Podcasts about ipse dixit

Rasatura confortevole, regolazione perfetta, rifinitura precisa, tutte in un unico strumento.Philips OneBlade è ideale per la barba di ogni giorno: scoprilo qui

Have you ever heard someone say (or said yourself?) "Because I said so"? There's a fancy Latin term for it, and I'll tell you the different ways this fallacy shows up. When you can recognize the foolishness, you won't get fooled by it! Learn more about Crazy Thinkers: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/crazy Thank you to our sponsor, CTC Math! Website: https://www.ctcmath.com/?tr_id=brain Homeschool page: https://www.ctcmath.com/how-it-works/home-school?tr_id=brain Free trail: https://www.ctcmath.com/trial?tr_id=brain Special offer! Get 1/2-off discounts plus bonus 6-months free! https://www.ctcmath.com/purchase/homeschool50?tr_id=BRAIN Special thank you to our sponsors, Classical Conversations! Interested in homeschooling? For more than 25 years, Classical Conversations has equipped parents just like you with the support and tools to home educate. Start your journey today and find your local Classical Conversations community of homeschool families at www.classicalconversations.com/gibbens. Here's how you can purchase the Logical Fallacies ebook: https://www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/offers/z6xbAcB2 Want to test yourself on how well you can recognize fallacies in real life? Take the Meme Fallacy Quiz! www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/quiz. Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you! think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up on my email list at: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/contact

Brian Frye and I engage in academic navel gazing, discuss scholarly shit posting, and argue about the virtues of plagiarism. A fun time was had!My guest today is one of the most unusual and creative voices in the legal academy, Brian Frye, the Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky. He teaches classes in civil procedure, intellectual property, copyright, and nonprofit organizations, as well as a seminar on law and popular culture. Today we're engaging in academic navel gazing and opining on plagiarism, law review publishing, and plagiarism.Brian is also a filmmaker. He produced the documentary Our Nixon (2013), which was broadcast by CNN and opened theatrically nationwide. His short films and videos have shown in the 2002 Whitney Biennial, the New York Film Festival, and the San Francisco International Film Festival, among other venues, and are in the permanent collection of the Whitney Museum of American Art. His critical writing on film and art has appeared in October, The New Republic, Film Comment, Cineaste, Senses of Cinema, and Incite! among other journals.Additionally, Professor Frye also produces a podcast that I highly recommend, Ipse Dixit https://shows.pippa.io/ipse-dixit

We discuss a couple legal immunities, one listeners will be familiar with and one that's pretty unknown. The second is being addressed by our special guest, Aliza Shatzman. She is the co-founder of The Legal Accountability Project, a new nonprofit whose mission is to ensure that as many law clerks as possible have positive clerkship experiences while extending support and resources to those who do not. Aliza had a harrowing experience as a law clerk and found that the laws that apply to other government employees often don't extend to those in the judicial branch. She also presents a recent case from the Fourth Circuit about a judicial branch employee who brought a number of claims to try and get around sovereign immunity—and actually succeeded on a few of them. Then Kirby Thomas West of IJ discusses a Fifth Circuit case with terrible facts, but a good outcome on the qualified immunity front. Strickland v. U.S., https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/211346.P.pdf Sims v. Griffin, https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-40457-CV0.pdf Aliza on Ipse Dixit, https://shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit/episodes/aliza-shatzman-on-holding-judges-accountable Untouchable Judges? What I've Learned About Harassment in the Judiciary, and What We Can do to Stop It, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4096245 Aliza's Statement for the Record to Congress, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU03/20220317/114503/HHRG-117-JU03-20220317-SD005.pdf Aliza Shatzman and the Legal Accountability Project, https://www.legalaccountabilityproject.org/ Kirby Thomas West, https://ij.org/staff/kirby-thomas-west/ Anthony Sanders, https://ij.org/staff/asanders/

Brian Frye is the Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at UK Law School, with a focus on copyright and trademark law. Before getting into the legal field, Brian was a successful film artist in New York City. Once NFTs started gaining popularity, Brian dove into the space by issuing his own “conceptual art” NFTs and hosting conversations about NFTs on his legal scholarship podcast, Ipse Dixit. The intersection of Brian's unique perspectives and experiences made for an in-depth conversation on the key concepts of NFTs, how they're affecting copyright law, and what it means to own something on the internet. Learn more about Brian here. Visit us at MiddleTech.com Twitter Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Evan's Twitter Logan's Twitter Middle Tech is proud to be supported by: Our presenting sponsor, KY Innovation Bolt Marketing The Johnson Law Group Render Capital

Questa settimana c'è Lorenzo Campanella ai nostri microfoni, in compagnia di Alessandro e Federico per AF Chronicles. Se volete scoprire com'è nato il suo podcast 'Ipse Dixit' e perchè ha scelto di trattare temi e personaggi storici, siete nel posto giusto! Buon ascolto. 

We've got a cross-posted podcast for you this week! Recently, Mike appeared on the Ipse Dixit podcast with host Professor Brian L. Frye — the inspiration for our Plagiarism Collection of NFTs and, previously, our OK, Landlord gear — for a wide-ranging discussion about scarcity and abundance in the digital age. You can listen to the whole conversation on this week's episode. Ipse Dixit - https://shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit

Brian L. Frye is a law professor and filmmaker - and somewhere along the way, he decided to draw on the most interesting bits of both those endeavours and come up with an entirely different approach to his engagement with the law. He describes his work as "conceptual art in the medium of legal scholarship", wherein he challenges some of the most dearly-held commitments of the academy, including arguing that norms against plagiarism are illegitimate (indeed, he specifically encourages and authorizes people to plagiarize his work). Lately, he's taken to successfully selling his law review article art projects as NFTs. We talk about imagining Sergei Eisenstein, what he lifted from Isaiah Berlin, why law students say they don't like math but actually do, and what's been inspiring his most recent run of publications and interventions. You can follow Brian on Twitter @brianlfrye, check out some of his scholarship at SSRN, and listen to his podcast, Ipse Dixit, at https://shows.acast.com/ipse-dixit.

Caterina Soffici, su La Stampa, racconta del regime di Orbàn, che censura libri e vieta la proiezione di film in alcune ore del giorno: "Orbàn come la Santa Inquisizione mette all'indice le opere sgradite al suo regime e le vieta ai minori di diciotto anni. Nel tritacarne della censura del dittatore ungherese finiranno tutti i libri e i film che mettono in scena dinamiche di amore omosessuale: la televisione Rtl Klub Hungary ha già annunciato che opere come Harry Potter, Friends, Billy Elliot o Il diario di Bridget Jones passeranno solo in seconda serata [...]".Dal Corriere della Sera: "Le affermazioni scientifiche vanno valutate sulla base del contenuto e dei risultati empirici, non da chi le pronuncia. In più, nella moderna comunicazione, nessuno verifica che l'attribuzione sia vera" questo il messaggio contenuto nel corsivo di Massimiano Bucchi.

In a special partnership with The University of Chicago Law Review Online and the Academy for Justice, Ipse Dixit brings you a three part series on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice. This symposium of essays, hosted by The University of Chicago Law Review Online, was organized by the Academy for Justice. The contributors include leaders of criminal justice and health law centers, and scholars of criminal legal systems, whose works discuss the intersection of Criminal Justice and the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributors include Valena E. Beety (ASU), Brandon L. Garrett with Deniz Ariturk and William E. Crozier (Duke), Sharon Dolovich (UCLA), Maybell Romero (Northern Illinois), Pamela R. Metzger with Gregory J. Guggenmos (SMU Deason Center), Barry Friedman (NYU) with Robin Tholin, and Jennifer Oliva (Seton Hall).In November, the participants joined each other online to discuss their pieces with Ipse Dixit host Maybell Romero, associate professor at Northern Illinois University College of Law. In this Episode 3 of the resulting three part series, Romero speaks with Deniz Ariturk and William Crozier about their piece coauthored with Brandon Garrett, Virtual Criminal Courts, and Pam Metzger and Greg Guggenmos about their piece, COVID-19 and the Ruralization of U.S. Criminal Court Systems. Ariturk is a researcher at the Duke Law Center for Science and Justice and the Duke Moral Attitudes and Decision Making Lab, and Crozier the Research Director at Duke’s Center for Science and Justice. Metzger is the inaugural Director of the Deason Criminal Justice Reform Center at SMU Dedman School of Law, and Guggenmos is as consulting statistician at Deason.Crozier is on Twitter at @WilliamCrozierIV, Metzger at Friedman at @ProfPamMetzger, and Romero at @MaybellRomero. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

0:00:00 Introduction Richard Saunders 0:04:07 Susan Gerbic We find out what GSoW are doing to support those fighting COVID-19. Also the latest ravings from two time Bent Spoon winner, Pete Evans. https://abouttimeproject.wordpress.com 0:17:00 A Dive into a Trove A wander through the decades of digitised Australian newspapers on a search for references to Uri Geller in the 1970s. http://www.trove.nla.gov.au 0:38:55 Logical Fallacies. With Michelle Bijkersma This week Michelle looks at "Ipse Dixit". Also known as "It Simply Is", this is when an opinion is given as if it were an undisputed fact, without any need for supporting evidence. A Logical Fallacy is an error we can make in reasoning, but it usually crops up when we are discussing or arguing our point of view. 0:45:17 Australian Skeptics Newsletter What is making news in the skeptical world? Find out with the newsletter compiled by Tim Mendham. http://www.skeptics.com.au Also Corona Conspiracy - Upload Images https://coronaconspiracy.cloud

In a special partnership with The University of Chicago Law Review Online and the Academy for Justice, Ipse Dixit brings you a three part series on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice. This symposium of essays, hosted by The University of Chicago Law Review Online, was organized by the Academy for Justice. The contributors include leaders of criminal justice and health law centers, and scholars of criminal legal systems, whose works discuss the intersection of Criminal Justice and the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributors include Valena E. Beety (ASU), Brandon L. Garrett with Deniz Ariturk and William E. Crozier (Duke), Sharon Dolovich (UCLA), Maybell Romero (Northern Illinois), Pamela R. Metzger with Gregory J. Guggenmos (SMU Deason Center), Barry Friedman (NYU) with Robin Tholin, and Jennifer Oliva (Seton Hall).In November, the participants joined each other online to discuss their pieces with Ipse Dixit host Maybell Romero, associate professor at Northern Illinois University College of Law. In this Episode 2 of the resulting three part series, Romero speaks with Jennifer Oliva about her piece, Policing Opioid Use Disorder in a Pandemic, and Barry Friedman about his piece, Policing the Pandemic. Oliva is an Associate Professor at Seton Hall Law where she specializes in health law and policy, FDA law, drug policy, evidence, and complex litigation. Friedman is a Professor of Law at NYU, and is the founding director of NYU’s The Policing Project, which works with all stakeholders to ensure that policing is transparent, equitable, and democratically accountable.Oliva is on Twitter at @jenndoliva, Friedman at @barryfriedman1, and Romero at @MaybellRomero. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In a special partnership with The University of Chicago Law Review Online and the Academy for Justice, Ipse Dixit brings you a three part series on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice. This symposium of essays, hosted by The University of Chicago Law Review Online, was organized by the Academy for Justice. The contributors include leaders of criminal justice and health law centers, and scholars of criminal legal systems, whose works discuss the intersection of Criminal Justice and the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributors include Valena E. Beety (ASU), Brandon L. Garrett with Deniz Ariturk and William E. Crozier (Duke), Sharon Dolovich (UCLA), Maybell Romero (Northern Illinois), Pamela R. Metzger with Gregory J. Guggenmos (SMU Deason Center), Barry Friedman (NYU) with Robin Tholin, and Jennifer Oliva (Seton Hall).In November, the participants joined each other online to discuss their pieces with Ipse Dixit host Maybell Romero, associate professor at Northern Illinois University College of Law. In this Episode 1 of the resulting three part series, Romero speaks with Sharon Dolovich about her piece, Mass Incarceration, Meet COVID-19, and Valena Beety about her piece, Pre-Trial Dismissal in the Interest of Justice: A Response to COVID-19 and Protest Arrests. Dolovich is Professor of Law at UCLA, and the founding director of the UCLA Prison Law and Policy Program, which is just entering its 7th year. She also spearheads the UCLA Law COVID-19 Behind Bars Data Project. Professor Beety is professor of law at Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and the deputy director of the Academy for Justice, a criminal justice center connecting research with policy reform.Dolovich is on Twitter at @SharonDolovich, Beety at @valenabeety, and Romero at @MaybellRomero. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Jesus is the only man who has ever had authority to proclaim a teaching simply because He said it was so.

In this special series hosted by Jennifer Sturiale, a group of legal scholars discuss a question over drinks. This episode features Mark Lemley, William H. Neukom Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, Gus Hurwitz, Associate Professor of Law at the Nebraska College of Law, and Jacob Victor, Acting Assisting Professor of Lawyering at New York University School of Law discussing the following question:Many IP scholars assume that "more is more." They assume that copyright law can constrain speech, so copyright law should also be constrained. And they argue that patent law can constrain innovation, so patent law should also be constrained. But is it always true that more speech and more innovation are better? Is it possible that "less is more" or "less is better"?This episode is "patient zero" for the new series. Let us know what you think! Email brianlfrye@gmail.com or tweet @brianlfrye. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this episode of Ipse Dixit, Kaci Bishop, Clinical Associate Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina School of Law, discusses her article, "Framing Failure in the Legal Classroom: Techniques for Encouraging Growth and Resilience," which is published in the Arkansas Law Review. Bishop explores the concept of “failure” and how it can be used in the legal classroom to foster a growth mindset in students and aid in learning to create a more resilient and practice ready lawyer. Bishop is on Twitter at @Kaci_Bishop.This episode was hosted by SJ Morrison, a student at Duquesne University School of Law. Morrison is on Twitter at @SJMilliron. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Professor Brian Frye, of the University of Kentucky College of Law, joins A. J. and Professor Alexandra Roberts to discuss “Plagiarize This Paper,” which will be in the upcoming edition of IDEA: The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for IP, and his podcast Ipse Dixit. Produced and Hosted by A. J. Kierstead UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law is now accepting applications, apply today at https://law.unh.edu 

This is a cross-posted episode of the excellent UNH Law Podcast. In this episode, Alexandra J. Roberts, Associate Professor of Law at the University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law, and A.J. Kierstead, the host of the UNH Law Podcast, interview Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law, about his scholarship on plagiarism. Among other things, they discuss his new article, "Plagiarize This Paper," which will be published in IDEA®: The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property. They also discuss the Ipse Dixit podcast, it origins, and Frye's approach to interviewing. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On March 2, 1974, a group of antitrust scholars met at the Airlie House in Warrenton, Virginia, and changed the consensus position on United States antitrust policy. "The Day Antitrust Died?" is a special feature of the Ipse Dixit podcast, hosted by Ramsi Woodcock and Brian L. Frye, examining that historical moment. In this episode, we interview Daniel Crane, Frederick Paul Furth Sr. Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. Crane reflects on the impact of the Airlie House conference and how it affects current discussions of antitrust policy. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In this episode, Brian L. Frye, Spears Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky explains the Fair Use Doctrine. Prof. Frye explains the history of both copyright law and the fair use doctrine and then provides a detailed discussion of how students might evaluate a fair use question on an exam. About our guest…Brian L. Frye joined the faculty of the College of Law in 2012. He teaches classes in civil procedure, intellectual property, copyright, and nonprofit organizations, as well as a seminar on law and popular culture. Previously, he was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Law at Hofstra University School of Law, and a litigation associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. He clerked for Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Justice Richard B. Sanders of the Washington Supreme Court. He received a J.D. from the New York University School of Law in 2005, an M.F.A. from the San Francisco Art Institute in 1997, and a B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1995. His research focuses on intellectual property and charity law, especially in relation to artists and arts organizations.Professor Frye is also a filmmaker. He produced the documentary Our Nixon (2013), which was broadcast by CNN and opened theatrically nationwide. His short films and videos have shown in the 2002 Whitney Biennial, the New York Film Festival, and the San Francisco International Film Festival, among other venues, and are in the permanent collection of the Whitney Museum of American Art. His critical writing on film and art has appeared in October, The New Republic, Film Comment, Cineaste, Senses of Cinema, and Incite! among other journals.Additionally, Professor Frye also produces a podcast, Ipse Dixit https://shows.pippa.io/ipse-dixitWant to learn more about Professor Frye? Visit the links below: http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye@BrianlFryehttps://shows.pippa.io/ipse-dixitAs always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know! You can email us at leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet to @lawtofact. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and Instagram (@lawtofact) and to like us on FaceBook! And finally, your ratings and reviews matter! Please leave us a review on iTunes.Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact? Join our mailing list by visiting us at www.lawtofact.com.

Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law and Friend of the Show, is here to talk about what it means to be a teacher under plagiarism norms. In "Plagiarism is Not a Crime", he tackles the differences between the often-conflated copyright infringement and plagiarism and concludes plagiarism prohibition is not justified on its supporters' own terms. Here, we stretch the paper's ideas to divine what policy goals could possibly justify the cruel, career-ending repercussions of doing something that is not illegal; that is, a practice in service of extra-legal norms.*Ipse Dixit* is your perpetual podcast on legal scholarship produced by Mike Overby, software engineer extraordinaire, podcaster, and Twitter-approved legal thinker. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On March 2, 1974, a group of prominent antitrust scholars convened a conference at the Airlie House in Warrenton, Virginia to discuss the future of antitrust theory and policy. At the time, the prevailing position on antitrust policy favored deconcentration of industry and relatively aggressive antitrust enforcement. But "Chicago-school" economists and lawyers challenged that consensus position, arguing that the goal of antitrust policy should be efficiency and the promotion of consumer welfare. Ultimately, the challengers prevailed, and antitrust enforcement precipitously declined.This special feature of the Ipse Dixit podcast, hosted by Ramsi Woodcock and Brian L. Frye, investigates whether the Airlie House Conference was "the day that antitrust died." In order to answer that question, we will interview scholars who attended the conference, as well as scholars who have studied its aftermath and effects on antitrust theory and policy. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On March 2, 1974, a group of antitrust scholars met at the Airlie House in Warrenton, Virginia, and changed the consensus position on antitrust policy in the United States. "The Day Antitrust Died?" is a special feature of the Ipse Dixit podcast, examining that historical moment. In this episode, we interview Frederic M. Scherer, Professor of Public Policy and Corporate Management in the Aetna Chair, Emeritus at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. In 1974, Scherer had just left the International Institute of Management, Science Center Berlin and was about to become the director of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Economics. He describes his experiences at the Airlie House Conference, how it affected his antitrust scholarship, and its broader effect on antitrust policy.Keywords: Business and Government Policy, Law and Legal Institutions, Science¸ Technology and Public Policy See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This "from the archives" episode of Ipse Dixit features two versions of the song, "Snoops, the Lawyer," which was published in 1919. The music was composed by Harry Ruby and the lyrics were written by Bert Kalmar. The first version of the song was performed by Nora Hayes and released by Columbia in 1919 (A2852). The second version was performed by Beatrice Lillie, with Sam Walsh on piano, and released by Gramophone Shop Varieties in 1934. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Homicide Squad is a special segment of Ipse Dixit devoted to murder ballads, those delightfully grisly folk songs that tell stories about the ultimate sin. Most murder ballads are based on true stories, more or less. And many of those true stories took place in Appalachia.Each episode of the Homicide Squad will focus on a different murder ballad. I will explain the true story behind the song, when it has survived. And I will explore how the song has evolved over time, sharing several different versions to illustrate different interpretations.The subject of this first episode is one of my very favorite murder ballads, The Banks of the Ohio.Tracks:Red Patterson's Piedmont Log Rollers, Down on the Banks of the Ohio (1927).Bascom Lamar Lunsford, Banks of the Ohio (1953).Blue Sky Boys, Down on the Banks of the Ohio (1936).Irene and Ellen Kossoy, The Banks of the Ohio (1956).Joan Baez, Banks of the Ohio (1961).Clarence Ashley (with Fred Price on fiddle, Clint Howard, and Doc Watson), Banks of the Ohio (1961).Kristen Hersh, Banks of the Ohio (1998).Dolly Parton, Banks of the Ohio (2014).Vandaveer, Banks of the Ohio (2013). See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Here's your Thanksgiving Holiday episode, perfect for travel and your other holiday needs. If you listen only for law-related content, you'll probably want to skip to 01:17:16, where we somewhat casually discuss the controversy over whether the supposed Acting Attorney General was properly appointed. But we discuss many mailbag-related topics: the California fires and climate change (00:25), politeness and over-decorousness (8:53), how we imagine the mailbag and the miracles of pre-computer-age physical organization (11:06), how to find a good coffeeshop and the origins of "heyday" (22:15), our supposed bad taste in movies and our regard for certain consumer electronics (38:47), caselaw access and textbooks (55:44), seekers (59:44), markdown and word processing and the inevitable demise of Oral Argument (01:03:19), a discussion of the pretending Acting Attorney General and meltdowns and trainwrecks (01:17:16), podcast recommendations (01:33:30). Mary Beard's Ultimate Rome (https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0797yqk) About Michael Mann (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mann) About The Story of Star Wars LP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Story_of_Star_Wars) Travis Bostick, Jóhann Jóhannsson, Mother!, and Sound Over Score (http://blogs.iac.gatech.edu/film2018/2018/02/12/johann-johannsson-mother-and-sound-over-score/) Caselaw Access Project (https://case.law); H2O (https://h2o.law.harvard.edu) About Markdown (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown) Oral Argument 11: Big Red Diesel (https://oralargument.org/11), on Markdown and word processors Ulysses (https://ulysses.app) and Byword (https://bywordapp.com) Bat Kid is cancer free (https://twitter.com/CBSEveningNews/status/1062860135662530560) Jed Shugerman, Whitaker’s Appointment as Acting Attorney General Is Statutorily Illegal (https://shugerblog.com/2018/11/09/whitakers-appointment-as-acting-attorney-general-is-statutorily-illegal/); Stephen Vladeck, Whitaker May Be a Bad Choice, but He’s a Legal One (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/09/opinion/trump-attorney-general-constitutional.html); Walter Dellinger and Marty Lederman, Initial Reactions to OLC’s Opinion on the Whitaker Designation as “Acting” Attorney General (https://www.justsecurity.org/61483/initial-reactions-olc-opinion-whitaker-designation-acting-attorney-general/) Podcasts: Bag Man (https://www.msnbc.com/bagman), Slow Burn (https://slate.com/slow-burn), Serial (https://serialpodcast.org) (and Oral Argument 44: Serial (https://oralargument.org/44)), Feeding Us (http://feedingus.libsyn.com), Ipse Dixit (https://shows.pippa.io/ipse-dixit)

In this 77th episode of Philosophy Bakes Bread Eric Thomas Weber and Anthony Cashio interview law professor Brian Frye on "Justifications for Intellectual Property and Copyright Law."  Brian is the host of The Bindle on WRFL 88.1 FM and is the Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky's College of Law. He earned his bachelor’s degree at Berkeley and then went on to earn his MFA at the San Francisco Art Institute. After that, he earned his JD at NYU’s School of Law. He has also recently launched a law podcast called Ipse Dixit. Subscribe to it too! Listen for our “You Tell Me!” questions and for some jokes in one of our concluding segments, called “Philosophunnies.” Reach out to us on Facebook @PhilosophyBakesBread and on Twitter @PhilosophyBB; email us at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com; or call and record a voicemail that we play on the show, at 859.257.1849. Philosophy Bakes Bread is a production of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA). Check us out online at PhilosophyBakesBread.com and check out SOPHIA at PhilosophersInAmerica.com.