Podcasts about File

GET A SYDNEY PLUSH (LAST CHANCE!!!)Audio gathered from various sources at SITE2 on day 1333.MAJOR INSIGHT INTO:Dynamics between ENTITY7 and ENTITY6ENTITY7's propensity for wildlifeMINOR INSIGHT INTO:Complicated affairs between ENTITY7 and his social circleENTITY6's fear of plastic insectsImportant notes:I'm too tired to explain how I was able to rig the outside megaphone and microphones right now, but it's a similar method to the intake for ETITY2's radio.I imagine ENTITY3 will disconnect it come next week.Keep AGENT23 away from this one. It's so soap-opera-like that I imagine she'd have a tonally inappropriate field day, and I'm on my fifth night without sleep.-Disclaimer: Camp Here & There is intended for audiences aged 16+. The story deals with mature themes and graphic horror which may not be suitable for all audiences. Viewer discretion is advised.Performances by Emily Safko, Ty Coker, and Voicebox Vance.With original music composed by Will Wood and produced by Jonathon Maisto.Additional music composed by Kyle Gabler and Another You.Dialogue editing by Emily Safko. Audio engineering by The Leo!Mumbling Crowd sourced from imagefilm.berlinMidwest Clean Guitar sourced from YellowTreeCrashbox effect sourced from MshanenList of people in the crowd: Lacey, Sharpie, Splemonocracy, Riley, Hunter, MK, Shiloh, The Leo, Xan, Cupid, Tundra, Ragtime, Addie, Reese, Rhys, Ren, and CaliWEBSITE⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠PATREON⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠DISCORD

In this episode, with Doug Pagitt and Robb Ryerse, we dive into the shocking and disturbing details surrounding the latest Epstein file release.   Newly surfaced documents include a deeply troubling letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar, raising urgent questions about power, protection, and the systems that allowed abuse to persist for so long. Doug and Robb unpack what's actually known, what's still unclear, and why this moment matters—not just as a headline, but as a window into how institutional silence, influence, and moral failure intersect. This is an honest, sober conversation about accountability, truth-telling, and why confronting uncomfortable facts is essential if we hope to prevent future harm.

The Epstein file dump, released this week, included redacted and deleted files, some of which were later re-added. Did the DOJ do this to protect survivors and victims, or to protect the predators and perpetrators? There are also photos of the prison cell in which Epstein apparently died by suicide, but the images don’t add up. Also, a tragic car accident on the Angel Crest Highway near LA has claimed the life of Call of Duty developer Vince Zampella. To more on the Epstein files, the video of the financier, abuser and sex trafficker apparently attempting suicide in his prison cell has turned out to be fake, hence why it was removed from the file dump. Andy loves on Skeletor, the supervillain from “Masters of the Universe.” Another listener phones in to tell us the story of his favorite Christmas present from high school, his new ski jacket. Last Saturday in the Bay Area, a fire at a PG&E substation knocked out power for 130,000 residents — for two days! There are still a few thousand people currently without power.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Most musicians would only dream of opening for Robert Plant from Led Zeppelin on tour but for Rosie Flores the dream came true! Rosie drops by The City's Backyard Podcast on this episode to talk about her music, career, and new album called Impossible Frontiers with her band The Talismen! Plus she speaks about what it's like to be on the road opening for Robert Plant with Saving Grace and Suzi Dian.Rosie Flores, triple-threat Texas musician, has never allowed the challenge of navigating the male-centric worlds of rock and country music slow her down. In fact, she often drew upon those challenges as source material in sharply observed songs she not only wrote and sang with authority and passion, but also brought to life musically as a widely respected lead guitarist in a string of notable bands.Rosie is one of the 2024 NEA National Heritage Fellows! In September 2024 she accepted her gold medal award at the Library Of Congress, appearing at the Kennedy Center as well as the White House. A daughter of San Antonio whose musical journey also has included quality time in Austin, Los Angeles, and Nashville, Flores has adroitly absorbed, helped preserve, and extended the musical legacies of influential Texas musicians as varied as country music's King of Western Swing Bob Wills & His Texas Playboys, blues guitar master T-Bone Walker, and Tex Mex innovator Doug Sahm.In the 1970s, she became one of the most celebrated performers on the “cowpunk” circuit (a hybrid of punk rock and country), alongside such other rising stars as Dwight Yoakam, Lucinda Williams, Rank & File, and Los Lobos (2021 NEA National Heritage Fellows). The release of her 1987 debut solo album Rosie Flores proved her to be a singer and songwriter of the first rank, and helped lay the foundation for what coalesced into the alt country movement.Flores became the first Latina to crack Billboard's country music chart. For her enthusiastic participation in and ongoing promotion of Austin's deep and wide music scene, including the annual South by Southwest Conference, the city has proclaimed Rosie Flores Day in 2006.Flores has remained a spark plug live performer for more than five decades, a goosebump-inducing electric guitarist and songwriter as well as champion of the trailblazers who preceded her. Notably, she lured pioneering rockabilly heroines Wanda Jackson (2005 NEA National Heritage Fellow) and Janis Martin (“the female Elvis”) back into recording studios and onto concert stages for lauded late-career rejuvenations. Flores won a 2007 Peabody Award for her narration of the NPR rockabilly documentary, Whole Lotta Shakin'.For more on Rosie and her tour click here > https://rosieflores.com/tour/

Headlines: – Welcome To Mo News (02:00) – DOJ Under Pressure After Redactions, Delay In Epstein File Release (04:30) – U.S. Coast Guard Seizes Venezuela-Linked Oil Tankers (09:45) – MAGA Infighting At Turning Point Youth Conference (15:20) – Australia Mourns Victims Of Bondi Beach Attack (20:00) – New Details In Brown University, MIT Professor Killings (21:30) – Massive San Francisco Power Outage (23:10) – Miami Negotiations To End Ukraine War (24:20) – Paraplegic Engineer Becomes First Wheelchair User To Go To Space (25:40) – On This Day In History (28:00) Thanks To Our Sponsors:  – LMNT⁠ - Free Sample Pack with any LMNT drink mix purchase –⁠ Industrious⁠ - Coworking office. 50% off day pass | Promo Code: MONEWS50 – Incogni - 60% off an annual plan| Promo Code: MONEWS – Aura Frames -  $35 off best-selling Carver Mat frames | Promo Code: MONEWS – Monarch - 50% off your first year | Promo Code: MONEWS

Rush Hour Podcast — Morning Edition The Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni legal saga hits a one-year milestone as we revisit how the lawsuit began, what's changed since, and why the case still dominates headlines. We also break down the latest Epstein Files release, the heavy redactions, and why so many across the political spectrum feel completely let down. Plus, JD Vance sparks backlash after a bizarre, white-supremacy-tinged speech at a Turning Point USA event, and we examine growing chatter around a possible $2,000 tariff stimulus check — what it is, who might qualify, and whether it's real or political theater. Today's topics include: Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni, one year after the initial lawsuit Epstein Files updates, redactions, and public frustration JD Vance's controversial Turning Point USA speech The rumor and reality of a potential $2,000 tariff stimulus check Sponsored by 1-800-Contacts Go to 1800Contacts dot com for hassle free contacts!

This morning we're diving into the fallout from the long-awaited release of the Epstein files, and for many, it feels like a gut punch. On Friday, the DOJ released the files after a months-long bipartisan push and congressional demand for full transparency. But what came out was heavily redacted, with more missing than revealed. For survivors and advocates who hoped this moment would finally bring justice and accountability, the release felt like a slap in the face. To make matters worse, the DOJ then removed certain images that had already been made public, only to quietly re-release them later. The confusion, the reversals, and the omissions have only fueled suspicion. So what's being hidden? Why all the redactions? And why does it seem like there's such an aggressive effort to shield Donald Trump? This episode is sponsored by ZBiotics. Go to https://zbiotics.com/LEMON and use LEMON at checkout for 15% off first time orders. This episode is brought to you by the Freedom From Religion Foundation. Make a tax-deductible donation to FFRF before December 31st. Or become a member and support their ongoing fight for reason, equality, and constitutional integrity. Go to https://FFRF.US/Winter25 or text DON to 511511 This episode is sponsored by 120Life. For a limited time, try 120Life and get 20% off. Just use the code “DON” at checkout at https://120Life.com. 120Life offers a risk-free trial with a full refund If your blood pressure doesn't come down in 2 weeks. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The U.S. Department of Justice has quietly restored an Epstein-related document that had been deleted from its public release—one that referenced Donald Trump—after outside scrutiny made the omission impossible to ignore. The initial disappearance of the file raised immediate concerns about selective disclosure, especially given the DOJ's repeated assurances that the Epstein release would be comprehensive and politically neutral. By restoring the document only after it was flagged, the department reinforced the perception that the process was reactive rather than transparent, driven more by damage control than a commitment to full disclosure. The episode added to longstanding criticisms that the Epstein materials are being curated in real time, with politically sensitive references handled differently from the rest of the archive.Critically, the restoration does not resolve the deeper problem—it underscores it. The DOJ has offered no clear explanation for why the file was removed in the first place, who authorized the deletion, or how many other documents may have been altered, withheld, or temporarily scrubbed before publication. Restoring a single document after public pressure does little to rebuild trust when the broader release remains heavily redacted and inconsistently managed. Instead of closing the credibility gap, the reversal highlights a pattern that has plagued the Epstein case for years: piecemeal transparency, shifting narratives, and a justice system that appears more concerned with controlling fallout than confronting the full scope of the record head-on.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Trump photo restored to Epstein files by DOJ after review | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Trump's Epstein file release gets botched beyond repair. Brian interviews Ro Khanna about the DOJ failing to comply with the law, Bernie Sanders about Republicans blocking the ACA extension, Jasmine Crockett about her run for Senate in Texas, and Hakeem Jeffries about how House Democrats outsmarted Mike Johnson on yet another discharge petition.Shop merch: https://briantylercohen.com/shopYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/briantylercohenTwitter: https://twitter.com/briantylercohenFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/briantylercohenInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/briantylercohenPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/briantylercohenNewsletter: https://www.briantylercohen.com/sign-upWritten by Brian Tyler CohenProduced by Sam GraberRecorded in Los Angeles, CASee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

We mourn Rob Reiner by replaying three of his directorial contributions to the arts.    The Princess Bride starts immediately The American President starts at 51:44 LBJ starts at 2:02:20   File length 3:08:11 File Size 143.1 MB Theme by Jul Big Green via SongFinch Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts Listen to us on Stitcher Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Send your comments to show@notinacreepyway.com Visit the show website at Not In A Creepy Way

⚡ How to Get a Fast Divorce in Palmdale? | Palmdale Divorce

Tonight on “Banfield,” Brian Entin is live in Massachusetts with new details on who the suspected Brown University shooter is and how he was discovered.Then, the deadline for release of the Epstein files has come and gone. Attorney Josh Shiffer joins to discuss what was most notable about the massive DOJ document dump of more than 300,000 files.Plus, an attorney for one of the victims of Jesse Mack Butler, the teenager sentenced as a youthful offender for rape, talks about the next steps in the case for her client. Ashleigh Banfield is *the* definitive authority on the nation`s biggest true crime stories. A veteran award-winning journalist, Ashleigh brings a sharp focus to the crime stories gripping America, distilling facts and analyzing context in a way which captures viewers` interests and imaginations. No one knows the prosecution and the defendants` cases better than BANFIELD, all the while keeping the victim at the heart of every story we tell just another reason NewsNation is truly News for All Americans.Weeknights at 10p/9C. #BanfieldNewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all Americans. More from NewsNation: https://www.newsnationnow.com/Get our app: https://trib.al/TBXgYppFind us on cable: https://trib.al/YDOpGyGHow to watch on TV or streaming: https://trib.al/Vu0Ikij

The US justice department has released a tranche of some of the so-called Epstein files, including photos of the interiors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's homes, his overseas travels and celebrities. Survivors and some US politicians have criticised the release as incomplete, overly-redacted and providing no context of when and where photos were taken. We hear from survivor Marina Lacerda. Also in the programme: US fighter jets attack targets linked to Islamic State in Syria; and a rare sighting of a "pink" platypus in Australia. (Photo: Undated handout photo issued by the US Department of Justice of a photograph appearing to show Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor reclining across the laps of five people. It has been released in the latest tranche of Epstein files. He appears to be smiling with his eyes closed and his head nearly resting on a woman's lap while Ghislaine Maxwell (now a convicted associate of Epstein) stands above peering and smiling in the undated picture. Issue date: Friday December 19, 2025. PA Photo)

Overnight, the Justice Department released hundreds more heavily redacted pages of material it had gathered on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. They come in addition to the thousands of pages released Friday, but what has been made public so far falls short of the full disclosure required by the law Congress passed last month. John Yang speaks with Reuters correspondent Jeff Mason for more. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Analysis and discussion of news and current affairs in Ghana with panellists

The Rush Hour Podcast — Friday Morning Friday's Rush Hour dives into a swirl of breaking updates and unanswered questions. Candace Owens interviews a man claiming he saw Erika Kirk on a military base the night before Charlie Kirk was killed—we break down what he says and what it could mean. Plus, Luigi Mangione's attorneys speak out after his pre-trial hearing, and we unpack the latest movement on Medicare for All. Donald Trump makes headlines again by announcing plans to rename the Kennedy Center as the Trump Kennedy Center, and finally, today is the day the Epstein files are supposed to be released—but what happens if they aren't? We game out the political fallout and public reaction. For up to 45% off your order, head to VeracitySelfCare.com and use code RUSHHOUR.   Quince dot com slash rush hour for free shipping and 365 day returns

Send us fan responses! The line between private life and public record shapes how you're treated at the counter, on the roadside, and at the airport. We dig into the practical side of tribal IDs, “tax exempt” language that actually lands, and the paperwork that turns a tense moment into a calm transaction. You'll hear real stories from dispensaries and hotels to TSA checkpoints, plus the exact forms and phrasing that clerks and officers understand without a debate.We go further by unpacking how to structure your world privately—what it means to use a credential instead of a state ID, why county notice changes the conversation, and how a trust, Motor Certificate of Origin, and private insurance can move a vehicle out of commercial lanes. If you've wondered whether a word on your card can trigger a citation, we explain why “driver” versus “traveler” matters and how to keep tickets off the table with clean documentation. We also cover responding to tickets and warrants with commercial endorsements, timelines, and default procedures that force agencies to play by their own rules.The standout segment introduces a community policing program with UN and Interpol alignment. Think scannable IDs and badges that smooth TSA lines, de-escalation training that protects everyone, and a chain of command you can call when a situation goes sideways. We're honest about limits: only act within your training, carry with proper insurance, and lead with de-escalation. The aim is simple—build relationships that make communities safer while keeping your private records tight and your language precise.If you're ready to navigate public systems with private strength, tune in, take notes, and bring a friend who needs this. Subscribe, share the episode with someone who travels often, and leave a review with the toughest scenario you want us to break down next.https://donkilam.com FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD - DON KILAMGO GET HIS BOOK ON AMAZON NOW! https://www.amazon.com/Cant-Touch-This-Diplomatic-Immunity/dp/B09X1FXMNQ https://open.spotify.com/track/5QOUWyNahqcWvQ4WQAvwjj?autoplay=trueSupport the showhttps://donkilam.com

Podcast player software, File managers

This Day in Legal History: Entrapment as DefenseOn December 19, 1932, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Sorrells v. United States, a case that reshaped how American courts evaluate government conduct in criminal investigations. The case involved a Prohibition-era prosecution in which a federal agent repeatedly pressured the defendant to obtain illegal liquor. The Court held that criminal convictions should not stand when the government induces a crime that the defendant was not otherwise predisposed to commit. This decision formally recognized entrapment as a valid defense under federal law.Rather than focusing only on the defendant's actions, the Court emphasized the importance of limiting improper law enforcement tactics. The majority opinion reasoned that Congress could not have intended criminal statutes to be enforced through deception that manufactures crime. As a result, courts were instructed to examine whether the criminal intent originated with the government or the accused. The ruling reflected growing concern about aggressive policing methods during Prohibition. Over time, Sorrells became a foundational case cited whenever defendants challenge undercover operations. The decision also highlighted the judiciary's role in supervising executive conduct in criminal prosecutions.The Trump administration has suspended the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program—commonly known as the green card lottery—following two high-profile campus attacks. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the move, stating that the suspect in the fatal shootings of a Brown University student and an MIT professor had entered the U.S. through the program. The shooter, Claudio Manuel Neves Valente, a 48-year-old Portuguese national and former Brown student, was found dead in an apparent suicide. Noem said the pause is necessary to prevent further harm from what she called a “disastrous program.”The lottery program, which grants up to 50,000 green cards annually, has long been a target of Trump's immigration agenda, which links violent incidents to immigration policy failures. This suspension follows earlier actions by the administration, including visa restrictions after a separate shooting by an Afghan national and a proposal to impose a $100,000 application fee for H-1B work visas, which are heavily used in the tech industry.Trump's broader immigration crackdown also includes enhanced social media vetting for tourists, expanded ICE operations in major cities, and the development of large-scale immigration detention centers known as “mega centers.” These moves align with Trump's campaign promises to tighten border controls and execute large-scale deportations.Trump Suspends US Green Card Lottery After Brown, MIT AttacksTrump administration officials are scrambling to meet a Friday deadline to release a large cache of documents related to the Justice Department's investigations into Jeffrey Epstein. The release was mandated by a recently passed law, supported by both parties in Congress, following months of political pressure and public frustration over the administration's resistance to transparency. Though President Trump initially opposed the legislation, he reversed course shortly before the vote amid growing dissent from his own supporters.The new law permits the Justice Department to withhold certain details, including victims' identities and information tied to ongoing investigations. Attorneys in the department's National Security Division have been racing to redact sensitive data, raising internal concerns about the risk of mistakes, especially regarding private information. The tight timeline has disrupted other DOJ casework since Thanksgiving.Trump's handling of the Epstein matter has dented his support among Republicans, with only 44% approving of his actions, according to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll. This contrasts sharply with his broader 82% approval within the party. Critics argue that Trump's past friendship with Epstein and his failure to follow through on a 2024 campaign promise to declassify the records have fueled suspicions of a cover-up. While Trump has denied knowledge of Epstein's crimes and has not been accused of wrongdoing, past email disclosures have added to the controversy.As more emails emerge—some implying Trump's involvement, others suggesting no direct misconduct—the administration has tried to redirect attention toward figures like Bill Clinton and JPMorgan. But with midterms approaching, the Epstein file release may remain a political liability.Trump administration officials race to meet Friday deadline for Epstein files | ReutersWisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan was found guilty of obstructing a federal proceeding for aiding a migrant in avoiding an immigration arrest at the courthouse, marking a significant legal win for the Trump administration's intensified immigration enforcement efforts. The jury acquitted Dugan on a lesser charge of concealing a person from arrest but convicted her on the more serious obstruction count. The case is part of a broader Justice Department campaign targeting local officials accused of interfering with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.Prosecutors alleged that in 2023, Dugan helped Mexican national Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who faced domestic violence charges, avoid a planned ICE arrest by rerouting him and his lawyer through a restricted exit after confronting ICE agents stationed near her courtroom. Dugan, a former head of Catholic Charities and longtime legal aid attorney, argued she was following internal court policies meant to manage ICE activity in courthouses, especially after prior arrests caused confusion and concern.Flores-Ruiz was ultimately arrested outside the courthouse after a brief chase. The Justice Department framed the case as a message that even judges are not above the law when it comes to obstructing federal immigration enforcement. Critics, however, view courthouse arrests as damaging to the legal system's integrity, potentially deterring vulnerable individuals from seeking legal protection.Judge found guilty of obstructing arrest in Trump immigration crackdown | ReutersIn a piece I wrote for Forbes earlier this week, I take down yet another One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax “reform” that, upon closer examination, isn't as great a deal as it may first seem.Starting in 2025, a new federal tax deduction allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 in interest on qualifying new car loans—but only under strict conditions. The car must be newly purchased (not leased or used), assembled in the U.S., and not used for business purposes. The deduction phases out for individuals earning over $100,000 and joint filers over $200,000, narrowing its reach to a slim demographic of middle- to upper-middle-income earners. While promoted as consumer relief amid high car prices and interest rates, critics argue it's a veiled subsidy for automakers, not a meaningful economic benefit for struggling Americans.The policy resembles the mortgage interest deduction, which has long been criticized for inflating home prices and disproportionately benefiting wealthier borrowers. Similarly, this car loan deduction doesn't lower car costs—it subsidizes borrowing, pushing consumers toward pricier new vehicles and encouraging debt accumulation. The IRS will also gain new data from lenders, who must now report annual interest paid, further expanding government oversight.Despite the flashy $10,000 cap, few borrowers will come close to that threshold. A typical new car loan might yield only a $600 annual tax benefit—negligible compared to high monthly payments and rapid depreciation. Rather than meaningful relief, the policy appears to be more of a political gesture, using tax code tweaks to create the illusion of support while primarily serving industry interests.‘No Tax On Car Loan Interest'—Tax Reform Or Facade?This week's closing theme is by Louis-Nicolas Clérambault.This week's closing theme comes from Clérambault, a French Baroque composer born on December 19, 1676, whose music captures the elegance and structure of early 18th-century Paris. Clérambault is best known today for his sacred cantatas and his refined works for keyboard and chamber ensemble. He spent much of his career as an organist, serving at prominent Paris churches and developing a style that balanced expressive melody with formal clarity. His music reflects the French taste for ornamentation while remaining grounded and disciplined.The piece featured here is Suite du premier ton: V. Basse et Dessus de Trompette, presented in a complete performance. This movement highlights the contrast between a strong bass line and a bright, trumpet-like upper voice, a hallmark of French Baroque color and texture. Rather than showcasing virtuosity for its own sake, the music emphasizes balance and conversation between parts. The result is confident and ceremonial, yet never overstated.As a closing theme, this work offers a sense of order and resolution, bringing the week to a measured and dignified close. Clérambault's writing reminds us that Baroque music was as much about structure and purpose as it was about beauty. His music endures because it is clear, expressive, and carefully crafted. Ending the week with this piece is a quiet nod to tradition, discipline, and lasting musical craft.Without further ado, Louis-Nicolas Clérambault's Suite du premier ton: V. Basse et Dessus de Trompette–enjoy! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In this two-part episode our hosts, Cayla, Nathan and Halli take a look at two topics of intrigue:Bog Bodies: Over a thousand bog bodies have turned up across Europe, in at least 250 sites from Ireland to the Baltics. The oldest date back 10,000 yearsHunt of the Unicorn: The unicorn tapestries enthralled me as a child, the amount of effort put into them is staggering, and the fact that they have been preserved so well is amazing. But then I got to wondering, what exactly is the story behind them? And turns out, we're not 100% surePt. 2Hunt of the Unicornhttps://www.thehumanexception.com/l/file-0156-0157-the-bog-unicorn-tapestries/

Social Security isn't just about picking an age and calling it a day, it's one of the biggest financial choices you'll make, with lots of rules and personal factors to consider. In this episode, Nick walks you through exactly how your benefit gets calculated and breaks down the essential rules you really need to know. If retirement is on the horizon, Nick's clear and practical advice will help you ask the right questions and feel more confident in your Social Security decisions. Here's what we discuss in this episode:

The Treasury Department is officially suspending Direct File, a free online tax filing platform the IRS launched last year. The department said it's exploring alternatives. That includes strengthening its partnership with tax preparation companies through its Free File program. Direct File expanded to 25 states during this year's filing season and saw higher favorability scores. But Treasury said the program cost too much and didn't see enough usage to keep scaling it up. For more on what happens next, Federal News Network's Jory Heckman spoke with the CEO of Code for America, Amanda Renteria.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Stephen Grootes speaks to travel writer Sibusiso Mkhwanazi about how to plan smarter, travel better, and get real value out of your time away. The Money Show is a podcast hosted by well-known journalist and radio presenter, Stephen Grootes. He explores the latest economic trends, business developments, investment opportunities, and personal finance strategies. Each episode features engaging conversations with top newsmakers, industry experts, financial advisors, entrepreneurs, and politicians, offering you thought-provoking insights to navigate the ever-changing financial landscape.    Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Money Show Listen live Primedia+ weekdays from 18:00 and 20:00 (SA Time) to The Money Show with Stephen Grootes broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show, go to https://buff.ly/7QpH0jY or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/PlhvUVe Subscribe to The Money Show Daily Newsletter and the Weekly Business Wrap here https://buff.ly/v5mfetc The Money Show is brought to you by Absa     Follow us on social media   702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702   CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/Radio702 CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textSTOCK MARKET TRADING FOR BEGINNERS. CEO Of Your Life. Easy To Learn First❤️️Grants from states and local governments: https://findhelp.org/❤️️Caregivers, Mental Health: https://www.211.org

Volvemos a la carga con un programa de los muy diferentes. A raíz de ‘Expediente Vallecas’, la serie documental de Buendía Estudios que lo ha petado en HBO Max, os traemos un contenido que, esperamos, sea de vuestro interés. David Cuevas, responsable de este podcast que ha participado asesorando todo el proceso de la gestación de la serie como jefe de investigación, se reúne de nuevo con Noemí Redondo (directora de la serie) e Irene del Cerro (co-creadora y productora ejecutiva de la misma) para contar un montón de curiosidades que, creemos, os van a sorprender. Ya nos contaréis… Hablamos de su desarrollo, creación, dirección, rodaje y muchas cosas más de las que no se suele hablar. Contamos bastantes anécdotas de los entresijos de la propia serie, además de explicar todo el proceso de creación de una producción de estas características, incluyendo las trabas, dificultades, satisfacciones o conflictos que conlleva. Y lo hacemos en el marco del podcast que sirvió como base principal para la investigación del famoso poltergeist de Vallecas que derivó en la mentada serie. Disponéis, además, de la versión audiovisual de esta entrevista en ‘Expediente Cuevas’, nuestro canal de Youtube. Por último, si queréis colaborar con el programa, podéis hacerlo a través de una cuenta de PayPal que hemos creado para que, libremente, quien así lo crea conveniente, pueda contribuir agradeciendo el trabajo realizado para que este pueda seguir adelante. Tomad nota: - E-mail: Apoyodimensionlimite@gmail.com - Página: http://www.paypal.me/dimensionlimite Dirige, presenta y produce: David Cuevas.

This release explains why tax refunds are bigger in 2025 for some taxpayers and why many still miss out. Corey Allison of Mastermind Tax Team breaks down overlooked strategies affecting refunds and encourages taxpayers to review their situation before filing. Mastermind Tax Group City: Fort Worth Address: 1617 Park Place Avenue Website: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1bgmhlgor3/?mibextid=wwxifr Phone: +1-945-273-0915 Email: mastermindtaxteam@gmail.com

John doesn't want to pass out, Alison is a wuss, but Liz doesn't think it's gratuitous. An uncorrected transcript of this episode is available here. Please email your letters of comment to comment@octothorpecast.uk, join our Facebook group, and tag @OctothorpeCast (on Bluesky or on Mastodon) when you post about the show on social media. Content warnings this episode: Gore and vampirism (Liz's pick) Letters of comment Chris Garcia (email) Fredrik Coulter (Facebook) Ivan Sinha (email) Nicholas Whyte (email) Paul Weimer (email) Roseanna Pendlebury (email) Tammy Coxen (Bluesky) We also heard from Ali Baker Brooks, Farah Mendlesohn, Kev McVeigh, and Mike Scott Chris Barkley got his Hugo Award! Smofcon 2025: Smofcon 42 in Stockholm, Sweden The Q&A Videos of the Q&A on YouTube Kayla Allen notes on File 770 that the sound is very poor in places Smofcon 2026: Smofcon 43 in Lisbon, Portugal The Worldcons that presented: 2026: LAcon V in Los Angeles, USA 2027: Montreal, Canada 2028: Brisbane, Australia Nuremberg, Germany Kigali, Rwanda 2029: Dublin, Ireland 2030: Edmonton, Canada 2031: Texas, USA 2032: Nantes, France Nantes Utopiales 2033: No interest 2034: Glasgow, Scotland Vision statement 2035: Poland Unknown: Czechia Festival Fantazie Picks John: Your Wish is My Command by Deena Mohamed Alison: The Lost Nose by John Sladek Sort of collected in Maps: The Uncollected John Sladek by John Sladek Liz: The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones Credits Cover art: “Alison is Still Obsessed with Ukuleles” by Alison Scott Alt text: A Mahalo Flying V, an Uma Blue Pineapple, and a Brunswick soprano are hanging on a Christmas tree beneath the words “Octothorpe 150”. Theme music: “Fanfare for Space” by Kevin MacLeod (CC BY 4.0)

Turning 62 might not feel like a milestone birthday… until you realize the Social Security clock just started ticking. Filing now could put money in your pocket sooner or cost you tens of thousands over a lifetime. How do you pick the right strategy? Let's break down how to think through one of the biggest retirement decisions you'll ever make.   Important Links: Website: http://www.yourplanningpros.com Call: 844-707-7381   ----more---- Transcript:  Speaker 1: Turning 62 might not feel like a milestone birthday until you realize the social security clock just started ticking. Filing now could put money in your pocket sooner or cost you tens of thousands over your lifetime. So which is the right strategy? Let's break it down.   Hey everybody, welcome to the podcast. This is Plan with the Tax Man, with Tony Mauro and myself to talk, "Hey, I'm 62. Should I file or wait?" That's the big conversation, Tony, that happens all the time. I imagine you probably have this chat with new prospects virtually every single time you meet with somebody.   Speaker 2: Every time. Yes. And I picked this topic this week because I've been getting a lot of questions on it. There's been a lot of chatter on social media about it. So I wanted to address it again because it is important.   Speaker 1: And it's complicated for people, but you could talk big money here. So I mean, why do it? Why file at 62? There's a plethora of reasons. If you take out the just actual need it, okay, it's like I ran the numbers and we actually do need to turn it on. Oftentimes it's things like, "Well, it's mine. I want it back." Or whatever. Understandable, but what's some other things you've heard?   Speaker 2: Well, I hear things such as, "My parents didn't live very long, so therefore I want to collect it while I still got some time." Okay. And by the way, as we talk about this, we could sit, if I had 10 listeners on the podcast as a call in, we would all have different opinions. And you could get into some serious arguments about this. So a lot of this depends upon each individual situation, like most things financial planning do. But that being said, besides worried about longevity, they want to basically take the money and invest it in themselves. Some want to give it to their heirs a little earlier.   Some are, of course, like you said, they're just ready to get out. They've worked for somebody else forever. They want to retire now and they need the income now is always the biggest one, but there are some drawbacks to that, which we'll get to. But those are the things I find most people want to take it early. And most people, when they want to take it early, they've given it no though other than those things. They haven't run any projections. They haven't done any type of planning for this, which we'll talk about here in a second.   Speaker 1: Okay. Well, why wait until FRA, full retirement age? So there's some compelling reasons to do so. First, it's what, about 6% annually. If you were to do the numbers from 62 every year you're waiting, it's about 6% up to full retirement age. Yeah?   Speaker 2: It is. So when you take it early, of course, you have to take a reduction in benefits.   Speaker 1: Yeah, like 30%.   Speaker 2: Yeah. And there's a cap on how much you can earn if you're still wanting to go out and do some work. Now, if you wait till full retirement age, not only is your benefit higher, but you can go out and earn as much as you want and they won't reduce your social security benefit. Yeah, you're still taxed on it and all of that. But that's one of the reasons why people might want to wait. They want the higher benefit. They might want to use some sophisticated planning and coordinate with spouse benefits and maybe have the lower amount or the lower earning person take theirs earlier and the higher earning take theirs later. And then of course, like I said, maybe-   Speaker 1: You should definitely think about doing that, right?   Speaker 2: Absolutely.   Speaker 1: Yeah.   Speaker 2: I mean, that's one of the biggest ones. And a lot of times you get this full retirement age statistically showing both men and women, if your health is fairly decent, you plan on living quite a bit longer up to at least the averages. At least that's, again, that's an assumption. But those are some reasons why. And if you start running some numbers and you take a look at, I ran my own before we got on the podcast. And if I took mine at 62 versus 67 is my full retirement age, by the time that I, if I lived, I used both scenarios. This is just for example, and this is what the planning software can do for you. If I lived until 83, if I waited until 67 versus 62, I would've collected $72,700 more if I waited. And so you have to decide and you should run some of these numbers.   And I also would say to all the listeners, you at very least should be out and have yourself a login and username to the social security website so you can see your reports and look at some of this stuff. It's free. They've actually done a nice job with it. So the question becomes like, in my case, is it important enough for me to delay? Because I could die between 62 and 67. Who knows?   Speaker 1: Sure, yeah.   Speaker 2: But do I want to take that chance and maybe get 72, $73,000 more I live in the same amount of time? And I think that is what the real planning stage is. And there's really no right or wrong answer because for some people, yes, maybe they do need it at 62, but for a lot of us, if you don't need the income, it generally is better to wait.   Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, think about it. 6% from 62 to 67 is... And it's a safer investment because somebody would say, to one of the arguments, "Well, I want to just take it now and I'll reinvest that money." Especially if the argument is that, "I'm doing it, I'm turning it on, but I don't actually need the income." So let's just take, I need the income off the table because if you need it, you need it. But if you're turning it on because you just want to turn it on for whatever other reason, and you're saying, "Well, I can invest in myself." Okay, maybe you're going to get a guaranteed 6% year over year with very little risk. That's one piece. Now you might look at the market right now year to date, the S&P, Tony, while we're talking is like up 16%. Somebody said, "Well, yeah, I could get 16%." Well, fine, but that's 100% at risk.   Speaker 2: That's 100% at risk. I just saw not too long ago, which led me to even pick this topic this week is somebody on Facebook sent me a clip of what appeared to be a financial advisor or some annuity person talking about it's never better to wait. Always take it at 62. And I listened to it and I would love to debate that with a gentleman, at least for every case. I mean, he does make some compelling arguments as to why some people should take it at 62, but most of what he was talking about was, "Well, they need the income now and they can reinvest it." Well, okay, yes, that is right, but you can't just sit there and tell everybody never to wait because there are some compelling arguments in some cases to wait.   Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah. And to your point. So you ran those numbers at $70,000 or whatever. Did you think about the spousal piece? Sometimes people, they don't necessarily do that. It's like, okay, don't forget, the higher of the two is what the person that's left behind is going to get. So you mentioned earlier doing that option. So if you're in a situation where one member of the family, one of the couple there is making more and you want to turn the lower one on at 62, that's a fine strategy for many people still run the numbers first to see. But again, you got to kind of factor all that stuff in there. You can't just claim it without some intentionality in there.   Speaker 2: No, you do need to be intentional with it. You do need to talk to your advisor about it because that's one thing that we use a lot is we have the lower earning spouse, if they do want some money now, okay, let's claim that now, but let's let the higher earning spouses ride a little bit and then that way you've got kind of a little bit of best of both worlds. You're getting some money now because that's what you said you wanted, but you want to get some higher benefits and generally the women live longer and if the man dies, then she can reclaim and get his higher benefit, which will benefit her later by him waiting. And so I think that's one thing that we generally try to do as far as that goes. But we use some good software just like most advisors have to be able to at least show people and run a lot of different scenarios very quickly so they can at least have all of the facts to make the best decision for them.   Speaker 1: And you know, Tony, it can go the other way too. I was just talking with another advisor earlier and he was sharing an interesting story that he had some new clients that were in prior, right before Thanksgiving, saying that they were in, they were starting to do the preliminaries and everything and they were like, "No, no, we've already identified a lot of stuff and we're going to both wait until we're 70." They wanted to do the total maximization. And he said, "Cool, but let's go through the exercise of running stuff and just see what those," Like you kind of did, "What some of those projections lay out." And he was able to show them for a myriad of reasons why, and again, he's like, "It's not my job. If you want to go 70, we'll go 70. But if we turn it on, in your case, specifically both of you at 67, you're actually going to fare better." So there is times when it can go one way or the other, but you don't know that until you get into the math of it.   Speaker 2: You don't. And that advisor probably showed them something they probably never had dreamed of and probably going to-   Speaker 1: They were shocked, yeah.   Speaker 2: Get more money over their lifetimes.   Speaker 1: They were, actually. And then you started thinking about IRMAA and you start thinking about the taxational. That's the other piece, how much of your social security is going to get taxed? In this situation where we were talking about today or our topic point, if you're turning it on at 62, but you don't need the income, you are probably going to wind up paying the max tax on this too. So not only are you taking a 30% haircut, but you're probably paying up to the 85% as taxable.   Speaker 2: It's going to be taxable. And depending on your tax bracket, it could increase that haircut by quite a bit, which is why you need to think about some of this stuff before you do it.   Speaker 1: Now you got a buzz cut.   Speaker 2: Yeah. The other thing too is I always ask people, well, if you take it 62, especially the single people, what are you going to do for health insurance until you're 65? Because Medicare doesn't kick in. And so there's some things to think about there. And if you just blindly go into this and quit your job or whatever, you probably aren't going to be able to go back and now you could be stuck with some real unfavorable circumstances.   Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah. We all know that age discrimination is not supposed to be a thing, but we also know it's a thing. So it's like trying to be 70 and find a job or the job you had before, the odds aren't great.   Speaker 2: Not great.   Speaker 1: No. So at the end of the day, look, it's a huge, huge decision, Tony. I mean, you can truly be talking tens of thousands of bucks here.   Speaker 2: You can. I mean, at the end of the day, as I say, and on most of them, and of course, we're tooting our own horn here with, you need your advisors and help to make sure that your decisions work with your plan, your health, your long-term goals. And once you do that, then at least you could feel good about what you chose. But like I say, I would caution you to just blindly do it without running the numbers because they are big. And in fact, back to my case as we close is, my plan personally is we're probably going to wait at least until we are full retirement age, if not 70, because I'm going to want that extra 70,000. I mean, that's just my psyche. But I have run the numbers and we might do a spouse claiming early, but it probably won't be 62. It might be 64 or 65.   Speaker 1: And that's true. That's true. The reason we hear things like, "Oh, there's 6,000 claiming options." Or whatever they claim there is that's because every day after 62 that you delay and turn it on, could change something, whether it's 63-   Speaker 2: Two pennies.   Speaker 1: Yeah. 63 in two weeks or 64 in three months or whatever it might be. So it all changes that number a little bit. Again, about 6% roughly from 62 to 67 is the growth. And then from 67 to 70, it's what about 8%.   Speaker 2: It's about 8%, yeah. It really goes up during those last couple, two or three years.   Speaker 1: So something to think about. So the right social security decision depends on your income needs, work plans, health and long-term goals, but before you file, make sure you're choosing that path that supports your retirement, not necessarily just some other reason that you've got in your head. And if you need some help with that, to Tony's point, tooting the own horn, yes, but the social security office folks, they do a fine job, but they're not allowed to help you go through the... They're going to tell you your options and then you pick. They're not going to ask you about your tax implifications. They're not going to ask you about your IRAs and how much you have in your income so that you're making the right decision based on all that.   So get with a financial professional before you take this action and have those chats. And if you need Tony's help, yourplanningpros.com is where you find them online, yourplanningpros.com. Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple or Spotify and also share with others that might benefit from the message as well and maybe enjoy the content. Maybe they'll need some information that might help them along their path. Again, yourplanningpros.com. Tony, thanks for hanging out, my friend. It's the end of the year, so have yourself a great holiday season, my friend.   Speaker 2: You do the same, and I wish everybody out there a great and safe holiday season as well.   Speaker 1: Yeah. And we'll see you in 2026. Ugh, sounds weird already, but we'll see on the other side here with Tony Mauro from Tax Doctor, Inc. on Plan with the Tax Man.   Securities offered through Avantax Investment Services SM, member FINRA, SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Avantax Advisory Services. Insurance services offered through an Avantax affiliated insurance agency. Investment strategies discussed in this episode may not be suitable for all investors. Please consult with a financial professional.

Want to learn more about financial planning? Please subscribe to our channel and you won't miss a video ➟ https://bit.ly/33RO6mV Book an appointment with Phil to get your customized planning process started ➟ https://www.afswealthmgt.com/schedule-appointment Turning 62 might not feel like a milestone birthday until you realize the Social Security clock just started ticking. Filing now could put money in your pocket sooner, or it could cost you tens of thousands of dollars over your lifetime. In this episode, Phil breaks down how to think through one of the biggest retirement decisions you'll ever make without letting emotion lead the way. Before you file, make sure you're choosing the strategy that supports your long-term retirement, not just the date on the calendar.   Here's some of what we discuss in this episode:

In this hour of Cashing Out, host Dustin Swedelson is joined by Cole Thompson, Host of Morning Drive with Dan & Cole on SportsTalk 970, to discuss the Houston Texans. Also, joining the show is Aniello Piro, DenverSports 104.3 FM, to talk about the Denver Broncos. Dustin also does Rank and File and hits on the College Football Playoff. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Art of Keeping Things Separate This topic comes up more than people admit. Usually in a whisper. Or an email that starts with, "This might be a weird question…" It's not weird. It's just complicated. A lot of actors are working in NSFW or spicy spaces. Erotica audiobooks. Adult games. ASMR. OnlyFans. Patreon. Sensual storytelling. And at the same time, they're booking e-learning, commercials, family-friendly narration, children's content. The work itself isn't the problem. The overlap is. So I want to talk about how to keep those worlds separate in a way that's professional, grounded, and sane. Not from a morality angle. From a business one. Why This Feels So Loaded Most of the discomfort doesn't come from the work. It comes from fear. Fear of being judged. Fear of being misunderstood. Fear that one client will see something they weren't meant to see and make a snap decision about you. And honestly? That fear isn't irrational. Algorithms don't understand nuance. Brand managers don't scroll thoughtfully. Google definitely doesn't care about context. So when people ask, "Should I be hiding this?" what they're really asking is, "How do I protect my career without betraying myself?" That's the real question. What Separation Actually Is Separating your spicy work is not about shame. It's about clarity. You're not hiding your art. You're organizing it. Just like authors use different names for different genres, actors can use separate identities for separate audiences. A pseudonym. A distinct brand. A different website, email, and social presence. Both are real. Both are you. They just serve different people. When everything lives in one place, clients get confused. And confused clients don't book. Clear clients do. The Practical Line in the Sand A few things matter more than people realize. Separate branding. Different headshots, colors, fonts, tone. If one side of your work says PBS and the other says sultry midnight headphones, they should not look related. Separate metadata. File names, tags, credits. This is where people accidentally connect dots they never meant to connect. Separate systems. Emails. Phone numbers. Invoicing if you can. Boundaries get easier when logistics support them. None of this makes you secretive. It makes you intentional. When the Worlds Almost Touch This is the moment that spikes everyone's nervous system. Someone recognizes your voice. A link gets shared accidentally. A client stumbles across something unexpected. Here's the rule. Don't panic. If you're comfortable acknowledging it, a simple line works: "I work in multiple genres under different names to keep my projects organized." That's it. No explanation tour. No justification. You're allowed to run your business like a business. And if you're not comfortable bridging those worlds, quiet consistency does the work for you. No cross-linking. No wink-wink posts. No mixing lanes just this once. Something We Don't Talk About Enough Adult performance work can take real emotional energy. Just like screaming in video games. Just like intense drama. Just like anything that asks your nervous system to open. So recovery matters. Boundaries matter. Choice matters. Doing one kind of spicy work does not obligate you to do all of it. Your comfort line is allowed to move, but it's also allowed to exist. Take care of the system holding all of this. One artist. One body. One brain. A Thought I'm Sitting With People assume separation means being two different people. I don't see it that way. I see one whole artist with range and boundaries. Different lighting. Different outfits. Same integrity. The goal isn't secrecy. It's sovereignty. You decide who sees what, where, and when. That's not avoidance. That's professionalism. If you want to train your voiceover craft in a grounded, professional space, Voiceover Gyms is where we do that. Learn more about the classes here: https://www.actingbusinessbootcamp.com/actor-training-program You can always reach me at mandy@actingbusinessbootcamp.com , and if Voiceover Gyms feels like the next right step, keep an eye on your inbox. I'll let you know when doors are open.

Nick is joined by Lee Mottershead, with news that Fact to File is highly likely to contest the King George next week subject to pleasing in gallops in the coming days. Kempton's future is the subject of significant conversation again, with further statements from developers Redrow and Spelthorne Council yesterday. Also on today's show, Fergal O'Brien - approaching 1000 GB jumps wins - talks Crambo ahead of a bid to win a third Long Walk on Saturday, Vicky Leonard has the latest sensational Australian pattern development, William Buick spins through his rides - including Opera Ballo - on Festive Friday in Dubai, while JA McGrath has the latest from Hong Kong.

Leighton is on summer break, so we are highlighting some of his favourite guests from 2025. The term “lawfare” is getting plenty of attention; basically it represents the corruption that's becoming more widespread in the courtrooms of the Western world. Judicial activism and the politicisation of the law and legal system makes for a duo of issues that need addressing by the legislatures of countries which are the targets of the misuse of such activities. In what we think is a very productive discussion on a number of current democracy headwinds, Professor James Allan is arguably better than ever. We share a commentary on tariffs that cuts to the core intent of Trumps actions, and we visit The Mailroom with Mrs Producer. File your comments and complaints at Leighton@newstalkzb.co.nz Haven't listened to a podcast before? Check out our simple how-to guide. Listen here on iHeartRadio Leighton Smith's podcast also available on iTunes:To subscribe via iTunes click here See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dette ble et enda villere år enn vi kunne forestilt oss. Men hva er støy og sirkus, og hva er endringer som får konsekvens for ettertiden? Vi ser tilbake på det første året i Trump 2.0 og spør: Hva var det aller viktigste som skjedde? Med programleder Kristoffer Rønneberg, korrespondent Kjetil Hanssen og kommentator Christina Pletten. Produsent: Peter Daatland Foto: REUTERS/Jeenah Moon, REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool, REUTERS/Wolfgang Rattay, AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File, AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

Radio International - The Ultimate Eurovision Experience is broadcast from Malta's Radio 105FM on Tuesday evenings from 2100 - 0059 hours CET. The show is broadcast live on Wednesday evenings from 1900 - 2300 hours CET on the Eurovision Radio International Mixcloud Channel as well as on the Facebook Page of Eurovision Radio International with an interactive chatroom.         AT A GLANCE - ON THE SHOW THIS WEEK  The Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2025 - We have a Winner Junior Eurovision 2025 Interview with  Sofia Nersesian (JESC 2025, Ukraine, Number 2) Junior Eurovision 2025 Interview with  Nela Mančeska (JESC 2025, North Macedonia, Number 7 Junior Eurovision 2025 Interview with  Leonardo Giovannangeli (JESC 2025, Italy, Number 12) Junior Eurovision 2025 Interview with  Inês Gonçalves (JESC 2025, Portugal, Number 13) Step into a Eurovision Christmas - Eurovision Artists sing Christmas Songs  The Eurovision Song Contest 2026 National Final Season Eurovision Spotlight: Austria's History at the Eurovision Song Contest  with Chris Poppe (final in the current series) Eurovision News with Nick van Lith from www.escXtra.com Eurovision Birthday File with David Mann Eurovision Cover Spot with David Mann Eurovision Calendar with Javier Leal  National Final Update for Junior and Eurovision Song Contest with Alain Forotti  New Music Releases by Eurovision Artists  Your music requests    The Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2025 - We have a Winner: The 23rd edition of the Junior Eurovision Song Contest was held on Saturday 13 Dec 2025 from the Gymnastic Hall of the Olympic City in Tblisi in Georgia with young artists from 18 countries taking part. In the running order: Malta, Azerbaijan, Croatia, San Marino, Armenia, Ukraine, Ireland, The Netherlands, Poland, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Georgia, Cyprus, France and Albania. Returning countries were Azerbaijan, Croatia and Montenegro while Estonia and Germany took a break. The Hosts of the show were David Aladashvili and Liza Tsiklauri. The show started at 1700 hours CET.        Lou Deleuze - Junior Eurovision 2025 Winner for France   CONGRATULATIONS !!! to Lou Deleuze from France   for winning the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2025  with the song "Ce Monde"   with a total of 248 points       The Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2025 Scoreboard   Interviews with four Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2025 Little Artists:  The Radio International Rowing Reporter Alain Forrotti has traveled to Tiblisi, Georgia to meet some of the young stars and interview them. Meet the four young artists on the show this week.  Sofia Nersesian (Ukraine, Number 2, "Motanka"),  Nela Mančeska (North Macedonia, Number 7, "Miracle" ),  Leonardo Giovannangeli (Italy, Number 12, "Rockstar") Inês Gonçalves (Portugal, Number 13, "Para onde vai o amor?")         The Eurovision Spotlight - The history of Austria at the Eurovision Song Contest:  It is time for the traditional look at the next host country's Eurovision Song Contest entries. JJ won Eurovision 2025 and with that Austria will host the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 in the Wiener Stadthalle on 12 and 14 May 2026 for the two Semi Finals and the Grand Finale to take place on Saturday, 16 May 2026. Over the next weeks and before the National Final Season for 2026, Radio International's team members will be reviewing all the Eurovision entries from Austria. Chris Poppe will be continuing series of the Eurovision Spotlight looking at the history of Austria at the Eurovision Song Contest.   Eurovision News, New Song Releases, Birthday File, Coverspot, Eurovision Calendar:Also JP will be joined by David Mann for the Eurovision Birthday File and Eurovision Coverspot.  Javier stands in for Nick and will be presenting the Eurovision News courtesy of escXtra.com. There will be a lot of the great new releases of Eurovision artists on the show as well as great Eurovision Classics. Javier will be updating us on the upcoming Eurovision events in the Eurovision Calendar and Alain Forotti gives us already some updates of the National Finals regarding the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2025 and the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 and and....   For full details of this week's Show Content and Play List - click here

GET A SYDNEY PLUSH BEFORE TIME RUNS OUT!Audio gathered from various sources at SITE2 on day 1333.MAJOR INSIGHT INTO:ENTITY9's psychological stateENTITY9's pre-limnal memoryconflict between ENTITY9 and ENTITY12ENTITY1's inability to maintain neutralityMINOR INSIGHT INTO:behavioral patterns associated with medication withdrawalENTITY12 and ENTITY9's relationshipImportant notes:I did what you asked and checked local weather channels as far out as Virginia. If we're to believe ENTITY12, then the stations are typical fare.But they do sound concerning.-Disclaimer: Camp Here & There is intended for audiences aged 16+. The story deals with mature themes and graphic horror which may not be suitable for all audiences. Viewer discretion is advised.Performances by Voicebox Vance, Corey Wilder, and Tom Laflin.With original music composed by Will Wood and produced by Jonathon Maisto.Additional music composed by Mollie Maxwell, Kyle Gabler and Another You.Dialogue editing by Emily Safko. Audio engineering by The Leo!Sensitivity read by Ragtime.-WEBSITE⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠PATREON⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠DISCORD⁠

Industrial firefighting foams are an essential part of on-site safety in UK factories. But for decades some of these familiar canisters contained potentially dangerous, toxic chemicals. File on 4 Investigates discovers that 3M the multi-billion dollar chemical company responsible for producing the chemicals knew about the risks as early as the 1960s because their own internal studies on animals and tests on workers indicated a possible increase in rates of cancer. Despite this, the company failed to warn its workers of the dangers associated with using the foams for decades and was involved in an environmental accident at one of its sites that led to the chemicals being released into a Welsh river.The programme obtained never seen before documents showing the regulator warning the company it thought it had committed an offence but choosing not to prosecute it.In 2004, with evidence of the risks to the environment of the two specific forever chemicals PFOS and PFOA, a report commissioned by the government recommended any remaining firefighting foams containing the chemicals be incinerated. But we discover in the years after that companies struggled to dispose of legacy stock of foams, and, appearing unaware of the unofficial advice, discharged them straight into the sewer with no treatment, in one case with permission from the water company.3M said that the health and safety of its workers and their families were “critical priorities" for the company.Reporter: Esme Stallard Producer: Anna Meisel Technical Producer: Richard Hannaford Production Coordinator: Tim Fernley Editor: Tara McDermott

This week, corporate media is ignoring DOJ's reasons for refusing to release Epstein material, Trump's prosecutors continue to flounder, and Trump is underwater on all fronts as Democrats continue to win elections.Watch the video here: https://www.youtube.com/live/-EUjaptr9kU?si=1Ur8FziqdMHqqba2 Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:https://apple.co/3XNx7ckWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?https://patreon.com/thedailybeanshttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/https://apple.co/3UKzKt0 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9900Written by: QueeriousSupport the Patreon to see Exploring videos early and vote on new ones!: http://bit.ly/1U9QkPhJoin the Discord!: https://discord.gg/beRYZgbbgPSupport the Series with official Merch!: https://t.co/aH0HApXp7vFollow me on Twitter for updates!: https://twitter.com/TES_ManggListen on Podcasts: https://anchor.fm/theexploringseriesExploring SCP Foundation Playlist: https://bit.ly/2whu8NAExploring Dungeons and Dragons Playlist: https://bit.ly/348IZZuExploring Warhammer 40k Playlist: https://bit.ly/2DoFZguExploring Celtic Mythology Playlist: https://bit.ly/2rTuHLmExploring Norse Mythology Playlist: http://bit.ly/2EAHTdaExploring Elder Scrolls Playlist: http://bit.ly/2fgqQoYExploring Star Wars Playlist: http://bit.ly/2lNtlN0Exploring Middle-Earth Playlist: http://bit.ly/2cGNctyExploring the Cthulhu Mythos Playlist: http://bit.ly/25OI9jYExploring History Playlist: https://bit.ly/2w7XMqMVideo Game Stories Playlist: https://bit.ly/3hhgbqKMy Gaming Channel: youtube.com/user/ManggsLPsMusic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbEX2cpDdPUContent relating to the SCP Foundation, including the SCP Foundation logo, is licensed under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 and all concepts originate from http://www.scp-wiki.net and its authors. This video, being derived from this content, is hereby also released under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0.

Brothers J and Eric discuss the 2019 film Doctor Sleep. It's a short ep for the holiday season but it's a fun movie to talk about.    File length 46:37 File Size 36.8 MB   Theme by Jul Big Green via SongFinch Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts Listen to us on Stitcher Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Send your comments to show@notinacreepyway.com Visit the show website at Not In A Creepy Way

The headlines of the day by The Indian Express

Send us a textBancus Crypto Visa Debit Card Grand Opening Dec 15th 2025Bancus Crypto Debit Card Presentation