Podcasts about Judicial activism

This lecture series explores the critical role of the Supreme Court in the American constitutional system, focusing on judicial review, interpretive methods, landmark cases, and the relationship between the judiciary and political branches. It discusses the origins, scope, and limits of judicial review, as well as major debates surrounding judicial activism and reform proposals.TakeawaysThe Supreme Court's role is central to the constitutional system.Judicial review allows courts to invalidate unconstitutional laws.The doctrine of standing limits who can bring cases to court.Interpretive methods include originalism, living constitutionalism, and textualism.Landmark cases illustrate the power of judicial review.The judiciary is an independent branch but interacts with political branches.Judicial activism and restraint are ongoing debates in constitutional law.Substantive due process protects rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.The politicization of judicial appointments raises concerns about legitimacy.Reform proposals include term limits and changes to court jurisdiction.Supreme Court, Judicial Review, Constitutional Law, Interpretive Methods, Landmark Cases, Political Branches, Judicial Activism, Judicial Restraint, Legal Reform, Constitutional Interpretation

Caleb O. Brown hosted the Cato Daily Podcast for nearly 18 years, producing well over 4000 episodes. He has gone on to head Kentucky's Bluegrass Institute. This is one among the best episodes produced in his tenure, selected by the host and listeners. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

You want revival? Then pay attention—because the next great awakening could die in a courtroom. Judicial activism is the enemy's strategy to stall Trump, block reform, and legally choke the move of God before it begins. We must intercede now, or we'll miss the moment entirely.   Today's Sponsor Go to MyPillow.com/Lance to check out Mike's new deals! Use code LANCE to save big!

Has judicial activism eroded the foundation of democracy as we know it? In this insightful episode of The Jeremy Ryan Slate Show, we tackle this critical question, offering a deep dive into the complex interplay between judicial activism, immigration, and the future of American sovereignty. Join Jeremy Ryan Slate, CEO and co-founder of Command Your Brand, as he connects with special guest Peter Quinones to explore how activist judges may be reshaping democracy, the implications of unchecked immigration policies, and the broader cultural impacts on national identity and governance.We also examine historical parallels, from the fall of the Roman Empire to the rise of modern managerial states, offering a unique perspective on the challenges America faces today. With an emphasis on critical examination, this must-watch episode unpacks the cultural and political crossroads we stand at and what it means for Liberty, Freedom, and the future of our nation.What's your take on judicial activism and its impact on democracy? Join the conversation by leaving a comment below, and don't forget to like this video and smash that subscribe button to stay updated on thought-provoking discussions that matter. Together, let's build a better future. Special thanks to our sponsor, The Wellness Company. Stay safe and prepared with their medical emergency kits—because your health is your wealth. Let's keep the conversation going!#legaldiscourse #lawandpolicy #societalimpact #judicialactivismvsjudicialrestraint #judicialrestraint___________________________________________________________________________⇩ SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS ⇩THE WELLNESS COMPANY: Health without the propaganda, emergency medical kits before you need it. Get 15% off now by using our link: https://twc.health/jrsCOMMAND YOUR BRAND: Legacy Media is dying, we fight for the free speech of our clients by placing them on top-rated podcasts as guests. We also have the go-to podcast production team. We are your premier podcast agency. Book a call with our team https://www.commandyourbrand.com/book-a-call MY PILLOW: By FAR one of my favorite products I own for the best night's sleep in the world, unless my four year old jumps on my, the My Pillow. Get up to 66% off select products, including the My Pillow Classic or the new My Pillow 2.0, go to https://www.mypillow.com/cyol or use PROMO CODE: CYOL________________________________________________________________⇩ GET MY BEST SELLING BOOK ⇩Unremarkable to Extraordinary: Ignite Your Passion to Go From Passive Observer to Creator of Your Own Lifehttps://getextraordinarybook.com/________________________________________________________________DOWNLOAD AUDIO PODCAST & GIVE A 5 STAR RATING!:APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-create-your-own-life-show/id1059619918SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/5UFFtmJqBUJHTU6iFch3QU(also available Google Podcasts & wherever else podcasts are streamed_________________________________________________________________⇩ SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩➤ X: https://twitter.com/jeremyryanslate➤ INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/jeremyryanslate➤ FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/jeremyryanslate_________________________________________________________________➤ CONTACT: JEREMY@COMMANDYOURBRAND.COM

Educated in India and Canada, Ramesh Thakur has had an amazing career as an academic, lawyer and government adviser. He has taught in universities in Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and Singapore. He offers broad commentary on judicial “adventurism" and growing tyranny, India, Pakistan, China, the U.N. and W.H.O.. His advice on global affairs would unquestionably aid the NZ Government in some of their misguided ideas. We share a medical professional's submission to the second Covid Inquiry, and we visit The Mailroom with Mrs Producer. File your comments and complaints at Leighton@newstalkzb.co.nz Haven't listened to a podcast before? Check out our simple how-to guide. Listen here on iHeartRadio Leighton Smith's podcast also available on iTunes:To subscribe via iTunes click here See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week on The P.A.S. Report Podcast, Professor Nick Giordano exposes how ideological fanaticism on the left has overtaken rational governance. Democrats Have Shown Who They'll Fight For – And It's Not You. From their passionate defense of criminal illegal immigrants to disturbing examples of judicial corruption, Professor Giordano reveals the dangerous consequences of the left's selective outrage. He discusses cases involving deported gang affiliates, judges actively breaking laws, and institutional abuses ignored by the left, emphasizing the urgent need for citizens to demand accountability from public officials. Episode Highlights: How Democrats' defense of Kilmar Abrego Garcia exposes their misplaced priorities. Shocking arrests of judges Joel Cano and Hannah Dugan for allegedly aiding criminals. The consequences when fanaticism replaces impartial justice and rational governance.  

On Thursday's Mark Levin Show, it's frustrating that these leftwing federal judges are reversing President Trump's decisions, effectively trying to run the government from their courtrooms, which is not our constitutional system. Specifically, a judge blocked Trump's requirement for proof of citizenship on voter registration forms. These judges are doing the dirty work for the Democrat Party. This judge is helping the Democrats by taking the fraud barriers out of Trump's order.  We cannot have a country where unelected judges undermine the nation. In the first 100 days of Trump's presidency, we are witnessing an aggressive, rogue judiciary. There may come a time when the only response is to refuse compliance with court orders, one courtroom after another.  Also, Harvard's President Alan Garber is pretending to combat antisemitism at Harvard, but the university does not take the issue seriously.  These colleges and universities need to be defunded. They have no inherent right to taxpayer money; it is a privilege. If they want public funds, they must conduct themselves honorably. Later, Russia is relentlessly attacking Ukraine, with Putin aiming to conquer it as a step toward Poland. Ukraine's biggest mistake was giving up its nuclear weapons, and the Biden administration's withholding of weapons to punish Russia was a significant error in the war. Meanwhile, Iran's former official, Mohammad-Javad Larijani, say they are reluctantly joining U.S. talks, criticizing American negotiators and Trump. Despite this, negotiations continue, though Iran is unlikely to honor agreements, potentially only complying under Trump but not his successor. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Defending Free Speech, Judicial Overreach, and Constitutional Integrity — with Alan DershowitzIn this compelling episode of The Andrew Parker Show, constitutional law scholar and author Alan Dershowitz returns for an unflinching discussion on today's most volatile legal and political debates — from the weaponization of the legal system to the future of free speech in America.Professor Dershowitz and Andrew Parker explore the erosion of First Amendment protections on college campuses, the dangers of selective speech enforcement, and the hypocrisy embedded in today's cries of "judicial activism." Dershowitz doesn't shy away from controversial ground — including Roe v. Wade, immigration enforcement, the administrative state, and the modern-day assault on lawyers for the clients they represent.Together, they dissect:Why both sides of the political aisle embrace judicial activism when convenientHow Roe v. Wade may have been a strategic misstep for the pro-choice movementThe constitutional boundaries of executive authority in immigration and deportationHistorical precedents that shape today's decisions in times of national crisisThe alarming rise of “lawfare” and efforts to silence dissent through bar complaints and legal threatsHow the legal profession and elite law schools are failing the next generation of lawyersFrom the founding fathers to modern-day lawfare, this conversation is a sweeping, insightful journey through the heart of American legal and political tensions. Whether you're left, right, or somewhere in between, this episode is a must-listen.Smart Plain Talk and a dose of principle, history, and unflinching legal clarity.Support the showThe Andrew Parker Show - Politics, Israel & The Law. Follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube and X. Subscribe to our email list at www.theandrewparkershow.com Copyright © 2025 The Andrew Parker Show - All Rights Reserved.

On this episode of the podcast, former Texas Judge and Congressman Louie Gohmert dives into the growing politicization of the American judicial system. Gohmert pulls no punches as he critiques judges who choose to legislate from the bench and overstep their constitutional authority — pointing to a controversial New Hampshire ruling on gender identity in sports as a prime example.The former Chief Justice on Texas's 12th Court of Appeals reflects on the evolution of federal judges, including conservative appointees like Judges David Souter and Stephen McAuliffe, who shifted left over time and waited to retire until a Democrat president like former President Barack Obama could replace them. Gohmert also explores the lasting impact of the confirmation process on Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh. From calling for judicial reform to questioning birthright citizenship and the effects of illegal immigration on elections, Gohmert delivers a hard-hitting take on the intersection of law, politics, and the Constitution.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Since 2020, claims of widespread voter fraud have been dismissed—until now. In this explosive exposé, we dive into recent revelations that validate years of warnings about illegal immigrants on voter rolls, Social Security misuse, and how courts and federal agencies may be aiding a shadow electorate. From Arizona's 50,000 purged non-citizens to whistleblower battles inside Social Security, this episode breaks it all down. Sheriff Mark Lamb, DOJ battles, terror watch list migrants, and a silent war over the integrity of U.S. elections—it's all here. You'll understand why this story could reshape the 2024 election—and maybe democracy itself.

Judicial Activism and Nationwide Injunctions: An unprecedented number of nationwide injunctions issued against President Trump within the first two months of his administration, comparing it to the total number issued during the administrations of George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. It discusses the implications of these injunctions, describing them as an abuse of power and a deliberate attempt to undermine Trump's agenda. We include statements from various officials, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, emphasizing the constitutional crisis posed by these injunctions. Legislative and Judicial Responses: Efforts to address the issue, including a bill co-sponsored by Chuck Grassley and the possibility of impeaching judges who are seen as defying their oath of office. It also discusses the role of the appellate process and the Supreme Court in addressing these nationwide injunctions. USA Fencing and Transathlete Policy: An investigation into USA Fencing's policy on transgender athletes, initiated by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. It details the case of Stephanie Turner, a female fencer who refused to compete against a transgender opponent and was subsequently disqualified from the tournament. The investigation aims to gather information on the policy, the number of transgender athletes competing, and any injuries resulting from these competitions. Mexico's Water Treaty Violation: Mexico's violation of the 1944 Water Treaty, which obligates Mexico to provide water to South Texas. It highlights the impact of this violation on Texas farmers, who are facing severe drought and economic hardship due to the lack of water. We mention efforts by Senator Ted Cruz and President Trump to address the issue and ensure Mexico complies with the treaty. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and the Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. Thanks for Listening #seanhannity #hannity #marklevin #levin #charliekirk #megynkelly #tucker #tuckercarlson #glennbeck #benshapiro #shapiro #trump #sexton #bucksexton#rushlimbaugh #limbaugh #whitehouse #senate #congress #thehouse #democrats#republicans #conservative #senator #congressman #congressmen #congresswoman #capitol #president #vicepresident #POTUS #presidentoftheunitedstatesofamerica#SCOTUS #Supremecourt #DonaldTrump #PresidentDonaldTrump #DT #TedCruz #Benferguson #Verdict #justicecorrupted #UnwokeHowtoDefeatCulturalMarxisminAmericaYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textSummaryIn this episode of Clarity from Chaos, host David Campbell speaks with Michael Letts, founder and CEO of InvestUSA, about pressing issues such as domestic terrorism, law enforcement accountability, judicial activism, and corruption within Congress. Letts emphasizes the importance of providing bulletproof vests to officers and discusses the challenges faced by law enforcement in today's society. The conversation highlights the need for accountability and integrity in both the judiciary and legislative branches, as well as the role of community support in ensuring safety.TakeawaysInvestUSA provides bulletproof vests to protect law enforcement officers.Domestic terrorism is being treated with serious legal consequences.Judicial activism is undermining the authority of the executive branch.Corruption exists within Congress and the judiciary, affecting governance.Community support is crucial for the safety of law enforcement personnel.The funding sources for vandalism and domestic terrorism are being targeted.Accountability is necessary to prevent a repeat of past civil unrest.Judges should not usurp the authority of the executive branch.The importance of active shooter vests for police officers is emphasized.Public awareness and action are needed to address corruption. Support the show"Wherever you find yourself is exactly and precisely where God wills you to be" Support our show at the following: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2063276/support Follow us on X: @CFC30290 Follow us on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-3123766 Website: https://clarityfromchaospodcast.buzzsprout.com/ Thanks for listening to Clarity from Chaos

In this episode, Aaron McIntire discusses various pressing issues including the death penalty for Luigi Mangione, judicial activism affecting immigration laws, the ongoing debate about censorship and disinformation, the political landscape in Florida under Governor Ron DeSantis, an actress's experience with her son's autism, and the priorities of Congress regarding maternity leave. Each topic is explored in depth, providing insights into the current political climate and societal challenges.    

A new MP3 sermon from VCY America is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: The Critical Need to Rein in Judicial Activism Subtitle: Crosstalk America Speaker: Jim Schneider Broadcaster: VCY America Event: Current Events Date: 3/25/2025 Length: 53 min.

William J. Federer is a nationally known speaker, historian, author, and president of Amerisearch, Inc. He's the speaker on The American Minute daily broadcast. He has authored numerous books including, America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations, Who is the King in America?, Socialism: The Real History From Plato to the Present - How the Deep State Capitalizes on Crises to Consolidate Control and the newly released, Silence Equals Consent: The Sin of Omission.On January 20th, 2025, President Donald Trump began his second term as the 47th president of the United States. He won both the popular as well as the electoral vote, leaving no doubt concerning his election. The people decided this change was necessary for what many believed was the preservation of our nation. In the weeks that have followed, his administration is having to deal with an unprecedented 132 legal challenges by liberal judges.Some are referring to this as a judicial "January 6th." Others see it as a judicial coup or judicial insurrection. In fact, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer has even admitted, "...we did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time."This program takes a look at the "road" our judiciary is traveling on as William looked at numerous warnings about judicial overreach as expressed by individuals such as Montesquieu, Thomas Jefferson, Alexis De Tocqueville, George Washington and also modern commentators such as Phyllis Schlafly and law professor Alan Dershowitz.

William J. Federer is a nationally known speaker, historian, author, and president of Amerisearch, Inc. He's the speaker on The American Minute daily broadcast. He has authored numerous books including, America's God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations, Who is the King in America?, Socialism: The Real History From Plato to the Present - How the Deep State Capitalizes on Crises to Consolidate Control and the newly released, Silence Equals Consent: The Sin of Omission.On January 20th, 2025, President Donald Trump began his second term as the 47th president of the United States. He won both the popular as well as the electoral vote, leaving no doubt concerning his election. The people decided this change was necessary for what many believed was the preservation of our nation. In the weeks that have followed, his administration is having to deal with an unprecedented 132 legal challenges by liberal judges.Some are referring to this as a judicial "January 6th." Others see it as a judicial coup or judicial insurrection. In fact, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer has even admitted, "...we did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time."This program takes a look at the "road" our judiciary is traveling on as William looked at numerous warnings about judicial overreach as expressed by individuals such as Montesquieu, Thomas Jefferson, Alexis De Tocqueville, George Washington and also modern commentators such as Phyllis Schlafly and law professor Alan Dershowitz.

The judiciary was meant to interpret laws, not rewrite them and not enforce them. Yet activist judges are going beyond their constitutional role by undermining both the executive branch and Congress's legislative authority. In this episode of The P.A.S. Report Podcast, Professor Nick Giordano exposes how left-wing judges are making unconstitutional rulings that defy executive authority, particularly in cases involving President Trump's efforts to remove federal employees and enforce immigration laws. These judges, many with histories of Democrat donations and political activism, are not ruling based on the Constitution but rather their personal ideologies. As Trump calls for their impeachment, we examine why this is not the right solution and why Congress must find a way to hold these judges accountable. Judicial activism erodes the foundations of our republic, and if left unchecked, it will only get worse. Tune in as Professor Giordano breaks down the most egregious cases, the dangers of a politicized judiciary, and why judicial restraint is essential to maintain a constitutional balance of power. Episode Highlights: • Judicial Overreach Exposed – How activist judges are blocking Trump's executive actions and undermining the rule of law. • The Dangers of Politicized Courts – Why a judiciary driven by ideology threatens the separation of powers. • Fixing the Problem – Why impeachment isn't the answer, but censure and reforms are necessary to restore judicial integrity.

G.K. and Dave talk about the Democrats and Left's use of the media and courts to block the will of the people.  They also lament about the violence being directed at Tesla owners and dealerships. Dave gives a civics lesson on the limited powers of the judiciary and how their current conduct is anti-constitutional. They end the show encouraging the listeners to contact and encourage their elected officials to continue support

In this episode, Charlie Kirk is joined by Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley to discuss the growing issue of nationwide injunctions from district courts against the Trump administration, with Hawley arguing that only the Supreme Court or Congress should have such authority. They also address left-wing extremism, including Tesla vandalism, and emphasize the need for Republican action on tax cuts, border security, and spending reductions.

This episode centers around the critical Wisconsin Supreme Court race, highlighting the significant political and judicial implications of the election. Judge Brad Schimel discusses the influence of outside money in the race, the importance of judicial objectivity, and critiques his opponent's record. The discussion also touches on the broader issue of judicial activism and the ethical considerations surrounding campaign support for judicial candidates. The Truth with Lisa Boothe is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Tuesday & Thursday. Learn more about Judge Brad Schimel HERE #Wisconsin #SupremeCourt #judicialrace #electionintegrity #judicialactivism, #Judge #Schimel #SusanCrawford #GeorgeSorosSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

G.K. and Dave hit a lot of topics in this power-packed half hour show, including their thoughts on the cult known as the Democrat Party. They also look at China and its border situations. Lastly, Dave gives a quick history lesson on the actual constitutional powers and mandate given to the Judicial Branch. Please be sure to visit our website at www.miningthemedia.com and share it with your friends, relatives, associates, and neighbors.

Contact me! Send me a text message here!That's a nice decision, now enforce it. Join The Victor Nieves Show this week as we talk about judicial activism in light of Federalist 78, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolution, and articles 2 and 3 of the constitution! If you love the show leave it a rate and subscribe for next week's episode. Support the showIf you love the show, share it with friends and family!

What does the dismantling of USAID mean for freedom? Is this government overreach, or the government pulling back its power? Join us as we discuss this and more, breaking down Thomas Sowell's thoughts on a variety of legal issues, from allegations of racist cops, lack of trust between doctors and patients, and what freedom actually is. Follow us on X! Give us your opinions here!

In this episode, we're talking about how America has real leadership again under Trump's administration, the importance of deporting illegal immigrants to restore law and order, and why we need to confirm RFK Jr. for the good of American health and wellbeing. We'll break down the policies that actually put America first, expose the chaos that's unfolded since, and discuss how we can push for real positive change for our country. We also need to focus on how we (desperately) need a separation of business and state.—https://noblegoldinvestments.com/invest/gold-ira/

On this episode of the podcast, Amanda Head hosts a powerful discussion with three expert guests on critical issues facing America today.Former Deputy National Security Advisor Victoria Coates addresses the tragic execution of hostages by Hamas, including an American, while criticizing the Biden administration's lackluster support for Israel. The conversation also delves into the alarming rise of pro-Hamas protests on U.S. college campuses and the legal and financial implications for universities involved.Additionally, Michael Chamberlain, Director of Protect the Public's Trust, exposes a concerning effort by the Biden-Harris administration to "Trump-proof" the Justice Department by hiring attorneys through a non-competitive process, raising fears of entrenched political bias.Finally, trial attorney and author Todd McMurtry joins Head to explore media bias and judicial activism, using Sarah Palin's defamation case against the New York Times as a cautionary tale of judicial overreach and the erosion of public trust in the legal system.For more interviews like this, you can tune in to watch Amanda Head's nightly, primetime TV news show titled, “Just The News, No Noise” co-hosted by longtime investigative journalist and Just The News Editor-in-Chief John Solomon. www.JustTheNews.com/TVSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome back to THE IAS COMPANION. Today, we explore judicial activism, its origins, and its impact in the United States and India. Judicial activism, coined by Arthur Schlesinger Jr. in 1947, refers to a judiciary actively shaping social policies. In India, it emerged in the mid-1970s with Justices V. R. Krishna Iyer and P. N. Bhagwati leading efforts to protect citizens' rights and ensure justice. Judicial activism involves the judiciary enforcing and expanding rights, often stepping in where the legislature and executive fail. It contrasts with judicial restraint, where judges limit their interference in legislative and executive functions. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India exemplifies judicial activism, allowing the judiciary to address broader societal issues. While judicial review checks the constitutionality of laws, judicial activism proactively interprets laws to promote social betterment. This approach is vital when other branches fail their duties, but it raises concerns about overreach. Judicial restraint emphasizes respecting the separation of powers and adhering to the original intent of the constitution. Understanding both concepts is key to appreciating the judiciary's role in democracy. #UPSC #IASprep #civilserviceexam #IASexamination #IASaspirants #UPSCjourney #IASexam #civilservice #IASgoals #UPSC2024 #IAS2024 #civilservant #IAScoaching #aUPSCmotivation #IASmotivation #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theiascompanion/message

Ken Macdonald and Tim Owen speak to Jessica Simor KC, an acclaimed specialist in public and regulatory law, EU law, competition law and human rights law.    The episode discusses the issue of whether litigation, whether before the European Court of Human Rights or domestic courts can be effective in addressing the challenge presented by climate change. They highlight two landmark cases in which Jessica Simor acted - one against the Swiss government and one against the UK government. The Swiss case saw a group of elderly Swiss women, bringing the case that they suffered personal health issues caused by heatwaves, and used litigation to hold their government accountable for climate change.    Tim and Ken further explore the UK case in the High Court in London recently which was brought by Friends of the Earth, Client Earth and the Good Law Project. Mr Justice Sheldon found the government was found to be falling short in meeting its obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008. The judicial review judgement held that the government had breached its duty under the Climate Change Act 2008 to adopt policies and proposals to enable legally binding carbon reduction targets to be met. Both cases marked a significant victory for climate activists.   A great episode around the urgency of combating climate change, the pressure on national governments for climate action and the influence of the Paris agreement on court decisions.

Judicial activism in redistricting alters 17th LD and a dozen Washington legislative districts. A dozen Republican legislators and one Democrat legislator will be impacted by judicial redistricting decision. https://tinyurl.com/yc534rkb #NikkiTorres #JimWalsh #Redistricting #RobertLasnik #VotingRightsAct #WashingtonStateLegislature #CurtisKing #GinaMosbrucker #LyndaWilson #PaulHarris #JohnBraun #2024GeneralElection #BradHawkins #ShastiConrad #Yakima #ClarkCountyWa #KlickitatCounty #Goldendale #YakimaCounty #WashingtonStateRepublicanParty #9thCircuitCourt #SteveHobbs #ShellyShort #PerryDozier #ChrisCorry #JudicialActivism #WashingtonRedistrictingCommission #UCLAVotingRightsProject #Wenatchee #DisenfranchiseHispanics #GerrymanderedMaps #HannahJoy #VancouverWa #ClarkCountyNews #ClarkCountyToday

"Keeping Politics Out of the Courtroom"The Tennessee Conservative's Kelly Jackson interviews 21st Judicial District Circuit Court Candidate David Veile.In recent years, we have seen unprecedented judicial activism from benches all over our country.It seems there are many judges who forget that their job is to interpret the laws that govern our country, states and counties.Who we choose for these important positions matters a great deal.Join the Tennessee Conservative's Kelly Jackson as she sits down with current candidate for Circuit Court Judge for the 21st Judicial District, David Veile, as they discuss this topic of judicial activism, and the role of politics in our courts (spoiler alert, it shouldn't have one!).Veile also explains his background, and why he feels he is the best candidate for the job.Early voting ends today, so for those in Middle Tennessee who will have Mr. Veile on their ballot, please listen in!

Perhaps Trump should've focused more on state and local politics?  Maybe YOU should. The "disgorgement" (their euphemism for theft) of half a billion from Trump is worse than a corrupt judicial system.  It is LEGAL, based on a BAD law and an unlimited definition of FRAUD.  So, what is this law?  How could it be applied to ANY of their political enemies? Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/contra-radio-network/support

Perhaps Trump should've focused more on state and local politics?  Maybe YOU should. The "disgorgement" (their euphemism for theft) of half a billion from Trump is worse than a corrupt judicial system.  It is LEGAL, based on a BAD law and an unlimited definition of FRAUD.  So, what is this law?  How could it be applied to ANY of their political enemies? Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show

 In June, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court delivered an historic and far reaching decision overturning Roe v. Wade and turning abortion law to the states. Less than two years on, we are seeing just how that decision is playing out as women navigate a divided country with a patchwork of reproductive rights.  The recent example of Kate Cox, a Dallas-area mother of two who sought to have a medical exemption from Texas' strict abortion laws and was forced to leave the state to receive the care she needed when her request was denied, brought the consequences of the Court's decision to the headlines. In this episode we hear from the show's co-host Pam Karlan, an expert in reproductive law, about the Texas case and reproductive rights in the US after Roe was overturned.Connect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>>  Twitter/XStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford  Law Magazine >>> Twitter/XChapters:(00:00:00) IntroductionRich Ford introduces the episode and highlights the significant changes in abortion laws over recent years. (00:01:08) Current Legal ContextPam Karlan provides an overview of the legal landscape since the Dobbs case decision and summarizes the changes and confusion it has led to.(00:05:00) Texas Abortion Controversy: Kate Cox CaseFocus on the case of Kate Cox, a woman in Texas seeking abortion due to fetal health complications. Analysis of the legal, political, and ethical implications of the verdict.(00:10:02) Impact of Returning Abortion Laws to StatesThe misconception that returning abortion decisions to states would reduce controversy. Analysis of attempts to to restrict travel for abortion services.(00:12:20) Legal Ramifications and Political ScenariosDiscussion on potential legal consequences for aiding abortion travel and comparisons with state laws regarding child-related travel. Contemplation of federal abortion bans utilizing the Commerce Clause and the potential scenarios for imposing such bans.(00:14:48) Medical Abortions and Legal ChallengesInsights into the rise of medical abortions and the controversy surrounding the approval and distribution of drugs, and subsequent legal battles.(00:20:20) State Politics, Abortion Laws & State Referendum DynamicsExploration of the shifting dynamics in state politics, including red states' stances on protecting abortion rights, and measures in California & Ohio.(00:22:56) Shifting Political NarrativesDiscussion on the evolving focus of the abortion debate, and examination of how abortion politics are playing out in national and state elections, influencing political strategies.(00:24:59) Federal Legislation Prospects and Responsive ActivismThe potential for federal legislation protecting or banning abortion rights & insights into citizen activism  both aiding and impeding abortion access. (00:28:18) Abortion in Unlikely ArenasExamples showcasing how abortion politics infiltrate seemingly unrelated areas, affecting military promotions and governmental functionality. 

Judicial Review: An Overview. 1. Defining Judicial Review. Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to review and, if necessary, invalidate actions of the executive and legislative branches that violate the Constitution. This crucial power allows the courts to ensure that government actions align with the supreme law of the land. Significance: Judicial review acts as a vital check on the powers of the other branches, safeguarding the principles enshrined in the Constitution. Example: If a law passed by Congress or an action taken by the President is challenged as unconstitutional, the judiciary has the authority to review and potentially strike down such measures. Marbury v Madison: Establishing Judicial Review. 1. Overview of Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison (1803) is a landmark case in U.S. constitutional law. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the Supreme Court, established the principle of judicial review. Background: William Marbury was appointed as a justice of the peace by President John Adams but did not receive his official commission before the new administration took office. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court to compel the new Secretary of State, James Madison, to deliver the commission. 2. Key Holding: Power of Judicial Review. In Marbury v Madison, the Court held that it had the authority to review the constitutionality of actions by the executive branch. Chief Justice Marshall articulated that it was the duty of the judiciary to interpret the Constitution and ensure that it remained the supreme law of the land. Significance: This case established the principle that the judiciary has the power to declare acts of Congress or the President unconstitutional, setting a foundational precedent for the system of checks and balances. Quote: "It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule." The Role of the Judiciary in Interpreting the Constitution. 1. Judicial Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions. The judiciary plays a central role in interpreting the Constitution. This involves analyzing constitutional provisions, understanding their historical context, and applying them to contemporary issues. Significance: Judicial interpretation ensures that constitutional principles remain relevant in a changing society. It allows the Constitution to be a living document that adapts to new challenges and circumstances. Example: In interpreting the First Amendment's protection of free speech, the judiciary must balance the right to express oneself with considerations of public safety and order. 2. The Doctrine of Judicial Restraint v Judicial Activism. Judicial restraint involves judges interpreting the Constitution narrowly and deferring to the decisions of elected branches. Judicial activism, on the other hand, involves judges interpreting the Constitution more broadly and sometimes shaping public policy. Significance: The debate between judicial restraint and activism reflects differing views on the proper role of the judiciary in a democratic society. Example: In cases related to social issues, such as abortion rights or marriage equality, the judiciary's approach can be influenced by whether judges prioritize interpreting the Constitution narrowly or expansively. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

It's almost impossible to imagine a scenario as is playing out in the United States at this hour. One blue state county's lax prison control has an escaped murderer on the loose while a blue state governor in another state suggests its time to take law abiding citizens' guns from them. Stigall discusses New Mexico's gun madness with Brietbart's AWR Hawkins. Stigall's radio show in Philadelphia broadcasts specifically to the manhunt area in question, so you'll hear him unpack the search as he talks to the citizens in that community specifically. Plus, high drama in the NFL to open the season and how much are you willing to pay to see NFL games at home? - For more info visit the official website: https://chrisstigall.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chrisstigallshow/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisStigall Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/chris.stigall/ Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/StigallPod Listen on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/StigallShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode we talk with returning guest Brandon the "BigSib" about judicial activism and legislating from the bench. We go over a report and recommendations issued by a magistrate judge from a federal court on a case here locally. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-justice-revolution/support

OPINION: Writ of kalikasan and science: Is the risk from GMOs or from judicial activism? | April 29, 2023Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein #TheManilaTimes#OPINION Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This episode was livestreamed on February 13, 2022.

Since 2016, Canada has offered assisted suicide through its public healthcare system. And the criteria for Medical Assistance in Dying has steadily expanded year on year, and will soon include not just those suffering from terminal conditions, but also those experience mental illness too. This week we speak with a Christian psychiatrist from Canada who has been involved in both the campaigning against the spread of euthanasia, and also figuring out on the ground how to care well for patients in a system which offers them the chance to take their own lives instead of receiving treatment. In particular, what can we in other countries yet to introduce such laws learn from the Canadian experience of sliding down the infamous slippery slope since 2016? We briefly discussed Canadian euthanasia in a previous episode in 2021 about assisted dying, which you can listen to here - https://johnwyatt.com/2021/10/08/assisted-dying-the-meacher-bill-radicals-in-the-lords-canadas-slippery-slope-and-fragile-conscience-protections/ (Correction: Our guest on a few occasions accidentally says the expansion of MAiD to those with mental illnesses was due in 2022, when it was in fact originally scheduled to begin in March 2023, although it has now been delayed again.) Subscribe to the Matters of Life and Death podcast: https://pod.link/1509923173 If you want to go deeper into some of the topics we discuss, visit John's website: http://www.johnwyatt.com For more resources to help you explore faith and the big questions, visit: http://www.premierunbelievable.com  

The landmark Roe V. Wade decision in the early 1970s did not come fully formed.  We explore the road to Roe and the judicial activism that made it possible.  

On this day in 1967, President Lyndon B. Johnson nominated Judge Thurgood Marshall to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Washington politicians have historically tried to gain power by finding ways to override or outright ignore the U.S. Constitution, which is why the nation's founders installed a Supreme Court. Former United States Attorney General Ed Meese joins our panel to discuss the prevailing debate over the past century-plus as to whether the Constitution must remain followed to the text and intent of its creators versus the assertion it is a "living, breathing document" which needs to change with the times: the fight between Constitutional Originalists vs. Judicial Activists. The current chaos over the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision (a clear violation of the 10th Amendment) is only one example of quite a few Supreme Court decisions pitting emotional and Constitutional arguments outside and within the SCOTUS chambers. The question is: should judicial activists have a place in the Supreme Court considering the duty of its justices is to protect, not conveniently interpret the US Constitution? For decades, legislators have tried to gain power by weakening the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 10th amendments on a regular basis; their bidding done eagerly by activists instilled in the Judicial body.On this edition of Thought to Action, our panel discusses the need for Constitutional originalists in the Supreme Court and how to instill such values in the next generation of judges and legislators. We explore cases, the need to continue nominating Constitutional Originalists and to promote the understanding to all in the U.S. that the right decision as per the law of the land will not always go someone's way, but protection of its foundation is paramount. We also discuss why it is important to keep politicians from attempting to pack the Supreme Court with extra ideological sycophants in the future via a Keep Nine Amendment.Our panelists:London Center for Policy Research President LTC Tony ShafferLondon Center for Policy Research Distinguished Fellow Navy Capt. Pete O'BrienFormer United States Attorney General Ed MeeseFormer Tennessee Attorney General and Keep Nine Coalition Chairman Paul SummersKeep Nine Coalition Director Roman Buhler If you enjoy our Thought to Action videos, please comment and subscribe to our channelAlso, visit our Thought to Action Teespring Store: https://my-store-10084335.creator-spring.com/ Follow the London Center on Twitter: @TheLCPR Thank you for watching; please feel free to comment, share and subscribe. For exclusive content, sneak previews and access to our full Ask Us Anything Sessions (and future live virtual events) - please join our Patreon community: https://www.patreon.com/thoughttoaction Thought to Action is presented by the London Center for Policy Research https://www.londoncenter.org​

Judicial Activism and Private Property Rights - Tom Gann by Darryl Baskin, eXp Realty

Do you know the difference between “original intent” and “judicial activism”? “Original Intent” is a concept wherein one seeks to understand the meaning of the document as written and as ratified. “Judicial Activism” is a concept wherein the Constitution is viewed as a “living document”. Therefore it can be based on existing cultural practices and generally accepted societal dogmas. Understanding the difference between the two is critical. Find out what our Founders gave us and why in this episode of Constitution Corner. Action Items:1.) Help prevent a Constitutional Convention2.) Please like this video & share it with others3.) If you haven't already, subscribe to our channel so that you don't miss a new video

Do you know the difference between “original intent” and “judicial activism”? “Original Intent” is a concept wherein one seeks to understand the meaning of the document as written and as ratified. “Judicial Activism” is a concept wherein the Constitution is viewed as a “living document”. Therefore it can be based on existing cultural practices and […] The post Original Intent vs. Judicial Activism | Constitution Corner appeared first on The John Birch Society.

We've heard a lot about our court system over the last few years and have started to hear more about Judicial Activism. In order to get a better perspective on this subject and to get beneath the headlines, Chad Robichaux and Jeremy Stalnecker are joined by lawyer, civil rights activist, citizen journalist, Rogan O'Handley also known as DC_Draino on social media. This is an episode of Situation Report you won't want to miss. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/situation-report/support See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We've heard a lot about our court system over the last few years and have started to hear more about Judicial Activism. In order to get a better perspective on this subject and to get beneath the headlines, Chad Robichaux and Jeremy Stalnecker are joined by lawyer, civil rights activist, citizen journalist, Rogan O'Handley also known as DC_Draino on social media. This is an episode of Situation Report you won't want to miss. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/situation-report/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com

This episode discusses the issues created when courts overstep their judicial role and act in the place of legislatures and the people in creating and amending legal rules. As the courts become more politicized, the people lose their voice on key policy issues. A commitment to the text of our laws is the only way to ensure the rule of law endures and we do not become a society ruled by the whims of men. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/solis-veritas/support

  White Paper on Judicial "Originalism" How to Spot "Judicial Activism" - Heritage Foundation Simple Explanation and Short Case Study on Separation of Powers Assessment of Justice Ginsburg's Contributions to First Amendment Jurisprudence National Review Critique of Justice Ginsburg's Activism Profile of SC Nominee Amy Coney Barrett SC Selection Process: The President “shall nominate, and [...]