Podcasts about interrogatories

We hope you're hungry for anime that distill the essence of RPGs, because on the menu this episode are Solo Leveling and Delicious in Dungeon! Lando takes us through an E-rank hunter's quest for strength and other stats as he levels up into a formidable fighter. Huy spins a yarn about a journey of a party of adventurers as they try to resurrect the hero's sister and cook delicious creatures along the way. Will Mucci's heart or his stomach get the better of him? And in our Recess segment this week: Interrogatories!OTR Theme by Lando and Mucci. Other music, courtesy of Freesound.org: "RPG Shop Village theme" by M-Murray, "Born To Drive (loop ver.1)" and "Song of Little Ducks (loop ver.2)" by AudioCoffee [Music by AudioCoffee: https://www.audiocoffee.net], and "funkygroove beat 0" and "Drum fill 5" by lewk.Follow us on our socials:IG: @otr_debateFB: @otrdebateor on YouTube! You can also email topics you think we should cover at OTRdebate@gmail.com!

Chapter 6: Discovery Process The discovery process is a critical phase of civil litigation, allowing parties to obtain information and evidence relevant to their claims and defenses. This chapter explores various discovery tools, including requests for production, subpoenas, interrogatories, requests for admission, and depositions, highlighting their purposes, legal frameworks, strategic uses, and best practices. 6.1 The Scope of Discovery Scope and Principles: Relevance: Discovery is broad and allows parties to obtain information relevant to any claim or defense, even if not admissible at trial. Proportionality: Requests must be proportional to the needs of the case, considering factors like importance, amount in controversy, and resources. Privilege: Certain information, like attorney-client communications, is protected from discovery. Challenges and Strategies: Balancing comprehensive discovery with efficiency. Addressing objections and disputes over scope and privilege. 6.2 Discovery Planning and Conferences Discovery Planning: Discovery Plan: Outlines scope, methods, and schedule for discovery, ensuring a structured approach. Initial Disclosures: Parties exchange basic information early, identifying witnesses and documents supporting claims or defenses. Conferences: Purpose: Facilitate cooperation, clarify issues, and resolve disputes, reducing litigation costs and delays. Strategies: Collaborate with opposing counsel, tailor the discovery plan to the case, and leverage technology. 6.3 Depositions Depositions Overview: Definition: Oral questioning of witnesses under oath, recorded for trial use. Purpose: Gather detailed information, assess credibility, preserve testimony, and impeach witnesses. Process: Notice and Scheduling: Provide notice and coordinate timing and location. Conduct: Attorneys question witnesses, and court reporters record proceedings. Use at Trial: Can be used to impeach, preserve testimony, or substitute for live testimony. Challenges and Strategies: Manage costs, avoid evasive answers, and leverage technology for video depositions. 6.4 Interrogatories and Requests for Admission Interrogatories: Definition: Written questions answered under oath, revealing facts and legal positions. Purpose: Clarify issues, identify witnesses and evidence, and narrow disputes. Requests for Admission: Definition: Requests to admit or deny facts or document authenticity, reducing trial complexity. Purpose: Establish undisputed facts and simplify proceedings. Best Practices: Draft clear and precise requests, align with case strategy, and provide timely responses. 6.5 Requests for Production and Subpoenas Requests for Production: Definition: Demands for documents, ESI, or tangible items relevant to the case. Purpose: Obtain evidence, clarify issues, and assess case strengths and weaknesses. Subpoenas: Definition: Court orders requiring third parties to produce evidence or testify. Types: Subpoena duces tecum (documents) and subpoena ad testificandum (testimony). Strategies: Identify key third parties, draft clear requests, and ensure compliance with legal requirements. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 6: Discovery Process The discovery process is a critical phase of civil litigation, allowing parties to obtain information and evidence relevant to their claims and defenses. This chapter explores various discovery tools, including requests for production, subpoenas, interrogatories, requests for admission, and depositions, highlighting their purposes, legal frameworks, strategic uses, and best practices. 6.1 The Scope of Discovery Scope and Principles: Relevance: Discovery is broad and allows parties to obtain information relevant to any claim or defense, even if not admissible at trial. Proportionality: Requests must be proportional to the needs of the case, considering factors like importance, amount in controversy, and resources. Privilege: Certain information, like attorney-client communications, is protected from discovery. Challenges and Strategies: Balancing comprehensive discovery with efficiency. Addressing objections and disputes over scope and privilege. 6.2 Discovery Planning and Conferences Discovery Planning: Discovery Plan: Outlines scope, methods, and schedule for discovery, ensuring a structured approach. Initial Disclosures: Parties exchange basic information early, identifying witnesses and documents supporting claims or defenses. Conferences: Purpose: Facilitate cooperation, clarify issues, and resolve disputes, reducing litigation costs and delays. Strategies: Collaborate with opposing counsel, tailor the discovery plan to the case, and leverage technology. 6.3 Depositions Depositions Overview: Definition: Oral questioning of witnesses under oath, recorded for trial use. Purpose: Gather detailed information, assess credibility, preserve testimony, and impeach witnesses. Process: Notice and Scheduling: Provide notice and coordinate timing and location. Conduct: Attorneys question witnesses, and court reporters record proceedings. Use at Trial: Can be used to impeach, preserve testimony, or substitute for live testimony. Challenges and Strategies: Manage costs, avoid evasive answers, and leverage technology for video depositions. 6.4 Interrogatories and Requests for Admission Interrogatories: Definition: Written questions answered under oath, revealing facts and legal positions. Purpose: Clarify issues, identify witnesses and evidence, and narrow disputes. Requests for Admission: Definition: Requests to admit or deny facts or document authenticity, reducing trial complexity. Purpose: Establish undisputed facts and simplify proceedings. Best Practices: Draft clear and precise requests, align with case strategy, and provide timely responses. 6.5 Requests for Production and Subpoenas Requests for Production: Definition: Demands for documents, ESI, or tangible items relevant to the case. Purpose: Obtain evidence, clarify issues, and assess case strengths and weaknesses. Subpoenas: Definition: Court orders requiring third parties to produce evidence or testify. Types: Subpoena duces tecum (documents) and subpoena ad testificandum (testimony). Strategies: Identify key third parties, draft clear requests, and ensure compliance with legal requirements. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 6: Discovery Process The discovery process is a critical phase of civil litigation, allowing parties to obtain information and evidence relevant to their claims and defenses. This chapter explores various discovery tools, including requests for production, subpoenas, interrogatories, requests for admission, and depositions, highlighting their purposes, legal frameworks, strategic uses, and best practices. 6.1 The Scope of Discovery Scope and Principles: Relevance: Discovery is broad and allows parties to obtain information relevant to any claim or defense, even if not admissible at trial. Proportionality: Requests must be proportional to the needs of the case, considering factors like importance, amount in controversy, and resources. Privilege: Certain information, like attorney-client communications, is protected from discovery. Challenges and Strategies: Balancing comprehensive discovery with efficiency. Addressing objections and disputes over scope and privilege. 6.2 Discovery Planning and Conferences Discovery Planning: Discovery Plan: Outlines scope, methods, and schedule for discovery, ensuring a structured approach. Initial Disclosures: Parties exchange basic information early, identifying witnesses and documents supporting claims or defenses. Conferences: Purpose: Facilitate cooperation, clarify issues, and resolve disputes, reducing litigation costs and delays. Strategies: Collaborate with opposing counsel, tailor the discovery plan to the case, and leverage technology. 6.3 Depositions Depositions Overview: Definition: Oral questioning of witnesses under oath, recorded for trial use. Purpose: Gather detailed information, assess credibility, preserve testimony, and impeach witnesses. Process: Notice and Scheduling: Provide notice and coordinate timing and location. Conduct: Attorneys question witnesses, and court reporters record proceedings. Use at Trial: Can be used to impeach, preserve testimony, or substitute for live testimony. Challenges and Strategies: Manage costs, avoid evasive answers, and leverage technology for video depositions. 6.4 Interrogatories and Requests for Admission Interrogatories: Definition: Written questions answered under oath, revealing facts and legal positions. Purpose: Clarify issues, identify witnesses and evidence, and narrow disputes. Requests for Admission: Definition: Requests to admit or deny facts or document authenticity, reducing trial complexity. Purpose: Establish undisputed facts and simplify proceedings. Best Practices: Draft clear and precise requests, align with case strategy, and provide timely responses. 6.5 Requests for Production and Subpoenas Requests for Production: Definition: Demands for documents, ESI, or tangible items relevant to the case. Purpose: Obtain evidence, clarify issues, and assess case strengths and weaknesses. Subpoenas: Definition: Court orders requiring third parties to produce evidence or testify. Types: Subpoena duces tecum (documents) and subpoena ad testificandum (testimony). Strategies: Identify key third parties, draft clear requests, and ensure compliance with legal requirements. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Two anime about fighting off giant creatures face off this week! Huy represents the '90s classic Neon Genesis Evangelion, with its in-depth explorations of philosophy and the psychology of such characters as Shinji, Asuka, and Misato. Mucci takes the new kid on the block, Kaiju No. 8, fresh off its first season, and points to its history-making livestreams of each episode on Crunchyroll and X, as well as its sense of humor and characters that twist common tropes like the typically young shonen protagonist and the harsh tsundere characters. And in our Recess segment, we have Interrogatories! Will Judge Lando be swayed to watch either of these anime this time? OTR Theme by Lando and Mucci. Other music: "Futuristic Sci Fi Cinematic (loop1)" by AudioCoffee [https://www.audiocoffee.net]; "Anime Style Soundscape - In The Hills" by Soughtaftersounds [Copyright (C) 2014 Grant Stevens www.varazuvi.com]; "Anime Intro type song" by Mike_306; "fill -16sh - crash.wav" by bigjoedrummer; "Funny music (orchestra) .wav" by Darkash28; and "TV Show Intro Music" by TheoJT -- all on Freesound.org. Follow us on our socials: IG: @otr_debate Twitter: @OTRdebate FB: @otrdebate or on YouTube! You can also email topics you think we should cover at OTRdebate@gmail.com! Sources: https://screenrant.com/kaiju-no-8-crunchyroll-livestream-dub-release/ https://gamerant.com/kaiju-no-8-kafka-hibino-name-pun-explained/ https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/anime-shows/kaiju-no-8-anime-adaptation-beloved-manga-best-superhero-comics-marvel-opinion/ https://www.cbr.com/kaiju-no-8-x-twitter-crunchyroll-stream-new-trailer/

Rene Thomas Folse, JD, Ph.D. is the host for this edition which reports on the following news stories: WCAB Affirms WCJ's Apportionment in Psyche Case. WCAB Rescinds WCJ Order to Compel Answers to Interrogatories. No Discovery of Attorney Work Product in Carrier's Subrogation Case. New Trial Ordered in Employers' Class Action Against Sutter Health. Palomar Hospital Pays $250,000 for Diverting Fentanyl. Growing Number of Female Minority Doctors in California Report Burnout. FDA Approves Traumatic Brain Injury. Rapid Test Using One Drop of Blood. Data from MRI Can Detect Who Will Get Alzheimer's and When.

Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade's conflicting statements are laid bare in David Shafer's supplemental motion to dismiss Fani Willis' RICO indictment.Georgia Senators sound the alarm over Fani Willis' refusal to investigate election integrity issues throughout Fulton County, calling on Merrick Garland and the FBI to step in.The CIA orchestrated spying on the Trump campaign using foreign spies, according to a new report from Michael @shellenberger. The new details reveal what led to the Russian Collusion hoax perpetrated against the incoming President.

Section 4: Discovery. Discovery is a critical phase in civil litigation, where parties exchange information relevant to the case. This stage is designed to eliminate surprises, clarify what the lawsuit is about, and gather evidence necessary for trial. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and corresponding state rules provide the framework for discovery. Scope and Limits of Discovery. Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the scope of discovery is broad. Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case. The information sought need not be admissible in evidence if it appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. However, the scope of discovery is not limitless. The concept of proportionality, introduced in the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plays a crucial role. Proportionality limits discovery requests that are overly burdensome, unnecessary, or disproportionate to the case's needs. Factors considered in assessing proportionality include the importance of the issues at stake, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Discovery Tools. Interrogatories: These are written questions one party sends to another, requiring answers under oath. Interrogatories are useful for obtaining basic information like names, dates, and details of the case. However, they are limited in number (usually to 25) and scope. Depositions: A deposition is an out-of-court testimony given under oath by a party or witness. It allows attorneys to question the deponent (the person being deposed) in person and assess their demeanor and credibility. Depositions are powerful tools for gathering information and locking in testimony before trial. Requests for Production (RFPs): Parties can request documents, electronic data, and other tangible evidence from each other. RFPs are broad in scope and can include requests for emails, documents, internal memos, and physical evidence relevant to the dispute. Requests for Admissions: These are statements sent to the opposing party to admit or deny specific assertions. They are used to establish certain facts as true for the purpose of trial, thereby narrowing the issues to be litigated. Physical and Mental Examinations: In certain cases, a party may request the court to order a physical or mental examination of a person if the person's condition is in controversy. Electronic Discovery (e-Discovery). Electronic discovery refers to the process of identifying, collecting, and producing electronically stored information (ESI) in response to a request for production in litigation. ESI includes emails, documents, databases, voicemails, audio and video files, social media posts, and more. The challenges of e-discovery are manifold. First, the sheer volume of ESI can be overwhelming. Second, ESI is dynamic and can be altered, deleted, or lost, making preservation crucial. Third, ESI is often stored in complex systems, requiring technical expertise to retrieve. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure address e-discovery specifically. Rule 26(f), known as the "meet and confer" provision, requires parties to discuss e-discovery issues early in the litigation. Rule 34 allows for the request of ESI in specific forms. And Rule 37(e) provides guidance on the failure to preserve ESI, outlining measures a court may take if ESI that should have been preserved is lost. Discovery Disputes and Resolutions. Discovery disputes are common and can arise over the scope of discovery, the protection of privileged information, the format of production, and the burden or expense of the requested discovery. Strategies to resolve these disputes include: --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Discovery – Interrogatories, Subpoenas, Documents – Episode 263 of the Divorce University Online Podcast. Discovery is one of the most complex issues to understand in any divorce or child custody case. What is it? How do you respond to it? I'll help shed some light on this topic so you can understand the basics and navigate how to respond to it. To find out how I can support you in achieving success in your custody matter, please schedule a free strategy session at www.divorceuniversityonline.com/vip-coaching. Thanks for listening!

Host Josh Camson sits down with attorney and MBA member John Han to discuss acupuncture, Boston accents, and waking up next to a horse's head - in other words, a typical episode of Interrogatories.  John Han can be found at www.han.law.  Enjoying the show? Don't forget to subscribe, rate, and review!

Conduct of depositions Depositions usually take place at the office of the court reporter or in the office of one of the law firms involved in a case. However, depositions are also sometimes taken at a witness's workplace or home, or in a nearby hotel's conference room. Generally, the deposition is attended by the person who is to be deposed, their attorney, court reporter, and other parties in the case who can appear personally or be represented by their counsels. Any party to the action and their attorneys have the right to be present and to ask questions. Prior to taking a deposition, the court reporter administers the same oath or affirmation that the deponent would take if the testimony were being given in court in front of a judge and jury. Thereafter, the court reporter makes a verbatim digital or stenographic record of all that is said during the deposition, in the same manner that witness testimony is recorded in court. Some jurisdictions allow stenomask technology in lieu of traditional stenographic equipment, although many jurisdictions still prohibit stenomask because of its disconcerting effect on some lawyers and witnesses. Attorneys for the deposing litigant are often present, although this is not required in all jurisdictions. The attorney who has ordered the deposition begins questioning of the deponent (this is referred to as "direct examination" or "direct" for short). Since nods and gestures cannot be recorded, the witness is instructed to answer all questions aloud. After the direct examination, other attorneys in attendance have an opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The first attorney may ask more questions at the end, in re-direct, which may be followed by re-cross. During the course of the deposition, one attorney or another may object to questions asked. In most jurisdictions, only two types of objections are allowed: The first is to assert a privilege and the second is to object to the form of the question asked. Objections to form are frequently used to signal the witness to be careful in answering the question. Since the judge is not present, all other objections, in particular those involving the rules of evidence, are generally preserved until trial. They still can be made sometime at the deposition to indicate the serious problem to judge and witness, but the witness must answer the question despite these objections. If the form objection is made, the opposite party still has the right to re-phrase the same question and ask it again. Indeed, in Texas, lawyers were so aggressively using objections to indirectly coach their witnesses on the record that all objections outside four narrow categories are now prohibited and making such prohibited objections waives all objections to the question or answer at issue. California is the major "outlier" on deposition objections; under the California Civil Discovery Act as enacted in 1957 and heavily revised in 1986, most objections must be given on the record at the deposition (and must be specific as to the objectionable nature of the question or response) or they are permanently waived. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

In law, interrogatories (also known as requests for further information) are a formal set of written questions propounded by one litigant and required to be answered by an adversary in order to clarify matters of fact and help to determine in advance what facts will be presented at any trial in the case. Use. Interrogatories are used to gain information from the other party relevant to the issues in a lawsuit. The law and issues will differ depending upon the facts of a case and the laws of the jurisdiction in which a lawsuit is filed. For some types of cases there are standard sets of interrogatories available that cover the essential facts, and may be modified for the case in which they are used. When a lawsuit is filed, the pleadings filed by the parties are intended to let the other parties know what each side intends to prove at trial, and what legal case they have to answer. However, in most cases, the parties will require additional information to fully understand each other's legal and factual claims. The discovery process, including the use of interrogatories, can help the parties obtain that information from each other. For an example of how interrogatories may be used, in a motor vehicle accident lawsuit, an injured plaintiff typically asserts that the defendant driver committed the tort of negligence in causing the accident. To prove negligence, the law requires the injured plaintiff to show that the driver owed them a duty of care and breached it, causing the injury. Assuming that the defendant did not dispute driving a vehicle that was involved in the accident that injured the plaintiff, the case would come down to whether the driver drove in accordance with the standard of a reasonable driver, and whether the injured person's injuries are a foreseeable consequence of the driving. The parties may use interrogatories to seek information, including concessions as to how the accident occurred, from each other. The injured plaintiff might serve interrogatories on the defendant driver seeking information that would support the plaintiff's theory of the case. If the plaintiff is alleging that the defendant was speeding, the plaintiff might ask the defendant to state the speed of the defendant's vehicle at the time of the accident. If the plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to control the car properly or failed to pay proper attention to the road and other vehicles, the plaintiff could ask interrogatory questions that would help prove those allegations or require disclosure of the basis of any denial of negligence by the defendant. The driver may have a defense to those allegations, perhaps if the accident occurred at low speed, and was unavoidable (maybe due to some third party intervention). The injured person may, however, argue that the driver was still responsible (perhaps the driver should have used the horn of the vehicle to alert the third party), or there may be other allegations. The defense may similarly use interrogatories to help build legal and factual defenses to the plaintiff's case. Continuing with the example of a car accident, the defendant may seek information or concessions from the plaintiff that would suggest that a different driver was partially or wholly responsible for the accident, or that under the facts the accident was unavoidable despite the proper exercise of care. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/law-school/support

In contested divorce or family law litigation, discovery is vital to a successful outcome. Discovery might involve interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission. Depositions are also crucial in almost any case going to trial or an evidentiary hearing. Using subpoenas to get records or information from third parties can also be vital. To find out more, listen to this episode. This episode is based on an article on Family Law Headquarters tired: Why Discovery is Important in Family Law Matters. To find out more about us, you can call us at 855-805-0595 or find information online about divorce lawyers in Omaha, Nebraska.  

In this episode, Josh talks to MBA member Frank Mazzeo, Esq.  Frank is an IP (Patent) Attorney and partner with Ryder, Mazzeo & Konieczny, LLC in Colmar, PA.  Frank talks about growing up and working in the family business - a cheesesteak and hoagie shop and what persuaded Frank to pursue a career in law as well as a lengthy discussion on the merits of the oxford comma.  Frank can be found at his firm's website: www.ryderlu.com.  As always, make sure you rate, review, and subscribe to Interrogatories with Josh Camson!

For the second episode of the second season of Interrogatories, host Josh Camson interviews his second Chicagoan: Jessica Bednarz, Esq. Josh and Jessica discuss how to make legal assistance more accessible and affordable for those who need it.  Jessica leads the Justice Entrepreneurs Project (JEP) for the Chicago Bar Foundation and consults with law firms on ways to make their practices more affordable. Learn more about Jessica at www.chicagobarfoundation.org and www.adifferentpractice.com. 

Welcome to Season 2 of Interrogatories with Josh Camson! In our first episode of the new season, Josh sits down with Ben Grimes, Esq.  Ben is an Army veteran and currently works for the U.S. Department of Justice.  He is also a leadership coach and founder of BKG Leadership Coaching. You can find Ben at www.bkgleadershipcoaching.com and at LinkedIn - Benjamin Grimes. SPECIAL NOTE: Ben's stance on the Oxford Comma does not reflect the official stance of the USDOJ.  

Gear up for Season 2 of Interrogatories with Josh Camson! New episodes will be released throughout the summer and fall of 2022.  

Josh welcomes his first sitting Judge in this episode of Interrogatories.  Hon. Edward J. Levine is a Magisterial District Court Judge in Lansdale, PA who is currently running for reelection.  Judge Levine discusses his journey to the bench, by way of the Discovery Channel, car wash management, and becoming a lawyer later in life.  Also, bonus points for mentioning both Wilco and Vampire Weekend. Judge Levine can be reached at www.reelectjudgelevine.com and on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ReelectJudgeEd.  As always, make sure to share, rate, review, and subscribe!

In this special 20th episode of Interrogatories, Josh interviews 2020 MBA President Patrick J. Kurtas, Esq.  Patrick had an eventful year as President, steering the Montgomery Bar Association and local legal community through the uncharted waters of the worst pandemic in 100 years, leading the bar association during a time of political and social upheaval not seen in this country in 50 years, and overseeing the search and hiring of a new Executive Director for the first time in nearly 30 years.  Phew. Patrick and Josh also discuss the business of starting your own firm, cryptocurrency, and both Lollapalooza and Lawyerpalooza.  Make sure to rate, review, and subscribe!

Josh welcomes guest John Gibson, an attorney based in California who lives in a van with his wife, Tawnee, and their daughter.  Tawnee is an endurance coach and together they produce the Endurance Planet podcast.  For more information, visit: https://enduranceplanet.com/ and follow John on Instagram - @ipaatthefinish. As always, please rate, review, and subscribe to Interrogatories with Josh Camson!

In this episode, Jim Garrity encourages you to think of Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) depositions as an ingenious, unlimited source for additional interrogatories, if you need more than is allowed by rule. Rule 30(b)(6) depositions (and their topic lists) are close cousins of the interrogatory, because both result in responses that are the voice of, and bind, the responding entity. This is the kind of thinking that Garrity urges - the use of deposition rules and procedures as tools that can be used in conjunction with, and to build on, other discovery devices. Thanks for listening! And be sure to leave us a five star review wherever you get your podcast. It takes less than 30 seconds. And your reviews (even if you just leave a five star rating, without comments) are a great way to say thanks to our production staff, who put a great deal of time and energy into producing these timely and useful episodes.

In a first for Interrogatories, Josh welcomes not one, but TWO guests: Bruce Pancio, Esq. and Hon. Joseph P. Walsh of the firm Walsh Pancio, LLC.  Bruce and Judge Walsh (or "Your Honor" as he is called at home) discuss how they started their firm and how the practice has evolved since then.  Also, learn why you should always prepare your briefs with an even number of paragraphs or a number that is divisible by five.  What? Yup. Listen. Visit Walsh Pancio at www.walshpancio.com, and follow on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/WalshPancioLLC . Don't forget to rate and subscribe to this amazing podcast! 

Discovery provides a complete understanding of the issues and facts. It occurs after you have filed for divorce or child custody—it is the “investigation” phase, and one of the most significant steps in the divorce or child custody process. It is the exchanging of information. Read the full article here: http://www.oflaherty-law.com/learn-about-law/what-is-discovery-in-an-illinois-divorce-and-child-custody-cases O'Flaherty Law now serves over 105 counties across Illinois, Iowa, and Indiana. If you have any questions regarding a case or would like to speak to one of our attorneys after watching a #LearnAboutLaw video, give us a call at (630) 324-6666 or send us an email at info@oflaherty-law.com to get in contact with someone from our team. Subscribe to our channel for daily videos dedicated to all things law and leave a comment with any questions about this topic. Find us online for more legal content and to stay connected with our team - Website: https://www.oflaherty-law.com/ - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oflahertylaw - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oflahertylaw - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/oflahertylawGroup/ **None of the content in this series is intended as paid legal advice. In this video, we explain Discovery in Illinois divorce and child custody cases. We will cover things to remember about the discovery process as well as 5 different methods for Discovery: Request for Production, Interrogatories, Request for Admissions, Depositions, and Subpoena Duces Tecum.

What happens if you believe the other party is hiding money or they don't fully disclose everything in the initial disclosure step of a divorce? Ryan Kalamaya explains how the discovery process in a divorce works in the State of Colorado. In This Episode:-       What is the discovery process in a divorce-       Rules that guide the process of discovery-       Interrogatories and request for production of documentsMake sure to follow us to continue the conversation on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. Step by Step Colorado Divorce GuideThe initial thought of trying to file for divorce can be overwhelming and emotionally exhausting. Ryan Kalamaya, one of the founding partners of innovative law firm Kalamaya | Goscha, has created a simple, step by step guide to the Colorado divorce process, so you know what to expect and how to best protect yourself and your assets.  Each 5-minute episode will cover the process for divorce, parenting in a divorce, property division, and more. To watch the videos of each episode, click here.About Kalamaya | GoschaKalamaya | Goscha is an innovative law firm with an award-winning team of trial lawyers specializing in highly personal disputes — divorce, child custody, property division, maintenance/alimony, pre-marital and marital agreements, and collaborative divorce — in Colorado. If you have additional questions or would like to speak to one of our attorneys, give us a call at 970-429-5784 or email us at info@kalamaya.law.************************************************************************DISCLAIMER: THE COMMENTARY AND OPINIONS ON THIS PODCAST IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND NOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE. CONTACT AN ATTORNEY IN YOUR STATE OR AREA TO OBTAIN LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY OF THESE ISSUES.

Somewhere between questioning everything and questioning nothing lies the law. The law consists of duties, rights, and obligations of everyone plus a process of determining if there was a breach, whether it mattered and what to do about it. Successful foreclosure defense is entirely about establishing a breach by the foreclosure mill. The best way to do that is usually through demanding discovery Successful foreclosure defense is about seeking answers that you are entitled to ask when you are allowed to ask them, and how the questions are required to be asked. It is not about getting answers. If someone sues you to collect on a debt, you are entitled to ask, What debt? How do I owe it to you? Who are you? If you don't get answers or adequate responses, you are in the driver's seat. You can either apply the brakes or coast along until you lose. But If you apply the gas, you can run the foreclosure mill into a corner. Because they have no answers. People lose their homes because they assume they know the answers. They don't. None of them do. Lawyers inadvertently allow their clients to lose their homes because they were afraid to ask the right questions and then follow up. Lawyers do that because they think they know the answers and wish to avoid them. Tonight we discuss the who, what, where, when, and why of discovery and why it usually leads to homeowner victory. Make absolutely certain that you don't admit something that is against your interests.  Start as early as possible.  Avoid using the nomenclature of the opposition, to wit: Loan Servicer Trustee Trust Certificates Certificate holders

In this episode, Josh welcomes Nicole Phillips, an attorney running for Judge of the Court of Common Pleas in Montgomery County.  Nicole talks about why she is running for Judge (other than not having to pick out an outfit every day), her journey to Pennsylvania from Florida via Massachusetts, and why you should never place a hat on a bed.  Visit Nicole online at www.friendsofnicolephillips.org and on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/friendsofnicolephillips.     If you're enjoying Interrogatories with Josh Camson, which of course you are or you wouldn't be reading this, remember to rate and subscribe!

In this episode of Interrogatories, Josh Camson sits down with Montgomery County Prothonotary Noah Marlier.  Noah talks about being a newly-elected official during a global pandemic, how his experience in the Peace Corps and teaching led to a career in law and politics, and the correct spelling and pronunciation of "prothonotary."  Follow Noah and the Montgomery County Prothonotary's office on Facebook (Prothonotary Noah Marlier), Twitter (Montgomery County Prothonotary Noah Marlier) and online at: http://montcopa.org/prothy 

In our premier episode of Interrogatories, host Josh Camson interviews Montgomery Bar Association President Jacqueline M. Reynolds, a Shareholder with Marshall Dennehey (https://marshalldennehey.com/). 

Discovery, Interrogatories and Inspection

Courts have been ruling on the question for years: Is it proper to ask the same questions in depositions that you just asked (and received answers to) in interrogatories? In this episode Jim Garrity definitively answers the query, and provides practical guidance for you. This podcast is based on the best-selling 450-page field guide, 10,000 Depositions Later: The Premier Litigation Guide for Superior Deposition Practice, now in its 3d edition. Buy it on Amazon, or just about anywhere else you buy your practice materials. Cases cited in this episode: Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co. Ltd. V. Conte Medical Systems USA, Inc., 2020 WL 1701861 (N.D. Ill. April 8, 2020) (use of interrogatory to ask question similar to one previously asked in deposition not improper; discovery methods are complementary, not alternative or exclusive) Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 15 F.R.D. 242 (N.D. Ill. 1954) (asking same questions in both interrogatories and depositions not necessarily improper; absent showing that complete answers to the interrogatories are contained in the depositions, this burden is not discharged) Beasley v. Lang, 2018 WL 2072856 (S.D. Miss. May 2, 2018) (court, in compelling defendants to respond to plaintiff’s interrogatories and document requests, specifically ruled “This order does not prevent Plaintiff from asking any questions during the deposition of EF Properties or Mr. Flechas that are related to, the same, or similar to the interrogatories”) DiSantis v. Smith of Philadelphia, 1987 WL 28537 (E.D. Penn. 1987) (“. . . the various methods of discovery are intended to be cumulative, not alternative nor exclusive;” but party wishing to object to interrogatory in grounds a prior deposition covered it, movant must show abuse or injustice from it) Hunt v. McNeil Consumer Healthcare, 2013 WL 12231272 (E.D. La. Jan. 15, 2013) (interrogatory questions asked in interrogatories and in depositions were “semantically distinct,” even though the questions shared many similarities; subtle differences in the way the interrogatories and depositions questions were asked justified finding that plaintiff’s testimony in those formats did not conflict) Rutledge v. Elliott Health System, 2018 WL 851354 (D. N.H. Feb. 13, 2018) (“To the extent Rutledge faults the defendants for failing to ask her follow up questions on these topics during her deposition, she has not shown that a party waives the right to compel a response to an interrogatory by not including the same question during a deposition”) Sprayberry v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC, 2018 WL 10604345 (D. Oregon Feb. 2, 2018) (court rejected plaintiff’s request that defendant be forbidden to ask depositions questions because, the plaintiff contended, the opposing party could ask the same question in an interrogatory or request for admission or obtain the information from another source; court said that answering deposition questions is “. . . certainly no more burdensome that responding to written discovery requests”) Lowery v. County of Riley, 2009 WL 648928 (D. Kan. 2009) (party cannot avoid answering interrogatories by demanding opponent ask the desired questions in depositions instead ) Richlin v. Sigma Design West, Ltd., 88 F.R.D. 634 (E.D. Cal. 1980) (patently duplicative interrogatories, served in February after extensive depositionsin December,were oppressive and overly burdensome; there was no hint that new information had come to light, or that the pleadings had changed, such to warrant service of the same questions by interrogatory that had been answered fully in deposition; fact that rules allow multiple types of discovery  is “. . . not a license to engage in ‘repetitious, redundant and tautological’ inquiries…”)

Custody!  Divorce!  Parenting time!  Money!  Disagreements over children!      "Discovery" can cause stress and misunderstanding, and take up time and energy.   In this Episode 21, Custody and Divorce Lawyers Barry C. Boykin and Kevin R. Johnson discuss and explain some methods of "Discovery" that are used in court cases.  Subpoenas for records, Interrogatories, Notices to Produce, Depositions -- all part of the Court Rules, intended to cause information to be revealed and exchanged during litigation (divorce and custody cases.)Custody and Divorce Lawyers Barry C. Boykin and Kevin R. Johnson have more than 50 combined years of experience.  They know first-hand the court battles, psychological warfare, pain and frustration that parents, spouses, partners and children endure as disputes are resolved in the family-court system.                                                            From their perspective as Chicago attorneys, Barry and Kevin attempt to bring hope and clarity to a troubled world, where lawyers, judges and other professionals see the best and worst of human behavior on public display.                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Attorney Kevin R. Johnson - http://www.divorce.nu/                                                                                Attorney Barry C. Boykin -  https://www.gclclaw.org/barry-c-boykin

Scott, Ron Renzy, and Joe Littman discuss Litigation of First Party Insurance Claims in Florida. They discuss the process and time frames as well as what to expect.

Retired Judge Ronald J. Hedges covers how an attorneys and judges could maximize and manage tools such as discovery, interrogatories, requests for production, depositions for a case.

Attorney Tyson Mutrux discusses in this episode the written discovery process and the documents involved (interrogatories, request for production, request for admission, certificate of service). How to get in touch with us: - Phone - 888.550.4026 - www.TysonMutrux.com - Twitter and Instragram - @lawyertyson - https://www.facebook.com/MutruxFirm/ - YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqpYdV3X5PO3tx6bvM4g78w --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/mutrux-firm-injury/message

The Court system has certain tools that allow you to obtain documents and evidence that you may need to help prove your case. These 'Discovery Tools' are used during the 'Discovery' phase of your case.  There are several Discovery Tools available to someone going through the divorce process.  In this show, Leh and Todd discuss what those tools are and when might be the best time to use which tools.   If you would like a transcript of this show, you can find it on our website.     If you are enjoying the show, please take a moment to post a positive review about it.  Not sure how, you can read about it here.

In episode #7 of "Ask Henry", attorney, Henry Gornbein, answers the question, "When Are Depositions and Interrogatories Useful During a Divorce?" For more full length free podcasts related to divorce, visit: www.DivorceSourceRadio.com

Jeff discusses the investigation procedure of a lawsuit, called discovery. In particular, he talks about Interrogatories, Request for Production, and Request for Admissions.

In this week's episode of The Crushing Debt Podcast I talk about Discovery, the process by which the parties to a lawsuit determine, challenge, narrow, and identify the evidence to be used in proving their case to the judge and/or jury. There are different types of discovery.  Depositions are questions asked in an interview style, under oath. Request for Admissions are written statements that the party must admit or deny as true.  Request for Production are designed to force the party to show any documentary or physical evidence it intends to rely upon in proving its case. Interrogatories are requests for written narrative answers to be signed under oath. There is an art both to creating and answering discovery. If you enjoy the content, please share the episode. If you have questions, please connect with me at Shawn@YesnerLaw.com or www.YesnerLaw.com.  Also, please remember to visit our sponsor, www.ElliottWealth.com for your free 15-minute life insurance check up.

How can you present your case if you don't really understand it? The key to understanding your own case, its strengths and weaknesses is in conducting discovery in court and following up. Without the follow up it's virtully useless.  The devil is in the details. The details in litigation lie basically in discovery — asking and responding. Very few pro se litigants know how to construct good Interrogatories, Requests to Produce, or Requests for Admission. They know even less about how to use the responses, if they get any. And they know still less about how to use inconsistencies or lack of response as the basis for enforcement and motions for contempt and sanctions and ultimately to limit the evidence that can be introduced by the claimant in foreclosure. Failure to know about this is fatal because it is failure to understand the nature and procedure of litigation. Most lawyers don't suffer from that ignorance. But they often do suffer from lack of motivation and thus they head for failure when they could be heading for success.

On this episode of the NP Dude podcast I provide a dry run of a presentation I did today for a group of DPT students.  What a cool experience and super smart group to talk with.  I break down how to analyze malpractice as an expert witness and some things to be aware of if […] The post Episode 131 – Malpractice as Determined by the Expert Witness! first appeared on The NP Dude.

On this episode of Court Appointed, Mike and Tommy discuss what is involved in Discovery. No, not like Christopher Columbus or Ponce de Leon or even the channel. The lawyery type of discovery and all the fascinating or boring, depending on your point of view, things that this phase of law entails. The Court is now in Session with music, "Doctor, Lawyer, Indian Chief" by MCRB

At the outset of a lawsuit, an experienced attorney will formulate a discovery strategy that is geared toward learning as much as possible about who the opposing party's trial witnesses will be, what their testimony will consist of, and what documents they will offer to support their claims. We assume that attorneys possess an exhaustive knowledge base in many fields, yet for some legal cases, attorneys have little grasp of the interdisciplinary clockwork of the industry, such as how public schools operate day-to-day. In such instances, an outside expert, like "The Safety Doc" can be used to help a client and his or her attorney gain a better understanding of how best to present a successful case. DISCLAIMER. I am not an attorney. This show isn't legal advice. It's a compilation of personal experiences related to cases that I reviewed as a consult expert or expert legal witness. This show is also informed by personal research to help inform my own professional opinions. WHAT IS DISCOVERY? "Discovery" is a legal term of art that consists of several tools that are used to uncover facts relevant to the various claims and defenses at issue in the case. The parties are permitted to discover relevant facts through three main types of written discovery (1) Interrogatories (2) Requests for Production of Documents, & (3) Requests for Admissions. WHAT ARE DEPOSITIONS? Depositions are questions of witnesses and typically don't take place in courtrooms. The attorneys will ask the witness, or deponent, a series of questions about facts and events related to the lawsuit with the entire deposition recorded word-for-word by a court reporter or videotaped. All parties to the case may attend the deposition and a deponent often has his or her attorney present, albeit with a more limited role than the attorney would have in a courtroom. WHAT IS BENCHMARKING? Benchmarking is comparing one's business processes and performance metrics to industry bests and best practices from other companies. Dimensions typically measured are quality, time and cost. In education, this approach is often flawed as it is near impossible to compare schools. WHAT I DO. As a consulting expert or expert witness, I determine viability of a case, and if so, prioritize strategies. I recognize my own strengths, ways to become informed, identify my limitations and assemble discovery requests and deposition questions. Much time is spent to analyze and summarizing documents from discovery and depositions. RECOMMENDATIONS TO YOU. Act in the best interest of yourself or others given the context and situation. If you are in a position to train, then training materials and a list of persons that attended the training. Finally, always document with timestamps and maintain copies in electronic and paper. If you have questions about your job duties, ask a superior and if a satisfactory response isn't provided, use emails and letters to seek clarification from those you deem as superiors. FORMATS. You can also listen to this podcast on iTunes https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/t... or SoundCloud https://soundcloud.com/user-186592129 or on The 405 Media http://the405media.com/the-safety-doc/ You can view this episode on YouTube https://youtu.be/QjdoT68NNc4 FOLLOW DR. PERRODIN: On Twitter @SafetyPhD and subscribe to “The Safety Doc” YouTube channel and SoundCloud RSS feed. DR. PERRODIN'S SAFETY BLOG: https://crisisprepconsulting.wordpres... SAFETY DOC WEBSITE: www.safetyphd.com David will respond to discussion thread comments or questions & also to emails. The Safety Doc Podcast is hosted & produced by David Perrodin, PhD. ENDORSEMENTS. Opinions are those of the host and guests and do not reflect positions of The 405 Media or supporters of “The Safety Doc Podcast”. The show is curse free and adheres to nondiscrimination principles while seeking to bring forward productive discourse and debate on topics relevant to personal or institutional safety. Email David: thesafetydoc@gmail.com

This video discuss form interrogatories in California.  How do you respond to these?  What are they?   Attorney Steve, the business and real estate lawyer discusses.

After you have filed a Complaint or responded to a Complaint by filing an Answer to the Complaint, the next phase of the litigation is called discovery.  Discovery typically begins by sending Interrogatories and Requests for the Production of Documents, Objects and Tangible Things (“Requests to Produce”).  Interrogatories are written questions and Requests to Produce are requests for documents, objects and tangible things.  This Podcast with Jennifer Burt of Lavelle Law will review the process and provide an overview of what to expect.