gendered critique. And I want to acknowledge straight-up that I'm not the most qualified person to make this argument, but I think there is no debate that it is Black women who bear the brunt of tone policing. And it is because it is at the intersection of patriarchal power and racial oppression. So if a Black woman shows emotion, even about injustice that she has personally experienced, we say that she's angry. That seems to discredit her and disqualify her and make her appear dangerous, like she's a threat to society. And that is a huge problem, and it's been used and wielded to silence so many women. And really, I just feel like it's a battle, not only for the ability to express certain things, but a battle for the ability to express things in a genuine, authentic way. That you shouldn't have to take on that armor of the self-sufficient white man to be able to speak your truth. You should be able to speak your truth in the way that you need to speak it, in the way that it comes out. So those are my initial thoughts. I'm going to get off my soap box [laughs]. You guys jump back in. Sy Hoekstra: Wait, sorry, those are your initial thoughts [laughs]? Suzie Lahoud: I know, I realized that I was going to go do the whole thing, and then I was like, “Let me step back. Sy has some good questions.” Jonathan Walton: No, listen. Suzie is back. Suzie is back, just so you know. In case you forgot. [Laughter] Sy Hoekstra: Exactly. And I think it's worth pointing out, that some of these points are similar to something we talked about last month, when we talked about how the hierarchy of sins just plays differently along lines of race and gender and whatever else. Because that's just how anything like this shakes out as being more negative for people who are less empowered. It's just a similar dynamic that we were talking about. Jonathan Walton: Right. Quick thing that I'll add is, at that intersection of race and gender, for at least, I think, from what I've observed and read, the critique against white women is not anger, but hysteria. Like why are you being so ridiculous? Like this isn't a problem. And for Chinese, Korean and Asian, it's like, what do you mean this is a problem? They expect submission. They're like, what do you mean this is an issue? I thought this would be fine, that they would just roll over and it'd be, and take whatever is coming. And I think for, and Sy, I think I've actually talked with you about this. For folks with disabilities, it's like the expectation is that y'all will be nice and grateful at all times for people who engage and talk with you and are willing so much to sacrifice our time to be in a relationship with someone like you. Sy Hoekstra: That's actually an interesting one because there's this great… she's a professor of something or other. I don't know, because I just read her Twitter, which is mostly about the fact that she's blind [laughs]. She's an English woman named Amy Kavanagh. Another Kavanagh, but one who's not as frustrating. And she… Suzie Lahoud: We don't discriminate against Kavanaghs.  Sy Hoekstra: No, no, absolutely not. She just had this whole thread recently, specifically about the fear that a lot of blind and other disabled women face for speaking up at all about what they want, because it so frequently can result in lots of unwanted attention from men. If you're angry, unwanted attention from men. If you speak up at this dynamic of like, I'm talking to you, and I just grab your arm or your hand to help you, guide you across. We've talked about this before too, Jonathan. How blind people in general, like you have to at least ask, and you should probably just let them ask, if you want someone to, if you want to offer help. And she's just like, if we at all say, “I don't need that help,” even if it's no tone at all, just the notion that you would say, “I don't need the help,” you're liable to face a ton of anger, and even groping or in some cases, sexual assault. This happens at much higher rates to disabled women. It's just like a terrifying situation to be in, where the slightest, the smallest tone, even no tone, just the suggestion that you don't need the help that someone's offering, makes you ungrateful. So that word in particular that you used, is I think very accurate, and I don't know, it can be met with like, it's like tone…  Jonathan Walton: Tone punishment? No, but like it's a punishment, right? Like we violated a social norm. So for, and for me, getting too angry about police brutality, it might be that I'm dismissed from my position because I'm too emotional. Like Jonathan's too close to the issue, so my thoughts and my feelings, my leadership is invalidated. And then maybe my leadership is invalid in other places. So then I won't be able to write on that blog anymore or speak at that place anymore.  For this woman, and that, I had never thought about that before. That is tragic. For a woman who is willing to speak up and advocate for herself that is disabled, to be assaulted or berated in, it's almost like there's a… it's actually what Suzie already brought up. You run into the guard rails of white rage. There's like, that keeps you in your place. So she doesn't say anything because she fears running into that third rail. Guard rail, sorry to mix metaphors. Suzie Lahoud: Third rail is good too. Yeah. Well, and gosh, this reminds me of why I miss having these conversations with you guys. Because you're helping me nuance even my own thinking, because I'll be honest, I came into this conversation thinking that part of the problem is that it's expected that there's a single tone that we're all allowed to take, but really, I think maybe to nuance that idea more, it's that there are tones that are dictated to each of us within our boxes. But like you said, there are norms around how we are allowed to express ourselves based on who we are, and bringing it back to, we were already touching on this concept of intersectionality and overlapping layers of oppression that each of us experience based on our identities, and tone falls into that. That there's only a certain way you're allowed to express yourself.  Jonathan Walton: Right. And one other thing, not Jenning's book, After Whiteness, but the book before that, Christian Imagination. He talks about, I think it's page 34, because I wrote about it a lot. Is that he says, there's this image of maturity. Suzie Lahoud: Yes. Jonathan Walton: Yeah. Like that the paterfamilias is like the white male form, will bring all other things into maturity. Suzie Lahoud: Yes. And that gets expressed in the church. Sorry to cut you off, but yes.  Jonathan Walton: So the idea of a mature woman, is this. The idea of a mature disabled person, is this. A mature Black person is this. Like mature creation. The thought that native people were not using the land in the way that it should be used, therefore Europeans can take it and bring it to maturity. Children being separated from their parents, whether it be native people or immigrants today. Like we quote, “we can raise that child to maturity better than this person.” Sy's talked about that with children and the foster care system being taken. So anyway, there's lots of intersections. Suzie Lahoud: Jonathan actually touches too on something I was looking at again recently. In The Fire Next Time, James Baldwin talks about that, kind of the same concepts from Dr. Willie Jennings. That white people, particularly white men, think that everyone needs to become like them in order to better themselves and become mature and for society to progress. And the fact that they're not willing to let go of that idea and understand that no, the point is not for everyone to assimilate to your way of being. Again, this comes out in tone. It comes out in the way that you are allowed to express yourself. Because the problem is not that the person speaking to you is angry. The problem is the problem that upset them in the first place.  And I have to, sorry, I just have to jump in on this too. But one of the things that, and I mean, obviously I have emotions about this. So one of the things that's so upsetting about this, is that you're essentially asking, a lot of times when tone policing happens, you're asking… And this came up with the examples you were giving about abuse in the church. You're asking the victim or the one who is oppressed to not show emotion about their oppression, and actually, it's the oppressor who's asking them to not show emotion about it. This is also one of the things I loved about, I recently recommended in our newsletter, that, the Trojan Horse Affair and it's all about Islamophobia, but one of the things that ended up being most… Sy Hoekstra: So good. I listened to the whole thing in like three days after you recommended it. It's amazing.  Suzie Lahoud: It is definitely binge material. Yeah. So, so good. So well done. But what really ended up getting me the most, was the story of these two journalists who were working on this, and one of them is a British Muslim. He comes out of these meetings enraged oftentimes. And this white male journalist who's working with him from the New York Times, he's not having the same emotion. So they have these conversations about it on the side, and a lot of it ends up weaving around, how do you relate to your profession, what's your job as a journalist? Those kinds of questions.  But what struck me, and what they kind of get out, but I wish they'd almost dug into more, is that the Muslim journalist is having a stronger response because this is his lived experience. He doesn't exist apart from this. So when they're making Islamophobic statements, when he's listening to British officials make bold Islamic claims, that's personal for him. Of course, he's going to get emotional about it, but somehow he's not allowed to do that. And not recognizing the importance of his positionality in the story, that's what we do. We shut people down. We don't allow them to be human and we don't allow ourselves to see the power structures that create these moments of injustice, these experiences of injustice that lead to the emotion. But to us, the problem is the emotion, not the structures. Sy Hoekstra: The other sort of ironic point about it I think, is that the person who's doing the tone policing, is telling someone to be quieter, less emotionally involved in things that have happened to them that are really painful. Is that in almost every case, those things have never happened to the person who's doing the tone policing. The person who's doing the tone policing has no experiential basis with which to evaluate the reaction of the person who is getting quote unquote, “too emotional”. So there's all the other kind of hypocrisies wrapped up in it that we've talked about, but on top of that, it's also just, usually the person doing the tone policing is the least likely person to be able to accurately evaluate whether or not the tone of the person speaking is actually appropriate. Jonathan Walton: Right. And I think something that I hope people listening, we can separate is anyone is capable of doing tone policing.  Sy Hoekstra: Oh yeah. Suzie Lahoud: That's a good point, yeah. Jonathan Walton: And the willingness and ability to do it testifies, I think, to our unwillingness to engage with our own discomfort. Because when somebody else gets angry, for me to be able to validate their anger, I have to think anger is good in and of itself. And then I have to enter into my own feelings to be able to empathize with them. And if I have a problem being emotional, whatever the emotion is, sadness, joy or anything along the spectrum, I won't be able to do it. And that, all in the name of control is, just radically unhelpful and not Christ-like at all. Sy Hoekstra: Which is why I think of so much of that sort of control as just a trauma response to discomfort. Like the people that are tone policing, the trauma response being, instead of dealing with the thing that is making you uncomfortable or anxious or whatever, your solution is to try and just get rid of it. That's almost always a trauma response. Is like, just get rid of this problem instead of dealing with this problem. That is the, a kind of classic sign of somebody who is overwhelmed with anxiety or discomfort or something like that.  Suzie Lahoud: Yeah. I feel like that's what Brené Brown is kind of getting at when she talks about how you are the least capable of being empathetic towards something that triggers your own shame. Sy Hoekstra: Oh yeah. Jonathan Walton: Yes.  Sy Hoekstra: So we've talked a lot now about how this operates and all the kind of negative things that tone policing does, but Jonathan, I think you were starting to hint at the actually positive things that come from the emotional expression of the person being criticized. Like there are legitimately positive things that tone policing is shutting down. Aside from just naming somebody's suffering, there are lots of other things that are being shut down that are actually good, that come from the emotion in particular. So can you talk a little bit more about that, Jonathan?  Jonathan Walton: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, me and Priscilla have conversations about this a lot, where like, how do we raise Maia to trust her gut? That her feelings are good, that they actually signal what she values. They actually, they are things worth contemplating, because they say something about who she is as a person. They say something about what she believes about herself, about the world. So our feelings are signals. They may not necessarily be truth or things that identify us or that we wrap our identities in, but they are essential to who we are as people, because they communicate values, they communicate beliefs. They reflect something deep inside of us. So one of the ways that we have actively tried not to tone police, is actually doing what Jesus did.  And something that Jesus did when people had strong feelings or strong beliefs that were different from his, that would normally make us quote unquote “uncomfortable” is the difference between teaching someone and judging someone. So Jesus taught, but he didn't judge. Which is a very, I think, subtle distinction, where someone can come to me and have strong feelings, and I can allow them to have those strong feelings and not condemn them for those said feelings, you know what I mean?  Suzie Lahoud: I feel like one of the… Yeah, I mean, first of all, that's so wise. Thank you, Jonathan. And I think that's an important place for me to kind of make the clarification, that the point should be that we can all, all of us, understand and express our emotions in a healthy way. In the way that God intends. Because emotion is a part of our faith and obviously that's clear in the Bible. So again, just to clarify, the point is that this isn't healthy for anybody. Another thing that we were talking about earlier when we were prepping for this conversation, is just this idea that, I think, anger itself can be an important expression of injustice or of speaking out. An important way of speaking out against injustice and speaking out against something that is wrong. That is not as it should be. That is not in keeping with the Shalom that God desires. That is not representative of human flourishing in all of its fullness. So anger can actually be an important emotion to recognize, to understand how to deal with.  Honestly, I feel like, so one of the people that has a lot of insight on this is, reading Audre Lorde. She talks about anger as a fuel for the work that she does, and she makes an important distinction between anger and hate. So we're not talking about hatred. And I appreciate that you guys touched on anger in your previous bonus episode, because I think it's important to recognize that we have to… gosh, there needs to be a lot of nuance there in how we talk about anger, how we deal with anger. Obviously, it holds a lot of power in, so it can be very destructive and that's how a lot of us have experienced it and continue to experience it.  But she specifically talks about the power of anger to kind of fuel your engine to work towards change, because ultimately what she wants to see is change. There's this quote that I was reading recently from this powerful speech that she gives, called “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism.” She says, “Anger is an appropriate reaction to racist attitudes, as is fury when the actions arising from those attitudes do not change... I cannot hide my anger to spare your guilt, nor hurt feelings, nor answering anger; for to do so insults and trivializes all our efforts. Guilt is not a response to anger; it is a response to one's own actions or lack of action. If it leads to change then it can be useful, since it is then no longer guilt but the beginning of knowledge. Yet all too often, guilt is just another name for impotence, for defensiveness destructive of communication; it becomes a device to protect ignorance and the continuation of things the way they are, the ultimate protection for changelessness.”  So essentially she's saying, anger is an appropriate response to racism. I mean, that's what she says straight-up. And your problem is not my anger. Your problem is that it triggers guilt in you. Why? Because of your, I'll put it in Christian terms, like Christianese, because of your lack of repentance. But she's saying, I'm not even… It has to be repentance rooted in action, because ultimately, she's saying, I'm not even interested in your feelings, your guilt doesn't do me any good. I'm interested in change. I want this thing that is hurting me, is hurting my kids, is hurting the people that I love, I want it to change. That is why I'm angry. And the problem is not my anger, it is the thing that needs to change. Help me change it.  Sy Hoekstra: Yeah. And I think in addition to all that powerful stuff… just if you haven't read any of Lorde, go do that because a lot of it is like what Suzie just read. It's all very good. Suzie Lahoud: Yeah. It gets you right in the gut. It's powerful stuff. Sy Hoekstra: Yeah, for sure. Right. And I think part of, like another aspect of that whole quote, is just that if you're somebody who is in a position of power and somebody comes to you with a criticism and they're angry about it, that anger is actually a useful tool for you as a leader to understand what is important to somebody else. Like you can have emotions that are a tool of measurement about importance to someone who you're trying to lead. And you can look at it that way, instead of responding with defensiveness and impotence and guilt. If you're in a church leadership context, it also helps you see where people are passionate, where they might be gifted, where you could put them in positions of leadership. All those things, if you're getting past your own emotional reaction to their tone. So I think she was getting at a different angle of what Jonathan was saying before. That tone policing is sort of your own unprocessed emotional problems. Not usually the problems of the people who are speaking to you. I think one other point that you brought up Suzie, that I wanted to touch on. You brought up before we were having this conversation, was just, tone policing is also shutting down just diverse forms of communication. Some of these things are cultural, some of them are, they're not positive or negative. It's just somebody else's way of communicating, that again by the standards of white people is interpreted as something that is overly emotional for a million different reasons.  Then when you said that, that made me think of, well, there's also, there's a lot of people who have different kinds of disabilities or neurodivergence or whatever, whose means of communication comes off as emotional as well just because it's different. Like you might have somebody who just the way they process thoughts or feelings or experiences, comes out of their mouth, comes out of their facial expression in a way that you're not used to, simply because their brain operates differently than yours does. Or you might have somebody who has a disability that leads to literally just a different way of speaking.  A louder way of speaking, a way where their speech, they might have like a bit of a slur or a stutter and to get over their stutter, they have to do certain things with the way that they speak that to you, you can interpret in a million different ways. I just think there are, I don't know, there's a lot of room to explore there. Just different modes of communication and how if you just let people have their mode of communication, then you're going to have a better church. You're going to have a better organization, a better community of people who are living, and kind of experiencing God and sharing in community together in a more effective way.  Do we have any more thoughts before we wrap up?  Jonathan Walton: Yeah. I just want to affirm, Suzie, your quote's amazing. Our podcast is better with you on it.  [laughter] Suzie Lahoud: When I read other people [laughs]. Thank you. Jonathan Walton: No, but I mean like, well, quotes by themselves are not powerful. Like your application of them in this conversation. Suzie Lahoud: Thank you. No, I appreciate that. Thank you. I guess my point was, I can't take credit for the quote, but I appreciate that, Jonathan. Thank you. Sy Hoekstra: [in a formal tone] Your strategic placement and integration of quotes into our podcast improves the overall content. Suzie Lahoud: [matching Sy's formality] Oh, why thank you, Sybren. Jonathan Walton: The reason that I think that's important, is because I often don't point people to the places where I got the good water. Suzie Lahoud: That's a good point. Jonathan Walton: So I think it's important to do that, and so I appreciate that you did that. It's just exceptionally helpful. I will say just one more thing about Jesus. Anger is just as a part of God's divinity as it is his humanity. Often, in the same way that anger gets framed as sin, I think we actually do need to reframe it as like, oh, anger is because of some of the product of emotion, and God's anger is because of his love. God's anger is because of his care. God's anger is because of the sense of injustice and indignity towards people made in his image. So that the anger, and then in Isaiah, the act of sanctification that comes like, be angry but sin not, for when you don't sin, you heap coals of fire upon the other person's head. It's like we can sanctify people through our anger when it's shared in ways that are transformative to help and we communicate just why that anger is happening.  Suzie Lahoud: Yeah. Thank you for bringing it back to, yeah, this process of wanting to know God more and become like him. I mean, what we want to be at the heart of all of these conversations. Yeah, it's interesting that even as you say that, even as you talk about anger and how it relates to the divine being, to divinity, it's so hard because we, I wonder if it's almost because we live in a dominant culture that doesn't know how to deal with anger in a healthy way, that allows it to be explosive when it shouldn't be, that shuts it down when it should be allowed to come out. We don't know how to talk about anger and God in ways that don't lead to abuse. So even as you make that argument, and I'm like, “Yes, amen.” And yet at the back of my mind, it's all the ways that anger has been used, taken from scripture, and then used in abusive, manipulative situations. Sy Hoekstra: As fire and brimstone. Suzie Lahoud: Yes, and it makes me so sad because we don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water. I'll be specific that this is an area that I need to understand more. I don't understand the anger of God. I don't understand it, and I have understood it in ways that have been unhealthy. I want to understand it in healthy ways. I've understood it in ways that are destructive, I want to understand it in holy ways. There's just so much work that needs to be done, and I think we're just at the beginning of diving into the mystery of that. Yeah, and that's an area that I want to grow in wisdom and understanding. Sy Hoekstra: So I think our final closing thought here is, stop tone policing God. [laughter] Jonathan Walton: Fair.  Suzie Lahoud: And stop using God to tone police others.  Sy Hoekstra: Yes, right. Jonathan Walton: That would definitely be a thing. Suzie Lahoud: Particularly Black women. Just don't do that. Sy Hoekstra: The end. Thank you all so much for listening [laughs]. This is a great conversation. Suzie, we are so happy to have you back.   Jonathan Walton: Yes. Suzie Lahoud: Thanks guys, it's good to be back. Sy Hoekstra: Everybody, please remember to follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter @KTF Press. Leave us a rating and review on your podcast player of choice if it allows that. You know what? If your podcast player doesn't allow that, just open up Apple Podcasts or Spotify on your phone. Give us a rating there. You don't have to listen. Why do I keep saying you should do it on the app where you listen? Do it on every app. Open every podcast app you can find. Download new apps, just to rate and review us. [laughter] Suzie Lahoud: Be generous with your rates and reviews. Sy Hoekstra: Exactly. Suzie Lahoud: Spread them widely.  Sy Hoekstra: Spread them widely. Our theme song as always, “Citizens” by Jon Guerra. Our podcast art is by Jacqueline Tam, and we will see you all in March. Thank you so much for listening. [The song “Citizens” by Jon Guerra fades in. Lyrics: “And that you're building a city/ Where we arrive as immigrants/ And you call us citizens/ And you welcome us as children home/ Where we arrive as immigrants/ And you call us citizens/ And you welcome us as children home.” The song fades out.] Jonathan Walton: No. Oh, wait, hold on. Everest is awake. Sorry, hold on. Hold on. I got to go get her. Sorry. [Laughter] Suzie Lahoud: On that note… [Loud crashing noises from Jonathan's mic] Sy Hoekstra: Whoa! Whoa, what was that? Suzie Lahoud: Oh, Jonathan just ate it! Are you okay, Jonathan? [No response from Jonathan; just two more small sounds of things falling] Sy Hoekstra: Jonathan, did you fall?  Jonathan Walton: [weakly] Yeah. Definitely did.  Sy Hoekstra: Are you okay?  Jonathan Walton: Yeah, I'm alright [laughs]. Sy Hoekstra: Okay. Jonathan Walton: I didn't realize my foot was wrapped in the cords.  [laughter] Suzie Lahoud: Oh, no. Did you actually hurt yourself though?  Jonathan Walton: Oh, no no no no no. I caught myself on the ground, but I'm okay. I'm alright.  This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.ktfpress.com

Sybren Russell is a collegiate athlete from Colorado and discusses his soccer journey. IG: @noguidancepodcast51 @berada51 @sybren_russell --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

In deze dertiende aflevering komt mijn aanknopingspunt met de zwaardere baswereld op bezoek: Sybren Camerlynck ofte de gemaskerde bassist van Fleddy Melculy is rocking my garage! Niet enkel met een zak vol backstagestories van Werchter tot Pinkpop, ook met anekdotes uit de periode 'timmeren aan de weg' met De Fanafaar, de metalband die jarenlang dienst deed als 'orkest' voor de grote Urbanus Hemzelve! Hij leert me en passant ook nog hoe ik mijn bas zo metalproof mogelijk kan doen klinken. Tot slot speelt hij live zijn 'famous last notes' - zijn quote van Charles Mingus' baslijn op "Haitian fight song". Dit alles vergezeld van een blinde proef battle tussen de prestigieuze Franse Corton uit de Bourgogne versus de Spätburgunder aan de andere kant van de grens in Duitsland, besproken door sommelier Bernard De Vriendt van VITIS.VIN. Met dank aan Algam Benelux voor de Aguilar bass amplification.

Plotscast is een werkplaats, een speelplaats en een luisterplaats. En niet te vergeten een ontmoetingsplaats! Heel spannend is de ontmoeting van drie artiesten, die ieder vanuit een heel ander gebied komen aangevlogen:Judy Blank vanuit laten we zeggen independent AmericanaElten Kiene, vanuit de hip hop en spoken wordRienk, vanuit de al dan niet analoge synthezirette.Wat er dan allemaal ontstaat? Je hoort het in deze live editie nummer 21! Luister trouwens ook nog eens terug naar de prachtige editie nummer 15 met de stadsdichter van Eindhoven Iris Penning, slam-poet Monique Hendriks en trompettist Sybren van Doesum. En check ook onze instagram.com/plotscast_Curator, hosting & socials: Wordbites, Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound studio. Web: Bieke JongejanPlotscast is een onafhankelijk initiatief van Wordbites en Yeppe van Kesteren dat wordt ondersteund door de Gemeente Utrecht en het Cultuurmakersfonds van het Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds. www.plotcast.nl 

Sybren Bosch is adviseur bij Copper8 waar hij zich bezig houdt met de circulaire economie. De huidige omgang met grondstoffen is niet vol te houden op de lange termijn. Samen met Pieter van Exter die in aflevering 30 te gast was deed Sybren onderzoek naar de schaarste van kritieke metalen die nodig zijn voor onder andere elektrische auto's. Ook vertelt hij over de enorme hoeveelheid CO2-uitstoot die vrij komt bij het maken van cement. Problematisch omdat er onder andere in Nederland een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid huizen gebouwd gaan worden de komende jaren. Maar daar zou de inzet van houtbouw een interessant alternatief kunnen zijn waarbij het mes ook nog eens aan meerdere kanten snijdt. Klik hier voor de Tegenlicht documentaire over houtbouwHelp jij de Ecosofie podcast naar financiële duurzaamheid?Om daar te komen zijn er 1000 fans nodig die één euro per maand kunnen missen. Doneer via: petje.af/ecosofie Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In deze 17e editie van Plotscast liep het plots nóg weer anders. Iets met avonden, iets met klokken… Daarom live vanuit onze studio: singer-song-dichter-funker Terence Goodmann en toetsenist Jerry Bloem en spoken word artiest Demi Baltus.  Luister ook nog eens terug naar onze vorige live editie, nummer 15 met , de stadsdichter van Eindhoven, Iris Penning, slam-poet Monique Hendriks en trompettist Sybren van Doesum. Check ook onze instagram.com/plotscast_Curator & hosting: Wordbites, Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound studio.  Plotscast is een onafhankelijk initiatief van Bieke Jongejan, Yeppe van Kesteren en Wordbites, dat wordt ondersteund door de Gemeente Utrecht en het Cultuurmakersfonds van het Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds. www.plotcast.nl 

In deze 15e editie van Plotscast liep het plots toch weer even anders. We zouden een live opname met publiek doen vanuit de door ons zo geliefde Nijverheid in Utrecht maar goed, het liep anders.Nu dus live vanuit onze studio: de stadsdichter van Eindhoven, Iris Penning als speciale gast samen met slam-poet Monique Hendriks en trompettist Sybren van Doesum. Inderdaad, dé Sybren van onze begin en eindtune. Genieten dus!Luister ook nog eens terug naar aflevering 14, onze special met de broeders en zusters van Woorden worden zinnen of naar een van de eerdere edities. Of kijk op www.plotscast.nl voor interviews, achtergrondverhalen en meer. Curator & hosting: Wordbites,  Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound studio. Plotscast is een onafhankelijk initiatief van Bieke Jongejan, Sanne Clifford, Yeppe van Kesteren en Wordbites, dat wordt ondersteund door de Gemeente Utrecht, het Cultuurmakersfonds van het Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds en Voordekunst. 

Lieve Plotscasters… Welkom bij de dertiende editie van Plotscast! Tja, het liep Plots weer anders. Dit zou eigenlijk de live editie zijn van Plotscast, met de hip/hop filosoof Adam Bais aka Benjamin Fro, met woordzetter Tijdelijke Toon en met de levende legende dj Dimitri. Maar het liep Plots weer anders… de mannen komen trouwens terug op donderdag 21 maart 2021 in de door ons zo geliefde Nijverheid…  Voor nu…. een extra-dubbel-dikke mozaïek-editie, die bol staat van muziek en aangrijpende woorden van:singer songdichter Leonieke Toering,  Justin Samgar, Nadine Spronk, Talal Fayyad, Petit Jean,  Jente Jong,  Post Traumatic Drum Disorder & Monty,  Jibbe Willems,   Charlotte Beerda, en een slotstuk Leonieke Toering. Curator en hosting: Wordbites Montage door: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound. Kijk ook op www.plotscast.nlGraag attenderen wij je ook nog even op de komende Plotscast Live op De Nijverheid donderdag 21 januari met de stadsdichter van Eindhoven Iris Penning, slam poet Monique Hendriks en trompettist Sybren van Doesum. We hopen met heel ons hart dat de 21-ste met publiek mag doorgaan. Koop nu je kaartje. Het blijft eventueel ook geldig voor een volgende editie. 

Deze tiende editie van Plotscast biedt weer een mozaïek van woordkunstenaars, muzikanten, dichters, denkers en ook niet weters.  Met:trompettist Sybren van Doesum,taaltalent Demi Baltus met turntabilists Roswitha & Merlijn Nash, Libris winnaar Rob van Essen, woordbaas Justin Samgar met accordeonist Tuur Florizoone, dichter Meliza de Vries,godfather Gijs ter Haar met accordeonist Tuur Florizoone,Wordbites & Em Vierthaler met levende legende dj Dimitri, denker Desanne van Brederoode enmuzikaal activist, Florian Wolff. De volgende editie van Plotscast Live! wordt opgenomen op do. 19 november in De Nijverheid in Utrecht met Loki Project, Saskia van Kampen en Gino Bombrini. Bij zijn? Koop je ticket, a 10 euro, op www.ticketkantoor.nl/shop/plotscast   Curator & hosting: Wordbites,  Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound studio.   Plotscast is een onafhankelijk initiatief van Bieke Jongejan, Yeppe van Kesteren en Wordbites. We worden ondersteund door het Cultuurmakersfonds van het Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds.

We hebben een klimaatprobleem en een grondstoffen probleem. Maar hoe zit het nu echt? En moeten we nu gaan sprinten of hebben we juist denk- en plantijd nodig? Met Helga van Leur, ambassadeur klimaat, duurzaamheid en gedrag en voormalig Weervrouw van RTL en Sybren Bosch, expert circulaire erconomie van Copper8 Meer luisteren? https://impact.radio

Plotscast is een podcast van bekende en aanstormende woordkunstenaars, muzikanten, filosofen, dichters, dromers en ook-niet-weters. Zo plots als we in één klap al onze podia kwijt waren en er een streep werd gezet door onze complete festival-zomer, zo spontaan hebben we een nieuw podium gecreëerd: Plotscast. In deze achtste, dubbeldikke zomer-editie van Plotscast de volgende woordmuzikanten:Sybren van Doesum, Jörgen Unom, Benjamin Fro, Inke Gieghase aka Queer perspective, Josephine Zwaan, Asha Karami, M., Kira ontmoet Bertolt Brecht, Jan Bos, Kasper Peters, Infinite Joy aka Joy Singh, Curator & hosting: Wordbites, Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound studio. Plotscast is een onafhankelijk initiatief van Bieke Jongejan, Wordbites en Yeppe van Kesteren. Artwork: Julia Kaiser.

Plotscast is een podcast van bekende en aanstormende woordkunstenaars, muzikanten, filosofen, dichters, dromers en ook-niet-weters. Zo plots als we in één klap al onze podia kwijt waren en er een streep werd gezet door onze complete festival-zomer, zo spontaan hebben we een nieuw podium gecreëerd: Plotscast. In deze zevende, editie van Plotscast de volgende muzikanten en woordgeestjongleurs:Sybren van Doesum, Kraut,Anouk Smies, LOKI project, Sjaan Flikweert, Lies Jo Vandenhende & Ardzacht, Ramor, Loraine Baas, Ayden, Wordbites & Jack Julian, Rense Sinkgraven en Uno Basta, Curator & hosting: Wordbites Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound studio. Plotscast is een initiatief van Bieke Jongejan, Wordbites en Yeppe van Kesteren.

Zo plots als we werden geconfronteerd met een virus, zo spontaan is ons project om met een groep dichters, denkers, dromers, muzikanten en ook-niet-weters een podcast te maken voor jou. Plotscast is een werkplaats, een speelplaats en een luisterplaats tegelijk. Ontdek niet alleen onze poëzie in woord en klank, maar vooral ook de poëzie in jezelf.In deze aflevering:Sybren van Doesum,Biek & Len,Charlotte Beerda,Emily Vierthaler,Ard Zacht,Lies Jo Vandenhende,Jorgen Unom,Wordbites.Montage: Yeppe van Kesteren | Spot on Sound.Afbeelding van: Julia Kaiser.

De Belgische metalsensatie Fleddy Melculy is terug met hun nieuwe plaat Sabbath Fleddy Sabbath. Reden genoeg voor opperhoofd Jeroen Camerlynck om nog een keer langs te komen en ditmaal is broer en bassist Sybren er ook bij. Vandaag dus een hoop gezelligheid over hoe het is om samen te spelen met je broer, corona autoverzekeringen, kutrocksterren en achterklap van andere bands. Dat de heren er al een hoop fantastische jaren hebben opzetten is geen geheim en op basis van hun nieuwe plaat die op 13 maart in de winkels ligt, is er geen enkele reden om te denken dat de Fleddy Trein binnenkort zal stoppen.

Zomerveren deel 4 zondag 21 juli ’19 Dominique Engers: Kinderen van Karbaat (Engers/ Eelco Menkveld) Dominique Engers Vier huizen (Engers / Hans van Gelderen) Dominique Engers De zwanen Engers / Hans van Gelderen) Dominique Engers Met: Gitaar: Hans van Gelderen, Piano: Eelco Menkveld, Trompet: Sybren van Doesum Yoga is voor iedereen (Hoogeboom) Johan Hoogeboom, trompet: Sybren van Doesum Voor haar (Holmes/Van der Plas, Halsema) Frans Halsema 2’52 Van de cd Frans Halsema 1939-1984 Phonogram 824 193-2 Voor haar (Holmes/Marée) Bas Marée, piano: Johan Hoogeboom Light verse: Frank van Pamelen Jan Veldman: Bruiloftslied (Veldman) Jan Veldman Ik ga niet op vakantie (Veldman) Jan Veldman Van mist (Loebis/N. van Praag) Liekje Welten, piano: Nanda van Praak, trompet: Sybren van Doesum De stervende (Brel/R. Klinkenberg) Bas Marée, piano: Johan Hoogeboom

Werk je om te leven, of leef je om te werken? Deze week buigen Jouwert en Aukje zich over deze en andere vragen over werk. Wat voor werk zou Aukje willen doen, en is Jouwert blij met zijn werk? | De Podcast van de week is Zig Zag, de podcast van Manoush Zomorodi en Jen Poyant over het starten van een eigen bedrijf en de hype-cycle. Een fascinerende podcast van twee power-ladies. Hosts: Jouwert en Aukje van Geene | Muziek: Jouwert (openingstune) en Sybren van Geene (credits tune) | Album-art gemaakt door Aukje met plaatjes van www.flaticon.com | Deze podcast werd opgenomen in de Abkoudestudio met Anchor.fm | Laat een bericht achter via Anchor.fm/geens of stuur ons een vraag of suggestie via geenspodcast@gmail.com | en laat een mooie review achter op iTunes. Dank! | Info: geenspodcast.fandom.com/nl

Hoe kan het dat we nog nooit zo rijk zijn geweest, en tegelijkertijd minder welzijn ervaren? Aukje en Roos deden hier een jaar onderzoek naar voor hun profielwerkstuk van VWO-6. In deze podcast vertellen ze samen over hun bevindingen, de ups en downs van hun zoektocht en hun plannen om de wereld te verbeteren. Lees hun manifest en PWS op twitter.com/RoosEnAukje | De Podcast van de week is de Rudi & Freddie Show. Rutger Bregman en Jesse Frederik discussiëren maandelijks over economie en politiek. Ze hijsen regelmatig de zwarte vlag tegen het grootkapitaal en schuwen radicale oplossingen niet - altijd met veel humor. Hosts: Jouwert en Aukje van Geene | Gast: Roos Huisman | Muziek: Jouwert (openingstune) en Sybren van Geene (credits tune) | Nieuwe album-art gemaakt door Aukje met plaatjes van www.flaticon.com | Deze podcast werd opgenomen in de Abkoudestudio met Anchor.fm | Laat een bericht achter via Anchor.fm/geens of stuur ons een vraag of suggestie via geenspodcast@gmail.com | en laat een mooie review achter op iTunes. Dank! | Info: geenspodcast.fandom.com/nl

Nederlands is dood! De VU stopt met de studie Nederlands - en wat dan nog? Staan scholieren te juichen, omdat er geen docenten Nederlands meer zullen zijn? Aukje vermoedt een crisis in de geesteswetenschappen, maar Jouwert hoort juist veel mooi Nederlands in nieuwe HipHop. De Podcast van de week is Benjamin Walker's Theory of Everything. Een geweldige Amerikaanse podcast met echte en bijna echte verhalen die je aan het denken zet. Wat is nog waar? Waarom is dat belangrijk? Hosts: Jouwert en Aukje van Geene | Muziek: Jouwert (openingstune) en Sybren van Geene (credits tune) | Album-art gemaakt met plaatjes van www.flaticon.com | Deze podcast werd opgenomen in de Abkoudestudio met Anchor.fm | Laat een bericht achter via Anchor.fm/geens of stuur ons een vraag of suggestie via geenspodcast@gmail.com | en laat een mooie review achter op iTunes. Dank! | Info: geenspodcast.fandom.com/nl

Ertussenin: geen man en geen vrouw, maar ertussenin. Hoe gaan scholieren daarmee om? En heeft Jouwert wel eens aan zijn mannelijkheid getwijfeld? Wij praten erover in onze lekkere bubbel. De Podcast van de week is De Eeuw van de Amateur van Botte Jellema en Ype Driessen - heerlijk lekkere lange gesprekken en heel verslavend. Hosts: Jouwert en Aukje van Geene | Muziek: Jouwert (openingstune) en Sybren van Geene (credits tune) | Album-art gemaakt met plaatjes van www.flaticon.com | Deze podcast werd opgenomen in de Abkoudestudio met Anchor.fm | Laat een bericht achter via Anchor.fm/geens of stuur ons een vraag of suggestie via geenspodcast@gmail.com | en laat een mooie review achter op iTunes. Dank! | Info: geenspodcast.fandom.com/nl

In deze eerste aflevering van Geens hebben we het over de klimaatmars van 7 februari waar Aukje zomaar Jesse Klaver tegen het lijf liep. En over het profielwerkstuk als schoolfenomeen: hoeveel stress levert dit op, en hoeveel vreugde? De Podcast van de week is Anatomy of Next: New World van Founders Fund over de kolonisatie van Mars. Hosts: Jouwert en Aukje van Geene Muziek: Jouwert (openingstune) en Sybren van Geene (credits tune) | Album-art gemaakt met plaatjes van www.flaticon.com | Deze podcast werd opgenomen in de Abkoudestudio met Anchor.fm | Laat een bericht achter via Anchor.fm/geens of stuur ons een vraag of suggestie via geenspodcast@gmail.com | en laat een mooie review achter op iTunes. Dank!

Bumalijst Zondag 22 juli Zomerveren deel 5 Vanuit Theater De Mess, Naarden Hi ha Hoogeboom (Hoogeboom) Johan Hoogeboom Jammer (S. Carmiggelt/J. Hoogeboom) Johan Hoogeboom Lieve mensen (Hoogeboom) Johan Hoogeboom) Klotevogel (Lennon/McCarney/Wiersma) Dorine Wiersma Binnenkijken (Polderman) Katinka Polderman Je krijgt er wel heel veel voor terug (Polderman) Katinka Polderman Ode aan Nick en Simon (Polderman) Katinka Polderman Korteliedjescompetitie: Johan hoogeboom en Katinka Polderman Klasje van George: George Groot, Johan Hoogeboom, Ko de Laat Rukker (Wiersma) Dorine Wiersma Rustig Blijven (Wiersma) Dorine Wiersma, met Johan Hoogeboom, piano Eerste zomerdag (D. Engers/W. Coppes) Dominique Engers + Eelco Menkveld, piano. Hans van Gelderen, gitaar. Sybren van Doesum, trompet Toegift: Breekbaar (H. Sacksioni) Harry Sacksioni 2?08 Van de cd En nooit weerom Harlekijn 847 895-2

Op zeer jonge leeftijd leer je zonder al teveel veel problemen een taal. Het oppikken van nieuwe woorden en maken van goede zinnen lijkt als vanzelf te gaan. Maar is dat wel zo? Taalkundige Sybren Spit van de Universiteit van Amsterdam onderzoekt of kinderen zich bewust zijn van de regels van een taal. Daarvoor heeft hij een experiment ontwikkeld waarbij hij kleuters zijn eigen zelfverzonnen taal leert. Spit heeft een aantal voorbeelden meegenomen en legt ze aan de presentator voor. De podcastserie Faces of Science is een samenwerking tussen NEMO Kennislink en de NTR.

Your Learning Curve Never Sounded So Good! Helping automotive aftermarket professionals improve; one lesson at a time. Learn from your industry peers in a round-table forum. Get new ideas,  perspectives, trends, insights, best practices and expertise from aftermarket professionals. This is the only weekly forum for aftermarket professionals bringing fresh and innovative discussion to inspire and grow individuals and companies. The Panel: Robert L. Redding Jr., ASA Legislative representative –Bob has represented the Automotive Service Association, from their Capitol Hill office, since 1993.  He has received presidential appointments to several Federal Advisory Committees at the United States EPA, DOJ, Department of Labor and the U.S. Department of Transportation. www. Previous episodes with Bob Redding (https://remarkableresults.biz/?s=%22redding%22) . Joe Battista, Joseph (Joe) Battista is currently Vice President of Sales and Business Development for Parsons Corporation, a leading provider of program management services in periodic safety and emissions vehicle inspection programs to government jurisdictions throughout North America. Shop owner Sybren van der Pol Sybren is an A.S.E. Master L1 Technician and owns Adolf Hoepfl & Son Garage, a 10-bay shop that employs 14 people. He serves on the local ASA Houston chapter Board of Directors.   Talking Points: The State of Periodic State Safety Inspections. Only 14 states have them running. In 1975 there were 31 states doing PMVI (Periodic Motor Vehicle Inspections) because of a mandate from the Federal Government for funds. They’ve been in attack and we now have only 14 states doing some form of inspection. Many states who got out of PMVI looked at it as a tax break and that inspections were not doing anything for their citizen. The aftermarket has done a poor job of educating the consumer on the value of safety inspection. When state PMVI requirements go away your business will be affected. A four-legged stool. Business/Industry, Government, Politics, Clients. There has been more defense instead of office to fight the state on elimination of these programs. We need more offense. Writing letters to your congressman and involving your customer to write to their congressman. We need help from National Highway Safety Transportation Administration (NHSTA) A discussion with NHSTA to include the aftermarket in recalls and education to the consumer. Model year exemptions should not be considered because there are about 8 – 9 % of newer vehicles that Parsons see’s that have safety issues. Many programs have gone away because they are not defensible because the data is not there, yet NHTSA has the data. Data should drive the debate, but we do not have good data. The best way to improve and increase PMVI programs is when everyone is singing off the same sheet of music; Industry, Government, Customer. Without mandatory program safety inspections from the state, necessary safety repairs will not get done. (http://www.takingthehill.com) ASA – Automotive Service Association Website (https://asashop.org/) .   Email (mailto:carm@remarkableresults.biz) (http://eepurl.com/bhqME9) This episode is brought to you by Jasper Engines & Transmissions. When a car’s engine or transmission fails, it’s not the end of the road. A remanufactured drivetrain product from Jasper Engines & Transmissions will give your car a new lease on life. JASPER has over 2000 Associates, three manufacturing facilities, two distribution centers and 45 branch offices across the country. They’re all working to produce, transport and deliver the perfect product. That’s what they do best… keep customers happy. Visit jasperengines.com (http://jasperengines.com)

It's 2018! After a rundown on the latest Blender Cloud updates (especially Flamenco) by Dr. Sybren, we review the status of the Hero and Spring Open Movies. Finally we delve into a fully scientific prediction about the trends of this year.

This week we welcome Sybren on the BI team!