Podcast appearances and mentions of Clint Bolick

Clint Bolick, the 44th Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss how the Supreme Court agreeing to take up the St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond case, and what it could mean for the future of charter schools and religious education in the United States.

In the twentieth century, state supreme courts and legislatures limited the practice of law to licensed law school graduates and prevented nonlawyers from investing in law firms. This regulatory structure has not yielded a sufficient supply of affordable legal services to keep pace with demand: despite government and charitable funding and pro bono work, over 90% of the basic civil legal needs of low-income Americans now go unmet.As lawyers have taken an interest in regulatory reform in this century, some have begun to scrutinize our own profession and explore whether innovative structural changes can help close this justice gap. The experts on this panel will equip attendees to consider reform in their states by examining the pros and cons of three such changes: (1) licensing legal paraprofessionals to perform limited legal services; (2) allowing nonlawyers to invest in legal service providers; and (3) reforming legal education and licensure to increase the supply of lawyers, especially in underserved geographic and practice areas.Featuring:Hon. Clint Bolick, Justice, Supreme Court of ArizonaHon. Charles Canady, Chief Justice, Florida Supreme CourtMs. Danielle Hirsch, Managing Director, Court Consulting Division, National Center for State CourtsMs. Lucy Ricca, Executive Director, Deborah L. Rhode Center on the Legal Profession, Stanford Law SchoolModerator: Hon. J. Brett Busby, Justice, Texas Supreme Court

Clint Bolick, the 44th Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss how the Supreme Court has interpreted the clauses of the First Amendment of the Constitution, and its impact on religious education in the United States.

The work of judges is often opaque to the public and poorly understood generally, and yet voters are regularly expected to vote on them. Clint Bolick of the Arizona Supreme Court makes his case for a better way. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Clint Bolick - AZ Supreme Court justice

Justice Clint Bolick joins the show.

Kamala Harris pledges millions to Lebanon. FEMA hits back against "misinformation". Democrats panic over polls. Mike Vallante, Clint Bolick and Kari Lake join the show.

Justice Bolick joined Mike to explain the court's ruling on a voter registration system error.

Judicial selection in the states is not uniform, but most states have some form of judicial elections. Some are contested elections--whether partisan or nonpartisan--and some involve uncontested retention elections. During an election, judicial candidates must abide by ethical rules that explicitly restrict their ability to speak freely.What are the implications, if any, for restrictions on judicial speech arising from different systems of selecting and retaining judges? How do judicial campaign experiences inform free speech perspectives? Join us for a conversation about how judicial elections intersect with free speech rights.Featuring:Hon. Clint Bolick, Justice, Arizona Supreme CourtHon. J. Brett Busby, Justice, Texas Supreme CourtHon. Daniel Kelly, Former Justice, Wisconsin Supreme Court(Moderator) Hon. G. Barry Anderson, Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court (ret.) Related Reading(s):Op. Ed By Justice BolickOther Materials

Terry Schilling - American Principles Project; Clint Bolick - Arizona Supreme Court Justice

Justice Clint Bolick provides a behind-the-scenes look at life as a State Supreme Court Justice and shares his experiences working with now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Delve into the role of federalism in the judicial system as Justice Bolick navigates the complexities of the legal landscape. Tune in for intriguing insights into the justice system’s […]

Justice Clint Bolick provides a behind-the-scenes look at life as a State Supreme Court Justice and shares his experiences working with now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Delve into the role of federalism in the judicial system as Justice Bolick navigates the complexities of the legal landscape. Tune in for intriguing insights into the justice system's inner workings and the impact of judicial decisions. Justice Clint Bolick was appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court in 2016 and in 2018 was retained by the voters for a six-year term. Prior to joining the Court, Justice Bolick litigated constitutional cases in state and federal courts from coast to coast, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Among other positions, he served as Vice President for Litigation at the Goldwater Institute and as Co-founder and Vice President for Litigation at the Institute for Justice. He has litigated in support of school choice, private property rights, freedom of speech, and federalism, and against racial classifications and government subsidies. Justice Bolick received his J.D. from the University of California at Davis, and his Bachelor of Arts degree from Drew University. Justice Bolick has written a dozen books and hundreds of articles. Among his most recent books are Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution, co-authored with former Florida Governor Jeb Bush; and David's Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On March 23, 2023, the Center for Constitutional Design at Arizona State University's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law and the Federalist Society's Arizona State University Student Chapter and Article I Initiative co-hosted a debate about whether the legislative power can be delegated.The debate featured Professor James Stoner and Professor Michael Rappaport, and was moderated by Arizona State Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick.Featuring:- Prof. Michael Rappaport, Hugh & Hazel Darling Professor of Law and Director, Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism, University of San Diego School of Law- Prof. James Stoner, Hermann Moyse, Jr., Professor and Director, Eric Voegelin Institute, Department of Political Science, Louisiana State University- [Moderator] Hon. Clint Bolick, Justice, Arizona Supreme Court- [Introduction] Prof. Stephanie Lindquist, Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science and Director, Center for Constitutional Design, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University

Since 1967, TFAS has reached more than 46,000 students and professionals through academic programs, fellowships and seminars.This season on the Liberty and Leadership Podcast, TFAS President Roger Ream sits down with outstanding TFAS alumni for exclusive, one-on-one conversations about their unique leadership journeys. From venture capitalists, authors, entrepreneurs, filmmakers, educators, opinion columnists, veterans, lawmakers, and more, these alumni represent just a small sample of the courageous leaders who are making a difference in their communities and throughout the world.Hear stories from Will Weatherford, Katie Barlow, Nicholas Ballasy, Nicole Jain, Mark Stansberry, Jillian Kay Melchior, Paul Glader, Dan McConchie, Abby Witt, and Clint Bolick, and more on the Liberty and Leadership Podcast.Never miss a new alumni story – subscribe to the Liberty and Leadership Podcast now on Apple, Spotify or wherever you catch your podcasts, or visit TFAS.org/podcasts. The Liberty and Leadership Podcast is produced and distributed by kglobal.Support the show

When Arizona Governor Doug Ducey appointed the noted libertarian lawyer Clint Bolick to the Arizona Supreme Court in 2016, the left freaked out (so what else is new), calling his appointment “chilling.” The Center for American Progress gasped, “Mr. Bolick has spent the last quarter century working — at times quite successfully — to make […]

When Arizona Governor Doug Ducey appointed the noted libertarian lawyer Clint Bolick to the Arizona Supreme Court in 2016, the left freaked out (so what else is new), calling his appointment “chilling.” The Center for American Progress gasped, “Mr. Bolick has spent the last quarter century working — at times quite successfully — to make the law more friendly to anti-government conservatives. Source

When Arizona Governor Doug Ducey appointed the noted libertarian lawyer Clint Bolick to the Arizona Supreme Court in 2016, the left freaked out (so what else is new), calling his appointment “chilling.” The Center for American Progress gasped, “Mr. Bolick has spent the last quarter century working — at times quite successfully — to make the law more friendly to anti-government conservatives. Source

Today, we have another fascinating guest on the Liberty + Leadership podcast - Associate Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court and TFAS alumnus, the Honorable Clint Bolick. In addition to serving on the bench, Justice Bolick teaches Constitutional Law at Arizona State University School of Law, serves as a research fellow with the Hoover Institution, and is the author of numerous books. In this week's episode, Roger and Clint discuss advice for young leaders, insights on SCOTUS cases, and why Clint marked a constitutional victory for free speech by getting a tattoo of a scorpion on his index finger.The Liberty + Leadership Podcast is hosted by TFAS President, Roger Ream  and produced by kglobal. If you have a comment or question for the show, please drop us an email at podcast@TFAS.org.Support the show

The 44th Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, Clint Bolick, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss Justice Bolick's book new book, "Unshackled: Freeing America's K–12 Education System," co-written with Kate J. Hardiman.

Monday, June 28, 2021 Hoover Institution, Stanford University   The Hoover Institution Press presents a discussion of the recent publication Unshackled: Freeing America's K–12 Education System with authors Clint Bolick and Kate J. Hardiman, joined by Hoover Senior Fellow Chester E. Finn, Jr., on Monday, June 28, 2021 at 1:00 pm PT | 4:00 pm ET. Unshackled explores how to leverage decentralization, school choice, and technology to further freedom and flexibility in education—issues that are more pressing than ever in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this conversation, Bolick, Hardiman, and Finn discuss proposals to bring K–12 education into the 21st century. PARTICIPANT BIOS Clint Bolick is a justice on the Arizona Supreme Court and research fellow at the Hoover Institution. He is a lifelong champion of educational opportunity. Kate J. Hardiman is a legal fellow, law student, and former teacher who has experienced how school choice changes lives. She hopes to follow in the footsteps of her coauthor and mentor by litigating for educational change. Chester E. Finn, Jr., is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a distinguished senior fellow and president emeritus at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. He previously served as assistant secretary for research and improvement, and counselor to the cabinet secretary at the US Department of Education; and as legislative director for Senator Daniel P. Moynihan.

Eight years ago, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush wrote a book, Immigration Wars: Forging An American Solution, offering a practical, nonpartisan approach to solving one of America’s most divisive matters – only to see a window for reform in Washington quickly close. The co-author of that book, Hoover fellow and Arizona Supreme Court associate justice Clint Bolick, explains why immigration reform remains elusive and what fixes are most sensible.

Education policy has long been a bi-partisan priority, and education has played a significant role in the development of constitutional law—from First to Fourteenth Amendment—over the past century. During the COVID-19 pandemic, debates about the structure of the public school system and the parental right to choose private or home schooling have come to a head. This program will focus on the debate over reform and school choice through the lens of a new book, Unshackled: Freeing America's K-12 Education System. Co-authors Clint Bolick and Kate Hardiman join education law expert Nicole Garnett to review the new book. Featuring: -- Hon. Clint Bolick, Supreme Court of Arizona-- Kate Hardiman, William H. Rehnquist Fellow, Cooper & Kirk PLLC-- Moderator: Prof. Nicole Stelle Garnett, John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School

Clint Bolick joins Seth to talk about his new book, "Unshackled: Freeing America's K-12 Education System." The booming housing market. The Andrew Cuomo sexual harassment allegations. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Justice Clint Bolick of the Arizona Supreme Court and Kate Hardiman, Rehnquist Fellow at Cooper & Kirk, join us to discuss their latest book, "Unshackled: Freeing America’s K–12 Education System." For more information, visit www.edchoice.org.

On this episode, redefinED’s executive editor speaks with longtime education choice advocate Bolick, who is co-founder of the Institute for Justice. Now serving as an associate justice on the Arizona… The post podcastED: Matt Ladner interviews Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick appeared first on redefinED.

This week on “The Learning Curve,” Cara and Gerard kick off National School Choice Week with Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick, co-author with Kate Hardiman of a new book, Unshackled: Freeing America's K–12 Education System. Justice Bolick shares his experiences serving on a state supreme court, and how it has shaped his understanding of America's legal system. They discuss his new book... Source

Clint Bolick, Arizona Supreme Court Justice and Co-Founder of Institute for Justice, and Kate Hardiman, former school teacher and current law student, join Corey DeAngelis and Matthew Nielsen to discuss their new book, Unshackled: Freeing America's K–12 Education System. Find EFI online at EFInstitute.org, @EF_Institute on twitter, and Educational Freedom Institute on Facebook and other social platforms.

The Atlas Society Asks Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick. Justice Bolick founded the Institute for Justice in 1991, a non-profit law firm that litigates to limit government power, especially when it comes to property rights, economic liberty, and free speech. Justice Bolick is well known for his support of school choice and defense of vouchers. He has written a number of books, including "David’s Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary" and "Death Grip: Loosening the Law’s Stranglehold over Economic Liberty."

John Tamny, Director of FreedomWorks's Center for Economic Freedom, makes several important observations about the problem with lockdowns and bans on “non-essential” business that has eluded the so-called “experts”:“Experts are routinely called on as the answer to ‘crises,' when it's more realistic to assert that the experts are the crisis,” he writes in a recent piece for Real Clear Markets. In particular, the one-size-fits all diktats handed down from on high prevent the discovery of information from small-scale experiments. Individuals, acting freely as adults, possess local knowledge, which accumulates and multiplies across the millions of participants in society. This phenomenon has been called “the wisdom of crowds,” but perhaps the “wisdom of markets” would be a better term.Thankfully, the crowds are beginning to wake up, and along with them, markets are coming back to life without any central planning required.Two weeks ago, Randal O'Toole showed how government distorts incentives in transportation, and how that distortion has exacerbated the COVID-19 epidemic in New York City via mismanaged mass transit. Yet we continue to pour billions into these failing systems. When the market operates without intervention, mistakes tend to be limited – not subsidized – and the firms and individuals with bad judgment quickly go out of business.Ideally, Tamny notes, the government wouldn't need to declare an end to the shutdown – people could simply re-open as they see fit, taking into account the risks and rewards, and learning from each other's experience.Some will say that this situation is different because of the invisible nature of the coronavirus, and its infectious potential. Tamny is no stranger to this refrain that “this time it's different.” He joins me this Sunday to debunk the central planning “one-size-solution” crowd and to discuss his article, “Don't Plan to Reopen; Just Reopen,” for the American Institute for Economic Research.We'll dissect the recent stock market rally – is it a Fed-inflated bubble or something more sustainable? Tamny is an optimist, assuming people are allowed to go back to work on their own schedule, rather than on the governors' fickle timing.Finally, we will also discuss the possibility that states are exceeding their constitutional powers in continuing the lockdowns. Are we witnessing the kinds of “grassroots tyranny” that Clint Bolick warned of decades ago? And if so, should the Federal government step in as Trump seems to want to do, or is there another solution?You won't want to miss this episode of the show of ideas, not attitude.

In this edition of Liberty Law Talk, I talk with Clint Bolick, Director of the Center for Constitutional Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, about his new book Death Grip: Loosening the Law’s Stranglehold over Economic Liberty. Bolick, of course, is no stranger to litigating constitutional claims for economic liberties and property rights, among other achievements. […]

In this episode, J Cal Davenport and his co-host, Seth Root, invite Arizona Supreme Court Judge Clint Bolick on the podcast to talk about the Constitution!We talk about how America got the Constitution, we talk about the connection between the Declaration and the Constitution, and we talk about judicial engagement vs judicial restraint. Enjoy! 

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The roundtable discussion covered "Federalism's Contribution to Economic Liberty: Catalyzing Technological Advancement and Economic Growth".Does the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee economic liberty? If not, what role might states play in advancing economic liberty? Frustrated with the federal government’s inability or unwillingness to solve regulatory or competition-based problems, some states have taken matters into their own hands. This panel will address how states have been, and still can be, laboratories of democracy when it comes to regulation and catalyzing economic growth. It will also address how federal regulators can work with, not against, states to accomplish these goals.Using case studies ranging from emerging technologies to marijuana deregulation, the panel will explore the state’s role in our modern federal system, with special attention paid to modern interpretations of both the Fourteenth Amendment and the Commerce Clause.Discussion will focus on demonstrating the ways in which states can remain flexible in fostering innovation—both technological and regarding social policy—while ensuring that consumers are adequately protected from dangerous product or service testing or other offerings. This flexibility enables states to attract, test, and encourage competition in emerging and innovative technologies, as well as long-existing technologies with lowered barriers to entry.Prof. Jonathan H. Adler, Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Business Law & Regulation, Case Western Reserve University School of LawMs. Dana Berliner, Senior Vice President and Litigation Director, Institute for JusticeHon. Clint Bolick, Arizona Supreme CourtHon. Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney GeneralProf. Allan Ides, Professor of Law and Christopher N. May Chair, Loyola Law School, Los AngelesModerator: Hon. Chad Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law hosted the 2019 National Student Symposium. The roundtable discussion covered "Federalism's Contribution to Economic Liberty: Catalyzing Technological Advancement and Economic Growth".Does the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee economic liberty? If not, what role might states play in advancing economic liberty? Frustrated with the federal government’s inability or unwillingness to solve regulatory or competition-based problems, some states have taken matters into their own hands. This panel will address how states have been, and still can be, laboratories of democracy when it comes to regulation and catalyzing economic growth. It will also address how federal regulators can work with, not against, states to accomplish these goals.Using case studies ranging from emerging technologies to marijuana deregulation, the panel will explore the state’s role in our modern federal system, with special attention paid to modern interpretations of both the Fourteenth Amendment and the Commerce Clause.Discussion will focus on demonstrating the ways in which states can remain flexible in fostering innovation—both technological and regarding social policy—while ensuring that consumers are adequately protected from dangerous product or service testing or other offerings. This flexibility enables states to attract, test, and encourage competition in emerging and innovative technologies, as well as long-existing technologies with lowered barriers to entry.Prof. Jonathan H. Adler, Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Business Law & Regulation, Case Western Reserve University School of LawMs. Dana Berliner, Senior Vice President and Litigation Director, Institute for JusticeHon. Clint Bolick, Arizona Supreme CourtHon. Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney GeneralProf. Allan Ides, Professor of Law and Christopher N. May Chair, Loyola Law School, Los AngelesModerator: Hon. Chad Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth CircuitAs always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

Clint Bolick, an Associate Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, talks with Paul E. Peterson about how the results of gubernatorial elections will affect the school choice climate in various states. They also discuss the proposed expansion of an education savings account program which was on the ballot in Arizona.

In designing the American Constitution, the Founding Fathers were careful to establish a balance of powers — not only among co-equal branches of federal government, but also among states, federal government, and the people themselves.If the United States were a computer, then federalism would be its operating system. Extending the analogy, the most basic functions are performed by a “Central Governing Unit” (CGU) and strictly enumerated by Article I, Section VIII. The states were delegated the task of “programming” in the gaps — specialized “apps” to handle more localized issues. This design was supposed to serve as a bulwark against federal tyranny, although we've seen how the principles of federalism have been eroded by the commerce clause, and other broad powers usurped by federal government from the states.On the flip side, states and local governments are not immune from the temptation to seize powers beyond their designated scope. The 10th amendment specifies that the powers not delegated to the Federal government are reserved to the states and to the people. The founders were clear in their writings that the ultimate authority rests in individuals. Both conservatives and liberals have ignored individual sovereignty in promoting a bastardized version of federalism. Conservatives have often championed discriminatory legislation based on “states rights,” while contemporary liberals support the power of state and local governments to regulate the economy and redistribute wealth.Standing firm against this “local leviathan” are libertarians. The smallest minority on earth, Ayn Rand noted, is the individual. Sometimes the individual has to fight city hall all by himself, and the odds are stacked against him. Other times, however, groups like the Institute for Justice can take the government to court to defend their constitutional rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”Before becoming an Arizona Supreme Court Justice, Hon. Clint Bolick co-founded the IJ, which has been featured many times on this show. Shortly after founding the IJ, Bolick authored a book titled Grassroots Tyranny: The Limits of Federalism (Cato Institute Press). In it, he cautioned proponents of decentralization that localizing power is no guarantee that it won't be abused. It's not all about empowering states, Bolick says — both states and federal government are merely devices that ultimately derive their powers from their protection of individual liberty.While states and local governments can still serve as “laboratories of democracy,” these laboratories must never be allowed to violate inalienable rights, lest federalism — the “bulwark” of liberty — turn loose a thousand experiments in governance gone wrong.Tune in for the full discussion between Bob and Clint on Grassroots Tyranny: The Limits of Federalism.

SUN. 9/23: AZ Supreme Court Justice and IJ founder Clint Bolick on Grassroots Tyranny & the Limits of Federalism.

On the last day of its 2017-2018 term, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Janus vs. AFSCME that public employee unions can no longer collect agency fees from non-members. Clint Bolick, an associate justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss why the U.S. Supreme Court felt it was necessary to overrule a decision from the 1970s allowing agency fees.

It can be frustrating looking for a “win” from the good guys. Far too often we look for big, obvious and life-changing circumstances, but sometimes the good guys do win -- and Clint Bolick is one of those good guys you may or may not have heard about. As the co-founder of the Institute for Justice, Clint knows a thing or two about going toe-to-toe with the government on every level. Now, Clint serves as an Associate Justice on the Arizona Supreme Court, where he has taken his passion for justice and liberty to a whole new level. Clint is both a liberty warrior and a scholar, a thought leader *and* active leader in the field of law and order, and here's what we'll learn from him in this episode of Leading Liberty: Whether judicial activism from the bench is what our Founding Fathers feared What the "Gift Clause" is, and how the Arizona Constitution may be leading the way on some amazing state-level taxpayer protections What’s really going on with the status of Civil Asset Forfeiture reform Whether jury nullification is justified -- and when it turns problematic I could keep going, but this episode goes into all of that and so much more! So listen, enjoy, learn, but don’t forget to leave the show a rating and review on iTunes if you haven’t already done that. Resources for this episode: Go back and check out Episode 13: Mastering Public Relations for Liberty with the Institute for Justice’s John Kramer and Episode 23: The Blue Republican Revolution for Ron Paul with the Foundation for Economic Education’s Robin Koerner to get a clearer picture of the story behind more of what we discussed in this episode. Also, pick up up a copy of both of Clint’s books we discussed today -- “David’s Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary” and “Two-Fer: Electing a President and a Supreme Court” -- which you can find on Amazon now (and if you click those links, you support the show in the process, so it’s a win-win). And for more after the show, check out the free marketing resources for the freedom movement on JennGray.com. P.S. Did you like this episode? Help other freedom fighters find the show by leaving Leading Liberty a quick review! OR Get a shout out on the next show by pledging a dollar or two per episode! 100% of the proceeds support the Leading Liberty production team.

What is the proper role of the State judiciary when considering questions of federal law? If there are independent and adequate federal and State grounds, on which basis should a state supreme court decide a case? -- This panel was part of the 2017 Annual Western Chapters Conference at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, CA on January 28, 2017. -- Luncheon: Conversation with State Supreme Court Justices -- Hon. Clint Bolick, Arizona Supreme Court and Hon. Stephen Markman, Michigan Supreme Court. Moderator: Hon. Diane Sykes, U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit. Introduction: Jennifer Perkins, Assistant Solicitor General, AG Opinions and Ethics at Arizona Attorney General's Office.

State constitutions often protect liberty better than the U.S. Constitution, and in many cases fighting the government in state court can be much easier. Clint Bolick, a justice on the Arizona Supreme Court, comments. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

View the full event here: https://www.cato.org/events/15th-annual-constitution-day.

Equality of opportunity is supposed to be a fundamental American principle. But it is not being realized today – in large part due to our failing education system. Despite being better funded, American public schools consistently lag those of comparable countries. The disparity is especially stark in inner-city and minority school districts, where poor children are most in need of quality education. Is school choice the solution? What role should the federal government play in education? And what legal issues are implicated by reform efforts? -- This panel was presented at the 2016 National Student Symposium on Saturday, February 27, 2016, at the University of Virginia School of Law. -- Featuring: Hon. Clint Bolick, Arizona Supreme Court; Mrs. Cynthia Brown, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress; Dr. William Galston, Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution; and Prof. Amy Wax, Robert Mundheim Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School. Moderator: Hon. Jennifer W. Elrod, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Introduction: Ms. Abby Hollenstein, 1L Committee Co-Chair, University of Virginia School of Law Student Chapter.

Today on The Larry Kudlow Show, Larry talks with Art Laffer, founder & chairman of Laffer Associates and Laffer Investments. Also on the show Congressman Tom Price (R-GA), incoming Chairman of the House Budget Committee. Michael Cuggino, President & Portfolio Manager at Permanent Portfolio Fund, along with Jim LaCamp, senior VP & portfolio manager at Macroportfolio Wealth Management @ UBS. More great guests include Clint Bolick, Co-Author (with Jeb Bush): "Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution." As always the Money/Politics panel with James Pethokoukis, Steve Moore, and John McIntyre! All this and much more on The Larry Kudlow Show!

Today on The Larry Kudlow Show, Larry talks with Art Laffer, founder & chairman of Laffer Associates and Laffer Investments. Also on the show Congressman Tom Price (R-GA), incoming Chairman of the House Budget Committee. Michael Cuggino, President & Portfolio Manager at Permanent Portfolio Fund, along with Jim LaCamp, senior VP & portfolio manager at Macroportfolio Wealth Management @ UBS. More great guests include Clint Bolick, Co-Author (with Jeb Bush): "Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution." As always the Money/Politics panel with James Pethokoukis, Steve Moore, and John McIntyre! All this and much more on The Larry Kudlow Show!

Today on The Larry Kudlow Show, Larry talks with Art Laffer, founder & chairman of Laffer Associates and Laffer Investments. Also on the show Congressman Tom Price (R-GA), incoming Chairman of the House Budget Committee. Michael Cuggino, President & Portfolio Manager at Permanent Portfolio Fund, along with Jim LaCamp, senior VP & portfolio manager at Macroportfolio Wealth Management @ UBS. More great guests include Clint Bolick, Co-Author (with Jeb Bush): "Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution." As always the Money/Politics panel with James Pethokoukis, Steve Moore, and John McIntyre! All this and much more on The Larry Kudlow Show!

A judge in Florida has turned back a union challenge to education savings accounts for special needs children. Clint Bolick of the Goldwater Institute comments. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

On the Liberty Law Talk podcast, host Richard Reinsch talks with Clint Bolick, Vice President of Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, about his book Death Grip: Loosening the Law’s Stranglehold over Economic Liberty. Bolick, of course, is no stranger to litigating constitutional claims for economic liberties and property rights, among other achievements. Death Grip argues that the infamous Slaughterhouse Cases of 1873 emptied the privileges or immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of one its primary purposes: the protection of economic liberties against encroachment by state governments. This conversation explores the history and intent behind the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and its privileges or immunities clause, and then looks to current efforts to breathe life back into the protection of economic liberties.   >> Listen here On the Liberty Law Talk podcast, host Richard Reinsch talks with Clint Bolick, Vice President of Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, about his book Death Grip: Loosening the Law’s Stranglehold over Economic Liberty. Bolick, of course, is no stranger to litigating constitutional claims for economic liberties and property rights, among other achievements. Liberty Law TalkMonday, May 7, 2012 - 14:07Liberty Law TalkConstitutional RightsBusiness & Job CreationAudioIn the NewsYesEconomic liberty, jobs, business, booksBy Topicsfalse

Clint Bolick, co-founder of the Institute for Justice and President of the Alliance for School Choice makes the case for judicial activism. He and Russ Roberts discuss school choice, interstate wine sales, the Kelo eminent domain case and the crucial role the Supreme Court and the Constitution can and should play in securing economic liberty.

Clint Bolick, co-founder of the Institute for Justice and President of the Alliance for School Choice makes the case for judicial activism. He and Russ Roberts discuss school choice, interstate wine sales, the Kelo eminent domain case and the crucial role the Supreme Court and the Constitution can and should play in securing economic liberty.