Podcasts about Bosch

En más notas, Sheinbaum afirma que relevo en Fiscalía fue consensuado y marca el inicio de una "nueva etapa", en información internacional, inundaciones dejan más de mil 100 muertos en Indonesia, Sri Lanka y Tailandia, y en los espectáculos, Fátima Bosch, Miss Universo 2025, reafirma su derecho al título frente a las críticas. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Maartje Bregman en Tessel Zandstra hebben wat te vieren, want Happy Times Radio bestaat twee jaar! Helaas is het een bitterzoet jubileum, want Yoursafe Radio stopt met alle programma's en dus ook met ons (snik). Maar laat dat de pret absoluut niet bederven. Tijd om terug te blikken op twee mooie jaren, mét een hoop gasten!Het is het einde, maar het voelt als een nieuw begin. Wauw. Wat was het bijzonder. Twee jaar geleden belde we met Giel Beelen, of we een spot op zijn nieuwe radiozender wilden. We blikken deze aflevering terug op de rollercoaster die toen volgde. Met een bijzonder LIVE optreden, een terugblik van mr. radio himself, onze HTM crew kwam langs om terug te kijken op 2 jaar Happy Times Radio én vooruit te kijken naar HTM2.0. Producer Pleun kwam nog even wat gezelligheid in de show brengen en Charlotte bakte een taart (vegan kwark en vegan kardemom brownie halloww!!). En alsof dit nog niet genoeg was, was er een kunstenaar die tijdens de show een jasje heeft omgetoverd tot een custom jack met alle herinneringen van 2 jaar Happy Times Media. INSANE BIJZONDER. Alles aan deze show was goud. Deze geweldige tijd neemt niemand ons meer af. We luisteren fragmenten terug van onze eerste shows en dan pas realiseer je hoeveel we hebben geleerd. Over de inhoud, we zijn echt wel een beetje duurzaamheidsexpert geworden door meer dan 350 interviews met experts, maar ook het radiomaken, een boodschap overbrengen en het comfortabel zijn als spreker. In deze show hoorde je:SABRI met het nummer ‘Wish The Love Never Dies'Giel Beelen, radiomaker en creatief directeur YoursafeFRE met de nummers ‘Vluchten' en ‘Over Morgen'Maxime van Biebels Atelier artiest van het unieke upcycled HTM jasjeRashi (Instagram: @rashiagarwal), covermodel van Happy Times Magazine editie 4Pleun Vondeling, radiomaker en producerAnanda van Doorn, covermodel Happy Times Magazine editie 5 en founder van RelivingJara van den Bosch, fotograaf en storytellerFranziska Mueller, eindredacteur van het magazine Roos Ritmeester, schrijft de nieuwsbrief en spot al het positieve nieuws voor onsCharlotte Ros, bracht taart, maakte foto's en is onze helpende hand bij alle shows en live eventsDylan Beukenkamp, radiomaker en producerJoshua van Meuwen, techniek en producer Happy Times RadioBlijf op de hoogte, verwen jezelf met wat positieve verhalen en lift mee op onze vibe! Schrijf je in voor de Happy Times nieuwsbrief, bestel een van de eerder verschenen Happy Times Magazines en volg ons natuurlijk via de socials!Dit is de laatste radioshow op Yoursafe Radio, maar jullie zijn nog niet van ons af. Blijf ons volgen via Instagram en LinkedIn!

5/8. Guano, Tragedy, and the Rise of Intensive Farming — Steven Moss — Moss discusses seabird guano (nutrient-rich droppings), first recognized as a valuable resource by the Incas and subsequently monetized by William Gibbs, who accumulated immense wealth trading guano from arid Peruvian islands. Moss emphasizes that guano harvesting occurred under tragic human conditions, with Chinese indentured laborers frequently dying during extraction operations. Mossnotes that declining guano availability stimulated the invention of synthetic fertilizers by Haber and Bosch, catalyzing the emergence of intensive chemical agriculture. Moss documents that high-intensity chemical farming, despite enabling global food production, precipitated catastrophic declines in bird and insect populations, a phenomenon extensively documented in Rachel Carson's seminal work Silent Spring. 1880

En una nueva demanda federal presentada en Puerto Rico, Daddy Yankee acusa a Raphy Pina, Mireddys Gonzalez y varias corporaciones de haber construido un presenta esquema que duró casi 10 años y que habría modificado documentos para que Pina apareciera como coautor de varias canciones en las que no participó para cobrar regalías. En otras noticias: Fátima Bosch, la nueva Miss Universo, llegó a su tierra natal México y habló sobre todas las controversias que la rodean a ella y al concurso.¿Quién es Taina Pimentel? Ella es el nuevo amor de Lupillo Rivera. JBalvin hizo historia en su natal Medellín con un concierto de casi 7 horas lleno de artistas invitados. 

I am Rolf Claessen and together with my co-host Ken Suzan I am welcoming you to episode 169 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann, co-founder of my patent law firm Michalski Hüttermann & Partner and a true expert on the Unified Patent Court. He has written several books about the new system and we talk about all the things that plaintiffs and defendants can learn from the first decisions of the court and what they mean for strategic decisions of the parties involved. But before we jump into this very interesting interview, I have news for you! The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is planning rule changes that would make it virtually impossible for third parties to challenge invalid patents before the patent office. Criticism has come from the EFF and other inventor rights advocates: the new rules would play into the hands of so-called non-practicing entities (NPEs), as those attacked would have few cost-effective ways to have questionable patents deleted. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) reports a new record in international patent applications: in 2024, around 3.7 million patent applications were filed worldwide – an increase of 4.9% over the previous year. The main drivers were Asian countries (China alone accounted for 1.8 million), while demand for trademark protection has stabilized after the pandemic decline. US rapper Eminem is taking legal action in Australia against a company that sells swimwear under the name “Swim Shady.” He believes this infringes on his famous “Slim Shady” brand. The case illustrates that even humorous allusions to well-known brand names can lead to legal conflicts. A new ruling by the Unified Patent Court (UPC) demonstrates its cross-border impact. In “Fujifilm v. Kodak,” the local chamber in Mannheim issued an injunction that extends to the UK despite Brexit. The UPC confirmed its jurisdiction over the UK parts of a European patent, as the defendant Kodak is based in a UPC member state. A dispute over standard patents is looming at the EU level: the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) of the European Parliament voted to take the European Commission to the European Court of Justice. The reason for this is the Commission’s controversial withdrawal of a draft regulation on the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs). Parliament President Roberta Metsola is to decide by mid-November whether to file the lawsuit. In trademark law, USPTO Director Squires reported on October 31, 2025, that a new unit (“Trademark Registration Protection Office”) had removed approximately 61,000 invalid trademark applications from the registries. This cleanup of the backlog relieved the examining authority and accelerated the processing of legitimate applications. Now let's jump into the interview with Aloys Hüttermann: The Unified Patent Court Comes of Age – Insights from Prof. Aloys Hüttermann The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has moved from a long-discussed project to a living, breathing court system that already shapes patent enforcement in Europe. In a recent IP Fridays interview, Prof. Aloys Hüttermann – founder and equity partner at Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner and one of the earliest commentators on the UPC – shared his experiences from the first years of practice, as well as his view on how the UPC fits into the global patent litigation landscape. This article summarises the key points of that conversation and is meant as an accessible overview for in-house counsel, patent attorneys and business leaders who want to understand what the UPC means for their strategy. How Prof. Hüttermann Became “Mr. UPC” Prof. Hüttermann has been closely involved with the UPC for more than a decade. When it became clear, around 13 years ago, that the European project of a unified patent court and a unitary patent was finally going to happen, he recognised that this would fundamentally change patent enforcement in Europe. He started to follow the legislative and political developments in detail and went beyond mere observation. As author and editor of several books and a major commentary on the UPC, he helped shape the discussion around the new system. His first book on the UPC appeared in 2016 – years before the court finally opened its doors in 2023. What fascinated him from the beginning was the unique opportunity to witness the creation of an entirely new court system, to analyse how it would be built and, where possible, to contribute to its understanding and development. It was clear to him that this system would be a “game changer” for European patent enforcement. UPC in the Global Triangle: Europe, the US and China In practice, most international patent disputes revolve around three major regions: the UPC territory in Europe, the United States and China. Each of these regions has its own procedural culture, cost structure and strategic impact. From a territorial perspective, the UPC is particularly attractive because it can, under the right conditions, grant pan-European injunctions that cover a broad range of EU Member States with a single decision. This consolidation of enforcement is something national courts in Europe simply cannot offer. From a cost perspective, the UPC is significantly cheaper than US litigation, especially if one compares the cost of one UPC action with a bundle of separate national cases in large European markets. When viewed against the territorial reach and procedural speed, the “bang for the buck” is very compelling. China is again a different story. The sheer volume of cases there is enormous, with tens of thousands of patent infringement cases per year. Chinese courts are known for their speed; first-instance decisions within about a year are common. In this respect they resemble the UPC more than the US does. The UPC also aims at a roughly 12 to 15 month time frame for first-instance cases where validity is at issue. The US, by contrast, features extensive discovery, occasionally jury trials and often longer timelines. The procedural culture is very different. The UPC, like Chinese courts, operates without discovery in the US sense, which makes proceedings more focused on the written record and expert evidence that the parties present, and less on pre-trial disclosure battles. Whether a company chooses to litigate in the US, the UPC, China, or some combination of these forums will depend on where the key markets and assets are. However, in Prof. Hüttermann's view, once Europe is an important market, it is hard to justify ignoring the UPC. He expects the court's caseload and influence to grow strongly over the coming years. A Landmark UPC Case: Syngenta v. Sumitomo A particularly important case in which Prof. Hüttermann was involved is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo matter, concerning a composition patent. This case has become a landmark in UPC practice for several reasons. First, the Court of Appeal clarified a central point about the reach of UPC injunctions. It made clear that once infringement is established in one Member State, this will usually be sufficient to justify a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That confirmation gave patent owners confidence that the UPC can in fact deliver broad, cross-border relief in one go. Second, the facts of the case raised novel issues about evidence and territorial reach. The allegedly infringing product had been analysed based on a sample from the Czech Republic, which is not part of the UPC system. Later, the same product with the same name was marketed in Bulgaria, which is within UPC territory. The Court of Appeal held that the earlier analysis of the Czech sample could be relied on for enforcement in Bulgaria. This showed that evidence from outside the UPC territory can be sufficient, as long as it is properly linked to the products marketed within the UPC. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to state its view on inventive step. It confirmed that combining prior-art documents requires a “pointer”, in line with the EPO's problem-solution approach. The mere theoretical possibility of extracting a certain piece of information from a document does not suffice to justify an inventive-step attack. This is one of several decisions where the UPC has shown a strong alignment with EPO case law on substantive patentability. For Prof. Hüttermann personally, the case was also a lesson in oral advocacy before the UPC. During the two appeal hearings, the presiding judge asked unexpected questions that required quick and creative responses while the hearing continued. His practical takeaway is that parties should appear with a small, well-coordinated team: large enough to allow someone to work on a tricky question in the background, but small enough to remain agile. Two or three lawyers seem ideal; beyond that, coordination becomes difficult and “too many cooks spoil the broth”. A Game-Changing CJEU Decision: Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux Surprisingly, one of the most important developments for European patent litigation in the past year did not come from the UPC at all, but from the Court of Justice of the European Union. In Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux, the CJEU revisited the rules on cross-border jurisdiction under the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia). Previously, under what practitioners often referred to as the GAT/LuK regime, a court in one EU country was largely prevented from granting relief for alleged infringement in another country if the validity of the foreign patent was contested there. This significantly limited the possibilities for cross-border injunctions. In Bosch, the CJEU changed course. Without going into all procedural details, the essence is that courts in the EU now have broader powers to grant cross-border relief when certain conditions are met, particularly when at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state. The concept of an “anchor defendant” plays a central role: if you sue one group company in its home forum, other group companies in other countries, including outside the EU, can be drawn into the case. This has already had practical consequences. German courts, for example, have issued pan-European injunctions covering around twenty countries in pharmaceutical cases. There are even attempts to sue European companies for infringement of US patents based on acts in the US, using the logic of Bosch as a starting point. How far courts will ultimately go remains to be seen, but the potential is enormous. For the UPC, this development is highly relevant. The UPC operates in the same jurisdictional environment as national courts, and many defendants in UPC cases will be domiciled in UPC countries. This increases the likelihood that the UPC, too, can leverage the broadened possibilities for cross-border relief. In addition, we have already seen UPC decisions that include non-EU countries such as the UK within the scope of injunctions, in certain constellations. The interaction between UPC practice and the Bosch jurisprudence of the CJEU is only beginning to unfold. Does the UPC Follow EPO Case Law? A key concern for many patent owners and practitioners is whether the UPC will follow the EPO's Boards of Appeal or develop its own, possibly divergent, case law on validity. On procedural matters, the UPC is naturally different from the EPO. It has its own rules of procedure, its own timelines and its own tools, such as “front-loaded” pleadings and tight limits on late-filed material. On substantive law, however, Prof. Hüttermann's conclusion is clear: there is “nothing new under the sun”. The UPC's approach to novelty, inventive step and added matter is very close to that of the EPO. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears frequently in UPC decisions. Intermediate generalisations are treated with the same suspicion as at the EPO. In at least one case, the UPC revoked a patent for added matter even though the EPO had granted it in exactly that form. The alignment is not accidental. The UPC only deals with European patents granted by the EPO; it does not hear cases on purely national patents. If the UPC were more generous than the EPO, many patents would never reach it. If it were systematically stricter, patentees would be more tempted to opt out of the system. In practice, the UPC tends to apply the EPO's standards and, where anything differs, it is usually a matter of factual appreciation rather than a different legal test. For practitioners, this has a very practical implication: if you want to predict how the UPC will decide on validity, the best starting point is to ask how the EPO would analyse the case. The UPC may not always reach the same result in parallel EPO opposition proceedings, but the conceptual framework is largely the same. Trends in UPC Practice: PIs, Equivalents and Division-Specific Styles Even in its early years, certain trends and differences between UPC divisions can be observed. On preliminary injunctions, the local division in Düsseldorf has taken a particularly proactive role. It has been responsible for most of the ex parte PIs granted so far and applies a rather strict notion of urgency, often considering one month after knowledge of the infringement as still acceptable, but treating longer delays with scepticism. Other divisions tend to see two months as still compatible with urgency, and they are much more cautious with ex parte measures. Munich, by contrast, has indicated a strong preference for inter partes PI proceedings and appears reluctant to grant ex parte relief at all. A judge from Munich has even described the main action as the “fast” procedure and the inter partes PI as the “very fast” one, leaving little room for an even faster ex parte track. There are also differences in how divisions handle amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. Munich has suggested that if a patentee needs to rely on claim amendments or auxiliary requests in a PI, the request is unlikely to succeed. Other divisions have been more open to considering auxiliary requests. The doctrine of equivalents is another area where practice is not yet harmonised. The Hague division has explicitly applied a test taken from Dutch law in at least one case and found infringement by equivalence. However, the Court of Appeal has not yet endorsed a specific test, and in another recent Hague case the same division did not apply that Dutch-law test again. The Mannheim division has openly called for the development of an autonomous, pan-European equivalence test, but has not yet fixed such a test in a concrete decision. This is clearly an area to watch. Interim conferences are commonly used in most divisions to clarify issues early on, but Düsseldorf often dispenses with them to save time. In practice, interim conferences can be very helpful for narrowing down the issues, though parties should not expect to be able to predict the final decision from what is discussed there. Sometimes topics that dominate the interim conference play little or no role in the main oral hearing. A Front-Loaded System and Typical Strategic Mistakes UPC proceedings are highly front-loaded and very fast. A defendant usually has three months from service of the statement of claim to file a full statement of defence and any counterclaim for revocation. This is manageable, but only if the time is used wisely. One common strategic problem is that parties lose time at the beginning and only develop a clear strategy late in the three-month period. According to Prof. Hüttermann, it is crucial to have a firm strategy within the first two or three weeks and then execute it consistently. Constantly changing direction is a recipe for failure in such a compressed system. Another characteristic is the strict attitude towards late-filed material. It is difficult to introduce new documents or new inventive-step attacks later in the procedure. In some cases even alternative combinations of already-filed prior-art documents have been viewed as “new” attacks and rejected as late. At the appeal stage, the Court of Appeal has even considered new arguments based on different parts of a book already in the file as potentially late-filed. This does not mean that parties should flood the court with dozens of alternative attacks in the initial brief. In one revocation action, a plaintiff filed about fifty different inventive-step attacks, only to be told by the court that this was not acceptable and that the attacks had to be reduced and structured. The UPC is not a body conducting ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case actively and to ask parties to focus on the most relevant issues. Evidence Gathering, Protective Letters and the Defendant's Perspective The UPC provides powerful tools for both sides. Evidence inspection is becoming more common, not only at trade fairs but also at company premises. This can be a valuable tool for patentees, but it also poses a serious risk for defendants who may suddenly face court-ordered inspections. From the perspective of potential defendants, protective letters are an important instrument, especially in divisions like Düsseldorf where ex parte PIs are possible. A well-written protective letter, filed in advance, can significantly reduce the risk of a surprise injunction. The court fees are moderate, but the content of the protective letter must be carefully prepared; a poor submission can cause more harm than good. Despite the strong tools available to patentees, Prof. Hüttermann does not view the UPC as unfair to defendants. If a defendant files a solid revocation counterclaim, the pressure shifts to the patentee, who then has only two months to reply, prepare all auxiliary requests and adapt the enforcement strategy. This is even more demanding than at the EPO, because the patentee must not only respond to validity attacks but also ensure that any amended claims still capture the allegedly infringing product. It is entirely possible to secure the survival of a patent with an auxiliary request that no longer covers the defendant's product. In that scenario, the patentee has “won” on validity but lost the infringement case. Managing this tension under tight time limits is a key challenge of UPC practice. The Future Role of the UPC and How to Prepare Today the UPC hears a few hundred cases per year, compared with several thousand patent cases in the US and tens of thousands in China. Nevertheless, both the court itself and experienced practitioners see significant growth potential. Prof. Hüttermann expects case numbers to multiply in the medium term. Whether the UPC will become the first choice forum in global disputes or remain one pillar in parallel proceedings alongside the US and China will depend on the strategies of large patentees and the evolution of case law. However, the court is well equipped: it covers a large, economically important territory, is comparatively cost-effective and offers fast procedures with robust remedies. For companies that may end up before the UPC, preparation is essential. On the offensive side, that means building strong evidence and legal arguments before filing, being ready to proceed quickly and structured, and understanding the specific styles of the relevant divisions. On the defensive side, it may mean filing protective letters in risk-exposed markets, preparing internal processes for rapid reaction if a statement of claim arrives, and taking inspection requests seriously. Conclusion The Unified Patent Court has quickly moved from theory to practice. It offers pan-European relief, fast and front-loaded procedures, and a substantive approach that closely mirrors the EPO's case law. At the same time, national and EU-level developments like the Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision are reshaping the jurisdictional framework in which the UPC operates, opening the door for far-reaching cross-border injunctions. For patent owners and potential defendants alike, the message is clear: the UPC is here to stay and will become more important year by year. Those who invest the time to understand its dynamics now – including its alignment with the EPO, the differences between divisions, and the strategic implications of its procedures – will be in a much better position when the first UPC dispute lands on their desk. Here is the full transcript of the interview: Rolf Claessen:Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann. He is founder and equity partner of my firm, Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner. More importantly for today's interview, he has written several books about the Unified Patent Court. The first one already came out in 2016. He is co-editor and author of one of the leading commentaries on the UPC and has gained substantial experience in UPC cases so far – one of them even together with me. Thank you very much for being on IP Fridays again, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you for inviting me, it's an honour. How did you get so deeply involved in the UPC? Rolf Claessen:Before we dive into the details, how did you end up so deeply involved in the Unified Patent Court? And what personally fascinates you about this court? Aloys Hüttermann:This goes back quite a while – roughly 13 years. At that time it became clear that, after several failed attempts, Europe would really get a pan-European court and a pan-European patent, and that this time it was serious. I thought: this is going to be the future. That interested me a lot, both intellectually and practically. A completely new system was being built. You could watch how it evolved – and, if possible, even help shape it a bit. It was also obvious to me that this would be a complete game changer. Nobody expected that it would take until 2023 before the system actually started operating, but now it is here. I became heavily interested early on. As you mentioned, my first book on the UPC was published in 2016, in the expectation that the system would start soon. It took a bit longer, but now we finally have it. UPC vs. US and China – speed, cost and impact Rolf Claessen:Before we go deeper into the UPC, let's zoom out. If you compare litigation before the UPC with patent litigation in the US and in China – in terms of speed, cost and the impact of decisions – what are the key differences that a business leader should understand? Aloys Hüttermann:If you look at the three big regions – the UPC territory in Europe, the US and China – these are the major economic areas for many technology companies. One important point is territorial reach. In the UPC, if the conditions are met, you can get pan-European injunctions that cover many EU Member States in one go. We will talk about this later in more detail. On costs there is a huge difference between the US and the UPC. The UPC is much cheaper than US litigation, especially once you look at the number of countries you can cover with one case if the patent has been validated widely. China is different again. The number of patent infringement cases there is enormous. I have seen statistics of around 40,000 infringement cases per year in China. That is huge – compared with roughly 164 UPC infringement cases in the first year and maybe around 200 in the current year. On speed, Chinese courts are known to be very fast. You often get a first-instance decision in about a year. The UPC is comparable: if there is a counterclaim for revocation, you are looking at something like 12 to 15 months for a first-instance decision. The US can be slower, and the procedure is very different. You have full discovery, you may have juries. None of that exists at the UPC. From that perspective, Chinese and UPC proceedings are more similar to each other than either is to the US. The UPC is still a young court. We have to see how influential its case law will be worldwide in the long run. What we already see, at least in Germany, is a clear trend away from purely national patent litigation and towards the UPC. That is inside Europe. The global impact will develop over time. When is the UPC the most powerful tool? Rolf Claessen:Let's take the perspective of a global company. It has significant sales in Europe and in the US and production or key suppliers in China. In which situations would you say the UPC is your most powerful tool? And when might the US or China be the more strategic battleground? Aloys Hüttermann:To be honest, I would almost always consider bringing a case before the UPC. The “bang for the buck” is very good. The UPC is rather fast. That alone already gives you leverage in negotiations. The threat of a quick, wide-reaching injunction is a strong negotiation tool. Whether you litigate in the US instead of the UPC, or in addition, or whether you also go to China – that depends heavily on the individual case: where the products are sold, where the key markets are, where the defendant has assets, and so on. But in my view, once you have substantial sales in Europe, you should seriously consider the UPC. And for that reason alone I expect case numbers at the UPC to increase significantly in the coming years. A landmark UPC case: Syngenta vs. Sumitomo (composition patent) Rolf Claessen:You have already been involved in several UPC cases – and one of them together with me, which was great fun. Looking at the last 12 to 18 months, is there a case, decision or development that you find particularly noteworthy – something that really changed how you think about UPC litigation or how companies should prepare? Aloys Hüttermann:The most important UPC case I have been involved in so far is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo case on a composition patent. It has become a real landmark and was even mentioned in the UPC's annual report. It is important for several reasons. First, it was one of the first cases in which the Court of Appeal said very clearly: if you have established infringement in one Member State, that will usually be enough for a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That is a powerful statement about the reach of UPC relief. Second, the facts were interesting. The patent concerned a composition. We had analysed a sample that had been obtained in the Czech Republic, which is not a UPC country. Later, the same product was marketed under the same name in Bulgaria, which is in the UPC. The question was whether the analysis of the Czech sample could be used as a basis for enforcement in Bulgaria. The Court of Appeal said yes, that was sufficient. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to say something about inventive step. It more or less confirmed that the UPC's approach is very close to the EPO's problem-solution approach. It emphasised that, if you want to combine prior-art documents, you need a “pointer” to do so. The mere theoretical possibility that a skilled person could dig a particular piece of information out of a document is not enough. For me personally, the most memorable aspect of this case was not the outcome – that was largely in line with what we had expected – but the oral hearings at the appeal stage. We had two hearings. In both, the presiding judge asked us a question that we had not anticipated at all. And then you have about 20 minutes to come up with a convincing answer while the hearing continues. We managed it, but it made me think a lot about how you should prepare for oral hearings at the UPC. My conclusion is: you should go in with a team, but not too big. In German we say, “Zu viele Köche verderben den Brei” – too many cooks spoil the broth. Two or three people seems ideal. One of them can work quietly on such a surprise question at the side, while the others continue arguing the case. In the end the case went very well for us, so I can speak about it quite calmly now. But in the moment your heart rate definitely goes up. The CJEU's Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision – a real game changer Rolf Claessen:You also mentioned another development that is not even a UPC case, but still very important for European patent litigation. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes. In my view, the most important case of the last twelve months is not a UPC decision but a judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU): Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. This is going to be a real game changer for European IP law, and I am sure we have not seen the end of its effects yet. One example: someone has recently sued BMW before the Landgericht München I, a German court, for infringement of a US patent based on acts in the US. The argument is that this could be backed by the logic of Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. We do not know yet what the court will do with that, but the fact that people are trying this shows how far-reaching the decision might be. Within the UPC we have already seen injunctions being issued for countries outside the UPC territory and even outside the EU, for example including the UK. So you see how these developments start to interact. Rolf Claessen:For listeners who have not followed the case so closely: in very simple terms, the CJEU opened the door for courts in one EU country to rule on patent infringement that took place in other countries as well, right? Aloys Hüttermann:Exactly. Before Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux we had what was often called the GAT/LuK regime. The basic idea was: if you sue someone in, say, Germany for infringement of a European patent, and you also ask for an injunction for France, and the defendant then challenges the validity of the patent in France, the German court cannot grant you an injunction covering France. The Bosch decision changed that. The legal basis is the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia), which deals with jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters in the EU. It is not specific to IP; it applies to civil cases generally, but it does have some provisions that are relevant for patents. In Bosch, a Swedish court asked the CJEU for guidance on cross-border injunctions. The CJEU more or less overturned its old GAT/LuK case law. Now, in principle, if the defendant is domiciled in a particular Member State, the courts of that state can also grant cross-border relief for other countries, under certain conditions. We will not go into all the details here – that could fill a whole separate IP Fridays episode – but one important concept is the “anchor defendant”. If you sue a group of companies and at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state, then other group companies in other countries – even outside the EU, for example in Hong Kong – can be drawn into the case and affected by the decision. This is not limited to the UPC, but of course it is highly relevant for UPC litigation. Statistically it increases the chances that at least one defendant will be domiciled in a UPC country, simply because there are many of them. And we have already seen courts like the Landgericht München I grant pan-European injunctions for around 20 countries in a pharmaceutical case. Rolf Claessen:Just to clarify: does it have to be the headquarters of the defendant in that country, or is any registered office enough? Aloys Hüttermann:That is one of the open points. If the headquarters are in Europe, then it is clear that subsidiaries outside Europe can be affected as well. If the group's headquarters are outside Europe and only a subsidiary is here, the situation is less clear and we will have to see what the courts make of it. Does the UPC follow EPO case law? Rolf Claessen:Many patent owners and in-house counsel wonder: does the UPC largely follow the case law of the EPO Boards of Appeal, or is it starting to develop its own distinct line? What is your impression so far – both on substantive issues like novelty and inventive step, and on procedural questions? Aloys Hüttermann:On procedure the UPC is, of course, very different. It has its own procedural rules and they are not the same as at the EPO. If we look at patent validity, however, my impression is that there is “nothing new under the sun” – that was the title of a recent talk I gave and will give again in Hamburg. Substantively, the case law of the UPC and the EPO is very similar. For inventive step, people sometimes say the UPC does not use the classical problem-solution approach but a more “holistic” approach – whatever that is supposed to mean. In practice, in both systems you read and interpret prior-art documents and decide what they really disclose. In my view, the “error bar” that comes from two courts simply reading a document slightly differently is much larger than any systematic difference in legal approach. If you look at other grounds, such as novelty and added matter, the UPC even follows the EPO almost verbatim. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears all over UPC decisions, even if the EPO case numbers are not always cited. The same is true for novelty. So the rule-based, almost “Hilbertian” EPO approach is very much present at the UPC. There is also a structural reason for that. All patents that the UPC currently deals with have been granted by the EPO. The UPC does not handle patents granted only by national offices. If the UPC wanted to deviate from EPO case law and be more generous, then many patents would never reach the UPC in the first place. The most generous approach you can have is the one used by the granting authority – the EPO. So if the UPC wants to be different, it can only be stricter, not more lenient. And there is little incentive to be systematically stricter, because that would reduce the number of patents that are attractive to enforce before the UPC. Patent owners might simply opt out. Rolf Claessen:We also talked about added matter and a recent case where the Court of Appeal was even stricter than the EPO. That probably gives US patent practitioners a massive headache. They already struggle with added-matter rules in Europe, and now the UPC might be even tougher. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, especially on added matter. I once spoke with a US practitioner who said, “We hope the UPC will move away from intermediate generalisations.” There is no chance of that. We already have cases where the Court of Appeal confirmed that intermediate generalisations are not allowed, in full alignment with the EPO. You mentioned a recent case where a patent was revoked for added matter, even though it had been granted by the EPO in exactly that form. This shows quite nicely what to expect. If you want to predict how the UPC will handle a revocation action, the best starting point is to ask: “What would the EPO do?” Of course, there will still be cases where the UPC finds an invention to be inventive while the EPO, in parallel opposition proceedings, does not – or vice versa. But those are differences in the appreciation of the facts and the prior art, which you will always have. The underlying legal approach is essentially the same. Rolf Claessen:So you do not see a real example yet where the UPC has taken a totally different route from the EPO on validity? Aloys Hüttermann:No, not really. If I had to estimate how the UPC will decide, I would always start from what I think the EPO would have done. Trends in UPC practice: PIs, equivalents, interim conferences Rolf Claessen:If you look across the different UPC divisions and cases: what trends do you see in practice? For example regarding timelines, preliminary injunctions, how validity attacks are handled, and how UPC cases interact with EPO oppositions or national proceedings? Aloys Hüttermann:If you take the most active divisions – essentially the big four in Germany and the local division in The Hague – they all try to be very careful and diligent in their decisions. But you can already see some differences in practice. For preliminary injunctions there is a clear distinction between the local division in Düsseldorf and most other divisions. Düsseldorf considers one month after knowledge of the infringement as still sufficiently urgent. If you wait longer, it is usually considered too late. In many other divisions, two months is still viewed as fine. Düsseldorf has also been the division that issued most of the ex parte preliminary injunctions so far. Apart from one special outlier where a standing judge from Brussels was temporarily sitting in Milan, Düsseldorf is basically the only one. Other divisions have been much more reluctant. At a conference, Judge Pichlmaier from the Munich division once said that he could hardly imagine a situation where his division would grant an ex parte PI. In his words, the UPC has two types of procedure: one that is fast – the normal main action – and one that is very fast – the inter partes PI procedure. But you do not really have an “ultra-fast” ex parte track, at least not in his division. Another difference relates to amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. In one recent case in Munich the court said more or less that if you have to amend your patent or rely on auxiliary requests in a PI, you lose. Other divisions have been more flexible and have allowed auxiliary requests. Equivalence is another area where we do not have a unified line yet. So far, only the Hague division has clearly found infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and explicitly used a test taken from Dutch law. Whether that test will be approved by the Court of Appeal is completely open – the first case settled, so the Court of Appeal never ruled on it, and a second one is still very recent. Interestingly, there was another Hague decision a few weeks ago where equivalence was on the table, but the division did not apply that Dutch-law test. We do not know yet why. The Mannheim division has written in one decision that it would be desirable to develop an autonomous pan-European test for equivalence, instead of just importing the German, UK or Dutch criteria. But they did not formulate such a test in that case because it was not necessary for the decision. So we will have to see how that evolves. On timelines, one practical difference is that Düsseldorf usually does not hold an interim conference. That saves them some time. Most other divisions do hold interim conferences. Personally, I like the idea because it can help clarify issues. But you cannot safely read the final outcome from these conferences. I have also seen cases where questions raised at the interim conference did not play any role in the main oral hearing. So they are useful for clarification, but not as a crystal ball. Front-loaded proceedings and typical strategic mistakes Rolf Claessen:If you look at the behaviour of parties so far – both patentees and defendants – what are the most common strategic mistakes you see in UPC litigation? And what would a well-prepared company do differently before the first statement of claim is ever filed? Aloys Hüttermann:You know you do not really want me to answer that question… Rolf Claessen:I do! Aloys Hüttermann:All right. The biggest mistake, of course, is that they do not hire me. That is the main problem. Seriously, it is difficult to judge parties' behaviour from the outside. You rarely know the full picture. There may be national proceedings, licensing discussions, settlement talks, and so on in the background. That can limit what a party can do at the UPC. So instead of criticising, I prefer to say what is a good idea at the UPC. The system is very front-loaded and very fast. If you are sued, you have three months to file your statement of defence and your counterclaim for revocation. In my view, three months are manageable – but only if you use the time wisely and do not waste it on things that are not essential. If you receive a statement of claim, you have to act immediately. You should have a clear strategy within maybe two or three weeks and then implement it. If you change your strategy every few weeks, chances are high that you will fail. Another point is that everything is front-loaded. It is very hard to introduce new documents or new attacks later. Some divisions have been a bit generous in individual cases, but the general line is strict. We have seen, for example, that even if you filed a book in first instance, you may not be allowed to rely on a different chapter from the same book for a new inventive-step attack at the appeal stage. That can be regarded as late-filed, because you could have done it earlier. There is also case law saying that if you first argue inventive step as “D1 plus D2”, and later want to argue “D2 plus D1”, that can already be considered a new, late attack. On the other hand, we had a revocation action where the plaintiff filed about 50 different inventive-step attacks in the initial brief. The division then said: this does not work. Please cut them down or put them in a clear hierarchy. In the end, not all of them were considered. The UPC does not conduct an ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case and to tell the parties to limit themselves in the interest of a fair and efficient procedure. Rolf Claessen:I have the feeling that the EPO is also becoming more front-loaded – if you want to rely on documents later, you should file them early. But it sounds like the UPC is even more extreme in that regard. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, that is true. Protective letters, inspections and the defendant's perspective Rolf Claessen:Suppose someone from a company is listening now and thinks: “We might be exposed at the UPC,” or, “We should maybe use the UPC offensively against competitors.” What would you consider sensible first steps before any concrete dispute arises? And looking three to five years ahead, how central do you expect the UPC to become in global patent litigation compared to the US and China? Aloys Hüttermann:Let me start with the second part. I expect the UPC to become significantly more important. If we have around 200 cases this year, that is a good start, but it is still very small compared to, say, 4,000 to 5,000 patent cases per year in the US and 40,000 or so in China. Even François Bürgin and Klaus Grabinski, in interviews, have said that they are happy with the case load, but the potential is much larger. In my view, it is almost inevitable that we will see four or five times as many UPC cases in the not-too-distant future. As numbers grow, the influence of the UPC will grow as well. Whether, in five or ten years, companies will treat the UPC as their first choice forum – or whether they will usually run it in parallel with US litigation in major disputes – remains to be seen. The UPC would be well equipped for that: the territory it covers is large, Europe is still an important economy, and the UPC procedure is very attractive from a company's perspective. On sensible first steps: if you are worried about being sued, a protective letter can make a lot of sense – especially in divisions like Düsseldorf, where ex parte PIs are possible in principle. A protective letter is not very expensive in terms of court fees. There is also an internal system that ensures the court reads it before deciding on urgent measures. Of course, the content must have a certain quality; a poor protective letter can even backfire. If you are planning to sue someone before the UPC, you should be extremely well prepared when you file. You should already have all important documents and evidence at hand. As we discussed, it is hard to introduce new material later. One tool that is becoming more and more popular is inspection – not just at trade fairs, where we already saw cases very early, but also at company premises. Our firm has already handled such an inspection case. That is something you should keep in mind on both sides: it is a powerful evidence-gathering tool, but also a serious risk if you are on the receiving end. From the defendant's perspective, I do not think the UPC is unfair. If you do your job properly and put a solid revocation counterclaim on the table, then the patentee has only two months to prepare a full reply and all auxiliary requests. And there is a twist that makes life even harder for the patentee than at the EPO. At the EPO the question is mainly: do my auxiliary requests overcome the objections and are they patentable? At the UPC there is an additional layer: do I still have infringement under the amended claims? You may save your patent with an auxiliary request that no longer reads on the defendant's product. That is great for validity, but you have just lost the infringement case. You have kept the patent but lost the battle. And all of this under very tight time limits. That creates considerable pressure on both sides. How to contact Prof. Hüttermann Rolf Claessen:Thank you very much for this really great interview, Aloys. Inside our firm you have a nickname: “the walking encyclopedia of the Unified Patent Court” – because you have written so many books about it and have dealt with the UPC for such a long time. What is the best way for listeners to get in touch with you? Aloys Hüttermann:The easiest way is by email. You can simply write to me, and that is usually the best way to contact me. As you may have noticed, I also like to speak. I am a frequent speaker at conferences. If you happen to be at one of the conferences where I am on the programme – for example, next week in Hamburg – feel free to come up to me and ask me anything in person. But email is probably the most reliable first step. Rolf Claessen:Perfect. Thank you very much, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you. It was a pleasure to be on IP Fridays again. Some of your long-time listeners may remember that a few years ago – when you were not yet part of our firm – we already did an episode on the UPC, back when everything was still very speculative. It is great to be back now that the system is actually in place and working. Rolf Claessen:I am very happy to have you back on the show.

¿Que dijo Fátima Bosch? Alejandro Fernandez a punto de vomitar en escenario. Wendy Guevara sensible tras operación.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Waldy and Bendy discuss the many record sales that have happened in the art world recently. Bendy has a chat with Elizabeth Goldring about her new Holbein book, while Waldy dives into the thrills of Bosch's Garden of Earthly Delights.   See the show notes here: https://zczfilms.com/podcasts/waldy-bendy/season-5-episode-11-auction-records-smashed-bosch-and-holbein/ Watch on YouTube here: https://youtu.be/eqBLVvW1tQM

Sinds november vorig jaar gaan in het land massaal mensen de straat op tegen de regeringspartij Georgische Droom, die steeds autoritairder optreedt en zich nadrukkelijk afzet tegen de Europese Unie. Dat staat haaks op de wens van een grote meerderheid van de bevolking, die juist een Europese toekomst voor zich ziet. Wat speelt er in dit land van heerlijke wijn en ruige bergen? Groene-journalist Irene van der Linde en fotograaf Nicole Segers reisden een maand lang door Georgië om met bewoners te spreken. Ze ontmoetten journalisten die hun baan verloren, jongeren die een eigen kunstcentrum oprichtten, en burgers voor wie demonstreren inmiddels onderdeel van het dagelijks leven is – vaak samen met de hele familie. In de podcast vertellen Van der Linde en Segers over hun bevindingen. Ze zagen de repressie en de angst, maar ook de vasthoudendheid en het optimisme dat blijft oplichten. Het opvallendste symbool van die hoop is de Europese Unie, voor veel Georgiërs een belofte van vrijheid en democratie. Productie: Kees van den Bosch en Eva Markx.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

* Bloqueos se mantienen en varios puntos del país* Fátima Bosch responde y muestra violencia digital* Rusia reanuda bombardeo en Ucrania mientras negocian plan de paz

Top headlines for Wednesday, November 26, 2025In this episode, a New Jersey spa faces controversy after being ordered to allow trans-identifying men into women-only nude areas, beloved comedy duo “The Skit Guys” parts ways after a co-founder's moral failure, and newly crowned Miss Universe Fátima Bosch goes viral for boldly proclaiming her Christian faith.00:11 Spa must let trans men into female-only nude spaces01:00 Skit Guys ministry ends after 30 years amid 'moral failure'01:49 Christian street preacher acquitted of ‘Islamophobia' charge02:36 Catholic priest arrested for assault put on leave by archdiocese03:19 Conor McGregor claims Trinity appeared during ibogaine trip04:06 Mass abduction in Nigeria: 50 Students Escape, 253 still missing04:53 Miss Universe Fátima Bosch credits faith after historic winSubscribe to this PodcastApple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastFollow Us on Social Media@ChristianPost on XChristian Post on Facebook@ChristianPostIntl on InstagramSubscribe on YouTubeGet the Edifi AppDownload for iPhoneDownload for AndroidSubscribe to Our NewsletterSubscribe to the Freedom Post, delivered every Monday and ThursdayClick here to get the top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning!Links to the NewsSpa must let trans men into female-only nude spaces | U.S.Skit Guys ministry ends after 30 years amid 'moral failure' | EntertainmentChristian street preacher acquitted of ‘Islamophobia' charge | WorldCatholic priest arrested for assault put on leave by archdiocese | U.S.Conor McGregor claims Trinity appeared during ibogaine trip | SportsMass abduction in Nigeria: 50 Students Escape, 253 still missing | WorldMiss Universe Fátima Bosch credits faith after historic win | Entertainment

Gerardo Fernandez Noroña criticó a Grecia Quiroz por pedir que investiguen al exgobernador de Michoacán tras el asesinato de su esposo, Carlos Manzo. Por segundo día consecutivo, los transportistas y campesinos realizaron bloqueos en México para pedir seguridad en las carreteras y el campo. Además… Te contamos lo que pasó en la marcha por el 25N de la CDMX; Presentaron avances sobre el Plan Integral contra el Abuso Sexual; La Corte Suprema de Brasil ordenó que Bolsonaro comience a cumplir su condena de 27 años en prisión; Fátima Bosch rompió el silencio sobre las acusaciones de fraude en Miss Universo; Detuvieron a cuatro personas por el robo del Louvre; La FIFA dio más detalles sobre el Mundial 2026.Y para #ElVasoMedioLleno… Al parecer los mapaches urbanos se están domesticando. Para enterarte de más noticias como estas, síguenos en redes sociales. Estamos en todas las plataformas como @telokwento. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

◉ Búscanos en todas las redes sociales como abejorromedia 

En más notas, agricultores y transportistas no logran acuerdos con Segob y anuncian ampliación de bloqueos, en información internacional, las 24 niñas secuestradas en un internado de Nigeria recuperan la libertad, dice el presidente Bola Ahmed, y en los espectáculos, Fátima Bosch responde a amenazas por ganar Miss Universo 2025: estos ataques duelen, pero no me definen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

En entrevista con Manuel López San Martin para MVS Noticias, Jorge García Orozco, periodista investigador de “Eme Equis” habla del caso Fátima Bosch-Pemex y el conflicto de interés en Miss Universo.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a text

Hoy en Me Lo Dijo Adela arrancamos con una conversación clave con Raúl Rocha Cantú, presidente de Miss Universo, quien responde a las acusaciones que han ensombrecido el triunfo de Fátima Bosch; el empresario explica el alcance del contrato con Pemex, la polémica por la supuesta compra de la corona y las renuncias de jueces que denunciaron presiones y favorecimientos. Más adelante, hablamos con el doctor David Coronado, jefe del Laboratorio de Violencia e integrante del Comité Universitario de Análisis de Personas Desaparecidas de la Universidad de Guadalajara, sobre el hallazgo de tres fosas clandestinas alrededor del Estadio Akron, sede del próximo Mundial, de donde se han recuperado 427 bolsas con restos de al menos 91 víctimas, un retrato devastador de la violencia en Jalisco y de cómo las desapariciones continúan siendo una emergencia nacional. Conversamos con Osvaldo Anaya, editor en EMEEQUIS, sobre la versión que apunta a que un escolta habría ejecutado, con su propia arma, al presunto asesino de Carlos Manzo, un giro más en un caso que sigue mostrando fallas de seguridad, contradicciones y un manejo opaco de la información. Luego, enlazamos con Luis Alfaro, reportero vial, para entender el impacto del megabloqueo nacional que ha paralizado carreteras, aumentado la tensión social y provocado afectaciones en múltiples estados. En Montón Shot, Juan Carlos Díaz Murrieta nos pone al día con lo más relevante del deporte. Más tarde recibimos en el estudio a Denisse de Kalafe, quien presenta su concierto íntimo en el Lunario del Auditorio Nacional este 29 de noviembre, una mirada cercana a su trayectoria y su regreso a los escenarios. Cerramos con la sección Piel Sana, con el dermatólogo oncólogo Javi Derma, director médico y fundador de Dermedica, certificado por el Consejo Mexicano de Dermatología; hoy hablamos de salud dermatológica en genitales, un tema necesario, poco conversado y clave para el bienestar integral. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

En Saga Noticias con Kim Armengol te traemos lo más relevante del fin de semana: la gira de la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum en Oaxaca, la inauguración de la cuarta estación del Tren Interoceánico y programas educativos en comunidades alejadas; sentencias y detenciones de líderes delictivos en Guerrero, Baja California y Michoacán; bloqueos carreteros de agricultores y transportistas y su impacto en la población; incidentes de violencia en eventos deportivos y accidentes trágicos en Michoacán; polémica en torno a la victoria de Fátima Bosch en Miss Universo 2025; y noticias internacionales como la designación del Cártel de los Soles como grupo terrorista y la tensión en Venezuela y Perú. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Hoy en Me Lo Dijo Adela, martes 25 de noviembre, analizamos los avances en la investigación del asesinato del alcalde Carlos Manzo con Juan Manzo, subsecretario de Gobierno de Michoacán; hablamos sobre los mega bloqueos de transportistas y agricultores con David Estévez Gamboa y su posible trasfondo político; tenemos mesa de debate con Damián Zepeda, Arturo Ávila y Juan Zavala sobre seguridad, política y protestas; además, Juan Carlos Díaz Murrieta nos trae las últimas noticias deportivas y les contamos la polémica tras la victoria de Fátima Bosch en Miss Universo 2025. No se despeguen del programa y manténganse informados. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

We’re chatting about some wild stage slips this weekend, from Katy Steele taking a tumble at the WA Day Festival to Miss Jamaica doing a dramatic fall at Miss Universe. Katy powered through with four broken ribs, and Miss Jamaica miraculously escaped with no broken bones. Meanwhile, Miss Mexico strutted away with the crown while everyone else was picking themselves up.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ariana Grande está teniendo un enorme éxito con su nueva entrega de 'Wicked: por siempre' sin embargo lo que está en el centro de la atención es su extrema delgadez. Consultamos con expertos para entender qué está pasando con la cantante.Además en El Gordo y La Flaca: La actriz Gabriela Michel, madre de Aislin Derbez y ex pareja de Eugenio Derbez falleció repentinamente. Esto nos contó el actor. Cinco años después de su muerte, los cuestionamientos y dudas alrededor de lo que pasó en las últimas horas de Diego Armado Maradona continúan. Los fanáticos siguen pidiendo justicia y un juicio sigue pendiente.Fátima Bosch está denunciando que está sufriendo cyber acoso e incluso amenazas de muerte. 

Hoy en Me Lo Dijo Adela, martes 25 de noviembre, analizamos los avances en la investigación del asesinato del alcalde Carlos Manzo con Juan Manzo, subsecretario de Gobierno de Michoacán; hablamos sobre los mega bloqueos de transportistas y agricultores con David Estévez Gamboa y su posible trasfondo político; tenemos mesa de debate con Damián Zepeda, Arturo Ávila y Juan Zavala sobre seguridad, política y protestas; además, Juan Carlos Díaz Murrieta nos trae las últimas noticias deportivas y les contamos la polémica tras la victoria de Fátima Bosch en Miss Universo 2025. No se despeguen del programa y manténganse informados. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

En Saga Noticias con Kim Armengol te traemos lo más relevante del fin de semana: la gira de la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum en Oaxaca, la inauguración de la cuarta estación del Tren Interoceánico y programas educativos en comunidades alejadas; sentencias y detenciones de líderes delictivos en Guerrero, Baja California y Michoacán; bloqueos carreteros de agricultores y transportistas y su impacto en la población; incidentes de violencia en eventos deportivos y accidentes trágicos en Michoacán; polémica en torno a la victoria de Fátima Bosch en Miss Universo 2025; y noticias internacionales como la designación del Cártel de los Soles como grupo terrorista y la tensión en Venezuela y Perú. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Hoy en Me Lo Dijo Adela arrancamos con una conversación clave con Raúl Rocha Cantú, presidente de Miss Universo, quien responde a las acusaciones que han ensombrecido el triunfo de Fátima Bosch; el empresario explica el alcance del contrato con Pemex, la polémica por la supuesta compra de la corona y las renuncias de jueces que denunciaron presiones y favorecimientos. Más adelante, hablamos con el doctor David Coronado, jefe del Laboratorio de Violencia e integrante del Comité Universitario de Análisis de Personas Desaparecidas de la Universidad de Guadalajara, sobre el hallazgo de tres fosas clandestinas alrededor del Estadio Akron, sede del próximo Mundial, de donde se han recuperado 427 bolsas con restos de al menos 91 víctimas, un retrato devastador de la violencia en Jalisco y de cómo las desapariciones continúan siendo una emergencia nacional. Conversamos con Osvaldo Anaya, editor en EMEEQUIS, sobre la versión que apunta a que un escolta habría ejecutado, con su propia arma, al presunto asesino de Carlos Manzo, un giro más en un caso que sigue mostrando fallas de seguridad, contradicciones y un manejo opaco de la información. Luego, enlazamos con Luis Alfaro, reportero vial, para entender el impacto del megabloqueo nacional que ha paralizado carreteras, aumentado la tensión social y provocado afectaciones en múltiples estados. En Montón Shot, Juan Carlos Díaz Murrieta nos pone al día con lo más relevante del deporte. Más tarde recibimos en el estudio a Denisse de Kalafe, quien presenta su concierto íntimo en el Lunario del Auditorio Nacional este 29 de noviembre, una mirada cercana a su trayectoria y su regreso a los escenarios. Cerramos con la sección Piel Sana, con el dermatólogo oncólogo Javi Derma, director médico y fundador de Dermedica, certificado por el Consejo Mexicano de Dermatología; hoy hablamos de salud dermatológica en genitales, un tema necesario, poco conversado y clave para el bienestar integral. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Changing Economics of IoT

Vianey Esquinca, Periodista y columnista de Excelsior

Lili regresó de Tailandia después de acompañar a su hija y nos cuenta de primera mano todo lo que vio en Miss Universo 2025.Omar Harfouch, el primer juez que renunció al certamen, está pidiendo la renuncia de Miss México por supuestos lazos económicos y políticos entre su familia y la organización Miss Universo.Miss Costa de Marfil renunció a su designación como Miss Universo África y Miss Universo Oceanía.Raúl Rocha, dueño de Miss Universo, ofreció polémicas explicaciones de porqué no ganó Miss Costa de Marfil.En otras noticias: sigue dando mucho de qué hablar el encuentro entre Belinda y Cazzu. 

Donald Trump presentó un plan para terminar la guerra entre Ucrania y Rusia. Volodymyr Zelensky, que tiene como deadline el jueves para aceptar el plan, respondió que sólo aceptará una paz “real y digna”. Por eso mismo, ya empezaron las negociaciones entre funcionarios de ambos países. Un juez dictó prisión preventiva oficiosa para Jorge Armando “N”, el presunto autor intelectual del asesinato del alcalde de Uruapan, Carlos Manzo. Además, siete escoltas del funcionario también recibieron la misma medida por fallas en su protección.Además… Juan Carlos Mezhua, exalcalde de Zongolica, fue asesinado; Israel afirmó haber asesinado al segundo líder más importante de Hezbollah; La COP30 terminó con un plan conjunto que no mencionó los combustibles fósiles; Jair Bolsonaro fue arrestado en su casa; El Gran Premio de Las Vegas tuvo una vuelta inesperada; El triunfo de Fátima Bosch como Miss Universo 2025 llegó con polémica.Y para #ElVasoMedioLleno…. La organización ambientalista Earth Mission organiza jornadas en las que la comunidad veracruzana se une para llevar al cangrejo azul al mar.Para enterarte de más noticias como estas, síguenos en redes sociales. Estamos en todas las plataformas como @telokwento.¿Quieres saber más sobre Kuspit? Haz click aquí. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transportistas y agricultores arman paro nacional en carreteras; detienen a siete escoltas del alcalde Carlos Manzo por matar al asesino; Pemex confirma contrato a dueño de Miss Universo tras cuestionamientos por triunfo de Fátima Bosch.

En notas de El Esto, Liga MX Femenil: Tigres conquista título del Apertura 2025, en información internacional, ataque israelí contra suburbios del sur de Beirut deja 5 muertos y 28 heridos, y en los espectáculos, Pemex niega injerencia en Miss Universo por vínculo del padre de Fátima Bosch y el presidente del certamen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

From Congress to the catwalk, tonight's episode of “What's New with ME” pulls back the curtain on power, privilege, and how the game is really played.Hosted by Ali Mehdaoui, this late-night–style breakdown stays unbiased, mixing satire, sharp analysis, and real empathy where it counts.

PODCAST SÁBADO 22 NOVIEMBRE 2025Suscríbanse al canal ➡️  https://www.youtube.com/hildaisasalasSíguenos en Instagram ➡️ https://www.instagram.com/lavandodenocheSíguenos en Twitter ➡️ https://twitter.com/lavandodenocheEscucha nuestro Podcast en Spotify ➡️ https://open.spotify.com/show/5qZvo25texwnKRqq0WaDWD© 2025 Lavando de Noche Derechos Reservados  © 2025 Copyright Lavando de NocheProducción: @markogh#HildaIsaSalas #LilianaLópezGarcía #GilHuerta #YouTube #Facebook #FamososEnVivo #ChismeEnVivo #EspectáculosEnVivo #LavandoDeNoche #LDN #EspectáculosEnVivo #LavandoDeNoche #LDN #YouTube #Facebook #FamososEnVivo #ChismeEnVivo #EspectáculosEnVivo #LavandoDeNoche #LDN #EspectáculosEnVivo #LavandoDeNoche #LDN #LaNaciónDelChisme

La historia detrás del triunfo de Fátima Bosch está llena de giros inesperados, acusaciones, tensiones internacionales y decisiones que cambiaron el rumbo del certamen. ¿Fue mérito, destino o algo más? Aquí te cuento lo que casi nadie se atreve a decir. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

El nuevo alcalde de Nueva York Zohran Mamdani se reunió con el presidente Donald Trump en la oficina oval después de varios ires y venires entre ambos.En otras noticias: Autoridades federales respondieron a las críticas que han surgido por el operativo de ICE en el que un agente le apuntó con su arma a una mujer y su bebé en brazos.El Departamento de Justicia lanzó una campaña para reclutar a jueces de inmigración, que ahora llama jueces de deportación.El presidente Trump aclaró que no amenazó de muerte a los legisladores demócratas que instaron a miembros de las fuerzas armadas a desobedecer órdenes ilegales del gobierno.Fátima Bosch la representante de México, fue elegida como la nueva Miss Universo 2025.

¡¡Felicidades a Fátima Bosch, nuestra reina universal!! Pumas se vuelve a quedar en la orillita y conductor panameño agradece a la Guatemala de Tena por darles el pase al Mundial. Dua Lipa está próxima a tocar en México y le sugerimos cantar "Chilanga banda", a ver si se anima, jajaja. Una 'influencer' entrevista al 'Checo' Pérez, sin saber que era el 'Checo' Pérez, la deslumbró su belleza.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Fátima Bosch, la representante de México, se lleva la corona de Miss Universo. Seis legisladores demócratas hacen un llamado a militares que Trump considera sedicioso. Genera expectativa la reunión que tendrá Zohran Mamdani con el presidente.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Yordi rinde un vibrante homenaje a Fátima Bosch, la recién coronada Miss Universo 2025.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Fátima Bosch, de México, se corona como la nueva Miss Universe 2025.Denuncian maltrato a menores y exigencias de pruebas de ADN.Alto funcionario de ICE testifica en corte sobre caso de Kilmar Ábrego.Proponen limitar colaboración policial con ICE.Mirante venezolano es detenido y separado de su familia.Jueza dice que despliegue de guarda nacional en Washington D.C es ilegal.TSA propone cobrar $18 dólares a pasajeros sin real ID.Rescatan a 23 migrantes secuestrados en Ciudad Juárez.Controversia por cambios sobre el autismo y las vacunas en Web de los CDC.Escucha de lunes a viernes el ‘Noticiero Univision Edición Nocturna' con Elián Zidán.    

Semov formaliza la Red de Transporte Mexiquense Edomex registra 2,450 denuncias de acoso sexual  Sismo de 5.5 sacude Bangladés, no reportan daños  Más información en nuestro podcast

Miss México, Fátima Bosch, fue elegida como la nueva Miss Universo 2025, la misma del escándalo con un directivo de Tailandia. Renuncias de jueces, favoritismos y falta de transparencia, quedaron muchas denuncias y dudas en el certamen.Además en El Gordo y La Flaca: se llevó a cabo una nueva gala de la revista GQ en México. Quienes se robaron las miradas fueron Belinda y Cazzu que estuvieron frente a frente.Maite Perroni denuncia que está sufriendo violencia digital a través de las redes sociales por su peso.

En entrevista para MVS Noticias con Luis Cárdenas, Susana Moscatel, periodista de espectáculos, habló sobre la mexicana Fátima Bosch se corona Miss Universo 2025.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Baja convocatoria y vigilancia de granaderos marcan la segunda marcha de la “Gen Z”; Sheinbaum asegura que en México ya nadie es silenciado o perseguido, a diferencia del Porfiriato; la mexicana Fátima Bosch gana Miss Universo.

En más notas, sentencian a Gerardo Ortiz a 3 años de libertad condicional en EU por vínculos con el CJNG, en información internacional, Trump estudia “medidas adicionales” contra los cárteles en México, dice la Casa Blanca, y en notas de El Esto, todo se define en el volcán, América vs tigres Femenil! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Huiselijk geweld komt lang niet altijd voor een rechter, zelfs als er een noodknop wordt ingedrukt. Het afgelopen jaar is femicide steeds hoger op de agenda gekomen, maar aan de moord op vrouwen gaat vaak veel vooraf: stalking, bedreigingen, herhaald huiselijk geweld. Zelfs wanneer daarvan aangifte wordt gedaan, belandt de zaak niet altijd bij een rechter. Slachtoffers kunnen dan in beroep gaan via een artikel-12-procedure, waarin een gerechtshof beoordeelt of het OM alsnog moet vervolgen. Maar die procedures vinden achter gesloten deuren plaats. Onderzoeksplatform Investico kreeg uitzonderlijk inzage in deze zaken van het gerechtshof Amsterdam. Ook zij wilden begrijpen hoe dit proces werkt, wat er precies gebeurt en of er patronen zichtbaar worden. Het onderzoek werd uitgevoerd door Jolanda van de Beld, Belia Heilbron en Bobby Uilen, in samenwerking met RTL. Er klinkt al langer kritiek op de manier waarop Nederland huiselijk geweld afhandelt. Maar in de regio Rotterdam is een nieuwe werkwijze ontwikkeld die, voorzichtige indicaties wijzen daarop, beter lijkt te werken. Productie: Kees van den Bosch en Matthijs Domen.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Glenn MacArthur grew up in a tiny village high in the French Alps, where riding bikes and exploring mountains was just part of everyday life. He's taken that foundation and built a really interesting path in mountain biking, one that doesn't follow traditional racing norms. From blind racing to setting fastest known times on crazy routes. From navigating the privateer world to landing a standout result at Epic Enduro, Glenn's approach is all about curiosity, commitment and finding what actually feels right, rather than what the sport says you should do. This is a chat about carving your own place in the MTB world, learning from the tough days, and keeping things authentic. So sit back, hit play, and enjoy this episode with Glenn MacArthur. You can also watch this episode on YouTube here. You can follow Glenn on Instagram @glennmac_mtb and you can watch his Giro Del Monviso film here. Podcast Stuff Episode Sponsors WTB WTB's biomechanics expert joined me recently on the podcast. If you've ever struggled to find the right saddle for you, then check out that episode here. If you'd like to check out WTB's full range of saddles and other products, you can find them over at wtb.com. Canyon Canyon recently launched the Neuron:ON CLLCTV and it's a whole lot of fun to ride. With a gravity ready spec and the latest Bosch motor, this is an insanely good bike for £5149. Check it out over at canyon.com. Patreon I would love it if you were able to support the podcast via a regular Patreon donation. Donations start from as little as £3 per month. That's less than £1 per episode and less than the price of a take away coffee. Every little counts and these donations will really help me keep the podcast going and hopefully take it to the next level. To help out, head here. Merch If you want to support the podcast and represent, then my webstore is the place to head. All products are 100% organic, shipped without plastics, and made with a supply chain that's using renewable energy. We now also have local manufacture for most products in the US as well as the UK. So check it out now over at downtimepodcast.com/shop. Newsletter If you want a bit more Downtime in your life, then you can join my newsletter where I'll provide you with a bit of behind the scenes info on the podcast, interesting bits and pieces from around the mountain bike world, some mini-reviews of products that I've been using and like, partner offers and more. You can do that over at downtimepodcast.com/newsletter. Follow Us Give us a follow on Instagram @downtimepodcast or Facebook @downtimepodcast to keep up to date and chat in the comments. For everything video, including riding videos, bike checks and more, subscribe over at youtube.com/downtimemountainbikepodcast. Are you enjoying the podcast? If so, then don't forget to follow it. Episodes will get delivered to your device as soon as it's available and it's totally free. You'll find all the links you need at downtimepodcast.com/follow. You can find us on Apple Podcast, Spotify, Google and most of the podcast apps out there. Our back catalogue of amazing episodes is available at downtimepodcast.com/episodes

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Continuum is solving the multi-party return problem in B2B supply chain—a transaction involving distributors, manufacturers, and end users that previously took 30-45 days and now completes in 30-45 seconds. In this episode of Category Visionaries, we sat down with Alex Witcpalek, CEO and Founder of Continuum, to unpack how he's building what he calls "reverse EDI" in a market of 1.5 million distribution and manufacturing companies across North America. After 13 years selling technology into this space, Alex is now growing 8x year-over-year by turning customers into the primary acquisition channel through network effects. Topics Discussed: Why multi-party returns require replicating order management, warehouse management, and procurement systems simultaneously The tactical sequencing of building network businesses: solving for independent value, achieving critical mass, then activating network effects How Continuum navigates deep ERP integrations (SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Epicor) plus bespoke business logic across multiple supply chain tiers Facebook retargeting, BDR outbound, events, and customer referrals as the four channels driving growth in a non-PLG market Why business model differentiation is the only remaining moat when technical barriers collapse Building domain expertise distribution systems using AI-powered LMS fed by sales call recordings GTM Lessons For B2B Founders: Choose problems where you can capture 100% of addressable market, not fractional share: Alex deliberately avoided competing in CRM, sales order automation, or accounts payable—categories where even dominant players cap at 25-30% market penetration. Instead, he targeted multi-party reverse logistics, a greenfield problem no one else was solving. This strategic choice eliminates competitive displacement risk and allows every prospect conversation to focus on change management rather than competitive differentiation. Founders should map their TAM against competitive saturation: markets where you can own the entire category create fundamentally different growth trajectories than fighting for fragments. Sequence network businesses: independent value → critical mass → network activation: Alex was told by investors 18 months in that network effects "weren't going to work." His insight: "When you don't have a network, you don't sell the network. It's just in your plans and how you're building." Continuum sold P&L impact, manual labor reduction, and customer experience improvements to early adopters while building network infrastructure invisibly. Only after achieving density in specific verticals (HVAC, electrical, plumbing) did they surface the network value proposition. This sequencing prevents the cold-start problem—founders building marketplace or network businesses must design standalone value that makes the first 100 customers successful independent of network density. Exploit high pain thresholds in legacy industries as competitive barriers: Supply chain companies accept 30-45 day return cycles, manual warranty claims on paper, and playing "guess who" by phone to find inventory across distributor branches. Alex notes they have "extremely high pain threshold" from living with broken systems for decades. While this creates longer education cycles, it also means competitors won't enter (too hard) and once you prove ROI, switching costs become prohibitive. Founders should reframe customer inertia: industries tolerating obvious inefficiencies offer category creation opportunities with built-in moats, not just sales friction. Business model architecture is the only defensible moat—technical differentiation is dead: Alex is building his own e-signature platform (Continue Sign) and AI LMS using vibe coding to prove technical moats no longer exist. Continuum's defensibility comes entirely from network lock-in: displacing them requires disconnecting manufacturers like Carrier, Daikin, and Bosch plus their entire distributor ecosystems simultaneously. He references EDI (1960s technology still dominant today) as proof that network effects create permanent advantages. Founders must architect switching costs, network density, or proprietary data advantages into their business model—technology alone provides zero protection in the AI era. Match channel strategy to actual ICP behavior, not SaaS conventions: Continuum's top lead source is customer-driven network growth—distributors recruiting manufacturers and vice versa. Facebook retargeting works because their 50+ year-old supply chain buyers "are trying to comment on their grandkids' pictures," not scrolling LinkedIn. BDR outbound still delivers high win rates in an industry where business happens on handshakes, making events critical. This channel mix would fail for PLG products but works perfectly for enterprise cycles with $40K ACVs and 90-day sales processes. Founders should ethnographically research where their specific buyers actually spend attention rather than defaulting to LinkedIn, content marketing, or PLG based on what works in adjacent categories. Use 90-day enterprise cycles and multi-stakeholder complexity as qualification, not friction: Continuum runs enterprise sales motions for $40K deals because multi-party returns touch 16 constituents across sales, customer service, fleet, supply chain, warehouse, purchasing, and finance. Rather than trying to simplify buying, Alex uses this complexity as a filter—companies willing to coordinate VP of Supply Chain, COO, and CFO alignment are serious buyers. He layers three value propositions (P&L impact, labor reduction, customer experience) knowing different stakeholders weight them differently. Founders selling into complex environments should embrace multi-threading as a qualification mechanism that improves win rates and reduces churn, not overhead to eliminate. //  Sponsors:  Front Lines — We help B2B tech companies launch, manage, and grow podcasts that drive demand, awareness, and thought leadership. www.FrontLines.io The Global Talent Co. — We help tech startups find, vet, hire, pay, and retain amazing marketing talent that costs 50-70% less than the US & Europe. www.GlobalTalent.co // Don't Miss: New Podcast Series — How I Hire  Senior GTM leaders share the tactical hiring frameworks they use to build winning revenue teams. Hosted by Andy Mowat, who scaled 4 unicorns from $10M to $100M+ ARR and launched Whispered to help executives find their next role. Subscribe here: https://open.spotify.com/show/53yCHlPfLSMFimtv0riPyM