Podcast appearances and mentions of samuel warren

Privacy law and technological advancements have a deep and intertwined history that go back to at least the 1890s with Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis's article "The Right to Privacy," which was prompted by camera technology. George Washington University Law Professor Dan Solove has long studied and written about privacy law. He published several well-known books including "Nothing to Hide: The False Trade Off Between Privacy and Security" and co-authored "Privacy Law Fundamentals," which is published by the IAPP. Solove recently published a new book, "On Privacy and Technology." IAPP Editorial Director Jedidiah Bracy caught up with Solove just before the book was published to discuss it and whether the regulation-versus-innovation trade-off is a fallacy, why the notice-and-choice paradigm hasn't worked for consumers, and where the future will take privacy, AI, and cybersecurity law and regulation.

Summary of Chapter 12: The Right to Privacy. Chapter 12 explores the evolving concept of privacy rights in the United States, covering its historical origins, key legal developments, and emerging challenges in the digital age. The chapter is divided into several key sections: 1. Origins and Development of the Right to Privacy. Privacy as a legal concept has deep historical roots, beginning with English common law's recognition of the home as a protected space. In the U.S., privacy rights began to take shape in the 19th century, as industrialization and urbanization raised concerns about personal autonomy and dignity. A seminal moment in privacy law came with Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis' 1890 article, The Right to Privacy, which argued for privacy as an independent legal right. This article became the foundation for the modern understanding of privacy, defined as “the right to be let alone.” The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly guarantee a right to privacy, but courts have interpreted various amendments to protect privacy in specific contexts. Landmark Supreme Court cases such as Griswold v Connecticut (1965), Katz v United States (1967), and Roe v Wade (1973) have established privacy as a constitutional right, particularly regarding personal decisions about marriage, reproductive rights, and bodily autonomy. 2. Reproductive Rights. The right to privacy has been particularly significant in the area of reproductive rights. Contraception: The Supreme Court first recognized the right to privacy in reproductive decisions in Griswold v Connecticut, which struck down a law banning contraceptives for married couples. This right was extended to unmarried individuals in Eisenstadt v Baird (1972), establishing reproductive autonomy as a matter of individual privacy. Abortion: In Roe v Wade (1973), the Court recognized a woman's right to choose to have an abortion as part of her privacy rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This right was later modified in Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992), which introduced the "undue burden" test, allowing for state regulation of abortion as long as it does not place an undue burden on a woman's ability to obtain an abortion. Current Challenges: Reproductive rights have faced increasing legal challenges, culminating in the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v Wade, returning the authority to regulate abortion to individual states. 3. Right to Marry and Family Autonomy. The right to marry and family autonomy are also protected under the umbrella of privacy rights. The Right to Marry: The Supreme Court has long recognized marriage as a fundamental right. In Loving v Virginia (1967), the Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage, affirming that marriage is a basic civil right. This was further expanded in Obergefell v Hodges (2015), where the Court ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry, grounding this decision in both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. Family Autonomy: Privacy rights also protect family autonomy, particularly parents' rights to make decisions about the upbringing and education of their children. In Pierce v Society of Sisters (1925) and Troxel v Granville (2000), the Court ruled that the government cannot interfere with parents' fundamental rights to direct their children's upbringing, unless there is a compelling state interest. 4. Emerging Issues in Privacy Law. As society evolves, so too does the concept of privacy. Emerging issues in privacy law include: Digital Privacy and Technology: The rise of digital platforms has introduced new privacy concerns, particularly regarding the collection, storage, and use of personal data by both governments and private companies. Issues of data privacy and government surveillance, as seen in cases like Carpenter v United States (2018), highlight the need for updated legal protections in the digital age. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Summary of Chapter 12: The Right to Privacy Chapter 12 explores the evolution and scope of privacy rights in the United States, addressing its origins, key legal developments, and emerging challenges. 1. Origins and Development of the Right to Privacy Privacy rights have historical roots in English common law, particularly the notion that the home should be protected from state intrusion. In the U.S., the modern concept of privacy was significantly shaped by the 1890 article by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, which argued for privacy as an independent legal right. Although privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, courts have recognized it as an implied right through various amendments. Landmark cases like Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Roe v. Wade (1973) established constitutional protections for privacy in areas such as contraception, reproductive rights, and personal autonomy. 2. Reproductive Rights Reproductive rights have been at the center of privacy law: Contraception: Griswold v. Connecticut established the right to use contraception as part of the constitutional right to privacy. This was later extended to unmarried individuals in Eisenstadt v. Baird. Abortion: In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court recognized a woman's right to choose to have an abortion, framing it as part of her right to privacy. This right was later modified in Planned Parenthood v. Casey with the "undue burden" test, and ultimately overturned by Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022), allowing states to regulate or ban abortion. 3. Right to Marry and Family Autonomy Right to Marry: The Supreme Court has recognized marriage as a fundamental right. In Loving v. Virginia, it struck down bans on interracial marriage, and in Obergefell v. Hodges, it extended the right to marry to same-sex couples, framing marriage as a fundamental aspect of personal liberty and autonomy. Family Autonomy: Parents' rights to raise their children are protected under the right to privacy. Key cases like Pierce v. Society of Sisters and Troxel v. Granville affirm that parents have the right to make decisions about their children's education and upbringing without undue government interference. 4. Emerging Issues in Privacy Law Privacy law faces new challenges in the digital age: Digital Privacy: The collection and use of personal data by companies and government agencies, particularly in the realm of surveillance, have raised significant concerns. Cases like Carpenter v. United States have extended privacy protections to digital data. Genetic Privacy: Advances in biotechnology and genetic testing have introduced concerns about the use of genetic information, leading to laws like the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) to protect against misuse. The Right to Be Forgotten: This concept, prominent in Europe under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), allows individuals to request the removal of personal data from the internet. In the U.S., its potential implementation is debated due to concerns over free speech and access to information. Conclusion Chapter 12 outlines the significant legal protections around privacy in the U.S., tracing its origins and addressing key issues like reproductive rights and family autonomy. It also highlights emerging challenges in privacy law, particularly in the digital age, showing how courts and lawmakers must adapt to new technological and societal changes to protect individual privacy. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this EG Property Podcast, we delve into the transformative world of workplace environments, focusing on the EG Power Properties List, powered by HqO. Listen in as EG editor Samantha McClary sits down with Samuel Warren, senior vice president of sales at HqO, for an in-depth discussion on what it takes for companies to not only make it onto this coveted list but also to achieve the distinguished HqO Best Spaces to Work certification. The conversation looks at the critical importance of curating superior occupier experiences in today's competitive landscape and uncovers why HqO has spearheaded the Real Estate Experience platform. This initiative aims to arm businesses with actionable insights drawn from comprehensive data on how end-users engage with their workspaces. Join us as we question the future of workplace design, investigate the role of data in shaping occupier experiences, and reveal the strategies that companies can employ to transform their spaces into hubs of innovation and productivity. Find out more about how to make it on to the Power Properties list here 

This bonus episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast is an interview with Amy Gajda, author of “Seek and Hide: The Tangled History of the Right to Privacy.” Her book is an accessible history of the often obscure and sometimes “curlicued” interaction between the individual right to privacy and the public's (or at least the press's) right to know. Gajda, a former journalist, turns what could have been a dry exegesis on two centuries of legal precedent into a lively series of stories behind the case law. All the familiar legal titans of press and privacy—Louis Brandeis, Samuel Warren, Oliver Wendell Holmes—are there, but Gajda's research shows that they weren't always on the side they're most famous for defending.  This interview is just a taste of what Gajda's book offers, but lawyers who are used to a summary of argument at the start of everything they read should listen to this episode first if they want to know up front where all the book's stories are taking them.

This bonus episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast is an interview with Amy Gajda, author of “Seek and Hide: The Tangled History of the Right to Privacy.” Her book is an accessible history of the often obscure and sometimes “curlicued” interaction between the individual right to privacy and the public's (or at least the press's) right to know. Gajda, a former journalist, turns what could have been a dry exegesis on two centuries of legal precedent into a lively series of stories behind the case law. All the familiar legal titans of press and privacy—Louis Brandeis, Samuel Warren, Oliver Wendell Holmes—are there, but Gajda's research shows that they weren't always on the side they're most famous for defending.  This interview is just a taste of what Gajda's book offers, but lawyers who are used to a summary of argument at the start of everything they read should listen to this episode first if they want to know up front where all the book's stories are taking them.

Press Freedom vs. Privacy—Newsworthiness in a Self-Publishing Era (Part 2)An interview with Prof. Amy GajdaThe First Amendment provides broad but not absolute freedom of press protections. Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren first famously articulated the right to privacy in 1890, a “right to be let alone” from undue prying by the press in private matters. While historically the press has enjoyed considerable latitude in determining what is newsworthy and publishable, there have been recent movements in the courts to constrict press freedoms and broaden individual privacy rights. Professor Amy Gajda of Tulane Law School examines how the concept of newsworthiness has evolved and what happens to press freedoms when “quasi-journalists,” self-publishers, bloggers and the like who don't abide by traditional ethics codes overstep the editorial line.

Press Freedom vs. Privacy—Newsworthiness in a Self-Publishing Era (Part 2)An interview with Prof. Amy GajdaThe First Amendment provides broad but not absolute freedom of press protections. Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren first famously articulated the right to privacy in 1890, a “right to be let alone” from undue prying by the press in private matters. While historically the press has enjoyed considerable latitude in determining what is newsworthy and publishable, there have been recent movements in the courts to constrict press freedoms and broaden individual privacy rights. Professor Amy Gajda of Tulane Law School examines how the concept of newsworthiness has evolved and what happens to press freedoms when “quasi-journalists,” self-publishers, bloggers and the like who don't abide by traditional ethics codes overstep the editorial line.

The First Amendment provides broad but not absolute freedom of press protections. Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren first famously articulated the right to privacy in 1890, a “right to be let alone” from undue prying by the press in private matters. While historically the press has enjoyed considerable latitude in determining what is newsworthy and publishable, there have been recent movements in the courts to constrict press freedoms and broaden individual privacy rights. Professor Amy Gajda of Tulane Law School examines how the concept of newsworthiness has evolved and what happens to press freedoms when “quasi-journalists,” self-publishers, bloggers and the like who don't abide by traditional ethics codes overstep the editorial line.

The First Amendment provides broad but not absolute freedom of press protections. Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren first famously articulated the right to privacy in 1890, a “right to be let alone” from undue prying by the press in private matters. While historically the press has enjoyed considerable latitude in determining what is newsworthy and publishable, there have been recent movements in the courts to constrict press freedoms and broaden individual privacy rights. Professor Amy Gajda of Tulane Law School examines how the concept of newsworthiness has evolved and what happens to press freedoms when “quasi-journalists,” self-publishers, bloggers and the like who don't abide by traditional ethics codes overstep the editorial line.

Summary: In the 7th episode of season 8 of the Propcast, Louisa is joined by Julia Paolucci, Managing Director at HqO France and Samuel Warren, Managing Director of HqO UK Ltd about how tenant engagement can slow down the resignation movement and help landlords meet ESG targets. They touched on what tenants can get out of HqO's product, the acquisition of Office App and how ESG plays into the tenant experience. They also discussed what HqO has planned for 2022 as well as JLL Spark being a key investor. The key takeaway from this episode is that the focus in the current era is all about the employee experience.  Resources: LMRE Global Recruitment and Search Consultancy LMRE YouTube Interviews Companies Mentioned: HqO WorkWell Insight Partners  JLL Spark  Navitas Capital Cushman & Wakefield Suffolk Capital Office App by HqO Shout Outs:   Chase Garbarino - Cofounder and CEO at HqO   Key Insights From This Episode:    In a tech company, or a very service-driven company, things do change considerably month in, month out – Samuel When we started delivering something to the office market, it was something that was predictable, something pretty stable, and now we've seen everything transforming. - Julia In this era right now, the focus is really being directed at the employee and what their experience is as well as engaging with them and making them see the benefits of the workplace. - Julia  48% of the working population in the US are seeking new employment, therefore employers really need to understand what an employee wants. - Louisa The trend right now for us is; what can the landlord give to their tenant to enhance that tenant experience, to make the experience in the building as attractive as possible? - Julia     Keywords: ESG, tenants, landlords, real estate, office, future of work   About Our Guests: Julia Paolucci Julia Paolucci is Managing Director for France at HqO, where she is responsible for establishing and growing the French business.  Julia brings forward a property technology expertise, and a track record of leading greenfield organisations. In her previous role, as Head of Sales for Workwell, she was tasked with building the organisation's client base in the proptech sector's nascent stages, developing a thorough understanding of the landlord, tenant, service provider, and end-user experiences. Julia started her career in banking, working in New York, Paris and London for the New York Stock Exchange, Deutsche Bank, and lastly HSBC Corporate Bank where she spent 7 years.  Julia graduated with a BComm from McGill University in Montreal and an Executive MBA from IE University in Madrid.    Samuel Warren Samuel Warren is the Managing Director of HqO UK Ltd, our London based business. At HqO Samuel is responsible for the growth of our platform in Northern Europe, including Germany, Netherlands and Nordics.  Prior to HqO, Samuel spent 12 years in the real estate market specialising in growing new businesses and high performing sales and marketing teams with companies such as CBRE and Chesterton Global and developers such as Berkeley Group and Country Garden. He worked in the Middle East, Singapore, China and Russia.  He is a graduate of Exeter University and also commissioned into the British Army, serving as a Bomb Disposal and Search Officer in the Royal Engineers.    About Our Host Louisa Dickins https://www.linkedin.com/in/louisa-dickins-ab065392/ Louisa started her career in property working at a well-known estate agency in London. Realising her people skills, she moved over to Lloyd May to pursue a career in recruitment. She now is a Director at LMRE, who are a specialist recruitment firm driven by PropTech and recruitment professionals, and Louisa oversees their 5 core areas. Louisa co-founded LMRE and provides a constructive recruitment platform to the new disruptors in real estate. Louisa is also on the board of Directors at UK PropTech Association (UKPA). About LMRE www.lmre.tech LMRE believe there is a better way to recruit. LMRE focus on a more comprehensive, client led focus delivering exceptional talent to the place at the time. They are passionate about the industry and passionate about people's careers. LMRE spend time with each client to become and an extension of the business, and their transparency and core values help them grow with the sector. LMRE simplify recruitment and innovate with our clients and evolve the people driven, PropTech community. Timestamps: [01:50] Julia, how did you become the managing director of HqO France? I started my career in finance, working for different financial institutions in New York, Paris and London.  I was one of the first members of WorkWell.  I joined HqO in November 2019 to launch the French market.  [03:15] Sam, how did you end up at HqO and what experience do you bring to it?  I have a varied career, I worked for the British army and now my career in real estate has been focused on growing high-performance sales teams.  I started at HqO and set up a country from the start, I grew the team and brought everything together.  [04:30] Tell us more about the product and how has the product pivoted over the last few years?  One of the underlying things at HqO is regardless of the product, it's working with our customer base to really understand what they're trying to achieve.  We've done a huge amount of work on analytics and data. When we started delivering something to the office market, it was something that was predictable, something pretty stable, and now we've just seen everything transforming.  [06:20] Say I'm one of the tenants, what value do I get out of this product? An individual employee in a building is going to have the technology on their mobile phone and will be able to do a whole range of things in that workplace; from booking different meeting spaces, being able to work in different places to being able to use your phone as an access badge.  Connecting you to those services and features as well as making your day in the building a lot happier and easier.  Bringing perks to employees, thinking of discounts in the vicinity, or promoting local foods and beverages.  [09:25] You have some well known investors; Insight Partners, JLL Spark, Navitas Capital, Cushman & Wakefield and Suffolk Capital. This has allowed you to grow across North America, UK and Europe. Are there any areas of focus or growth for the business which you are looking at?  It varies from region to region so in Europe, we are consolidating what we deliver across those territories.  Making sure that we can service a customer in all the different languages, all the different territories and all the different technologies.  [11:20] You acquired Office App. How did that come about and what does it mean for the business? You also have a fantastic culture; how do you sort of balance that with the acquisition? They were a direct competitor of ours in the European market but our cultures weren't miles apart. What they brought to the table was where we had gaps and vice versa. [13:25] How does ESG play into obviously tenant experience? It is a necessity right now for real estate because they actually have to take action, they have to reduce their carbon footprint but they don't necessarily know how to do that yet.  From the employer's perspective, this is becoming more important because we are in a great resignation period and people are looking for new employment opportunities. [15:50] Can you talk us through how HqO can help clients achieve their ESG goals?  ESG = environmental, social, and governance. Social: Our customer success team can implement for our clients can be things like events that are going to bring about inclusion or can push a different cause.  We've been able to include a lot of guidance to users. [17:00] JLL Spark has made an investment into HqO, what does this mean for the whole of HqO?  Their knowledge of the marketplace has been put forward by them in the early days when no one knew who we were and it was really fundamental.  They provide introductions that ratify who we are. Our clients know and trust JLL and their evaluations. [19:25] What's next for 2022 in HqO, in each of your regions?  The great resignation and people in work spaces are really driving that more holistic experience for both users of our product and people in buildings. With our acquisition of Office App, we have acquired a lot of knowledge about the corporate market. The trend right now for us is; what can the landlord give to their tenant to enhance that tenant experience, to make the experience in the building as attractive as possible.  Enriching the experience for the employee and creating that engagement for them in their workplace in general, not just the building.  Landlords and corporations desperately want to understand more about their population. A big trend of 2022 in the real estate world, in France, is satisfaction, how do we gauge satisfaction? [23:40] The ‘LMRE' part, Louisa asks the guests to talk about:   Lessons learned in your career   Julia: Revolutions don't happen overnight but they do happen. To make revolutions happen, you need to keep pushing, you need to have energy, but you also need to have patience.     Mention a person, product or service   Samuel: Some of our early adopters, some of our customers that have got innovation teams that wanted to test the product and innovate, evolve, work with us.    Rewarding parts of working in the space:    Julia: Seeing my clients not refer to tenants anymore but rather as users.    What are you most Excited about for the future of the space?:     Samuel:  A more holistic approach. The big goal is the way that physical space will be totally connected, be it whether you are in a residential component of it, whether you're in an office component of it, whether you're a public visitor. It's not about tenants anymore, it's about customers. Sponsors Launch Your Own Podcast Kopus.com is the leading podcast production and strategic content company for brands, organisations, institutions, individuals, and entrepreneurs. Our team sets you up with the right strategy, equipment, training, and guidance and content to ensure you sound amazing while speaking to your niche audience and networking with your perfect clients. Get in touch jason@kopus.com

There has always been a need for protecting private data, but long gone are the days when sensitive customer documents were locked on a filing cabinet at the end of the workday. In our digital world, customers share more information about themselves than ever, across a variety of platforms. We often hear in media and at conferences about advances in technology to catch up with regulations on data protection. Yet we also continue to read about breaches like the Colonial Pipeline breach of May 7, 2021 and AXA Asia a week later. In this PodChats for FutureCIO, we speak to John Grimm, Vice President of Strategy and Business Development, Data Protection Solutions, Entrust, on the topic of data privacy, data protection and what enterprises are doing right and wrong to comply with regulations and customer expectations.Topics covered:1.       The idea of data protection started as far back as 1890 when US lawyers, Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis, wrote the Right to Privacy. Arguably one of the biggest developments around privacy is GDPR in 2018. Three years, where is the holdup when it comes to upholding personal data privacy? 2.       Before we go further, let's start off with definitions. What is data protection? In a typical large enterprise, what does it encompass, and what is its relationship to data encryption?3.       We continue to hear about high profile cyberattacks like the Colonial Pipeline and more recently AXA Asia. Why do organisations seem to struggle with their data protection strategies?4.       Speaking of encryption, is there a magic number in terms of how many encryption tools is enough? You spoke of between 8 to 10 as average. 5.       Environments have become more complex. Today enterprises operate in hybrid multi-cloud environments covering on-prem, private, public and edge.  The same goes for data encryption and data protection tools. How do you manage and effectively use this growing complexity that is the cloud and protecting it?6.       Specific to the Ponemon Institute report, can you cite reasons why Southeast Asia ranked lowest globally in terms of encryption adoption (50% global average vs 36% in Southeast Asia)?7.       How do you see encryption evolving? What can organisations do to better leverage encryption as the foundation for a more holistic data protection strategy?8.       Gartner predicts that by 2023, 65% of the global population will have their personal information protected by data privacy laws. Given all the breaches that are occurring today, what needs to happen for this prediction to become a reality?9.       In the digital economy, who owns the data? Is it the CIO, the CDO, the marketing department or the customer?10.   What must enterprises do to rein back the perceived loss of control in data protection? And what should CIOs be doing to own part of the solution?11.   Simplification vs the sprawl of solutions – what is Entrust's USP (standout)?

St Martins C3"God is looking for a partnership with you, not a performance from you." Using the life and faith of Samuel as an example, Warren Gouman encourages us to dig deep in prayer, bringing everything we have before God and basing everything we do on his word. 

  In May 1840 London was scandalized by the murder of Lord William Russell, who'd been found in his bed with his throat cut. The evidence seemed to point to an intruder, but suspicion soon fell on Russell's valet. In this week's episode of the Futility Closet podcast we'll follow the investigation and trial, and the late revelation that decided the case. We'll also marvel at Ireland's greenery and puzzle over a foiled kidnapping. Intro: Marshal Ney directed his own execution. Lewis Carroll invented an alphabet he could write in the dark. Sources for our feature on the murder of Lord William Russell: Yseult Bridges, Two Studies in Crime, 1959. Claire Harman, Murder by the Book: The Crime That Shocked Dickens's London, 2019. Thomas Dunphy and Thomas J. Cummins, Remarkable Trials of All Countries, 1870. J.E. Latton Pickering, Report of the Trial of Courvoisier for the Murder of Lord William Russell, June 1840, 1918. William Harrison Ainsworth, Jack Sheppard: A Romance, 1839. "Remarkable Cases of Circumstantial Evidence," in Norman Wise Sibley, Criminal Appeal and Evidence, 1908. Samuel Warren, "The Mystery of Murder, and Its Defence," in Miscellanies, Critical, Imaginative, and Juridical, 1855, 237-271. "Trial, Confession, and Execution of Courvoisier for the Murder of Lord Wm. Russell: Memoir of F.B. Courvoisier, Lord W. Russell's Valet [broadside]," 1840. "Russell, Lord William (1767-1840)," in D.R. Fisher, ed., The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1820-1832, 2009. "The Practice of Advocacy: Mr. Charles Phillips, and His Defence of Courvoisier," Littell's Living Age 25:313 (May 18, 1850), 289-311. "English Causes Celebres," Legal News 14:39 (Sept. 26, 1891), 310-311. O'Neill Ryan, "The Courvoisier Case," Washington University Law Review 12:1 (January 1926), 39-46. Michael Asimow, "When the Lawyer Knows the Client Is Guilty: Legal Ethics, and Popular Culture," Law Society of Upper Canada 6th Colloquium, University of Toronto Faculty of Law 10 (2006). J.B. Atlay, "Famous Trials: The Queen Against Courvoisier," Cornhill Magazine 2:11 (May 1897), 604-616. Paul Bergman, "Rumpole's Ethics," Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law 1:2 (April 2012), 117-124. Abigail Droge, "'Always Called Jack': A Brief History of the Transferable Skill," Victorian Periodicals Review 50:1 (Spring 2017) 39-65, 266. Albert D. Pionke, "Navigating 'Those Terrible Meshes of the Law': Legal Realism in Anthony Trollope's Orley Farm and The Eustace Diamonds," ELH: Journal of English Literary History 77:1 (2010), 129-157. Matthew S. Buckley, "Sensations of Celebrity: Jack Sheppard and the Mass Audience," Victorian Studies 44:3 (2002), 423-463. Elizabeth Stearns, "A 'Darling of the Mob': The Antidisciplinarity of the Jack Sheppard Texts," Victorian Literature and Culture 41:3 (2013), 435-461. Ellen L. O'Brien, "'Every Man Who Is Hanged Leaves a Poem': Criminal Poets in Victorian Street Ballads," Victorian Poetry 39:2 (Summer 2001), 319-342. Matthew Buckley, "Sensations of Celebrity: Jack Sheppard and the Mass Audience," Victorian Studies 44:3 (Spring 2002), 423-463. "This Day's Examination of the Valet for the Murder of Lord William Russell, M.P.," 1840, English Crime and Execution Broadsides, Harvard Digital Collections. Peter Dean, "Death by Servant," Daily Mail, May 18, 2019, 12. Robert Douglas-Fairhurst, "The Victorian Melodrama That Led to Murder and Mayhem," Spectator, Nov. 10, 2018. Hannah Rosefield, "The Strange Victorian Murder of Lord William Russell," New Statesman, Oct. 31, 2018. "Look Death in the Face," [Liverpool] Daily Post, Sept. 1, 2018, 12. Alexandra Mullen, "Bloody-Minded Victorians," Wall Street Journal, July 26, 2013. Dalya Alberge, "Vital Clue Ignored for 50 Years," Independent, Dec. 9, 2012. "Murder of Lord William Russell -- Confession of the Murderer," Sydney Herald, Oct. 20, 1840, 3. William Makepeace Thackeray, "Going to See a Man Hanged," Fraser's Magazine 128:22 (August 1840), 150-158. "Murder of Lord William Russell," New-Orleans Commercial Bulletin, June 16, 1840. "Further Evidence Concerning the Murder of Lord William Russell," Spectator, May 23, 1840, 7. "Francois Benjamin Courvoisier: Killing: Murder," Proceedings of the Old Bailey, June 15, 1840 (accessed Aug. 4, 2019). Annalisa Quinn, "Could A Novel Lead Someone To Kill? 'Murder By The Book' Explores The Notion," National Public Radio, March 27, 2019. Listener mail: "Local Elections Results," Irish Times, Aug. 17, 2019. Wikipedia, "List of Political Parties in the Republic of Ireland," (accessed Aug. 8, 2019). Wikipedia, "List of Political Parties in the United States" (accessed Aug. 9, 2019). Wikipedia, "United States Marijuana Party" (accessed Aug. 9, 2019). Wikipedia, "United States Congress" (accessed Aug. 8, 2019). Justin McCurry, "South Korea Mulls Ending Arcane Age System to Match Rest of World," Guardian, June 2, 2019. James Griffiths and Yoonjung Seo, "In South Korea, You're a 1-Year-Old the Day You're Born. Some Want to Change That," CNN, June 3, 2019. Beatrice Christofaro, "In South Korea's Unique Aging System, Some Babies Turn 2 Years Old the Day After They Were Born. A Bill Is Trying to Change That," Insider, Jun. 3, 2019. "Life Term in Murder Contested; Culture Cited on Age," KDKA Pittsburgh, Aug. 7, 2019. James Halpin, "Killer Claims Ignorance of Korean Age Custom," Citizens' Voice, Aug. 8, 2019. James Halpin, "Killer Blames Culture Quirk for Age Miscalculation," Citizens' Voice, Aug. 7, 2019. Wikipedia, "National Assembly (South Korea)" (accessed Aug. 11, 2019). Penelope's drawing: This week's lateral thinking puzzle was contributed by listener Ken Murphy. You can listen using the player above, download this episode directly, or subscribe on Google Podcasts, on Apple Podcasts, or via the RSS feed at https://futilitycloset.libsyn.com/rss. Please consider becoming a patron of Futility Closet -- you can choose the amount you want to pledge, and we've set up some rewards to help thank you for your support. You can also make a one-time donation on the Support Us page of the Futility Closet website. Many thanks to Doug Ross for the music in this episode. If you have any questions or comments you can reach us at podcast@futilitycloset.com. Thanks for listening!

TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues related to information technology. In this episode, Jonathan and Eric address the discussion around privacy, which has been going on for over a century but has new implications with modern technology.

Reading Revelations given to the Patriarch of The Church Verses one through 60. http://www.thekingdomofgodornothing.com/samuel-warren-schaffer

Do you have a right to film the police? Should people film the police? A lot of attention has been given to the use by police officers of body cameras (and dash cameras), but what about citizens’ filming arrests on the street? With Jocelyn Simonson, we explore the ways that the use of cameras both facilitates and is expression. This show’s links: Jocelyn Simonson’s facult profile and writing Oral Argument 64: Protect and Serve (guest Seth Stoughton) Jocelyn Simonson, Beyond Body Cameras: Defending a Robust Right to Record the Police Timothy Williams, James Thomas, Samuel Jacoby, and Damien Cave, Police Body Cameras: What Do You See? (an interactive NY Times feature using videos created by Seth Stoughton); see also Jason Kottke’s link to this piece, which also features links to related ideas in film direction The Chicago Police Accountability Task Force (with links to the report); see also Monica Davey and Mitch Smith, Chicago Police Dept. Plagued by Systemic Racism, Task Force Finds ACLU of Illinois v. Alvarez (featuring a dissent by Judge Posner) Floyd v. City of New York (the stop and frisk case); see also p.597 of the same case for the judge’s quotations of police, some used in Jocelyn’s paper, evincing a “contempt and hostility . . . toward the local population”) This American Life 414: The Right to Remain Silent, Act Two (“For 17 months, New York police officer Adrian Schoolcraft recorded himself and his fellow officers on the job, including their supervisors ordering them to do all sorts of things that police aren't supposed to do.”) Jocelyn Simonson, Copwatching About the panopticon Seth Stoughton, Law Enforcement’s ‘Warrior’ Problem (read online here if you don’t want the PDF) About Stephen Colbert’s performance at the 2006 White House Correspondents’ Dinner (Here’s the video.) City of Houston v. Hill (“Why don’t you pick on somebody your own size?”) Fields v. City of Philadelphia (finding no First Amendment right to film police officers) Samuel Warren and and Louis Brandeis, The Right to Privacy Oral Argument 1: Send Joe to Prison (guest Sonja West) Sonja West, First Amendment Neighbors Sonja West, The Monster in the Courtroom Special Guest: Jocelyn Simonson.

Die Dissertation widmet sich dem populärwissenschaftlichen Phänomen Forensik, einem Modetrend in Kriminalliteratur sowie Fernsehen, in dem Mordermittlungen mittels rechtsmedizinischer Verfahren stattfinden. Forensik meint in der Arbeit weniger die deutsche Rechtsmedizin, sondern umfasst gemäß dem englischen Forensics eine Ansammlung von vielen Wissensbereichen. Im Zentrum des Interesses steht insbesondere die literarischen Ausprägung des Phänomens, die Kriminalromane von Kathy Reichs und Jefferson Bass und die Sachbuch-Krimis von Michael Tsokos, alle drei Autoren und praktizierende forensische Wissenschaftler. Die Blickrichtung der Untersuchung geht über das Literarische hinaus und bezieht auch das ‚Beiwerk‘ des Textes ein, die Paratexte, die wiederum ihrerseits auf Kon- und Kotexte außerhalb der Fiktion verweisen, somit neue Zusammenhänge entstehen lassen und neue Deutungsmöglichkeiten der literarischen Texte anbieten. Es werden auch die Wurzeln des forensischen Krimis erörtert, die in den kasuistischen Schreibweisen in der Medizin und der Jurisprudenz gesucht werden. Der Ursprung der 'Wissenschaftlichkeit' des forensischen Krimis sowie seiner ausgeprägten Körpersemiotik sieht die Verfasserin in den Sherlock-Holmes-Erzählungen von Arthur Conan Doyle, insbesondere in deren vestimentär-vestignomischen Signifikationssystem. Die Fallgeschichten von Samuel Warren werden als Bindeglied zwischen der medizinischen und juristischen Fallgeschichte und ihrer literarischen Ausformung der Detektivgeschichte einbezogen. Das allgemeine Interesse der Arbeit gilt dem Verhältnis von Literatur und Wissen.