Podcasts about B20

Episode 470 of the Lens Shark Photography Podcast In This Episode If you subscribe to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast, please take a moment to rate and review us to help make it easier for others to discover the show. Sponsors: - Build Your Legacy with Fujifilm. Latest savings at FujfilmCameraSavings.com - Shop with the legends at RobertsCamera.com, and unload your gear with UsedPhotoPro.com - 20% OFF Nanlite PavoTube II XR and kits at NanliteUS.com. - More mostly 20% OFF codes at LensShark.com/deals. Stories: Adobe announces some potentially useful new features. (#) Sigma's new 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Art. (#) Profoto's new B20 and B30 monolights. (#) Peak Design's latest tripod Kickstarter. (#) Godox's V480C TTL flash. (#) Leica's first filmstock to celebrate 100 years of this. (#)   Connect With Us Thank you for listening to the Lens Shark Photography Podcast! Connect with me, Sharky James on Twitter, Instagram Vero, and Facebook (all @LensShark).

This week Démar and Adriel discuss Kali Uchis' latest album 'Sincerely,' how she's tracing her musical lineage throughout the album and whether her reversion is worth it.Démar's rating: 8.5 / 10Adriel's rating: 7.5 / 10The Love List: Illegal, Tonight, Noises, Stateside,Timecodes:1:34 - Demar's favourite women's weekend5:40 - No Features6:39 - Song structure  10:40 - thinks it has regressed a little14:00 - Sunshine and Rain/pocket of drums16:17 - Pre R&B20:40 - For you22:19 - It sounds like silk lingerie24:50 - Her voice is an instrument28:00 - Lana Del Rey comparison36:45 - How do you feel about no features?39:04 - Small breath for some extra air – could have enjoyed another artist43:15 - Her cover game is weird45:25 - The ScoresFollow us:TikTok: Album Mode: https://www.tiktok.com/@albummodepodAdriel: https://www.tiktok.com/@adrielsmileydotcom Démar: https://www.tiktok.com/@godkingdemiInstagram:Album Mode: https://www.instagram.com/albummodepod/Adriel: https://www.instagram.com/adrielsmileydotcom/Démar: https://www.instagram.com/demarjgrant/Twitter:Album Mode: https://twitter.com/AlbumModepodAdriel: https://twitter.com/AdrielSmiley_Démar: https://twitter.com/DemarJGrant ===================================Kali Uchis - Sincerely, / 2025 / R&B, Soul

Motheo Khoaripe chats to Dr Anthony Costa, the Head of Secretariat for B20 South Africa about how thoughtful financial decisions and forward-thinking regulations can pave the way for sustainable economic progress. The Money Show is a podcast hosted by well-known journalist and radio presenter, Stephen Grootes. He explores the latest economic trends, business developments, investment opportunities, and personal finance strategies. Each episode features engaging conversations with top newsmakers, industry experts, financial advisors, entrepreneurs, and politicians, offering you thought-provoking insights to navigate the ever-changing financial landscape.    Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Money Show Listen live Primedia+ weekdays from 18:00 and 20:00 (SA Time) to The Money Show with Stephen Grootes broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show, go to https://buff.ly/7QpH0jY or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/PlhvUVe Subscribe to The Money Show Daily Newsletter and the Weekly Business Wrap here https://buff.ly/v5mfetc The Money Show is brought to you by Absa     Follow us on social media   702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702   CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/Radio702 CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Møde nr. 61 i salen 1) Fremme af F 17 om ytringsfriheden og satireForespørgsel til justitsministeren om ytringsfriheden og satire. Af Mikkel Bjørn (DF) m.fl.2) Indstilling fra Udvalget til Valgs PrøvelseGodkendelse af stedfortræder som nyt ordinært medlem af Folketinget for Rasmus Prehn (S).3) 3. behandling af L 33 om klimamålForslag til lov om ændring af lov om klima. (Nye klimamål for 2045 og 2050). Af Søren Egge Rasmussen (EL) m.fl.4) 3. behandling af L 111 om styrket beredskab i energisektorenForslag til lov om styrket beredskab i energisektoren. Af klima-, energi- og forsyningsministeren (Lars Aagaard).5) 3. beh. af L 26 om indførelse af mærkningsordning for retoucherede reklamerForslag til lov om ændring af lov om markedsføring. (Indførelse af mærkningsordning for retoucherede reklamebilleder og reklamefilm). Af Karina Lorentzen Dehnhardt (SF) m.fl.6) 2. beh. af B20 om at øge danske virksomheders muligheder for rekruttering af arbejdskraft fra bestemte landeForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at øge danske virksomheders muligheder for rekruttering af international arbejdskraft fra bestemte lande. Af Dina Raabjerg (KF) og Mona Juul (KF).7) 2. beh. af B5 om at fjerne nordiske borgeres adgang til at erklære sig til dansk statsborgerskabForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at fjerne adgangen for nordiske statsborgere til at erklære sig til dansk statsborgerskab. Af Mikkel Bjørn (DF) m.fl.8) 1. behandling af L 132 om opdatering af det grønlandske arbejdsskadesystem m.v.Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om arbejdsskadesikring i Grønland. (Harmonisering af regler om anmeldelse, en lempeligere vurdering af anerkendelsesspørgsmålet ved arbejdsulykker m.v.). Af beskæftigelsesministeren (Ane Halsboe-Jørgensen).9) 1. beh. af B68 om mulighederne for et dansk idrætsmuseum, der hylder danske sportsnavneForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at undersøge mulighederne for et dansk idrætsmuseum, der hylder og bringer minder om danske sportsnavne gennem tiden, herunder også de paraatletiske. Af Søren Espersen (DD) m.fl.10) 1. behandling af B 88 om at indføre et nationalt ressourcebudgetForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at indføre et nationalt ressourcebudget. Af Theresa Scavenius (UFG).11) 1. behandling af L 136 om forskellige ændringer på indfødsretsområdetForslag til lov om ændring af lov om dansk indfødsret. (Ændring af erklæringsadgangen for nordiske statsborgere, ændring af reglerne vedrørende fortabelse af dansk statsborgerskab og ændring af gebyret, der betales ved indgivelse af ansøgning om dansk statsborgerskab ved naturalisation). Af udlændinge- og integrationsministeren (Kaare Dybvad Bek).12) 1. behandling af B 98 om udvisning af bandekriminelleForslag til folketingsbeslutning om udvisning af bandekriminelle. Af Mette Thiesen (DF) m.fl.

Møde nr. 61 i salen 1) Fremme af F 17 om ytringsfriheden og satireForespørgsel til justitsministeren om ytringsfriheden og satire. Af Mikkel Bjørn (DF) m.fl.2) Indstilling fra Udvalget til Valgs PrøvelseGodkendelse af stedfortræder som nyt ordinært medlem af Folketinget for Rasmus Prehn (S).3) 3. behandling af L 33 om klimamålForslag til lov om ændring af lov om klima. (Nye klimamål for 2045 og 2050). Af Søren Egge Rasmussen (EL) m.fl.4) 3. behandling af L 111 om styrket beredskab i energisektorenForslag til lov om styrket beredskab i energisektoren. Af klima-, energi- og forsyningsministeren (Lars Aagaard).5) 3. beh. af L 26 om indførelse af mærkningsordning for retoucherede reklamerForslag til lov om ændring af lov om markedsføring. (Indførelse af mærkningsordning for retoucherede reklamebilleder og reklamefilm). Af Karina Lorentzen Dehnhardt (SF) m.fl.6) 2. beh. af B20 om at øge danske virksomheders muligheder for rekruttering af arbejdskraft fra bestemte landeForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at øge danske virksomheders muligheder for rekruttering af international arbejdskraft fra bestemte lande. Af Dina Raabjerg (KF) og Mona Juul (KF).7) 2. beh. af B5 om at fjerne nordiske borgeres adgang til at erklære sig til dansk statsborgerskabForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at fjerne adgangen for nordiske statsborgere til at erklære sig til dansk statsborgerskab. Af Mikkel Bjørn (DF) m.fl.8) 1. behandling af L 132 om opdatering af det grønlandske arbejdsskadesystem m.v.Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om arbejdsskadesikring i Grønland. (Harmonisering af regler om anmeldelse, en lempeligere vurdering af anerkendelsesspørgsmålet ved arbejdsulykker m.v.). Af beskæftigelsesministeren (Ane Halsboe-Jørgensen).9) 1. beh. af B68 om mulighederne for et dansk idrætsmuseum, der hylder danske sportsnavneForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at undersøge mulighederne for et dansk idrætsmuseum, der hylder og bringer minder om danske sportsnavne gennem tiden, herunder også de paraatletiske. Af Søren Espersen (DD) m.fl.10) 1. behandling af B 88 om at indføre et nationalt ressourcebudgetForslag til folketingsbeslutning om at indføre et nationalt ressourcebudget. Af Theresa Scavenius (UFG).11) 1. behandling af L 136 om forskellige ændringer på indfødsretsområdetForslag til lov om ændring af lov om dansk indfødsret. (Ændring af erklæringsadgangen for nordiske statsborgere, ændring af reglerne vedrørende fortabelse af dansk statsborgerskab og ændring af gebyret, der betales ved indgivelse af ansøgning om dansk statsborgerskab ved naturalisation). Af udlændinge- og integrationsministeren (Kaare Dybvad Bek).12) 1. behandling af B 98 om udvisning af bandekriminelleForslag til folketingsbeslutning om udvisning af bandekriminelle. Af Mette Thiesen (DF) m.fl.

Guest: Leonard Mbulle-Nziege |Senior Consultant at Concerto As the G20 Finance Track meetings wrap up in Cape Town, Africa Melane speaks to Senior Consultant at Concerto to unpack the biggest takeaways at the B20 meeting this week.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

LISTENER QUESTION Topic: What is B20 and how will it benefit South Africans Guest: Glenton de Kock, CEO of the Southern African Association for the Conference Industry.

Stephen Grootes speaks to Mxolisi Mgojo, co-chair of the B20, about the meeting in Cape Town, where finance ministers and business leaders are set to discuss key economic issues, including a set of business priorities for the G20. In other interviews, Warren Ingram, financial advisor and Co-Founder of Galileo Capital, talks about the importance of setting life goals and using money as a tool to achieve them, rather than just focusing on survival or accumulation.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stephen Grootes speaks to Mxolisi Mgojo, co-chair of the B20, about the meeting in Cape Town, where finance ministers and business leaders are set to discuss key economic issues, including a set of business priorities for the G20.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Standard Bank sê Suid-Afrika se rol as gasheer van die 2025 G20-beraad en sy gepaardgaande B20-beraad bied ʼn goeie sakegeleentheid. Suid-Afrika het die G20-presidentskap in Desember 2024 ontvang en die eerste Afrikaland geword wat die presidentskap van die wêreld se grootste groepering vir ekonomiese samewerking beklee. Oscar Siziba van Standard Bank sê die B20-beraad, die G20 se amptelike skakelforum met die privaat sektor, sal ʼn platform bied vir leiers in dié sektor om wêreld- ekonomiese beleid te beïnvloed wat sakevriendelike hervormings aandryf:

Henry K. H. Wang discusses his journey from starting at the bottom of corporate life to becoming a corporate leader and board member, emphasizing the importance of giving back by sharing his knowledge with younger generations and international organizations like the G20 and B20. He highlights his involvement in climate change and sustainability initiatives, contributing to policy recommendations that influence global government policies.  Henry values donating knowledge over wealth, aiming to leave a lasting impact through his books, lectures, and speeches. We both agree on the significance of giving back and the various forms it can take. Henry K. H. Wang: “There are different ways of donating. I enjoy sharing my knowledge. Many billionaires pledge to give away their wealth before they die. I want to give away all my knowledge before I die. When I die and am cremated, all my knowledge will become carbon molecules, so that's not going to be much use to anybody. But things I've written, lectures I've given, the six books I've written and hopefully the seventh, together with the 100 papers and speeches I've written will benefit students.” * Have a listen as I interview my special guest Henry K. H. Wang. Find out what climate change really means.

Nokukhanya Mntambo speaks to Cas Coovadia, CEO at Business Unity SA about the key takeaways from the B20 2024 summit, where global business leaders converged to shape a path towards inclusive and sustainable economic growth.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In our latest episode of the No Ordinary Wednesday podcast, CEO of Investec SA Cumesh Moodliar and Business Unity South Africa CEO Cas Coovadia explore how South Africa's G20 presidency can boost investor confidence and unlock opportunities for Africa. Discover how SA is positioning itself as a gateway to growth and innovation on the global stage. Podcast key moments: 00:00 – Introduction 01:43 - How will South Africa's G20 presidency influence the country's economic trajectory? 02:59 – What focus areas should South Africa prioritise during its presidency? 05:11 – What is the B20 and what does it aim to achieve? 06:47 – What are the B20 priorities 09:00 – Are there specific recommendations from Brazil that will need to be taken forward? 10:37 – What macroeconomic issues should be top of the agenda at the G20 meetings? 11:46 – How will the themes of Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability address development priorities? 13:41 – A multi-dimensional approach to measuring growth 15:03 – Can Africa position itself as a trade partner and offshoring destination? 17:04 – G20 public-private partnerships opportunities Read more on www.investec.com/now Hosted by seasoned broadcaster, Jeremy Maggs, the No Ordinary Wednesday podcast unpacks the latest economic, business and political news in South Africa, with an all-star cast of investment and wealth managers, economists and financial planners from Investec. Listen in every second Wednesday for an in-depth look at what's moving markets, shaping the economy, and changing the game for your wallet and your business. Investec Focus Radio SA

Stephen Grootes speaks to Anthony Costa, B20 head of Secretariat as they discuss SA's proposal to address inequality and ensure economic sustainability.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

·         Stephen Grootes speaks to Anthony Costa, B20 head of Secretariat as they discuss SA's proposal to address inequality and ensure economic sustainability.   ·         Stephen Grootes speaks to Bani Kgosana, Chief Revenue Officer Pragma Global as they discuss how the government can best restore its dilapidated infrastructure and save money by using local, world-class solutions.   ·         Stephen Grootes chats to Izak Odendaal, an Investment Strategist at Old Mutual as they discuss how investors can manage mixed messages.   ·         Stephen Grootes hosts Hilton Kalner, the CEO of Discovery Bank to chat about standout reads for 2024 for and his executive team.   ·         Stephen Grootes hosts Sizwe Nxasana, former CEO of Telkom, FirstRand and cofounder of Sifiso Learning Group and he speaks about his career, his philosophy when it comes to money and his life in general.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stephen Grootes speaks to Anthony Costa, B20 head of Secretariat as they discuss SA's proposal to address inequality and ensure economic sustainability.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Neste episódio de WITcast, Verônica Prates conversa com Constanza Negri, Gerente de Comércio e Integração Internacional da CNI e Sherpa do B20 Brasil, e Gabriela Leoni, PMO do B20 Brasil, e revela como o B20 atua no G20 e qual a sua importância para as negociações.

Bill Gates, chair of the Gates Foundation and founder of Breakthrough Energy, speaks with Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait about the fight against climate change, the future of global health and the role of innovation in addressing the world's most pressing challenges at Bloomberg New Economy at B20 in Sao Paulo, Brazil.New Economy at B20 is being organized by Bloomberg Media Group, a division of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

El mercado está con pocos cambios a la espera de más resultados; Deutsche Bank informa alza de ingresos; acciones de McDonalds caen tras brote de E.Coli; Dan Cancel, reportero senior de Bloomberg en Brasil, explica qué esperar del foro Bloomberg New Economy at B20.Para ver el streaming del foro Bloomberg New Economy en Español: https://www.youtube.com/live/Yx_LNPGToCE?feature=shared Más de Bloomberg en EspañolNewsletter Cinco cosas: https://trib.al/WIwfnT0Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bloomberg-en-espanol/Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/BloombergEspanolWhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaFVFoWKAwEg9Fdhml1lTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@bloombergenespanolX: https://twitter.com/BBGenEspanolProducción: Eduardo ThomsonSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mulheres, diversidade e inclusão nos negócios. Esse é o assunto do novo episódio do McKinsey Talks e tema do Action Council do B20 no Brasil, do qual a McKinsey é Knowledge Partner. Ao longo de todo o ano, mais de 200 lideranças globais debateram os caminhos para acelerar a representatividade de diferentes grupos no ambiente corporativo e o papel fundamental das empresas nessa jornada. O resultado é um conjunto de recomendações que foram entregues às 20 maiores economias do mundo, o G20. Fernanda Mayol, Sócia da McKinsey no Rio de Janeiro, e Paula Bellizia, vice-presidente da AWS na América Latina e Chair do Action Council, conversam sobre o trabalho do grupo e como as recomendações devem se tornar ações concretas. Gostou desse episódio? Acesse nossa pesquisa e deixe seu comentário.

O assunto desse podcast é o fórum B20 que encaminhará recomendações de desenvolvimento e propostas  globais  para a Cúpula do G20, agendada para novembro, no Rio de Janeiro. Dan Ioschpe, chairman do B20 e Walter Schalka, responsável por uma das Forças-Tarefa, a do Trabalho Educação, conversam com os jornalistas João Borges, diretor de Comunicação, Mona Dorf, diretora-adjunta de Mídias Sociais da Febraban e Isaac Sidney, presidente da Febraban que também integra o fórum. Os empresários se dividiram em 8 forças-tarefas, cada uma com a missão de propor 3 recomendações, incluindo políticas de ação e indicadores de performance para mensurar os resultados. Ficaram definidos 03 temas centrais: redução das desigualdades, transição energética e reforma dos organismos de governança global. Dan Iochpe explica que a ideia foi concentrar as recomendações em propostas de grande valor e escaláveis para os 42 países participantes. Segundo ele, o B20 acaba funcionando como mesas de conversas e negociações “menos travadas do que demais ambientes que discutem temas da grande geopolítica global”. O B20 também preparou o Legado Brasil, com recomendações específicas ao nosso país, como a digitalização e a adoção de escola em tempo integral “para acelerar a qualidade da educação brasileira”, exemplifica Walter Schalka, responsável pela Força-Tarefa Trabalho Educação do B20. Eles recomendam também a regulação do mercado de carbono, “com a aprovação, o mais rápido possível, do projeto de lei em tramitação no Congresso Nacional”, acrescenta Schalka. Isaac Sidney, destaca a contribuição dos bancos na oferta de crédito e no financiamento da transição energética, na jornada de descarbonização da economia. Isaac alerta para a urgência do enfrentamento da crise climática, que coloca em risco não só o meio ambiente e a economia, “mas até a nossa própria sobrevivência no planeta”. Nos próximos dias 24 e 25 de outubro, o B20 realiza o seu Summit em São Paulo, quando os grandes líderes vão expor as recomendações com mais detalhes, a um público esperado de 1500 pessoas, entre lideranças e delegações do mundo todo. Quem quiser participar, deve se inscrever pelo site www.B20Brasil.org. As vagas são limitadas.

Mahanth Joishy, Fleet Superintendent for the City of Madison, Wisconsin, highlights the flexibility of switching between B5, B20 and B100, offering a major advantage in fleet operations. Joishy explains how biodiesel provides a cleaner, conversion-free fuel solution, keeping fleet vehicles operational even through the toughest winters.For more information, visit Clean Fuels Alliance America. To suggest topics or guests for a future episode, email us at podcasts@CleanFuels.org.

A transição energética se tornou incontornável nas conversas de importantes fóruns mundiais e na agenda de ESG de grandes empresas. Como o Brasil está posicionado nessa jornada, o papel que o etanol de segunda geração pode desempenhar no ciclo rumo à descarbonização e os bastidores da força-tarefa de Transição Energética & Clima do B20 – o fórum de engajamento que conecta o setor empresarial ao G20 – estão entre os temas do segundo episódio da série CEO Insights do McKinsey Talks. O nosso convidado é Ricardo Mussa, CEO da Raízen, empresa que é referência global em bioenergia e uma força importante para sustentabilidade no Brasil. Mussa também é Chair da força-tarefa de Transição Energética & Clima do B20, da qual a McKinsey é knowledge partner. Confira a entrevista.

Joe Biden is er nu ook over uit: hij wordt geen presidentskandidaat. Dat is niet alleen slecht nieuws voor Donald Trump, maar misschien ook voor oliebedrijven die bepaald niet gecharmeerd zijn van Kamala Harris. Als zij inderdaad de kandidaat wordt en wint, dan kunnen zij het refrein 'drill baby drill' bij het grofvuil zetten. Maar techbedrijven als Meta, LinkedIn en Spotify kunnen juist hun lol op. Onze gast zag ze op de schoot kruipen bij Kamala. Pikant: Facebook-investeerder-van-het-eerste-uur Peter Thiel financierde zo'n beetje op eigen houtje de man achter Trump, JD Vance. Dat belooft nog vuurwerk in het land van de techbedrijven. RyanAir kreeg 'nee' verkocht in het vorige kwartaal. De consument pikt de hogere prijzen niet langer. Na twee jaar van groei gaat de winst bij de meest succesvolle luchtvaartmaatschappij bijna door de helft: 46% minder winst. Wat betekent dat voor de cijfers van EasyJet en Air France-KLM deze week? Verder praten we over chips in aanloop naar de cijfers van NXP. Chiporakel Jos Versteeg duidt nog even de nieuwe B20-chip van Nvidia en legt uit waarom NXP last krijgt van Chinese concurrentie.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nvidia werkt aan een nieuwe AI-chip voor de Chinese markt, maar zou daarbij níet in de problemen komen met Amerikaanse export-restricties. Joe van Burik vertelt erover in deze Tech Update. Nvidiais volgens bronnen die Reuters sprak bezig met een nieuwe chip geschikt voor het uitvoeren van AI-gerelateerde taken, genaamd B20. Die aanduiding lijkt trouwens wel erg op B200, de nieuwe chip voor AI-taken die Nvidia afgelopen maart onthulde en later dit jaar gemaakt gaat worden om de nieuwe standaard te worden. De vraag is echter hoe Nvidia hiermee de exportbeperkingen die Washington heeft opgelegd, gaat omzeilen. Dat meldt het verhaal niet, al is wel bekend dat Nvidia hiervoor wil samenwerken met Inspur, een Chinese partij die distributie verzorgt. Nvidia heeft ook  al wel vaker chips specifiek voor de Chinese markt ontwikkeld, tot driemaal toe sinds de strengere beperkingen vanuit Washington werden ingevoerd in 2023. Verder in deze Tech Update: Na de CrowStrike-update voor Windows die voor wereldwijde storingen zorgde, met zeker 8,5 miljoen getroffen computers, heeft Microsoft een nieuwe tool uitgerold om deze problemen beter te kunnen verhelpen Google wilt de strijd aan met Meta op het gebied van slimme brillen, en is daarom in gesprek met het moederbedrijf van Ray-Ban, waar Meta nota bene al een samenwerking mee heeft See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Joe Biden is er nu ook over uit: hij wordt geen presidentskandidaat. Dat is niet alleen slecht nieuws voor Donald Trump, maar misschien ook voor oliebedrijven die bepaald niet gecharmeerd zijn van Kamala Harris. Als zij inderdaad de kandidaat wordt en wint, dan kunnen zij het refrein 'drill baby drill' bij het grofvuil zetten. Maar techbedrijven als Meta, LinkedIn en Spotify kunnen juist hun lol op. Onze gast zag ze op de schoot kruipen bij Kamala. Pikant: Facebook-investeerder-van-het-eerste-uur Peter Thiel financierde zo'n beetje op eigen houtje de man achter Trump, JD Vance. Dat belooft nog vuurwerk in het land van de techbedrijven. RyanAir kreeg 'nee' verkocht in het vorige kwartaal. De consument pikt de hogere prijzen niet langer. Na twee jaar van groei gaat de winst bij de meest succesvolle luchtvaartmaatschappij bijna door de helft: 46% minder winst. Wat betekent dat voor de cijfers van EasyJet en Air France-KLM deze week? Verder praten we over chips in aanloop naar de cijfers van NXP. Chiporakel Jos Versteeg duidt nog even de nieuwe B20-chip van Nvidia en legt uit waarom NXP last krijgt van Chinese concurrentie.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Show notes and Transcript James Roguski has been calling out lies and propaganda for decades. He believes it is every person's responsibility to question their most cherished beliefs, challenge claims of authority and disobey unjust laws and that is how we grow while remaining free and maintaining our integrity. In February 2022 the company that had hosted James's websites for over a decade deleted his account and tens of thousands of hours of his work.  They gave no reason other than the content violated their “Terms of Service.” They may of deleted many of James's websites, but they ignited his passion to burn even brighter. If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then this interview and James's Substack are the places to be. Connect with James... Substack             jamesroguski.substack.com Website               exitthewho.org X                          twitter.com/jamesroguski Interview recorded  29.3.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ TRANSCRIPT (Hearts of Oak) And I'm delighted to be joined by James Roguski today. James, thank you so much for your time today. (James Roguski) Oh, any time. I'm honoured that you'll have me share this information with you and your audience. And so thank you very much for having me. Well, we're going to delve into all things WHO. And people obviously can find you @JamesRoguski on, that is your Twitter handle. And obviously Substack, it is again the same, just .substack.com. On the end of your name all the links are in the description and I know that our audience will be interested and hungry for that information so you're an awesome source of information and thanks to Noor for actually connecting us when she said I know someone who knows all things WHO you need to have them on so although I don't really know Noor yet the answer is yes and then I delved into and found out, she was completely accurate. So thank you to Noor for the introduction and connection. But James, before we get into the topic WHO, can I just ask you to take a moment and introduce yourself to our guests? Well, you know, you mentioned my Twitter handle, and I don't honestly really spend a lot of time on Twitter. But if anybody goes to my Twitter account, you'll see that right at the top, I have my phone number and I encourage everybody to give me a phone call. 310-619-3055. I'm in California. So, you know, wherever you may be, I'm that serious about what's going on with the WHO that if anybody out there, you know, wants to have a conversation, happy to do so, you know, reach out on telegram or signal or WhatsApp or phone call or text message or whatever it might be. You know, we got connected through Noor, but I'm readily available because this is complicated. It's confusing. And what I have observed is that almost everybody gets a little tiny piece of information that's been mangled. You know, the game of telephone, right? You know, you tell somebody who tells somebody who tells somebody who tells somebody. I just want people to get the facts. Don't believe anything I say. All I've been doing is pointing to the WHO's documents and their video recordings of their meetings and going, hey, did you see that? Did you see what they said? Now, I obviously have opinions and happy to share my opinions with you. But what I encourage everybody to do is to go to the source. Read the darn documents don't listen to hear, you know hearsay, it's funny I hear I have a lot of people reach out to me and they go, oh did you hear what so-and-so said I'm like okay that might be a clue but by definition that is hearsay if you hear somebody say something interesting and you dig in and you find the source, man, 99 times out of 100 the source is a little bit different than what what you heard somebody say about the source. So don't trust me, right? I think I'm trustworthy, but don't trust me. Don't take my word for it. The problem that we're dealing with is people hear something, they accept it, and then when they're greeted with the actual source, factual documents, it conflicts with the confusing thing they heard somebody say, and they don't wanna let go of their initial understanding, one of the hardest things in the world to do is to unlearn something that you thought you knew but maybe where you got that information was a little bit mangled. So be careful out there I agree too often our feelings are to accept things and to assume things and I always whenever I see someone posting something I, with so many memes you kind of think think, okay, is that accurate? And delve into it. And you're right. Then you find out whether it's true and you're not repeating hearsay, which can be extremely dangerous. But James, WHO, how did you, before we get into kind of what it is, and I do want to give that kind of overview to the audience, because I think it's important to put together the piece of the jigsaw. And I know you delve deeply into many different parts of it on your Substack, but how on earth did the WHO come on your radar and how did you decide that I tell you what I think I want to delve into this and make this a large part of my life to understand it and expose it? I'll have to thank some invisible sensor out in the world. I have been talking about natural health for 30 years and written a number of books and you know had many many many many websites. And in 2022, I learned that the FDA on, if my memory is correct, I believe it was January 21st, 2022, that the FDA approved outpatient injections for infants to receive Remdesivir. And my head exploded. And I wrote a couple of articles on websites that I had. And a couple of days later, I got an email from my website hosting provider that I had been with for like a decade and everything was gone. And I was like, Oh, must've been right over the target with that one. Okay. And I, I have to say, I was a little bit happy with myself because I was like, Oh, all right. I guess this is one of those midlife crisis change of, you know, direction things that the universe is trying to tell me something. And so, I ended up, I had many, many websites and they were all gone and rather than rebuild them, I'm like, okay, fine. What should I be doing? And I ended up on Substack. So jamesrugoski.substack.com. And I started writing on Substack and I got to give credit where credit is due. I bumped into an article by Shabnam Palaisa Muhammad, who's connected to many, many things, but she's also with World Council for Health. And she had started started talking about something that had happened really on December 1st, 2021. So this was February 2022. And I ended up doing about a month's worth of research. And on March 24th, so slightly more than a year, two years ago, I published a big article about what was going on with the proposed pandemic treaty. And I thought I was done with it. And four days later, would have been two years ago yesterday, I woke up at four in the morning and I was compelled to go searching for something. And I found a website that had a document and it said, we've obtained this document. And the document was hyperlinked. So I clicked on it and I went down the rabbit hole and I started reading the document and I just got a massive shiver down my spine. I'm like, wait a minute, what is this? It wasn't anything to do with the treaty. It was amendments to another existing document called the International Health Regulations. It had been submitted to the WHO more than two months prior in January. And it was to be discussed in May, which was, a month and pretty much two months away. And I'm like, nobody's talking about this. What the heck is this? And it was the Biden administration trying to do many things. They had a number of different amendments, but what they were mainly trying to do was shorten the time period through which any future amendments might be put into effect. Currently that's two years, they wanted to shorten it to six months. And I'm like, okay, what does that mean? what's coming? And down the rabbit hole I went and I haven't gotten out of the WHO rabbit hole since. I've got a slogan for myself. I want to get out of the WHO and on with the new, but we've got two months to flatten the WHO they're shooting to, they're hoping to adopt amendments to the international health regulations and a new pandemic treaty, two separate things. And it's really important to keep those things separate. May 27th to June 1st is their yearly world health assembly. And so for the next two months, just trying to raise everyone's awareness of what it is they're trying to do. Well we'll get on to the pandemic treaty and a lot has been made out of it, I think it was the World Council for Health had that petition in the UK and we'll maybe touch on some of that but we, I mean you've got this organization, a massive power grab and I don't think many people will have had any idea of this and the role this played, I mean it's 75 year history probably most people don't even know it's a UN organization and the power it had I think maybe the WEF is higher on people's radar where the WHO seems to have been much under it and I mean just give us a little bit of a snapshot and I know you've looked into the the current proposals. But there's 75 years of history of this organization, but it seems to be having a massive power grab, certainly COVID time. But what about the organization itself? Because we're told it's just a benign organization, but it doesn't seem so. I don't know if anything in life is benign. It all depends on what is going on with it. So you've really got to go back almost to the Civil War in the United States and the 1800s where –, If you think about living in a world where you ride a horse, okay, and you don't have a toilet that goes into a wastewater sewage treatment system, okay, you know, manure everywhere. People who lived in cities would have a chamber pot, maybe throw it out the window in the gutter. I can only imagine, I've heard stories about the stench, you know, of the River Seine in Paris. Getting control in large cities of everyone's excrement is what really cleaned up a lot of infectious disease. Okay. And so from the 1800s, early 1900s, all the way through World War II, after World War II, when the WHO was brought into being, and in 1951, they sort of organized the sanitary regulations. We kind of take a lot of things for granted right now, but the pathogens found in excrement from animals and humans are a problem. Well, we don't really deal with that so much anymore. And the fallacy of all of the many childhood diseases that just plummeted in the 1800s, 1900s, you know, after World War II, they were primarily gone. And then started jabbing people and they gave credit to the jabs for what sanitation actually did. And so fast forward to 1969, I don't know how old you are, so I'll have a little fun with you. Where were you and what were you doing when the moon landing happened in July of 1969? I was just a thought somewhere. I wasn't around. 77 is my birthday. Okay. I was a nine-year-old boy. I was born in 1960. And I was watching, you know, black and white feed from maybe it was the moon, maybe it was the Hollywood soundstage, whatever. At that same time in July of 1969, the 22nd World Health Assembly was going on in Boston. And five days after the moon shot, or the moon landing, they agreed to the international health regulations. That was sort of an update on the sanitary regulations. Nobody was paying attention. Nobody read them. Nobody ever ratified them. What they put in there, all of the diplomats who met said, okay, you know, we've agreed to all of this. And if nobody objects, it'll be international law. So it wasn't the case that the UK parliament or the Senate of the United States or any other body around the world considered it and voted to, you know. What they put in there was, we'll give everybody nine months to object to it. And if nobody objects, then we're good. So on the first day of January 1971, it went into legally binding effect. Everybody's kind of default, ignored it, and it was now international law. Fast forward to 2005, after 9-11, after the anthrax scare, after SARS-1, they made a whole bunch of changes in 2005. And that went into effect in 2007. So for 17 years or so, we've been under the international health regulations. Raise your hand, everybody, if you've read them. Okay. Why would you, who, you know, two and a half years ago, I had no idea. Okay. So I can, understand why that's just mysterious. Well, the idea behind the 2005 regulations was they wanted nations to feel comfortable, not just seeing if someone who was traveling at the border was bringing in leprosy or smallpox or whatever, checking ships to see if they're infested with with rats or, you know, other vectors that might bring some kind of disease. They also wanted nations to set up an office in their nation to surveil their health system. To say, you know, if something's going on, you know, I've talked to many people in the UK and where all the mussel beds and oyster shells and all the many seafood areas around the coast, with the sewage not being as well processed as it might be, you get E. Coli infections and things like that. So they want the nations to immediately notify the WHO if something is going on, not just at a border crossing, but inside the country. And on one level, you go, you know, that's just, okay, we got a problem. As a good member of the international community, you tell the WHO, if it's deemed to be a public health emergency of international concern, P-H-E-I-C, or fake, the director general can alert the world that you've got a problem. On a certain level, much of that makes sense. And we've been operating under that rule, those rules since 2007. When COVID hit, it all went out the window. Everybody panicked, right? Oh, you know, something's going on in China. And everybody went nuts. They threw their plans out the window. They started making rules out of thin air to do lockdowns and social distancing. Just an absolute mess. Okay. And so there was a call to strengthen the international health regulations because everybody ignored them. Right. And the, one of the biggest issues that triggered these negotiations, it didn't trigger it necessarily, but it certainly is embedded deeply into it. If you can recall when South Africa and Botswana said that they had found a very different variant called Omicron, and they publicly quickly said, hey, look what we found. And Europe, and I think the UK, I'm not 100% sure about the UK, but European Union, you know, travel lockdowns. Oh, you know, no more travel to South Africa. Well, that's what the international health regulations were supposed to prevent. Don't punish nations for being honest. But that's what happened. And then the real kick in the balls, quite frankly, from their point of view, was Pfizer and Moderna put that into the boosters and made a couple of billions of dollars. And so what we're dealing with here is not what people think it is. What we're dealing with here is a trade dispute. We're dealing with an understanding that, wait a minute, the international health regulations are supposed to encourage transparency. Hey, we got a problem. But what's being negotiated is not, how do you deal with that problem? How do you give someone good early treatment? How do you let doctors be doctors and deal with the patient in front of them? You know, there's all these many, many issues. And so the confusion has been enormous because there's, on one hand, amendments to the international health regulations. But on the other hand, there's a whole new agreement that they would like to have passed, two separate related but separate tracks. And almost everybody's getting them all co-mingled and confused. And so I'll stop right there for that. That's the setup, right? The reason why these negotiations are happening is because the relatively poor nations like South Africa and Botswana said, hey, we identified something. We turned it over to you. You put travel restrictions to hurt our economy and then you took that information and made billions of dollars off of it. Oh, hell no. That ain't happening again. Okay. That is what these negotiations are really all about. And then it gets worse from there. It's not about your health or, you know, what you should do to maintain or optimize or regain your health. This is a business deal and it's an evil, evil business deal. Well, I can, I want to get to the session they've just had and you have titled it, the spirit of Geneva, which I know is a reference used many times in it, and that's on your latest sub-stack. But looking at the WHO, it seems to be, I think we've learned a lot, the relationship the governments have with Big Pharma, with the mass lobby power of Big Pharma, I think has been exposed to many people during the COVID tyranny. And I'm guessing the WHO is no different and very much part of that collusion with Big Pharma to assist in making money. Because in the West, obviously, this is the opposite of your thinking, your background. The thinking we're told now is you've got a problem. Don't worry, there are drugs to treat it manufactured by a mass company that will make a ton of money from you. No conversation about health, style, lifestyle, diet, anything like that. So it does seem as if the WHO are very much part of that big pharma global entity. I have dubbed what's going on with this negotiations for the new treaty, and maybe we'll talk about that first, as the new OPEC. OPEC currently stands for the oil producing and exporting countries, Saudi Arabia and so forth. Well, the new OPEC, in my view, is the Organization of Pandemic Emergency Corporations. If you think about this from a business perspective, if you were doing some sort of thesis or something at a business school, or I don't know if people in your audience are familiar with United States television program called Shark Tank, where entrepreneurs pitch their business idea, right? If 10 years ago you said, hey, I got this business idea, we'll put a bunch of letters in a data file, and we'll say that that's the genetic sequence of a deadly pathogen. And we'll then wrap that up in a lipid nanoparticle and say that if we get your body to make that pathogenic compound, to get your immune system to attack your own body, to trigger immunity to this deadly pathogen, we can scare everybody, get governments to put billions of dollars into our business model, and we'll be billionaires. You'd have probably gotten laughed off stage. You probably would have failed your business school course. But wait a minute. That's what just happened. Well, that's a really good business model. And I got clued in to great detail in November of 2022. I was actually waiting and trying to find, I had put in freedom of information requests and they were being denied. By that time, the treaty had first come out in July and then again in November. But the amendments that were not the ones Biden proposed, but a whole new batch of amendments had been submitted, but they were being kept secret. So I was looking all over the place to try to find information. And I watched the Indonesian health minister speak before the B20 meeting, not the G20, the 20 biggest countries, but the business leaders from the 20 biggest countries. And he had advanced information about something that was going to be happening the next month in December. And what he told the audience was, hey, United States and a whole bunch of other nations, they're about to implement through the World Bank, the pandemic fund, got a multi-billion dollar fund. And this is a great business opportunity. Go invest. Well, invest in what? Pandemic-related products and the industry that surrounds them. Testing, laboratory, genetic analysis, anything related to pandemic-related products was viewed as a potential growth industry because the nations were putting together this multi-billion dollar fund and contracts were going to have to be dished out. The next month, the Congress of the U.S. passed and President Biden signed the National Defense Authorization Act. Well, that pledged $5 billion a year from the U.S. Defense Department to oversee the global health security agenda, which is a build out of, you know, bio labs and the one health approach, which is predicated on the, I think, misguided belief. Oh, well, you know what happened in Wuhan is, you know, a bat and a pangolin got together and somebody had some soup in a wet market in Wuhan. And that's why we got a pandemic as opposed to, Hey, wait a minute. People were going to bat caves in some other part of China, bringing the guano or whatever they use to get the pathogens. And they're messing with them in the lab. Maybe that's where the problem started. Who the heck knows at this point, right? But what they want to do is shut down, you know, animal, trade with wild animal meats or domestic animal, you know, oh, you're going to get sick because you're eating meat and there's going to be some pathogen in there and it's going to transfer to humans and we're all going to die. So the solution is let's go find those pathogens and bring them into a whole WHO coordinated laboratory network where if we identify a pathogen, we'll put that into the pathogen access and benefit sharing system, stamp it with our information so that if anybody turns that into a product, we get to share the benefits. And we'll put the WHO in charge of a global distribution and logistics network to distribute the products. Well, if you've ever worked retail, you know that if you have a lot of products in storage, you've got to rotate your stock. So if you've got pandemic related products sitting in a big old warehouse, they proudly talk about their 20,000 square meter distribution hub in Dubai. That's four football fields. Okay. How many contracts could you disperse amongst your cronies to fill four football fields with pandemic related products? Well, that's not good enough. You got to rotate that stock. You need an emergency here and an early action alert and a pandemic and this and that and the other to move those products, get them either jabbed into people's arms or, or use the gloves, or use the tests, or whatever it might be. What we're dealing with here is organized crime and racketeering and a business model that needs another pandemic. Let's go look for it. They call it a pathogen with pandemic potential. Whenever I hear that phrase, my mind says, well, that's a pathogen with pandemic profiteering potential. Let's go find something scary. Scare the people who will be scared by that kind of thing. People will line up to get jabbed or take drugs or whatever it might be. What it's really predicated on is an argument from the relatively poor nations who, when the jabs rolled out in 2021, they couldn't afford to get contracts to buy the jabs. Canada bought 400 million jabs for 40 million people. European Union did a few text messages and cut a deal and bought up gobs and gobs. So the smaller nations, while they gave the information about Omicron, they couldn't beg, borrow, or buy, get a contract for any of the jams. They should be down on their knees praising God that they were so lucky that they missed out. But they also missed out on the profits. And that's what these negotiations are about. Nobody, nobody has had the guts to go, excuse me, the jabs didn't work. They didn't stop infection. They didn't stop transmission. They deranged people's immune system. Now we've got, you know, disease, disability, and death, excess deaths, sudden deaths. Why are we arguing that we want investment to build out mRNA manufacturing plants? You know, send a container from Germany to build a manufacturing plant, you know, in Rwanda or wherever they're setting this up. They're not questioning the flaws in the treatment, right? They want more ventilators and more midazolam and more, you know, Paxlovid and Molnupiravir or whatever the next drug, you know, Remdesivir, whatever it might be. They missed out on the the profit of being able to produce that and poison their own people with it, but they don't seem to understand what probably most of your audience understands, that they did quite better than the nations who did all of the pharmaceutical treatments. On the WHO's own website, site, if you look at the stats, on a population basis, there's about a billion people in North and South America. There's about a half a billion in Europe, and there's over a billion in Africa. 16 times as many people in North and South America died and their deaths were attributed to COVID when compared to Africa. And in Europe, it's like 30 times. We should be exporting whatever they did into our systems, but that's not profitable. So they're trying to export what killed many, many more people into their nations so that they can profit from it. And the cognitive dissonance and the just bias in their thinking were if you stood up in one of the rooms where they're having these meetings and you said, excuse me, are you people absolutely insane? Why do you want the thing that doesn't work and causes health problems? Oh, wait a minute. It's very profitable. What they want is the wealthy nations, United States, UK, Canada, European Union, Australia, the global north, which is not a geographical thing. It's a line of of wealthy versus poor. They want the global north to put a bunch of money into a big fund. I actually think the WHO has fund envy. They're looking at the United States and the WHO pandemic fund, and they want to have a bigger fund, you know, $30 billion a year that they can distribute to oligarchs in poor nations to build out what I call the other fake. You know, they talk about the Public Health Emergency of International Concern, PHEIC, and I talk about the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex. They want poor people in rich nations to either take their tax dollars or debt money, put it into a fund that they control to give to oligarchs in poor nations under the premise that looking for pathogens, bringing them into the laboratory and turning them into pandemic-related products is how you would stop the next pandemic. Well, how about good, clean water and healthy food and essential medications and nutrition and maybe herbs and some vitamins? How about that? Well, that's just nowhere near as profitable. There are lots I'd like to pick up on you, but I will hold myself back. And I will ask you for what's been happening the last number of days. And that is the ninth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, which most of the public will not know this group has ever met once, never mind nine times or whatever it is. And that's, I think, how a lot of these organizations wanted to be. But that was going to finish on the 28th. So we record this Good Friday, so yesterday. And they don't seem to have come to an agreement. So I think you're saying it's going to resume again end of April for another 10, 12 days. What exactly was the international governmental negotiating body negotiating and what exactly did they not, were they not able to agree on? Pretty much what I was just talking about. They were negotiating the new agreement. Many people call it a treaty, but it's really not properly called a treaty. It's a framework convention, think framework convention for climate change. That was an agreement that was reached in 1992. And year after year after year, unelected, unaccountable, unknown bureaucrats get together. They have a conference of the parties and they would decide how to dish out all this money, have all the contracts to fill up the distribution hubs with whatever they think they need for whatever pandemic they're looking for. And so the problem that they're having are many. I'll try to summarize it this way. They keep saying that it's a member nation-led series of negotiations. Well, what they've been doing is they get together, they talk, they submit for two years now, whatever their input would be. And then the six members of the the Bureau, the Intergovernmental Negotiating Bodies Bureau, one from each region of the WHO, would then craft a new version of the treaty. Well, that was the wrong way to do it if they were really trying to reach an honest agreement, because what has consistently happened is when they came back with each new version, all of the member nations said, well, did you not hear what what we told you we wanted in that treaty, you ignored us, right? Back in April, they did this, and there was a 208-page compilation text that was everything that all the nation said they wanted. And rather than make that public, they kept that hidden forever. They came out with a 43-page Bureau's text. Well, you can't eliminate 200, you know, take 208 pages and boil it down to 43 and keep everybody happy. So all summer long in 2023, they were arguing about that. They came out with another one in October. Same thing. They came out with another one in February. Same thing. In these past couple of weeks of negotiations, it was the first time that they took the Bureau's draft submission and treated it as a negotiating text. And so in these past two weeks, they started with a 29-page document that looked all nice nice and clean, you know, here's what it is. But it didn't reflect what the nations actually said that they wanted. It was all sugar-coated and sweet looking, but it didn't actually say what the nations had been telling them they wanted. So in the last two weeks, that ballooned up to 140 pages with over 5,000 text edits. It's the first time the nations actually got to have them, you know, put that in and they're going to go back and do the same dumb thing. They're going to have the Bureau take that 140 page document and have them try to winnow it down to probably even smaller than 30 pages because they're desperate to just get any agreement. Because if they get any agreement and it's a framework convention, then next year they can add whatever they want to add. It's like signing a blank check or an empty contract. If you were contracting with somebody to do something, and at the last minute they said, hey, you know what? Let's just sign on the dotted line. I've got all these blank pieces of paper. We'll figure this out next year. Just agree, and we'll have other people work out the details later. That's insane. But that's what they're trying to ram through. And tell us how there has been some pushback on this WHO power grab in the UK media. We had that petition. And I know there's a pandemic treaty, there's international health regulations. And I know, I don't want to confuse them, but also want to simplify them. Maybe another time we can delve even deeper into this. But there is a slow awareness, but yet governments seem to be very willing. And I guess the government doesn't want to be left behind. It has to join in the club and agree. It doesn't want to have any punishments or any negative response from Big Pharma. You know, if they don't sign this, then I can imagine the UK being told by Pfizer, well, you may not get the drug at that cheap price. It may be double the price for you. So I'm sure there's pushing behind the scenes. But how does it, I think I've watched some of your videos talking about, and you've mentioned the beginning, this automatically comes in, that it's not that governments opt into it, it's kind of they need to opt out of it. And if they don't put up their hand, disagree, it automatically becomes part of the laws of each country. To clarify all of that, again, it is important to start with the awareness that there's two separate negotiations, okay? And so in the UK, very specifically, it's a little bit unique in how international agreements are concluded and agreed upon and put into force. And so in other countries, it's very, very different. So everybody needs to take this with the proverbial grain of salt, depending upon where you live. In the UK, what is supposed to happen is the executive branch of government, the foreign minister, the health minister, the prime minister, whoever is given the authority from the crown to approve or adopt any international agreement is supposed to then have the foreign development and Trade Office, submit it for 21 days to Parliament, not to be approved, but to be reviewed and potentially rejected. If they just sit on their butt for 21 days and don't do anything, you missed your chance too late. Okay, so that's for any new agreement. With the international health regulations, it's cooked into the IHR from 1969 and 2005. If your nation and your executive branch sends a delegate to the yearly World Health Assembly and they agree to regulation changes or amendments to the international health regulations, it's assumed that you're good with it unless the executive, you know, head head of state, writes a letter to the WHO and says, nope, we reject them. And so in 2022, they tried to pull a fast one. They submitted amendments in violation of Article 55, which says you've got to give four months notice. They submitted amendments to five articles on May 24th, 2022, four days later, they concocted a fake document saying that they adopted them, but they never voted. And nobody, with the exception of Rob Roos and 11 other members of the European Parliament, on November 28th, 2023, they wrote a letter to Tedros and they said, said, hey, you guys purportedly adopted these amendments in May of 2022, but there's no record that you ever voted. Silence. November. So what is that? Four, five months now, four months, five months. They don't really seem to care because the propaganda and the hypnosis, they just keep saying, well, we adopted these amendments. No, you didn't. Not by any proper voting means that anybody's been able to find. And so they don't really seem to care about rules. Article 55 said that they should have submitted a final package of amendments by January 27th, 2024, four months in advance of their May meeting. Well, they just blew that off and they're still negotiating. So to wrap this up and let everybody know what's coming in April, from April 22nd to the 26th, they're supposed to have the last week of negotiations about the amendments, which we we haven't really spent too, too much time talking about. And what's of great concern to me in the amendments is they want to make it easier to quarantine people when they're traveling internationally. Look at article 24 and 27 and articles 35, 36, 37, and annexes, you know, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and eight, they want the WHO to be the one to determine which vaccines can be required. They're not requiring them. They would be the ones who decide if the nation you're traveling to, when you disembark, if they say, well, you got to take a rapid antigen test, or you got to show that you've gotten this jab, or boom, you're in quarantine. The WHO's international health regulations have almost always been about restricting international travel, and now they want to add quarantine to the language that was not there before. Now, that's not your doctor and you. Whatever people are talking about in terms of mandates and mask mandates and any kind of lockdowns or social distancing, no one in the UK, no one in the United States, no one in any nation around the world needed any amendments or a new treaty to abuse your rights and freedoms over the last four years. So the concern about that is local. What is your local health official doing? What is your local city council or mayor or school board or medical review board? What is your hospital making their doctors do, the NHS or whatever it might be? Those issues are very, very local. The amendments are about international travel and quarantining. You know, you get off the cruise boat and your vacation might go to crap in a heartbeat because you didn't pass the test that the WHO authorized and the nation you're visiting requires. The treaty is a big money game. It's just corruption. Let's get rich nations to put billions of dollars to build out the infrastructure in poor nations so all our cronies can make a bunch of money because they missed out the first time. And so in the end of April, from the 29th of April to I believe May 10th, they've scheduled a new additional two weeks worth of negotiations on the treaty because they're having a hell of a time, meaning the greed on both sides is causing great difficulty in reaching an agreement on how to distribute all of the billions of dollars that they want to collect to run this criminal operation. So we've got two months to flatten the WHO, and I have every faith that people around the world can see through this. They're not addressing the real issues of what it is that people need to do to be healthy. They're just trying to redistribute the wealth under the guise of preventing the next pandemic. But I'm pretty sure that going out looking for pathogens and bringing them into laboratories to do gain of function and then create more biological weapon mRNA jabs that local people can manufacture and profit from. I think that's how you profiteer from the next pandemic, not how you prevent it. 100% and can I just remind people of James Substack, jamesroguski.substack.com, piece every day and it is, when I looked into it I thought this is good and then as I've looked into it further I think it's probably the go-to place to understand what exactly is happening with the World Health Organization. So to our viewers and listeners, make sure, sign up and make that your go-to place for understanding the WHO. Jim, just as we finish, as the viewers, the listeners go and make use of your Substack and read it. And I'm amazed at the, always at the time that people put into those articles, I've gotten into doing videos, actually writing, that is a whole other skill. And the work, the effort, the research that you put in on each individual article is phenomenal. But what do you want the viewers, the listeners, how do they respond? What is your point in that? It's educating, and then they take that information. And what can they do with it? Where do they go with that then? Well, step number one is to understand what the heck is going on. And, I think we gave a pretty decent summary. And so the easy answer for the people watching this video is take the link to this video and share it like you've never shared anything in your life. OK, what's going on is all of these many documents are getting confused and people are talking about all kinds of different things. The documents are changing, you know, on an ongoing basis. They've got amendments and treaties last year and this year. If you just share this video and I don't mean just post it on Facebook and walk away and think that Facebook is gonna knock on everybody's door and go, Hey did you see this okay, If you have a phone and you have a contact list, take the link and start with a, Ann and Bob and Carol and Doug and Emily and Fred and on down the list, if there's a person that you don't share this video with you're censoring this information. They're not going to find it on the mainstream news. They're probably not going to find it on most alternative news. They're probably going to get it wrong. Now, I've put all of this information in exitthewho.org. I've been working with people in dozens of countries around the world. So if you want the mother load, right, Go to exitthewho.org. But what we've just done here is a reasonable summary of what the heck is going on. For most people, this is enough to alert them, hey, you ought to pay attention. You got two months from about now to when they're meeting. Spread the word. Take this video, share it. Take that video, share it. Share it, share it, share it. I'll leave you with a math problem. Okay. If you tell a hundred people and they do the same and they do the same through five levels of referral, five degrees of separation, a hundred to the fifth power is 10 billion. So if you share this and other people share this, it could go viral overnight. And so you could be sharing a TikTok video of your cat doing something funny. OK, or you could be sharing this with everybody, you know, go from A to Z, send them a text message, then go to your email account and send this video to everybody that, you know, via email. And then if you have a social media account, you can post it on there, but go to your direct messages and direct messages to everybody that you've got a friend or a follower or whatever it might be. And then call up everybody you've got a phone number for and go, hey, I texted you, I emailed you, I DM'd you, are you okay? You know, what do you think about this video that I just sent you? And if they don't care, that's okay. You can spend your time trying to convince them, right? Or you can blame me for not being able to convince them. Take the easy road. And there will be some people who go, oh my God, I had no idea this was going on. Thank you so very much. Work with the willing, organize your actions. There's on exitthewho.org. It's an activist toolbox. There's an endless list of things you can do. And my phone number is in every article. If you have a question, I'm in California. So you got to use whatever codes you need to use or signal or telegram or WhatsApp, send me a text message, whatever it might be if you have any questions be more than happy to help you but it starts with awareness. And so you can do your part just by making as many people as you possibly can aware of this discussion that we just had. Well James once again thank you for giving us your time expanding on that and all those links will be in the description for the viewers and listeners to make use of and to pass on to share and to encourage friends family colleagues to actually delve into the subject and understand what we all face worldwide. So thank you, James, for your time. Thank you, Peter.

Selamat datang di Ngobrol Sore Semaunya episode 131! Episode kali ini kita kedatangan seorang women leader hebat yang merupakan perempuan Asia pertama yang memimpin forum B20 dan juga perempuan pertama yang menjadi Ketua Umum APINDO. Shinta Kamdani mengunjungi Ngobrol Sore Semaunya untuk ngobrol mengenai woman leader, gender equality, dan entrepreneurship. Follow Us! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ngobrolsoresemaunya TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ngobrolsoresemaunya Ngobrol Sore Semaunya hadir setiap Kamis jam 18.00 WIB hanya di cxomedia.id & YouTube CXO Media #NgobrolSoreSemaunya #PutriTanjung #ShintaWKamdani

The G20 leaders summit concluded with the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi leading the final session titled 'One Future' in the Indian capital, New Delhi. Ravneet Pawha, the CEO (South Asia) of Deakin University who represented the Australia India Business Council (AIBC) at the summit, shared some key takeaways of the G20 and B20 with SBS Hindi.

New York City has come up with a new solution to solve the illegal immigrant crisis: building a mega-project, and letting them live in it for free. The new location for this giant migrant camp will be a vacant office building in Long Island City. In other news, a speech given by World Economic Forum leader Klaus Schwab is going viral again. Last November, at the B20 summit in Indonesia, Schwab talked about harnessing the power of innovation for the future of economic growth. During his remarks, Schwab reiterated his intentions for how his organization should shape the economic future of the world. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump was recently indicted in Georgia—hot on the heels of three other indictments. And as the country awaits the trials, there are growing questions of whether even more criminal charges are in the works. Attention is turning to Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is working on criminal investigations into Mr. Trump.   ⭕️

This month, BNEF's New Delhi Summit took place alongside the B20 meetings, the official business community engagement forum for the G20. Among BNEF's guests was Amitabh Kant, the G20 Sherpa for the Indian government, who sat down for a conversation with BNEF CEO Jon Moore on the Summit stage. Amitabh has had a long career in public service, including serving as the Secretary for India's Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, the Chairman and CEO of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corporation, and the Secretary for the Indian Ministry of Tourism. He is now the CEO of the Government of India's think tank NITI Aayog. Together, he and Jon discussed Amitabh's vision for Indian green hydrogen production, the nation's expanding EV sector, and how attracting private capital investment will help decarbonize India's hard-to-abate sectors. Complimentary BNEF research on the trends driving the transition to a lower-carbon economy can be found at BNEF on the Bloomberg Terminal, on bnef.com or on the BNEF mobile app. Links to research notes from this episode: Information on upcoming BNEF summits - https://about.bnef.com/summit/ Videos of interview and talks from previous BNEF summits - https://www.bnef.com/videos?video-type=summitSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Growing demand for clean fuels like biodiesel increases not only the demand for Ohio soybeans, but the value as well. In this Voice of Soy, Scott Fenwick with Clean Fuels Alliance America highlights how Ohio soybean checkoff dollars are being used to help add value to Ohio soybeans.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Host Letitia Berbaum was joined in the podcast studio by Jason Ma, a world-renowned Chief Mentor of Next-Gen Leaders and CEO of ThreeEQ, a family business. With over 38 years of industry experience, including cofounding and leading successful education and technology ventures, and over 2 million miles of world travel, Jason has inspired, guided, and transformed 1-on-1 the lives of numerous Gen Z and elder leaders, while easing legacy and succession planning in Ultra High Net Worth families. As an appointed member of the B20, the G20's official engagement group representing the global business community, Jason has served on its Future of Work and Education Taskforce in the G20 Presidencies of nine countries, being one of a select few Americans appointed yearly to the powerful B20/G20.   Jason not only is an Elite College Admissions Counselor, Life and Executive Coach, Parent Coach, and Speaker sought after by wealthy families, family offices, and top-tier event organizers, but also is the author of Young Leaders 3.0 (a highly acclaimed book), a contributor to Impact Wealth and Family Office Magazine, a star former Forbes contributor on Mentoring Young Leaders, and a delegate by invitation to the prestigious Forbes Global CEO Conference for 8 years. Jason is also a well-connected Board/CEO advisor and high-level rainmaker to select tech companies and family offices, as well as an investor.   In this episode learn more about: - How ThreeEQ is preparing the NextGen for greatness - How ThreeEQ helps create remarkable outcomes while reducing family stress - Why it is important to start preparing your children for college admissions success early Learn more about Jason Ma and ThreeEQ by visiting: https://threeeq.com/ *** The Zandbergen Report, where wealth strategies and investment wisdom collide, is led by host Bart Zandbergen. The show is also available on Apple Podcasts, Google Play Store, Podbean and Spotify. Interested in being a guest on The Zandbergen Report? Email podcast@bartzandbergen.com. Learn more about Bart by visiting www.BartZandbergen.com *** NO OFFER OR SOLICITATION: The contents of this podcast episode: (i) do not constitute an offer of securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities, and (ii) may not be relied upon in making an investment decision related to any investment offering Axxcess Wealth Management, LLC, an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. Axxcess does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Opinions are our current opinions and are subject to change without notice. Prices, quotes, rates are subject to change without notice. Generally, investments are NOT FDIC INSURED, NOT BANK GUARANTEED and MAY LOSE VALUE.

Greater Indiana Clean Cities is a standalone nonprofit focused on advancing communities with education and resources on alternative fuel vehicles. For 24 years, the organization has helped foster partnerships between fleets and industry providers in the Hoosier state.In this episode of Fueling Conversations, Greater Indiana Clean Cities Executive Director Kerri Garvin and Indiana Soybean Alliance Biofuels Director Helena Jette, board president of Greater Indiana, will discuss transportation and clean air challenges in Indiana and the role biodiesel can play. They also discuss educational and grant opportunities that are helping fleets move to cleaner fuels like B20 today.For more information visit www.greaterindiana.com, www.b20clubindiana.org, www.indianasoybean.com/, or www.cleanfuels.org/. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Nishchal Gaba is the CMO at DefiEdge, an asset management protocol for concentrated DEXs. Established in 2021, the protocol has garnered recognition in the web3 space with over $8M in total value locked (TVL). Nishchal's career has spanned across DeFi and artificial intelligence, demonstrated in his role as Co-Founder of Prodigal AI, a Generative AI solutions firm. In recognition of his industry expertise and leadership skills, Gaba was appointed as a committee member of the Confederation of Indian Industry and B20 task force of India in December 2022. He holds a Master of Science in Artificial Intelligence from the University of Edinburgh. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/crypto-hipster-podcast/support

The World Health Organization have existed for 9 decades since the first World Health Assembly meeting in 1948. For much of this time they have been viewed as an organisation that focused on health and working with national governments for you and your families best interest. Michele Bachmann returns to Hearts of Oak to look at a very different side to the WHO, the one that was exposed to the public over the last 3 years. At the upcoming assembly in Geneva we will witness the biggest WHO power grab ever attempted where national governments and the interests of countries will be urged to submit their sovereignty to the WHO. But have they overplayed their hand? With the Gates Foundation and the CCP being exposed as the 2nd and 3rd biggest funders, will the public see through this power grab. Join us this episode for Michele's expert analysis. Michele Bachmann is the dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University and was born in Waterloo, Iowa. She received a B.A. in Political Science and English from Winona State University in 1978. She married Marcus Bachmann, a clinical therapist who holds a master's degree from Regent University. In 1986, she received a Juris Doctor degree from Oral Roberts University. She was a member of the ORU law school's final graduating class, and was part of a group of faculty, staff, and students who moved the ORU law school library to Regent University. Two years later, she completed a Master of Law in taxation at the College of William & Mary. She worked for four years as a lawyer for the Internal Revenue Service's Office of Chief Counsel in St. Paul, Minnesota. Michele and her husband have five children. They also worked with a private foster care agency to house 23 children in their home during the 1990s. Their children were home schooled and also attended private Christian schools, and her political career stemmed from her interest in education reform. In 2000, Michele defeated a long-time moderate incumbent for a state senate seat in Minnesota. In 2006, she entered the race to represent her suburban Minneapolis congressional district, winning 52 percent of the vote, becoming the first Republican woman from Minnesota elected to the House of Representatives. She easily won re-election in 2008 and 2010. Michele's extensive career highlights include: She was the first Republican woman from Minnesota elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. Michele served as a United States Congresswoman representing Minnesota's 6th District from 2007 to 2015. She quickly became a national figure in the Republican Party and a founding member of the congressional Tea Party Caucus. In 2011, Michele announced her bid for the Republican presidential nomination and ran for president in 2012 and is a highly respected leader who is deeply committed to conservative values in government. Regent University https://www.regent.edu/ Interview recorded 24.4.23 *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and Twitter https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more... https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Please like, subscribe and share! Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Hello, Hearts of Oak, and welcome to another interview, coming up with Michele Bachmann, who was with us a couple of weeks ago, and she joins us this time to talk about the WHO, the World Health Organization. It's an organization which she has been concerned about and following for quite a while. Obviously, we have seen it come to prominence during the last three years, but Michelle joins us to look into the workings of it. We look at the finance, Bill and Melinda Gates Organization Foundation are I think the second highest funders of it, the Chinese Communist Party are the third highest. Make of that what you will. So we discussed that and the control and power play behind that and then the clash between national governments and the WHO. The WHO seems to be a massive power play on control of the health services and sector and drugs within all countries and coming up next month in Geneva is the 76th World Health Assembly meeting in Geneva and this happened since 1948. It's the governing group body in effect of the WHO and they'll be meeting to propose a number of issues. One which is for the WHO to take full control of health in any pandemic. We discuss what that means, is this control, and then also we touch on the digital IDs of the WHO, who are very fond off on how that will affect us all. So Michele brings experience from her political background, her educational background, and I know you will be inspired as you listen to her opening the door on this issue and inspiring us to actually respond in an effective away so this does not happen.   Michele Bachmann, thank you so much for joining us once again. (Michele Bachmann) Peter, it's always great to be with you. I enjoy being on Hearts of Oak. Thank you so much. And last time we obviously discussed education and if the viewers don't know, Michele is a former member of Congress and current Dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University down there in Virginia. And the last time we had a conversation was all to do with the education and pushing back that woke wave. But I know that there is an issue that you also feel passionate about, as well as education, and that is a concern on the WHO, on the World Health Organization. And we've heard a lot about that, I think, over the last three years, I guess people maybe before may have been unfamiliar with the WHO. So maybe ask you personally, why is this an area of interest? Was there a particular, time or point or bill or something that happened that made you aware the WHO were maybe not what what they seem to be. Well, just so people know what the WHO is, it's the World Health Organization. It is the health care arm of the United Nations. And so for many people, the United Nations really is not a, big figure in their lives. They hope that they're doing good things to keep peaceful relations between countries. But other than that, people don't think too much about the United Nations. And the World Health Organization, we've always seen them as an organization that can maybe try and do good, especially in poor countries where they don't have money for healthcare so that they could help, for instance, with maternal, positive maternal outcomes for pregnancies, for young babies that are just born, dealing with diseases where the nation doesn't have enough money. Everyone is on board with that. Nations are happy to give money toward that so that other nations have positive outcomes for their people. So when we think of the World Health Organization, those are the kind of hopes you might say that we infuse into the organization, that we hope they are doing. But we saw something very different, Peter, about three years ago or so with the outbreak of the COVID pandemic. And with that, then we saw the World Health Organization in a completely different light. Well, tell us, it is that three years that probably weren't on people's radar. The UN people are aware of, but there are many other organisations that happen really behind the scenes and people are unaware of the effect they have on their everyday life. And I'm looking over the last three years, I'm wondering whether the WHO have overplayed their hand, because I guess they're an organisation that have thrived in the shadows and now they're front and centre and people are aware of them. And I kind of wonder whether they've overplayed their hand. Well, quite honestly, it's bewildering to me how much power they were infused with. And this wasn't actual power. This was imputed power. What do I mean by that? Here in the United States, I can give you our example here. Our government, led by President Joe Biden, looked to the WHO, and whatever recommendation the WHO, the World Health Organization gave regarding COVID, our United States Centers for Disease Control, the director was a woman named Rachel Walensky, the World Health Organization is run by a man, his first name is Tedros, his last name is something like Galbraithius, he's from Ethiopia. He has a very controversial checkered history, he was involved in a lot of collusion cover up, allegedly, in Ethiopia. And so, of course, the way these things work, these people often are plucked out of that position and they fail up, so to speak. So they're put in a position with even more responsibility. That's what happened to Tedros. He was made the director general of the World Health Organization. So, you know, no cry, no foul. Nobody really cared about it until along came COVID. And the United States of America is the number one funder of the World Health Organization. The number two funder of the World Health Organization, interestingly, is a man named Bill Gates. Many people may know the name of the billionaire Bill Gates, one of the richest men in the world. He was the founder of Microsoft. The third funder of World Health Organization is the Communist Party of China. So the interesting thing is that Tedros, who himself is a communist, seems to be controlled by the number three funder at the World Health Organization, not the number one funder, but by the number three, and arguably also by the number two funder, Bill Gates. And so the World Health Organization then, unbelievably, was lifted up to a point where whatever their pronouncements were for the last three years. Here in the United States, our President Joe Biden took the World Health Organization pronouncements, and those recommendations went to our Centers for Disease Control, which is not a regulatory body, which has no power of enforcement, but they took the recommendations of the WHO, and then the CDC made those same recommendations. But weirdly, somewhere in the ether, those recommendations were treated as though they were law, as though our Congress had passed them, and the president had signed them into law. None of that happened. Congress never passed a law regarding COVID. They never passed a law regarding the recommendations of the WHO. And yet, here in the United States, people were forced to stay home for 15 days. They weren't allowed out of their houses. I can't even believe I'm saying that, thinking back three years ago, what we all willingly did, how naive were we? And after that, then businesses were told they were not allowed to open. So what did that mean? That meant for two weeks, people didn't have a pay check. For two weeks, employers didn't have employees. For two weeks, there was no incoming monies for the GDP. That's millions and millions of dollars, billions of dollars that never got made. Well, what was going to happen? Well, in that extraordinary circumstance that had never happened before in the United States saw extraordinary actions. These actions were led by whatever it was that the World Health Organization said. Here we are, arguably the greatest military and economic superpower nation on earth, and we're bowing down and kowtowing to whatever this Tedros, who heads up the World Health Organization is saying, it's kind of an interesting phenomenon that the United States would do something like that. It's almost like you could imagine a scenario where communist China, who seeks domination all across the world, who has their infamous Silk and Road Initiative, where they are trying to dominate the ancient Silk Road pattern, the trade routes that went across. India and the Stans and making their way into Europe. Also it has a Silk and Road initiative trying to go through the Latin American countries and South America but also now through the United States. And it seems that they wanted to do the actions that were being pronounced for ones that would bring about economic ruination to the West, to the United States to the European nations, to Australia, to New Zealand. It was very odd. The COVID, the spread of COVID seemed to hit the West extremely hard. So it was after a while, it seemed inescapable to reach the conclusion that communist China seemed to be benefiting from COVID, while the rest of the world seemed to be hurt by COVID. But the WHO, the World Health Organization, seemed to be the vehicle that was being used to make pronouncements as phony and as detrimental as they were, and then countries in the West magically bowed down and did whatever the World Health Organization said. At least that's what happened here in the United States, including, Peter, social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google. We saw that here in America, people were thrown off of their social media accounts. They were cancelled if they disagreed with what the World Health Organization said. As a matter of fact, these social media companies, including Google, would put up a notification that their standard for knowledge and information was the World Health Organization. And if anyone disagreed with them, they would be thrown off. And the same was true of the United States government. Their standard was the World Health Organization. There was no legal requirement for this. They didn't have to do this, but they chose, they imputed power to the World Health Organization, even though over and over again, the World Health Organization contradicted the recommendations. The recommendations were found to be faulty afterwards. They were, they pretended. The people who cried the loudest pretended to always say, the science, the science, we're following the science. When as a matter of fact, they chose to silence free inquiry and scientists who were not finding the same results as the World Health Organization. Any opinion that deviated in any way from the World Health Organization was not only silenced, they were also accused of being misinformation and they were blackmailed. They were censored. Here in America, doctors were thrown out of positions in medical schools if they disagreed with the World Health Organization's opinion. I think if you could step back about 50 steps and take a look objectively at what's happened the last three years, people would be aghast. But unfortunately, the media hasn't done that. There hasn't really been allowed, at least in America, an overview of all of the mistakes that have happened in the last three years. I'll give you one example. I just read an article this morning about the incredible damage that mask wearing did to people, whether they were old or whether they were young. And what they found is that within five minutes of wearing a mask, damage already began to individuals. Up to and including the stillborn birth of unborn babies to pregnant women. Little children had cognitive damage from the build-up of CO2 hurting their brain functioning. There are all sorts of issues that have come out and that's just mask wearing, let alone the vaccines, let alone other things like lockdowns that were encouraged by the WHO and were implemented by the WHO. Probably in America, nothing was more damaging than the shutdown of economic activity in our nation. We saw literally trillions of dollars take wings and fly away because they were unearned. And we also printed money that we didn't have. We spent money that we didn't have. We're continuing to do that. And here in the United States, we have a contagion of inflation. That is very difficult. It's a tiger by the tail. It's hurting the poorest in the United States and the middle class, and it's inhibiting the creation of new start-ups and new businesses. So the WHO, an innocuous healthcare arm of the United Nations has a lot to answer for. But unfortunately, in the structure of the United Nations, there doesn't appear to be an accountability structure. And it appears that just like the fellow who's heading the WHO, Tedros, failed up. He was rewarded with failure from Ethiopia. It appears now that the World Health Organization also will be granted benefits and even more empowered after their failures. And so they may also soon fail up as well with even more power, more control over more people across the earth. Oh, well, Tedros has been rewarded with another five years in charge, so things are not going to get any better. There are a whole lot of those things you come to like pick you up on. But one is the social media. We have been amazed that actually it is discussing COVID that affects you on social media. I personally thought having a robust conversation on Islam or have a robust conversation on the gender nonsense would. But actually it was it was COVID and of course you've been on Mark Steyn's show many times and Mark Steyn was removed from GB News through Ofcom, the regulatory body in the UK on communications because he talked to those who were vaccine injured. And I'm wondering, you looking at the States, is there a way through that or are social media companies going to hold that over us all, that if we talk out of line then immediately people will be punished. Where does that leave a free and open conversation? Well, it's stifled here in the United States. We have what is called the First Amendment protections. We have our Constitution of the United States, and we have what's called is the Bill of Rights. This is in the Constitution. It's equal to the Constitution. And America is built on the fact that our government is supposed to have very limited powers. The people are supposed to have an expansive set of powers, and those powers are guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, the first being freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of worship and religious expression, the right to petition our government, the right to gather together and assemble. Those are all a part of the First Amendment freedoms and including our Second Amendment, which is the right to keep and bear arms, guns, for the right to protect yourself. And when the founders passed the Second Amendment, it was so that the people could protect themselves against the government. That was the intention. So we have 10 of those amendments of rights. And what we've seen is that there's a new cohort of people in the United States, many of whom have obtained positions of power, and those people don't agree with what we have as our constitutional rights. And so we're seeing not only the threat to those rights in law, but in practice. And we've seen it most particularly through social media, where we are no longer allowed to have free speech. And as a matter of fact, it's even worse because people are told if they disagree with the the state line. That they are giving misinformation. In other words, they're harming the public. By giving an opinion that digresses from government. And I think you've had to deal with that in the United Kingdom as well. And it's egregious because it is anti-science. It is anti-freedom. Quite frankly, it is anti-human. Because if you look at the carnage, for instance, the fallout that happened from wearing masks, from being forced to get a vaccine when you didn't want to, but your livelihood depended on it, so you felt you had to. And then, despite everything that we were told, that we would be instantaneously cured of COVID if we take a vaccine. We would never go to a hospital. We wouldn't transmit the virus. We wouldn't die from it. Every one of those claims was proved false. And even more egregious than that, the number of people that we're seeing over and over the excess deaths, if you will, in the United Kingdom, in America, anywhere that these vaccines were pushed, people's lives are continuing to be harmed by what's happened. And there's been no review. There's been no honest, transparent review of what happened during those three years. We're still going through that. Here in the United States, Peter, there are colleges that still mandate that students must get vaccinated before they come into college. And this is after even the CDC director, the Centers for Disease Control director, Rachel Walensky, just this last week admitted, yes, you can still transmit COVID. You can still get COVID even if you take a vaccine. Well, what was this thing worth? What was it worth? Especially when you see the people who are physically harmed after taking this vaccine. So I think we need to move our compassion toward those who are trying, who are we're believing? Just on face value with the government and what the World Health Organization, what the CDC said, they just said, okay, well, they must be looking out for my welfare. Well, we don't wanna impugn motives if the CDC or the WHO was or wasn't looking out for people's welfare, that we don't know. But what we do know is the objective fact of what happened to people's lives. And there's ongoing carnage continually from these lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccines, all of the restrictions that happen, we're continuing to deal with the downstream impacts of it. And it is devastating, probably one of the worst public policy failures in human history.   One thing on the damage for going on to say some more more with the WHO. I was with a friend today from, who's over from the States and his business is property. He was talking about the ghost towns are being created across America. I mean generally in Europe we've had a, probably the majority have returned to work, to an office, but still you have some working from home. But he was giving me a picture of how bad it is of people working from home and then the damage that's causing to towns and cities across the country and then I guess the bankruptcy that's going to happen with property spaces not being filled and banks having to, I mean it's it seems to time bomb I mean what is it what is it like in the U.S. have people returned to the workplace or are they still working from home? Well, you're right. It is a huge problem. A lot of people who got used to being able to be at home so they could answer the door, take the dog out, throw the laundry in, throw it in the dryer. People just got used to that, not having to dress up for work, not having to commute. A lot of people like that. So in some ways, the positive is that some businesses saw that they don't have to take on the expense of leasing office space. They can get just as much productivity from employees at home. However, a lot of businesses have seen we don't get as much productivity from our employees who are at home. Plus, what we're really missing is that magic that happens when people come together and they talk to each other and they get ideas and they exchange information that they wouldn't have known otherwise. That just doesn't happen in a Zoom call or a Zoom meeting. And so there's a lot of interactions that no longer happen. I know. You know, in the United States in major metropolitan city after major metropolitan city, you hear of huge downtown office buildings, that no longer are being filled like you had mentioned in the UK and it's happening here as well. If I could just deviate for one second, when you opened your remarks, it reminded me of something else that happened. And that was, it was extraordinary when COVID hit that landlords who own apartment buildings or own smaller units that they leased out. Landlords were prohibited from evicting tenants if they couldn't pay their rent. And so here a landlord was not relieved of the duty to pay taxes or insurance or a mortgage, but they weren't allowed to evict anyone. So this went on for months and months and months and months and months. How do you penalize one business, one portion of the business sector, It's just unbelievable the confusion. So then you look at landlords of huge office buildings. I'll give you one example. Maybe people have heard of the corporation Target. That is from Minneapolis, Minnesota. So this is a huge department store in America and Target Corporation leased all sorts of office space in downtown Minneapolis. Well, there were a lot of riots that happened after George Floyd. That people in the UK heard of the George Floyd situation. And so Minneapolis downtown became very dangerous. People don't, employees don't wanna go downtown plus COVID. So now we see office building after office building. The largest hotel in Minneapolis couldn't make money because you remember hotels were shuttered because of the World Health Organization. And in our case in America, the CDC. So the largest hotel in downtown Minneapolis went up on auction because they couldn't make it anymore. So hotels, office buildings, then you have the guy trying to shine shoes, and then the guy trying to sell coffee, and then the local diners. And so what we're seeing is an absolute implosion in metropolitan areas. And metropolitan areas are like the tent post holding up a tent. And then you've got all the suburban areas. So that impacts real estate, people's abilities to buy homes, sell homes. So this is all continuing to happen. We're three plus years on. And these horrible decisions made by these bureaucrats at the World Health Organization with no accountability, and at the Centers for Disease Control in America with no accountability, and I'm sure for you it's the NIH, the National Institute of Health. These decisions are continuing to go on. Let me give you one more example. And this is one that we're not used to in the United States. We've always had very high quality health care in the United States. But now in the United States, you'd call, you'd make an appointment, you'd probably get in to see your doctor the same day. Now it's not like that. Now we have to wait weeks, in some cases months, to get in to see a doctor. That has never happened before in the United States. Now we're seeing waiting times on being able to get in And we've primarily been a private healthcare system, which has worked beautifully. The more government has gotten involved in our healthcare system, the worst it's gotten, the more expensive it's gotten, the more the times are lengthening. So the World Health Organization, from my perspective, caused a chain reaction of events that we're continuing to be harmed from today. And so that's why, Peter, again, it's so dangerous, the proposals that are on the table, to empower them even more after their failure? One area you talked about was the clash, the power of the WHO. Before we look in the funding in China, but simply that clash between national governments and their responsibility for their population and the WHO. And maybe in Europe, we have had that control above national governments in the European Union. But by and large, you don't really have the World Trade Organization doesn't have that much power in relation to what was in the WHO. So, I mean, it's it is concerning that every country seems to have to, well, fall into line or to bow down to the WHO's latest edict. And I wonder where that leaves nations like the US, like other nations, that independent, that supporting what is best for their populations, that seems to have gone out the window and the WHO seems to be the one that kind of plays the tune and countries have to dance to it. Well, we can blame the WHO, but really what we have to do is blame our own political leaders. I can't blame the WHO today entirely because they are a recommendation and advisory only body. That's it. So they can give advice. And the 194 member nations of the World Health Organization, There's about 200 nations in the world and 194 are members of the World Health Organization. So those nations don't have to follow those dictates if they don't want to, because the WHO only issues recommendations. The problem is our leaders, our leader, President Joe Biden, who took whatever the WHO said as gospel and forced that onto our our healthcare system, our centres for disease control, and then our national health grants, and our Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, the ones who were standing up and telling Americans, you must do this, you must do that, even as silly as Dr. Fauci coming out on stage, wearing not one mask, not two masks, three masks, in some cases, four masks. It's like, this was theatre. This was theatre when he would come out and wear these masks. Especially in light of the evidence that was available before on masks, but even now more profound after COVID, how damaging and worthless these masks are. Not one of those masks could stop the prevention of COVID. So what was the point? Why did people have to sit for eight hours on an airplane flight wearing a mask when all it did is hurt the passenger? It didn't save anyone else on that plane. So this is the kind of nonsense we've had to deal with. And now there's an effort by our political leader. You know, you have your political leaders and what they've imposed on your population. Our political leader, Joe Biden, empowered, he didn't have to, he empowered the World Health Organization. But now last year in 2022, the Biden administration offered 29 amendments, to the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland. They meet annually once a year to change and radically alter the WHO. I'd like to say before that. During COVID, our president was Donald Trump, and Donald Trump saw the mess that was coming out of the World Health Organization. He saw a lot of the nonsense and a lot of the confusing contradictory pronouncements that they were making. So Donald Trump said, we're getting the United States out of the WHO. We're not going to stay in. So he pulled the funding for the WHO, and he also gave notice to the World Health Organization, to the UN, the United States will no longer be in. Well, the protocol that you have to follow is that it takes one year for a nation to fully pull out of the World Health Organization. As your audience knows, Donald Trump was not returned to the White House in 2020. Joe Biden became president of the United States. So on the very first day that Joe Biden became president, he put the United States back into the World Health Organization, and he restored all of their funding. And from there, he empowered them even more, to the point of offering and he's been the aggressor, he's been the lead, President Biden, to offer these amendments at the World Health Assembly, the World Health Assembly is the governing organization that governs the WHO. So the WHO is the UN organization, but the governing board is the World Health Assembly. And they meet once a week, the last week of May in Geneva, Switzerland. This has been going on since 2005. But curiously the amendments that were being offered would completely transfer the World Health Organization away from being an advisory only body to becoming an international regulatory body. And in some respects, these amendments are so incredibly strong, it would create a platform in the World Health Organization for a global system of government, so that the World Health Organization would be empowered to declare a public health emergency of international concern. Well, what's that? That means that the WHO would have the power to declare a global emergency. And then they would be empowered to set the standard and to put the orders out for what each nation has to do, whether it's lockdowns, whether it's masking, whether it's vaccinations, whether it's all of the PPP that people had to come up with. They could even order a country to supply PPP, pay for it, supply it to other countries. So this would be a redistribution of wealth. This is an absolutely jaw-dropping increase of power that they would have. This would affect the budgets of various countries, but it would impact the freedom that people have. These amendments are also stating what could be said and what couldn't be said in countries on healthcare. So if we thought that we were restricted on speech during this last pandemic, this would be globally enforced, what we can say and what we couldn't say. Every nation would be expected to toe the exact same line. Because remember, in Sweden, they didn't shut down their schools. Kids went to school in Sweden. Whereas in America, kids had to stay home. So this is an absolutely jaw-dropping level of power that the Biden administration tried to push. Now with those amendments in 2022, a few African nations pushed back. Thank God for these African nations like Botswana. They said, we don't wanna go along with these amendments. So they didn't go through last year. So now behind the scenes, President Joe Biden. And other nations have gotten together, and they're kind of spreading these amendments around with other countries. And I've got a video clip, actually I can send to you, Peter. And it's a video clip of the foreign minister from Indonesia meeting last November, the first week of November in 2022 at the B20. There's the G20 and the B20, the top 20 businesses. And this foreign minister said quite clearly that what they're planning to do is pass the international health rule amendments in Geneva, Switzerland in May of 2023. And that would change the World Health Organization. So they would be empowered to tell all nations on earth and all people on earth what they must do. And one of the first things they want to do is demand that every person on earth get a digital identity that would be on their phone. We'd all have our own digital identity and we would each be assigned a QR code. And what he was saying is this will be so great. Now we all don't have to stay home and be restricted from being able to travel. Those who do what they're told will be allowed to get on a plane. They'll be allowed to buy groceries at the grocery store or go to a hardware store, or they'll be allowed to buy things or get on public transportation. But woe be to those who don't follow with what the World Health Organization says. Their life is basically over. This has never happened before in human history. This has never happened. What country in their right mind would empower the World Health Organization, basically the UN, to become a platform for global governance? The last thing we would give the UN is power and more money or a military or the ability for taxation. You would never do that because here in the United States, as we've seen, our rights infringed by our own government and by corporations. Can you imagine? There are no rights when the UN controls the world. They're the rights. Whatever the elites want, that's what they get. So you're talking essentially global dictatorship. And the president of the United States is pushing this and the leaders of various foreign countries are pushing this. So this is a two track approach, Peter. One is through a global pandemic treaty, which is far more difficult to get adopted, but it is a possibility. The other track approach is changing these amendments at the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland. That's a far easier proposition because that's basically majority rule and you can get it through. And so that's why we're very concerned. Now, in the rules of the World Health Assembly nations have 18 months to opt out, but I'm telling you, you don't want to get to that point. You don't want something like this to pass. And then you've got to try and figure out how to get out of it. You just don't want it to pass in the first place. And you would know better than anyone, your country has dealt with Brexit and the empowerment of the EU over your decisions in your nations. And so now imagine that breath-taking level of control going to the World Health Organization with the UN. So this is the World Health Alliance next month meeting in in Geneva, and my huge concern, you talked about funding with with the Bill and Melinda Gates organization being number two and then with China being number three. And you wonder what lies behind this push, because the call will be that it will make our lives easier. And convenience is a double-edged sword in many ways. But where, because then when you look at the digital ID, you're looking at the intrusion of AI. And obviously Bill Gates has a lot of experience in the tech world and branching out into all of the vaccines and the farming. And then China, it seems as though You've got some organisations that are, I guess, being forced along. But other organisations or countries are more intentional. China seems to be intentional with what it's doing, as does the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, where other countries seem to be, I guess, useful idiots, kind of caught along. So tell us kind of about that power play that's happening?   Well, it's honestly, this isn't very difficult to figure out and see what's going on. It's control. There are some people in this world who are are just control freaks and they they tend to be extremely wealthy. We've got a lot of them in the United States. Mark Zuckerberg, who has Facebook now called Meta. He's one of them. And Bill Gates, who has Microsoft, and he was an early funder in vaccines. And now he's buying up farmland, and he is a very interesting character, Bill Gates, but he's not the only one. There are other people who are interested in being able to increase their level of control and perhaps even their own bottom line. They have their own ideas about how we should be living our lives, and it isn't necessarily in line with our interests. These people really fundamentally hate the idea of democracy. They hate the idea of people being able to choose the leaders to serve them, but then also the way that they live and the laws that they live under. They think they know better. This is a global nanny state that they're looking to create, but it's global control. So this isn't hard to figure out because if you look at the the entire, we have 5,000 years of recorded human history. And if you look at that history, there's a lot of ugly, bloody efforts where people, history is man's attempt to enslave man, to control mankind for their own best interests. And it's the idea of faith and religion in particular, the faith of the Bible where you kind of see that the story play out, where you have another way other than madmen controlling other men. And God, through the Bible, talks about freedom for men, and various governments were created because people were enlightened by that image of men being free. This worldview that we're seeing with trying to lift up and enlarge the power structure of the World Health Organization, primarily the UN is what we're talking about, that is not that structure, looking to empower people or to enhance freedom or have better options for people or better health care for people. That's not what this is. This is about more control for a very small group of people and less control for the rest of us. So it's easy to see what will happen. We all become serfs in a modern morality tale where we're the losers and very few people are the winners.   Can I just finish looking at the political response just last question on it because obviously this is the WHO are wanting this global push and control over each and every country and certainly in the US it doesn't matter if you've got one state which is red, one state which is blue, that kind of removes that advantage when when you have a large organization like this overarching countries. So does this, is this a pushback from the Republicans there in the States? And we look to you because we don't have, we have bright sparks of conservative movements breaking out across Europe, we do. Certainly in Sweden, in Hungary, in Italy, possibly in Austria. So there are things happening, but what does it mean for the U.S. politically? Politically, what it means is people, this issue hasn't been a high profile issue by design. The Biden administration has tried to down pedal this. They've really tried to go under the radar so no one knew what was going on. But there are some people who know. And I don't know if your listeners know, I mean, here in America, we are losing more and more rights every day to freedom of speech and expression, which again, from the inception of our nation is unknown. We've always had the rights to freedom of speech and expression, but we're seeing them squelch, particularly through social media companies. But people are finding out. So in America, because we are a constitutional republic where people can contact their representatives and let them know what they think, people are letting their senators and representatives know, we, don't want Joe Biden's plans to succeed. We don't want the World Health Organization to to take over our sovereign choices on healthcare. We wanna keep our choices on healthcare. So people are trying to get that message out. It's tough, it's a tough environment to get that message, but we're always hopeful. The one thing about Americans, they tend to be very optimistic. And just like we saw last year, it was literally a miracle where countries like Botswana and some African nations pushed back and stopped this from passing. They raised real concerns. There's no reason why people can't contact their representatives in the UK, in England, in Scotland, in Wales, in other nations throughout Europe to let your country know you have a vote. Every single country has a vote. There's 194 votes. Every country can register opposition and say, look, we're not giving over sovereignty to the World Health Organization. Because trust me, it won't be just healthcare, it will expand. And for instance, there's some language that I've read in the global pandemic treaty, but also with the healthcare amendments in Geneva, Switzerland, where they're saying that if a country is deemed to be racist, that that would be considered a health problem, or from climate change, if something is deemed to be climate change, the World Health Organization steps in. So it's about two steps away from world government. That's really what this is. So don't delude yourself into thinking this is only about trying to help poor countries during a pandemic. This has nothing to do with that. This is all about empowering a global entity. So this global entity will be able to force all governments to do its bidding. And the number one question I get, Peter, from people is, well, Michele, this would never happen because if the World Health Organization told our country to do something that we didn't want to do, our government wouldn't go along with it. Well, if Joe Biden is the lead instigator of handing over this sovereignty to the World Health Organization, I think he will be the enforcer because we will lose massive rights. And if there's one thing that history teaches us, it's this. Once you give up power, once you lose freedom, it's very difficult to get it back. And when it comes back, if it comes back, it's in a very different form. So a country like the United States was very unique when it was founded. And we've seen our own freedoms and our own rights chipped away to an extent that people in the United States, frankly, don't even recognize our country anymore. And we've been the nation that people have looked to, to help safeguard their rights. If the United States is no longer open and free and able to help safeguard other nations' rights, then where do we go. We all see what's happening, this is no clandestine story. Communist China has very clear designs on ruling the world. Just a couple of weeks ago, Xi Jinping was in Moscow with Putin, and he said, we will rule the new global order, the new global alliance. He said it three times during his visit. And again, if history teaches us anything, it's when a madman speaks, listen, Xi Jinping is stating the obvious, and he wouldn't state it unless he felt China was at the threshold of being able to accomplish this. They see the United States as past tense. They see themselves not only at the ascendancy, but just about to grab the brass ring of global domination. And part of that domination is having the 194 nations blindly and voluntarily give up their sovereignty on health care to the World Health Organization. Because Communist China knows they control the organization anyway, and then they can project their power to dominate the rest of the globe and be the true hegemon, the true leader globally if we have foolishly given away our power to the World Health Organization. And then just recognize the world will never be in the same place. So this isn't just doom and gloom despair. That's not what I'm saying. The reason why I'm saying this is we're free men, free women. At least that's what the advertising is. We're free men, free women. And so we've got to do what prior generations have done. We have to act. We have to make our voices heard, but we have to let our own governments know. And if a country like Botswana could have tipped the tide last year, why couldn't England this year? Why couldn't Wales this year? Why couldn't Scotland this year? Or Ireland or any other country? Of course we can. And so we're trying to get to every person that we can here in the United States, even though Republicans aren't in charge, it's the Democrats that are in charge, but we still have a voice and we can still pray. I'm a Christian, I believe in the God of the Bible, I pray, he's performed miracles when everything is impossible, there's a miracle. And so I think there's always room for optimism, always room for joy and hope. And we cry out to the God who created us and we ask him to deliver us. It's a perfect end and I've seen miracles many times in my life, I attest to that, Michele, when God steps in and does what is impossible makes it possible. But thank you for, this is a huge subject and just happening next month in Geneva and the viewers need to be aware of it. So thank you for coming along and sharing what's happening. And I think it is a rallying call for people to act, to engage with their elected officials and encourage them to vote properly at that assembly. So thank you so much for your time, Michele. You're welcome. And Peter, it's not over until it's over. A lot of people that evil designs before and they were foiled. This one could be foiled too.

This week Illinois Soybean Association's Public Policy Manager gives an overview of biodiesel production and use in Illinois, highlighting its benefits to the environment and Illinois soybean farmers. He also gives an update on checkoff investments toward biodiesel expansion including the B20 club.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Gather around the fireplace and let Rizzle and I take you on a trip down memory lane to the now infamous launch of the $B20 token back in January 2021 at the then largest metaverse event ever, Metapalooza. We talk about the token launch, original intent and technical underpinnings of the project that vaulted 20 unique Beeple 1/1s together with premium metaverse parcels and a 3lau soundscape followed by an epic crash and burn. After recording I uncovered the links to the buyout smart contract (since the original auction page frontend is no longer working) and other links that folks may find helpful as they dig into the project themselves. ___ B20 Buyout contract link: https://etherscan.io/address/0x450e00a6a32728a25b9dd06d7a9cf7193c9a0162#code Vault contract link 1 (holds B20 master key): https://etherscan.io/address/0xe846d7ab0bfff2f0b9b9a818b845fb99c94786c2 Vault contract link 2 (holds the Beeple Art + Metaverse Land +NFTs): https://etherscan.io/address/0xfe366786cb07068237fdb6232af60903c209a14b#code Broken auction frontend: https://b20.whalestreet.xyz/ ___ B20 FAQ 1 (Mar 9 2021): https://metapurser.substack.com/p/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-b20 B20 FAQ 2 (Mar 10 2021): https://medium.com/metapurse/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-b-20-buyout-e7edb445149a ___ Shout-outs & Shots-fired: @beeple @metakovan @lendroidproject @cryptovoxels @decentraland @VoxelArchitects @SomniumSpace @TheSandboxGame @3LAU @metapurse @Dreamverse_life @ZooToken @Dat_Ogar @steveklbnf @balajis @monaverse @dankvr @BrightMoments @crypto_citizens @CryptoKitties @mathcastles @VanArman @artblocks_io @poopie @dapperlabs @doodles @AFuckingNobody @MetageistVR @oncyber @scuube @fabianospeziari @patriziabarnato @MetaBrook @dragonateyt @niftygateway @wizards_magic @Pokemon

Lloyd's List Sponsored content in association with Argus Media Biofuels do not get the media coverage enjoyed by ammonia or hydrogen, but expertise is growing. Bunker suppliers and shipowners are working with fuels specialists to assess the potential as the shipping industry moves towards its 2030 targets. The term biofuels is broad. It covers a range of energy sources such as bioethanol and biodiesel. Biodiesel itself is used interchangeably with FAME (fatty acid methyl ester), a generic chemical term for a bio-based component from renewable sources like soya oil, used cooking oils, and animal fats/tallow. What makes this energy source worth exploring is the fact that biofuels can be fully renewable and almost 100% CO2 neutral. Transportation, storage, and handling are simple as biofuels can be dropped into conventional fuels, and they must therefore be regarded as an attractive contribution to the sustainability discussion. Are biofuels significant for shipping's sustainability or merely a minor element for certain vessels operating in restricted waterways? Can claims about zero harm be justified? What's the difference between a B20 blend and a B30 blend, and should we care? In this podcast, two marine fuels experts from Argus Media, which provides commodity and energy price benchmarks, argue there's a good case is to be made for following the progress of biofuels as a global option. Sammy Six and Catherine Caulfield — respectively deputy editor, Marine Fuels, and business development manager, Marine Fuels, Bitumen, and Base Oils — explore industry demand, biofuels availability and likely cost, regional variation of blends, and Argus' own market-assessed pricing. As Ms Caulfield observes, biofuels are currently available for bunkering while other alternative fuels such as methanol are still under development. Container and cruiseship owners are assessing the benefits because their customers are driving demand for lower-carbon solutions and are willing to pay the higher costs associated with greener solutions. That's biofuels: sustainable, available, and compliant with International Maritime Organization and customer requirements.

In today's show, we talk about specialized and expensive home inspection equipment and our preferred brands. Eric Houseman, inspection manager at Structure Tech joins the discussion. They talk about telescoping ladders, Xtend+Climb ladders, and Little Giants. Eric shares about his preferred brand, the Werner 28-foot fiberglass with the Glidesafe technology. Then they talked about combustible gas detectors or gas sniffers that work like magic. Reuben talks about infrared cameras and the new brands and features in the market like the HIKMICRO Pocket2 and B20. Reuben and Tessa discuss moisture meters and their mechanism. Other fancy tools that they talked about are combustion analyzers and flashlights. They also talk about the convenience of using suspenders during home inspections. Eric and Reuben share the tools they carry in their tool pouches during inspections. Then they talked about specific tools such as the outlet tester, voltage sniffer, and thermometers. They also share home inspector must-have tools. Reuben has written about some of these tools in his blogs, visithttps://structuretech.com/home-inspector-tool-list/. Continue to e-mail your feedback, questions, and suggestions to podcast@structuretech.com.

Klaus Schwab recently delivered a keynote address at the 2022 G20 and B20 shindig in Indonesia on the transition into a multi-polar world, as opposed to the world we've been living in where the United States has been the pre-eminent superpower. Starting right around the 2:00 mark, Schwab talks about the fundamental restructuring of the world which needs to be embraced to the end of engineering a bright new future. Yet he admits that all is not so rosy. Schwab talks about the restructuring of the global economy leading to a reduction of income, and therefore the standard of living of regular men and women. Such, they know, is increasing social tension - though not for Schwab, it seems. One could hardly find a more opposite vision to what Make America Great Again has been about, by the way. And pay attention to who is on board with this, including especially the politicians and corporations here in America who think this is grand for all the same reasons they hate Trump and the folks who've voted for and supported him. For those inclined to dismiss such diatribes as conspiracy theory, do note that Schwab being allowed to speak at all at the G20 and B20 summit does say something of his clout, and the widespread acceptance of his ideas. And note then that he says explicitly that their goal requires both government and business being on board. Thus you will make sense of ESG scores and corporations going woke, even when it costs them dearly in their sales revenue and share prices. But what is the G20? And what is the B20? Only this: they are the largest economies and companies in the world, governing one way or another most of the people and wealth on planet Earth. Schwab, for his part, is a German engineer, economist, author, and founder of the World Economic Forum, and has been the chairman of that organization since 1971. But you can't make up his German accent. As many have pointed out, he sounds just like a supervillain from a James Bond film - not just because of the accent, but also because it's paired with the kind of euphemistically articulated megalomaniacal aspirations to godhood we've come to expect of the baddies featured by Ian Fleming type works. If you ask me, Schwab may as well be a supervillain from a James Bond film. In fact, I'm not so sure he isn't one. Maybe this is the real reason why the release of 'No Time To Die' was delayed. But when he talks about using the Metaverse to facilitate global dialogue, and that toward the stated goal of “a more inclusive world," we should understand by now that this is code for you and I being further pressured to affirm and tolerate things we don't believe are true or right. Moreover, the power of global governance and economic constraint will be brought to bear as convincing if we're reluctant. Sustainability is also code. It's a stand-in for the promise we will endure arbitrary redistributions of all our wealth and power - after men like Schwab take their very sizeable cuts, of course. In his case, that cut is currently a salary of over $1 million per year. But that is for the greater good, clearly. Not like yours and my wages. By all means, let them take care of the planet if you want to. Just know that's a front for a one world government. And like the bust of Lenin on the shelf behind Schwab in this film from 2019, this intended global governance is distinctly communistic. Mercifully, there's something stronger than supervillains bent on reshaping the world in their image. The power of love, which God has extended to us in Christ, and which those who belong to God reflect back in turn - not only in word, but also in deeds, and efforts which are both concentrated and sustained on building and conserving what is true, beautiful, and good. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/garrett-ashley-mullet/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/garrett-ashley-mullet/support

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks about Elon Musk reinstating Donald Trump's Twitter account; Elon Musk's savage response to AOC's tweet about the workers of Twitter; the ending of the Jordan Peterson's Twitter ban; CBS News' brief hiatus from Twitter due to Musk's leadership; Adam Kinzinger telling CNN's Jake Tapper conspiracies about why Elon Musk ended Donald Trump's Twitter ban; the end of Bob Chapek ruining Disney as he has been fired and replaced by Bob Iger; Dave Portnoy explaining to Tucker Carlson how Sam Bankman-Fried used FTX and Alameda Research to fund Democrat donations to help write crypto regulations; Klaus Schwab telling the crowd at the B20 summit how society needs to be restructured; how the Oregon mask mandate may become permanent; how China's zero-COVID policy is creating a dystopia; the G20's push for vaccine passports for travel; Giorgia Meloni's takedown of Emmanuel Macron's exploitation of African nations; and much more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

THE THESIS: Trump is to the Deep State what Twitter under Elon could be to the rest of The Party. THE SCRIPTURE & SCRIPTURAL RESOURCES: Psalm 83:33 With cunning they conspire against your people; they plot against those you cherish.Proverbs 21:28-3128 A false witness will perish, but a careful listener will testify successfully.29 The wicked put up a bold front, but the upright give thought to their ways.30 There is no wisdom, no insight, no plan that can succeed against the Lord.31 The horse is made ready for the day of battle, but victory rests with the Lord.THE NEWS & COMMENT:Elon Musk has said he will empower citizen journalism. This, of course, terrifies the Mockingbird Media who seek to regain complete narrative control. They consider Elon a gate-crasher. Citizen reporting beats legacy media on a crucial, complex story (yet again); While the New York Times et al offer puffery on Sam Bankman-Fried and the FTX collapse, expert outsiders sift through the wreckage and get to the truth; this is Twitter and Substack at their bestTwitter is where we learn how desperate the Mockingbirds are to work with the DO”J” to hide the truth about Paul Pelolsi.NBC suspends correspondent after retracting his story on Paul Pelosi attack, report; The report by "Today Show" correspondent Michael Almaguer report seems to contradict police and prosecutors' claims and spurred conspiracy theories.But, Elon is not the free speech absolutist he fancies himself . . . The Party considers President Trump a gate-crasher. He spoke truths about America that are not to be voiced by people in power. We learned from President Trump's words--and then what the DO”J” did to him--how corrupt that organization really is at the top. Just like we learn so much of value from independent data analysts and truth-telling doctors on Twitter. [AUDIO] - MSNBC Contributor: This prosecutor will be almost EXCLUSIVELY focused on Donald Trump."Of course, this has nothing to do with politics. Just like the DO”J”, FBI, CDC, FDA and DHS conspiring with Twitter and other social media companies to keep truth telling doctors and others from crashing the gates. [AUDIO] - Karine Jean-Pierre: “We do not politicize the Department of Justice.”Does this guy seem like he's capable of honest investigation on a non-ideological basis? Jack Smith has been a Swamp Creature forever. Read about him in this 2014 report on the IRS's targeting of conservatives:Does this seem impartial? The DO”J” wants the judge hearing the social media censorship case to make sure citizens never get to see video of Fauci and his fellow psychopaths in depositions The same feds threatening Trump are threatening Elon. In this case, it's Senator Markey, a man who performed a hoax in partnership with the uber-hoaxters at the Washington Post, all to frame Elon Musk. [AUDIO] - @SenMarkey threatens @elonmusk: "You cannot ignore what the federal government is requiring of your company, and that goes for ... guardrails that have to be built around social media ... They will pay a price if they don't put safeguards in place at Twitter"President Trump was the first big-time candidate for President to speak so openly and convincingly about the globalists since JFK. Like Klaus . . .[AUDIO] - G20 - Here's Klaus Schwab, on the great Great Reset none of you voted for. “Deep systemic restructuring of our world and this will take some time. And the world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.” And Klaus's possession, Justin . . . [AUDIO] - TRUDEAU - Speaking at the B20 (the business leaders offshoot of the G20) Trudeau confirms only government approved free speech will be allowed online & monitored by A.I. For your own safety

Gerald Celente, TrendsJournal.com, connects the dots to BOTH parties involvement with Zelensky and SBFFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

Gerald Celente, TrendsJournal.com, connects the dots to BOTH parties involvement with Zelensky and SBFFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

On this edition of The Ex Terra Podcast, Tom Patton talks with Stefan Powell, CEO of Dawn Aerospace, a company developing an innovative spaceplane as well as satellite thrusters fueled by "green" propellant. Dawn Aerospace is based in Christchurch, New Zealand, with offices in Delft, The Netherlands and New York City. The company builds thrusters for both small satellites and CubeSats, and is flight testing a spaceplane that can operate from standard airports to deliver satellites to orbit. Dawn's B20 thruster achieves performance equal to that of those using hydrazine propellants by using a unique, green-propellant combination; nitrous oxide and propylene. Having delivered this technology to both CubeSats and Small Satellites, Dawn is demonstrating this technology can be applied to satellites of all sizes. Using nontoxic propellants is naturally far less risky than using something like hydrazine, which is toxic at extremely low concentrations - 40 parts per million. Dawn's green propellants are great for the environment, but can also save the satellite operator about $500,000 per satellite by eliminating the safety precautions required to store and handle hydrazine. The Dawn Mk-II Aurora is designed for multiple flights per day to 100 km (66 mile) and above. Taking off and landing from standard airports, alongside normal aircraft, this vehicle merges the world of rockets and aviation. The Aurora, a sub-scale suborbital vehicle, has been built to demonstrate Dawn's core technology for daily access to space. It is the latest vehicle of a series that will one day deliver satellites and assets to, and return them from, space. The vehicle's 3U payload is capable of hosting scientific experiments. The next vehicle in Dawn's series, the Mk-III, will be based on this design, but much larger and capable of delivering 250 kg (≈550 pound) satellites to orbit. How does what happens in space affect your everyday life? The Ex Terra podcast is dedicated to introducing you to many of the interesting people involved in the commercial space industry, and taking you behind the scenes with many of the companies making significant contributions to the new space economy. The podcast is available on Anchor, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Breaker, Overcast, Pocketcasts and Radio Public.

➤ Tesla begins rolling out FSD Beta version 11 to some employees ➤ Fed officials discuss lower rate increases ➤ Elon Musk interviewed at B20 summit ➤ Tesla crash draws questions in China ➤ Tesla retains top selling spot in California ➤ Model 3 receives 5-star Green NCAP score ➤ Tesla continues hiring solar installers ➤ Musk comments on Twitter, SpaceX, Tesla buyback ➤ SEC charges S&P Shareloft: https://www.shareloft.com Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/teslapodcast Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/tesladailypodcast Tesla Referral: https://ts.la/robert47283 Executive producer Jeremy Cooke Executive producer Troy Cherasaro Executive producer Andre/Maria Kent Executive producer Jessie Chimni Executive producer Michael Pastrone Executive producer Richard Del Maestro Executive producer John Beans Music by Evan Schaeffer Disclosure: Rob Maurer is long TSLA stock & derivatives

To round out the WIP Crew Series interviews, Matthew & Rizzle chopped it up the very first videographer of the metaverse himself, Paradoxx. We talked about how Paradoxx created a whole new category of creator: the metaverse videographer, and some seminal moments along the way from early Cent days, to working with HiveMuse, joining the WIP Crew, working on the B20 metaverse event launch party, receiving a Metapurse grant and finally joining the Monaverse team. Shout-outs and shots fired: @Cent @MetageistVR @maxosirisart @DragoNateYT @josiebellini @tvabby @nbatopshot @TakesItnMakesIt @nessnissla @j1mmyeth @HiveMuseum @cryptovoxels @twobadour @metapurse @growyourbase_ @Ezincr @monaverse @justinmmelillo @artblocks_io @MLOdotArt @opensea @beeple @raregotchi @skeenee_art @MovieShots @NFTStudios_io @ArtOnBlockchain Previous Episodes: - Dragonate - Sho - Sandy Meows - Foxyoga - Carolinaduhh - EZinCrypto Paradoxx's Twitter: https://twitter.com/Paradoxx_Media _______________________ The Matthew & Rizzle Show is proudly sponsored by Proof of Beauty Studios, a lab that has been running a series of beautiful and thought-provoking generative art projects on the Ethereum blockchain. Follow Proof of Beauty Studios on Twitter to stay on the bleeding edge of tokenized digital experiences.

endlessly grateful, love u. the painting i was talking about https://www.agefotostock.com/age/en/details-photo/at-the-sick-woman-s-side-1899-1900-pablo-picasso-1881-1973-museu-picasso-museum-barcelona-catalonia-spain/B20-3431095 my artist page on spotify https://open.spotify.com/artist/5jGbyepZRz1wngPcDKqfrd plz listen to my new song :) --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/caroline3376/support

1. 2004 Jeep Laredo dies at idle. 2. 2008 Toyota Tundra wheel bearings were changed now brakes are out. 3. 2003 Ford F230 the transmission gets hot under heavy use. 4. 1975 Chevy Caprice. Valve VS adding miles to car. Only 3000 miles. 5. Should you warm up a cold car? 6. 2007 Duramax truck using B20 fuel or higher. 7. 2009 Nissan Titan. Horn wont honk when turning sharply.