Podcasts about Proportionality

Moon Duchin is a math professor at the University of Chicago whose theoretical work has practical applications for voting and democracy. Why is striving for fair elections so difficult? SOURCES:Moon Duchin, professor of mathematics at Cornell University. RESOURCES:"Gerrymandering: The Origin Story," by Neely Tucker (Timeless: Stories from the Library of Congress, 2024)."Redistricting for Proportionality," by Gabe Schoenbach and Moon Duchin (The Forum, 2023)."The Atlas Of Redistricting," by Aaron Bycoffe, Ella Koeze, David Wasserman, and Julia Wolfe (FiveThirtyEight, 2018)."In a Comically Drawn Pennsylvania District, the Voters Are Not Amused," by Trip Gabriel (The New York Times, 2018). EXTRAS:"State of Texas to begin calling witnesses in federal hearing over Trump-backed congressional map," by Blaise Gainey (KUT News, 2025)."Utah's Redistricting Battle Explained," (PBS Utah, 2025)."Is This the Future of High School?" by People I (Mostly) Admire (2022). Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

HEADLINE: Free Speech, Trump's Proportionality Crisis, and the Independence of the Federal Reserve GUEST NAME: Richard Epstein SUMMARY: Professor Richard Epstein discusses Trump's "all-in" strategy affecting free speech (Jimmy Kimmel, FCC). He severely criticizes Trump's abnormal attempt via the Supreme Court to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. 1914 FED

CONTINUED HEADLINE: Free Speech, Trump's Proportionality Crisis, and the Independence of the Federal Reserve GUEST NAME: Richard Epstein SUMMARY: Professor Richard Epstein discusses Trump's "all-in" strategy affecting free speech (Jimmy Kimmel, FCC). He severely criticizes Trump's abnormal attempt via the Supreme Court to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.1917 FED

Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor, and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He has written numerous works of fiction and nonfiction, as well as hundreds of essays in major national and global publications. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio and appears regularly on cable TV news programs.  Beyond Proportionality examines the relevant legal standards, as embodied in the U.N. Charter, international humanitarian law, and, most especially, the principle of proportionality, as codified in the Geneva Conventions, and concludes that Israel's war in Gaza is lawful and just. And, yet, as in any war, there is collateral damage, but it is proportionate to necessary military objectives. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/israel-studies

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of civil discovery, focusing on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and New York state law. It emphasizes the importance of understanding Rule 26 as the foundation of discovery, the concept of proportionality, and the various tools available for gathering information. The discussion also covers the duties of disclosure, the role of expert testimony, and the significance of e-discovery in modern litigation. Key best practices for managing electronically stored information (ESI) and the potential consequences of failing to meet discovery obligations are highlighted, making this a vital resource for law students and practitioners alike.TakeawaysCivil discovery is critical for aspiring lawyers.Rule 26 is the central nervous system of discovery.Proportionality is essential in determining the scope of discovery.Automatic disclosures streamline the discovery process.Expert testimony requires detailed disclosures under Rule 26.The meet and confer process is mandatory and strategic.Depositions and interrogatories are key tools for gathering information.Requests for production must clearly specify ESI needs.Understanding privilege is crucial in discovery.Cost management is vital to avoid excessive litigation expenses.civil discovery, FRCP, e-discovery, legal process, litigation, Rule 26, proportionality, discovery tools, legal obligations, attorney-client privilege

The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Much reform has been accomplished on Texas' local government property tax system but many exceptions that were needed to get bills passed need ending – especially the “hit 'em while they're down” disaster loophole abused by local politicians. A new law takes effect next year that does tighten down the disaster loophole but only time will tell if it is enough.Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.In the border/immigration news stack there is a story that is an example of anti-Trump hyperbolethat only works with voters because of decades of failed public education – it's the proportionality problem as I've long called it.Campaign finance numbers rolling in: Greg Abbott logs $20M campaign haul after school voucher win Big money flows into Texas AG, comptroller GOP primaries Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com

Are Jews entitled to their own homeland? Is the Israeli response to the massacre of civilians perpetrated by Hamas on October 7th justified? Should there be a ceasefire? David's Article in Quillette: https://quillette.com/2023/10/21/its-not-the-occupation/ Raja Halwani wrote to us about Jason's exposition of his view at 33:06. Here is Raja's clarification:**I wanted to clarify a point that Jason made during the interview with David Benatar. Jason asked Benatar what he thought of the view that “the view is that the Gazans are an oppressed people. They've been oppressed for so long that they've acted out of desperation. And there's only two options that they have.” Jason goes on to say that I have defended the view that “the Gazans are an oppressed people who only have two options. The one option is to die and the other option is to attack, to attack Israel in order to secure some sort of freedom. Those are its only two options. And so ... Raja takes the view that if Hamas were to lay down its arms, then it's just a slow death for the Gazans. That's, that would be the future of Gaza.”However, I did not make this claim about having only two options, nor would I, because it reads as a justification of killing civilians, especially given the context of the Hamas attacks of October 7 (and other attacks against Israelis). It reads as a justification because if death is one of only two options, then the second, to attack, seems permissible. The last sentence in Jason's question, about Hamas laying down its arms, seems to especially imply this (though Jason did not intend to make me come out as justifying Hamas's actions).Jason attributes this view to me based on something I wrote in my blog (as he explained to me in personal correspondence). Here is the specific passage on which Jason bases his attribution:People are quick to condemn Hamas for the evil that it has wrought, but they are as quick to neglect that Hamas acts out of sheer desperation, out of the sheer desire, no matter how steep the price, to score a victory against Israel, a country whose military might not even its prime ministers fully comprehend, and out of the sheer hopelessness of the slow death that their people has been dying. Although to explain this is not to justify it, I also ask the reader: What options do the Palestinians have? What do you advise them to do? Their lives are going nowhere. Peace initiative after peace initiative has failed them (and, to add insult to injury, they are blamed for the failure). No Palestinian state has emerged, and none is likely to given the current map (just look and see whether a state can be built out of the Swiss cheese that is the West Bank). Their tunnel has been long and with no light at its end. So what should they do? They ought to sit still and “take it like a man.” To suck it up. To bear the unfair burden of history. We have to tell them, “Misfortune has fallen upon you, and you may not extricate yourselves from it by killing civilians. Even as you yourselves die, slowly, surely, with no justification, and with barely an explanation, you may not take the lives of the civilians of your enemy. This is the noble way.”Clearly, the passage is a bitter one about Palestinian loss and oppression, but it is as clearly morally ruling out the option of killing civilians. So even though Hamas might take up arms against civilians, this is not a morally viable options for Gazans or Palestinians in general. Hence, insofar as Jason's question attributes to me a justification of attacks on civilians, this clarification should clarify that this is not my position.**Chapters:[0:00] Introduction[0:22] Thought Experiment[7:52] Historical context[23:13] Two-State Solution[27:46] Ethical Blockade[31:37] What if Hamas laid down their arms?[36:06] Current War[45:46] Proportionality[54:59] Concluding thoughts[59:01] Outro

Thane Rosenbaum, CBS News Radio legal analyst and distinguished law professor, is our special guest in this episode. Dr. Wendy Patrick and attorney Larry Dershem taps into our guest’s vast legal knowledge and get his take on why there has been a 900% increase in antisemitism on U.S. college campuses and in our nation in just the last four years. We also explore Thane’s new book, Beyond Proportionality: Israel's Just War in Gaza, to find out what we must do to counter the global intifada and save Western civilization. https://thanerosenbaum.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this month's EM Quick Hits podcast: Zafar Qasim & Andrew Petrosoniak on whole blood transfusion in trauma, Justin Morgenstern on calcium pre-treatment to prevent diltiazem-induced hypotension, Kiran Rikhraj on dynamic LV outflow tract obstruction, Anand Swaminathan on resuscitative thoracotomy, Andrew Tagg on uterine casts, and Jesse McLaren on scale & proportionality in occlusion MI ECG interpretation. **Please support EM Cases to continue to be free open access by making a donation: https://emergencymedicinecases.com/donation/

0:00 - Intro1:05 - Day 2 after femur lengthening: initial post-opexperience6:43 - Height Journey returns to the show with a bigannouncement12:03 - Surprise guest: Real Deal joins with recoveryupdates18:01 - Waiting for Precice Max: Nail strength and nextsteps19:42 - Nail breakage stories and updates from otherpatients24:10 - Ale joins with walking update one weekpost-weightbearing29:34 - Christopher joins with questions about proportionand tibia lengthening31:12 - Is 3 inches possible on tibias? Risks explained42:51 - The power of pushing yourself in recovery43:04 - Wait for Precice Max or proceed with 2.2?47:14 - Natalie shares her severe nerve pain experience50:03 - Height Journey announces retirement and legacytransfer to Cyborg 4 Life56:01 - Final Q&A: Proportionality and limb lengthlimits57:02 - OutroRoundtable with prospective, current or past limb lengthening patients to hear their experiences to share with others.________Audio Podcast: will be posted within 24-48hrs after the stream endsTimestamps: will be posted within 24-48hrs after the stream ends________

How can leaders make measured, appropriate and reasonable decisions? Niels Brabandt discusses these aspects in this week's episode.   Host: Niels Brabandt / NB@NB-Networks.com Contact: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nielsbrabandt/ Leadership Letter: https://expert.nb-networks.com/ Website: https://www.nb-networks.biz/ 

How do top policymakers balance fostering technological advancement with necessary oversight? Join Michael Krigsman as he speaks with Lord Chris Holmes and Lord Tim Clement-Jones, members of the UK House of Lords, for a deep dive into the critical intersection of technology policy, innovation, and public trust.In this conversation, explore:-- The drive for "right-sized" AI regulation that supports innovators, businesses, and citizens.-- Strategies for effective AI governance principles: transparency, accountability, and interoperability.-- The importance of international collaboration and standards in a global tech ecosystem.-- Protecting intellectual property and creators' rights in the age of AI training data.-- Managing the risks associated with automated decision-making in both public and private sectors.-- The push for legal clarity around digital assets, tokenization, and open finance initiatives.-- Building and maintaining public trust as new technologies become more integrated into society.Gain valuable perspectives from legislative insiders on the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, digital assets, and data governance. Understand the thinking behind policy decisions shaping the future for business and technology leaders worldwide.Subscribe to CXOTalk for more conversations with the world's top innovators: https://www.cxotalk.com/subscribeRead the full transcript and analysis: https://www.cxotalk.com/episode/ai-digital-assets-and-public-trust-inside-the-house-of-lords00:00 Balancing Innovation and Regulation in AI02:48 Principles and Frameworks for AI Regulation09:30 Global Collaboration and Challenges in AI and Trade15:25 The Role of Guardrails and Regulation in AI17:43 Challenges in Protecting Intellectual Property in AI22:32 AI Regulation and International Collaboration29:11 The UK's Approach to AI Regulation32:00 Proportionality and Sovereign AI36:28 Digital Sovereignty and Creative Industries39:09 The Future of Digital Assets and Legislation40:53 Open Banking, Open Source Models, and Agile Regulation45:43 Ethics and Professional Standards in AI47:22 Exploring AI and Ethical Standards49:00 AI in the Workplace and Global Accessibility51:40 Regulation, Public Trust, and Ethical AI#cxotalk #AIRegulation #AIInnovation #DigitalAssets #PolicyMaking #UKParliament #TechPolicy #Governance #PublicTrust #LordChrisHolmes #LordTimClementJones

L'Observatoire des conflits multidimensionnels vous propose une conférence de Jessica Dorsey, qui met en lumière certains enjeux, notamment juridique et éthique, liés à l'usage de l'intelligence artificielle dans le ciblage militaire. Animée par Simon Hogue.

Nothing fails like success. As you rise, study harder, stay humble and get better. When you feel like playing small with your gifts or going minuscule with your personal magic, just remember that someone is always watching you. And that someone is always your highest you.This is what my latest book The Wealth Money Can't Buy is all about. Real wealth versus fake success. True winning versus spending your life climbing a mountain, only to find out at the end that it was the wrong one. You can order it now by clicking here.FOLLOW ROBIN SHARMA:InstagramFacebookTwitterYouTube

International Law expert Allen Weiner joins Pam for a comprehensive overview of the legal challenges and humanitarian concerns in one of the world's most contentious regions, looking at the Israel/Gaza conflict and the delicate balance between military strategy and civilian safety. Allen and Pam explore the principles of proportionality in warfare, highlighting the legal and ethical considerations of targeting high-level military commanders in civilian areas. They then discuss President Trump's controversial proposal for Gaza's future and its plan to transform the region into a resort. The conversation also touches on the ICJ indictments against Palestinian and Israeli leaders, the role of satellite imagery in legal research, and the broader implications of governance and security in Gaza. Links:Allen Weiner >>> Stanford Law page“There is Nothing Left: Jus ad Bellum Proportionality and Israel's War Against Hamas in Gaza” >>> Stanford Law publication pageConnect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>>  Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X(00:00:00) Introduction and Overview of Gaza Conflict (00:04:20) Proportionality in Warfare (00:19:50) The Day After Phenomenon (00:28:22) Governance and Security of Gaza (00:29:11) Conclusion and Call to Action 

Pythagoras of Samos (c. 570–495 BCE) was an ancient Greek philosopher and mathematician, best known for founding Pythagoreanism and the Pythagorean theorem.   His teachings combined mathematics, mysticism, and philosophy, influencing Plato, Western thought, and early science.

Donald Trump has always been blunt about his transactional view of global politics but has he just accelerated the decline of American soft power? We unpack his latest moves, from tariffs on Canada to his surreal vision for a 'Gaza Riviera,' and explore why his worldview could redefine America's role on the global stage. With USAID shutting down, longtime allies turning away, and economic isolationism on the rise, is the U.S. shifting from a nation of influence to one of brute force? What does this mean for global power dynamics? Is Trump simply playing for attention, or are we witnessing a true transformation in America's foreign policy? We dive into it all with Evan Solomon, examining how trust, trade, and tariffs are reshaping the world, and whether the U.S. is burning down the very system it built. Join the gang! https://plus.acast.com/s/the-david-mcwilliams-podcast. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Moon Duchin is a math professor at Cornell University whose theoretical work has practical applications for voting and democracy. Why is striving for fair elections so difficult?  SOURCE:Moon Duchin, professor of mathematics at Cornell University. RESOURCES:"Gerrymandering: The Origin Story," by Neely Tucker (Timeless: Stories from the Library of Congress, 2024)."Redistricting for Proportionality," by Gabe Schoenbach and Moon Duchin (The Forum, 2023)."The Atlas Of Redistricting," by Aaron Bycoffe, Ella Koeze, David Wasserman, and Julia Wolfe (FiveThirtyEight, 2018)."In a Comically Drawn Pennsylvania District, the Voters Are Not Amused," by Trip Gabriel (The New York Times, 2018). EXTRAS:"Why Are Boys and Men in Trouble?" by People I (Mostly) Admire (2024)."Is This the Future of High School?" by People I (Mostly) Admire (2022).

With Friedrich Pukelsheim I discuss double proportional representation. Since 2006 the Canton of Zurich in Switzerland uses double proportionality to elect its 180 members of parliament. Friedrich Pukelsheim was invited to design an electoral system that would deliver on the promise of overall proportional representation in the canton while keeping the existing electoral districts since they are meaningful social and geographic entities. The complication is that some of these districts are very small (4 seats) while others are large (up to 18 seats). So the problem to be solved was to achieve proportional representation and electoral equality while honoring those very diverse districts. The resulting electoral system was double proportionality, nicknamed “Doppelter Pukelsheim” (“Double Pukelsheim”). Friedrich Pukelsheim has become well-known across Switzerland thanks to his successful design of an electoral system that fits the Zurich's requirements. He emphasizes, however, that the system was first discovered by Michel Balinski. As of now, 8 cantons in Switzerland have adopted a double proportional representation system.  Friedrich Pukelsheim is Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at the University of Augsburg in Germany. He got his doctoral degree in 1977 from the University Albert-Ludwigs University in Freiburg, and a Habilitation in 1982 from the same University. Still in the same year he became professor of mathematics and he has over time developed a special interest in the mathematical intricacies of electoral systems. Throughout his career he had research stays at the universities of Stanford, Cornell, Penn State, the London School of Economics and Political Science, among many others. Two books that treat the design of proportional electoral systems are Proportional Representation – Apportionment Methods and Their Applications, first published in 2014, and one in German: Sitzzuteilungsmethoden – Ein Kompaktkurs über Stimmenverrechnungsverfahren in Verhältniswahlsystemen, published in 2016. You can find all of his contributions on his website. You find links to all references in the show notes. As a remark, this conversation was recorded in July 2024. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Find a full transcript and links to all material discussed in the show notes⁠⁠⁠⁠.⁠ Schedule: 00:00 Introduction / 04:03 Personal questions / 6:08 Main discussion / 52:50 Recommendations by Friedrich Pukelsheim. Find Friedrich Pukelsheim's research here. Please send feedback to⁠⁠ ⁠rulesofthegame.ddi@gmail.com⁠⁠⁠. If you find my discussions interesting and you'd like to support my work, consider buying me a coffee at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠buymeacoffee.com/rulesofthegame⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Many thanks to Ana Margarida Santos who co-produced this episode. Please enjoy this conversation with Friedrich Pukelsheim.

In this episode I talk about dose proportionality, which is a surrogate for determining if we have linear clearance across a range of dose levels. I discuss 3 different methods that people use to determine dose proportionality along with a recommendation to use the power model method. Links discussed in the show: Power model method You can connect with me on ⁠LinkedIn and send me a message⁠⁠ Send me a message⁠⁠ Sign up for my newsletter⁠

This week on our Vino Lingo segment we feature Katie Wetzel Murphy, Brand Ambassador & Family Partner, Alexander Valley Vineyards, Sonoma County, defining the term “Balance (Proportionality)”.  Learn more

We often hear that this or that military attack caused disproportionate civilian casualties. Most often, these accusations are directed against Israel, when they are not directed against the United States.  I will be generous and presume that most of these accusations are based on a misconception of what proportionality in armed conflict means, and how it is different from proportionate use of force civil or human rights law circumstances. Proportionality in war is the subject of this episode of the Ancient Art of Modern Warfare.     Reference: Although a main reference for almost all episodes is On War, by Carl von Clausewitz, a primary reference for this episode is Chapter 5.12 of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual, 2016 edition. Music: Holst, G. The Planets: Mars Bringer of War, downloaded from Internet Archive Kilstoffe, Jens, The Cavalry, Machinamasound (Licensed)  

Judge Roy Altman joins Sarah and David at Duke University School of Law. Note: The opinions expressed on this podcast do not represent Duke (who would have thought that anyways?). The trio discuss Altman's trip to Israel and legal troubles the country has in defending itself. The Agenda: —The intersection of law and military operations —Proportionality as legal principle in armed conflict —How Hamas' tactics complicate the legal landscape of military operations —Tire chalking! And Fourth Amendment issues —Don't erase David's identity, SarahShow notes: —Judge Roy Altman's first appearance on AO —NYU Law Review article on tire chalking —Advisory Opinions live at UNC Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including Sarah's Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Mark 9:38-50

Faith Organizers Kelley Fox and Rev. Terry Williams welcome back Jen Miller, Executive Director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio (LWVO). Our first repeat guest, in this episode Jen breaks down everything voters need to know about Ohio's 2024 Issue 1 ballot campaign “Citizens Not Politicians.” Self-described as “fiercely nonpartisan,” the LWVO has been at the forefront of fighting gerrymandering in Ohio for well over 100 years. Jen helps Kelley and Rev. Terry cut through the hype with history and hard facts, laying out why Citizens Not Politicians is supported by Republicans, Democrats, and Independents across Ohio & why a Yes on 1 is so important to Ohioans this year. Links to discussed content: League of Women Voters of Ohio: www.lwvohio.org/  Citizens Not Politicians: www.citizensnotpoliticians.org/ LWV Ohio FAQ on the Citizens Not Politicians ballot initiative: www.lwvohio.org/citizens-not-politicians-faq Ohio's Gerrymandering Problem: https://my.lwv.org/sites/default/files/leagues/wysiwyg/%5Bcurrent-user%3Aog-user-node%3A1%3Atitle%5D/ohios_gerrymanding_problem.pdf Timeline of Ohio's Gerrymandered Maps: www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/timeline-ohios-gerrymandered-maps-how-ohio-politicians-defied-court  Proportionality and Ohio's legislative map mapping process: www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/11/ohio-redistricting-how-does-prioritizing-proportionality-affect-maps/74631944007/ "Slay the Dragon" Film: www.slaythedragonfilm.com/ R-Soul Episode 109 — A Bone to Pick: https://faithchoiceohio.podbean.com/e/a-bone-to-pick-how-ohios-supreme-court-wildness-will-affect-reproductive-freedom/ Music by Korbin Jones

#ISRAEL: The lawful conduct of military action vs adversaries: Necessity, distinction, proportionality. PETER BERKOWITZ, HOOVER INSTITUTION 1944 Portsmouth?

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Important open problems in voting, published by Closed Limelike Curves on July 2, 2024 on LessWrong. Strategy-resistance Identify, or prove impossibility, of a voting system which incentivizes 1. A strictly sincere ranking of all candidates in the zero-information setting, where it implements a "good" social choice rule such as the relative (normalized) utilitarian rule, a Condorcet social choice rule, or the Borda rule. 2. In a Poisson game or similar setting: a unique semi-sincere Nash equilibrium that elects the Condorcet winner (if one exists), similar to those shown for approval voting by Myerson and Weber (1993) and Durand et al. (2019). Properties of Multiwinner voting systems There's strikingly little research on multiwinner voting systems. You can find a table of criteria for single-winner systems on Wikipedia, but if you try and find the same for multi-winner systems, there's nothing. Here's 9 important criteria we can judge multiwinner voting systems on: 1. Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives 2. Independence of Universally-Approved Candidates 3. Monotonicity 4. Participation 5. Precinct-summability 6. Polynomial-time approximation scheme 7. Proportionality for solid coalitions 8. Perfect representation in the limit 9. Core-stability (may need to be approximated within a constant factor) I'm curious which combinations of these properties exist. Probabilistic/weighted voting systems are allowed. Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

Join us for an intense debate featuring Mark Oppenheimer, who defends Israel's war as just, and Raja Halwani, who argues Israel's war is unjust. The debate covers historical contexts, moral principles, and the roles of both Israel and Hamas, aiming to provide nuanced insights into one of the most challenging global issues of our time. [00:00] Introduction to the Debate [01:08] Raja's Opening Statement: Israel's War is Unjust [11:13] Mark's Opening Statement: Israel's Right to Self-Defense [21:37] Raja's Rebuttal: Addressing Misconceptions [27:34] Mark's Rebuttal: The Reality of the Conflict [32:10] Cross Examination: Raja Questions Mark [47:45] Debating the Justification of War [48:39] Israel's Response to October 7th [49:59] Military Options and Intelligence [51:11] Idealistic Solutions and International Cooperation [52:21] Transition to Open Discussion [52:48] Questioning Israel's Conduct in Gaza [56:16] One-State vs. Two-State Solutions [01:04:07] Legitimacy and Rights of Israel [01:07:48] Hamas Ideology and Anti-Semitism [01:10:37] Civilian Casualties and Proportionality in War [01:18:07] Historical Context and Atrocities [01:19:57] Gaza: Open-Air Prison or Ghetto? [01:27:39] Closing Statements --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/braininavat/message

Jason Knudson joined the Navy in 1998, deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, and now works in innovation and defense. We talk about the ongoing war in Gaza, among other things. Jason's perspective, which is different than mine, and comes from outside Catholic teaching on war, I see as a dose of worldly wisdom that the CAM podcast needs (not that I believe much in worldly wisdom on the topic, but it is worth hearing if only because, sometimes, worldly wisdom seems more connected to reality than the opining of the Catholic Just Warists who only want to talk about war in the theoretical and the abstract). Longtime listeners will, I hope, make connections with the ideas discussed more broadly on this podcast and will, I hope, share those observations charitably and thoughtfully in the comments section. I highly recommend Episode 45 as a follow up to this conversation: https://youtu.be/SEMwUG2EJycFind CAM here:  https://catholicsagainstmilitarism.comRSS feed: http://www.buzzsprout.com/296171​Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/CAMpodcastFind CAM here: https://catholicsagainstmilitarism.comRSS feed: http://www.buzzsprout.com/296171​Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/CAMpodcast

In violence, as in war, two concept stand in tension with one another: proportionality and utility. McMahan identifies one understanding of proportionality as "a constraint on action that causes harm." (Killing in War Pg 19). Utility, on the other hand, often functions as the context for informing one part of strategy, tactics, and techniques. We prioritize actions of these sorts that produce the desired outcome.As such, the tension that exists between them is that they both must be accomplished or accommodated for the action to be considered moral, and further, both can be corrupted. Just as utility can lead to a might-makes-right worldview, and easily justify the absolute eradication of a warring people group, so the idea of proportionality is corrupted if we cease to believe some of those in conflict are less than human. One part of the solution, or the developed skill of managing this tension comes from training. As we have seen in Gun Culture, those who train are rarely, if ever, the ones who participate in senseless violence. It is the untrained, who are both quick to call for the death of their accused oppressors, and it is the untrained who respond to a smaller conflict with overwhelming force. This episode has been sponsored by Obsidian Arms, a manufacturer of tools, parts and firearms, as well as operating as an OEM shop for those looking to bring excellence to the market. Their Minnesota-based shop builds and cuts parts out of U.S.-sourced materials. Their gunsmith tools, custom firearms, and capabilities can be found at www.obsidianarms.comFollow Obsidian Arms on Instagram at @obsidianarmsSupport the REDACTED Culture Cast at redactedculture.locals.comSSP and boutique products at redactedllc.comFollow us on Instagram at @redactedllc

Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com

Investigative journalist, blogger, and broadcaster Brad Friedman's investigative interviews, analysis and commentary, as ripped from the pages of The BRAD BLOG (BradBlog.com), today's current events (if they matter) and the rest of the stuff we have to live with.

Independent investigative journalism, broadcasting, trouble-making and muckraking with Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com

Investigative journalist, blogger, and broadcaster Brad Friedman's investigative interviews, analysis and commentary, as ripped from the pages of The BRAD BLOG (BradBlog.com), today's current events (if they matter) and the rest of the stuff we have to live with.

Although not a hard and fast rule, a heuristic can be applied to both stolen valor claims, and individual violence. Stolen Valor, when a person claims to have held a position in the military that they never achieved, comes in a few different forms. However, in Gun Culture large cases often explode into a witch hunt for similar offenders. The amount of self-aggrandizement is inversely proportional to the likelihood of the story. Similarly, the more skilled a person is at the use of force, the less likely they are to use it, especially in rampages like school shootings. The heuristic of an inverse proportionality can be applied to both, and more importantly uncovers the danger of perceiving one's self as weak as if it were an equivalent to being good. This Episode has been sponsored by Obsidian Arms, a manufacturer of tools, parts and firearms, as well as operating as an OEM shop for those looking to bring excellence to the market. Their Minnesota-based shop builds and cuts parts out of U.S.-sourced materials. Their gunsmith tools, custom firearms, and capabilities can be found at www.obsidianarms.comFollow Obsidian Arms on Instagram at @obsidianarmsSupport the REDACTED Culture Cast at redactedculture.locals.comSSP and boutique products at redactedllc.comFollow us on Instagram at @redactedllc

Rabbi Shlomo Brody, executive director of Ematai and author of Ethics of Our Fighters: A Jewish View on War and Morality, joins the show to talk about the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas and the Jewish tradition of military ethics. ▪️  Times      •      01:28 Introduction      •      04:04 Just war     •      07:27 The Bible as a framework     •      13:34 International service      •      18:33 Reprisals     •      21:37 Purity of arms      •      27:09 Collateral damage     •      33:41 International law     •      35:48 Proportionality      •      39:40 A dangerous ideology   Follow along  on Instagram Find a transcript of today's episode on our School of War Substack

401 - Proportionality and International Humanitarian Law (IHL)After defining proportionality (enjoy the audio clip from the West Wing) there is so much to debate about the ethical conduct of the current war. While it is difficult for citizens to debate these issues with limited information, it is arguably their duty to do so. Is Israel correctly protecting civilian life in Gaza? Should it be sending in more humanitarian aid? How much should international opinion be taken into account? Calev hosts this episode's debate, where Matt takes the position that Israel must improve its conduct in the conflict, and Mike argues that it does not. (followed by another West Wing clip)Am Yisrael Chai!

Rublev's default from Dubai generated tons of discourse this week, and we devote quite a bit of time to it: the facts, the question of proportionality (of both Rublev's actions and the umpire's decision), and why player reactions aren't the final word. We also recap the end of the lead-up to Indian Wells, with several players showing off the best tennis of their lives. Plus, Murray's retirement talk; the ATP's partnership with Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund; and the suspension of a low-ranked player for cannabis and how WADA decides to ban a substance. 2:15 Quick results recap: de Minaur, Boulter, Yuan, Humbert, Baez  8:30 The Rublev Default 13:10 The Act of (non)Contrition 25:35 Proportionality, in a few senses 34:45 Andy Murray talks about the end 38:40 #TheNetflixSlam: it was a bit tacky and very American, but overall a huge win for the sport 46:00 ATP partners with PIF 50:55 A 2-year suspension for weed? Also an opportunity for some nerdy anti-doping discussion

In this episode of "High Bit," host Brett Gibson interviews Rahul Raina, cofounder and CTO of TRM Labs. Rahul shares insights into TRM's mission of creating a safer financial system and discusses the launch of their innovative features. The conversation delves into Rahul's background, TRM's approach to tackling financial crimes, and the challenges of processing massive amounts of data in the ever-evolving world of crypto.  00:00 Introduction 2:09 TRM's mission to build a safer financial system 9:20 The question that started TRM 14:47 Breaking down their iteration process 20:21 The journey to pushing the state of the art 24:52 Proportionality as update strategy

Twelve hundred Israelis were killed by Hamas. Perhaps 15,000 Gazans have died as Israel has pursued its attacker, many Hamas fighters among them. But those numbers alone do not help us understand the concept of proportionality in international law. Ben Wittes of Lawfare is here to help us think through the idea. Plus, delving into "Homonationalism." Also on the show, Rudy has defamed and also suffers from having lesser fame than his old client, Donald Trump. Produced by Joel Patterson and Corey Wara Gift The Gist at https://subscribe.mikepesca.com/gifts Email us at thegist@mikepesca.com To advertise on the show, visit: https://advertisecast.com/TheGist Subscribe to The Gist Subscribe: https://subscribe.mikepesca.com/ Follow Mikes Substack at: PescaProfundities| Mike Pesca | Substack Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Marc LiVecche hosts COL Keith Pavlischek, USMC (RET), long-time Providence contributor for a long-form discussion about the Israel-Hamas War. Points of focus include getting the meaning of proportionality right, the criticality of making basic distinctions between good and evil, right and wrong, causal and moral responsibility, and much else. Among the highlights is their imagined scenario in which they are talking with an honest college student who wants to know how the goal of eliminating Hamas–and the known if undesired cost in innocent lives that will go along with that–is compatible with Christian moral commitments guiding the moral prosecution of war. PROGRAM NOTES: * Photo: LiVecche and Pavlischek at the Israeli Knesset, Jerusalem, in 2017 celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Six Day War. With colleagues from the Philos Project, they had a private audience with Michael Oren, former Israeli ambassador to the United States and then Deputy Minister within the Prime Minister's office. Check out an LiVecche's discussion with him on Israeli history, focusing on the 6 Day War: “One-Hundred-Thirty-Two Hours and Fifty Years“ Michael Brendan Dougherty, “On Proportionality in War” National Review, October 10, 2023 Keith Pavlischek, “Proportionality in Warfare,” from The New Atlantis, No. 27 (Spring 2010), pp. 21-34 Marc LiVecche, “Just War 101,” from providencemag.com Mattias Küntzel, Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism, and the Roots of 9/11 Bob Dylan, “Man of Peace” and “Neighborhood Bully”

The October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas, and Israel's response to it, has raised anew questions about the morality of warfare. Throughout their long history, Christian thinkers have not had one mind about these questions, but the majority of them have adhered to the just war tradition. This tradition acknowledges that “political authorities are responsible for promoting the good and deterring evil,” as Eric Patterson puts it. That responsibility may involve waging war. In this episode of the Influence Podcast, I'm talking to Patterson about how war can be just. I'm George P. Wood, executive editor of Influence magazine and your host. Eric Patterson, Ph.D., is president of the Religious Freedom Institute and scholar-at-large and former dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia. He previously served in the United States military and at the U.S. State Department. He has authored and edited numerous books on the ethics of war, most recently, A Basic Guide to the Just War Tradition, published in October by Baker Academic. ————— This episode of the Influence podcast is brought to you by My Healthy Church, distributors of Momentum Training Series. Momentum Training Series will help you become more effective in your ministry, whether you are a new volunteer or a seasoned leader. The series covers topics such as including children with disabilities, teaching lessons that last, leaving a spiritual legacy, and cultivating a Spirit-empowered kids ministry. For more information about Momentum Training Series, visit MomentumTrainingSeries.com.

Open Source fuels the engine of innovation, according to Arthur Mensch, CEO and co-founder of Mistral AI. Mistral is a French AI company which recently made a splash with releasing Mistral 7B, the most powerful language model for its size to date, and outperforming much larger models. Sarah Guo and Elad Gil sit down with Arthur to discuss why open source could win the AI wars, their $100M+ seed financing, the true nature of scaling laws, why he started his company in France, and what Mistral is building next. Arthur Mensch is Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Mistral AI. A graduate of École Polytechnique, Télécom Paris and holder of the Master Mathématiques Vision Apprentissage at Paris Saclay, he completed his thesis in machine learning for functional brain imaging at Inria (Parietal team). He spent two years as a post-doctoral fellow in the Applied Mathematics department at ENS Ulm, where he carried out work in mathematics for optimization and machine learning. In 2020, he joined DeepMind as a researcher, working on large language models, before leaving in 2023 to co-found Mistral AI with Guillaume Lample and Timothee Lacroix. Show Links:  Arthur's Linkedin Mistral Mistral 7b Retro: Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens Chinchilla: Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models Sign up for new podcasts every week. Email feedback to show@no-priors.com Follow us on Twitter: @NoPriorsPod | @Saranormous | @EladGil | @ArthurMensch Show Notes:  (0:00) - Why he co-founded Mistral (4:22) - Chinchilla and Proportionality  (6:16) - Mistral 7b (9:17) - Data and Annotations (10:33) - Open Source Ecosystem  (17:36) - Proposed Compute and Scale Limits (19:58) - Threat of Bioweapons  (23:08) - Guardrails and Safety  (29:46) - Mistral Platform (31:31) - French and European AI Startups

Grand Mufti of Jerusalism-Hitler link: https://www.hoover.org/research/mufti-and-holocaust _______________________________________ My book The Saad Truth about Happiness: 8 Secrets for Leading the Good Life is now available for order: https://www.amazon.com/Saad-Truth-about-Happiness-Secrets/dp/1684512603 _______________________________________ If you appreciate my work and would like to support it: https://subscribestar.com/the-saad-truth https://patreon.com/GadSaad https://paypal.me/GadSaad To subscribe to my exclusive content on Twitter, please visit my bio at https://twitter.com/GadSaad _______________________________________ This clip was posted earlier today (October 15, 2023) on my YouTube channel as THE SAAD TRUTH_1611: https://youtu.be/Ey-UYsPQ19s _______________________________________ Please visit my website gadsaad.com, and sign up for alerts. If you appreciate my content, click on the "Support My Work" button. I count on my fans to support my efforts. You can donate via Patreon, PayPal, and/or SubscribeStar. _______________________________________ Dr. Gad Saad is a professor, evolutionary behavioral scientist, and author who pioneered the use of evolutionary psychology in marketing and consumer behavior. In addition to his scientific work, Dr. Saad is a leading public intellectual who often writes and speaks about idea pathogens that are destroying logic, science, reason, and common sense. _______________________________________

#Israel: Proportionality in International Law. Richard Epstein,Hoover Institution. https://www.hoover.org/research/moral-clarity-hamas-israel-and-terrorism 1919 Lithuania

As usual, the US and other world leaders are calling for "de-escalation" and a "proportionate" response from Israel as it takes action to defend its country from Hamas terrorists. Kevin Williamson from The Dispatch breaks down what a proportionate response would look like, why escalation is necessary, and what questions we need to be asking if we actually want to have peace in the Middle East. 

Basic human nature responds to aggression by fight or flight. Neither of these responses build community or have positive results. Jesus gives a third way to respond to aggressive behavior that provides the environment to both reduce violence in the aggressor and gives the victim an opportunity to respond with dignity and strength.

Jordan B Peterson Talks to Heather MacDonald on Her New Book. Dr. Jordan B. Peterson and Heather Mac Donald break down her new book, “When Race Trumps Merit,” detailing how the West has bizarrely adopted discriminatory practices in our institutions all in the name of wokeness. Heather Mac Donald is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a contributing editor at City Journal, and the 2005 recipient of the Bradley Prize. Mac Donald received a BA from Yale University, an MA from Cambridge University, and a JD from Stanford University. Her work has covered a range of topics, from higher education and immigration to policing and race relations. Mac Donald's writing has appeared in publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and New York Times. She is the author of several critically acclaimed books, including “The Diversity Delusion” and the New York Times bestseller “The War on Cops.”   Watch this interview at-  https://youtu.be/ZkXJojxSE0U In the Name of Wokeness: Institutionalized Racism | Heather Mac Donald Jordan B Peterson 6.88M subscribers 409,287 views Apr 20, 2023 The Dr. Jordan B. Peterson Podcast Watch Jordan Peterson's "Vision & Destiny" on DW+ https://bit.ly/3KrWbS8 Peterson draws upon his extensive research and relatable real-life experiences to illustrate how to develop attainable goals for intimate relationships, meaningful friendships, and your career. Transform the chaotic potential of the future into actuality — with a vision. Dr. Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: https://bit.ly/3KrWbS8 - Sponsors - ExpressVPN: Get 3 Months FREE of ExpressVPN: https://expressvpn.com/jordan Moink: Get FREE bacon in your first Moink order today! http://www.MoinkBox.com/JBP - Links - For Heather Mac Donald Order your copy of “When Race Trumps Merit” today! https://www.amazon.com/dp/1956007164 Twitter https://twitter.com/HMDatMI - Chapters - (0:00) Coming up (1:36) Intro (2:20) Ethics and hiring criteria (5:21) The technical definition of merit (6:51) A book written out of rage (8:40) Nepotism and dynasty (10:01) Presumed racism, faulty alternatives (17:27) Cognitive ability and the merit index (20:53) The bell curve, meeting the distribution (25:13) The US military, sub-83 (26:10) Founders rhetoric (27:21) This discourse is predominantly driven by race (31:05) Relevant factors (35:20) The Perry preschool experiment, verbal environments (36:47) The best predictor for your child's IQ (39:38) Destructive underclass cultures (45:16) A screeching halt in civil rights (48:04) Becoming a plausible mate, future orientation (49:11) Why we grow up (56:06) Functional values (59:26) How the left defines poverty (1:02:40) Conscientiousness (1:03:51) Bad solutions, the lapse of no-excuses charter schools (1:07:36) Post George Floyd guilt (1:10:50) The alternative explanation for disparity (1:15:10) Research priorities (1:16:34) Proportionality is impossible (1:18:13) Why we developed the SAT's (1:19:11) Excellence is a fundamental human ambition (1:19:40) China is ruthlessly meritocratic (1:22:59) The only requirement of a scientist (1:27:07) The awe of human expression (1:30:32) The racism format and the double standard (1:31:53) The failure of fine art curators, re-emergence of Cane (1:38:07) An excuse for ignorance (1:39:14) Haidt, science behind proclivity and depression (1:43:28) The feminization of the university // SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL // Newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/jordanbpeterson.co... Donations: https://jordanbpeterson.com/donate // COURSES // Discovering Personality: https://jordanbpeterson.com/personality Self Authoring Suite: https://selfauthoring.com Understand Myself (personality test): https://understandmyself.com // BOOKS // Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: https://jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: https://jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-... Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: https://jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m... // LINKS // Website: https://jordanbpeterson.com Events: https://jordanbpeterson.com/events Blog: https://jordanbpeterson.com/blog // SOCIAL // Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson Instagram: https://instagram.com/jordan.b.peterson Facebook: https://facebook.com/drjordanpeterson Telegram: https://t.me/DrJordanPeterson All socials: https://linktr.ee/drjordanbpeterson #JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus

We all make mistakes in life. When we do it's important to take appropriate responsibility, feel the "wince," and make amends as we can. But after we've done that...then what? Many people find it easier to forgive others than they do to truly forgive themselves, and it's not uncommon to be burdened by excessive shame and guilt that has outlived its expiration date.On this episode Dr. Rick and Forrest explore forgiveness, including how we can forgive ourselves. This includes common myths and misunderstandings about forgiveness, the difference between healthy and unhealthy forms of shame and remorse, coming to terms with what we've done, and a roadmap to achieving (self-)forgiveness. Key Topics:0:00: Introduction2:05: Assumptions, approval, and what forgiveness is and is not7:45: What does healthy remorse look like?10:00: Forrest exploring a dream about appropriate remorse13:00: Our internalized justice system17:00: More on dreams and internal parts24:25: Aspects of unhealthy remorse27:30: How to move through a recurring cycle of shame and unhealthy remorse32:30: Proportionality, defensiveness, intention, and owning your mistakes41:00: Clean pain and dirty pain46:55: Some concrete practices51:40: RecapSupport the Podcast: We're on Patreon! For just the cost of a cup of coffee a month you can support the show, and receive a variety of bonuses in return.Sponsors:Listen to Season 2 of Turning Points from Boston Globe Media wherever you get your podcasts!Access over 30 at-home lab tests from Everlywell, and head to everlywell.com/beingwell for twenty percent off your next test.Join over a million people using BetterHelp, the world's largest online counseling platform. Visit betterhelp.com/beingwell for 10% off your first month!Want to sleep better? Try the Calm app! Visit calm.com/beingwell for 40% off a premium subscription.Connect with the show:Subscribe on iTunesFollow Forrest on YouTubeFollow us on InstagramFollow Forrest on InstagramFollow Rick on FacebookFollow Forrest on FacebookVisit Forrest's website