Podcast appearances and mentions of brian frye

The SEC's latest enforcement action is targeting NFTs, and OpenSea is in the crosshairs. In this episode, crypto lawyer Preston Byrne joins to unpack the implications of the SEC's Wells Notice to OpenSea and what it might mean for the platform and the broader NFT market. Could Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provide a unique defense for OpenSea? Preston also dives into other recent SEC moves, including cases against Stoner Cats, Impact Theory, and more.  Lastly, with the 2024 elections looming and political divides sharpening, is the SEC overreaching in its approach to crypto? Show highlights: Why Preston believes that the SEC will go after OpenSea for being an unregistered securities exchange What the Stoner Cats case was about and why it was not a strong enforcement action, according to Preston Why OpenSea's defense against the SEC may hinge on Section 230 protections for user-generated content, setting it apart from traditional exchanges like Coinbase or Binance How the clear-cut promises made by Impact Theory about potential returns made their NFTs resemble securities, unlike the typical art-focused NFTs on OpenSea Why Nate Chastain's NFT insider trading case is unlikely to impact the SEC's potential lawsuit against OpenSea Whether the $4 million settlement by Dapper Labs over NBA Top Shot NFTs likely represents little relevance to OpenSea's SEC issues What a Wells notice signals about the SEC's likelihood of suing OpenSea and why they might feel confident about winning this case How Jonathan Mann and Brian Frye's lawsuit for clarity on NFTs as securities highlights the SEC's potentially overreaching stance in its possible case against OpenSea How Trump's careful language around his NFT collection likely minimizes SEC risk by avoiding investment promises and focusing on their use as digital collectibles Whether the SEC's actions could reinforce the divide among crypto voters, with Trump promising a crypto-friendly stance and Harris likely continuing a more adversarial approach Visit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.com Thank you to our sponsors! iTrustCapital Polkadot Token 2049 Mantle's FBTC Gemini Guest Preston Byrne, Managing Partner at Byrne & Storm Links Wells notice Original announcement by X by OpenSea's CEO Devin Finzer Unchained: OpenSea's Wells Notice From the SEC Could Prove ‘Disastrous' Recent cases Unchained: Are NFTs Securities Offerings? Two Artists Sue the SEC to Find Out The Defiant: NFTs Are Securities? All Eyes Turn to Top Shot Case Reuters:  US regulator fines Stoner Cats creator for offering NFTs Ex-OpenSea manager sentenced to 3 months in prison for NFT insider trading Hester Peirce's dissent on the Stoner Cats case Others Paper: The Economic Reality of NFT Securities. Mondaq: Defining NFTs: Property, Securities, Or Commodities? National Post: Trump's newest NFTs show him as superhero, boxer and motorcyclist Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction 02:11 - SEC targets OpenSea: Unregistered exchange? 03:58 - Stoner Cats case: Weak for SEC? 07:42 - OpenSea's defense: Section 230 protections 13:15 - Impact Theory's promises vs. OpenSea's NFTs 15:34 - Nate Chastain's case 17:15 - Dapper Labs settlement: Relevance to OpenSea 18:56 - Wells notice: SEC's confidence to sue 19:48 - Mann & Frye's lawsuit: SEC overreach? 22:39 - Trump's NFT strategy: Minimizing SEC risk 24:53 - What this Wells notice says about the presidential election 58:25 - News Recap Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

NFT marketplace OpenSea received a Wells notice from the SEC. Crypto lawyer Preston Byrne explains whether Gensler's agency has a chance to win a potential case.The SEC's latest enforcement action is targeting NFTs, and OpenSea is in the crosshairs. In this episode, crypto lawyer Preston Byrne joins to unpack the implications of the SEC's Wells notice to OpenSea and what it might mean for the platform and the broader NFT market. Could Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provide a unique defense for OpenSea? Preston also dives into other recent SEC moves, including cases against Stoner Cats, Impact Theory, and more. Lastly, with the 2024 elections looming and political divides sharpening, is the SEC overreaching in its approach to crypto?Show highlights:Why Preston believes that the SEC will go after OpenSea for being an unregistered securities exchangeWhat the Stoner Cats case was about and why it was not a strong enforcement action, according to PrestonWhy OpenSea's defense against the SEC may hinge on Section 230 protections for user-generated content, setting it apart from traditional exchanges like Coinbase or BinanceHow the clear-cut promises made by Impact Theory about potential returns made their NFTs resemble securities, unlike the typical art-focused NFTs on OpenSeaWhy Nate Chastain's NFT insider trading case is unlikely to impact the SEC's potential lawsuit against OpenSeaWhether the $4 million settlement by Dapper Labs over NBA Top Shot NFTs likely represents little relevance to OpenSea's SEC issuesWhat a Wells notice signals about the SEC's likelihood of suing OpenSea and why they might feel confident about winning this caseHow Jonathan Mann and Brian Frye's lawsuit for clarity on NFTs as securities highlights the SEC's potentially overreaching stance in its possible case against OpenSeaHow Trump's careful language around his NFT collection likely minimizes SEC risk by avoiding investment promises and focusing on their use as digital collectiblesWhether the SEC's actions could reinforce the divide among crypto voters, with Trump promising a crypto-friendly stance and Harris likely continuing a more adversarial approachVisit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.comThank you to our sponsors!iTrustCapitalPolkadotToken 2049Mantle's FBTCGeminiGuestPreston Byrne, Managing Partner at Byrne & StormUnchained Podcast is Produced by Laura Shin Media, LLC. Distributed by CoinDesk.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The SEC's latest enforcement action is targeting NFTs, and OpenSea is in the crosshairs. In this episode, crypto lawyer Preston Byrne joins to unpack the implications of the SEC's Wells Notice to OpenSea and what it might mean for the platform and the broader NFT market. Could Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provide a unique defense for OpenSea? Preston also dives into other recent SEC moves, including cases against Stoner Cats, Impact Theory, and more.  Lastly, with the 2024 elections looming and political divides sharpening, is the SEC overreaching in its approach to crypto? Show highlights: Why Preston believes that the SEC will go after OpenSea for being an unregistered securities exchange What the Stoner Cats case was about and why it was not a strong enforcement action, according to Preston Why OpenSea's defense against the SEC may hinge on Section 230 protections for user-generated content, setting it apart from traditional exchanges like Coinbase or Binance How the clear-cut promises made by Impact Theory about potential returns made their NFTs resemble securities, unlike the typical art-focused NFTs on OpenSea Why Nate Chastain's NFT insider trading case is unlikely to impact the SEC's potential lawsuit against OpenSea Whether the $4 million settlement by Dapper Labs over NBA Top Shot NFTs likely represents little relevance to OpenSea's SEC issues What a Wells notice signals about the SEC's likelihood of suing OpenSea and why they might feel confident about winning this case How Jonathan Mann and Brian Frye's lawsuit for clarity on NFTs as securities highlights the SEC's potentially overreaching stance in its possible case against OpenSea How Trump's careful language around his NFT collection likely minimizes SEC risk by avoiding investment promises and focusing on their use as digital collectibles Whether the SEC's actions could reinforce the divide among crypto voters, with Trump promising a crypto-friendly stance and Harris likely continuing a more adversarial approach Visit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.com Thank you to our sponsors! iTrustCapital Polkadot Token 2049 Mantle's FBTC Gemini Guest Preston Byrne, Managing Partner at Byrne & Storm Links Wells notice Original announcement by X by OpenSea's CEO Devin Finzer Unchained: OpenSea's Wells Notice From the SEC Could Prove ‘Disastrous' Recent cases Unchained: Are NFTs Securities Offerings? Two Artists Sue the SEC to Find Out The Defiant: NFTs Are Securities? All Eyes Turn to Top Shot Case Reuters:  US regulator fines Stoner Cats creator for offering NFTs Ex-OpenSea manager sentenced to 3 months in prison for NFT insider trading Hester Peirce's dissent on the Stoner Cats case Others Paper: The Economic Reality of NFT Securities. Mondaq: Defining NFTs: Property, Securities, Or Commodities? National Post: Trump's newest NFTs show him as superhero, boxer and motorcyclist Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction 02:11 - SEC targets OpenSea: Unregistered exchange? 03:58 - Stoner Cats case: Weak for SEC? 07:42 - OpenSea's defense: Section 230 protections 13:15 - Impact Theory's promises vs. OpenSea's NFTs 15:34 - Nate Chastain's case 17:15 - Dapper Labs settlement: Relevance to OpenSea 18:56 - Wells notice: SEC's confidence to sue 19:48 - Mann & Frye's lawsuit: SEC overreach? 22:39 - Trump's NFT strategy: Minimizing SEC risk 24:53 - What this Wells notice says about the presidential election 58:25 - News Recap Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Is AI a miracle? A threat? Will it free us? Enslave us? Both? Neither? What's the future of AI and governance? AI and art? AI and elections? AI and social media? AI and the economy? AI and the world?Welcome to the Tech Policy Podcast: AI and Everything. On this special episode, we present highlights from more than a year of conversations with leading experts on the state of the AI revolution.Featuring Adam Thierer, Samuel Hammond, Liza Lin, Arnold Kling, Brian Frye, Joseph Tainter, James Pethokoukis, Robert Atkinson, Alice Marwick, and Ari Cohn.Links:Tech Policy Podcast 327: The Collapse of Complex SocietiesTech Policy Podcast 337: China and Domestic SurveillanceTech Policy Podcast 346: Who's Afraid of Artificial Intelligence?Tech Policy Podcast 355: Conservative FuturismTech Policy Podcast 361: AI, Art, Copyright, and the Life of BrianTech Policy Podcast 363: AI and ElectionsTech Policy Podcast 369: AI and State CapacityTech Policy Podcast 375: Tech Facts and FallaciesTech Policy Podcast 377: AI and Wicked Problems

Description:In this special episode of Beyond the Code, host Yitzy welcomes back previous guests Brian L. Frye and Jason Gottlieb, along with new guest Jonathan Mann, to discuss their recent lawsuit against the SEC. Jonathan and Brian, both prominent artists in the NFT space, have teamed up with superstar securities lawyer, Morrison & Cohen's Jason Gottlieb, to challenge the SEC's actions against NFT projects like Stoner Cats and Impact Theory. This episode delves into the legal and artistic implications of the SEC's enforcement actions, exploring what this means for the future of digital art and blockchain technology. Subscribe & Follow: Subscribe to Beyond the Code on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Follow us on Twitter, YouTube and LinkedIn for updates and more.

Nog altijd zorgen de Ether ETF's nog altijd voor extra aanbod op de markt, in plaats van vraag. Dat heeft natuurlijk alles te maken met het fonds van Grayscale, dat leegloopt. Bij ETHE vertrok inmiddels zo'n twee miljard aan kapitaal. Dat is 20% van het totale vermogen. De andere ETF's, waaronder die van BlackRock en Fidelity, doen het redelijk. De koers van ETH staat inmiddels op 3150 dollar, maar dat heeft meer te maken met de onrust op (risicovolle) financiële markten.  Ondertussen slepen twee artiesten, Jonathan Mann en Brian Frye, de SEC voor de rechter. Zij brengen hun kunst als NFT's uit en zijn bang dat die als 'security' (effect) worden geklassificeerd. Dat gebeurde eerder bij de collectie Stoner Cats, van Mila Kunis en Ashton Kutcher. Volgens het tweetal is de NFT-kunst helemaal geen effect en niets anders dan het verkopen van muziek op plaat, CD of via een streamingdienst. Het is slechts een manier om de broek op te houden als artiest, zonder dat de koper van de NFT een redelijke verwachting heeft van winst.  En diezelfde SEC lijkt zich nu niet te willen buigen over welke crypto nu wel of geen security is. Het gaan onder andere om Binance Coin, Solana, Cardano en Polygon. Op dit moment heeft de SEC naar eigen zeggen geen oordeel nodig van de rechter, in een rechtszaak tegen Binance.  Deze week in de Cryptocast We praten na over de bitcoinconferentie in Nashville afgelopen weekend, waar twee presidentskandidaten en een senator hun plannen met bitcoin presenteerden. Met Bart Mol van kennisplatform Bitcoin Alpha vragen we ons af of de Verenigde Staten zomaar van geconfiskeerde bitcoins een nationale reserve kunnen maken en wat er gebeurt als het land gaat proberen een miljoen bitcoins aan te schaffen op de vrije markt. En we stellen vast dat als de stemmen staken in de Senaat over een bitcoinwet – wat heel goed kan – dat dan de voorzitter de doorslag geeft, dat is de vice-president. En op dit moment is dat nog altijd die presidentskandidaat die er niet was, in Nashville Netto aanbod bij Eth-ETF's Artiesten slepen SEC voor de rechter Vrouwen doen het beter dan mannen in cryptowereld Solana, Cardano en Polygon voorlopig veilig Met Herbert Blankesteijn bespreken we elke week de toestand van de crypto. Luister live donderdagochtend rond 8:50 in De Ochtendspits, of wanneer je wilt via bnr.nl/podcast/cryptocast    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nog altijd zorgen de Ether ETF's nog altijd voor extra aanbod op de markt, in plaats van vraag. Dat heeft natuurlijk alles te maken met het fonds van Grayscale, dat leegloopt. Bij ETHE vertrok inmiddels zo'n twee miljard aan kapitaal. Dat is 20% van het totale vermogen. De andere ETF's, waaronder die van BlackRock en Fidelity, doen het redelijk. De koers van ETH staat inmiddels op 3150 dollar, maar dat heeft meer te maken met de onrust op (risicovolle) financiële markten.  Ondertussen slepen twee artiesten, Jonathan Mann en Brian Frye, de SEC voor de rechter. Zij brengen hun kunst als NFT's uit en zijn bang dat die als 'security' (effect) worden geklassificeerd. Dat gebeurde eerder bij de collectie Stoner Cats, van Mila Kunis en Ashton Kutcher. Volgens het tweetal is de NFT-kunst helemaal geen effect en niets anders dan het verkopen van muziek op plaat, CD of via een streamingdienst. Het is slechts een manier om de broek op te houden als artiest, zonder dat de koper van de NFT een redelijke verwachting heeft van winst.  En diezelfde SEC lijkt zich nu niet te willen buigen over welke crypto nu wel of geen security is. Het gaan onder andere om Binance Coin, Solana, Cardano en Polygon. Op dit moment heeft de SEC naar eigen zeggen geen oordeel nodig van de rechter, in een rechtszaak tegen Binance.  Deze week in de Cryptocast We praten na over de bitcoinconferentie in Nashville afgelopen weekend, waar twee presidentskandidaten en een senator hun plannen met bitcoin presenteerden. Met Bart Mol van kennisplatform Bitcoin Alpha vragen we ons af of de Verenigde Staten zomaar van geconfiskeerde bitcoins een nationale reserve kunnen maken en wat er gebeurt als het land gaat proberen een miljoen bitcoins aan te schaffen op de vrije markt. En we stellen vast dat als de stemmen staken in de Senaat over een bitcoinwet – wat heel goed kan – dat dan de voorzitter de doorslag geeft, dat is de vice-president. En op dit moment is dat nog altijd die presidentskandidaat die er niet was, in Nashville Netto aanbod bij Eth-ETF's Artiesten slepen SEC voor de rechter Vrouwen doen het beter dan mannen in cryptowereld Solana, Cardano en Polygon voorlopig veilig Met Herbert Blankesteijn bespreken we elke week de toestand van de crypto. Luister live donderdagochtend rond 8:50 in De Ochtendspits, of wanneer je wilt via bnr.nl/podcast/cryptocast    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jonathan Mann has been writing a song a day for 16 years and 211 days. Today, he and Brian Frye are suing the SEC. In today's episode, Jonathan, better known as ‘Song a Day Man' is joined by Brian Frye, a law professor at the University of Kentucky and NFT/security law expert.  Hear why Jonathan and Brian are suing the SEC, why this lawsuit is so important to the crypto industry as a whole, and what winning would mean for the future of our space.    ------

Is Plagiarism love by another name? Professors Chris Sprigman and Brian Frye stop by Supreme Myths to discuss everything you wanted to know about plagiarism but were afraid to ask!

In this episode the Savings Captain meets with Brian Frye. Brian is an expert on two important commodities that impact all areas our life. Oil and Agriculture. Brian uses his multi-generational experience working on his Iowa family farm, and 15 years in the oil patch to dispel myths and offer insight.Follow BrianTwitter (X): @bfrye21Contact The Savings CaptainTwitter           @SavingsCaptainInstagram     @thesavingscaptainEmail                thesavingscaptain@gmail.comWebsite.        thesavingscaptain.comTalking Trading - Expert trading and investing tactics so you can excel in the markets.Your key to getting the results you deserve.Listen on: Apple Podcasts

Hour 2 - Guests this hour include Brian Frye who is running for the mayor's office, and Harlan Bascombe running for school board 

On this week's episode, Send Network's Brian Frye and Mike McDaniel share the recently announced Church Mobilization Pathway with SendNC's Mike Pittman. They discuss what it looks like for all churches to become involved in church planting and sending.  Listen to how this new five-step tool will assist churches in visualizing how they can become involved. 

In the new episode of Chat NDT with ASNT, host Debbie Segor, CAE, spoke with Gary Zimak, Director of Quality Supply at Newport News Shipbuilding, and Brian Frye, ISQ Program Manager at ASNT, about the new Naval Shipbuilders NDT Level III Specific Exams for NDT Level III examiners. 

Brian L. Frye is a law professor at the University of Kentucky. His research focuses on intellectual property and charity law, especially in relation to artists and arts organizations. Professor Frye is also an artist and filmmaker and just a really interesting dude. Among other works, he produced the documentary 'Our Nixon' (2013), which was broadcast by CNN and opened theatrically nationwide. Highlights: [5:30] - Is academic literature facing an existential risk in light of ChatGPT and other AIs? [11:40] - Advocating for Plagiarism [20:00] - Generative art: Is it copyrightable? Challenges in IP distribution, licensing, and use in the NFT market. [37:10] - Charities and non-profits in web3 [43:10] - DAOs [45:00] - Resale royalties Links: 1. ROYALTIES AND THE NEW COLLECTOR ECONOMY, Prof. Brian L. Frye - https://www.rightclicksave.com/article/royalties-and-the-new-collector-economy 2. Video where I called Brian, Philip

Today, I'm joined by two fabulous guests: Marielle Gross, Assistant Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, and renaissance man, Brian Frye, the Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky.  Marielle provides clinical care at UPMC Altoona and her research focuses on the application of technology and elimination of bias as a means of promoting evidence-basis, equity and efficiency in women's healthcare. Today, we're discussing heny, Inc., a start up that Marielle founded that utilizes NFTs to allow breast cancer patients to remain connected to their biopsy results. When patients participate in research studies, their names and identifying features are taken off of their samples – in other words, they are deidentified. What this means is that if researchers find medically relevant information, they can't pass that on to the patient. Nor can patients share in any of the profits that research on their tissue might generate. As we discuss in this episode, Marielle was inspired by the infamous Henrietta Lacks case to create a non-fungible NFT-like token that allows breast cancer patients to track and learn about research on their donated tumor and tissues.  That's where Brian Frye comes in: he teaches courses on patent and intellectural property law, and has published widely about NFTs. Many of his articles are linked in the show notes. Brian is also a filmmaker. He produced the documentary Our Nixon (2013), which was broadcast by CNN and opened theatrically nationwide. His short films and videos have shown in the 2002 Whitney Biennial, the New York Film Festival, and the San Francisco International Film Festival, among other venues, and are in the permanent collection of the Whitney Museum of American Art. If you don't get enough of Brian in this episode, then make sure to listen to my earlier bonus episode: The Plagiarism Taboo with Brian Frye.  Further reading and listening: Marielle S Gross, MD; Amelia J Hood, MA; Robert C Miller Jr, BA, Nonfungible Tokens as a Blockchain Solution to Ethical Challenges for the Secondary Use of Biospecimens: Viewpoint, JMIR Bioinform Biotech 2021;2(1):e29905) doi: 10.2196/29905; https://bioinform.jmir.org/2021/1/e29905 This Pitt professor's startup applies NFTs to bioethics, Technical.ly, Sept. 13, 2022; https://technical.ly/startups/heny-nfts-bioethics-marielle-gross/ The Plagiarism Taboo with Brian Frye, https://www.buzzsprout.com/1227113/episodes/11050801 Frye, Brian L., NFTs & the Death of Art (April 19, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3829399 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829399 Frye, Brian L., How to Sell NFTs Without Really Trying (September 25, 2021). 13 Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law 113 (2022), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3930430 Frye, Brian L., After Copyright: Pwning NFTs in a Clout Economy (November 25, 2021). 45 Colum. J.L.& Arts 341 (2022), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3971240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3971240 Frye, Brian L., The Art of the Token (March 16, 2022). Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4059574 

Hello everyone and welcome back to another podcast. I have the honor of sitting down with Brian and hearing his story. He tells about his time growing up, his time in prison, his time as a missionary, and God's redemption and enduring love. I hope his testimony speaks to you as it did me. I really enjoyed this conversation. Catch you on the next podcast.    You can email Brian at Brianfrye777@gmail.com Or find him on Facebook - Brian Frye   You can email me at Timonspodcast@gmail.com Or find me on Twitter - Timonspodcast   Peace and love friends. 

Yesterday, on the show we had lawyer Brian Frye, who gave us novel takes securities. You can find that episode here: https://youtu.be/jo1ZuhuCVZE  In today's episode, David continues down the securities rabbit hole with special guest Mike Selig. Mike is a crypto lawyer at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, former a regulator at the CFTC and a frequent contributor to Coindesk about the state of crypto regulation. ------ Osmosis | Your Gateway into the Cosmos Ecosystem www.osmosis.zone/bankless  ------ SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER: https://newsletter.banklesshq.com/?utm_source=banklessshowsyt  ️ SUBSCRIBE TO PODCAST: https://availableon.com/bankless  ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://bankless.cc/kraken  UNISWAP | ON-CHAIN MARKETPLACE https://bankless.cc/uniswap  ️ ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum  EARNIFI | CLAIM YOUR UNCLAIMED AIRDROPS https://bankless.cc/earnifi  ------ Topics Covered: 0:00 Intro 5:35 Mike's Background 6:55 Why Securities 10:20 Investing Contract 13:00 Where's the Line? 20:11 Asset vs. Schemes 24:38 SEC Regulation 29:00 NFTs as Membership 36:48 2023 Regulation 42:51 SEC vs. CFTC 47:25 The Solution to Security Laws 50:40 Centralization 55:10 Current SEC Administration 1:01:30 Decentralization Theatre 1:04:50 Closing & Disclaimers ------ Recources: Mike Selig https://mobile.twitter.com/mikeseligesq  ----- Not financial or tax advice. This channel is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This video is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research. Disclosure. From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures 

David has been obsessed with this topic for the last couple weeks. It's time to get to the bottom of this: Are NFTs securities? On the way down this rabbit hole, we found lawyer Brian Frye, who has some fascinating and novel takes on this very issue.  Brian is a law professor at the University of Kentucky, and recently wrote an article in Coindesk titled “NFTs Are Securities and It's Great.”  ------  Osmosis | Your Gateway into the Cosmos Ecosystem www.osmosis.zone/bankless  ------  SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER:          https://newsletter.banklesshq.com/?utm_source=banklessshowsyt  ️ SUBSCRIBE TO PODCAST:                 https://availableon.com/bankless  ------ BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS:  KRAKEN | MOST-TRUSTED CRYPTO EXCHANGE https://bankless.cc/kraken  UNISWAP | ON-CHAIN MARKETPLACE https://bankless.cc/uniswap  ️ ARBITRUM | SCALING ETHEREUM https://bankless.cc/Arbitrum   EARNIFI | CLAIM YOUR UNCLAIMED AIRDROPS https://bankless.cc/earnifi  ------ Topics Covered: 0:00 Intro 7:30 Are All NFTs Securities? 14:00 Triggered by the Word 19:30 Trolling the SEC 29:20 A Really Good Tool 36:00 New Securities 44:55 Use a Different Term 53:30 Creative Assets 1:01:00 Copyright Law and Clout Sales 1:09:30 A Medium of Value Capture 1:14:00 Public Goods 1:19:00 Closing ------ Recources: Brian Frye https://twitter.com/brianlfrye  After Copyright: Pwning NFTs in a Clout Economy https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3971240  Securities Spectrum: https://imgur.com/8jt6OZ1  NFTs are Securities and It's Great https://www.coindesk.com/consensus-magazine/2022/12/28/nfts-are-securities-and-its-great/  ----- Not financial or tax advice. This channel is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. This video is not tax advice. Talk to your accountant. Do your own research. Disclosure. From time-to-time I may add links in this newsletter to products I use. I may receive commission if you make a purchase through one of these links. Additionally, the Bankless writers hold crypto assets. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures 

- Brian Frye, University of Kentucky Rosenberg College of Law- Rebecca Giblin, Melbourne Law School- Scott Hemphill, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy - Stephen Lee, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Target Corporation - Jason Schultz, NYU School of Law and Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy (moderator)

Brian Frye and I engage in academic navel gazing, discuss scholarly shit posting, and argue about the virtues of plagiarism. A fun time was had!My guest today is one of the most unusual and creative voices in the legal academy, Brian Frye, the Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky. He teaches classes in civil procedure, intellectual property, copyright, and nonprofit organizations, as well as a seminar on law and popular culture. Today we're engaging in academic navel gazing and opining on plagiarism, law review publishing, and plagiarism.Brian is also a filmmaker. He produced the documentary Our Nixon (2013), which was broadcast by CNN and opened theatrically nationwide. His short films and videos have shown in the 2002 Whitney Biennial, the New York Film Festival, and the San Francisco International Film Festival, among other venues, and are in the permanent collection of the Whitney Museum of American Art. His critical writing on film and art has appeared in October, The New Republic, Film Comment, Cineaste, Senses of Cinema, and Incite! among other journals.Additionally, Professor Frye also produces a podcast that I highly recommend, Ipse Dixit https://shows.pippa.io/ipse-dixit

Brian L. Frye joins us on the podcast to discuss, among many things, law professorship, legal scholarship, and the need for making nuanced academic material more accessible and understandable for the everyday person. Gus and Brian also explore the idea of what it looks like when conceptual art and legal scholarship overlap. Brian L. Frye is the Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law, as well as a filmmaker, and artist.

Brian Frye is the Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at UK Law School, with a focus on copyright and trademark law. Before getting into the legal field, Brian was a successful film artist in New York City. Once NFTs started gaining popularity, Brian dove into the space by issuing his own “conceptual art” NFTs and hosting conversations about NFTs on his legal scholarship podcast, Ipse Dixit. The intersection of Brian's unique perspectives and experiences made for an in-depth conversation on the key concepts of NFTs, how they're affecting copyright law, and what it means to own something on the internet. Learn more about Brian here. Visit us at MiddleTech.com Twitter Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Evan's Twitter Logan's Twitter Middle Tech is proud to be supported by: Our presenting sponsor, KY Innovation Bolt Marketing The Johnson Law Group Render Capital

For Right Click Radio's inaugural podcast, Alex Estorick sat down with Danielle King, CFO of ClubNFT and former Manager of Painting and Sculpture at MoMA to discuss what's been going on in the NFT space over the last month.

https://news.gsu.edu/podcast/episode-36-professor-brian-frye/ () Professor Brian Frye stops by Supreme Myths to give us some fascinating copyright law education, to say we have plagiarism all wrong, and to explain why law reviews are obsolete and ridden with elitism.

Professor Brian Frye stops by Supreme Myths to give us some fascinating copyright law education, to say we have plagiarism all wrong, and to explain why law reviews are obsolete and ridden with elitism.

ASNT Marketer Debbie Segor talks with ASNT Quality Manager/NDT Technical Specialist Brian Frye about his first NDT job. Fresh out of NDT school, Brian shares how his first day lasted nearly 48 hours and left him smelling like the inside of storage tank.

ASNT Marketer Debbie Segor talks with ASNT Quality Manager/NDT Technical Specialist Brian Frye about his first NDT job. Fresh out of NDT school, Brian shares how his first day lasted nearly 48 hours and left him smelling like the inside of storage tank.

On October 14-15, the Federalist Society's Kentucky lawyers chapters hosted their annual conference via online webinars. The first panel of the conference covered "Issues in Election Law and Election Integrity."During the 2020 session of the General Assembly, the state’s legislature enacted measures designed to promote election integrity, culminating in SB 2—the state’s voter ID law. That law is currently being litigated, but is otherwise poised to be in effect for the November 2020 general election. Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Kentucky shifted the date of its primary election and conducted the primary almost entirely by absentee ballot. This panel will address each of these issues along with expectations for the general election in November, both in terms of election procedures and election law issues likely to emerge.Featuring:Jessica Furst Johnson, Partner, Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLCMichael Adams, Secretary of State, KentuckyDr. Rachel Kleinfeld, Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceModerator: Prof. Brian Frye, Professor, UK College of LawIntroduction: Thomas Travis, President, Central Kentucky Lawyers Chapter*******As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On October 14-15, the Federalist Society's Kentucky lawyers chapters hosted their annual conference via online webinars. The first panel of the conference covered "Issues in Election Law and Election Integrity."During the 2020 session of the General Assembly, the state’s legislature enacted measures designed to promote election integrity, culminating in SB 2—the state’s voter ID law. That law is currently being litigated, but is otherwise poised to be in effect for the November 2020 general election. Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Kentucky shifted the date of its primary election and conducted the primary almost entirely by absentee ballot. This panel will address each of these issues along with expectations for the general election in November, both in terms of election procedures and election law issues likely to emerge.Featuring:Jessica Furst Johnson, Partner, Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLCMichael Adams, Secretary of State, KentuckyDr. Rachel Kleinfeld, Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program, Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceModerator: Prof. Brian Frye, Professor, UK College of LawIntroduction: Thomas Travis, President, Central Kentucky Lawyers Chapter*******As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

Brian Frye, associate professor of law at the University of Kentucky, joins the Business Scholarship Podcast to discuss his forthcoming article Against Deaccessioning Rules. In this article, Frye questions the bases for professional ethical rules that prohibit charitable art museums from selling works of art. Going further, as a matter of corporate governance, he explores situations in which museum directors may have a fiduciary duty to sell art, especially if doing so means the difference for the institution's survival.This episode is hosted by Andrew Jennings, a teaching fellow and lecturer in law at Stanford Law School.

Brian Frye is working across North America to help church planters start collegiate churches.The best way to follow up with Brian is on the NAMB web site here: https://www.namb.net/send_city/collegiate/

On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, a case involving a split among the Courts of Appeals regarding when a copyright owner may initiate a suit for infringement in federal court.Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. is an online news organization that licenses articles to different websites but retains the copyright to those articles. Wall-Street.com and Fourth Estate entered into a license agreement for a number of articles written by Fourth Estate. As part of the agreement, Wall-Street.com was required to remove all Fourth Estate content from its website before cancelling its account. Wall-Street cancelled its account but continued to display Fourth Estate articles, and Fourth Estate filed suit for copyright infringement against Wall-Street.com and its owner in federal district court. At the time Fourth Estate filed suit, it had submitted applications with the Registrar of Copyrights, but the Registrar had not yet acted upon them.Wall-Street.com moved to dismiss, arguing that the Copyright Act permits an infringement suit only after the Registrar of Copyrights approves or denies an application to register the copyright at issue. The district court agreed with the defendants and dismissed Fourth Estate’s complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that judgment, but noted a split among the federal courts of appeals on the issue: whether the ability to file an infringement suit turns on application by the copyright owner (the “application” approach) or the making of a decision on the application by the Registrar of Copyrights (the “registration” approach).Granting certiorari, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the judgment of the Eleventh Circuit. In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that “registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright.”To discuss the case, we have Brian Frye, Associate Professor of Law at University of Kentucky College of Law.

On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, a case involving a split among the Courts of Appeals regarding when a copyright owner may initiate a suit for infringement in federal court.Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. is an online news organization that licenses articles to different websites but retains the copyright to those articles. Wall-Street.com and Fourth Estate entered into a license agreement for a number of articles written by Fourth Estate. As part of the agreement, Wall-Street.com was required to remove all Fourth Estate content from its website before cancelling its account. Wall-Street cancelled its account but continued to display Fourth Estate articles, and Fourth Estate filed suit for copyright infringement against Wall-Street.com and its owner in federal district court. At the time Fourth Estate filed suit, it had submitted applications with the Registrar of Copyrights, but the Registrar had not yet acted upon them.Wall-Street.com moved to dismiss, arguing that the Copyright Act permits an infringement suit only after the Registrar of Copyrights approves or denies an application to register the copyright at issue. The district court agreed with the defendants and dismissed Fourth Estate’s complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that judgment, but noted a split among the federal courts of appeals on the issue: whether the ability to file an infringement suit turns on application by the copyright owner (the “application” approach) or the making of a decision on the application by the Registrar of Copyrights (the “registration” approach).Granting certiorari, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the judgment of the Eleventh Circuit. In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that “registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright.”To discuss the case, we have Brian Frye, Associate Professor of Law at University of Kentucky College of Law.

On January 8, 2019, the Supreme Court heard argument in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, a case considering whether a copyright owner may sue for infringement in federal court after merely applying for registration of the copyright, or whether the Registrar of Copyrights must first act on the application.Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. is an online news organization that licenses articles to different websites but retains the copyright to those articles. Wall-Street.com and Fourth Estate entered into a license agreement for a number of articles written by Fourth Estate. As part of the agreement, Wall-Street was required to remove all Fourth Estate content from its website before cancelling its account. When Wall-Street cancelled its account but continued to display Fourth Estate articles, Fourth Estate filed suit for copyright infringement against Wall-Street and its owner in federal district court. The defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that the Copyright Act permits an infringement suit only after the Registrar of Copyrights approves or denies an application to register the copyright at issue. Here, Fourth Estate alleged that it had filed applications with the Registrar, but did not indicate whether any application had been acted upon. The district court agreed with the defendants and dismissed Fourth Estate’s complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that judgment. Noting a circuit split on whether the ability to file an infringement suit turns on application by the copyright owner (the “application” approach) or the making of a decision on the application by the Registrar of Copyrights (the “registration” approach), the Eleventh Circuit adhered to the registration approach.The Supreme Court granted argument to address the circuit split regarding whether the “registration of [a] copyright claim has been made” within the meaning of 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) when the copyright holder delivers the required application, deposit, and fee to the Copyright Office, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have held, or only once the Copyright Office acts on that application, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Tenth and, in the decision below, the Eleventh Circuits have held.To discuss the case, we have Brian Frye, Associate Professor of Law at University of Kentucky College of Law.

On January 8, 2019, the Supreme Court heard argument in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, a case considering whether a copyright owner may sue for infringement in federal court after merely applying for registration of the copyright, or whether the Registrar of Copyrights must first act on the application.Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. is an online news organization that licenses articles to different websites but retains the copyright to those articles. Wall-Street.com and Fourth Estate entered into a license agreement for a number of articles written by Fourth Estate. As part of the agreement, Wall-Street was required to remove all Fourth Estate content from its website before cancelling its account. When Wall-Street cancelled its account but continued to display Fourth Estate articles, Fourth Estate filed suit for copyright infringement against Wall-Street and its owner in federal district court. The defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that the Copyright Act permits an infringement suit only after the Registrar of Copyrights approves or denies an application to register the copyright at issue. Here, Fourth Estate alleged that it had filed applications with the Registrar, but did not indicate whether any application had been acted upon. The district court agreed with the defendants and dismissed Fourth Estate’s complaint without prejudice. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that judgment. Noting a circuit split on whether the ability to file an infringement suit turns on application by the copyright owner (the “application” approach) or the making of a decision on the application by the Registrar of Copyrights (the “registration” approach), the Eleventh Circuit adhered to the registration approach.The Supreme Court granted argument to address the circuit split regarding whether the “registration of [a] copyright claim has been made” within the meaning of 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) when the copyright holder delivers the required application, deposit, and fee to the Copyright Office, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have held, or only once the Copyright Office acts on that application, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Tenth and, in the decision below, the Eleventh Circuits have held.To discuss the case, we have Brian Frye, Associate Professor of Law at University of Kentucky College of Law.

In this 77th episode of Philosophy Bakes Bread Eric Thomas Weber and Anthony Cashio interview law professor Brian Frye on "Justifications for Intellectual Property and Copyright Law."  Brian is the host of The Bindle on WRFL 88.1 FM and is the Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky's College of Law. He earned his bachelor’s degree at Berkeley and then went on to earn his MFA at the San Francisco Art Institute. After that, he earned his JD at NYU’s School of Law. He has also recently launched a law podcast called Ipse Dixit. Subscribe to it too! Listen for our “You Tell Me!” questions and for some jokes in one of our concluding segments, called “Philosophunnies.” Reach out to us on Facebook @PhilosophyBakesBread and on Twitter @PhilosophyBB; email us at philosophybakesbread@gmail.com; or call and record a voicemail that we play on the show, at 859.257.1849. Philosophy Bakes Bread is a production of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA). Check us out online at PhilosophyBakesBread.com and check out SOPHIA at PhilosophersInAmerica.com.

Dave & Chad talk about the Big Idea from Episode 68 with Brian Frye, a collegiate strategist at the State Convention of Baptist in Ohio and works with the North American Mission Board. They discuss whether you are in specifically collegiate church planting or church planting in general, it all comes back to being intentionally evangelistic.

Dave & Chad talk with Brian Frye, a collegiate strategist at the State Convention of Baptist in Ohio and works with the North American Mission Board. In this episode they discussed the concept of collegiate church planting.

Are there strategic opportunities for partnerships between campus ministries and church planters? How can we work together to advance the gospel further in on our campuses and in our communities? Brian Frye, National Collegiate Strategist for the NAMB and co-founder of the Collegiate Collective, joins us to discuss the strategic nature of partnering with church planters. 5 Misconceptions About Collegiate Church Planting - Brian Frye Resource of the Week: The Starfish and the Spider - Brafman & Beckstrom The Defining Decade - Meg Jay After College - Eric Young Reitz

Tom Knight talks with Brian Frye, National Collegiate Strategist for the North American Mission Board, on the college campus being a Send City.   Questions asked? What is a Send City? Why did the North American Mission Board declare the college campus a Send City? Why should the church attempt to reach the college campus? What are the gateways and barriers to reaching college students with the Gospel.     You might share this episode with: • church planters • collegiate leaders• pastors.   ________   Like us on Facebook @NoCampusLeft on Twitter    The views expressed by guests on the NCL podcast are their own, and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the BSCNC. 

Brian talks to us about his art life -- what's the difference between an art film and a commercial documentary, and how does that impact on the intersection of copyright. He helps us think about quilting from outside of quilting, and he's thinking about weaving too! He's part of our quilting army, and he is awesome!

Brian talks to us about his art life -- what's the difference between an art film and a commercial documentary, and how does that impact on the intersection of copyright. He helps us think about quilting from outside of quilting, and he's thinking about weaving too! He's part of our quilting army, and he is awesome!

Branch Sports Podcast - Episode 10 - Super Bowl Preview & Prop Bets with El Pelirrojo & B-Frye Tenth episode of the Branch Sports Podcast @Branch_Sports @JacksonKPaisley @30Matthews Jackson and Luke welcome special guests Brian Frye and Aaro.. I mean, El Pelirrojo to the pod to discuss the SUPER BOWL. We also sprinkle some prop bets that everyone should bet on. This interview is ELECTRIC. Special thanks to our guests for coming on.

In the process of preparing to testify in a divorce case, Brian had to study one of the strangest books he had ever come across, where religion, mathematics, and the apocalypse intersect. This week, we look at how a religious cult of number worshipers on the Italian coast gave rise to modern science, mathematics, philosophy, and music. In the interim 2500 years, as we have increased our knowledge of the universe using mathematics, we have lost the ability to explain why math is so successful at describing nature. Guest voices include Brian Frye, Errol Morris, Monte Johnson, and Gideon Rosen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The post The TACO Episode 70: Texas Hold and Toss Em with New CO Brian Frye appeared first on American Cornhole.

Floods in Louisiana have led to an activation of Send Relief, GuideStone has restructured for efficiency, and we talk collegiate ministry with Brian Frye from NAMB.

Episode six of Office Hours is here! Join us as we talk to Professor Steven Alvarez about his research and work involving immigration as we explore "Mexington," Kentucky and discuss what inspired his focus and creativity. Then, listen in as we meet with Professor Brian Frye to learn about how his background as a filmmaker has influenced his role as a professor of law at the University of Kentucky, including his part in creating Our Nixon, a documentary about Richard Nixon that has won several awards at various film festivals. Office Hours is produced by the College of Arts & Sciences and airs on WRFL FM 88.1 every Wednesday from 2-3 p.m. This podcast was produced by Casey Hibbard.

Chad continues the conversation with Brian Frye, the National Collegiate Strategist for The North American Mission Board. How many collegiate church plants are there? How should a collegiate church plant launch? Should collegiate churches be financially self sufficient? Listen to this episode to hear new strategies to reach the 20.7 collegians in North America.

Some college ministry strategists are saying that we are on the cusp of a major paradigm shift in college ministry toward collegiate church planting, but this shift doesn't come without real questions like: Is collegiate church planting a biblical model? What are the distinctions in collegiate church planting from existing campus-based ministries? Chad interviews Brian Frye, the National Collegiate Strategist for The North American Mission Board. in part 1 of our series on collegiate church plants, we will begin to uncover real answers to these questions.