Podcasts about Concordance

durée : 00:58:35 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Écrivain de talent, Jacques Benoist-Méchin fut aussi l'un des plus ardents défenseurs de la collaboration avec l'Allemagne nazie. Condamné à mort puis gracié, il incarne l'un des parcours les plus déroutants du XXᵉ siècle. Éric Roussel revient sur ce destin paradoxal. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar, Jeanne Guérout - invités : Eric Roussel Journaliste et écrivain Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

At the heart of a recent lawsuit filed by a physician is whether the medical profession's understanding and practice of racial concordance is legally defensible.“Find-A-Black-Doctor” has served as a platform for Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC) to locate providers who can offer them the best holistic treatment.However, some see this as discrimination against white-majority physicians, curtailing their access to potential patients.During my next live edition of Monitor Monday, Dr. Drew Updike, ] review the evidence behind concordance – as it pertains to women's health, BIPOC patients, and others – to provide you your team with an appreciation of its relevance in modern medicine.Broadcast segments will also include these instantly recognizable features:• Monday Rounds: Ronald Hirsch, MD, vice president of R1 RCM, will be making his Monday Rounds.• The RAC Report: Healthcare attorney Knicole Emanuel, partner at the law firm of Nelson Mullins, will report the latest news about auditors.• Risky Business: Healthcare attorney David Glaser, shareholder in the law offices of Fredrikson & Byron, will join the broadcast with his trademark segment.• Legislative Update: Matthew Albright, chief legislative affairs analyst for Zelis, will report on current healthcare legislation.

durée : 00:58:21 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Au 18ᵉ siècle, la France mobilise les réseaux jésuites établis en Chine pour observer, décrire et parfois reproduire des savoir-faire inconnus en Europe. Sébastien Pautet retrace cette collecte des connaissances, de la porcelaine à la soie, menée par de véritables "espions" des Lumières. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar, Jeanne Guérout - invités : Sébastien Pautet Historien moderniste Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:58:02 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Et si le paganisme avait résisté à la christianisation de l'Empire romain ? À travers la figure fascinante de Julien, dit l'Apostat, dernier empereur païen, Claire Sotinel revient sur le destin, les convictions et la postérité de cette figure aussi controversée que fascinante. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar, Jeanne Guérout - invités : Claire Sotinel Professeure d'histoire romaine à l'Université de Paris-Est Créteil Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

durée : 00:58:42 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Crimes, duels, guet-apens : derrière le vernis du raffinement aristocratique, la noblesse d'Ancien Régime entretenait une violence quotidienne et souvent impunie. Adèle Delaporte éclaire les liens entre culture de l'honneur, privilèges sociaux et brutalité nobiliaire. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar, Jeanne Guérout - invités : Adèle Delaporte Docteure en histoire moderne Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

John McKee delivers the May 2026 Outreach Israel News update. Far too many people across the Messianic spectrum, limit their engagement with Hebrew and Greek language matters to Strong's Concordance. There are many more, affordable, useful tools, which definitely need to be considered by various people in positions of leadership and teaching.

durée : 00:58:22 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Poète majeur de la Renaissance naissante, Pétrarque a profondément marqué l'histoire littéraire et intellectuelle de l'Europe. Étienne Anheim lui consacre un « portrait de famille » sensible et original, où les liens affectifs éclairent la genèse d'une œuvre fondatrice. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar, Jeanne Guérout - invités : Etienne Anheim Historien, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, membre du comité de rédaction des Annales Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Concordance —150 Years of Charles Ives

Dans cet épisode de KeyLIME+, Adam s'entretient avec le Dr Bernard Charlin à propos de la théorie de la concordance de script, une approche permettant de comprendre et d'évaluer le raisonnement clinique dans des contextes médicaux incertains et complexes. Ils explorent comment le test de concordance de script saisit certaines des nuances de la prise de décision en situation réelle en analysant la manière dont les cliniciens ajustent leur réflexion face à de nouvelles informations. Ils approfondissent également comment cette approche va au-delà de l'évaluation pour devenir un puissant outil d'apprentissage, offrant une rétroaction personnalisée qui remet en question les hypothèses et aiguise le jugement clinique. Bernard partage aussi ses réflexions sur l'impact étendu de ce test dans différentes spécialités ainsi que sur la manière dont les technologies émergentes, comme l'intelligence artificielle, pourraient en façonner l'avenir.   Episode Length: 32:29   Resources to check out:  Hudon A, Phan V, Charlin B, Wittmer R. Teaching Clinical Reasoning in Health Care Professions Learners Using AI-Generated Script Concordance Tests: Mixed Methods Formative Evaluation. JMIR Form Res. 2025 Nov 20;9:e76618.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41264864/    Bernard Charlin, Jacques Tardif, Henny P A Boshuizen, Scripts and Medical Diagnostic Knowledge: Theory and Applications for Clinical Reasoning Instruction and Research, Academic Medicine, Volume 75, Issue 2, February 2000, Pages 182–190 Scripts and Medical Diagnostic Knowledge | Academic Medicine | Oxford Academic  Contact   Contact us: keylime@royalcollege.ca     Follow: Dr. Adam Szulewski https://x.com/Adam_Szulewski   

durée : 00:58:20 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - L'ostracisme : honneur ou infamie ? À Athènes, exiler sans procès visait à préserver l'équilibre démocratique. Arbitraire mais encadrée, cette pratique interroge encore nos régimes, un débat éclairé par Vincent Azoulay. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Vincent Azoulay Historien spécialiste de la Grèce antique

In this episode of the Christ Alone Podcast, Stevens and the team discuss the powerful documentary The Story of Everything, inspired by Stephen C. Meyer's book Return of the God Hypothesis. Together, we explore how discoveries in cosmology, biology, and physics increasingly point toward the existence of an intelligent mind behind the universe.Is the universe the result of blind chance… or intentional design?From the fine-tuning of the cosmos to the complexity of DNA and the origins of life itself, this conversation examines why many scientists and philosophers are reconsidering the evidence for God in light of modern scientific discovery.This episode is not just about science — it's about worldview, meaning, and the Creator revealed through creation.Key Scriptures To Look Up:Romans 1:20Psalm 19:1Colossians 1:16–17Hebrews 3:4John 1:1–3Resources Mentioned:• Return of the God Hypothesis — Stephen C. Meyer• The Story of Everything documentary• Connect With Christ Alone NetworkDownload the Christ Alone Network app to access:• Bible reading tools• Podcast episodes• Blogs and devotionals• Strong's Concordance tools• Christian media and teachingFollow and support Christ Alone Network for more Christ-centered conversations grounded in truth, Scripture, and apologetics.Give Now: www.christalonenetwork.com/giveFeatured Ad: www.renewedmindsets.comQuestions/Suggestions: www.christalonenetwork.com/contactPrayer Request: www.christalonenetwork.com/prayerImmediate Contact: call/text 407-796-2881

If you've been pushing yourself to do more, research more, and try more when it comes to your health — this episode is for you. Today we're going back to the original Hebrew to uncover what Solomon actually meant when he used the word "diligent" in Proverbs. And it's not what most of us think. This isn't a try-harder message. This is a work-smarter, trust-God, move-with-precision message — and it has everything to do with how you approach your healing journey. This episode is for the Christian woman who is done spinning her wheels, confused by every new health trend, and ready to move forward with clarity, faith, and real direction. --- What Does "Diligent" Actually Mean in Proverbs? Most of us grew up thinking diligent simply meant hardworking and persistent. But when you go back to the original Hebrew, the word used in Proverbs — charuwts — paints a completely different picture. According to Strong's Concordance, charuwts means incisive, decisive, and sharp. It's the same word used to describe a threshing sledge — a heavy agricultural tool with iron teeth, dragged across grain to separate what's valuable from what isn't. Sometimes a person would sit on top of it to increase the weight and effectiveness. This is not a passive word. This is a precise, relentless, purposeful word. And here's what Proverbs says about the diligent woman: • Proverbs 12:24 — the diligent will rule • Proverbs 13:4 — the soul of the diligent will be richly supplied • Proverbs 21:5 — diligence leads to abundance --- Work Smarter, Not Just Harder Here's the shift that changes everything: the threshing sledge wasn't just powerful — it was efficient. It had a specific purpose and it executed that purpose with precision. Jesus said in Matthew 11 that his yoke is easy and his burden is light. That doesn't mean life won't require effort. But it does mean we're not called to frantic, scattered, exhausting effort. We're called to sharp, intentional, God-directed effort. In 2026, distraction is one of the biggest enemies of diligence. When we don't know what our goals are, when we haven't sat with God long enough to hear what He's asking of us, we can't be relentless — because we don't even know what we're running toward. James 1 puts it plainly: the double-minded person, the one who asks but doubts, is like a wave tossed by the wind. Unstable. Unsteady. Unable to receive. --- Why Your Holistic Health Journey Feels So Overwhelming If you're dealing with chronic fatigue, autoimmune symptoms, or trying to figure out what your body actually needs — the noise is overwhelming. Every doctor says something different. Every health guru has a different protocol. Every natural remedy promises to be the answer. But the Hebrew definition of diligent isn't "research everything." It's be precise. Be decisive. Be sharp about what God is showing you. This is what a faith-centered approach to holistic health actually looks like in practice: • Going to God first for wisdom about your body, not just Google • Receiving direction and then actually following through — not second-guessing every step • Recognizing that every part of your life shapes your health: your relationships, your schedule, your commitments, your alignment with your calling • Letting go of the supplement overload and leaning into the foundational things — rest, alignment, peace, and purpose When the busyness of life pulls us away from who God created us to be, that disconnect creates a mental and physical load that affects our health in ways no supplement can fix. Christian wellness isn't just about what you eat. It's about how you live. --- Time-Stamped Highlights • 0:00 — The Hebrew word for "diligent" in Proverbs and the threshing sledge picture • 0:29 — Three key Proverbs about diligence and what they promise • 1:22 — What charuwts actually means: incisive, decisive, sharp, relentless • 3:18 — Why this points to working smarter, not just harder • 4:15 — Distraction as the enemy of diligence in 2026 • 4:42 — James 1 and the danger of being double-minded • 5:42 — How this applies directly to your autoimmune healing and health journey • 7:08 — The turning point: when healthy eating wasn't enough and God showed a better way • 8:07 — How living out of alignment with your calling affects your health • 9:03 — A direct invitation to act on what God has already been showing you --- Key Takeaways • The Hebrew word for "diligent" in Proverbs means far more than hardworking — it means precise, decisive, sharp, and relentless, like a threshing instrument with a specific purpose • Distraction is one of the biggest barriers to true diligence — it's hard to be relentless when you don't know what you're pursuing • God calls us to seek His wisdom and then obey it — not to keep searching indefinitely while doubting every step • Holistic health isn't just physical — your relationships, schedule, purpose, and alignment all shape your body's ability to heal • You can acknowledge your feelings — the tiredness, the discouragement, the lack of hope — and still choose obedience anyway • This is not about doing more. It's about doing what God has already shown you, with precision and trust --- Ready to Move Forward with Precision? If this episode stirred something in you and you're ready to stop guessing and start moving forward with real focus — the More Energy & Peace Session was built for you. This is for the woman who hears truth and acts on it. The one who is done being overwhelmed and ready to bring sharp, intentional focus to her health and her life. Book your More Energy & Peace Session at herholistichealing.com/peace.   This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. 

Episode 575 - Abe Goldstein & Dave Sakolsky, Concordance Ferments Happy Monday, Thieves! We're doing a bit of a flip from last week when Augie was off on his bike in Spain and Kennedy, Casse, and Holl held down the fort. This week, Augie's cruising mostly solo to talk to Abe & Dave of Hatboro, PA's Concordance Ferments. They talk some kitchen ferment geekery before getting into beer eventually. Great listen, tune in and let us know what you think!***As always, you can email your questions, complaints, whimpers, or whines to us at stealthisbeerpodcast@gmail.com. We read everything we get and we'll try to respond as quickly as we can. If not online, then on air. And THANKS! You can subscribe to STB on iTunes and PLEASE LEAVE US A REVIEW!!! Co-hosts: Augie Carton & John Holl Producer: Justin Kennedy Engineer: Brian Casse Music: "Abstract Concepts - What Up in the Streets" by Black Ant.

durée : 00:58:48 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Poète, premier président du Sénégal et académicien, Léopold Sédar Senghor incarne un parcours d'exception autant que de vives controverses. Elara Bertho fait le portrait nuancé de cet homme d'État, tout en rendant justice à la grande actualité de sa pensée poétique et philosophique. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Elara Bertho Docteure en lettres modernes, chercheuse au CNRS dans le laboratoire Les Afriques dans le Monde (LAM)

UNIVERSAL GOSPEL What went wrong? Paul was entrusted with the Gospel of the Word of Reconciliation. And he entrusted that to Timothy and it has been entrusted to us.  2Timothy 2:2 and what you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also.  The Gospel Word of Reconciliation. 2Corinthians 5:18 All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, God was  in Christ reconciling the world to himself, not counting their sins against them, and entrusting to us the message (logos) of reconciliation (katalasso). Logos – (Strong's Concordance)the Divine Expression (Christ) — account, cause, communication concerning doctrine.  This is the ‘logos' message, the Good news that God entrusted to Paul. Reconciliation is Katalasso - kata thoroughgoing intensity, alasso means to alter or change and in God's work of reconciliation he brought Divinity into humanity in a thorough mutual exchange. This was done through the incarnation of Jesus who became eternally changed from pure spirit being into the divine plus human spirit being of Jesus as a new creation, and we become this New Creation in Christ (Isaiah 7:14 – Virgin has a Son, Emmanuel ‘God with us'). Peter also received the revelation of being made one in the spirit with Jesus and he preached the same message about the logos word of God as the seed that brings forth the life of the New Creation. He uses a simpler more organic language to convey it. 2Peter 1:4 we have been given exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature. 1 Peter 1:23 having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God (logos) which lives and abides forever. All flesh is like grass and all its glory like the flower of grass. The grass withers, and the flower falls, but the word of the Lord remains forever +++. And this word (logos) is the good news that was preached to you. With Peter the illustration is that as that seed grows through faith, the outer husk of the seed, our outer soul-self life, is burned away by the fiery trials of faith. 1 Peter 4:12 Beloved, do not think it strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened to you; 19 Therefore let those who suffer according to the will of God commit their souls to Him in doing good. This redemptive transformational suffering result in the forever saving of our souls. 1Peter 1:9 Receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation/healing of the soul.  Peter and Paul both had the same gospel, which was that Jesus the new seed of Heavenly life is sown into humanity (Incarnation) so that Divine life and human life become one new life. That describes the initial saving of the human spirit. Then occurs the ongoing salvation of our soul through faith and the purifying of our soul by the fiery trials of faith. John and James also preached this same universal work of the human spirit being eternally joined to God through the incarnation of Jesus. John 1:10 That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world. Vs.16 And of His fullness we have all received,  James 1:21 receive with meekness the implanted word (logos), which is able to save your souls. There are people who are getting this revelation of the exchanged life of ‘God with us' day after day because of the work of the Holy Spirit revealing the truth taught in the Bible. They can have this truth without knowing exactly what Paul wrote concerning Reconciliation or what Peter wrote about the logos seed of life, or what John or James wrote, but their hearts have received grace and been purified by faith - that is God's work of grace. I am not insisting upon a dogmatic compliance to what I have found in these Scriptures - but having understood it by the grace of God I am compelled to not withhold anything that may be profitable to you for the sake of the Gospel. Galatians 1:11 For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel. For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with anyone; The Gospel comes by revelation from the Holy Spirit in a myriad of ways.  Peter comments on Paul's message of Reconciliation – and politely says that it can be difficult to understand, but that it is inspired and should not be diminished or twisted. 2Peter 3:15 consider that the longsuffering (withholding of condemnation to achieve transformation) of our Lord is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures. Paul and Peter and James and John jealously guarded the integrity of this amazing salvation of the human spirit by the grace of God and the ongoing transformation and salvation of the human soul.  Paul warns the legalistic Galatians about this. Galatians 1:6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you (tarasso - to strike one's spirit with fear and dread) and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven or anyone else should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed (anathema) Being ‘accursed' or being ‘anathama' in the Greek is ana- handing up and tithemi – the gift. It is handing something up to God as a sacrificial gift to be purified from corruption. The handing over leaves that person ‘cut off' in isolation but the purpose is that the corruption will be destroyed so their spirit and soul can be purified. This is a redemptive act to transform and resttore someone from corruption.  Paul makes this clear later when he says that Jesus has become the anathema curse for us. That is because Jesus took his incorruption up to the altar of the cross as a sacrifice to redeem humanity's corruption.  Galatians 3:13 Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”), that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the all people in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.  In 1 Corinthians 5:5 Paul even handed a man over to Satan for the ‘destruction of the flesh' - his embodiment of a serious sin - that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. It was the sin of committing adultery with his father's wife. The man was cut off from the church community and afterwards turned from his sin and was forgiven and restored. That was not done out of a desire to punish but out of a redemptive desire to see forgiveness and transformation and restoration, which is what happened.  Paul took the integrity of the true Gospel message very seriously. He sought to embody the Gospel in his soul as being one of love and care, and not one of motivating people by fear or from a place of assuming power over other people's lives. 1Thessalonians 2:4-10 But as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, even so we speak... But we were gentle among you, just as a nursing mother cherishes her own children. So, affectionately longing for you, we were well pleased to impart to you not only the gospel of God, but also our own souls (psyche), because you had become dear to us. The Gospel message became diminished and narrowed over time, starting when Rome lorded Christianity over people turning it into Christendom, but then Martin Luther received the revelation of justification by faith in the reformation in the 1500s till denominational conflict and legalism crept back over the years. there are some who trouble you (tarasso - to strike one's spirit with fear and dread) Jonathan Edwards was a profoundly spiritual man of puritan and reformed theology who preached powerfully and sincerely in the eighteenth century about the death and resurrection of Jesus as our saviour from sin, and many thousands responded to his message. But his influence of puritanism and Calvinism shaped the character of American Protestantism for many years, and it still distorts much modern evangelicalism, a gospel of retribution rather that transformation and restoration. The following is an excerpt of Jonathan Edward's preaching from ‘Sinners in the hands of an Angry God'. ‘The bow of Gods wrath is bent, and the arrow made ready on the string, and justice bends the arrow at your heart and strains the bow and it is nothing but the mere pleasure of God and that of an angry God, without any promise or obligation at all that keeps the arrow for one moment from being made drunk with your blood.' And why should God be obliged to express such wonderful love to you, who never exercised the least degree of love to him in all your life? You never have loved God, who is infinitely glorious and lovely; and why then is God under obligation to love you, who are all over deformed and loathsome as a filthy worm, or rather a hateful viper?  (1John 4:18 perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment–kolasis punishment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love. We love Him because He first loved us). And why then should God be looked upon as obliged to take so much care for your happiness, as to do such great things for it, as he does for those that are saved?  there are some who trouble you (tarasso - to strike one's spirit with fear and dread) This has resulted in a retributive Gospel of shame and guilt and condemnation that emphasises the fear of a likely future of eternal punishment in hell, which Paul never once mentions.  A false gospel doesn't just harm behaviour—it distorts our perception of God Himself. The western Church has grown weaker in love and unity and stronger in pseudo spiritual performance and judging others and falling away. Compare the angry God Gospel with the original early Christian era of Church Fathers like Athanasius who wrote around 350 AD. He was an Egyptian Coptic Christian Theologian and Church Father - the chief defender of the teaching of the Trinity.  ‘It was unworthy of the goodness of God that creatures made by him should be brought to nothing by the deceit wrought upon man by the devil, and it was supremely unfitting that the work of God in mankind should disappear either through their own negligence or through the deceit of evil spirits. As then the creatures whom He had created reasonable like the Word were in fact perishing and such noble works were on their way to ruin, what then was God, being good, to do? Was he to let corruption and death have their way with them – and in that case what would be the use of having made them in the beginning? Surely it would have been better never to have been created at all than have been created to be neglected and perish. And besides that, such indifference to the ruin of his own work before his own eyes would argue not goodness in God, but limitation, and that far more than if he had never created man at all. It was impossible therefore that God should leave man to be carried off by corruption because it would be unfitting and unworthy of himself…' He writes further,Thus, taking a body like our own because all our bodies were liable to the corruption of death, he surrendered his body to death for us all, and offered it to the Father. This he did out of sheer love for us so that in his death all might die, and the law of death be abolished because having fulfilled in his body that for which he was appointed, death was thereafter voided of its power for men. This he did that he might turn men again to incorruption who had turned back to corruption and make them alive through death by the appropriation of his body and by the grace of his resurrection thus he would make death to disappear from them as utterly as straw from fire.  Straw from fire is those fiery trials of faith that burn off straw and reveal the gold (1Corinthians 3:11++) But over time the gospel shifted from a cosmic announcement of what God has done for the world to a power based institutionalised message which gave a selective, conditional offer of what God might do if people believed that Jesus could forgive them and save them from going to hell if they obeyed what the church told them.  What went wrong? there are some who trouble you (tarasso - to strike one's spirit with fear and dread).Since the time of Christ, a World population of almost 70 billion people has existed. How many people have heard the true gospel? What is true and what is false? Certain English words have been prejudicially translated from the original language that have altered the nature of the gospel and altered our perception of a loving, saving God - Words such as torment, wrath, eternity, hell, and perishing, and many others. How has that affected our current global Western culture relationally and morally? What questions remain? We will consider some possible answers in our next session - the Lord willing. 2Peter 3:9 The Lord…is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance (metanoia – a change of mindset). Paul OSulivan - pauloss@me.com

durée : 00:58:26 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Mal connues, les reines carolingiennes occupèrent pourtant des fonctions majeures du VIIIe siècle au Xe siècle. Laurent Theis rappelle le rôle de Berthe, Hildegarde, Judith et les autres dans la dynastie carolingienne. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Laurent Theis Historien, éditeur et critique français

Ever wrestled with a question that felt too big to answer—something that Google couldn't quite help with, and the Bible app just gave a list of verses that didn't really land? We live in a world of instant answers, but spiritual wisdom takes more than a search bar. So, how do we actually find answers to hard questions using God's Word first, not last? Today's episode is called “Bible First: Finding Real Answers to Questions”, and we're talking about how to study, search, and investigate hard topics using Scripture, not just shortcuts. And the episode is less about specific questions and more about methods to use when searching for answers. When you have a question, where do you usually start? Why do you take this approach? Be honest! Here are more questions to consider: Why is our default to Google or search in the Bible app? And is that always bad? What does it look like to actually investigate using Scripture alone? What types of resources can we use when searching for answers? What makes this kind of study so hard for most of us? What fruit comes from doing it “the hard way”—the Bible-first way? What do we really need when we're studying? TIME and PATIENCE! I hope our listeners know that that Google is not our enemy, but we should still question the root, and the effect, of getting quick answers that we seldom meditate upon. How do you need to slow down, read, reread, and ponder God's word? This is a challenge for me, as well. We don't learn everything all at once; growth takes time. We are always learning! We encourage you to keep reading, praying, and talking with the Lord about your questions. Then, speak with mature Christians who have navigated similar questions and know their Bibles well. Subscribe so you don’t miss an episode! UNEDITED TRANSCRIPTION: 00:00:00 Patricia: Have you ever wrestled with a question that felt too big to answer? Something that Google couldn’t quite help you with? And the Bible app just gave a list of verses that didn’t really land. We live in a world of instant answers, but gaining spiritual wisdom takes more than just searching in a search bar. So today’s podcast is about using the Bible first finding real answers to our questions. Welcome to our Patterns of Truth podcast. I’m Patricia, your host, and today we are talking about how to study, search and investigate hard topics using the scriptures and not just shortcuts. Shortcuts are not a bad thing. We’ll talk about that. Um, but we want to kind of reexamine the practices that we engage in when we’re searching for answers. So this episode is about is not really about specific questions, specific hard questions that we seek to answer, but more about the methods that we can use when searching for those answers. So hello to everyone on the podcast today. Hello, Peter. Hello, Roy. Hello, Bethel. How are you all doing today? 00:01:05 Peter: Hello, hello. 00:01:07 Roy: Hey, great. Rainy and cold in Oregon. Oh it’s raining. Yeah. Rainy. 00:01:15 Bethel: Not humid here. 00:01:17 Patricia: Yeah. 00:01:17 Peter: Whereas here Bethel. 00:01:19 Bethel: Right now it’s Jersey. 00:01:21 Patricia: Yeah. 00:01:22 Bethel: It’s not Philly. It’s Jersey today. 00:01:24 Patricia: Jersey. Welcome back. All right. So um I’ll start with a panel question for all of us. So when any of us have a question, something popped into your mind. Somebody talks about something. Where do you usually start to find the answer? It can be any resource. It could be Google, it could be another. Right. So where do you start and why do you take this approach? 00:01:52 Bethel: I’m a Googler. 00:01:54 Patricia: All right. Yeah. 00:01:55 Bethel: Everybody and everybody makes fun of me that I even use Google because everybody just uses AI. Like everybody’s just like, just ask ChatGPT. Just ask ChatGPT. Um, so even googling is like outdated at this point, but depending on how deep I might text my dad. 00:02:11 Patricia: Oh, nice. All right. Cool. Roy? Peter. 00:02:17 Roy: Um, I asked my wife. 00:02:19 Patricia: Okay. 00:02:21 Roy: Um, good place to start. That’s good intuition. Um, my daughter, um, who also has very good insight. Um, and then it depends on what kind of a question. And I appreciate the Google answer. Um, in fact, I did, I used Google just the other day when I wanted to know the initial, um, area that was assigned to the tribe of Dan and I got a pretty good answer. So if the question is specific enough, um, then I think, um, Google is fine or I don’t know about chat, I haven’t used chat GP so I don’t know how that works, but I know Google uses AI underneath. So Google basically a, a front end to an AI program. Yeah. But it has to be specific. It depends on the type of question. 00:03:18 Patricia: Yeah, I like that you mentioned that because sometimes you could do like a broad question and then who knows what you’re going to get just just how Google works. Right. Sorry, Peter. 00:03:28 Peter: Yeah. I, I would say I try to find the shortest article I find, usually from kind of the same circle of church community. Amen. Um, um, and uh, definitely Google. Like sometimes it’s like a specific website that I go to other than, uh, I find got questions sometimes is a website that would help a lot in like general questions. Uh, if it’s something specific, more doctrine, I go back to the like some brief, uh, article and then control F to find. Yeah, the article. So, uh, yeah, I do that. 00:04:12 Patricia: Yeah. All right. That’s practical, I like it. I tend to start with the Bible app for some reason, right? There’s just, I don’t know, it’s, uh, it’s easy and I don’t know, there’s something I like Google, but I feel like So I really slow down and I think about like, what I feel when I Google something, I usually feel fear because I think that there are questions that I may have that when I Google it, there are harmful or anti-God, anti-Christian things that seem to pop up at the top. And I honestly just don’t want to see that when I’m searching out something. I don’t know what it is, but it just really disturbs me. Um, I know some people can see it and just discard it, but for me, it just, it really unsettles me. So I tend to like not want to go to Google for some reason. So maybe the Bible app, I’m trying to protect myself in some way. I’m not sure. But, um, our first question really is about like, why do we think that, um, a more popular default for searching for any question will be Google or a search in the Bible app? Why is that something that we tend to do these days? And is that always a bad thing? 00:05:21 Peter: Well, convenience. 00:05:24 Patricia: Um. 00:05:25 Roy: It depends a lot on the question. 00:05:28 Patricia: Do you ever feel like. Or maybe I should ask it this way? Is there a scenario where you find something on Google or a different tool, and it makes you immediately stop searching? Like you don’t go back to your Bible? Or does the opposite happen? You find what you need and then you say, oh, I want to go deeper. What does that look like? 00:05:50 Roy: Really depends upon the subject matter and the question. Okay. Um, I think, you know. 00:05:56 Peter: Yeah. I mean, for, for Patricia’s point, um, that’s a good point because I think when I Google things, it does stop me from digging more into scripture because I found the solution or at least part of an answer, and then I’m satisfied with it. Um, so that’s a, that’s a good point. I mean, we’re definitely not against technology. We should use technology. Um, if it’s your favorite AI search, LLM or Google, uh, it can be useful. Um, but, um, I think studying scripture as we can talk soon about is and, uh, like changing your heart through studying scripture is more just knowledge. Um, and I think you reach just knowledge if you like, get the answer quickly. 00:06:55 Roy: Yes. That’s very important point. Uh, and I want to emphasize that we are talking about having a specific question or a question about something. We get an answer, but that should lead us to dig deeper. And that should even that even specific studies should not keep us from regular Bible reading. Um, and that’s where we gain a general knowledge of God’s character. Um, you know, there’s a, a rule, there’s apps and whatnot that lead you through the Bible? Genesis to revelation in a year? Well, you may or may not want to use one of those apps, but the point is you have to be generally familiar with your Bible. I found questions that are, quite surprisingly in books like Ecclesiastes or Proverbs or Chronicles, and that seem to have nothing to do with the subject matter, but they. But they’re put in a way that for trigger thinking about things in a different way. So general Bible reading needs to always be done on a regular basis. 00:08:03 Patricia: Yeah. So leading into that, um, or coming out of that point, I should say, uh, if we had no technology, right. I couldn’t use my phone. Google’s down. It does happen from time to time, right? We can’t get to the website that we want. Um, I’m thinking about that AWS blackout from a few weeks ago where people were panicking. They couldn’t find anything. So if we only had our Bible in front of us, the actual physical volume, what does it look like to investigate using Scripture alone? Where does it start? 00:08:38 Roy: Need to know the books of the Bible and where they are. 00:08:41 Patricia: Mhm. Mhm. 00:08:44 Speaker 6: And I think maybe a general gist of what’s happening in each one. 00:08:48 Patricia: Yeah. 00:08:49 Roy: Definitely the difference between the Old and New Testament. Mhm. Um, and it also helps to have a, a mental map like Bethel was saying of what generally goes together. And this is fairly obvious, and I think a lot of people, uh, talk about it. So maybe we don’t need to belabor the point, but there are prophetic books, there are poetry books, there are history books, and there’s the Pentateuch and there’s New Testament. That’s a general classification. But we should know generally how how the different books relate to one another. Like among the Gospels, Matthew presents the Lord Jesus as the King. And I’m not saying anything that is particularly remarkable. I mean, we I think we all know this quote. 00:09:44 Bethel: And maybe instead of just looking up, oh, what does the Bible say about this? Fill in the blank. We could use Google as a resource to say, hey, how is the Bible split up? What is the Old Testament about? What are the parts of the Old Testament? What makes it different from the New Testament? What makes the Gospels different from each other? And you can use the internet as that type of resource to dig deeper in that way. 00:10:10 Patricia: Yeah. I think also if someone is a new believer, I mean, it’s, it might feel like kind of steep, right? Like, oh, before you start, you got to memorize all these things. I think while you’re doing it, I think I’m looking at the front of my Bible. There’s a table of contents, right? So if you’re a new Christian, or maybe it’s been a little while, if you if you need the pages with the numbers, right, start with it, like where each book of the Bible is. And what’s great is like most Bibles, like mine is organized, it tells you what’s in the Old Testament, what’s in the New Testament, and that can help you with organizing. Um, we’re looking at the Bible like how it’s, how it’s organized. And I think that’s a good place to begin. Um, I. 00:10:52 Peter: Think it’s high yield to Patricia. Like knowing the books of the Bible can be very helpful and knowing like the sections that, like Roy was saying, and I can argue also like some of them maybe can, they’re not inspired the chapters, but knowing how many chapters, like, you know, like, oh, you know, for example, Ephesians and Galatians are six chapters. Colossians and Philippians are four chapters. Um, so help you kind of. you know, contain or have a hold of of the book and how, how long it is. 00:11:29 Patricia: Yeah, that’s really good. And I think too, it’s, um, it’s good to think of how while we learned about what the book of the Bible’s are and how the Bible’s organized, that we can still start reading it. I think sometimes it can feel like levels like, oh, I can’t, I can’t do this until I do that. But it’s like, no, start reading while you’re memorizing where the books of the Bible are. So we talked about, I guess, operationally speaking, knowing how the Bible’s organized, but is there another way that we can begin that helps us when we’re just looking at the scripture alone and trying to find an answer? 00:12:08 Peter: We need help from Roy on this one. 00:12:14 Roy: Well, it’s been a long time since I was, uh, first, uh, I was pretty much know where everything is right now, and I hope this is going to be cut out of the. That’s the final deal. Um, well, again, I have to go back to the kind of question, I guess, because questions about the church, for example, if I have a question about that, I’m going to have to look in the New Testament. And I have to start with acts because that’s where the church began. And then Paul’s epistles in particular. So having a knowledge of where things are talked about and explained in Scripture is almost essential. Um, if you need comfort, let me give a couple of examples. We often look to the Psalms for comfort and encouragement, but in doing that, you need to realize that it’s a Jewish book. And so there are things in the Psalms which do not apply to us. Um, the Imprecatory Psalms in particular, which are Psalms which call down judgment upon our enemies. Well, if you’re new to the Bible, you might get confused by some of that. If you haven’t read and absorbed Romans, for example, toward the end where it says, vengeance is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord. And if you haven’t really digested that. So I guess I’d have to say that we need to start looking through the New Testament to get a feel for the kinds of things that are particularly appropriate for the Christian. I’m thinking of a new believer now. Sometimes we say, okay, start reading John’s gospel. Well, that’s a good one. Um, if I say start reading Matthew, Then I may run across the kingdom of God, where servants are failed, and throw in thrown into outer darkness. And that kind of verses have led to the idea of we can lose our salvation if you don’t really understand what the kingdom of God is. So there is some basic knowledge that’s required. You know, if you keep reading, then you’ll get to John’s Gospel. And there you find out that if you’re in the hand of the Lord, no one can pluck you out. And so there’s the answer. But some of this can be confusing to a new person. So the only solution is, I think, to ask somebody that you can trust, give you a general feeling for what the different books talk about. And then you have to have your general knowledge to have scripture reading it through to, to come up with stuff. And I gotta say this right here too. There are several verses that emphasize that God is compassionate and he preserves the simple. And I think if actually, in my experience, the biggest hindrance is pride. So if we come to the Bible with the proper attitude that this is God’s word, then I think God can lead us. The Holy Spirit leads us to apply things in the right way. Um, striking verses in um, um, Psalm one hundred and sixteen six is perhaps just a good one. Um, and also in Proverbs there’s some. So God and God will guide us if we’re humble enough to learn from him. 00:16:15 Peter: Yeah. Just to add to what Roy was saying is when you’re studying the scripture, uh, it’s good to, uh, uh, look at the context of. 00:16:25 Roy: Right. 00:16:26 Peter: Uh, I think that’s what Roy’s saying also of the whole scripture and the book and the context of the chapter. What does it talk about? 00:16:36 Patricia: So then, okay, so we have the word of God, um, itself, and we have the Holy Spirit who will teach us and reveal things to us that we cannot learn just intellectually on our own. So when we’re Christians, we have that. We have him as a resource. But what about some other resources that we can use when searching for answers? I’m talking about things that other very mature Christians who have studied the Bible have put together. Um, and I’m thinking of a concordance. I’m thinking of biblical commentaries. Um, can we have some commentary on that? What type of resources can we use when searching for answers and how do we use them? 00:17:19 Roy: Concordance is really helpful. I use a concordance frequently. Usually there’s a concordance at the back of most Bibles that is tuned to the particular, um, um, uh, version that you’re using, uh, translation, but you can always do a cross-reference. You know, the standard concordance is ah, Strong’s and Young’s someone that says strongest for the weak and young is for the old. But be that as it may, um, they’re both both good, although they’re different. Um, um, and if you’re not using King James, both of those are based on King James. Maybe they’ve been upgraded, I don’t know, or changed. But anyway, you can always, um, if you have a particular verse in NIV, for example, look it up at the same verse, uh, in, uh, in the King James. Um, and figure out what verse, what word you want to look up and then go to the concordance with that. Now, I use Young’s a lot because it gives the Greek and Hebrew and, um, that can be helpful if you have a good, um, uh, uh, dictionary, uh, specific, you know, the, the, the old Testament, uh, dictionary I use is um, theological wordbook of the old Testament, which is good, good Hebrew, uh, analysis. I don’t know a word of Hebrew. So I just have to depend in that, uh, in Greek, uh, in Hebrew. 00:18:56 Speaker 7: Let me ask you, Roy. 00:18:57 Peter: Um, I, I don’t remember the last time I used the concordance. Bethel. Have you you. 00:19:05 Bethel: Really just just the one in the back of my Bible. 00:19:09 Peter: Uh, are we missing out a lot because we’re not using the concordance or when do you use it? Do you. When is the deep study verse by verse? 00:19:19 Patricia: Wait, so maybe I should define it and it will help to answer the question. Right? I’m thinking that the concordance is actually what the search bar is now in the Bible app. But all right, so the definition of concordance, it’s an alphabetical index of all the words in the Bible or any text. And it lists where each word appears. So it’s an alphabetical index of all the words in a text and lists where each word appears. 00:19:48 Roy: Now the problem is, and this is why I use Young’s analytical concordance, is that there are only about four thousand words in the Hebrew biblical Hebrew. Now, modern Hebrew is totally different, but we’re dealing with an Old Testament text. And if you think about the number of words that we have in the English language, It’s up in the. Millions and more are being added every year. So to have four thousand words in a language means that each word is going to have to do multiple jobs. And so context is really important. And you can get that information. You can look that information up, uh, in the, um, in the back of the Young’s concordance and figure out how the different words are being used in the context in which they’re being used. So you can kind of parse that out. So it is definitely for a deeper study of, of the words. But the basic idea is that it gives you a list of verses where the word is used. 00:20:56 Patricia: Mhm. 00:20:56 Roy: And so you can go and compare where the word is used or how the word is being used in these different verses. And in the back of Young’s Concordance, you also have a reverse cross reference so that you can look up the Hebrew word, for example, and see the different version, the different ways the translators have translated it. So you get a sense of how specific the word is and, um, and what the translators were thinking of when they translated it. You can sort of figure that out. So, um, those kinds of things have to do with puzzling verses that you run across and they just, why? What does that mean? And so if you’re trying to figure out what that means or what a particular verse means, then, uh, a concordance is really helpful. Okay. 00:22:00 Patricia: So on the most basic level, for example, if I have a question about world peace, does the Bible ever talk about world peace? I can look up the word peace in a physical concordance. And I know Strong’s is like big and blue. Maybe they updated it, but the one I grew up seeing was like baby blue. Um, and you could look up the word peace. And when you look it up, it’s got a list of every single place that the word peace is mentioned. And you have to go through each verse to decipher what the definition of peace, I guess you could say is being, or I should say like the part of speech is being used, right? Is it the peace that’s between that passes all understanding for Christians? Is it the peace between God and humans? Now, because of the Lord Jesus? Is it peace that God will establish in the future? So you have to really do some legwork to find out if what you’re looking for is the definition of the word that you found. I guess you would say, is that like how you start at the most basic level? 00:23:04 Roy: Yes. 00:23:05 Patricia: Okay. All right. But if you’re advanced, you’d be like, going towards more nuanced definitions of the word. Um, maybe if they’re in Greek or in Hebrew, there are different words for different types of peace, which I know, like for people who are bilingual, they understand that a lot better than I do. Like being monolingual. I only speak English, but I know there are multiple words. Say, for example, love. So you can’t just look up love. You can. But there’s so much variety in what you’ll find. So it takes effort, right? That’s what it sounds like. Effort. 00:23:42 Roy: Yeah, yeah. You have to do some study. Okay. Probably a real example would be, um, the word corruption in the New Testament. Okay. That has a certain, uh, mental image brought up. But the problem is that in Greek, which is what the base language that the New Testament was translated from, the Greek word uses the same word, same Greek word for two different kinds of corruption. Now we distinguish, for example, corruption from decay. Decay is what results from the law of physics. The entropy. You throw a pile of grass out in the in the backyard and after a while it decays. Um, on the other hand, um, immorality is also corruption. So this, this requires that you kind of look at the verse and try and figure out what is being meant by the word decay. But and some translators will translate them differently. Sometimes they won’t. Okay. 00:24:53 Patricia: So then I guess it’s good to just have a dictionary. Yes. Do I know what the words mean that I’m searching up? Right. That I think that would probably be useful. Like even in your own language, like, you know, the way we use certain words are not necessarily how they’re always used in other contexts? It would be good to have a dictionary as well. Okay. All right. So we got the concordance. So what about biblical commentaries? What are they? When should be the when should they be used and does the publication date matter? 00:25:27 Peter: I thought the use the commentary. 00:25:29 Bethel: Honestly, I’m big on commentaries. I am an enduring word person. Um, I don’t know how the saints feel about that, but I like it. Um, no, I just think it’s very helpful that like sometimes, honestly, I’ll sit and read a passage and I’m like, wow. Um, my reading comprehension is not with us today. I have no idea what I just read. And so sometimes enduring word does a good job of setting the scene of where are we in the chapter? What’s going on? Um, and it breaks it down like couple verses at a time. And then it’ll provide like texts of what certain authors have said about said portion. Um, so it’s very helpful to get a well-rounded picture. Of course, like anything else, we are trying to emphasize that using things as a resource is good. Using things as the source is not good. And so referring back to the Word of God and just kind of, you know, I think we said this, but to, to pray and ask the Lord for wisdom and help. Um, because that’s, that’s the main reason that we can understand any of this because of the help of the Holy Spirit and, um, to kind of be able to have a better understanding of the word of God, but using scriptures in itself to understand you look at a couple commentaries. I mean, like that’s, I really thought about like, how did I learn anything when I was applying for college? How did I learn how any of that process worked? I read a million articles and I read a million Reddit posts, and I read a million everything. And I gathered information on what is what are people saying? And so you can go about it like that, but ultimately approaching it prayerfully and using things, like we said, as a resource, not as the source. 00:27:16 Roy: Yes, that’s that’s a very important principle because no resource I haven’t I’ve been through lots of different translations, for example, and I don’t find any single one that’s perfect or that I, you know, isn’t without some complaint that I can come up with. Uh, and that’s doubly true of commentaries. We have to look at several. And it changes over the years. The commentaries that I looked at when I was, uh, twenty or thirty are quite different than the ones I look at today. But we have to look at different ones and think about what they’re saying in context. And we have to talk to different people to. MM. 00:27:58 Patricia: Oh, one thing I forgot to do was like, define what a commentary is. I know the word comment is in commentary, but there are some people who don’t use a commentary at all. Or maybe they’re nervous about it because it seems like, is it about the Bible? How am I supposed to know? So just by way of defining things, a biblical commentary is a written aid that provides explanations and sometimes interpretations of scriptures to help readers better understand a biblical text. So there are lots of different types. There are some that are about certain topics that are discussing certain topics. And then there are others that are, um, devotional, um, there are some that are historical, cultural. So Bethel, probably the one that you’re talking about. And I’ve seen some in some study Bibles where they give the context of the cultural Sauk, um, backdrop of a particular book of the Bible or a particular passage. And that’s really helpful to help to assist in how we can understand. But like I said, there’s lots of different types of commentaries that we. 00:29:06 Bethel: I think. 00:29:06 Patricia: It is. 00:29:06 Bethel: Helpful along the lines of what you’re saying. I took a class and it’s silly that I had to take a class about this in college to understand it. But always, always, always, no matter what you are looking up, know what the source is and knowing what the point of the source is like. For example, if I’m reading a commentary that is meant for daily encouragement, it’s always going to be not twisted, but the point pulled out of that portion will be to encourage me. And so maybe that’s not exactly what this portion is, or that’s not the point of this portion, or that’s not the context that this portion originally was in. So being able to read a resource and take a step back and put it back in the big picture, is this what the what the scripture is saying? Is this what our context is? Does this fit into what we’re understanding here? AM I getting this right? Always, always, always looking back at what is the source? 00:30:01 Roy: Yes, that’s extremely important. Um, if you pick up something from Legionnaire, for example, which is a reformed, uh, outlet, um, you’re going to have reformed theology woven in and some of what they said is going to be quite wrong. Uh, from my point of view, um, but a lot of it is going to be spot on. You know, I was once riding in a car. This really struck me because I was riding in, in the car listening to some religious program of some kind. It was just a general program. No, it was a Catholic priest, and it was one of the best explanations of a particular subject in Scripture that I had heard. I haven’t heard anything better since, but that was a Catholic priest, but it just happened to be a subject that was so universal that, uh, any denomination basically would, um, would agree to what he said. Uh, but it was, it was very sound and very well put. But if I’m going to listen to him about the remembrance meeting, as we call it, or can, um, confession or something like that, that’s not going to be reliable. So having the source, knowing the source is extremely important. 00:31:15 Patricia: What should people do if they, if the answer they are seeking, the support they’re seeking can be found in a commentary that was written a long time ago, but it just doesn’t make sense to you because we understand things a little bit differently now. What should they do? 00:31:33 Roy: That’s a really tough one. And the best advice that I can say is to talk to somebody about it. Um, an older person, uh, it’s really unfortunate. Uh, you know, it’s, it’s terrible because I, I see exactly what you’re, what you’re talking about. Um, some of these, some of these texts should be rewritten. Um, but who’s going to do that? We just don’t have the energy and the time anymore. Um, if you, if you really want to get into some of the best commentaries I remember, I tell you a funny story. I was in a Bible study at work for a while, and as a miscellaneous group of people there from all kinds of denominations. And, um, we were talking everything and I said, well, I don’t think anything useful has been written about the Bible in the last hundred years. 00:32:27 Patricia: Mhm. 00:32:29 Roy: Well, that was a good talking point. We got off on a real discussion about commentaries. Right. But the problem is it’s it’s almost true. And it’s sad. Um, if you really want to learn about these, then get a dictionary. Sit down and just work at it. MM. That’s all I can say. You know, it’s like if you want, if you want to be really good at something, If you want to be a great basketball player and always be able to sink that shot from beyond the third three shot line, three point line. That’s going to take concentration. It’s going to take work. It’s going to take effort. It’s going to take time. Yeah. So I’m I’m sorry. There’s just no other way. 00:33:18 Patricia: Yeah. No I don’t think you have to be sorry. I do think that there’s something there’s something in the effort that comes forth. And just on the literacy side, like I’ve always got two suggestions. Um, one is using technology and one is just reading out loud. So at times reading out loud, right, can help bring a certain clarity that the voice in your head may not be able to, um, and reading something repeatedly out loud in a conversational voice can be very helpful. Um, in terms of helping you to hear what the author is saying. My second suggestion is that particular sentences or passages you don’t understand, honestly, you can feed it into AI and ask AI, can you please change the level which is literacy? You could change the lexile level. That is what it’s called, or just the reading level of the passage. And you can put it down to like a ninth grade or tenth grade level. If you’re in nine states and it’s going to help you a lot. Just know that it may take away some of the original author’s voice and their particular writing style. Um, but that could be really helpful for you to get the gist of what they’re trying to say. But do be careful because those commentaries are commenting on the Bible, which is God’s Word and AI, and Google those resources. When they summarize, they can lose the original nuances of the words that the Lord intends. So always just know that the technology is not perfect either. Um, and it can also just be a way to just lose the true core meaning of a passage. So just be careful. Thank you, Peter Boy and Bethel for this important conversation about how to answer any question using the Bible. Of course, I’ll go back to the beginning. Knowing the books of the Bible and where they are is always a really great challenge to put upon yourself. Memorize them. We used to have competitions about this when we were younger. There’s some there are there are songs. Right? Exactly. But that’s a really good place to start. Um, I hope that our listeners know that Google is not our enemy. The internet is not our enemy. We love technology, but we should always question the root. The effect of getting quick answers. Um, when we seldom meditate on those answers. So let’s think about how we need to slow down, read, reread, and ponder God’s Word. It’s a challenge for me as well. And just know that we don’t need to learn everything all at once. Growth takes time as well. So we encourage you to keep reading, praying, and talking to the Lord about your questions. And then also, as has been mentioned so many times, talk to mature Christians who have navigated similar questions and they know their Bibles well. They can probably give you some really great supports as to how they have been helped too. For more on this topic, you can check out Patterns of Truth dot org and we will see you next time for another conversation about living this Christian life. 00:36:15 Speaker 1: Thank you for listening to the Patterns of Truth podcast. We invite you to join us for our next episode. And we also encourage you to check out Patterns of truth dot org, where we post articles every week for the encouragement and growth of Christ followers. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to submit them on our website. I’m Peter. Until next time. The post Using God's Word to Answer Hard Questions appeared first on Patterns of Truth.

durée : 00:58:32 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - De la Loterie royale de 1776 à la Loterie nationale de 1933, l'État oscille entre condamnation morale et dépendance financière au jeu. François Guillet nous entraîne au cœur des tensions sociales, politiques et culturelles d'un vertige collectif aux ressorts durables. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : François Guillet

durée : 00:58:34 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Au XIXᵉ siècle, le voyage nourrit un imaginaire puissant, porté par le romantisme et par une littérature qui accompagne la naissance du tourisme et éclaire encore nos façons de voyager. Sylvain Venayre en propose une exploration historique et littéraire. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Sylvain Venayre Historien, professeur d'histoire contemporaine à l'Université Grenoble-Alpes

durée : 00:58:15 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Sous l'Occupation, les femmes affrontent contraintes et violences, tout en trouvant des marges pour agir, entre survie, résistance et parfois collaboration. Éric Alary propose un éclairage nuancé et incarné. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Eric Alary Historien, enseignant et chercheur à Sciences-po Paris.

durée : 00:58:33 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - De Gaulle inspire, irrite et fascine : Julian Jackson montre comment, de 1940 à 1970, les caricaturistes du monde entier ont saisi ce géant de l'histoire, révélant, à travers leurs traits, les perceptions étrangères et les tensions politiques de son époque. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Julian T. Jackson Historien, professeur d'Histoire à Queen Mary (Université de Londres), membre de la British Academy et de la Royal Historical Society.

Ever been mentally turned on but your body isn't responding? Or maybe your body is turned on but your mind isn't? That's arousal non-concordance, and it's way more common than you think. In this ep, Dee speaks to psychologist and sexologist Laura Lee about why it happens, how it can impact consent and how to handle it.SHOW NOTES:Laura Lee Website - https://www.lauralee.com.au/DM us your thoughts, questions, topics, or to just vent at @triplejthehookup on IG or email us: thehookup@abc.net.auThe Hook Up is an ABC podcast, produced by triple j. It is recorded on the lands of the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin nation. We pay our respects to elders past and present. We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Australians and Traditional Custodians of the land where we live, work, and learn.

durée : 00:58:20 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - De la « vieille folle à chats » au « vieux garçon », le célibat traîne son cortège de clichés. Dans une Amérique pétrie de puritanisme, la méfiance a longtemps visé celles et ceux qui échappaient au mariage. Romain Huret en retrace l'histoire, entre assignations sociales et désirs d'émancipation. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Romain Huret Historien des États-Unis, président de l'EHESS

durée : 00:58:50 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - "Le Feu", puissant témoignage des tranchées de 1914-1918, demeure un classique ; son auteur, Henri Barbusse, est pourtant largement tombé dans l'oubli. Philippe Baudorre revient sur le destin d'un écrivain qui voulut, par la guerre et par les mots, mener « la guerre à la guerre ». - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Philippe Baudorre Professeur de littérature à l'université Bordeaux-3

We have arrived! This episode explores the final and highest rung of the Apostle Peter's “virtue ladder”- agape, the selfless, God‑shaped love that defines the true purpose of Christian character. We walk through how each previous rung—faith, moral excellence, knowledge, self‑control, perseverance, godliness and brotherly kindness—builds the capacity to reach this culminating form of love. While Strong's Concordance’s Greek definition of agape may sound simple or even underwhelming, Scripture masterfully fills the word with depth, weight and divine intention. This eight and final rung powerfully reveals the height what our Christian characters aspire to! The love of God Himself Agape is the love God demonstrates in giving His only begotten son. It is the love Jesus lived by laying down his life, and the love the apostles taught as the unmistakable evidence of spiritual maturity. This love is “disinterested” in the classical sense—free from selfish motive, seeking no advantage and offered even when it is not reciprocated. It is critical to remember that while this kind of love grows out of brotherly kindness, it surpasses it by embracing even the hardest expressions of love: loving enemies, blessing those who persecute us and caring for those we don't naturally like. A powerful illustration of this is the story of Maximilian Kolbe, who voluntarily took another man's place in a starvation bunker at Auschwitz—an act that embodied Christlike, sacrificial agape. The first few verses of 1 Corinthians 13, show us how this kind of love must shape what we as Christians say, know and do; without it, eloquence becomes noise, knowledge becomes pride, and even great acts of sacrifice lose their spiritual value. Finally, we observe how the Scriptures remind us that perfect love casts out fear, and that agape matures in us as we continually practice the earlier virtues. When brotherly love is strong and relationships are aligned with God's will, agape becomes the defining purpose of a disciple's life, shining as the highest expression of Christlikeness. Key Takeaways Agape is the highest rung of Christian character, built on the foundation of the previous seven virtues. Strong's definition is insufficient—Scripture reveals agape as God's own selfless, sacrificial love. Jesus models agape through his willingness to lay down his life. Agape includes loving enemies and those we don't naturally like. Without agape, words, knowledge and actions lose spiritual value (1 Corinthians 13). Perfect love casts out fear, revealing maturity and alignment with God's purpose.

durée : 00:58:41 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Pionnière ardente du féminisme sous la Troisième République, Hubertine Auclert défendit des revendications alors jugées extravagantes : droit de vote des femmes, féminisation des titres, indemnité de grossesse ou salaire pour le travail domestique. Arnaud-Dominique Houte en éclaire la modernité. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Arnaud-Dominique Houte Professeur d'histoire contemporaine à Sorbonne-Université

durée : 00:58:47 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Rassembler, préserver, diffuser tous les savoirs du monde... Telle fut l'audace d'Alexandrie. Claudine Le Tourneur d'Ison restitue l'histoire de cette bibliothèque mythique et montre son étonnante résonance à l'ère numérique. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Claudine Le Tourneur d'Ison Journaliste et documentariste, passionnée d'égyptologie.

In this JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights episode, host Dr. Carolyn Lineen summaries the article, "Concordance of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Assay Results Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Excision Specimens in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer," by Nassar et al. TRANSCRIPT Carolyn Lineen: Hello and welcome to JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights. I'm your host, Carolyn Lineen, from St. James's Hospital, Dublin, and today we will be discussing the JCO Precision Oncology article titled "Concordance of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score Assay Results Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Excision Specimens in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-Negative Early-Stage Breast Cancer" by Dr. Aziza Nassar and colleagues. The Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score assay is a 21-gene expression test that provides both prognostic information regarding distant recurrence risk and predictive information regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. The recurrence score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of recurrence and a potentially higher likelihood of benefit from chemotherapy. Traditionally, genomic testing is performed on surgical excision specimens following tumor resection. However, this approach can potentially delay access to biological risk stratification, which may be important when early treatment planning or neoadjuvant therapy is being considered. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the level of concordance between recurrence scores derived from paired core needle biopsy specimens and surgical excision specimens obtained from the same untreated primary breast tumors. Investigators specifically evaluated both continuous recurrence score agreement and categorical risk classification concordance. The study included 134 patients with paired biopsy and surgical specimens. The median patient age was 62 years, with a wide age range from 33 to 99 years. Approximately 17% of patients were aged 50 years or younger, while 83% were older than 50 years. All patients had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer and had not received prior systemic treatment before either specimen collection. Each patient contributed two tumor samples: a core needle biopsy specimen obtained at initial diagnosis and a surgical excision specimen obtained during definitive tumor resection. Both samples underwent Oncotype DX testing, allowing direct within-patient comparison. The investigators reported mean recurrence scores of 15.6 for core needle biopsy specimens and 16.6 for surgical excision specimens. Although this absolute mean difference between specimen types did reach statistical significance with a P value of 0.003, the authors note that this numerical difference was small at one recurrence score unit and may not therefore be clinically meaningful. Additionally, categorical recurrence score results did not differ significantly. The primary measure of agreement between recurrence scores was the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The study demonstrated a Lin concordance correlation coefficient of 0.86 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.80 to 0.90, indicating strong agreement between biopsy and surgical specimens. Additionally, categorical agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic. The study reported a kappa value of 0.64 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.44 to 0.83, indicating substantial agreement between specimen types. Comparing this study to previously published evidence, the authors referenced prior smaller studies examining concordance between paired tissue samples. For example, earlier research evaluating 50 patients demonstrated correlation coefficients of approximately 0.8 and categorical concordance rates ranging from 72% to 78%, depending on the classification cut points used. Compared with earlier studies, the present study provides stronger evidence supporting consistency between biopsy and surgical testing. These findings have several important implications for clinical practice. First, early availability of recurrence score results may enhance multidisciplinary care planning. Obtaining genomic risk data at the time of diagnosis allows tumor boards to integrate molecular risk stratification into initial treatment discussions rather than waiting for postoperative results. Second, biopsy-based testing may support decision making regarding treatment sequencing. Earlier genomic information may help guide selection of neoadjuvant therapy or inform early decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy necessity. Third, early testing may reduce delays in treatment initiation. Separate research evaluating presurgical Oncotype DX testing has demonstrated potential reductions in time to initiation of adjuvant therapy by approximately 8 days, suggesting potential improvements in care efficiency. Additionally, biopsy-based testing demonstrates strong technical feasibility. Studies examining real-world implementation have reported test success rates as high as 99.1% when performed on core biopsy specimens. Despite the encouraging results, certain limitations must be considered. Core needle biopsy samples evaluate only a portion of the tumor, and intratumoral heterogeneity could theoretically influence recurrence score results in selected cases. Preanalytical factors, including tissue fixation and sample handling, may also affect RNA integrity and assay performance. Standardization of specimen processing protocols will be essential if biopsy-based testing becomes routine. Furthermore, although analytical concordance is strong, prospective outcome studies demonstrating equivalent long-term clinical outcomes based on biopsy-directed treatment decisions would further strengthen the evidence base. In conclusion, this study demonstrates strong concordance between Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Scores derived from core needle biopsy specimens and surgical excision specimens in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. With a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.86 and overall categorical agreement exceeding 90%, the findings support the clinical feasibility of performing genomic testing at the time of diagnostic biopsy. If validated through additional prospective studies, this approach may enable earlier risk stratification and improve multidisciplinary treatment planning. Thank you for tuning in to JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights. Don't forget to subscribe and join us next time as we explore more groundbreaking research shaping the future of oncology. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

durée : 00:58:44 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Avant de devenir l'institution à vocation universelle que l'on connaît, le Louvre fut composé de nombreux petits musées issus de l'expansion coloniale française. Pierre Singaravélou redonne vie à ces « fantômes » aujourd'hui disparus, qui, dès l'origine, firent entrer le monde au Louvre. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Pierre Singaravélou Historien spécialiste des empires coloniaux et de la mondialisation, professeur au King's College de Londres et à l'université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne.

durée : 00:58:36 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Longtemps, l'histoire des guerres a laissé dans l'ombre les femmes qui suivaient les armées en campagne. Marion Trévisi nous montre comment ces « suiveuses de guerre » ont vécu et travaillé, éclairant autrement la guerre et la société européenne jusqu'à l'époque napoléonienne. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Marion Trévisi Maître de conférences en histoire moderne à l'université de Picardie Jules-Verne

durée : 00:58:33 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Après les propos du chef d'État-major relançant le débat sur la place de l'armée en démocratie, Gilles Candar revient sur la réflexion de Jean Jaurès qui, dès 1911 dans L'Armée nouvelle, interrogeait le lien entre civils et militaires, et les enjeux toujours actuels de la défense et de la paix. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Gilles Candar Historien, président de la Société d'études jaurésiennes

L'éclairage public, de nos jours, il y en a à beaucoup d'endroits, et ce n'est pas rare qu'il soit éteint aux heures creuses de la nuit pour lutter contre la pollution lumineuse. Mais à ses débuts, c'était une toute autre histoire, parce qu'il a été très mal reçu par les habitants ! Et quand je parle de ses débuts, ce n'est pas le 19e siècle avec l'électricité, car l'éclairage public, il est né en France dans la deuxième moitié du 17e siècle ! Mais alors, comment ça s'est fait ? Eh bien pour le découvrir, j'ai eu le plaisir de recevoir dans un nouvel entretien historique l'historienne Sophie Reculin, dont c'est la spécialité, pour qu'elle nous éclaire à ce sujet ! Je vous souhaite une bonne écoute sur Nota Bene !➤ Pour approfondir le sujet, découvrez : ➜ Le livre de Sophie “L'invention de l'éclairage public en France. De la nuit illuminée à la nuit éclairée (1697-1789)” : https://www.septentrion.com/FR/livre/?GCOI=27574100084770➜ Sa page Academia : https://univ-lille.academia.edu/SophieReculin

In this episode, we sit down with three disinformation researchers whose new paper found something surprising about both our resistance and our susceptibility to both true news we wish was fake and fake news we wish was true.Our guests are three of the scientists exploring a newly named cognitive distortion, one that every human being is prone to exhibiting, one that is so common and so easily provoked that nefarious actors depend on it when distributing disinformation and propaganda.Samuel Woolley, Katie Joseff, and Michael Schwalbe will share their methods, findings, and takeaways. They will also explain the troublesome nature of something they are calling concordance over truth bias – a distortion that most often appears in those who have the most (undeserved) confidence in their own (not-so-objective) objectivity. - How Minds Change- Show Notes- Newsletter- David McRaney's BlueSky- David McRaney's Twitter- YANSS Twitter- Why Do We Share Our Feelings With Others?- Concordance Over Truth Bias- Samuel Wooley- Katie Joseff- Michael Schwalbe- Geoffrey Cohen Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

durée : 00:58:17 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Derrière les prix vertigineux du marché de l'art se cache un angle mort : le moment où l'artiste fixe et négocie lui-même le prix de son œuvre. Charlotte Guichard explore cette scène fondatrice, de la Renaissance à nos jours. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Charlotte Guichard Historienne de l'art, directrice de recherche au CNRS et professeure attachée à l'École normale supérieure

durée : 00:58:42 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Écrivain de la nature, penseur politique radical, figure tutélaire de la désobéissance civile... Les textes de Thoreau comptent de nos jours parmi les best-sellers internationaux. Henriette Levillain revient sur la vie et l'œuvre inclassable de cet auteur américain énigmatique. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Henriette Levillain Professeure émérite de Littérature à la Sorbonne

durée : 00:58:50 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Figure joyeuse et cosmopolite du XVIIIe siècle, célébré par Goethe, Madame de Staël et Catherine II, le Prince de Ligne fut à la fois homme de guerre, homme d'esprit et homme du monde. Benoît Florin redonne vie à cet écrivain prolifique, ennemi de la gravité. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Benoît Florin Docteur de l'université Paris-I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Benoît Florin consacre ses recherches au monde des élites du XVIIIe siècle.

durée : 00:58:09 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Depuis le 18e siècle, l'identité nationale a fait l'objet de multiples interprétations. Sylvain Venayre, maître de conférences à la Sorbonne, revient sur la manière dont les historiens ont construit le récit national français, des Gaulois à la Révolution. - réalisation : Patrick Molinier - invités : Sylvain Venayre Historien, professeur d'histoire contemporaine à l'Université Grenoble-Alpes

durée : 00:58:39 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - La plupart des spécialistes estiment à 2 à 3 % ce que nous possédons aujourd'hui de la production écrite des anciens Grecs. Selon quelles chances la littérature de l'Antiquité a pu survivre jusqu'à nous, ou au contraire être perdue ? Maurice Sartre nous éclaire sur cet héritage. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Maurice Sartre Professeur émérite d'histoire ancienne à l'Université de Tours

durée : 00:58:29 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Un beau jour de 1893, Arthur Conan Doyle a bien cherché à s'en débarrasser en le jetant dans les chutes d'eau de Reichenbach, en Suisse. En vain : l'auteur a été contraint, sous la pression de millions de lecteurs désemparés, de ressusciter Sherlock Holmes. Un héros à la vitalité sans équivalent. - réalisation : Anne Kobylak - invités : Nathalie Jaëck Professeure de littérature britannique du 19e siècle, à l'université de Bordeaux Montaigne

durée : 00:58:40 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - À partir de quand les conflits humains deviennent-ils une guerre organisée ? S'appuyant sur les découvertes archéologiques, Anne Lehoërff éclaire l'émergence, à l'âge du Bronze, de sociétés investissant durablement dans les armes et la guerre. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Anne Lehoërff Professeur des universités en archéologie

durée : 00:58:34 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Entre mythes d'explorateurs, violences coloniales et rivalités chileno-argentines, la Patagonie reste un territoire chargé d'imaginaires. Yves Saint-Geours en éclaire l'histoire et les enjeux. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Yves Saint-Geours Historien et diplomate, ancien ambassadeur en Bulgarie, au Brésil et en Espagne

durée : 00:58:32 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Longtemps perçues comme des intruses menaçant l'ordre social, les étudiantes ont conquis l'université entre 1870 et 1940. Amélie Puche retrace le combat de ces pionnières pour accéder aux études prestigieuses et rompre avec une “destinée naturelle” qui les cantonnait au foyer. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Amélie Puche Docteure en histoire contemporaine et post-doctorante à l'Institut des Humanités en Médecine (IHM – Lausanne).

Part 4 - Wisdom Cries Out: Light in Proverbs 4If Light reveals identity… what does it mean to be “a son” in the fullness of existence? Especially when considering the authorship of such words being found to be written at the hands of King Solomon, who asked God for "an understanding heart to judge Your people to discern between good and evil," (1 Kings 3:9) of which God said... "I have given you a wise and discerning heart..." - let us consider these things together. In this thought-provoking episode, we explore Proverbs 4 through the lens of Light, Identity, and Presence. Using Strong's Concordance and a simple exegesis-style presence-first approach in Being Still to Know God - April expands each verse to reflect Light's role in defining sonship, wisdom, authority, and creative existence. This is more than a proverb - it's a pathway into knowing who you are in the Light of who He is.Keywords: Proverbs 4 Light revelation, identity in Christ, Hebrew word study, God as Light, sonship in the Bible, divine inheritance, wisdom and revelation

durée : 00:58:43 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Et si le Moyen Âge avait aimé ses enfants ? Didier Lett brise un demi-siècle de certitudes et montre une société bien plus tendre et soucieuse d'éducation et de protection qu'on ne le croyait. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Didier Lett Professeur d'histoire médiévale à l'Université de Paris

durée : 00:58:44 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - À Tahiti, les Lumières rêvent et s'illusionnent. Antoine Lilti retrace la rencontre fascinante au XVIIIe siècle entre Polynésiens et Européens, où se mêlent curiosité ardente et profondes incompréhensions. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Antoine Lilti Historien spécialiste de l'époque moderne et des Lumières, professeur au Collège de France

durée : 00:58:41 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Du tsarisme à Poutine, un même despotisme impérial russe se réinvente sans se renier. Sabine Dullin montre comment, sous couvert d'une défense existentielle du pays, ce pouvoir autoritaire s'est perpétué depuis des siècles, de l'autocratie au communisme, jusqu'à la “verticale du pouvoir” actuelle. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Sabine Dullin Historienne de la Russie, professeure en histoire contemporaine à Sciences Po Paris

durée : 01:02:45 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - Sitôt investi, Donald Trump annonçait son ambition de reprendre la main sur le canal de Panama. L'historien Jean-Yves Mollier retrace l'histoire mouvementée de cet ouvrage colossal, théâtre d'affrontements politiques, financiers et impériaux. - réalisation : Camille Mati - invités : Jean-Yves Mollier Historien français, professeur émérite d'histoire contemporaine à l'université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines

durée : 00:58:43 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - La grande majorité des gens de lettres ne pouvaient vivre de leur plume au XVIIIe siècle. Robert Darnton restitue les modes de vie, les pratiques éditoriales, les heurs et les malheurs de ces milliers d'écrivains qui ont alors animé en profondeur la vie des idées et les sensibilités. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Robert Darnton Historien américain, spécialiste des Lumières et de l'histoire du livre sous l'ancien régime. Ancien directeur de la Harvard University Library.

durée : 00:58:17 - Concordance des temps - par : Jean-Noël Jeanneney - De tous les animaux, peu suscitent aujourd'hui autant d'affection que l'âne. Mais depuis l'Antiquité, son image a oscillé entre dérision et tendresse, mépris et respect. Michel Pastoureau raconte la destinée culturelle de cet humble compagnon de l'homme, familier de nos contes et de notre enfance. - réalisation : Vincent Abouchar - invités : Michel Pastoureau Historien, directeur d'études à l'École pratique des hautes études

Hello and WELCOME BACK to the Unedited podcast! The goal of this podcast is to help you develop and enjoy the habit of daily Bible reading and prayer. It is through the Word of God and the presence of God that we GET TO KNOW God. In this episode, Meg encourages listeners to use a concordance as they read their Bibles, and shares an Unedited journal entry: “Be Anxious For Nothing.” Meg's books, “Unedited: Hope and Healing Through the Simple Habit of Bible Reading and Prayer” and “Overflow: The Fine Art of Cultivating Joy In Sorrow,” (in English and Spanish) are available on Amazon and through Pentecostal Publishing House. Thank you for joining me for this journey. I look forward to meeting up with you again next Friday! If you have questions, please visit megunedited.com Go grab your Bible and your journal! Looking forward to the power of this habit in YOUR life. This is Unedited. This is for U. Happy Friday! IG: @unedited_meg