Podcast appearances and mentions of justice stevens

MDJ Script/ Top Stories for October 22nd Publish Date:  October 22nd    Commercial: From the BG AD Group Studio, Welcome to the Marietta Daily Journal Podcast.  Today is Tuesday, October 22nd and Happy Birthday to actor Christopher Lloyd. ***10.22.24 – BIRTHDAY – CHRISTOPHER LLLOYD*** I'm Dan Radcliffe and here are the stories Cobb is talking about, presented by Credit Union of Georgia.  1.       Second Week of Advance Voting Underway in Cobb 2.       HarvestFest Celebrates Autumn in Marietta Square 3.       Cobb Eyes Transit Program for KSU Students   Plus, Cobb's election director Tate Fall recent speech the Kiwanis Club. All of this and more is coming up on the Marietta Daily Journal Podcast, and if you are looking for community news, we encourage you to listen and subscribe!    BREAK: CU of GA (06.26.24 CU OF GA FREE CHECKING_REV_FINAL) STORY 1:  Second Week of Advance Voting Underway in Cobb In Cobb County, early voting is in full swing with over 118,900 voters participating since it began. After a busy first week, turnout steadied with 14,067 voting on Saturday and 4,181 on Sunday. Wait times on Monday ranged from 20 minutes to an hour at popular locations. Voters like Barry Whitener and Cindy Jones cited the economy and the need for change as key motivators. Others, like Vish Ganapathy, emphasized the importance of voting early to avoid issues. Early voting continues until November 1, with 12 polling stations open daily. STORY 2:     HarvestFest Celebrates Autumn in Marietta Square Marietta Square was bustling with activity during the annual HarvestFest, attracting thousands for a day of fall-themed fun. The event featured a touch-a-truck experience with the Marietta fire and police departments, allowing kids to explore vehicles and equipment. Officer Aaron Wright highlighted the importance of community connection. The festival also included an arts market, pie-eating contests, and a scarecrow competition. Percy Hardy and Enrique Figueroa won the children's and adult pie-eating contests, respectively. The day wrapped up with a costume contest for kids, adding to the festive atmosphere. STORY 3:  Cobb Eyes Transit Program for KSU Students Cobb County is considering a partnership with Kennesaw State University to enhance student access to CobbLinc buses. The proposed pilot program, up for a vote by the Board of Commissioners, would allow KSU students to ride three specific CobbLinc routes for free with a valid student ID, with KSU reimbursing the county $2 per trip, up to $100,000 annually. The program, running from January 1 to December 30, 2025, aims to improve student mobility beyond campus. Commissioner JoAnn Birrell highlighted the benefit of expanded access to areas like Marietta and downtown.     We have opportunities for sponsors to get great engagement on these shows. Call 770.799.6810 for more info.    We'll be right back    Break: DRAKE (Drake Realty (Cobb County) STORY 4:  Local Named 2024 Justice John Paul Stevens Public Interest Fellow Jiovanny Dominguez from Powder Springs, a student at Georgia State University College of Law, has been named a 2024 Justice John Paul Stevens Public Interest Fellow. This fellowship, honoring the late Justice Stevens, supports over 150 law students nationwide in public interest law. Dominguez, along with fellow Georgia State students Aaliyah Knight and Aimee Lyons, received a stipend from the Stevens Foundation to support their unpaid public interest law internships this summer, reflecting a commitment to a robust justice system. STORY 5:  Georgia man arrested in attack on Capitol Cylester Maxwell, a 42-year-old from Alpharetta, Georgia, was arrested for his involvement in the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol attack. He faces felony charges for assaulting law enforcement with a dangerous weapon and civil disorder, along with misdemeanors for entering restricted grounds and engaging in violence. Court records show Maxwell was seen in video footage participating in the riot, including using a "TRUMP" sign as a battering ram against police. The FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office are handling the investigation and prosecution. We'll be back in a moment    Break: Ingles Markets (Roasting Vegetables) 7 ***Interview – Tate Fall*** Break: Marietta Theatre (06.10.24 MARIETTA THEATRE MARGARITAVILLE_FINAL)   Signoff-   Thanks again for hanging out with us on today's Marietta Daily Journal Podcast. If you enjoy these shows, we encourage you to check out our other offerings, like the Cherokee Tribune Ledger Podcast, the Marietta Daily Journal, or the Community Podcast for Rockdale Newton and Morgan Counties. Read more about all our stories and get other great content at www.mdjonline.com/ Did you know over 50% of Americans listen to podcasts weekly? Giving you important news about our community and telling great stories are what we do. Make sure you join us for our next episode and be sure to share this podcast on social media with your friends and family. Add us to your Alexa Flash Briefing or your Google Home Briefing and be sure to like, follow, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Produced by the BG Podcast Network   Show Sponsors: ●        www.ingles-markets.com  ●        www.cuofga.org  ●        www.drakerealty.com ●        www.mariettatheatresquare.com   #NewsPodcast #CurrentEvents #TopHeadlines #BreakingNews #PodcastDiscussion #PodcastNews #InDepthAnalysis #NewsAnalysis #PodcastTrending #WorldNews #LocalNews #GlobalNews #PodcastInsights #NewsBrief #PodcastUpdate #NewsRoundup #WeeklyNews #DailyNews #PodcastInterviews #HotTopics #PodcastOpinions #InvestigativeJournalism #BehindTheHeadlines #PodcastMedia #NewsStories #PodcastReports #JournalismMatters #PodcastPerspectives #NewsCommentary #PodcastListeners #NewsPodcastCommunity #NewsSource #PodcastCuration #WorldAffairs #PodcastUpdates #AudioNews #PodcastJournalism #EmergingStories #NewsFlash #PodcastConversationsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Think you're too busy managing legal work to get involved in public policy? Think again. In this episode, Chad Golder, General Counsel of the American Hospital Association, shares why it's important for lawyers (especially in-house counsel) to develop relationships with trade associations and share their company's perspectives with policy makers. A former clerk to Justice Stevens, Golder shares perspectives on the court and what it was like to get feedback from Stevens' beach reads.

The Destiny's Child of constitutional law (aka Strict Scrutiny) is back on Getting Curious to help us digest and dissect all the wack-a-doodle nonsense that is: Project 2025. Leah Litman & Kate Shaw from the hit podcast Strict Scrutiny sat down with JVN to really parse out the MAGA manifesto. We're talking all about Project 2025's hallmark proposals, the key players involved, as well as tossing in some Supreme Court, Alito/Thomas Updates for good measure. Leah Litman is an assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. She clerked for Judge Sutton on the Sixth Circuit and Justice Kennedy on the Supreme Court. Leah researches and writes about constitutional law and federal courts. She also maintains an active pro bono practice (and she loves reality television). Kate Shaw is a Professor of Law at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in NYC. She teaches Constitutional Law, Legislation, Administrative Law, and a seminar on the Supreme Court, and writes about executive power, the law of democracy, and reproductive rights and justice. Before becoming a law professor she worked in the Obama White House Counsel's Office, and before that was a clerk to Justice Stevens and Judge Posner. You can follow Strict Scrutiny on Twitter @StrictScrutiny_ and on Instagram @strictscrutinypodcast. For more information, check out crooked.com. Leah is on Twitter @LeahLitman and Instagram @profleahlitman. Kate is on Twitter @Kateashaw1 and Instagram @kateashaw. Follow us on Instagram @CuriousWithJVN to join the conversation. Jonathan is on Instagram @JVN. Our senior producer is Chris McClure. Our editor & engineer is Nathanael McClure. Production support from Julie Carrillo, Anne Currie, and Chad Hall. Our theme music is “Freak” by QUIÑ; for more, head to TheQuinCat.com. Curious about bringing your brand to life on the show? Email podcastadsales@sonymusic.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Cliff Sloan of Georgetown Law stops by to discuss his great new book, “The Court at War,” detailing how the Justices acted during WWII. It is a fabulous read with compelling stories. We also discussed his clerking for Justice Stevens and legal realism.

What's better than one constitutional law expert? THREE! This spring we had the honor of speaking with Professor Melissa Murray about the Supreme Court's recent term. Now she's back, with her brilliant Strict Scrutiny co-hosts, Professors Leah Litman and Kate Shaw. They join Jonathan to discuss WTF is going on with the Supreme Court these days—from Clarence Thomas' luxury vacations to what the nation's highest court has in store for us this fall. Plus, an epic round of judicial-themed F*ck, Marry, Kill… You can follow Strict Scrutiny on Twitter @StrictScrutiny_ and on Instagram @strictscrutinypodcast. For more information, check out crooked.com. Melissa is on Twitter and Instagram @profmmurray. Leah is on Twitter @LeahLitman and Instagram @profleahlitman. Kate is on Twitter @Kateashaw1 and Instagram @kateashaw. Melissa Murray is a Professor of Law at NYU School of Law, where she teaches constitutional law, family law, criminal law, and reproductive rights and justice and writes about the legal regulation of intimate life. Melissa clerked for Judge Stefan Underhill on the District of Connecticut and for Justice Sotomayor when she served on the Second Circuit. When she's not reading the SCOTUS tea leaves, she's practicing the violin, reading People magazine, and keeping up with Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex. Leah Litman is an assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. She clerked for Judge Sutton on the Sixth Circuit and Justice Kennedy on the Supreme Court. Leah researches and writes about constitutional law and federal courts. She also maintains an active pro bono practice (and she loves reality television). Kate Shaw is a Professor of Law at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in NYC. She teaches Constitutional Law, Legislation, Administrative Law, and a seminar on the Supreme Court, and writes about executive power, the law of democracy, and reproductive rights and justice. Before becoming a law professor she worked in the Obama White House Counsel's Office, and before that was a clerk to Justice Stevens and Judge Posner. Follow us on Instagram @CuriousWithJVN to join the conversation. Jonathan is on Instagram @JVN. Transcripts for each episode are available at JonathanVanNess.com. Find books from Getting Curious guests at bookshop.org/shop/curiouswithjvn. Our executive producer is Erica Getto. Our producer is Chris McClure. Our associate producer is Allison Weiss. Our engineer is Nathanael McClure. Production support from Julie Carrillo, Samantha Martinez, and Anne Currie. Our theme music is “Freak” by QUIÑ; for more, head to TheQuinCat.com. Curious about bringing your brand to life on the show? Email podcastadsales@sonymusic.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

We cover many developments -- Justice Alito's unusual interview in the Wall Street Journal, the release of Justice Stevens' papers, more news on Supreme Court ethics, as well as a new cert. grant on the Chevron doctrine, the mifepristone shadow-docket ruling, and still more jurisdictional news in Moore v. Harper. But first -- an anonymous caller drops a new voicemail song.

Audio of Dissent Part 2: District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) Justice Stevens' Dissenting Opinion (Second Amendment, Firearms Restrictions, Handguns)    

Audio of Dissent Part 1: District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) Justice Stevens' Dissenting Opinion (Second Amendment, Firearms Restrictions, Handguns)   Music by Epidemic Sound

The third season of Amarica's Constitution begins with a special guest, as the star of the podcast “Strict Scrutiny,” Professor Kate Shaw, spends an hour with us.  Like Andy and Akhil, she attended the oral arguments in Moore v. Harper - as she had attended many arguments when she clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens.  Her insights on clerking for the Court are particularly timely, since Justice Stevens wrote the dissent in Bush v. Gore, which listeners know has been enjoying a lamentable rehabilitation, it seems, as the Moore case is argued and the infamous case keeps popping up.  Professor Shaw also scoops her own podcast with a fascinating insight that links the January 6 commissions actions this past week with the Moore case, and you are there to hear it!

98. Frank Blake - You Get What You Recognize and Celebrate “I worked at GE for Jack Welch…I asked him what is the single most important characteristic of a leader. … His answer was: Generosity…He said leaders need to be fueled by the success of the people who work for them.” — Frank Blake Guest Bio: Frank Blake served as Chairman and CEO of The Home Depot from January 2007 through November 2014, and then as chairman through January 2015. Frank joined The Home Depot in 2002 as executive vice president, business development and corporate operations. Frank previously served as deputy secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy. Prior to that, he served in a variety of executive roles at General Electric, including senior vice president, Corporate Business Development. Frank's public sector experience also includes having served as general counsel for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, deputy counsel to Vice President George Bush and law clerk to Justice Stevens of the U.S. Supreme Court. Frank serves on the board of directors for the Georgia Aquarium, Macy's and is currently serving as Chairman of the Delta Air Lines board. Additionally, he sits on the Board of Trustees at Agnes Scott College and recently completed tenure on the Proctor & Gamble and Grady Hospital Boards. He holds a bachelor's degree from Harvard University and a jurisprudence degree from Columbia University School of Law. R.O.G. Takeaway Tips: Get outside of yourself and take action Nominate someone for a Thank You Award Resources: Frank Blake - Wikipedia CrazyGoodTurns.org Thank You Award ($50 to anyone you thank) David Novak - Yum Brands episode from Crazy Goods Turns Network Diversity Index Quiz Coming Next: Episode 99 Building Bridges episode with Shannon Cassidy will focus on Emotional Intelligence Credits: Frank Blake, Sheep Jam Productions, Host Shannon Cassidy, Bridge Between, Inc.

Today on "The Daily Signal Podcast," we are featuring the latest episode of "SCOTUS 101" a sister podcast on the Heritage Podcast Network. Subscribe to SCOTUS 101: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/scotus-101/id1282064006This week saw the biggest leak in Supreme Court history: a leaked opinion. And not just any opinion, but an early draft of a purported majority decision in the Dobbs case, which would, if issued, overrule Roe v. Wade and return abortion policy to the people of each state. Zack and GianCarlo chat about the leak, what it means for the Court, and what ought to happen to the leaker. They also discuss all the other news that was drowned out by the leak including the memorial service for Justice John Paul Stevens and a major First Amendment opinion issued this week. GianCarlo then interviews Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch, and they talk about her career and her legal strategy in Dobbs. Finally, Zack quizzes GianCarlo about Justice Stevens' life and career.Here's a link to Zack and John Malcolm's article about whether the leaker can be criminally prosecuted. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This week saw the biggest leak in Supreme Court history: a leaked opinion. And not just any opinion, but an early draft of a purported majority decision in the Dobbs case, which would, if issued, overrule Roe v. Wade and return abortion policy to the people of each state. Zack and GianCarlo chat about the leak, what it means for the Court, and what ought to happen to the leaker. They also discuss all the other news that was drowned out by the leak including the memorial service for Justice John Paul Stevens and a major First Amendment opinion issued this week. GianCarlo then interviews Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch, and they talk about her career and her legal strategy in Dobbs. Finally, Zack quizzes GianCarlo about Justice Stevens' life and career.Here's a link to Zack and John Malcolm's article about whether the leaker can be criminally prosecuted.Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

In Season 2, Episode 3 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Grutter v. Bollinger, which involved the question of whether a law school admissions policy that considered race as a factor in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 5-4 majority opinion decided that the law school's admission policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause and was written by Justice O'Connor and joined in whole by Justice Ginsburg, Justice Stevens, and Justice Breyer. The Court found that the law school's stated interest that it wanted to maintain diversity of its student body was a compelling government interest and that compelling interest withstood strict scrutiny by the Court. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurrence, joined by Justice Breyer, agreeing in the judgment and in the overall opinion, but elaborating on Justice O'Connor's point in reference to the timeline she expected universities and other institutions to maintain race as one of the considerations that go into the admissions process.  Patterson Belknap attorneys Michelle Bufano, Alejandro Cruz, and Amir Badat discuss Justice Ginsburg's impact on this case. Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg's writings, see Decisions and Dissents of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:  A Selection, edited by Corey Brettschneider. For more information about Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, see www.pbwt.com. For information about becoming a guest on Notorious, email Michelle Bufano. For questions or more information about Notorious, email Jenni Dickson. Also, check out the Patterson Belknap podcast, How to Build A Nation in 15 Weeks. Related People: Michelle Bufano Alejandro Cruz Amir Badat

Featuring guest speaker, Mai Ratakonda of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. In Season 2, Episode 2 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Gonzales v. Carhart, which involved the Supreme Court's consideration of the constitutionality of The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (“the Act”). In 2003, Congress passed and President Bush signed the Act into law. Dr. LeRoy Carhart and other physicians, who performed late term abortions, sued to stop the Act from going into effect. A federal district court agreed and ruled the Act unconstitutional. The government appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which upheld the lower court's ruling. The question ultimately presented to the Supreme Court was whether the Act was an unconstitutional violation of the personal liberty protected by the Fifth Amendment because the Act lacked an exception for partial birth abortion necessary to protect mothers. In a 5-4 ruling, the majority ruled that there was no undue burden because there are other types of abortions that one could get in their second trimester. Justice Ginsburg wrote the dissent, joined by Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Breyer. The dissent criticized the majority for failing to follow precedent in this case. Specifically, Justice Ginsburg noted “Retreating from prior rulings that abortion restrictions cannot be imposed absent an exception safeguarding a woman's health, the Court upholds an Act that surely would not survive under the close scrutiny that previously attended state decreed limitations on a woman's reproductive choices.” Mai Ratakonda of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, joined by Patterson Belknap attorneys Michelle Bufano and Patricia Kim discuss Justice Ginsburg's impact on this case. Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg's writings, see Decisions and Dissents of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:  A Selection, edited by Corey Brettschneider. For more information about Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, see  www.pbwt.com. For information about becoming a guest on Notorious, email Michelle Bufano. For questions or more information about Notorious, email Jenni Dickson. Also, check out the Patterson Belknap podcast, How to Build A Nation in 15 Weeks. Related People: Michelle Bufano Patricia Kim

Legal Question: Whether a public university's interest in maintaining a “strict separation of church and state” allows it to bar religious student groups from reserving facilities for worship. Action: The Court held that the policy was not content-neutral, violating the student group's First Amendment rights. Mr. Justice Powell delivered the opinion of the Court, at 00:44 Mr. Justice Stevens, concurring, at 30:07 Mr. Justice White, dissenting, at 40:10 This opinion's citations have been edited down for ease of listening. For more information, visit our explanation. For more on Widmar, visit FIRE's First Amendment Library. For more episodes, visit thefire.org/outloud.

Legal Question: Whether school officials may prohibit a vulgar and lewd student speech at an assembly even if the speech does not create a substantial disruption. Action: The Court held the district was “within its permissible authority in imposing sanctions upon Fraser” in response to his speech. Justice Brennan, concurring, at 19:43 Justice Marshall, dissenting, at 26:28 Justice Stevens, dissenting, at 27:36 This opinion's citations have been edited down for ease of listening. For more information, visit our explanation. Watch a brief overview of Bethel v. Fraser. For more on Bethel v. Fraser, visit FIRE's First Amendment Library. For more episodes, visit thefire.org/outloud.

Retired Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens discusses some changes he would make to the U.S. Constitution in his recent book, Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution . There are chapters on political gerrymandering, campaign finance, the death penalty, and gun control, among others. On guns, Justice Stevens notes the Second Amendment was adopted to protect the states from federal interference with their power to ensure that their militias were “well regulated.” As a result of more recent rulings, federal judges have the ultimate power to determine the validity of state regulations of both civilian and militia-related uses of arms. Stevens says this anomalous result can be avoided by adding five words to the Second Amendment to make it unambiguously conform to the original intent. With those words, it would now read, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms when serving in the

In general, are most laws and regulations constitutional? Should the courts do more to enforce constitutional limits, or should they defer to the political branches unless there are blatant violations? Cato's Ilya Shapiro and the Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra are joined by participating moderator Jonathan Rauch of the Brookings Institution to explore the role of the Supreme Court when laws conflict with the U.S. Constitution.Learn More:"Crisis at the Supreme Court," by Ilya Shapiro"How the Supreme Court Undermines Its Own Legitimacy," by Ilya Shapiro"The Supreme Court: Too Important," by Ilya Shapiro"Against Judicial Restraint," by Ilya Shapiro"Chief Justice John Roberts Is under Tremendous Pressure," by Elizabeth Wydra"Will Trump Ever Face Consequences?," by Elizabeth Wydra"The First Magistrate in Foreign Pay," by Brianne Gorod and Elizabeth Wydra"Those Who Deny Birthright Citizenship Get the Constitution Wrong," by Elizabeth Wydra"No, Justice Stevens, We Don't Need to Repeal the Second Amendment," by Elizabeth Wydra Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

THE HOME FOR PROGRESSIVE POLITICS This Week’s Discussion: The anniversary of Apollo 11, the death of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and lesser news items show us what we've lost over the last several decades, and how little we ask of ourselves.  The moon landing shows us what we could be if we shared a national purpose...or at least a belief in science. Justice Stevens shows us what Republicans could be, if they had any empathy, compassion, intelligence, or decency. He also showed us what we should expect of the guardians of our constitution and rules of law, and how far we have come from that ideal.  Robert Mueller's testimony and its aftermath show us just how fragile democracy is when you have a criminal as President, and how great is the threat to US democracy right now. California's deal with auto companies on fuel standards shows what is possible when government wants to govern. Puerto Rico shows us what can be accomplished by an energized citizenry; Boris Johnson shows us what's possible when the opposite is the case, how Donald Trump is not a unique threat, and just how fragile it all is. The budget deal shows us how small we've been trained to think, while Trump's new Press Secretary shows us...well, whatever she shows us, it's certain not to be true.      *Also available on Spotify, iTunes, and Stitcher-Please SUBSCRIBE   THE HOME FOR PROGRESSIVE POLITICS Forward Nation Radio with Professor David Leventhal    If you love what you heard, Like Us and share on Facebook - Instagram - Twitter

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who died last week at age 99, was an independent thinker and a fascinating figure. We recall a few notable moments from Justice Stevens's extraordinary legal career.

WUKY's award winning history series Saving Stories with Dr. Doug Boyd from the Nunn Center for Oral History in the UK Libraries, returns with audio from the Heyburn Initiative For Excellence in the Federal Judiciary. Among the more than 40 interviews conducted by project director Anu Kasarabada, is a conversation with former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who died at the age of 99 earlier this month. Stevens is one of only a few Supreme Court Justices who started their law careers by clerking for a Supreme Court Justice. In this interview from 2017 Stevens reveals that a coin toss determined whether he would clerk for Justice Wiley Rutledge or Chief Justice Fred Vinson; both hailed from Kentucky.

The 2019 Class was inducted into the Hall of Fame, interesting article on the ethics of athletic competition, Justice Stevens lies in repose and other breaking news!

Trump's racist and Justice Stevens is dead and Trump's racist and Antifa are assholes and Trump's racist and Disney sucks

Richard Epstein looks back on the career of the late Justice John Paul Stevens, reviewing some of his most consequential judicial decisions.

Justice John Paul Stevens—one of the nation’s oldest, longest-serving, and most-revered justices—passed away at the age of 99 on Tuesday. On this episode, we remember the man, the justice, and some of his most influential majority opinions and dissents. Two of Justice Stevens' former law clerks, Daniel Farber of Berkeley Law and Kate Shaw of Cardozo Law, share some favorite memories from their clerkships and commemorate Justice Stevens’ life and legacy in conversation with host Jeffrey Rosen.  Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

On this episode of The Critical Hour, Dr. Wilmer Leon is joined by Bob Schlehuber, producer for By Any Means Necessary and Sputnik news analyst.Police deployed tear gas and fired rubber bullets at protesters in Puerto Rico's capital city of San Juan late Wednesday on the fifth consecutive day of mass demonstrations to demand the resignation of Gov. Ricardo Rosselló. That marked the second time this week that police used tear gas outside the governor's mansion amid growing outrage directed at Rosselló, a member of Puerto Rico's New Progressive Party who is affiliated with Democrats nationally. Despite the mounting unrest, Rosselló has refused to step down. He told reporters in a news conference on Tuesday, "I have not committed any illegal acts, I only committed improper acts," and "I will continue my work and my responsibility to the people of Puerto Rico." There is no recall law in Puerto Rico, and the power to impeach the governor rests with the legislature, both houses of which are controlled by the New Progressive Party.As promised, the United States is refusing to sell F-35 jets to Turkey after that country purchased missile systems from Russia. Last week, Turkey received its first shipments of Russian S-400 surface-to-air missile systems, despite warnings that the purchase would mean that the United States would not sell Turkey any F-35 stealth fighter jets. A statement from the White House says, "The F-35 cannot coexist with a Russian intelligence collection platform that will be used to learn about its advanced capabilities. Accepting the S-400 undermines the commitments all NATO allies made to each other to move away from Russian systems."Former US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens died Tuesday, just months shy of his 100th birthday. He was a very important and pivotal figure on the court. He was not a blind ideologue, a jurist who came to the court with a worldview and an approach to jurisprudence that could not be swayed by the facts and a changing world. Yesterday I gave you my analysis on Justice Stevens' impact, but today I want to provide you all with some deeper insight.GUESTS:Bob Schlehuber — Producer for By Any Means Necessary and Sputnik news analyst. Mark Sleboda — International affairs and security analyst. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett Sr. — First African-American US magistrate judge.

Justice John Paul Stevens—one of the nation’s oldest, longest-serving, and most-revered justices—passed away at the age of 99 on Tuesday. On this episode, we remember the man, the justice, and some of his most influential majority opinions and dissents. Two of Justice Stevens' former law clerks, Daniel Farber of Berkeley Law and Kate Shaw of Cardozo Law, share some favorite memories from their clerkships and commemorate Justice Stevens’ life and legacy in conversation with host Jeffrey Rosen.  Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

Donuts and Dynamite coming up in 15 minutes for tonight's Andrea Kaye Show! Pelosi gags herself on the House floor? Justice Stevens is dead! Will Gavin Newsom get impeached? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Former Justice John Paul Stevens spent 35 years on the Supreme Court, writing some of its most important decisions. At age 99, he is still writing, including a new memoir, and weighing in on prominent U.S. issues today. Judy Woodruff sat down with Justice Stevens in April to hear his thoughts on everything from President Trump to how a childhood accident shaped his future views on gun ownership. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

Welcome back to Counting to 5, a podcast about the United States Supreme Court. In this episode, I look at three new opinions in argued cases and one newly granted case for next term.   Show Notes News and developments: Justice Stevens’s 98th Birthday: Media coverage: National Constitution Center Books: Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court … Continue reading Episode 045: Livestream — Inter Partes Review and Alien Torts

(http://www.legalfandfpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Legal-Fact-and-Fiction-iTunes-Cover.jpg)

Steffan talks to Mike Jones, "the man who took down Ted Haggard", sharing thoughts on the Stormy Daniels-Trump controversy. Dick Abramson from Centennial Gun Club on the Justice Stevens op-ed on 2A repeal.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

When we do a Supreme Court term preview, we of course turn to Slate’s amazing Dahlia Lithwick, and then we proceed not to discuss the upcoming term. We begin with a whirlwind fourteen minutes of feedback on, among other things, an index for the show, the Cyberloquium, the potential for classes in our goofy style, the North Dakotan listening trend, listening while cooking, the possibility of a Dworkin episode, surname vs. last name, the use of “antepenultimate,” the dearth of recent speed trap law discussion, and a tease further discussion of law and morals. With Dahlia, we then talk about the Supreme Court’s new rule on standing in line for oral arguments, what it means when the Court does things that are not manifest in written opinions, the idea of Supreme Court previews, and looking ahead. This show’s links: Dahlia Lithwick’s page, featuring her recent writing and podcasting, at Slate Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick Oral Argument and the Oral Argument Index The brand new Narrowest Grounds blog The Supreme Court’s new rule against “line standers” for members of the Supreme Court bar; Oral Argument 55: Cronut Lines (guest Dave Fagundes) Joan Biskupic, Janet Roberts and John Shiffman, At America’s Court of Last Resort, a Handful of Lawyers Now Dominates the Docket The Court’s new repository of PDFs of its web citations and a page featuring samples of the way it will highlight post-hand-down revisions of its opinions Justice Breyer on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert A Conversation with Elena Kagan Oyez, which hosts audio and (interactive) transcripts of decision announcements as well as oral arguments Oyez’s audio for Glossip v. Gross Oral Argument 22: Nine Brains in a Vat (guest Dahlia Lithwick), talking about hand-down days Lani Guinier, Supreme Cout 2007 Term Foreword: Demosprudence Through Dissent Jill Duffy and Elizabeth Lambert, Dissents from the Bench: A Compilation of Oral Dissents by U.S. Supreme Court Justices (containing a list of all dissents from the bench since 1969 and updated through summer 2014) William Blake and Hans Hacker, 'The Brooding Spirit of the Law': Supreme Court Justices Reading Dissents from the Bench Supreme Court Opinion Announcements: An Underutilized Resource (noting Justice Stevens’ oral dissent in Citizens United replaced a comparison between “Tokyo Rose” and “Allied commanders” to one between “Tokyo Rose” and “General MacArthur”) Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern, The Supreme Court’s Most Important Cases of the New Term SCOTUSblog page for Evenwel v. Abbott, the new one-person, one-vote case Special Guest: Dahlia Lithwick.

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens spoke with Yale Law School lecturer and Knight Distinguished Journalist in Residence Linda Greenhouse at Yale Law School on April 24, 2012. The conversation focused on Justice Stevens’ jurisprudence and experiences on the Court, as well as his recent memoir, Five Chiefs.

The Friends of the Law Library of Congress presented the 2011 Wickersham Award for exceptional public service and dedication to the legal profession to former Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens. Following the award presentation, Justice Stevens was interviewed by Gwen Ifill, moderator and managing editor of "Washington Week" and senior correspondent for "PBS NewsHour." Speaker Biography: Nominated by President Gerald Ford to replace the Court's longest-serving justice, William O. Douglas, Justice John Paul Stevens served from Dec. 19, 1975, until his retirement on June 29, 2010. At the time of his retirement, Stevens was the oldest member of the Court and the third-longest-serving justice in the Court's history. For captions, transcript, or more information visit http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=5256.

Lynne Viti outlines Cass Sunstein's four categories of judicial thought: fundamentalism/originalism, perfectionism, majoritarianism, and minimalism She then explains how these categories come into play in 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court decisions.

By Alison van Diggelen, host of Fresh Dialogues Today, President Obama announced his nominee for Supreme Court to replace Justice Stevens. No surprise to Fresh Dialogues readers: it’s Elena Kagan. So what might she mean for the environment and green tech? On April 1st, just days before Justice Stevens announced his retirement, I sat down […]

The end of Texas Stadium,the tea party movement, Justice Stevens' retirement and the myth of the moderate Democrat!

By Alison van Diggelen, host of Fresh Dialogues I sat down with Supreme Court expert, Jeffrey Toobin, to discuss the court’s environmental record and Obama’s likely pick for the Supreme Court to replace Justice Stevens. Without skipping a beat, Toobin said his No. 1 pick is Solicitor General, Elena Kagan. Just one week later, Justice Stevens […]

By Alison van Diggelen, host of Fresh Dialogues Fresh Dialogues (TM) is an interview series with a green focus: Fresh Questions, Fresh Answers. This video interview took place at  Foothill College Celebrity Forum on April 1, 2010, just one week before Justice Stevens announced his retirement. Check out the new Fresh Dialogues YouTube Channel more exclusive interviews. […]

Mike welcomes [The 45th Podcast's](https://45thpod.com/) Susan Simpson to the show, in Part II of The Politics Guys / The 45th Podcast host exchange. Mike and Susan open with a look at the shakeup at the VA, with Mike questioning the managerial qualifications of Ronny Jackson, President Trump's choice to take over for David Shulkin at the massive VA. Susan argues that no reasonable person would even want the VA job, and suggests that Jackson's fawning estimate of the president's health, along with a desire for power, are what may have made him Trump's pick. Next it's discussion of the recent announcement by the Department of Commerce that the 2020 Census will have a questions about citizenship status. Both Mike and Susan are skeptical of the motives of the Justice Department, which requested the question be added. Mike hesitates to call the move racist, but points out that any likely political advantage from the move will be to the Republicans. After that, Mike and Susan turn to a discussion of what North Korean leader Kim Jung Un's recent meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, and his upcoming meetings with South Korea's Moon Jae-in and President Trump, might mean. Mike suggests that President Trump's tougher stance could be bearing fruit, though he concedes that even a Democratic administration would have almost certainly ratcheted up sanctions in response to the North's nuclear tests. Susan says there's no policy here but chaos, and is concerned that President Trump might lead us into an unnecessary armed conflict with North Korea. Then it's a look at the March for our Lives and Justice Stevens recent call for repeal of the Second Amendment. Mike and Susan are both big supporters of the March and hope that it leads to significant change. They differ somewhat on Justice Stevens advocacy for a repeal of the Second Amendment. Mike feels it's a gift to the NRA and not necessary, as even the draconian gun regulations in Washington D.C. - far tougher than what most people are calling for - are possible without touching the Second Amendment. Susan doesn't entirely disagree, but argues that the Second Amendment can make reasonable gun laws more difficult to pass, and points out that even a repeal wouldn't make firearms illegal. After that, they discuss the increasingly strained relations between Russia and the United States in the wake of tit-for-tat expulsions of diplomats and closing of consulates. Susan points out that despite this strong U.S. response - which she argues Trump was forced to make - we still haven't heard the president say anything negative about Vladimir Putin. She argues that's because Putin almost certainly has damaging information on Trump. **Show Notes** **What Susan's Reading & Listening To:** [Maryland appeals court decision in Adnan Syed case](https://bsun.md/2pTHSuC). [Missing and Murdered](http://bit.ly/2pWGVBJ) (podcast) **What Mike's Listening To:** [Philosophize This](http://philosophizethis.org/). Stephen West (podcast) - [The 45th Podcast](https://45thpod.com/) - [The 45th on Twitter](https://twitter.com/45thPod) **Listener support helps make The Politics Guys possible**. If you're interested in supporting the show, go to [politicsguys.com/support](http://www.politicsguys.com/support). Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-politics-guys/donations Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy