POPULARITY
Categories
This shiur covers Devarim 33:1-7 with Rashi's commentary, exploring Moshe's blessings to the tribes of Israel before his passing, the giving of the Torah at Sinai, and the unique roles and merits of Reuven and Yehudah. https://www.torahrecordings.com/chumash-with-rashi/devarim/011_vezos_haberacha/001
This shiur covers Devarim 33:1-7 with Rashi's commentary, exploring Moshe's blessings to the tribes of Israel before his passing, the giving of the Torah at Sinai, and the unique roles and merits of Reuven and Yehudah. https://www.torahrecordings.com/chumash-with-rashi/devarim/011_vezos_haberacha/001
Hashem strengthens Yehoshua in his new role as leader, people are told will travel over Jordan River in 3 days, and reaffirmation of the pact of children of Reuven, Gad, and half of Menashe
Dedicado leilui nishmat Dvora bat Kisl Z´´LPatrocine uma aula e ajude a levar a Torá mais longe: shiurpix@gmail.comNesta aula de Shabat Teshuvá, em conexão com a Parashat Haazinu, o Rav Avraham analisa por que o Midrash destaca Reuven como o primeiro verdadeiro baal teshuvá. A partir dos episódios de Adam, Caim e Reuven, a aula diferencia reconhecer um erro de assumir plenamente a responsabilidade por ele. A Teshuvá não começa quando dizemos que foi o outro, a situação, a educação ou as circunstâncias; ela começa quando temos a coragem de dizer: fui eu.Reuven se arrependeu antes de ser confrontado e não apenas confessou o que havia feito, mas também reconheceu a culpa de sua própria escolha. Essa ideia é aprofundada por meio da advertência contra o “eu te falei”, pela comparação entre Shaul e David e pelos ensinamentos do Rambam sobre livre-arbítrio. O perdão não apaga automaticamente todas as consequências, mas a responsabilidade abre o caminho para escolher melhor na próxima vez. A verdadeira Teshuvá é dizer “eu errei”, sem porém, e voltar a agir com consciência diante de Hashem.Siga nas redes para mais conteúdos:• Instagram: @rabinoavraham• YouTube: @KehilatKnessetIsrael• TikTok: @rabinoavraham• Spotify: Rabino Avraham#Teshuvá #RavAvraham #ParashatHaazinu #Reuven #ResponsabilidadePessoal #YomKippur #Torá
Rabbi Reuven Stein - Chelkeinu 5 - Yom Kippur by Congregation Beth Jacob
Rabbi Reuven Stein - Chelkeinu 1 - Intro Sarah by Congregation Beth Jacob
Rabbi Reuven Stein - Chelkeinu 2 - RH Chana by Congregation Beth Jacob
Rabbi Reuven Stein - Chelkeinu 4 - Rachel Shofar by Congregation Beth Jacob
Rabbi Reuven Stein - Chelkeinu 3 - Chana Akeida by Congregation Beth Jacob
1) The lower hinge that holds the door of my fridge, is broken. The door of the fridge has a gusset all around that encloses a magnet. Effectively, the door could be offered onto the frame of the fridge-body and it will hold. May one doso on Shabbos?[1] 2) Reuven brings his Tallis & Tefilin bag into the Mikva dressing room – inside another bag. When challenged, Reuven says he's had his Tefilin go missing four times! OK?[2]3) At Mincha on Tisha b'Av, we start with Shir shel Yom (that was omitted at Shacharis). Do we preface with בית יעקב וכו', also omitted at Shacharis?[3]4) Why isn't Shir shel Yom said on Tisha b'Av in Shacharis? [4]5) On Shabbos morning I was daydreaming and said Boruch sheOmar. I then realized that I had missed all the Tehillim added on Shabbos. Do I recite them now or not?[5] 6) May one use his Tzitzis to tickle someone in the ear?[6] 7) Feedback re. 2nd Chazan saying the Kaddish after U'Vo leTziyon:[7]To sponsor a Shiur – to honour a special occasion -contact: dayan@lubavitchuk.com[1] ראה שוע"ר סי' שיגסי"ח שאסור להחזיר דלת לכלי שיש בו שיעור מ' סאה – משום בנין.[2] יש בזה ב' דינים: דין תשה"מ בחדר שיש בוכתבי הקודש; דין הכניסה בתפילין לביהכ"ס ולבית המרחץ. בדין הא' מותר אםהתפילין מונחים כיס בתוך כיס, וא' מהם אינו מיוחד. שוע"ר סי' מ ס"ג.בנכנס עם תפילין לבהכ"ס (בשוע"ר סי' מג) לא נזכר דין כיס בתוךכיס. [ושם (ס"ו) מחמיר יותר בשאר ספרים מבתפלין]. גם בדין מרחץ (שם סימןמה ס"ג) לא נזכר כיס בתוך כיס.אך בס'נימוקי או"ח סי' מג קרא תגר על האברכים המכניסים תיקי הטלית ותפילין לביתהמרחץ. וכתב שם: "אך יש לחלק בין דלעיל לענין תה"מ דחמיר, כיון שדינומגמ' (ברכות כה, ב), משא"כ לענין להכניסן בבית המרחץ".ומשמעדלגבי בהכ"ס ובית המרחץ שפיר איכא לסמוכי על היתר כיס בתוך כיס. והכי נהוגעלמא בלכתם בדרך, ובתוך התיק נצטיידו בספרי קודש, שבהצטרכם ליכנס לבהכ"ס -ואי אפשר להשאיר התיק בלי השגחה - מכניס התיק אתו וסומך להקל על זה שהםכבת"כ.ובנמוקיאו"ח שם אמר להשאיר הכל בפרוזדור. ואכן הכי נהוג עלמא. אך מה נעשה לאדם זהשכבר נגנבו לו תפיליו ד' פעמים. ומן הדין יש לסמוך להקל, מה גם שהתפילין מונחיםבג' וד' כיסים.בנמוקיאו"ח שם לא ניחא לי' לאשוויי תיק הטלית ככלי החיצון ותיק התפילין כתיקהפנימי, כיון שהפנימי בטל אל התפילין. אבל בשוע"ר סי' מ שם מבואר שגם זה נחשבכיס בתוך כיס, כל שהחיצון אינו מיוחד אליו. וראה גם במשנ"ב שם סק"ח. אךלהעיר שבשוע"ר שם פוסק כהמג"א, בכיס התפילין והטלית מונחים בכיס גדול –משווה הכיס הגדול כליין. אבל בפמ"ג ומח"הש שם כתבו שאם הטלית מונחבכיס מעל התפילין, הוי' הטלית ככלי נוסף.[3] בספר תפלות לתשעה באב(מהדורת חזק) הכניסו 'בית יעקב' וכו'. אבל בס' הלכות ומנהגי חב"ד (ע' 285 הע'104) נסתפק בזה, אולי פסוקים הללו הם בקשה שתתקבל תפלתו. ולפ"ד צ"בדילוגם בר"ח. ולענ"ד, פסוקים אלה הם הכנה ליציאה לשוק. משא"כ קודםמנחה. [4] צ"ע הדילוג בשחרית,שהרי כל שהוא מסדר היום אומרים גם בבוקר (שו"ע סי' תקנד ס"ד). וההשמטהשל שיר של יום וקטורת בשחרית של ת"ב (ראה רמ"א או"ח סי' תקנטס"ד), מסתבר שהוא מנוסח אשכנז, שאין להם קביעות לומר שיר של יום וקטורת בסוףשחרית בכל יום.[5] בפסקי תשובות סי' רפא הע' 35 כתב להשלים היכןשנזכר, ואפילו למתפללי נוסח ספרד (זולת האדרת והאמונה). ושוב מביא משער הכולל(יט:א) לאסור להפסיק, ואח"כ מביא מקצות השלחן (סי' פג הע' ב). (הארכתי בדברישער הכולל הללו אשתקד פ' מטות-מסעי). ולענ"ד להשוות לדברי אדה"ז בסדורבנוגע לעניית אמן באופן שיגרום לברך "על מצות תפילין", דאיכא לסמוכי עלמנהג המברכים ברכה זו בכל יום. וה"ה נימא בנדו"ד, לסמוך דלא הוי הפסק. [6] מפורש לאיסור בשוע"רר"ס כא.[7] קצות השלחן סי' כב סי"א. אשי ישראלפכ"ד הע' קנח. הערת ר"מ גורקאוו: הוכחה מהקדיש שאחר תפלת ערבית, שאינועל החזרה. מקור לזה שיש ב'ובא לציון' י"ח אזכרות – אבודרהם.
Questions? Comments? We love feedback! Email us at info@baishavaad.orgRav Baruch FriedQuestion: Reuven is walking in the street in a place where no Jews live and he finds a book. On the inside cover, he sees a name and phone number. Does he have to return the book to its Akum owner?Answer: The Torah commands us to return lost objects to their owners; however, this is limited to our Jewish brethren, and this commandment does not apply to items lost by an Akum. Accordingly, if the finder wants to keep the object, he may do so.If he specifically wants to return it, he runs up against two serious problems. Firstly, there is a prohibition of “lo sichanem”, which means that it is forbidden to give gifts to an Akum. Secondly, it is prohibited to return a lost object to an Akum. The Rambam says that the reason for this is that one who does so would be helping a sinful person. According to Rashi, the reason is that doing so is belittling the mitzvah of Hashavas Aveidah. One is supposed to return a lost object because the Torah commands us to give it back. If he shows a willingness to do so even when there is no commandment from the Torah, he is showing disrespect to the mitzvah.Now, the Shulchan Aruch states that if one wants to return a lost object to an Akum in order to make a kiddush Hashem, he is permitted to do so. According to the Gra, this is based on a story about Rav Shimon ben Shetach. The story is cited both in the Yerushalmi and the midrash Yalkut, but with a slight variation. The story goes that Rav Shimon's students purchased a donkey on his behalf from a non-Jew, and they found a precious stone hidden on it. He returned the stone to the non-Jew from whom he made the purchase. According to the Yerushalmi, he said that he returned it in order to make a Kiddush Hashem. According to the Yalkut, he said to return because, “I bought a donkey, not a precious stone”. It would seem that we actually need both of these reasons. If he actually took possession of the stone, he would not have been permitted to return it, as this would be a transgression of “lo sichanem”. To counter this problem, he said that he only bought a donkey, and never intended to take possession of the stone. Still and all, he needed the reason of Kiddush Hashem to permit him to return this lost object to the non-Jew.Having said this, it would seem that if Reuven would want to make a Kiddush Hashem by returning the book, he definitely may do so, and it would be a beautiful thing to do. People should be aware, however, that there are times when people think they are making a Kiddush Hashem when they actually are not doing that at all. For example, when one calls a multimillion-dollar company to return a small amount of money, and they are connected to a sales representative, the sales rep will often have no idea what they are talking about. To this end, the teshuvas Sdei Ha'aretz says that one must be careful not to cause a Chillul Hashem by returning a lost item. Accordingly, one should weigh the situation carefully before acting.In this particular case, it would seem to be a very nice Kiddush Hashem to return the book.
Chris Reuven LongFrom Lehto Files — audio of the YouTube episode.Watch: https://www.youtube.com/@LehtoFilesSupport: https://www.patreon.com/chrislehtoPodcast support: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/lehto-files-investigating-uaps--5990774/support
Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson continues to navigate the controversy around the dismissal of Shon Barnes. The Mariners traded away beloved pitcher Luis Castillo. // LongForm: GUEST: Former State Sen. Reuven Carlyle says Katie Wilson is already at a tipping point in her term. // Quick Hit:Another loss: Judge rejects Attorney General Nick Brown’s Medicaid work rules lawsuit.
Well, now I would invite you to pick up where we left off last week in the book of Numbers and chapter 32 so the book of Numbers chapter 32 we're going to begin where we left off in verse 16. Now you'll recall that there is a happening going on. The children of Reuven and the children of God, they wanted something. They did not want to move across the Jordan River. But rather, they wanted to inherit the land east of the Jordan River, and what we would call Jordan of today, and parts of Syria as well. This is where they wanted to make their home. https://get.theapp.co/yjjqTo donate please visit us at:https://loveisrael.org/donate/Checks may be sent to:LoveIsrael.org
Well, take out your Bible and look with me, if you would, to the book of Numbers. And chapter 32 the Book of Numbers and chapter 32 now in this we're going to see a request that comes from two families or two tribes. I'm speaking about the tribe of Reuven and the tribe of God. What were these two tribes? Well, they, in a unique way, had much cattle, and therefore they were seeking an inheritance. And we're going to see over and over in this scripture, God is doing something. https://get.theapp.co/yjjqTo donate please visit us at:https://loveisrael.org/donate/Checks may be sent to:LoveIsrael.org
When considering if a breakaway is appropriate or not, one could look at the story of b'nei Reuven v'Gad for a historical lesson.
We continue in Parshat Matot as we learn about the war with Midyan the death of Bilaam and the splitting of the land for the Shevatim of Reuven and Gad.. Outside of Israel!