Podcasts about greiser

Viele, die Fabian Greiser in seiner Jugend haben Basketball spielen sehen, waren sich sicher, dass sie dem größtem Basketballtalent der Stadt zusehen durften. Mit seiner Athletik stopfte der junge Mann derart kraftvoll den Ball durch die Reuse, dass er mit diesem Können weltweit für Aufsehen sorgte und diverse Slam-Dunk-Contests gewinnen konnte. Während seiner Reisen vertiefte er sich in die Kunst des Graffiti und fragte sich früh, wie Firmen es schaffen, Kunden für sich zu gewinnen und an sich zu binden. Nachdem sein Körper der sportlichen Belastung nicht mehr Stand hielt, sattelte er um und schaffte den Grunstein seiner heutigen Arbeit im Designbüro x-height in Rosenheim. Neben dieser Arbeit sucht er zunehmend die Herausforderung, sich als Künstler zu finden. Fabian Greiser erzählt u.a. , wie ihn die Kunst gepackt hat und was es bedeutet, mit einem Kunstwerk in einen Dialog zu treten. (Foto: privat) Vielen Dank fürs Zuhören!!! Fabian Greiser im Internet: https://www.x-height.de/ - https://www.atelier-atmo.de/about Fabian Greuser auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fab.greiser/ Wer HALLO WELT HIER ROSENHEIM unterstützen möchte, findet hier eine Möglichkeit mit paypal: https://ko-fi.com/hallowelthierrosenheim HALLO WELT HIER ROSENHEIM im Internet: https://www.instagram.com/hallowelthierrosenheim/ https://www.facebook.com/hagen.dessau.5 HALLO WELT HIER ROSENHEIM bei AMAZON-Music: https://music.amazon.de/podcasts/2d9e4660-cb38-4965-be65-f613aacf8252/Hallo-Welt-Hier-Rosenheim

Alexandra Greiser hat sich früh dazu entschieden, Stoff-Upcycling zu machen und hat sich selbst das Designen und Nähen von Kleidern beigebracht. Mit diesem Wissen hat sie vor 10 Jahren ihre erste Modelinie auf ihrem Label "Nanas" veröffentlicht. Inzwischen setzt sie sich mit der Frage auseinander, wie können Stoffreste so zusammengebracht und verarbeitet werden, dass neue Stoffe entstehen, die auch eine Lebensdauer haben. Für Alexandra Greiser ist es wichtig, sich kreativ ausdrücken zu können und Kreativität den Stellenwert in der Gesellschaft zu geben, den sie verdient. So erzählt sie von wie erfüllend es sein kann prozessorientiert und eben nicht ergebnisorientiert zu arbeiten. (Foto: privat) Vielen Dank fürs Zuhören!!! Alexandra Greiser im Internet: https://nana-s.mywoikn.com/index.html Alexandra Greiser auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/this.is.nanas/ Wer HALLO WELT HIER ROSENHEIM unterstützen möchte, findet hier eine Möglichkeit mit paypal: https://ko-fi.com/hallowelthierrosenheim HALLO WELT HIER ROSENHEIM im Internet: https://www.instagram.com/hallowelthierrosenheim/ https://www.facebook.com/hagen.dessau.5 HALLO WELT HIER ROSENHEIM bei AMAZON-Music: https://music.amazon.de/podcasts/2d9e4660-cb38-4965-be65-f613aacf8252/Hallo-Welt-Hier-Rosenheim

Der Podcast mit Buchempfehlungen von und für Unternehmerinnen und Unternehmer.

We're excited to welcome XYPN member Ryan Greiser, founder of the Pennsylvania-based financial planning firm Opulus, to the show. Ryan started his professional career as an athletic trainer before a client recruited him into a financial planning firm, where “financial planning” was actually just cold calling and selling insurance. Ryan lasted three years before moving to a broker-dealer, and while he was able to do more planning there, he was still expected to sell insurance—and a lot of it at that. Ryan ultimately launched his own firm in 2019, and has been on a rapid growth trajectory ever since. Most recently, Ryan has been building out a cryptocurrency offering to support his clients, which has become a big driver of new business for his firm. In this episode, we talk extensively about Ryan's cryptocurrency offering, going into the details of how he designed it and his vision for the future. You can find show notes and more information by clicking here: http://www.xyplanningnetwork.com/338

"Wer rastet, der rostet!" Du kennst diesen Spruch ganz bestimmt! Und vielleicht ist es der Schlüssel zu all unseren Herausforderungen und der Anfang für einen bewegten Alltag. Jedoch ist das alles sehr graue Theorie, die so vielen Menschen weitere Herausforderungen beschert. Umso wertvoller ist es, dass es Menschen gibt, die sich genau mit diesem Thema beschäftigen. Heute möchte ich mit dir einen Ausschnitt aus einem Gespräch mit Gino Greiser von @gino_bewegt_dich teilen. In diesem Austausch geht es sehr intensiv um das Thema Bewegung im Bezug auf den eigenen Fokus. Gino teilt hierbei sehr persönliche Erfahrungen und ein paar wertvolle Tipps für deinen persönlichen bewegten Alltag. Wenn du mehr über Gino und seine Arbeit als Personal Trainer erfahrne möchtest besuche ihn sehr gern auf folgenden Portalen: https://www.instagram.com/gino_bewegt_dich/ https://gino-dein-coach.de Lass Gino und mich sehr gern an deinen Gedanken teilhaben und erzähle mir, was du aus dieser Podcastepisode für dich mitnimmst. Ich freue mich über den gemeinsamen Austausch und wenn du mir etwas zurückgeben möchtest, lasse mir sehr gern eine 5-Sterne-Bewertung und ein paar liebe Worte unter dieser Folge da. Falls dies bei deiner Podcast-App nicht möglich ist nutze sehr gern diesen Link zu meinem Google-Account: https://g.page/r/CatodJATwTxzEB8/review Ich danke dir von Herzen für deine Zeit und alles, was du mir zurückgibst und ich freue mich so sehr von dir zu hören. Bis dahin denke immer daran, du bist so wundervoll und einzigartig. Bleibe Bewegt deine Marie --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/marie-dittrich/message

Seit 1982 ist Paul Biya Präsident in Kamerun. Seine Herrschaft steht im Kontrast zur sehr jungen Bevölkerung, die sich befreien will aus den verkrusteten politischen Strukturen. Sie strebt nach Gleichberechtigung, Wohlstand und Demokratie.Von Susanne Lettenbauerwww.deutschlandfunkkultur.de, WeltzeitDirekter Link zur Audiodatei

I’ve worked in the financial industry since 2011. Before that, I obtained my bachelor’s degree from Liberty University. As a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ , I’m passionate about educating and empowering clients so they can make the most of their wealth. My passion for this work stems from the opportunity to gain new perspectives and insights.Your wealth is simply a tool that, when utilized correctly, can help ensure your life is filled with the items, experiences and opportunities that matter most to you.A fiduciary independent Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), Opulus’s mission is to deliver transparent advice that serves your best interests in all aspects of your life — your family, your career and your aspirations. Passionate about technology, we are constantly looking for new ways to enhance our offering. When you work with us, we view our time together as an ongoing collaboration, one that continues to grow and evolve with you, whether you’re looking towards retirement or establishing yourself in a lucrative career.The size of our firm is intentional. We want to ensure every one of our clients receives the same level of care, attention and service. While we are a smaller firm, we have strategic alliances with a multitude of professionals who offer expertise in a variety of industries such as taxes, law, insurance and banking.Ryan Greiser:  Currently, I live in Doylestown, PA with my wife, Jessica, and two sons. My interests outside of work include traveling with my family, attending football games and firing up the grill for family and friends on the weekend. Beyond Opulus, I am a member of the Maxwell Football Club and Financial Planning Association. I’m also a big Philadelphia sports fan, Go Birds!Fran Walsh: Growing up, I always knew I wanted to work in the financial industry. I believe financial planning is a great way to help people achieve the lifestyle they always wanted for both themselves, and their family. I am committed to helping people from a variety of backgrounds utilize their wealth to their advantage so they can live a more fulfilling life.  I graduated from Villanova Universities School of Business with a bachelor’s degree in finance. And with enough experience under my belt to qualify for the exam, I am currently pursuing my CFP® designation. In my free time, I love to exercise and go to the beach with my friends and family. Outside of work, I am a member of Team Walsh, the Maxwell Football Club, & a supporter of Athletes Helping Athletes as well as the Bux-Mont Saints. Last & certainly not least... I am avid fan of our beloved Philadelphia Eagles.For more information about Opulus, please visit www.opulus.us.  To listen and subscribe to their podcast, Inside the Path to Success Podcast, please click:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/path-to-success/id1488162772   

Adrienne Jane Burke had a successful career going as a business writer for Yahoo. Then she attended a program Ed Eppley was conducting on Professional Management and soon found herself helping Ed write his book, Let's Be Clear. All of this stirred in her an interest in starting her own business. Today she's the proud owner of Greiser's Coffee and Market in Easton, CT. Listen to the fascinating journey, the way she funded her startup and be inspired!

In this episode we check out the Town of Easton, CT. Erika looks at the farms along Sport Hill Road. We go over the Easton Real Estate stats. Our industry focus is First Time Home Buyers Tips.  Our Go-To-2 is Greiser's Coffee & Market and The Old Blue Bird Inn for lunch. Don't miss George's ghost story of Easton's "White Lady."  We head to Fairfield, CT for our next episode.Our Google Slides Presentation on Easton:https://www.keepandshare.com/doc23/110186/easton-feb-2020-pdf-4-3-meg?da=yCheck Out Greiser's Coffee & Market:https://www.greisers.com/Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/HerBrainsHisLooks?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=creatorshare)

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein's remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein's book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn't really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein's remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein's book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn't really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities.

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein’s remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein’s book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn’t really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein’s remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein’s book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn’t really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein’s remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein’s book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn’t really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein’s remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein’s book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn’t really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein’s remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein’s book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn’t really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The term “totalitarian” is useful as it well describes the aspirations of polities such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union (at least under Stalin). Yet it can also be misleading, for it suggests that totalitarian ambitions were in fact achieved. But they were not, as we can see in Catherine Epstein’s remarkably detailed, thoroughly researched, and clearly presented Model Nazi: Arthur Greiser and the Occupation of Western Poland (Oxford UP, 2010). Greiser was a totalitarian if ever there were one. He believed in the Nazi cause with his heart and soul. He wanted to create a new Germany, and indeed a new Europe dominated by Germans. As the Gauleiter of Wartheland (an area of Western Poland annexed to the Reich), he was given the opportunity to help realize the Nazi nightmare in the conquered Eastern territories. But, as Epstein shows, he was often hindered both by his own personality and the chaos that characterized Nazi occupation of the East. Grieser emerges from Epstein’s book as someone who wanted to be a “model Nazi,” but couldn’t really manage it because he was a crooked timber working in a crooked system. His personal life was an embarrassing tangle of marriages, affairs, and break-ups that at points threatened his career. His professional life was marked by ambition, ego-mania, and fawning, none of which endeared him to most of his colleagues and superiors. And his murderous attempts to “work toward the Fuhrer” in the Wartheland–by displacing Poles, murdering Jews and other “undesirables,” and populating the East with Germans–were stymied by the cross-cutting jurisdictions, conflicting agendas, and professional jealousies that were one of the hallmarks of Nazi rule. Grieser did his best (or his worst, depending on how you look at it) to Germanize the Wartheland. He improvised, maneuvered, and “worked the system” such as it was in pursuit of the Nazi totalitarian project. Thankfully, he failed, demonstrating again that totalitarian dreams, though they can be horribly distructive, are a far reach from totalitarian realities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices