Daily Halacha Podcast - Daily Halacha By Rabbi Eli J. Mansour

The Shulhan Aruch writes that it is preferable to recite fewer supplications with Kavana (concentration) than to recite more without Kavana. Of course, there are certain prayers which we are strictly required to recite, and which thus should not be skipped. And, we are not going to change the Siddur and omit non-obligatory sections which we have been accepted as part of the prayer service, so that we can recite the rest slower and with greater Kavana. On an individual level, however, if a person finds it difficult to recite these non-obligatory texts with Kavana, then he should preferably recite fewer, slowly and with concentration. For example, if somebody finds it difficult to recite all the additional supplications added to Shaharit on Monday and Thursday, I would advise him to recite a small amount with Kavana, and this is far better than mindlessly rushing through the entire text to complete it in time. This concept of "quality over quantity" applies also to Torah learning. G-d counts not the number of pages a person covers, but the quality of his learning, the time and effort he invests in Torah study. It is preferable to learn less material and to understand it properly, then to cover more ground but without a clear understanding of what was learned. The fixed learning regimens that many people follow – most famously, of course, Daf Yomi – have great value in providing a framework that helps ensure that a person spends time each day learning, but they also have a disadvantage, in that they do not allow enough time for a clear understanding of the material. Am Yisrael has accepted frameworks such as Daf Yomi because of the benefit of having a fixed structure of learning, but as a general rule, it is preferable to cover less material slowly, and understand it properly, than to learn larger quantities quickly with less clarity. Ideally, of course, a person should strive for both quality and quantity – devoting enough time to learn large amounts of material properly and in-depth.

The Gemara in Masechet Berachot (3a) teaches that the night is divided into three periods, and at the points when one period leads to the other, Hashem "roars like a lion," bemoaning the fact that our sins compelled him to destroy the Bet Ha'mikdash. The Bet Yosef brings from earlier sources that it is proper to join Hashem at those moments and lament the destruction of the Bet Ha'mikdash. The Kabbalists, however, determined that this should be done at the point of Hasot, halachic midnight. This is the time best suited to mourn the destruction of the Bet Ha'mikdash, the Jewish People's dispersion, and the death of the righteous Sadikim. The Kabbalists taught that it is especially important not to sleep at the moment of Hasot, as this brings upon the person a certain level of impurity. For many generations, the practice of Tikkun Hasot – reciting a special prayer mourning the destruction of the Bet Ha'mikdash at Hasot – was observed by the Sadikim. There are accounts of how the synagogue in Halab (Aleppo, Syria) would be filled at Hasot by men reciting Tikkun Hasot and then remaining to learn Torah. Tikkun Hasot is normally recited in a manner reflecting mourning – on the floor, without shoes, wearing sackcloth, with ashes on one's head, and crying loudly. Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim shared with us his memories of his father reciting Tikkun Hasot while sitting on the floor. People in our community remember seeing Hacham Shaul Kassin crying on the floor while reciting Tikkun Hasot. I had the opportunity to join the special Thursday night Tikkun Hasot service led by Rav Benayahu Shmueli in Jerusalem, near the Temple Mount, in close proximity to the site of the Kodesh Ha'kodashim (the inner sanctum of the Bet Ha'mikdash). For two hours, the small group of Rabbis sit on the floor, weep, and sing, beseeching Hashem to rebuild the Bet Ha'mikdash. Although Tikkun Hasot is not required as a strict Halachic obligation, Hacham Ovadia Yosef writes that one who is in any event awake shortly before Hasot should certainly remain awake a bit longer in order to recite Tikkun Hasot. It should be noted the during the winter months, Hasot is around 11:30-11:45pm, which is not very late for many people, and so it is certainly worthwhile for those who are awake at that time to recite this special prayer. Halachic Hasot is defined as the midway point between sunset and sunrise. Some claimed that Hacham Ovadia Yosef permitted during Elul reciting Selihot – which may not be recited prior to Hasot – after the time of Hasot in Jerusalem, wherever one is located. This would mean that in New York, for example, it would be permissible to recite Selihot already in the late afternoon hours. However, Rav Yisrael Bitan writes that these reports are unreliable. Nevertheless, with regard to Tikkun Hasot, Rav Bitan cites Hacham David Yosef as ruling in Halacha Berura that there is room to allow reciting Tikkun Hasot shortly before midnight in areas west of Eretz Yisrael. There is a view among the Poskim that permits reciting Tikkun Hasot even before Hasot, and so although we do not follow this opinion, we can combine this lenient ruling with the possibility that the time of Hasot depends on the moment of Hasot in Jerusalem. Since in any event Tikkun Hasot is not required as a strict Halachic obligation, there is room to rely on these two lenient positions to permit reciting Tikkun Hasot even before halachic midnight, if it is after Hasot in Jerusalem.

If a person feels alert in the late hours of the night, should he spend that time learning Torah, even if this will likely cause him to wake up late in the morning and miss the final time for reciting Shema? One might argue that at night, one is not required to take the next morning into account, and since he currently is able to learn Torah, he should do so without worrying about how this might affect the next morning. In truth, this line of reasoning is entirely incorrect, and it is clear that one must ensure to go to sleep early enough at night to ensure his ability to wake up in time for Shema in the morning. Reading Shema before the final time in the morning constitutes a Torah obligation, and, moreover, it cannot be made up once it is missed. Thus, if a person oversleeps and does not read Shema by the final time, he has neglected a Torah obligation. Hacham Bension Abba Shaul (Jerusalem, 1924-1998) sharply criticized yeshiva students who stay up late to learn and then oversleep the next morning, noting that they are using the Torah to act contrary to Hashem's will, which cannot possibly be excused. He related that Rav Tzadka Hussin (Baghdad-Jerusalem, 1876-1961) always recited Shaharit at sunrise, but one morning he woke up late, and he decided to pray privately at home, rather than arrive late in the synagogue. He felt that a Rabbi arriving late for the prayer creates a Hilul Hashem – a defamation of G-d's Name – and it is therefore to pray at home under such circumstances. This underscores the impropriety of Torah scholars rising late in the morning. It is far preferable to learn less at night and wake up on time in the morning than to learn until the late nighttime hours and risk waking up late in the morning. It should be mentioned that there is a famous dispute among the Poskim in calculating the final time for Shema in the morning. The two opinions are commonly referred to as the view of the Magen Abraham (Rav Abraham Gombiner, Poland, 1633-1683) and the Vilna Gaon (1720-1797). Sephardic practice follows the view of the Magen Abraham, according to which the final time is earlier than according to the Vilna Gaon. Hacham Ovadia Yosef writes that one should not rely on the lenient view of the Vilna Gaon except under extenuating circumstances. Certainly, though, if one missed the time of Magen Abraham, he should ensure to recite the Shema before the time of the Vilna Gaon.

The Gemara in Masechet Sukka (26a) instructs that one should not sleep during the day for a longer period than that which a horse sleeps, a duration of "sixty breaths." Rashi explains that sleeping during the day is not allowed because the daytime should be used constructively, for Torah learning. This is mentioned by subsequent writers, and brought as Halacha by the Shulhan Aruch. However, the Mahasit Ha'shekel (Rav Shmuel Kellin, 1724-1806) ruled that if a person needs to nap during the day to enhance his productivity, then this is allowed. For many people, daytime naps increase productivity, as it helps them accomplish more the rest of the day, after they wake up. According to this view, then, although in general one should not take a nap during the day, this is allowed if the objective is to be more alert and productive afterward. The Arizal taught that one must not sleep during the day under any circumstances, as this may cause damage to one's soul. However, the Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his Rav Pe'alim, writes that the Arizal's teaching applies only to the souls of the great Sadikim, which are on an especially high level of sanctity and are thus particularly sensitive. Such souls could be damaged by daytime naps. For us, however, this is not a concern. It is indeed customary in many yeshivot for the students to take a nap during the afternoon, as this significantly enhances the quality of their learning the rest of the afternoon and at night. For most students, the afternoon nap does not at all diminish from their productivity, as to the contrary, it enables them to accomplish far more than they would otherwise. Hacham Ovadia Yosef writes that while it is preferable to avoid napping during the day, this is certainly allowed if one's intention is not simply to relax, but to increase his productivity the rest of the day and in the evening.

Rav Haim Palachi (Turkey, 1788-1868), in his Ruah Haim, lists several behaviors that helps a person live a long life, one of which is waking early, before dawn, every morning. He even mentions a certain British diplomat who wrote about the health benefits of waking early, how this contributes to one's physical wellbeing, promotes longevity, and even enhances his intellectual capabilities. A number of sources speak about the value of spending the "transition" moments at the beginning and end of each day involved in Torah learning or prayer. This means learning or praying early in the morning, when night transitions to morning, and at the end of day, from sunset until nightfall. This is mentioned by the Mishna Berura and by the Ben Ish Hai, and earlier by the Magen Abraham (Rav Abraham Gomibiner, Poland, d. 1682), based on the writings of the Shela Ha'kadosh (Rav Yeshaya Horowitz, d. 1630). Some Poskim propose that learning Torah during these transitional periods fulfills the command "Ve'hagita Bo Yomam Va'layla" – to learn Torah day and night. The vast majority of people, of course, cannot fulfill this command in the literal sense, by learning Torah constantly by day and by night. It is possible, however, to fulfill this Misva by "connecting" day and night with Torah learning, studying during the period when night turns to day and day turns to night. For this reason, too, there is value in waking early, just before dawn, so one can pray and learn Torah as the new day begins.

The Kabbalists taught that it is preferable to sleep during the first part of the night – from nightfall (when the stars come out) until Hasot (halachic midnight). During this first half of the night, the Kabbalists explained, the harmful spiritual energies are in force, posing danger to the purity of the Neshama (soul). It is thus best to go to sleep right at nightfall, when these energies surface, as when one sleeps his soul is entrusted to Hashem and hence protected from these forces. Then, right before Hasot, one should rise and involve himself in Torah and prayer. This was the practice followed by the Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909). Citing the Arizal, the Ben Ish Hai taught that the first part of the night of called "Layil," whereas the second part of the night is called "Layla." The exceptions to this rule are Friday night and the night of the Seder. On Friday night, the sanctity of Shabbat protects the soul from harm, and the night of the Seder is called "Lel Shimurim" (Shemot 12:42), a night of protection, when even the "Layil" portion of the night is safe for the soul due to the special quality of this night. However, Hacham Ovadia Yosef noted that both the Gemara (Berachot 62b) and the Rambam (Hilchot De'ot 4:4) instruct that sleep is most beneficial during the latter part of the night. Hacham Ovadia writes that he saw Rabbis in Jerusalem who followed the Ben Ish Hai's practice, but his practice was to learn until late at night and then go to sleep. Practically speaking, it seems that the advent of electric lighting and modern travel and communication has rendered this question moot. Years ago, there was no possibility of working or doing much else after dark, and so people stayed home. Today, of course, people are still busy after nightfall, and it is not practical for most people to go to sleep right at nightfall – which can be as early as 5:30pm or so in the winter – and then wake up at Hasot. Therefore, while there are those (such as the "Kollel Hasot" program) who sleep during the first part of the night and then rise before Hasot, for most people it is more proper to learn at night and then go to sleep.

The Rambam, in Hilchot Talmud Torah (3:12), writes that one cannot achieve success in Torah learning if he learns in a relaxed manner, and only when learning is convenient and comfortable. Like anything else in life, a person excels only through persistence, diligence, and hard work. "Dabbling" in Torah will not result in Torah scholarship – just like "dabbling" in any other field will not lead to mastery or excellence in that field. There are no shortcuts to achievement in Torah study. Rav Mordechai Gifter (1915-2001), Rosh Yeshiva of the Telz Yeshiva in Cleveland, would say that a lot of students want to learn the entire Shas in one night – and also manage to sleep eight hours that night…and to learn while sipping soda… Quite obviously, this is not how it works. A person can succeed in Torah learning only if he is prepared to put in the time, work and effort, and to learn even when conditions are far less than ideal. This includes learning even when one feels tired. Although a person should certainly sleep as much as he needs, he should ensure to use the rest of his time for Torah learning, and not for sleeping beyond what he needs for his physical and emotional wellbeing. Many sources emphasize the particular importance and value of learning Torah during the nighttime hours. In fact, the Gemara (Erubin 65a) states explicitly that the nighttime period was designated specifically for Torah learning. And the Rambam writes in Hilchot Talmud Torah (3:13): "Even though it is a Misva to study both during the day and at night, it is only at night that a person acquires the majority of his wisdom. Therefore, whoever wishes to merit the "Crown of Torah" should be careful with all of his nights, not wasting even one of them on sleep, eating, drinking, idle chatter, or the like—rather, [spending them] in the study of Torah and words of wisdom." The Rambam concludes: "And any house in which the words of Torah are not heard at night will be consumed by fire." If one's "fire" – his passion, his excitement and energy – is directed somewhere else other than Torah, then his home runs the risk, Heaven forbid, of being consumed by fire. The Torah tells (Bereshit 28:11) that when Yaakob was leaving Eretz Yisrael, and he reached the site where the Bet Ha'mikdash would be built, he went to sleep ("Va'yalen Sham"). The Midrash comments that Yaakob slept there – but did not sleep at all during the fourteen previous years, which he spent learning Torah in the yeshiva of Shem and Eber. The commentators explain that this cannot mean that he literally remained awake for fourteen years. Rather, it means that during that period, Yaakob never actually went to sleep in a bed. When he needed to, he put his head down, or found a place to lie so he could get the small amount of sleep that he needed. In order to achieve in Torah learning, one must be prepared to sacrifice physical comfort, and to keep his sleep to a minimum. A different passage in the Midrash tells that King David would go to sleep at nightfall, but he kept a musical instrument by his bedroom window, that served as a kind of "alarm clock." At Hasot (midnight), the wind would blow the strings, producing music, and David would wake up to learn Torah. The Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination) would try to convince him to go back to sleep, saying that kings normally enjoy the luxury of sleeping late, as they do not have to rise early for work like the commoners. But David would ignore the Yeser Ha'ra and spend the rest of the night engrossed in Torah study. The Gemara (Sukka 26b) instructs that if a person needs to sleep during the day, he should sleep for only a brief amount. Elsewhere (Erubin 65a), the Gemara relates that Rav Hisda's daughter asked why he slept so little, and he replied that soon – after his passing – he would have plenty of time for sleep… Our limited time here in this world should be used productively, and not wasted on excessive rest and relaxation. The Midrash Tanhuma (Parashat Noah, 3) warns that in order to succeed in learning the intricate material of the Torah She'be'al Peh, one cannot aspire to wealth and luxuries; the only way to excel in Torah learning is by sacrificing physical and material comforts. Similarly, Tana De'beh Eliyahu Zuta (14) warns that excessive eating and sleeping leads to "poverty" in the area of Torah knowledge. Normally, when a person stays up late at night and sleeps only the minimum that he requires, he is likely to appear the next day pale, drained, and bleary-eyed, and might not be very pleasant to look at. However, the Gemara (Hagiga 12a) promises that if a person spends his night learning Torah, Hashem "casts a cord of Hesed" over him. This means that he will have a certain "charm" the next day, earning people's admiration and favor despite his fatigue. In a different passage (Sanhedrin 71b), the Gemara teaches that when the righteous sleep, they and the entire world suffer a loss. As the Sadikim spend their time productively, involved in meaningful pursuits that benefit them and the entire world, they and the world lose as a result of the time they spend sleeping. (Conversely, then, when the wicked sleep – and thus are not engaged in their sinful behavior – they and the entire world benefit from their inactivity.) The Gemara in Masechet Menahot (110a) teaches that scholars who spend their nights learning Torah are considered as though they offer sacrifices in the Bet Ha'mikdash. And in Masechet Tamid (32b), the Gemara states that if a person learns Torah at night, the Shechina accompanies him wherever he goes. The Talmud Yerushalmi (Ta'anit 3a) cites Rav Ada Bar Ahaba as avowing that he never slept an entire night, as he always rose early to learn Torah. The Reshit Hochma ( Rabbi Eliyahu de Vidas, 1518–1587) writes that when one learns Torah at night, he is not seen; his study is private, without publicity and fanfare, and this lends it a very special quality. Since he learns secretly, he is worthy of having the hidden secrets of the Torah revealed to him. An especially stern passage appears in Abot De'Rabbi Natan (29:3), warning that if a person is awake at night and not involved in Torah learning, "he would be better off had he been strangled at birth." Rabbenu Yona (Spain, 1200-1263) writes that if a person stays awake at night learning Torah, then he obviates the need for Yisurin (punishments). Since he subjects himself to the discomfort of remaining awake to learn Torah, this counts for whichever kinds of suffering he needs to experience. This is alluded to by the verse in Tehillim (94:12), "Ashreh Ha'geber Asher Teyaserenu Y-ah U'mi'Toratecha Telamedenu" – "Fortunate is the man whom G-d punished, and teaches him from his Torah." This can be read to mean that a person is fortunate if he receives his punishments by immersing himself in intensive Torah learning, exerting hard work and effort. Rabbenu Yona further notes that Moshe Rabbenu did not sleep at all throughout the forty days he spent atop Mount Sinai receiving the Torah – setting an example of minimizing sleep for the sake of Torah learning. If, Rabbenu Yona adds, a king invited someone to his treasury to collect as many riches as he could for a specific period of time, this man would certainly not sleep at all during that time, and would use every moment he could to collect riches. We, too, should use as much of our limited time in this world as we can for Torah learning, collecting spiritual "riches," rather than waste our time indulging in physical comforts. Rav Besalel Ashkenazi (Israel, 1520-1592) writes that in his youth, he spent his nights engaged in Torah study, often learning throughout the night without sleeping. He also occasionally skipped meals. It was through this sacrifice of physical comforts for Torah learning that he achieved Torah scholarship. The Reshit Hochma writes that his esteemed mentor, Rav Yosef Taychik (1465-1546), did not sleep in a bed for forty years, and would instead sit on an elevated piece of furniture with his legs dangling, such that he would not stay asleep for an extended period. He rose every night at midnight and spent the rest of the night learning Torah. And a disciple of Rav Yehonatan Eibshutz (1694-1764) testified that throughout the years he spent learning under him, Rav Yehonatan never slept in a bed, and instead dozed for brief periods in his chair. Rav Chaim Brim (Jerusalem, 1922-2002) related that the Hazon Ish (Rav Abraham Yeshaya Karelitz, 1878-1953) was once found sleeping on his bed in the wrong position – with his feet on the side where the head was supposed to be. The people told him to turn around, and he said, "If I had the strength to turn myself around, I would learn another Tosafot." The Hazon Ish continued learning Torah until he had no strength left, not even to turn his body around. Rav Haim Palachi (Turkey, 1788-1868) wrote that if a person could see into the future, to the time when he would be in the grave, and understand the extent of the regret he would experience for not having used his time properly, he would never waste time, and he would minimize his sleep in order to spend more time learning Torah. Rav Palachi added that a person who rises at midnight to learn Torah earns the status of a "friend" of Hashem and of the Nation of Israel, and he will be spared punishments that befall the rest of the world. The Reshit Hochma notes that when rising at midnight to learn Torah, one should be driven solely by his genuine love for Hashem, and not by any ulterior motives. Only if his intentions are pure will he reap the precious rewards for learning Torah at night. The Reshit Hochma says that as a teenager, he devoted himself entirely to Torah study, engaging in virtually no other activities. The Peleh Yoetz (Rav Eliezer Papo, 1785-1828) urges us to train ourselves to sleep fewer hours and to learn Torah even when we feel drowsy, in order to maximize the amount of time we have to devote to Torah. The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909) discusses the great value of learning Torah in the predawn hours, adding that one's intentions should be for the sake of Hashem, and not to earn reward. The Tchebiner Rav (1881-1965) had the practice on Shabbat afternoons of testing schoolchildren on their Torah studies. One Shabbat afternoon, a boy knocked on his door, but there was no answer, as the Rabbi was sleeping. The youngster continued knocking until the Rabbi answered. The Rabbi gently told the boy that if nobody answers the door on Shabbat afternoon, this usually means that the people in the home are asleep. "I didn't think that the Rabbi slept on Shabbat afternoon!" The Tchebiner Rav committed to never sleep again on Shabbat afternoon, acknowledging that this was the expectation of a sage of his stature. From all these sources, we see the importance of learning Torah even when one feels tired, and that we must try to push ourselves to achieve to the best of our ability rather than spend our free time relaxing and learning only when it is easy and convenient.

The Mishna at the end of Masechet Menahot (110a) teaches: "Ehad Ha'marbeh Ve'ehad Ha'mam'it, U'bilbad She'yechaven Libo La'Shamayim" – "Whether one does much or one does little, as long as he directs his heart toward Heaven." The point made by the Mishna is that the most important factor is not the amount that one actually manages to accomplish, but rather the extent to which he maximizes his potential and does his best. A person who is able to learn six hours a day is not necessarily greater than a person who is able to learn just one hour day, as these two individuals might face very different circumstances. If the first individual learns for six hours but has the ability to learn even more, whereas the second only has an hour for learning and takes full advantage of that hour, then the second is greater than the first. This is true also of scholarly achievement, charity, Hesed, community involvement, and so on. Not everyone is in the position to do the same amount. Every individual has his unique set of strengths, weaknesses, talents, struggles, challenges and circumstances, and no two people's expectations are thus exactly alike. The most important thing is "She'yechaven Libo La'Shamayim" – that one sincerely invests the greatest effort that he can and achieves to the very best of his ability. Hacham Ovadia Yosef noted that the word "Leb" ("heart") consists of the letters Lamed and Bet. These two letters are preceded by the letters Kaf and Alef – which spell the word "Ach" ("only"), and are followed by the letters Mem and Gimal – which spell the word "Gam." Now the Gemara teaches us that the word "Ach" implies a "Mi'ut," an exclusion, and when it appears in the Torah in the context of a Halacha, it indicates that something is excluded from the law in question. Conversely, the word "Gam" implies a "Ribui," an extension, that the law includes something that we might not have expected it to. The word "Leb" is thus "surrounded" by both "Marbeh" and "Mam'it," by an allusion to a large amount and an allusion to a smaller amount. This reinforces the notion that the most important thing is the heart, one's sincerity, one's genuine quest for excellence and devoted efforts to do the most he can. This – and not the bottom-line result – is what matters to Hashem and what should matter to us.

King Shlomo teaches us in the Book of Mishleh (3:6), "Be'chol Derachecha Da'ehu" – "Know Him in all your ways." The Rambam explains this to mean that we are to serve Hashem even in our ordinary "ways," while tending to our physical and material needs, and conducting our day-to-day affairs. Religion is not reserved for the realm of the sacred; it is not observed only when we pray, learn Torah, and perform Misvot. Even when are involved in ordinary, mundane activities, we are to serve G-d by engaging in these activities for the sake of Abodat Hashem (the service of G-d). We are to care for our bodies, and work to earn a living, not as ends unto themselves, but rather for the purpose of enabling us to serve Hashem. If we eat to maintain our health and strength so that we can learn Torah and observe Misvot, then we in essence turn our calories into Misva calories; we transform the mundane act of eating into a sacred act. This is true also of sleeping, exercising, earning a living, and even reasonable amounts of recreation. If we engage in these activities with the intention of maintaining our physical and emotional wellbeing so that we can serve Hashem, then we infuse these activities with holiness, and they become part of our Abodat Hashem. The converse, however, is also true. If we fail to use our free time for Torah learning and other sacred endeavors, then this shows that our mundane affairs are not conducted for the sake of Hashem. If a person does not spend meaningful amounts of time learning Torah during the workweek, this might be justified if he truly has no free time for learning due to the pressures of his profession or business – but only if he uses the free time that he does have for Torah learning. If a person does not spend time on Sunday or on his other free days learning Torah, then this undermines his excuse for not learning Torah during the week. Some have explained in this vein the Mishna's teaching in Pirkeh Abot (4:10), "Im Bitalta Min Ha'Torah, Yesh Lecha Betelim Harbeh Ke'negdecha" (literally, "If you neglected Torah, there are many 'neglects' equal to yours"). This could mean that if a person wasted time that he could have used for Torah study, then he is held accountable also for "Betelim Harbeh Ke'negdecha" – lots of other wasted time. The times which he could have legitimately claimed to be unavailable for Torah learning could no longer be excused, since he does not properly use the time that he does have available for Torah learning. It is only when we utilize our free time for Torah learning that our mundane affairs can be considered part of our Abodat Hashem, as they are conducted for the sake of our service of G-d. Rav Shmuel Pinhasi (contemporary) found an allusion to this concept in a verse in Tehillim (75:3): "Ki Ekah Mo'ed Ani Mesharim Eshpot" (literally, "When I take a festival, I judge justly"). On Hol Ha'mo'ed, when a person takes time off from work, the way he spends his time reveals his priorities. If he fails to use the time for Torah learning, then he will be judged for all the time that he did not learn with the excuse that he was busy working. Working for a living is considered sacred if a person properly utilizes the time when he does not need to work, thereby showing that he works for the sake of serving Hashem, to enable him to learn Torah. But if a person fails to learn Torah when he does not need to work, then the time he spent working can no longer be regarded as sacred, as he demonstrates that this is not his objective.

G-d created the human body in such a way that it requires rest, and cannot function properly without a significant period of sleep each night. In His infinite wisdom, G-d determined that it is preferable for human beings not to have the ability to continuously work and tend to their affairs without ever resting. One explanation for this decision is that Hashem mercifully granted us the opportunity to "reset" after a difficult, challenging or upsetting day. When a person feels disappointed or pained, a good night's sleep allows him to begin fresh the next morning, to experience a new start, so that the failures or misfortunes of the previous day no longer discourage him and he can approach the new day with vigor and positivity. Another explanation is that the person's Neshama (soul) receives an "upgrade" every night when he sleeps. During sleep, Hashem cleanses the soul and returns it in the morning in better condition than it had been when the person went to sleep. We might say that we have our souls "serviced" every night, and this is the great benefit of sleep. The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909) writes that it is a mistake to think that sleeping is always beneficial for the body. Sleeping excessively, more than the body needs, is actually detrimental to one's health. This has been confirmed by modern medicine. Therefore, one should sleep only as much as he needs and no more. Of course, one must also ensure not to sleep less than the body needs in order maintain its strength. But after one sleeps a reasonable amount, he should use the rest of his time for Torah study. The Ben Ish Hai also writes that there are certain times when it is recommended to stay up late learning Torah – such as on Thursday nights, the night before Rosh Hodesh, during Elul and the Aseret Yemeh Teshuba, and during the weeks of Shobabim in the winter. Some people sleep only four-and-a-half or five hours a night on these occasions, and the Ben Ish Hai writes that the extra time devoted to the soul compensates for the lost time of sleep. The Rambam taught that one should sleep eight hours a night in order to maintain his physical wellbeing. He should then spend eight hours working for a living, and the other eight hours learning Torah. Some found an allusion to this concept in the verse in Iyob (3:13), "Yashanti Az Yanu'ah Li" ("I have slept, and then I experience rest"). The word "Az" in Gematria equals 8, and thus "Yashanti Az" subtly refers to the eight hours that one should sleep each night. Another allusion is the passage in our Shabbat prayers, "Az Tasliah Et Derachecha" ("Then shall you succeed in your paths"), indicating that sleeping "Az" – eight hours – brings success. There were great Sages who slept less than eight hours. The Vilna Gaon (1720-1797), for example, is said to have slept only two hours a night. And Rav Zalman of Volozhin (1752-1799)– one of the Vilna Gaon's most illustrious disciples – slept just fours a night. It is told that Rav Zalman was once asked about the verse, "Yashanti Az Yanu'ah Li," which alludes to eight hours of sleep, and he replied that the world "Li" at the end of the verse in Gematria equals 40. This verse thus instructs that one should sleep eight hours out of every forty-eight hours, or four hours a night… The Tiferet Yisrael (Rav Yisrael Lifshitz, Germany, 1782-1860) distinguished between different ages, stating that until the age of 50, when people are generally more physically active, one should sleep eight hours each night, whereas after 50, less sleep is needed. In any event, it is generally accepted that most people should sleep between six and eight hours a night. The most important thing is to use one's time constructively the rest of the day. When we look at our daily schedules, we will find that many of us sleep less than the eight hours recommended by the Rambam, and yet most of us fail to learn even close to the eight hours that he urges us to learn. It is true that much of our time is spent working, commuting, and tending to our families. Unfortunately, however, much of the other time is being consumed by vanity and wasteful pursuits, particularly screentime. It is critically important for us to refrain from wasting time, to make sure to get enough sleep and to care for our physical wellbeing, but to use the rest of the time as constructively as possible.

The Gemara (Bava Mesia 23b) establishes that a Torah scholar is permitted to speak untruthfully in regard to three matters, one of which is "Masechet." Rashi explains that if a scholar is asked whether he has thoroughly studied a certain Masechet, he is permitted to untruthfully answer in the negative in order to avoid sounding boastful about his proficiency. The Gemara's teaching, then, instructs that when necessary, one is allowed to distort the truth for the sake of humility, in the interest of concealing one's achievements. Both humility and honesty are critically important religious values, but sometimes they might clash. And when they do, the value of humility overrides honesty, and one may untruthfully deny his accomplishments in order to remain humble. Interestingly, however, the Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) noted that not everyone accepts this interpretation of the Gemara. The Rambam understood the Gemara to mean that a scholar can dishonestly deny having learned a Masechet to avoid being questioned about that Masechet. If a scholar fears that he will be asked about a certain Masechet and then suffer embarrassment when he is unable to answer questions about the topic, then Halacha allows him to avoid embarrassment by saying that he had not yet studied the material. According to the Rambam's reading of the Gemara, it does not provide a source for allowing dishonesty in the interest of humility. Regardless, the Hida brings a different source – the story told in the Gemara (Ketubot 77b) of Rabbi Yehoshua Ben Levi's encounter with Rabbi Shimon Bar Yohai in Gan Eden. Rabbi Shimon asked Rabbi Yehoshua if a rainbow ever appeared in the sky during his lifetime, and Rabbi Yehoshua Ben Levi said that indeed it did. A rainbow is an inauspicious sign, indicating G-d's anger, that He considered bringing another flood, and so it does not appear in the lifetime of especially pious Sadikim whose merit sustains the world. Rabbi Yehoshua Ben Levi was indeed on this unique level, and a rainbow never appeared during his lifetime, but he answered in the affirmative in the interest of humility. This shows that it is permissible to speak untruthfully for the purpose of concealing one's achievements. Others cite the Yosef Ometz (by Rav Yosef Yuzpa, Germany, 1570-1637) as advancing a different line of reasoning. Halacha famously allows distorting the truth for the sake of peace. If being precisely truthful will cause tension or hostility between people, then the value of maintaining harmony supersedes the value of honesty, and it is preferable to speak imprecisely. The Yosef Ometz reasoned that this can be applied also to humility, because arrogance causes tension to the soul. An arrogant person is at odds with himself, whereas the humble person is at peace with himself. Therefore, the rule allowing dishonesty for the sake of peace can be extended to allow speaking dishonestly for the sake of maintaining humility, as maintaining humility means maintaining inner peace. The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his Ben Yehoyada (Bava Mesia 23b), suggested a different proof, from the story told in Masechet Baba Batra (8a) about Rabbi Yonatan falsely denying his scholarly achievements. However, the Ben Ish Hai then refutes this proof, noting that in that story, Rabbi Yonatan needed to speak untruthfully to avoid deriving benefit from his scholarly status. As it is strictly forbidden to use one's Torah scholarship for personal gain, it was necessary for him to falsely deny his credentials, and so this does not prove that one may do so in the interest of humility. Nevertheless, Halacha indeed allows one to falsely deny his spiritual and scholarly achievements for the sake of humility. It is worth adding in conclusion that as important as it is to be humble, and to conceal one's achievements, it is equally important to strive for greatness so that one has something to hide. Indeed, it is no coincidence that Moshe Rabbenu is described as the humblest of all men – precisely because he was the greatest of all men. It is because he had what to be humble about – more than any other person in world history – that he was able to excel in humility by concealing his greatness. The Sages famously explain that G-d chose to give the Torah specifically on a relatively low mountain – Mount Sinai – as opposed to the taller mountains in the region, in order to teach us the importance of humility in Torah study and practice. The Sefat Emet (Rav Yehuda Aryeh Leib Alter of Ger, 1847-1905) noted that although G-d wanted to teach us humility, He decided to give the Torah on a mountain, and not in a valley, or a canyon. The reason, the Sefat Emet explains, is because Hashem wants us to strive for great heights, to achieve greatness, to excel to the very best of our ability, to rise like a mountain – but while maintaining our humility. This is the symbolism of Mount Sinai – a mountain that extends into the air, but not as high as other mountains, showing us that we are to strive for excellence while concealing our accomplishments rather than putting them on display.

One should strive to perform Misvot humbly and discreetly, without publicizing the religious act or making a spectacle of himself. In fact, the greatest Sadikim are "Sadikim Nistarim" – "concealed" Sadikim whose piety is not discernible, whom people view as ordinary laymen. There is great value to Misvot fulfilled in private, without anyone knowing about it. Conversely, the Rabbis of Mussar warn of the severity of performing Misvot for the sake of impressing people and drawing attention to oneself. Based on the comments of the Hobot Ha'lebabot (Rabbenu Bahya Ibn Pakuda, Spain, d. 1120), they warn that performing Misvot for publicity could be even graver than idol-worship. When a person performs a Misva to earn people's admiration, then he is serving himself, not G-d – and this is a grievous sin akin to idolatry. We must always remember that the objective of Misvot is to bring glory and honor to Hashem, and not to bring glory and honor to oneself. Some Rabbis taught that when a person receives praise and compliments for a Misva which he performed, then Hashem sends angels to bring his reward, instead of rewarding him directly. The angels delivering the reward are exposed to the risk of sabotage by the prosecuting angels who deny the individual's worthiness, and so the reward is not certain to materialize. By contrast, people who fulfill Misvot in an invisible manner, hidden from view, become "invisible" to the prosecuting angels, and cannot be harmed by them. Indeed, there are stories of "hidden" Sadikim, who kept their piety secret, and actually became invisible, unseen by those who were trying to harm them. The Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) writes that if a person receives praise for a Misva or for his good qualities, he should immediately remind himself that he has yet to accomplish even a fraction of what he is meant to accomplish. He should recognize, first and foremost, that a lot of the praise people give is false flattery, spoken to earn his favor. And even if it was spoken sincerely, he should remember that he has so much more to do. Even Abraham Abinu, as great as he was, said about himself, "I am but dust and ash" (Bereshit 18:27). King Shlomo teaches us in Mishleh (27:2), "Yehalelucha Zar, Ve'lo Picha" – "Let others praise you, but not your mouth." Even if other people give us praise, we should refrain from giving ourselves praise, and should instead humbly acknowledge our imperfections and how much better we can be. Unfortunately, in our day and age, people expect their good deeds to be noticed and praised, instead of feeling content knowing that they did a Misva. The desire for attention and compliments calls the person's sincerity into question, and could undermine the value of the Misva which he performed. If a person takes upon himself a fast, for example, he should keep it private and not tell anyone about it. A fascinating story is told of Rav Yaakob Kuli (Turkey, d. 1732) who decided to observe a three-day fast, for a full 72 hours. Toward the very end of the fast, with only about one hour left, he was with somebody who was drinking coffee and offered him some. Rav Yaakob agreed to drink the coffee, breaking his fast which he had nearly completed, in order not to disclose his piety. If a person wishes to accept upon himself a certain stringency, he must try to conceal it. People often use stringency as a way to showcase themselves, to put themselves on display, to make themselves appear more religiously committed than others. This undermines the value of an otherwise admirable religious practice. It is also not uncommon for people to use stringencies as a way of "upstaging" their Rabbi, of pretending that they are more devout than he is. They choose to observe a certain stringency that he does not observe and then make a point of telling him about it, thus presenting themselves as more religious. This is not only very disrespectful, but also the diametric opposite of the kind of humility and sincerity with which Misvot are to be performed. The Mishna in Pirkeh Abot (1:13) warns very sternly, "U'd'ishtamash Be'taga Halaf" – one who uses Torah as a "crown" for glorifying himself deserves to be eliminated from the world. I am reminded of the time when, many years ago, before it was common for married men to wear Tefillin Rabbenu Tam, a regular fellow started putting on Tefillin Rabbenu Tam in front of everyone in the Deal Synagogue. Rav Yom Tob Yedid reprimanded him, noting that even the great Rabbis of Halab (Aleppo, Syria) would not put on Tefillin Rabbenu Tam in the synagogue; they wore it in the privacy of their home, so as not to publicize their observance of this admirable measure of piety. Another example of this mistake is when a person walks into shul in the morning with a towel around his neck, publicizing the fact that he went to the Mikveh before praying. If he were really sincere in his desire to achieve purity, then he would not need to draw attention to himself by wearing a towel. This applies also to the way we pray in the synagogue. A person should not pray in an unusual manner, swaying and throwing his hands around, turning his emotions into a public display. It is told that Rabbi Akiba would be standing at the end of his prayer in a different part of the room because he moved so much while praying – but this was only when he prayed at home. In public, one must not do anything unusual that would attract attention. The Peri Megadim (Rav Yosef Teomim, 1727-1792) notes that refraining from public displays of religiosity helps one avoid scorn and derision. One of the difficult obstacles that arise when people seek to grow in their religious observance is the ridicule that they hear from their peers. If one keeps his religious growth private, he is not subject to the scorn of cynical onlookers who seek to discourage him. Moreover, private endeavors are more likely to succeed and endure. The first Luhot (tablets) which Hashem gave to Moshe were shattered soon afterward – in response to the sin of the golden calf – whereas the second lasted forever. The Sages noted that the first Luhot were given as part of a public spectacle, whereas the second Luhot were given to Moshe privately, in quiet – and so the second Luhot endured. An important exception to this rule is religious observance in the presence of one's children. It is crucially important for children to see their parents' religious devotion so they learn from their example. The Torah says in the Book of Debarim (29:28), "Ha'nistarot L'Hashem Elokenu, Ve'ha'niglot Lanu U'l'banenu Ad Olam" – "The concealed matters are for Hashem our G-d, whereas the revealed matters are for us and our children, for all time." This has been explained to mean that everything we do for Hashem should be "Nistarot" – kept hidden, except that "Lanu U'l'banenu," with respect to our role as parents educating our children, our deeds should be "Niglot," revealed, open for them to see, so they can learn how to properly serve Hashem. Ultimately, of course, the most important factor is one's sincerity. The goal of every Misva act must be the pure service of Hashem, and connecting to Him to the best of one's ability, without any ulterior motives.

The Hafetz Haim, toward the beginning of his Bi'ur Halacha, references the comments written by the author of the anonymous Sefer Ha'hinuch, in the introduction to that work. There the author lists the six "Misvot Temidiyot" – "constant" Misvot, which one can always fulfilled at any moment of any day simply by thinking certain things. These Misvot apply at all times, and involve certain thoughts, giving us the opportunity to earn credit for Misvot at any time. Elsewhere in his writings – in his Shemirat Ha'lashon – the Hafetz Haim advises us to fulfill these Misvot after the morning Shaharit prayer, before eating breakfast. These six Misvot are: The belief in Hashem's existence, that there is a Creator. The belief that there is no other deity besides the Almighty. The belief that G-d is one, a singular entity, and does not consist of multiple parts. Ahabat Hashem – love of G-d. The Rambam writes that one arrives at genuine love of Hashem by contemplating the vastness and intricacy of the natural world, the majesty of creation, how everything is perfectly designed. Additionally, one can arrive at Ahabat Hashem by thinking of Hashem's kindness, of how much Hashem has given him and continues giving him each and every moment of every day, despite his unworthiness. Twice each day, we recite Shema, in which we make reference to this Misva – "Ve'ahabta Et Hashem Elokecha" ("You shall love Hashem your G-d"). Now the Gemara (Berachot 14b) teaches that one who recites Shema without wearing Tefillin is considered giving "false testimony," as though he does not believe the words he speaks, because the text of Shema contains the command to wear Tefillin. The Sefer Haredim (Rav Elazar Ezkari, Safed, 1533-1600) writes that by the same token, if one does not work to fulfill the Misva of Ahabat Hashem, then he is guilty of giving "false testimony" each time he recites Shema and mentions this obligation. Fear of G-d. This Misva incorporates two different levels of fear. The first and more basic level is the fear of retribution, recognizing that we are held accountable for our conduct and Hashem punishes those who disobey Him. The higher level of fear, known as "Yir'at Ha'romemut," refers to what we might call reverence, feelings of awe as we recognize Hashem's infinite power and greatness. The final of the six "constant" Misvot is the command of "Ve'lo Taturu Ahareh Lebabchem Ve'ahareh Enechem," which forbids harboring illicit thoughts and looking at inappropriate sights. Many people mistakenly disregard the severity of this prohibition, figuring that without acting upon their lustful thoughts, and just by looking at inappropriate sights, they are not doing anything wrong. This is wrong. The Torah forbids even looking at forbidden sights because the process of sin begins when a person sees something alluring, which then arouses temptation in the heart that can likely lead to illicit behavior. And the Rambam, in Moreh Nebuchim, writes that in a sense, thinking sinful thoughts is even worse than sinful action, because sinful thoughts corrupt the mind, the loftiest and most important part of the human being. Moreover, a sinful act is finite, occurring over the course of several brief moments, whereas sinful thoughts can remain in one's mind for lengthy periods of time. The Hafetz Haim warned that if one does not guard his eyes during his lifetime, his soul will experience blindness in the next world. This notion is developed further by the Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), who writes that the soul has eyes just as the body does. After a person's soul departs, the soul will experience the ultimate pleasure – beholding the glory of the Shechina (divine presence). However, in order to experience this pleasure, the soul needs good "vision," and the quality of the soul's vision depends on whether the individual had properly guarded his physical eyes against forbidden sights during his lifetime. Of course, guarding the eyes has become an especially difficult challenge in our generation. A person may not, however, simply give up. One must make every effort he can to guard his eyes, and, at very least, must avoid places where the challenge becomes even greater. One must also recognize that every successful avoidance of forbidden sights is exceedingly valuable, and cherished by the Almighty. And, even if one has failed repeatedly in this regard, he must believe in Hashem's compassion and recognize the power of Teshuba. Hashem lovingly welcomes and accepts our efforts to improve, regardless of our failures in the past. Returning to the Hafetz Haim's comments in Bi'ur Halacha, he writes there that consciously observing these six Mivot – thinking about the required beliefs about Hashem, feeling love and fear, and avoiding improper thoughts and sights – is a way to fulfill the verse, "Shiviti Hashem Le'negdi Tamid" – "I have placed G-d opposite me, constantly" (Tehillim 16:8). One can have G-d on his mind at all times by making an effort to fulfill these Misvot whenever he can over the course of the day. Incidentally, there is a custom observed by many to have a Sofer (scribe) prepare for them a special piece of parchment with this verse – "Shiviti Hashem…" – written on top, and beneath it an image of a Menorah with Kabbalistic text. This is kept in the Siddur, with the top protruding from the Siddur, so the individual always sees this verse during the prayer service and thus remains focused on Hashem. Others have similar texts written with certain Names of G-d, for the same reason. The Mishna Berura warns, though, that one must ensure to properly care for these pieces of parchment and to see to it that they do not fall to the floor. Many congregations have the custom of prominently featuring the verse of "Shiviti Hashem" in large letters on the wall of the synagogue.

Yir'at Shamayim – the awareness that Hashem is watching us at all times, and sees everything we do – does not come naturally. Since we do not directly perceive Hashem with our senses, it is difficult to live with this awareness. This is something that requires work and a conscious effort. One of the important things we can do to help ourselves develop Yir'at Shamayim is to pray for it. The Gemara (Shabbat 156b) relates that Rav Nahman Bar Yishak's mother was informed by astrologers that her child would grow to become a criminal. She immediately ensured that he would never go about bareheaded, and she instructed him to regularly pray to be saved from the Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination). Sure enough, the Gemara in Masechet Sota (49b) cites Rav Nahman Bar Yishak as testifying about himself that he possessed Yir'at Shamayim. This was, undoubtedly, due at least in part to his impassioned prayers for Yir'at Shamayim. The Maharsha (1555-1631) explains that although the Talmud (Berachot 33b) teaches, "Everything is in G-d's hands, except for the fear of G-d," implying that G-d does not help us fear Him, nevertheless, one who sincerely strives for Yir'at Shamayim can certainly pray for Hashem's assistance. If Hashem sees that a person has made the decision to try to live with Yir'at Shamayim, and beseeches Him for help, then He will assist that person. Indeed, we pray in Birkat Ha'mazon, "Ha'Rahaman Hu Yita Torato Ve'ahabato Be'libenu Ve'tiheyeh Yir'ato Al Panenu Le'bilti Neheta" – "The Merciful One shall plant in our hearts the love of His Torah and the love of Him, and the fear of Him shall be upon our faces so that we do not sin." At several points during the prayer service, too, we ask Hashem to help us in our quest for Yir'at Shamayim so we conduct ourselves properly at all times. It is also critically important to pray for one's children to have Yir'at Shamayim. Rav Haim Soloveitchik of Brisk (1853-1918) said that a boy's level of Torah learning depends on how often his father studies Torah with him, and his level of Yir'at Shamayim depends on how many tears his mother sheds while praying for his Yir'at Shamayim during candle lighting on Friday evening. Additionally, many great Rabbis gave us "tips" and strategies for developing our fear of G-d. The Yafeh La'leb (Rav Rahamim Nissim Yishak Palachi, Turkey, 1813-1907) writes that we can help engender Yir'at Shamayim within ourselves by regularly saying "Be'ezrat Hashem" – "with G-d's help" – before we proceed to do something. The more we remind ourselves that nothing we try to do can succeed without Hashem's assistance, that He is with us at all times helping us to do all that we need to do, even simple tasks, the more aware we will be of His continuous presence. Rav Yisrael Bitan cites from a wide range of sources fifteen "Segulot" that help one attain Yir'at Shamayim: 1) Looking up to the sky, to heighten our awareness of Hashem. 2) Looking at one's Sisit. 3) Reciting the verses in the Book of Debarim about Yir'at Shamayim (10:12-13) while wearing Tefillin Rabbenu Tam. 4) Learning Torah while wearing Tefillin Rabbenu Tam. 5) Spending a good deal of time in the synagogue. 6) Exercising care to avoid all kinds of forbidden speech. 7) Always seeking peace and promoting peace, while avoiding conflict and fights. 8) Ensuring to fulfill the Misva of standing in honor of the elderly and of Torah scholars. The Arizal noted that right after the Torah commands us to stand to honor the elderly and the scholars, it adds, "Ve'yareta Me'Elokecha" – "You shall fear your G-d" (Vayikra 19:32), indicating that fulfilling this Misva helps one develop Yir'at Shamayim. The Gemara (Berachot 28a) tells that when Rabbi Zera grew tired, and was unable to learn Torah, he would stand by the entrance to the study hall, explaining that when the Rabbis would pass by, he would stand in their honor and thereby receive reward. The Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) explained that Rabbi Zera certainly did not fulfill Misvot for the sake of earning reward. However, he was saying that by fulfilling the Misva to honor the Torah scholars, he would be rewarded with Yir'at Shamayim, and this is how he could continue developing himself spiritually when he lacked the strength to learn Torah. 9) Picturing in one's mind the Name of "Havaya" punctuated with the vowels of the word "Yir'a." 10) Regularly studying Torah. 11) Conducting oneself with humility at all times. 12) Having the works of the Rambam in one's home. 13) Regularly studying the Tur, the Bet Yosef, and the Shulhan Aruch. 14) Eating Shabbat meals with the specific intention of giving honor to the Shabbat. 15) Speaking sparingly, and spending periods of time in silence. When we are with great people, we feel somewhat uncomfortable and therefore speak little, afraid that we might say something inappropriate or foolish. Therefore, we should accustom ourselves to avoid excessive speech, sensing that we are in the presence of the Almighty. I would humbly add another piece of advice – to study the works of the Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909). His works are written in a very unique style, in a way that engenders a great deal of excitement for every topic he writes about. Regularly studying these precious books can help inspire us and inject us with Yir'at Shamayim. It is told that Rav Nahman of Breslav (Ukraine, 1772-1810) would spend some time each day outdoors, alone, speaking to Hashem, thanking Him for all his blessings, expressing all his needs, concerns and wishes, and asking for His assistance. This, too, is a very effective way to develop Yir'at Shamayim – taking some time each day to speak to Hashem in our own words, without a fixed text, as though He is right in front of us, expressing our feelings of gratitude as well as our fears, our needs and our wishes. These regular "meetings" help us remain conscious of His ongoing presence in our lives. One of the most important strategies for developing and maintaining Yir'at Shamayim is ensuring to be in good company, with likeminded individuals who share our religious values and our religious commitment. We are profoundly influenced by our surroundings, and so the more time we spend with G-d-fearing people, the more likely we are to be G-d-fearing ourselves. Furthermore, Rav Chaim Soloveitchik would advise people to have a close peer, a confidant, with whom to discuss matters related to Yir'at Shamayim and work together to think of practical measures to help them live with genuine fear of Hashem.

The Rama opens his glosses to the Shulhan Aruch by citing a passage from the Rambam's Moreh Nebuchim about the importance of maintaining awareness of Hashem's watchful eye. Knowing that Hashem is always watching us, wherever we are, will naturally bring us Yir'at Shamayim (fear of Heaven), which will, in turn, help ensure that we avoid wrongdoing, even when we feel tempted to sin. This concept is stated very clearly in a famous Mishna in Pirkeh Abot (2:1) which teaches: "Look at three things and you will not come upon sin: Know what is above you – a watchful eye and a listening ear, and that all your deeds are written in a book." The most basic thing we can do to avoid wrongful conduct, to overcome spiritual challenges and withstand sinful lures, is to live with a constant awareness that Hashem sees everything we do. In fact, this was the primary message that the religious leaders would convey to the people in times of crisis to inspire them to perform Teshuba (repentance). The Mishna in Masechet Ta'anit (15a) says that when a public fast day was declared on account of a crisis, such as a drought or plague, the townspeople would assemble and their spiritual leader would speak to them "Dibreh Kibushin." Rabbenu Hananel (Tunisia, d. 1050) explains the word "Kibushin" to mean "concealed," and writes that the leader would reveal the people's hidden sins. This seems very difficult to understand, as it works off the assumption that the town's Rabbi had prophetic insight and knew which sins the people committed in private. The Elya Rabba (Rav Eliyahu Spira, Prague, 1660-1712) explained Rabbenu Hananel to mean that the Rabbi would not actually expose hidden offenses, but would rather remind the people that everything they do, even in private and secrecy, is known to Hashem. This would draw the people's attention to the need to avoid misconduct at all times, as everything they do is seen and recorded. The Hafetz Haim famously remarked that the advent of video recording helps us understand this concept. It was always difficult for people to fully comprehend the notion that everything we do in life is "filmed' and put onto the record. Now that we have the ability to record, we understand this much more clearly. One of the most basic principles of religious life is that we must live with this awareness, with Yir'at Shamayim, recognizing that Hashem sees everything we do.

The Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1530-1572) begins his glosses to the Shulhan Aruch by citing the Rambam's comments in Moreh Nebuchim regarding the verse in Tehillim (16:8), "Shiviti Hashem Le'negdi Tamid" – "I have placed G-d opposite me, always." The Rambam describes this verse as "Kelal Gadol Ba'Torah U'b'ma'alot Ha'sadikim Asher Holechim Lifnei Ha'Elokim" – "a great principle of the Torah and of the qualities of the righteous who walk before G-d." He explains that a person acts much differently in private than he does in the presence of a king, and thus if a person lives with the awareness that he is always in G-d's presence, and that G-d sees everything he does, even when he is alone, he will avoid sin and always conduct himself properly. The Rama brings this passage at the very beginning of the Shulhan Aruch because if a person lacks Yir'at Shamayim – fear of G-d – then learning this book will not help him. The Shulhan Aruch establishes for a person what he must do and must not do, but if a person does not live with fear of Hashem, and does not recognize that he is held accountable for all his actions, then there is no purpose served by learning about his religious responsibilities. The verse discussed by the Rambam in this passage begins with the word "Shiviti," which is commonly translated as "I place," but could also be understood as a derivative of the word "Shaveh" – "equal." Some have thus explained this verse to mean that our awareness of Hashem's presence and His Hashgaha (providence) must remain "equal" and consistent at all times. It is relatively easy to sense Hashem's watchful eye when things are going well, when we enjoy good fortune, but this becomes more difficult in times of hardship and distress. "Shitivi Hashem" means that we fully acknowledge Hashem's presence at every moment, and that He guides and directs the course of our lives at every step, under all circumstances, both in good times and in life's more difficult periods. As the Mishna in Masechet Berachot (54a) famously teaches, we must bless Hashem upon experiencing misfortune just as we bless Him in times of good fortune. This might also explain why this verse speaks of Hashem being present "Le'negdi" – "opposite me." Rather than say that G-d is "Lefanai" – "before me," this verse chooses the word "Le'negdi," which connotes opposition. One explanation is that we must acknowledge Hashem's presence and live in humble submission to His will even when it appears that He is "opposing" us, that He is causing us misfortune. We believe that everything Hashem does – even that which causes us pain and distress – is ultimately to our benefit, and so even when He appears "Le'negdi," in opposition, we must continue placing our trust in Him and serving Him faithfully. Others explain the word "Le'negdi" as a reference to the need to occasionally oppose our natural instincts. Living with an awareness of Hashem's presence leads us to self-restraint, to abstain from things we instinctively wish to do in submission to Hashem's command. And thus Hashem's presence is "Le'negdi," causing us to oppose ourselves, our sinful tendencies, so we live in strict accordance with His will at all times.

Immediately upon waking in the morning, one should recite the brief "Modeh Ani" prayer, thanking Hashem for restoring his soul. This prayer is mentioned already in Sefer Ha'yir'a, by Rabbenu Yona (Spain, 1210–1263), and in Seder Ha'yom (by Rav Moshe Ben Machir, Safed, 16th century). When one sleeps, he entrusts his soul to G-d, who returns it in the morning, and so when we wake up in the morning, we thank Hashem for returning our soul "Be'hemla" – with compassion. G-d is under no obligation to return our souls, but He does so in His infinite mercy and love. We must therefore express our gratitude to Him as soon as our souls are returned, right when we wake up. In fact, Hashem not only restores our souls, but He gives them back to us in better condition, as it were, than they were when we entrusted them to Him. Imagine a person borrows his fellow's phone, and he returns it fully charged, with a new screen and a new case. This is what happens with a person's soul each morning. Over the course of the day, a person "damages" his soul through his misdeeds. However, if he sincerely repents before he goes to sleep, Hashem mercifully "cleanses" the soul for him during the night, returning it in the morning in a pristine state of purity. For this, too, we must express our gratitude when we wake up in the morning. Additionally, the soul feels more comfortable and "at home" in the heavens, in the purely spiritual realm, than it does here on earth within our physical bodies. Each morning, when the time comes for the soul to return to the person's body, it resists. G-d needs to exert pressure, as it were, and "convince" the soul to once again leave the pristine environs of the heavens and go bacl into our messy, complex physical world. This is another reason why we express our gratitude each morning. One of the commentators noted that the "Modeh Ani" prayer is specifically formulated such that the first word which leaves our mouth in the morning is "Modeh," an expression of gratitude. If the words were reversed, and the text read "Ani Modeh," then the first word uttered in the morning would be "Ani" – "I," and this would be inappropriate. Our first thoughts in the morning should be not about ourselves, but rather about Hashem, our debt of gratitude to Him, and our obligations toward Him. Many people make the mistake of reciting the words "Be'hemla Rabba" together, assuming that it means, "with abundant compassion." However, this is incorrect, because this leaves the final word of the prayer – "Emunatecha" ("Your trustworthiness") – on its own, without any meaning. The correct reading of this prayer is that we thank Hashem for restoring our souls "Be'hemla," with compassion, and we then exclaim, "Rabba Emunatecha" – G-d's trustworthiness is truly extraordinary. As mentioned, He reliably restores our souls each morning – giving them back not only intact, but in even better condition than they were when we entrusted them to Him. The widespread custom is that women recite this prayer in the feminine form, saying, "Moda" instead of "Modeh." Although there were some Poskim who opposed adjusting the text of the fixed prayer service to the feminine form for women, this does not apply to "Modeh Ani," which is not a formal prayer. It was introduced after the time of the Talmud, and so we do not need to be so strict about its wording. Children should be taught to recite "Modeh Ani" each morning. Since "Modeh Ani" does not have the status of a formal prayer, it may be recited even without wearing a Kippa, and it may be recited even before one washes his hands. Rav Yaakob Emden (Germany, 1697-1776) maintained that one must wash his hands before reciting "Modeh Ani" in the morning, but the consensus among the Poskim does not follow this opinion. The Yalkut Yosef cites the ruling of Rav Aryeh Tzvi Frommer (Poland, 1884-1943) that one may recite "Modeh Ani" in the restroom, since it is not a formal prayer and does not mention a Name of Hashem. However, Rav Yisrael Bitan questioned this ruling, noting that Halacha forbids uttering even descriptive references to Hashem – such as "Rahum" and "Hanun" – in a bathhouse. This should, seemingly, apply also to a prayer in which we speak directly to Hashem, such as "Modeh Ani." Moreover, Rav Bitan cites Poskim who forbade reciting "Modeh Ani" in the presence of a patient with a bedpan. Therefore, one should not follow this leniency, and should refrain from reciting "Modeh Ani" in the restroom. It should be recited immediately when one wakes up, before he gets out of bed.

We have been discussing the opening Halacha in the Shulhan Aruch requiring one to be "strong like a lion" to rise in the morning. The Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1530-1572) adds: "Yakum Bi'zrizut La'abodat Bor'o" – "One shall rise with zeal for the service of his Creator." A number of commentators raised the question of how to reconcile these statements with the Gemara's warning in Masechet Gittin (70) that rising immediately after performing certain activities poses a danger to one's health. These activities include eating, drinking, blood-letting, and sleeping. How can the Shulhan Aruch and Rama require one to immediately jump out of bed in the morning, if the Gemara warns that this could be harmful to one's health? Several different answers have been offered for this question. The Taz (Rav David Segal, 1586-1667) dismissed this question entirely, stating that if a person jumps out of bed for the service of Hashem, then clearly his wellbeing will not be harmed. Hashem protects those who go to perform Misvot, and so the warning about jumping out of bed immediately after waking up does not apply if one's intention is to right away prepare for prayer and for the day's Misvot. The work Tosefet Shabbat explains that when the Rama writes that a person should immediately "rise" – "Yakum" – he means that a person should right away sit up. The Tosefet Shabbat brings a prooftext from the story of Yaakob bringing meat to his father, Yishak, before receiving his blessing. When Yaakob arrived, he said, "Yakum Abi Ve'yochal Mi'sed Beno" – "My father shall rise and eat from the hunt of his son" (Bereshit 27:31). Clearly, Yaakob was not telling his father to stand up to eat. Rather, Yishak – an elderly man – was lying or reclining, and Yaakob asked him to sit up straight so he can eat. Likewise, the Rama perhaps meant that a person should right away straighten himself up in bed after waking, but should then wait a few moments before getting out of bed. The Magen Abraham explains in a slightly different vein, asserting that the Rama meant that a person should get out of bed quickly, but not immediately after waking up. A person should wait a moment or two, and then get out of bed. Likewise, the Shulhan Aruch Ha'Rav (Rav Schneur Zalman of Liadi, 1745-1812) writes that one should first stay in bed for the recitation of "Modeh Ani," and then get out of bed. This is, indeed, the Halacha – that one should recite "Modeh Ani" immediately upon waking, and should then get out of bed.

The Mishna in Pirkeh Abot (5:20) instructs that one should "run like a deer" ("Ratz Ka'sevi") to fulfill Hashem's will. This refers to the requirement to perform Misvot energetically, with enthusiasm, and not lethargically, as though we would rather be doing something else. People often run to the synagogue when they are late for the Minyan – but the truth is that one should always "run like a deer" to shul, even when they have plenty of time. Walking fast to the synagogue shows one's enthusiasm and eagerness to serve Hashem, and so regardless of the time, even if one is early, he should walk briskly to shul. This also means that one should not procrastinate when it comes to Torah learning or Misva observance. If a person has an opportunity to learn or to perform a Misva, he should proceed to seize the opportunity immediately, without delay. Otherwise, he gives the Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination) a chance to interfere, to disrupt his plans by trying to convince him not to perform the Misva. Finally, this admonition requires us to strive to perform Misvot ourselves rather than delegate them to others. The Gemara in Masechet Kiddushin (41a) establishes, "Misva Bo Yoter Mi'bi'shluho" – it is preferable to perform a Misva oneself than to discharge one's obligation through an agent. Personally tending to a Misva demonstrates one's love for the Misva, and that he cherishes opportunities to serve his Creator. There are certain Misvot that may be performed through an agent, a rule known in Halacha by the expression "Sheluho Shel Adam Ke'moto" – "A person's messenger is like himself." However, Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim noted that the word "Kemoto" in this expression can be read to mean "like his death" – warning that accustoming oneself to delegate Misvot is a type of spiritual demise. We achieve spiritually and build our relationship with Hashem by pursuing Misva opportunities, by lovingly and excitedly involving ourselves in Misvot, without looking for other people to do them for us.

The Mishna in Pirkeh Abot (5:20) instructs us to be "Kal Ka'nesher" – "light as an eagle." The Tur, at the very beginning of the work, comments that although this appears to refer to zeal and alacrity in the performance of Misvot, this cannot be the correct meaning, because the Mishna then instructs us to "run like a deer" ("Ratz Ka'svi"), which clearly speaks of swift, energetic performance of Misvot. Rather, the Tur writes, "Kal Ka'nesher" means that we must ensure to guard our eyes and avoid forbidden sights. An eagle, which soars to great heights and flies at great speeds, can see vast distances at every moment, and so this creature is associated with the faculty of vision. We must be exceptionally vigilant to turn our eyes away from forbidden sights, because sinful desires begin with the eyes – the eyes see something enticing, and then the heart wants it. The lure begins with the eyes, and so the Mishna urges us to swiftly turn our eyes away from things that we should not be seeing. In fact, there is a tradition that if a person has the opportunity to look at an improper sight, and he turns his eyes away, then at that moment he can make any request from G-d, and the request is likely to be granted. Of course, this is an especially difficult challenge, and, moreover, we often cannot control what we see, because things come into view without our having wanted them to. For this reason, King David prayed, "Ha'aever Enai Me're'ot Shav" (119:37) – that G-d should turn his eyes away from improper sights. We need to beseech G-d for assistance, and ask Him to shield our eyes from things that we should not see. We read in the Book of Bereshit (17:5) that Hashem added the letter Heh to Abraham Abinu's name, which was thus changed from "Abram" to "Abraham." Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim explained that the name "Abraham" in Gematria equals 248, alluding to the 248 limbs in a person's body. Abraham was called "Abram" because he exerted control over his entire body except for five of his limbs – the two eyes, the two ears, and the nose. These are beyond a person's control, as he can encounter forbidden sights, forbidden sounds (such as Lashon Ha'ra) and forbidden smells (such as the scent of pagan sacrifices) without planning to. Once Abraham had fully mastered all that he was able to master, Hashem then added the letter Heh – stepping in to ensure that his eyes, ears and nose would likewise remain pure and be protected from anything improper. If we exert the maximum effort that we can in this regard, and we beseech G-d for help, then He will give us the assistance we need to avoid seeing forbidden sights.

The Midrash tells that each day, King David would have plans for the day, intending to go to various places and to see different people, but his legs always brought him to the Bet Midrash to learn Torah. The Or Ha'haim (Rav Haim Ben-Attar, 1696-1743) understood the Midrash's comment literally, that King David's legs had "a mind of their own," so-to-speak, and would bring David to the study hall despite his plans to go elsewhere. David had such a strong, deep-seated desire to learn Torah that his legs automatically took him to the Bet Midrash, even when he did not plan to go there. The Or Ha'haim explains on this basis the Torah's promise of great reward "Im Be'hukotai Telechu" – "If you walk according to My statutes" (Vayikra 26:3). This means that we are worthy of great reward if we feel such love and passion for Torah that we walk "Be'hukotai" – toward the Torah's laws, to learn, even when we do not intend to, because our legs automatically bring us to the study hall. Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim, however, offered a different explanation of the Midrash's comment. He said that each morning, the Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination) would try to convince David to stay in bed, and David fought the Yeser Ha'ra by saying that he needed to get up to tend to his personal affairs. The Yeser Ha'ra has no problem with us getting up for mundane purposes, and so it left David alone and discontinued its efforts to persuade David to remain in bed. Once David got out of bed without having to struggle against the Yeser Ha'ra, he then went to the Bet Midrash to learn Torah instead of tending to his personal affairs. This was David's strategy for defeating the Yeser Ha'ra in the morning and overcoming the difficult challenge of getting up early to serve Hashem. This reading of the Midrash perhaps sheds light on a difficult verse in Shir Hashirim (4:16): "Uri Safon U'bo'i Teman" – "Arise in the north, and come to the south." The north is associated with material blessings, as the Shulhan (table) in the Mishkan – which symbolized Parnasa (livelihood) – was positioned to the north side. The south is associated with Torah wisdom, as the Menorah – the symbol of the "light" of Torah – was situated along the southern wall of the Mishkan. For this reason, the Gemara teaches that one who seeks wealth should turn somewhat to the north while praying, whereas one who seeks Torah wisdom should turn somewhat to the south. Accordingly, the verse in Shir Hashirim may be understood to mean that we should tell the Yeser Ha'ra in the morning that "Uri Safon" – we are waking up for the sake of pursuing wealth, to work and make a respectable livelihood, as the Yeser Ha'ra will then cease his efforts to convince us to stay in bed. But thereafter, "Bo'i Teman" – we should go "south," to the synagogue and study hall to pray and immerse ourselves in Torah study.

The Shulhan Aruch begins by urging us to be "strong as a lion" to wake up early for the service of our Creator. The Hesed La'alafim (Rav Eliezer Papo, 1785-1828) explains that struggling against the Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination) is always a difficult challenge, but the struggle to wake up early in the morning is particularly difficult. Right when we wake up, it takes us time to be fully alert, and both our physical and mental faculties are frail. We are therefore in an especially compromised position vis-à-vis the Yeser Ha'ra, who is always "on top of its game" and working to discourage us from doing the right thing. The Shulhan Aruch therefore urges us to muster strength "like a lion" to resist the efforts of the Yeser Ha'ra to keep us in bed when we are supposed to be getting up to serve Hashem. The Mesilat Yesharim (Rav Moshe Haim Luzzato, Italy, 1707-1746) discusses at length the need for "strategies" for fighting the Yeser Ha'ra. The Yeser Ha'ra is exceptionally shrewd in its efforts to lead us astray, so we need to be equally clever in combating these efforts and to remain consistent in our service of Hashem. This is especially true when it comes to the struggle to get up in the morning. The Bayit Hadash (Rav Yoel Sirkis, Poland, 1561-1640) writes that in the morning, the Yeser Ha'ra cleverly tries to convince a person to remain in bed – in the winter, because it is cold early in the morning, and in the summer – when it is actually more comfortable in the cool, early morning hours – because sunrise is very early and he did not sleep enough. Often, the Yeser Ha'ra disguises its arguments as piety, telling the person that he should stay in bed and sleep late so that he can pray later with greater concentration. As the Yeser Ha'ra is shrewd and wily, it is necessary to explore strategies for winning the most difficult battle against the Yeser Ha'ra – the battle to get out of bed on time in the morning. The Hafetz Haim, who was always awake and out of bed early, was once asked about his strategy for winning this battle. He said that when the Yeser Ha'ra tries telling him to stay in bed because it's still early, or it's very cold, he would respond, "Well, you're out of bed! If you got out of bed, then so can I!" The Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) draws our attention to the comment of the Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles, Cracow, 1530-1572) on this first Halacha of the Shulhan Aruch. Citing from the Rambam in his Moreh Nebuchim, the Rama writes that a person must live with the constant awareness that Hashem is always present and sees everything he does. Knowing that we are under constant "surveillance" will assuredly affect the way we act. The Hida writes that G-d takes notice of whether or not we rise when we should, and this awareness should motivate us to wake up on time in the morning. King David says in Tehillim (119:98), "Me'oyebai Tehakemeni," which, simply understood, means, "You make me smarter than my foes." The Rabbis of Mussar explained that this verse also implies that we can gain wisdom "Me'oyebai" – from our adversaries, by learning from their example. When we see the way the wicked tirelessly pursue their desires and how carefully they plan to commit their wrongful acts, we are shown an example of the kind of vigilance with which we are to serve Hashem. When Yaakob Abinu sent a message to his brother, Esav, he told him, "I have lived with Laban, and I observed the 613 Misvot, and did not learn from his evil ways" (Rashi, Bereshit 32:5). Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky (1891-1986) explained that Yaakob here expressed his regret that he did not learn from Laban's pursuit of evil, from the way Laban so passionately and fervently dedicated himself to earn money through any possible means. Yaakob realized that he should have followed Laban's example of devoted work when serving the Almighty. Similarly, we see the lengths people go to earn money, to plan luxury vacations, to build luxury homes, to indulge in vanity – and we should commit to do the same for the sake of Torah and Misvot. Just as people wake up early very easily when this is necessary for a major business deal, or to catch a plane for a vacation, we should certainly be able to wake up early to serve Hashem. Some people employ the tactic of self-imposed "penalties," pledging to give a substantial amount of money to charity each morning that they do not wake up on time. Another relatively simple strategy for getting up early in the morning is to commit to some structured program or framework. For example, when I learned in yeshiva, some of us scheduled Havrutot (study sessions with partners) for the early morning, before Shaharit. If a person knows that his study partner will be waiting for him, he is more likely to get out of bed even if he feels tired or otherwise tempted to stay in bed. Likewise, one can join an early-morning study group, as knowing that he is part of the group makes him feel responsible to regularly attend, thus helping him overcome the temptation to sleep late. Perhaps the simplest – and most important – strategy for waking up early is going to sleep at a reasonable hour. As mentioned in an earlier installment in this series, some explain the Shulhan Aruch's instruction, "Yitgaber Ka'ari" – to be "strong as a lion" in the morning – to mean that one should go to sleep early, like a lion does, so he will wake up refreshed and energized. A yeshiva student once asked me how he can know whether or not he invests sufficient effort into his Torah study in yeshiva. I answered, very simply, that he just needs to strictly follow the yeshiva's schedule. True diligence in Torah learning does not mean that one studies into the wee hours of the morning. Rather, it means that he learns when he is supposed to learn, he eats when he is supposed to eat, he sleeps when he is supposed to sleep, and he relaxes when he is supposed to relax. Staying up very late – even to learn Torah! – is not advisable, as this makes the person less likely to wake up in time in the morning. In fact, it is told that the Hafetz Haim would shut the lights in the Bet Midrash of his yeshiva at night, because he did not want the boys to stay up too late. It is far more important to go to sleep at a reasonable hour so one can get up on time and pray properly, than to stay awake learning until late hours of the night. It is told that at one point during the Hida's travels, he found himself in a certain yeshiva in Germany, where there was a certain outstanding young prodigy, who was remarkably diligent in his Torah study. This youngster grew to become a renowned sage – Rav Natan Adler (1741-1800), the mentor of the Hatam Sofer (Rav Moshe Sofer of Pressburg, 1762-1839). As a young man, he would stay up very late learning Torah, and the Hida saw him arrive late one morning, since he had been up so late. The Hida approached him and gently reprimanded him by citing the remark made by the Shunamite woman, who would host the prophet Elisha: "Ish Elokim Kadosh Hu, Ober Alenu Tamid" – "He is a sacred man of G-d, who regularly passes through here" (Melachim II 4:9). This alluded to young Natan Adler who was a very holy individual – but who regularly "passed Alenu" – arriving late for Shaharit, after the recitation of Alenu… When we go to sleep early, so we wake up refreshed, we avoid the Yeser Ha'ra altogether. We don't even "get into the ring," so-to-speak, because we feel well-rested and ready to get out of bed, without having to struggle. Concluding this opening passage, urging us to rise early in the morning, the Shulhan Aruch writes, "She'yeheh Hu Me'orer Ha'shahar" – "that one should wake up the dawn." Meaning, ideally one should be awake before the sunrise, as though he "wakes up" the morning sun. The source of this concept is King David's proclamation in Tehillim (57:9), "A'ira Shahar" – "I shall awaken the dawn." The Midrash comments: "I shall awaken the dawn, rather than allow the dawn to awaken me." The Taz (Rav David Segal, Poland, d. 1667) raises the question of why the Shulhan Aruch writes only, "that one should wake up the dawn," omitting the Midrash's addition – that David did not allow the dawn to awaken him. The answer, the Taz suggests, is that only a righteous person like King David could have the confidence to declare that he would never wake up past dawn. A person on his level has the motivation and self-discipline to arise early in the morning. Most other people, however, cannot be so confident. We are instructed to make an effort to wake before dawn, but we know that we are frail and require Hashem's assistance. The Shulhan Aruch alludes to this distinction between us and King David by stating only that a person should arise before dawn, without expressing himself as definitively as King David did. The Taz's comments instruct that we must seek Hashem's assistance, and ask Him to help us get up early in the morning. The Rama, in his glosses to this opening passage in the Shulhan Aruch, emphasizes that when a person goes to sleep, he should be mindful of the fact that Hashem is present and watches him even while he sleeps. The work Si'ah Yishak explains the Rama to mean that going to sleep with this awareness will help a person get out of bed on time in the morning. When a person goes to sleep, he can "program" his mind to wake up early by contemplating that Hashem is watching him as he sleeps, and that he must therefore ensure to wake up properly. This is yet another important strategy for waking up early in the morning – to be mindful when going to sleep that Hashem is there watching him as he sleeps, and expects him to wake up on time.

Rav Yosef Karo, author of the Shulhan Aruch, begins his seminal work of Halacha by stating, "Yitgaber Ka'ari La'amod Ba'boker La'abodat Bor'o" – "One shall strengthen himself like a lion to arise in the morning for the service of his Creator." This exhortation is based on the Mishna in Pirkeh Abot (5:20), in which Yehuda Ben Tema urges us to be "brazen as a leopard, swift as an eagle, running like a deer, and mighty as a lion" to fulfill G-d's will. Some have raised the question of why the Shulhan Aruch brings only the analogy to a lion, and not the others. He writes that we should be strong "as a lion" when rising in the morning, without mentioning the requirement to be "brazen like a leopard" or energetic like an eagle or deer. Why? One intriguing theory appears in the work Shulhan Melachim, which notes that the phrase "Yitgaber Ka'ari" in Gematria equals 846 – the same Gematria as Rav Yosef Karo's name: "Yosef ben Efrayim Karo." (This resembles the observation made by some commentators that the Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles, Cracow, 1530-1572), who wrote glosses to the Shulhan Aruch, begins these notes by twice writing the word "Hagaha" ("note"). The word "Hagaha" in Gemaria equals 13, such that the two instances of this word equal 26 – the Gematria of the Name of Hashem ("Havaya"). The Rama was alluding to us that he was writing this work purely for the sake of Heaven.) Another explanation given is that the four animals mentioned by Yehuda Ben Tema in the Mishna correspond to the four basic elements of the natural world – fire, water, air and earth, and the lion is associated with fire. The Shulhan Aruch therefore emphasizes this particular exhortation – "Yitgaber Ka'ari" – to emphasize that we must strive to rise early in the morning in order to defeat the Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination), which burns like a fire within each person. Waking early is a critically important aspect of the war we must wage against the Yeser Ha'ra, and so the Shulhan Aruch urges us to muster the strength of a lion – which is associated with fire – to counteract the force of the "fire" of the evil inclination. Others explain that a lion sleeps with one eye open, so it can remain alert to potential dangers even while it sleeps. The lion thus symbolizes the vigilance needed to protect ourselves against spiritual risks, that we can never fully "close our eyes" and ignore the spiritual dangers that abound all around us. I also saw a different approach – that the lion wakes up energetic and refreshed in the morning because it consistently goes to sleep when night falls and sleeps throughout the night. One of the simplest measures we can take to help ensure we can rise early in the morning is to go to sleep at a reasonable hour at night. The Shulhan Aruch instructs us to wake up in the morning like a lion to indicate that we should go to sleep like a lion – at a reasonable hour – which will enable us to wake up refreshed like a lion.

The Shulhan Aruch, the authoritative code of Halacha, begins with the following instruction: "Yitgaber Ka'ari La'amod Ba'boker La'abodat Bor'o" – "One shall strengthen himself like a lion to arise in the morning for the service of his Creator." The fact that this Halacha opens the Shulhan Aruch shows us that waking early in the morning is a fundamental part of our religious responsibilities. In fact, this quality is what impressed Bilam when he attempted to place a curse upon Beneh Yisrael, compelling him to bless them, instead, as he exclaimed, "Hen Am Ke'labi Yakum" – "Behold, a nation that rises like a lion" (Bamidbar 23:24). Rashi explains this as a reference to the way Beneh Yisrael rise in the morning and immediately "pounce" to perform Misvot, putting on Tallit and Tefillin, and praying. Indeed, Rashi (Shemot 19:3) brings from the Midrash that each time Moshe Rabbenu climbed to the top of Mount Sinai, he did so early in the morning – "Kol Aliyotav Be'hashkama Hayu." Some explain this to mean that every spiritual "ascent" requires "Hashkama" – rising early. The path to spiritual greatness begins with waking up early in the morning. Abraham Abinu is likewise described on several occasions as rising early in the morning, because this is how he became great – by beginning his day early. Rav Eliyahu Lopian (1876-1970) was known for rising early every morning. When he was asked about this practice, he said that when he leaves this world, and will stand before the Heavenly Tribunal, he will be judged regarding his compliance with the Shulhan Aruch. He wanted to at least "pass" the first question – whether he complied with the Shulhan Aruch's very first ruling, that one should make an effort to get up early in the morning. If a businessman scheduled an early morning meeting with a prospective customer, and the potential deal was worth a million dollars, there is no question that he would be up at the crack of dawn and arrive early so he could be fully prepared with his sales pitch. The money at stake motivates the businessman to arise early. If we knew that the Misvot we perform each morning are worth many times more than any amount of money, bringing us eternal rewards, we would never think to sleep late. We would eagerly get out of bed and rush to perform the Misvot energetically and enthusiastically, as early as we could. People want to stay in bed and sleep late only if they don't have anything to wake up for. Once we acknowledge the inestimable value and worth of each and every Misva, we realize how much we have to do, and we then excitedly get out of bed early in the morning to get started. Rising early is also a crucial component of our ongoing struggle against the Yeser Ha'ra (evil inclination). The Sha'reh Tefila comments that just as when an army goes out to war, the first battle is the most important one because it sets the tempo and momentum for the rest of the war, our first battle with the Yeser Ha'ra each day similarly sets the tone for the rest of the daily "war" against it. The Yeser Ha'ra tries to convince us to remain in bed, and if we win this struggle and get up early, then we are in a better position to emerge victorious in our subsequent struggles with the Yeser Ha'ra throughout the day. Waking up early, then, helps us overcome all spiritual challenges that we encounter. The Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) cites his grandfather, the Hesed Le'Abraham (Rav Abraham Azulai, Hebron, d. 1643), as finding an allusion to this concept in the Gemara's famous teaching, "Ha'ba Le'horgecha, Hashkem Le'horgo" – "He who comes to kill you, arise to kill him." On the simple level, this means that one is allowed to kill a person who seeks to kill him. On a deeper level, however, "He who comes to kill you" refers to the Yeser Ha'ra, which seeks to spiritually kill us by leading us to sin. The Gemara teaches us, "Hashkem Le'horgo" – that we should arise early in the morning in order to defeat the Yeser Ha'ra. The way we eliminate our evil inclination is by waking early. This is alluded to also in G-d's pronouncement to the snake after it lured Adam and Hava to sin in Gan Eden: "Hu Yeshufcha Rosh, Ve'ata Teshufenu Akeb" (Bereshit 3:15). Literally, this means that human beings will kill the snake by stomping on its head, whereas the snake can strike the human being only by biting its foot. Additionally, however, "Hu Yeshufcha Rosh" means that the way we defeat the Yeser Ha'ra – which is symbolized by the snake – is through "Rosh," by waking up at the "head," or beginning, of the day. Conversely, the snake can defeat a person through "Akeb," the "heel," by convincing him to oversleep and get a late start to the day. The Torah says that when Abraham Abinu set out to fulfill the command of Akedat Yishak, he arose early in the morning and saddled his donkey ("Va'yashkem Abraham Ba'boker Va'yahavosh Et Hamoro" – Bereshit 22:3). The word "Hamor" ("donkey") is often interpreted as an allusion to "Homriyut," physicality, the animalistic tendencies within every person. Abraham succeeded in "saddling" and restraining his physical qualities by rising early in the morning. The Midrash comments that this donkey was the same donkey on which Moshe Rabbenu rode when he journeyed from Midyan to Egypt, and Mashiah will ride this same donkey when it arrives to redeem the Jewish People. The deeper meaning of the Midrash is that all great Sadikim – like Moshe Rabbenu and Mashiah – succeed in overcoming their physical tendencies by rising early in the morning, like Abraham Abinu did. The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in Parashat Vayishlah, writes that the first half of the night – from nightfall to midnight – is called "Layil," whereas the period from midnight until sunrise is called "Layla" – the word "Layil" with the letter Heh added. This letter Heh signifies a higher level, indicating that this is a time of great spiritual potential. Accordingly, the Ben Ish Hai writes, the great Sadikim would go to sleep right at nightfall and then rise at Hasot to learn Torah until the early morning. The Ben Ish Hai notes that the letters of the word "Layla" (Lamed, Yod, Lamed, Heh) are the first letters of the words "Ha'ba Le'horgecha Yashkim Le'horgo" – alluding to the aforementioned teaching that the way we defeat and eliminate the Yeser Ha'ra is by rising early, and being awake during the "Layla," the second part of the night. Although nowadays we are not able to keep to this schedule, nevertheless, this demonstrates for us the importance of rising early in the morning. The Sages teach, "Kol Hat'halot Kashot" – "All beginnings are difficult," which means simply that any new undertaking is difficult at the outset, when a person gets started. However, Rav Haim Palachi (Turkey, 1788-1868) explained that this refers to the morning, the beginning of the day. Getting out of bed in the morning is difficult, but this is a challenge we must all work to overcome. Another reason to start the day early is that whenever we begin something new, it is critically important to start strong, as this builds a sturdy foundation for the rest of the undertaking. If the foundation of a structure is done improperly, the rest of the building will not be safe. Likewise, the beginning of any new project must be strong and sturdy for it to succeed. The Jewish Nation has succeeded because we are built on the strong foundation of our Abot (patriarchs) and Imahot (matriarchs), righteous men and women who laid the spiritual groundwork for Am Yisrael. This is true also of a new day – the stronger we start our day, the more likely we are to have an accomplished and successful day. We find numerous examples of this concept in our sources. Elisha Ben Abuya was an outstanding scholar, a Tanna, and the mentor of the great Rabbi Meir, but he ultimately lost his way and became a heretic, committing grievous sins such as desecrating Shabbat and even Yom Kippur. Different stories are told to explain how and why Elisha Ben Abuya abandoned the path of Torah observance. One story, told in the Talmud Yerushalmi, is that when he was a young child, his father showed him the great Sages of Israel, how their Torah study brought the fire of the Shechina into the home, and he said, "If you learn Torah, you can do amazing things like these Rabbis!" Since as a youngster Elisha was taught the message that he should learn Torah for self-serving motives, and not out of a sincere desire to serve Hashem, his educational foundations were shaky, and this allowed him to be led astray as an adult. Likewise, the Midrash comments that Noah was sharply reprimanded for planting a vineyard right after exiting the ark following the flood. As he set out to rebuild the earth, he should have begun with something more significant and meaningful than producing wine. The process was started on the wrong foot, as it were, on faulty foundations, and so Noah was criticized. This idea has also been developed in the context of the Hanukah story. As we know, the Gemara tells that the Hashmonaim, after driving the Greeks from Jerusalem, found only a small jug of pure oil with which to kindle the Menorah in the Bet Ha'mikdash, and this small quantity of oil miraculously sufficed for eight nights. The Peneh Yehoshua (Rav Yaakob Yehoshua Falk, Germany, 1680-1756) raises the question of why the Hashmonaim did not rely on the Halacha which permits performing the service in the Mikdash in a state of impurity if the entire nation is in such a state ("Tum'a Hutra Be'sibur"). After the Greeks had defiled the Bet Ha'mikdash, this leniency was certainly relevant and applicable, seemingly obviating the need to use specifically pure oil. The Peneh Yehoshua answered that the Hashmonaim did not wish to rely on Halachic leniencies as they inaugurated the Bet Ha'mikdash anew. They were now beginning a new chapter, restoring the service in the Bet Ha'mikdash after many years during which it could not be performed, and so they found it necessary to perform the service at the very highest standards, in order to set the tone for the years to come. They therefore refused to rely on the leniency of kindling the Menorah with impure oil. King Shlomo teaches in Kohelet (2:14), "He'hacham Enav Be'rosho" – "The wise man, his eyes are upon his head." The plain meaning of this verse is that a wise person looks at the potential outcome of his actions, and assesses potential risks before acting. Additionally, however, this verse has been understood to mean that a wise person focuses on the "head," on the beginning of his day, to ensure to start the day the right way, as this impacts the rest of the day. It is told that when Rav Shmuel Salant (1816-1909), the renowned Rabbi of Jerusalem, grew old, he decided to bring a Rabbi from Europe to assume his position, and the Rabbi chosen was the Aderet (Rav Eliyahu David Rabinowitz-Teomim, 1843-1905). Immediately upon the Aderet's arrival, Rav Salant brought him to officiate at a wedding to show the community their new leader. The Aderet was weary from the long, grueling trip, and so when the time came to recite the Beracha over the wine under the Huppa, he mistakenly recited "She'ha'kol" instead of "Ha'gefen." He immediately corrected himself, and recited "Ha'gefen." Afterward, people spoke about the Aderet with disdain, charging that he was ignorant of Halacha. It is well-known that although the proper blessing over wine is, of course, "Ha'gefen," one who mistakenly recited "She'ha'kol" over wine has fulfilled his obligation and does not then recite "Ha'gefen." There were those who claimed that the Aderet was unfit to serve as a Rabbinic leader, as he was unfamiliar with this simple Halacha. The Aderet explained that he certainly knew this Halacha, but he nevertheless recited "Ha'gefen" because he was reciting the blessing over the wine not only for himself, but also on behalf of the Hatan (groom), who was standing under the Huppa with his bride, prepared to begin their new life together. This new beginning, the Aderet explained, could not be built on a shaky foundation, using Halachic leniencies. It was important for the proper Beracha to be recited, even if the wrong Beracha would normally suffice after the fact, so that the marriage would begin on a strong foundation. While as a practical matter, one could question this line of reasoning, the basic concept is an important one – whenever we start something new, we must strive to begin as strongly as possible. We must therefore try hard to begin each day the right way, by waking early in the morning with energy and enthusiasm, ready to serve our Creator.

The word "Yahrtzeit" comes from the Yiddish word "Yahr," which means "year," and it is of course used in reference to the date on which a loved one had passed away. It is customary for a person who observes a Yahrtzeit for a parent to recite Kaddish from the Shabbat preceding the Yahrtzeit. Thus, for example, if the Yahrtzeit falls on Tuesday, then the individual begins reciting Kaddish from the Kaddish Al Yisrael following "Bameh Madlikin" on Friday night, and he continues through Minha on Tuesday afternoon. It is customary for the person to also receive an Aliya on the Shabbat preceding the Yahrtzeit, and the Hashkaba prayer is recited at that time. Preferably, he should receive the Aliya of Maftir, which brings the greatest benefit to the parent's soul. Importantly, though, one must not fight to receive the Aliya of Maftir – or any Aliya – as the merit of foregoing for the sake of peace far exceeds the merit of any Aliya. Different customs exist regarding the case of a Yahrtzeit that falls on Shabbat. Some recite Kaddish from the preceding Shabbat and throughout the week, whereas others recite Kaddish only on the Shabbat of the Yahrtzeit. One should consult with his Rabbi for practical guidance in such a situation. Some have the custom to fast on a parent's Yahrtzeit. This is due to the tradition that a deceased soul is judged each year on his Yahrtzeit. Although a person obviously can no longer perform Misvot after he leaves this world, he is judged on the basis of his offspring's conduct. Therefore, by fasting, learning Torah, praying and giving Sedaka on the Yahrtzeit, one benefits the departed parent's soul by helping to ensure a favorable judgment. A Yahrtzeit is to be observed even many years – and even many decades – after a parent's passing. The Sages teach that the righteous "have no rest, neither in this world nor in the next world," as here in our world, they constantly work and strive for greater spiritual heights, and in the next world, they are constantly being elevated through the good deeds of their progeny. Therefore, a child should continue observing the parent's Yahrtzeit throughout his life. If, for whatever reason, a person did not recite Kaddish on a parent's Yahrtzeit, he can make it up the next day, or on whichever day he remembers. This is the ruling of Hacham Ovadia Yosef.

When one concludes the twelve-month mourning period following a parent's passing, an event called an "Arayat" is customarily held. The word "Arayat" means "reading," and the event is so named because portions of Tehillim and of certain Kabbalistic works are read. Food is normally served as the event. Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled that if a person wishes to continue reciting Kaddish even after the twelve-month mourning period, he may do so, and this will bring benefit to the deceased's soul. Although the standard punishment in Gehinam lasts for only twelve months, Rav Haim Vital (1543-1620) writes that some wicked people are not even ready to be brought to Gehinam immediately after their death, and thus their period of suffering in Gehinam – which could last up to twelve months – might begin only some time after death. Therefore, there is benefit to the Kaddish recitation even beyond the twelve-month mourning period. In fact, the Hesed La'alafim (Rav Eliezer Papo, 1785-1828) instructed his sone to recite Kaddish after his passing at least once a day for the rest of their lives. Nevertheless, this is not the commonly accepted practice. Generally speaking, people recite Kaddish for their parents after the first twelve months only following a Torah class or Tehillim reading, but not during the prayer service. Sometimes, a Rabbi might advise a congregant to continue reciting Kaddish after the first year of mourning in order to encourage the congregant to continue attending the prayers. Summary: Although there is benefit to reciting Kaddish for a deceased parent even after the twelve-month mourning period, it is customary not to, except after a Torah class or Tehillim reading.

After the passing of a parent, Heaven forbid, the child observes a twelve-month period of mourning, and thus, fundamentally, Kaddish should be recited for that entire period. However, the Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1530-1572) brings (Y.D. 376) Poskim who ruled that the mourner should stop reciting Kaddish after eleven months. This is due to the Mishna's teaching in Masechet Eduyot (2:10) that the wicked are punished in Gehinam for twelve months. If a mourner recites Kaddish for a parent for twelve months, this might give the impression that he considers his parent a wicked person, Heaven forbid, such that the parent requires twelve months of Kaddish to be spared the punishments of Gehinam. Therefore, some Poskim rule that the child should recite Kaddish for only eleven months. A second custom is mentioned by the Kenesset Ha'gedola (Rav Haim Benvenisti, Turkey, 1603-1673), who writes that he instructed people to stop reciting Kaddish one week before the culmination of the twelve-month mourning period. By contrast, the Sha'ar Ha'kavanot (Rav Haim Vital, 1542-1620) cites the Arizal's teaching that a mourner should recite Kaddish for a parent throughout the year of mourning. The Arizal emphasized that Kaddish is recited even on Shabbat and Yom Tob, when the wicked receive a respite from the punishments of Gehinam. This demonstrates, the Arizal explained, that reciting Kaddish does more for the deceased parent than simple extricate the soul from Gehinam; it also elevates the soul to higher levels in Gan Eden. Publicly declaring G-d's greatness fulfills the Misva of Kiddush Hashem – glorifying the Name of G-d, which is the greatest Misva a person can perform. In fact, some Kabbalists teach that the Misva of Kiddush Hashem can rectify even the most grievous sins. The merit of the Kaddish recitation, then, brings immense benefits to the deceased parent's soul, beyond protecting the soul from the punishments of Gehinam. Therefore, the Arizal maintained that reciting Kaddish for the entire year of mourning does not necessarily give the indication that one considers his parent a wicked person. Accordingly, the Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) writes that the custom in Italy, Egypt and Jerusalem was to recite Kaddish for twelve full months. Nevertheless, the Hida recommended refraining from reciting Kaddish for one week. Similarly, the Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his Rav Pe'alim, writes that the custom in Baghdad was to conduct a memorial service (Arayat) after eleven months to signify that the deceased is not considered a sinner, after which the mourners would refrain from reciting Kaddish for one week, and then resume reciting Kaddish until the end of the twelfth month. This is, indeed, the common practice in our community – to refrain from Kaddish for one week at the beginning of the twelfth month, and to then resume the Kaddish recitation until the end of the month. It should be noted that this entire discussion applies only to the Kaddish recitations in the prayer service. The Kaddish recited after Torah learning or after the reading of Tehillim is recited by a mourner throughout the twelve months, even during the week when he abstains from Kaddish during the prayer service. Additionally, Hacham David Yosef, in Halacha Berura, cites his father, Hacham Ovadia, as ruling that if a mourner serves as Hazzan, then he recites all the Kaddishim included in the prayer service, even during the first week of the twelfth month. Summary: Different customs exist as to when a mourner stops reciting Kaddish for a deceased parent. The generally accepted custom in our community is to stop reciting Kaddish during the first week of the twelfth month, and to then resume reciting Kaddish until the end of the month. Even during that week, the mourner recites Kaddish after Torah learning and Tehillim reading, and if he serves as Hazzan, then he recites all the Kaddishim that are part of the prayer service.

If a mourner is reciting Pesukeh De'zimra when the congregation reaches the point where the mourners recite Kaddish – just before Alenu, at the end of the service – is the mourner allowed to interrupt his Pesukeh De'zimra recitation to say Kaddish? As a rule, it is forbidden to interrupt Pesukeh De'zimra, and the question thus arises whether reciting Kaddish for a parent qualifies as an exception where interrupting Pesukeh De'zimra is justified. The Mishna and Gemara in Masechet Berachot address the situation where a person is reciting Shema, or the blessings before or after Shema, when his father passes by. Strictly speaking, Halacha permits the person to interrupt his recitation for the sake of extending a greeting his father. As a practical matter, this Halacha does not apply nowadays, because protocols for greeting parents are not as formal as they were in the past, and thus it is not necessary to interrupt one's prayer in order to extend a greeting to a parent. However, the concept underlying this Halacha is relevant with regard to the Kaddish recitation. Reciting Kaddish for a parent fulfills the Misva of Kibbud Ab Va'em (honoring parents), and we therefore apply the rule that was observed in the past regarding respectful greetings to one's parent during the prayer service. The benefit brought to the deceased parent's soul through the recitation of Kaddish indeed justifies interrupting Pesukeh De'zimra, and thus the person in this case should recite the mourners' Kaddish together with the congregation. If the person sees that the congregation will soon arrive at the point of the mourners' Kaddish, he should, if possible, complete the Mizmor (chapter) that he is currently reciting, as it is preferable to make an interruption in between two Mizmorim instead of interrupting a Mizmor. Summary: If a mourner is reciting Pesukeh De'zimra when the congregation reaches the point of the mourners' Kaddish, he should interrupt Pesukeh De'zimra to recite Kaddish. Preferably, he should try to complete the Mizmor (chapter) that he currently recites before Kaddish need to be recited, so he does not interrupt a Mizmor.

When a non-Jew undergoes conversion and becomes a Jew, he is, halachically speaking, no longer related to his biological parents. Nevertheless, if a convert's parent passes away, it is appropriate for him to recite Kaddish to benefit the parent's soul. He of course owes his parents a debt of gratitude for bringing him into the world and caring for him, and so it is proper recite Kaddish to benefit their soul. Although the parents are not Jewish, nevertheless, the Kaddish recitation enables their souls to rest peacefully in the afterlife, and it spares them from punishment. This is the ruling of Hacham Ovadia Yosef, who noted the discussion of Tosafot (Sota 10b) regarding King David's prayers for the soul of his son, Abshalom. Tosafot establish that although a person's Misvot cannot benefit the soul of his deceased child (the way a person's Misvot benefit the soul of a deceased parent), a person's prayers can benefit his deceased child's soul. And thus King David's prayers to elevate his son's soul from Gehinam were effective. Hacham Ovadia applied this principle to the case of a convert. Since Halacha does not regard the convert as the biological parent's child, his Misvot cannot benefit the parent's soul, but his prayers can benefit the parent's soul. Therefore, it would be appropriate for the convert to recite Kaddish for the deceased parent. An adopted child should recite Kaddish for the parents who adopted him and raised him. He of course owes them an enormous debt of gratitude for all they did for him, raising him, caring for him, and assuming responsibility for him, and so he should recite Kaddish after their passing to benefit their souls. Summary: It is appropriate for a convert to recite Kaddish for his deceased parent. Likewise, a person who was adopted should recite Kaddish for the parents who adopted him and cared for him.

The Gemara in Masechet Yebamot (62b) teaches that grandchildren are considered like children. One application of this principle is the ruling of the Rama (Rav Moshe Isserles, Poland, 1530-1572) that the obligation of Kibbud Ab Ve'aem (honoring parents) includes a requirement to give honor to one's grandparents. Accordingly, Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled that there is a Misva to recite Kaddish for a deceased grandparent, as this benefits the grandparent's soul and thus fulfills the Misva of Kibbud Ab Va'em. Indeed, the Kensset Ha'gedola (Rav Haim Benvenisti, Turkey, 1603-1673) writes that he instructed his sons to recite Kaddish for their grandmother. However, if one's parent is still alive, he should first request the parent's permission, as some people do not feel comfortable with their children reciting Kaddish. Although it is a Misva to recite Kaddish for a grandparent, this is not commonly done, unless there is nobody else to recite Kaddish for the grandparent. Hacham Ovadia cites Rav Menahem Azarya Mi'Fano (Italy, 1548-1620) as stating that there is no obligation to recite Kaddish for one's deceased wife. Nevertheless, it is customary to do so, and a husband's recitation of Kaddish for his wife brings greater benefit to her soul than Kaddish recited by somebody who is not related to her. Summary: It is a Misva to recite Kaddish for a deceased grandparent, provided that one's living parents allow him to do so, though this is not customarily done unless there is nobody else to recite Kaddish for the grandparent. It is customary to recite Kaddish for one's deceased wife, even though this is not strictly required.

If a person who had a daughter but no sons passed away, may the daughter recite Kaddish for her deceased parent? The Shebut Yaakob (Rav Yaakob Reischer, 1661-1733) ruled that a daughter may recite Kaddish for a parent if ten men assembled in her home, but not in the synagogue. Likewise, the Teshuba Me'ahaba (Rav Elazar Fleckeles, 1754-1826) writes that this was done in Amsterdam, with the approval of the local Rabbis. He adds that it was customary in Prague for elderly men and women to sit in the Ezrat Nashim (women's section) of the synagogue and recite Tehillim all morning, and if there was a girl whose parent had passed away without sons, the daughter would recite Kaddish after the Tehillim reading. This was done in the Ezrat Nashim, but not in the main section of the synagogue. The Teshuba Me'ahaba explained that women are no less obligated in the Misva of honoring parents than men, and so they should have the opportunity to benefit the soul of their departed parent through the recitation of Kaddish. Although this should not be done in the public setting of the synagogue, it is permissible if a private Minyan is formed. Hacham Ovadia Yosef concurred with this ruling. A solution in such a case is for the family to appoint a man to recite Kaddish for the deceased. Rav Yosef Kolon (France, 15 th century) ruled that one may recite Kaddish for somebody who was not a relative. He adds, based on an earlier source, that one may recite Kaddish for the souls of several different people, and so even if somebody is already reciting Kaddish for a parent, he may be asked to recite Kaddish also for a person who left the world without sons. Similarly, the Elya Rabba (Rav Eliyahu Spira, Prague, 1660-1712) writes that if somebody needs to travel during the year of mourning, and will be unable to recite Kaddish for a period of time, he should hire somebody to recite Kaddish on his behalf during that period. It should be noted that there was a custom that the Rabbi would recite the final Kaddish – the Kaddish before Alenu – for the benefit of all those who had passed away without sons. Although this is not our custom, it demonstrates that when there are no men to recite Kaddish, this can be assigned to somebody else, even a person who is not related to the deceased. Summary: If a person passed away without sons, and the daughter wishes to recite Kaddish for the parent, she may if a private Minyan is assembled in her home. The preferred solution, however, is for the family to appoint somebody – even someone who is not related to the deceased – to recite Kaddish for the deceased. This may be done even by someone who is already reciting Kaddish for his own parent.

Rav Shmuel Vital (1598-1677) writes that the custom in his time was to permit even young children to recite Kaddish for a deceased parent, Heaven forbid. Others, however, opposed this practice. Some Poskim permitted a child to recite Kaddish only if he is at least six years old and understands the concept of praying to Hashem. There were also Poskim who forbade any child under the age of Bar-Misva from reciting Kaddish for the congregation. Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled that strictly speaking, if a child is at least six years old and understands the general concept of prayer, he may recite Kaddish for the congregation for a deceased parent, Heaven forbid. Preferably, however, an adult should recite the Kaddish with the child. Hacham Ovadia made an exception in the case of the Kaddish recitation following the reading of Tehillim, which to begin with is not obligatory. Since this Kaddish recitation is not an outright requirement, it may be recited by a child even if no adult recites it with him. Hacham Bension Abba Shaul (Jerusalem, 1924-1998) ruled more leniently, allowing a youngster age six and above to recite Kaddish alone even during the prayer service. He noted the Halacha permitting a child at this age to receive an Aliya, which includes leading the recitation of Barechu. By the same token, then, a child may recite Kaddish. Summary: A child age six or above, who understands the concept of prayer, may recite Kaddish for a deceased parent, Heaven forbid, though according to some opinions, there should preferably be an adult reciting Kaddish with him. When it comes to the Kaddish recited after the reading of Tehillim, according to all opinions a child age six or above may recite this Kaddish alone.

Following the Torah reading on Monday and Thursday, it is customary for the Kaddish to be recited by somebody who is observing the year of mourning for a parent. There is considerable controversy surrounding the question of asking the cantor to recite the Hashkaba prayer for a deceased parent beyond the year of mourning. Rav Yaakob Molcho (Jerusalem, 17 th century) is cited as asserting that it is improper to make a Hashkaba except during the year of mourning and during the week of the Yahrtzeit. He explained that when the Hashkaba is made, the deceased's soul descends from the heavens, and it cannot return unless a charitable donation is made in the deceased's merit. It is therefore not to the deceased's benefit to recite the Hashkaba prayer outside the usual times. However, the Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his Rav Pe'alim, disagreed. He writes that there is no source in the Kabbalistic works for such a notion, that the departed soul descends from the heaven as a result of the Hashkaba and then requires charity to return, and so there is no reason for concern. In fact, the Ben Ish Hai brings a passage from the writings of the Arizal that appears to contradict the theory advanced by Rav Yaakob Molcho. Hacham Ovadia Yosef, his Hazon Ovadia – Abelut, accepts the Ben Ish Hai's position, and writes that it is proper to occasionally have the Hashkaba prayer recited in memory of a deceased parent, even after the first year, and not only on the Yahrtzeit. By contrast, Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim discouraged this practice. One should consult with his Rabbi for practical guidance. Summary: Different opinions exist as to whether the Hashkaba prayer should be recited only during the first year after a parent's passing, and during the week of the Yahrtzeit, or if it is commendable to recite the Hashkaba occasionally even beyond the first year, and even when it is not the Yahrtzeit. One should consult with his Rabbi for guidance on this matter.

After a family member's passing, one has the status of "Onen" until the burial. During this period, he is exempt from Misvot, and thus he does not recite Kaddish. If, however, a family member is not tending to the funeral preparations, then he may recite Kaddish for the parent. Thus, for example, if a loved one passed away on Friday night, or during the night of Yom Tob, one may recite Kaddish, since he is unable to tend to funeral preparations on Shabbat or Yom Tob. Even on a weekday, a person may recite Kaddish for a loved one once the Hebra Kaddisha has assumed responsibility for the burial. This is the ruling of Hacham Ovadia Yosef, based on a responsum of the Noda Bi'yehuda (Rav Yechezkel Landau, Prague, 1713-1793). Similarly, it is customary for the mourners to recite Kaddish at the funeral after the eulogies, just before the body is taken for burial. Although the family members still have the status of "Onen" at that point – as the deceased has not yet been buried – they are nevertheless allowed to recite Kaddish, and, as mentioned, this is the accepted practice.

The Poskim addressed the situation of a man who, after his wife's passing, asks his son not to recite Kaddish for her. He might feel uneasy about his son saying Kaddish because people who see this might mistakenly think that he, the father, had passed away, or might just ask questions which would make the father uncomfortable. Should the son obey his father's wishes, or should he recite Kaddish in defiance of his father to honor his mother's memory? The preferred solution in this case is for the son to ask a Rabbi or someone else whom the father respects to speak to the father and try to change his mind. The anxiety that some people feel when it comes to Kaddish, while understandable, is unnecessary. There is no risk whatsoever to a person if his child recites Kaddish, and there is no reason for concern. However, if the father's mind cannot be changed, and he insists that his son not recite Kaddish for his mother, then the son should obey his father's wishes and ask somebody else to recite Kaddish for his mother.

In a previous installment, we discussed the great value of the Kaddish recitation for a deceased parent, and how it benefits the parent's soul. The Hida (Rav Haim Yosef David Azulai, 1724-1806) emphasizes in particular the value of the Kaddish recited following the reading of Tehillim. He writes that this Kaddish recitation has the ability to protect a parent's soul from harmful forces in the afterlife. However, notwithstanding the great importance and value of Kaddish, one must realize that other Misvot, too, bring great benefit to a parent's soul. The Gemara (Sanhedrin 104) teaches, "Bera Mezakeh Abba" – a son brings merit to his father through the observance of Misvot. Elsewhere (Erubin 70), the Gemara states that a son is "Kareh De'abu'ah" – his father's "leg." After one leaves this world, he is no longer capable of performing Misvot, and so he is unable to rise to greater heights in the afterlife – if not for his children, whose Misva observance brings him merit. In this sense, a child is the parent's "leg," enabling the parent to move forward despite being unable to continue fulfilling Misvot. In particular, besides Kaddish, learning Torah and giving charity in a parent's memory bring immense benefit to the soul. Additionally, a son benefits his parent's soul by reading the Haftara for the congregation. Many people assume that the Aliya of "Mashlim" is the preferred Aliya to receive in the synagogue, because it comes with the recitation of Kaddish. However, Hacham Ovadia Yosef maintained that Maftir is even greater, because of the special benefits granted to a parent's soul through the reading of the Haftara. Therefore, if a person has the choice between these two Aliyot, then – assuming he is capable of reading the Haftara properly – he should choose the Aliya of Maftir. The practice in some Ashkenazic communities is that only one person recites Kaddish. There as entire literature in Ashkenazic halachic sources determining the order of precedence when several people wish to recite Kaddish for a departed loved one. Unfortunately, this practice often led to a great deal of strife, as people vied and competed with one another for the privilege of reciting Kaddish, prompting a number of leading Ashkenazic Poskim to adopt the Sephardic model, whereby all who need to recite Kaddish do so together in unison. The Hatam Sofer (Rav Moshe Sofer, Pressburg, 1762-1839) changed the practice in his yeshiva to follow the Sephardic custom in order to avoid strife. And Rav Yaakob Emden (Germany, 1697-1776), in his commentary to the Siddur, writes that he decided to omit the discussion of precedence with regard to Kaddish, because the Sephardic custom, that the people recite Kaddish together, is preferable, as it avoids strife and conflict. The work Yesh Nohalim emphasizes that a person's performance of Misvot is far more beneficial to his parent's soul than his recitation of Kaddish, and his "hair would rise" when he saw conflicts arise among mourners in the synagogue over the Kaddish recitation. Such conflicts occasionally take place even in Sephardic congregations when two mourners or people observing Yahrtzeit vie for the privilege of leading the service, or for the Aliya of Mashlim. I remember that our great Rabbi, Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim, observed Yahrtzeit on the same day as one of the congregants in his synagogue, Shaare Zion, and each year, he deferred to that congregant. When asked about this practice, he explained that avoiding strife and conflict brings far more benefit to a deceased's soul than leading any part of the service. There is nothing more precious that a person can do to benefit the soul of a parent than to increase peaceful relations among Jews. People must realize that if leading the service requires anger and instigating strife, then the merits accrued are more than offset by the sins that have been committed. The Arizal taught that anger contaminates the soul, and one must immerse in a Mikveh to cleanse it afterward. Without question, there is no sense whatsoever in becoming angry and initiating a fight out of a desire to bring merit to a parent's soul. When several people recite Kaddish together, they must ensure to recite it aloud in unison, so as not to confuse the congregation.

The Or Zarua (Rav Yishak of Vienna, 13 th century) brings a Midrash that tells a remarkable story about Rabbi Akiba, who once saw a man running frantically while carrying a large stack of twigs. The man was unclothed, and his body was black like charcoal. Rabbi Akiba asked the man to stop, and offered to help. He assumed that this man was a slave working for a ruthless master, and he wanted to release him from his state of servitude so he would not have to continue suffering. The man explained to Rabbi Akiba that he actually was not from the world of the living. When he was alive, he worked as a tax collector, and he would heartlessly tax the needy into poverty while currying favor with the rich, among other grave misdeeds. His punishment was that he needed to collect firewood every day, to be then burned in the fire. The only chance to end this suffering, the man told Rabbi Akiba, was for his son to recite Kaddish or lead the recitation of Barechu in the synagogue. He had died when his wife was pregnant with their only child. Rabbi Akiba asked the man about his wife's name and place of residence, and he went to find this man's child. When he asked the townspeople about the widow and her child, they angrily cursed the deceased man who was so cruel and heartless, driving many people to destitution. Rabbi Akiba learned that the man had a son, but he was not even circumcised, and certainly never learned Torah such that he would be in a position to recite Kaddish. After finding the young man, Rabbi Akiba convinced him to have a berit mila . He tried teaching him Torah, but the young man had extreme difficulty learning. Rabbi Akiba fasted for forty days, beseeching G-d to help the boy learn. He was then able to teach him. Eventually, when the young man was ready, Rabbi Akiba brought him to the synagogue, and he recited Kaddish and Barechu. Rabbi Akiba continued teaching this young man Torah, until he emerged as a great scholar, known as Rabbi Nahum Ha'pakoli. The name "Ha'pakoli" alludes to the verse in the Book of Yeshayahu (28:7), "Paku Peliliya" – "He who extracts the guilty," which is precisely what Rabbi Nahum did, rescuing his sinful father from eternal suffering. The father appeared Rabbi Akiba in a dream and wished him that he be granted a distinguished place in Gan Eden. He explained that after his son recited Kaddish and Barechu, he was relieved of the suffering that had been decreed. When the son began learning Torah regularly, he was no longer subject to any punishment. And when the son was ordained as a Rabbi, he was brought to Gan Eden to join the Sadikim. This is an early source of the time-honored custom to recite Kaddish on behalf of one's deceased parent, which has the effect of sparing the parent from punishments in the afterlife. Another source is a passage in Tanna De'beh Eliyahu, brought by Rabbi Eliezer of Worms (Germany, d. 1238), which states that even a small child can save his father from the punishments of Gehinam through the recitation of Kaddish. Moreover, the Yad Eliyahu writes that by reciting Kaddish for a deceased parent, one fulfills the Misva of Kibbud Ab Va'em – honoring one's parent. In fact, the Yad Eliyahu adds, one has more of an opportunity to fulfill the Misva of Kibbud Ab Va'em after a parent's passing, since during the parent's lifetime, the parent can decline the child's offers to give honor. After the parent's passing, however, the parent cannot refuse the recitation of Kaddish – and even if the parent never requested that Kaddish be recited after his or her death, the child must assume that this was the parent's wish. As Kibbud Ab Va'em constitutes a Torah obligation, we follow the rule that one must act stringently in situations of uncertainty ("Safek De'Orayta Le'humra"), and thus a child must, under all circumstances, recite Kaddish for a deceased parent. Similarly, Rav Yosef Engel (1858-1919) writes that reciting Kaddish is the highest form of Kibbud Ab Va'em, as there is nothing greater that one can do for a parent than bring the parent to Gan Eden, which is what a child achieves by reciting Kaddish. Our community can be proud that this practice is meticulously observed, virtually without exception. Even when people travel, if they are in the first year after a parent's passing, Heaven forbid, they ensure to have a Minyan available so as not to miss even a single recitation of Kaddish. This is a testament to our community's awareness of the great importance of this cherished custom, and of our community's strong dedication to the precious Misva of Kibbud Ab Va'em. Importantly, however, Hacham Ovadia cites the Yosef Ometz as noting that the Kaddish recitation was instituted for those who are unable to benefit their parents' souls through the study of Torah. The benefit brought through Torah study is many times greater than the recitation of Kaddish, and if one arrives at a Hiddush (a novel Torah insight) while learning in his parent's memory, he brings immeasurable honor to the parent's soul in the afterlife. Therefore, as important as it of course is to recite Kaddish for a deceased parent, it is even more important to devote time to learn Torah in the parent's memory, as this is the greatest thing one can do for a deceased parent's soul. Many parents, understandably, are troubled by the exorbitant cost of Torah education. However, while the problem is real, and should be addressed, at the same time, we must maintain a proper perspective and realize that no matter how much money parents pay for their children to receive a Torah education, the dividends are infinitely greater. There is no price tag that one can place on eternal life in Gan Eden, and being spared the punishments of Gehinam. By providing their children with a proper religious education, parents ensure that their children will recite Kaddish and learn Torah in their memory, thereby guaranteeing their place in Gan Eden for all eternity – and we can all agree that there is no price too high for that.

The Kaddish text (specifically, "Kaddish Titkabal" and "Kaddish Yeheh Shelama") concludes with the famous prayer for peace: "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav Hu Ya'aseh Shalom Alenu Ve'al Kol Yisrael, Ve'imru Amen" – "He who makes peace in His high places shall bestow peace upon us and upon all Israel, and say: Amen." This prayer, as we know, also concludes the silent Amida and Birkat Ha'mazon, and for good reason – because the most important thing we can pray for is peace. The previous line in Kaddish also prays for peace ("Yeheh Shelama Rabba" – "May there be an abundance of peace…"), but the prayer of "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav" adds a particular element of our wishes for peace. We speak of Hashem bringing peace in the upper worlds ("Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav"), a reference to the peace and harmony that exists among the angels in heavens. These include an angel of water and angel of fire, which should, at first glance, be archrivals, and should be in a constant state of competition and tension. In truth, however, Hashem maintains the peace in the heavens – even among diametrically opposite forces. We thus pray that here on earth, too, we should have peace among different people, and among those with different opinions. Hashem specifically created the world such that no two people are the same. No two people think exactly alike, view things exactly alike, or have the exact same preferences, likes and dislikes. In the prayer of "Oseh Shalom," we ask Hashem to maintain the peace among people despite their differences, to help all of us live harmoniously with those who are unlike us. The Torah allows room – within certain limits, of course – for a wide range of different opinions and ideas, and we are encouraged to form opinions, but to show respect toward those who think differently than we do. It is no coincidence that just before we leave the synagogue, at the end of the final Kaddish, we recite the prayer of "Oseh Shalom," as we beseech G-d to help us as we go out and interact with many different kinds of people, to ensure that we can engage them peacefully and respectfully. It is customary during the Aseret Yemeh Teshuba (the ten-day period from Rosh Hashanah through Yom Kippur) to slightly emend the text at the end of "Kaddish Titkabal," by reciting "Oseh Ha'shalom" instead of "Oseh Shalom." Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled that this change is made only in "Kaddish Titkabal" recited by the Hazzan after repeating the Amida – meaning, at Shaharit, Musaf and Minha, but not at Arbit. The reason for this change is that the Gematria of the word "Ha'shalom" is 381, and thus alludes to the angel "Safri-el" whose name equals this same number, and who is assigned the task of counting our merits during the High Holidays so we receive a favorable judgment. The Hazzan should try to have this in mind when reciting "Oseh Ha'shalom" at the end of Kaddish. However, although this is a proper practice, the Hazzan does not need to repeat this line if he mistakenly recited the usual text. (In fact, the word "Oseh" also equals 381, so this allusion is made even if the Hazzan forgets to recite "Ha'shalom.") Before reciting "Oseh Shalom," one should take three steps back, by first moving the left foot back such that the toes are aligned with the heel of the right foot, then moving the right foot such that the toes are aligned with the heel of the left foot, and finally moving the left back next to the right foot. One should then bow to the left and recite "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav," bow to the right and recite "Hu Ya'aseh Shalom Alenu," and then bow to the center and recite "Ve'al Kol Yisrael." He should then rise and say, "Ve'imru Amen." Rav Haim Palachi (Turkey, 1788-1868) asserted that the correct way to divide this sentence is to pause after the word "Shalom," and then recite "Alenu Ve'al Kol Yisrael." This is in contrast to the common practice to recite "Hu Ya'aseh Shalom Alenu," and then "Ve'al Kol Yisrael." And the way we bow – bowing to the right for "Hu Ya'aseh Shalom Alenu," and then bowing to the center for "Ve'al Kol Yisrael," as explained – seems more consistent with the conventional practice of pausing between "Alenu" and "Ve'al Kol." It seems that according to Rav Haim Palachi, when bowing to the center, one must pause after the word "Shalom," before saying "Alenu." Summary: Before reciting "Oseh Shalom," one should take three steps back, bow to the left and recite "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav," bow to the right and recite "Hu Ya'aseh Shalom Alenu," and then bow to the center and recite "Ve'al Kol Yisrael." He should then rise and say, "Ve'imru Amen." During the period from Rosh Hashanah through Yom Kippur, the word "Shalom" in "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav" at the end of Kaddish is changed to "Ha'shalom." This change is made only by the Hazzan when he recites "Kaddish Titkabal" at Shaharit, Musaf and Minha.

In the "Kaddish Yeheh Shelama," which is recited by mourners at the end of the prayer service, we make twelve requests, asking for: "Shelama Rabba" (an abundance of peace), "Haim" (life), "Saba" (satiation), "Yeshua" (salvation), "Nehama" (consolation), "Shezaba" (protection), "Refua" (health), "Ge'ula" (redemption), "Seliha" (forgiveness), "Kapara" (atonement), "Revah" ("relief"), and "Hasala" (deliverance). These twelve requests correspond to the twelve tribes of Israel – which were founded by the twelve righteous sons of Yaakob Abinu – and we pray to Hashem to grant us these wishes in their merit. The word "Revah" (translated above as "relief") could also refer to material prosperity. The Arizal taught that the Name of G-d associated with Parnasa (livelihood) is Het-Tav-Chaf. This Name is alluded to in the verse "Pote'ah Et Yadecha U'masbia Le'chol Hai Rason" ("You open Your hand and wilfully satiate every living creature" – Tehillim 145:16), as the final letters of the words "Pote'ah et Yadecha" are Het, Tav and Chaf. These letters in Gematria equal 428 (8+400+20), which is twice the Gematria of the word "Revah" (200+6+8=214). In "Kaddish Yeheh Shelama," we say "Ve'revah" – with the letter Vav appearing before the word "Revah." Now Rashi (Bereshit 27:28) comments that the word "Ve'yiten" ("And He shall give") means that G-d should give and then give again ("Yiten Ve'yahazor Ve'yiten"). The word "Ve'revah," then, might also refer to a double blessing of "Revah" – or twice 214, for a total of 428. The word "Ve'revah," then, perhaps alludes to the special Name of Parnasa – Het-Tav-Chaf. This might be the reason why many have the custom to loudly exclaim "Ve'revah" during Kaddish – emphasizing the desire to access this special Name and thereby earn a comfortable livelihood.

In the "Kaddish De'Rabbanan" – known as "Kaddish Al Yisrael" – a special prayer is offered on behalf of the Torah scholars and their students. We pray for the wellbeing of the Rabbis, and for "Talmidihon Ve'al Talmideh Talmidehon" – "their students, and their students' students" – that is, for three generations of scholars. This parallels the verse in the Book of Yeshayahu (59:21) in which Hashem promises that the words of the Torah will not depart "from your mouth, from the mouth of your offspring, or from the mouth of your offspring's offspring." The Gemara derives from this verse that if three generations in a family study Torah, then Torah is guaranteed to remain in that family for all generations in the future. Correspondingly, we pray for the scholars, their students, and their students' students. We speak in this prayer of scholars "De'askin Be'Orayta Kadishta" – "who engage in the sacred Torah." Since the word "Orayta" (Torah) is a feminine noun, the adjective must likewise be in the feminine form – "Kadishta" – and not in the masculine form – "Kadisha." One must therefore ensure to recite "Kadishta," with the letter Tav. We emphasize that we pray for these blessings on behalf of scholars in this land and "Be'chol Atar Ve'atar" – in any place, no matter where they are. Some communities have the custom of reciting this phrase as "De'yatbin Ve'askin Be'Orayta Kadishta" – adding the word "De'yatbin" ("who sit…"). Although this is the practice among Moroccan and Tunisian communities, this is not the custom among Syrian Jews. Different versions exist for the phrase "Yeheh Lana U'lechon U'lehon" ("There shall be for us and for you and for them…"), as in some editions, the words "Lehon" and "Lechon" are reversed: "Yeheh Lana U'lehon U'lechon." Hacham Ovadia Yosef maintained that the correct text is "Yeheh Lana U'lechon U'lehon," as it is proper to first extend a blessing "to you" – to those who are present, and only then to others. We pray that Hashem should grant the scholars "Hina Ve'hisda Ve'rahameh" – "grace, kindness and compassion." The word "Hina" is Aramaic for the Hebrew word "Hen" ("grace"), which is sometimes translated as "charm." It denotes an intangible quality that some people have which leads others to like them and wish to deal kindly with them. In order to succeed in life, we need a degree of "Hen," a certain likeability that earns us people's favor and goodwill, and so we bless the scholars that they should not only receive Hashem's kindness and compassion, but also be granted "Hen." Some commentators explain that these three wishes – "Hina, Ve'hisda, Ve'rahameh" – correspond to Abraham, Yishak and Yaakob.

The Gemara posits the principle that "Yisrael Af Al Pi She'hata Yisrael Hu" – a Jew does not lose his status as a Jew even after he sins. As a general rule, then, a Jew who violates Torah law is nevertheless considered a full-fledged Jew in all respects. There are, however, a number of exceptions. One is a person who commits sins 'Le'ha'ch'is" – with the specific intention to anger G-d. If a person not only transgresses the Torah, but has decided to spitefully reject G-d, and he thus commits Torah transgressions out of anger and resentment – and not due to convenience, for money, or due a lack of self-discipline – then he forfeits his status as a Jew. Such a person, therefore, cannot be counted toward a Minyan. (A fascinating story is told of Rav Levi Yishak of Berditchev, who once saw a Jewish fellow whom he knew eating pork, and he wished him, "Bon Appetit," that he should enjoy it. He explained to his students that this individual suffered from a certain condition that resulted in pain in his stomach when he ate pork, but he nevertheless ate it out of hostility toward religion. Rav Levi Yishak extended to him the wish that he should eat it for the pleasure that it brings, and not out of resentment, so that he would at least retain his status as a Jew.) Another exception – which is far more common – is Shabbat desecration. Since Shabbat desecration is equated with idol-worship, a public Shabbat desecrator is, in certain respects, considered not Jewish. The Hafetz Haim explained this Halacha by way of an analogy to a person who walks by a store which is currently closed. If the sign is still up, then the person will likely assume that the store is still in business, and has closed only temporarily. Once, however, the sign has been taken down, the person will conclude that the store has closed permanently. The Torah refers to Shabbat as an "Ot," a "sign." As long as a person observes Shabbat, he demonstrates that he's "open for business," that he's still "in the game," as it were, even if in other ways he might falter. Therefore, a public Shabbat violator – in principle – is not considered a Jew with respect to certain Halachot, such as being counted toward a Minyan. This applies to public Shabbat violators regardless of the reason why they desecrate Shabbat – whether it's for ideological reasons, out of anger toward G-d, or because of convenience or an unwillingness to make the sacrifices that Shabbat observance requires. The Poskim dispute the question of how often one must publicly violate Shabbat to be disqualified from counting toward a Minyan. Some maintain that this disqualification applies only to habitual Shabbat violators, but others contend that even if a person publicly violated Shabbat just once, he cannot be counted toward a Minyan. This is the view accepted by Hacham Ovadia Yosef. It goes without saying that once a person has performed Teshuba and committed to Shabbat observance, he regains his status as a full-fledged Jew and may be counted. Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled that one becomes disqualified only by publicly committing an act that is forbidden on Shabbat by force of Torah law. This includes driving, cooking, writing, and carrying in a public domain. If, however, a person publicly commits acts which are forbidden on Shabbat only by force of Rabbinic enactment, he may be counted toward a Minyan. The act of Shabbat desecration must be committed publicly – meaning, in the presence of ten men, the violator included. The Mishna Berura ruled that the act does not need to have been committed publicly, as even if it becomes known to ten people, this qualifies as a "public" act. Hacham Ovadia, however, disagrees, and rules that a person is not considered a public Shabbat violator unless he committed a forbidden act that was seen by ten men at the same time. (Incidentally, these conditions apply also with regard to the prohibition against drinking wine handled by a public Shabbat violator (unless the wine has been previously boiled). This applies only to somebody who committed an act of Shabbat desecration in the presence of ten men.) Hacham Ovadia made a very significant exception to this Halacha, addressing the situation of generally G-d-fearing Jews who work on Shabbat. It was quite common in certain periods that Jews would come to the synagogue, recite Kiddush and eat a Shabbat meal, but then go to work, succumbing to the anxiety of otherwise being unable to support their families. Hacham Ovadia ruled that although such people act incorrectly, nevertheless, since in their eyes, they violate Shabbat under duress, they are not considered intentional Shabbat violators. Hence, they may be counted toward a Minyan (and wine which they handled remains permissible). Additionally, the Mishna Berura writes that if a person violates Shabbat in public, but is too embarrassed to do so in the presence of a Rabbi, then he is not considered a public Shabbat violator with respect to this Halacha. The fact that he still experiences shame shows that he recognizes the sanctity of Shabbat, and so he does not attain the status of a flagrant desecrator who may not be counted toward a Minyan. However, Hacham Ovadia clarified that this applies only if we are certain that this individual would not desecrate Shabbat in view of his Rabbi. Much has been written about whether and how these Halachot apply in our generation. In the case of a person who was raised without a religious education, there is a general consensus that we apply the rule of "Tinok She'nishba" (literally, "an infant who was taken captive"), which excuses from liability a sinner who was never taught about Halachic observance. If someone was not taught to observe Shabbat as Halacha requires, then he is not held accountable for his failure to do so. As such, he does not have the status of a flagrant Shabbat desecrator. Some extend this rule further, asserting that even if a person learned about Shabbat, he cannot be considered a Shabbat desecrator if he was not made aware of the severity of Shabbat. There are people who received some level of Jewish education but their training was not grounded in Halacha, and they were thus never taught about the various Shabbat prohibitions and how they constitute capital offenses. These people, too, might not be considered flagrant Shabbat desecrators. An even more drastic view was advanced by the Hazon Ish (Rav Avraham Yeshaya Karelitz, 1878-1952). He contended that a person does not attain the status of a public Shabbat desecrator unless he was reprimanded for violating Shabbat and then ignored the rebuke he received. Effective criticism is a difficult art, a skill which the vast majority of people do not have in our time. As such, the Hazon Ish wrote, violators can be assumed to not have ever received proper rebuke for their acts of desecration, and they therefore do not have the status of public Shabbat desecrators. This novel ruling of the Hazon Ish should seemingly allow any Shabbat violator to be counted toward a Minyan nowadays, given the assumption that proper rebuke was never administered. However, Rav Yisrael Bitan noted that one might question this conclusion, in light of the fact that technology has made knowledge about Torah law readily available to all, and, moreover, there are many Jews who were raised in Torah homes and received a proper religious education, and then decided to abandon halachic observance. It seems difficult to exclude such people from the category of intentional Shabbat desecrators. Rabbi Bitan therefore concludes that every community Rabbi must determine the policy for his congregation, given the different opinions that exist and different realities in each community. It must be emphasized that we speak here only of being counted toward the minimum quorum of ten men. By no means does Halacha disallow a Shabbat violator from entering a synagogue and participating in the Minyan. Personally, I went into the rabbinate specifically for such Jews, to help Jews grow in their observance, each on their level and in a way that suits them, irrespective of one's current level of commitment. Those who do not properly observe Shabbat should be at least as welcome in the synagogue as fully-observant Jews, if not more so. I am reminded of a story told by Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim of a person who once came to pray in Congregation Shaare Zion and was given an Aliya, and afterward, somebody else approached Hacham Baruch to object. He said that he knew for a fact that this individual who was given an Aliya regularly shaved with a razor – a strict Torah violation – and thus should not be given the honor of being called to the Torah. "Let me tell you a story," Hacham Baruch replied. "Many years ago, there was somebody who came to shul who was not at all serious about Halachic observance. We welcomed him very warmly, and gave him an Aliya. There were those who objected and were angry at me. But gradually, this fellow became more involved, attending prayers and classes, and building a relationship with me and other Rabbis. He ended up raising a fully observant home, and all his children are strictly observant. "As it so happens," the Hacham continued, "that man was your father. You would not be in the synagogue today if I had followed the policy you are advocating." This should be our attitude toward our fellow Jews who are not as observant as we would want. While there is some question about whether or not they may be counted toward the minimum required amount of ten men, and, as we saw, different opinions exist, there is no question about whether they should be warmly welcomed in our synagogues. Our institutions must be inviting for all Jews, regardless of their level of observance, so everyone can grow in a way and at a pace that is appropriate for them.

Whereas some Kaddishim end with "Da'amiran Be'alma Ve'imru Amen," others consist of additional prayers and conclude with "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav…" Is the one reciting Kaddish required to take three steps back for "Oseh Shalom" at the end of Kaddish, as we do for "Oseh Shalom" at the end of the Amida? The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his Od Yosef Hai, distinguished in this regard between the "Kaddish Titkabal" that the Hazzan recites following the repetition of the Amida, and other Kaddishim. For the Hazzan reciting "Kaddish Titkabal," the Ben Ish Hai writes, taking three steps back is required, because he needs to step back after repeating the Amida. When reciting the other Kaddishim, however, this is not necessary. The Ben Ish Hai cites this ruling in the name of earlier Poskim (Shalmeh Sibur, Mateh Yehuda). This is the view also of the Kaf Ha'haim (Rav Yaakob Haim Sofer, Baghdad-Jerusalem, 1870-1939), who observed that this was the common practice, adding that this is consistent with the teachings of Kabbalah. Hacham Ovadia Yosef, however, disagreed, and ruled that it is proper to step back for "Oseh Shalom" at the end of every Kaddish. He refuted the Kaf Ha'haim's claim that Kabbalistic teaching does not require stepping back, noting that Rav Eliyahu Hamwe of Aleppo (1839-1915), a great Kabbalist, writes in his Peh Eliyahu that one must step back at the end of every Kaddish. Moreover, the Radbaz (Rav David Ben Zimra, Egypt, 1479-1573) maintained that one should take three steps back at the end of every Kaddish, and this is also the position of Maran, in Bet Yosef and Shulhan Aruch. Therefore, whenever one recites a Kaddish that ends with "Oseh Shalom," he should take three steps back. The proper procedure is to move the left foot back, then move the right foot behind the left foot, and then move the left foot next to the right foot. One then recites the words "Oseh Shalom Bi'mromav" while bowing to the left, "Hu Ya'aseh Shalom Alenu" while bowing to the right, and "Ve'al Kol Yisrael" while bowing frontward. He then stands upright for "Ve'imru Amen."

Our community's practice is to recite in Kaddish Titkabal the phrase "Kodam Abuna De'bi'shmaya Ve'ar'a" – asking that our prayers be accepted "before our Father who is in the heavens and the earth." Hacham Ovadia Yosef was of the opinion that this text is incorrect, as the word "Ve'ar'a" ("and the earth") does not belong. Several Rishonim omit this word from their text of the Kaddish, and, moreover, we cannot speak of G-d as our "Father on earth," as every person already has a father here on earth. Hashem is our Father in the heavens, in addition to our father here on earth. All Siddurim that bear a Haskama (letter of approval) by Hacham Ovadia omit the word "Ve'ar'a." Nevertheless, the custom among the communities in Aleppo, Syria was always to include the word "Ve'ar'a," and the work Yosef Haim justified the legitimacy of this text. Therefore, it is proper for Syrian Jews who follow the customs of Aleppo to add the word "Ve'ar'a." I am reminded of the time when, as a youngster, I became aware of Hacham Ovadia Yosef's ruling that the Beracha of "La'minim" in the Amida prayer should conclude with the words "U'machni'a Zedim," as opposed to the text which is customarily used in our community – "U'machni'a Minim." Hacham Ovadia advanced several compelling proofs to his ruling, and so I figured that this is the correct text. When I served as Hazzan in the synagogue, I recited "Zedim" in accordance with Hacham Ovadia's ruling. Hacham Baruch Ben-Haim approached me afterward and asked why I had changed the word from "Minim" to "Zedim," and I explained to him that I thought I should follow Hacham Ovadia's view. The Hacham reprimanded me, noting that notwithstanding Hacham Ovadia's ruling, it is improper to change the text that has been used in our community for generations. With regard to "Ve'ar'a," too, given the longstanding tradition among Syrian Jews to include this word in Kaddish, this is the custom that our community should follow. Summary: The custom in our community is to recite in Kaddish Titkabal the phrase "Kodam Abuna De'bi'shmaya Ve'ar'a," including the word "Ve'ar'a."

The Hazzan recites a special Kaddish after the Amida (or the repetition of the Amida) known as Kaddish Titkabal. Following the basic Kaddish text (which ends with "Da'amiran Be'alma"), the Hazzan adds a request that the congregation's prayers should be accepted along with those of the entire Jewish Nation: "Titkabal Selotana U'ba'utana Im Selot'hon U'ba'ut'hon De'chol Bet Yisrael…" The Hazzan mentions the prayers of the entire nation in fulfillment of the Gemara's teaching in Masechet Berachot (30a) that when a person prays, he should pray not as a lone individual, but rather as part of the entire nation. A person himself may not be worthy of having his prayers accepted, but when he joins with all Am Yisrael, he accesses the collective merit of the nation, including the merits of the great Sadikim, and this helps ensure the acceptance of his prayers. We therefore ask not only that G-d accept our prayers, but also that He accept the prayers of the entire Jewish Nation. We can perhaps gain further insight into the expression "Selotana U'ba'utana" – literally, "our prayers and our requests" – from the Targum Onkelos translation to a verse in Parashat Vayehi (Bereshit 48:22). Yaakob Abinu recalls how he seized the city of Shechem from his enemies "Be'harbi U'b'kashti" – "with my sword and with my bow." Targum Onkelos, interestingly enough, translates these words as "Bi'sloti U'b'ba'uti" – "with my prayer and with my request." It was clear to Yaakob that although he waged war, his success in vanquishing the enemy resulted not from his weapons, but rather from his prayers to G-d. It is also significant that Yaakob viewed Tefila as his "ammunition," as the weapons with which he defeated those who threatened him. Exploring Oneklos' translation more closely, the "sword" and the "bow" are used here as metaphors for two kinds of prayer – "Seloti" and "Ba'uti." The commentators explain that whereas a sword is used in close combat, when the enemy is right in front of the soldier, the bow is used to target enemies stationed at a distance. Correspondingly, then, "Selotana" and "Ba'utana refer to two different kinds of Tefila. Sometimes we pray like a sword – to address an immediate need, such in the case of an illness. Other times, however, we pray in the form of a bow – beseeching G-d to protect us from distant threat, from future dangers. When the Hazzan recites, "Titkabal Selotana U'ba'utana," he asks that all our prayers should be mercifully accepted – our prayers for our immediate needs, as well as our prayers for the future.

In the phrase in Kaddish "Yitbarach Ve'yishtabah Ve'yitpa'ar…" the word "Ve'yishtabah" begins a series of seven words that consist of six letters each, for a total of 42 letters. This phrase thus alludes to the special "Shem Mem-Bet" – the 42-letter Name of G-d, which has special significance. If we add the other three words of praise in Kaddish – "Yitgadal," "Ve'yitkadash," and "Yitbarach," we arrive at a total of ten expressions of praise, which parallel the ten utterances with which Hashem created the universe. These ten pronouncements later found expression in the declaration of the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai. The people heard the first two commandments from G-d, whereas the other eight were told only to Moshe who then conveyed them to the people. Accordingly, the ten expressions of praise in Kaddish are separated into two series: the two expressions of "Yitgadal" and "Ve'yitkadash" at the beginning of Kaddish, and the eight expressions from "Yitbarach" through "Ve'yit'halal," which appear later. The Peri Hadash (Rav Hizkiya Da Silva, 1659-1698) writes that these ten expressions of praise correspond to the ten different terms that King David used in Tehillim when praising Hashem (e.g. Nisu'ah, Niggun, Shir, Mizmor).

When reciting in Kaddish the words "Le'ela Min Kol Birchata Ve'shirata," one should ensure to recite "Min Kol" as two words, as opposed to "Mi'kol." The "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" response – which, according to our custom, continues through the word "De'alma" – must consist of 28 words, and if one recites "Mi'kol" instead of "Min Kol," he ends up with only 27 words. Rav Shmuel Vital (1598-1677) held a different view, asserting that the expression "Min Kol" is grammatically incorrect. He thus maintained that the proper text is "Mi'kol," and that the word "Ve'imru" after "Da'amiran Be'alma" counts as the 28 th word. The consensus opinion, however, is that the correct text is "Min Kol," as "Ve'imru" cannot count toward the required number of words. The custom among Ashkenazim is to substitute "Min Kol" with "Mi'kol" during the Aseret Yemeh Teshuba (Ten Days of Repentance), from Rosh Hashanah through Yom Kippur. They do so because their practice is to repeat the word "Le'ela" during this period, resulting in 29 words. The words "Min Kol" are thus replaced with "Mi'kol" to keep the total number at 28. They end up reciting, "Le'ela Le'ela Mi'kol Birchata…" Sepharadim, however, do not follow this custom. According to some Poskim, a Sepharadi who prays in an Ashkenazic Minyan during the Aseret Yemeh Teshuba should follow the Ashkenazic custom and recite "Le'ela Le'ela Mi'kol Birchata." Toward the end of the "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" response, we mention the word "Tishbehata." Our custom is to pronounce this word "Tishbehata," and not "Tushbehata." The word after "Tishbehata" is "Nehemata," which means "consolation." The explanation is that G-d is in mourning, as it were, during the Jewish People's period of exile. He grieves, so-to-speak, over the fact that we lost the Bet Ha'mikdash, were driven from our homeland, and have been dispersed among the other nations. We therefore wish the Almighty "consolation" with the rebuilding of the Bet Ha'mikdash and our return to our land. Summary: When reciting in Kaddish the words "Le'ela Min Kol Birchata Ve'shirata," one should ensure to recite "Min Kol" as two words, as opposed to "Mi'kol." Ashkenazim have the custom to change this phrase during the Aseret Yemeh Teshuba (reciting "Le'ela Le'ela Mi'kol…"), but this is not the practice among Sepharadim. Our custom is to recite "Tishbehata," and not "Tushbehata."

Different customs exist regarding the phrase "Le'alam U'l'almeh Almaya" in the "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" response to Kaddish. Some recite this phrase this way, whereas others omit the letter Vav from "U'l'almeh" and recite simply "Le'almeh." The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909), in his work Od Yosef Hai, writes that the word should be pronounced "Le'almeh," without the letter Vav at the beginning. He explains that the "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" response is meant to consist of 28 letters, and if the Vav is included, this response consists of 29 letters. Therefore, the Vav must be omitted. This is the position also of the Kaf Ha'haim (Rav Yaakob Haim Sofer, Baghdad-Jerusalem, 1870-1939). This argument assumes that the word "Shemeh" in "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" is spelled with a Yod (Shin, Mem, Yod, Heh). In some Siddurim, this word is spelled without the letter Yod, thus allowing for the Vav to be included in "U'l'almeh" without exceeding 28 letters. It is true that, as discussed in a previous installment, the Mahzor Vitri understood the phrase "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" as a prayer that the divine Name, which currently contains only the letters Yod and Heh, should become complete, and according to this reading, the word "Shemeh" is read as "Shem Yod-Heh" ("the Name of Yod-Heh"). However, as we saw, Halacha does not follow this opinion, and therefore it is acceptable to omit the letter Yod from the word "Shemeh." Moreover, Hacham Ovadia Yosef noted that Maran (author of the Shulhan Aruch), in Bet Yosef, clearly follows the opinion that the correct text is "U'l'almeh," and this is how the word appears in the texts of earlier Rabbis such as Rav Saadia Gaon, Rav Amram Gaon, the Rambam, and others. Hacham Ovadia asserts that in light of these sources, a Kabbalistic teaching involving the significance of the number 28 does not justify altering the text. By contrast, Rav Meir Mazuz (1945-2025), who was a renowned expert in grammar, maintained that the correct text is "Le'almeh." Rav Moshe Rahamim Shayo (contemporary), in his Mehkereh Aretz, writes that in the Bet Obed edition of the Siddur, which was used by the Jewish communities of Aleppo, Syria, the text reads "Le'almeh," without the letter Vav. This text also appears in the Siddur published by Rav Abraham Hamway, and this was the ruling of Rav Yeshayahu Dayan (1833-1903), head of Aleppo's Rabbinical court. There is also testimony that later, in the times of Aleppo's Chief Rabbi Moshe Mizrahi (1863-1955), Rav Mizrahi sharply reprimanded a member of the community who recited "U'l'almeh" instead of the "Le'almeh," which was the accepted custom in Aleppo. In the Kol Yaakob edition of the Siddur, which is used by many Syrian Jews, the word appears as "U'l'almeh," but this is a mistake, as the custom in Aleppo was clearly to say "Le'almeh." In practice, therefore, it is proper for members of the Syrian community to recite "Le'almeh," and not "U'l'almeh." Summary: In the "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" response to Kaddish, the word "Le'almeh" appears this way in some editions of the Siddur, and in others, "U'l'almeh," with the letter Vav at the beginning. The text that should be followed by members of the Syrian community is "Le'almeh."

The Poskim address the question as to the proper pronunciation of the word "Shemeh" in the "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" response to Kaddish – whether or not the Heh at the end of the word has a Dagesh (dot), which would turn it into a "Mapik Heh." Whereas a regular Heh at the end of the word is silent, a "Mapik Heh" is pronounced as an "H" sound. Does one pronounce the Heh at the end of "Shemeh" as a "Mapik Heh," or as a silent Heh? Some Poskim assert that this question hinges on the interpretation of the phrase "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach." As discussed in an earlier installment in this series, the simple interpretation of this phrase is "May the great Name be blessed." The Mahzor Vitri, however, explained that in this response, we pray that the Name of G-d, which, in our current state of exile, has only two letters – Yod and Heh – should become "Rabba" – great. According to this reading, the word "Shemeh" actually means "Shem Yod-Heh" (the Name of Yod-Heh), in which case the Heh at the end of the word must be pronounced as a "Mapik Heh." According to the first understanding, however, the Heh is silent. If so, then since we accept the first reading, it would seem that we should say "Shemeh" with a silent Heh at the end. However, other Poskim disagree, and claim that according to both interpretations of "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba," the rules of Hebrew grammar dictate that the Heh at the end "Shemeh" receives a Dagesh. This is the view accepted by Hacham Ovadia Yosef. In practice, therefore, one should pronounce "Shemeh" with a "Mapik Heh" at the end, with an "H" sound. When responding "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach," one must ensure to say "Mebarach" and not "Meborach." In Hebrew, the word for "blessed" is "Meborach," but in Aramaic – the language of the Kaddish text – the word is "Mebarach." Summary: When responding "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach" to Kaddish, the word "Shemeh" should be pronounced with a "Mapik Heh" at the end – meaning, the Heh at the end of the word should be expressed with an "H" sound. One must ensure to say "Mebarach" and not "Meborach."

The simple interpretation of the phrase "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach" – which we respond to Kaddish – is "May the Great Name be blessed." Meaning, we declare that "Shemeh Rabba" – G-d's great Name – shall be blessed and glorified. Tosafot (Berachot 3a) cite this interpretation in the name of Rabbenu Yishak. However, Tosafot also bring a different interpretation of this phrase, in the name of the Mahzor Vitri, according to which this phrase actually consists of two separate proclamations. First, we declare that "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" – that G-d's Name shall be great, or complete, and we then add that it should be blessed forever ("Mebarach Le'alam…"). The concept underlying this second explanation is that G-d's Name is "incomplete" in our nation's state of exile. G-d's complete Name consists of four letters – Yod, Heh, Vav and Heh – but when the Jewish People are in exile, His Name is compromised, consisting of only Yod and Heh. This is indicated by G-d's pronouncement after Beneh Yisrael's first battle against Amalek: "Ki Yad Al Kes Y-ah" (Shemot 17:16). As long as Amalek exists, Hashem's Name is only "Y-ah," missing the final two letters, Vav and Heh. For the same reason, G-d refers in this verse to His throne with the word "Kes," a shortened version of the word "Kiseh," indicating the incompletion of His reign, so-to-speak, due to the presence of evil in the world. The Maharsha (Rav Shmuel Eidels, 1555-1631) explains on this basis the verse in Tehillim (132:13) which we recite each morning, "KI Bahar Hashem Be'Sion, Iva Le'moshab Lo" (literally, "For G-d has chosen Zion, desiring it as His abode"). This means that when Hashem will choose to return to Zion, with the rebuilding of the Bet Ha'mikdash, then "Iva" – the letters Alef, Vav and Heh – will be restored to their rightful place ("Le'moshab"). The missing Alef of the word "Kiseh," and the Vav and Heh missing from Hashem's Name, will finally return. Similarly, we recite each morning after Shema, "Hu Kayam U'shemo Kayam Ve'chis'o Nachon" – "He exists, His Name exists, and His throne is firmly set in place." Rav Shlomo Amar explains this to mean that when "Hu Kayam" – the letters Heh and Vav will come back, then "Shemo Kayam" – Hashem's Name will again be complete, and "Ve'chis'o Nachon" – His throne will be complete, as well. This notion is alluded to also in the prayer added by Ashkenazim to Birkat Ha'mazon: "Ha'Rahaman Hu Yishlah Lanu Et Eliyahu Ha'nabi" – "The Compassionate One – He will send us Eliyahu the prophet." When Eliyahu comes, "Hu" – the letters Heh and Vav – will be restored. Another allusion to this concept appears in the final verse in Tehillim: "Kol Ha'neshama Tehalel Ya-ah" – "Every soul shall praise Y-ah." The word "He'neshama" ("the soul") can be punctuated differently such that it means "the desolation." This verse thus implies that in the current state of "desolation," in the absence of the Bet Ha'mikdash, we can praise only "Y-ah," as Hashem's Name remains incomplete. According to this second interpretation of "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach," we are praying that "Shemeh" – a contraction of the words "Shem" and "Y-ah," referring to the incomplete Name – shall be made "Rabba," complete, and, additionally, His Name should be blessed ("Mebarach"). Incidentally, the word "Yitgadal" consists of five letters, and the word "Ve'yitkadash" consists of six letters. These two words thus represent the letters Heh and Vav, which, respectively, equal in Gematria 5 and 6. We pray through the recitation of these words that G-d's Name should be glorified through the restoration of the missing Vav and Heh. According to this second opinion, when reciting "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach," one should pause slightly between the words "Shemeh" and "Rabba," as this is a prayer that the Name ("Shemeh") should become great ("Rabba"), and the word "Rabba" is thus not describing the word "Shemeh." The Ben Ish Hai (Rav Yosef Haim of Baghdad, 1833-1909) cites the Arizal as concurring with this view of the Mahzor Vitri. However, as Hacham Ovadia Yosef cites, Tosafot challenged this reading in light of the Gemara's comment (there in Berachot) that speaks of Jews proclaiming in the synagogue, "Yeheh Shemeh Ha'gadol Meborach" ("May His great Name be blessed") – which clearly indicates that we are declaring that the great Name shall be blessed, as Rabbenu Yishak explained. Moreover, Rav Yisrael Bitan notes that the Ben Ish Hai elsewhere brings Rabbenu Yishak's understanding, and ruled that one should therefore not pause between the words "Shemeh" and "Rabba." This is, indeed, the correct practice to follow. Summary: The accepted interpretation of "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba Mebarach" is "May the Great Name be blessed." One should recite these words without any pause in between the words "Shemeh" and "Rabba."

One who recites Kaddish must ensure while saying the phrase "Be'alma Di Bera" to pronounce "Di Bera" as two separate words. If one recites this phrase too quickly, he will end up saying, "Dibera," as one word, which is incorrect. He must be careful to recite two separate words – "Di" and "Bera." Different opinions exist regarding the pronunciation of the word "Chi'r'uteh" in the phrase "Be'alma Di Bera Chi'r'uteh," as according to some views, the letter Chaf has a Dagesh (dot), such that it should be pronounced "Ki'r'uteh." The debate hinges on how to read this phrase. The basic rule is that when any of the letters Bet, Gimmel, Dalet, Kaf, Peh or Tav appears at the beginning of the word, it receives a Dagesh. The exception to this rule is when the preceding word ends with an Alef, Heh, Vav or Yod, in which case the word does not receive a Dagesh. In the case of "Chi'r'uteh," then, it would seem that since the previous word ("Bera") ends with the letter Alef, the Chaf at the beginning of "Chi'r'uteh" should remain without a Dagesh, and thus be pronounced "Chi'r'uteh." Indeed, this is how the word is punctuated in many editions of the Siddur. However, Hacham Ovadia Yosef ruled that the more correct pronunciation is "Ki'r'uteh." He explained that although the previous word ends with an Alef, that word – "Bera" – is not connected to the word "Ki'r'uteh." The word "Ki'r'uteh" means "in accordance with His will," and Hacham Ovadia explained, based on a passage in Masechet Sofrim, that this word modifies not the immediately preceding words, but rather the beginning of Kaddish, when we pray for G-d's Name to be glorified. We pray that His Name should be sanctified and praised "Ki'r'uteh" – in fulfillment of His will. Hence, the word "Ki'r'uteh" stands separate and apart from the words "Di Bera," and so the Heh at the end of the word "Bera" does not affect the letter Chaf at the beginning of the word "Ki'r'uteh." We thus apply the standard rule that a Chaf at the beginning of a word receives a Dagesh, such that the word should be pronounced "Ki'r'uteh." Rav Meir Mazuz (1945-2025) disputed Hacham Ovadia's position. He noted that the Abudarham (Spain, 14 th century) interpreted "Di Bera Chi'r'uteh" to mean, "that He created in accordance with His will." According to this reading, the word "Chi'r'uteh" indeed modifies the immediately preceding words – "Di Bera," such that the letter Chaf should not receive a Dagesh. Rav Mazuz conceded, however, that the passage in Masechet Sofrim indeed implies that "Chi'r'uteh" modifies the earlier part of the sentence, and not the words "Di Bera." In practice, different customs exist. Tunisian communities pronounce the word "Ki'r'uteh," whereas the custom among the communities in Aleppo, Syria was to pronounce it "Chi'r'uteh." Rav Yisrael Bitan writes that Hacham Ovadia, despite preferring the pronunciation of "Ki'r'uteh," acknowledged that those who pronounce it "Chi'r'uteh" have a legitimate basis for this practice. Therefore, each community should follow its custom. Summary: One who recites Kaddish must ensure while saying the phrase "Be'alma Di Bera" to pronounce "Di Bera" as two separate words, and not as one word ("Dibera"). Different customs exist regarding the next word – "Chi'r'uteh," as some pronounce the word this way, and others pronounce it "Ki'r'uteh." Each community should follow its custom.

When one responds, "Amen Yeheh Shemeh Rabba" to Kaddish, he must ensure to pause between "Amen" and "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba." The word "Amen" is a response to the prayer that the Hazzan had just said – that G-d's Name should be glorified and praised throughout the world. The words "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba…" constitute a separate proclamation, and are not a direct continuation of the "Amen" response. Therefore, one must pause briefly after responding "Amen," before declaring, "Yeheh Shemeh Rabba…"