Podcasts about tariffs

Tonight on The Last Word: Democrats excoriate Donald Trump for shifting reasons on the Iran war. Also, MS NOW reports the FBI is losing national security experts in droves. Plus, the FBI subpoenas records from the 2020 election in Arizona. And small businesses sue Trump over his latest global tariffs. Sen. Mark Kelly, Sen. Alex Padilla, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, and Rick Woldenberg join Lawrence O'Donnell.  To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

3. Guest Alan Tonelson evaluates wartime trade, highlighting China's failure to stop fentanyl precursors. He discusses the impact of tariffs and potential global shortages of fertilizer and sulfur due to Middle East instability. (3)1793

Think the latest global headlines are just random political chaos?  Trade wars. Global Tariffs. The Panama Canal squeeze. Buying Greenland. The escalating military tensions in Iran and Venezuela. The mainstream media covers these as isolated incidents, erratic moves, or standard foreign policy friction. But are they deliberately hiding the bigger picture? Welcome to the New Cold War. And the key battlefield isn't nuclear or ideological. In this explosive episode, we are peeling back the curtain on the trillion-dollar shadow war happening right under our noses. We connect the dots that no one else is pointing out to reveal the story behind the story. If you want to understand who will actually control the future of the global economy, you can't afford to miss this. In this episode, we expose: The Greenland Deception  The Venezuela & Iran Paradox The Panama Canal Chokepoint: How stealth trade wars are being fought by controlling the literal gates of global commerce. Trump's Tariffs and Trade Wars Stop reading the headlines and start reading the map. Tune in now to find out who is really pulling the strings of the global economy. Shopify: Launch your dream business with Shopify. Sign up for your $1/month trial at https://Shopify.com/Jillian and start selling today! 120Life: Go to https://120Life.com and use code JILLIAN to save 20% Click Here to Download My App! https://www.jillianmichaels.com/join Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jillianmichaels/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jillianmichaels/ X: https://x.com/JillianMichaels/ Welcome to the "Keeping It Real" podcast – where authenticity meets impactful storytelling. Hosted by Jillian, this podcast dives into the stories, ideas, and truths that shape our world. Featuring top journalists, newsmakers, thought leaders, and everyday heroes, we explore breaking news, global events, and the personal journeys that inspire and challenge us. From controversial current events and transformative ideas to health, wellness, and self-discovery, no topic is off-limits. With honest dialogue and fresh perspectives, "Keeping It Real" is your go-to space for staying informed, inspired, and engaged. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The global economy is facing new uncertainty — from the Iran conflict to tariffs and the rapid rise of artificial intelligence. What could it all mean for real estate investors? In this episode of The Real Wealth Show, Kathy Fettke talks with investor J Scott about the biggest economic risks right now. They discuss how the Iran conflict could affect oil prices, inflation, and interest rates, why tariffs and policy uncertainty are impacting business decisions, and how AI could reshape jobs, rents, and property values over the next decade. Despite these risks, J Scott explains why he remains bullish on real estate and why hard assets have historically held up well during periods of economic uncertainty.

The Supreme Court, abused by Trump for voting against him on Tariffs, may get the last laugh and is sending a message to Trump about the midterm election: No, you won't be able to steal 20 more or so congressional seats away from black Americans for the midterms, as the Supreme Court sits on issuing a ruing to gut the Voting Rights Act many MAGA thought would be issued last October! Popok explains how last week's decision to block NY's efforts to draw new maps may actually signal that the Court will now allow any new maps to be drawn before November, a gift to the democrats. DeleteMe: Get 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to https://joindeleteme.com/LEGALAF and use promo code LEGALAF at checkout. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode of the Trade Guys, Bill and Scott dive into the impacts of the Iran Conflict on world trade, especially for energy markets. Bill then gives an update on the Court of International Trade's efforts to implement the Supreme Court's IEEPA decision. They conclude by unpacking an escalating trade war between Ecuador and Colombia. 

Politics keeps offering us drama in place of design. We sat down with Nicholas D. Vairo to chart how the post-liberal moment slid from grand promises into a Bonapartist reality: a leader-first spectacle with no plan to build or maintain the institutions that make a society work. The core insight isn't just about ideology; it's about capacity. Professional elites still run what functions, for better and worse, because no competing class has figured out how to reproduce competence at scale.We unpack why Yarvin-style CEO fantasies and Deneen's mixed-constitution nostalgia mirror historical dead ends. The French parallels are illuminating: attempts to jury-rig monarchs and blended constitutions collapsed into Bonapartism, not renewal. That's where we are now—big talk, weak statecraft, and a movement that confuses obedience with order. Meanwhile, liberalism struggles with the deeper wound: a crisis of socialization. Without strong civil society—churches, associations, unions, schools that do more than sort—people can't generate shared meaning or stable norms. That vacuum breeds nihilism and brittle politics.We also go material. Neoliberal underinvestment hollowed America's productive base, leaving the U.S. with high labor productivity but low capital intensity and a long productivity slump ahead. Tariffs and culture war won't fix a capacity gap that took decades to create. China offers a counterexample—not as a model to copy, but as proof that disciplined investment and state competence matter more than performative revolt. On technology, we challenge fatalism: AI can de-skill or empower depending on the incentives and institutions wrapped around it. Design education for mastery and collaboration, and the tools raise the floor; design it for compliance and shortcuts, and skills atrophy.Where does that leave the left? With work to do. We argue for pro-factional, member-driven organizations that build beyond elections, tie back into unions and tenant power, and actually teach people to run things. Less content, more construction. If post-liberalism's disillusion teaches anything, it's that there's no substitute for institutions that build meaning and capacity together.If this resonates, subscribe, share with a friend who's wrestling with these questions, and leave a review telling us which institution you think we must rebuild first.Send a text Musis by Bitterlake, Used with Permission, all rights to BitterlakeSupport the showCrew:Host: C. Derick VarnIntro and Outro Music by Bitter Lake.Intro Video Design: Jason MylesArt Design: Corn and C. Derick VarnLinks and Social Media:twitter: @varnvlogblue sky: @varnvlog.bsky.socialYou can find the additional streams on YoutubeCurrent Patreon at the Sponsor Tier: Jordan Sheldon, Mark J. Matthews, Lindsay Kimbrough, RedWolf, DRV, Kenneth McKee, JY Chan, Matthew Monahan, Parzival, Adriel Mixon, Buddy Roark, Daniel Petrovic,Julian

This Day in Legal History: The AmistadOn March 9, 1841, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. The Amistad, ruling that a group of Africans who had seized control of the Spanish ship La Amistad were free individuals who had been illegally enslaved. The case began after the captives, led by Sengbe Pieh—often called Cinqué—revolted against the ship's crew while being transported from Cuba in 1839. They had originally been kidnapped in West Africa and sold into slavery in violation of international agreements banning the transatlantic slave trade. After the revolt, the ship was intercepted near Long Island and the Africans were taken into U.S. custody. Spanish officials demanded that the United States return both the ship and the captives to Cuba. The U.S. government supported Spain's request, arguing that the captives were property under Spanish law.Abolitionists rallied to the Africans' defense and secured legal representation for them in American courts. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, where former President John Quincy Adams joined the legal team arguing for the captives' freedom. Adams delivered a lengthy and passionate argument emphasizing natural rights and the illegality of the slave trade that had brought the Africans to Cuba. Writing for the majority, Justice Joseph Story concluded that the captives had been unlawfully enslaved and were therefore not property. Because they were free individuals, the Court held that they had the legal right to resist their captivity and fight for their liberty. The Court ordered that the Africans be released rather than returned to Spanish authorities.The ruling was celebrated by abolitionists as an important moral and legal victory in the fight against slavery. Although it did not end slavery in the United States, the decision demonstrated that courts could recognize limits on the slave trade and acknowledge the legal claims of enslaved people.Thirteen major U.S. book publishers have filed a copyright lawsuit against Anna's Archive, a website they describe as one of the largest “shadow libraries” distributing pirated books and academic papers. The publishers—including HarperCollins, Wiley, McGraw Hill, and Cengage—filed the complaint in federal court in New York, alleging that the site hosts more than 63 million books and 95 million research papers without authorization. According to the lawsuit, Anna's Archive allows users to download these materials directly or through torrent networks, making copyrighted works widely available for free. The publishers claim the site openly presents itself as a pirate platform and intentionally violates copyright law.The complaint also alleges that Anna's Archive was created in 2022 after copying entire collections from other illegal book repositories and has continued expanding its database. The publishers say the site operates anonymously and frequently changes domain names across different countries to avoid enforcement efforts. They further claim the platform targets artificial intelligence developers by offering large datasets of books and papers. While free users can access files slowly, the complaint states that faster downloads are available to users who make donations through untraceable methods like cryptocurrency or gift cards. The publishers allege that these donations can reach roughly $200,000 for high-speed bulk access. In response, the plaintiffs are asking the court to shut down the site and award statutory damages of up to $150,000 for each infringed work.The lawsuit follows a separate case brought by Atlantic Recording Corp., which earlier obtained a preliminary injunction preventing Anna's Archive from distributing millions of music files allegedly copied from Spotify. That case resulted in a default after the site failed to respond to the complaint. However, the publishers argue that the earlier injunction does not cover books, allowing the alleged book piracy to continue. The Association of American Publishers has publicly supported the lawsuit, describing the scale of digital piracy as extremely large and urging legal action to stop the operation.Publishers Sue ‘Shadow Library' For ‘Staggering' Book Piracy - Law360Companies that operate in California are facing uncertainty as the state moves forward with major climate disclosure laws while a federal appeals court considers whether the rules should be blocked. The laws—California Senate Bills 253 and 261—require large companies doing business in the state to disclose information about greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks. In late February, the California Air Resources Board approved initial regulations explaining how the reporting system will be administered and how companies will pay implementation fees. At the same time, the Ninth Circuit has temporarily blocked enforcement of S.B. 261 and is reviewing a request from business groups to halt both laws entirely.Because of this parallel regulatory and legal process, many companies are unsure whether they should invest heavily in compliance or wait for the courts to rule. S.B. 253 applies to companies with more than $1 billion in annual revenue and requires reporting of Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, which include direct emissions, energy-related emissions, and emissions from supply chains. S.B. 261 applies to companies with more than $500 million in revenue and requires disclosure of climate-related financial risks and mitigation strategies. Attorneys say collecting this data could be difficult, especially for companies that only have limited operations in California or that must gather information from suppliers and partners in other regions.The reporting requirements could also affect businesses outside California because companies subject to the law may need emissions data from their partners and vendors. Regulators have begun setting deadlines for initial reporting, including an August deadline for certain emissions data, but many details about how the system will function remain unresolved. Meanwhile, business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce argue the laws violate the First Amendment by forcing companies to speak on controversial issues related to climate change. With rulemaking still underway and litigation ongoing, companies are left trying to prepare for possible compliance while waiting to see whether the courts ultimately uphold or invalidate the laws.Companies In Limbo Over Calif. Climate Disclosure Laws' Fate - Law360In a major California bellwether trial over claims that social media harms children's mental health, the plaintiff has finished presenting her case against Instagram and YouTube. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old referred to as Kaley G.M. to protect her identity, alleges that features on the platforms contributed to anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphia she experienced as a minor. Her attorney, Mark Lanier, chose not to call Kaley's mother to testify live, instead presenting a brief portion of her deposition to the jury. The decision appeared partly influenced by strict time limits imposed by the judge during the trial. In the deposition testimony, the mother acknowledged she had little knowledge of her daughter's social media use and did not monitor her phone because she viewed it similarly to a household landline.Defense attorneys have argued that Kaley's mental health problems were caused by difficulties at home rather than the platforms themselves. Evidence introduced at trial suggested the plaintiff had conflicts with her mother, including allegations of neglect, verbal abuse, and limited supervision of internet use. The defense also pointed to bullying and other personal issues as alternative explanations for the plaintiff's struggles. Meanwhile, a former Meta employee testified that internal company information suggested Instagram could be addictive and harmful to young users, although defense lawyers challenged his credibility and the extent of his involvement with safety issues.The plaintiff's final expert witness discussed ways social media companies could design safer platforms for children. After the plaintiff rested, Meta began presenting its defense with testimony from school administrators connected to the plaintiff. The case is the first bellwether trial among thousands of similar lawsuits consolidated in California, with outcomes potentially shaping settlement negotiations and future trials. TikTok and Snap previously settled with this plaintiff, but the broader litigation against social media companies continues.Meta, Google Begin Defense As Mental Harm Plaintiff Rests - Law360 UKThe U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency told a federal trade court that it expects to create a system within about 45 days to process refunds for tariffs that were previously imposed under President Donald Trump and later ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. The tariffs generated roughly $166 billion in payments from about 330,000 importers, and the Court's decision did not specify how those funds should be returned. As a result, government lawyers and a judge from the U.S. Court of International Trade are working to establish a practical process for issuing refunds.Under the proposed plan, importers would submit a declaration through CBP's electronic system detailing the tariffs they paid. The agency would verify the information and then issue a single payment from the Treasury Department to each importer, including interest. Officials say this approach would avoid forcing businesses to file individual lawsuits to recover their money. The judge overseeing the matter recently modified an earlier order that required immediate refunds, acknowledging that the agency needs time to build a workable system.CBP explained that its current administrative system cannot automatically process refunds on the massive scale required. Importers paid tariffs on more than 53 million shipments, and manually reviewing each transaction could require millions of hours of labor. Several large companies, including affiliates of Nintendo and CVS, have already filed lawsuits seeking repayment, though the government hopes a broader refund system will resolve claims more efficiently.Business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have supported the proposal, saying it could simplify the process for smaller companies. However, officials noted that relatively few importers have registered for the electronic refund system created earlier this year. The court continues to oversee the development of the refund process through a test case that could guide how payments are returned to all affected businesses.US customs agency expects tariff refund system to be ready in 45 days | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

U.S. Customs and Border Protection says it cannot quickly process refunds tied to Trump-era tariffs that the Supreme Court ruled illegal. In a new court filing, the agency says more than 330,000 importers paid about $166 billion across more than 53 million shipments, and refunding that money manually would take about 4.4 million labor hours. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed with the latest news from a leading Black-owned & controlled media company: https://aurn.com/newsletter Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to Omni Talk's Retail Daily Minute, sponsored by Grocery Dealz and Mirakl.In today's Retail Daily Minute, Omni Talk's Chris Walton discusses:All Eddie Bauer stores are set to close after the brand's retail operator failed to find a single qualified buyer in bankruptcy court.Costco CEO Ron Vachris pledges to flow any IEEPA tariff refunds back to members through lower prices and better values.Dick's Sporting Goods crashes the AI party, briefly hitting #3 on the Apple App Store's free download chart thanks to a viral wave of posts about the app's fitness rewards feature.The Retail Daily Minute has been rocketing up the Feedspot charts, so stay informed with Omni Talk's Retail Daily Minute, your source for the latest and most important retail insights.Be careful out there!

In light of the Supreme Court's recent ruling, two experts from Eisner Advisory Group -- Dean Peterson, partner-in-charge of the international tax services group, and Blair Robbins, partner and leader of the manufacturing and distribution group -- discuss the tax and business ramifications of the Trump administration's tariff policies that accountants should be advising clients about.   

Chris Markowski, the Watchdog on Wall Street, delves into the complexities of financial truths, political accountability, and the implications of U.S. military involvement. He expresses discontent with current leadership, questions the narratives surrounding war, and emphasizes the need for financial responsibility in funding military actions. Markowski also discusses the impact of tariffs on the economy and critiques government waste and inefficiency. The conversation highlights the importance of independent thinking and the need for transparency in political discourse.

South Korea's industry minister says the United States is unlikely to slap higher tariffs on Seoul if parliament moves swiftly to implement investment legislation sought by Washington next week as scheduled.

On MoneyFM 89.3’s International News Review, Steve Okun joins Saturday Mornings Show host Glenn van Zutphen and co-host Neil Humphreys unpack a fast‑moving and deeply unsettling set of global developments — from the widening Iran conflict to political shifs inside the Trump Administration and Singapore's global bagel standing! We begin with the Iran war, which has now spilled across Lebanon, Syria, Kuwait, the UAE and the wider Gulf, with hundreds of drones targeting military and civilian sites. The conflict is no longer contained — it’s regional, persistent, and increasingly shaped by cheap, mass‑produced drones that are redefining modern warfare. Steve explains why these low‑cost weapons are so destabilising and what their proliferation means for global security. We look at the political drama in Washington: Kristi Noem’s exit from the Department of Homeland Security and the rise of Markwayne Mullin, a little‑known but fast‑ascending figure now thrust into the national spotlight. Steve explains who he is, why he matters, and what his emergence signals about the shifting dynamics inside the Trump administration. Finally, is Singapore's world bagel standing on the rise?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

During our Week in Review, we explain why diversification only works when investors have enough cash and patience, especially during periods when markets move in the same direction. We explore the jump in workers taking money from their retirement plans and how changing laws and rising costs are affecting their choices. We wrap up with the global events and economic reports that moved markets and what they may mean in the weeks ahead.  Plus, segments on navigating financial conversations with family and solo aging.

While Washington has become more hostile to globalization, Americans continue to buy foreign goods in record numbers. Lincicome notes that economic nationalism is “about an inch deep,” with support collapsing when Americans face higher prices for domestic products. The conversation also explores the impact of tariffs on businesses and consumers. Lincicome explains that if certain tariffs are ruled illegal, companies could seek refunds totaling up to $175 billion, potentially through litigation rather than administrative action. Krugman emphasizes that while policy debates grab headlines, public perception and midterm politics may ultimately matter more than the details of trade law or corporate strategy. From the immediate fallout of legal challenges to the broader question of how the U.S. navigates trade and globalization, Bremmer, Lincicome, and Krugman explore the delicate balance between politics, policy, and the economy—and what it could mean for American consumers, businesses, and the upcoming midterms. Host: Ian Bremmer Guests: Paul Krugman, Scott Lincicome Subscribe to the GZERO World with Ian Bremmer Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform, to receive new episodes as soon as they're published. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

While Washington has become more hostile to globalization, Americans continue to buy foreign goods in record numbers. Lincicome notes that economic nationalism is “about an inch deep,” with support collapsing when Americans face higher prices for domestic products. The conversation also explores the impact of tariffs on businesses and consumers. Lincicome explains that if certain tariffs are ruled illegal, companies could seek refunds totaling up to $175 billion, potentially through litigation rather than administrative action. Krugman emphasizes that while policy debates grab headlines, public perception and midterm politics may ultimately matter more than the details of trade law or corporate strategy. From the immediate fallout of legal challenges to the broader question of how the U.S. navigates trade and globalization, Bremmer, Lincicome, and Krugman explore the delicate balance between politics, policy, and the economy—and what it could mean for American consumers, businesses, and the upcoming midterms. Host: Ian Bremmer Guests: Paul Krugman, Scott Lincicome Subscribe to the GZERO World with Ian Bremmer Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform, to receive new episodes as soon as they're published. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In our news wrap Friday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection says it should have a process ready in about 45 days to start refunding invalidated tariffs to hundreds of thousands of companies, storms are rolling across the central U.S. with forecasters warning of possible tornadoes and GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales is vowing to finish out his term after announcing he won't seek re-election. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

This month on Ask Rick, Rick Schmidt from National Parts Depot joins us for a St. Patrick's Day edition covering everything from green cars and Guinness to real-world business questions. We discuss whether presidential addresses truly move the needle for business decisions, what the current tariff situation looks like on Taiwanese restoration sheetmetal, and how NPD is handling pricing in real time. We also dive into the growing conversation around Chinese electric vehicles entering the U.S. market — and whether joint ventures with American automakers make that inevitable. Plus, Rick tackles a thoughtful listener question about selling a company to employees with no family successor, and we close with a truck-heavy investment showdown: custom builds under $75K and which ones make the smartest five-year bet. Insightful, practical, and always honest — it's classic Ask Rick from start to finish. The post TMCP #640: Ask Rick — Green Cars, Tariffs on Taiwan, Chinese EV Rumors, and the Best Trucks to Buy Now first appeared on The Muscle Car Place.

On this episode of Supply Chain Now, we explore how global events are rippling through supply chains, from escalating geopolitical tensions and military strikes on Iran to continued tariff uncertainty and shifting consumer behavior. These developments are raising important questions about preparedness, resilience, and how leaders can stay ahead in a rapidly changing environment. Join hosts Scott Luton and Jake Barr as they unpack the latest developments impacting global commerce. Welcome to The Buzz, powered by Altium!Recent geopolitical developments, including military strikes on Iran, are highlighting how quickly global events can impact supply chains, from inventory concerns to broader economic uncertainty. In this episode, we examine how leaders must strengthen resilience and remain proactive as geopolitical risks, tariff changes, and regulatory decisions continue to influence global trade.We also explore emerging consumer trends shaping the food industry, particularly the growing demand for healthier products and innovative flavors, and discuss how technologies like AI can help organizations make faster, smarter decisions in an increasingly complex supply chain landscape.Tune in and learn:How geopolitical tensions, including military strikes on Iran, can impact global supply chains and inventory planningWhy supply chain leaders must strengthen resilience in the face of growing geopolitical riskThe latest developments around U.S. tariffs and Supreme Court decisions affecting global tradeWhy strategic agility is essential as legal and regulatory frameworks continue to evolveHow food companies are innovating to meet demand for healthier products and unique flavorsThe significance of National Supply Chain Day and what it represents for the industryHow technologies like AI are helping organizations improve decision-making and operational efficiencyIf you're a supply chain, logistics, procurement, or operations leader trying to make sense of today's rapidly shifting landscape, this episode offers valuable context and actionable insights. From geopolitical disruption to evolving consumer trends, the forces shaping supply chains are growing more complex, and leaders who stay informed and adaptable will be best positioned to succeed.Tune in to better understand the signals shaping tomorrow's supply chains.Additional Links & Resources:Today's edition of The Buzz is powered by Altium. Learn more about Altium: http://altium.com/yt/supplychainnowWith That Said: https://bit.ly/WTS-1-March-2026National Supply Chain Day: https://bit.ly/NSCD-2026University of Kentucky Supply Chain Forum 2026: https://bit.ly/UK-Supply-Chain-Forum-2026Juxta Book a Demo: https://www.juxta.com/book-demoSCOTUS Tariff Ruling Favors Policy-Savvy Teams Building Regionalized Supply Chains: https://bit.ly/The-Signal-on-TariffsHow McCormick is keeping up with food giants' race to reformulate: https://bit.ly/Food-Industry-TrendsEasyPost Guide: https://bit.ly/LLMs-in-Shipping-EPAI is gobbling up the world's memory chips, sending smartphone prices to record highs, report says: https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/27/tech/ai-memory-chips-smartphones-intl-hnkScott's Wednesday Morning Rundown: https://bit.ly/Scott-WedMornRundown-2MAR2026Automatic for the People: https://bit.ly/Automatic-For-The-PeopleSupply Chain Planning Reimagined: https://bit.ly/SC-Planning-ReimaginedConnect with Jake on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jake-barr-3883501/Supply Chain Now Resource Hub: https://supplychainnow.com/resource-hub/Follow Scott on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottwindonluton/Today's edition of The Buzz is powered by Altium. Learn more about Altium: http://altium.com/yt/supplychainnowLearn more about Supply Chain Now: https://supplychainnow.comWatch and listen to more Supply Chain Now episodes here: https://supplychainnow.com/program/supply-chain-nowSubscribe to Supply Chain Now on your favorite platform: https://supplychainnow.com/joinWork with us! Download Supply Chain Now's NEW Media Kit: https://bit.ly/3XH6OVkThis episode is hosted by Scott Luton Jake Barr and produced by Trisha Cordes, Joshua Miranda, and Amanda Luton. For additional information, please visit our dedicated show page at: https://supplychainnow.com/buzz-geopolitics-tariffs-food-trends-shaping-supply-chain-1554

"This could be one of the biggest busts we've ever seen on Wall Street," warns Chris Whalen, Chairman of Whalen Global Advisors. In this interview with Daniela Cambone, Whalen unravels how the private credit market has become a ticking time bomb for the financial system. He explains how private equity firms are purchasing insurance companies and, instead of taking a conservative approach to investing, are using cheaper Federal Home Loan Bank advances to make riskier investments, putting retirees' money in harm's way. Citing recent defaults in the sector, including issues at Blue Owl, he warns that it will be "quite a mess when it really unfolds." Whalen also offers a solution for investors, stating, "That's why metals are so important, Daniela. Metals are an act of refusal. If you invest in gold and silver or even other metals, what you're saying is you're choosing not to follow the crowd." Chapters: 00:00 The private credit is cracking06:50 Is this the end of bitcoin?08:29 Will the Fed save the market?10:04 Financial market correction12:42 Kevin Warsh is a gold guy15:32 Silver and gold growth trajectory17:52 Tariffs: what happens next? ✅ FREE RESOURCESDownload The Private Wealth Playbook — a data-backed guide to strategically acquiring gold and silver for maximum protection, privacy, and performance. Plus, get Daniela Cambone's Top 10 Lessons to safeguard your wealth (FREE)

Wisconsin's U.S. Senators sound off about the war in Iran. And they couldn't be further apart. Wisconsin has joined another multi-state lawsuit against the Trump administration's tariffs. And, how algae could be part of the solution to getting micro-plastics out of our water.

LA County wants to know why LAHSA can't pay its bills. California leads a coalition to take on President Trump's newest tariffs. LAX is boosting its police presence because of the war in Iran. Plus, more from Morning Edition. Support The L.A. Report by donating at LAist.com/join and by visiting https://laist.comSupport the show: https://laist.com

Tariffs are no longer theoretical.They're now showing up in earnings calls, pricing data, and customer behavior across the entire eCommerce market.Walmart reported merchandise inflation jumping from 1.7% to 3% in a single quarter. Adobe tracked a 4% spike in online prices in January, the largest single-month increase since they began tracking eCommerce prices 12 years ago.Most sellers see these headlines and panic. Operators translate them into decisions.In this episode of the High Voltage Business Builders Podcast, Neil breaks down what the latest tariff data, price increases across Amazon and Walmart, and changing consumer behavior actually mean for eCommerce operators, and how to build systems that protect your margins when markets shift.

Within just weeks of the President's imposition of a 10% global tariff under Sec. 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, two dozen states have filed suit challenging the lawfulness of the tariffs at the U.S. Court of International Trade.  For more information, listen to Today's Two Minutes in Trade.  

First, the latest round of tariffs targets nearly every country in the world, and now it is now facing legal challenges. Then, a new transitional living program just landed in North County. Also, we'll tell you what a death cafe is and what they're all about. Plus, we tell you about the San Diego Zoo Safari Park's new Elephant Valley!

SCOTUS halted Trump's sweeping tariffs, but Americans already paid higher prices. Now corporations may receive refunds. Will consumers see relief or another corporate windfall? Weems and Willies.Subscribe to our Newsletter:https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletterPurchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make AmericaUtopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And BeFit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of anAfro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE

This week Sam discusses Trump tariffs, flooding in Bordeaux and Victoria, lawsuits in France over copper fungicides, the complete buyout of Freixenet Cava by Germany's Henkell group and bribery at Southern Glazer's. You can read the transcript of this newscast (with linked news sources) at https://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/flooding-bordeaux-and-victoria-bribery-southern-glazers-tariff-update.

Our region joins a lawsuit over new global tariffs. Senator Murphy wants to restrict government officials from using online prediction markets. Plus, a new report finds chemical contamination in certain vegetables grown on Long Island's East End.

What happens when tariffs collide with AI, oil volatility, margin erosion, and agentic commerce,  all in the same week?In Episode of Around the Horn in Wholesale Distribution, Kevin Brown and Tom Burton break down the accelerating news cycle impacting manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and the global supply chain. From the latest job report and Federal Reserve signals to tariff refund chaos, AI-driven margin strategy, and the Amazon vs. Walmart agentic commerce divide, this episode delivers practical insight for distribution leaders navigating economic uncertainty.If you are asking, “How should distributors respond to tariffs, AI disruption, and margin pressure right now?” This conversation is your roadmap.What You'll Learn:Why the latest U.S. jobs report may not reflect real-time economic reality — and how distributors should interpret lagging indicators like CPI, PPI, and unemployment dataHow tariff refund litigation could create a $40+ billion Wall Street trading frenzy — and why downstream distributors face complex reconciliation challengesThe real drivers of margin erosion in wholesale distribution, including internal discounting and product mix blind spotsHow AI-powered discovery systems (like the DAGA framework: Discover, Alert, Guide, Automate) can unlock 40–50% revenue growth from existing accountEpisode Highlights:03:15 – Why the news cycle now shifts between Thursday night and Friday morning12:09 – February jobs report: 92,000 jobs lost and what that signals for the Fed22:40 – Oil volatility, the Strait of Hormuz, and supply chain risk exposure29:43 – Tariff increases to 15% and the Supreme Court refund implications40:18 – Wall Street's move to buy tariff refund claims at a discount59:14 – Margin erosion in distribution and the three silent profit killers1:06:00 – The DAGA framework: Discover, Alert, Guide, Automate1:13:46 – Amazon vs. Walmart: Competing models for agentic commerce1:22:33 – “Your data is worthless until you give it purpose”Tools, Frameworks, and Strategic Concepts Mentioned:DAGA Framework – Discover, Alert, Guide, AutomateAI-driven white space analysisMargin mix optimizationAgentic commerce modelsPredictive sales intelligence and guided sellingAI-enabled demand forecastingData clarity vs. data overloadKey Themes for Distribution Leaders:Tariffs are not just policy, they are operational complexityMargin compression is often self-inflicted through unmanaged discountingAI should enhance sales teams, not replace themData without context is decorationClosing Insight:“AI is not about replacing people. It's about making good people better.”Leave a Review: Help us grow by sharing your thoughts on the show.Learn more about the LeadSmart AI B2B Sales Platform: https://www.leadsmarttech.com/ Join the conversation each week on LinkedIn Live.Want even more insight to the stories we discuss each week? Subscribe to the Around The Horn Newsletter.You can also hear the podcast and other excellent content on our YouTube Channel.Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or TikTok.

LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE on:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/watchdog-on-wall-street-with-chris-markowski/id570687608 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2PtgPvJvqc2gkpGIkNMR5i WATCH and SUBSCRIBE on:https://www.youtube.com/@WatchdogOnWallstreet/featured  More than 2,000 lawsuits are challenging recent tariffs, creating a legal and financial nightmare. If courts force refunds, taxpayers could end up paying twice—first through higher prices and again through legal costs, refunds, and nearly $700 million per month in interest until the money is returned.

This Day in Legal History: FDR Declares Bank HolidayOn March 6, 1933, just two days after taking office, President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared a nationwide bank holiday in response to the escalating financial panic of the Great Depression. At the time, banks across the country were collapsing as frightened depositors rushed to withdraw their savings. The closures threatened to completely destabilize the American financial system. Roosevelt used emergency executive authority to temporarily shut down the nation's banks in order to stop the flood of withdrawals. The pause allowed federal officials to inspect financial institutions and determine which were stable enough to reopen.Although the order began as an executive action, Congress quickly moved to support the president's efforts. On March 9, lawmakers passed the Emergency Banking Act, which retroactively approved Roosevelt's bank holiday and expanded federal oversight of banks. The law allowed only financially sound banks to resume operations and provided additional confidence to depositors. In the days that followed, many banks reopened under stricter supervision, and public trust gradually returned to the banking system. Roosevelt reinforced this confidence through his first “fireside chat,” explaining the reforms directly to the American public.Legal challenges later tested the government's authority to take such sweeping action during a crisis. Courts ultimately upheld many emergency financial measures adopted during the early New Deal period. These rulings helped establish the principle that the federal government has broader power to respond to national economic emergencies. The bank holiday of March 6, 1933, therefore became an important early example of how executive initiative and congressional support can combine to address a national crisis.An insurer has filed a lawsuit accusing OpenAI of engaging in the unauthorized practice of law after its AI chatbot allegedly provided faulty legal assistance to a disability benefits recipient. According to the complaint, Nippon Life Insurance Co. of America had settled a long-term disability dispute with Graciela Dela Torre in January 2024. About a year later, she questioned the agreement and asked her attorney about reopening the case due to alleged documentation problems. When her lawyer explained that the settlement was final, Dela Torre consulted ChatGPT, asking whether her attorney had dismissed her concerns.The insurer claims the chatbot suggested that her attorney had invalidated her feelings and deflected responsibility. After receiving that response, Dela Torre fired her lawyer and attempted to reopen the case on her own. The lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT generated legal arguments asserting that her former counsel had pressured her into signing a blank signature page. She filed a motion based on those arguments, which Nippon says violated the settlement agreement releasing the company from future claims.According to the complaint, Dela Torre then submitted numerous additional filings drafted with the chatbot's help, including more than twenty motions and other court documents. The court rejected her attempt to reopen the case and upheld the settlement as valid. Despite that ruling, she allegedly used ChatGPT again to prepare a new lawsuit asserting claims such as fraudulent misrepresentation and interference with disability benefits. Nippon says she has filed dozens of motions that serve no legitimate legal purpose, forcing the company to spend significant time responding. The insurer is now seeking damages and an injunction preventing OpenAI from providing legal assistance to Dela Torre, while OpenAI has dismissed the claims as meritless.OpenAI Practices Law Without A License, Insurer Alleges - Law360A coalition of 24 states has filed a lawsuit challenging new global tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The case was brought in the U.S. Court of International Trade and seeks to block tariffs introduced on February 20 under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The states argue the administration rushed to impose the tariffs only hours after the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated an earlier set of trade measures that had been issued under a different statute. According to the complaint, the new tariffs were an attempt to revive similar trade restrictions using a separate legal authority.The policy first imposed a 10% tariff on imports worldwide and was raised to the statute's maximum 15% the following day. The administration justified the move by claiming it was necessary to address serious U.S. balance-of-payments deficits. However, the states argue that such deficits do not actually exist and that the government selectively relied on negative data while ignoring overall positive financial inflows. They claim this misuse of the statute mirrors the earlier tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down.The lawsuit also argues that the tariffs violate the Constitution because the authority to impose taxes and duties belongs to Congress. The Supreme Court recently emphasized this principle when it ruled against the administration's earlier tariff policy. According to the states, Section 122 was originally enacted to address problems tied to an outdated international currency system that no longer exists today. Because the statutory conditions cannot be met, the coalition argues the president's tariffs are unlawful. The states are asking the court to invalidate the measures before they remain in effect through the summer.Two Dozen States Sue Trump to Halt New Global Tariffs - Law360Twenty-four US states file lawsuit to stop Trump's latest global tariffs | ReutersA federal trade judge is meeting privately with government lawyers to determine how the United States will refund billions of dollars in tariffs that courts recently ruled unconstitutional. Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade scheduled the closed-door meeting as a settlement conference to discuss a practical process for returning money to importers. The tariffs at issue were a major part of President Donald Trump's trade policy but were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in February for exceeding presidential authority. Because the Court did not provide guidance on how refunds should be handled, lower courts are now working to establish a workable procedure.The scale of the refunds could be enormous, potentially reaching $175 billion and affecting more than 300,000 importers. Government attorneys have warned that processing the reimbursements will be unusually complex because it may involve manual review of tens of millions of tariff payments. Many of the affected importers are small businesses concerned about the cost and administrative burden of seeking repayment. Judge Eaton has indicated that he wants a system that avoids forcing companies to file individual lawsuits.The issue arose in a case filed by Atmus Filtration Inc., which claims it paid $11 million in unlawful tariffs. Eaton recently ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to begin using its internal processes to refund tariffs not only to Atmus but potentially to all affected importers. The upcoming conference is expected to focus on how the agency can efficiently review roughly 79 million shipments and distribute refunds. Attorneys involved in related cases believe the meeting could lead to a standardized process that allows most businesses to receive reimbursements without extended litigation.Exclusive: US judge to meet parties on Trump-tariff refunds in closed-door ‘settlement conference' | ReutersA federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump has the authority to suspend refugee admissions to the United States, reversing most of a lower court decision that had blocked the policy. The ruling came from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The judges concluded that federal law gives the president broad power to restrict the entry of foreign nationals when he believes it serves national interests. As a result, the panel allowed Trump's halt of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program to remain in place.The policy was introduced shortly after Trump took office in 2025 and paused the admission of refugees while the administration reviewed whether the program ensured proper assimilation. Refugees, their family members, and several resettlement organizations filed a class action lawsuit challenging the move. A federal judge in Seattle had previously issued injunctions blocking the suspension and related actions. However, the Ninth Circuit determined that most of those rulings exceeded the district court's authority.Writing for the panel, Judge Jay Bybee acknowledged that the decision could have serious real-world consequences for thousands of refugees who had already completed years of vetting and were awaiting resettlement. Despite those concerns, the court emphasized that Congress granted the president sweeping authority over immigration entry decisions. The judges said policy judgments about refugee admissions belong to the executive branch rather than the courts.The panel did leave some portions of the lower court's order in place. It upheld injunctions that prevent the government from cutting services to refugees who have already been admitted to the United States and from terminating certain agreements with refugee support organizations. One judge dissented in part, arguing that the district court's injunctions should have been entirely overturned.Trump can suspend refugee admissions, US appeals court rules | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In this episode, host April Walker, CPA, CGMA, Senior Manager — AICPA & CIMA, is joined by Kasey Pittman, Managing Director of Tax Policy — Cherry Bekaert.  A recent Supreme Court decision invalidated key tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — raising major questions about refunds, executive authority and what comes next. We discuss the ruling itself, explain what tariffs are impacted and outline practical steps tax practitioners should consider right now for importer clients.   What you'll learn from this episode: ·       Why the Supreme Court invalidated the IEEPA tariffs ·       Which tariffs are affected and which remain in place ·       What we know (and don't know) about potential refunds ·       How tax practitioners with importer clients can add value right now ·       What to watch next in tariff policy AICPA resources Supreme Court decisions: Implications for the tax and accounting profession Tariff Resource Center Tax implications of tariffs Other resources   Global Business Alliance (GBA) Tariff Tracker      Keep your finger on the pulse of the dynamic and evolving tax landscape with insights from tax thought leaders in the AICPA Tax Section. The Tax Section Odyssey podcast includes a digest of tax developments, trending issues and practice management tips that you need to be aware of to elevate your professional development and your firm practices. This resource is part of the robust tax resource library available from the AICPA Tax Section. The Tax Section is your go-to home base for staying up to date on the latest tax developments and providing the edge you need for upskilling your professional development. If you're not already a member, consider joining this prestigious community of your tax peers. You'll get free CPE, access to rich technical content such as our Annual Tax Compliance Kit, a weekly member newsletter and a digital subscription to The Tax Adviser.

✨Trending Items:

A.M. Edition for Mar. 5. The Trump administration is on the hook for billions in tariff refunds. WSJ global economics correspondent Tom Fairless says that provides some relief for the more than 2,000 companies who are looking to claw back money they've paid in duties. Plus, China cuts its economic growth forecast as it preps for an era of slower expansion. And Europe ups its support for the U.S. war on Iran but many countries remain critical. WSJ's Max Colchester and Austin Ramzy explain why the strikes on Iran have divided U.S. allies and adversaries equally. Luke Vargas hosts. Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In our news wrap Thursday, a group of states is suing the Trump administration over its planned 15% global tariff, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Latin American countries to step up their fight against drug cartels and Cuban officials say Washington's oil blockade of the island is at least partly to blame for a widespread blackout that left millions in the dark. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

From Iran strategy to multi-trillion-dollar tariff refunds and a nationwide crackdown on illegal employment, we break down Trump's latest moves and their massive impact on America. Plus, a surprising health tip that's going viral: bone broth as the ultimate joint booster. Episode Summary In this episode, we cover three major areas shaping today's political and economic landscape: 1. Iran & Military Approval Polling shows 76% of Americans approve of swift military action if it's short-term. Approval drops sharply if conflict drags on. Trump's team is focused on a fast, decisive strategy to realign the Middle East, leveraging next-generation technology. Gulf states are implicitly aligning with the U.S. and Israel due to Iran's missteps — a new regional coalition is forming. The lesson: extreme military action can be precise, limited, and effective without escalating into prolonged wars. 2. Trump Tariffs & Multi-Trillion-Dollar Refunds The Supreme Court ruled companies can claim refunds for Trump-era tariffs — estimated at $300–360 billion, potentially rising to $1–2 trillion including damages and interest. Law firms are already buying rights to claims, betting they can recover more than they pay out. Strategic, short-term tariffs remain a non-violent way to exert U.S. economic power, forcing trade compliance while avoiding long-term harm. 3. Immigration Enforcement & DHS Action The Department of Homeland Security is bypassing the IRS to directly enforce legal work requirements. Employers nationwide are being investigated for hiring undocumented workers; thousands of illegal employees are being removed from payrolls and welfare programs. This crackdown is the most significant seen in decades, with millions potentially self-deporting due to lost benefits and job restrictions. Red states are cooperating, while sanctuary states resist; federal action is being taken to regain control. 4. Health & Lifestyle Segment Bone broth is emerging as a viral wellness trend for joint health. Rich in protein, collagen, and nutrients, it supports joint repair and reduces stiffness. Recommended starting dose: 8 ounces per day, gradually increasing. Supplements like MSM, glucosamine, and chondroitin can also help. Bonus: bone broth cocktails, like the “bloody bowl,” are gaining popularity as a tasty way to consume this health powerhouse. This episode combines high-stakes politics, economic strategy, immigration enforcement, and practical health advice — all impacting Americans today. Key Topics U.S. military strategy and Iran polling Trump-era tariffs: refunds and law firm claims Homeland Security crackdown on illegal employment Welfare reductions and self-deportation programs Strategic use of trade and tariffs as non-violent leverage Bone broth for joint health and emerging wellness trends

The trucking industry is facing pressure from every direction .... the courtroom, the criminal underworld, and regulators.In this episode we break down a major U.S. Supreme Court case that could redefine broker liability and determine whether freight brokers can be sued for negligent carrier selection after crashes.If the Court expands liability, it could reshape how freight is matched, how carriers are vetted, and how insurance markets price risk across the industry.We also dive deep into the growing crisis of freight fraud and cargo theft, speaking with investigative journalist Phillip Brink, the new head of Fraud Media & Education at FreightWaves and CEO of The Bannon Report. Brink exposes how organized crime rings are infiltrating the freight marketplace and how scammers are impersonating legitimate carriers to steal high-value loads.Plus, Dale Prax of FreightValidate and Truckstop.com joins the show to discuss regulatory compliance issues including UCR enforcement, the implications of the Supreme Court case, and what carriers and brokers should be doing right now to protect themselves.Topics include:• The Supreme Court case that could change broker liability• Negligent carrier selection and the future of freight brokerage• How cargo theft rings are professionalizing their operations• The rise of freight fraud and identity theft in trucking• Compliance issues every carrier should understand• What the industry must do to restore trust in the freight marketplaceTrucking is changing fast  and the consequences are reaching the highest court in the country.This is Brake Check, the industry wake-up call. Follow the Brake Check Podcast Other FreightWaves Shows Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you had told Jan a year ago she would bring a member of Congress onto this show, she would have said you were crazy.But this isn't about politics.It's about survival.It's about supply chains, tariffs, China, semiconductors, and the reality that policy decisions now move faster than most production lines.In this episode of the Automotive Leaders Podcast, Jan Griffiths sits down with Congresswoman Haley Stevens, often called the “manufacturing geek,” for a direct conversation about industrial policy, public-private partnership, national security, and what automotive leaders should expect from Washington.Whether we like it or not, policy volatility is now a leadership variable.Themes Discussed in this EpisodeWhy Manufacturing Mondays keep policymakers grounded in shop-floor realityLessons from the 2008–2009 auto rescue and bipartisan public-private partnershipThe Chips and Science Act and reshoring semiconductor productionChina's 95% dominance in rare earth processing and why it mattersCritical minerals, battery recycling, and national competitivenessTariff volatility and the cost of policy uncertaintyUSMCA review, Canada relationships, and North American stabilityThe Chinese OEM threat and rule-based trade enforcementWhat automotive leaders can expect from policymakers moving forward

In this March 5 episode of Badlands Daily, CannCon and Alpha Warrior walk through the rapidly evolving geopolitical and economic landscape, focusing on the strategic use of tariffs, global negotiations, and how pressure can be applied without traditional warfare. The conversation centers on President Trump's approach to economic leverage, particularly through tariffs, and how these tools reshape negotiations on the world stage. The hosts explore how economic pressure can function as a diplomatic weapon, forcing adversaries and allies alike to reconsider long-standing arrangements. They examine how media narratives often frame tariffs as reckless escalation while ignoring their role as negotiating leverage. CannCon and Alpha also discuss the broader implications of ongoing peace talks and how strategic pressure can create openings for resolution rather than conflict. Throughout the episode, they emphasize the importance of recognizing narrative framing, questioning headlines, and understanding the difference between economic confrontation and actual war. The discussion blends economic strategy, geopolitics, and media skepticism while encouraging listeners to look beyond surface-level reporting.

Listen for the latest from Bloomberg News See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mike Armstrong and Paul Lane explain why thousands of companies are seeking refunds, the legal fight still ahead, and why the process could become a logistical nightmare—especially for smaller businesses trying to recover the money they paid. They also discuss rising oil prices and market volatility tied to the Middle East conflict, why energy stocks are outperforming while tech continues to lag in 2026, new warnings about AI-powered financial scams targeting Americans, and key retirement planning strategies investors should understand before required minimum distributions begin.

"I ran across an article listing musicians who are in both the Rock and the Country Halls of Fame. There aren't many. When I started looking into it further I found that the people on the list were in multiple other Halls of Fame as well. I wanted to find out what musician is in the most Halls. There is a clear winner."

Hosts: Lalo Solorzano Guests: Eric Hargraves – Elliott Davis Cindy Allen – Trade Force Multiplier Mark Segrist – Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg Recorded Live At: The International Compliance Professionals Association (ICPA) Annual Conference in San Antonio. Episode Summary In this special live conference episode, Lalo sits down with three trade experts at the ICPA Annual Conference to unpack one of the biggest trade law developments in years: the Supreme Court ruling limiting the use of IEEPA for tariff authority. Together, Eric Hargraves, Cindy Allen, and Mark Segrist break down what the decision actually means, how the administration pivoted immediately to other tariff tools, and why importers should not assume refunds are guaranteed. The conversation dives into the legal fallout, enforcement uncertainty, and compliance strategies companies should be thinking about right now, including protests, litigation strategies, and how trade compliance is rapidly becoming a C-suite level issue. If you're trying to understand the real-world impact of the ruling, tariff stacking, and what actions importers should be taking today, this discussion delivers practical insight straight from the conference floor. Key Takeaways The Supreme Court Limited Presidential Tariff Authority Under IEEPA The Court ruled that the president cannot impose tariffs using IEEPA, emphasizing that taxation powers belong to Congress under the Constitution. The Administration Immediately Pivoted to Other Tools With IEEPA tariffs struck down, the administration quickly shifted toward Section 122 and other statutory authorities, showing that tariff policy will continue through different mechanisms. Tariff Stacking and Complexity Are Increasing Importers now face potential layers of tariffs under Section 232, Section 301, Section 122, and other mechanisms, making duty calculations and compliance far more complex. Refunds Are Not Guaranteed Even though the ruling invalidated certain tariffs, experts warn that refunds are not automatic, and companies must actively preserve their rights. Importers Must Take Action Now Companies should be monitoring liquidation dates, filing protests when necessary, and considering litigation options to protect their ability to recover duties. Trade Compliance Is Now a Strategic Function Trade and customs issues have moved from back-office compliance work to strategic discussions at the executive level, impacting supply chains, costs, and global operations. Notable Topics Discussed The Supreme Court decision on IEEPA tariffs Section 122 as the administration's immediate fallback tool How tariff stacking affects real duty rates Litigation strategies and the growing role of the Court of International Trade Why companies should file protests and protect their refund rights The rise of trade compliance as a strategic corporate function Resources & References International Compliance Professionals Association (ICPA) ICPA on LinkedIn ICPA LinkedIn Group About the Guests Eric Hargraves A trade and customs specialist with Elliott Davis who advises companies on navigating complex regulatory frameworks and trade enforcement issues. Cindy Allen Founder of Trade Force Multiplier and a leading voice in customs compliance, supply chain strategy, and global trade education. Mark Segrist Attorney with Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg focusing on international trade law, customs regulations, and tariff litigation. Join the Conversation What do you think this ruling means for importers and future tariff policy? Join the discussion and share your thoughts with the Simply Trade community. Credits Host: Lalo Solorzano Guests: Eric Hargraves Cindy Allen Mark Segrist Produced by: Global Training Center Subscribe & Follow Follow Simply Trade to stay updated on the latest insights in global trade and customs compliance. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@simplytradepod Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/09m199JO6fuNumbcrHTkGq Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/simply-trade/id1640329690 Connect With Us Lalo Solorzano: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lalosolorzano/ Andy Shiles: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andyshiles/ Global Training Center: https://www.linkedin.com/company/global-training-center Join the Trade Geeks community: https://globaltrainingcenter.com/portal/

For today's episode, Lawfare Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson sits down with three leading scholars from the Georgetown University Law Center—Professor Kathleen Claussen, Professor Marty Lederman, and Visiting Scholar Peter Harrell of the Institute of International Economic Law—to talk through the Supreme Court's groundbreaking opinion in Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump, which invalidated the array of global tariffs that the Trump administration had imposed using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).Together, Scott and his guests break down the Court's opinion, weigh what it might mean for the Major Questions Doctrine and foreign relations law, and look ahead to the legal fights to come over the other tariff authorities the Trump administration is now using to pursue its agenda.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Phillip and Brian get deep on a week when everything felt a little unhinged: Shopify's AI sidekick started building custom apps, Iran allegedly took out AWS data centers mid-Claude-outage, and the McDonald's CEO went mega-viral just days after Phillip prophesied it. Underneath the chaos, a throughline emerges: the things we've used to measure value (view counts, credit card rewards, third-party apps, and AI contracts) are quietly expiring. Culture is first. Then comes commerce. This SKU Is Delicious Key takeaways: Shopify Sidekick can now build one-off apps on demand, raising real questions about the future of third-party SaaS. AI geopolitics is here: data centers are now strategic infrastructure, and the "human in the loop" question has military stakes. Meta's move to invoicing ends years of free credit card rewards for brands running paid social,  — and that party's been winding down anyway. MrBeast's long-form view counts are down 50% YoY, even with heavy paid promotion; the algorithm has shifted to interest-based, not subscriber-based. Media buyers optimizing for CPMs are chasing non-real traffic. — Rrecovering a sense of propriety is the only way back. In-Show Mentions: How MrBeast Dominated 2025 Using Advertising Phillip's Big Arch burger virality prediction Get on the list for the Future Commerce x Shoptalk After Party Associated Links: Check out Future Commerce on YouTube Check out Future Commerce Plus for exclusive content and save on merch and print Subscribe to Insiders and The Senses to read more about what we are witnessing in the commerce world Listen to our other episodes of Future Commerce Have any questions or comments about the show? Let us know on futurecommerce.com, or reach out to us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn. We love hearing from our listeners! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

From time to time, we'll re-air a previous episode of the show that our newer audience may have missed. During this episode, Santosh is joined by Ian Fletcher and Marc Fasteau, Co-Authors of “Industrial Policy for the United States: Winning the Competition for Good Jobs and High-Value Industries." In this conversation, Marc and Ian emphasize the need for a strategic approach to support key industries, highlighting the importance of government-sponsored research, trade protection, and a competitively valued currency. The conversation also covers the role of tariffs, workforce development, and the necessity of a unified economic strategy. The group advocates for intentional policies to foster economic growth, innovation, competitiveness in the global market, and more.  Highlights from their conversation include: Introducing Marc and Ian and the New Book (0:41) Defining Modern Industrial Policy (4:33) Industry-Based Economic View (5:35) Importance of Industry Selection (7:23) Global Perspectives on Industrial Policy (11:25) Three Pillars of Industrial Policy (17:26) List of Industrial Policy Tools (19:16) Granularity of Industrial Policy (25:27) Role of Tariffs in Industrial Policy (26:49) Workforce Development and Automation (29:00) Future of U.S. Industrial Policy (30:58) Challenges of Policy Silos (31:36) Hope for Unified Discipline in Industrial Policy (32:24) Dynamo is a VC firm led by supply chain and mobility specialists that focus on seed-stage, enterprise startups. Find out more at: https://www.dynamo.vc/ Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Let's talk about the Tariff Refund Act trying to get your money back....

In this episode of John Solomon Reports, we tackle a pressing issue that has taken the nation by storm—the tin can crisis in America. Kicking off the discussion, Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin shares insights on the challenges posed by the current situation and outlines potential solutions to this growing concern.We also hear from Congressman Tom McClintock of California, who advocates for temporary relief on tariffs to ensure that American businesses can thrive without giving an unfair advantage to foreign competitors. His perspective is crucial in understanding the broader implications of the tin can and tin plate shortages.Additionally, Congressman Tom M. Tiffany joins us from Wisconsin, shedding light on the agricultural impact of this crisis, especially given his state's significant canning operations. As the likely Republican nominee for governor, he also shares his thoughts on the upcoming election and its importance for Wisconsin's future.To wrap up the episode, we delve into a chilling story from investigative reporter John Sommer about a realtor in California who deceitfully stole a house from unsuspecting homeowners. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

1. Supreme Court Tariff Decision A predicted 5–4 ruling upholding presidential tariff authority was incorrect; the Court ruled 6–3 against the administration’s use of one specific tariff statute (AIPA). Majority held that the statute allowed banning imports but not charging tariffs—a conclusion strongly criticized in the dissents (Kavanaugh, Thomas). Despite the ruling, the impact is expected to be limited, as the President has multiple other statutes still available to impose tariffs. A new 10–15% tariff was quickly announced using alternate legal authority. The administration still retains broad power using: Section 338 (1930 Tariff Act) – allows tariffs up to 50% for discriminatory treatment. Section 122 (Trade Act of 1974) – 15% tariffs for 150 days (renewable). Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974) – addresses unfair foreign trade practices. Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act of 1962) – tariffs for national‑security threats. Section 201 (Trade Act of 1974) – safeguard tariffs for import surges. Litigation may unfold for years, potentially costing billions over refunded or contested tariffs. China and Democrats were portrayed as celebrating the ruling, implying political dimension rather than policy substance. Administration aims to use tariffs as leverage for better trade deals, not as permanent protectionism. 2. State of the Union (SOTU) Speech Impact Speech viewed as effective, more disciplined, and likely helpful for midterm momentum. Highlighted major administration achievements: Border control and sharp decline in illegal crossings. Crime reductions (e.g., murder and overdose rates reportedly down by ~20%). Economic relief themes like no tax on tips and overtime. Strong emotional moments involving veterans, Olympians, and American heroes created bipartisan resonance. Speaker Johnson and congressional Republicans portrayed as unusually unified. Coordination with the President seen as stronger than in previous cycles. 3. The Olympic Contrast: Alysa Liu vs. Eileen Gu Alysa Liu Daughter of a Chinese refugee who fled Tiananmen Square. Target of CCP intimidation and espionage on U.S. soil. Required 24/7 FBI protection before the Beijing Olympics. Despite pressure, competed for Team USA and won gold. Story framed as patriotic, resilient, and emotionally powerful. Eileen Gu Also U.S.-born with Chinese heritage. Chose to compete for China after being offered substantial financial incentives. Criticism focused on choosing a communist regime over the U.S., though the speakers avoided personal attacks. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.