Real or perceived bias of journalists and news producers in mass media
POPULARITY
Categories
109 episodes with Media bias
111 episodes with Media bias
34 episodes with Media bias
31 episodes with Media bias
42 episodes with Media bias
7 episodes with Media bias
23 episodes with Media bias
16 episodes with Media bias
11 episodes with Media bias
8 episodes with Media bias
6 episodes with Media bias
9 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
19 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
6 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
7 episodes with Media bias
10 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
6 episodes with Media bias
3 episodes with Media bias
7 episodes with Media bias
7 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
3 episodes with Media bias
3 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
6 episodes with Media bias
2 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
3 episodes with Media bias
7 episodes with Media bias
7 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
3 episodes with Media bias
10 episodes with Media bias
3 episodes with Media bias
5 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
2 episodes with Media bias
4 episodes with Media bias
2 episodes with Media bias
2 episodes with Media bias
In this episode of "The Kelsi Sheren Perspective," we dive into the controversial actions of the CBC and their impact on independent voices in Canada. Kelsi discusses the recent takedown of a major Canadian political podcast by YouTube, allegedly at the behest of the CBC, and explores the broader implications for free speech and media bias. Tune in as we unpack the complexities of censorship, the role of taxpayer-funded media, and the urgent need for advocacy against authoritarian measures. Don't miss this eye-opening discussion on the future of free expression in Canada.Introduction & Overview - 0:00CBC's Influence on Media Platforms - 1:34Impact of Censorship on Independent Voices - 3:45Role of Taxpayer-Funded Media - 5:12Advocacy for Free Speech - 7:28Conclusion & Call to Action - 9:15Photo via: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-politics-youtube-channel-taken-down-1.7542250Substack: https://substack.com/@kelsisheren - - - - - - - - - - - -SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS - - - - - - - - - - - -RHO Nutrition - Code: KELSI20 - https://rhonutrition.com/KELSIKetone IQ- 30% off with code KELSI - https://ketone.com/KELSIGood Livin- 20% off with code KELSI - https://www.itsgoodlivin.com/?ref=KELSIBrass & Unity - 20% off with code UNITY - http://brassandunity.com - - - - - - - - - - - - -SHOPB&U Jewelry & Eyewear: https://brassandunity.com - - - - - - - - - - - - -Follow #thekelsisherenperspective- - - - - - - - - - - - -CHARITYHeroic Hearts Project - https://www.heroicheartsproject.orgAll Secure Foundation - http://allsecurefoundation.orgDefenders of Freedom -https://www.defendersoffreedom.usBoot Campaign - https://bootcampaign.org
In Episode 148, we dissect the media's role in gaslighting, rewriting, or ignoring the Russia collusion narrative, once touted as fact but now unraveling. Former CIA Director John Ratcliffe reveals more disclosures are imminent from the CIA and FBI, exposing the narrative's cracks. We then explore Shakespeare's timeless insights into human emotions and ambitions, mirrored in today's news: Othello reflects Russiagate's deceit, The Tempest echoes Project Mockingbird's control, Julius Caesar exposes media manipulation of public sentiment, and Macbeth warns of ambition justifying unethical means. The episode concludes with the fiery Texas redistricting showdown, where political lines fuel debate, CNN's Abby Phillip clashing over a debunked NYTimes photo hoax, and Senator Elizabeth Warren's support for Mamdani's socialist agenda. Join us for a deep dive into how media, literature, and politics intertwine, revealing truths about power and deception in today's world. Tune in for Episode 148! Please take a moment to rate and review the show and then share the episode on social media. You can find me on Facebook, X, Instagram, GETTR, TRUTH Social and YouTube by searching for The Alan Sanders Show. And, consider becoming a sponsor of the show by visiting my Patreon page!!
In this episode, the hosts Trevor aka 'The Iron Fist', Scott aka 'The Velvet Glove', and Joe the tech guy, discuss the significant developments and reactions to the ongoing crisis in Gaza over the past week. They highlight the sudden shift in media coverage and political responses, focusing on the impact of the growing starvation in Gaza. The discussion covers the change in stance by various global leaders and the implications of Western civilisation's reactions to the crisis. They also touch upon related matters such as media bias, international law, and humanitarian issues. The show concludes with a lighter segment on Donald Trump's latest statements and actions, as well as a call for supporting unions.00:00 Introduction: Setting the Stage00:36 Gaza Crisis: A Turning Point01:04 Meet the Hosts01:43 Media Bias and Western Civilization02:33 International Reactions and Political Dynamics06:30 Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza11:21 Australian Government's Stance15:53 Protests and Public Sentiment29:55 Media Coverage and Propaganda36:09 TikTok and Censorship37:13 Controversial Statements by Marjorie Taylor Greene37:48 Debate on Jewish Identity and Anti-Zionism38:47 Historical Context and Socialism in Israel39:43 Current Events: School Children and Antisemitism40:31 Yanis Perspective on Hamas and Apartheid46:11 Discussion on Japan's Military Role47:26 Trump's Policies and Federal Workers50:03 Trump's Trade Tariffs and Beef Exports54:05 Windmills and Clean Energy Debate56:38 Trump's Battle with the Federal Reserve59:10 Unionism and Social Change01:05:53 Conclusion and Final ThoughtsTo financially support the Podcast you can make:a per-episode donation via Patreon or one-off donation via credit card; orone-off or regular donations via Paypal orif you are into Cryptocurrency you can send Satoshis. We Livestream every Monday night at 7:30 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.auYou can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au
Today on The Truth Central, Dr. Jerome Corsi takes a deep dive into New York Times' Reporter Walter Duranty, who was given a Pulitzer Prize for his fictional accounts of Josef Stalin's rule over the Soviet Union, serving as the communist dictator's public relations agent and promoter. Duranty's glowing stories about Stalin and the communist oppression included lies about life under the dictatorship, propping the murderous tyrant up into celebrity status (at least for those who believed the stories) and willfully hiding Holodomor - the starvation of Ukrainians - from the world.Still, there was an even darker side to Duranty and his alliance with evil: the disgraced reporter's life was one of debauchery, sinister behavior, quid-pro-quo deals with Soviet leaders and a close bond with Satanist Aleister Crowley.Visit The Corsi Nation website: https://www.corsination.comIf you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:Get RX Meds Now: https://www.getrxmedsnow.comMyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.
Boobs, Bombs, and Boebert's Bad BoyJoin Dan and Corey in a wild episode of Libservative filled with controversial opinions and no-holds-barred commentary. They kick things off with a heated debate on Michigan's bipolar weather and its impact on daily life. The conversation takes a deep dive into swamps and winter, drawing bizarre parallels to the American political system. Next, they tackle the controversial stock trading bill introduced by Josh Hawley, exposing congressional hypocrisy with hilarious impersonations. The episode takes a dark turn discussing starvation tactics in Gaza and Trump's awkward Epstein denials. They wrap up with a juicy scandal involving Lauren Bobert's son, crazy corporate initiatives to reduce national debt, and the absurd controversy around Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad. Don't miss out on the laughs, rants, and surprisingly insightful analysis!00:00 Welcome to Libservative00:52 Michigan Weather Woes01:25 Winter vs. Summer Debate02:55 Sledding and Winter Activities05:39 Economic Updates and Interest Rates07:11 Unemployment and Inflation Discussion11:01 Tariffs and Trade Policies27:16 Congressional Stock Trading Ban48:52 Randy Fine's Controversial Comments54:41 Pro-Israel Propaganda Critique54:52 Charlie Kirk's Hypocrisy56:13 Rabbi Icky's Interview57:35 Gaza's Starvation Crisis01:03:38 Debunking Propaganda01:10:17 Political Realignments and Media Bias01:19:49 Trump and Epstein Controversy01:22:36 Sydney Sweeney Ad Controversy01:34:36 Lauren Boebert's Family Scandals01:43:49 Closing Remarks and Sign-Off
Mark Walters from Armed American Radio breaks down the tragic New York City shooting, spotlighting the fallen NYPD officer's heroism and the shocking failure of New York's strict gun laws to prevent the attack. He criticizes media for downplaying the role of a “good guy with a gun” who helped stop violence in a separate incident, highlighting a deliberate editorial bias. Walters and Marc debate the subjective use of “mental health” in gun discussions, and the futility of more gun laws against determined criminals. The segment closes with a preview of upcoming political discussion about Trump's EU trade deal and Gaza aid.
In this episode Tudor interviews investigative journalist Lee Smith about the ongoing implications of the Russia investigation and its impact on Donald Trump's presidency. They discuss the role of media in shaping the narrative, the accountability of intelligence officials, and the potential for civil suits against those involved in the political lawfare against Trump. Smith emphasizes the importance of justice for Trump and his associates, as well as the need for accountability for the media's involvement in the intelligence operations surrounding the investigation. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.com Purchase Lee's NEW Book 'Disappearing the President' HERE Watch The Tudor Dixon Podcast on RumbleSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Welcome to Episode 143 of The Alan Sanders Show! Today, we dive into the EU trade deal, unpacking its implications for global markets and why it's stirring debate. We expose the mainstream media's silence on explosive Russiagate intel, revealing details that demand attention. The Democrats are hitting rock bottom in the polls—Alan breaks down what's driving their freefall and what it means for the political landscape. Plus, we discuss why nobody can outshine Trump's unique political brand in the current climate. With sharp wit and unfiltered analysis, Alan connects the dots on these critical stories, offering insights you won't hear on legacy media. Tune in for a no-holds-barred take on today's headlines, blending humor, skepticism, and truth-seeking. Don't miss this episode—subscribe, share, and join the conversation as we cut through the noise and get to the heart of what's shaping our world! Please take a moment to rate and review the show and then share the episode on social media. You can find me on Facebook, X, Instagram, GETTR, TRUTH Social and YouTube by searching for The Alan Sanders Show. And, consider becoming a sponsor of the show by visiting my Patreon page!!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this Omnibus, we bring you our collected interviews with historian and author, Richard Dolan. From the premiere episode of Somewhere in the Skies to about a month ago, these conversations took place over the span of eight years and over the course of 400 episodes. Join us as we continue to navigate the delicate conversation of UFOs throughout history and the secret keepers who may hold some of the keys to the UFO mystery and beyond.Please take a moment to rate and review us on Spotify and Apple.Book Ryan on CAMEO at: https://bit.ly/3kwz3DOPatreon: http://www.patreon.com/somewhereskiesByMeACoffee: http://www.buymeacoffee.com/UFxzyzHOaQPayPal: Sprague51@hotmail.comDiscord: https://discord.gg/NTkmuwyB4FBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/ryansprague.bsky.socialTwitter: https://twitter.com/SomewhereSkiesInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/somewhereskiespod/Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ryansprague51Order Ryan's new book: https://a.co/d/4KNQnM4Order Ryan's older book: https://amzn.to/3PmydYCStore: http://tee.pub/lic/ULZAy7IY12URead Ryan's articles at: https://medium.com/@ryan-sprague51Opening Theme Song by SeptembryoCopyright © 2025 Ryan Sprague. All rights reservedSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/somewhere-in-the-skies. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Marc and Kim deliver a relentless, no-holds-barred critique of the left's biggest scandals and failures across four explosive hours. Hour 1 celebrates Bob Onder's bold push to rename the Kennedy Center after Trump, exposes the Epstein cover-up, and highlights Kansas City's failed city-run grocery store as a symbol of progressive decay. Hour 2 digs into Tulsi Gabbard's fearless unveiling of Obama's intelligence manipulation, Trump's game-changing trade deal with Japan, and sharp sports insights on the Cardinals' future. Hour 3 tears apart the Obama administration's Russia collusion fraud with former Senator Jim Tallent confirming deep-state sabotage, while spotlighting the political war over Gabbard's documents and questioning justice in the Idaho mass stabbing case. Hour 4 reveals Kansas City's public transit and food crises, breaks down stalled Trump nominations and Russiagate's immunity shield, and delivers live White House updates on sanctuary cities and media's anti-Trump meltdown—capping a powerful series that challenges the swamp and the propaganda machine at every turn.
On this episode of Carnivore Bites, Jeff Sherman and Eric Lopkin take aim at the fall of Stephen Colbert, Hunter Biden's wild interview, the crumbling legacy of political elites, and the media's complicity.
Jeremy Cordeaux returns with another fiery Garage edition, holding nothing back as he critiques the Albanese government, reflects on Australia’s economic struggles, and questions the media's role in shaping public opinion. From power prices to immigration, Jeremy challenges conventional narratives and calls for accountability in politics and journalism. Anthony Albanese and public trust issues Skyrocketing electricity prices and economic pressures Media bias and manipulation, especially the ABC Immigration and national identity concerns Qantas CEO controversies Aged care and political mismanagement The future of Australian democracy Political correctness vs. free speech Calls for media accountability and integrity Australian sovereignty and international perception More at Jeremycordeaux.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The End of The Late Show: Is America Laughing or Just Tuning Out?GoRight with Peter Boykin Commentaryhttps://gorightnews.com/the-end-of-the-late-show-is-america-laughing-or-just-tuning-out/ https://rumble.com/v6wc97g-the-end-of-the-late-show-is-america-laughing-or-just-tuning-out-gorightnews.html https://youtu.be/mDjwUwxw8mw https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-end-of-the-late-show-go-right-with-peter-boykin--67025884In “The End of The Late Show: Is America Laughing or Just Tuning Out?”, Peter Boykin delivers a sharp #GoRight commentary on the cultural collapse of late-night television. As CBS announces the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, this article explores the evolution from Johnny Carson's bipartisan humor to today's partisan comedy echo chambers. With insight, history, and a call for unity through authentic conversation, Boykin asks whether we're witnessing the end of a shared American experience — or just the beginning of something new. #GoRight, #PeterBoykin, #LateShow, #Colbert, #CancelCulture, #LateNightTV, #CBS, #TalkShow, #ComedyCrisis, #TrumpEffect, #MediaBias, #FreeSpeech, #Constitutionalist, #CulturalLoss, #WhatHappenedToFunnyGoRight with Peter BoykinIt's TIME TO #GoRight, For Truth, Liberty, and the Constitution!
Trump, Epstein & the Biggest Cover-Up of Our Time? | Karel Cast Ep 25-99 An SF Chronicle opinion piece says Trump and Epstein may be at the center of the biggest scandal of our time — filled with lies, cover-ups, and underage sex trafficking. But is that really the biggest? What about ICE abducting Americans off the streets without warrants? Why isn't that front-page outrage? Is our moral compass broken? PLUS — it's time for some Pet Peeves Therapy:
In this episode, Jill Savage shares her journey from sports journalism to political reporting, discussing the challenges and intricacies of investigative journalism. She delves into her recent work on Congressman Cory Mills, revealing the complexities of political narratives and the importance of accountability in journalism. Jill emphasizes the need for integrity in reporting, especially within the political landscape, and offers insights into her passion for uncovering the truth. The discussion also touches on the evolving nature of sports journalism and the impact of political bias in media.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
DJ Whitmore spent 30 years inside the walls of federal prisons — not as an inmate, but as an associate warden. From serving in the Gulf War to working his way up through the ranks of the Bureau of Prisons, DJ has seen every side of the justice system. In this powerful interview, he shares what really goes on behind bars, from low-security camps to high-security penitentiaries. If you've ever wondered what prison is like from the other side — this episode pulls back the curtain. #FederalPrison #BureauOfPrisons #PrisonWardenStories #InsidePrisonWalls #PrisonLifeUncovered #VeteranToWarden #TrueCrimePodcast #LifeBehindBars Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ Presented by Tyson 2.0 & Wooooo Energy: https://tyson20.com/ https://woooooenergy.com/ Buy Merch: http://www.ianbick.com/shop Timestamps: 00:00:00 Life Inside Federal Prisons: Insights from Associate Warden DJ Whitmore 00:06:58 Career Path in Corrections: From Military to Federal Bureau 00:14:05 Climbing the Professional Ladder in Corrections 00:21:24 Challenges of Inmate Punishments and Privileges 00:28:40 Navigating Prison Rules: Finding Balance 00:35:40 Tragic Consequences: Violence Over Minor Disputes 00:42:43 The Role of Paperwork in Prison Safety 00:49:35 Unbelievable Contraband Story: Inmate's Desperate Measures 00:56:38 Inmate Labor Dynamics and Facility Management 01:03:34 Challenges of Substitute Teaching in Prisons 01:10:32 Importance of Mental Health Support 01:17:48 Leadership in Bureau of Prisons 01:24:54 High Incidents in the Special Management Unit 01:32:03 Accountability in Correctional Facilities 01:39:21 Challenges in the U.S. Prison System 01:46:23 Media Bias in Union vs. Administration Story Powered by: Just Media House : https://www.justmediahouse.com/ Creative direction, design, assets, support by FWRD: https://www.fwrd.co Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Middle East specialist Andrew Fox joins The Winston Marshall Show for a haunting, firsthand account of the horrors unfolding in Gaza—and the global narratives that refuse to face the truth.Fox, recently returned from the region, describes scenes of unspeakable brutality—massacres, ch*ld soldiers, and war crimes ignored by much of the international press. He explains how Hamas manipulates both civilians and the global media to fuel its propaganda war, while using human shields to mask its operations.They discuss the international community's moral double standards, the weaponisation of victimhood, and the psychological toll on those who witness the atrocities firsthand.All this—media distortion, humanitarian tragedy, Hamas war tactics, and the unseen horrors the world still refuses to look at…-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------To see more exclusive content and interviews consider subscribing to my substack here: https://www.winstonmarshall.co.uk/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA:Substack: https://www.winstonmarshall.co.uk/X: https://twitter.com/mrwinmarshallInsta: https://www.instagram.com/winstonmarshallLinktree: https://linktr.ee/winstonmarshall----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chapters01:25 Andrew's Background and Experience05:19 The Destruction in Gaza and Hamas' Tunnels09:46 Media Coverage and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation20:33 The Ceasefire Deal and Hamas' Future30:15 The Broader Middle East Conflict38:28 The Abraham Accords and Palestinian Statehood51:09 Media Bias and the Role of Journalists in Conflict Zones1:03:00 Final Thoughts Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In a truly bizarre Washington Post article, penned by a literal clown… Excuse us, a Clown. As we learn the grammatical rules of using Clown in a sentence, Subway Takes spiked their interview with Kamala because it was embarrassing. Release the tapes! Plus, Hakeem's bad photoshop is not a first-time problem. ️ Then, anti-ICE violence is springing up around the country and yet, no one is wondering how we got here. From the shooting last year, the fire-bombing of Gov. Shapiro, to the LA riots and more — we get to the permission structure the left built for its violent tendencies. If you have a round of golf planned, please take this opportunity to make sure you don't pick a fight with the wrong former NHL player in our favorite video of the week. And American Beverage President and CEO, Kevin Keane on the growth of MAHA and their efforts at transparency. For more info visit https://goodtoknowfacts.org/ 00:00 - Democrats and the "Hamas Caucus" 02:30 - The Infamous Clown Article 11:00 - MORE Hakeem Jeffries' Photoshopped Pics 15:30 - Kamala Harris's Shelved Podcast Interview 22:30 - The Violence Against ICE 36:00 - The Democratic Party's Silence and Captivity to Radical Elements 48:30 - A Very Polite Golf Fight 59:59 - Kevin Keane on MAHA and The Beverage Industry Efforts Our Sponsors: ➢Find out the true power of America's oil and natural gas. Go to https://lightsonenergy.org/ ➢Help fuel America's energy advantage. Visit https://www.chevron.com/America to learn more
Across these two impassioned broadcasts, the host takes aim at mainstream media narratives and political hypocrisy. First, they break down how climate change headlines—like claims that extreme weather is worsening—ignore historical floods and NASA data showing record ice growth, accusing outlets like the AP of deliberately spreading propaganda. Then, they respond to criticism about U.S. policy toward Iran, arguing that military action against Soleimani was a necessary defense of American troops and that Iran's $21 million bounty on Trump reveals the true stakes. With sharp commentary on the intersection of media bias, national security, and partisan politics, this segment challenges conventional narratives on climate and foreign policy alike.
Marc returns fired up, blasting the political exploitation of the Texas flood tragedy—from Rosie O'Donnell's unhinged Trump blame to racist hot takes the media won't touch. He breaks down the ambush of an ICE officer and slams Democrats like AOC and Ilhan Omar for fueling violence against law enforcement. In a deep dive on Trump's “Big Beautiful Bill,” Marc, Wiggins, and Kim uncover major wins: border wall progress, Planned Parenthood defunding, American energy dominance, HSA and child tax reforms, and factory incentives that put America First. Then they expose an outrageous truth: the U.S. still values its gold at just $42/oz—ignoring over $750 billion in real wealth. Is the gold even in Fort Knox? And who's really running in 2028? Expect fireworks and blunt truth.
American Hypocrisy: Why Do We Tolerate These Contradictions? The contradictions in American life are everywhere — and today, we break them down. Why is sex work still taboo when porn is the internet's #1 use? Why are gay adult performers still punished while straight ones get mainstream careers? Why do we spend billions on incarceration but won't invest in housing? Why do we mourn 100 deaths in Texas but ignore daily massacres in Gaza or Ukraine? And why, in a nation of excess, do so many still go hungry? From reality shows like Love Island booting cast members over adult content, to America's obsession with punishment over prevention, today's Karel Cast dives deep into the twisted double standards that define U.S. culture. If you've ever wondered why America seems so upside down — I've got thoughts. Uncensored. Unfiltered. Unhinged. It's The Karel Cast.
In this episode, Im joined by special guest Kira Shishkin to unpack the chaos of todays media landscapefrom the nonstop firehose of information to the dangers of bias and misinformation. We talk about how the average person is drowning in headlines, spin, and clickbait, and what can be done to break through the noise.Kira is the CEO of informed, a news concierge service delivering concise, factual, and bias-free news briefings straight to your phone. No fluff, no ads, just the facts. With a background in investment banking, private equity, and tech entrepreneurship, and a Forbes 30 Under 30 recognition, Kira brings sharp insight into how we can rethink our relationship with the news.Learn more at https://informed.nowConnect with Kira on LinkedIn: https://844406.info/kira
In this special Fourth of July episode, we're talking about The Big Beautiful Bill—yes, it passed, and yes, it's time to get on board. While I normally support smaller, single-issue legislation (so we can actually see what's in these bills), there's still a lot to be excited about here. From major investments in border security to a strong push toward deporting illegal immigrants, this bill takes some long-overdue steps in the right direction.Sure, there are parts that could've been better—and no surprise, Elon Musk isn't thrilled because it didn't personally benefit him as much as he hoped—but overall, I agree with the majority of what's in it.Tune in as we break down the good and the bad inside The Big Beautiful Bill—and what it means for the future of our country.Happy Fourth of July, and let's keep America strong.
How has the media distorted Israel's response to the October 7 Hamas attacks? In this powerful conversation from AJC Global Forum 2025, award-winning journalist and former AP correspondent Matti Friedman breaks down the media bias, misinformation, and double standards shaping global coverage of Israel. Moderated by AJC Chief Communications and Strategy Officer Belle Etra Yoeli, this episode explores how skewed narratives have taken hold in the media, in a climate of activist journalism. A must-listen for anyone concerned with truth in journalism, Israel advocacy, and combating disinformation in today's media landscape. Take Action: Take 15 seconds and urge your elected leaders to send a clear, united message: We stand with Israel. Take action now. Resources: Global Forum 2025 session with Matti Friedman:: Watch the full video. Listen – AJC Podcasts: The Forgotten Exodus: Untold stories of Jews who left or were driven from Arab nations and Iran People of the Pod: Latest Episodes: John Spencer's Key Takeaways After the 12-Day War: Air Supremacy, Intelligence, and Deterrence Iran's Secret Nuclear Program and What Comes Next in the Iranian Regime vs. Israel War Why Israel Had No Choice: Inside the Defensive Strike That Shook Iran's Nuclear Program Follow People of the Pod on your favorite podcast app, and learn more at AJC.org/PeopleofthePod You can reach us at: peopleofthepod@ajc.org If you've appreciated this episode, please be sure to tell your friends, and rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Transcript of the Interview: Manya Brachear Pashman: I've had the privilege of interviewing journalism colleague Matti Friedman: twice on this podcast. In 2022, Matti took listeners behind the scenes of Jerusalem's AP bureau where he had worked between 2006 and 2011 and shared some insight on what happens when news outlets try to oversimplify the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Then in 2023, I got to sit down with Matti in Jerusalem to talk about his latest book on Leonard Cohen and how the 1973 Yom Kippur War was a turning point both for the singer and for Israel. Earlier this year, Matti came to New York for AJC Global Forum 2025, and sat down with Belle Yoeli, AJC Chief Strategy and Communications Officer. They rehashed some of what we discussed before, but against an entirely different backdrop: post-October 7. For this week's episode, we bring you a portion of that conversation. Belle Yoeli: Hi, everyone. Great to see all of you. Thank you so much for being here. Matti, thank you for being here. Matti Friedman: Thanks for having me. Belle Yoeli: As you can tell by zero empty seats in this room, you have a lot of fans, and unless you want to open with anything, I'm going to jump right in. Okay, great. So for those of you who don't know, in September 2024 Matti wrote a piece in The Free Press that is a really great foundation for today's discussion. In When We Started to Lie, Matti, you reflect on two pieces that you had written in 2015 about issues of media coverage of Israel during Operation Protective Edge in 2014. And this piece basically talked about the conclusions you drew and how they've evolved since October 7. We're gonna get to those conclusions, but first, I'm hoping you can describe for everyone what were the issues of media coverage of Israel that you first identified based on the experience in 2014? Matti Friedman: First of all, thanks so much for having me here, and thanks for all of the amazing work that you guys are doing. So it's a real honor for me. I was a reporter for the AP, between 2006 and the very end of 2011, in Jerusalem. I was a reporter and editor. The AP, of course, as you know, is the American news agency. It's the world's largest news organization, according to the AP, according to Reuters, it's Reuters. One of them is probably right, but it's a big deal in the news world. And I had an inside view inside one of the biggest AP bureaus. In fact, the AP's biggest International Bureau, which was in Jerusalem. So I can try to sketch the problems that I saw as a reporter there. It would take me seven or eight hours, and apparently we only have four or five hours for this lunch, so I have to keep it short. But I would say there are two main problems. We often get very involved. When we talk about problems with coverage of Israel. We get involved with very micro issues like, you call it a settlement. I call it a neighborhood. Rockets, you know, the Nakba, issues of terminology. But in fact, there are two major problems that are much bigger, and because they're bigger, they're often harder to see. One of the things that I noticed at the Bureau was the scale of coverage of Israel. So at the time that I was at the AP, again, between 2006 and the very end of 2011 we had about 40 full time staffers covering Israel. That's print reporters like me, stills photographers, TV crews. Israel, as most of you probably know, is a very small country. As a percentage of the world's surface, Israel is 1/100 of 1% of the surface of the world, and as a percentage of the land mass of the Arab world, Israel is 1/5 of 1%. 0.2%. And we had 40 people covering it. And just as a point of comparison, that was dramatically more people than we had at the time covering China. There are about 10 million people today in Israel proper, in China, there are 1.3 billion. We had more people in Israel than we had in China. We had more people in Israel than we had in India, which is another country of about 1.3 billion people. We had more people in Israel than we had in all of the countries of Sub-Saharan Africa. That's 50 something countries. So we had more people in Israel than we had in all of those countries combined. And sometimes I say that to Jews, I say we covered Israel more than we covered China, and people just stare at me blankly, because it's Israel. So of course, that makes perfect sense. I happen to think Israel is the most important country in the world because I live there. But if the news is meant to be a rational analysis of events on planet Earth, you cannot cover Israel more than you cover the continent of Africa. It just doesn't make any sense. So one of the things that first jumped out at me– actually, that's making me sound smarter than I am. It didn't jump out at me at first. It took a couple of years. And I just started realizing that it was very strange that the world's largest organization had its largest international bureau in the State of Israel, which is a very small country, very small conflict in numeric terms. And yet there was this intense global focus on it that made people think that it was the most important story in the world. And it definitely occupies a place in the American political imagination that is not comparable to any other international conflict. So that's one part of the problem. That was the scope, the other part was the context. And it took me a while to figure this out, but the coverage of Israel is framed as an Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The conflict is defined in those terms, the Israeli Palestinian conflict, and everyone in this room has heard it discussed in those terms. Sometimes we discuss it in those terms, and that is because the news folks have framed the conflict in those terms. So at the AP bureau in Jerusalem, every single day, we had to write a story that was called, in the jargon of the Bureau, Is-Pals, Israelis, Palestinians. And it was the daily wrap of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. So what Netanyahu said, what Abbas said, rockets, settlers, Hamas, you know, whatever, the problem is that there isn't an Israeli=Palestinian conflict. And I know that sounds crazy, because everyone thinks there is. And of course, we're seeing conflicts play out in the most tragic way right now in Gaza. But most of Israel's wars have not been fought against Palestinians. Israel has unfortunately fought wars against Egyptians and Jordanians and Lebanese and Iraqis. And Israel's most important enemy at the moment, is Iran, right? The Iranians are not Palestinian. The Iranians are not Arab. They're Muslim, but they're not Arab. So clearly, there is a broader regional conflict that's going on that is not an Israeli Palestinian conflict, and we've seen it in the past year. If we had a satellite in space looking down and just following the paths of ballistic missiles and rockets fired at Israel. Like a photograph of these red trails of rockets fired at Israel. You'd see rockets being fired from Iraq and from Yemen and from Lebanon and from Gaza and from Iran. You'd see the contours of a regional conflict. And if you understand it's a regional conflict, then you understand the way Israelis see it. There are in the Arab world, 300 million people, almost all of them Muslim. And in one corner of that world, there are 7 million Jews, who are Israelis. And if we zoom out even farther to the level of the Islamic world, we'll see that there are 2 billion people in the Islamic world. There's some argument about the numbers, but it's roughly a quarter of the world's population. And in one corner of that world there, there are 7 million Israeli Jews. The entire Jewish population on planet Earth is a lot smaller than the population of Cairo. So the idea that this is an Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where Israelis are the stronger side, where Israelis are the dominant actor, and where Israelis are, let's face it, the bad guy in the story, that's a fictional presentation of a story that actually works in a completely different way. So if you take a small story and make it seem big. If you take a complicated regional story and you make it seem like a very small local story involving only Israelis and Palestinians, then you get the highly simplified but very emotive narrative that everyone is being subjected to now. And you get this portrayal of a villainous country called Israel that really looms in the liberal imagination of the West as an embodiment of the worst possible qualities of the age. Belle Yoeli: Wow. So already you were seeing these issues when you were reporter, earlier on. But like this, some of this was before and since, since productive edge. This is over 10 years ago, and here we are. So October 7 happens. You already know these issues exist. You've identified them. How would you describe because obviously we have a lot of feelings about this, but like, strictly as a journalist, how would you describe the coverage that you've seen since during October 7, in its aftermath? Is it just these issues? Have they? Have they expanded? Are there new issues in play? What's your analysis? Matti Friedman: The coverage has been great. I really have very I have no criticism of it. I think it's very accurate. I think that I, in a way, I was lucky to have been through what I went through 10 or 15 years ago, and I wasn't blindsided on October 7, as many people were, many people, quite naturally, don't pay close attention to this. And even people who are sympathetic to Israel, I think, were not necessarily convinced that my argument about the press was right. And I think many people thought it was overstated. And you can read those articles from 2014 one was in tablet and one was in the Atlantic, but it's basically the two chapters of the same argument. And unfortunately, I think that those the essays, they stand up. In fact, if you don't really look at the date of the essays, they kind of seem that they could have been written in the past year and a half. And I'm not happy about that. I think that's and I certainly wrote them in hopes that they would somehow make things better. But the issues that I saw in the press 15 years ago have only been exacerbated since then. And October seven didn't invent the wheel. The issues were pre existing, but it took everything that I saw and kind of supercharged it. So if I talked about ideological conformity in the bureaus that has been that has become much more extreme. A guy like me, I was hired in 2006 at the AP. I'm an Israeli of center left political leanings. Hiring me was not a problem in 22,006 by the time I left the AP, at the end of 2011 I'm pretty sure someone like me would not have been hired because my views, which are again, very centrist Israeli views, were really beyond the pale by the time that I left the AP, and certainly, and certainly today, the thing has really moved what I saw happening at the AP. And I hate picking on the AP because they were just unfortunate enough to hire me. That was their only error, but what I'm saying about them is true of a whole new. Was heard. It's true of the Times and CNN and the BBC, the news industry really works kind of as a it has a herd mentality. What happened was that news decisions were increasingly being made by people who are not interested in explanatory journalism. They were activists. Activists had moved into the key positions in the Bureau, and they had a very different idea of what press coverage was supposed to do. I would say, and I tried to explain it in that article for the free press, when I approach a news story, when I approach the profession of journalism, the question that I'm asking is, what's going on? That's the question I think you're supposed to ask, what's going on? How can I explain it in a way that's as accurate as as possible? The question that was increasingly being asked was not what's going on. The question was, who does this serve? That's an activist question. So when you look at a story, you don't ask, is it true, or is it not true? You ask, who's it going to help? Is it going to help the good guys, or is it going to help the bad guys? So if Israel in the story is the villain, then a story that makes Israel seem reasonable, reasonable or rational or sympathetic needs to be played down to the extent possible or made to disappear. And I can give you an example from my own experience. At the very end of 2008 two reporters in my bureau, people who I know, learned of a very dramatic peace offer that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had made to the Palestinians. So Olmert, who was the prime minister at the time, had made a very far reaching offer that was supposed to see a Palestinian state in all of Gaza, most of the West Bank, with land swaps for territory that Israel was going to retain, and a very far reaching international consortium agreement to run the Old City of Jerusalem. Was a very dramatic. It was so far reaching, I think that Israelis probably wouldn't have supported it. But it was offered to the Palestinian side, and the Palestinians rejected it as insufficient. And two of our reporters knew about this, and they'd seen a map of the offer. And this was obviously a pretty big story for a bureau that had as the thrust of its coverage the peace process. The two reporters who had the story were ordered to drop it, they were not allowed to cover the story. And there were different explanations. And they didn't, by the way, AP did not publish the story at the time, even though we were the first to have it. Eventually, it kind of came out and in other ways, through other news organizations. But we knew at first. Why were we not allowed to cover it? Because it would have made the Israelis who we were trying to villainize and demonize, it would have made Israel seem like it was trying to solve the conflict on kind of reasonable lines, which, of course, was true at that time. So that story would have upended the thrust of our news coverage. So it had to be made to go away, even though it was true, it would have helped the wrong people. And that question of who does this serve has destroyed, I want to say all, but much, of what used to be mainstream news coverage, and it's not just where Israel is concerned. You can look at a story like the mental health of President Biden, right. Something's going on with Biden at the end of his term. It's a huge global news story, and the press, by and large, won't touch it, because why? I mean, it's true, right? We're all seeing that it's true, but why can't you touch it? Because it would help the wrong people. It would help the Republicans who in the press are the people who you are not supposed to help. The origins of COVID, right? We heard one story about that. The true story seems to be a different story. And there are many other examples of stories that are reported because they help the right people, or not reported because they would help the wrong people. And I saw this thinking really come into action in Israel 10 or 15 years ago, and unfortunately, it's really spread to include the whole mainstream press scene and really kill it. I mean, essentially, anyone interested in trying to get a solid sense of what's going on, we have very few options. There's not a lot, there's not a lot out there. So that's the broader conclusion that I drew from what I thought at the time was just a very small malfunction involving Israel coverage. But Israel coverage ends up being a symptom of something much bigger, as Jews often are the symptom of something much bigger that's going on. So my problems in the AP bureau 15 years ago were really a kind of maybe a canary in the coal mine, or a whiff of something much bigger that we were all going to see happen, which is the transformation of the important liberal institutions of the west into kind of activist arms of a very radical ideology that has as its goal the transformation of the west into something else. And that's true of the press, and it's true of NGO world, places like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, which were one thing 30 years ago and are something very different today. And it's also true of big parts of the academy. It's true of places like Columbia and places like Harvard, they still have the logo, they still have the name, but they serve a different purpose, and I just happen to be on the ground floor of it as a reporter. Belle Yoeli: So obviously, this concept of who does this serve, and this activist journalism is deeply concerning, and you actually mentioned a couple other areas, academia, obviously we're in that a lot right now in terms of what's going on campus. So I guess a couple of questions on that. First of all, think about this very practically, tachlis, in the day to day. I'm a journalist, and I go to write about what's happening in Gaza. What would you say is, if you had to throw out a percentage, are all of them aware of this activist journalist tendency? Or you think it's like, like intentional for many of them, or it's sort of they've been educated that way, and it's their worldview in such a way that they don't even know that they're not reporting the news in a very biased way. Does that make sense? Matti Friedman: Totally. I think that many people in the journalism world today view their job as not as explaining a complicated situation, but as swaying people toward the correct political conclusion. Journalism is power, and the power has to be wielded in support of justice. Now, justice is very slippery, and, you know, choosing who's in the right is very, very slippery, and that's how journalism gets into a lot of trouble. Instead of just trying to explain what's going on and then leave, you're supposed to leave the politics and the activism to other people. Politics and activism are very important. But unless everyone can agree on what is going on, it's impossible to choose the kind of act, the kind of activism that would be useful. So when the journalists become activists, then no one can understand what's what's going on, because the story itself is fake, and there are many, many examples of it. But you know, returning to what you asked about, about October 7, and reporting post October 7, you can really see it happen. The massacres of October 7 were very problematic for the ideological strain that now controls a lot of the press, because it's counterintuitive. You're not supposed to sympathize with Israelis. And yet, there were a few weeks after October 7 when they were forced to because the nature of the atrocities were so heinous that they could not be ignored. So you had the press covering what happened on October 7, but you could feel it. As someone who knows that scene, you could feel there was a lot of discomfort. There was a lot of discomfort. It wasn't their comfort zone, and you knew that within a few weeks, maybe a month, it was gonna snap back at the first opportunity. When did it snap back? In the story of the Al Ahli hospital strike. If you remember that a few weeks in, there's a massive global story that Israel has rocketed Hospital in Gaza and killed about 500 people and and then you can see the kind of the comfort the comfort zone return, because the story that the press is primed to cover is a story about villainous Israelis victimizing innocent Palestinians, and now, now we're back. Okay. Now Israel's rocketing hospital. The problem was that it hadn't happened, and it was that a lot of stories don't happen, and they're allowed to stand. But this story was so far from the truth that even the people involved couldn't make it work, and it had to be retracted, but it was basically too late. And then as soon as the Israeli ground offensive got into swing in Gaza, then the story really becomes the same old story, which is a story of Israel victimizing Palestinians for no reason. And you'll never see Hamas militants in uniform in Gaza. You just see dead civilians, and you'll see the aftermath of a rocket strike when the, you know, when an Israeli F16 takes out the launcher, but you will never see the strike. Which is the way it's worked in Gaza since the very end of 2008 which is when the first really bad round of violence in Gaza happens, which is when I'm at the AP. As far as I know, I was the first staffer to erase information from the story, because we were threatened by Hamas, which happened at the very end of 2008. We had a great reporter in Gaza, a Palestinian who had always been really an excellent reporter. We had a detail in a story. The detail was a crucial one. It was that Hamas fighters were dressed as civilians and were being counted as civilians in the death toll, an important thing to know, that went out in an AP story. The reporter called me a few hours later. It was clear that someone had spoken to him, and he told me, I was on the desk in Jerusalem, so I was kind of writing the story from the main bureau in Jerusalem. And he said, Matti, you have to take that detail out of the story. And it was clear that someone had threatened him. I took the detail out of the story. I suggested to our editors that we note in an Editor's Note that we were now complying with Hamas censorship. I was overruled, and from that point in time, the AP, like all of its sister organizations, collaborates with Hamas censorship in Gaza. What does that mean? You'll see a lot of dead civilians, and you won't see dead militants. You won't have a clear idea of what the Hamas military strategy is. And this is the kicker, the center of the coverage will be a number, a casualty number, that is provided to the press by something called the Gaza health ministry, which is Hamas. And we've been doing that since 2008, and it's a way of basically settling the story before you get into any other information. Because when you put, you know, when you say 50 Palestinians were killed, and one Israeli on a given day, it doesn't matter what else you say. The numbers kind of tell their own story, and it's a way of settling the story with something that sounds like a concrete statistic. And the statistic is being, you know, given to us by one of the combatant sides. But because the reporters sympathize with that side, they're happy to play along. So since 2008, certainly since 2014 when we had another serious war in Gaza, the press has not been covering Gaza, the press has been essentially an amplifier for one of the most poisonous ideologies on Earth. Hamas has figured out how to make the press amplify its messaging rather than covering Hamas. There are no Western reporters in Gaza. All of the reporters in Gaza are Palestinians, and those people fall into three categories. Some of them identify with Hamas. Some of them are intimidated by Hamas and won't cross Hamas, which makes a lot of sense. I wouldn't want to cross Hamas either. So either. And the third category is people who actually belong to Hamas. That's where the information from Gaza is coming from. And if you're credulous, then of course, you're going to get a story that makes Israel look pretty bad. Belle Yoeli: So this is very depressing. That's okay. It's very helpful, very depressing. But on that note, I would ask you so whether, because you spoke about this problem in terms, of, of course, the coverage of Israel, but that it's it's also more widespread you talk, you spoke about President Biden in your article, you name other examples of how this sort of activist journalism is affecting everything we read. So what should everyone in this room be reading, truly, from your opinion. This is Matti's opinion. But if you want to you want to get information from our news and not activist journalism, obviously The Free Press, perhaps. But are there other sites or outlets that you think are getting this more down the line, or at least better than some, some better than others? Matti Friedman: No, it's just The Free Press. No. I mean, it's a question that I also wrestle with. I haven't given up on everyone, and even in publications that have, I think, largely lost the plot, you'll still find good stuff on occasion. So I try to keep my eye on certain reporters whose name I know. I often ask not just on Israel, but on anything, does this reporter speak the language of the country that they're covering? You'd be shocked at how rare that is for Americans. A lot of the people covering Ukraine have no idea what language they speak in Ukraine, and just as someone who covers Israel, I'm aware of the low level of knowledge that many of the Western reporters have. You'll find really good stuff still in the Atlantic. The Atlantic has managed, against steep odds, to maintain its equilibrium amid all this. The New Yorker, unfortunately, less so, but you'll still see, on occasion, things that are good. And there are certain reporters who are, you know, you can trust. Isabel Kirchner, who writes for The New York Times, is an old colleague of mine from the Jerusalem report. She's excellent, and they're just people who are doing their job. But by and large, you have to be very, very suspicious of absolutely everything that you read and see. And I'm not saying that as someone who I'm not happy to say that, and I certainly don't identify with, you know, the term fake news, as it has been pushed by President Trump. I think that fake news is, you know, for those guys, is an attempt to avoid scrutiny. They're trying to, you know, neuter the watchdog so that they can get away with whatever they want. I don't think that crowd is interested in good press coverage. Unfortunately, the term fake news sticks because it's true. That's why it has worked. And the press, instead of helping people navigate the blizzard of disinformation that we're all in, they've joined it. People who are confused about what's going on, should be able to open up the New York Times or go to the AP and figure out what's going on, but because, and I saw it happen, instead of covering the circus, the reporters became dancing bears in the circus. So no one can make heads or tails of anything. So we need to be very careful. Most headlines that are out there are out there to generate outrage, because that's the most predictable generator of clicks, which is the, we're in a click economy. So I actually think that the less time you spend following headlines and daily news, the better off you'll be. Because you can follow the daily news for a year, and by the end of the year, you'll just be deranged. You'll just be crazy and very angry. If you take that time and use it to read books about, you know, bitten by people who are knowledgeable, or read longer form essays that are, you know, that are obviously less likely to be very simplistic, although not, you know, it's not completely impossible that they will be. I think that's time, that's time better spent. Unfortunately, much of the industry is kind of gone. And we're in an interesting kind of interim moment where it's clear that the old news industry is basically dead and that something new has to happen. And those new things are happening. I mean, The Free Press is part of a new thing that's happening. It's not big enough to really move the needle in a dramatic way yet, but it might be, and I think we all have to hope that new institutions emerge to fill the vacuum. The old institutions, and I say this with sorrow, and I think that this also might be true of a lot of the academic institutions. They can't be saved. They can't be saved. So if people think that writing an editor, a letter to the editor of the New York Times is going to help. It's not going to help. Sometimes people say, Why don't we just get the top people in the news industry and bring them to Israel and show them the truth? Doesn't help. It's not about knowing or not knowing. They define the profession differently. So it's not about a lack of information. The institutions have changed, and it's kind of irrevocable at this point, and we need new institutions, and one of them is The Free Press, and it's a great model of what to do when faced with fading institutions. By the way, the greatest model of all time in that regard is Zionism. That's what Zionism is. There's a guy in Vienna in 1890 something, and his moment is incredibly contemporary. There's an amazing biography of Herzl called Herzl by Amos Elon. It's an amazing book. If you haven't read it, you should read it, because his moment in cosmopolitan Vienna sounds exactly like now. It's shockingly current. He's in this friendly city. He's a reporter for the New York Times, basically of the Austro Hungarian empire, and he's assimilated, and he's got a Christmas tree in his house, and his son isn't circumcised, and he thinks everything is basically great. And then the light changes. He notices that something has changed in Vienna, and the discourse about Jews changes, and like in a Hollywood movie, the light changes. And he doesn't try to he doesn't start a campaign against antisemitism. He doesn't get on social media and kind of rail against unfair coverage. He sits down in a hotel room in Paris and he writes this pamphlet called the Jewish state, and I literally flew from that state yesterday. So there's a Zionist model where you look at a failing world and you think about radical solutions that involve creation. And I think we're there. And I think Herzl's model is a good one at a dark time you need real creativity. Belle Yoeli: Thank God you found the inspiration there, because I was really, I was really starting to worry. No, in all seriousness, Matti, the saying that these institutions can't be saved. I mean the consequences of this, not just for us as pro-Israel, pro-Jewish advocates, but for our country, for the world, the countries that we come from are tremendous. And the way we've been dealing with this issue and thinking about how, how can you change hearts and minds of individuals about Israel, about the Jewish people, if everything that they're reading is so damaging and most of what they're reading is so damaging and basically saying there's very little that we can do about that. So I am going to push you to dream big with us. We're an advocacy organization. AJC is an advocacy organization. So if you had unlimited resources, right, if you really wanted to make change in this area, to me, it sounds like you're saying we basically need 15 Free Presses or the new institutions to really take on this way. What would you do? What would you do to try to make it so that news media were more like the old days? Matti Friedman: Anyone who wants unlimited resources should not go into journalism. I have found that my resources remain limited. I'll give you an answer that is probably not what you're expecting or not what you want here. I think that the fight can't be won. I think that antisemitism can't be defeated. And I think that resources that are poured into it are resources wasted. And of course, I think that people need legal protection, and they need, you know, lawyers who can protect people from discrimination and from defamation. That's very important. But I know that when people are presented with a problem like antisemitism, which is so disturbing and it's really rocking the world of everyone in this room, and certainly, you know, children and grandchildren, you have a problem and you want to address it, right? You have a really bad rash on your arm. You want the rash to go away, and you're willing to do almost anything to make it go away. This has always been with us. It's always been with us. And you know, we recently celebrated the Seder, and we read in the Seder, in the Haggadah, l'chol dor vador, omdim aleinu l'chaloteinu. Which is, in every generation, they come at us to destroy us. And it's an incredibly depressing worldview. Okay, it's not the way I wanted to see the world when I grew up in Toronto in the 1990s. But in our tradition, we have this idea that this is always gonna be around. And the question is, what do you do? Do you let other people define you? Do you make your identity the fight against the people who hate you? And I think that's a dead end. This crisis is hitting the Jewish people at a moment when many of us don't know who we are, and I think that's why it's hitting so hard. For my grandfather, who was a standard New York Jew, garment industry, Lower East Side, poor union guy. This would not have shaken him, because he just assumed that this was the world like this. The term Jewish identity was not one he ever heard, because it wasn't an issue or something that had to be taught. So if I had unlimited resources, what I would do is I would make sure that young Jewish people have access to the riches of Jewish civilization, I would, you know, institute a program that would allow any young Jewish person to be fluent in Hebrew by the time they finish college. Why is that so important? Why is that such an amazing key? Because if you're fluent in Hebrew, you can open a Tanakh, or you can open a prayer book if you want. Or you can watch Fauda or you can get on a plane to Israel and hit on Israeli guys. Hebrew is the key to Jewish life, and if you have it, a whole world will open up. And it's not one that antisemites can interfere with. It does not depend on the goodwill of our neighbors. It's all about us and what we're doing with ourselves. And I think that if you're rooted in Jewish tradition, and I'm not saying becoming religious, I'm just saying, diving into the riches of Jewish tradition, whether it's history or gemara or Israel, or whatever, if you're if you're deep in there enough, then the other stuff doesn't go away, but it becomes less important. It won't be solved because it can't be solved, but it will fade into the background. And if we make the center of identity the fight against antisemitism, they've won. Why should they be the center of our identity? For a young person who's looking for some way of living or some deep kind of guide to life, the fight against antisemitism is not going to do it, and philanthropy is not going to do it. We come from the wisest and one of the oldest civilizations in the world, and many of us don't know how to open the door to that civilization, and that's in our hands. And if we're not doing it, it's not the fault of the antisemites. It's our own fault. So if I had unlimited resources, which, again, it's not, it's not going to happen unless I make a career change, that's where I would be putting my effort. Internally and not externally. Belle Yoeli: You did find the inspiration, though, again, by pushing Jewish identity, and we appreciate that. It's come up a lot in this conversation, this question about how we fight antisemitism, investing in Jewish identity and who we are, and at the same time, what do we do about it? And I think all of you heard Ted in a different context last night, say, we can hold two things, two thoughts at the same time, right? Two things can be true at the same time. And I think for me, what I took out of this, in addition to your excellent insights, is that that's exactly what we have to be doing. At AJC, we have to be engaging in this advocacy to stand up for the Jewish people and the State of Israel. But that's not the only piece of the puzzle. Of course, we have to be investing in Jewish identity. That's why we bring so many young people to this conference. Of course, we need to be investing in Jewish education. That's not necessarily what AJC is doing, the bulk of our work, but it's a lot of what the Jewish community is doing, and these pieces have to go together. And I want to thank you for raising that up for us, and again, for everything that you said. Thank you all so much for being here. Thank you. Manya Brachear Pashman: If you missed last week's episode, be sure to tune in as John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at West Point, breaks down Israel's high-stakes strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure and the U.S. decision to enter the fight.
Segment 1: 22 Christians Martyred by Suicide Bomber A heartbreaking tragedy strikes as an Islamist suicide bomber attacks a Christian church, killing 22 believers during worship. Dr. Chaps honors the martyrs and calls for prayer and international awareness of Christian persecution. Segment 2: Supreme Court Victory – States Can Defund Planned Parenthood The U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of state sovereignty, declaring that states may lawfully defund Planned Parenthood. What does this mean for the pro-life movement? Dr. Chaps explains the legal and spiritual implications. Segment 3: Pete Hegseth Rebukes Left-Wing Media Attacks Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth boldly calls out the mainstream media for bias and misinformation. We show highlights of his fiery statements and discuss the growing battle over truth in America's media landscape. Get free alerts at http://PrayInJesusName.org © 2025, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD. Airs on NRB TV, Direct TV Ch.378, Roku, AppleTV, Amazon FireTV, AndroidTV, GoogleTV, Smart TV, iTunes and www.PrayInJesusName.org
This week, Carl is pleased to welcome Vinay Kolhatkar, an editor, author, and PR professional, living and working in Australia, for a comprehensive discussion on politics, freedom, and the power of mission. Vinay emphasizes the importance of identifying and committing to a personal mission in order to lead a meaningful life. The conversation explores his work with Savvy Street Publications, a pro-liberty platform, and his admiration for Ayn Rand's influence. Vinay discusses his novels, 'A Sharia London' and 'Frankenstein Candidates,' and delves into the unique concept of 'literary thrillers.' The dialogue addresses pressing global socio-political issues, such as free speech, climate change skepticism, progressive movements, and the power dynamics influenced by global elitism. Vinay shares insights into Australia's political landscape and his efforts as a libertarian candidate. The episode underscores the necessity for active personal involvement in societal change, encouraging listeners to take a stand and contribute meaningfully to their communities. The conversation concludes with reflections on the broader impact of individual actions and a call for listeners to share their own stories and experiences. Connect with Vinay & Savvy Street: Website LinkedIn Author Profile Political Profile The Savvy Street Show E-mail: vinay@thesavvystreet.com Connect with Carl: Instagram Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Website Produced by Social Chameleon
Send us a textAward-winning British author, journalist, and political commentator Douglas Murray joins State of a Nation for an explosive two-part special. Get 10% off your Artza box here - https://www.artzabox.com/discount/EYLON Recorded back in March, this special part 2 of our deep-dive with renowned British author and commentator Douglas Murray, we turn the spotlight to the implications for Western democracies and the stakes at play for not just Israel but the Western World. How do democracies like Israel battle a terrorist organization like Hamas on the information front? What happens behind closed doors when world leaders, journalists, and spokespersons debate the truth?Douglas gives a raw, unfiltered look into the invisible battlefield: one waged on TV screens, in headlines, and through viral tweets. This is the side of the war you won't see on the news.
As the fourth anniversary of the Biden administration's National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism passes, one thing is clear: President Trump must immediately rescind this unconstitutional framework. In this episode of The P.A.S. Report, Professor Nick Giordano how the National Strategy was never about protecting Americans. It created a dangerous system used to silence dissent, target political opponents, and empower unelected bureaucrats. Parents, Catholics, and critics of government overreach were all caught in its crosshairs. With newly declassified documents and Trump back in office, now is the time to dismantle the surveillance state and restore constitutional accountability. This episode breaks it all down and explains why every American, regardless of party, should be alarmed. Episode Highlights How Biden's domestic terror strategy criminalized dissent and violated civil liberties Why President Trump must revoke the Strategy and how he can dismantle the surveillance state The legal gray zone federal agencies exploited to target Americans without oversight
Aaron McIntire recaps the week's top stories, focusing on the U.S. military's stunning operation against Iran, the strategic collaboration between branches, and the implications of a ceasefire. The episode dives into Trump's role in de-escalating tensions, the setback to Iran's nuclear ambitions, and the media's predictable spin. Plus, a poll reveals what listeners think of the 12-day war. AM Update, Week in Review, Aaron McIntire, U.S. military, Iran, ceasefire, Trump, Middle East, nuclear program, Israeli intelligence, media bias, peace deal
Infinite Inning 337: Yankees and Cubs Have Wants and Desires Babe Ruth asks for a small favor from Yankees owner Jacob Ruppert—well, 100,000 small favors—and is rebuked in the papers, suggesting a modern problem is actually an old one as well. Then a Cubs great goes to California and finds that prohibition is no impediment to his drinking, a tale which leads to stories of another drinker and a murderer who shared his last name. The Infinite Inning is a journey to the past to understand the present using baseball as our time machine. America's brighter mirror, baseball reflects, anticipates, and even mocks the stories we tell ourselves about our world today. Baseball Prospectus's Steven Goldman shares his obsessions: history from inside and outside of the game, politics, stats, and Casey Stengel quotations. Along the way, we'll try to solve the puzzle that is the Infinite Inning: How do you find the joy in life when you can't get anybody out? Mysterious Dramatic Music by tyops License: Attribution 4.0
Rabbi Wildes sits down with Shabbos Kestenbaum to talk about Jewish identity, leadership, and the growing hostility toward Israel and the Jewish people — from elite universities to global politics. They discuss Shabbos' lawsuit against Harvard, media narratives on Iran, and the importance of Jewish education rooted in values, not just victimhood. A timely and honest conversation about unity, resistance, and hope for the Jewish future.
The Inside Word at EWTN with Doug Keck, Vanessa Denha-Garmo and Teresa discuss media bias and more. Teresa takes a look over the man with the highest recorded IQ and his claim to believe in God. Plus, Patty Chase and Markael Butler join to talk about how cool it is to be Catholic!
On this episode of Uncommon Sense with Ginny Robinson, I explain why I've shifted to a neutral stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. While mainstream media pressures us to “pick a side,” Scripture tells a deeper story, one that's not bound by modern borders or politics.Christians are the true Israel, not by race or nation, but by faith in Christ. The Church is the chosen people of God, not a geopolitical state. So why are we being told that standing with the a government equals standing with God?We'll unpack the phrase “Judeo-Christian”—what it really means (and what it doesn't)—and discuss how religiously manipulative narratives can cloud our judgment. Supporting everything any group does (whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim) is not biblical discernment. It's idolatry.None of us are perfect. Not every Christian represents Christ well, and not every Jew or Muslim represents their faith's ideals either. So let's step back, seek the truth, and refuse to be emotionally blackmailed into blind allegiance.--https://policecoffee.com/collections/coffee
Join us as we delve into the contentious issues surrounding media narratives on Iran and Israel, the ongoing proxy conflicts in the Middle East, and the historical shadows of the USS Liberty incident. We'll explore claims of media bias, the potential for false flag operations, and the implications for U.S. foreign policy. Also, a message from Anonymous, warning of an impending false flag attack on American soil. The video, released today, June 17, 2025, suggests a sinister plot orchestrated by an 'elite shadow alliance' within a nation posing as the U.S.'s greatest ally, with implications pointing towards Israel.
On this episode of Uncommon Sense with Ginny Robinson, I explain why I've shifted to a neutral stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. While mainstream media pressures us to “pick a side,” Scripture tells a deeper story, one that's not bound by modern borders or politics.Christians are the true Israel, not by race or nation, but by faith in Christ. The Church is the chosen people of God, not a geopolitical state. So why are we being told that standing with the a government equals standing with God?We'll unpack the phrase “Judeo-Christian”—what it really means (and what it doesn't)—and discuss how religiously manipulative narratives can cloud our judgment. Supporting everything any group does (whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim) is not biblical discernment. It's idolatry.None of us are perfect. Not every Christian represents Christ well, and not every Jew or Muslim represents their faith's ideals either. So let's step back, seek the truth, and refuse to be emotionally blackmailed into blind allegiance.--https://policecoffee.com/collections/coffee
On this episode of Uncommon Sense with Ginny Robinson, I explain why I've shifted to a neutral stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. While mainstream media pressures us to “pick a side,” Scripture tells a deeper story, one that's not bound by modern borders or politics.Christians are the true Israel, not by race or nation, but by faith in Christ. The Church is the chosen people of God, not a geopolitical state. So why are we being told that standing with the a government equals standing with God?We'll unpack the phrase “Judeo-Christian”—what it really means (and what it doesn't)—and discuss how religiously manipulative narratives can cloud our judgment. Supporting everything any group does (whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim) is not biblical discernment. It's idolatry.None of us are perfect. Not every Christian represents Christ well, and not every Jew or Muslim represents their faith's ideals either. So let's step back, seek the truth, and refuse to be emotionally blackmailed into blind allegiance.--https://policecoffee.com/collections/coffee
On this episode of Uncommon Sense with Ginny Robinson, I explain why I've shifted to a neutral stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. While mainstream media pressures us to “pick a side,” Scripture tells a deeper story, one that's not bound by modern borders or politics.Christians are the true Israel, not by race or nation, but by faith in Christ. The Church is the chosen people of God, not a geopolitical state. So why are we being told that standing with the a government equals standing with God?We'll unpack the phrase “Judeo-Christian”—what it really means (and what it doesn't)—and discuss how religiously manipulative narratives can cloud our judgment. Supporting everything any group does (whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim) is not biblical discernment. It's idolatry.None of us are perfect. Not every Christian represents Christ well, and not every Jew or Muslim represents their faith's ideals either. So let's step back, seek the truth, and refuse to be emotionally blackmailed into blind allegiance.--https://policecoffee.com/collections/coffee
Summary: In this conversation, Dr. Michael Easley and Janet Parshall examine the evolving landscape of journalism, highlighting the shift from traditional reporting to clickbait and its impact on public trust. They delve into the ethical responsibilities of journalists, the role of media in shaping culture, and the importance of accountability and integrity in reporting. Framed through a biblical lens, they discuss the challenges of navigating the information age, stressing the need for critical thinking, cultural engagement, and discernment. The conversation also addresses the urgency of evangelism, the distinction between influencers and true thought leaders, and growing concerns about the church's direction and the rise of soft totalitarianism. They urge listeners to stay rooted in truth, read deeply, and prepare wisely for the road ahead. Takeaways: Journalism has evolved from factual reporting to sensationalism. The 24/7 news cycle prioritizes speed over quality. Trust in media is at an all-time low, with only 31% of Americans expressing confidence. Critical thinking is essential for a biblical worldview. Soft totalitarianism is creeping into society and the church. The urgency to share the gospel is increasing. Links Mentioned: In The Market with Janet Parshall Buyer Beware by Janet Parshall Watch the highlights and full version of this interview on our Youtube channel. For more inContext interviews, click here.
In today's episode, we examine the intensifying public rift between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. The catalyst? Trump's recently proposed “Big Beautiful Bill” which notably removes federal subsidies that have historically benefited Musk's ventures. Elon has not remained silent, and tensions escalated further when he retaliated by implying that Trump is listed among Jeffrey Epstein's known associates, suggesting this as the reason the full client list remains sealed.Major accusation.Is this an authentic ideological clash, or a calculated distraction? What are the political implications, and who truly benefits from this spectacle? Let's dissect the rhetoric, analyze the deeper motives, and apply biblical clarity in the midst of all of the chaos.—https://www.thebrandsunday.com/products/the-bible-study-physical?srsltid=AfmBOopJ1q_VkwFOO-Q2RCLoc1uzsHwAP4yh-_ZFG-r8_S9idICTj6nR
Welcome back to Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu. In this episode, Tom and Producer Drew dive straight into the heart of political chaos, exploring the ever-expanding landscape of conspiracy, media spin, and why public trust—sometimes even in the president—is at an all-time low. With Lisa Bilyeu co-hosting and special guest Victor Davis Hanson weighing in, the conversation pulls no punches: from Biden's alleged cover-up and the inner workings of political “team ball,” to international conflicts like Ukraine's bold drone strikes deep within Russia, and the jaw-dropping implications of global policies around information integrity. The hosts question just how much power is held by a few political insiders, why the media might be in on the game, and why the rest of us should fight ferociously for freedom of speech—especially as the UN flirts with ideas that look a lot like global censorship. You'll also hear deep-dive explorations into economic peril, with stark warnings about ballooning national debt and insights into the human biases that keep us locked into self-defeating political cycles. SHOWNOTES 00:00 Media Bias and Political Teams 18:16 Consequences of Inaction 21:34 Uniting Through Common Challenges 31:50 Balancing Conflict and Loyalty 47:10 War-Driven Innovation Dynamics 52:07 Deflation Misunderstood: Innovation Insight 01:06:36 "Political Machinery's Constraints" CHECK OUT OUR SPONSORS Vital Proteins: Get 20% off by going to https://www.vitalproteins.com and entering promo code IMPACT at check out ButcherBox: New users that sign up for ButcherBox will receive their choice between steak tips, salmon, or chicken breast in every box for a year + $20 off their first box at https://butcherbox.com/impact Monarch Money: Use code THEORY at https://monarchmoney.com for 50% off your first year! Netsuite: Download the new e-book Navigating Global Trade: 3 Insights for Leaders at http://NetSuite.com/Theory iTrust Capital: Use code IMPACTGO when you sign up and fund your account to get a $100 bonus at https://www.itrustcapital.com/tombilyeu Jerry: Stop needlessly overpaying for car insurance - download the Jerry app or head to https://jerry.ai/impact Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Guest host Dom Giordano of WPHT Philadelphia fills in for Rich and reacts to Elon Musk naming Donald Trump in the Epstein files. David Bozell, President of the Media Research Center, joins to expose liberal bias at NPR and PBS and calls to defund public media. Bruce de Torres of the American Small Business League discusses Trump's criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and the implications of a disappointing jobs report. Plus, workplace expert Heather Lisle, author of Hold the Pineapple, breaks down the blue-collar job boom as more employers drop college degree requirements in the age of AI. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
An attempted massacre at a Colorado Jewish center leaves a community shaken and a nation on edge. Dr. Phil unpacks the chilling details—from the attacker's manifesto to the missed warning signs. Survivors, experts, and Jewish leaders speak out on the rise of antisemitism—and what must change. #DrPhil #TheRealStory #ColoradoShooting #Antisemitism #HateCrimes #JewishCommunity #SynagogueAttack
NPR Lawsuit Against the Trump Administration: NPR and Colorado public radio stations filed a lawsuit challenging an executive order by President Trump that defunds NPR and PBS. The hosts criticize the lawsuit, arguing it misuses the First Amendment to justify taxpayer funding for what they describe as biased media. Debate Over Transgender Athletes in Women's Sports: The episode discusses California's policy shift in response to federal pressure, allowing biological girls to retain championship slots even if outperformed by transgender athletes. The hosts frame this as a political victory and a sign of retreat by progressive leadership. James Comey Controversy: Former FBI Director James Comey is accused of posting a cryptic image interpreted as a veiled threat against Donald Trump. The hosts allege Comey’s actions are politically motivated and potentially criminal, referencing federal statutes on threats against the president. Media Bias and Political Polarization: The episode critiques mainstream media outlets, particularly NPR and PBS, for alleged liberal bias. It includes audio clips and commentary on statements made by NPR’s CEO, Catherine Maher, during congressional hearings. Electoral Strategy and Public Opinion: The hosts discuss how issues like transgender participation in sports are resonating with moderate voters, especially women, and influencing campaign strategies. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and the Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. Thanks for Listening #seanhannity #hannity #marklevin #levin #charliekirk #megynkelly #tucker #tuckercarlson #glennbeck #benshapiro #shapiro #trump #sexton #bucksexton#rushlimbaugh #limbaugh #whitehouse #senate #congress #thehouse #democrats#republicans #conservative #senator #congressman #congressmen #congresswoman #capitol #president #vicepresident #POTUS #presidentoftheunitedstatesofamerica#SCOTUS #Supremecourt #DonaldTrump #PresidentDonaldTrump #DT #TedCruz #Benferguson #Verdict #justicecorrupted #UnwokeHowtoDefeatCulturalMarxisminAmericaYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Send us a textNo guest tonight which means we have a bunch of housekeeping to catch up on. We will chat about the current happenings of the day, playing some relevant sound bites and taking your calls later in the show. Call in 248-238-8155.SUPPORT THE SHOWBuy Me A Coffee http://buymeacoffee.com/DangerousinfopodcastSubscribeStar http://bit.ly/42Y0qM8Super Chat Tip https://bit.ly/42W7iZHBuzzsprout https://bit.ly/3m50hFTPaypal http://bit.ly/3Gv3ZjpPatreon http://bit.ly/3G37AVx SMART is the acronym that was created by technocrats that have setup the "internet of things" that will eventually enslave humanity to their needs. Support the showCONNECT WITH USWebsite https://www.dangerousinfopodcast.com/Guilded Chatroom http://bit.ly/42OayqyEmail the show dangerousinfopodcast@protonmail.comJoin mailing list http://bit.ly/3Kku5YtSOCIALSInstagram https://www.instagram.com/dangerousinfo/Twitter https://twitter.com/jaymz_jesseGab https://gab.com/JessejaymzTruth Social https://truthsocial.com/@jessejaymzWATCH LIVE YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@DANGEROUSINFOPODCASTRumble https://rumble.com/c/DangerousInfoPodcast Twitch https://www.twitch.tv/dangerousinfopodcastPilled https://pilled.net/profile/144176Facebook https://www.facebook.com/DangerousInfoPodcast/BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/egnticQyZgxDCloutHub https://clouthub.com/DangerousINFOpodcastDLive https://...
The conversation covers significant political and social issues, including Supreme Court rulings on immigration, media manipulation regarding political figures, recent legislative changes in Colorado, economic concerns reflected in credit rating downgrades, controversial statements by Hillary Clinton on birth rates and immigration, and cultural reflections on parenting trends among Gen Z parents.
We kick things off with Trump's extraordinary welcome in Qatar, complete with a state dinner that looked like a movie. The Emir thanked him personally—and yes, the media actually gave him credit (for once). Senator Kennedy weighed in with his signature sass, and we break down what it all means for Trump's global influence.Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is back in the headlines attacking Trump—and you know we've got the receipts. The Clinton Foundation's shady $40 million connection resurfaces and it's juicy.Then we dive into:-Teen killer Karmelo Anthony allowed to graduate? Parents are outraged.-Jake Tapper gets surprisingly honest… is the media tide turning?-RFK Jr. gets emotional at a hearing—then gets blamed for measles by Rep. DeLauro-Hakeem Jeffries goes full knockoff Obama in a new speech-Theo Von meets Ivanka Trump, and Kristi Noem dodges hard questions with even harder sassPlus: Mark Levin vs. Alex Jones, and Democrats sleeping on the Big Beautiful Bill—literally.Cozy Earth – Everyday luxury, made unbelievably soft. Go to https://CozyEarth.com/CHICKS and use code CHICKS for up to 40% off! Get 2 FREE tickets to The Last Rodeo when you become a premium Guild member of Angel Studios. Visit https://Angel.com/chicks and sign up today! VISIT OUR WEBSITE DAILY! https://chicksonright.com SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST: https://link.chtbl.com/BtHbvS8C?sid=y... JOIN OUR SUPPORTER COMMUNITY ON LOCALS: https://chicksontheright.locals.com/ JOIN OUR SUPER DOUBLE AWESOME SECRET BUT NOT SECRET EXCLUSIVE GROUP: / 388315619071775 Subscribe to our email list: https://politics.chicksonright.com/su... GET OUR BOOK! https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08H5D3CF1/... Venmo: @chicksonright Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/chicksonright Get exclusive Chicks merch here: https://www.etsy.com/shop/InRealLifeC... Even more Merch: https://shop.spreadshirt.com/chickson... Thank you for the Superchats! Watch live to donate and be recognized! Facebook: Chicks on the Right Facebook Group: Chicks on the Right Twitter, IG, Parler, Rumble: @chicksonright
- The media and Democrats are criticized for opposing the arrival of South African refugees. - Celebration of the release of Edan Alexander. - Debate over Trump accepting a luxury plane from Qatar. - Boston Celtics star Jason Tatum's likely Achilles injury. Today's podcast is sponsored by : PRESERVE GOLD – Text NEWSMAX to 50505 for a free info kit and get up to $15,000 in FREE gold and silver with a qualified purchase. TAKE LEAN – The supplement that controls your body sugar and promotes weight loss. Get 20% off by using promo code NEWSMAX20 at http://takelean.com Listen to Newsmax LIVE and see our entire podcast lineup at http://Newsmax.com/Listen Make the switch to NEWSMAX today! Get your 15 day free trial of NEWSMAX+ at http://NewsmaxPlus.com Looking for NEWSMAX caps, tees, mugs & more? Check out the Newsmax merchandise shop at : http://nws.mx/shop Follow NEWSMAX on Social Media: • Facebook: http://nws.mx/FB • X/Twitter: http://nws.mx/twitter • Instagram: http://nws.mx/IG • YouTube: https://youtube.com/NewsmaxTV • Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/NewsmaxTV • TRUTH Social: https://truthsocial.com/@NEWSMAX • GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/newsmax • Threads: http://threads.net/@NEWSMAX • Telegram: http://t.me/newsmax •BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/newsmax.com • Parler: http://app.parler.com/newsmax Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
How can you tell if your news source is reliable? In this episode, Sharon talks with Vanessa Otero, founder of Ad Fontes Media and creator of the Media Bias Chart, about how to better evaluate the reliability of your news. They explore the difference between fact-based journalism and misinformation, and why so much of our news falls somewhere in the middle. Credits: Host and Executive Producer: Sharon McMahon Supervising Producer: Melanie Buck Parks Audio Producer: Craig Thompson To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
