Podcasts about Bosch

Fátima Bosch y el escándalo de Raúl Rocha: ¿Un alivio o un peso sobre sus hombros?, ¿Nepotismo disfrazado de equidad? La ‘Ley Esposa’ en San Luis Potosí genera polémica, Tasa de Interés al 7%: ¿Beneficio o riesgo para la economía de México?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En entrevista con Manuel López San Martin para MVS Noticias, Ricardo Ravelo, experto en temas de seguridad y narcotráfico habla de la FGR que pide detener a Raúl Rocha Cantú, dueño de Miss Universo, por delincuencia organizada.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

"I think curiosity is very important. When you're curious about something, you listen." "You have to be at the forefront, not the back. You can't, hide behind and say, 'hey, you know, guys solve it', right?" "When they trust you, beautiful things happen."              "Ideas are welcome. You know, ideas are free. But it's got be data driven."  Tomo Kamiya is President Japan at PTC, a company known for parametric design and CAD-driven simulation that helps engineers model, test, and refine complex products digitally before manufacturing. He began his career in sales at Bosch, covering Kanagawa and Yamanashi with a highly autonomous, remote-work style that was ahead of its time, learning early that trust and relationship continuity—not brand alone—move outcomes in Japan. He later joined Dell during its disruptive growth era, moving from enterprise sales into marketing and broader regional responsibility, including supporting Korea marketing and later leading the server business, where his team hit number one market share in Japan. After a short consulting stint connected to Japan Telecom, he joined AMD to grow the business in Japan, then relocated to Singapore to run a broader South Asia remit and strategic customers. He subsequently led a wide Asia Pacific portfolio at D&M Holdings across multiple markets, navigating shifting consumer behaviour as subscription and streaming changed the fundamentals of product value. That experience led naturally into Adobe during its historic shift from perpetual software to subscription, where he led the Digital Media business in Japan (including Photoshop, Illustrator, and Acrobat) for almost a decade. Across this cross-industry arc, he has repeatedly adapted to business model change, regional cultural differences, and the practical realities of leading people in Japan—especially the need to listen deeply, build trust patiently, and step forward decisively when problems hit. Tomo Kamiya's leadership story is, at its core, a story about compressing complexity—first in products, then in organisations. At PTC, he sits at the intersection of engineering reality and digital abstraction: the ability to take something massive—a ship, an engine, an entire manufacturing system—and "frame" it into a screen so it can be simulated, stress-tested, and improved before any physical cost is incurred. That same instinct shows up in the way he talks about people and performance. In his earliest Bosch years, he learned that Japan's reliability culture does not eliminate the need for continuous trust-building; even a global brand can stall if the relationship energy disappears. His answer was to create value where the buyer's uncertainty lives—showing up, demonstrating, educating, and, as he put it, "sell myself," because credibility travels faster than product brochures. That bias for action stayed with him through Dell's high-velocity era, where "latest and the greatest" rewarded leaders who could anticipate market timing and organise teams around speed without losing discipline. Later, running regional remits outside Japan, he saw the contrast between Japan's "no defect" mindset and emerging markets that prioritised pace. Rather than treat one as right and the other as wrong, he learned to search for the productive middle ground: the discipline that prevents future failure, paired with the pragmatism that prevents paralysis. It is a useful lens for Japan, where uncertainty avoidance and consensus expectations can slow decisions unless the leader builds momentum through listening and clear intent. In his most practical leadership shift, an executive coach forced a hard look at his calendar: too much time on objectives, not enough time on people. The result was a deliberate reallocation toward one-on-ones, deeper listening, and clearer delegation—creating what amounts to a management operating system that improves decision speed because the leader knows what is really happening. He sees ideas as abundant but insists that investment requires decision intelligence: data points, ROI thinking, and a shared logic that gives teams confidence to commit. In Japan's consensus environment—where nemawashi and ringi-sho-style alignment often determine whether execution truly happens—his approach is to build trust through presence, make it safe for the "silent minority" to contribute, and then move decisively when critical moments arrive. Technology, including AI as a "co-pilot," can help leaders think through scenarios and prepare responses, but he remains clear that empathy and execution in the worst moments cannot be outsourced. The leadership standard, as he defines it, is simple and demanding: when things go south, step to the front. Q&A Summary What makes leadership in Japan unique? Leadership in Japan is shaped by trust-building, restraint, and the practical demands of consensus. Even when products are high quality and risk reduction is strong, outcomes often hinge on relationships and continuity. Japan's consensus culture—often expressed through nemawashi and ringi-sho-style alignment—means leaders must invest time in listening, building internal confidence, and demonstrating respect for the context that teams and customers protect. Why do global executives struggle? Global executives often arrive with a headquarters lens and try to "fix" what looks inefficient before understanding why it exists. When they change processes or people without learning the customer rationale, they trigger resistance and lose credibility. The gap is not intelligence; it is context. Japan requires deliberate time in the market and inside the organisation to decode what is really being optimised—often customer trust, stability, and long-term reliability. Is Japan truly risk-averse? Japan can appear risk-averse, but much of the behaviour is better described as uncertainty avoidance. The goal is to reduce surprises and protect relationships, not to avoid progress. Kamiya's early sales experience shows that buyers will pay for reliability when the cost of failure is high. The leadership challenge is to move forward while lowering uncertainty—through data, clear rationale, and predictable communication—rather than forcing speed without alignment. What leadership style actually works? The style that works is visible, empathetic, and action-oriented. Trust grows when leaders walk the floor, create everyday touchpoints, and listen in detail—especially because many Japanese employees will not speak up easily. At the same time, Kamiya argues that in critical moments—big decisions, business model shifts, major complaints—the leader must be "at the forefront," not hiding behind delegation. Delegation matters, but stepping forward in the hardest moments is what earns trust. How can technology help? Technology helps leaders compress complexity and make better decisions. In product terms, simulation and digital-twin style approaches reduce risk by testing before manufacturing. In leadership terms, data-driven thinking improves idea selection, investment confidence, and ROI clarity. AI can function as a co-pilot for scenario planning—offering options and framing responses—but it does not replace human judgement, empathy, or the social work of building consensus. Does language proficiency matter? Language matters because it shrinks distance. Full fluency may take years, but even small efforts signal respect and closeness, making it easier to build rapport and trust. Language is not just vocabulary; it is an everyday bridge that reduces friction with teams and increases the leader's ability to read nuance—critical in a culture where people may be reserved. What's the ultimate leadership lesson? The ultimate lesson is that trust is built through time, listening, and decisive presence. Leadership is revealed when trouble hits: the leader who listens, takes action, and stands in front earns durable commitment. Once trust is established, the organisation can move faster—because consensus forms more naturally, delegation improves, and decisions carry less uncertainty. Author Credentials Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have also been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). In addition to his books, Greg publishes daily blogs on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, offering practical insights on leadership, communication, and Japanese business culture. He is also the host of six weekly podcasts, including The Leadership Japan Series, The Sales Japan Series, The Presentations Japan Series, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews. On YouTube, he produces three weekly shows — The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews — which have become leading resources for executives seeking strategies for success in Japan.

Wir sprechen mit Dorit Bosch, Juristin, Choachin und "Verwaltungsinfluencerin". Alte Strukturen von innen heraus aufbrechen und dabei immer die richtigen Leute direkt im Schlepptau – für Mitarbeitende in deutschen Verwaltungen gar nicht so einfach. Und doch klappt es immer wieder. Mit solchen "Pionier:innen" spricht Dorit Bosch in ihrem eigenen Podcast "Let's Staat", bringt sie zusammen auf das Mindshift Festival und zeichnet sie aus: mit einem Flamingo-Pokal. Was Flamingos mit Verwaltung zu tun haben, warum neue Ideen nur gut sind, wenn sie auch umgesetzt werden und welche Voraussetzungen jeder von uns braucht, um wirksam sein zu können: all das und mehr in der neuen Episode von "why"! Hört doch auch mal rein in Lets Staat und lasst euch inspirieren: https://open.spotify.com/show/6gbcJWBxKfSg9M7l19TbxV?si=de8384f913544b88

PATROCINADO POR ACADEMIA NAVARRO BOMBER Conducido por Sergi Martínez. En este capítulo contamos además con Arturo Roda y Víctor Bosch. Además traemos la úlitma hora del Mallorca Toda la actualidad del Valencia CF desde la redacción de nostreport

EXCLUSIVA: ¡#FátimaBosch REGRESA a #Tabasco tras GANAR #MissUniverse2025! ¿Qué te pareció este momento?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

¡#FátimaBosch AGRADECE el APOYO de #México y sus FANS! Además, el #DrKrasovsky nos explica los RIESGOS de las OPERACIONES ESTÉTICAS, tuvimos la visita de #OmarChaparro y probó los rollitos de carne con tocino de la chef #IngridRamos. ¡No te pierdas de esto y más en el PROGRAMA COMPLETO de #SaleElSol este 16/12/2025!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

¡#FátimaBosch AGRADECE el APOYO de sus FANS tras su llegada a #Tabasco después de GANAR #MissUniverse2025! ¿Qué mensaje tienes para ella?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

La force onirique des grandes compositions de Jérôme Bosch, au premier rang desquelles figure L'Enfer, nous fait un peu vite oublier leur exceptionnelle maîtrise esthétique. Mention légales : Vos données de connexion, dont votre adresse IP, sont traités par Radio Classique, responsable de traitement, sur la base de son intérêt légitime, par l'intermédiaire de son sous-traitant Ausha, à des fins de réalisation de statistiques agréées et de lutte contre la fraude. Ces données sont supprimées en temps réel pour la finalité statistique et sous cinq mois à compter de la collecte à des fins de lutte contre la fraude. Pour plus d'informations sur les traitements réalisés par Radio Classique et exercer vos droits, consultez notre Politique de confidentialité.Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Er is iets aan de hand met jongeren en met geloven. Jongeren laten zich feestelijk dopen. Influencers delen een getuigenis van hun bekering op sociale media. Het lijkt een nieuwe trend: Gen Z kiest Jezus. Het is een onderwerp dat het afgelopen jaar veel is besproken in journalistieke bladen. Jongeren zouden de secularisatietrend hebben gekeerd. Is dit een significante verandering? Dat was het startpunt voor het onderzoek van Groene-journalisten Casper Thomas en Joost Ingen-Housz. Maar wat begon als een statistische vraag, ontwikkelde zich tot een journalistiek-filosofische zoektocht naar wat het betekent om over religie te spreken. Wat geloof is, staat op losse schroeven. Jongeren tonen een dynamischere omgang met geloof. Dat vraagt om een herziening van het vraagstuk: wat betekent het om te geloven? En waarom zoeken jongeren religie juist nu weer meer op? Productie: Kees van den Bosch en Laura ten Hove.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

North Dakota has made large strides towards using investments of public funds not just as a way to generate revenue for the for the state but also, by making those investments in North Dakota companies, to benefit the state's economy. But these investments are happening in a lot of different ways, and when some investments made through some programs go bad, and make negative headlines, they can sour the public's view of this sort of public investing. One complicating factor in this is that the state has dozens and dozens of economic development programs, overseen by a patchwork of boards and government entities, and that can make things like transparency and accountability difficult. "We've just got too many too many programs," Rep. Glenn Bosch, a Republican from Bismarck, said on this episode of Plain Talk. Bosch, along with Rep. Jonathan Warrey, a Republican from Casselton who also joined us, serves on a committee overseeing Legacy Fund investments. They want to make sure the public understands the success the state is having with its in-state investment programs. But to better communicate that message, it may require consolidating some of what the state is doing. In South Dakota "they really just have two or three different places that economic development funds flow out of," Bosch said. "It's either type A, type B, or type C. When people come to the state and want to understand what economic development looks like in South Dakota, that's what they offer. When they come here, they're given all these different options, and they're trying to figure it out." "We just need to consolidate," he continued. "Have a plan and have a framework that people can understand when they want to talk about economic development." But despite some of the confusion, Warrey and Bosch said North Dakota's investments are going well. North Dakota has the "second largest in-state investment program in the country, really second only to California," Bosch said, noting that relative to the state's gross domestic product, it is the largest. That program, specifically, uses a portion of the Legacy Fund, and includes investments in private equity, through the North Dakota Growth Fund, real assets, through the North Dakota Real Assets fund, low-interest loans to companies through the Match Program, and in infrastructure projects through the Infrastructure Revolving Loan Fund. In the three years since the in-state investment program began, "there has been 24 investments made with committed capital of $122 million," Warrey added. Also on this episode, we discuss a shift in Fargo away from property tax incentives, whether a universal school lunch ballot measure will pass, and whether Gov. Tim Walz ought to resign amid the fraud scandal which has rocked his state. If you want to participate in Plain Talk, just give us a call or text at 701-587-3141. It's super easy — leave your message, tell us your name and where you're from, and we might feature it on an upcoming episode. To subscribe to Plain Talk, search for the show wherever you get your podcasts or use one of the links below. Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Pocket Casts | Episode Archive

North Dakota has made large strides towards using investments of public funds not just as a way to generate revenue for the for the state but also, by making those investments in North Dakota companies, to benefit the state's economy. But these investments are happening in a lot of different ways, and when some investments made through some programs go bad, and make negative headlines, they can sour the public's view of this sort of public investing. One complicating factor in this is that the state has dozens and dozens of economic development programs, overseen by a patchwork of boards and government entities, and that can make things like transparency and accountability difficult. "We've just got too many too many programs," Rep. Glenn Bosch, a Republican from Bismarck, said on this episode of Plain Talk. Bosch, along with Rep. Jonathan Warrey, a Republican from Casselton who also joined us, serves on a committee overseeing Legacy Fund investments. They want to make sure the public understands the success the state is having with its in-state investment programs. But to better communicate that message, it may require consolidating some of what the state is doing. In South Dakota "they really just have two or three different places that economic development funds flow out of," Bosch said. "It's either type A, type B, or type C. When people come to the state and want to understand what economic development looks like in South Dakota, that's what they offer. When they come here, they're given all these different options, and they're trying to figure it out." "We just need to consolidate," he continued. "Have a plan and have a framework that people can understand when they want to talk about economic development." But despite some of the confusion, Warrey and Bosch said North Dakota's investments are going well. North Dakota has the "second largest in-state investment program in the country, really second only to California," Bosch said, noting that relative to the state's gross domestic product, it is the largest. That program, specifically, uses a portion of the Legacy Fund, and includes investments in private equity, through the North Dakota Growth Fund, real assets, through the North Dakota Real Assets fund, low-interest loans to companies through the Match Program, and in infrastructure projects through the Infrastructure Revolving Loan Fund. In the three years since the in-state investment program began, "there has been 24 investments made with committed capital of $122 million," Warrey added. Also on this episode, we discuss a shift in Fargo away from property tax incentives, whether a universal school lunch ballot measure will pass, and whether Gov. Tim Walz ought to resign amid the fraud scandal which has rocked his state. If you want to participate in Plain Talk, just give us a call or text at 701-587-3141. It's super easy — leave your message, tell us your name and where you're from, and we might feature it on an upcoming episode. To subscribe to Plain Talk, search for the show wherever you get your podcasts or use one of the links below. Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Pocket Casts | Episode Archive

L'intelligence artificielle est devenue le mot magique de la Silicon Valley. Les géants du numérique veulent l'injecter partout, parfois à marche forcée. Chez Amazon, très engagé dans cette course technologique, l'idée a été de truffer sa plateforme de streaming Prime Video de fonctionnalités dopées à l'IA. Mais l'expérience tourne, pour l'instant, au sérieux revers. Ces derniers jours, Amazon a essuyé une vague de critiques sur les réseaux sociaux. En cause : une nouvelle fonction de résumés générés par intelligence artificielle, testée en version bêta aux États-Unis. Le principe semblait séduisant : proposer, sous forme de courts clips vidéo narrés par une voix synthétique, un rappel des éléments clés de l'intrigue d'une série. Dans les faits, l'outil s'est révélé largement défaillant.La polémique a explosé autour de Fallout, l'une des séries phares de Prime Video. Les résumés produits par l'IA contenaient des erreurs factuelles, des incohérences, et parfois des éléments qui ne correspondaient tout simplement pas à l'histoire. Rapidement, les extraits ont circulé en ligne, suscitant moqueries et indignation. Face au bad buzz, Amazon n'a pas tardé à réagir. La plateforme a tout simplement désactivé la fonctionnalité, non seulement pour Fallout, mais aussi pour l'ensemble des séries concernées par le test : Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan, The Rig, Bosch et Upload. Un retrait discret, mais révélateur d'un échec cuisant dans l'intégration de l'IA à l'expérience de streaming.Ce n'est d'ailleurs pas la première fois que Prime Video se retrouve dans l'embarras sur ce terrain. Plus tôt ce mois-ci, Amazon avait déjà été critiqué pour avoir proposé des doublages d'animés générés par intelligence artificielle, jugés artificiels et dénaturant les œuvres originales. Là encore, sous la pression des abonnés, ces contenus avaient été retirés. Ces ratés successifs illustrent les limites d'une stratégie qui consiste à déployer l'IA à tout prix, parfois au détriment de la qualité. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Australia’s response to the antisemitic massacre over the weekend on Bondi Beach during the first night of Chanukkah is to enact even tougher gun laws. To more on Rob and Michele Reiner’s fatal stabbing at the alleged hands of his son Nick. According to reports, they’d earlier attended a holiday party at the home of Conan O'Brien but the family argued and left early, after Nick Reiner made people feel uncomfortable. The father and son made a film 10 years ago called “Being Charlie,” about substance abuse. Nick is presently being held without bail. Any “Bosch” fans? The Amazon LAPD detective drama, which stars actor Titus Welliver and has concluded its run, is set in Los Angeles and frames the City of Angels as a main character. The Swag Gap? It’s basically the thing where your partner is cooler than you are. The concept was created by a 20-year-old student named Dillon Escourse. Jerry O’Donnell, the actor who played Officer Servidone in “Bosch,” is now training to be a police officer — at age 65. Andy nerds out on old radio segments that exist on YouTube. He just loves that deep voice of God! Can we win $19,000 if we guess the music medley? What does AI mean for the future of humankind? Well, a streamer named IShowSpeed is being sued for assaulting gay robot named Jake the Rizzbot, who moved to Los Angeles and came out. The lawsuit is worth a whopping $1 million. In Michigan, gas is averaging $2.85 a gallon. We in SoCal are very jealous of that gas price.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Fátima Bosch no necesita ningún título ni corona para ser la reina de belleza, una mujer empoderada y digna representante de lo bueno de México

Sponsorem odcinka jest marka Bosch, producent lodówek Total No Frost.Sprawdź promocje na produkty Bosch:https://www.bosch-home.pl/promocje?cid=Promo_Dec25~coop~noend~fix~ins~~RockBorys~spon~~(00:00) Lodówka Bosch - Segment sponsora(05:23) YT wprowadza podsumowanie komentarzy(08:24) Wyjaśnienie DLC do Wiedźmina 3(11:41) Reklamy na TGA 2025(13:30) KUNA (15:00) Nowy Patch do POE 2(16:38) Żywy czy martwy: Film z serii "Na noże" - Nerflix(19:18) Aplikacja Freepik - AI do grafiki(21:50) Podcastowe plany na święta(24:14) Gala The Game Awards i nagrody(29:46) STAR WARS Fate of the Old Republic(34:18) Divinity(39:30) ONTOS(43:19) EXODUS(47:27) Control: Resonant(54:11) Gang of Dragon(56:53) Tomb Raider: Catalyst (01:01:29) Tomb Raider Legacy of Atlantis(01:04:36) No Law(01:10:01) Star Wars: Galactic Racer(01:12:49) Phantom Blade Zero(01:15:47) Forest 3(01:18:01) Street Fighter(01:21:23) Saros(01:25:06) 4:LOOP(01:28:20) HighguardSTAR WARS: Fate of the Old Republic Trailer (2026)https://youtu.be/ay25swjFGGg?si=XTxq-FsZVMygxkvVDivinity - Cinematic Announcement Trailerhttps://youtu.be/VxzyVeAG00w?si=t0KIE7VNzl0P51cgONTOS – Reveal Trailerhttps://youtu.be/ll4ZPxUzPhc?si=2NqIi0R8TCs_4In7EXODUS – The Rise of Jun Aslan | Official Trailerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c80LMt_UxsControl: Resonant Announcement Trailerhttps://youtu.be/xObZQARXLOc?si=BRCp6HlFuQrMInTJGang of Dragon Reveal Trailer | The Game Awards 2025https://youtu.be/CAuTGHQmimk?si=6-3U_7X0D5AuIXqbTomb Raider: Catalyst Teaser Trailerhttps://youtu.be/N2yLZQFPSLo?si=OLCx1enlV_jAdSStTomb Raider Legacy of Atlantis - Official Announcement Trailer | The Game Awards 2025https://youtu.be/jZj4vWjzGas?si=Sc4O9gF2LaVU9TU5No Law - Reveal Trailer | PS5 Gameshttps://youtu.be/LYO8M69d_iQ?si=Uj8i-C9OR6mjeE8GStar Wars: Galactic Racer™ - Official Reveal Trailerhttps://youtu.be/RiavNl4qxWY?si=iMGYJ775jNIy351dPhantom Blade Zero - Official Release Date Announcement Trailerhttps://youtu.be/Q89X4nOzxGw?si=gWWRTcuAnMDUFX3zForest 3 - Official Announcement Trailer | The Game Awards 2025https://youtu.be/NIcf1L0HNrU?si=RJa_eYjFDpGS4mGiSaros - Pre-Order Trailer | PS5 Gameshttps://youtu.be/xmsc_GokLPI?si=To1J-zfJnNupicZ64:LOOP - The Game Awards 2025 Announcement Trailer | PS5 & PC Gameshttps://youtu.be/6-5ieEtmgTc?si=vzv1aJrliQ4vPWAwHighguard - Official Reveal Trailer | The Game Awards 2025https://youtu.be/rh6Pi6h_css?si=GdfM0_RnS4mwJjXkGrupa Rock i Borys na FB - https://www.facebook.com/groups/805231679816756/Podcast Remigiusz "Pojęcia Nie Mam" Maciaszekhttps://tinyurl.com/yfx4s5zzShorty Rock i Boryshttps://www.facebook.com/rockiboryshttps://www.tiktok.com/@borysniespielakSerwer Discord podcastu Rock i Borys!https://discord.com/invite/AMUHt4JEvdSłuchaj nas na Lectonie: https://lectonapp.com/p/rckbrsSłuchaj nas na Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2WxzUqjSłuchaj nas na iTunes: https://apple.co/2Jz7MPSProgram LIVE w niedzielę od osiemnastej - https://jarock.pl/live/rockRock i Borys to program o grach, technologii i życiu

durée : 00:38:52 - 100% Rugby - Facundo Bosch, talonneur de l'Aviron Bayonnais et Ekain Imaz Aguirre, 3ème ligne du Biarritz Olympique, sont invités de 100% Rugby ce lundi 15 décembre avant le déplacement à La Rochelle en Top 14 et la réception d'Oyonnax en Pro D2. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

Dos sujetos matan a 15 personas y lesionan a decenas en Sidney, uno de los agresores es abatido; Gobierno descarta descentralización de secretarías, con AMLO, sólo 7 de 32 dependencias lograron mudanza; México, a la par de Cuba y Jamaica en el uso de efectivo: ABM; Miles de tabasqueños dieron la bienvenida a Fátima Bosch, Miss Universo 2025; El Toluca es bicampeón del futbol mexicano, conquistó su decimosegundo título y alcanzó a las Chivas como el segundo máximo ganador.Un Podcast de EL UNIVERSAL. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

O tym, jak spożywaliśmy mikroplastik w sklepiku szkolnym, o sosie żony Włocha i o drożdżowej pizzy.===Partnerem tego odcinka podcastu jest marka Bosch - producent niezawodnych i nowoczesnych sprzętów AGD, które ułatwiają codzienne życie. Na ich stronie znajdziecie aktualne promocje na sprzęty agd do zabudowy i nie tylko: KLIK

Pauline Frommer discusses her recent trip to Spain with Jason Cochran, Editor in Chief of Frommers.comTakeaways: In this episode, we discuss the cosmopolitan nature of Madrid, highlighting its expansive avenues, walkability, top restaurants and extraordinary museums. The culinary experiences in Madrid are diverse, ranging from molecular gastronomy to traditional tapas, showcasing the city's rich gastronomic culture. Our exploration of Madrid includes visits to renowned museums, where masterpieces from artists like Bosch and Goya captivate the imagination. The flamenco show at Corral de la Moreria stands out as a cultural highlight, demonstrating the city's historical significance in the flamenco tradition and its artistic vibrancy. A side trip to Toledo is the perfect add on to an adventure in Madrid, as it's a very different city, with extraordinary religious heritage, and only 30 minutes away by trainCompanies and sights mentioned in this episode: Frommers.com Melt the band DSTAgE Restaurant Doppelganger Bar Coral de la Moreria Thyssen-Bornemisza National MuseumEl PradoPrimatial Metropolitan Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption in Toledo

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

KGMI's Jason Upton speaks with Sumas Mayor Bruce Bosch about the state of the town after it got the brunt of historic flooding in Whatcom County, including where residents can seek shelter, where the town goes from here, what the community can do to help and more.

This week the boys ruin your ears as they chat about Hamnet, Laura (the 1944 movie), DC KO, Hill Street Blues, TV in Kuwait, Weird English, Sleepy Drunks, Witchworld, D&D, a new suit, Bosch, dairy, Clover Pit, Dome Keeper, A Game About Digging A Hole, Total Chaos, Routine, Fallout, Supergirl, and more.  So get your horse tested for herpes, it's Geekshock time!

This week marks a major milestone for the Regular Joes Podcast as they celebrate their 600th episode! Dave, Barry, and Tod welcome back a very special guest...actor, collector, and all-around great guy Titus Welliver. Titus, who is best known for his starring roles in television hits like Bosch and his memorable appearances in films and series such as Lost and Deadwood, co-hosts this weeks show, which turned into a giant-sized episode filled with stories of their shared love of collecting everything from toys and action figures to comics, movie memorabilia and more. The long and the short of it, you can really never have enough stuff … or time talking about your passions with good friends. Thanks to Titus for being so generous with his time and thanks to all of the listeners and viewers of The Regular Joes Podcast who have supposed the show over the years! As always, thanks for listening! Links: Fanboy Collectibles - https://www.fanboycollectibles.com From Dave's Workshop - https://www.fromdavesworkshop.com Reach Out: e-mail: podcast@regularjoes.com Voice Message: 413-475-1650 Text Message: 413-422-0004 Leave us a review on iTunes or Spotify

„Wir müssen für mehr Zuversicht sorgen.“ Das sagte Bundespräsident Frank-Walter Steinmeier während der Verleihung des Deutschen Zukunftspreises 2025 vor wenigen Wochen. Gewonnen haben den Preis drei Ingenieure des Automobilzulieferers Bosch, der in den vergangenen Wochen nicht mit Zuversicht und Zukunft, sondern vor allem mit Krise und Stellenabbau in den Nachrichten war. Die vom Bundespräsidenten ausgezeichnete Technologie ist jedoch Zukunft pur, und zudem in Deutschland entwickelt: Prämiert wurde die mit Wasserstoff betriebene Brennstoffzelle für schwere Lastwagen, die zumindest in kleiner Stückzahl bereits in Serie gegangen ist. Zu Gast haben wir in dieser Folge mit dem Bosch-Ingenieur Thomas Pauer den Mann, in dessen Verantwortung nicht nur die Brennstoffzelle fällt, sondern auch die komplette Antriebstechnologie von Bosch, also auch das klassische Geschäft mit Komponenten für Diesel- und Benzinmotoren. Mit ihm diskutieren wir, welches Potential im Energieträger Wasserstoff steckt. Auch wenn Wasserstoff momentan „ein wenig Flaute“ habe, so Pauer, will Bosch an der Technologie festhalten. In China sei man sehr erfolgreich, zudem habe man für die Elektrolyse-Geräte, mit der Wasserstoff erzeugt werden, mittlerweile konkrete Kundenaufträge. Es sei nun Sache der Politik, die Rahmenbedingungen so zu gestalten, dass Wasserstoff auch hierzulande in größerer Menge wirtschaftlich produziert und über Pipelines transportiert werden kann.

Mit Spenden lässt sich viel erreichen, vor allem, wenn man strategisch vorgeht. Wie das funktioniert, erklärt die Erbin und Großspenderin Ise Bosch. Moderation: Elif Şenel Von WDR 5.

De dochter van de vader des vaderlands van Myanmar werd in 1988 bekend toen ze in verzet kwam tegen de militaire junta die het land regeerde. Ze leefde - totdat ze in 2016 State Counselor werd - af en aan 15 jaar onder huisarrest en werd een beroemde politieke gevangene. In 1991 won ze voor haar strijd de Nobelprijs voor de Vrede. Na een periode van voorzichtige democratisering volgde in 2021 opnieuw een staatsgreep. Nu zit ze weer gevangen. Ze werd dit jaar tachtig en geldt daarmee als een van de oudste politieke gevangenen ter wereld. Intussen is er in Myanmar al tachtig jaar sprake van een volksopstand tegen het leger. Voor journaliste Minka Nijhuis is dit geen abstract verhaal. Aan het begin van haar carrière kreeg ze het advies om naar Myanmar te reizen. In 1995 sprak ze Aung San Suu Kyi voor het eerst, toen die nog onder huisarrest leefde. In de jaren daarna ontmoette ze haar vele malen en zag ze van nabij de veranderingen in Suu Kyi’s leven: van vrijlating tot regeringsdeelname, en alle obstakels die daarmee gepaard gingen. Deze week staat er een uitgebreid profiel van Suu Kyi in De Groene. Met de recente geschiedenis van Myanmar erdoorheen geweven. Want dat lijkt ook zo te zijn met het leven van Aung San Suu Kyi. Productie: Laura ten Hove, Kees van den Bosch en Matthijs Domen.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Când Suzy privește pe fereastră, vede cum primii fulgi de nea plutesc ușor din cer, așternându-se pe pământ. Abia așteaptă să se joace afară cu prietenii ei! Ea și Elanul fac un om de zăpadă, iar apoi pornesc împreună prin pădure, să le caute pe celelalte animale. Însă o liniște ciudată domnește atât în jur, cât și în casele prietenilor lor. Oare de ce?

Amazon streicht tausende Stellen und auch andere Tech-Riesen wie Meta bauen ab. In Deutschland sieht es nicht besser aus: Bosch kündigt 15.000 Stellenstreichungen an, Lufthansa weitere 4.000. Die Frage ist: Welche Jobs werden in so einem Umfeld eigentlich noch gebraucht – und welche sind besonders gefährdet? „Es gab ein starkes Over-Hiring. Kurz nach der Corona-Pandemie und auch währenddessen schon. Dort versucht man jetzt, dass Personal wieder abzubauen. Davon sind gerade die Industrie und die Tech-Industrie betroffen. Die Unternehmen haben auch das Problem, neue Mitarbeiter einzustellen, z.B. bei der KI. Das ist toxisch für den Arbeitsmarkt. Es wird immer bei Verwaltung und Back Office zuerst gekürzt. Man digitalisiert einfach mal das HR-System weg. HR ist auch ein schrumpfender Bereich. Auch die Daseinberechtigung von Mitarbeitern im mittleren Managment wird stark hinterfragt. Und auch IT-ler und Programmierer sind betroffen. Wir werden keine ganz große Entlassungswelle sehen, aber...", sagt der BWL-Influencer und Mitgründer von pumpkincareers David Döbele. Alle Details im Interview mit Inside Wirtschaft-Chefredakteur Manuel Koch an der Frankfurter Börse und auf https://inside-wirtschaft.de

Fátima Bosch abandona entrevistaGloria Trevie en entrevista con Sabina Berman Guillermo del Toro, multinominado

Al parecer, dos personas iban a bordo del vehículo que explotó en Coahuayana, Michoacán. Así lo informó el secretario de Seguridad federal, Omar García Harfuch, este martes. Claudia Sheinbaum ya respondió a la amenaza de los nuevos aranceles de Trump. El Gobierno reconoció una deuda en el agua que debe dar a Estados Unidos y dijo que está actuando conforme al deal. Además… México es el segundo país donde más asesinan periodistas; Un juez federal autorizó que el Departamento de Justicia de EE.UU publique documentos inéditos del caso de tráfico sexual contra Ghislaine Maxwell; Altagracia Gómez confirmó la cancelación del contrato millonario entre Minsa y Diconsa; Atacaron a balazos al subsecretario de Operaciones de la Secretaría de Seguridad de Colima; Australia implementó una ley que prohíbe a menores de 16 años tener cuentas de redes; Y Fátima Bosch otra vez está en el centro de la polémica.Y para #ElVasoMedioLleno… Científicos crearon la reserva Ridgely, en Ecuador, para proteger al loro carirrojo, especie en peligro de extinción.Para enterarte de más noticias como estas, síguenos en redes sociales. Estamos en todas las plataformas como @telokwento. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Zestien jaar stond Peter van den Bosch aan het roer van het Bureau Kredietregistratie. Op het moment dat hijhet stokje overdraagt het aantal Nederlanders met betalingsachterstanden historisch laag. Toch stemt hem dat niet te per se tevreden. Waar is hij het trotst op en welke uitdagingen wachten zijn opvolger? Macro met Mujagić/Boot Elke dag een intrigerende gedachtewisseling over de stand van de macro-economie. Op maandag en vrijdag gaat presentator Thomas van Zijl in gesprek met econoom Arnoud Boot, de rest van de week praat Van Zijl met econoom Edin Mujagić. Ook altijd terug te vinden als je een aflevering gemist hebt. Blik op de wereld Wat speelt zich vandaag af op het wereldtoneel? Het laatste nieuws uit bijvoorbeeld Oekraïne, het Midden-Oosten, de Verenigde Staten of Brussel hoor je iedere werkdag om 12.10 van onze vaste experts en eigen redacteuren en verslaggevers. Ook los te vinden als podcast. Lobbypanel De Europese Commissie komt eindelijk over de brug met een versoepeling van de stikstofnormen rondom duurzame projecten. En: maakt een minderheidskabinet Den Haag vatbaarder voor het influisteren van 'belanghebbenden' of wordt lobbyen juist een stuk ingewikkelder? Dat en meer bespreken we om 11.30 in het lobbypanel met: -Tristan Bons, adjunct-directeur van Vastgoed Nederland -Jacco Vonhof van MKB Nederland Luister l Lobbypanel De economisch stand van Nederland Van een tekort aan stroom tot een teveel aan stikstof, van woningnood tot oorlogseconomie, en van een lokale subsidie tot mondiale handelsoorlog; hoe staat de Nederlandse economie er eigenlijk voor? En welke impact heeft de macro-economie op jouw portemonnee? In deze serie bespreek ik elke woensdag met economen en andere deskundigen 'de economische stand van Nederland'. Vandaag gaat het over CO2-compensatie. Want, hoewel er al jaren veel over te doen is, besloten de EU-landen in november dat 5 procent van hun CO2-reductie BUITEN de EU gecompenseerd mag worden. Te gast is Ties Gijzel, beleidseconoom en Follow the Money-journalist. Zakenlunch Elke dag, tijdens de lunch, geniet je mee van het laatste zakelijke nieuws, actuele informatie over de financiële markten en ander economische actualiteiten. Op een ontspannen manier word je als luisteraar bijgepraat over alles wat er speelt in de wereld van het bedrijfsleven en de beurs. En altijd terug te vinden als podcast, mocht je de lunch gemist hebben. Contact & Abonneren BNR Zakendoen zendt elke werkdag live uit van 11:00 tot 13:30 uur. Je kunt de redactie bereiken via e-mail. Abonneren op de podcast van BNR Zakendoen kan via bnr.nl/zakendoen, of via Apple Podcast en Spotify. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

¿A qué obedece el cambio en la ruta? ¿En qué consiste el ajuste? El coordinador del recibimiento de Fátima Bosch en Tabasco, Pedro Cano, lo explica. ¿La verbena en el parque Centenario sigue en pie? ¿Cómo va la logística? ¿Por qué el llamado a “no acercarse” al carro alegórico? ¿Quedó definido el coche que se usará? ¿Ya se sabe cuándo arribará al edén? Entérate aquí de los pormenores.

Presentaties van Gideon van Meijeren (recht van verzet) en Cees van den Bosch (hoe zit de deepstate in elkaar) op de vierde editie van de Science Summit uncensored, op 22 november 2025 georganiseerd door VoorWaarheid.playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyoEPcyalk8J3lhzCLkJKltUKVqiW8en_&si=eUX0XciWFg5vNrbA 0:00:00 Willem Engel0:04:16 Gideon van Meijeren1:00:15 Cees van den BoschOp zaterdag 22 november organiseerde VoorWaarheid de 4e Science Summit Uncensored: "Dit jaar onderzoeken we of Nederland nog een functionerende rechtsstaat is. We gaan op zoek naar waar de werkelijke macht ligt en hoe deze is georganiseerd. Er is ruim gelegenheid voor het stellen van vragen en het ontmoeten van gelijkgestemden".In deze playlist de integraal opgenomen summit in de drie delen, zoals ze werden gepresenteerd.aankondiging en programma: https://voorwaarheid.nl/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/4e-Science-Summit-Uncensored-22-november-2025.pdfOp Potkaars: https://potkaars.nl/blog/2025/11/24/science-summit-uncensored-4-2025-integrale-registratie aankondiging en programma op https://voorwaarheid.nl/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/4e-Science-Summit-Uncensored-22-november-2025.pdfhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Potkaars uitzendingen zijn gemaakt onder Creative Commons licentie. Je mag ze hergebruiken met bronvermelding, je mag ze niet hergebruiken voor commerciele doelen.Support the showSupport the show

El gobierno de Trump suspendió todos los trámites migratorios a personas de 19 países que son considerados 'de preocupación' incluyendo a Cuba y Venezuela.En otras noticias: En Nueva Orleans se lanzó un nuevo operativo de inmigración llamado 'Catahoula Crunch' que tiene como meta el arresto de al menos 5 mil personas.El presidente Trump indultó al representante demócrata de Texas Henry Cuellar, acusado de soborno y conspiración.El Secretario de Estado, Marco Rubio dijo que ve posible una negociación directa entre Donald Trump y Nicolás Maduro para lograr su salida del poder. Fátima Bosch, la ganadora de Miss Universo 2025 fue demandada por el ejecutivo que la habría llamado tonta. 

In een tijd waarin democratieën worden uitgehold en extreemrechts steeds verder oprukt, is verzet meer dan ooit noodzakelijk. Er waren de succesvolle rode-lijn-demonstraties in Nederland, en in de Verenigde Staten trokken ‘No Kings’-protesten door het hele land, gericht tegen het presidentschap van Trump. Recent was er ook de actie om het nummer ‘Vrijheid, Gelijkheid en Zusterschap’ van Sophie Straat massaal te streamen, als tegenwicht voor ‘Nee, Nee, Nee tegen een AZC’, dat door verschillende actiegroepen werd gedeeld. Maar volgens Koen Haegens zijn dergelijke symbolische acties — hoe sympathiek ook — onvoldoende om een politieke tegenkracht te vormen tegen partijen die de democratie willen ondermijnen. Daarom maakte hij een doe-het-zelf-handleiding in negen stappen, voor de trotse burger die geen sterke man boven zich duldt. Met voorbeelden uit andere landen laat hij zien hoe mensen macht kunnen uitoefenen, zowel lokaal als op economisch terrein. Productie Kees van den Bosch en Matthijs Domen.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En más notas, Caso Rich: posponen audiencias hasta 2026; buscan negociar con víctimas, en información internacional, Trump sugiere que dejará expirar el T-MEC y buscará un nuevo acuerdo con México y Canadá, y en los espectáculos, Director de Miss Universo Tailandia, Nawat Itsaragrisil, denuncia a Fátima Bosch por difamación. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

5/8. Guano, Tragedy, and the Rise of Intensive Farming — Steven Moss — Moss discusses seabird guano (nutrient-rich droppings), first recognized as a valuable resource by the Incas and subsequently monetized by William Gibbs, who accumulated immense wealth trading guano from arid Peruvian islands. Moss emphasizes that guano harvesting occurred under tragic human conditions, with Chinese indentured laborers frequently dying during extraction operations. Mossnotes that declining guano availability stimulated the invention of synthetic fertilizers by Haber and Bosch, catalyzing the emergence of intensive chemical agriculture. Moss documents that high-intensity chemical farming, despite enabling global food production, precipitated catastrophic declines in bird and insect populations, a phenomenon extensively documented in Rachel Carson's seminal work Silent Spring. 1880

En una nueva demanda federal presentada en Puerto Rico, Daddy Yankee acusa a Raphy Pina, Mireddys Gonzalez y varias corporaciones de haber construido un presenta esquema que duró casi 10 años y que habría modificado documentos para que Pina apareciera como coautor de varias canciones en las que no participó para cobrar regalías. En otras noticias: Fátima Bosch, la nueva Miss Universo, llegó a su tierra natal México y habló sobre todas las controversias que la rodean a ella y al concurso.¿Quién es Taina Pimentel? Ella es el nuevo amor de Lupillo Rivera. JBalvin hizo historia en su natal Medellín con un concierto de casi 7 horas lleno de artistas invitados. 

I am Rolf Claessen and together with my co-host Ken Suzan I am welcoming you to episode 169 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann, co-founder of my patent law firm Michalski Hüttermann & Partner and a true expert on the Unified Patent Court. He has written several books about the new system and we talk about all the things that plaintiffs and defendants can learn from the first decisions of the court and what they mean for strategic decisions of the parties involved. But before we jump into this very interesting interview, I have news for you! The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is planning rule changes that would make it virtually impossible for third parties to challenge invalid patents before the patent office. Criticism has come from the EFF and other inventor rights advocates: the new rules would play into the hands of so-called non-practicing entities (NPEs), as those attacked would have few cost-effective ways to have questionable patents deleted. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) reports a new record in international patent applications: in 2024, around 3.7 million patent applications were filed worldwide – an increase of 4.9% over the previous year. The main drivers were Asian countries (China alone accounted for 1.8 million), while demand for trademark protection has stabilized after the pandemic decline. US rapper Eminem is taking legal action in Australia against a company that sells swimwear under the name “Swim Shady.” He believes this infringes on his famous “Slim Shady” brand. The case illustrates that even humorous allusions to well-known brand names can lead to legal conflicts. A new ruling by the Unified Patent Court (UPC) demonstrates its cross-border impact. In “Fujifilm v. Kodak,” the local chamber in Mannheim issued an injunction that extends to the UK despite Brexit. The UPC confirmed its jurisdiction over the UK parts of a European patent, as the defendant Kodak is based in a UPC member state. A dispute over standard patents is looming at the EU level: the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) of the European Parliament voted to take the European Commission to the European Court of Justice. The reason for this is the Commission’s controversial withdrawal of a draft regulation on the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs). Parliament President Roberta Metsola is to decide by mid-November whether to file the lawsuit. In trademark law, USPTO Director Squires reported on October 31, 2025, that a new unit (“Trademark Registration Protection Office”) had removed approximately 61,000 invalid trademark applications from the registries. This cleanup of the backlog relieved the examining authority and accelerated the processing of legitimate applications. Now let's jump into the interview with Aloys Hüttermann: The Unified Patent Court Comes of Age – Insights from Prof. Aloys Hüttermann The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has moved from a long-discussed project to a living, breathing court system that already shapes patent enforcement in Europe. In a recent IP Fridays interview, Prof. Aloys Hüttermann – founder and equity partner at Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner and one of the earliest commentators on the UPC – shared his experiences from the first years of practice, as well as his view on how the UPC fits into the global patent litigation landscape. This article summarises the key points of that conversation and is meant as an accessible overview for in-house counsel, patent attorneys and business leaders who want to understand what the UPC means for their strategy. How Prof. Hüttermann Became “Mr. UPC” Prof. Hüttermann has been closely involved with the UPC for more than a decade. When it became clear, around 13 years ago, that the European project of a unified patent court and a unitary patent was finally going to happen, he recognised that this would fundamentally change patent enforcement in Europe. He started to follow the legislative and political developments in detail and went beyond mere observation. As author and editor of several books and a major commentary on the UPC, he helped shape the discussion around the new system. His first book on the UPC appeared in 2016 – years before the court finally opened its doors in 2023. What fascinated him from the beginning was the unique opportunity to witness the creation of an entirely new court system, to analyse how it would be built and, where possible, to contribute to its understanding and development. It was clear to him that this system would be a “game changer” for European patent enforcement. UPC in the Global Triangle: Europe, the US and China In practice, most international patent disputes revolve around three major regions: the UPC territory in Europe, the United States and China. Each of these regions has its own procedural culture, cost structure and strategic impact. From a territorial perspective, the UPC is particularly attractive because it can, under the right conditions, grant pan-European injunctions that cover a broad range of EU Member States with a single decision. This consolidation of enforcement is something national courts in Europe simply cannot offer. From a cost perspective, the UPC is significantly cheaper than US litigation, especially if one compares the cost of one UPC action with a bundle of separate national cases in large European markets. When viewed against the territorial reach and procedural speed, the “bang for the buck” is very compelling. China is again a different story. The sheer volume of cases there is enormous, with tens of thousands of patent infringement cases per year. Chinese courts are known for their speed; first-instance decisions within about a year are common. In this respect they resemble the UPC more than the US does. The UPC also aims at a roughly 12 to 15 month time frame for first-instance cases where validity is at issue. The US, by contrast, features extensive discovery, occasionally jury trials and often longer timelines. The procedural culture is very different. The UPC, like Chinese courts, operates without discovery in the US sense, which makes proceedings more focused on the written record and expert evidence that the parties present, and less on pre-trial disclosure battles. Whether a company chooses to litigate in the US, the UPC, China, or some combination of these forums will depend on where the key markets and assets are. However, in Prof. Hüttermann's view, once Europe is an important market, it is hard to justify ignoring the UPC. He expects the court's caseload and influence to grow strongly over the coming years. A Landmark UPC Case: Syngenta v. Sumitomo A particularly important case in which Prof. Hüttermann was involved is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo matter, concerning a composition patent. This case has become a landmark in UPC practice for several reasons. First, the Court of Appeal clarified a central point about the reach of UPC injunctions. It made clear that once infringement is established in one Member State, this will usually be sufficient to justify a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That confirmation gave patent owners confidence that the UPC can in fact deliver broad, cross-border relief in one go. Second, the facts of the case raised novel issues about evidence and territorial reach. The allegedly infringing product had been analysed based on a sample from the Czech Republic, which is not part of the UPC system. Later, the same product with the same name was marketed in Bulgaria, which is within UPC territory. The Court of Appeal held that the earlier analysis of the Czech sample could be relied on for enforcement in Bulgaria. This showed that evidence from outside the UPC territory can be sufficient, as long as it is properly linked to the products marketed within the UPC. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to state its view on inventive step. It confirmed that combining prior-art documents requires a “pointer”, in line with the EPO's problem-solution approach. The mere theoretical possibility of extracting a certain piece of information from a document does not suffice to justify an inventive-step attack. This is one of several decisions where the UPC has shown a strong alignment with EPO case law on substantive patentability. For Prof. Hüttermann personally, the case was also a lesson in oral advocacy before the UPC. During the two appeal hearings, the presiding judge asked unexpected questions that required quick and creative responses while the hearing continued. His practical takeaway is that parties should appear with a small, well-coordinated team: large enough to allow someone to work on a tricky question in the background, but small enough to remain agile. Two or three lawyers seem ideal; beyond that, coordination becomes difficult and “too many cooks spoil the broth”. A Game-Changing CJEU Decision: Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux Surprisingly, one of the most important developments for European patent litigation in the past year did not come from the UPC at all, but from the Court of Justice of the European Union. In Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux, the CJEU revisited the rules on cross-border jurisdiction under the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia). Previously, under what practitioners often referred to as the GAT/LuK regime, a court in one EU country was largely prevented from granting relief for alleged infringement in another country if the validity of the foreign patent was contested there. This significantly limited the possibilities for cross-border injunctions. In Bosch, the CJEU changed course. Without going into all procedural details, the essence is that courts in the EU now have broader powers to grant cross-border relief when certain conditions are met, particularly when at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state. The concept of an “anchor defendant” plays a central role: if you sue one group company in its home forum, other group companies in other countries, including outside the EU, can be drawn into the case. This has already had practical consequences. German courts, for example, have issued pan-European injunctions covering around twenty countries in pharmaceutical cases. There are even attempts to sue European companies for infringement of US patents based on acts in the US, using the logic of Bosch as a starting point. How far courts will ultimately go remains to be seen, but the potential is enormous. For the UPC, this development is highly relevant. The UPC operates in the same jurisdictional environment as national courts, and many defendants in UPC cases will be domiciled in UPC countries. This increases the likelihood that the UPC, too, can leverage the broadened possibilities for cross-border relief. In addition, we have already seen UPC decisions that include non-EU countries such as the UK within the scope of injunctions, in certain constellations. The interaction between UPC practice and the Bosch jurisprudence of the CJEU is only beginning to unfold. Does the UPC Follow EPO Case Law? A key concern for many patent owners and practitioners is whether the UPC will follow the EPO's Boards of Appeal or develop its own, possibly divergent, case law on validity. On procedural matters, the UPC is naturally different from the EPO. It has its own rules of procedure, its own timelines and its own tools, such as “front-loaded” pleadings and tight limits on late-filed material. On substantive law, however, Prof. Hüttermann's conclusion is clear: there is “nothing new under the sun”. The UPC's approach to novelty, inventive step and added matter is very close to that of the EPO. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears frequently in UPC decisions. Intermediate generalisations are treated with the same suspicion as at the EPO. In at least one case, the UPC revoked a patent for added matter even though the EPO had granted it in exactly that form. The alignment is not accidental. The UPC only deals with European patents granted by the EPO; it does not hear cases on purely national patents. If the UPC were more generous than the EPO, many patents would never reach it. If it were systematically stricter, patentees would be more tempted to opt out of the system. In practice, the UPC tends to apply the EPO's standards and, where anything differs, it is usually a matter of factual appreciation rather than a different legal test. For practitioners, this has a very practical implication: if you want to predict how the UPC will decide on validity, the best starting point is to ask how the EPO would analyse the case. The UPC may not always reach the same result in parallel EPO opposition proceedings, but the conceptual framework is largely the same. Trends in UPC Practice: PIs, Equivalents and Division-Specific Styles Even in its early years, certain trends and differences between UPC divisions can be observed. On preliminary injunctions, the local division in Düsseldorf has taken a particularly proactive role. It has been responsible for most of the ex parte PIs granted so far and applies a rather strict notion of urgency, often considering one month after knowledge of the infringement as still acceptable, but treating longer delays with scepticism. Other divisions tend to see two months as still compatible with urgency, and they are much more cautious with ex parte measures. Munich, by contrast, has indicated a strong preference for inter partes PI proceedings and appears reluctant to grant ex parte relief at all. A judge from Munich has even described the main action as the “fast” procedure and the inter partes PI as the “very fast” one, leaving little room for an even faster ex parte track. There are also differences in how divisions handle amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. Munich has suggested that if a patentee needs to rely on claim amendments or auxiliary requests in a PI, the request is unlikely to succeed. Other divisions have been more open to considering auxiliary requests. The doctrine of equivalents is another area where practice is not yet harmonised. The Hague division has explicitly applied a test taken from Dutch law in at least one case and found infringement by equivalence. However, the Court of Appeal has not yet endorsed a specific test, and in another recent Hague case the same division did not apply that Dutch-law test again. The Mannheim division has openly called for the development of an autonomous, pan-European equivalence test, but has not yet fixed such a test in a concrete decision. This is clearly an area to watch. Interim conferences are commonly used in most divisions to clarify issues early on, but Düsseldorf often dispenses with them to save time. In practice, interim conferences can be very helpful for narrowing down the issues, though parties should not expect to be able to predict the final decision from what is discussed there. Sometimes topics that dominate the interim conference play little or no role in the main oral hearing. A Front-Loaded System and Typical Strategic Mistakes UPC proceedings are highly front-loaded and very fast. A defendant usually has three months from service of the statement of claim to file a full statement of defence and any counterclaim for revocation. This is manageable, but only if the time is used wisely. One common strategic problem is that parties lose time at the beginning and only develop a clear strategy late in the three-month period. According to Prof. Hüttermann, it is crucial to have a firm strategy within the first two or three weeks and then execute it consistently. Constantly changing direction is a recipe for failure in such a compressed system. Another characteristic is the strict attitude towards late-filed material. It is difficult to introduce new documents or new inventive-step attacks later in the procedure. In some cases even alternative combinations of already-filed prior-art documents have been viewed as “new” attacks and rejected as late. At the appeal stage, the Court of Appeal has even considered new arguments based on different parts of a book already in the file as potentially late-filed. This does not mean that parties should flood the court with dozens of alternative attacks in the initial brief. In one revocation action, a plaintiff filed about fifty different inventive-step attacks, only to be told by the court that this was not acceptable and that the attacks had to be reduced and structured. The UPC is not a body conducting ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case actively and to ask parties to focus on the most relevant issues. Evidence Gathering, Protective Letters and the Defendant's Perspective The UPC provides powerful tools for both sides. Evidence inspection is becoming more common, not only at trade fairs but also at company premises. This can be a valuable tool for patentees, but it also poses a serious risk for defendants who may suddenly face court-ordered inspections. From the perspective of potential defendants, protective letters are an important instrument, especially in divisions like Düsseldorf where ex parte PIs are possible. A well-written protective letter, filed in advance, can significantly reduce the risk of a surprise injunction. The court fees are moderate, but the content of the protective letter must be carefully prepared; a poor submission can cause more harm than good. Despite the strong tools available to patentees, Prof. Hüttermann does not view the UPC as unfair to defendants. If a defendant files a solid revocation counterclaim, the pressure shifts to the patentee, who then has only two months to reply, prepare all auxiliary requests and adapt the enforcement strategy. This is even more demanding than at the EPO, because the patentee must not only respond to validity attacks but also ensure that any amended claims still capture the allegedly infringing product. It is entirely possible to secure the survival of a patent with an auxiliary request that no longer covers the defendant's product. In that scenario, the patentee has “won” on validity but lost the infringement case. Managing this tension under tight time limits is a key challenge of UPC practice. The Future Role of the UPC and How to Prepare Today the UPC hears a few hundred cases per year, compared with several thousand patent cases in the US and tens of thousands in China. Nevertheless, both the court itself and experienced practitioners see significant growth potential. Prof. Hüttermann expects case numbers to multiply in the medium term. Whether the UPC will become the first choice forum in global disputes or remain one pillar in parallel proceedings alongside the US and China will depend on the strategies of large patentees and the evolution of case law. However, the court is well equipped: it covers a large, economically important territory, is comparatively cost-effective and offers fast procedures with robust remedies. For companies that may end up before the UPC, preparation is essential. On the offensive side, that means building strong evidence and legal arguments before filing, being ready to proceed quickly and structured, and understanding the specific styles of the relevant divisions. On the defensive side, it may mean filing protective letters in risk-exposed markets, preparing internal processes for rapid reaction if a statement of claim arrives, and taking inspection requests seriously. Conclusion The Unified Patent Court has quickly moved from theory to practice. It offers pan-European relief, fast and front-loaded procedures, and a substantive approach that closely mirrors the EPO's case law. At the same time, national and EU-level developments like the Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision are reshaping the jurisdictional framework in which the UPC operates, opening the door for far-reaching cross-border injunctions. For patent owners and potential defendants alike, the message is clear: the UPC is here to stay and will become more important year by year. Those who invest the time to understand its dynamics now – including its alignment with the EPO, the differences between divisions, and the strategic implications of its procedures – will be in a much better position when the first UPC dispute lands on their desk. Here is the full transcript of the interview: Rolf Claessen:Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann. He is founder and equity partner of my firm, Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner. More importantly for today's interview, he has written several books about the Unified Patent Court. The first one already came out in 2016. He is co-editor and author of one of the leading commentaries on the UPC and has gained substantial experience in UPC cases so far – one of them even together with me. Thank you very much for being on IP Fridays again, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you for inviting me, it's an honour. How did you get so deeply involved in the UPC? Rolf Claessen:Before we dive into the details, how did you end up so deeply involved in the Unified Patent Court? And what personally fascinates you about this court? Aloys Hüttermann:This goes back quite a while – roughly 13 years. At that time it became clear that, after several failed attempts, Europe would really get a pan-European court and a pan-European patent, and that this time it was serious. I thought: this is going to be the future. That interested me a lot, both intellectually and practically. A completely new system was being built. You could watch how it evolved – and, if possible, even help shape it a bit. It was also obvious to me that this would be a complete game changer. Nobody expected that it would take until 2023 before the system actually started operating, but now it is here. I became heavily interested early on. As you mentioned, my first book on the UPC was published in 2016, in the expectation that the system would start soon. It took a bit longer, but now we finally have it. UPC vs. US and China – speed, cost and impact Rolf Claessen:Before we go deeper into the UPC, let's zoom out. If you compare litigation before the UPC with patent litigation in the US and in China – in terms of speed, cost and the impact of decisions – what are the key differences that a business leader should understand? Aloys Hüttermann:If you look at the three big regions – the UPC territory in Europe, the US and China – these are the major economic areas for many technology companies. One important point is territorial reach. In the UPC, if the conditions are met, you can get pan-European injunctions that cover many EU Member States in one go. We will talk about this later in more detail. On costs there is a huge difference between the US and the UPC. The UPC is much cheaper than US litigation, especially once you look at the number of countries you can cover with one case if the patent has been validated widely. China is different again. The number of patent infringement cases there is enormous. I have seen statistics of around 40,000 infringement cases per year in China. That is huge – compared with roughly 164 UPC infringement cases in the first year and maybe around 200 in the current year. On speed, Chinese courts are known to be very fast. You often get a first-instance decision in about a year. The UPC is comparable: if there is a counterclaim for revocation, you are looking at something like 12 to 15 months for a first-instance decision. The US can be slower, and the procedure is very different. You have full discovery, you may have juries. None of that exists at the UPC. From that perspective, Chinese and UPC proceedings are more similar to each other than either is to the US. The UPC is still a young court. We have to see how influential its case law will be worldwide in the long run. What we already see, at least in Germany, is a clear trend away from purely national patent litigation and towards the UPC. That is inside Europe. The global impact will develop over time. When is the UPC the most powerful tool? Rolf Claessen:Let's take the perspective of a global company. It has significant sales in Europe and in the US and production or key suppliers in China. In which situations would you say the UPC is your most powerful tool? And when might the US or China be the more strategic battleground? Aloys Hüttermann:To be honest, I would almost always consider bringing a case before the UPC. The “bang for the buck” is very good. The UPC is rather fast. That alone already gives you leverage in negotiations. The threat of a quick, wide-reaching injunction is a strong negotiation tool. Whether you litigate in the US instead of the UPC, or in addition, or whether you also go to China – that depends heavily on the individual case: where the products are sold, where the key markets are, where the defendant has assets, and so on. But in my view, once you have substantial sales in Europe, you should seriously consider the UPC. And for that reason alone I expect case numbers at the UPC to increase significantly in the coming years. A landmark UPC case: Syngenta vs. Sumitomo (composition patent) Rolf Claessen:You have already been involved in several UPC cases – and one of them together with me, which was great fun. Looking at the last 12 to 18 months, is there a case, decision or development that you find particularly noteworthy – something that really changed how you think about UPC litigation or how companies should prepare? Aloys Hüttermann:The most important UPC case I have been involved in so far is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo case on a composition patent. It has become a real landmark and was even mentioned in the UPC's annual report. It is important for several reasons. First, it was one of the first cases in which the Court of Appeal said very clearly: if you have established infringement in one Member State, that will usually be enough for a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That is a powerful statement about the reach of UPC relief. Second, the facts were interesting. The patent concerned a composition. We had analysed a sample that had been obtained in the Czech Republic, which is not a UPC country. Later, the same product was marketed under the same name in Bulgaria, which is in the UPC. The question was whether the analysis of the Czech sample could be used as a basis for enforcement in Bulgaria. The Court of Appeal said yes, that was sufficient. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to say something about inventive step. It more or less confirmed that the UPC's approach is very close to the EPO's problem-solution approach. It emphasised that, if you want to combine prior-art documents, you need a “pointer” to do so. The mere theoretical possibility that a skilled person could dig a particular piece of information out of a document is not enough. For me personally, the most memorable aspect of this case was not the outcome – that was largely in line with what we had expected – but the oral hearings at the appeal stage. We had two hearings. In both, the presiding judge asked us a question that we had not anticipated at all. And then you have about 20 minutes to come up with a convincing answer while the hearing continues. We managed it, but it made me think a lot about how you should prepare for oral hearings at the UPC. My conclusion is: you should go in with a team, but not too big. In German we say, “Zu viele Köche verderben den Brei” – too many cooks spoil the broth. Two or three people seems ideal. One of them can work quietly on such a surprise question at the side, while the others continue arguing the case. In the end the case went very well for us, so I can speak about it quite calmly now. But in the moment your heart rate definitely goes up. The CJEU's Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision – a real game changer Rolf Claessen:You also mentioned another development that is not even a UPC case, but still very important for European patent litigation. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes. In my view, the most important case of the last twelve months is not a UPC decision but a judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU): Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. This is going to be a real game changer for European IP law, and I am sure we have not seen the end of its effects yet. One example: someone has recently sued BMW before the Landgericht München I, a German court, for infringement of a US patent based on acts in the US. The argument is that this could be backed by the logic of Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. We do not know yet what the court will do with that, but the fact that people are trying this shows how far-reaching the decision might be. Within the UPC we have already seen injunctions being issued for countries outside the UPC territory and even outside the EU, for example including the UK. So you see how these developments start to interact. Rolf Claessen:For listeners who have not followed the case so closely: in very simple terms, the CJEU opened the door for courts in one EU country to rule on patent infringement that took place in other countries as well, right? Aloys Hüttermann:Exactly. Before Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux we had what was often called the GAT/LuK regime. The basic idea was: if you sue someone in, say, Germany for infringement of a European patent, and you also ask for an injunction for France, and the defendant then challenges the validity of the patent in France, the German court cannot grant you an injunction covering France. The Bosch decision changed that. The legal basis is the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia), which deals with jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters in the EU. It is not specific to IP; it applies to civil cases generally, but it does have some provisions that are relevant for patents. In Bosch, a Swedish court asked the CJEU for guidance on cross-border injunctions. The CJEU more or less overturned its old GAT/LuK case law. Now, in principle, if the defendant is domiciled in a particular Member State, the courts of that state can also grant cross-border relief for other countries, under certain conditions. We will not go into all the details here – that could fill a whole separate IP Fridays episode – but one important concept is the “anchor defendant”. If you sue a group of companies and at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state, then other group companies in other countries – even outside the EU, for example in Hong Kong – can be drawn into the case and affected by the decision. This is not limited to the UPC, but of course it is highly relevant for UPC litigation. Statistically it increases the chances that at least one defendant will be domiciled in a UPC country, simply because there are many of them. And we have already seen courts like the Landgericht München I grant pan-European injunctions for around 20 countries in a pharmaceutical case. Rolf Claessen:Just to clarify: does it have to be the headquarters of the defendant in that country, or is any registered office enough? Aloys Hüttermann:That is one of the open points. If the headquarters are in Europe, then it is clear that subsidiaries outside Europe can be affected as well. If the group's headquarters are outside Europe and only a subsidiary is here, the situation is less clear and we will have to see what the courts make of it. Does the UPC follow EPO case law? Rolf Claessen:Many patent owners and in-house counsel wonder: does the UPC largely follow the case law of the EPO Boards of Appeal, or is it starting to develop its own distinct line? What is your impression so far – both on substantive issues like novelty and inventive step, and on procedural questions? Aloys Hüttermann:On procedure the UPC is, of course, very different. It has its own procedural rules and they are not the same as at the EPO. If we look at patent validity, however, my impression is that there is “nothing new under the sun” – that was the title of a recent talk I gave and will give again in Hamburg. Substantively, the case law of the UPC and the EPO is very similar. For inventive step, people sometimes say the UPC does not use the classical problem-solution approach but a more “holistic” approach – whatever that is supposed to mean. In practice, in both systems you read and interpret prior-art documents and decide what they really disclose. In my view, the “error bar” that comes from two courts simply reading a document slightly differently is much larger than any systematic difference in legal approach. If you look at other grounds, such as novelty and added matter, the UPC even follows the EPO almost verbatim. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears all over UPC decisions, even if the EPO case numbers are not always cited. The same is true for novelty. So the rule-based, almost “Hilbertian” EPO approach is very much present at the UPC. There is also a structural reason for that. All patents that the UPC currently deals with have been granted by the EPO. The UPC does not handle patents granted only by national offices. If the UPC wanted to deviate from EPO case law and be more generous, then many patents would never reach the UPC in the first place. The most generous approach you can have is the one used by the granting authority – the EPO. So if the UPC wants to be different, it can only be stricter, not more lenient. And there is little incentive to be systematically stricter, because that would reduce the number of patents that are attractive to enforce before the UPC. Patent owners might simply opt out. Rolf Claessen:We also talked about added matter and a recent case where the Court of Appeal was even stricter than the EPO. That probably gives US patent practitioners a massive headache. They already struggle with added-matter rules in Europe, and now the UPC might be even tougher. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, especially on added matter. I once spoke with a US practitioner who said, “We hope the UPC will move away from intermediate generalisations.” There is no chance of that. We already have cases where the Court of Appeal confirmed that intermediate generalisations are not allowed, in full alignment with the EPO. You mentioned a recent case where a patent was revoked for added matter, even though it had been granted by the EPO in exactly that form. This shows quite nicely what to expect. If you want to predict how the UPC will handle a revocation action, the best starting point is to ask: “What would the EPO do?” Of course, there will still be cases where the UPC finds an invention to be inventive while the EPO, in parallel opposition proceedings, does not – or vice versa. But those are differences in the appreciation of the facts and the prior art, which you will always have. The underlying legal approach is essentially the same. Rolf Claessen:So you do not see a real example yet where the UPC has taken a totally different route from the EPO on validity? Aloys Hüttermann:No, not really. If I had to estimate how the UPC will decide, I would always start from what I think the EPO would have done. Trends in UPC practice: PIs, equivalents, interim conferences Rolf Claessen:If you look across the different UPC divisions and cases: what trends do you see in practice? For example regarding timelines, preliminary injunctions, how validity attacks are handled, and how UPC cases interact with EPO oppositions or national proceedings? Aloys Hüttermann:If you take the most active divisions – essentially the big four in Germany and the local division in The Hague – they all try to be very careful and diligent in their decisions. But you can already see some differences in practice. For preliminary injunctions there is a clear distinction between the local division in Düsseldorf and most other divisions. Düsseldorf considers one month after knowledge of the infringement as still sufficiently urgent. If you wait longer, it is usually considered too late. In many other divisions, two months is still viewed as fine. Düsseldorf has also been the division that issued most of the ex parte preliminary injunctions so far. Apart from one special outlier where a standing judge from Brussels was temporarily sitting in Milan, Düsseldorf is basically the only one. Other divisions have been much more reluctant. At a conference, Judge Pichlmaier from the Munich division once said that he could hardly imagine a situation where his division would grant an ex parte PI. In his words, the UPC has two types of procedure: one that is fast – the normal main action – and one that is very fast – the inter partes PI procedure. But you do not really have an “ultra-fast” ex parte track, at least not in his division. Another difference relates to amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. In one recent case in Munich the court said more or less that if you have to amend your patent or rely on auxiliary requests in a PI, you lose. Other divisions have been more flexible and have allowed auxiliary requests. Equivalence is another area where we do not have a unified line yet. So far, only the Hague division has clearly found infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and explicitly used a test taken from Dutch law. Whether that test will be approved by the Court of Appeal is completely open – the first case settled, so the Court of Appeal never ruled on it, and a second one is still very recent. Interestingly, there was another Hague decision a few weeks ago where equivalence was on the table, but the division did not apply that Dutch-law test. We do not know yet why. The Mannheim division has written in one decision that it would be desirable to develop an autonomous pan-European test for equivalence, instead of just importing the German, UK or Dutch criteria. But they did not formulate such a test in that case because it was not necessary for the decision. So we will have to see how that evolves. On timelines, one practical difference is that Düsseldorf usually does not hold an interim conference. That saves them some time. Most other divisions do hold interim conferences. Personally, I like the idea because it can help clarify issues. But you cannot safely read the final outcome from these conferences. I have also seen cases where questions raised at the interim conference did not play any role in the main oral hearing. So they are useful for clarification, but not as a crystal ball. Front-loaded proceedings and typical strategic mistakes Rolf Claessen:If you look at the behaviour of parties so far – both patentees and defendants – what are the most common strategic mistakes you see in UPC litigation? And what would a well-prepared company do differently before the first statement of claim is ever filed? Aloys Hüttermann:You know you do not really want me to answer that question… Rolf Claessen:I do! Aloys Hüttermann:All right. The biggest mistake, of course, is that they do not hire me. That is the main problem. Seriously, it is difficult to judge parties' behaviour from the outside. You rarely know the full picture. There may be national proceedings, licensing discussions, settlement talks, and so on in the background. That can limit what a party can do at the UPC. So instead of criticising, I prefer to say what is a good idea at the UPC. The system is very front-loaded and very fast. If you are sued, you have three months to file your statement of defence and your counterclaim for revocation. In my view, three months are manageable – but only if you use the time wisely and do not waste it on things that are not essential. If you receive a statement of claim, you have to act immediately. You should have a clear strategy within maybe two or three weeks and then implement it. If you change your strategy every few weeks, chances are high that you will fail. Another point is that everything is front-loaded. It is very hard to introduce new documents or new attacks later. Some divisions have been a bit generous in individual cases, but the general line is strict. We have seen, for example, that even if you filed a book in first instance, you may not be allowed to rely on a different chapter from the same book for a new inventive-step attack at the appeal stage. That can be regarded as late-filed, because you could have done it earlier. There is also case law saying that if you first argue inventive step as “D1 plus D2”, and later want to argue “D2 plus D1”, that can already be considered a new, late attack. On the other hand, we had a revocation action where the plaintiff filed about 50 different inventive-step attacks in the initial brief. The division then said: this does not work. Please cut them down or put them in a clear hierarchy. In the end, not all of them were considered. The UPC does not conduct an ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case and to tell the parties to limit themselves in the interest of a fair and efficient procedure. Rolf Claessen:I have the feeling that the EPO is also becoming more front-loaded – if you want to rely on documents later, you should file them early. But it sounds like the UPC is even more extreme in that regard. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, that is true. Protective letters, inspections and the defendant's perspective Rolf Claessen:Suppose someone from a company is listening now and thinks: “We might be exposed at the UPC,” or, “We should maybe use the UPC offensively against competitors.” What would you consider sensible first steps before any concrete dispute arises? And looking three to five years ahead, how central do you expect the UPC to become in global patent litigation compared to the US and China? Aloys Hüttermann:Let me start with the second part. I expect the UPC to become significantly more important. If we have around 200 cases this year, that is a good start, but it is still very small compared to, say, 4,000 to 5,000 patent cases per year in the US and 40,000 or so in China. Even François Bürgin and Klaus Grabinski, in interviews, have said that they are happy with the case load, but the potential is much larger. In my view, it is almost inevitable that we will see four or five times as many UPC cases in the not-too-distant future. As numbers grow, the influence of the UPC will grow as well. Whether, in five or ten years, companies will treat the UPC as their first choice forum – or whether they will usually run it in parallel with US litigation in major disputes – remains to be seen. The UPC would be well equipped for that: the territory it covers is large, Europe is still an important economy, and the UPC procedure is very attractive from a company's perspective. On sensible first steps: if you are worried about being sued, a protective letter can make a lot of sense – especially in divisions like Düsseldorf, where ex parte PIs are possible in principle. A protective letter is not very expensive in terms of court fees. There is also an internal system that ensures the court reads it before deciding on urgent measures. Of course, the content must have a certain quality; a poor protective letter can even backfire. If you are planning to sue someone before the UPC, you should be extremely well prepared when you file. You should already have all important documents and evidence at hand. As we discussed, it is hard to introduce new material later. One tool that is becoming more and more popular is inspection – not just at trade fairs, where we already saw cases very early, but also at company premises. Our firm has already handled such an inspection case. That is something you should keep in mind on both sides: it is a powerful evidence-gathering tool, but also a serious risk if you are on the receiving end. From the defendant's perspective, I do not think the UPC is unfair. If you do your job properly and put a solid revocation counterclaim on the table, then the patentee has only two months to prepare a full reply and all auxiliary requests. And there is a twist that makes life even harder for the patentee than at the EPO. At the EPO the question is mainly: do my auxiliary requests overcome the objections and are they patentable? At the UPC there is an additional layer: do I still have infringement under the amended claims? You may save your patent with an auxiliary request that no longer reads on the defendant's product. That is great for validity, but you have just lost the infringement case. You have kept the patent but lost the battle. And all of this under very tight time limits. That creates considerable pressure on both sides. How to contact Prof. Hüttermann Rolf Claessen:Thank you very much for this really great interview, Aloys. Inside our firm you have a nickname: “the walking encyclopedia of the Unified Patent Court” – because you have written so many books about it and have dealt with the UPC for such a long time. What is the best way for listeners to get in touch with you? Aloys Hüttermann:The easiest way is by email. You can simply write to me, and that is usually the best way to contact me. As you may have noticed, I also like to speak. I am a frequent speaker at conferences. If you happen to be at one of the conferences where I am on the programme – for example, next week in Hamburg – feel free to come up to me and ask me anything in person. But email is probably the most reliable first step. Rolf Claessen:Perfect. Thank you very much, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you. It was a pleasure to be on IP Fridays again. Some of your long-time listeners may remember that a few years ago – when you were not yet part of our firm – we already did an episode on the UPC, back when everything was still very speculative. It is great to be back now that the system is actually in place and working. Rolf Claessen:I am very happy to have you back on the show.

Waldy and Bendy discuss the many record sales that have happened in the art world recently. Bendy has a chat with Elizabeth Goldring about her new Holbein book, while Waldy dives into the thrills of Bosch's Garden of Earthly Delights.   See the show notes here: https://zczfilms.com/podcasts/waldy-bendy/season-5-episode-11-auction-records-smashed-bosch-and-holbein/ Watch on YouTube here: https://youtu.be/eqBLVvW1tQM

Sinds november vorig jaar gaan in het land massaal mensen de straat op tegen de regeringspartij Georgische Droom, die steeds autoritairder optreedt en zich nadrukkelijk afzet tegen de Europese Unie. Dat staat haaks op de wens van een grote meerderheid van de bevolking, die juist een Europese toekomst voor zich ziet. Wat speelt er in dit land van heerlijke wijn en ruige bergen? Groene-journalist Irene van der Linde en fotograaf Nicole Segers reisden een maand lang door Georgië om met bewoners te spreken. Ze ontmoetten journalisten die hun baan verloren, jongeren die een eigen kunstcentrum oprichtten, en burgers voor wie demonstreren inmiddels onderdeel van het dagelijks leven is – vaak samen met de hele familie. In de podcast vertellen Van der Linde en Segers over hun bevindingen. Ze zagen de repressie en de angst, maar ook de vasthoudendheid en het optimisme dat blijft oplichten. Het opvallendste symbool van die hoop is de Europese Unie, voor veel Georgiërs een belofte van vrijheid en democratie. Productie: Kees van den Bosch en Eva Markx.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

* Bloqueos se mantienen en varios puntos del país* Fátima Bosch responde y muestra violencia digital* Rusia reanuda bombardeo en Ucrania mientras negocian plan de paz

Send us a text

En Saga Noticias con Kim Armengol te traemos lo más relevante del fin de semana: la gira de la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum en Oaxaca, la inauguración de la cuarta estación del Tren Interoceánico y programas educativos en comunidades alejadas; sentencias y detenciones de líderes delictivos en Guerrero, Baja California y Michoacán; bloqueos carreteros de agricultores y transportistas y su impacto en la población; incidentes de violencia en eventos deportivos y accidentes trágicos en Michoacán; polémica en torno a la victoria de Fátima Bosch en Miss Universo 2025; y noticias internacionales como la designación del Cártel de los Soles como grupo terrorista y la tensión en Venezuela y Perú. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Hoy en Me Lo Dijo Adela, martes 25 de noviembre, analizamos los avances en la investigación del asesinato del alcalde Carlos Manzo con Juan Manzo, subsecretario de Gobierno de Michoacán; hablamos sobre los mega bloqueos de transportistas y agricultores con David Estévez Gamboa y su posible trasfondo político; tenemos mesa de debate con Damián Zepeda, Arturo Ávila y Juan Zavala sobre seguridad, política y protestas; además, Juan Carlos Díaz Murrieta nos trae las últimas noticias deportivas y les contamos la polémica tras la victoria de Fátima Bosch en Miss Universo 2025. No se despeguen del programa y manténganse informados. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Hoy en Me Lo Dijo Adela arrancamos con una conversación clave con Raúl Rocha Cantú, presidente de Miss Universo, quien responde a las acusaciones que han ensombrecido el triunfo de Fátima Bosch; el empresario explica el alcance del contrato con Pemex, la polémica por la supuesta compra de la corona y las renuncias de jueces que denunciaron presiones y favorecimientos. Más adelante, hablamos con el doctor David Coronado, jefe del Laboratorio de Violencia e integrante del Comité Universitario de Análisis de Personas Desaparecidas de la Universidad de Guadalajara, sobre el hallazgo de tres fosas clandestinas alrededor del Estadio Akron, sede del próximo Mundial, de donde se han recuperado 427 bolsas con restos de al menos 91 víctimas, un retrato devastador de la violencia en Jalisco y de cómo las desapariciones continúan siendo una emergencia nacional. Conversamos con Osvaldo Anaya, editor en EMEEQUIS, sobre la versión que apunta a que un escolta habría ejecutado, con su propia arma, al presunto asesino de Carlos Manzo, un giro más en un caso que sigue mostrando fallas de seguridad, contradicciones y un manejo opaco de la información. Luego, enlazamos con Luis Alfaro, reportero vial, para entender el impacto del megabloqueo nacional que ha paralizado carreteras, aumentado la tensión social y provocado afectaciones en múltiples estados. En Montón Shot, Juan Carlos Díaz Murrieta nos pone al día con lo más relevante del deporte. Más tarde recibimos en el estudio a Denisse de Kalafe, quien presenta su concierto íntimo en el Lunario del Auditorio Nacional este 29 de noviembre, una mirada cercana a su trayectoria y su regreso a los escenarios. Cerramos con la sección Piel Sana, con el dermatólogo oncólogo Javi Derma, director médico y fundador de Dermedica, certificado por el Consejo Mexicano de Dermatología; hoy hablamos de salud dermatológica en genitales, un tema necesario, poco conversado y clave para el bienestar integral. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

¡¡Felicidades a Fátima Bosch, nuestra reina universal!! Pumas se vuelve a quedar en la orillita y conductor panameño agradece a la Guatemala de Tena por darles el pase al Mundial. Dua Lipa está próxima a tocar en México y le sugerimos cantar "Chilanga banda", a ver si se anima, jajaja. Una 'influencer' entrevista al 'Checo' Pérez, sin saber que era el 'Checo' Pérez, la deslumbró su belleza.