Podcast appearances and mentions of David Gelernter

On this ID The Future, enjoy the concluding half of a remarkable and candid discussion on the limits of Darwinian evolution and the arguments for intelligent design. The conversation, recorded in 2019, is hosted by Peter Robinson for his program Uncommon Knowledge, and features philosopher of science Dr. Stephen Meyer, mathematician and author Dr. David Berlinski, and Yale Professor of Computer Science Dr. David Gelernter. In Part 2, Stephen Meyer argues there's a "powerful signal of design" in nature. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Source

Does the math behind Darwinian evolution add up? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid invites you to enjoy the first half of a remarkable and candid discussion about the limits of Darwinian evolution and the arguments for intelligent design. The conversation, originally recorded in 2019, is hosted by Peter Robinson for Uncommon Knowledge, and features philosopher of science Dr. Stephen Meyer, mathematician and author Dr. David Berlinski, and Yale Professor of Computer Science Dr. David Gelernter. In Part 1, the trio engage in an honest conversation about Darwin, his “brilliant and beautiful” theory, and why it's time to move past it. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Source

Five years ago, Yale University professor of computer science David Gelernter wrote that he was bidding farewell to neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. Why would he take such a bold step? What convinced him that the neo-Darwinian paradigm no longer satisfied the scientific evidence? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid marks the fifth anniversary of Gelernter's important essay by reading it aloud in full. If you've read the essay, this will likely be a good refresher on Gelernter's arguments. If you haven't read it yet, by all means enjoy! Source

Five years ago, Yale University professor of computer science David Gelernter wrote that he was bidding farewell to neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. Why would he take such a bold step? What convinced him that the neo-Darwinian paradigm no longer satisfied the scientific evidence? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid marks the fifth anniversary of […]

LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE: youtube.com/indiethinkerThe Hoover Institute hosts an explosive interview with David Gelernter, David Berlenski, and Stephen Meyer.

Bill spoke with David Gelernter about the current state of academia and the latest advancements of artificial intelligence. David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Bill spoke with David Gelernter about the current state of academia and the latest advancements of artificial intelligence. David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University.

Connaissez-vous le concept de jumeaux numériques ? Ces dernières années, cette technologie suscite beaucoup d'intérêt au point de devenir un sujet majeur dans le monde de la tech. Concrètement, les jumeaux numériques sont des reproductions numériques d'organisations ou d'objets, équipés de capteurs qui fournissent des données en temps réel. Ils sont déjà utilisés dans des secteurs tels que l'automobile, le BTP et l'industrie. Les données récoltées permettent d'anticiper les dysfonctionnements et d'identifier les ajustements nécessaires. Les jumeaux numériques peuvent donc simuler plusieurs situations et permettre des analyses approfondies des performances.Exemple concret avec Michel Morvan, cofondateur de CosmoTech, entreprise française spécialisée dans les jumeaux numériques : « Supposons que je sois en train de concevoir un avion. Avec sa version numérique, je peux le tester sous toutes les conditions possibles pour déterminer les meilleurs matériaux à utiliser, la meilleure technologie à incorporer pour qu'il réponde à mes besoins dans le monde réel » fin de citation. À noter que le concept de jumeaux numériques relie plusieurs technologies de pointe bien connues des passionnés de tech comme l'intelligence artificielle (IA), l'analyse de données, l'apprentissage automatique et le big data.Pour comprendre plus précisément le concept de jumeaux numériques et ses enjeux, il est nécessaire de se pencher sur son origine. Les jumeaux numériques seraient nés d'une idée exprimée pour la première fois par David Gelernter dans Mirror Worlds en 1991. La NASA aurait utilisé cette technologie dès les années 1960 pour simuler chaque vol de vaisseau à des fins d'étude. Toutefois, le concept de jumeau numérique tel que nous le connaissons aujourd'hui a été introduit en 2010 par John Vickers, de la NASA. Depuis, le marché des jumeaux numériques a connu une croissance spectaculaire, passant de 10,27 milliards de dollars en 2021 à une valeur estimée de 61 milliards de dollars d'ici 2027, selon une étude de Mordor Intelligence. Les industries manufacturières et de la santé devraient être les principaux moteurs de cette croissance, surtout sur le continent asiatique. Parmi les acteurs majeurs dans le domaine des jumeaux virtuels, on retrouve notamment Dassault Systèmes, Microsoft avec son service Azure Digital Twins et IBM. En attendant de voir qui se saisira pleinement de cette technologie et dans quel secteur elle se fera connaître du grand public en premier, une chose est sûre, la transformation numérique de nos sociétés ne se fera pas sans elle. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Connaissez-vous le concept de jumeaux numériques ? Ces dernières années, cette technologie suscite beaucoup d'intérêt au point de devenir un sujet majeur dans le monde de la tech. Concrètement, les jumeaux numériques sont des reproductions numériques d'organisations ou d'objets, équipés de capteurs qui fournissent des données en temps réel. Ils sont déjà utilisés dans des secteurs tels que l'automobile, le BTP et l'industrie. Les données récoltées permettent d'anticiper les dysfonctionnements et d'identifier les ajustements nécessaires. Les jumeaux numériques peuvent donc simuler plusieurs situations et permettre des analyses approfondies des performances. Exemple concret avec Michel Morvan, cofondateur de CosmoTech, entreprise française spécialisée dans les jumeaux numériques : « Supposons que je sois en train de concevoir un avion. Avec sa version numérique, je peux le tester sous toutes les conditions possibles pour déterminer les meilleurs matériaux à utiliser, la meilleure technologie à incorporer pour qu'il réponde à mes besoins dans le monde réel » fin de citation. À noter que le concept de jumeaux numériques relie plusieurs technologies de pointe bien connues des passionnés de tech comme l'intelligence artificielle (IA), l'analyse de données, l'apprentissage automatique et le big data. Pour comprendre plus précisément le concept de jumeaux numériques et ses enjeux, il est nécessaire de se pencher sur son origine. Les jumeaux numériques seraient nés d'une idée exprimée pour la première fois par David Gelernter dans Mirror Worlds en 1991. La NASA aurait utilisé cette technologie dès les années 1960 pour simuler chaque vol de vaisseau à des fins d'étude. Toutefois, le concept de jumeau numérique tel que nous le connaissons aujourd'hui a été introduit en 2010 par John Vickers, de la NASA. Depuis, le marché des jumeaux numériques a connu une croissance spectaculaire, passant de 10,27 milliards de dollars en 2021 à une valeur estimée de 61 milliards de dollars d'ici 2027, selon une étude de Mordor Intelligence. Les industries manufacturières et de la santé devraient être les principaux moteurs de cette croissance, surtout sur le continent asiatique. Parmi les acteurs majeurs dans le domaine des jumeaux virtuels, on retrouve notamment Dassault Systèmes, Microsoft avec son service Azure Digital Twins et IBM. En attendant de voir qui se saisira pleinement de cette technologie et dans quel secteur elle se fera connaître du grand public en premier, une chose est sûre, la transformation numérique de nos sociétés ne se fera pas sans elle. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bill welcomes David Gelernter to the show and they discuss how the Dems’ policy seem to be based on their hatred for former Pres. Trump. David Gelernter is an author, and professor of computer science at Yale University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Bill welcomes David Gelernter to the show and they discuss how the Dems' policy seem to be based on their hatred for former Pres. Trump. David Gelernter is an author, and professor of computer science at Yale University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

以往的我们根据生活方式养成自己的生活习性，成为了“我”。数字时代的我们通过使用各类应用软件和数字平台，留下我们的数字化脚印，像3D打印技术一样向对方展现数字打造的“类我”。 类我是否可以代表部分或者完全的我们？数字化时代下的我们是否也像机器般留存下各种分析数据和生成评估报告？类我的个性化特质反而会让我们陷入更深的信息井而无法自救吗？从“类我”反观现在的自己，也从“我”去比较数字化下的信息漏洞。即使数据为人类服务而生，我们仍需警惕被数字化作生活的模式和答案，适时冲破透明的信息壁墙。 本期主播：Sanyi、毛头、阿骨 Shownotes： 《必然》 凯文•凯利 | https://book.douban.com/subject/26658379/ 《信息乌托邦》凯斯•R•桑斯坦 | https://book.douban.com/subject/3338726/ 尼葛洛庞帝预言 "The Daily Me" (我的日报) | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Me 《The Filter Bubble（过滤泡）》 Eli Pariser | https://book.douban.com/subject/5994771/ 《娱乐至死》尼尔•波兹曼 | https://book.douban.com/subject/26319730/ 《我们为何膜拜青春》罗伯特·波格·哈里森：https://book.douban.com/subject/30152811/ 生活流 Lifestream 计算机科学家大卫•格勒恩特（David Gelernter）| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifestreaming

Bill spoke with David Gelernter about the state of American education and what needs to happen to improve it on every level. David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Bill spoke with David Gelernter about the state of American education and what needs to happen to improve it on every level. David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On today's ID the Future, Casey Luskin, associate director of Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, discusses his Evolution News article about the recently deceased Steven Weinberg. On Weinberg's view, one of science's social functions is to undermine religion, which he sees as superstition. Luskin takes the opposite view and points to skilled and successful scientists he got to know in Africa. He says these scientists are convinced that the supernatural is real and would find Weinberg's secular Western rejection of the supernatural as blinkered. Luskin and host Robert Crowther also discuss a hopeful trend among some atheists toward a more civil and respectful way of engaging intelligent design, even to the point of acknowledging that design theorists are Read More › Source

This week, we listen to Robert J. Marks speaking at the launch of the Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Dallas, Texas. Robert J. Marks is the Director of the Bradley Center and Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Baylor University. In a panel discussion at the 2019 launch of the Bradley Center, Dr. Marks… Source

This week, we listen to Robert J. Marks speaking at the launch of the Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Dallas, Texas. Robert J. Marks is the Director of the Bradley Center and Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Baylor University. In a panel discussion at the 2019 launch of the Bradley Center, Dr. Marks… Source

The Turing test, developed by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour indistinguishable from a human. Many think that Turing’s proposal for intelligence, especially creativity, has been proven inadequate. Is the Lovelace test a better alternative? What are the capabilities and limitations of AI? Robert J. Marks and Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discuss… Source

The Turing test, developed by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour indistinguishable from a human. Many think that Turing’s proposal for intelligence, especially creativity, has been proven inadequate. Is the Lovelace test a better alternative? What are the capabilities and limitations of AI? Robert J. Marks and Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discuss… Source

Robert J. Marks talks with Larry L. Linenschmidt of the Hill Country Institute about nature and limitations of artificial intelligence from a computer science perspective including the misattribution of creativity and understanding to computers. Other Larry L. Linenschmidt podcasts from the Hill Country Institute are available at HillCountryInstitute.org. We appreciate the permission of the Hill Country Institute to rebroadcast this… Source

Robert J. Marks talks with Larry L. Linenschmidt of the Hill Country Institute about nature and limitations of artificial intelligence from a computer science perspective including the misattribution of creativity and understanding to computers. Other Larry L. Linenschmidt podcasts from the Hill Country Institute are available at HillCountryInstitute.org. We appreciate the permission of the Hill Country Institute to rebroadcast this… Source

There are some who say immortality is available if we can upload our minds to a computer. This presupposes our minds are computable and can be duplicated by a computer. Are our minds computable? Robert J. Marks and Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discuss consciousness, cognition, and artificial intelligence. Show Notes 00:39 | Introducing Selmer Bringsjord, Professor — Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) Read More › Source

There are some who say immortality is available if we can upload our minds to a computer. This presupposes our minds are computable and can be duplicated by a computer. Are our minds computable? Robert J. Marks and Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discuss consciousness, cognition, and artificial intelligence. Show Notes 00:39 | Introducing Selmer Bringsjord, Professor — Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)… Source

I continue in this episode with David Gelernter’s piece, “Giving Up Darwin,” at https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/giving-up-darwin/. He thinks we need to shift away from the idea that natural selection and molecular biology can explain the origin of human life. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

CultureCast is a podcast devoted to keeping people up to speed on cultural matters. I am a philosopher currently currently completing a doctorate at Temple University. I am also a novelist who has produced one novel so far, “The Realm of Possibility.” In this episode, I introduce an article from the Claremont Review of Books which challenges the Darwinian orthodoxy that new species can be generated through random heritable variation and natural selection. David Gelernter is a Yale computer scientist who wrote this piece. It hints at a possible monumental paradigm shift in the way we understand human life. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Robert J. Marks talks with Larry L. Linenschmidt of the Hill Country Institute about the misattribution of creativity and understanding to computers. This is Part 2 of 2 parts. Other Larry L. Linenschmidt podcasts from the Hill Country Institute are available at HillCountryInstitute.org. We appreciate the permission of the Hill Country Institute to rebroadcast this podcast on Mind Matters. Show Read More › Source

Robert J. Marks talks with Larry L. Linenschmidt of the Hill Country Institute about the misattribution of creativity and understanding to computers. This is Part 2 of 2 parts. Other Larry L. Linenschmidt podcasts from the Hill Country Institute are available at HillCountryInstitute.org. We appreciate the permission of the Hill Country Institute to rebroadcast this podcast on Mind Matters. Show… Source

David Gelernter is a computer science professor at Yale, an author, an artist, an American Genius, and a survivor of a Unabomber attack in 1993. Gelernter discusses his concern with the amount of power Facebook holds thanks to the data handed over to the social media giant by its users. Domenech and Gelernter discuss bias in tech, data privacy, artificial intelligence, and both the good and bad of technology.

Could you even imagine a sports car with such a powerful, finely tuned rotary engine, whose rotor, drive shaft, and subunits work together so smoothly, that the engine can hit 42,000 rpm and achieve 100% energy efficiency? Well, no… as amazing as cars are these days, the best redline at 10,000 rpm and achieve below 50 percent energy efficiency, meaning that less than half of the power produced actually propels the car. The rest is emitted as wasted heat. But… if automobile engineers could mimic the efficiency and power of the rotary engine that exists in every cell in our bodies? Well, watch out. Recently, the an article was posted at the Discovery Insitute website summarizing three new studies of the enzyme ATP synthase. As they describe it, “ATP synthase is a high-tech, micromolecular power generator” that works like a rotary engine. Its “barrel-shaped rotator spins around transmitting mechanical energy into the drive shaft of the machine to create adenosine triphosphate, or ATP. This is a good thing, since ATP is an “energy molecule that provides fuel that every one of your cells needs to function.” And here's where this gets really amazing. According to one of the recent studies, the ATP synthase rotary engine achieves nearly 100% energy efficiency. Meaning there is hardly any energy loss, even when working anywhere from 6,000 to 42,000 rpm—something human engineers can only dream about. From their research, the authors of one of the studies claims “that nano-scale rotary engines” like ATP synthase “have much in common with basic design principles of man-made machines from the function of individual ‘machine elements' to the requirement of the right ‘fuel' and ‘oil' for different types of motors.” Now, there's still a lot we don't know about ATP synthase, but, the researchers confidently tell us, “What is evident is that several billion years of evolution have resulted in a biological motor that are unsurpassed in efficiency, fine-tuning to their environment, and sustainability.” Really? So, a nano-tiny, vastly complex, and nearly perfectly energy-efficient machine can come about purely by chance and natural selection? This is the claim that Darwinists have to make, but as proponents of Intelligent Design have argued for the past 20-plus years, reason, logic, and mathematics stand in their way. ATP synthase is a poster-child for what scientist Michael Behe calls “irreducible complexity,” a concept widely derided by neo-Darwinians because it's so hard to refute. These tiny machines not only include many complex parts, they require a precise configuration of these parts in order to function properly. They could not have evolved from simpler mechanisms, because all the parts have to be present in order for them to work at all. Similarly, Stephen Meyer describes in his book “Signature in the Cell,” how our DNA is made of “digitally encoded information.” All specified information like this, he writes, “always arises from an intelligent source, from a mind and not a strictly material process.” He places the chance of information randomly coming together to form the building blocks of life at 1 in 10 to the 41 thousandth power. In his other landmark work “Darwin's Doubt,” Meyer shows how the sudden appearance of numerous species of animals without common predecessors, something called the “Cambrian explosion,” proves to be an insurmountable obstacle to neo-Darwinian evolution. In fact, in a recent article entitled “Giving up Darwin”, renowned computer scientist and thinker David Gelernter credited Meyer's work for leading him to reject Darwinism all together. The more we discover about the world, the more complex and irreducibly complex we discover the world to be, from the vastness of the universe, to the preciseness of language, to those nano-sized rotary engines fueling our bodies. Eventually, the so-called “appearance of design” requires us to conclude the universe is the product of design, and therefore a Designer.  

The Christian Outlook – August 31, 2019 Kevin McCullough talks with The Federalist's Joy Pullman, who talks about how children’s book publisher, Scholastic, has adopted left-wing identity politics. Dr. Albert Mohler looks at the recent Wall Street Journal/NBC poll that revealed today’s youth are less patriotic, less religious, and less likely to value children. John and Kathy talk with Jessica Prol Smith and Jeremy Tedesco, two ADF attorneys, about the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate group” list and why some of the finest organizations around today are on that list. Georgene Rice talks with Mary Grabar about her book, “Debunking Howard Zinn: Exposing Fake History that Turned a Generation Against America.” Craig Roberts talks with pastor and author Francis Chan about the reality of life versus the prosperity gospel. Frank Sontag talks with Todd Starnes, author of “Culture Jihad: How to Stop the Left from Killing a Nation” on what must happen to get our country back on track. Bob Burney discusses Yale Computer Science Professor David Gelernter’s decision that sent shockwaves through the academic world recently when he challenged the dogmatic belief in Darwin’s theory of evolution.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dave and Ray Ray talk about the recent tragedies in El Paso and Dayton, then we have "The Talk" about Christian Memeing -- coin "sentimental theology" and "sentimental apologetics." They demonstrate this via a couple of memes, then shift to talk about Yale's recent Darwinist doubter, David Gelernter

Recorded on June 6, 2019 in Italy. Based on new evidence and knowledge that functioning proteins are extremely rare, should Darwin’s theory of evolution be dismissed, dissected, developed or replaced with a theory of intelligent design? Has Darwinism really failed? Peter Robinson discusses it with David Berlinski, David Gelernter, and Stephen Meyer, who have raised doubts about Darwin’s theory in their two books and essay, respectively The Deniable Darwin, Darwin’s Doubt, and “Giving Up Darwin” (published in the Claremont Review of Books). Robinson asks them to convince him that the term “species” has not been defined by the authors to Darwin’s disadvantage. Gelernter replies to this and explains, as he expressed in his essay, that he sees Darwin’s theory as beautiful (which made it difficult for him to give it up): “Beauty is often a telltale sign of truth. Beauty is our guide to the intellectual universe—walking beside us through the uncharted wilderness, pointing us in the right direction, keeping us on track—most of the time.” Gelernter notes that there’s no reason to doubt that Darwin successfully explained the small adjustments by which an organism adapts to local circumstances: changes to fur density or wing style or beak shape. Yet there are many reasons to doubt whether Darwin can answer the hard questions and explain the big picture—not the fine-tuning of existing species but the emergence of new ones. Meyer explains Darwinism as a comprehensive synthesis, which gained popularity for its appeal. Meyer also mentions that one cannot disregard that Darwin’s book was based on the facts present in the 19th century. Robinson then asks the panel whether Darwin’s theory of gradual evolution is contradicted by the explosion of fossil records in the Cambrian period, when there was a sudden occurrence of many species over the span of approximately seventy million years (Meyer’s noted that the date range for the Cambrian period is actually narrowing). Meyer replies that even population genetics, the mathematical branch of Darwinian theory, has not been able to support the explosion of fossil records during the Cambrian period, biologically or geologically. Robinson than asks about Darwin’s main problem, molecular biology, to which Meyer explains, comparing it to digital world, that building a new biological function is similar to building a new code, which Darwin could not understand in his era. Berlinski does not second this and states that the cell represents very complex machinery, with complexities increasing over time, which is difficult to explain by a theory. Gelernter throws light on this by giving an example of a necklace on which the positioning of different beads can lead to different permutations and combinations; it is really tough to choose the best possible combination, more difficult than finding a needle in a haystack. He seconds Meyer’s statement that it was impossible for Darwin to understand that in his era, since the math is easy but he did not have the facts. Meyer further explains how difficult it is to know what a protein can do to a cell, the vast combinations it can produce, and how rare is the possibility of finding a functional protein. He then talks about the formation of brand-new organisms, for which mutation must affect genes early in the life form’s development in order to control the expression of other genes as the organism grows. “Intelligent design” is something only Meyer agrees with, but Berlinski replies that as a scientific approach, one can agree or disagree with it, but should not reject it. Meyer talks about the major discovery in the 1950s and ’60s concerning the DNA molecule, which encodes information in a somewhat digital format, providing researchers with the opportunity to trace the information back to its source. Gelernter argues that if there was/is an intelligent designer then why is the design not the most efficient, rather than prone to all sorts of problems, including the mental and emotional. Robinson quotes Gelernter: “Darwinism is no longer just a scientific theory but a basis of a worldview, and an emergency . . . religion for the many troubled souls who need one.” Gelernter further adds that it’s a fantastically challenging problem that Darwin chose to address. How difficult will it be for scientists to move on from Darwin’s theory of evolution? Will each scientist need to examine the evidence for his or herself? These are some of most important questions facing science in the 21st century.

David Gelernter's giant macaw, Ike, has taken a tumble. One moment he was there, offering agreeable squawks as Gelernter spoke, and then, in a flash of lightning, he wasn't. Ike is fine, the 64-year-old Yale computer scientist assures me, simply stunned. “Luckily he's as light as a bird. So he can fall great lengths and it doesn't bother him,” he says.

To be a conservative, says Yale polymath David Gelernter, is to “give due credit to the ideas that created the civilization we live within.” A simple and beautiful summary. In a new podcast episode of Great Mind with Michael Medved, Dr. Gelernter talks with our host Mr. Medved about the shocking irresponsibility in the failure to introduce young people to the best achievements in thought. They also, however, discuss evidence that our civilization is due for a healthy correction as we “snap out” of the torpor that suppresses consideration of great ideas. If Gelernter is right, there’s reason for optimism.

David Gelernter's op-ed in the Wall Streat Journal. The journalist killed in Saudi Arabia. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode of the Bill Bennett Show, David Gelernter talks Artificial Intelligence with Bill in a conversation that includes the growth of A.I., implications on education an a variety of issue . David Gelernter is professor of computer science at Yale, chief scientist at Mirror Worlds Technologies, contributing editor at the Weekly Standard and member of the National Council of the Arts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Of his many specialties, in this episode Michael inquires into David Gelernter's professional preoccupation: artificial intelligence. Gelernter recalls the pioneering role of his father, warns of the perils of letting children be captive to flickering screens, and remarks on whether AI robots can be spiritual seekers. Gelernter also emphasizes the key role of the Judeo-Christian Western tradition in creating a free and idealistic context in which technology is primed to explode.

In this wide ranging conversation, Michael Medved and David Gelernter touch on scientism, consciousness, and education. Gelernter observes how at times, scientists let their vaunted position get to their head, bullying other disciplines while failing to acknowledge their own limits. Having written extensively on consciousness, he describes the current state of the field and Thomas Nagel's scandalous opinion that we currently lack the tools to solve this "deepest mystery". Finally, Gelernter reflects on the state of higher education, specifically with reference to Yale.

Consciousness has been an elusive enigma for philosophers and scientists alike for about as long as there've been philosophers and scientists.And, while it's long been thought that artificial intelligence would bring us the next big breakthroughs in our understanding of consciousness, A.I. authority David Gelernter has a different idea entirely.He looks for answers to these fundamental questions in, instead... literature.Support the show: http://www.wnpr.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bill shares his thoughts on President Trump's major opioid address this week and explains how we can win the war on drugs. Then Bill interviews Byron York about the remarkable and growing scandal regarding Hillary Clinton, the FBI and the "Trump dossier." Finally, Bill has a fascinating, in-depth conversation with David Gelernter about Trump's presidency, artificial intelligence and the future of America and technology.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

David Gelernter, professor of computer science at Yale University and author of The Tides of Mind, talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about consciousness and how our minds evolve through the course of the day and as we grow up. Other topics discussed include creativity, artificial intelligence, and the singularity.

Yale University professor David Gelernter is a pioneering computer scientist, cultural critic, and artist. In this conversation, Gelernter details the decline in America's cultural literacy over the last few generations—a phenomenon Gelernter terms “America-lite.” Gelernter also discusses computer science, the future of the Internet, and the promise and peril of new technologies. Finally, Kristol and Gelernter consider art and the art world today.

Yale University professor David Gelernter is a pioneering computer scientist, cultural critic, and artist. In this conversation, Gelernter details the decline in America’s cultural literacy over the last few generations—a phenomenon Gelernter terms “America-lite.” Gelernter also discusses computer science, the future of the Internet, and the promise and peril of new technologies. Finally, Kristol and Gelernter consider art and the art world today.

Yale University professor David Gelernter is a pioneering computer scientist, cultural critic, and artist. In this conversation, Gelernter details the decline in America's cultural literacy over the last few generations—a phenomenon Gelernter terms “America-lite.” Gelernter also discusses computer science, the future of the Internet, and the promise and peril of new technologies. Finally, Kristol and Gelernter consider art and the art world today.

Bill Bennett interviews Marc Thiessen on why we need American troops fighting the Islamic State. Medved talks with John McCain about the best strategy moving forward in Iraq. Krauthammer tells Hugh Hewitt that Obama lives in a cocoon surrounded by sycophants. Bennett speaks with Marco Rubio and then David Gelernter on Islamic Jihadism and Muslims trying to stop Ayaan Hirsi Ali from talking on campus.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bill Bennett and combat vet Bing West on the assassination of U.S. General Greene in Iraq. Dennis Prager on the potential Kurdistan target from ISIS. Mark Larson and Israeli Ambassador to the U.S.—Ron Dermer. Israel PM Netanyahu's defends his country's strategy and tactics. Michael Medved on the CNN/Wolf Blitzer confrontation with Hamas Spokesman and "Blood Libel" believer, Osama Hamdan. Hugh Hewitt with Arizona gubernatorial candidate, Doug Ducey. Edward Lucas discusses his latest book, "The New Cold War" with Medved. Bill Bennett and David Gelernter on America's lack of resolve.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

David Gelernter describes "America-Lite" how imperial academia dismantled our culture and ushered in the Obamacrats. Fierce.   Senator Chuck Grassley updates us on "Fast and Furious."  Then,  bulb envy.  Mine.