POPULARITY
Categories
It's a massive week on Call It What You Want as Jimmy Conrad, Charlie Davies, and Tony Meola gear up for Friday's World Cup draw. With the entire soccer world buzzing, the guys dive into Mauricio Pochettino's unfiltered comments on player entitlement, the USMNT's ceiling, and why he has felt slighted by fellow coaches and media members (03:03). Christian Pulisic's absence from the U.S. Soccer Male Player of the Year finalists raises eyebrows (19:05), and Tony takes us back to the 1994 World Cup draw with stories from his own experience pulling balls out of pots (26:38). The crew breaks down FIFA's procedures, how the pots shake out, and which teams the U.S. absolutely wants to avoid next summer (32:19). Plus, Tyler Adams' stroke of genius against Sunderland sparks a spirited debate over the greatest Premier League goals ever scored by an American (48:08). And northwest meets southeast as Inter Miami and the Vancouver Whitecaps square off in the MLS Cup Final (58:44). Call It What You Want is available for free on the Audacy app as well as Apple Podcasts, Spotify and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Follow the Call It What You Want team on X: @JimmyConrad, @CharlieDavies9, @TMeola1 Visit the betting arena on CBSSports.com for all the latest in sportsbook reviews and sportsbook promos for betting on soccer For more soccer coverage from CBS Sports, visit https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/ To hear more from the CBS Sports Podcast Network, visit https://www.cbssports.com/podcasts/ Watch UEFA Champions League, UEFA Europa League, UEFA Europa Conference League, UEFA Women's Champions League, EFL Championship, EFL League Cup, Carabao Cup, Serie A, Coppa Italia, CONCACAF Nations League, CONCACAF World Cup Qualifiers, Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup, NWSL, Scottish Premiership, AFC Champion League by subscribing to Paramount+ Visit the betting arena on CBS Sports.com: https://www.cbssports.com/betting/ For all the latest in sportsbook reviews: https://www.cbssports.com/betting/news/sportsbook-promos/ And sportsbook promos: https://www.cbssports.com/betting/news/sportsbook-promos/ To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond
Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! This episode continues the discussion on criminal identification procedures, focusing on potential due process violation issues. Through analyzing a hypothetical scenario, we illustrate how courts look at the totality of the circumstances and assess whether identification procedures are unnecessarily suggestive. The episode concludes with a step-by-step approach to tackling identification procedure questions on an exam. In this episode we discuss: A question from the October 2020 California bar exam The various types of identification procedures How to consider the totality of the circumstances when determining potential due process violations An exam strategy for answering identification procedure questions Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/law-school-toolbox-podcast-substantive-law-topics/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, October 2020 (https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/Examinations/October-2020-Essay-Selected-Answers.pdf) Podcast Episode 290: Listen and Learn – Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Miranda Rights (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-290-listen-and-learn-privilege-against-self-incrimination-and-miranda-rights/) Podcast Episode 295: Listen and Learn – Due Process and Equal Protection (Con Law) (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-295-listen-and-learn-due-process-and-equal-protection-con-law/) Podcast Episode 330: Listen and Learn – The Sixth Amendment (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-330-listen-and-learn-the-sixth-amendment/) Podcast Episode 530: Listen and Learn – Criminal Procedure: Identifications (Part 1) (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-530-listen-and-learn-criminal-procedure-identifications-part-1/) SpacedRepetition.com (https://spacedrepetition.com/) Download the Transcript (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/episode-532-listen-and-learn-criminal-procedure-identifications-part-2/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/law-school-toolbox-podcast/id1027603976) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website (http://lawschooltoolbox.com/contact). If you're concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox (http://barexamtoolbox.com/). You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/get-law-school-podcast-updates/) to make sure you never miss an episode! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee
"Think about how stretchy you are and what you accept. Where are your breaking points?"One particularly striking data point: 70% of people face obstacles asking questions at work. This statistic underscores a core issue. Curiosity is often cited as a value, yet many environments make it unsafe to ask for clarification or challenge ideas. Fear of looking incompetent, challenging authority, or slowing down progress often silences valuable input.Julie and I discuss how curiosity, respect, and self-awareness can transform organisational life. We explore practical strategies for leaders to foster psychological safety and inclusive collaboration, using Julie's own unique journey and the powerful “Seven Forms of Respect” framework for guidance. We often talk about “soft skills” in organisations, but as teams become more global and complexity increases, these skills are anything but soft. They're foundational. We discover a refreshing perspective to curiosity, respect, and self-awareness, showing us how to make these invisible dynamics tangible and actionable. This in turn allows leaders to shift from just “knowing” to truly “learning” — a real leadership superpower in our changing world.Recognising your “rubber band” stretchiness - Understand personal boundaries and breaking points, and communicate them to others is also key as it prevents snapping and strengthens relationships. This episode offers key insights into navigating complex team dynamics and maintaining a learning mindset in high-pressure environments.The main insights you'll get from this episode are : - Being a self-taught organisational development consultant taught the critical value of sharing resources and building communities in times of crisis; there is tension and friction in any community but making the invisible relational dynamics tangible helps to understand them.- When it comes to learning from other people, curiosity and self-assessment are required for the shift from knowing to learning, and to decode the different dynamics; curiosity requires questions, but do people feel safe enough to ask questions?- Internal narrative and cultural formatting influence communication - we are all members of multiple cultures, communities and identities simultaneously, and inward curiosity is a prerequisite: What matters to me?- Our multiple identities mean that we must slow down and reflect to enable good decisions to be made from a place of curiosity; leadership rituals (e.g. meeting facilitator rotation) can help teams maintain curiosity when under pressure, create empathy and force listening.- Using the seven forms of respect as a framework for collaboration helps understand how respect is relative, dynamic, subjective and contradictory: Procedure, Punctuality, Information, Candor, Consideration, Acknowledgement, Attention.- A useful analogy here is with language: the organisational level represents the national language; departments represent dialects; and the individual is represented by their own language – we all need to be multilingual.- Intercultural working results in unclear messages, which lead to perpetuated actions and unmet expectations that were never made explicit - a team must understand what respect means to them, not by guessing, but by asking others.- Inward curiosity is about self-reflection and admitting what challenges us and what our expectations are – this can be difficult to acknowledge given that it can be perceived as a challenge to our identity.- Curiosity in practice means approaching...
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Lauren Walker, journalist at Euronews, discusses the impact of asylum-related measures introduced in Belgium last year, which are similar to those being considered by the Irish government.
When embarking on your ISO journey, a crucial first step is evaluating your current level of compliance and identifying what gaps need to be filled to gain certification or fully align with a Standard. This is typically done by conducting a Gap Analysis. This exercise sets the foundations for your ISO Implementation project, from setting key actions and objectives, to resourcing and establishing a project timeline. In this episode, Ian Battersby dives into the purpose of a Gap Analysis, who should be involved in the exercise and what inputs and outputs you should expect to have from conducting a Gap Analysis. You'll learn · What is a Gap Analysis? · What is the aim of a Gap Analysis? · What is the process of conducting a Gap Analysis? · Who should be involved in a Gap Analysis? · What inputs should be included in a Gap Analysis? · What outputs can you expect from a Gap Analysis? Resources · Isologyhub In this episode, we talk about: [02:05] Episode Summary – Ian Battersby dives into the first step on any ISO Implementation journey, breaking down what a Gap Analysis is, it's purpose and what you should expect to get out of conducting one. [02:50] What is a Gap Analysis?: Simply put, it's the start of the process. It's a key to understanding where an organisation is right now and establishing what it needs to do on its journey to ISO certification. But it's not just for certification, as certification isn't always what people are trying to achieve. Many businesses opt to align themselves to a standard to ensure they're doing the right thing, but may not go through with full certification. [04:05] Who is the aim of a Gap Analysis? The objective of a Gap Analysis is to carry out a review of your organisation against the requirements of the respective standard. This will help to establish the following: · Areas where you conform to the standard, where you may have established the required processes, procedures, roles, responsibilities, systems, methods, documents · Areas of nonconformity, where such things will need to be developed · You may partly conform, so it's important to understand that as well From that understanding, you can build key actions, timescales and responsibilities for implementing an ISO Standard. It's also very useful to leadership; to clarify what's needed, to look at priorities, to resource what's required and to establish a timeline to your end goal. [06:25] What is the process of conducting a Gap Analysis? It's important to do this in a very structured manner. It's also important to get access to existing documentation and personnel in key roles; they'll be helpful during the gap analysis in providing understanding. You'll need to evaluate your current level of compliance against the following clauses within your desired ISO Standard(s): 4 Context: Understanding the world in which you operate, the people and organisations which are important to you. This is where you will determine the scope of your system (what to include, what parts of the standard are relevant). 5 Leadership: Top management's commitment, how involved they are, their accountability and their commitment to resourcing, promoting, to giving people authority through clear roles and responsibilities. 6 Planning: This is about assessing risks and opportunities; understanding the uncertainty caused by your operating environment (context). It also involves setting objectives and then establishing meaningful plans to address the risks/opportunities and objectives; mitigations; establishing controls; operational processes. 7 Support: This is where you look at people, competence Infrastructure and environment (are your facilities/equipment appropriate to what you need to do). You will also need to identify what you need to monitor and measure to demonstrate the effectiveness of your ISO Management System. Next, you need to cover awareness and communication, i.e. how do you make people aware of your system, policy, processes; what do you tell other interested parties? Lastly, ensure you address how you control the documentation which supports your system. 8 Operation: This address the delivery of a product or service to the customer, including all the processes for doing so. For example, in ISO 9001 this clause defines what's required when designing, developing, controlling externally provided products/services and controlling anything which goes wrong. This is typically the clause that contains the largest difference between ISO Standard, with each one focusing requirements on it's topic focus. For example, ISO 14001 includes requirements for emergency preparedness and response in the event of an environmental incident. 9 Performance evaluation: This is where you review and report on the results of the monitoring and measurement that you've put in place. For those familiar with ISO, this is where the internal audit and management review requirements sit. 10 Improvement: This clause states requirements for addressing any non-conformities that pop-up during your Internal Audits. It also encourages you to address opportunities for improvement to help drive continual improvement and innovation. [13:50] Who should be involved in a Gap Analysis? One key myth that we'd like to clear up is that not everyone in the business needs to be involved in this process, however, we do recommend the following are included: The person responsible for the day-to-day running of the Management System. This may not be known at this early stage, which is fine as the purpose of the Gap Analysis is to identify gaps such as this. Leadership; someone in a senior role; responsible for resourcing the system, communicating its importance to the workforce; responsible for setting the strategic direction and objectives. People who understand the context of the organisation; understanding interested parties (stakeholders); needs of customers and others; the regulatory environment Those involved in risk management; operational, financial, commercial, regulatory, safety or environmental. Someone with knowledge of the legal requirements and how they're evaluated; relative to specific standard. Anyone setting objectives related to the specific standard. Those with knowledge of competence arrangements; not just those responsible for co-ordinating the Management System, but across the board, for delivering operational processes. Those responsible for facilities and equipment; maintenance, service, test, inspection, etc. People responsible for developing and delivering operational processes. People with knowledge of how things are monitored or measured; possibly operations people, data analysis or those who report performance to management. Those who control nonconformity and those who run improvement processes. It can be quite a range of people! However, in smaller organisations there may be quite a limited number who likely wear many hats. Again, that's not a problem, as the Gap Analysis exists to discover that. [21:55] What inputs should be included in a Gap Analysis? This can include a number of things, as not everything will necessarily be a document. Typically, we as consultants will look at: · Management System manual or System Scope · Organisational chart · Mission, vision, values and culture · SWOT/PESTLE and Interested Parties · Policy relevant to the standard · Job descriptions · Risk and opportunities analysis; methodology · Objectives · Legislation register and methods of evaluation · Competence arrangements, training records · Management System awareness, training completion · Details of version and document control in place · Monitoring and measuring plans (KPIs, SLAs, internal performance metrics) · Internal audit programme and audit reports · Management review records · Agendas for any regular management meetings · Nonconformities, incident report and corrective action records · Customer complaints/feedback · Emergency Plans · Process Documentation · Examples of process documentation: · Change control documentation · Sales, tendering, order processing · Procedures for the design and development of products and services · Design and development records stating inputs, verification and validation activities, outputs, and approval of changes · Procedures to approve products and services for release to customers including quality checks · Supplier / third party evaluation and onboarding documents · Non-conformity/complaint information · Traceability documentation [29:40] What is the output from a Gap Analysis? We look at all of this and compare it against the requirements of the Standard to see where you currently stand. In our case, we do this on a spreadsheet with a simple scoring system to give you an overview of what you already have in place and what needs to be addressed. In many cases, businesses already have a lot of the required documentation, but don't have it tied together in one cohesive system. So a large part of implementation is consolidating that existing documentation, process ect. Into an accessible and easily understood system. The key thing to remember is that this is not an audit. The evidence required does not have to be as detailed as an audit; some things can be taken on trust or face value. At this stage we aren't demonstrating anything to a certification body, and you are not being judged. We are simply looking at what needs to be done to achieve full Implementation or certification. If you'd like assistance with carrying out a Gap Analysis, get in contact with us, we'd be happy to help. We'd love to hear your views and comments about the ISO Show, here's how: ● Share the ISO Show on Twitter or Linkedin ● Leave an honest review on iTunes or Soundcloud. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. Subscribe to keep up-to-date with our latest episodes: Stitcher | Spotify | YouTube |iTunes | Soundcloud | Mailing List
The most common male infertility procedures are varicocele ligation, vasectomy reversal, and sperm retrieval for IVF. Peter Kolettis, M.D., a urologist, explains the purposes and steps of each procedure. He discusses working with colleagues in reproductive endocrinology to support each couple's goals. Learn how urologists counsel patients to understand the factors that influence success with fertility procedures.
Navigating the Legal Labyrinth: A Deep Dive into Civil ProcedureThis conversation explores the essential skills required for success in legal education, emphasizing the importance of civil procedure and legal research and writing. The discussion highlights how mastering these foundational skills early can significantly ease the challenges faced in law school and contribute to a successful legal career.Imagine embarking on a journey through the intricate pathways of the American legal system. Civil procedure is not just a set of rules; it's the skeleton that supports the entire litigation process. This blog post explores the foundational elements of civil procedure, offering insights into its critical role in shaping legal outcomes.Understanding Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction is the cornerstone of any legal case, determining which court has the authority to hear a case. It encompasses subject matter jurisdiction, which relates to the type of case, and personal jurisdiction, which concerns the parties involved. These concepts are akin to untangling holiday lights—complex at first, but illuminating once understood.The Role of Pleadings: Pleadings are the opening act of a lawsuit, setting the stage for the legal drama to unfold. They must be crafted with precision, presenting a plausible claim that withstands judicial scrutiny. The evolution of the plausibility standard has raised the bar, requiring detailed factual allegations to proceed.Discovery and Its Challenges: Discovery is the phase where the curtain rises, revealing the facts of the case. It's a powerful tool for truth-finding but can become a quagmire of excessive demands and disputes. The principle of proportionality ensures that discovery remains focused and relevant to the case's needs.The Art of Legal Writing: Legal writing is the bridge between knowledge and persuasion. It requires clarity, precision, and a deep understanding of both predictive and persuasive writing styles. Whether drafting a motion or an appellate brief, the ability to communicate effectively is paramount.Civil procedure and legal writing are the twin pillars of a successful legal career. Mastering these skills provides a map and a compass, guiding lawyers through the complexities of litigation. As you navigate your legal journey, remember that these foundational skills will serve you well, both in law school and beyond.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights into the legal world.TakeawaysCivil procedure and legal research are foundational skills.Mastering them early provides a roadmap for success.Strong communication skills are essential in law.Navigating law school challenges requires preparation.Building a legal career starts with strong foundations.Legal writing is a critical component of legal education.Understanding civil procedure is crucial for all lawyers.Effective research skills enhance legal practice.The journey through law school is manageable with the right skills.Investing time in foundational skills pays off in the long run.legal education, civil procedure, legal research, law school, foundational skills, legal writing, career development, communication skills
Navigating the Complexities of Civil Procedure: A Deep DiveThis conversation delves into the complexities of the Erie Doctrine, which governs the relationship between federal and state courts in diversity cases. It highlights the foundational case of Erie Railroad v. Tompkins and discusses the constitutional limitations on federal courts regarding substantive law.In the realm of law, understanding the nuances of civil procedure is crucial for any aspiring lawyer. This blog post delves into the final critical segment of civil procedure, focusing on appellate review, the Erie doctrine, and preclusion. These elements are foundational for success in exams and real-world applications, demanding a disciplined sequential analysis.Appellate Review: The Path to Correctness Appellate review is a cornerstone of the legal process, ensuring that decisions are made correctly. It involves a multi-step framework, applying rules from statutes and major Supreme Court precedents. The final judgment rule, as outlined in 28 USC section 1291, is pivotal, granting jurisdiction to courts of appeals only from final decisions. This principle prevents piecemeal appeals, maintaining efficiency in the legal system.The Erie Doctrine: Balancing State and Federal Power The Erie doctrine is a complex area of civil procedure, defining the power dynamic between federal and state courts. It mandates that federal courts apply state substantive law and federal procedural law in diversity cases. The doctrine's twin aims are to prevent forum shopping and ensure the equitable administration of laws. Understanding this doctrine is essential for navigating the intricacies of civil procedure.Preclusion: Ensuring Finality in Litigation Preclusion, encompassing claim and issue preclusion, is vital for maintaining the finality of judgments. Claim preclusion prevents parties from relitigating claims that were or could have been raised in a previous action. Issue preclusion bars the re-litigation of specific issues decided in a prior case. These doctrines ensure that once a case is decided, it remains resolved, promoting stability in the legal system.The Interconnected System of Civil Procedure Civil procedure is an interconnected system, balancing competing values of justice and finality. As you prepare for exams or practice law, remember the importance of a disciplined approach. Understanding appellate review, the Erie doctrine, and preclusion will equip you with the tools needed to navigate the legal landscape effectively.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in civil procedure and other legal topics.TakeawaysThe Erie Doctrine is a critical area of civil procedure.It defines the relationship between federal and state courts.Federal courts must apply state substantive law in diversity cases.The Erie Doctrine emerged from Erie Railroad v. Tompkins.Federal courts cannot create their own substantive law.The 10th Amendment plays a key role in this dynamic.State law governs areas like contract, tort, and property law.The Rules of Decision Act is essential to understanding this issue.The shift from federal common law to state law was significant.Understanding the Erie Doctrine is essential for legal practitioners.Erie Doctrine, federal courts, state law, diversity jurisdiction, civil procedure
Get more value from the technology you already own. It's Not Just the NumbersWith Penny Breslin and Damien GreatheadFor CPA TrendlinesWhen accountants and bookkeepers talk about building a scalable, profitable firm, the conversation often jumps straight to technology. Which workflow app is best? Should we move payroll into a dedicated platform? Is our practice management system due for an upgrade? But as Penny Breslin and Damien Greathead emphasize in the latest episode of It's Not Just the Numbers, software is only as good as the processes that support it. Without consistent policies and documented procedures, even the most advanced tech stack will fail to deliver efficiency or profitability. MORE Penny Breslin and Damien Greathead | MORE Advisory & Consulting | BUY "It's Not Just the Numbers" This lesson is especially crucial for firms offering Client Advisory Services (CAS). Advisory work depends on reliable, timely data and standardized outputs. If every accountant on the team closes the books differently, it doesn't just create inefficiency; it undermines the consistency and trust that clients rely on.
Navigating the Complexities of Civil Procedure: A Deep Dive into Adjudication Devices and Class ActionsThe conversation delves into the intricate balance within the justice system, highlighting the tension between efficiency and the fundamental right to justice. It emphasizes the importance of not sacrificing the essence of justice for the sake of speed and efficiency, as articulated by Justice Hugo Black. The discussion raises critical questions about the legal rules that govern access to the courts and the potential barriers they create for individuals seeking justice.In the realm of civil procedure, understanding the strategic application of legal rules is crucial for both law students and practicing attorneys. This blog post delves into the critical mechanics of how lawsuits are resolved, focusing on the federal rules of civil procedure, including involuntary dismissal, summary judgment, and class actions.The Power of Rule 41B: Involuntary DismissalRule 41B serves as a judicial management tool, allowing courts to dismiss cases where plaintiffs fail to prosecute or comply with court orders. This rule underscores the tension between judicial efficiency and the right to a fair trial. A staggering 86.3% of cases where judges apply multi-factor tests result in involuntary dismissal, highlighting the importance of understanding this rule's application.Summary Judgment: Cutting to the MeritsRule 56, or summary judgment, allows for the resolution of cases without a trial when there are no genuine disputes over material facts. The 1986 Supreme Court trilogy revolutionized its application, making it a primary tool for case management. Understanding the burden of proof and the evidentiary standards applied at this stage is essential for any legal professional.Class Actions and Rule 23: A Complex LandscapeRule 23 governs class actions, providing a framework for collective legal action. The rule's categories—B1, B2, and B3—address different legal scenarios, from avoiding inconsistent adjudications to seeking injunctive relief. The predominance and superiority tests for B3 class actions are particularly challenging, requiring careful navigation to ensure the best outcome for all class members.Balancing Efficiency and JusticeThe federal rules of civil procedure are designed to ensure a just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of cases. However, the balance between efficiency and individual justice remains a central policy question. As legal professionals, understanding these rules and their implications is key to mastering civil procedure and advocating effectively for clients.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in legal practice and civil procedure.TakeawaysThese incredibly powerful rules shine a spotlight on this fundamental tension.In our rush to be efficient, we might accidentally sacrifice justice.Speed is good, but it can't come at the cost of someone's basic right to be heard.The question is where to draw the line between necessary tools and barriers.These rules are not just technical things to memorize for a test.Justice Hugo Black warned us about the dangers of prioritizing efficiency.The essence of the courts is to deliver justice, not just clear dockets.We must consider the impact of legal rules on real claims.Navigating the justice system requires careful consideration of efficiency and rights.The conversation challenges us to think critically about access to justice.justice system, efficiency, legal barriers, court rights, Hugo Black, balancing act, legal claims, court efficiency, justice delivery, legal rules
November 21, 2025 In this episode, Scott, Mark, and Ray Painter explore the reimbursement challenges surrounding procedures that may not be covered by insurance, including those considered cosmetic, elective, or medically unnecessary. They discuss how to identify whether a service is reimbursable, when to use ABNs, how different payer rules come into play, and why collecting upfront may be the smartest move. You'll also hear strategies for handling denials, gray-area procedures, and why knowing the rules—and your contracts—can make all the difference.Urology Advanced Coding and Reimbursement SeminarInformation and RegistrationPRS Coding and Reimbursement HubAccess the HubFree Kidney Stone Coding CalculatorDownload NowPRS Coding CoursesFor UrologistFor APPsFor Coders, Billers, and AdminsPRS Billing and Other Services - Book a Call with Mark Painter or Marianne DescioseClick Here to Get More Information and Request a Quote Join the Urology Pharma and Tech Pioneer GroupEmpowering urology practices to adopt new technology faster by providing clear reimbursement strategies—ensuring the practice gets paid and patients benefit sooner. https://www.prsnetwork.com/joinuptpClick Here to Start Your Free Trial of AUACodingToday.com The Thriving Urology Practice Facebook group.The Thriving Urology Practice Facebook Group link to join:https://www.facebook.com/groups/ThrivingPractice/
Navigating the Complex World of Civil Procedure: Discovery and Its ImpactThis conversation provides a comprehensive overview of discovery in law, focusing on the rules and strategies essential for law students preparing for exams and practicing attorneys. It covers the scope of discovery, the tools available, mandatory disclosures, the importance of expert testimony, and the implications of electronically stored information (ESI). The discussion also delves into the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine, as well as the potential sanctions for failing to comply with discovery rules. The conversation concludes with practical exam strategies and reflections on the justice system's approach to truth and proportionality.In the realm of civil litigation, discovery is often where the real battle is fought. As law students and practitioners alike know, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Chapter Five, can make or break a case long before it reaches the courtroom. This blog post delves into the critical aspects of discovery, offering insights and strategies to navigate this complex terrain.Understanding the Scope and ProportionalityThe foundation of discovery lies in Rule 26B1, which governs the scope of what can be requested. Historically, discovery aimed to eliminate trial by ambush, ensuring full disclosure. However, the rise of electronically stored information (ESI) has transformed the landscape, leading to a paradigm shift in 2015. The focus has shifted from mere relevance to proportionality, requiring that requests be non-privileged, relevant, and proportional to the needs of the case.The Six Factors of ProportionalityTo determine proportionality, courts consider six factors: the importance of the issues at stake, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to information, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Understanding these factors is crucial for any legal professional navigating discovery disputes.The Role of Privilege and Work ProductTwo critical shields in discovery are attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. While privilege protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client, work product safeguards materials prepared in anticipation of litigation. These doctrines are essential for protecting sensitive information and ensuring a fair adversarial process.Sanctions and ComplianceFailure to comply with discovery rules can lead to severe sanctions under Rule 37. From exclusion of evidence to default judgments, the consequences of non-compliance underscore the importance of adhering to discovery obligations. Understanding the nuances of these rules is vital for avoiding costly mistakes.As you prepare for exams or practice law, remember that discovery is not just about gathering information—it's about strategy, compliance, and understanding the rules that govern the process. By mastering the intricacies of discovery, you can effectively navigate the legal landscape and achieve favorable outcomes for your clients.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest legal insights and strategies.TakeawaysDiscovery is crucial for case outcomes.Understanding proportionality is key in discovery.The burden of proof lies with the resisting party.Mandatory disclosures streamline the discovery process.Interrogatories help clarify facts and contentions.Corporate depositions require thorough preparation.ESI has transformed litigation practices.Attorney-client privilege is easily waived.Work product doctrine protects legal strategies.Sanctions enforce compliance with discovery rules.law school, discovery, civil procedure, bar exam, legal education, attorney-client privilege, ESI, sanctions, legal strategy, exam preparation
Chapter 7! Opening, of course, with a new mishnah: Still, with regard to bird offerings, with all the proper details of a sin-offering for the offering to be valid. And then cases that changes an element, such that the sin-offering is incorrectly offered - whether in procedure or intent, the offerings are then invalid -- though not judged for karet. And likewise, the same review for the bird burnt-offering, olah. Also, another long mishnah - with a shift to focus on dead body of the bird, and when "nevalah" - the impurity of the body of a dead animal - might kick in, or not - because the offering does not carry that kind of impurity, or shouldn't, depending on the terms. Going back to me'ilah - the misuse of that which has been consecrated. Plus, can there be misuse of a bird olah, as consecrated? It's a machloket.
Navigating the Complex World of Civil Procedure: Pleadings, Motions, and JoinderThis conversation delves into the intricacies of civil procedure, focusing on the rules governing pleadings, motions, and joinder. It emphasizes the importance of understanding Federal Rule 15, particularly in the context of amending pleadings and the implications of the 2009 amendments. The discussion covers the dynamics of amending pleadings, judicial discretion, the Fomen factors, relation back under Rule 15C, and the logical relationship test for joinder. The overarching theme is the balance between procedural flexibility and the defendant's right to fair notice, culminating in strategies for law students preparing for exams.In the realm of civil procedure, understanding the nuances of pleadings, motions, and joinder can be the difference between winning and losing a case. This blog post delves into the critical aspects of these legal processes, offering insights and strategies for law students and practitioners alike.Imagine you're preparing for a civil procedure exam or facing the daunting bar exam. The chapter on pleadings, motions, and joinder is not just a collection of technicalities; it's where cases are won and lost. This post serves as your guide to mastering these essential rules.Amending Pleadings: Federal Rule 15 is your safety valve when it comes to amending pleadings. It allows for amendments as a matter of course, providing a crucial opportunity to correct mistakes without court intervention. However, timing is everything. The 2009 amendment to Rule 15A1 changed the landscape, closing the "free ride" loophole and emphasizing the importance of acting within the 21-day window.The Doctrine of Relation Back: When the statute of limitations looms, the doctrine of relation back can be a lifesaver. It allows new claims to be treated as if they were filed with the original complaint, provided they arise from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence. This legal time machine ensures that valid claims aren't dismissed on technical grounds.Joinder of Parties: Rule 20A's permissive joinder allows for the inclusion of multiple parties in a single case, provided the claims arise from the same transaction or series of transactions. This rule promotes efficiency and convenience, enabling the consolidation of related claims into one cohesive lawsuit.The modern procedural landscape is designed to be flexible, balancing the need for efficiency with the defendant's right to fair notice. As you prepare for exams or navigate real-world cases, remember that mastering these rules is key to success. The Supreme Court's decisions in Twombly and Iqbal have raised the bar for pleadings, making Rule 15's liberal amendment policy more crucial than ever.Subscribe Now: Stay informed and ahead of the curve by subscribing to our blog for more insights into civil procedure and other legal topics.TakeawaysThese rules can be the difference between your claim surviving.Understanding the dynamics of amending pleadings is crucial.The 2009 amendment to Rule 15 changed the game.Judicial discretion plays a significant role in amendments.The Fomen factors are essential for understanding amendment denials.Relation back under Rule 15C is a powerful tool.Joinder of claims and parties enhances efficiency in litigation.The logical relationship test is key for joinder.Efficiency in civil procedure is paramount for case management.Exam strategies should focus on the continuous period model for amendments.Civil Procedure, Rule 15, Amending Pleadings, Joinder, Legal Exam, Fomen Factors, Relation Back, Legal Strategy, Law School, Exam Preparation
Labiaplasty is one of the most private concerns women have — and one of the least discussed. Despite how common it is, many women feel too embarrassed, too unsure, or too unsupported to seek real answers.Today, we're breaking that silence. In this candid episode of Plastic Surgery Uncensored, Dr. Rady Rahban takes you through a clear, respectful, medically accurate deep dive into labiaplasty — from anatomy, to indications, to realistic recovery, to what can go wrong in the wrong hands. Why are so many women secretly struggling with discomfort, asymmetry, irritation, or self-consciousness?Why is this procedure often misunderstood — and why is it now being performed by a range of providers with wildly different techniques?And why, despite all the stigma, is labiaplasty consistently one of the highest-satisfaction procedures in plastic surgery?Dr. Rahban walks step-by-step through:The real anatomy of the labia minora, labia majora, clitoral hood, and introitusThe most common reasons women seek labiaplasty (hygiene, comfort, intimacy, symmetry, confidence)The technique he trusts: simple, precise linear excisionWhat to avoid — including aggressive over-resection that can cause irreversible damageRecovery timelines and what is actually normalAdjunct options like labia majora volume restoration and clitoral hood refinementWhat's fact, what's fiction, and what's simply not supported by scienceThis episode was designed for every woman who has ever wondered, “Is this normal?” but felt too embarrassed to ask. It's for the friend, sister, or patient suffering quietly because she doesn't know where to turn for real information — not the sensationalized, inaccurate content found online. Education is empowerment. And for many women, understanding this procedure can be life-changing.If this episode brings you clarity, please leave a review — and share it with the women you love. You never know who has been silently struggling and just needed someone to open the conversation.✨ If you enjoyed this episode of Plastic Surgery Uncensored:✔️ Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.✔️ Rate & Review—your feedback helps more people find us.✔️ Follow Dr. Rady Rahban across all platforms for daily insights, behind-the-scenes, and patient education:Instagram: @drradyrahbanTikTok: @radyrahbanMDYouTube: @Rady RahbanFacebook: @Rady Rahban✔️ Share this episode with someone considering plastic surgery—the right knowledge can save a life.
Understanding Personal Jurisdiction: A Deep Dive into Civil ProcedureThis conversation provides a comprehensive overview of personal jurisdiction in civil procedure, tracing its historical evolution from rigid territorial rules to the modern minimum contacts standard. It discusses the critical components of specific and general jurisdiction, the importance of service of process, and the procedural traps that can arise in legal practice. The conversation emphasizes the need for law students to master these concepts for exams and highlights future challenges in jurisdiction as technology evolves.In the complex world of civil procedure, personal jurisdiction stands as a pivotal concept that can determine the validity of a lawsuit. This doctrine, often referred to as "PJ," is the cornerstone of asserting judicial power over a defendant. But what exactly does it entail, and why is it so crucial?The Evolution of Personal JurisdictionThe journey of personal jurisdiction begins with the landmark case of Pennoyer v. Neff in 1877, which established jurisdiction based on territorial sovereignty. This meant that a court's power was strictly limited to its borders, requiring physical presence for jurisdiction to be valid. However, as commerce expanded and the world became more interconnected, this rigid model proved inadequate.Enter the revolutionary case of International Shoe Co. v. Washington in 1945, which shifted the focus from mere geography to fairness. The court introduced the "minimum contacts" standard, allowing jurisdiction if a defendant had sufficient connections with the state, even without physical presence. This was a seismic shift, emphasizing fairness and due process over strict territoriality.The Modern Framework: Specific vs. General JurisdictionToday, personal jurisdiction is analyzed through two main lenses: specific and general jurisdiction. Specific jurisdiction applies when a claim arises directly from a defendant's activities within the state. In contrast, general jurisdiction is broader, allowing a court to hear any claim against a defendant if their connections to the state are so continuous and systematic that they are essentially "at home" there.Navigating the Procedural TrapsFor law students, understanding personal jurisdiction is not just about knowing the rules but also about avoiding procedural pitfalls. One critical trap is the waiver of personal jurisdiction defense. Under federal rule 12, a defendant must raise this issue in their first communication with the court, or risk losing it forever.The Balance of Fairness and FederalismThe doctrine of personal jurisdiction is more than just a set of rules; it embodies the balance between state sovereignty and individual fairness. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, especially with the rise of digital and global commerce, the principles of foreseeability and voluntariness remain at the heart of jurisdictional analysis.Stay tuned as we continue to explore the dynamic world of civil procedure and equip you with the knowledge to ace your exams. Subscribe now for more insights and updates!TakeawaysPersonal jurisdiction is foundational to civil procedure.Without proper personal jurisdiction, all procedural steps are void.The historical evolution of jurisdiction reflects changes in society.The minimum contacts test is essential for determining jurisdiction.Specific jurisdiction arises from the defendant's activities in the state.General jurisdiction is much harder to establish today.Tag jurisdiction allows for jurisdiction based on physical presence.Service of process must comply with strict requirements.Lack of personal jurisdiction must be raised immediately to avoid waiver.The law surrounding jurisdiction is evolving with technology.personal jurisdiction, civil procedure, minimum contacts, specific jurisdiction, general jurisdiction, service of process, legal history, exam strategies, jurisdictional challenges, fairness
Dr. Michael Blankstein chats with Dr. Jo De Schepper about study findings of the paper: "Local Osteo-Enhancement Procedure Significantly Increases Bone Mineral Density in the Proximal Femur of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis at High Risk of Hip Fracture" in the first part of the episode. In the second part, Dr. Blankstein speaks with Dr. Clayton R. Welsh about the results of their study entitled: "The Effect of Fully Threaded Screws on Valgus Collapse in Garden One and Two Femoral Neck Fractures." Live from the 2025 OTA Annual Meeting. For additional educational resources visit OTA.org
Commentary by Dr. Jian'an Wang.
Understanding Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A Key to Navigating Federal CourtsThis conversation delves into the complexities of subject matter jurisdiction (SMJ) in federal courts, emphasizing its foundational importance for legal exams and practice. The discussion covers federal question jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, supplemental jurisdiction, and the removal process, providing insights into key rules and exceptions that govern these areas. The speakers aim to equip listeners with a structured analysis to navigate jurisdictional issues effectively, highlighting the critical distinctions and procedural nuances that can impact case outcomes.Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ) is a fundamental concept in the legal world, especially for those preparing for exams like the bar or Civ Pro finals. It's the gatekeeper to the federal court system, determining whether a court has the authority to hear a particular type of case. Understanding SMJ is crucial, as a misstep can lead to a case being dismissed outright.Federal Question Jurisdiction: One of the primary ways to establish SMJ is through federal question jurisdiction, which applies to cases arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. The well-pleaded complaint rule is central here, requiring that the federal issue be a necessary element of the plaintiff's claim. The landmark case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Motley illustrates this principle, emphasizing that anticipated defenses do not suffice to establish federal jurisdiction.Diversity Jurisdiction: Another pathway into federal court is diversity jurisdiction, which requires complete diversity of citizenship between parties and an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000. This jurisdictional basis aims to protect out-of-state litigants from potential local bias. However, the rules are strict, with complete diversity being a non-negotiable requirement.Supplemental Jurisdiction: Supplemental jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear additional state law claims related to a case already under federal jurisdiction. This is governed by Section 1367, which codifies older doctrines like pendant and ancillary jurisdiction. However, in diversity-only cases, Section 1367B imposes limitations to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing the complete diversity requirement.Removal and Remand: The process of moving a case from state to federal court is known as removal, a tool available exclusively to defendants. The rules are stringent, with a 30-day deadline for filing a notice of removal and a one-year cap for diversity cases. The forum defendant rule further restricts removal in diversity cases if any defendant is a citizen of the state where the action is pending.Navigating the intricacies of subject matter jurisdiction is essential for legal practitioners. By understanding the pathways and limitations of federal question and diversity jurisdiction, as well as the nuances of supplemental jurisdiction and removal, one can effectively maneuver through the federal court system. For those preparing for exams, mastering these concepts is key to success.Subscribe now to stay updated on more legal insights and deepen your understanding of complex legal topics.TakeawaysSMJ is crucial for federal court access.Federal courts have limited jurisdiction defined by the Constitution and Congress.The well-pleaded complaint rule is essential for federal question jurisdiction.Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity and an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000.The Grable exception allows state law claims with significant federal issues to be heard in federal court.Supplemental jurisdiction allows related claims to be heard together in federal court.Subject Matter Jurisdiction, SMJ, Federal Question, Diversity Jurisdiction, Supplemental Jurisdiction, Removal Process, Legal Exam Tips, Civil Procedure, Federal Courts, Jurisdictional Analysis
The Law School Toolbox Podcast: Tools for Law Students from 1L to the Bar Exam, and Beyond
Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! Today we're talking about the rules and timing of the different types of criminal identification procedures. This is Part 1 of a two-part episode. In this episode we discuss: Types of criminal identifications procedures Timing of identifications procedures and right to counsel Due process in identifications procedures Analysis of a hypothetical scenario Resources: "Listen and Learn" series (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/law-school-toolbox-podcast-substantive-law-topics/#listen-learn) California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, February 2003 (https://nwculaw.edu/pdf/bar/February%202003%20Essays%20and%20Sample%20Answers.pdf) Podcast Episode 290: Listen and Learn – Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Miranda Rights (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-290-listen-and-learn-privilege-against-self-incrimination-and-miranda-rights/) Podcast Episode 295: Listen and Learn – Due Process and Equal Protection (Con Law) (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-295-listen-and-learn-due-process-and-equal-protection-con-law/) Podcast Episode 330: Listen and Learn – The Sixth Amendment (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/podcast-episode-330-listen-and-learn-the-sixth-amendment/) SpacedRepetition.com (https://spacedrepetition.com/) Download the Transcript (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/episode-530-listen-and-learn-criminal-procedure-identifications-part-1/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/law-school-toolbox-podcast/id1027603976) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website (http://lawschooltoolbox.com/contact). If you're concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox (http://barexamtoolbox.com/). You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter (https://lawschooltoolbox.com/get-law-school-podcast-updates/) to make sure you never miss an episode! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee
Navigating the Complexities of Civil Procedure: Jurisdiction and VenueThis conversation provides a comprehensive overview of civil procedure, focusing on the essential elements needed to navigate the complexities of lawsuits in America. It covers the foundational concepts of subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue, along with the importance of pleadings, joinder, summary judgment, and the Erie doctrine. The discussion emphasizes the procedural traps and analytical frameworks necessary for success in civil procedure exams and practice.In the intricate world of civil procedure, understanding the foundational elements of jurisdiction and venue is crucial for any aspiring lawyer. These concepts are not just academic exercises; they are the keys to unlocking the courtroom doors.The Three Keys to the CourthouseImagine the courthouse as a fortress with three locked doors: subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue. Each door requires a unique key, and they must be unlocked in a specific order. Subject matter jurisdiction determines the court's power over the type of case, personal jurisdiction assesses the court's authority over the defendant, and venue ensures the trial is held in the most appropriate location.Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The First GateFederal courts, unlike their state counterparts, are courts of limited jurisdiction. They can only hear cases authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The two main pathways into federal court are federal question jurisdiction, where the plaintiff's claim is based on federal law, and diversity jurisdiction, involving parties from different states with a dispute exceeding $75,000.Personal Jurisdiction: Fairness and Due ProcessPersonal jurisdiction is rooted in the due process clause, ensuring fairness to the defendant. The landmark case of International Shoe introduced the concept of "minimum contacts," shifting the focus from physical presence to the defendant's actions and intentions within the state.Venue: The Final StepVenue is about convenience and geography, determining the most logical courthouse for the trial. Governed by statutory rules, venue is typically proper where any defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events occurred.The Evolving LandscapeAs the legal landscape evolves, particularly with the rise of the internet, the application of these rules continues to be a dynamic and challenging area of law. Understanding and mastering these procedural elements is essential for success in both exams and practice.Subscribe Now to stay updated on the latest insights and developments in civil procedure.TakeawaysCivil procedure is a step-by-step logic puzzle.Subject matter jurisdiction (SMJ) is crucial for any case.Personal jurisdiction (PJ) focuses on fairness to the defendant.Venue is about convenience and geographic location.Pleadings must meet specific standards to survive motions to dismiss.Joinder rules allow for efficient litigation of related claims.Summary judgment can resolve cases before trial if no material facts are in dispute.The Erie doctrine determines which law applies in federal diversity cases.Preclusion doctrines prevent relitigation of claims and issues.Understanding these concepts is essential for success in civil procedure.Civil Procedure, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction, Venue, Pleadings, Joinder, Summary Judgment, Erie Doctrine, Preclusion
This episode continues the study of the laws of Shabbos as they relate to performing a circumcision on the eighth day when it falls on Shabbos. The discussion covers which preparations must be done before Shabbos and which may not be performed on Shabbos itself. The episode reviews the rules for transporting the knife, when one may ask a non-Jew to assist with rabbinic prohibitions, and the status of the knife as muktzeh after the procedure. Practical guidance is provided on avoiding unnecessary carrying, safeguarding the knife, and prioritizing where the baby or knife should be brought.
Welcome to the Sterile Technique Podcast! It's the podcast about Surgical Technology. Whether you are a CST or CSFA, this podcast helps you earn CE credits and improve both your surgical knowledge and skills in the OR. This episode discusses the cover article of the November 2025 issue of The Surgical Technologist, the official journal of the Association of Surgical Technologists (AST). The article is titled, "Partial Heart Transplant Procedure, Part 2". "Scrub in" at steriletpodcast.com and on Twitter, @SterileTPodcast (twitter.com/SterileTPodcast). This podcast is a Dybas Media production. Sound effects adapted from GarageBand and sindhu.tms at https://freesound.org/people/sindhu.tms/sounds/169065/ and licensed courtesy of https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
Special Advocates in the Adversarial System (Routledge, 2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party in closed trials. Professor John Jackson's empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book tackles issues of accountability and the ethical concerns surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice. Professor John Jackson is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network
Special Advocates in the Adversarial System (Routledge, 2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party in closed trials. Professor John Jackson's empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book tackles issues of accountability and the ethical concerns surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice. Professor John Jackson is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/national-security
Special Advocates in the Adversarial System (Routledge, 2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party in closed trials. Professor John Jackson's empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book tackles issues of accountability and the ethical concerns surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice. Professor John Jackson is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law
Ever wondered what it really means to undergo a thyroidectomy -- surgery to remove your thyroid? Why is it done? What are the risks and rewards? How does life look when you're living without a thyroid? In this episode, we're diving deep into a journey some of you with thyroid disorders face: removal, recovery, and rebuilding.What you'll learn: The why: From persistent symptoms in Hashimoto's thyroiditis to nodules, goiter, or cancer — when thyroid removal becomes the next step. We unpack when surgery is recommended and what you should ask before saying “yes”. The how & what: What does a thyroidectomy entail? What types exist (partial vs total)? What does recovery look like—short-term, long-term? The pros & cons: On one hand, removal can relieve stubborn symptoms or eliminate recurring issues. On the other hand: surgical risks (voice changes, parathyroid damage, hypocalcemia), lifelong hormone replacement, and unexpected challenges. We also answer the big question: “Can you live without a thyroid gland?” You'll also get an action plan: If you're facing or have had a thyroidectomy: how to optimize your hormone replacement, protect your voice and calcium levels, monitor your antibody/autoimmune activity (yes, even without a thyroid your body's immune system still matters). Why you'll want to listen? Because removing your thyroid isn't just a “cut and heal” procedure—it rewires your hormone landscape, your metabolism, your self-care routine. Whether you're newly diagnosed, considering surgery, or navigating life post-thyroidectomy, this episode arms you with the knowledge, nuance, and confidence to ask the right questions and take ownership of your health.
Note: Over the next couple of weeks I need everyone to be on the lookout for guests & visitors making sure that they 1) are given a Connection Card and encouraged to fill it out and 2) that guests - after the service - are given a gift. Opening: Last week we wrapped up looking at “Presenting the Gospel.”…
Understanding Personal Jurisdiction: A Deep Dive into Civil ProcedureThe conversation delves into the landmark Supreme Court case Daimler AG v. Bauman, exploring the complexities of jurisdiction and corporate liability in a global context. It highlights the legal arguments surrounding whether a foreign parent company can be sued in the U.S. based on the activities of its subsidiary.Imagine a courtroom drama where the stakes are high, and the rules of engagement are as complex as they are crucial. Welcome to the world of personal jurisdiction, a foundational concept in civil procedure that determines a court's power to make decisions affecting a defendant. In this post, we unravel the intricacies of personal jurisdiction, exploring its evolution and its pivotal role in the legal landscape.The Evolution of Personal Jurisdiction: Personal jurisdiction has undergone significant transformation, from the rigid territorial rules of the 19th century to the more nuanced "minimum contacts" test established by the landmark case, International Shoe Co. v. Washington. This shift marked a move from raw territorial power to a focus on fairness and relational connections, ensuring that defendants are not unfairly dragged into distant courts.Key Concepts and Cases:Pennoyer v. Neff: The starting point for understanding jurisdiction, emphasizing physical presence within state borders. International Shoe Co. v. Washington: Introduced the "minimum contacts" test, balancing state power with fairness to defendants. Daimler AG v. Bauman: Clarified the limits of general jurisdiction, focusing on where a corporation is "essentially at home."Practical Implications: For law students and practitioners, mastering personal jurisdiction is essential. It involves understanding the balance between state interests and defendant rights, the procedural mechanics of service and notice, and the strategic considerations in litigation.As we navigate the complexities of personal jurisdiction, we are reminded of its critical role in ensuring justice and fairness in the legal system. Whether you're preparing for an exam or engaging in legal practice, a deep understanding of these principles is indispensable.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in civil procedure and beyond.TakeawaysThe case revolves around jurisdiction and corporate liability.Daimler AG v. Bauman is a landmark Supreme Court case.The plaintiff argued for jurisdiction based on subsidiary activities.The case raises questions about global corporate accountability.Jurisdictional challenges are common in international law.The ruling has implications for how corporations operate globally.Legal precedents shape future cases involving corporate liability.Understanding jurisdiction is crucial for law students.The case illustrates the intersection of law and international business.Corporate structures can complicate legal accountability.Daimler AG, Bauman, jurisdiction, corporate liability, Supreme Court, California, global law, legal precedent
LEARN MORE at http://teach4theheart.com/363 Struggling to keep your art, music, Spanish, or PE class running smoothly? What works in a traditional classroom may not always translate to specials or elective classes. Listen in as Linda and a team member unpack proven classroom management strategies every specials teacher needs to create order, build relationships, and keep learning on track. 00:00 Introduction to Classroom Management for Specials Teachers 03:36 Understanding the Unique Challenges of Specials Classes 06:29 The Importance of Structure and Procedures 09:25 Effective Classroom Management Strategies 12:40 Dealing with Misbehavior in Specials Classes 16:23 Building Relationships with Students 19:24 Final Thoughts and Encouragement for Specials Teachers Resources/Links Mentioned: Classroom Procedures That Will Save Your Sanity: https://teach4theheart.com/procedures Classroom Management 101: https://teach4theheart.com/cm101
Jodi is Murphy's emergency contact today because of a procedure he's having. Come along! #family See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Tra le altre notizie: le aziende dei paesi europei, Italia inclusa, sono sempre più bersaglio dei crimini cyber: il sequestro dei dati e la richiesta di riscatto in testa. Strutture sportive, in Italia sono vecchie e poco efficienti: la capienza nei grandi impianti è sotto il 60% Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
A Skamania County Sheriff's Office report concluded the Clark County Council violated the County Charter, procedural rules, and the Open Public Meetings Act when removing Councilor Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN Board, citing collusion and recommending fines and reinstatement. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/opinion-skamania-co-sheriffs-report-says-clark-county-council-violated-the-county-charter-rules-of-procedure-and-was-open-public-meetings-act/ #ClarkCounty #OPMA #ClarkCountyCouncil #SkamaniaCounty #MichelleBelkot #CTRAN #WashingtonPolitics #WAGOP #LightRailFunding #GovernmentAccountability
A reading of the Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH) Appendix A. Checkout: www.wifiCFI.com for more audiobook readings and:STUDY COURSES (click any to try free!)Private Pilot >Instrument Rating >Commercial Pilot >CFI Study Course > CFII Study Course > Multi Engine Add-On > CHECKRIDE LESSON PLANS (click any to try free!)CFI Lesson Plans >CFII Lesson Plans > MEI Add-On Lesson Plans >TEACHING COURSES (click any to try free!)Teach Private Pilot >Teach Instrument Rating >Teach Commercial Pilot >Teach CFI Initial >Teach CFII Add-On >Support the show
Thanks to our Sponsor, BetterHelp! Our listeners get 10% off their first month at BetterHelp.com/SpillTheBeans Thanks to our Sponsor, Tovala! For a limited time, because you are a Spill the Beans listener, you can save up to $300 on the Tovala smart oven when you order meals 6+ times by heading to Tovala.com/BEANS and use our code BEANS Hit the FOLLOW button and TURN ON Notifications so you never miss an episode! If you enjoyed this episode, leave a review and make sure you subscribe! And if you are interested in advertising on this podcast or having Blanca and Jonathan as guests on your Podcast, Radio Show, or TV Show, reach out to podcast@yeamediagroup.com You can WATCH the Podcast on YOUTUBE Follow STB on INSTAGRAM Visit our STORE OUR OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA INSTAGRAM @jonathaanfloress @iblancaj TIK TOK @spillthebeanspodcast @iblancaj @jonathaanfloress18 YOUTUBE @blancaj @jjvlogs3547 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
A reading of the Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH) Chapter 7. Checkout: www.wifiCFI.com for more audiobook readings and:STUDY COURSES (click any to try free!)Private Pilot >Instrument Rating >Commercial Pilot >CFI Study Course > CFII Study Course > Multi Engine Add-On > CHECKRIDE LESSON PLANS (click any to try free!)CFI Lesson Plans >CFII Lesson Plans > MEI Add-On Lesson Plans >TEACHING COURSES (click any to try free!)Teach Private Pilot >Teach Instrument Rating >Teach Commercial Pilot >Teach CFI Initial >Teach CFII Add-On >Support the show
A reading of the Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH) Chapter 6. Checkout: www.wifiCFI.com for more audiobook readings and:STUDY COURSES (click any to try free!)Private Pilot >Instrument Rating >Commercial Pilot >CFI Study Course > CFII Study Course > Multi Engine Add-On > CHECKRIDE LESSON PLANS (click any to try free!)CFI Lesson Plans >CFII Lesson Plans > MEI Add-On Lesson Plans >TEACHING COURSES (click any to try free!)Teach Private Pilot >Teach Instrument Rating >Teach Commercial Pilot >Teach CFI Initial >Teach CFII Add-On >Support the show
A reading of the Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH) Chapter 5. Checkout: www.wifiCFI.com for more audiobook readings and:STUDY COURSES (click any to try free!)Private Pilot >Instrument Rating >Commercial Pilot >CFI Study Course > CFII Study Course > Multi Engine Add-On > CHECKRIDE LESSON PLANS (click any to try free!)CFI Lesson Plans >CFII Lesson Plans > MEI Add-On Lesson Plans >TEACHING COURSES (click any to try free!)Teach Private Pilot >Teach Instrument Rating >Teach Commercial Pilot >Teach CFI Initial >Teach CFII Add-On >Support the show
Send us a textEpisode #149: Month-end doesn't have to feel like a rolling emergency. We walk through a proven, blame-free framework—the U.S. Army's After Action Review—to turn your close into a reliable, data-driven process that gets faster and more accurate every cycle. If your calendar is packed and bottlenecks keep returning, this is the practical reset your team needs.We start by reframing performance reviews as a leadership habit that compounds. Then we break down the AAR into three simple stages: plan, prepare, execute. You'll learn how to define clear success metrics for close, set roles and handoffs, and create a safe environment where facts matter more than opinions. We show how to gather evidence during the cycle—timelines, task logs, error heat maps—so the review pinpoints root causes and turns observations into action.From there, we dive into the backbone of a modern close: standardized processes, integrated systems, and tools that truly enable collaboration. Expect concrete ideas for automating data flow, reducing manual entries, and mapping end-to-end dependencies. We share ways to align accounting and FP&A early, cut late reclasses, and measure progress with a focused KPI set: close duration, on-time tasks, aged reconciliations, and post-close entries.Episode outline:The U.S. Army's After-Action Review process,Let's always focus on processes, systems, and tools, andUsing the After-Action Review system to evaluate our month-end close procedures.Please connect with me on:1. Instagram: stephen.mclain2. Twitter: smclainiii3. Facebook: stephenmclainconsultant4. LinkedIn: stephenjmclainiiiFor more resources, please visit Finance Leader Academy: financeleaderacademy.com.Support the show
Amy tested her boyfriend with the bird theory. She also gave Bobby a list of bird inspired baby names. Amy shares the Top 10 pains in the world that the human body can experience and we rank them. A listener calls us to share their unique rule in their marriage where only one person is allowed to be crazy at a time and how they decide who gets dibs on not being 100%. Lunchbox gives us an update on his pain after going to yet another doctor. Did they find out what's wrong? A celebrity is donating a kidney to a stranger so we reveal what body part we feel is our best that we would donate.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
John Sampogna co-founded his digital agency, Wondersauce, at just 26, with the ambition to take on the giants of Madison Avenue. He spent five years grinding, building a stellar reputation, and scaling his team from two to 100 employees. But as the operational weight of payroll, HR, and collections threatened to pull him under, he made a decision that shocks most founders: he sold the company he bled for.For most founders, that's the end of the story. For John, it was just the beginning. He stayed on to run Wondersauce, proving that selling your business doesn't mean selling your soul. Now, 15 years in and still at the helm post-acquisition, John is having his best year ever, redefining success by mastering the shift from entrepreneur to "intrapreneur."In this interview, John sits down with Ryan Atkinson to share his playbook for competing against giants, even when you're the underdog. He reveals his "ruthlessly raw" pitching strategy, the keys to scaling from 2 to 100 employees, and how to build systems and redundancy (SOPs) so you can stop being the bottleneck in your own company. John also gets transparent about the process of business acquisition, what buyers really look for, and how to structure a deal that lets you keep building. Whether you're a service business owner or a founder planning your exit strategy, this episode provides a masterclass in building a business based on reputation, discipline, and relentless growth.Takeaways:- A "ruthlessly raw" and direct pitching style, focused on ideas rather than a polished script, can be a refreshing way to win over clients who are tired of "buttoned-up" agency presentations.- The two biggest levers for scaling a service business from 2 to 100 employees are the quality of your work and the reputation it builds through word-of-mouth.- When planning an exit, you must build redundancy and systems (SOPs) so the business is not dependent on you. This makes it a much more attractive and stable asset for a buyer.- Founders who are "hands-on" in everything are often a bottleneck.1 You should hire people to fill your weaknesses (like project management) so you can focus on your strengths (like sales).- When clients repeatedly ask for a service you don't offer, see it as an opportunity. Be transparent, learn alongside them, and offer it at a discount to prove your capability.- Stop selling services (e.g., "email marketing") and start selling results (e.g., "client retention"). This communicates your true value and avoids commoditization.- Only start a business you are genuinely interested in. If you're not passionate, you'll be beaten by competitors who absorb industry knowledge organically simply because they love it.- Be a broken record with your marketing. No one listens or remembers after one time; you must relentlessly drill your unique message into people's heads.- The toughest, unseen part of being a CEO is the emotional tax of managing and protecting your team, all while having to find your own ways to cope and "keep it together."- There is power in being "blissfully naive." The lack of experience in the early days allows for purer and less conservative decision-making, which can be a powerful advantage.Tags: Business Growth, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Business Acquisition, Systems and Procedures, Digital AgencyResources:Grow your business today: https://links.upflip.com/the-business-startup-and-growth-blueprint-podcast Connect with John: https://www.instagram.com/wondersauce/?hl=en
A reading of the Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH) Chapter 4. Checkout: www.wifiCFI.com for more audiobook readings and:STUDY COURSES (click any to try free!)Private Pilot >Instrument Rating >Commercial Pilot >CFI Study Course > CFII Study Course > Multi Engine Add-On > CHECKRIDE LESSON PLANS (click any to try free!)CFI Lesson Plans >CFII Lesson Plans > MEI Add-On Lesson Plans >TEACHING COURSES (click any to try free!)Teach Private Pilot >Teach Instrument Rating >Teach Commercial Pilot >Teach CFI Initial >Teach CFII Add-On >Support the show
Welcome The Allegendly Podcast, the history podcast where truth and trickery go head-to-head! Each episode, our hosts are handed 5 historical "facts", but here's the twist: not all of them are real. Using sharp memory, deductive reasoning, and a healthy dose of skepticism, they must separate the verified from the fabricated.This week's theme: Antique Medical Devices and Procedures. From leech therapy to electrified corsets, we're diving into the bizarre, brilliant, and sometimes terrifying world of old-school medicine. Which treatments were actually used, and which are just historical hearsay?Can you spot the imposters before the hosts do?Tune in, test your knowledge, and prepare to be amazed (and maybe a little horrified).Subscribe for weekly episodes and join the hunt for historical truth!#HistoryPodcast #FactOrFiction #AntiqueMedicine #MedicalHistory #PodcastChallenge
The Trump administration’s anti-immigration agenda has included efforts to cut back on both illegal and legal pathways into the country. Thursday, the president set the lowest-ever cap on refugee entries at 7,500 per year. At the same time, more than 2.2 million migrants are awaiting asylum hearings. Amna Nawaz sat down with the family member of an asylum seeker caught up in the restrictions. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy
A reading of the Instrument Procedures Handbook (IPH) Chapter 3. Checkout: www.wifiCFI.com for more audiobook readings and:STUDY COURSES (click any to try free!)Private Pilot >Instrument Rating >Commercial Pilot >CFI Study Course > CFII Study Course > Multi Engine Add-On > CHECKRIDE LESSON PLANS (click any to try free!)CFI Lesson Plans >CFII Lesson Plans > MEI Add-On Lesson Plans >TEACHING COURSES (click any to try free!)Teach Private Pilot >Teach Instrument Rating >Teach Commercial Pilot >Teach CFI Initial >Teach CFII Add-On >Support the show
This year has big year for conversations regarding scope modernization in Canada (and on The 20/20 Podcast!).We have had many guests and experts from across the country throughout the year sharing their insights on why scope modernization is important for the public and for optometry.Alberta has long been the province that has lead the way in terms of scope in Canada. And once again, optometric leadership in Alberta is knocking on the door of broadening their scope and helping to set a new precedent in Canada. In this episode, Dr. Michelle Duke, President of the Alberta College of Optometrists, discusses what Alberta optometry is asking for in their current scope proposal and the potential new optometry school in Alberta.In recent weeks, Adriana LaGrange, Alberta's Health Minister tweeted that she is looking forward to finalizing an agreement with the Alberta College that would ensure they have the education and training required to provide "additional services". It will be exciting to see what changes are on the horizon in Alberta.Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review & share! http://www.aboutmyeyes.com/podcast/
This year, the US government has issued sanctions on a number of experts from the UN to the International Criminal Court for speaking out about human rights in Gaza. President Donald Trump authorized sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan with the goal of stopping the ICC from undertaking its independent mandate. UN experts strongly condemned the move, calling it “an attack on global rule of law."In this episode of Entitled, we discuss how sanctions are being used and abused by the Trump administration, and how other UN members are responding to the sanctioning of their colleagues for speaking out. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Is meningeal artery embolization the key to ending the cycle of chronic subdural hematomas? In this episode of the Back Table Podcast, Dr. Paul Gullota from Ochsner Health joins host Michael Barraza to share his technical insights on middle meningeal artery embolization, including patient workup, procedure technique, and post-operative care.---SYNPOSISThe episode begins with a discussion on the evolving role of middle meningeal artery embolization in preventing chronic subdural recurrence. The doctors talk through patient selection and procedural planning for middle meningeal artery embolization, emphasizing the importance of assessing collateral pathways and hemorrhage laterality. Dr. Gullota shares his access techniques, microcatheter and embolic options, and the critical role of teamwork with neurosurgery. He also shares his approach to navigating complex vascular anatomy as well as ensuring appropriate patient follow up.---TIMESTAMPS00:00 - Introduction03:12 - Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization: Rationale and Process04:17 - Patient Evaluation and Procedure Steps06:09 - Outpatient Procedures and Billing07:06 - Candidates for Embolization Post-Evacuation07:56 - Unilateral vs. Bilateral Embolization10:34 - Procedure Techniques and Tools19:48 - Post-Procedure Care and Follow-Up21:35 - Final Thoughts and Conclusion
Listen to all my reddit storytime episodes in the background in this easy playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_wX8l9EBnOM303JyilY8TTSrLz2e2kRGThis is the Redditor podcast! Here you will find all of Redditor's best Reddit stories from his YouTube channel. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.