Podcasts about outcomes registry

MedLink Neurology Podcast is delighted to feature selected episodes from BrainWaves, courtesy of James E Siegler MD, its originator and host. BrainWaves is an academic audio podcast whose mission is to educate medical providers through clinical cases and topical reviews in neurology, medicine, and the humanities, and episodes originally aired from 2016 to 2021. Originally released: September 21, 2017 Atrial fibrillation increases your risk of clotting. Anticoagulation increases your risk of bleeding. Surgery increases your risk of both. Dr. Mike Rubenstein speaks with Dr. Jim Siegler this week about how providers weigh the risks and benefits of anticoagulant bridging in the perioperative setting. Produced by Michael Rubenstein and James E Siegler. Music by Chris Zabriskie, Lee Rosevere, and Jason Shaw. Voiceover by Erika Mejia. BrainWaves' podcasts and online content are intended for medical education only and should not be used for clinical decision-making. REFERENCES Garcia DA, Regan S, Henault LE, et al. Risk of thromboembolism with short-term interruption of warfarin therapy. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(1):63-9. PMID 18195197Raval AN, Cigarroa JE, Chung MK, et al. Management of patients on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the acute care and periprocedural setting: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;135(10):e604-33. Erratum in: Circulation 2017;135(10 ):e647. Erratum in: Circulation 2017;135(24):e1144. PMID 28167634Rechenmacher SJ, Fang JC. Bridging anticoagulation: primum non nocere. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66(12):1392-403. PMID 26383727Schulman S, Carrier M, Lee AY, et al. Perioperative management of dabigatran: a prospective cohort study. Circulation 2015;132(3):167-73. PMID 25966905Steinberg BA, Peterson ED, Kim S, et al. Use and outcomes associated with bridging during anticoagulation interruptions in patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). Circulation 2015;131(5):488-94. PMID 25499873Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study. Final results. Circulation 1991;84(2):527-39. PMID 1860198  We believe that the principles expressed or implied in the podcast remain valid, but certain details may be superseded by evolving knowledge since the episode's original release date. 

Bob Harrington and Manesh Patel discuss sudden cardiac death in athletes and the importance of the chain of survival. This podcast is intended for healthcare professionals only. To read a transcript or to comment, visit https://www.medscape.com/author/bob-harrington COVID and the Athlete's Heart https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/945282 Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.029052 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000937 Point-of-care screening for HFrEF using artificial intelligence during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00256-9 International recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw631 Elevation of Cardiac Troponins After Endurance Running Competitions https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034655 Vigorous Exercise in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1042 Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Preamble, Principles, and General Considerations https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000236 RACE-CARS Trial https://racecarstrial.org/ AHA CPR Resources https://cpr.heart.org/en/cpr-courses-and-kits/hands-only-cpr You may also like: Medscape editor-in-chief Eric Topol, MD, and master storyteller and clinician Abraham Verghese, MD, on Medicine and the Machine   https://www.medscape.com/features/public/machine Hear John Mandrola, MD's summary and perspective on the top cardiology news each week, on This Week in Cardiology   https://www.medscape.com/twic Questions or feedback, please contact   news@medscape.net

This week, please join author Ronald Goldberg, Editorialist Hertzel Gerstein, and Guest Editor Rury Holman as we discuss the article "Effects of Long-term Metformin and Lifestyle Interventions on Cardiovascular Events in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcome Study" and the editorial "Shouldn't Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Also Prevent Its Long-Term Consequences?" Dr. Carolyn Lam: Welcome to Circulation on the Run, your weekly podcast summary and backstage pass to the journal and its editors. We're your co-host. I'm Dr. Carolyn Lam, Associate Editor from the National Heart Centre and Duke National University of Singapore. Dr. Greg Hundley: And I'm Dr. Greg Hundley, Associate Editor, Director of the Pauley Heart Center at VCU Health in Richmond, Virginia. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Today. Oh, this feature discussion involves the glance of diabetes. Truly this interview, I felt like I was sitting among gurus and just learning so much about diabetes, the history and the whole topic is about long term metformin and lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular events in the Diabetes Prevention Program and its outcome study. Now, way more than that, we discussed. You have to have to listen. But okay, before that, let's summarize today's issue for our listeners. Shall we, Greg? Dr. Greg Hundley: You bet Carolyn. So the first paper that I've got to discuss today really comes to us from the world of interventional cardiology and it's led by Dr. William Fearon from Stanford University Medical Center. Well, Carolyn previous studies have shown quality of life improves after coronary artery revascularization, more so after coronary artery bypass grafting than after PCI. Now this study aimed to evaluate the impact of fractional flow reserve guidance, and current generation zotarolimus drug-eluting stents on quality of life after PCI compared with CABG. Dr. Greg Hundley: Now the study emanates from fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multi vessel evaluation or the fame three trial. And Carolyn, that's a multicenter international trial that included 1500 patients with three vessel coronary artery disease who were randomly assigned to either CABG or FFR guided PCI. Now, what did they assess? So quality of life was measured using the European Quality of life Five Dimensions. And we're going to abbreviate that EQ-5D questionnaire baseline, one, and then 12 months following the procedure. Also, Canadian cardiovascular class angina grade and working status were assessed at the same time points, and then also an additional time point in six months. And the primary objective was to compare the EQ-5D summary index at 12 months, and secondary endpoints included angina grade and work status. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Ooh, interesting Greg. So quality of life in the theme three trial. All right. So what did they find? Dr. Greg Hundley: Right, Carolyn. So the EQ-5D, so that... European Quality of life Five Dimensions summary index at 12 months did not differ between the PCI and CABG groups, but the trajectory over the 12 months at the one month time interval between PCI and CABG did differ. Now, the proportion of patients with the Canadian cardiovascular class or CCS2 or greater angina 12 months was 6.2% versus 3.1% respectively in the PCI group compared with the CABG group. Additionally, a greater percentage of younger patients, so those less than 65 years old were working at 12 months in the PCI group compared with the CABG group. So in summary, Carolyn, in the fame three trial, quality of life after fractional flow reserve guided PCI with current generation DS compared with CABG was similar in one year. And the rate of significant angina was low in both groups and not significantly different. However, the trajectory of improvement in quality of life was significantly better with PCI as was working status in those less than 65 years old. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Wow. Thanks Greg. Hey, guess what? It's time for Greg quiz. The next paper is about the Chocolate Touch Study. So, Greg, is this about, A, the benefits of eating chocolate? B, the benefits of chocolate mud baths? Or C, the benefits of a second generation drug coated balloon? Dr. Greg Hundley: So, Carolyn, I just have one question. Where in the world do we get the benefits of chocolate mud bath? I don't think that's right. I do love eating chocolate, but I am going to go with the benefits of the second generation drug coated balloon. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Yeah, yeah, yeah. I made it easy for you. All right. So first generation drug coated balloons have significantly reduced the rate of restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty alone. However, high rates of bailout stenting and dissections persist. The chocolate touch drug coated balloon is a nitinol constrained balloon designed to reduce acute vessel trauma and inhibit neointima formation and restenosis, so you were right, Greg. In today's study led by Dr. Shishehbor, from University Hospital's Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute at Cleveland, Ohio. They studied 313 patients with claudication or ischemic rest pain, and superficial femoral or popliteal disease. And randomized them one to one to the chocolate touch or Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon at 34 sites in the United States, Europe and New Zealand. The primary efficacy endpoint was drug coated balloon success defined as primary patency at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events at 12 months. A composite of target limb related death, major amputations, or reintervention. Both primary endpoints was assessed for non-inferiority and have met sequential superiority testing for efficacy was pre-specified. Dr. Greg Hundley: Interesting, Carolyn. So this nitinol constrained balloon designed to reduce acute vessel trauma. So, what were the results of this study? Dr. Carolyn Lam: So in this trial, the second generation chocolate touch drug coated balloon met both non-inferiority endpoints for efficacy and safety. And was more effective than the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon at 12 months for the treatment of femoral popliteal disease. Cool, huh? Dr. Greg Hundley: Very interesting. Great summary, Carolyn. So Carolyn, my next paper comes to us from the world of preclinical science. And the impact of three dimensional chromatin topology on transcriptional dysregulation and pathogenesis in human dilated cardiomyopathy remains elusive. And so these authors led by Professor Lei Jiang from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, and Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, generated a compendium of 3D epigenome and transcriptome maps from 101 biobank human dilated cardiomyopathy, and non-filing heart tissues and mouse models to further interrogate the key transcription factor implicated in 3D chromatin organization, and transcriptional regulation in dilated cardiomyopathy pathogenesis. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Oh, wow. Sounds like a lot of work. What did they find, Greg? Dr. Greg Hundley: Right, Carolyn. So they found that enhancer promoter connectomes are extensively rewired in human dilated cardiomyopathy, which reside in pre accessible chromatin size and also hand one drives the rewiring of enhancer promoter connectome to induce dilated cardiomyopathy pathogenesis. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Okay, Greg. So what are the clinical implications? Dr. Greg Hundley: Right, Carolyn. So first, dilated cardiomyopathy enriched enhancer promoter loops identified in this study could be developed as novel 3D genomic biomarkers for dilated cardiomyopathy. And then second Carolyn, targeting hand one might be used as a novel approach for therapeutic intervention in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Oh, nice. Greg. Well, also in today's issue, there's an On My Mind paper by Dr. Brook, entitled, “The Doctor is Out, New Tactics and Soldiers For our Losing Battle against Hypertension.” In another paper, we have Molly Klemarczyk bringing us highlights from the Circulation Family of Journals. Dr. Greg Hundley: Right, Carolyn. And also from the mailbag, there's a Research Letter from Professor Baggish, entitled, “Cardiovascular Outcomes in Collegiate Athletes, Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The 1-Year Follow Up From the Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Condition in Athletes.” Well, Carolyn, how about now we get onto that feature discussion and learn a little bit more about the long term metformin and lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular events in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Hold on to your seats, everyone. Here we go. We know that lifestyle intervention and metformin have been shown to prevent diabetes. However, what is their efficacy in preventing the cardiovascular disease associated with diabetes development? Well, guess what? We're going to have data on that through today's feature paper and what a star crowd I'm talking to today. We have Dr. Ron Goldberg and he's a first end corresponding author from the University of Miami Diabetes Research Institute. We have the editorialist Dr. Hertzel Gerstein from McMaster University Population Health Research Institute. And a guest editor for this paper, Dr. Rury Holman from University of Oxford. I have to admit I'm starstruck. You gentlemen have totally defined the field. I cannot wait to learn more, but shall we start with you, Dr. Goldberg? Could you tell us a little bit more about your paper, what you did, what'd you found? Dr. Ronald Goldberg: So the background is that the Diabetes Prevention Program started in 1996 was a Diabetes Prevention Program to test the effects of intensive lifestyle intervention versus metformin, versus placebo on the prevention of diabetes in over 3000 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, a form of prediabetes. And after demonstrating the efficacy of those interventions over about three years, we went on to do a follow up study in which the metformin group continued to receive it. Everybody got lifestyle because it worked so effectively. And we are now reporting after a further 18 years of follow up on the question of whether these interventions, now 21 years later, had any effect on cardiovascular outcomes. The background to that of course, is that people with prediabetes have a somewhat increased risk for heart disease and that rate increases as diabetes develops, particularly with severity of hyperglycemia and duration of diabetes. So, that was the study and we're now reporting on whether these interventions had a significant effect on the major cardiovascular. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Well, first Dr. Goldberg, congratulations on the foresight to get the informed consent and to plan ahead to be able to get these valuable data. But because I know this is going to be a critical point later. Could you tell us a little bit about the completeness of follow up and perhaps surveillance for outcomes before you share the results? Dr. Ronald Goldberg: Absolutely. So, 86% of the original randomized group of participants agreed to continue with a follow up study, so there was a loss at that point. And then of course, over 18 years of follow up, there's going to be a further loss. Some due to death and some due to loss to follow up. But despite that, I would say the group that entered the follow up study, we were able to maintain follow up in 85%. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Fantastic. And the results? Dr. Ronald Goldberg: The findings were that we found no significant effect of either of the two active interventions on our primary cardiovascular outcome, which was nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke and fatal cardiovascular disease. We also had an extended outcome with more events in it, and similarly found no significant benefit or harm from either of those two intervention. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Oh, I love that paper. What a great, great, perhaps surprising conclusion that Dr. Gerstein loved the title of your editorial, you crystallize it. Shouldn't preventing type two diabetes also prevent long term consequences? So please tell us what was your thoughts when you saw this paper and how you frame it? Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: Thanks very much, Carolyn. And first of all, I was very impressed by the extensive amount of work and analysis done by Dr. Goldberg and his team. I thought that it's wonderful to see this sort of long term follow up. I've had the privilege in the past of speaking together with the DPP team on their trial and in their long term follow up. And I continue to be impressed by the extensive amounts of work and data collected and a rigor and academic value of the analysis. So, that was my very first impression and obviously it's a pleasure to write on this. I think the findings are clearly important and they both highlight the importance of long-term follow up as well as highlight the difficulties of long-term follow up in a study like this. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: So this was a study done in a trial, originally done in a fairly young cohort of individuals who had very low risk for cardiovascular events. And over their 18 year follow up that Dr. Goldberg Ron described, the actual annual event rate for the primary outcome was 0.6% per year in that ballpark. Now, anybody... I've had the privilege as Ron Avery of doing many cardiovascular trials and we all know that we would never start a trial recruiting people with an event rate of 0.5% per year, 0.6% per year, because we would have to recruit 30,000 people and follow them for seven years in order to accrue enough events to be able to detect a clinically relevant benefit of the therapy. So because of this low event rate, the advantage was the long term follow up, the 26th year, I think it was in the end follow up. No, it was a 21 year median follow up period, because of the long follow up, you get a little bit away from the advantage of the low event rate. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: But even then, over the course of the 21 years, there were only about 310 first cardiovascular events and most cardiovascular outcomes trials, for instance, we need close to at least a 1000, 500 to a 1000 is what we like to see. So that being said, it's perhaps not surprising that we didn't see a benefit of diabetes prevention because even if diabetes reduces the risk of a cardiovascular event by a quarter, by 25%, there would've only been a 50, 50 chance of detecting that with this particular cohort of people. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: So I would say that the most conservative assumption is that diabetes prevention doesn't reduce the event rate by 25% or less or 30, but it's certainly... pardon me, by 25% or more, it could reduce it by 20%, 15% we would not have detected at all, or Ron would not have detected and his team would not have detected it with this thing. So I think that to me is the most important caveat in interpreting this does not mean that diabetes prevention has no effect on cardiovascular outcomes. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: It means that diabetes prevention doesn't have a moderate or smaller effect. So, that's I think the most important message to take and as is even mentioned in the paper by Ron and the team is that there has been at least one diabetes prevention trial conducted in China many, many years ago that showed clearly that people who were randomly assigned to the diabetes prevention arm, 26 years later did have lower cardiovascular events and even death than people who were in the control arm. So, I think this adds to the story but it's clearly like everything, not the final word in this, but it certainly adds a lot of important data. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Oh, I would love to hear Dr. Goldberg's response to that. But before that, Dr. Holman, could I ask you to weigh in as well? Dr. Rury Holman: Yes. Sure. So, I agree with Hertzel that this is underpowered, but this is a question I've long wanted to see the answer to. And I congratulate Ron and his team for actually doing the work. All major studies should have long term follow up. People should be consented for life so that we can answer these questions. And Hertzel even though the power is perhaps minimal, we still need to do this analysis. Dr. Rury Holman: And if there had been a dramatic result, then we'd have all been very excited. I think one of the issues... one, if I could just bring it up, you mentioned the look ahead study in your discussion as being a negative dietary intervention. But I have a slightly different take on that. When you look at that paper in detail, what you see is that the people in the usual care group forgot quite a lot more risk factor reduction medications, and that's because their usual care physicians spotted the fact that their risk factor levels were higher than in the intensive care group, of course it was blinded at that point. But there's a whole point here is, in your paper you show an increase in the statin proportion, which is higher in the placebo group compared with the metformin and your intensive lifestyle, significantly so for the lifestyle one. So I'm just wondering whether even the low power was further blunted by the drop in effects of these other medications. Dr. Ronald Goldberg: Thanks very much for those comments guys, I think they're spot on. Let me first respond Hertzel with my thoughts on this, and then go over to your point, Rury. I think it's really interesting to look back over time and realize how much medical management has changed. And that goes right to your point, Rury, that doing a clinical trial like this where the primary care physicians are informed about what we're doing, what... communicated with on a regular basis, particularly when their patients develop diabetes, it just heightens the entire level of medical management. And I think you're absolutely right, but it's interesting to see what's happened to cardiovascular disease over the last 25 years, both in the general population and in the prediabetic population, the risk of cardiovascular disease has gone down. And then on top of that, we've got this very intensive cardio prevention intervention by primary care physicians, with high rates of statin usage, high rates of any hypertensive treatment, even the placebo group to your question, really lost weight. Dr. Ronald Goldberg: And they knew full well what was... and this was a very hands on type of study where our participants were really followed now for all these years, really became integrated with the research team. And so everybody knew what everybody else was doing. And so I'm sure the placebo effect was very strong, but I think nevertheless... Oh, and the last point I wanted to make was of course, the severity of the diabetes, even though 60% are developed diabetes, the severity of the diabetes was relatively mild. Even in those who developed diabetes, we know their average A1C was only about 6.7. And so I think that has a lot to do with blunting the acceleration effect of diabetes on cardiovascular disease. So, I think all of these factors contributed together to produce a negative result. But I think an important message, nevertheless. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: I can highlight that point, that Ron was saying is that if diabetes prevention is going to prevent cardiovascular outcomes, it's going to do that because of a difference in glycemic exposure. The diabetes is by definition a disease of an elevated blood sugar. So if diabetes prevention prevents cardio, it means that the blood sugar's going to be lower than it would otherwise be. So if there's very little difference over the long term follow up in blood sugar because of co-intervention and therapy of all the treatment groups, then that would eliminate a lot of the benefits of diabetes prevention, because these are patients who are in this trial, who are being scrutinized even more than they would be if they were out there free range without being involved in any follow up. So, that's a spot on point. Rury, you wanted to comment. Dr. Rury Holman: Yeah. So, Hertzel just to expand on that. Obviously the glycemic impact on macrovascular disease is relatively modest compared to the impact on microvascular disease, which of course is what we all saw originally with type 2 diabetes. In fact, in KPDS35, when we looked or calculated what 1% reduction in A1C would do, it would only reduce stroke or MI by about 12 to 14%. So it's quite a shallow slope if you like. And your point is spot on is if that glucose levels are kept low by good treatment and good management role tell us about the great team they have. Then there was no room for a glycemic impact in this particular study. It's another question, whether you think metformin acts by different mechanisms to reduce cardiovascular disease, that's another question I had for Ron that he might like to address, is if there was a magic effect of metformin, why didn't we see that? Dr. Ronald Goldberg: And that's a really interesting question, Rury, because you may be aware that we published a paper a few years ago on our assessment of coronary calcification in a subgroup, in about 60% of the population who agreed to do this and who were eligible. And interestingly found that metformin did was accompanied by a reduction in the prevalence of coronary calcium in men, not women. Dr. Ron Goldberg: And the effect was actually when we did subgroup analysis, we found it was particularly strong in young men. And actually that gave us some sense of optimism that we might see something when we came to actual events. And of course, as you all know, metformin has beneficial effects on several cardiovascular risk factors. And so the question is whether there is some effect of metformin that might yet be identified, a coronary calcium after all is a surrogate of events and may take time, or it may be that... And we are really interested in the idea that both prediabetes and diabetes are heterogeneous. There's more and more interest in looking at subgroups of individuals who may be more predisposed. And it may be that metformin might have beneficial effects in some of those subgroups. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: But also remember on the other hand, there was a lot of co-intervention with metformin in all groups after the trial was over. So all groups were offered metformin, et cetera. So even if metformin had an effect, it could have easily been washed out by the exposure of all the other groups to metformin during follow up. But Ron, you also touched on both the hope and the frustration too, because if we start thinking about subgroups, we can always think of subgroups. Yeah. But then the problem with subgroups is you have a study, let's say you have a cohort study with 7,000 or 10,000 people and it followed for five years and, oh, well the effect isn't in all 10,000, it's only in 20% of them. So now you have a study of 2000 people, that's not enough to detect an effect in a subgroup. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: So, subgroups just eat away at power in an exponential, not a linear way, so that you just rapidly lose any ability to detect anything. And so, yes, this is going to work in people with these three snips on this gene, in this subpopulation. Good luck, that's the difficulty and the challenge of... We need to find sometimes better or more efficient ways of identifying outcome protective therapies, because we can't keep drilling into some groups because we just don't have the resources to find it really. I don't know what other people feel about that, but. Dr. Carolyn Lam: I'm personally so enjoying this conversation as I know the audience is and we covered a lot. I'm sure everyone wants to pick up the paper and the editorial. Now, we talked about being underpowered for the number of studies. We talked about profitable dilution of things like statins, antihypertensive agents, even the crossover of potential treatment in the placebo arm and so on. And then we started talking about, or is it the how you got there and the drug that was used. And here, please don't shoot me, but I just know I have the answers on behalf of everyone else's thinking it. What do you say of people who go, "Well, it's because it's metformin. What if it was an SGLT2 inhibitor? What if it was a GLP-1 receptor agonist?" And as you know, a lot of people say those would in spite of the effect on glucose. Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: I can quickly jump in. It's very clear. We've learned this in the last 10 years, is that there are glucose lowering drugs and there are glucose lowering drugs with benefits. And the GLP-1 receptor agonist and the SGLT2 inhibitors are glucose lowering drugs with benefits. They lower glucose, but they seem to have a separate cardioprotective effect. And with the SGLT2 inhibitors that cardioprotective effect does not seem to be related to the glucose lowering. There are a few meta regression analyses that suggest that with the GLP-1 receptor agonist, part of the cardioprotective effect is related to glucose lowering and part is not. And clearly mediation analysis with some of the trials have shown the same thing with the GLP-1 receptor agonist, not really with the SGLT2 inhibitors. So, maybe, that's my spin on this. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Dr. Holman. Dr. Rury Holman: Yeah. I was going to echo what Hertzel said in that regard, these other agents do have multiple effects. They change weight, they change blood pressure. And so other risk factors are brought into play other than glucose lowerings. We've already agreed, glucose lowering impact on cardiovascular disease is quite modest. I'd rather have it than not, but it wouldn't be my primary way to treat cardiovascular disease. And coming back to Ron's study, which is crucial today, the issue here is whether we could untangle an impact particularly of metformin, which has been foundation drug for type 2 diabetes for so long. Dr. Rury Holman: But clearly within the dataset we have here, underpowered it is. There are no clear messages in that respect, which is disappointing, but it doesn't mean that there isn't an effect. With longer follow up, with more data than you might see it. When the study... I'm coming for you Hertzel, was stopped for futility then the hazard ratio has changed, that often the way, not for the right way, but it's often what happens when you stop studies. I wondered if you wanted to comment on that aspect, because I know it's something that you've talked a lot about. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Dr. Gerstein. Did you want to? Dr. Hertzel Gerstein: I agree with what Rury said. I think the point you're making Rury goes back to power, and the ability to have enough people and enough events to detect and effect and that's clearly true, so... Dr. Carolyn Lam: Well, I hate to be the one to break the party up, but we have gone over time and intentionally so, there's just so much learning here. But Dr. Goldberg, could I give you the last say please? What do you think is the important clinical take home message of your paper? Dr. Ron Goldberg: Well, I think that the fact that we demonstrated that our study has been able to maintain really low levels of cardiovascular risk factors, low levels of A1C, even though that likely contributed to the negative finding still leaves the physician where the recognition that it is important to identify individuals with prediabetes to Institute Diabetes Prevention Programs, because I think it's entirely possible as I said earlier, and we've begun to identify them, subgroups of individuals who do progress more rapidly and who do warrant a more effective treatment, which would come from an early intervention program. Dr. Carolyn Lam: Wow. Thank you so, so much for that. Thank you so much. All three gentlemen for this amazing discussion. Well, audience, you heard it right here on Circulation on the Run from Greg and I thank you for joining us today and don't forget to tune in again next week. Speaker 6: This program is copyright of the American Heart Association, 2022. The opinions expressed by speakers in this podcast are their own and not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association. For more, please visit ahajournals.org.

On this episode of the AMSSM CRN Spotlight Podcast, host Dr. Jeremy Schroeder, DO, is joined by BJSM Editor-in-Chief Dr. Jonathan Drezner, MD, FAMSSM, and Kimberly Harmon, MD, FAMSSM, who are both Past Presidents of AMSSM. In this 23-minute conversation, Drs. Drezner and Harmon discuss the Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes (ORCCA) national registry and address the following topics: Details about the ORCCA registry, what makes it unique and why it was created The early findings of the registry and what they mean for team physicians and athletic trainers How this study and others are impacting return-to-play decisions after COVID The current recommendations regarding cardiac imaging in athletes Finding the right balance in our professional and personal lives Resources: SARS-CoV-2 Cardiac Involvement in Young Competitive Athletes

On this episode of the AMSSM CRN Spotlight Podcast (T: @TheAMSSM) host Dr. Jeremy Schroeder, DO, is joined by BJSM Editor-in-Chief Dr. Jonathan Drezner, MD, and Kimberly Harmon, MD, who are both Past Presidents of AMSSM. In this 23-minute conversation, Drs. Drezner and Harmon discuss the Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes (ORCCA) national registry and address the following topics: · Details about the ORCCA registry, what makes it unique and why it was created · The early findings of the registry and what they mean for team physicians and athletic trainers · How this study and others are impacting return-to-play decisions after COVID · The current recommendations regarding cardiac imaging in athletes · Finding the right balance in our professional and personal lives Resources: SARS-CoV-2 Cardiac Involvement in Young Competitive Athletes (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054824)

Paul J. Wang: Welcome to the monthly podcast On the Beat for Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. I'm Dr Paul Wang, Editor-in-Chief with some of the key highlights from this month's issue. In our first paper, Jacob Koruth and Associates examine the ability to produce ablation lesions using pulse field ablation, which is tissue specific and non-thermal in swine compared to radio frequency ablation. All 46 targeted veins were successfully isolated on the first attempt in all cohorts. Pulmonary vein isolation durability was assessed in 28 veins, including the SVC. Durability was higher in the pulsed field ablation bipolar group, 18 out of 20 in the bipolar group, 10 out of 18 in the monopolar group, and 3 out of 6 in the radio frequency group. P = 0.002. Transmit morality rates were similar across groups with evidence of nerve damage only with radiofrequency. In our next paper, Vivek Reddy and Associates is part of the multicentered first-in-human study, RADIANCE, examine the ability of a novel compliant radio frequency balloon catheter with 10 irrigated flexible electrodes to simultaneously and independently deliver energy. At four sites, 39 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein isolation using energy delivery simultaneously from all electrodes up to 30 seconds posteriorly, and 60 seconds anteriorly. 152 of 152 targeted pulmonary veins were isolated. 79.6% with a single application. Electrical reconnection occurred in only 7 out of 150 pulmonary veins or 4.7% upon adenosine isoproterenol challenge. Esophageal temperature was monitored in all patients. The esophagus was also mechanically deviated in ten patients. At three months, imaging revealed no pulmonary vein stenosis and early atrial recurrence occurred in only 10 out of 39 or 25.6% of patients. In our next paper Takeshi Kitamura and Associates examine the effect of substrate based ventricular tachycardia ablation targeting local abnormal ventricular activity on recurrent ventricular fibrillation events in patients with structural heart disease. In a retrospective two center study of a total of 686 patients with incident ventricular tachycardia ablation procedure targeting local abnormal ventricular activity, 21 patients, age 57 years left ventricular ejection fraction 30%, had both ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. A total of 80 ventricular fibrillation events were recorded in the ICD logs, the six months preceding ablation. Complete and partial local abnormal ventricular activity elimination was achieved in 11 or 52%, in 10 or 58% of patients respectively. Catheter ablation was associated with a highly significant reduction in ventricular fibrillation recurrences. P less than 0.0001 which were limited to three or 14 patients at six months. The total number of ventricular events therefore, decreased from 80 to three with a median of 1.0 to 0.0 in the six months prior to and following ablation respectively. The reduction in ventricular fibrillation events was significantly greater in patients with catheter ablation compared to 21 match controls during a 6- month period preceding and following a baseline assessment. The authors concluded that substrate guided ventricular tachycardia ablation, targeting local abnormal ventricular activity, may be associated with a significant reduction in recurrent ventricular fibrillation, suggesting that ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation share overlapping arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with structural heart disease. In our next paper, Feng Hu and Associates examine the effect of right anterior ganglion aided plexi ablation on vagal response during circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. 80 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent first time ablation were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n = 40) circumferential pulmonary vein isolation starting with the right pulmonary veins at the right anterior ganglion plexi site. In group B (n = 40) circumferential pulmonary vein isolation starting with the left pulmonary veins first, and the last ablation site being the right anterior ganglionic plexi site. During circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, the positive vagal response was observed in only one patient in group A, in 25 patients in group B. P less than 0.001. A total of 21 patients with positive vagal response in group B needed temporary ventricular pacing during the procedure, while the only patient with positive vagal response in group A did not need temporary ventricular pacing, P less than 0.001. Compared with baseline basic cycle length, sinus node recovery time, and AV node Wenckebach pacing cycle length were decreased significantly after pulmonary vein isolation procedure in both groups, all P less than 0.05 and without differences between the two groups. In our next paper, Karl-Heinz Kuck and Associates reported the results of the randomized atrial fibrillation management and congestive heart failure with ablation, AMICA trial. Patients with persistent or long standing persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, were randomly allocated to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation or best medical therapy. The primary study endpoint was the absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline at one year. Pulmonary vein isolation was the primary ablation approach. Best medical therapy comprised rate or rhythm control. All patients were discharged after index hospitalization with a cardioverter defibrillator or resynchronization therapy defibrillator implanted. This study was terminated early for futility of 140 patients, 65 years, 90% men available for endpoint analysis, 68 and 72 patients were assigned to ablation in best medical therapy respectively. At one year, left ventricular ejection fraction had increased in ablation patients by 8.8% and in medical therapy by 7.3%, P = 0.36. Sinus rhythm was recorded on 12-lead electrocardiograms at 1 year. In 61 of 83 ablation patients, or 73.5%, and 42 out of 82 best medical therapy patients or 50%. Device-recorded atrial fibrillation at one year, was 0% or maximally 50% of the time in 28 of 39 ablation patients, so 72% in 16 out of 36 best medical therapy patients or 44%. There were no differences in secondary endpoint outcomes of six-minute walk tests, quality of life or NT pro BNP between the ablation and best medical therapy patients. In our next paper, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy and Associates examined the association between unrecognized inflammation and premature ventricular contraction. In a single-center prospective study, 107 patients with 5,000 or more PVCs per 24 hours, which were symptomatic, and no known ischemic heart disease, underwent combination of laboratory testing including FDG or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose pet scan, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and biopsy. The mean age cohort was 57 years, 41% were males, a left ventricular ejection fraction was 47%. Positive pet scan was seen in 51%, and 51% had preserved left ventricular function. Based on clinical profile, FDG pet imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and histological data, 58% received immunosuppressive therapy alone and 25% received immunosuppressive therapy and catheter ablation. Optimal response was seen in 67% over a mean follow-up of six months in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 37% showed a mean improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of 13%. In our next paper, Clare Atzema and Associates examined the association of rapid (3 days), early (7 days), and basic (30 days), outpatient physician follow-up with short and long-term outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients discharged from an emergency department. In 163 emergency departments in Ontario, Canada with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, they use landmark analysis with propensity score matching. In the 10,657 patients with rapid follow-up care who are propensity score matched to a patient with follow-up between 4 and 7 days, the hazard of a return emergency visit was reduced by 11%. In the 17,234 patients with early follow-up who are matched to a patient with care between 8 and 30 days, the 1-year mortality was 11% lower, and 1-year hospitalization was 6% lower. Relative to no 30-day care, basic follow-up care was associated with an increased hazard ratio of 90-day hospitalization, but no longer was associated with mortality. The authors concluded that compared to follow-up care between 8 and 30 days, follow-up care within a week after discharge from an emergency department with atrial fibrillation, was associated with a reduction in death, in hospitalization at 1 year, in association not present with 30-day follow-up. In our next paper, James Freeman and Associates evaluate outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial bleeding, major bleeding hospitalization in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a propensity score match cohort of patients treated with anti-arrhythmic medications only in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) I and II registries. Among 21,595 patients, 6% underwent de novo atrial fibrillation ablation. The propensity score matched cohort included 1087 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation matched one-to-one with 1087 patients treated with an antiarrhythmic medication only. There were no significant differences in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death in most other major cardiovascular and neurologic events. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation was associated with an increased risk of all cause hospitalization hazard ratio 1.24 particularly in the 3 months after the procedure. Among those who underwent atrial relation ablation with CHA2DS2 VAS score, 2 for men and 3 for women, 23% had oral anticoagulation discontinued after ablation. Among those with discontinue oral anticoagulation, the median time to discontinuation was 6.2 months. Thus, the authors found no difference in adjusted rates of cardiovascular and all-cause death, between patients treated with atrial fibrillation catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic medications only. In our next paper, Michael Liu and Associates examined R-from-T as a common mechanism of arrhythmia initiation in long QT syndrome. In their study, spontaneous initiation of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was elicited by gradually ramping up ICa,L to simulate the early phase of sympathetic surge or changing the heart rate, reproducing the different genotype-dependent clinical electrocardiographic features in LQTS type 2 and 3, T-wave alternans was observed followed by premature ventricular complexes. Compensatory pauses occurred resulting in short-long sequences, as ICa,L increased further polymorphic ventricular tachycardia episodes occurred, always proceeded by short-long-short sequences. However, in LQTS type 1 once a PVC occurred, it almost immediately led to an episode of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythmias in LQT2 and 3 were bradycardia dependent, whereas LQT1 was not. In all 3 genotypes, PVCs always originated spontaneously from the steep repolarization gradient region and manifested on ECG as R-on-T. the authors called this mechanism R-on-T to distinguish it from the classic explanation of R-on-T arrhythmogenesis when an exogenous PVC coincidentally encounters a repolarization region. In R-from-T, the PVC and the T wave are causally related, where the steep repolarization gradients combine with enhanced ICa,L leading to the PVCs emerging from the T wave. Since enhanced ICa,L  was required for R-from-T to occur, suppressing window ICa,L  effectively prevented arrhythmias in all 3 genotypes. In our next paper, Dhani Dharmaprani and Associates hypothesized phase singularity formation and destruction in fibrillation could be modeled as a self-regenerating Poisson renewal processes, producing exponential distributions of inter event times governed by constant rate parameters defined by prevailing properties of each system. The authors studied 5 systems, human persistent atrial fibrillation in 20 cases, tachypaced atrial fibrillation in sheep in 5 cases, rat atrial fibrillation in 4 cases, and rat ventricular fibrillation in 11 cases, as well as computer simulated fibrillation. Phase singularity time to event data were fitted by exponential probability distribution functions computed using maximum entropy theory, and rates of phase singularity formation and destruction were determined. A systematic review is conducted to cross validate with sources from the literature. In all systems phase singularity lifetime and inter formation times were consistent with underlying Poisson renewal processes. The authors conclude that Poisson renewal theory provides an evolutionarily preserved universal framework to quantify formation and destruction of rotational events in cardiac fibrillation. In our issue, there was a very interesting special report on hypothermia outcomes after transvenous lead extraction complications requiring cardiothoracic surgery by Peter Hu and Associates. In addition, there is a very interesting review of atrial fibrillation mediated cardiomyopathy by Kevin Heist and Associates. That's it for this month. We hope that you'll find the journal to be the go-to place for everyone interested in the field. See you next time. This program is copyright American Heart Association 2019.  

Interview with Utibe R Essien, MD, and Daniel E. Singer, MD, authors of Association of Race/Ethnicity With Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II

Interview with Utibe R Essien, MD, and Daniel E. Singer, MD, authors of Association of Race/Ethnicity With Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II

Paul Wang:         Welcome to the monthly podcast “On The Beat”, for Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. I am Dr. Paul Wang, Editor-in-Chief, with some of the key highlights from this month's issue. We'll also hear from Dr. Suraj Kapa, reporting on new research from the latest journal articles in the field.                                 In our first article, Adetola Ladejobi and associates studied 1,433 patients, between 2000 and 2012, who were discharged alive after sudden cardiac arrest. A reversible and correctable cause was identified in 792 patients, or 55%. A reversible cause for sudden cardiac arrest was defined as significant electrolyte or metabolic abnormality, evidence of acute myocardial infarction or ischemia, recent initiation of antiarrhythmic drug, or illicit drug use, or other reversible circumstances.                                 Of the 792 sudden cardiac arrest survivors, due to reversible or correctable cause, 207 or 26% of the patients received an ICD after their indexed sudden cardiac arrest. During a mean follow-up of 3.8 years, 319 or 40% of patients died. ICD implantation was highly associated with a lower all-cause mortality, p < 0.001, even after correcting for unbalanced baseline characteristics.                                 In subgroup analyses, only patients with sudden cardiac arrest, were not associated with myocardial infarction, extracted benefit from the ICD, p < 0.001.                                 The authors concluded that in survivors of sudden cardiac arrest, due to a reversible and correctable cause, ICD therapies associated with lower all-cause mortality, except if the sudden cardiac arrest was due to myocardial infarction.                                 Further prospect of multi-center randomized control trials will be needed to confirm this observation.                                 In our next study, Carlo Pappone and associates, studied 81 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, randomized to undergo high density electrophysiological mapping, to identify repetitive regular activities, before modified circumferential pulmonary vein ablation, or modified circumferential pulmonary vein ablation alone. The primary endpoint was freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at one year.                                 In the 81 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, there were 479 regions exhibiting repetitive regular activities in these patients, or 5.9 repetitive regular activities per patient. There were 232 regions in the mapping group, which consisted of 41 patients, and 247 regions in the control group, consisting of 40 patients. Overall, 39% of the repetitive regular activities were identified within pulmonary veins, whereas 61% were identified in non-pulmonary vein regions.                                 Mapping-guided ablation resulted in higher arrhythmia termination rate, as compared to conventional strategy, 61% vs. 30%, p < 0.007. Total RF duration, mapping, and fluoroscopy times were not significantly different between the groups. No major procedure related adverse events occurred.                                 After one year, 73% of the mapping group of patients were free of recurrences, compared to 50% of the control group, p = 0.03.                                 The authors concluded that targeted ablation of regions showing repetitive regular activities provided adjunctive benefit in terms of arrhythmia freedom at one year in treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. These findings should be confirmed by additional larger randomized multi-centered studies.                                 In the next article, Maciej Kubala and associates examine repolarization abnormalities in 40 patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, comparing extent and location of abnormal T-waves of one millimeter or greater in depth, downsloping elevated ST segment in two or more adjacent leads to the area and location of endocardial bipolar and unipolar, and epicardial bipolar voltage abnormalities. They found an abnormal unipolar right ventricular endocardial area of 33.4% with presence in eight patients without negative T-waves. Patients with negative T-waves extending beyond V3, seen in 20 patients, had larger low bipolar and unipolar endocardial areas, and larger epicardial low bipolar areas, compared to those with negative T-waves limited to leads V1 to V3.                                 ECG localization of negative T-waves regionalized to the location of substrate. Patients with downsloping elevated ST segment, all localized to leads V1, V2 had more unipolar endocardial abnormalities involving outflow in mid-right ventricle, compared to patients without downsloping elevated ST segment.                                 The authors concluded that in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, abnormal electric current areas were proportional to the extent of T-wave inversion on the 12 lead electrocardiogram. Marked voltage abnormalities can exist without repolarization changes. Downsloping elevated ST segment patterns in V1 and V2 occurs with more unipolar endocardial voltage abnormalities, consistent with more advanced trans neural disease.                                 In the next manuscript, Teresa Oloriz and associates examine the timing and value of program stimulation after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia. They performed 218 program ventricular stimulations six days after ablation in 210 consecutive patients, 48% with ischemic cardiomyopathy in the median left ventricular ejection fraction of 37%. After ablation, ICDs were programmed according to NIPS results. Class A were noninducible, Class B non documented inducible VT, and Class C documented inducible VT. Concordance between the programmed ventricular stimulation at the end of the procedure and at six days was 67%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were higher for the programmed ventricular stimulation at day six. Ischemic patients and those with preserved ejection fraction showed the highest negative predictive value.                                 Among noninducible patients at the end of the procedure, but inducible at day six, 59 patients had VT recurrence at one year follow-up. Recurrences were 9% when both studies were noninducible. There were no inappropriate shocks, incidents of syncope with 3%, none harmful. The rate of appropriate shocks per patient per month according to NIPS was significantly reduced, comparing the month before and after the ablation.                                 The authors concluded that programmed ventricular stimulation at day six predicts VT recurrence.                                 In the next study, Tor Biering-Sørensen and associates examined ECG global electrical heterogeneity, GEH, in its longitudinal changes, are associated with cardiac structure and function, in their Atherosclerosis Risk and Community study, ARIC, consisting of 5,114 patients, 58% which were female and 22% African Americans. Using the resting 12-lead ECGs, and echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular ejection fraction, global strain, left ventricular mass index, end diastolic volume index, end systolic volume index at visit five.                                 Longitudinal analysis included ARIC participants with measured GEH at visits one to four. GEH was quantified by spatial ventricular gradient, the QRST angle, and the sum of the absolute QRST integral. Cross sectional and longitudinal regressions were adjusted for manifest subclinical cardiovascular disease.                                 Having four abnormal GEH parameters was associated with a 6.4% left ventricular ejection fraction decline, a 24.2 gram/meter square increase in left ventricular mass index, a 10.3 milliliter/meter square increase in left ventricular end diastolic volume index, and a 7.8 milliliter/meter square increase in left ventricular end systolic index. All together, clinical and ECG parameters accounted for approximately one third of the left ventricular volume in 20% of the systolic function variability.                                 The associates were significantly stronger in patients with subclinical cardiovascular disease. The QRST integral increased by 20 millivolts/meter second for each three year period participants who demonstrated left ventricular dilatation at visit five. Sudden cardiac death victims demonstrated rapid GEH worsening, while those with left ventricular dysfunction demonstrated slow GEH worsening.                                 The authors concluded that GEH is a marker of subclinical abnormalities in cardiac structure and function.                                 In the next manuscript, Takumi Yamada and associates studied 19 patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, originating in the parietal band in 14 patients, in the septal band in 5 patients. Among 294 consecutive patients with right ventricular arrhythmia origins, parietal band and septal band ventricular arrhythmias exhibited a left bundle branch block, with left inferior in 12 patients', superior in 2 patients' axes, in left or right inferior axis pattern in four and one patients respectively.                                 In Lead 1, all parietal band ventricular arrhythmias exhibited R-waves, while septal band ventricular arrhythmias often exhibited S-waves. A QS pattern in lead AVR, in the presence of a knock in the mid QRS were common in all infundibular muscle ventricular arrhythmias. During infundibular muscle ventricular arrhythmias, a far-field ventricular electrogram, with an early activation, was always recorded in the His bundle region, regardless of the location of ventricular arrhythmia regions. With 9.2 radiofrequency applications in a duration of 972 seconds, catheter ablation was successful in 15 of the 19 patients. Ventricular arrhythmias recurred in four patients during a fallout period of 43 months.                                 In the next paper, Uma Mahesh Avula and associates examine the mechanisms underlying spontaneous atrial fibrillation, in an Ovine model of left atrial myocardial infarction. The left atrial myocardial infarction was created by ligating the atrial branch of the left anterior descending artery. ECG loop recorders were implanted to monitor atrial fibrillation episodes.                                 In seven sheep, Dantrolene, a Ryanodine receptor blocker, was administered in vivo, during the observation period. The left atrial myocardial infarction animals experienced numerous episodes of atrial fibrillation during the eight day monitoring period, that were suppressed by Dantrolene. Optical mapping showed spontaneous focal discharges originating through the ischemic/normal-zone border. These spontaneous focal discharges were calcium driven, rate dependent, and enhanced by isoproterenol, but suppressed by Dantrolene.                                 In addition, these spontaneous focal discharges initiated atrial fibrillation-maintaining reentrant rotors anchored by marked conduction delays at the ischemic/normal-zone border. Nitric oxide synthase one protein expression decreased in ischemic zone myocytes, or NADPA oxidase in xanthine oxidase enzyme activities in reactive oxygen species increased. Calmodulin aberrantly increased, Ryanodine binding to cardiac Ryanodine receptors in the ischemic zone. Dantrolene restored the physiologically binding of Calmodulin to the cardiac Ryanodine receptors.                                 The authors concluded that atrial ischemia causes spontaneous atrial fibrillation episodes in sheep, caused by spontaneous focal discharges that initiate re-entry. Nitroso redox imbalance in the ischemic zone is associated with intensive reactive oxygen species production, and altered the Ryanodine receptor responses to Calmodulin. Dantrolene administered normalize the Calmodulin response and prevents left atrial myocardial infarction, spontaneous focal discharges in atrial fibrillation initiation.                                 In the next study, Wouter van Everdingen and associates examine the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to CRT with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. 48 heart failure patients with left bundle branch block were studied. Mean ejection fraction 28%, mean QRS duration 176 milliseconds. Immediately after CRT implantation, invasive left ventricular pressure volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing, with each separate electrode at four atrial ventricular delays.                                 Acute CRT response, measured as a change in stroke work compared to intrinsic conduction, was related to the intrinsic interval between the Q on the electrocardiogram and the left ventricular sensing delay, that is the QLV, normalized for the QRS duration, resulting in QLV over QRS duration in the electrode position.                                 QLV over QRS duration was 84% and variation between the four electrodes was 9%. The change in stroke work was 89% and varied by 39% between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position in a high QLV to QRS duration ratio had a significant association with a large change in stroke work, all P less than 0.01.                                 In a combined model, only QLV over QRS duration remained significantly associated with a change in stroke work, P less than 0.5. However, a direct relationship between QLV over QRS duration in stroke work was only seen in 24 patients, while 24 other patients had an inverse relation.                                 The authors concluded that a large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of stimulated electrode on the quadripolar electrode is important. Although QLV to QRS duration ratio was associated with acute hemodynamic response at a group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.                                 In the next study, Antonio Pani and associates conducted a multi-centered prospective study evaluating the determinance of zero-fluoroscopy ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias. They studied 430 patients with an indication for EP study and/or ablation of SVT. A procedure was defined as zero-fluoroscopy when no fluoroscopy was used. The total fluoroscopy time inversely was related to number of procedures previously performed by each operator since the study start. 289 procedures, or 67%, were zero-fluoro. Multi-variable analyses identified as predictors of zero-fluoro was the 30th procedure for each operator, as compared to procedures up to the ninth procedure, the type of arrhythmia, AVNRT having the highest probability of zero-fluoro, the operator, and the patient's age. Among operators, achievement of zero-fluoro varied from 0% to 100%, with 8 operators, or 23%, achieving zero-fluoro in 75% of their procedures. The probability of zero-fluoro increased by 2.8% as the patient's age decreased by one year. Acute procedural success was obtained in all cases.                                 The authors concluded that the use of 3D mapping completely avoided the use of fluoroscopy in most cases, with very low fluoro time in the remaining, and high safety and effectiveness profiles.                                 In the next paper, Demosthenes Katritsis and associates examine the role of slow pathway ablation from the septum as an alternative to right-sided ablation. Retrospectively, 1,342 undergoing right septal slow pathway ablation for AV nodal reentry were studied. Of these, 15 patients, 11 with typical and 4 with atypical AVNRT, had a left septal approach following unsuccessful right sided ablation, that is, the righted left group. In addition, 11 patients were subjected prospectively to a left septal only approach for slow pathway ablation, without previous right septal ablation, that is, left group. Fluoroscopy times in the right and left group, and the left groups were 30.5 minutes and 20 minutes respectively, P equals 0.6. The rate of [inaudible 00:18:24] current delivery time for comparable, 11.3 minutes and 10.0 minutes respectively.                                 There are no additional ablation lesions at other anatomical sites in either group, and no cases of AV block were encountered. Recurrence rate for arrhythmias in the right and left group was 6.7% and 0% in the left group, in the three months following ablation.                                 The authors concluded that the left septal anatomical ablation of the left inferior nodal extension is an alternative to ablation of both typical and atypical AV nodal reentry when ablation at the right posterior septum is ineffective.                                 In our next study, Mark Belkin and associates reported prior reports of new-onset device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias. Despite the clear association between atrial fibrillation and the risk of thromboembolism, the clinical significance of new-onset device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias and thromboembolism remains disputed.                                 The authors aim to determine the risk of thromboembolic events in these patients. Using the Ovid Medline, Cochrane, SCOPUS databases to identify 4,893 reports of randomized control trials, perspective or retrospective studies of pacemaker and defibrillator patients reporting the incidence of device detected atrial tachyarrhythmias.                                 The authors examine 28 studies, following a total of 24,984 patients. They had an average age of 69.9 years and a mean study duration of 21.8 months. New-onset device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias was observed in 23% of patients. Among nine studies, consisting of 8,181 patients, reporting thromboembolism, the absolute incidence was 2.1%. Thromboembolic events were significantly greater among patients with new-onset device-detected arrhythmias, with a relative risk of 2.88, compared to those who had less than one minute of tachyarrhythmias, 1.77 risk ratio.                                 The authors concluded that new-onset device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias is common, affecting close to one quarter of all patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators.                                 In our last paper, Sanghamitra Mohanty and associates performed a meta-analysis systematically evaluating the outcome of pulmonary vein isolation with and without thermoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. For pulmonary vein ablation alone, only randomized trials conducted in the last three years reporting single procedure success rates, off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months or greater follow-up were included. In the PVI plus FIRM group, all public studies reporting a single procedure off antiarrhythmic drug success rate with at least one year follow-up were identified.                                 Meta-analytic estimates were derived, using the DerSimonian and Laird Random-effects Models, and pooled estimates of success rates. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I-square. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.                                 15 trials were included, 10 with PVI plus FIRM, with 511 patients, non-randomized perspective design, and 5 pulmonary vein isolation-only trials, consisting of 295 patients, all randomized.                                 All patients in the pulmonary vein only trials had 100% non paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, except for one study, and no prior ablations. About 24% of the PVI plus FIRM patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.                                 After 15.9 months of follow-up, the off antiarrhythmic drug pooled success was 50% with FIRM plus PVI, compared to 58% in the PVI alone. The difference in the effect size between the groups was not statistically significant. No significant heterogeneity was observed in this meta-analysis.                                 The authors concluded that the overall pooled estimate did not show any therapeutic benefit of PVI FIRM over PVI alone.                                 That's it for this month, but keep listening. Suraj Kapa will be surfing all journals for the latest topics of interest in our field. Remember to download the podcast On The Beat. Take it away, Suraj. Suraj Kapa:          Thank you, Paul, and welcome back to “On The Beat”. Again, my name is Suraj Kapa and I'm here to review with you articles across the cardiac electrophysiology literature that were particularly hard hitting in the month of February.                                 To start, we review the area of atrial fibrillation, focusing on anticoagulation. Reviewing an article published in this past month's issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association, by Steinberg et al., entitled Frequency and Outcomes of Reduced Dose Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Anticoagulants, results from ORBIT AF II. The ORBIT AF II registry, also called the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, is a prospective national observational registry of AF patients.                                 The author sought to describe the frequency, appropriateness, and outcomes of patients prescribed reduced doses of NOACs in the community practice. They reviewed the records of almost 8,000 patients receiving NOACs and noted that the vast majority, nearly 84%, received a standard dose of NOACs, consistent with the U.S. FDA labeling. While only 16% received a reduced dose, only 43% of these were consistent with labeling instructions. Those who received reduced dose NOACs inappropriately more often tended to be younger and have, interestingly, lower overall bleeding risks scores.                                 Furthermore, compared with those appropriately receiving dosing, patients receiving inappropriately reduced dose NOACs had a higher unadjusted rates of thromboembolic events and death.                                 These data are important to understand, in that, discussion with patients, that inappropriate reduction of NOACs does not necessarily offer appropriate protection against long-term risk of thromboembolic events. Thus, close attention must be paid to consideration of the use cases and instructions for use.                                 While the registry cannot get into the details of why the dose was reduced in the spectrum of patients, it does highlight the fact that this continues to be a problem in general practice.                                 Further data is needed to understand what leads to inappropriate dose reduction, which could include factors such as patient preference, or physician education.                                 Staying within the realm of anticoagulation and understanding individual needs, we next review an article published in this past month's issue of Circulation, by Nielsen et al., entitled Female Sex Is a Risk Modifier Rather Than a Risk Factor for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation. Should we use a CHA2DS2-VA score rather than CHA2DS2-VASc? In this review, the authors sought to evaluate whether female sex is truly an overall risk factor, as opposed to a risk modifier.                                 Using three nationwide registries, they identified patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between 1997 and 2015, and they calculated two sets of scores. The first score, they termed a CHA2DS2-VA score, calculated for men and women with follow-up of one year in the Danish National Patient Registry. They wanted to calculate the risk based on this pseudo-value method. They then reviewed female sex as a prognostic factor by inclusion as an interaction term on the CHA2DS2-VA score, to calculate overall thromboembolic risk.                                 Amongst over 200,000 patients with atrial fibrillation, almost half of whom are women, they noted that the mean CHA2DS2-VA score, where sex is excluded, was a tad higher in women than men, namely 2.7 vs. 2.3. However, women had an overall higher one year thromboembolic rate of 7.3 vs. 5.7 per 100 person-years. Interestingly, with a CHA2DS2-VA score of zero, the absolute risk of thromboembolism was equal amongst men and women, around .5%. Once overall points increased above one, however, women exhibited a higher stroke risk. This interaction was statistically significant.                                 Thus, the authors indicated that female sex is a risk modifier for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, rather than a risk factor. The terminology is important to consider. Essentially, what they are noting is that at the lower risk level, female sex, in and of itself, is not something that necessarily puts somebody in the higher risk cohorts. Instead, at higher risk levels, because of other factors, a woman may have a higher overall risk of stroke than men. Thus, stroke risk is accentuated in women, who would have been eligible for oral anticoagulating treatment anyway, on the basis of a CHADS score above one.                                 These data highlight the importance of thinking about the fact that at the lower risk score level, female sex alone might not be sufficient to say that a patient has reached the CHA2DS2-VASc score of one and above. But, really, you need an overall CHA2DS2-VA score, or a risk score, inclusive of at least two other risk factors to indicate that now, being a female is going to modify the risk and further accentuate it.                                 Now, one thing to note is, these data are very consistent with the guidelines. The European guidelines indicates that female sex alone, which in the CHA2DS2-VASc score would confer a risk score of one, should not, by itself, construe the need to put somebody on anticoagulation.                                 However, it's important to highlight that these data show that at a CHA2DS2-VASc score of one in females, they should really be construed as equivalent to a CHA2DS2-VASc score of zero in men.                                 Using the CHA2DS2-VA score, where sex is excluded, but considering that women overall have a higher incidence of stroke at any given CHA2DS2-VA level above one, will help better counsel women about the importance of being on anticoagulants.                                 The next article we review relates to long-term risk related to atrial fibrillation, published in February's issue of Heart Rhythm, by Nishtala et al., entitled Atrial Fibrillation and Cognitive Decline in the Framingham Heart Study. While there's much out there about the potential long-term role of cognitive decline in atrial fibrillation patients, longitudinal research investigating the relationship is relatively sparse. Thus, the authors sought to investigate the association between atrial fibrillation and cognitive performance, cross-sectionally and longitudinally.                                 They chose patients within the Framingham study who are dementia and stroke-free at the time of baseline neuropsychological assessments. They evaluated atrial fibrillation status as a two level variable, namely prevalent atrial fibrillation vs. no atrial fibrillation in cross-sectional analyses. And they also separated into prevalent atrial fibrillation at baseline, interim development of atrial fibrillation, and those who didn't develop any atrial fibrillation in longitudinal analysis.                                 They studied 2,682 participants in the Framingham Heart study, including original and offspring cohorts. They noted that a baseline of about 4% had diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Prevalent AF was noted to be significantly associated with poorer attention. Interestingly, sex differences were noted, with men performing worse on test of abstract reasoning and executive function than women.                                 They noted that prevalent atrial fibrillation was significantly associated with the longitudinal decline in executive function, in both the original cohorts, as well as interim atrial fibrillation being significantly associated with longitudinal decline in executive function of the offspring cohorts. Thus, they noted that atrial fibrillation is associated with a profile of long-term change in cognitive function.                                 The importance of these data are to further highlight the potential contribution of atrial fibrillation to cognitive decline. While the exact mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated, the question of how to get ahead of the cognitive decline associated with atrial fibrillation is further put out by these data.                                 Whether the relationship between atrial fibrillation and cognitive decline is due to recurrent thromboembolic events vs. the therapies used vs. other factors such as humid anatomic factors resulting in poor brain perfusion, are relatively unclear.                                 Certainly it is also possible that atrial fibrillation simply reflects a process associated with other factors that might lead to cognitive decline. However, again, further mechanistic studies and potential treatment interventions to mitigate the risk of cognitive decline are still needed.                                 Speaking of this, we next review a paper published in the European Heart Journal this past month, by Friberg and Rosenqvist, entitled Less Dementia with Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.                                 Speaking of treatments to avoid long-term cognitive decline, the authors sought to evaluate if oral anticoagulant treatment might offer protection against long-term dementia risk in atrial fibrillation.                                 These retrospective registry studies of patients with the hospital diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and no prior diagnosis of dementia in Sweden, including patients between 2006 and 2014. The study included a total of 444,106 patients over 1.5 million years. They noted that patients who were on anticoagulant treatment at baseline were associated with a 29% lower risk of dementia than patients without anticoagulant treatments. Thus, there is an overall 48% lower risk on treatments with the appropriate anticoagulation. There is no difference on whether Warfarin or the newer oral anticoagulants were used.                                 Thus, the authors concluded that the risk of dementia is higher without oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation, suggesting that early initiation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation could be of value to preserve long-term cognitive function.                                 This relates directly back to the previous paper, which focused more on the epidemiologic risk, while this paper focuses on elements that might construe mechanism or treatment options.                                 Many authors have concluded the incredible importance of early recognition of the need for anticoagulant initiation in patients with atrial fibrillation. While the exact mechanism of cognitive decline and dementia in atrial fibrillation remains to be completely elucidated, certainly recurrent thromboembolic events that might be relatively silent as they occur, but result in a long-term cumulative risk might be helped by placing patients on anticoagulants.                                 This becomes another reason to counsel patients on the importance of long-term anticoagulant therapy. Certainly, the limitations of these studies, however, are the retrospective nature and the fact that there might be some subtle differences that may not be otherwise able to be construed from retrospective registry data regarding the relative role of anticoagulants in truly protecting against long-term cognitive decline. However, the data are certainly provocative.                                 Continuing within realm and discussing outcomes associated atrial fibrillation, we next review an article by Leung et al., entitled The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Subtype on Mortality, published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology this past month.                                 The author sought to investigate the prognostic implications of a subtype of atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal or persistent, on long-term prognosis. They sought to evaluate differences in mortality between paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation amongst 1,773 patients. They adjusted for comorbid diseases associated with atrial fibrillation, as well as CHA2DS2-VASc score. In the study, a total of about 1,005 patients or about 57% had persistent atrial fibrillation. Over the follow-up period, about 10% of those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 17% of those with persistent atrial fibrillation died.                                 They noted that persistent atrial fibrillation, after correcting for other comorbidities, was independently associated with worse survival. Thus, they concluded that persistent atrial fibrillation is independently associated with increased mortality in the long term.                                 These data are relevant in that they highlight that persistent atrial fibrillation in its nature might construe an overall higher risk cohort. It remains to be fully understood what are the true mechanistic differences between persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Overall, however, the community grossly agrees that persistent atrial fibrillation likely suggests a higher degree of atrial myopathy. If we believe this, then it is reasonable to believe that the risk associated with this specific form of atrial fibrillation might result in higher long-term harm.                                 Of course, these data are subject to the same limitations of all retrospective data. Namely, these persistent atrial fibrillation patients might have received different therapies or been more sick to start with that cannot be construed by comorbidities alone.                                 Furthermore, these data do not necessarily get to the point of whether treating atrial fibrillation in the persistent patient more aggressively necessarily reduces the risk equivalent to that of paroxysmal patients. Thus, further understanding is needed to understand how to use these data to reduce this mortality difference.                                 Continuing within the realm of epidemiology of atrial fibrillation, we next review an article published in this past month's issue of Circulation, by Mandalenakis et al., entitled Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Young Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. It is assumed that patients with congenital heart disease are vulnerable to atrial fibrillation because of multiple factors. These include residual shunts, hemodynamic issues, atrial scars from previous heart surgery, valvulopathy and other factors.                                 However, there's limited data on the overall risk of developing atrial fibrillation and complications associated with it, especially in children and young adults with congenital heart disease. Furthermore, these children and young adults with congenital heart disease have never been compared with overall risk and control subjects.                                 The authors use the Swedish Patient and Cause of Death Registries to identify all patients with diagnoses of congenital heart disease born from 1970 to 1993. They then matched these patients with control subjects from the Total Population Register in Sweden. They noted amongst almost 22,000 patients with congenital heart disease and almost 220,000 matched control subjects that 654 patients amongst the congenital heart disease cohort developed atrial fibrillation, while only 328 amongst the larger control group developed atrial fibrillation. The mean follow-up overall was 27 years.                                 They noted the risk of developing atrial fibrillation was almost 22 times higher amongst patients with congenital heart disease than control subjects. They noted the highest risk with a hazard ratio of over 84 was noted in patients with conotruncal defects. Furthermore, at the age of 42 years, over 8% of patients with congenital heart disease had a recorded diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.                                 Interestingly, heart failure was a particularly important complication in patients with congenital heart disease and atrial fibrillation, with over 10% of patients developing atrial fibrillation and [inaudible 00:38:20] congenital heart disease developing a diagnosis of heart failure as well.                                 These data are important in that they help in counseling the importance of close follow-up of patients with congenital heart disease and their long-term risk of other complications. Even if patients might be perceivably well managed, incident atrial fibrillation might increase risk of stroke in these patients. It is further important to note that many of these patients cannot be evaluated according to traditional risk or evaluations. Thus, it is important to consider whether or not a patient should be treated with anticoagulation once they develop atrial fibrillation.                                 The high risk of overall atrial fibrillation incidents, particularly in patients with more complex congenital defects, needs to be taken into consideration when advising on the frequency of follow-up.                                 It is important to further note that we must think of this overall risk as the minimum possible risk, namely, counseling a congenital heart disease patient that up to one in ten of them may develop atrial fibrillation by the age of 42 years, is likely the minimum amount. The reason for this is many patients, due to either lack of follow-up or lack of sufficient monitoring, and the asymptomatic nature of atrial fibrillation in many patients might have not been diagnosed.                                 Implications or treatments remain to be seen, and whether or not there are methods to reduce the overall risk of atrial fibrillation is unclear. However, engaging congenital heart disease experts and advising patients, especially at younger ages, on the importance of close electrocardiographic monitoring for a potential atrial fibrillation risk is critical.                                 Next within the realm of atrial fibrillation, we switch to the topic of ablation. And review an article by Pallisgaard et al., published in this last month's issue of European Heart Journal, entitled Temporal Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Rates After Ablation, between 2005 and 2014: a nationwide Danish cohort study.                                 Ablation has been increasingly used as a rhythm control strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation. Over this time, we have all noted evolution in both the experience and the techniques used. Thus, the authors sought to evaluate whether recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation has changed over the last decade. They included all patients with first-time AF ablation done between 2005 and 2014 in Denmark. They then evaluated recurrent atrial fibrillation based on a one year follow-up. They included a total of 5,425 patients undergoing first-time ablation.                                 They noted, interestingly, that the patient median age increased over time, and the median AF duration prior to ablation decreased over time. However, the rates of recurrent atrial fibrillation decreased from 45% in 2005 to 31% in the more recent years of 2013, 2014. With the relative risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation almost being cut in half.                                 They noted that female gender, hypertension, atrial fibrillation duration more than two years, and cardioversion with one year prior to ablation were all associated with an increased risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation, regardless of year.                                 These data, again, are retrospective and thus must be taken in the context of that consideration. However, they highlight that it is possible either our selection of appropriate patients for atrial fibrillation ablation or our techniques have improved overall success.                                 The fact that atrial fibrillation ablation is still a relatively young field, with evolving approaches and evolving techniques, needs to be taken into consideration when advising patients on success rates. Using data from many years prior to informed discussion today is fraught with potential error, especially as our catheter design and mapping system use and understanding of appropriate lesion set changes.                                 Of course, some criticism is required as well. While the patients included were relatively older in more recent years, the total AF duration prior to ablation decreased over the years. This suggests that patients are being ablated earlier than they were in the early days of atrial fibrillation ablation.                                 There is some data out there to suggest that earlier ablation for atrial fibrillation might result in a lower long-term recurrence rate. Thus, this might account for some of the difference. However, it is unlikely that it accounts for all of it, given the degree of reduction in overall risk of occurrence.                                 Staying within the trend of talking about changes in techniques for atrial fibrillation ablation, we next review an article published in this past month's issue of Heart Rhythm, by Conti et al., entitled Contact Force Sensing for Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Contact force sensing is one of the newer techniques being used to optimize the success rates for atrial fibrillation ablation. It is generally felt that understanding when one is in contact will optimize atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes by ensuring the physician knows each time they are in contact, and also potentially reducing complications by avoiding excessive contact.                                 Thus, the authors designed the TOUCH AF trial to compare contact force sensing-guided ablation vs. contact force sensing-blinded ablation. They included a total of 128 patients undergoing first-time ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation, and thus randomized them to a situation where the operator was aware of the contact force vs. blinded to the contact force. While the force data was hidden in the blinded cohort, it was still recorded on the backend.                                 In all patients, wide antral pulmonary vein isolation plus a roof line was performed, and patients were followed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, with clinical visits, ECGs, and 48-hour Holter monitoring.                                 The primary endpoint was cumulative radio frequency time for procedures, and atrial arrhythmia is greater than 30 seconds after three months is considered a recurrence.                                 They noted that average force was higher in the contact force-guided arm than contact force-blinded arm, though not statistically significant, with an average of 12 grams in the latter and 14 grams in the former.                                 Interestingly, the total time of ablation did not differ between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in the single procedure freedom from atrial arrhythmia, computing to about 60% in the contact force-guided arm vs. the 63% in the contact force-blinded arm. They did notice, however, that lesions with associated gaps were associated with significantly less force and less force-time integral.                                 The authors concluded from this, the contact force-guided ablation did not result in significant decrease in total radio frequency time or 12-month outcomes in terms of freedom from atrial arrhythmias.                                 These data are important to help guide us in terms of thinking about how the tools we use, as they change, actually alter outcomes. Sometimes we may perceive benefits based on logical thinking that's knowing more about what is happening when we are performing a procedure should optimize that procedure. However, this is not necessarily always the case, and thus highlights the importance of randomized trials to directly compare different situations, such as awareness of contact force vs. lack of awareness of contact force.                                 The relevance of these particular articles is that when we compare catheters with different designs, it does not necessarily highlight the importance of the force number itself. Namely, comparing a contact force catheter vs. non-contact force catheter implicates use of essentially two completely different catheters. To understand the incremental utility of force in making decisions, it is important to consider the same catheter, but simply with awareness or lack of awareness of the actual force number.                                 One of the limitations, however, is that individuals who might have been trained on using the same force sensing catheter might have some degree of tactile feedback and understanding of the amount of force being applied to the tip of the catheter, based on having been repeatedly exposed to contact force numbers during use of said catheter. Thus, there might be a difference in being blinded to contact force in early stage operators than in later stage operators who might have been trained based on repeated feedback.                                 Thus, it's difficult to conclude, necessarily, that contact force is not offering mental benefit. In fact, there's a fair chance that it does. However, offering a skeptical viewpoint to help guide the importance of continually evolving technology in actually improving outcomes is important.                                 Finally, within the realm of atrial fibrillation, we review an article published by Pathik et al., in this past month's issue of Heart Rhythm, entitled Absence of Rotational Activity Detected Using 2-Dimensional Phase Mapping and the Corresponding 3-Dimensional Phase Maps in Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.                                 Current clinically used phase mapping systems involve 2-dimensional maps. However, this process may affect accurate detection of rotors. The authors sought to develop 3-dimensional phase mapping technique that uses a 3D location of the same basket electrodes that are used to create the currently available 2-dimensional maps. Specifically, they wanted to determine whether the rotors detected in 2D phase maps were present in the corresponding time segments and anatomical locations in 3D phase maps.                                 They used one minute left atrial atrial fibrillation recordings obtained in 14 patients, using the basket catheter, and analyzed them offline, using the same phase values, based on 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional representations.                                 They noted rotors in 3.3% using 2D phase mapping, 9 to 14 patients demonstrated about 10 transient rotors, with a mean rotor duration of about 1.1 seconds. They noted none of the 10 rotors, however, were seen at the corresponding time segments and anatomical locations in 3D phase maps. When looking at 3D phases maps, 4 of the 10 corresponded with single wavefronts, 2 of 10 corresponded with simultaneous wavefronts, 1 of 10 corresponded with disorganized activity, and 3 of 10 had no coverage by the basket catheter at the corresponding 3D anatomical locations.                                 These data are important, in that they highlight the importance of when we consider reflecting 2-dimensional systems in a 3-dimensional world of atrial fibrillation. The role of ablating rotors is still in question. However, it is still an important question, and it requires continued study. The best way of identifying a rotor, knowing a rotor is a rotor, and understanding where the rotor is, are going to be critical to further evaluating whether actual ablation of these rotors has any relevance to long-term atrial fibrillation ablation.                                 The truth is, that we need to be sure that we are properly identifying all the rotors in order to help guide whether or not we are actually being successful in ablating atrial fibrillation. The importance of the study is in reflecting whether 2-dimensional representations of the 3-dimensional geometry is sufficient to reflect what is actually happening in that 3-dimensional geometry. These authors suggest that it is not.                                 One of the limitations, however, might be that when we wrap a 2-dimensional framework into 3 dimensions and perform additional post-processing, this might result in some degree of attenuation of the data. However, it does highlight the importance for continued rigorous evaluation of current approaches to phase mapping.                                 Several articles have been published in recent months as well, about different single processing techniques to evaluate whether or not a rotor is, in fact, a rotor and to help optimize identification of them.                                 The jury is still out on whether or not targeted ablation of rotors will, in fact, improve overall long-term atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes. The limitations might not necessarily be that rotors are not an appropriate target, but that we just don't understand entirely where rotors are, based on limited single processing options, or based on limitations of anatomical localization.                                 Next, delving into the realm of ablation at large, we review an article by Iwasawa et al., published in this past month's issue of Europace, entitled Trans Cranial Measurement of Cerebral Microembolic Signals During Left-Sided Catheter Ablation with the Use of Different Approaches - the Potential Microembolic Risk of a Transseptal Approach.                                 The authors note the importance of considering microemolization in subclinical brain damage during catheter ablation procedures. They evaluated microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler during ablation of supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias with the use of either a transseptal or a retrograde approach.                                 The study set was small, only including 36 patients who underwent catheter ablation. They noted in about 11 patients left-sided ablation was done with transaortic approach, and in 9 patients a transseptal approach was used. The other 16 patients were not included, as they only had right-sided ablation.                                 The total amount of microembolic signature, based on transcranial Doppler were counted throughout the procedure and then analyzed offline. There is no significant difference in number of radio frequency applications, total energy delivery time, total application of energy, or total procedure time between the different groups. However, they did note that the mean total number of microembolic signals was highest in those undergoing transseptal approach to left-sided ablation. It was significantly lower in those having retrograde aortic approach, and lowest in those having right-sided only ablation.                                 Interestingly, many of the microembolic signals were detected during the transseptal puncture period, and then during the remainder of the procedure there was relatively even distribution of emboli formation. A frequency analysis suggested that the vast majority of microembolic signals are gaseous, in particularly Group 1 and Group 3, though only 91% in Group 2. No neurological impairment was observed in any of the patients after the procedure.                                 Recently, there's been a lot of focus on the potential long-term risk of cognitive impairments due to microembolic events in the setting of ablation. At least one recent paper in ventricular arrhythmias and several recent papers in atrial fibrillation ablation have suggested a fairly high risk of incidence cerebral emboli noted on MRI post ablation. While these results do not necessarily get at MRI lesions, they do suggest microembolic events. And what is most interesting, they look at microembolic events that occur throughout the entire ablation period with different approaches.                                 Interestingly, there is a massive spike in overall microembolic signals during the transseptal puncture period, and relatively even distribution throughout ablation, irrespective of application of radio frequency or not. Furthermore, while nearly all microembolic signals are gaseous, based on frequency analysis, with retroaortic approach or in those having right-sided only ablation, significantly less seem to be due to gaseous events in those having a transseptal approach.                                 It is known that there's possible damage to the internal dilation system when exposing it to transseptal needles or wires. Thus, one has to wonder whether some of the embolization could be from material associated with the actual transseptal puncture, either from portions of the punctured septum itself, or perhaps from the plastic material that which is being pushed transseptally.                                 These data still need to be considered and we have yet to see what the long-term applications of these kinds of findings are. It may be possible that while transseptal approach seems to offer more instant microembolic signals, if the long-term risk is no different, does it really matter?                                 However, these findings are provocative in the sense that they highlight potential significant differences and the risk of silent cerebral damage, based on the approach we use to ablation.                                 Changing gears, we next focus on the role of devices. And the first paper review is in the last month issue of JACC: Heart Failure, by Gierula et al., entitled Rate Response Programming Tailored to the Force Frequency Relationship Improves Exercise Tolerance in Chronic Heart Failure.                                 The authors sought to examine whether the heart rate at which the force frequency relationship slope peaks can be used to tailor heart rate response in chronic heart failure patients with cardiac pacemakers, and to see whether this favorably influences exercise capacity.                                 They performed an observational study in both congestive heart failure and healthy subjects with pacemaker devices. They then evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, controlled crossover study, the effects of tailored pacemaker rate response programming on the basis of a calculation of force frequency relationship based on critical heart rate, peak contractility, and the FFR slope.                                 They enrolled a total of 90 patients with congestive heart failure into the observational study cohorts, and 15 control subjects with normal LLV function. A total of 52 patients took part in the crossover study. They noted that those who had rate response settings limiting heart rate rise to below the critical heart rate were associated with greater exercise time and higher peak oxygen consumption, suggesting the tailored rate response program can offer significant benefit, particularly in congestive heart failure patients.                                 The importance of this trial is in that it highlights the importance of thoughtful decision-making in programming devices, and that group decision-making involving exercise physiologists, alongside pacemaker programming, and involving our congestive heart failure specialists might be the most critical in optimizing the approach to programming.                                 It might be that more aggressive measures are needed in congestive heart failure patients to decide on what optimal programming is, than it is in otherwise normal patients.                                 Staying within the realm of devices, we next focus on a publication by Sanders et al., published in this past month's issue of JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, entitled Increased Hospitalizations and Overall Healthcare Utilization in Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks Compared With Antitachycardia Pacing.                                 The authors sought to evaluate the effect of different therapies and healthcare utilization in a large patient cohorts. Specifically comparing antitachycardia pacing with high voltage shocks. They used the PROVIDE registry, which is a prospective study of patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention in 97 U.S. centers. They categorized these patients by type of therapy delivered, namely no therapy, ATP only, or at least one shock. They then adjudicated all ICD therapies, hospitalizations, and deaths.                                 Of the 1,670 patients included, there was a total follow-up of over 18 months. The vast majority, 1,316 received no therapy, 152 had ATP only, and 202 received at least one shock.                                 They noted that patients receiving no therapy and those receiving only ATP had a lower cumulative hospitalization rate and had a lower risk of death or hospitalization. The cost of hospitalization was known to be significantly higher for those receiving at least one shock than for those receiving only ATP therapy.                                 They noted no difference in outcomes or cost between patients receiving only ATP and those without therapy. Thus, the authors concluded that those receiving no therapy or those receiving only ATP therapy had similar outcomes, and had significantly reduced hospitalizations, mortality, and costs compared to those who received at least one high voltage shock.                                 The relevant findings from this study is similar to prior studies that suggest that any shock over follow-up is associated with potential increase in long-term mortality. The difficulty in assessing this, however, is the fact that it might be that those who have VT that can be appropriately ATP terminated, might be at a somewhat lower risk than those who need to be shocked to get out of their VT. Thus, the presumption of needing a shock to restore normal rhythm might suggest a higher risk cohort, it cannot be gleaned from traditional evaluation of morbid risk factors.                                 This is why the importance of considering how devices are programmed and whether or not a patient who has received shocks can be reprogrammed to offer ATP only therapy to terminate those same VTs, needs to be taken into consideration. How to best tailor this therapy, however, is still remaining to be determined, though more and more clinical trials are coming out to suggest in terms of optimal overall population-wide programming for devices.                                 Staying with the realm of devices, we next review an article by Koyak et al., in this past month's issue of Europace, entitled Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.                                 Heart failure is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality amongst patients with congenital heart disease. But there's limited experience in the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy amongst these patients. Thus, the authors sought to evaluate the efficacy of CRT in adults with congenital heart disease.                                 They performed a retrospective study on a limited number of 48 adults with congenital heart disease who received CRT, amongst four tertiary referral centers. They have defined responders as those who showed improvement in NYHA functional class or improvement in systemic ventricular ejection fraction. The median age at CRT implant was 47 years, with 77% being male. There was a variety of syndromes included.                                 They noted that the majority of patients, nearly 77%, responded to CRT, either by definition of improvement of NYHA functional class, or systemic ventricular function, with a total of 11 non-responders.                                 They noted that CRT was accomplished with a success rate comparable to those with acquired heart disease. However, the anatomy is much more complex and those technical challenges in achieving success o

We brought you the news on the APTA outcomes registry last year at CSM first.  Now, we update you on where the registry is now and where it'll be in the near future.   The Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry (Registry) uses data from the profession, for the profession, to help you elevate your patient care, visualize your value, and define your future.   The Registry collects and aggregates electronic health record (EHR) data from participating practices to help physical therapists make well-informed clinical decisions and track and benchmark clinical outcomes against nationwide data. By joining the Registry, you will gain a critical tool to demonstrate the value of physical therapist services.   The PT Outcomes Registry is an approved Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the 2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). Learn more about APTA. https://www.ptpintcast.com/2017/10/16/8-reasons-join-physical-therapy-outcomes-registry/ https://www.ptpintcast.com/2017/09/28/tbt-apta-csm-2017-outcomes-registry-announcement/ https://www.ptpintcast.com/2017/10/26/apta-national-student-conclave-portland-oregon-2017-student-qa/    

In a health care system that is trying to achieve the triple aim effect, physical therapy is gearing up to meet those expectation through The Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry. The purpose of the registry is to provide data that demonstrates value to the consumers and payers of physical therapy. We dive deeper into the implications this outcome registry will have on the profession and talked with Heather Smith, program director of quality for the American Physical Therapy Association. We cover the following topics: Purpose of the Physical Therapy Outcome Registry How the Physical Therapy Outcome Registry can be used to improve clinical decision making The announcement by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approving the Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry to collect and report under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System. How to register Future direction of the Physical Therapy Outcome Registry Talus Media Talks is a subsidiary of Talus Media: PT Views & PT News. You can find physical therapy news on our sister channel, Talus Media News. Check us out on Twitter & Facebook @TalusMedia, and head to our website at talusmedia.org for more information.  

In this, Monday, August 28th newscast, we’re talking data. The Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry launched in February--we tell bring you up to speed. New guidelines have been released on whiplash. The opioid crisis affects our patients--but how do they deal? Correspondent Jason Peltier speaks with Jeff Hatch. Finally, we talk clinical education, and the recommendations that may lead us down a path to mandatory residency. Talus Media News is a subsidiary of Talus Media: PT Views & PT News. You can find all interviews mentioned in this newscast on our sister channel, Talus Media Talks. Check us out on Twitter & Facebook @TalusMedia, and head to our website at talusmedia.org for more information.