Podcasts about daubert

Prosecutors privately begin questioning Adam Mosher's false peer review claims, while defense attorney Don Malarcik uncovers evidence that Cybercheck reports were manually edited—contradicting claims that the system was fully automated. As the critical Daubert hearing approaches, prosecutors abruptly withdraw Cybercheck as evidence rather than defend it in court, effectively ending its use in Summit County without admitting wrongdoing. National reporting and expert analysis further undermine the technology's credibility, comparing it to unsupported pseudoscience. But despite Cybercheck being abandoned locally and Mosher facing investigation, Don realizes the tool has silently continued to spread across the country and raises troubling questions about how easily unproven technology can influence the justice system.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins reflects on recent presentations at the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors Symposium and the Association of Firearm and Toolmark Examiners conference before turning his attention to the central themes of his new book, "Valid Comparisons: The Forensic and Judicial Examination of Stochastic Patterns." Collins examines how misunderstandings surrounding the 1993 Daubert decision shaped decades of debate within forensic science and contributed to what he describes as the "Daubert contagion"—a movement that fostered excessive doubt about the scientific foundations of many forensic disciplines. Drawing on his experience as a forensic scientist, laboratory director, and expert witness, Collins argues that pattern comparison disciplines such as firearm identification, toolmark examination, and latent print analysis remain scientifically valid despite their perception as being highly interpretive. He challenges the notion that instrument-based disciplines are somehow free from subjectivity, emphasizing that all scientific conclusions require interpretation and professional judgment. The episode offers a thoughtful discussion of scientific validity, expert testimony, error, confidence, and the continuing role of forensic science in helping courts answer difficult questions in the pursuit of justice. Season:   6 Episode:  113 Duration:  1:00:24 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel REFERENCED RESOURCES None ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

One of the largest mass tort litigations in U.S. history is heating up, and this episode breaks down exactly what you need to know. From the collapse of Johnson & Johnson's third bankruptcy attempt to the current push for bellwether trials and remands, attorney Cameron Stephenson of Levin Papantonio gives a candid, insider look at where the talc litigation stands and what plaintiffs, attorneys, and affected individuals can expect in the months ahead. Host Greg is joined by Cameron to unpack the science behind asbestos contamination in talc, the latency period for ovarian cancer and mesothelioma diagnoses, why J&J's litigation tactics have drawn fierce criticism, and what a realistic path to settlement actually looks like.   Join Gregg and Cameron on Cut to the Chase as they explore: Why J&J's three bankruptcy attempts were rejected and what that means for plaintiffs The science behind asbestos in talc and how it causes ovarian cancer and mesothelioma What "latent disease" means and why recent diagnoses can still qualify for claims How the MDL remand process works and why it matters for case resolution The current state of state court trials and why plaintiffs have been winning Why J&J attacked Beasley Allen — and what it reveals about their litigation strategy   KEY MOMENTS Intro: Talc mass tort litigation overview Post-bankruptcy update: Back in the MDL How the 3 bankruptcies froze all cases Bellwether trial target: Q3/Q4 + active state court cases Can recently diagnosed patients still file? What is a latent disease & why it matters The asbestos-talc connection explained How asbestos gets into talcum powder (the mining process) J&J's defense vs. the evidence against them MDL, remand & Daubert explained in plain English Wave remand strategy: How to pressure J&J Why plaintiffs' attorneys need to coordinate now The $8.9B offer and why it wasn't enough Hope for plaintiffs: Strong science, angry juries How to contact Cameron Stevenson The attack on Beasley Allen, J&J's scorched earth tactics Closing: Don't wait, justice is coming   Cameron Stephenson is an attorney at Levin Papantonio, one of the country's leading plaintiffs' litigation firms. With a track record of significant courtroom victories, Cameron holds leadership positions in several of the largest mass tort litigations in the U.S., including the talc/ovarian cancer MDL and the Ozempic litigation. Stephenson is an active advocate for coordination among plaintiffs' counsel in the talc litigation, offering trial school resources, deposition packages, and case preparation support to attorneys across the country.   Contact Cameron Stephenson: Phone: (850) 435-7176 Email: cstephenson@levinlaw.com Website: https://levinlaw.com/   Want more insights on leadership, crisis, and the decisions that define careers and companies? Subscribe to Cut to the Chase with Gregg Goldfarb for new episodes every week.

Iris Eytan is the founder and CEO of Protect Ethical Prosecutors (PEP), a first-of-its-kind reform campaign working to end prosecutorial misconduct and bring accountability to the most powerful actors in the criminal legal system. After nearly 30 years as a criminal defense lawyer, Iris walked away from her practice to take on a system that she argues shields unethical prosecutors from consequences — even when they violate constitutional rights. Iris is a former Deputy State Public Defender, having represented thousands of defendants and secured acquittals in high-profile murder trials. She is best known for uncovering egregious prosecutorial misconduct in the People v. Barry Morphew case, which led to the dismissal of murder charges and the disbarment of an elected district attorney. Season:  6 Episode:  112 Duration:  47:52 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel REFERENCED RESOURCES PEP (Protect Ethical Prosecutors) ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Eric and Glenn start the episode with a listener email and then play a numbers themed game of Regional Quirkisms.  For the topic of this episode, the guys discuss a 2025 paper from Simon Cole and Justin Sola titled "First impressions matter: Mundane obstacles to a forensic device for probabilistic reporting in fingerprint analysis".  The article discusses practical and realistic obstacles and hurdles to developing a validated, accepted, and commercially-available statistical model for fingerprint evidence.  The article takes the novel view that most sources cite either "practitioner disinterest" (or worse: practitioner rejection) or lack of push and influence from the Courts, Daubert challenges, or Authoritative bodies.  However, once you remove those two obstacles and assume examiner 'buy-in' and Courts pushing for empirical data over subjective examiner expertise, what 'mundane' obstacles exist that most people don't realize or think about?  The article discusses a number of surprising, non-trivial obstacles that have a huge influence on the state of statistical model development in the field today. Article: Cole, S.A.; Sola, J.L.  First impressions matter: Mundane obstacles to a forensic device for probabilistic reporting in fingerprint analysis.  Social Studies of Science (2025), 55(5): 683-710. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251333074

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins discusses the central themes of his new book, Valid Comparisons: The Forensic and Judicial Examination of Stochastic Patterns, and examines the ongoing challenges facing forensic science in the courtroom. He addresses the growing tension between scientific reality and legal expectations, emphasizing that while forensic disciplines cannot offer absolute certainty, they remain grounded in decades of practical validation and real-world application. He reflects on how past mistakes—particularly in areas like bite mark evidence—have influenced public perception, and argues that the forensic community must take responsibility for communicating both its strengths and its limitations more clearly.  Throughout the episode, Collins makes the case for a more disciplined and transparent approach to forensic testimony—one that acknowledges uncertainty without surrendering confidence in well-established methods. This discussion offers an important perspective for forensic practitioners, attorneys, and anyone interested in how scientific evidence is evaluated in the pursuit of justice. Season:  6 Episode:  111 Duration:  1:04:02 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel REFERENCED RESOURCES Valid Comparisons (Book Page) Valid Comparisons (Press Release) Advanced Expert Witnessing ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

John Collins delivers a direct, practical coaching session for leaders in high-responsibility professions. Drawing on years of experience coaching executives, forensic professionals, and public-sector leaders, Collins identifies three common leadership habits that undermine credibility, erode trust, and diminish team performance. Without realizing it, many capable leaders fall into patterns that create unnecessary friction and limit their effectiveness. This episode offers a valuable opportunity for managers, supervisors, and aspiring leaders to reflect on how they lead—and how to avoid behaviors that can cost them the confidence of those they serve. Season:  6 Episode:  110 Duration:  55:10 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel REFERENCED RESOURCESAdvanced Expert Witnessing (Online) ASCLD Symposium and Workshop Registration ABOUT YOUR HOSTJohn Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins shares the experience of writing his new book, Valid Comparisons, and some of the unexpected impressions that his research had on him. As he explains, among the most impactful revelations was the disinterest of the National Academy of Sciences committee that produced the 2009 report, "Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States - A Path Forward." The impact of this report, however, was amplified by the 1993 Daubert ruling and the 2007 report by the Innocence Project summarizing the first 200 DNA exonerations. John explains how the forensic laboratory sciences were - and continue to be - adversely impacted by these developments and what has to happen for the profession to get some of its confidence back.  A trend is arising that will require forensic laboratory experts and administrators to be at their very best.  Season:  6 Episode:  109 Duration:  1:08:00 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel REFERENCED RESOURCES Subscribe to the VALID COMPARISONS VIP LIST and stay updated with excerpts and news about the release of John's newest book. ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Send a textTool output can look authoritative while still being dangerously easy to misread, and we've both seen how fast that goes sideways when a case hits court. Live from the MSAB Digital Summit 2026, we walk through a simple principle that saves careers: an artifact is a clue, not a conclusion. We talk about how “artifact worship” happens, how to build real corroboration, and why multiple records on the same phone are not automatically multiple lines of evidence.We also get honest about forensic reporting and peer review. Assuming “legal will catch it” is a trap, because attorneys and supervisors may not be able to validate the technical meaning of a timestamp, a parser decision, or an attribution statement. We share practical ways to write clearer digital forensics reports, verify tool parsing, and test your assumptions so you're not learning hard lessons under oath. If you work mobile device forensics, this section is for you.From there we shift into training and deep technical skills that are quickly becoming baseline: Android RAM acquisition and analysis, what kinds of artifacts can show up in memory, and why RAM can hold evidence you may never find in a file system extraction. We also unpack protocol buffers (protobuf) and the uncertainty that comes with app data when the .proto schema is missing, plus why that matters when AI and automation start “helping” with interpretation. We wrap with an ALEAPP update, a reminder that a portable tool report isn't analysis, and a quick look at how standards like Daubert and Frye raise the bar for methodology.Notes:Brett Shavers Blogs: It's Not Artifact Worship When One Artifact Actually Changes the Case https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/its-artifact-worship-when-one-actually-changes-case-brett-shavers-nwi6c/I Thought Legal Would Catch It. They didn't. https://www.brettshavers.com/brett-s-blog/entry/i-thought-legal-would-catch-it-they-didntIACIS https://www.iacis.com/events/in-person/2026-orlando-training-conference/

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins chats with his colleagues Pam Marshall, Julie Sikorsky, and Ray Wickenheiser - all members of the ISHI Forensic Leadership Alliance - to review the 2025 International Symposium on Human Identification (ISHI), important trends emerging in forensic DNA, Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), and the potential use of FIGG and other DNA techniques to solve the Nancy Guthrie investigation.  Pam Marshall is the Director of the Forensic Science and Law Masters program at Duquesne University; Julie Sikorsky is the Forensic Biology Manager at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Forensic Laboratory and a current member of the board of directors of the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors; and Ray Wickenheiser is the retired director of the New York State Police forensic laboratory system and a longtime leading voice in the forensic DNA community Season:  6 Episode:  108 Duration:  56:03 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Violent crime in the United States continues to decline — including measurable drops in several major categories in 2024. But what is driving the trend? In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, host John Collins examines the latest national data and explores a series of under-discussed possibilities that may be shaping public safety in ways most people haven't considered. At the same time, Collins raises an unsettling question: as one form of crime declines, is another quietly expanding? Drawing on federal data and professional insight, this episode offers a disciplined and thought-provoking look at how crime may be evolving — and what that means for the future of safety, accountability, and trust in our justice institutions. Season:  6 Episode:  107 Duration:  32:33 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel   FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification   REFERENCED RESOURCES Advanced Expert Witnessing Registration   ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan.   For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins examines the ongoing abduction investigation of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, mother of Today Show host Savannah Guthrie. Rather than rehashing timelines already covered extensively in national media, John focuses on what the case reveals about high-profile investigations — the resources they mobilize, the pressure they generate, and the complex realities that shape their trajectory. The episode explores the scale of the law enforcement response, including federal involvement and advanced forensic tools, while thoughtfully addressing the broader conversation about disparities in media attention among missing-person cases. John explains why high visibility can be both an advantage and a liability, drawing lessons from past cases where intense publicity complicated investigative work. Listeners will also gain a clear, practical understanding of how forensic evidence functions in real time — including the difference between evidence that generates investigative leads and evidence ultimately presented in court. The discussion includes a straightforward explanation of CODIS, fingerprint databases, and the emerging role of Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) in cases where traditional database searches fail. Season:  6 Episode:  106 Duration:  27:04 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES None ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Host John Collins sits down with award-winning investigative journalist Brian Joseph to discuss his provocative new book, Vegas Concierge: Sex Trafficking, Hip Hop, and Corruption in America. The conversation explores the complex realities of sex trafficking through the lens of Brian's reporting and his in-depth investigation into the story of hip-hop music producer Molly Maul. Brian shares insights from his career as a freelance reporter and the challenges he faced bringing this book to market, including the publishing industry's reluctance to engage with difficult—but necessary—topics. Together, John and Brian examine how societal stereotypes, entertainment norms, and systemic failures often obscure the stories and struggles of trafficking victims. They highlight the danger of glamorizing "pimp culture," particularly in popular media, and call for greater public education, empathy, and accountability. The justice system's response to trafficking is inadequate and lacks institutional support for survivors, often misplacing focus on perpetrators over victims. Brian makes the case for victim-centered reform and more responsible storytelling, both in journalism and in society at large. From Las Vegas tourism to hip-hop culture to criminal prosecution, this wide-ranging conversation reveals how deep and entrenched the problem of sex trafficking remains—and what must change to confront it. Season:  6 Episode:  105 Duration:  43:46 min YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES None ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this solo episode of Crime and the Courtroom, host John Collins kicks off the podcast's sixth season with personal updates, professional milestones, and critical reflections on the state of forensic science in the justice system. Collins shares the remarkable success of his recent cochlear implant surgery, which restored significant hearing from deafness caused by a decades-old firearm accident. The procedure has enhanced his ability to engage with clients and audiences, just in time for a busy season of national speaking engagements—including the ASCLD Symposium in Grand Rapids and a keynote address at the 2026 Association of Firearm and Toolmark Examiners (AFTE) conference in Baltimore. Collins also introduces his forthcoming book, Valid Comparisons, which provides a scientific and legal defense of forensic pattern disciplines such as firearm identification, handwriting, footwear, and more. He challenges the misuse of the term "junk science," especially in light of ongoing critiques from the innocence movement and the 2009 National Academy of Sciences report. Using high-profile cases such as Ray Krone's wrongful conviction and Ted Bundy's bite mark identification, Collins explores the role of expert testimony, the evolution of forensic odontology, and the need for professional self-reflection within the forensic sciences. Throughout the episode, Collins argues for a nuanced understanding of scientific credibility in the courtroom and urges caution in how forensic evidence is judged by reform advocates and legal professionals. He calls for higher standards of integrity in both forensic practice and innocence advocacy, while affirming the essential role of forensic experts in safeguarding truth and fairness in the justice system. With new books, workshops, and public engagements on the horizon, Collins sets the stage for a powerful new season that promises to tackle the most pressing issues facing criminal justice professionals today. Season:  6 Episode:  104 Duration:  1:12 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES None ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan.   For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Send us a textJoin us as we sit down with Dr. Chris Daubert, who brings a wealth of experience from every corner of the Food Science world.Currently serving as Vice Chancellor and Dean of the College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources at the University of Missouri Columbia, Dr. Daubert shares his unique career path—from his roots in agricultural engineering and becoming a recognized expert in rheology (the study of flow), to his pivotal roles as Department Head at NC State (2010-2017) and most recently, President of the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT).Join us as we explore the evolution of his leadership style, the crucial differences between leading a department versus an entire university college, the major challenges facing food science leadership today, and his top advice for students interested in leading the next generation. Don't miss this insightful look into the forces shaping the future of food!Got a questions for us? Email us at wolfingdownfoodscience@gmail.comPlease take a minute to help others find our podcast by leaving a rating and comment on your podcasting app!

Opening with a interview with Megan Daubert ( https://www.megandaubert.com/ ), a wife and mother, whose husband, Michael, suffered a serious brain injury in 2024. She has since been documenting the arduous, inspiring, journey to recovery on her social media, and tonight she'll be on to talk about the challenges of dealing with both grief and gratitude, especially around the holidays. In the second half of the show we'll take calls, review some news from over the weekend (most notably Candace Owens), and spend a little time remembering a precious little friend of ours. Promo code TURKEY to get in on Wednesday's $500+ KetoBrainz product giveaway! https://tinyurl.com/2cess6y7 Sponsor The Show and Get VIP Perks: https://www.quitefrankly.tv/sponsor One-Time Tip: http://www.paypal.me/QuiteFranklyLive Elevation Blend Coffee & Official QF Mugs: https://www.coffeerevolution.shop/category/quite-frankly Official QF MERCH: https://tinyurl.com/f3kbkr4s Gold & Silver: https://quitefrankly.gold Send Holiday cards, Letters, and other small gifts, to the Quite Frankly P.O. Box! Quite Frankly 222 Purchase Street, #105 Rye, NY, 10580 Tip w/ Crypto: BTC: bc1q97w5aazjf7pjjl50n42kdmj9pqyn5zndwh3lng XRP: rnES2vQV6d2jLpavzf7y97XD4AfK1MjePu Leave a Voice Mail: https://www.speakpipe.com/QuiteFrankly Read Exclusive Quite Frankly Articles & Past Newsletter Features: https://www.quitefrankly.tv/newsletter-archives Quite Frankly Socials: Twitter/X: @QuiteFranklyTV Instagram: @QuiteFranklyOfficial Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/u5RutUcSMJ Official Forum: https://tinyurl.com/k89p88s8 Telegram: https://t.me/quitefranklytv Truth: https://tinyurl.com/5n8x9s6f GETTR: https://tinyurl.com/2fprkyn4 Gab: https://tinyurl.com/mr42m2au Streaming Live On: QuiteFrankly.tv (Powered by Foxhole) Youtube: https://tinyurl.com/yc2cn395 BitChute: https://tinyurl.com/46dfca5c Rumble: https://tinyurl.com/yeytwwyz Kick: https://kick.com/quitefranklytv Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/quitefranklylive Audio On Demand: Spotify: https://spoti.fi/301gcES iTunes: http://apple.co/2dMURMq SoundCloud: https://tinyurl.com/yc44m474

In this final episode of the 2025 season of Crime and the Courtroom, host John Collins takes a candid and uncompromising look at a growing challenge within the forensic science community: the accelerating push toward standardization. While standards have long played a vital role in improving consistency and strengthening laboratory management, Collins argues that the pendulum may now be swinging too far. Drawing on decades of experience as a forensic scientist, laboratory director, and professional coach, he examines how overly rigid standardization can unintentionally suppress creativity, erode professional judgment, and undermine the very expertise that forensic science depends on. Through comparisons to medicine, education, and the history of European integration, Collins explores how well-intentioned standardization efforts in many fields have produced unexpected and sometimes damaging consequences. He also confronts persistent misconceptions about wrongful convictions and challenges the narrative that forensic science is a leading cause of injustice. This episode is both a warning and a call to action: a reminder that while quality systems and accreditation are essential, the soul of forensic science lies in the experts who think, notice, decide, and deliver answers when lives are broken by crime. Whether you are a scientist, attorney, policymaker, or simply someone who cares about justice, this season finale invites you into an honest, overdue conversation about the future of a profession that touches every corner of the criminal justice system. Season:  5 Episode:  103 Duration:  50:54 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES Growth of the European Union Innocence Project Report on First 200 Exonerations The Wrongful Conviction of Forensic Science - By Collins and Jarvis ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this episode, John tells the full story about his battle with hearing loss, how it started, and what steps are now being taken to give him back his hearing. It is a story involving a serious accident in a forensic laboratory many years ago - sometime around 1995 - and one that provides some important lessons about safety, leadership, and personal accountability in the workplace.  Season:  5 Episode:  102 Duration:  47:29 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES None ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, "The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge," which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

As we near the end of our 5th season, John Collins first takes a moment to discuss his upcoming surgery and his battle with hearing loss following an accident that occurred in a laboratory where he worked while he was in his early 20s. He then discusses “command coaching,” which is an application of coaching at the initial points of promotion for sworn law enforcement commanders, and how the development of police leaders MUST prioritize high-resolution self-awareness as a key factor in future success. In order to earn the trust and respect of team members, sworn commanders must know who they are from the inside out before they will have the ability to navigate the most difficult situations and personalities they will face in their leadership careers. As John explains, the “staff and command” model of leadership education is made weak when opportunities to help police officers truly understand themselves and their natural tendencies are wasted.   Issues on Trial - Tell us what you think!   Season:  5 Episode:  101 Duration:  49:44 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel   FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification   REFERENCED RESOURCES Book: The New Superior - A Better Way to Be the One in Charge   ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan.   For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

This week, join us as we revisit our episode on Daubert and What Makes a Good Expert! Original Air Date: June 25, 2021. Witnesses can testify based on what they saw and heard or they can be called to the stand with expert knowledge supported by scientific data or specialized training.  But expert witnesses must satisfy the court with more than a good resume – they must also show that the methodology they used to draw their conclusions are sound. On this week's installment, join Rebecca and Steve as they discuss the evolution of trial court standards for admitting expert testimony, from the Frye test, to the Daubert standard and beyond, and discuss what you should look for in a good expert witness.

In the 100th episode of Crime and the Courtroom, host John Collins pauses the celebration to examine the shooting death of Charlie Kirk in Utah and what it reveals about public safety, due process, and the health of civic life. Drawing on his experience in the Atlanta Olympic bombing investigation, Collins unpacks how early speculation and “wing violence” narratives can distort reality, feed polarization, and obscure root causes. He introduces the “event horizon” metaphor—the point where isolation, echo chambers, and performative media pull vulnerable people past reason—and argues that rigorous, respectful debate is a safeguard, not a threat. The episode considers the responsibilities of leaders, influencers, and platforms, and what this moment demands from parents, educators, and citizens: stronger critical-thinking skills, healthier information habits, and steadier support for law enforcement and the rule of law. If you care about clarity and courage in a noisy age, this conversation offers both context and a path forward. Issues on Trial - Tell us what you think! Season:  5 Episode:  100 Duration:  38:08 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Judges hold tremendous power in the American criminal justice system, and possibly more power than we realize. In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, John Collins shares his thoughts about a trend being encountered by expert witnesses whose testimony is being limited or controlled by judges. In some cases, the identification of latent prints or firearms is being rejected, and judges are instead instructing expert witnesses on what they can or cannot say. Is this even permissible? John also discusses what he describes as “the nuclear option,” a tactic that judges could adopt, if they chose to, that could force the reorganization and restructuring of the forensic science profession in the United States. This is an episode you won't want to miss. Issues on Trial - Tell us what you think about this issue   Season:  5 Episode:  99 Duration:  1:08:40 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel   FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification   REFERENCED RESOURCES On Being a Scientist - 3rd Edition United States v. Mitchell Brandon Mayfield Case ACE-V Method ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan.   For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, host John Collins is joined by colleagues Dr. Pamela Marshall, Julie Sikorsky, and Dr. Ray Wickenheiser to discuss their ongoing collaboration, the Forensic Leadership Alliance. The group reflects on their shared work since 2020 in providing leadership development opportunities for forensic scientists, with a focus on coaching, mentorship, and team empowerment. The conversation covers key leadership challenges facing forensic laboratories, including funding instability, cultural dynamics, and professional development. The episode also includes planning updates for their upcoming November workshop at the ISHI 2025 Symposium in Palm Beach, where they will lead sessions on managing uncertainty, fostering leadership, and mentoring the next generation of forensic professionals. Issues on Trial - Tell us what you think Season:  5 Episode:  98 Duration:  1:09:52 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES To set up a coaching session at ISHI 2025, please email John at the address provided. Please include your name, agency, and topics that our team can help you with. ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

John Collins examines the growing challenges facing U.S. forensic science laboratories as federal funding programs come under political pressure in Washington. Drawing on decades of experience as a former laboratory administrator and current leadership coach, Collins explores how dependence on federal grants has affected laboratory budgets, priorities, and culture—particularly in agencies where labs are managed by police commanders. He outlines the risks of “supplanting,” the importance of independent budget planning, and offers five practical recommendations for law enforcement leaders to better support their forensic operations. This candid discussion provides valuable insight for scientists, administrators, policymakers, and anyone interested in the health and integrity of forensic science in America. Issues on Trial - Tell us what you think about this issue Season:  5 Episode:  97 Duration:  41:28 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES Consortium of Forensic Science Organizations   ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this episode of Crime and the Courtroom, host John Collins speaks with Tom Arnold, a leading expert in digital evidence and cyber crime investigation. Mr. Arnold has led major breach investigations involving thousands of servers and has advised agencies including the U.S. Secret Service. He currently teaches at San Jose State University and the University of Nevada Las Vegas, where he helps develop academic programs in digital forensics and cybersecurity. In addition to his technical work, Tom recently authored The Digital Detective: First Intervention, a novel designed to teach cybersecurity principles to young readers. This conversation covers the evolving nature of cyber threats, the role of digital evidence in modern investigations, and what professionals and everyday citizens alike need to know to protect themselves in an increasingly digital world. Season:  5 Episode:  96 Duration:  54:35 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES Visit Tom Arnold Buy Tom's Book ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

In this episode, John Collins provides a thought-provoking and direct follow-up to episode #94, which covered the Oregon appellate court ruling in State v. Adams. In Adams, the court rejected the science of firearm identification and reversed the conviction. John explains the recent historical forces that have made forensic science a target of criminal justice reform activists, while providing encouragement to forensic practitioners in maintaining their professionalism and credibility as expert witnesses. He also calls out what he describes as “courtroom science activists” who've made it a professional mission to eliminate credible, legitimate forensic methods from America's courtrooms. In doing so, he poses a daunting question to these activists: Should James Fulton Foster, the innocent man whose conviction was overturned thanks to a firearm identification, been put to death? Season:  5 Episode:  95 Duration:  1:05:33 YOUTUBE CHANNELS Main Podcast Channel Highlights Channel FROM OUR SPONSOR Learn About the Innovators at Promega International Symposium on Human Identification REFERENCED RESOURCES Episode Transcript (PDF) Article by Oregonian/Oregon Live Court Ruling in State v. Adams Book: Crime Lab Report James Fulton Foster Exoneration (News Archive) James Fulton Foster (National Registry of Exonerations) Article: The Wrongful Conviction of Forensic Science Article: Contextual Contamination of Forensic Evidence by Post Conviction Litigators 2009 NRC Report on Forensic Science 2016 PCAST Report on Forensic Feature Comparison Methods The Innocence Project ABOUT YOUR HOST John Morrey Collins is a leadership and expertise coach specializing in working with clients in authoritative, high-stakes occupations, but with a primary emphasis on serving leaders, professionals, and organizations that support our complicated systems of criminal and civil justice. John started his private practice, Critical Victories, in 2013 after retiring his award-winning, 20-year career as a forensic laboratory scientist and executive administrator, having served as the Director of Forensic Science for the State of Michigan. His forensic technical expertise was in the examination and testing of firearms and firearm-related evidence, having provided expert courtroom testimony in approximately 130 criminal trials, including death penalty cases and Daubert hearings. John is also the author of three books on forensic science and criminal justice reform. In 2022, he released his fourth book, “The New Superior – A Better Way to Be the One in Charge,” which is available in print and audio. John's many career highlights include his part in the forensic investigation of the Atlanta serial bombings, which included the bombing of the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, as well as his 2013 participation in a historic meeting with the US Attorney General and other firearm experts to discuss the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. John has a master's degree in organizational management and is formally certified as a Senior HR Professional by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). In 2012, John was trained as a professional coach by the College of Executive Coaching, and he became certified as a Gallup Strengths Coach in 2022. He lives and works near Detroit, Michigan. For more books and other information, please visit www.criticalvictories.com.

Best of Series: Special Guest Interview with Ryan Daubert—Insurance for Investments (Part 2)

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Special Guest Interview with Ryan Daubert—Insurance for Investments (Part 1)

Christopher R. Daubert, Ph.D., serves as the President of the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) and as the Vice Chancellor and Dean of the College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources at the University of Missouri (Mizzou), as well as a Professor in the Division of Food Systems and Bioengineering. He joined Mizzou from North Carolina State University, where he served as a Professor and Head of the Department of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Services; Director of the Food Rheology Laboratory; and system Co-Chair of Food, Biochemical, and Engineered Systems. His research explained the physical chemistry, molecular-level interactions, and functionality of food systems through an understanding of rheological behavior, while solving problems facing the food and pharmaceutical industries.  Dr. Daubert has received distinguished alumnus awards from Pennsylvania State University and Michigan State University. He is also a Fellow of IFT and previously served IFT as chair of the Food Engineering Division and a member-at-large of the Dogwood section. He holds a B.S. degree in Agricultural Engineering from Penn State University, a Ph.D. in Agricultural Engineering and Food Science from Michigan State University, and a Post-Doctorate in Food Science from North Carolina State University.   In this episode of Food Safety Matters, we speak with Dr. Daubert [23:34] about: The challenges and opportunities for attracting students to food science and other food-related academic programs The value of an education in food science The role the food industry plays in food science education The complex food system challenges that today's students—tomorrow's workforce—can help address Dr. Daubert's work at Mizzou in promoting food science education How IFT helps prepare students to contribute to the global food community upon graduation. News USDA Secretary Rollins Increases Funding to Reimburse States for Food Safety Inspections [3:34]Senator Cotton Introduces Bill to Consolidate Federal Food Safety Agencies [6:38]MAHA Report Sets Stage for Overhaul of Food Chemicals, Environmental Contaminants, and Childhood Nutrition [10:18]Mars Removes Titanium Dioxide from Skittles in the United States [21:41] Sponsored by: CINTAS   We Want to Hear from You! Please send us your questions and suggestions to podcast@food-safety.com

Send us a textIn this episode, Scott and Chasity reunite in-studio after several remote recordings to discuss their recent activities and introduce a special panel discussion about the Scientific Advisory Work Group (SAW). Scott shares his excitement about getting accepted into OSU for a master's program, while the hosts debate the value of continuing education in fire investigation. They emphasize the importance of bachelor's degrees for investigators before diving into the main interview segment.The featured interview, recorded in Michigan, includes guest co-host Lauren Guber (a California Deputy Attorney General) along with Dr. Elizabeth Buck and Brian Fine (retired from the Texas State Fire Marshal's Office). They discuss SAW, a program that originated in Texas to improve fire investigation through peer review. The panel explains how investigators present cases to a diverse group of experts who then evaluate whether the investigation meets scientific standards. This constructive criticism helps investigators strengthen their reports and testimony, ultimately leading to more credible courtroom presentations. Brian shares how investigators initially dreaded these reviews but eventually began voluntarily submitting cases to showcase their improved work.The group discusses the challenges fire investigators face in court, particularly in Daubert states where scientific testimony is more strictly evaluated. Lauren explains how prosecutors must prove both that fire investigation expertise is needed and that the specific investigator is qualified to provide it. The panel emphasizes that maintaining credibility is crucial, as a poor performance in one case can follow investigators throughout their careers.Dr. Buck discusses efforts to expand the SAW program beyond Texas, having recently introduced it to Michigan with hopes of bringing it to California next. The episode concludes with the "Can You Use It in a Sentence?" segment featuring "hot gas layer" as the next term in their educational series, following previous explanations of "plume" and "ceiling jet." Scott and Chasity also address fan mail, including a question about Scott's recent court case and feedback about standardizing fire damage classification terminology.Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed the episode, give us 5 stars, hit the follow button, and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and anywhere you are listening in from. Follow us on social media!Instagram: @infocus_podcastLinkedIn: INFOCUS podcastFacebook: INFOCUS podcastTikTok: @infocus_podcast

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense's strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho's history.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

Send us a textThree things you'd have to believe to find Karen Read guilty of murder!Have you ever wondered how in excess of 8 people, drove directly past the spot where the Commonwealth said John O'Keefe was lying in the snow? Brian Higgins a highly trained ATF, testified he pulled out and his jeeps's lights would have fully illuminated that very area, yet no body? C'mon.Jen Mcabe's infamous 2:27am "Hos long to die in the cold" google search. During a Daubert hearing, Richard Green revealed that cell phone forensics found that Jen had made 4,560 google searches over the life of the phone, yet only one search had ever been deleted, the "hos long to die in cold" search. Read that again, that search happened and it happened at 2:27am. This is issue settled.In order to find Karen guilty of 2nd degree murder you'd have to believe that Jen Mcabe did "Butt Dial" John 7 times with none of the calls going to voicemail. You'd also have to believe Boston Police Sgt. Brian Albert "Butt Dialed" ATF agent Brian Higgins AND Higgins "Butt Dialed" back!! All the infamous butt dials occurred within an hour of John's homicide. You'd have to ask what are the odds of this happening? The defense expert covered that in recent court documents. The odds of all those butt dials occurring within an hour of the murder and none of the calls going to voicemail is equivalent to winning the Powerball lottery three times in a row!!C'mom man!NBC News 10-https://bit.ly/434XcsNBoston Herald-Howie Carr- https://bit.ly/3EI9P2DAtty. Melanie Little-https://bit.ly/3QlP8Mx

On January 31st, 2025, the Karen Read case continues with a hearing focused on motions and discovery. The defense argues over expert witness fees due to unavailable evidence, while the prosecution provides updates on new experts and witness interviews. The judge also indicated that a Daubert hearing regarding the defense's expert, Mr. Green, was unlikely and that they would issue an order by Monday. The defense requested more time to file a motion to dismiss, while the prosecution stated that they were still providing discovery to the defense. There's still upcoming motions in limine and motions to suppress, and the need for all discovery to be turned over ahead of the re-trial.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/ze-mWajMd2gRESOURCESTuesday's live stream - https://www.youtube.com/live/7dNN7AE5mekThe Alec Baldwin Rust Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJRVvIIF9jT5PfqCzlSMiibThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

You're a powerhouse in the courtroom, but does anyone beyond your county know it? In this episode of Personal Injury Mastermind, Don Worley reveals how being transparent with referral partners helped him scale from 2,000 to 40,000 cases without traditional marketing. Dominate your market today. Grab a copy of Chris' latest book, Personal Injury Lawyer Marketing: From Good to GOAT.  Don Worley runs one of the nation's largest mass tort practices, with over 400 law firms sending him cases. But he's never bought a TV ad or danced on TikTok. Instead, he built his empire through radical transparency - sending monthly case updates that most firms are too afraid to share. In this episode, Don explains why letting go of ego and embracing accountability has been the key to his success. We discuss: Why great trial lawyers often struggle with self-promotion How monthly case updates transformed referral relationships The entertainment factor: Making lawyer events actually fun Leveraging comedy background for courtroom adaptability Why you should choose between being an advertising firm or a handling firm Smart strategies for entering mass torts without losing money When to wait for Daubert before investing in mass torts The real reason Wall Street's interest in mass torts has cooled Guest Details Don Worley built a nationwide mass tort practice handling over 40,000 cases through referral partnerships. His stand-up comedy background and commitment to transparency helped him create one of the most successful referral networks in the industry. Don Worley: LinkedIn,  McDonald Worly:  Website, Instagram, Facebook,  Chris Dreyer and Rankings Details Chris Dreyer is the CEO and founder of Rankings.io, the elite legal digital marketing agency.  Rankings: Website, Instagram, Twitter Chris Dreyer: Website, Instagram Newsletters: The Dreyer Sheet  Books: Personal Injury Lawyer Marketing: From Good to GOAT; Niching Up: The Narrower the Market, the Bigger the Prize Work with Rankings: Connect Time Stamps 00:00 Intro  00:29 The marketing lawyer vs trial lawyer divide  01:17 Don's unique approach to growth  02:14 Relationship building through entertainment  04:08 Comedy background and courtroom skills  07:03 Building a referral network of 400+ firms  08:24 Mass torts: Investment strategies and pitfalls  13:43 Keys to sustainable growth in personal injury  15:30 The power of transparency Additional Episodes You Might Enjoy 80. Mike Papantonio, Levin, Papantonio, & Rafferty — Doing Well by Doing Good 84. Glen Lerner, Lerner and Rowe – A Steady Hand in a Shifting Industry 101. Pratik Shah, EsquireTek — Discovering the Power of Automation 134. Darryl Isaacs, Isaacs & Isaacs — The Hammer: Insights from a Marketing Legend 104. Taly Goody, Goody Law Group — Finding PI Clients on TikTok 63. Joe Fried, Fried Goldberg LLC — How To Become An Expert And Revolutionize Your PI Niche 96. Brian Dean, Backlinko — Becoming a Linkable Source 83. Seth Godin — Differentiation: How to Make Your Law Firm a Purple Cow 73. Neil Patel, Neil Patel — Digital A New Approach to Content and Emerging Marketing Channels

Karen Read and her legal team are back in court for the second day of the Daubert Hearing. They are evaluating the Defense 'dog bite expert' to determine what testimony will be permitted in the re-trial and the scope of Dr. Russell's testimony.We also learned that the prosecution actually went and found the dog, Chloe, and did measurements on her claws and paws and did molds of her jaws and bites as well.Karen Read is scheduled to go back to court for Oral Arguments with another Daubert Hearing regarding the Digital Defense Expert, Rule 14 Discovery Motions with regard to the ARCA Experts on January 31st, 2025 at 9am ET. Based on how that goes, then possibly we will have an Evidentiary Hearing on February 6th, 2025, at 9am ET that could run into the 7th.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/mqwz88FkNm8RESOURCESCatch up on Day 1 Quickly - https://youtu.be/587k95WaryI?si=l7QZKWLVnXmBz1mO Day 1 Full Court Day - https://youtube.com/live/MjU4nGT3TSsThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read returned to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read returned to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is back in court for a Daubert Hearing. Dr. Russell is the Defense Expert Witness and is being questioned by both the Defense and the Prosecution to see if the testimony should come into the Re-Trial. Dr. Russell explained why she thinks the marks on John O'Keefe are specifically from a dog attack which is different than what she said on the stand in the first trial when she said it might be from a dog bite. The Prosecution was not done questioning Dr. Russell but it was time for court to end. It is scheduled to resume on Jan 7th, 2025, at 9am ET.A Daubert Hearing is used to challenge an expert witness. The Judge acts as the gatekeeper of the evidence when determining if there is sufficient reliability for admissibility under FRE 702. The court can examine the methodology and reasoning behind the expert's opinion.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/MjU4nGT3TSsRESOURCESPrevious Voir Dire of Dr. Russell - https://youtube.com/live/Wzt0SgXLa7k Previous Testimony of Dr. Russell - https://youtube.com/live/-y57V1lkXeUThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy